[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / abdl / bestemma / doomer / eris / fast / trap / vg / vichan ]

/christian/ - Christian Discussion and Fellowship

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Email
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


The Lord is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear? the Lord is the strength of my life; of whom shall I be afraid?

File: be83f98b3a53cf8⋯.jpg (40.11 KB, 559x559, 1:1, 1519611097741.jpg)

d129e6  No.730238

hypothetically, if i went out and killed an abortion doctor right now, would it be a sin, and if the catholic church found out i was doing it, would they excommunicate me? also, if the murder was righteous, do you think i would feel any guilt over it? they're commiting murder and they continue to commit murder. they will kill more if they aren't stopped and no authority is willing to stop them. i think it follows that it is justified to put a stop to this via murder, as it is the only way. i guess you could also just chop off their hands or something, instead.

i think most actual catholics would be fine with someone doing this, but obviously the vatican could never endorse or encourage vigilante justice/unlawful behavior for political reasons. i think if someone says abortionists shouldn't be killed, they don't really think fetus's are humans with souls, and are crypto-heretics.

this is obviously all hypothetical and i would never risk committing such a grave sin without the blessing of the church. i just want to know your guys thoughts on this

94f101  No.730244

>if i went out and killed an abortion doctor right now, would it be a sin

Yes

>and if the catholic church found out i was doing it, would they excommunicate me?

No, but it wouldn't help your soul that much

>also, if the murder was righteous, do you think i would feel any guilt over it?

Yes

>think it follows that it is justified to put a stop to this via murder, as it is the only way

Ends don't justify the means and the double-effect principle doesn't apply


04dfb4  No.730246

Yes it would still be murder, you might get off with destroying their hands but you’ll be making a grave mistake thinking your murder is righteously justified.


d129e6  No.730247

>>730244

>>730246

so just do nothing lmao?


f03cdd  No.730250

>It's a CathoLARP thinks that ends justify the means thread


d129e6  No.730252

File: 29c90bcabea0bff⋯.png (1.16 MB, 1072x736, 67:46, 1521961028626.png)

>>730250

what about just burning down abortion clinics?


f4dab8  No.730254

>>730244

>>730250

I don't know guys, the 'ends justify the means' only applies to situations like when innocent people get harmed.

Not trying to encourage OP, but a doctor who consciously chose to make its sole purpose in life killing babies is due for a death penalty for both justice and avoidance of further deaths of babies.

>>730252

If nobody gets hurt then burning down an abortion clinic is definitely justified without question.


c127c5  No.730255

>>730254

So why didn't the earliest Christians assassinate enemy leaders, choosing rather to suffer martyrdom?


aba528  No.730256

All you would accomplish by killing a doctor or burning down a clinic is energizing of proabortionist base and make antiabortionist look like monsterss.


d129e6  No.730258

>>730250

yeah when the lefties freak out about not being able to kill babies without consequences, they will look really good. also,

>refraining from enacting your beliefs to appease atheist degenerates

i want a moral arguments only


d129e6  No.730259


e1d887  No.730262

>>730238

As you told you need the blessing of the Church. At least you need the confirmation of someone superior to know your action is the right political mean of the moment. Being a lone wolf won't help, instead the opposite.

In fact, I don't know, maybe, if you kill someone only to save the child. But since you are not sure the clinic will just find another abortionist.

Maybe burning clinics down and/or threatening abortionists.


e1d887  No.730263

>>730262

I'm not advocating genocide btw, it's just metaphoric.


feab21  No.730265

>>730238

I thought God was clear on this matter. He said to genocide child sacrificers.


401219  No.730267

>I want to kill people to get my way

<instead of getting off the internet and helping my community directly

>crusader drawing dot jpg

<I will interpret constructive criticism as attacks on the cause I claim to fight for


aba528  No.730269

>>730258

>>730259

Yes it will only hurt anti-abortionist movement, you lack basic optics.


9d4b19  No.730295

Abortionists deserve death. However, you have no authority to execute that judgment.

>the vatican could never endorse or encourage vigilante justice/unlawful behavior for political reasons

It's not just optics, it's a matter of justice. It's unjust to execute justice without the authority to do so, even though what you're trying to execute is justice. Just the same as if you asked a demon about theology, it's unwise to seek wisdom from demons, even though what you're trying to gain is wisdom. You have to do not only the right thing, but you have to do it in the right way, for it to be right.


d175f0  No.730375

>>730255

Because they didn't have the means to do so in a way that wouldn't backfire. You only saw it happen when the state was converted. Then they could do so without fear of massive reprisals.


d0663e  No.730382

>>730295

Not endorsing this approach, but, hypothetically, if you were to encounter an abortionist in the middle of performing an abortion, it would be morally licit to, if there were no other way to stop him, kill the abortionist.

If you believe that an unborn child is a person and that it is licit to defend the life of another person who is unjustly threatening it with deadly force, I fear you must accept this conclusion, and lack of judicial authority really isn't relevant to the immediate preservation of an innocent life.

That being said, to seek out such a confrontation would be counter-productive, vigilantism won't help the current situation.

>>730267

So do you think unborn children are people or not? If you do, then you are literally not being serious about this question. Would you flippantly call people who wanted to stop a gang of mass-murderers thugs who just "want to kill people to get their way"? Because that's what you're doing. You might be joking when you say that babies have a right to not be hacked to pieces but most Christians aren't. Being active at the knights of Colombus meetings isn't relevant.


675371  No.730409

>>730238

Things Jesus would most likely have done today:

>scold baby-murdering doctors and mothers for their actions

>drive baby-murderers out of an abortion clinic with a whip

>lay hands on a baby-murdering doctor, rendering them blind so they can murder no more

>lay hands on a baby-murdering mother, rendering her infertile so she can murder no more

Things Jesus would most likely not have done today:

>run around murdering sinners


9d4b19  No.730428

>>730382

I can't imagine a scenario in which killing an abortionist would be the only way to stop him from performing an abortion. Just tie his hands behind his back, lol. But yes, in that unimaginable scenario, lethal force could theoretically be justified. I don't think that scenario is what OP was asking about, though.

But keep in mind that the child's mother is also an abortionist. I wonder how, after killing the professional physician, you would protect the child's life from his own mother's presumably continuing sabotage attempts? So even killing the physician abortionist might not be something you could reasonably expect to save the child's life in the end… Just a thought.


eef3ec  No.730479

>>730238

In addition to issues like illegality of killing abortionists etc., consider also the wider effects this would have: in our culture where abortion is widely accepted, it would make finally outlawing abortion much harder, and so in the end, although it would save one child for a time, many more would die because outlawing abortion would become much harder, and would finally happen years later than it otherwise would - in this interval of time, maybe lasting decades, between the year when abortion would be outlawed if abortionists didn't get killed and the year when it will be outlawed if abortionists get killed, millions of children will get aborted anyway. Just some food for thought.


5c3621  No.730491

File: cc2015561858f66⋯.png (5.33 KB, 208x242, 104:121, purge.png)

To be a passive bluepilled hippe is heresy, that being said, striking out in anger/ rage or vengence is still condemned. Yes there are times when i myself browse /pol, see something bad happening (Sweden seriously get you stuff together!) but what would going full on PURGE mode do? If there is a path that would lead to that end then He would show you, but until then its better to just help who you can while enduring all the crap thats going on.

So basically; taking things into your own hands? Bad. Taking action when signs are given to do so? Good. Spreading His word and easing some suffering in the process? ALWAYS good.


787625  No.730501

Catholics aren't consequentialists.


463ae3  No.730513

>>730491

>Image

>

Where did you come form and go back there


5c3621  No.730522

>>730513

>blasphemes, idolising an image

Which discount cross did you purchase and how many hail mary's did you spaghetti?


f4dab8  No.730531

>>730255

>So why didn't the earliest Christians assassinate enemy leaders, choosing rather to suffer martyrdom?

So you're opting to let babies become martyrs instead of bringing justice and stopping systematic mass infanticide?

So why did Judith assassinate Holofernes?

Why did Maccabeus revolt against the Seleucids?

These people aren't just fighting against individual christians but killing babies, this is more akin to saving hundreds of lives by killing one murderer.


ae9ceb  No.730539

File: 3947c73d9eb57cb⋯.jpg (47.16 KB, 490x312, 245:156, abort.jpg)

File: 27d2355aa3fc9d4⋯.jpg (190.5 KB, 888x499, 888:499, 2lk3fy.jpg)

>>730238

>if i went out and killed an abortion doctor right now

In the US? You would just have killed a cog in the Jewish system, and the Jewish system would instantly replace it. In fact, even if you killed 100 abortion docotors, I don't think any abortion would even be delayed let alone prevented.

In a land as rich as Jewmerica limited material damage accomplishes NOTHING. If you killed an abortion doctor in a minor Moldovan town however, that might do something.

The only option you have in Jewmerica is to preach against the Jews. Tell the people about the Jews, and if people like Robert Bowers start popping up all over the place, then you might have a chance.


1aeec8  No.730560

Pro tip you retards. If you are going to do something, don't put it on the internet


814aab  No.730795

Don't waste your life as an impetuous kamikaze.

“Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.”


2e9993  No.730801

>>730522

I'm not even sure what you did to your reading comprehension there, I'll just repeat what I said again:

Go back to reddit


5a568b  No.731071

>>730238

Romans 3:5-8


df1870  No.740978

>>730238

Just make sure they know what they are doing is abominably evil and warn them that God will reward each to what he is owed


7e299f  No.740987

>>730238

Never do something like that. If you do you’ll bring down God’s name and Christianity’s reputation down with you. Jesus would never have done that; the most he would ever have done was protest or something like that. Pray for them, don’t kill them; you’ll just add more souls in hell.


bc4de4  No.740990

Entirely depends on your theology of the state

Almost every living Christian has been entirely bluepilled into thinking that Romans 13 means God ordains the power for your state oppressors to rule you, then you can not support any vigilante justice and need to just shrug your shoulders when your government endorses evil

If you know that this is not the case and that the state is an inherently evil organization with it's own interests against yours, you could reason that such a vigilante act of human execution in line with God's will might be a role you need to fill

Romans 13 justification: >>>/christianity/506


228517  No.741017

File: fb03ebceb134e3d⋯.jpg (151.51 KB, 450x590, 45:59, 9121.jpg)

>>740987

>Jesus would have only protested

Mark 9:42

Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to stumble, it would be better for him to have a large millstone hung around his neck and to be thrown into the sea.

Does this sound like a mere protest to you?

You don't know Jesus at all. Stop speaking for him, and read his words.


1bfc93  No.741054

>>730238

why care about what the catholic church thinks? Care about what God/Jesus thinks about it.

1 John 3:8 King James Version (KJV)

8 He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil.

Jesus did all the work already. You could kill the spirit that dwells inside the abortion doctor through the word of God.

Hebrews 4:12 King James Version (KJV)

12 For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.

1 John 3:6

Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him.


96f931  No.742096

>>741054

>why do you care about what church thinks? What matters is what you think God thinks.


232f3f  No.742145

It's really the "mother" who is the killer. The abortionist is playing the role of "hit man", a hired killer doing the will of the woman for pay. I suppose you could raise enough money to hire the abortionist to do something other than kill and there would be no question of legality or sin.


278431  No.742149

>>742145

Good point


df1870  No.742155

>>741017

This is clearly speaking about people who already believe in Jesus Christ but are taken by a heresy; such as the people in Galatians who say that one must be circumcised to be saved.


5acbcb  No.742189

File: 2f2bd78874df92e⋯.png (398.11 KB, 1492x1060, 373:265, Coupe.png)

First lets talk about killing sinners. This question is well answered in the Summa Theologiae. (http://www.newadvent.org/summa/3064.htm Article Two) There's really not much for me to say here, it's laid out very simply and clearly. "God sometimes slays sinners forthwith in order to deliver the good" This sums it up, it is lawful to slay sinners who are causing grievous harm to good people.

However, according to Article Three, you can can not personally put the grievous sinner to death, because you do not have public authority to care for the body. "It is lawful for any private individual to do anything for the common good, provided it harm nobody: but if it be harmful to some other, it cannot be done, except by virtue of the judgment of the person to whom it pertains to decide what is to be taken from the parts for the welfare of the whole."

So we can't kill the wicked doctor privately, and our government will do nothing to protect its people from him, so maybe what we need is war. According to Article One of http://www.newadvent.org/summa/3040.htm, we again need public authority to wage this war in the first place. "For it is not the business of a private individual to declare war, because he can seek for redress of his rights from the tribunal of his superior".

Well, we can't really form a paramilitary group and burn Babylon, can we, because a paramilitary group was not entrusted with the Authority to make decisions for the public. So I guess what's left is a coupe of the current standing authority. Trump could disregard congress, start making decisions, and become defacto dictator, but unfortunately he'll never do that. So what we need is a public figure within congress, the White-house, etc, to march on Washington as Mussolini did, and be declared the dictator by Trump him self.


109f0a  No.742190

>>730238

>hypothetically, if i went out and killed-

Yes, sin, hell


5acbcb  No.742196

>>742190

Nice protty translation.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / abdl / bestemma / doomer / eris / fast / trap / vg / vichan ]