/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

The discussion doesn't need to start deep from the start, it can also start with something simple,

like about good matters and what is considered disrespectful,

if this thread will go long enough, the deep talk will come up by itself.

Like for example, here in italy it's considered disrespectful to remove one own shoes when the people are in a formal setting.

While it can be sometimes allowed in informal settings.

That's because of two reasons, the climate of our land, and our body disposition. We usually have strong body odor, and our climate is usually humid and warm, so one of the most smelly parts of our bodies is exactly the feet, which odor matter is made worse by us very often wearing closed shoes with socks, so the smell further concentrates there and becomes a smell bomb.

Curiously, we may smell easily, but we also are sensitive to odors and expect to live in places which are mostly odorless. We don't like to perceive the odor of others.

While you would expect instead smelly people to just take their smell for granted, and go around stinking everything. That's not how italians are instead.

I find that contradiction of our people to be curious.

It's as if we italians place on ourselves expectations higher than outselves. That's a recurring theme also on other things.

Those higher self-expectations often lead to italian people being upset most of the time, but that's also what pushes us to try to improve things, until we actually manage to.

An other way to go about this thread, would be asking yourself:

What do you love about your people?

I'm curious about the american "tipping culture", which misuses the term "culture" in my opinion.

How old is the tipping culture? Did that exist before the two wars? Or is that also an aberration created by kikes?

I'm asking because "tipping culture" is completely foreign in italy, and I think in most of europe too.

The owner of a business here is expected to pay appropriately their employees, and the employees must not beg as a result of being underpaid.

If an employee is underpaid here, they have a reason to complain, and there is no social stigma in people complaining when they are mistreated, and all their relatives and friends will be aware of it and also not be happy for it. The one making a bad impression will be the business owner.

Though maybe here in italy, specifically, people complain easily about anything, to the point where somethimes serious stuff deserving criticism gets muddled up by complains about superficial or minor matters.

There is also the effect that when people complain too often and easily then the single complain loses its impact, and as a result every complain, even complains about important stuff, gets underplayed or ignored as just "the usual noise"

So having more freedom to speak one own grievances doesn't necessarily lead to things changing more easily, like in the example of business owners mistreating the employees, the complains of the employees can be as easily be ignored and underplayed by the owner, so often nothing changes.

Though, it's also true that if the single complain hardly ever changes anything, the total sum of all complains often does lead to something changing, on the long run. So in this case, complaining in italy is less of a personal matter, and more of a cultural matter, a societal matter, because complaining becomes a medium by which all the other people get aware of the current state of things, over which gained awareness, someone eventually will be able to act in the right place at the right time to make things better. It's a very long process though.

>>13643807

It's very simple.

White culture used to be promotion of the most qualified and the most clever as the pillars of a high trust society.

Any time the jew is allowed to implement usury this destroys white culture because Usuary allows inferior megalomaniacs to usurp the positions of power and respect they covet (but aren't qualified for) using artificial means. This destroys trust in the system not just because of incompetent leaders but also because the system is turned parasitic. The trust in the system erodes as does the high trust society.

The Bank controls the military and state. The state serves corporate interest and the citizens are economic slaves conditioned to obedience.

>>13643822

This. Usury is why america and its mother countries of france, england, italy all became shitholes.

>>13643807

Why do they insist that it's good and normal that the majority of newborn infant boys have their genitals mutilated? Is this really the culture we want?

>>13643966

because cutting the babies dick is part of the kikes culture (the same as faggotry and pedoraping are central to them)

and the kikes are trying to infect others with their (((culture))), in a way to normalize their own (communism, which is jewish, is also a vector for jewish culture to infect other people who aren't jewish)

since otherwise, everyone is normally and naturally disgusted by jews and their way to life

but if everyone would become a bit jewish then there would be less repulsion to it

or at least, the kikes may be thinking something like this, as their reason to do this shit

basically, the kikes are parassites, and their culture is also parasitic on other cultures

I was rethinking about the apparent contradiction between

1) the national or territorial culture is based on the land

2) a person isn't part of a culture only because he was born in a land (see migrants of second+ generation)

Like for example for (2)

An italian is normally born in italy.

But if an italian family had their baby be born in china, for example, that kid would not be chinese, but still italian.

(likewise any foreigner coming to italy and having their kids be born here, their kids are still not italian)

Because to be italian, you need to be born in an italian family. A person can't become italian if he wasn't born in an italian family.

(the protestant idea of "to be born again" could seem to apply, but I don't think that would work, a faith is a different thing from a territorial culture, people can convert when they recognize a better spiritual truth, but people can't change their history)

And yet the land still holds a role, because if an italian family did stay away from italy for more than 2 generations, they would start to be less italian, to the point they would stop to be italian entirely. Italians in name only, but not at all on the cultural level (see the italo-americans who, despite their best intentions, make only a mockery of italian culture, they aren't italian, they are american)

Losing one own culture by staying away from the homeland happens faster than gaining a new culture from zero, usually.

People who stay away from their homeland will usually reach a point, where they have lost their original culture, but they haven't gained a new culture either. Making them culture-less. The migrants of the 3+ generations are usually like this, without culture, nor their original, nor the one of the land they live on, and they are the kind of people who more easily go into terrorism, crime and other problems for the natives. See the profile of most of the arab terrosists in france and germany, that was a common trait, they are often arabs born there.

So it may be, that a territorial culture is nurtured and shaped by the homeland, and not just the soil, but the sum of all the people living there, from the unmoving community.

But it also happens that the territorial culture, once accumulated and gained from the land, can linger for some time (some generations, 1 or 2 generations) even without the contribute from the homeland.