The identity paradox is where modern identity politics use circular reasoning to justify censorship.
Person claims to change their gender.
Person is trans.
"Why are they trans?"
"Because they are changed their gender so they are what they claimed."
"Why do you hate them?"
"Because they are trans?"
:You hate them just for being trans?"
"No... wait? You caged me!"
That's how sheep are trapped by other sheep. They think because they can't justify themselves, they are wrong. This applies to any liberal discussion.
Stage 2. The liberal sheep ruin the sheep's life. The sheep's thick skin only apply to a few people. The liberal sheep mob come to shatter it. The flock of liberal sheep invade the sheep's mind and specifically target the sheep (unlike the sheep's generalization that carried no harm) and the sheep was socially ostracized. Measurable harm was caused to the sheep.
The liberal sheep (the defenders of the wolves) failed to distinguish the difference between a generalized opinion (something any sheep or wolf are capable of doing) and a verbal targeted attack which targeted at someone specific. They failed to notice how only the liberal sheep's thoughts affected their actions. They are pathetic sheep that want to silence other sheep.
Why do my categories exist? To prevent hypocrisy. My standards are low so a sheep can't commit a wolf act. No wolves were present here besides the trans mentioned.
