>>13659236
If it's worth a dollar, it didn't have a face; it had a tail end.
It isn't worth anything but a dime dollar.
The cold war is interesting. It's the strategic initiative, but those people are still living. On another point, Russia is adjacent to the Middle East and America is not. NATO throws people overboard for being stowaways and face no real legal consequences because they retain wealth in a military complex.
You don't have to buy horseshit; it's unhealthy.
If it's that case, I naturally go to Western Europe and West Africa because it was the immediate land adjacency of the USA, but not the orient because it is surrounded by other endogenous people and superpowers on opposing sides of the orient, which have been oriented around historically since the roman capital was renamed constantinope.
The truth is, without freight, nothing really got there. Cargo carrying gasoline 4.50 to the USA because it isn't running? How preposterous. Whatever they say, freight and pipe were direct economics and logistics and cargo was a boat that had to sail an ocean on a turbine spinner.
Historically, Russia has played games in that territory (west of Israel and in Africa), but the biggest jump was a dam that Egypt made along the Nile, and the southern countries pride the namestamp of bloodiest splatter visible from space (Sudan). Place is an undeveloped shithole, and sixty years of military planning and russian domestic subterfeuge makes me think it is an undeveloped land.
A russian man once said, "Africans go to Africa to die," perhaps tantamount to their limited factors, such as healthcare and infrastructure. But that is important because they're working on it. Most GDP goes there anyway, so that's the frontier of human development.
But these NATO men? They don't give a fuck about liberals. They'd toss a man overboard for thinking he deserved pay, making over 100k a year to just transport statues, arts, and weapons.
