>>281764
>Naughty Muffin
>Yuriba
Can you provide links?
>I can't stand when people list as "female" with no indication of dick-having and then just spring one out
Agreed. Lying wastes everyone's time.
>I've never been on Tapestries, but I'm curious about it
Tapestries is worth trying! It's the number one most populated MUCK. It has pros and cons, of course, though.
>"furry" and "BDSM" are both prominent in their description
The vast majority of characters are furries. If you don't want to play with furries, Tapestries won't work for you. However, you can play a human and get lots of furry ass if you're fine with that. There are also a considerable amount of quasihumans (elves, orcs, gargoyles, witches with cat ears, etc) but actual, entirely plain humans are very rare. I like human on furry pairings, myself, and wish I found more humans (and quasihumans) to pair with my furry character.
As for BDSM, (sadly, for me) there's not as much BDSM as the website claims. Supposedly, the whole MUCK used to be BDSM-oriented, but now only a few places on Taps cater to it. So BDSM absolutely will not be a problem for you, on Tapestries. There's lots of vanilla stuff available.
>>281768
>I forget the Pueblo system because there's only one client that actually supports it and that's not the one I use.
This.
>MUSHClient
MUSHclient is terrible. At least use BeipMU, if you're using Windows… MUSHclient still doesn't support TLS or SSL on its own, yet.