/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

80 iq post not worth spending time on. Read the article. Good luck competing with Italy (or Sweden, Estonia, Serbia, Ireland, etc.) against China (Autocracy with 1B+ people).

I shouldn't spent my time on this but since white nationalism is full of retards for whom reading is a challenge, first paragraph:

>Pan-Europeanism is an ideology which respects, preserves, promotes, extends, and fights for the interests of ALL peoples of European descent worldwide—whether these peoples are of single ethnic origin or if they are of “combinative” ethnic European ancestry. There is nothing in this definition which asserts that panmixia must take place and certainly nothing which can be characterized as a lack of interest in preserving various specific European ethnic groups. However, the commitment to safeguarding narrower degrees of uniqueness must not translate into hostility, or some sort of “vertical race” hierarchy in which some European groups are considered “better” than others, or in some cases, that some Europeans are disparaged as “not truly European,” whatever that means.

If "panmixia" is too hard a word for you then I can explain that too.

>>13637355

>Read the article

Nope

You're spewing collectivist drivel laden with lies and half truths underpinned by a heavy dose of Jewish bullshit.

The irony is you're literally spewing a nationalistic ideals it's just you scaled up to pan-Europe homogony and you want a race-mixed base nationality instead of Asian or Indian or white.

You're very clearly the type of stupid to shill nationalism and pretend it isn't nationalism. I almost guarantee you're a Marxist.

Still the same midwit larpers spouting buzzword insults as on Frenschan here, it seems. Not going to waste my time on that.

If by chance a 100+ iq individual were to come across this thread, you know where to go.

>>13637335

I love all my European brothers, wherever they are in the world. And as I said in another thread : "We need to realise that nationalism is redundant and unite as one race. Cleanse our lands of invaders. And create a big, beautiful, and safe white ethnostate."

But that is because we are surrounded by enemies and what we have in common is much greater than some grievances from the past.

Your site, however, offers some questionable takes.

>We are not interested in preserving a racial stasis, which is biologically impossible in any case. In contrast, we avoid genetically damaging mass changes, preserving the core of racial genetic essence. We wish to promote eugenics to improve the stock and, also, allow for the creation of new stabilized blends of European stocks – while also at the same type preserving the original stocks – to increase the diversity of European Man.

How is this different from jews promoting race mixing, just on a smaller scale?

>We will align our biological/genetic interests with Identity by closing the borders and stopping non-European gene flow into European territories. Thus, over time the genetic boundaries between Europe and the Others will become ever larger and more distinct; the genetic commonalities between Europeans, compared to the Others, will become larger and more integrated.

I'm all for closing borders and getting rid of shitskins but the other point doesn't carry much weight. The differences were already as big as they get when the retarded, brainwashed European normies started rooting for the influx of rapefugees. So it all comes down to the men in charge.

>barbarians like the Slavs

kek what? Slavs originate in Central Europe

>A Western knight was fighting equally for his Fatherland whether in battle against the Slav or the Turk on the Eastern Marshes of Germany

lmao. More like the Germans were invading Eastern European peoples, see Livonian Crusade, Prussian Crusade, and the following conflicts with Rus

>A Slavic, Turkish, or Moorish attack on Europe was met by forces drawn from all parts of Europe.

Hahaha. Nigger, ever heard of the 4th Crusade? Ever heard of the siege of Vienna? If it wasnt for the Poles, aka Slavic barbarians, Vienna would be turkish today.

Anyway, I stopped reading after that. This article was clearly written by some clown who doesn't know shit about European history. And it's very rich coming from a supposed Pan-Europeanist to call certain European peoples barbarians. Especially when he isn't Greek or Roman, who were building the greatest civilisation known to mankind while the rest of Europe were living in mud huts.

>>13637406

>How is this different from jews promoting race mixing, just on a smaller scale?

Regarding the allowance for the creation of "stabilized blends", he might be referring to America and other former Anglo-colonies there, where the process of ethnogenesis is ongoing. Obviously the author is not hostile to whites like Jews are, he has been involved in white nationalist activism for three decades and wrote for American Renaissance, Counter Currents, The Occidental Observer, and various other WN publications. He stopped doing that because he thinks that the extant WN movement is inept and hobbyist and we're trying to build an alternative.

>Anyway, I stopped reading after that.

That was Francis Parker Yockey being quoted and Sallis (who owns the Substack) doesn't agree with any of that. "Slavs" are more than welcome at the Sallis Groupuscule, trust me.

If you're interested, there are three concise books free to read:

archive.org/details/wnsallis-book-1

archive.org/details/after-the-deluge-ts-1

archive.org/details/outsidersSallis

>>13637335

It's called Christendom you uneducated nigger

>>13637409

It is necessary in the modern age to have a "European union", with combined military forces when threatened with outside powers and for economic benefits, but it must be nationalist. Any idea of mixing ethnicities and disrespecting and undermining each european nation just spoils it all

T. Ulster Irish with Jew flag (thanks Jim)

>>13637609

>It is necessary in the modern age to have a "European union", with combined military forces when threatened with outside powers and for economic benefits, but it must be nationalist.

That's exactly what the Sallis Groupuscule advocates for.

There are a lot of edgelords and idiots who just get triggered by the term "pan-European" or even "white nationalism"; childish morons who purity signal and use buzzword insults (Kike, marxist, communist, etc.) and attack nationalist activists of 30 years in an attempt to impress other cretins.

"Pan" just means "all". It means "[…] an ideology which respects, preserves, promotes, extends, and fights for the interests of ALL peoples of European descent worldwide."

It's the first damn sentence.

>>13637630

Yeah if that is what is meant then that's fine