[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]

/qresearch/ -  Q Research

Research and discussion about Q's crumbs
Name
Email
Subject
REC
STOP
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webp,webm, mp4, mov, pdf
Max filesize is16 MB.
Max image dimensions are15000 x15000.
You may upload5 per post.


Welcome Page | Archive | qnotables archive | Q's Board: /projectdcomms/ | Legacy Boards: /CBTS /TheStorm | TOR link
Practice Bake HERE: /comms | /qrn |

File: 79844a5ed2ade13⋯.jpg (180.82 KB,1200x600,2:1,OZ_Q_PAIN.jpg)

30a79f No.19188850 [Last50 Posts]

Welcome To Q Research AUSTRALIA

A new thread for research and discussion of Australia's role in The Great Awakening.

Previous thread

>>18924779 Q Research AUSTRALIA #30

Q's Posts made on Q Research AUSTRALIA threads

Wednesday 11.20.2019

>>7358352 ————————————–——– These people are stupid.

>>7358338 ————————————–——– All assets [F + D] being deployed.

>>7358318 ————————————–——– What happens when the PUBLIC discovers the TRUTH [magnitude] re: [D] party corruption?

Tuesday 11.19.2019

>>7357790 ————————————–——– FISA goes both ways.

Saturday 11.16.2019

>>7356270 ————————————–——– There is no escaping God.

>>7356265 ————————————–——– The Harvest [crop] has been prepared and soon will be delivered to the public for consumption.

Friday 11.15.2019

>>7356017 ————————————–——– "Whistle Blower Traps" [Mar 4 2018] 'Trap' keyword select provided.....

Thursday 03.28.2019

>>5945210 ————————————–——– Sometimes our 'sniffer' picks and pulls w/o applying credit file

>>5945074 ————————————–——– We LOVE you!

>>5944970 ————————————–——– USA v. LifeLog?

>>5944908 ————————————–——– It is an embarrassment to our Nation!

>>5944859 ————————————–——– 'Knowingly'

Q's Posts referencing Australia

https://qanon.pub/?q=AUS

https://qanon.pub/?q=australia

https://qanon.pub/?q=koala

https://qanon.pub/?q=HouseOfCards

https://qanon.pub/?q=boomerang

https://qanon.pub/?q=45HarisonHarold

https://qanon.pub/?q=6572656

https://qanon.pub/?q=RAT%20BAIT

https://qanon.pub/?q=VERY%20important

https://qanon.pub/?q=remain%20in%20the%20light

https://qanon.pub/?q=news.com.au

Q's Posts referencing Australian citizens

Malcolm Turnbull (X/AUS)

Former Prime Minister of Australia, 2015 to 2018

https://qanon.pub/?q=X%2FAUS

https://qanon.pub/?q=call%20details

https://qanon.pub/?q=Threat%20to%20AUS

Alexander Downer

Former Australian Liberal Party politician and former Australian High Commissioner to the United Kingdom

https://qanon.pub/?q=Downer

Cardinal George Pell

Australian Cardinal of the Catholic Church and former Prefect of the Vatican Secretariat for the Economy

https://qanon.pub/?q=Pell

https://qanon.pub/?q=cardinal-george-pell

https://qanon.pub/?q=pecking

Julian Assange

Australian activist, founder, editor and publisher of WikiLeaks

https://qanon.pub/?q=assange

https://qanon.pub/?q=JA

https://qanon.pub/?q=Under%20protection

https://qanon.pub/?q=WL

https://qanon.pub/?q=wikileaks

https://qanon.pub/?q=crowdstrike

https://qanon.pub/?q=server

https://qanon.pub/?q=Seth

https://qanon.pub/?q=SR

https://qalerts.app/?q=snowden

https://qalerts.app/?q=roadmap

Virginia Roberts Giuffre

American-Australian survivor of the sex trafficking ring operated by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell

https://qanon.pub/#4568

https://qanon.pub/#4728

https://qanon.pub/#1054

https://qanon.pub/?q=chandler

https://qanon.pub/?q=epstein

https://qanon.pub/?q=island

https://qanon.pub/#1001

https://qanon.pub/#1861

https://qanon.pub/#3145

https://qanon.pub/#3147

https://qanon.pub/#4578

https://qanon.pub/#3432

https://qanon.pub/#3497

https://qanon.pub/#4727

https://qanon.pub/#4797

https://qanon.pub/?q=wexner

https://qanon.pub/#4576

https://qanon.pub/#4577

https://qanon.pub/?q=maxwell

https://qanon.pub/#4569

https://qanon.pub/?q=spacey

https://qanon.pub/#4570

https://qanon.pub/?q=normalize

https://qanon.pub/?q=Prince%20Andrew

https://qanon.pub/#4579

https://qanon.pub/#4907

https://qanon.pub/#4911

https://qanon.pub/#4921

https://qanon.pub/?q=Welcome%20aboard.

https://qanon.pub/?q=dershowitz

https://qanon.pub/?q=Dearest%20Virginia

Q's Posts referencing The Five Eyes intelligence alliance (FVEY)

An anglophone intelligence alliance comprising Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States

https://qanon.pub/?q=FVEY

https://qanon.pub/?q=Five%20Eyes

https://qanon.pub/?q=Interesting%2C

https://qanon.pub/?q=RAT%20BAIT

"Does AUS stand w/ the US or only select divisions within the US?"

Q

Nov 25 2018

https://qanon.pub/#2501

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188852

#30 - Part 1

Australian Politics and Society - Part 1

>>18928925 Video: Mark McGowan resigns as WA Premier - Western Australia’s Premier Mark McGowan has announced he is stepping down as the state’s leader, admitting his many years serving has left him “exhausted”. “I just don‘t have the energy or drive that is required to continue in the role as Premier. Or to fight that election which would have been my eighth election as a Member of Parliament,” he said. McGowan led Labor back to government with an overwhelming victory over the Liberal government in March 2017, and again at the 2021 election. He enforced some of the toughest Covid-19 restrictions on travel during the pandemic.

>>18928944 Video: Mark McGowan stands down as WA premier in shock announcement, citing exhaustion - WA Premier Mark McGowan has announced he is retiring from politics in a bombshell announcement. In a press conference held with just 45 minutes' notice, Mr McGowan said he would step down as premier and member for Rockingham at the end of the week. "The truth is I'm tired, extremely tired. In fact, I'm exhausted," he said. Mr McGowan enjoyed overwhelming popularity in his second term throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, enacting the nation's strictest border policies. The approach came with its critics, with some arguing it was heavy-handed, and prompting then-deputy prime minister Barnaby Joyce to describe WA as a "kind of hermit kingdom".

>>18928950 WA Premier Mark McGowan’s shock departure puts Labor seats at risk - Mark McGowan’s shock departure from politics inflicts a ­massive blow to the Labor Party’s prospects at the 2025 state and federal elections. Western Australia’s most popular leader in its history - whose landslide 2021 state election victory left the Liberal and National parties in ruin – played a huge hand in delivering Anthony Albanese majority government. Albanese had to wait for the red wave in Perth - where results rolled in two hours behind those on the east coast – to deliver Labor the Liberal seats of Swan, Hasluck, Tangney and Pearce, before claiming majority government on election night. McGowan’s “X-factor” significantly boosted federal Labor’s stocks in Western Australia, and ALP strategists are concerned that losing his popular appeal in the west will make it tougher to retain seats.

>>18928954 Exit door: ‘Premier’s legacy a weakened federation’ - Mark McGowan was the first premier to take as strong an alternative approach to a federal government in foreign policy and “revelled” in stepping out from the commonwealth particularly on the relationship with China, foreign policy experts say. The outgoing Western Australian leader frequently called out the former Coalition government and its handling of the relationship with Beijing, which he labelled “insane”, and demanded Scott Morrison end the damaging rhetoric against Australia’s biggest trading partner. During a visit to China last month - the first in four years - Mr McGowan said it was “unfounded” to have a “fearful relationship” with Beijing after 50 years of fostering a close economic relationship.

>>18934236 Kevin Rudd AC Tweet: Great to see @SenSchumer at the Capitol. It was a busy day for the Majority Leader, but we found time to talk about the proliferation of Aussies and (Australian) coffee shops in NYC, and the passage of necessary legislation to support AUKUS.

>>18934236 https://qalerts.pub/?q=schumer - https://qalerts.pub/?q=[CS]

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188853

#30 - Part 2

Australian Politics and Society - Part 2

>>18940103 Why ‘gender affirming’ care is destroying our most vulnerable kids - "For years readers of The Australian have been made aware of the controversies surrounding the medical treatment of children who identify as other than their natal sex. But it is only recently the seriousness of the public health crisis has begun to be apparent. This is a public health crisis caused not by a virus, not by a disease, but by a social contagion. It is time for plain speaking about the issue. The transgender movement has been based on one truth and a thousand lies. The truth is that for a very small number of people, mostly born male, there can be such a disconnect between body and mind that they cannot find peace unless and until they take such steps as they can to pass as the other sex. This can involve taking cross-sex hormones and undergoing major surgeries that are difficult and risky. Those who take this path, usually well into their adult years and after much suffering, are courageous. They deserve respect and support from us all. But that one truth has been the nurse log on which a vast number of falsehoods have sprouted. Examples include the notion that there are not just two sexes, or that it is actually possible to change sex or be “non-binary”, or the idea that every child has an innate gender identity that awaits discovery. Most people know these things to be nonsense, but in polite society we have been asked to pretend otherwise." - Patrick Parkinson, emeritus professor of law at the University of Queensland and former chair of the Family Law Council - theaustralian.com.au

>>18940139 Donald Trump Jr demands media apologise for airing false claims that his father colluded with Vladimir Putin for 2016 election - Donald Trump Jr has lambasted the media for airing false claims about his father’s alleged collusion with Russian President Vladimir Putin during the 2016 presidential election and said outlets who endorsed the claims - including the ABC – should publicly apologise. After the release of the 316-page Durham report earlier this month, which criticised the FBI’s handling of the investigation into the alleged ties between the two leaders and found no evidence of collusion between Mr Trump and Mr Putin, Mr Trump Jr said his father was owed an apology. “The media made millions of dollars, the country was divided and my father’s first term was hamstrung by the whole thing,” the former president’s eldest son told The Australian.

>>18940223 Video: Memorial Day | The Last Full Measure of Devotion - May 29, 2023 - This #MemorialDay, we pay tribute to the brave men and women of the Armed Forces who made the ultimate sacrifice defending the nation’s freedom. Let us remember the greatness of past generations and find inspiration from their courage, devotion, and selfless determination. Semper Fidelis. (U.S. Marine Corps Video by Staff Sgt. John A. Martinez) - United States Marine Corps

>>18940278 Q Post #4545 - If America falls so does the world. If America falls darkness will soon follow. Only when we stand together, only when we are united, can we defeat this highly entrenched dark enemy. Their power and control relies heavily on an uneducated population. A population that trusts without individual thought. A population that obeys without challenge. A population that remains outside of free thought, and instead, remains isolated living in fear inside of the closed-loop echo chamber of the controlled mainstream media. This is not about politics. This is about preserving our way of life and protecting the generations that follow. We are living in Biblical times. Children of light vs children of darkness. United against the Invisible Enemy of all humanity. Q - https://qanon.pub/#4545

>>18940278 Q Post #1350 - If America falls, the World falls. God bless our brave fighting men & women. They deserve our deepest gratitude. Through their strength, and the millions of united Patriots around the World, we will succeed in this fight. Peace through strength. Now comes the pain. Q - https://qanon.pub/#1350

>>18940278 Q Post #2309 - WHERE WE GO ONE, WE GO ALL! WE, THE PEOPLE! FROM SEA TO SHINING SEA. LET FREEDOM RING, PATRIOTS. IT IS YOUR TIME. IF AMERICA FALLS, THE WORLD FALLS. UNITED WE STAND! GOD BLESS YOU ALL. Q+ - https://qanon.pub/#2039

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188854

#30 - Part 3

Australian Politics and Society - Part 3

>>18945832 Health leaders reject the need for oversight of transgender medicine - Australia’s most senior health leaders have dismissed suggestions the commonwealth should take a greater oversight and regulatory role in the prescription of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones to children as the federal government admits it has no idea how widely the drugs are being prescribed off-label for gender dysphoria.

>>18946058 Talisman Sabre Facebook Post: The countdown is on for Talisman Sabre 2023 - The largest bilateral military training activity between #YourADF and the United States is set to take place from 22 July - 4 August in Queensland. This year’s exercise will be the biggest yet in terms of geographical spread and number of partner nations participating. Fiji, France, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Tonga, United Kingdom, Canada, Germany and Indonesia will all take part and contribute to the exercise’s outcomes. Read more - https://www.defence.gov.au/news-events/news/2023-05-15/planning-key-success-talisman-sabre - #TalismanSabre2023

>>18946058 Talisman Sabre - MAGIC SWORD - https://qalerts.pub/?q=Operation+Specialists - https://qalerts.pub/?q=magic

>>18949906 Kyiv ‘needs to wait’ for fresh support, says Anthony Albanese - Anthony Albanese has pushed back at Ukraine’s suggestion his government is preparing to unveil fresh support for Ukraine next month, saying announcements would be made “when they’re ready to be made”. “My governments is a considered, adult government,” the Prime Minister told reporters on Saturday during a visit to Vietnam. “I can confirm that we make the announcements when they are ready, when they’ve been considered by all of our processes, including our cabinet.”

>>18955343 Devin Nunes Truth: Good morning #Australia - Glad to have you here @truthsocial

>>18955343 Karina Samperi Truth: Thank you @DevinNunes for finally letting #Australia join #TruthSocial. We have been waiting patiently to be let in support of the #Patriot movement that will affect #Australia

>>18960235 US Marines to join allied troops in Australia for combined force exercise - U.S. Marines in Australia will kick off a month of field training alongside Australian and Japanese troops next week, a precursor to one of the largest military exercises in the Pacific the following month. The exercise, Southern Jackaroo, is taking place between June 15 and mid-July, Maj. Matthew Wolf, a spokesman for Marine Rotational Force - Darwin, said. Next month, all three nations will participate in Talisman Sabre, a biennial exercise in Australia that’s scheduled to draw approximately 30,000 personnel.

>>18960257 Hawkei armoured cars bound for Ukraine war in Australian support deal - Australia is set to give Ukraine the missile-capable, four-wheel-drive armoured cars that it has been requesting for months - the Hawkei - as the centrepiece of a forthcoming support package. Although a formal commitment has yet to be sealed, there has been serious progress informally and Ukrainian Defence Minister Oleksii Reznikov told the Herald and The Age the vehicles were number one on his list of “demands” from Australia. He described the Australian-made vehicles as “very, very famous armed vehicles with air defence systems” in an interview in Singapore after meeting his Australian counterpart, Richard Marles, at the weekend. The Hawkei is a seven-tonne armoured car designed to be fitted with the same Norwegian-American air defence system that protects the White House.

>>18965978 Video: Nigel Farage said he decided to join Donald Trump Jr.'s Australian speaking tour because the former president's son is 'blooming-good fun' - Former Brexit campaigner Nigel Farage has announced he is joining Donald Trump Jr.’s speaking tour of Australia. The eldest son of the former US president is set to appear in Brisbane, Sydney, and Melbourne between 9 and 11 July, this year. Speaking to Sky News Australia’s Paul Murray, the former UK politician-turned GB News host said he had decided to join the tour - which will also include South Australian senator Alex Antic – at the last minute. “I’m coming, well for a couple of reasons really: One, I don’t think you get quite enough real, proper conservative conversation down in Australia these days; number two, I want you all to realise that whatever madnesses you're facing, we're facing them in America and in Britain; and number three, I really like Donald Trump Jr., he’s blooming-good fun, and it’s going to be a great time,” Mr Farage said.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188855

#30 - Part 4

Australian Politics and Society - Part 4

>>18971108 Australia to ban swastika, SS sign citing rise of far-right - Video: Australia said on Thursday it would introduce laws to the parliament next week banning public displays and sales of Nazi hate symbols, citing a rise in far-right activities at home. The swastika, one of the most recognisable symbols of Nazi propaganda, and the insignia of Schutzstaffel (SS), the paramilitary wing of the Nazi party, will be outlawed to be used as flags and armbands or printed on clothes. "We've seen, very sadly, a rise in people displaying these vile symbols, which are symbols that have no place in Australia, they should be repugnant," Federal Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus told Channel Seven television.

>>18971120 ‘Not pulling our weight’: Bipartisanship collapses over Ukraine support - A fight has erupted between the major parties over Australian support for Ukraine’s war against Russia, with the federal opposition declaring it embarrassing that Ukrainian officials have been forced to resort to social media posts to plead for more military assistance from the Albanese government. In the Coalition’s strongest criticism yet of the government’s Ukraine policy, opposition foreign affairs spokesman Simon Birmingham and defence spokesman Andrew Hastie said they were concerned that Australia was no longer pulling its weight when it came to supporting Ukraine’s military efforts.

>>18971125 Retired Australian F/A-18 Hornet jets a step closer to joining Ukraine's war effort - Kyiv has assured the White House that it would not deploy second-hand Australian warplanes into Russian airspace if dozens of the retired F/A-18s are transferred to Ukraine. High-level international negotiations are continuing between Australia, Ukraine, and the United States over the fate of the decommissioned fighter aircraft, in what could become this country's largest-ever single transfer of military equipment to a foreign power.

>>18977940 Alexander Soros, PhD Tweet: Was great to see my good friend and now Australian ambassador to the US @MrKRudd when I was in DC, one of the smartest statesmen there is.

>>18977940 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Soros - https://qalerts.pub/?q=soros - https://qalerts.pub/?q=[GS]

>>18977940 Q Post #416 - Soros takes orders from P. You have no idea how sick and evil these people are. Fight, fight, fight. Day of days. Game over. Q

>>18977940 Q Post #4349 - Nobody escapes this. Q

>>18983042 White House asked to approve Australian F/A-18 Hornets for Ukraine - Kyiv has formally asked the White House to green light the transfer of the RAAF’s fleet of retired F/A-18 Hornets to Ukraine under a commercial deal with a US aerospace company that has the rights to buy the aircraft. If the US approves the deal, Australia’s Defence Minister Richard Marles will be urged to make the sale happen, according to an Australian adviser to the Ukraine government who has been helping to broker the sale. Australian, American and Ukrainian officials are understood to have had initial discussions on the potential agreement in which Texas company RAVN Aerospace - which has paid a deposit for 41 of the jets - would on-sell its stake to Kyiv.

>>18983065 ‘Mystery man’ Robert Potter leads fighter jet talks in Ukraine - An Adelaide-born cyber security entrepreneur has emerged as a central figure in a proposed international arms deal to sell retired Australian fighter jets to Ukraine. Internet 2.0 co-founder Robert Potter has an agreement with Ukraine’s Digital Transformation Ministry to provide cyber security tools and training to support the country’s war against Russia. But Mr Potter’s role in the ­potential sale of up to 41 former RAAF F/A-18 Hornets to the country has raised eyebrows in Ukraine and Australia, with the Kyiv Post newspaper this week describing his involvement as “unconventional”.

>>18983102 Aussie Fighter Jets for Ukraine? More Questions Than Answers - "The mandate for such a deal or for the Australian cyber-security consultant who appears associated with it remains unclear after Kyiv Post investigated. Following the international spread of a media report that Australia and the US were negotiating with Ukraine about providing retired Australian F/A-18 aircraft, doubts about the alleged deal have emerged. Yesterday, the Australian Financial Review (AFR), a highly respected newspaper, published a report by two very well-regarded journalists that Australia, the US and Ukraine “are discussing sending 41 Royal Australian Air Force F/A-18 Hornets to Kyiv.” Given the Ukrainian government has repeatedly said that fighter aircraft are critical to their country’s defense, Kyiv Post sought to establish the bona fides of developments reported by AFR." - Pete Shmigel - kyivpost.com

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188856

#30 - Part 5

Australian Politics and Society - Part 5

>>18987818 Australian deaths from ‘suicide kits’ linked to global investigation - The deaths of several Australians by suicide have been linked to a now global investigation into a Canadian chef who has been charged in his homeland with selling a lethal substance online to vulnerable people all over the world. Australian law enforcement agencies have joined investigators in Britain, the United States, Italy, New Zealand and Canada to investigate alleged suicide kits sent by Kenneth Law who, for almost two years, used a website to sell a poison that at-risk people could use to end their lives.

>>18987863 Marine Rotational Force - Darwin Facebook Post: Video: Always Ready - Check out U.S. Marines with MRF-D as they conduct an embassy reinforcement scenario at Mount Bundey Training Area! - #AlliesandPartners #FreeandOpenIndoPacific #MRFD #embassy - (U.S. Marine Corps Video by Cpl. Brayden Daniel)

>>18992075 The Age sacks columnist Julie Szego amid gender furore - The editor of The Age has sacked one of the masthead’s star columnists, Julie Szego, after she took aim at the publication over its ­refusal to run an article on youth gender transition. Last week, Szego posted on ­social media that while she had been commissioned to write a feature-length story about the contentious issue by the newspaper’s former editor Gay Alcorn, The Age’s current boss Patrick Elligett refused to run it. Szego, a freelancer who has written for The Age on and off for more than two decades, subsequently chose to self-publish the 5000-word piece on her own Substack page, telling her social media followers about her new blog: “I’ll be writing about gender identity politics … without the copy being rendered unreadable by a committee of woke journalists redacting words they deem incendiary, such as ‘male’.”

>>18992075 A QUESTION OF TRANSITION - Youth gender treatment under scrutiny - JULIE SZEGO - 4 JUN 2023 - "This is a piece The Age refused to publish. It is the first in a series I’ll be posting here." - https://szegounplugged.substack.com/p/a-question-of-transition

>>18992091 Senior child psychiatrist stood down after questioning gender medicine - The suspension of a senior staff psychiatrist over her approach to transgender patients has thrown the Queensland Children’s Hospital into turmoil, casting a spotlight on widespread concerns among doctors at the treatment of children with gender dysphoria. The case of Jillian Spencer -- stood down from clinical duties apparently accused of transphobia – has exposed a culture in which clinicians are unable to employ medical discretion or a neutral therapeutic stance and are bound by their employment to affirm children’s gender transition. Dr Spencer, a senior staff specialist in the QCH’s consultation liaison psychiatry team, was removed from clinical duties in mid-April following a patient complaint in an unusual response from a public hospital that followed months of conflict over affirmative gender medicine and trans identity politics within the hospital.

>>18998407 USA puts flying schools on Entity List for training PLA aircrew - The US Department of Commerce has added international flight schools to its Entity List, stating that they have recruited Western pilots to provide training for China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA). The two companies, the Test Flying Academy of South Africa (TFASA) and Hong Kong-based Frontier Service Group, were among 43 entities added to the list. Entities on the list are subject to additional licensing requirements and policies beyond the USA’s standard Export Administration Regulations. The Commerce Department says that the various entities added have provided assistance to Beijing in areas such as pilot training, aircraft manoeuvres and tactics, hypersonic weapons development, and weapon lifecycle management using Western software. China’s tapping of former western military pilots has come into the spotlight in the last 12 months. Former US Marine Corps pilot Daniel Edmund Duggan is in Australia fighting extradition to the USA. He faces allegations that he helped train Chinese military pilots.

>>18998479 Video: Australia's Bushmasters to play 'huge role' in Ukrainian counteroffensive against Russia, troops say - In a secret location in eastern Ukraine, frontline troops from the 80th Air Assault Brigade are putting one of their Bushmasters through its paces. "It's fantastic," says driver Oleksandr when asked about the armoured personnel carrier that was built in Bendigo. "Words cannot express it. It's such a powerful vehicle. It is much easier to drive than our equipment," he says. Australia pledged 90 Bushmasters to Ukraine after President Zelenskyy addressed the national parliament last year and asked for the vehicles. They have proved invaluable to Ukraine's armed forces over the past year.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188857

#30 - Part 6

Australian Politics and Society - Part 6

>>19005499 Video: Lidia Thorpe accuses fellow senator David Van of ‘sexually assaulting’ her - Independent senator Lidia Thorpe has in parliament accused Victorian Liberal senator David Van of “harassing” and “sexually assaulting” her. The allegation was made by Thorpe soon after Senate question time on Wednesday as Van made a speech accusing the Labor Party of disgraceful behaviour in its handling of the Brittany Higgins sexual assault allegations. “Even yesterday and today the muck that has been thrown from that side [Labor] to this side [Liberal] senators [Michaelia] Cash and [Linda] Reynolds is really just not on and makes a mockery of your words,” he said.” As Van speaks, Thorpe can be heard interjecting and calling out the word “perpetrator” and “You can talk! You can talk! You know what you were doing around this time, you know what you were doing around this time don’t you Van? You got away with a lot.” Senate deputy president Andrew McLachlan repeatedly attempted to stop Thorpe from interjecting. Then the former Greens senator rose on a point of order and said: “I’m feeling really uncomfortable when a perpetrator is speaking about violence”.

>>19005586 KanekoaTheGreat Tweet: Australia's Sky News discusses @MarcoPolo501c3 releasing a 630-page report with 2,020 citations that thoroughly documents 459 crimes committed by the Biden family & their business associates. •140 business crimes •191 sex crimes •128 drug crimes - https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1668724106001543168

>>19005590 Video: 'Out of a novel': Hunter Biden's laptop filled with sex, drugs and shady deals exposed - A former aide to Donald Trump has lifted the lid on Hunter Biden’s laptop which has plagued the Democratic Party since it first surfaced in October 2020. Garrett Ziegler was one of the few people given a copy of the laptop in 2020 by the former president’s ex-lawyer Rudy Giuliani. He has been named in Hunter Biden’s attorneys demands for the Delaware attorney general, Department of Justice and IRS to investigate those who published the president’s son's personal material. Within the laptop was a treasure trove of information suggesting the now President’s son had been involved in overseas business deals including lobbying foreign oligarchs, influence peddling. It also includes explicit photos and videos of Hunter engaging in sex acts and taking drugs. Mr Ziegler detailed the contents in an exclusive interview with Sky News Australia in a bid to paint “a true picture”.

>>19010951 ‘Take it to the police’: David Van responds to Lidia Thorpe claims - Victorian Liberal senator David Van has told Lidia Thorpe to go to the police if she believes, as she has claimed, that he sexually assaulted her. The independent senator on Wednesday performed an ­extraordinary backdown in parliament, withdrawing her accusation hours earlier that Mr Van had “harassed and sexually assaulted” her when his party was in government. Senator Van said Senator Thorpe’s accusations were “just awful,” telling 2GB the allegations were “Just terrible for me and my family.” “The only time I’ve ever even touched her was shaking her hand after her maiden speech. “Nothing else, that’s for sure,” he said.

>>19010988 Liberal Senator David Van was accused by Lidia Thorpe of harassment, here’s what we know about him - A former public affairs consultant from Victoria, ousted Liberal senator David Van was thrown into the spotlight when independent Lidia Thorpe used parliamentary privilege to accuse him of harassment and sexual assault. Opposition Leader Peter Dutton on Thursday afternoon said further allegations had emerged about Senator Van and had “advised Senator Van of my decision that he should no longer sit in the Liberal Party party room.” Senator Thorpe on Thursday spoke of how she had faced “sexual comments” and had been “inappropriately propositioned” in corridors and stairwells of parliament house in an emotional speech to the Senate. “One man followed me and cornered me in a stairwell,” she said. “To me, it was sexual assault and the government of the time recognised it as such.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188859

#30 - Part 7

Australian Politics and Society - Part 7

>>19011007 Lidia Thorpe says she was propositioned and inappropriately touched in parliament - Independent Lidia Thorpe has doubled down on her allegations that Liberal Senator David Van is a “perpetrator”, telling the Senate on Thursday that he was among a number of men in parliament who had made her feel “unsafe” in the building. In a tearful address to the upper house, the former Greens senator said she had been “propositioned and inappropriately touched” in the hallways and corridors of parliament and called on the government to immediately increase the number of security guards and cameras in the building. “As all women that have walked the corridors of this building know, it is not a safe place. You are often alone in long corridors with no windows and in stairwells hidden from view, where there are no cameras,” she told the senate. “I experienced sexual comments and it was inappropriately propositioned by powerful men. One man followed me and cornered me in a stairwell. “There are different understandings of what amounts to sexual assault and what I experienced has been being followed, aggressively propositioned and inappropriately touched.”

>>19011031 Video: David Van moves to the crossbench after Thorpe’s Senate accusations - Liberal senator David Van has been removed from the Liberal party room after a meeting with Opposition Leader Peter Dutton following accusations of harassment made by Lidia Thorpe in the Senate. Dutton said he had met with the Victorian senator on Thursday morning after further allegations had been brought to him overnight. “A short time ago I advised Senator Van of my decision that he should no longer sit in the Liberal party room. At the outset, I want to make clear, very clear that I’m not making any judgement on the veracity of the allegations or any individual’s guilt or innocence. I make that very clear,” Dutton said.

>>19011145 Video: ‘Threat to our national security’: Government to terminate lease for new Russian embassy - The Albanese government has introduced emergency legislation to prevent Russia from opening a new embassy less than a kilometre from Parliament House in Canberra, saying the new site poses an unacceptable security risk. The government intervened in the long-running dispute about the embassy site after the Federal Court last week found an eviction order issued by the National Capital Authority (NCA) was invalid. The Russian government was granted the 99-year lease for the plot of land, in the upmarket suburb of Yarralumla, in 2008 but failed to progress plans to develop the site, leading the NCA to claim it should give it up to another country. “The government has received very clear security advice as to the risk presented by a new Russian presence, and so close to Parliament House,” Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said in a press conference.

>>19011190 Queensland makes gender optional on birth certificates - Sexual reassignment surgery will no longer be mandatory for adults and teenagers wanting to change sex on their Queensland birth certificates under new laws that were expected to pass state parliament. The transgender reforms, opposed by the Liberal National Party, will also give parents the ­option not to list any gender on their newborn’s documentation. Children older than 16 will be able to legally self-identify as another sex without parental consent, as long as they have a supporting statement from an adult who has known them for at least a year. Those aged 12 to 15 will ­require their parents’ permission to change their birth certificate, but can apply to the courts if their parents do not support an application. Attorney-General Yvette D’Ath said the opt-in approach for listing sex on birth certificates was designed to “give people the greatest agency over what information they want recorded. Providing these protections to trans and gender-diverse people does not pose a threat to others,” she said.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188860

#30 - Part 8

Australian Politics and Society - Part 8

>>19016472 Peter Dutton says senator David Van should quit parliament, after another allegation raised with him - Liberal leader Peter Dutton says senator David Van should quit parliament, after airing that allegations made against the senator by a third person were brought to him, contributing to his rapid expulsion from the party room. Over an explosive 48 hours, independent senator Lidia Thorpe raised allegations under parliamentary privilege that Senator Van had sexually harassed and assaulted her - which he immediately denied, and she later withdrew. Former Liberal senator Amanda Stoker yesterday raised her own claims that Senator Van had inappropriately touched her at a party by squeezing her bottom twice - something she said she dealt with internally at the time, but felt compelled to bring to Mr Dutton's attention after Senator Thorpe spoke in the Senate.

>>19016500 Sydney MP Alex Greenwich sues Mark Latham for allegedly suggesting he ‘goes to schools to groom children’ - Newly released court documents reveal independent MP Alex Greenwich is suing NSW One Nation leader Mark Latham for purportedly painting him as someone who “goes to schools to groom children to become homosexual”. Conservatives and progressives both responded with fierce disapproval to a graphic and homophobic tweet shared to Mr Latham’s social media on March 30 in which he claimed Mr Greenwich engaged in “disgusting” sexual activities. Mr Latham deleted the tweet after a public uproar and demands for an apology. “Greenwich goes into schools talking to kids about being gay. I didn’t want to be accused of anything similar, leaving that kind of content on my socials.”

>>19016596 Embassy of Russia in Australia Facebook Post: Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov: «To our regret, Australia diligently continues to move in the main stream of the authors of the Russophobic hysteria that is now taking place in the Western countries. Australia is trying to be an excellent student there».

>>19016596 Australia diligently continues to move in main stream of Russophobic hysteria: Kremlin - Australia, having cancelled the lease agreement for the site for the construction of the new Russian embassy building, diligently continues to move forward in the main stream of the authors of the Russophobic hysteria and tries to distinguish itself on this path, Kremlin Spokesman Dmitry Peskov said. "To our regret, Australia diligently continues to move in the main stream of the authors of the Russophobic hysteria that is now taking place in the Western countries. Australia is trying to be an excellent student there," the Kremlin spokesman told reporters on Thursday, commenting on Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's statement about introducing a relevant bill to parliament. - tass.com

>>19016648 Fears government data has been stolen by cyber criminals grow as law firm’s clients are revealed - The Albanese government has established a crisis group to examine what commonwealth data has been stolen by Russian-linked hackers who infiltrated the systems of HWL Ebsworth, the giant law firm that has tens of millions of dollars of contracts across at least 40 government departments and agencies. Sensitive agencies including Home Affairs, the Australian Federal Police, Australian Taxation Office, Department of Defence, Department of Foreign Affairs and Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions are among those feared to have been impacted by the hack.

>>19016676 Data on secret missile testing site, attack helicopters and police operations stolen by hackers - Russian cyber hackers who infiltrated the computer systems of law firm HWL Ebsworth have obtained government files apparently relating to the top-secret Woomera missile testing site, navy’s attack helicopter replacement project and Australia’s politically sensitive enhanced engagement in the Indo-Pacific. Sources said the hack - one of the largest in Australian history - had also seen the ransomware gang ­obtain documents concerning police intelligence about protests at an immigration detention centre, the escape of prisoners, and projects involving special forces. While a court injunction obtained by the giant law firm has sought to limit public knowledge of the content of the hacked documents, The Weekend Australian can ­reveal there is deep concern and fury in Canberra, where at least 45 departments and agencies fear data they shared with HWL Ebsworth has been compromised.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188861

#30 - Part 9

Australian Politics and Society - Part 9

>>19016711 ‘State warcraft’: Police won’t cop $1.7bn worth of meth imports - Federal police say international crime groups and “state actors” are threatening the rules-based order of democracies such as Australia by working together to smuggle illicit drugs, after revealing they had seized $1.7bn worth of meth bound for Victoria and NSW. In an extraordinary five-month operation, the Australian Federal Police, Victoria Police and other national crime-busting organisations worked with the Five Eyes law enforcement group to capture more than six tonnes of liquid and crystal methamphetamine since December last year. The illicit substance arrived in four separate sea cargo shipments, and originated from Canada. The drugs were replaced with a harmless substance but had it landed, almost 19 million street deals could have taken place.

>>19016940 Ukraine’s plea for Hawkei vehicles ‘unsupportable at this time’, government letter says - The Albanese government says it is unable to send Hawkei protected mobility vehicles to Ukraine in the near future despite increasingly desperate pleas from Kyiv, citing braking issues and a lack of spare parts. Ukraine has been requesting a fleet of Australian-made Hawkeis since September and the country’s Ministry of Defence has taken to social media in recent months to declare the vehicle its new “military crush”. In a letter sent to a member of the public earlier this month on behalf of Defence Minister Richard Marles, a senior Department of Defence official said: “We are aware of calls to provide [the] Hawkei to Ukraine. The combination of an unresolved braking issue and a limited supply of parts means that the gifting of the Hawkei is unsupportable at this time. The government is considering options for further support to Ukraine, which it will announce in due course.”

>>19021590 ‘Disregard for due process’: David Van resigns from Liberal Party following sexual harassment allegations - Victorian Senator David Van has formally resigned from the Liberal Party after what he has described as “wholesale disregard for due process and natural justice” in the handling of numerous sexual harassment allegations levelled against him. The Victorian Senator on Saturday wrote to Victorian Liberal Party president Greg Mirabella to say he was resigning his membership effective immediately. “I cannot remain a member of a party that tramples upon the very premise on which our justice system is predicated,” he said in the letter. “This is a travesty of justice and I reiterate that I deny the allegations made against me.

>>19021740, >>19021747 Kevin Rudd AC Tweet: Great to spend time with Pacific Ambassadors to the US and US Ambassador to Australia Caroline Kennedy. Important conversations about the future of the region we all call home.

>>19026316 Albanese government must recognise Palestine this term: Victorian Labor Conference - The Victorian Labor conference has called on the Albanese government to recognise Palestine before the next election, setting the stage for the matter to become a focal point at the upcoming national conference in August. A motion put to the Victorian Labor conference today congratulated Anthony Albanese and Foreign Minister Penny Wong for the restoration of aid to Palestinians and shifting Australia’s vote at the United Nations on matters relating to Israel’s occupation of Palestine. But the state conference called on the federal government to go further and formally recognise Palestine in this term.

>>19031721 Xie Feng (12th Chinese Ambassador to the United States) Tweet: Thank you, @AmboRudd, for inviting me and my wife to your beautiful residence. Good discussion.

>>19037068 Legalise Cannabis party introduces personal use bills in NSW, Victoria and Western Australia - The Legalise Cannabis party has today introduced bills to legalise marijuana for personal use in parliaments in Victoria, New South Wales and Western Australia. It is the first time the same bill has been tabled in three states on the same day. The bills have been introduced to the states' upper houses and will need support from major parties to become law. It will not allow people under 18 to access cannabis, or permit driving while impaired by the drug. New South Wales upper house MP Jeremy Buckingham said the reform would allow people over the age of 18 to grow up to six cannabis plants in their households. It would also allow people to gift small quantities to other people but driving under the influence of the drug would remain prohibited.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188862

#30 - Part 10

Australian Politics and Society - Part 10

>>19037075 Daniel Andrews defends Israel, saying he would have voted against his faction’s Palestine motion - Daniel Andrews has issued a staunch defence of Israel’s sovereignty, voicing his opposition to his own faction’s motion on Palestinian recognition, which passed without dissent at Labor’s Victorian conference on Sunday. Recommitting to comments he made three weeks ago that the Jewish homeland represented the “only true democracy” in the Middle East, the Victorian Premier indicated he would oppose any motion regarding the recognition of Palestine at the national ALP conference due to be held in August. “My position on Israel has been very, very consistent and clear. It’s not always popular, but it’s my view, and it won’t change,” the Premier said.

>>19037159 Donald Trump Jr. Faces Calls to Be Banned From Australia - Donald Trump Jr. is facing calls for his banning in Australia ahead of his upcoming tour there. Trump, the eldest son of the former president and a prominent conservative voice in his own right, will be headed Down Under for a three-city speaking tour presented by the nonprofit organization Turning Point Australia, with stops in Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane, from July 9 to 11. He is expected to be joined by former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage. Trump Jr.'s scheduled appearances have generated calls for the Australian government to block him from entering the country. His Australian critics have launched petitions to ban him from obtaining a visa to come into the country and have vowed to disrupt his speaking engagements. One Change.org petition, titled "Stop Donald Trump Jr getting an Australian Visa," has gained over 14,000 signatures.

>>19037218 Exercise Talisman Sabre 2023: Largest US amphibious assault ship USS America to dock in Brisbane - The largest amphibious assault ship in the US Navy’s Seventh Fleet is expected to arrive in Brisbane on Tuesday afternoon. It will be the second time in three years the USS America, which carries fighter jets and tiltrotor aircraft such as MV22-Ospreys, has visited Queensland, but only the first time it has been allowed to dock and its crew to come ashore. With US Marines from the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit on board, the warship is pulling in for a port call before heading off to participate in the 10th iteration of Australia’s largest bilateral combined military training activity with the US, Exercise Talisman Sabre 2023.

>>19044137 ‘A real head-scratcher’: Australia’s commitment to Ukraine questioned - The Australian government has been criticised for failing to send a minister to represent the nation at the Ukraine recovery conference taking place in London on Wednesday. Foreign Minister Penny Wong will skip the conference, instead opting to attend parliament and send a pre-recorded video message. “The Albanese government continues to send all of the wrong signals about Australia’s commitment to Ukraine,” Birmingham said. “It’s staggering that the Albanese government is a repeated ministerial no-show at important discussions about Ukraine’s future.”

>>19044166 Left-wing activists try to ban Trump Jr. from Australia ahead of speaking tour - Left-wing activists are pushing to derail Donald Trump Jr.’s planned speaking tour in Australia, and a petition to deny him a visa into the country has netted more than 17,000 signatures. Former President Trump’s eldest son is launching a three-city speaking tour of Sydney, Brisbane and Melbourne from July 9-11 that’s being held by Turning Point Australia, a sister organization of the American conservative group founded by Charlie Kirk. A Change.org page was launched in response calling for Trump Jr. to be blocked from even setting foot in Australia, which as of Tuesday morning has just over 17,200 supporters. "Donald Trump Jr is an illegal drug-taking bigoted person who should not be allowed to enter Australia for the purpose of earning himself and possibly his father any ‘Campaign Contributions’. Ban him from this country," wrote Kris Eriksen, the petition’s founder.

>>19044192 Amphibious assault ship ready for Talisman Sabre drills - The commander of a US Navy amphibious assault ship says he is "prepared" for attempts by other nations to seize maritime territory in the region. The USS America docked in the Port of Brisbane on Tuesday for a three-day visit ahead of the Talisman Sabre training exercise in northern Australia involving land combat, amphibious landings and air operations. The $A5 billion, 257-metre warship is crewed by 2000 sailors and marines and carries 20 aircraft including six F-35B Lightning II joint strike fighters with vertical take-off and landing capability.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188863

#30 - Part 11

Australian Politics and Society - Part 11

>>19044210 US sailors and Marines flock ashore as mega war ship USS America docks in Brisbane - Seeing koalas and kangaroos are high on the agenda for most of the crew of the USS America which arrived in Brisbane this week. The largest amphibious assault ship in the US Navy's Seventh Fleet docked to allow its 2500 embarked US Marines and sailors to enjoy a port visit before participating in Exercise Talisman Sabre 2023, Australia’s largest bilateral combined military training activity with the US. The 257m-long ship is designed to accommodate F-35B Lightning II Joint Strike Fighters and a combination of rescue, combat and support helicopters including MV22 Ospreys and CH-53E Super Stallions. US Marine Captain Erik Carlson, an F-35 pilot, said the Americans loved working with the Australian military. “We work with the Australians a lot and we love that relationship,” he said. “It’s good to have close friends down here.”

>>19044241 Video: American navy ship USS America arrives in Brisbane - Brisbane is about to be invaded by a large military force ready to take on the town. The massive navy vessel USS America is in Australia for vital training exercises, but first, its crew is coming ashore. - 7NEWS Australia

>>19044256 Video: Why this American warship has just docked in Brisbane - Queensland has thrown out the welcome mat to 2,000 US marines and navy sailors ready to explore Brisbane. The USS America is the largest amphibious warship in the US Navy's 7th fleet. It has sailed in for a port call before heading north to participate in the military exercise Talisman Sabre. - ABC News (Australia)

>>19051042 Australia issues Elon Musk's Twitter with a 'please explain' notice over surge in online hate - Elon Musk's social media platform Twitter has been issued with a demand from Australian authorities for information on what it is doing to tackle online hate. Australia's eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant said about one-third of the complaints her agency received about online hate involved content on Twitter, noting a surge in harmful posts since the Tesla chief bought the platform last year. Twitter has 28 days to comply with the "please explain" notice, or face fines of almost $700,000 for every day it misses the deadline.

>>19051054 Australia to Elon Musk: Explain how you’re dealing with hate on Twitter - Australia has ordered Twitter to explain what it is doing to tackle online hate, saying there had been a sharp increase in “toxicity and hate” since Elon Musk took over the company last year. Twitter could be fined as much as $475,000 a day if it doesn’t comply, under an online safety law that Australia touted as world-first when it was introduced in 2021. Julie Inman Grant, Australia’s eSafety commissioner and a former Twitter executive, said Thursday that she issued the notice after a “worrying surge of hate online” and specifically a sharp increase in reports of serious online abuse since Musk bought the company in October. - Frances Vinall - washingtonpost.com

>>19051106 Ukraine moves to become a cashless society in anti-corruption bid - Ukraine says it wants to make its economy cashless as soon as possible to stamp out corruption and secure the hundreds of billions of dollars from private investors that it will need to rebuild after the war. The plans follow the direct urging to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky by Australia’s richest man, Andrew “Twiggy” Forrest, who has unveiled a new investment fund for Ukraine’s reconstruction, kick-started with $US500 million ($735 million) paid for via his private company, Tattarang.

>>19051159 George Papadopoulos Tweet: The Australian “diplomat” who lied about me (the reason the sham crossfire investigation investigation went nowhere) also just happened to earmark $25 million to the Clinton foundation while he was Australia’s foreign minister. Are you catching on yet?

>>19058367 Russian Federation launches High Court action against decision to block new embassy in Canberra - The Russian Federation has officially launched legal action in the highest court in Australia as it challenges the government’s decision to block its plans for a new embassy in Canberra. Lawyers acting on behalf of Russian Ambassador Alexey Pavlovsky filed an injunction in the High Court on Friday afternoon against new laws that tore up the Kremlin’s lease for the proposed embassy site in Yarralumla. The Kremlin is challenging the new laws on constitutional grounds, arguing the commonwealth didn’t have just terms for terminating its lease, according to court documents.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188865

#30 - Part 12

Australian Politics and Society - Part 12

>>19058407 Germany invites Australia into elite ‘climate club’ - Australia will be invited to join a high-powered “climate club” for countries with ambitious emissions reductions goals when Prime Minister Anthony Albanese makes an expected visit to Berlin next month to meet with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz. Joining the German-led group would help Australia avoid potential European trade sanctions on countries that fail to take urgent action to tackle climate change. German ambassador to Australia Markus Ederer said the election of the Albanese government had opened up new opportunities for the countries to work together on low-emissions technologies and critical minerals exports. “With the arrival of a new government which is taking serious climate action, I think there’s a lot of convergence between our climate agendas,” he said.

>>19064520 Social media giants to face multimillion-dollar fines for spreading fake news - Social media giants will be hit with millions of dollars in fines if they repeatedly fail to remove disinformation and misinformation from their platforms under a major crackdown by the Albanese government. Communications Minister Michelle Rowland will on Sunday release draft legislation to give the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) powers to hold digital platforms to account for spreading harmful fake news. “Mis- and disinformation sows division within the community, undermines trust and can threaten public health and safety,” Rowland said. “The Albanese government is committed to keeping Australians safe online, and that includes ensuring the ACMA has the powers it needs to hold digital platforms to account for mis- and disinformation on their services.”

>>19064532 Air Force’s readiness chief sent into Home Affairs to fortify response to ‘cyber scumbags’ - The former head of the Royal Australian Air Force’s VIP operations and current air commander, Air Vice-Marshal Darren Goldie, will become the head of the National Office of Cyber Security and Australia’s cyber security coordinator within the Department of Home Affairs. The appointment is a major win for the military in the pecking order of Australia’s sprawling cyber estate. Under current cyber doctrine, the exfiltration and compromise of data and information from systems has largely been accepted as a norm of espionage and intelligence operations, while cyber attacks that seek to replicate kinetic attacks - such as destroying infrastructure or crashing planes - is largely interpreted as war-like. However, these boundaries are being pushed and tested by Russian-speaking actors who have created an extortion industry from ransomware attacks that both encrypt a target’s data and release it into the public domain.

>>19064564 Jacinta Allan, 12 members of the Australia Day Council of South Australia among those sanctioned by Russia - Several Australian businessmen, politicians, and journalists are now banned from visiting Russia in the latest sanctions imposed by the Russian Foreign Ministry. Russia has accused those named of being part of a "Russophobic campaign by the collective West". Victorian Deputy Premier Jacinta Allan is the most notable politician on the list, which also has South Australian Labor MP Dana Wortley and Liberal Jing Lee. In response, the deputy premier said her office continued to stand with the Ukrainian community. "We stand with the people of Ukraine and their families and friends during this difficult time," she said.

>>19064687 Video: Former FBI director James Comey speaks on Trump, the mob and his latest book - Former FBI director, James Comey, is a polarising figure in the United States for his role in the 2016 election. Long before that Comey had a storied career as a prosecutor of bullet-proof integrity, including years spent chasing mafia bosses in New York. Now, he's written a novel based on those battles with the Cosa Nostra. It's called Central Park West and he speaks to 7.30’s Sarah Ferguson.

>>19064687 https://qalerts.pub/?q=comey - https://qalerts.pub/?q=corney - https://qalerts.pub/?q=downer - https://qalerts.pub/?q=crossfire

>>19075444 High Court throws out Russia's bid to stop Australian government taking control of embassy site - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has welcomed the High Court's decision to reject a bid by Russia to prevent the Commonwealth from taking control of a site it leased for a new embassy. Earlier this month, the federal government rushed through legislation terminating Moscow's tenancy on land adjacent to Parliament House, citing a possible national security risk. This morning High Court Justice Jayne Jagot threw out Russia's bid for an injunction, which would have prevented the Commonwealth from entering the disputed land while any court action was underway. Mr Albanese urged the Russian government to heed the High Court's advice and leave the site.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188866

#30 - Part 13

Australian Politics and Society - Part 13

>>19075501 Australia pledges $110 million in military and humanitarian support for Ukraine's battle against Russia - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has announced another military support package for Ukraine worth $110 million. Australia will send a further 70 military vehicles to Ukraine, including 28 armoured vehicles. It will also send artillery ammunition to Ukraine, and provide $10 million to the United Nations to help meet humanitarian needs in the country in the wake of Russia's invasion. Australia has already supplied Ukraine with support worth more than $650 million, including through providing Bushmaster armoured personnel carriers, drones and ammunition. Mr Albanese denied Australia's extra support for Ukraine was in response to an aborted mutiny in Russia at the weekend. He said Australia had offered additional support for Ukraine around every four months.

>>19075550 ‘I never was a spy’: Space consultant denies she’s a national security risk - An Irish space industry consultant detained in Australia after ASIO advised she posed a national security risk had repeated contact with a suspected Russian intelligence officer. An investigation by this masthead has identified the suspected Russian spy who ASIO has alleged tasked Irish national Marina Sologub with sharing sensitive information she gained by working in the space industry, first in Europe and then in Australia. In an exclusive interview on 60 Minutes, Sologub responded to the allegations levelled at her privately by ASIO - which refused to comment on her case - that she had been liaising with a suspected Russian intelligence officer who was working under diplomatic cover in Ireland. The officer has left Dublin and now works as a Russian trade official in Serbia. “He never told me, ‘Marina, I’m Russian intelligence.’ He was the junior guy,” said Sologub, who arrived in Australia in 2020. “I never shared any information with him.” - Nick McKenzie - theage.com.au

>>19079344 Musk's Twitter Faces Millions In Fines After New 'Disinformation' Laws Released In Australia - Elon Musk’s Twitter and other social media giants face the prospect of billions in fines after the Australian government released new laws targeting “misinformation and disinformation.” Following a months-long process, Communications Minister Michelle Rowland released the draft legislation that will grant the country’s media regulatory body, the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), greater powers to stamp out harmful content online.

>>19082405 Taiwan frustrated by Australia’s decade-long trade snub over fears of China - Taiwan’s government is frustrated by Australia’s refusal to begin trade talks, as Anthony Albanese’s China trip becomes the latest in a litany of reasons given for Canberra’s decade-long snub of its fifth biggest trading partner. Taiwanese Foreign Minister Joseph Wu said that before President Tsai Ing-wen’s government was elected in 2016, it was told Australia wanted to sign a free-trade agreement with all of its major trading partners.

>>19094098 Corruption inquiry in Australia uncovers China links to state lawmaker - The former premier of Australia's most populous state engaged in corrupt conduct involving another lawmaker with whom she was in a secret romantic relationship, a years-long corruption inquiry that examined business dealings with China said on Thursday. The New South Wales Independent Commission into Corruption (ICAC) said in a report that Gladys Berejiklian had failed to notify the commission of her concerns that Daryl Maguire, a member of the state assembly with whom she was in a relationship during her term of office, may have engaged in corrupt conduct, and this undermined the ministerial code.

>>19103525 ‘Really angry’: Jacinda Ardern’s tensions with Scott Morrison revealed - New Zealand’s High Commissioner to Australia has revealed the simmering tensions between Jacinda Ardern and the Morrison government over migration policies, saying the NZ Prime Minister at one point became “really angry” with Scott Morrison. In an interview with AAP ahead of her retirement in December, Annette King said the 501 deportation policy - under which Australia deported NZ criminals even if they had never lived in NZ – was a particular bone of contention. In 2020 Dame Jacinda confronted then PM Morrison over the policy, telling him in front of reporters: “Do not deport your people and your problems”. “It certainly upset the Morrison government … the previous government was angry with her for raising it (even though) she had already warned that she would,” Dame Annette said. “She berated ScoMo on his treatment of New Zealanders. It was a really important signal back home to New Zealand.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188867

#30 - Part 14

Australian Politics and Society - Part 14

>>19103648 Nazi salute banned in Tasmania in an Australian first - Tasmania has become the first state to ban the Nazi salute, with six months jail for repeat offenders, in a move hailed by Jewish leaders but criticised by some free speech advocates. The landmark legislation, similar to that foreshadowed in Victoria amid a national debate on how to tackle Neo-Nazism, was passed by Tasmania’s upper house on Thursday night. “Nazis will not have a refuge here in Tasmania, and this sends a very clear message that Nazi symbols and salutes are not welcome in Tasmania,” said Attorney-General Elise Archer.

>>19104379 Labor Left to push Anthony Albanese on free abortions and to close Nauru - Anthony Albanese will be urged to provide free abortions across Australia, end offshore processing and close Nauru at Labor’s upcoming national conference, as the party membership pushes to government to adopt a more left-wing agenda. The Australian can reveal the motions that will be put up by Labor for Refugees and the influential women’s group Emily’s List, which is co-convened by NSW Left faction MP Sharon Claydon. With the Prime Minister reluctant to pursue abortion reform after the issue hurt Labor with faith communities in the 2019 election, Emily’s List will call for the ACT model of free abortions to be implemented nationally.

>>19104403 Video: Is she or isn't she a spy? The mother accused of working for Russia - The murky business of espionage usually exists in the shadows. But not this week on 60 MINUTES. In an intriguing and at times robust encounter, Tara Brown interviews a woman our spy agency, ASIO, claims is an agent tasked by Russia to gather sensitive information. Her name is Marina Sologub, and up until earlier this year she’d been living and working in Adelaide for three years. Now she’s in immigration detention waiting to be kicked out of the country. As Brown reports, cases like this would normally be kept top secret, but quite remarkably a very bold Sologub is refusing to go quietly, denying accusations she’s a spy, and vowing to fight her deportation to the bitter end.

>>19104595 Talisman Sabre Facebook Post - TS23 - Message from Exercise Directors - “An important part of a significant military exercise like Talisman Sabre are the planning events that are required to train together in dynamic situations across an area as large as northern Australia.” Hear from the Director of Exercise Talisman Sabre, Brigadier Damian Hill, as he shares more about the deep planning that goes into #TalismanSabre2023. This year, more than a dozen nations personnel are set to take part in the Australia-United States-led bilateral exercise. Partner Nations Fiji, France, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Tonga, United Kingdom, Canada, Germany and Indonesia will work together to enhance interoperability and strengthen key strategic partnerships.

>>19105135 OPINION: Anti-democrat Donald Trump Jr should not be allowed into Australia - "Donald Trump Jr, the eldest son of disgraced former US president Don­ald Trump and executive vice-president of The Trump Organisation, will be in Australia for a promotional tour speaking at events in Sydney on July 8 and continuing to Brisbane and Melbourne. But Trump should not be granted a visa to enter Australia because he fails multiple character test requirements under the Migration Act. Trump is an anti-democrat who encouraged the overturning of an election. He is a conspiracy theorist who spread misinformation about the Covid-19 pandemic. And he leads an organisation found guilty of tax fraud and document falsification. It is completely unacceptable to allow Trump Jr to come to Australia to give voice to the undermining of democratic elections, disrespecting the rule of law, denigrating people based on their race, religion or sexuality, and provoking political unrest. He has done all of these things and will do so in Australia, in search of a willing antipodean MAGA audience. The Migration Act is clear that if there is a risk the person entering Australia would vilify segments of the Australian community, harass or intimidate people, or “incite discord” with their views, then they should be denied entry on character grounds. There is plenty of evidence that this is what Trump Jr plans to do in Australia." - Troy Bramston, senior writer and columnist with The Australian - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188868

#30 - Part 15

Australian Politics and Society - Part 15

>>19109666 Video: Ukraine ambassador asks Foreign Minister Penny Wong to visit Kyiv amid calls for more weaponry - Ukraine's ambassador to Australia has made a public invitation for Foreign Minister Penny Wong to visit the besieged capital Kyiv and gain a fresh perspective on the conflict. Ambassador Vasyl Myroshnychenko told ABC Insiders he wanted Senator Wong to see the war for herself, as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese did in July last year. "When you visit it gives you a different angle," Mr Myroshnychenko said. "It gives you a bit of hands-on, I mean I've seen it with your prime minister, I was there on that trip … we were able to hear the stories out there, shared [by] people under the Russian occupation."

>>19114971 Defence, NT government strike deal to house Australian, international military personnel at Darwin's Howard Springs facility - The Northern Territory facility that gained national prominence as the "gold standard" for quarantine during the COVID-19 pandemic will house thousands of troops from both Australia and overseas under a new lease agreement struck by the federal and NT governments. Under the deal, which is effective immediately, the 3,500 bed Howard Springs centre on the outskirts of Darwin will be converted to a defence accommodation precinct for housing Australian and international defence personnel.

>>19114980 Telstra partners with Elon Musk’s Starlink - Telstra has signed an agreement to become the first telco globally to offer rural broadband and voice services with Elon Musk’s satellite provider Starlink. Expected to launch in late 2023 with pricing to be confirmed, Telstra chief executive Vicki Brady said the offering would provide additional connectivity options for people and businesses where distance and terrain made it difficult to reach with existing networks. Starlink, a low earth orbit satellite system owned by Elon Musk’s SpaceX, was launched in Australia in 2021 and offers unlimited data for $139 per month along with a hardware fee of about $900. Its speeds are similar to that of NBN’s 100Mbps plans.

>>19115008 Australian firm sues Twitter for $665,000 for not paying bills - An Australian project management firm has filed a lawsuit against Twitter Inc in a U.S. court seeking cumulative payments of about A$1 million ($665,000) over alleged non-payment of bills for work done in four countries, court filings showed. Sydney-based private company Facilitate Corp on June 29 filed the suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District Of California claiming breach of contract over Twitter's failure to pay its invoices. Facilitate said from 2022 through early 2023, it installed sensors in Twitter's offices in London and Dublin, completed an office fit-out in Singapore, and cleared an office in Sydney. For those works, Twitter owed the company about 203,000 pounds, S$546,600 and A$61,300, respectively, Facilitate said.

>>19120629 Visa extension, climate finance agreements as Indonesian President Joko Widodo visits Sydney - Australia will ease some visa rules for Indonesians visiting the country, as part of a series of agreements struck during President Joko Widodo's visit to Sydney. The head of state met with business and political leaders today, in what is expected to be his last visit as president as he nears the end of a second and final term in office. Following bilateral talks, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced Indonesians will have immediate access to an extended visa from three to five years.

>>19120663 Talisman Sabre Facebook Post - Video: We are counting down the days to the start of #TalismanSabre2023! #TS23 is the largest bilateral military training exercise between Australia and the United States. This year, 12 other nations will take part in the exercise which will take place across the top end of Australia. Stay tuned for more announcements as the countdown begins!

>>19132052 Donald Trump Jr’s Australian speaking tour delayed, promoter says - A speaking tour from the son of the former US president Donald Trump has been delayed, the tour promoter announced on Wednesday. Donald Trump Jr was to speak at events in Sydney, Brisbane and Melbourne, kicking off this Sunday. However Turning Point Australia announced on Wednesday that “due to unforeseen circumstances” the appearances would be postponed. “Ticket holders are urged to hold onto their tickets, with details of the rescheduled date to be confirmed in the coming days,” the announcement said. “Ticket holders will be contacted directly … with details.” In a Facebook post on Wednesday, Turning Point Australia wrote, “It seems America isn’t the only country that makes it difficult for the Trumps. “Hold onto your tickets, this is a short delay nothing more #CancelCulture. “Apologies for any inconveniences especially those who had long travel plans.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188869

#30 - Part 16

Australian Politics and Society - Part 16

>>19132058 Donald Trump jnr cancels anti-cancel culture tour amid visa doubts - "Donald Trump’s eldest son has cancelled a planned speaking tour of Australia just days before he was due to arrive in the country amid doubts over whether the Albanese government would grant him a visa. Donald Trump jnr was scheduled to make appearances in Sydney, Brisbane and Melbourne between July 9 and July 11, but organisers abruptly announced on Wednesday afternoon that the “landmark” tour had been postponed “due to unforeseen circumstances”. “Ticket holders are urged to hold on to their tickets, with details of the rescheduled date to be confirmed in the coming days,” event organiser Turning Point Australia said in a statement posted to the tour website. Some commentators, including former Labor speechwriter and The Australian columnist Troy Bramston, had called for Trump jnr’s visa to be cancelled on character grounds because of his role in promoting misinformation about voter fraud in the 2020 US presidential election and the COVID-19 pandemic. A change.org petition calling for Trump jnr to be denied a visa to Australia had attracted 21,725 signatures." - Matthew Knott - theage.com.au

>>19132063 Clare O’Neil forced to delete tweet calling Donald Trump Jr ‘big baby’ - Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil has been forced to delete a tweet in which she attacked the son of former US President Donald Trump as a “sore loser” and “just a big baby, who isn’t very popular” after the Prime Minister’s Office intervened and directed her to take it down. Turning Point Australia, the organisers for the tour, announced on Wednesday that the speaking engagements in Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane would be postponed due to unforeseen circumstances. The touring company released a statement detailing the postponement was due to a “the delay in the arrival of a visa for Donald Trump Jr to enter Australia.” Ms O’Neil on Thursday took to Twitter to respond to the claims and remained firm that the eldest son of former US president Donald Trump was granted a visa. “Geez, Donald Trump Jr is a bit of a sore loser. His dad lost an election fair and square - but he says it was stolen,” she wrote. “Now he’s trying to blame the Australian Government for his poor ticket sales and cancelled tour. Donald Trump Jr has been given a visa to come to Australia. “He didn’t get cancelled. He’s just a big baby, who isn’t very popular.” Immigration Minister Andrew Giles backed the comments, suggesting the tour was cancelled due to ticket sales.

>>19132069 Clare O’Neil calls Donald Trump Jr a ‘big baby’ in deleted tweets - Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil has been accused of childishness for calling Donald Trump’s eldest son a “sore loser” and a “big baby, who isn’t very popular” in a since-deleted series of posts on Twitter. In two tweets sent on Thursday morning, O’Neil said: “Geez, Donald Trump Jr is a bit of a sore loser. “His dad lost an election fair and square - but he says it was stolen. “Now he’s trying to blame the Australian government for his poor ticket sales and cancelled tour.” O’Neil, who has cabinet responsibility for immigration, continued: “Donald Trump Jr has been given a visa to come to Australia. He didn’t get cancelled. He’s just a big baby, who isn’t very popular.” She later deleted the tweets. Opposition home affairs spokesman James Paterson reposted the deleted tweets and said: “It’s good to see these childish tweets have now been deleted. “The minister should leave the woke tweets to Labor backbenchers and get back to focusing on the serious national security challenges facing Australia.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188870

#30 - Part 17

Australian Politics and Society - Part 17

>>19139080 Gender-sceptic doctor launches human rights challenge to ‘cheerleading’ trans pronouns policy - A doctor’s right to object on medical grounds to the unquestioning affirmation of children as the opposite gender faces a human rights test in Queensland, with a suspended psychiatrist filing a complaint against the state’s children’s hospital over transgender health policies. Jillian Spencer alleges she was prevented from adopting a neutral therapeutic approach and instead forced to comply with gender-­affirming polices that risked causing substantial harm to young ­people, during the course of her employment as a senior staff specialist in the consultation liaison psychiatry team at the Queensland Children’s Hospital. In a complaint lodged with the Queensland Human Rights ­Commission, Dr Spencer, who is openly critical of gender-affirming policies, reveals that she was subject to lawful employment directions that required her to use gender-­affirming pronouns at all times in her practise of medicine and ­refrain from dissuading any child and their family from seeking a ­referral to the hospital’s children’s gender clinic, which frequently prescribes puberty blockers and cross sex hormones to young teenagers.

>>19139143 Endocrinologists’ challenge to the medical transition of gender-questioning children silenced by medical college - The medical affairs committee of the nation’s peak endocrinology society opposed the prescription of hormones to children and expressed deep reservations over the lack of evidence underpinning transgender affirmative medicine standards of care adopted by children’s hospitals in explosive advice to a peak medical college. The Medical Affairs Committee of the Endocrine Society of Australia - a subspecialty college of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians – did not support the endorsement of gender-affirmative standards of care developed by influential doctors at the Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne, pointing to concerns about the lack of evidence behind practices including placing children on puberty blockers at a very young age. The views of the ESA’s medical affairs committee are contained in a letter to the RACP, which in late 2019 was consulting the profession at the request of then health minister Greg Hunt who had requested advice on the treatment of gender dysphoria in children and adolescents.

>>19139214 Slapdown for ‘big baby’ Donald Trump Jr tweet by Clare O’Neil - Anthony Albanese’s office has stepped in and directed a senior cabinet minister to delete a tweet attacking Donald Trump and his son, with foreign policy experts describing the incident as a diplomatic “own goal”. Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil accused Donald Trump Jr of attempting to blame the Albanese government for delays in his Australia tour, calling him a “sore loser” and a “big baby”. She also attacked the former US president over his election fraud claims, saying he “lost an election fair and square”. The Australian understands Ms O’Neil deleted the tweets at the direction of the Prime Minister’s office. Strategic Analysis Australia director Michael Shoebridge said Ms O’Neil’s comments were “an unnecessary own goal” that lacked foresight given Mr Trump may be the Republican nominee for the White House at next year’s election. Mr Shoebridge said the election of Mr Trump for a second term was “absolutely a credible scenario”.

>>19139383 EXCLUSIVE: Donald Trump Jr accuses Labor of 'lying' about why he cancelled his tour - and suggests a sinister reason for delaying his visa: 'They want to shut down conservative voices' - Donald Trump Junior has hit back at 'lies' from the Government about why he postponed his tour at the last minute - and suggested Labor delayed approving his visa because they want to shut down conservative voices. Trump Jr. confirmed he'd already sold 8,000 tickets to his speaking tour before it was cancelled at the last minute - and called Home Affairs Minister Clare O'Neil a 'coward' after she risked escalating the matter into a full-blown diplomatic crisis between the U.S. and Australia after posting a series of juvenile Tweets. The Prime Minister's Office ordered O'Neil to delete a series of Tweets in which she called Trump Jr. a 'sore loser and a big baby' - and claiming the reason he cancelled his tour was because of 'poor ticket sales' rather than visa delays. Trump Jr. exclusively told Daily Mail Australia her comments were 'ridiculous lies' and perpetuated 'fake news' - as he blamed the Labor Government for his decision to postpone the tour. 'The tyrannical Left doesn't believe people have the right to freedom of expression and will do anything to shutdown conservative voices, but we will not bow down to them,' he said.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188871

#30 - Part 18

Australian Politics and Society - Part 18

>>19148913 Ex-Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage says Clare O’Neil’s tweets criticising Trumps were ‘utterly stupid’ - Former Brexit Party leader and British broadcaster Nigel Farage has questioned the calibre of cabinet ministers in Australia following the social media furore that erupted after Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil posted multiple tweets attacking Donald Trump and his son. Mr Farage said the minister’s comments on social media were “utterly stupid” and it “looked comical, it’s so bad it’s funny”. Mr Farage, a presenter at conservative British news channel GB News, also criticised Australia’s cancel culture after a change.org petition drew more than 22,000 signatures calling for Mr Trump Jr to be stopped from getting an Australian visa. “That’s the embodiment of cancel culture, it’s not only disagreeing with what you have to say or what I think you are going to say, it’s saying I don’t think you’ve got the right to say it,” Mr Farage said. “It really worries me that we have young activist students who don’t seem to be taught in the western world anymore what critical thinking is.”

>>19148947 Trump promises to lift the shroud on JFK murder, releasing all classified documents - Donald Trump has promised to release all the remaining top secret documents surrounding former president John F Kennedy’s assassination, after Joe Biden for the third year in a row refused to release a remaining fraction of them. Former president Trump, the front runner for the Republican party’s 2024 presidential nomination, said he would “declassify and unseal all JFK assassination related documents”, despite himself having withheld their release during his presidency. “It‘s been 60 years, time for the American people to know the TRUTH!” Mr Trump said on his social media platform Truth.

>>19154732 Keating’s swipe at NATO leader Jens Stoltenberg as Albanese flies to Lithuania for summit - Paul Keating has savaged NATO secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg as a “supreme fool” and claimed the military alliance had impeded peace since the Cold War, causing a diplomatic headache for Anthony Albanese ahead of his attendance at the summit of North American and European leaders. With the Prime Minister invited to the summit in Lithuania as part of a grouping of Indo-Pacific guests, Mr Keating signalled his opposition to Australia’s attendance by declaring NATO had no business expanding its footprint into Asia. In a statement released on Sunday, Mr Keating said it was a mistake for Mr Stoltenberg and NATO nations to compare China with Russia. “Stoltenberg, in his jaundiced view, overlooks the fact that China represents 20 per cent of humanity and now possesses the largest economy in the world,” Mr Keating said. “And has no record of attacking other states, unlike the United States, whose bidding Stoltenberg is happy to do.”

>>19154748 Anthony Albanese calls NATO chief a 'friend of Australia' after Paul Keating's 'supreme fool' comment - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has described the head of NATO as a "friend" of Australia's while trying to distance himself from former prime minister Paul Keating who labelled the secretary-general a "complete fool". Last night Mr Keating issued a statement that slammed NATO's planned expansion into Asia, warning it could bring the "militarism of Europe" into the region. "Exporting that malicious poison to Asia would be akin to Asia welcoming the plague on itself," Mr Keating wrote. He went on to describe NATO secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg as a "supreme fool". "Stoltenberg by instinct and by policy is simply an accident on its way to happen," he said.

>>19154758 Anthony Albanese agrees $1bn defence deal with Germany - Anthony Albanese has announced an export deal with Germany for more than 100 Boxer heavy weapon carriers, worth more than $1bn to the Australian economy. On arrival in Berlin where he will meet with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz later today (AEST). the Prime Minister said the two countries were ready to announce a series of deals including that involving the Boxers. These will be produced by the German company Rheinmetall in Redbank, Queensland, which employs 1000 people. Mr Albanese said: “This will be one of our largest ever exports, it will guarantee the 1000 jobs there in Queensland will go into the future and it’s worth in excess of $1bn to the Australian economy. “This will boost our sovereignty, increase our defence capability and boost our economy. This is a great outcome, the first outcome of quite a few ready to announce tomorrow with our friends here in Germany and I thank Chancellor Scholtz for his very kind invitation to come here to commemorate these agreements we will enter into.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188872

#30 - Part 19

Australian Politics and Society - Part 19

>>19154790 German troops join US in Australian war games - Hundreds of German troops will arrive in Australia this week and join with the United States and 11 other nations in extensive military exercises as a part of a “productive relationship that we are developing with our German friends” to boost defence in the Indo-Pacific. The German military will take part in the comprehensive exercise, called Exercise Talisman Sabre, in Jervis Bay, NSW, Darwin and across Queensland alongside troops from Fiji, France, Indonesia, Japan, Republic of Korea, New Zealand Papua New Guinea, Tonga, the United Kingdom and Canada. As well, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand will be observers. Talisman Sabre is to test planning and conducting combined and joint military operations to improve combat readiness and interoperability between Australian and United States’ forces and other partner nations.

>>19154951 Plastic surgeons call for age limit as young teenagers line up for ‘top surgery’ - Leading surgeons are calling for the national medical regulator to step in to set “clear and specific guidelines” on gender-affirming surgery, including consideration of whether the age at which transgender adolescents are ­legally allowed to go under the knife should be raised to 18. Australia is one of the most liberal countries in the world in sanctioning children under 18 to get double mastectomies, a practice that is rare but appears to be increasing despite only a handful of surgeons around the country being willing to perform such procedures. The case of a 15-year old child in Queensland having “top surgery” has prompted Mark Ashton, a plastic surgery specialty elected counsellor to the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons and Melbourne University professor of surgery, to question the lack of regulations.

>>19160207 NATO summit: Australian eyes in the sky join fight for Ukraine - Australia will send one of its most sophisticated surveillance planes - the Royal Australian Air Force E-7A Wedgetail aircraft – to Europe for six months to help protect key wartime logistics hubs, in a significant step up of assistance to Ukraine. The deployment of the Wedgetail will help protect the uninterrupted delivery of key military and humanitarian assets into Ukraine via Poland and other neighbouring countries. As many as 100 Australian military personnel will be based in Germany, from where the plane will operate, for the six months to fly and service it. The Australian government said in a statement: “Along with ongoing military and humanitarian assistance support, this ­deployment reinforces that Australia remains a key partner in international endeavours to assist Ukraine repel Russia’s illegal and immoral attack. This deployment will help to ensure the continued and uninterrupted flow of military and ­humanitarian assistance into Ukraine.”

>>19160241 Video: Major changes to abortion access as all doctors and nurse practitioners can prescribe - All doctors and nurse practitioners will be able to prescribe the pregnancy termination pills, and all pharmacies can stock it as new rules are brought in. Until now, prescribers and dispensers of the two-part medical abortion treatment needed extra certification or registration, meaning only about 10 per cent of doctors and 30 per cent of pharmacists are currently able to deal with the pill. But from August 1, restrictions around 'MS-2 Step' will be removed, in a move the government says will “improve equitable access to healthcare for all Australians”. Nurse practitioners - who represent about one per cent of nurses – will also be able to prescribe the medications under the PBS. The changes follow an application from MS Health to the Therapeutic Goods Administration. The pill, known as RU486 overseas, was first registered by the TGA a decade ago for use on pregnant women up to nine weeks gestation. Assistant Health Minister Ged Kearney said it was a “very safe, very practical move” that met global guidelines.

>>19160276 What is abortion drug mifepristone MS 2-Step and who will be able to prescribe it under new access rules in Australia? - Major changes to abortion access in Australia will take effect from August 1, with all doctors and nurse practitioners to be authorised to prescribe them. Here’s everything you need to know: What is the abortion pill MS-2 Step? - When do the abortion pill changes take effect? - Who has prescribed abortion pills up until now? - How much do abortion drugs cost? - What is MS Health? - What has been the government’s response?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188874

#30 - Part 20

Australian Politics and Society - Part 20

>>19160276 Q Post #3405 - Reality is hard to swallow. Do you know the market price for a fetus? Correlation of market price & days old of fetus/baby? As age (days) increases so does the value? D's block 'born alive' bill? Planned Parenthood political donations? What party? Do you believe this has anything to do w/ a Woman's Right to Choose? Welcome to the Real World. Q - https://qanon.pub/#3405

>>19165867 Anthony Albanese gives Volodymyr Zelensky 30 more Bushmasters at NATO summit in Lithuania - Anthony Albanese will give Ukraine an extra 30 Bushmasters after telling Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that Australia “will remain with you for as long as this takes for you to restore your sovereignty and repel this brutal invasion’’. Meeting the war-torn country’s leader for a second time, the Prime Minister said providing the latest batch of Bushmasters would bring the tally of the vehicles being used by grateful Ukrainian soldiers to 120. So far, the federal government has provided military assistance of more than $710m, with total support, including humanitarian aid, at $890m. Mr Zelensky told Mr Albanese: “Australia stands shoulder to shoulder with our people and we appreciate that support.”

#30 - Part 21

Coronavirus / COVID-19 Pandemic, Australia and Worldwide - Part 1

>>18965947 British cardiologist calls for mRNA vaccines to be suspended due to heart risks - A controversial British cardiologist has called for the Pfizer and Moderna Covid shots to be suspended in Australia until the risk of heart complications is better understood, saying prior vaccines “have been pulled for much less”. Dr Aseem Malhotra, who has emerged as one of the most high-profile figures in the anti-vaccine movement and is currently in Australia on a speaking tour, said it was a “no-brainer” and accused the medicines regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), of ignoring the clear safety signal from its own reporting system once the rollout was well under way. “People can be forgiving if new information comes in, we know people make mistakes - but once you get that information back, them not acting on it … the problem is the cover-up is worse than the crime,” he said.

>>18977760 Victoria health chief Brett Sutton resigns after leading state Covid response - The man behind Victoria’s controversial Covid response which saw much of the state shuttered for months has resigned. Chief health officer Brett Sutton announced he would be stepping down as the state’s health czar after more than three years in the top role. Mr Sutton joined the Health Department in 2011, before leading the state’s response to the Covid pandemic from late-2019. Victoria was subjected to some of the largest Covid waves throughout the pandemic, with six lockdown measures being implemented. While widely seen as being instrumental in curbing Covid cases, tight lockdown laws drew criticism throughout Mr Sutton’s tenure. Victorian Premier Dan Andrews defended the state’s response late-last year, stating the pandemic presented “difficult decisions” for leaders. “These decisions were not made lightly, and they were the subject of debate and discussion and very careful consideration,” Mr Andrews said.

>>19011116 Wuhan Institute of Virology scientists the first to be sickened by Covid-19 - "Three Wuhan scientists toying with the closest relatives of SARS-CoV-2 were the first to contract Covid-19, as evidence the virus came from a lab leak rather than a live animal trade market grows. An investigation by journalists Michael Shellenberger and Matt Taibbi published on the Substack newsletter Public reported that Wuhan Institute of Virology researchers Ben Hu, Ping Yu and Yan Zhu were identified as “patients zero” of the virus by US government sources. They were involved in “gain-of-function” research on SARS-like coronaviruses. The investigation confirms the three WIV members were directly in the lab and were involved in collecting and experimenting with viruses and fell sick in late 2019. Mr Hu, who led WIV’s gain-of-function research, is believed to be a close contact of Shi Zhengli, the Chinese virologist who focuses on coronaviruses of bat origin." - Tricia Rivera - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188875

#30 - Part 22

Coronavirus / COVID-19 Pandemic, Australia and Worldwide - Part 2

>>19011137 Wuhan scientist Ben Hu, Covid’s ‘patient zero’, an explosive development in pandemic origin story - "Three unknown Chinese scientists working inside the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s coronavirus unit fell sick with Covid-like symptoms around November 2019. One of them, a relatively junior scientist, had started a new project earlier that year that was examining whether two new bat coronaviruses could infect humans. Just months into his experiments, that involved risky gain-of-function research, that can make viruses more transmissible and more virulent to humans, he fell sick, along with two of his colleagues. The names of the three scientists who fell ill with Covid-like symptoms have been published by overseas independent media outlets called Public and Racket. Those scientists are Ben Hu, Yu Ping and Yan Zhu. This is as close as we’ve come to explosive intelligence about patient zero. The United States, British and Australian governments should demand answers from China about whether these experiments at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, funded by Beijing, did in fact lead to the creation and spread of Covid-19." - Sharri Markson - theaustralian.com.au

>>19099510 Brett Sutton announced as Victorian of the Year - Victoria’s outgoing chief health officer professor Brett Sutton has been declared Victorian of the year. Dr Sutton, who recently announced he would leave the state’s Department of Health after 10 years and resign as CHO after four years in the job, accepted the gong in a Victoria Day Council Awards ceremony at Melbourne Town Hall on Friday. Dr Sutton was a controversial figure during the Covid-19 pandemic, when his health advice allowed Premier Daniel Andrews to impose curfews, playground bans and 262 days of lockdown. The Covid-19 rules lead to Melbourne being crowned the most locked down city in the world, along with other restrictions that included travel limits and homeschooling children. “It was a privilege to steward Victorians though very very choppy waters … the crisis of a lifetime. It was an achievement not of mine but of the people of Victoria,” Seven News reported Dr Sutton said.

#30 - Part 23

Julian Assange Indictment and Extradition - Part 1

>>18934224 FBI restarts Julian Assange probe despite hopes of release - United States law enforcement authorities are seeking to gather new evidence about Julian Assange in an apparent effort to bolster their case against the WikiLeaks founder, even as hopes rise among his supporters that a diplomatic breakthrough could soon see him released from prison. The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age can reveal that agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) last week sought to interview acclaimed novelist Andrew O’Hagan about his time working as a ghostwriter on Assange’s autobiography over a decade ago. Assange’s brother Gabriel Shipton said it appeared US prosecutors were trying to prepare a new indictment or a superseding indictment against Assange. “It shows they understand how weak the charges against Julian are and are trying to strengthen them,” he said.

>>18934231 Australia 'not aware' of fresh FBI probe into Assange - Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus was not contacted about a new FBI probe into WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange. US authorities are reportedly trying to gather new evidence against Mr Assange, and have requested to interview novelist Andrew O'Hagan about his previous work as a ghostwriter on the Australian's autobiography. Asked if he was aware of a new investigation, Mr Dreyfus said he was not until he read reports about it on Thursday morning. "Our position has been very clear for a long time now that this matter has gone on for too long, and that remains our position," he told ABC Radio. "We're doing everything we can to make sure that it's brought to an end."

>>18977745 Julian Assange will fight UK High Court decision in last legal option against extradition to the US - Australian Julian Assange will fight to overturn a United Kingdom High Court ruling that rejected his appeal against extradition to the United States. The 51-year-old WikiLeaks founder is wanted in the US for espionage, where he faces 18 charges related to publishing of tens of thousands of military and diplomatic documents. Mr Assange last year lodged an appeal in the United Kingdom's High Court after the UK government signed an order authorising his extradition to the US. The court rejected his appeal in a three-page written decision from Justice Jonathan Swift issued this week. The latest High Court decision means the WikiLeaks founder is "dangerously close" to being extradited to the US, according to Reporters Without Borders (RSF).

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188876

#30 - Part 24

Julian Assange Indictment and Extradition - Part 2

>>19099473 Pope Francis meets family of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange - Pope Francis on Friday granted an audience to the wife of Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks who is behind bars in Britain and battling extradition to the United States. "The Holy Father has received in audience Mrs. Stella Assange, with family members," a Vatican statement said, with no further details. Stella Assange tweeted that her family was "overwhelmed" by the private audience, with a photo of herself dressed in black in St. Peter's Square and the hashtag #FreeAssangeNOW. She is fronting the campaign to have her husband released, but the Vatican did not say if this was discussed in the meeting or if Francis expressed any support for it. A Vatican spokesman said papal audiences are private affairs.

>>19104294 Pope meets with wife and family of Julian Assange, who says pontiff ‘concerned’ by his suffering - Pope Francis met with imprisoned WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange’s wife Stella, who said the pope’s gesture in receiving her was evidence of his “ongoing show of support for our family’s plight” and concern over her husband’s suffering. The Vatican didn’t release any details of the private audience, other than to confirm that it happened. The Argentine Jesuit pope has long expressed solidarity with prisoners, frequently visiting detainees on his foreign visits and prioritizing prison ministry when he was archbishop in Buenos Aires. The visit came as Stella Assange has been seeking to drum up political support for her husband’s cause, including a visit to his native Australia last month. She said there was a growing consensus that his continued detention was inhumane. Citing Australia’s intervention, human rights organizations and press freedom organizations, she said there was growing consensus that “what is being done to my husband is inhumane, that he is suffering, that he’s been in prison for four years for publishing true information revealing the killing of innocents and criminality and injustice.”

>>19160178 Julian Assange’s wife coy on plea deal: ‘The priority is for him to be freed’ - Julian Assange’s wife and chief campaigner, Stella Assange, has not ruled out her husband taking a plea deal to obtain his freedom, but said their priority remains convincing US President Joe Biden to drop the case against the WikiLeaks founder. The election of Biden to the White House and Anthony Albanese in Australia had sparked hopes among Assange’s supporters that the case, being prosecuted by the independent Department of Justice, could be abandoned. However, despite Albanese’s direct lobbying to Biden, this has not eventuated and in May, the prime minister said Assange himself needed to be part of the solution to resolve his case, signalling that the 52-year-old may have to accept a plea deal to obtain freedom. Asked if that was something they were considering, Stella Assange did not rule out the possibility but argued that the case should be dropped. “The priority is for him to be freed. Julian could have a catastrophic health incident any moment and he has been in a high-security prison for four years and three months and this is indefinite. The priority here is for all the people who are involved, and this is a political case that involves the Australian government, to come together and find a solution to free him.”

>>19165628 Julian Assange’s wife in clemency plea to Joe Biden - The wife of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who is petitioning the British government’s decision to extradite him to the US, has appealed for clemency to President Joe Biden. The Australian publisher is the object of a US extradition request to face trial for divulging US military secrets about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. “Biden could end this any time. It’s not in the administration’s interests for Julian to be tried during an election period,” Stella Assange said while speaking to the Geneva Press Club. “The smart thing” for Mr Biden to do “would be to just stop it and end it.” The issue of the extradition was “a Trump-era legacy” and represented “a threat” for democracy and the press, she said.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188877

#30 - Part 25

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 1

>>18928680 Brittany Higgins is the wrong face for #MeToo - "With the board of inquiry into its third week of public hearings, it is becoming increasingly clear that Higgins is, and was, the wrong face for the #MeToo movement. Decisions by her, and those around her, to air her allegation in the media have undermined key features of our criminal justice system. Higgins, of course, has every right to go to the media first and police second. That was her strategy from the start. But that strategy, bolstered daily by her media supporters, came at a high cost to the police investigation, to the workings of the Office of the DPP, to the trial in the ACT Supreme Court and to subsequent events." - Janet Albrechtsen - theaustralian.com.au

>>18939581 Bruce Lehrmann discontinues defamation action against News Life Media - Bruce Lehrmann has discontinued his defamation action against News Life Media and news.com.au’s national political editor Samantha Maiden. Mr Lehrmann and News have reached an out-of-court settlement. News.com.au editor-in-chief Lisa Muxworthy said the two articles at the centre of the dispute remain online and have been updated with an editorial note. There is no apology or correction.

>>18939595 Sofronoff inquiry hears Heidi Yates knew of Higgins’s claim before it went public - Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates knew about Brittany Higgins’s sexual assault allegation a month before the former Liberal staffer publicly claimed that Bruce Lehrmann raped her inside Parliament House. And within three days of meeting Ms Higgins, Ms Yates was accompanying her to meetings with Anthony Albanese and Scott Morrison. Board chairman Walter Sofronoff KC is considering whether the Victims of Crime Commissioner acted in accordance with her relevant statutory framework in terms of the support she provided to Ms Higgins. During examination, Ms Yates defended her decision to be “the public face of support” for Ms Higgins by walking into the ACT Supreme Court, past a media pack, with her each day, despite its propensity to affect the accused’s presumption of innocence. Mr Sofronoff said by doing so, Ms Yates had decided to “really be the public face of that support”.

>>18939617 Victims of Crime Commissioner reveals ‘sensitive’ details about Brittany Higgins’ mental health - Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates has given harrowing evidence of calling an ambulance for Brittany Higgins when she believed there was an immediate threat to her life. In her first day of evidence at the inquiry into the investigation and prosecution of Bruce Lehrmann, Ms Yates has revealed she was reluctant to canvass the private matters but had sought Ms Higgins permission to do so. Detailing the multiple mental health incidents and hospitalisations that followed during her engagement with Ms Higgins, she revealed one incident followed the delay to the trial that followed Lisa Wilkinson’s Logies speech. She said despite repeated attempts to secure mental health counselling and support for Ms Higgins, she was struck throughout her contact with Ms Higgins by how isolated she was and how few people she trusted.

>>18939641 ‘She was not OK’: ACT victims advocate feared Higgins would collapse during speech - The ACT’s victims of crime commissioner, Heidi Yates, says she would have reconsidered standing next to Brittany Higgins during a televised speech after the Lehrmann rape trial was aborted if she’d known what she was going to say. Yates, who has been publicly accused of damaging the presumption of innocence of former Coalition staffer Bruce Lehrmann by her actions in the high-profile case, has told a public inquiry she was instead thinking of the possibility of his accuser collapsing while addressing the media shortly after the mistrial. “She was clearly not OK,” Yates told the inquiry into the handling of the case, explaining Higgins had suffered a panic attack when ACT Supreme Court Chief Justice Lucy McCallum cut short the trial on the morning of October 27, 2022, due to the misconduct of a single juror.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188878

#30 - Part 26

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 2

>>18954987 Video: Wilkinson, Higgins war-gamed ‘friendlies’ - Brittany Higgins and Lisa Wilkinson war-gamed how to recruit prominent politicians and media figures who could help give momentum to their upcoming interview on The Project, as the TV host made suggestions to the former Liberal staffer about how to frame her story. The more than five-hour session, which also involved Ms Higgins’ boyfriend David Sharaz and Wilkinson’s producer Angus Llewellyn, was recorded on January 27, 2021 a few days before they filmed the interview that was broadcast on February 15 revealing Ms Higgins’ claims she had been raped in Parliament House. The group brainstormed MPs who would “fire questions” in question time over the alleged sexual assault, highlighting Labor leaders Anthony Albanese and Tanya Plibersek as key players.

>>18955007 Video: Bruce Lehrmann says he hasn't ruled out suing Brittany Higgins for defamation in first TV interview since being accused of rape - Former Liberal staffer Bruce Lehrmann says he has not ruled out suing Brittany Higgins personally for defamation. Mr Lehrmann made the comments in his first television interview since Ms Higgins accused him of raping her at Parliament House in 2019. Mr Lehrmann's trial was abandoned due to juror misconduct last year. There are no findings against him. Speaking to 7NEWS Spotlight, Mr Lehrmann strenuously denied raping Ms Higgins but acknowledged that many people did not believe him. "I accept that there's going to be 50 per cent of the country, probably more, that thinks I'm a rapist," he said.

>>18955017 ‘Brittany Higgins lied to save her job’: Bruce Lehrmann - Bruce Lehrmann has accused Brittany Higgins of lying about being raped to save her job, as he announced he had not ruled out suing the former Liberal staffer for defamation. In a new, wide-ranging interview, Mr Lehrmann spoke of how her sexual assault allegation forced him to contemplate suicide. The Spotlight episode also included footage of Ms Higgins and Mr Lehrmann arriving at Parliament House on the night of the alleged rape. He claimed Ms Higgins intentionally told senator Linda Reynolds’ chief of staff, Fiona Brown, the “white lie” that he had raped her in order to keep her job after seeing him get sacked.

>>18955049 ‘Malicious’: ABC deliberately tried to prejudice my rape trial, says Bruce Lehrmann - The ABC deliberately tried to prejudice Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial when it broadcast an address by Brittany Higgins and Grace Tame at the National Press Club knowing he had been publicly named and charged, according to documents just filed in the Federal Court. Mr Lehrmann first filed his claim against the ABC in April but now claims it broadcast the Press Club event with “an improper motive”, namely to prejudice upcoming criminal proceedings against him, and that the broadcaster’s recklessness was so extreme that it amounted to “wilful blindness and constituted malice”.

>>18955072 ‘It’s pretty sick’: Bruce Lehrmann denies giving Brittany Higgins bruise in tell-all interview - Bruce Lehrmann has accused Brittany Higgins of having “fabricated” a photo of a bruise she claimed he inflicted during an alleged sexual assault. In February 2021, Ms Higgins spoke on The Project with host Lisa Wilkinson in an explosive interview regarding the alleged rape, during which she shared a disturbing image of a large bruise on her leg. On Sunday evening, Mr Lehrmann addressed the photograph in his own sit-down interview on the Channel 7’s Spotlight program, denying the authenticity of the image. “It was fabricated,” he said. “That’s the only explanation … or it’s a bruise from much later.” Ms Higgins said in her 2021 interview that the site of the bruise was “essentially where (Mr Lehrmann’s) leg pinned (her) down”.

>>18955096 Video: Tanya Plibersek hits back over Brittany Higgins question - A senior politician singled out by Lisa Wilkinson as a “friendly MP” likely to help fuel momentum for Brittany Higgins’ rape allegation in question time says she was never approached and would not have accepted being told what to ask. Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek was asked five times by Natalie Barr whether or not she had been approached to help fuel the story when she appeared on Sunrise on Monday morning. She said she reached out to Ms Higgins after she made her sexual assault allegations public two years ago. Ms Plibersek, who at the time was a senior opposition frontbencher, said she did not recall if the former political staffer had spoken to her about “firing up” specific questions during question time.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188879

#30 - Part 27

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 3

>>18960074 Disturbed and disappointed: Brittany Higgins’ angry letter to Lisa Wilkinson - Five days after Brittany Higgins’ rape allegations interview aired on The Project she wrote an angry letter to host Lisa ­Wilkinson accusing her of ­putting together a second program based on footage not used in the first, without her knowledge or consent. Ms Higgins writes that she is “disturbed and disappointed” that after making it clear she did not want another program “you have gone ahead and put one together anyway”.

>>18960084 Lisa Wilkinson denies briefing politicians about Brittany Higgins’ allegations - Anthony Albanese referenced allegations of rape made by Brittany Higgins in question time at least 20 times in the two months after the story broke but Lisa Wilkinson denies briefing politicians to promote her interview with the former Liberal staffer. Wilkinson on Monday said she had never spoken to any politician about the story following revelations she, Ms Higgins and Ms Higgins’ partner, David Sharaz, war-gamed recruiting politicians to ask questions in question time over a five-hour brainstorming session just weeks before the story broke on February 15, 2021. In recorded audio of the meeting on January 27, 2021, Ms Higgins told Wilkinson she could find some “friendly MPs” who could fire questions in question time. Wilkinson told The Australian on Monday she did not approach Mr Albanese or other politicians about raising the allegations in question time. “Nor did I speak to any other politicians, their minders or apparatchiks,” she said.

>>18960098 The proper thing to do would be for Lisa Wilkinson to hand back her Logie - "The torch has turned on the Ten celebrity to reveal someone who appears hellbent on launching a #MeToo juggernaut, maybe picking up an award here and there, with a large side-serving of political partisanship, nasty invective about women and gratuitous snide gossip. What’s lacking is a sober, objective and fair search for truth. The proper thing to do would be for Wilkinson to hand in her Logie for her Higgins interview. That interview has been nothing but trouble for her, for the justice system, for good journalism and for people who deserved to be treated better." - Janet Albrechtsen - theaustralian.com.au

>>18965791 Video: Tanya Plibersek 'briefed' by Brittany Higgins despite denials as Labor ministers come under fire for 'politicising case' - Labor ministers Tanya Plibersek and Katy Gallagher likely knew about Brittany Higgins' rape allegations before the story became public despite repeated denials. Ms Plibersek strongly refuted suggestions she had been in contact with Ms Wilkinson or knew of the case before it made public. Sky News Australia host Sharri Markson revealed secret text messages between Ms Higgins and ABC journalist Laura Tingle which showed Ms Plibersek had been briefed on the matter in early 2021.

>>18965804 Detective investigating Brittany Higgins’ rape allegation complained he ‘didn’t like being threatened’ after call with her boyfriend David Sharaz - In fresh witness statements released by the Board of inquiry into the conduct of police, prosecutors and the Victim of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates, the distress of Detective Superintendent Scott Moller has been laid bare. He said Mr Sharaz threatened to go public with complaints over the speed of the rape investigation and sent emails to the detective investigating the case and the Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates. Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates details a conversation with Det Insp Boorman on the 30th of July, 2021. “It was my recollection that Mr Boorman was upset and said to me, words to the effect of 'I don’t like being threatened.'”

>>18966095 ‘Feed it to Katy’: Higgins-Sharaz text plots - A tranche of previously unseen text messages between Brittany Higgins and her boyfriend David Sharaz has revealed the pair planned to directly enlist the help of senior Labor figures to pursue Ms Higgins’ rape allegation and her belief the Coalition government covered it up. The texts reveal Mr Sharaz arranging “drops” for favoured reporters, organising meetings with Labor MPs to bolster support for Ms Higgins’ claims of a cover-up by the Coalition government and disparaging former prime minister Scott Morrison, saying “I still hate the c…”. Ms Higgins says: “He’s about to be f.cked over. Just wait. We’ve got him”. The texts reveal Mr Sharaz, a former journalist, boasting of his special relationship with now-Finance Minister Katy Gallagher.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188882

#30 - Part 28

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 4

>>18966103 THE AUSTRALIAN EDITORIAL - Texts show probe is needed into Higgins’ compensation award - "The emergence of highly charged text messages between Brittany Higgins and her boyfriend David Sharaz raises important questions about the behaviour of senior political figures that must be answered. The plotting and conversations revealed in the text messages are of vital public interest. They go to the heart of how politics is played and how events that are the proper preserve of the criminal justice system can be exploited for personal and political gain. The extent of what appears to be collusion between Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz and political figures demands that a proper investigation be launched into a decision to award more than $2m in compensation to Ms Higgins with what could be considered a questionable regard for proper process."

>>18971017 Anthony Albanese defends Katy Gallagher amid involvement with Brittany Higgins allegation and compensation - Pressure is mounting for Anthony Albanese and key ministers in his government to disclose whether they had any involvement in helping Brittany Higgins pursue her rape allegation against Bruce Lehrmann after it was revealed the former political staffer and her boyfriend David Sharaz strategised how to make use of senior Labor figures. Finance Minister Katy Gallagher sits at the centre of the pair’s scheming, with Mr Sharaz having boasted about his friendship with the senator to Ms Higgins. Texts published in The Australian reveal Mr Sharaz and Senator Gallagher were in touch and that she was “angry and wants to help” before the rape allegation was made public.

>>18971045 Peter Dutton backs move to refer Brittany Higgins’ settlement to the National Anti-Corruption Commission - Peter Dutton has backed a move to refer the confidential Commonwealth payout made to former Liberal staffer Brittany Higgins to the new federal integrity watchdog for investigation. The Opposition Leader told 2GB Radio on Thursday that Anthony Albanese and other senior figures in the federal government had questions to answer about the payout and what they knew about Ms Higgins’ rape allegation and when. “It just seems that as each day goes by, there are more questions than there are answers and I think that’s creating a lot of suspicion understandably,” Mr Dutton said.

>>18977050 Video: Sharri Markson: Deep links between Brittany Higgins and Labor show how allegations were 'exploited for political purposes' - Sky News Australia host Sharri Markson has again exposed another link between the ALP and Ms Higgins and her now-fiancé David Sharaz. Emma Webster was seen throughout the Lehrmann trial side-by-side with Ms Higgins offering her support. Ms Higgins even described the former Labor staffer as a “wise advisor”. While Ms Webster was mentioned throughout the trial as a close friend of Ms Higgins and a lobbyist her deep Labor connections were hardly ever revealed. Before starting at Hawker Britton as a senior lobbyist, Ms Webster was a top advisor for former prime minister Julia Gillard, Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews and Ms Gallagher when she was the ACT chief minister.

>>18977104 Katy Gallagher accused of misleading parliament, faces referral to corruption watchdog - Katy Gallagher is facing serious claims she misled parliament over an outburst in which she rejected assertions she was tipped off about Brittany Higgins’ rape allegations in 2021, as pressure builds on Anthony Albanese over Labor’s war-gaming with Ms Higgins’ fiance David Sharaz. The Finance Minister and senior government ministers went to ground on Thursday following the damaging fallout from text messages and audio recordings of Mr Sharaz and Ms Higgins boasting about contact and collusion with senior Labor figures. The Australian can also reveal texts between the couple that show Mr Sharaz’s response to their growing fame after the allegations became public, with Ms Higgins’ partner telling her they “exude power” and expressing his delight at organising her private meetings with former prime ministers Kevin Rudd and Malcolm Turnbull.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188883

#30 - Part 29

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 5

>>18977134 Labor sought to gain - it’s found political pain over Brittany Higgins saga - "The vexing domestic realities of being prime minister have landed squarely at Anthony Albanese’s feet this week after his return from overseas. Facing a war with inflation, battles with business, the spectre of recession and flagging support for the voice to parliament, Albanese now also faces a potential political scandal involving senior members of his government. Having had an easy ride for the first 12 months in office, Albanese is now under pressure, with the road ahead riddled with potential political potholes. The key to the Brittany Higgins text revelations is who among Albanese’s cabinet colleagues knew what and when. There are unresolved questions about what level of involvement members of the then Labor opposition had." - Simon Benson - theaustralian.com.au

>>18977148 David Sharaz is a ‘puppet master’ set on destroying the Liberals: Bruce Lehrmann - Bruce Lehrmann has claimed Brittany Higgins’ partner David Sharaz is a “puppet master” who orchestrated the release of the rape allegations against him, and says he has exploited Ms Higgins’ “fame” to engineer a campaign to support Labor and topple the ­Liberals. Mr Lehrmann’s scathing opinion of Mr Sharaz comes as leaked text messages reveal Mr Sharaz had used his connections with a former Labor media adviser to line up a job for Ms Higgins, following her resignation from the office of former attorney-general Michaelia Cash.

>>18977167 What we know about Brittany Higgins’ fiance David Sharaz - From support act to central player, the links of David Sharaz to Canberra and key figures in the Labor Party appear deeply personal. After a week of explosive revelations, the fiance of Brittany Higgins, David Sharaz has gone from support act to central figure in the saga involving her alleged rape at Parliament House. Who is David Sharaz and where did he work? Why did he meet with Lisa Wilkinson? Why is he under fire?

>>18977231 Video: Lisa Wilkinson caught mocking Liberals in secret tape - Ex-Project star Lisa Wilkinson has been caught on tape struggling to pronounce Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price’s name and mocking Liberals with Ten colleagues. The explosive audio was recorded by Project producer Angus Llewllyn on his mobile phone during a pre-interview discussion at a Sydney hotel on January 27, 2021. It includes Ms Wilkinson, Brittany Higgins, her partner David Sharaz and Llewllyn, an executive producer, drinking gin and tonics and mimosas and giving their ‘unplugged’ views on political leaders.

>>18977278 Wilkinson, Network 10 apologise to Jacinta Nampijinpa Price over leaked recording - Lisa Wilkinson and Network 10 have apologised to Opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price after leaked audio revealed Wilkinson struggling to pronounce the senator’s name in a manner she claimed was racist. But Ms Wilkinson also defended the “tenor” of the conversation, which Senator Price claimed was “derogatory”, as about how many female Liberal pre-selections “were in unwinnable positions”. “I sincerely apologise to Senator Price for any offence I may have caused. The conversation was private and not intended to appear as it has out of context and in the public arena,” she said in a statement released by Network 10.

>>18982556 Brittany Higgins: Gallagher, Wong ‘knew of rape claim’ - Former defence minister Linda Reynolds claims now-Finance Minister Katy Gallagher and now-Foreign Minister Penny Wong conceded to her that they knew about Brittany Higgins’ rape allegations before they were made public, hours after Senator Gallagher told the Senate she had no prior knowledge of the ex-staffer’s story. The Coalition will use parliament next week to ramp up pressure on Senator Gallagher over her knowledge of the rape allegation, as Anthony Albanese emphatically denies his minister misled the Senate.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188884

#30 - Part 30

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 6

>>18982587 Video: Katy Gallagher admits she knew of Brittany Higgins’ rape claim, insists she didn’t ‘weaponise’ information - Under-fire Finance Minister Katy Gallagher has conceded she became aware of some details of Brittany Higgins’ rape allegations before they were made public, but insists she did not do anything with the information. Facing the media for the first time since text messages surfaced showing Ms Higgins’ boyfriend, David Sharaz, claiming to have corresponded with the senator in the days leading up to the story breaking, Senator Gallagher said she had not misled the parliament. “I was responding to an assertion that was being made by the minister Reynolds at the time that we had known about this for weeks and had made a decision to weaponise it,” she said. “That is not true. It was never true. I explained that to Senator Reynolds that night and she accepted that explanation.”

>>18982744 EXCLUSIVE: Mystery as Grace Tame quietly removes gushing Brittany Higgins birthday tribute where she declared her 'a national hero' on Instagram - Grace Tame has deleted an Instagram post in which she declared Brittany Higgins was 'a national hero' and that the former political staffer was a 'warrior' and 'my friend'. The sexual abuse survivor made national headlines when she wrote the post on Brittany Higgins' birthday last year, but it has now mysteriously disappeared from her social media page. The rousing post, which was an emotional tribute to the former Liberal staffer, decried what Ms Tame called an 'insidious nationwide character assassination campaign' against Ms Higgins, saying her 'friend' had faced 'layered injustice' and 'relentless criticism'. Ms Tame's December 7, 2022 post, which has now vanished from all stories about it linked to her Instagram page, was supporting Ms Higgins as she spent her 28th birthday in a Queensland mental health clinic.

>>18987561 Cash demands answers as new Wilkinson recording surfaces - Michaelia Cash has demanded Network 10 release the full five-hour recording of a pre-interview with Brittany Higgins in which The Project journalist Lisa Wilkinson discusses with her covertly recording the Liberal senator, who was then her boss. It previously came to light Ms Higgins secretly recorded a phone call with Senator Cash - the then-employment minister and now opposition legal affairs spokeswoman - shortly after her resignation from Parliament House. “That a senior journalist in Lisa Wilkinson, and the producer of The Project, would actively have encouraged a young woman in a distressed situation to basically commit what is considered to be an illegal offence by recording a conversation with another person. Personally, I think Channel 10, The Project and Lisa Wilkinson have some very, very serious questions to answer.”

>>18987606 Minister under siege digs in for a fight - Federal Finance Minister Katy Gallagher was defiant and all but silent as she flew into a Canberra firestorm over her knowledge of Brittany Higgins’ rape allegations, as Anthony Albanese’s ministers prepare to “back her to the hilt” against a Coalition onslaught in parliament this week. After a rapturous reception from Labor’s female activists at a Perth conference and the firm backing of the Prime Minister over the weekend, Senator Gallagher -- wearing a “Women’s Spirit Network” hoodie – had no patience for questions as she landed back in the national capital. “I’ve got nothing to say,” she said repeatedly after touching down in the ACT.

>>18998319 Video: 'Those are the facts': Katy Gallagher denies misleading parliament over Brittany Higgins' allegations - Katy Gallagher has once again denied misleading parliament over her knowledge of Brittany Higgins' rape allegations, while the Australian Federal Police is assesing a complaint over the leaking of text messages in the matter. In a statement to the Senate, the federal finance minister repeated her assertion that, while she knew about Higgins' rape allegations before they became public, she had not misled parliament by telling an estimates committee three years ago that "no one had any knowledge" of the matter.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188885

#30 - Part 31

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 7

>>18998327 Indigenous Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price says Lisa Wilkinson has not contacted her personally to apologise - The Indigenous senator who was mocked by Lisa Wilkinson as a “diversity pick” says the star journalist has not contacted her personally to apologise. Northern Territory CLP Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price lashed Wilkinson after audio emerged of the media personality making comments about the senator and struggling to pronounce her name during a pre-interview with Brittany Higgins and her partner David Sharaz. “She hasn’t personally made an apology to myself,” Senator Price told Sharri Markson on Sky News in her first interview since the incident. “If she was a real woman, I’d guess she’d ring me and personally apologise.”

>>18998342 Lehrmann court leak of Wilkinson recordings referred to police - Recordings of a five-hour meeting involving Brittany Higgins and journalist Lisa Wilkinson that were leaked to the media have been referred to police to investigate whether a contempt of court has been committed by passing on sensitive documents originally meant for the Bruce Lehrmann criminal trial. Thomson Geer law firm partner Marlia Saunders, who is acting for Network Ten in Lehrmann’s defamation proceedings, made a complaint to ACT Policing last Wednesday about material issued under subpoena for his criminal trial being aired in a televised interview with the Seven Network last week.

>>18998374 Video: Linda Reynolds sues Tanya Plibersek for defamation over Brittany Higgins comments - Liberal Senator Linda Reynolds has taken legal action against Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek, claiming Ms Plibersek defamed her in a television interview by stating she had “covered up” Brittany Higgins’ alleged rape. In a defamation concerns notice obtained by The Australian, Senator Reynolds accused Ms Plibersek of making false statements throughout the Channel 7 interview, that implied she had acted inappropriately during the investigation of Ms Higgins’ allegations and had attempted to “hide the commission of a criminal offence.” During the interview, which aired on Monday morning, Ms Plibersek stated: “The central point here is that a young woman made an allegation that she had been sexually assaulted in her workplace and that it had been inappropriately investigated, even covered up by her employers.”

>>19005424 Higgins, Sharaz and Wilkinson’s media campaign has backfired - "The beauty of the press is that it can’t be controlled. True, the supine, the stupid and the ideological end of the press can be manipulated, but eventually, in a free and open society with a competitive media, if a story is important enough, the press will usually ensure the truth comes out. That beauty became a problem for Brittany Higgins and David Sharaz. They made a rookie’s error when they set out on a strategy to use the media, instead of the criminal justice system, to press their case. Having tried to mould the media message, they cannot complain when some parts of the media - including this newspaper - decline to be shaped for their purposes. That was the gamble Higgins and Sharaz took. The effect of the Higgins-Sharaz media and political campaign was not merely to put themselves in the spotlight but to deprive Lehrmann of the presumption of innocence and the due process a normal criminal justice investigation would have given him." - Janet Albrechtsen - theaustralian.com.au

>>19005438 Brittany Higgins explains leg bruise injury photo date discrepancy - Brittany Higgins’s explanation of why the photograph of a bruise on her leg did not match the timeline of her rape allegation against Bruce Lehrmann has finally been revealed. File notes made by ACT Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates reveal that Ms Higgins told senior police that the leg bruise image she had provided to them and high-profile journalists was actually a screenshot of the original picture which had been mysteriously wiped from her phone by someone else.

>>19005464 Finance Minister Katy Gallagher reveals she never declared conflict over multimillion-dollar compensation payout - Finance Minister Katy Gallagher has said she never declared a conflict of interest in relation to a multimillion-dollar compensation payout to Brittany Higgins because it “never crossed her desk.” News.com.au revealed in December that Ms Higgins’ legal team had entered negotiations over a multimillion-dollar personal injury claim. Asked whether she subsequently declared a conflict of interest given her close contact and the fact her own department was responsible for administering the payout, Ms Gallagher said there was never any need because the negotiation was kept at arms length. “If it had come to me, I would have declared a conflict but it didn‘t. It didn’t cross my desk,’’ Senator Gallagher said.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188886

#30 - Part 32

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 8

>>19010860 Brittany Higgins’s elusive iCloud password delayed police completing brief of evidence for DPP - The investigation into Brittany Higgins’ rape allegation faced repeated delays because police could not access her cloud drives, which detectives believed contained potentially crucial evidence including emails and photos. New documents released by the Board of Inquiry into the ACT’s criminal justice system reveal that senior detectives were desperate to access Ms Higgins’ iCloud account as they worked to complete their brief of evidence for the Director of Public Prosecutions in mid-2021. But after finally gaining access, weeks later, the material they sought was not there.

>>19010879 40 years of economic loss, end to political career reasons for Brittany Higgins $2.5m payout - Brittany Higgins claimed up to 40 years’ worth of economic loss and the end of her pursuit of a future political career were among the reasons she was due more than $2.5m in compensation from the government after allegedly being raped, a draft statement of claim has revealed. The revelations came as Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus refused to answer questions over Ms Higgins’ multi-million-dollar payout, which was provided without the consultation of former senior Liberal ministers at the centre of her claims.

>>19010895 Katy Gallagher was invited to wedding of David Sharaz - Katy Gallagher has confirmed that Brittany Higgins’ fiance David Sharaz invited her to attend his first wedding in 2018, as senior Labor ministers hid behind parliamentary procedural tactics to dodge questions about when they first became aware of the Higgins rape allegations. The Finance Minister came under fire for a second consecutive day in question time over her relationship with Mr Sharaz, involvement in Ms Higgins’ reported $3m payout, and who contacted her prior to the sexual abuse allegations airing on The Project in February 2021. Asked about her invitation to Mr Sharaz’s wedding to former wife Alexandra Craig, Senator Gallagher said: “I didn’t recall that until I heard it reported and I had to ask the people I worked with at the time. I got a lot of invitations to a lot of things, some I was able to go to and others I weren’t. I didn’t attend that one. The invitation was declined,” she told parliament.

>>19010904 Labor’s grotesque hypocrisy appears to know no bounds - "For political chutzpah, senior Labor MPs who weaponised a rape allegation win hands down. This week in the federal parliament, Australians were treated to one of the more grotesque displays of political hypocrisy, subterfuge and trickery. The same politicians who weaponised a rape allegation for their own brute political purposes are now in high dudgeon about the public exposure of material that points to the extent of Labor’s involvement in this scandal. This newspaper revealed texts that suggested, among other things, that Katy Gallagher received a transcript of The Project interview before it aired. Publishing that text meant we know now that Gallagher was sought out by David Sharaz and Brittany Higgins about the rape allegation - even before questions were put by The Project to people portrayed as the chief villains: Bruce Lehrmann, Linda Reynolds and her former chief of staff Fiona Brown." - Janet Albrechtsen - theaustralian.com.au

>>19010931 Gallagher must come clean for the sake of the Albanese government - "Finance Minister Katy Gallagher has finally admitted she had prior knowledge of the alleged rape of Brittany Higgins, so why is it now good enough simply to take her word that she didn’t then weaponise the information? A thorough and independent inquiry needs to be held into whether Gallagher crossed the line. What seemed to have been forgotten by all the sorry actors in this sordid affair is that there was a criminal matter that needed to be tried. A rape was alleged and the victim and the accused deserved their day in court. Neither now have that closure. Both have been let down by a prosecutor and process that is itself under intense judicial scrutiny by Walter Sofronoff KC. Albanese would be well served by outing the truth and let Gallagher clear her name lest this does lasting damage to his own standing as Prime Minister." - Cameron Milner - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188887

#30 - Part 33

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 9

>>19010942 Video: Katy Gallagher apologises to Linda Reynolds over ‘hurt’ amid Brittany Higgins saga - Katy Gallagher has apologised to fellow senator Linda Reynolds for any hurt she endured during the protracted attention around Brittany Higgins’ alleging she was raped in her office in 2019. Claims which were dismissed by the ACT Supreme Court last year. “I’m sorry as Ms Reynolds is clearly upset about what happened to her,” she said. Senator Gallagher’s voice cracked and tears welled during day four of intense scrutiny from the coalition during Senate question time over her involvement and relationship with Ms Higgins and her partner David Sharaz. Senator Gallagher said she would have happily endured “this type of questioning” but was concerned for the toll the issue is having on women around the country.

>>19016452 Lisa Wilkinson’s lawyers’ furious letter to Sunrise over ‘false’ allegation - Lisa Wilkinson has lodged an official complaint with Channel 7, claiming a segment on its flagship morning program Sunrise aired “false” allegations against her. The former Project host’s lawyers took issue with the claim Wilkinson had “coached” Brittany Higgins to build a campaign against the man she accused of sexually assaulting her, Bruce Lehrmann. “That allegation is false. The material (falsely described in the report as ‘secret recordings’) published on Spotlight on the Seven Network on 4 June 2023 certainly does not justify that allegation,” the lawyers’ letter said.

>>19037048 Menslink CEO Martin Fisk tipped off Heidi Yates about Brittany Higgins’s rape claim - A Canberra charity boss who was nominated for a top Australian honour by David Sharaz and whose wife works for the Labor Party can be revealed as the mystery man who told Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates about Brittany Higgins’s rape claim weeks before it became public. Former Menslink chief executive officer Martin Fisk, whose wife Sandra is the ACT Labor Party’s operations manager, told Ms Yates in January 2021 that he was “working with a young woman who was about to make a sexual-assault disclosure” and that it “would likely attract national media attention”. Mr Fisk’s involvement reveals another puzzle piece as to “who knew what when”, while his wife’s strong links to the Labor Party, where she began working in 2012 while her Facebook friend ­Finance Minister Katy Gallagher was Territory chief minister, raise questions about the politicisation of Ms Higgins’ allegation.

>>19044075 DPP Shane Drumgold wanted ACT Police mistake in Brittany Higgins matter publicly exposed - ACT Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold has extended his leave as new documents reveal the depths of his frustration with police ­investigating Brittany Higgins’ rape allegation. Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates’s file notes, submitted to the inquiry, revealed Mr Drumgold wanted to publicly shame police for inadvertently providing Ms Higgins’ counselling notes to Mr Lehrmann’s lawyer. During a meeting on September 22, 2021, Mr Drumgold told Ms Yates that while he didn’t want the jury at Mr Lehrmann’s impending rape trial to suspect the detectives were incompetent, their mistake “needs to explode at some point”.

>>19058136 Sharaz and Higgins: ‘We’d become quite a twosome on game planning’ - "Brittany Higgins’ book appears to have been shelved. One look at the rough draft and it’s not hard to understand why. There are sound reasons many people are troubled by what they see as Higgins’s fixation on a political sex scandal - evidenced by texts, notes and in her draft book. Somewhere in this saga is an allegation of rape. And this is what makes this story such a dismal episode for the so-called women’s movement. People such as Heidi Yates, the ACT Victims of Crime Commissioner, have lauded Higgins for her advocacy work. But what precisely has Higgins become an advocate for? To many women, Higgins has become known, most famously, as the woman who chose to go to the media first, to politicians second, and to the police, to lodge a formal complaint, third." - Janet Albrechtsen - theaustralian.com.au

>>19058165 Video: Bruce Lehrmann breaks his silence on Brittany Higgins case. Full 7NEWS Spotlight Interview - The man accused of raping Brittany Higgins in Parliament House has admitted he told three different stories to three different people when asked why he was in the office at the time the alleged rape took place. In a 7NEWS Spotlight exclusive, Bruce Lehrmann has offered his version of events.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188888

#30 - Part 34

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 10

>>19120643 ‘Time to stop’: Brittany Higgins lashes out against Linda Reynolds - Brittany Higgins has lashed out at her former boss, Linda Reynolds, after the Liberal MP said she would ask the National Anti-Corruption Commission to investigate the circumstances surrounding the commonwealth payment to her former staffer. On Tuesday Ms Higgins posted on social media a series of newspaper headlines that she claimed originate “from a current Australian Senator who continues to harass me through the media and in the Parliament …. This has been going on for years now. It is time to stop.” Senator Reynolds has indicated she will refer Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus to the NACC over the payment of more than $2.5 million in compensation to her former staffer following Ms Higgins’ claims her allegations of rape were mishandled.

>>19126430 Shane Drumgold extends leave from ACT top prosecutor role following Bruce Lehrmann inquiry - The ACT’s top prosecutor has extended his leave for a second time in the wake of a bruising appearance at an inquiry into a high-profile trial. Shane Drumgold SC has been on leave since May after he faced days of questioning over his claims that he felt pressured not to charge former Coalition staffer Bruce Lehrmann over the alleged rape of Brittany Higgins. Mr Drumgold was due to return to work in mid-June, but his leave was extended to the end of June. In a short statement ACT Attorney-General Shane Rattenbury confirmed Mr Drumgold had extended his leave again until August 30.

>>19132091 ‘I have had enough’: Reynolds sends defamation notice to Higgins over Instagram post - Liberal senator Linda Reynolds has accused Brittany Higgins of repeatedly defaming her after sending a legal letter to her former staffer over a social media post this week in which Higgins accused Reynolds of using the media to harass her. On the same day Higgins’ partner, David Sharaz, faced defamation action filed by Reynolds in a West Australian court, Higgins tweeted on Thursday that she had received a concerns notice from her former boss - for whom she worked as a ministerial adviser in 2019 – “threatening defamation over an Instagram story”. Reynolds later said in a statement that her lawyers sent a concerns notice to Higgins the day before in a “private communication, which she has chosen to make public”.

>>19132103 Brittany Higgins considers 'legal options' after being issued concerns notice from WA senator Linda Reynolds - Former Canberra political staffer Brittany Higgins says WA senator Linda Reynolds is threatening to sue her over an Instagram post. In a tweet today Ms Higgins said she had receive a "concerns notice" from Ms Reynolds. "I've just received a concerns notice from @lindareynoldswa threatening defamation over an Instagram story," the tweet reads. "I'm considering my legal options." Prominent defamation lawyer Martin Bennett, who acts for Ms Reynolds, confirmed to the ABC the notice had been sent yesterday to Ms Higgins's legal counsel and was related to an Instagram post.

>>19138736 Peter FitzSimons subpoenaed to produce documents relating to Brittany Higgins book deal - Nine columnist Peter FitzSimons has been subpoenaed to produce documents relating to a book deal he helped secure for former ministerial staffer Brittany Higgins believed to be worth $325,000. Attempts will also be made to subpoena ABC journalist Laura Tingle and publisher Random House for the production of documents in the defamation action brought by former parliament staffer Bruce Lehrmann against Network 10 and the ABC. Mr Lehrmann, who has consistently denied the allegations, is suing Network 10 and Wilkinson over an interview with Ms Higgins that aired on The Project in February 2021 detailing allegations of rape but not naming Mr Lehrmann as the alleged attacker. Mr Lehrmann is also suing the ABC over the broadcast of a ­National Press Club address given by Ms Higgins, and Justice Lee on Friday stood over a subpoena for Tingle, who hosted the club address on February 9 last year, to produce documents. The press club promoted sales of tickets to the address that ­referred to Ms Higgins’ decision to “publicly allege she was raped by a colleague inside Parliament House”.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188889

#30 - Part 35

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 1

>>18960157 Anthony Albanese is expected to face pressure over the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal at national conference in August - Anthony Albanese’s support for AUKUS is expected to come under fire at Labor’s national conference in August, highlighting division within the ALP over the government’s national security agenda. Right faction delegates are preparing to counter an expected resolution from left-wing unions condemning the government’s support of the agreement. At the Queensland state conference on the weekend, the Electrical Trades Union moved a motion asking the branch to “categorically oppose the construction of nuclear-powered submarines” for the safety of constituents and the broader environment.

>>18982804 Transfer of Virginia-class submarines advances in US - US Congress has officially moved to introduce legislation that would pave the way for America’s most secret military intelligence - nuclear propelled submarines - to be transferred to Australia. Democrat congressman Joe Courtney along with Gregory Meeks and Ami Bera introduced the AUKUS Undersea Defense Act which provides legislative authority to allow for the transfer of Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarines to Australia. The bill would also lead to the training of Australian private sector defence personnel, as well as the integration of Australian financial contributions to the US defence industrial base.

>>18982955 The case for AUKUS: let’s get things clear - "While opponents like Paul Keating snipe at our strategic policies - and our new lethal weapons - they consistently spare scrutiny of China, despite its likeness to Nazi Germany in several ways. We allowed ourselves, for 20 years after the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre, to believe the CCP would see the error of its ways and liberalise. We clung - as we profited handsomely from China’s rapid economic growth - to the hope that a rising tide would lift all boats. We miscalculated. The party is not for turning. It is aggressively anti-liberal. It seeks, like Putin, to overturn the liberal international order. That’s why AUKUS now exists." - Paul Monk, fellow of the Institute for Law and Strategy (London and New York) and head of the China desk in Australia’s Defence Intelligence Organisation in the mid-1990s

>>18987638 IAEA must not bend rules for AUKUS: China Daily editorial - "Li Song, China's permanent representative to the International Atomic Energy Agency, once again stressed that the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal is a cover for nuclear proliferation at the board meeting of the IAEA in Vienna on Thursday. No matter how far the de facto anti-China bloc has gone to justify the deal, they cannot deny its fundamental nature, which is the transfer of weapons-grade highly enriched uranium from two nuclear-weapon states to a non-nuclear-weapon state. That violates the principles and practices of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and severely undermines the international non-proliferation regime and the IAEA's safeguards system." - chinadaily.com.cn

>>19011154 Albanese faces AUKUS backlash from Victorian Labor Party faithful - Powerful unions want Labor’s rank and file to formally condemn the $368 billion AUKUS submarine deal this weekend, potentially setting up an awkward clash with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese when he addresses Victorian Labor’s first state conference in four years. Both the prime minister and Premier Daniel Andrews will deliver speeches to party faithful at the conference, according to several state and federal government sources. The 606 delegates will be asked to vote on a motion from manufacturing union the AMWU seen by The Age, slamming Australia’s decision to acquire a nuclear-powered fleet from the United States and the prospect of the Albanese government “dragging Australia into a new Cold War, rather than pursuing the labour movement’s longstanding commitment to a peaceful and independent foreign and defence policy”.

>>19051132 The surprising reason ScoMo had to hoodwink Macron over AUKUS - Former prime minister Scott Morrison said his controversial decision to hide the truth about the AUKUS deal and the axing of France’s $90 billion submarine contract from President Emmanuel Macron was fuelled by a lack of trust not in the Frenchman but in US President Joe Biden. Mr Morrison said his fear was that if Mr Macron had prematurely found out what Australia was up to, the French leader could have persuaded Mr Biden to back away from the deal - leaving Canberra empty-handed. “He [Biden] could have said, ‘Oh, you know what, Emmanuel has been in contact. Look, I think we should put this off for a week or two while we work through these issues’,” Mr Morrison told UK-based Australian author Richard Kerbaj, in an updated edition of 'The Secret History of the Five Eyes' that will be released in Australia on July 11.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188891

#30 - Part 36

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 2

>>19082419 US ‘aspirational’ on timing of AUKUS submarines - The US navy is “aspirational” about meeting the submarine production targets required to ensure Australia will be able to purchase up to five nuclear-powered Virginia class submarines as promised under the AUKUS security pact. Admiral Michael Gilday told a seminar in Washington on Monday (Tuesday (AEST)) that it was “too early” to say “precisely where those submarines will come from, whether [from] excess capacity or whether that comes out of US inventory”. Bottlenecks in US submarine yards have limited the production of US Virginia class submarines to around 1.2 a year in recent years compared with the minimum of two per year required to fulfil the US navy’s own force projection requirements.

>>19082436 AUKUS could expand in second phase to include other countries, US officials say, while challenges remain for nuclear subs delivery - Senior US officials say they are in talks with a "variety" of other countries about potentially involving them in the second phase of the AUKUS agreement. Australia will obtain nuclear-powered submarines under what's known as Pillar One of the deal with the United States and the United Kingdom. Pillar Two will see the three nations working more closely together on other types of defence capabilities, such as artificial intelligence and quantum technologies.

>>19143911 Video: The three Australians on track to become the Top Guns of the sea - In the deep, dark waters of the Pacific Ocean, James Heydon, Adam Klyne, and William Hall could soon be breaking new ground for Australia: spending time at sea as AUKUS-ready nuclear submarine operators. The trio today became the first group of Royal Australian Navy personnel to graduate from Nuclear Power School: one of the US Defence Department’s most rigorous and demanding academic programs. “It’s a historic event for our navy, a historic event for our submarine force and a historic event for our nation,” said Australian Navy chief Mark Hammond, who attended their graduation ceremony at Goose Creek in South Carolina on Friday morning (US time).

>>19143964 Inside 'nuke school', the elite US training ground preparing Australian submariners for an AUKUS future - In America's deep south, a group of students has just completed one of the most rigorous academic programs in the US military. And for the first time, there were Australians among them. Three members of the Royal Australian Navy have graduated from the Nuclear Power School in South Carolina, more commonly known as 'nuke school'. The training pipeline was established with the US as part of the AUKUS agreement, under which Australia will obtain its own nuclear-powered submarines. The three Australians - Lieutenant Commander James Heydon, Lieutenant Commander Adam Klyne, and Lieutenant William Hall - started at the Nuclear Power School in November with the aim of eventually qualifying to operate the reactors onboard nuclear-powered submarines. Lieutenant Commander Heydon described the course he's just graduated from as a "four-year engineering degree crammed into six months". The Australians will now have to complete another set of practical learning, which will include spending time on retired nuclear-powered subs known as moored training ships. After that, they'll receive further training in Connecticut before being assigned to a Virginia-class sub.

>>19160130 China, Solomon Islands take swipe at AUKUS in announcing new strategic partnership - China and the Solomon Islands have signed a deal on police cooperation as part of an upgrade of their relations to a “comprehensive strategic partnership”, four years after the Pacific nation switched ties from Taiwan to China. The police cooperation pact was among nine deals signed after Solomon Islands Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare met with Chinese Premier Li Qiang in Beijing, underlining his nation’s foreign policy shift. China will continue to provide assistance to the Solomon Islands to enhance its law enforcement capacity, according to a joint statement released by China’s official Xinhua news agency. It urged “relevant countries” to “prudently” handle issues such as the discharge of nuclear-contaminated water into the sea and cooperation on nuclear submarines, in a thinly veiled swipe at Japan and AUKUS, the alliance among Australia, the United States and Britain.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188892

#30 - Part 37

Australian Defence Force Afghanistan Inquiry and Ben Roberts-Smith Defamation Trial - Part 1

>>18934029 Ben Roberts-Smith: Top Australian soldier loses war crimes defamation case - Australia's most-decorated living soldier Ben Roberts-Smith has lost a historic defamation case against three newspapers that accused him of war crimes in Afghanistan. The outlets were sued over articles alleging he killed unarmed prisoners. The civil trial was the first time a court has assessed accusations of war crimes by Australian forces. Justice Anthony Besanko said four of the six murder allegations, all denied by the soldier, were substantially true. These included - A handcuffed farmer the soldier had kicked off a cliff, a fall which knocked out the man's teeth, before he was subsequently shot dead - A captured Taliban fighter who was shot at least 10 times in the back, before his prosthetic leg was taken as a trophy and later used by troops as a drinking vessel - Two murders which were ordered or agreed to by Mr Roberts-Smith to initiate or "blood" rookie soldiers.

>>18934054 Ben Roberts-Smith loses mammoth defamation battle against newspapers, reporters - A defamation case by war veteran Ben Roberts-Smith against three newspapers has been dismissed, after a judge found defences of substantial or contextual truth had been established over alleged unlawful killings, bullying and domestic violence. The Victoria Cross recipient sued The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, The Canberra Times and three journalists in the Federal Court over a series of stories published in 2018. Mr Roberts-Smith said they contained false allegations of war crimes in Afghanistan, bullying of his former Special Air Service Regiment (SAS) colleagues and domestic violence against a woman in a Canberra hotel room.

>>18934081 Ben Roberts-Smith: SAS veteran a murderer with a cross to bear - Australia’s most decorated living soldier, Ben Roberts-Smith, callously murdered four unarmed ­civilians while serving with the Special Air Service in Afghanistan, a judge has found, and now faces the prospect of serious criminal charges and being stripped of his Victoria Cross. Handing down his decision in the high-stakes defamation action brought by the former soldier against Nine newspapers, Federal Court judge Anthony Besanko ruled on Thursday that Mr ­Roberts-Smith had murdered four prisoners, including a ­farmer who was kicked off a cliff in the village of Darwan, and a one-legged man dragged from a tunnel at the compound known as ­Whiskey 108.

>>18939562 Rogues in the ranks await their fate as a giant is toppled - The trials of Ben Roberts-Smith and a raft of other SAS soldiers who served with him in Afghanistan are only just beginning. We are now likely to see a slew of criminal prosecutions for war crimes in Afghanistan that will cast a dark shadow over Australia’s military for many years. Even though this was a civil case and therefore had a lower burden of proof than a criminal prosecution, the result offers further confirmation that Australian soldiers participated in horrific war crimes in Afghanistan. It adds to the findings of the 2020 Brereton report which found “credible” evidence of allegations 25 Australian soldiers murdered 39 Afghan civilians. So far only one former SAS soldier, Oliver Schultz, has been charged with murder. But more criminal charges are now expected, with the Office of the Special Investigator examining “between 40 and 50” further allegations of war crimes.

>>18939570 Courtroom void tells us something about the man - "Ben Roberts-Smith won his cherished Victoria Cross charging towards danger. He lost the honour it bestowed while draped across a sun lounge by a pool in Bali. It’s hard to imagine a greater fall from grace - harder still to know why he chose not to front up on the day of judgement. Roberts-Smith had turned up to court every day of the trial, sharply dressed, shoes polished, ready to stare down his accusers. Not on Thursday, when Judge Anthony Besanko sat down to deliver his verdict. The void in Courtroom 1 where Roberts-Smith should have stood on Thursday tells us something about the man. It speaks of contempt for a judicial system that, once he got a whiff it wasn’t working for him the way he’d planned, could be left at the door like last night’s room service. The war hero brought this case on but wouldn’t see it through to the end." - Stephen Rice - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188893

#30 - Part 38

Australian Defence Force Afghanistan Inquiry and Ben Roberts-Smith Defamation Trial - Part 2

>>18939574 A profound blow to our many honourable soldiers, but Army must be bound by rule of war - "The devastating loss by Ben Roberts-Smith in his defamation case will deliver a profound blow to the morale of the army and the Australian Defence Force generally. It was always a difficult case to understand. At some level, Roberts-Smith must believe himself innocent, or either remember or construe his actions differently from the way the court has. On the other hand, the evidence against him was strong. Still, we should remember this was not a criminal case and Roberts-Smith has not been charged with any crime and he has not been found guilty of anything to a criminal standard of proof. Nonetheless, taken in combination with the Brereton report, there is overwhelming evidence that there was grave misconduct by some Australian soldiers in Afghanistan." - Greg Sheridan - theaustralian.com.au

>>18955265 ‘Not an honest and reliable witness’: Judge’s scathing assessment of Roberts-Smith - Disgraced former soldier Ben Roberts-Smith gave false evidence, threatened a former comrade who later testified against him and arranged “unusual” legal fee payments for supportive witnesses, the judge who dismissed his multimillion-dollar defamation lawsuit said. In the full reasons for the judgment, released on Monday, Federal Court judge Anthony Besanko said the former Special Air Service corporal was “not an honest and reliable witness in … many areas”. He endorsed the credibility and honesty of witnesses who detailed Roberts-Smith’s wrongdoing.

>>18955292 Ben Roberts-Smith may have committed criminal offence, judge in defamation trial finds - War veteran Ben Roberts-Smith may have committed a criminal offence by sending threatening letters to a former SAS colleague, a Federal Court judge has found. Mr Roberts-Smith sued The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, The Canberra Times and three journalists, denying allegations contained in a series of 2018 reports of war crimes, bullying and domestic violence. The judge was satisfied, to the civil standard of the balance of probabilities, that allegations Mr Roberts-Smith was involved or complicit in four unlawful killings in Afghanistan were substantially true. Mr Roberts-Smith had also denied sending anonymous, threatening letters to a former SAS colleague in 2018 by asking a private detective, John McLeod, to post material on his behalf. In the full judgement, published today, Justice Anthony Besanko said the sending of the letters may constitute a criminal offence; either perverting the course of justice or using a postal service to menace, harass or cause offence. "I am satisfied on the evidence that the applicant, through Mr McLeod, arranged for two threatening letters to be sent to Person 18."

>>18960215 Going woke risks destroying the ADF as a real fighting force - "The government is now pushing a great deal of politically correct nonsense on the army. It has restored the rainbow morning teas. It rejoices in its membership of LGBTQ lobby groups. Diversity, equity and inclusion are all the rage. Recruitment advertisements make no mention of combat or what a life of service in the army is really all about. I am strongly in favour of diversity in the army and the ADF. But diversity should work this way: you encourage people from widely diverse backgrounds to apply, but then the selection and promotion procedures should be absolutely colourblind and gender-blind. We forget what the army is for. The key role of the army is to close with and destroy the enemy. You hope you never need to do that, but that’s what you have a military for. The Australian Army, like many Western armies, is now subject to a bewildering range of woke requirements that have nothing to do with being an effective army, nor indeed with being an ethical and moral military either. Given the emphasis on teamwork and group cohesion, this kind of poison can spread through a military at devastating speed." - Greg Sheridan - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188894

#30 - Part 39

Australian Defence Force Afghanistan Inquiry and Ben Roberts-Smith Defamation Trial - Part 3

>>18977671 Video: Ben Roberts-Smith alleged to have directed the killing of elderly imam in Afghanistan - Victoria Cross recipient Ben Roberts-Smith directed one of his SAS comrades to kill an elderly man who was dragged from a mosque in Afghanistan, according to allegations uncovered by ABC Investigations. ABC Investigations can reveal the disgraced war hero's alleged involvement in the killing, which sparked a diplomatic row for Australia. The Australian government was quick to defend the August 2012 killing of Haji Raz Mohammad, an imam in the village of Sola, in Uruzgan province, claiming he was an insurgent. ABC Investigations understands the alleged incident is now in the hands of Australia's war crimes agency, the Office of the Special Investigator (OSI).

>>19005517 ‘Massive blow’: AFP war crimes probe collapses over risk of tainted evidence - A five-year Australian Federal Police inquiry into Ben Roberts-Smith’s alleged involvement in the execution of three Afghan captives has collapsed after Commonwealth prosecutors ruled investigators may have unwittingly used tainted evidence. The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions’ (CDPP) decision not to prosecute Roberts-Smith based on evidence gathered during the AFP probe has led to a new joint taskforce being set up to investigate the alleged executions. The taskforce comprises detectives from the specialist war crimes agency, the Office of the Special Investigator (OSI), and a new team of federal police investigators not connected to the abandoned AFP probe. The CDPP concluded in March that the five-year AFP probe should not lead to a prosecution because of the risk it was unwittingly compromised by the receipt of certain information from the Brereton inquiry, a military inspector general probe which ran from 2016-2020 and used special coercive powers to question SAS soldiers.

>>19016850 War crimes ‘will be prosecuted’ says Andrew Hastie - Opposition defence spokesman and former SAS captain Andrew Hastie says he is confident special forces war criminals will be brought to justice despite the collapse of a five-year investigation into allegations of murder against Australia’s most decorated soldier, Ben Roberts-Smith. The Australian Federal Police defended its conduct on Wednesday after it was forced to junk its investigation into Mr Roberts-Smith’s alleged involvement in the execution of three Afghan prisoners, amid concerns over tainted evidence. The AFP and detectives from the nation’s war crimes agency, the Office of the Special Investigator, have now started a fresh probe into the alleged murders, which sources warn could take years. Mr Hastie said he was not privy to the reasons behind the decision, but declared: “The Office of the Special Investigator is active”.

>>19016902 Video: No apologies as Roberts-Smith returns to Australia following defamation judgment - Former SAS corporal Ben Roberts-Smith has ruled out apologising to the families of the victims affected by his actions in Afghanistan. Roberts-Smith - arriving into Perth on a Qantas flight shortly after 9pm on Wednesday – said he was devastated by the outcome of his high-profile defamation case against The Age, The Sydney Morning Herald and The Canberra Times, adding that he was “100 per cent” proud of his behaviour while serving in the Defence Force. It is the first time Roberts-Smith has spoken publicly since the case ended, spending the days prior to the court judgment in Bali.

>>19037107 Be brave, strip soldiers’ medals, says expert who sparked war crimes inquiry - The sociologist who triggered the Brereton war crimes inquiry has urged Defence Minister Richard Marles to stare down veterans’ groups by stripping medals from soldiers who oversaw alleged wrongdoing in Afghanistan, saying it will reflect poorly on the nation if no action is taken. Samantha Crompvoets, an expert on organisational culture, was commissioned by the Department of Defence in 2015 to produce a report that led to military personnel disclosing claims of unlawful behaviour including alleged war crimes. In her first interview since a Federal Court judge found Ben Roberts-Smith to be a murderer and war criminal when dismissing his defamation case last week, Crompvoets said the decorated former soldier should lose his Victoria Cross for bringing the Australian Defence Force into disrepute. Crompvoets said Australians should prepare to hear confronting allegations at possible future criminal trials flowing from the Brereton inquiry.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188895

#30 - Part 40

Australian Defence Force Afghanistan Inquiry and Ben Roberts-Smith Defamation Trial - Part 4

>>19037124 Video: Jacqui Lambie wants International Criminal Court to investigate military commanders for alleged war crimes - Tasmanian senator Jacqui Lambie has requested the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague investigate senior Australian Defence Force (ADF) commanders over their knowledge of alleged war crimes in Afghanistan. Senator Lambie has been scathing in her assessment of Major General Paul Brereton's landmark inquiry into allegations of serious misconduct by Australian special forces - a redacted version of which was made public in late 2020. She has argued the ADF's high command has avoided scrutiny and accountability over what they knew of unlawful killings and cruel treatment of prisoners, despite recollections from former SAS personnel and testimony in court suggesting rumours were well known by the top brass.

>>19075534 War crimes investigators want access to Ben Roberts-Smith defamation case secret file Federal investigators are poised to access secret files from Ben Roberts-Smith’s failed defamation case in a development that indicates prosecutors intend to use previously undisclosed evidence from the trial about the killing of unarmed prisoners in a future war crimes trial. A letter sent by the Australian Government Solicitor on Friday to both sides in the defamation case, seen by The Australian, says the Office of the Special Investigator -- the agency set up to investigate war crimes by Australian soldiers in Afghanistan - requires access to the case’s Sensitive Court File. The highly protected Sensitive Court File contains hundreds of classified documents and photographs, the identities of all the Special Air Service witnesses in the case and transcripts of evidence given in closed sessions of the trial, including by Mr Roberts-Smith himself.

>>19104491 OPINION: I exposed war crimes among the SAS. A few weeks ago, my car was repossessed - "When my car was repossessed by debt collectors a few weeks ago, amid wrapping up loose ends after my company went into liquidation, it made me reflect on the life I once led and the one I lead now. For me, it all began on Australia Day 2016. That was the day I submitted a report to army chief General Angus Campbell that would trigger the biggest inquiry into war crimes in Australia’s history. When the war crimes allegations emerged, then-defence minister Peter Dutton said he had made it “very clear” to Defence that I should not be awarded further contracts. That he did not want the military to be “distracted by things that have happened in the past”. My credibility was questioned repeatedly by Jacqui Lambie and reiterated in the Murdoch press. In a letter I received from the government solicitor’s office shortly after publication, I was told my conduct and public statements had “harmed the Commonwealth”. The result was that my ongoing work with the government was “terminated for convenience”. The implications for me, my family, my business, and my staff were profound. The message had been sent to the department loud and clear that I was now a liability and a risk. No work would follow. Work in the pipeline was stopped indefinitely. I’d told the truth, so they cut me out. After that my business collapsed and my mental health declined amid the endless stream of misogynistic threats through social media. Work from other organisations was not forthcoming. I gather this was because most businesses hire consultants to tell them what they want to hear, not uncover what is really at the heart of their problems." - Samantha Crompvoets, sociologist and expert in organisational culture - theage.com.au

>>19160231 Ben Roberts-Smith appeals major defamation loss - Disgraced soldier Ben Roberts-Smith has launched an appeal of the judgment in his failed defamation action against The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age and The Canberra Times, which ruled he is a war criminal, murderer and a bully. On Tuesday Mr Roberts-Smith filed a notice of appeal in the Federal Court. According to the notice, Mr Roberts-Smith is appealing on the grounds that Justice Besanko erred in finding the former soldier ordered executions and murdered Afghans. This includes the finding that he kicked an unarmed Afghan civilian off a cliff in 2012 and ordered his execution, as well as killing an elderly Afghan in 2009 with a machine gun. Nine managing director of publishing James Chessell said: “We believe the Federal Court’s judgment is comprehensive and categorical. The appeal will be opposed. We will always stand up for journalism that is in the public interest.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188896

#30 - Part 41

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 1

>>18928670 Indigenous Voice to Parliament: There has never been a political alignment like this - "In post-war Australia there has rarely, if ever, been a political alignment like this. Our elites have come together - political, corporate, financial, university, media, sporting, trade union and religious – to persuade and intimidate the Australian people to put an Indigenous voice to parliament into the Constitution. The nation confronts an unparalleled contest between an alliance of elites and a public that is wary and suspicious, increasingly resentful of the pressure to do the “polite” thing. Many Australians see the Yes campaign as well-intentioned deception. They feel they are not being levelled with but patronised, their goodwill exploited. The more the Yes campaign is scrutinised, the more the scale of serial deception is apparent." - Paul Kelly, Editor-at-Large, The Australian - theaustralian.com.au

>>18928883 An Indigenous voice to parliament is our chance to grasp history and create change, says Prime Minister Anthony Albanese - "Amid the fog of fiction and misunderstanding these past few months, it’s important to spell it out again. This isn’t about politics. This isn’t about politicians. This is about people. People striving to make themselves heard across our great nation. In the regions and beyond in the remotest corners of our vast continent. We are fortunate to be here in this moment in history, where we have within our hands the chance to make a positive change that will last for generations. A change that will outlast us." - Anthony Albanese, Prime Minister of Australia - theaustralian.com.au

>>18934123 State of Origin fans asked to ‘make right call’ on voice referendum - The Welcome to Country opening State of Origin I has alluded to the looming referendum on an Indigenous voice to parliament, calling on Australians to “make the right call”. Uncle Karl Winda Telfer addressed Adelaide Oval on Wednesday night ahead of the match between the Queensland Maroons and the NSW Blues. Mr Telfer said the match was taking place on sacred land and Australians would need to have “serious conversations” before the end of the year. “Today we’re not about pushing people apart, we’re about the union,” he said. “Of us all in this great game in this great country, we need to have the conversations leading up to the end of this year. I think we’re mature enough to make the right call yeah.”

>>18934161 Senator Jacinta Price slams State of Origin for using Welcome to Country ceremony to reference Voice to Parliament - Shadow minister for Indigenous Australians Jacinta Nampijinpa Price has lashed out at the State of Origin Welcome to Country ceremony after it made reference to the proposed Voice to Parliament. Uncle Karl Winda Telfer addressed Adelaide Oval on Wednesday night ahead of the series opener between the Queensland Maroons and New South Wales Blues where he called on the spectators to have “serious conversations” ahead of the referendum. The mention of the Voice to Parliament divided footy fans and Senator Price was among the vocal critics. “I’m sick and tired of it, I’m sick and tired of these acknowledgements because of nothing more than my racial heritage,” she said

>>18939765 Indigenous Voice to Parliament referendum bill passes lower house - The legislation to set up the referendum on enshrining an Indigenous Voice to Parliament in the constitution has passed the House of Representatives. The bill still needs to be dealt with by the Senate, which is likely next month, before the federal government sets a date for the poll later this year. The final vote in the lower house was 121 in favour of the bill, and 25 against - with the Nationals and a handful of Liberal MPs voting to block the referendum going ahead. Applause rung out across the House of Representatives after the result was announced.

>>18939781 Linda Burney says Indigenous voice to parliament has been ‘no flight of fancy’ as bill passes lower house - The Albanese government has been “extraordinarily careful and consultative” in forming the Indigenous voice to parliament, Linda Burney has declared, urging Australians to look at publicly available information to understand the advisory body. The country is on track to head to a referendum between October and December this year, with the government’s legislation outlining the question and constitutional amendment that Australians will be voting on passing the House of Representatives on Wednesday. The Constitution Alteration Bill is due to clear the final parliamentary hurdle -- receiving an ­absolute majority of support from senators – in June, before the five-week winter break.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188897

#30 - Part 42

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 2

>>18939811 Indigenous voice to parliament proposal is ‘modest’ no more, says Anthony Albanese - "Anthony Albanese’s lack of a detailed argument supporting the Yes case for an Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government and his propensity to emotionally adjust to the audience he is addressing is leading him into inconsistency. For months the Prime Minister has argued that the voice referendum proposal is “modest and gracious”. But, under emotional influence - genuine and sincere - Albanese has declared to a highly sympathetic audience that the proposal is “modest” no more. “So let us not content ourselves with modest change,” he said in the culmination and conclusion of the Lowitja O’Donaghue oration in Adelaide. “Let us not fill our hearts with the empty warmth of the merely symbolic,” he said." - Dennis Shanahan - theaustralian.com.au

>>18939831 A ‘modest’ Indigenous voice to parliament? Take a look out west to consider it’s far reaching consequences - "Anthony Albanese’s pitch to Australians for months has been that they should vote for his voice because it will be an important “but modest change”. Only the cat is now out of the bag with his comments in a speech to Indigenous leaders this week declaring “let this be no modest change”. In the clearest sign yet of what will come, all Australians need to look at the enormous Aboriginal heritage changes about to roll out across Western Australia from July 1. What’s more, these changes will create a whole new land-use approvals regime that circumvents elected officials and subjects the rights of private property owners to Aboriginal heritage assessment." - Peta Credlin - theaustralian.com.au

>>18939852 Don’t let No scare tactics get in the way of the Indigenous voice to parliament - "Some have claimed the voice’s representations would derail government decisions on everything from nuclear-powered submarines to lighthouses. Michaelia Cash even said the voice would interfere with parking tickets. Others have claimed the voice will stymie Australia’s national security and could even prevent Australia going to war. These suggestions demonstrate the tenor of the No case. The Yes case cannot resort to lies. The case for change must deal in truth. Advocates for this change must fight fear with facts, as Leeser has done in his latest speech. And we must answer hate with love. If we do that, the Yes vote will succeed." - Shireen Morris, constitutional lawyer and director of the Radical Centre Reform Lab at Macquarie University law school - theaustralian.com.au

>>18939907 Video: Voice to Parliament draws mixed opinions in Indigenous community of Woorabinda - Like many in his community, Douglas Graham wants to see the town of Woorabinda - and the lives of the people in it - improve, but he is unsure if or how the Indigenous Voice to Parliament would help. Mr Graham, the librarian at Woorabinda's Indigenous Knowledge Centre in central Queensland, has been following the public debate on the proposed Voice to Parliament. But the Gooreng Gooreng/Lamalama man says what it will mean for his people on the ground is still unclear. "We've had a voice … and they still haven't listened to us [since colonisation]," he said.

>>18939935 Queensland LNP leader David Crisafulli to vote No on Indigenous voice to parliament - Queensland’s Liberal National Party leader David Crisafulli has revealed he will vote No in the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum later this year. Mr Crisafulli, who had for months refused to reveal his position, on Wednesday said he planned to vote No but would not actively campaign against the voice. Mr Crisafulli said he was concerned about “risks” of enshrining the voice in the constitution, including the potential it could undermine parliament’s power. “I don’t feel a voice that is legislated wouldn’t be able to achieve exactly the same thing as one that’s enshrined in the constitution, (but) without that level of risk,” he said.

>>18945729 Father Brennan tells Albanese and Dutton to find common ground on Voice - One of the Catholic Church’s leading proponents of the Indigenous Voice to parliament fears the referendum will leave Australians divided - no matter the result - and he lays the blame on both sides of politics for not striving harder to find common ground. Father Frank Brennan, a Jesuit priest and human rights lawyer, will use a lecture in Rome to urge Australians to recommit themselves to a “deep inner listening” towards each other and the land. He will remind Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Opposition Leader Peter Dutton that they bear responsibility for the tone of the debate.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188899

#30 - Part 43

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 3

>>18945799 It’s not the No camp that’s highlighting race in Indigenous voice to parliament debate - "Everywhere I go in Australia today, discourse on matters of national interest lends itself to a racially intense focus. The debate surrounding the voice to parliament cannot exist without such discourse, whether Race Discrimination Commissioner Chin Tan likes it or not. This week Tan appealed to political leaders and the media to steer clear of making race the focus of the voice to parliament debate, warning it would embolden racists and expose Indigenous Australians to abuse and vilification. But asking Australians to avoid highlighting race in the voice debate is like asking someone to avoid getting wet walking through monsoonal rains. This is not the fault of everyday Australians but of the unyielding activist class that for the past decade has doused petrol on the flames of identity politics." - Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, CLP senator for the Northern Territory - theaustralian.com.au

>>18949802 ‘Duplicitous’: Noel Pearson accuses Peter Dutton over race argument on voice - Prominent Indigenous leader Noel Pearson has accused Peter Dutton of being “duplicitous” in raising concern that enshrining the Indigenous voice to parliament in the Constitution would “re-racialise the nation”, claiming the Opposition Leader assured him earlier this year he would be not making arguments on the basis of race.

>>18949819 Moral high ground in Indigenous voice to parliament debate has been hijacked by perceived ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ vote - "To label the Yes or No case as right or wrong is to convert people’s votes into moral judgments carrying a weight of guilt that should not attach to the free exercise of our democratic right on such a complex issue with ramifications across the federal government. There is also a conundrum in the heart of the debate about whether the voice will be modest or radical; practical or symbolic; and all-encompassing or restricted to issues affecting Indigenous people only. The difficulty for Albanese and voice supporters is that they are maintaining all points simultaneously despite the inherent contradictions." - Dennis Shanahan - theaustralian.com.au

>>18949840 It’s OK to vote Yes: Meet the Liberals campaigning for the Voice - Kate Carnell wants Liberals, Liberal voters and Liberal-curious people to know one thing: it’s OK to vote Yes. The former Liberal ACT chief minister and Small Business Ombudsman is the head of the Liberals For Yes campaign, which launches today with its own merchandise and website. “We are aiming our campaign at, not just at Liberal party members, but people who traditionally vote Liberal,” Carnell said. “We want to empower them. Just because federally the party is taking a different tack, doesn’t mean you can’t vote Yes.”

>>18955149 Newspoll reveals 46% of Australians intend to vote ‘yes’ to an Indigenous voice to parliament in referendum, 43% no - Less than half of eligible Australians now say they will vote in favour of a referendum to enshrine a voice to parliament and executive government in a troubling sign for the yes campaign and Anthony Albanese’s ambitions to ­secure constitutional recognition for Aboriginal and Torres Strait ­Islander people. An exclusive Newspoll conducted for The Australian shows only 46 per cent of voters approve of ­altering the Constitution to give effect to an Indigenous voice as proposed by the federal government. With opinion almost equally divided, 43 per cent of voters said they would vote no, while 11 per cent said they didn’t know. It is the first Newspoll survey to present voters with the precise question they will be asked at the ballot box when the referendum is held this year. Past Newspoll surveys showing support for a voice to parliament above 50 per cent were based on a more general question. The new survey suggests that the contest is now closer than previous polls have suggested, with the referendum poised to go either way with clear generational divisions now emerging amid a schism between regional Australia and the capital cities.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188900

#30 - Part 44

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 4

>>18955174 Voice campaigners confident despite new polling - Campaigners for an Indigenous voice remain confident of success at the upcoming referendum despite declining support in new opinion polling. The latest Newspoll shows 46 per cent backing for the proposal, dropping from 54 per cent earlier this year. Some 43 per cent of those surveyed were opposed and 11 per cent did not know. The referendum, due to be held between October and December, needs a national majority as well as a majority of voters in at least four states for the constitution to be changed. But Yes 23 campaign director Dean Parkin said he expected support to grow for the voice as it moves away from political debate in parliament and into communities. "It's understandable in some ways that there has been some tightening up in the numbers. We knew this would always become contested," he told Sky News.

>>18955207 Indigenous voice to parliament Yes campaigners must persuade dubious Australians ahead of referendum - "There is one unlikely point of agreement between the Yes and No camps for the voice referendum. Terror of the consequences of a lost vote. Each understands Indigenous Australians will be shattered. Each will blame the other. The scorched earth will belong to both. For Yes supporters - including me - winning is the only course. Politics, personalities and even past drafting disputes are irrelevant. But the immediate challenge is that the polling for the voice is not good. It is threatening. Multiple polls place the Yes vote between the high 40s and low 50s. Support for No is in the mid 30s. Undecideds are around 20 per cent. There is not a Yes majority in a single state." - Emeritus Professor Greg Craven, constitutional lawyer - theaustralian.com.au

>>18955225 Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s Indigenous voice to parliament ‘Yes’ campaign strategy is faltering - "Only several months out from the referendum and the Indigenous voice to parliament is in trouble. The strength of the No vote is now significant and the Newspoll results may well come as a shock to the other side. The findings don’t bode well for Anthony Albanese, whose political strategy to hold back detail of the voice to parliament and go on the vibe of constitutional recognition is clearly failing. The Prime Minister’s conviction that the moral imperative will win over Australians is being put to the test." - Simon Benson - theaustralian.com.au

>>18960113 Anthony Albanese’s decision to make no effort to attract Coalition support for Indigenous voice to parliament is backfiring - "The latest Newspoll figures suggest two of Anthony Albanese’s key strategies in his bid to pass the referendum on an Indigenous voice to parliament - to avoid giving detail and to eschew bipartisan support - are failing. The latest Newspoll figures, which it must be said respond to a different question to the previous referendum polling questions, suggest there is an across-the-board movement against the voice and a surge in uncertainty. The movement against the voice to parliament and the executive government is strongest among older Australians and Coalition supporters." - Dennis Shanahan - theaustralian.com.au

>>18960120 State premiers ‘important’ to Indigenous voice to parliament Yes campaign, referendum - The Albanese government is banking on the country’s premiers playing a crucial role in getting the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum across the line, hoping the state leaders’ popularity in states like South Australia and NSW will help clinch a Yes vote. While Queensland is considered the weakest link for the Yes camp, Labor insiders were hopeful Chris Minns in NSW, Peter Malinauskas in SA and the country’s only Liberal premier, Jeremy Rockliff in Tasmania, would be influential campaigners.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188902

#30 - Part 45

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 5

>>18960127 Indigenous voice to parliament doesn’t guarantee it will help Indigenous Australians - "Perhaps the most important question in the lead-up to the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum is not whether modifications to the Constitution are legally sound, but will such modifications contribute to helping Indigenous Australians in any practical way? I am not convinced a constitutionally enshrined body can help those Indigenous people who need the most help, any more than the legions of Indigenous people currently working for government can. In fact, I think it can be harmful to them. It sends the poisonous message to Indigenous Australians who suffer needlessly that their salvation lies in the voice and they are powerless to make any positive change in their lives, now or ever, through their own efforts or from receiving the help offered to them." - Anthony Dillon is an honorary fellow in the faculty of health sciences at the Australian Catholic University and identifies as a part-Indigenous Australian - theaustralian.com.au

>>18965820 There’s nothing impartial or even-handed in Labor’s support for the Indigenous voice to parliament - "I’ve been opposed to this voice proposal from day one. It’s wrong on moral grounds (for going down the group rights road and breaking the commitment to equal citizenship). It’s wrong on political grounds because our already sclerotic lawmaking process will grind massively more slowly if this body has to be consulted on near-on everything. And it’s wrong on legal and constitutional grounds (not least because this will be the first proposed referendum mooting a new chapter in our Constitution, a fact that is begging the judges to be activist, because past forays into “making it up at the point of application” always involve judges pointing to the structure and different-chapters nature of our Constitution). That’s my substantive position." - James Allan, Garrick professor of law at the University of Queensland - theaustralian.com.au

>>18965852 Migrants got a fair go, it’s our turn to pay it forward with the Indigenous voice to parliament - "Indigenous communities occupy a special historical place in this country. Provided with accurate information, most multicultural Australians understand this. I urge migrants and their descendants: do not be passive bystanders in this debate. It is inspiring to see more than 120 multicultural community organisations stepping up, saying Yes and helping educate their communities - but we can and must do more. We must fight fake news with facts. We must counter misinformation and division with truth and compassion. Let us do the hard work together. If multicultural Australians stand in solidarity with Indigenous people, the referendum will succeed." - Shireen Morris, constitutional lawyer and director of the Radical Centre Reform Lab at Macquarie University law school - theaustralian.com.au

>>18965884 Indigenous voice to parliament ‘does not deal with the reality of what it means to be Aboriginal and what people endure day-to-day’ - "There are many reasons to vote No to the legislation that establishes the voice to parliament: the lack of recognition of First Nations in the concept; the associated lack of a cultural rationale. How is it Indigenous? How can it succeed without being recognisably Indigenous? Associated with this lack of connection to the reality of life in Aboriginal communities is that just by its existence it will undermine the power First Nations have over their lands and waters, their existing relationships to governments, their autonomy; for these reasons it is bound to cause and exacerbate conflicts." - Victoria Grieves Williams PhD has worked for almost 40 years in Aboriginal affairs - theaustralian.com.au

>>18971069 ‘We are the voice from the bush’: Spirit of Yunupingu to spur Yes campaign - Australians will be asked to embrace the idea of an Indigenous Voice to parliament in a historic call from Northern Territory land councils to mark the 35th anniversary of the landmark Barunga Statement. Indigenous Affairs Minister Linda Burney will travel to the Northern Territory later this week to attend the Barunga festival - more than three decades after then-prime minister Bob Hawke was handed the famous treaty request by esteemed rights activist, the late Yunupingu, at the same event.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188903

#30 - Part 46

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 6

>>18971082 The Indigenous voice to parliament could be a new remedy for Aboriginal disadvantage - "If you live in regional Australia the issues that are creating divisions in the community are not based on political structures in Perth or Canberra but the growing incidence of crime and anti-social behaviour. These things I believe are symptoms of wider issues, but unless we create a mechanism to listen to the voices who say we must do something, nothing can change. The two questions I believe Australians should consider at the referendum are “What should we do?” or the more empowering question, “Who do we want to be?” I hope our answer to the second question will lead us to the conclusion that if most of the things we have tried in the past have not worked, and if we would like Aboriginal people to enjoy a better life, we will support the Indigenous voice to parliament." - Ian Trust, chairman of Empowered Communities - theaustralian.com.au

>>18971099 The powerful enjoy special access; Aboriginal people should too, through an Indigenous voice to parliament - "Nobody of any standing is opposed to recognition in the Constitution of the Aboriginal people as the country’s first inhabitants. So that leaves the practical measure that is proposed -- the voice itself. Surely to lift up our most marginalised citizens, so they can lobby just as the powerful can, is a reasonable course of action. For as long as can be envisaged, Aboriginal people will remain less powerful than existing interest groups, which have always had all the access they want. Why? Because, unlike most of the others, Indigenous Australians lack lots of money and entrenched influence. Those who represent the Aboriginal people will never be able to pull strings by way of political donations. But they do seek a seat at the table where decisions affecting them are made. We, the Australian people, ought to give them that seat, that access: the voice." - Ian Temby AO KC, the first commonwealth director of public prosecutions and the first commissioner of the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption - - theaustralian.com.au

>>18977458 NT land councils back the Voice to Parliament at Barunga Festival, 'to finally be respected as equals' - Members of Northern Territory Aboriginal Land Councils have gathered at Barunga, to declare their support of an Indigenous Voice in the upcoming referendum. More than 200 representatives of the Northern, Central, Tiwi and Anindilyakwa Aboriginal Land Councils gathered on the Traditional Lands of the Bagala (Jawoyn). Land council members signed the Declaration and a copy was then presented to Minister for Indigenous Australians Linda Burney.

>>18977583 Victorian Bar lawyers back the voice following membership poll - The Victorian Bar Association has thrown its support behind the Indigenous voice, claiming it is “sound” and “appropriate”, after a membership poll revealed just over 50 per cent of barristers supported the Bar taking a public stance. The state Bar Council elected to poll the entire association last month following a fractious debate broke out among members over whether it should issue a statement supporting the Indigenous voice, or whether it should stay silent. Results from the poll showed that of the 2229 Bar members who were eligible to vote, 1767 did. Of those 1767 members, 1008 (57 per cent) voted in favour of the Bar supporting the Indigenous voice and 714 (40 per cent) voted for a separate motion that the Bar not publicly support either the “yes” case of the “no” case for the voice. Forty-five members abstained from voting.

>>18992119 Yes campaign at odds with own director Noel Pearson - The Indigenous voice to parliament’s best-resourced campaign, Yes23, has directly contradicted criticism from one of its own directors Noel Pearson that the campaign lacks a clear message. Mr Pearson, one of 11 directors of Yes23 and its charitable arm Australians for Indigenous Constitutional Recognition, has pointed to failings in the campaign he helped devise. Amid concern over recent polls showing a reduction in support for the voice, he suggested the campaign must do better to convey the key message that recognition is the aim and a voice is the way to get there. “It’s a lack of clarity that is obviously working against us,” the veteran of the Indigenous rights movement told the Sydney Morning Herald. Danny Gilbert, the prominent lawyer who co-chairs Yes23 with screenwriter and filmmaker Rachel Perkins, was adamant the campaign was on track. “As the campaign moves into a new phase we are fully confident that we are on the right path to bringing Australians together to deliver a resounding ‘yes’.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188904

#30 - Part 47

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 7

>>18992132 Yes campaign ‘snookered’, says Noel Pearson in call for major campaign shift - Leading Voice architect Noel Pearson is pushing for a fundamental shift in how the Voice to parliament referendum is being presented, warning the Yes movement lacks a clear message and has been snookered by deceptive arguments of its opponents. In a significant intervention months out from a tightly contested referendum, the academic and activist also said there was an urgent need to elevate the goal of recognising Indigenous Australians in the Constitution above the creation of the Voice advisory body. “I think that message has got to be even more prominent than the Voice. The Voice is just the means; the core of the reform is recognition,” he said in an interview, “and our argument is that the Voice is the best means.”

>>18992142 Indigenous voice to parliament can complete the unfinished business of the 1967 referendum - "Australians have come to see the true significance of the 1967 referendum. The unprecedented Yes vote for the Indigenous proposal provided a mandate for national laws and policy on Aboriginal affairs. What was missing was positive acknowledgment in the Constitution and a means for first peoples to have a say on the laws and policies that could now be made for them. The task of the 2023 referendum is to remedy this unfinished business by providing recognition and a voice to Australia’s first peoples." - George Williams, deputy vice-chancellor and Professor of Law at the University of New South Wales

>>18992160 ‘A tipping point’: Support for Voice falls below a majority - Support for the Indigenous Voice has fallen below a majority on the Yes or No question that will decide the referendum, dropping from 53 to 49 per cent ahead of a crucial Senate decision on the wording of the change to the constitution. Voters have swung against the proposal for the third month in a row and are backing the No case in three states - Queensland, Western Australia and South Australia - when asked about the federal government’s proposed question. An exclusive survey shows that support for the Voice is at 56 per cent in Victoria and 53 per cent in NSW but this is outweighed by powerful swings that could block the reform gaining the required threshold of a majority of votes in a majority of states. The Resolve survey is the first major poll to show No has a majority and the first to show three states have shifted to the No side.

>>18992177 Is Anthony Albanese facing a tipping point on the Voice referendum? - "Anthony Albanese is about to reach the point of no return on the Indigenous Voice with an apparent confidence that Australians will back his preferred model for the contentious change. But the latest Resolve Political Monitor highlights the grave danger of defeat -- and a generational setback for reconciliation – unless the prime minister and the Yes campaigners take drastic action to save their cause." - David Crowe - theage.com.au

>>18998240 Conservative think-tank chairman Sean Gordon to co-lead Liberals for Yes campaign - Referendum working group member and chairman of the conservative think-tank Uphold and Recognise, Sean Gordon, will lead the Liberals for Yes campaign alongside former ACT chief minister Kate Carnell, ahead of the referendum on the Indigenous voice to parliament. The Liberals for Yes, which include federal opposition backbenchers Julian Leeser and Bridget Archer, officially launched their campaign advocating for the voice earlier this month, arguing the meaningful recognition of Indigenous Australians through a voice to parliament would deliver “practical policy and practical outcomes”. The Australian can reveal Uphold and Recognise, which was founded by Mr Leeser and whose board members include former Indigenous Australians minister Ken Wyatt, will formally join the Liberals for Yes this week.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188905

#30 - Part 48

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 8

>>18998246 Voice opponents turn to ‘Trump-like’ politics, misinformation: Burney - Campaigners against the Indigenous Voice referendum are copying Donald Trump by weaponising misinformation, Indigenous Affairs Minister Linda Burney has declared, as Voice backers implore Australians to keep faith in the reconciliation push. Burney used a speech in Canberra on Tuesday night to claim the Voice would lead to tangible improvements in society and a “more productive Australia, with greater social and economic participation”, while highlighting the No campaign’s “post-truth approach to politics”. “I fear that the No campaign is importing American-style Trump politics to Australia,” she said. “Its aim is to polarise people and its weapon of choice is misinformation. No campaign outfit, Fair Australia, regularly posts things on social media that are clearly false or taken out of context. The Yes campaign is articulating a positive vision of Australia’s future … the Australian people are better than Trump politics from the No campaign,” she said.

>>18998265 Australians’ support for Indigenous voice steady with 60% in favour, Essential poll finds - Public support for the Indigenous voice to parliament is holding steady and remains high, the latest Guardian Essential poll shows, in contrast with other recent polls suggesting support is sliding. The poll of 1,123 voters, published on Tuesday, found 60% of respondents were in favour of the voice, up one point on the previous survey, while 40% were opposed to it. The yes vote still leads in all major opinion polls, but voice supporters and senior Labor government figures have raised concerns about the vigour of the yes campaign as the no campaign grows in volume. A Resolve poll for the Nine newspapers, published on Monday, showed 42% in favour and 40% against with 18% undecided -- but when forced to make a yes or no decision only 49% supported the change while 51% opposed it. Last week’s Newspoll showed 46% support, 43% against and 11% undecided.

>>19005407 Yes23 group under increasing scrutiny over Indigenous Voice campaign tactics - Yes23 is under increasing pressure to take control of the campaign for an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice, as the final vote on the legislation in parliament looms. There are concerns within the government caucus the Yes23 campaign has not ramped up quickly enough, allowing the No campaign a foothold in the debate. A senior member of Yes23 told the ABC, internal polling indicates all six states are still in winnable positions for the Yes camp, and support for the Voice sits between numbers published this week by Resolve, which has been trending downward for some time and dipped below 49 per cent this week, and the Guardian Essential poll which has the proposal holding steady at 60 per cent in favour.

>>19005414 ‘We can’t turn back now’, Linda Burney digs in on Indigenous voice to parliament model - Linda Burney and prominent supporters of an Indigenous voice to parliament are staring down calls to reset the Yes campaign or delay the referendum and reconciliation, with the Indigenous Australians Minister declaring Australia has come too far to turn back now. Ms Burney told the Committee for Economic Development of Australia’s state of the nation conference on Tuesday night: “We have come too far as a nation on this journey of reconciliation to turn back now. We have to go forward. We have everything to gain and nothing to lose by supporting the voice … It is an opportunity to ensure we are getting the best possible advice from the ground. It is a mechanism for us to listen, so that we can make better policies and help close the gap. Because more of the same is not good enough.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188906

#30 - Part 49

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 9

>>19016362 Indigenous voice to parliament will be a distraction from the real problems, writes John Anderson - "The so-called voice to parliament, enshrined in the much-praised Uluru Statement from the Heart, claims to establish a constitutionally guaranteed Indigenous voice in our legislative and executive arms of government. This, according to its advocates, will ensure that the plight of Indigenous Australians is impossible to ignore. By saying so-called voice, I mean no disrespect, but it is misleading to suggest that Indigenous Australians currently have no voice to parliament when each Indigenous Australian has an equal vote to anyone else and, importantly, each state and territory has a minister for Aboriginal affairs, and federally we have a minister for Indigenous Australians. These portfolios liaise directly with many Indigenous stakeholders. Indigenous Australians, like all Australians, have many voices to parliament already. I and many others am simply not convinced that this so-called voice will achieve anything positive beyond a very short-lived rush of joy for those in favour of it." - John Anderson, deputy prime minister and leader of the Nationals from 1999 to 2005 - theaustralian.com.au

>>19016423 The Yes campaign is calm amid the ‘inevitable’ messy phase. But it still has divisions - "Divided on its core message to Australians, the movement to establish an Indigenous Voice is facing its toughest moment. A day before a poll showed the No side ahead for the first time, arguably Australia’s most eminent Indigenous leader Noel Pearson admitted something to this newspaper that none of his colleagues had said publicly: their adversaries were on top. But the major Yes campaign, Yes23, is calm about the referendum’s trajectory. Albanese remains confident that a perhaps unprecedented coalition of elite corporate and sporting bodies and smaller community groups will sway an increasingly cosmopolitan electorate." - Paul Sakkal - theage.com.au

>>19021634 Video: Uluru Statement from the Heart signatories ‘unhappy’ with Indigenous voice to parliament Yes ‘consent’ - Numerous signatories of the Uluru Statement from the Heart were “surprised” to see their names on the document that calls for an indigenous voice to parliament and “unhappy” to be seen as endorsing the statement, parliament has been told. Liberal senator and indigenous woman, Kerrynne Liddle, told the upper house on Friday she had heard from signatories of the statement that they were uncomfortable with their signatures being “interpreted as consent” for a voice. “I’ve heard from women surprised to see their signatures on the Statement, unhappy that their attendance and consultation is likely to be interpreted as consent - but who are not prepared to publicly come forward,” she said.

>>19021683 Shock of recognition as Yes vote for Indigenous voice to parliament softens - "The Yes campaign for an Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government is in trouble even before final passage of the referendum legislation next week and the official announcement of a poll date -- expected to be in October. This is not a subjective assessment but an objective judgment based on what the Yes campaign supporters are saying, what they are not saying, what they are doing and what they are not doing. There are also problems with polling and who the Yes campaign wants to be seen campaigning for the Indigenous voice and leading the public debate. This is a crucial point not only for the Yes campaign but also for Anthony Albanese and the Labor government, which stands to lose so much if the referendum is lost." - Dennis Shanahan - theaustralian.com.au

>>19026358 Crunch week for Albanese with no turning back on Voice referendum - The campaign for the Indigenous Voice has reached a point of no return after five years of stubborn argument for the peak body to be enshrined in the constitution. The power and membership of this new group will remain the subject of fierce debate, but the change to the Constitution will be set in cement once the Senate decides on the bill to hold a referendum later this year. The vote is expected from 10am on Monday. The Senate will set the clock ticking on a popular vote to be held within two to six months of the passage of the bill, which means the only way to rethink the wording of the constitutional amendment is to cancel this plan and draft a new bill.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188907

#30 - Part 50

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 10

>>19031491 Senate passes referendum plan, cementing Voice to Parliament vote before end of the year - Australians will vote in their first referendum in more than two decades, with the Senate passing legislation to hold a vote on an Indigenous Voice to Parliament later this year. The Senate vote ends months of parliamentary procedures and now requires Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to set a referendum date, which must happen no sooner than two months and no later than six months. The proposed Voice to Parliament would be an independent advisory body that can advise the parliament and government about matters that affect the lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians. Mr Albanese is expected to announce a referendum for October, which will be the first since 1999 when Australians rejected the establishment of a republic.

>>19031542 ‘Right balance’: PM defends Voice model as referendum bill clears the parliament - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says the power of the proposed Voice to parliament strikes the right balance and has vowed to campaign for a Yes vote after the bill to authorise the historic referendum passed the Senate on Monday morning, 52 votes to 19. The bill cleared the parliament after many hours of debate in both chambers, including an extended sitting of the Senate until 4am on Saturday, paving the way for the Yes and No camps to ramp up their campaigns within local communities. “Some people say this goes too far, some say it doesn’t go far enough. I say we’ve got the balance right,” Albanese said.

>>19031584 OPINION: We now face a momentous reckoning. Politicians must not decide the outcome - "Parliament on Monday finally passed legislation to enable the Australian people to vote later this year in a referendum to change our Constitution. I now look forward to discussions devoid of the political posturing that has poisoned the process so far, because this referendum belongs to the Australian people, not to politicians. It was to the people that the convention of First Peoples at Uluru more than six years ago addressed the invitation to walk together for a better future. Those who signed the Uluru Statement wanted the Australian people, not politicians, to decide whether the Voice should be enshrined in the Constitution and not to be just a creature of legislation. A successful referendum offers much hope. A negative result would doubtlessly be celebrated by the No voters, but they will have to live with the legacy bequeathed to our children and generations beyond. First Peoples would remain unrecognised in the Constitution and denied a permanent voice to the parliament and government." - Patrick Dodson, Labor senator for Western Australia - theage.com.au

>>19031593 Obstacles to the voice risk becoming ever more entrenched - "The final legislative hurdle has been passed for the voice referendum to go ahead on a so far unspecified date later this year. But the obstacles to its success remain and are at risk of only becoming more deeply entrenched. The public polling to date suggests waning support. If the referendum were to be held this weekend the chances of a Yes vote appear slim. This question for Anthony Albanese will be at what stage he is forced into a rethink if public support continues to soften. Albanese says he not for turning. He believes the mood will shift in his favour. But the political pressure on the prime minister will only intensify unless the yes campaign can begin to make up ground." - Simon Benson - theaustralian.com.au

>>19031608 ‘Happy assimilation day’: Lidia Thorpe embarks on voice tirade in Senate - Outspoken independent senator Lidia Thorpe has declared the “tokenistic” Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government is the final nail in the coffin that gives her people no power, while wearing a T-shirt inferring the advisory body was fake. The Indigenous senator embarked on a tirade against the voice as her upper house colleagues spent nearly an hour delivering their final contributions on the government’s Constitutional Alteration Bill, which will pave the way for the referendum to be held between October and December. Repeating her previous assertion she was in parliament to infiltrate and “destroy the white supremacy that is represented in this place”, Senator Thorpe labelled the Constitution illegal and wished the chamber a “happy assimilation day”.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188908

#30 - Part 51

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 11

>>19031624 Indigenous voice to parliament Yes campaigner Thomas Mayo’s radical vision - Prominent Yes campaigner for the Indigenous voice to parliament Thomas Mayo has described former prime minister John Howard as a “bastard” and threatened that politicians would be “punished” if they ignored the voice advisory body. The militant unionist and outspoken figure on the government’s First Nations referendum working group has also raised the prospect of a voice to parliament being the first step towards “reparations and compensation” for Indigenous Australians. Videos unearthed by No campaign strategists feature Mr Mayo appearing in online forums run by the Search Foundation - established in 1990 as a “successor organisation of the Communist Party of Australia” to preserve the socialist movement. The Maritime Union of Australia national Indigenous officer also delivered provocative statements in videos filmed at Invasion Day, Black Lives Matters and May Day rallies held between 2021 and 2023.

>>19036915 Indigenous voice to parliament campaigns prepare to launch across the country - Major events promoting the Indigenous voice to parliament will be held in every capital city within weeks of the bill needed to set up the referendum passing parliament, while the group known as the Liberals for Yes prepares to meet with high-powered conservatives who can lend their voices to the pro-voice campaign. Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney will also visit WA -- one of the key states of concern for the yes camp – next month as part of her push to convince Australians to support the referendum expected to be held in the middle of October.

>>19036958 Liberal party facing AEC complaint from constitutional lawyer Greg Craven - Conservative constitutional lawyer Greg Craven is considering an Australian Electoral Commission complaint against the Liberal Party for using his quotes as part of its No campaign, when he favours the ­Indigenous voice to parliament. Despite throwing his support behind the voice passing at the referendum, Professor Craven’s comments on potential risks posed by the body retaining the power to advise executive government are prominent on the Liberal website. “The voice can comment on everything from submarines to parking tickets … we will have regular judicial interventions,” his quote reads. Professor Craven’s comment is featured with those of prominent voice critics who are against the body being enshrined in the Constitution, including Coalition members Jacinta Nampijinpa Price and Kerrynne Liddle. “The quotes themselves are accurate. But the whole point of these pieces is to give the idea that I am actually opposed to the voice because of these quotes. (It) is completely untrue and misleading, and the Liberals know it,” he said. “I have repeatedly written publicly that I totally support and will campaign for the voice.”

>>19036983 Now it’s up to the people to decide this referendum on the Indigenous voice to parliament - "The referendum campaign carries a heavy responsibility for all Australians. It is now up to every citizen to command this debate from the politicians and to discuss and deliberate it with goodwill, to call out the fearmongering and misinformation by those opposing it, and to urge those supporting it to explain how it will deliver practical change. The voice, to my mind, is an opportunity that must be seized to turn Australia in a new direction, with reconciliation and responsibility, and to improve the lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Those who argue the voice is backed only by “elites” are misguided. This is a tactic to turn voters against constitutional change by fostering resentment. While referendums can be proposed only by politicians, the people will make the final judgment. That is where this debate now rests: with the citizens. The eyes of the world are upon us. History is calling on us. It is a test for all Australians. We must not fail." - Troy Bramston - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188909

#30 - Part 52

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 12

>>19037006 The Indigenous voice to parliament needs a fresh start away from Canberra - "Understanding the past can be difficult to comprehend because every experience is different, so I will speak only of my own. I grew up in a foster home on the old Brewarrina Mission in western NSW, and my life’s work has been dedicated to empowering other Indigenous people to step up and take responsibility, and for governments to loosen the control they have over our lives. This is the exact philosophy espoused by the Liberal Party. To me, voting Yes for recognition through a voice will be the ultimate expression of empowerment. It will acknowledge the desire for our people to be accountable to ourselves and our communities, and to our fellow Australians who voted Yes and put their faith in us. Voting Yes at the referendum means you are voting for a better future, where we come together with a common purpose: to see every Australian prosper and thrive, including our First Australians." - Sean Gordon, chairman of Uphold and Recognise and a member of the Referendum Working Group - theaustralian.com.au

>>19037011 Struggling Linda Burney must find her voice or risk damaging the Yes campaign - "Linda Burney is a parliamentary and political weak point in the Yes campaign for an Indigenous voice to parliament and is going to have to radically improve her sales pitch for the referendum. As the Minister for Indigenous Australians Burney is the second most important Labor face for the voice to parliament and executive government after Anthony Albanese, and she is struggling in the media and in parliament. There are three parliamentary sitting days before the winter break and Burney is going to have to improve because her performance can’t be shielded forever." - Dennis Shanahan - theaustralian.com.au

>>19037035 Lidia Thorpe announces she will be backing No campaign against Indigenous Voice - Independent senator Lidia Thorpe has announced she will give her full support to the No campaign against an Indigenous Voice to Parliament, and is vying to be part of the group writing the referendum pamphlet. Senator Thorpe had previously stated she would not give her outright backing to the No case, but on Tuesday revealed the change in her position was spurred on by a breakdown in negotiations with the federal government over implementing the recommendations from the 1991 Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody, and the 1997 Bringing them Home report into the over-representation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children in out of home care.

>>19037314 Video: Meet the Architect behind the 'Voice'… who literally wrote the book - "Divisive and aggressive commentary by Referendum Working Group activist Thomas Mayo has destroyed the Prime Minister’s claims that the Voice to Parliament is “a modest request” about “two things only: recognition and listening”. Mayo, the union official and self-described “militant” who wrote the book on the proposed constitutional change, has spoken candidly about the referendum’s aims, describing the Voice as a campaign tool to “punish politicians”, “abolish colonialist institutions” and “pay the rent, pay reparations and compensation”. Rather than what the PM described as an “inspiring and unifying Australian moment”, Mayo told a conference of communists that “there is nothing that we can do that is more powerful than building a first nations' Voice, a black institution, a black political force to be reckoned with”." - Advance Australia - June 19 2023

>>19043992 Indigenous Voice stirs minister’s emotions as Coalition demands Australia Day answers - Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney insists she wants to close the gap rather than engage in culture wars as the federal opposition demands answers about the Voice referendum. Ms Burney became emotional in parliament on Wednesday as Coalition MPs pursued her over why she had said the Indigenous Voice to parliament and executive government wouldn’t provide advice on changing the date of Australia Day. Under intense questioning, Ms Burney said creating a constitutionally-enshrined Voice was not about stoking culture wars but helping Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who were “crying out for a different way of doing things”.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188910

#30 - Part 53

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 13

>>19044003 Doubt over Linda Burney’s claim Indigenous voice to parliament won’t advise on Australia Day - Aboriginal leaders and constitutional law experts have cast doubt over Linda Burney’s declaration in parliament that the voice won’t give advice on changing the date of Australia Day, saying the controversial topic could become an issue the advisory body wants to pursue. The Indigenous Australians Minister faced a second day of ­intense parliamentary questioning from the Coalition on what would and would not fit within the voice’s remit, after the government’s referendum legislation cleared the parliament and the Yes and No campaigns began ramping up. Constitutional law expert ­George Williams, a member of the government’s expert group advising on the constitutional amendment, said whether the voice made representations on Australia Day would be up to its members and parliament could not prevent it from doing so.

>>19044017 Yes23 campaign director linked voice to January 26 - Yes23 campaign director Dean Parkin told a religious forum that the voice to parliament was the mechanism for Indigenous Australians to influence change on Australia Day and “any other issues” impacting Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. In an “Exploring 26th January” online forum hosted by Evangelisation Brisbane, Mr Parkin said a constitutionally enshrined voice was the vehicle for Indigenous Australians to have a seat at the table and ensure that the focus of decision-makers was on “truth”. “We need to make sure that we have that voice in place because that … constitutionally guaranteed voice is going to be the mechanism that allows us a seat at the table to ensure that these conversations around truth, be it on the 26th, be it on any other issues that’s affecting our people, that we have a real say and we have a real opportunity to actually influence change,” Mr Parkin told Brisbane Archbishop Mark Coleridge in a video posted on January 20 last year.

>>19044032 Yes campaign distances itself from Thomas Mayo comments - Yes23 campaign director Dean Parkin and Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney have distanced themselves from comments made by prominent Yes campaigner Thomas Mayo, who threatened that politicians would be punished if they ignore the voice advisory body. Mr Mayo, who sits on the board of Australians for Indigenous Constitutional Recognition which leads the Yes23 campaign, has previously said colonial institutions must be torn down and that the voice was a step towards “reparations and compensation”. Mr Parkin said he had spoken with Mr Mayo, who co-authored The Voice to Parliament Handbook with veteran journalist Kerry O’Brien, and described him as a “great champion” who has been having these conversations for years.

>>19044044 PM’s belief the voice will prevail now under challenge as no vote grows organically - "Anthony Albanese’s belief that Labor’s unassailable clout will be enough to push through a contested referendum is now being directly challenged by the reality of what the Prime Minister hopes to achieve. The strategy of being economical with detail over a significant alteration to the constitution is slowly killing the yes camp’s ability to present a unified message. Concerns about the referendum have been reflected in polling and is evidenced in the online reach of the no-campaign, much of it which is unpaid. The reach of the No campaign appears already to be deeper and broader in the community. And it is happening naturally without too much effort." - Simon Benson - theaustralian.com.au

>>19044059 Indigenous voice to parliament referendum date likely to be October 14 - "Anthony Albanese has said enough for us to sensibly conclude the date for a referendum to enshrine an Indigenous voice to parliament will be announced in the first week of August, have about a 12-week campaign and be held on October 14. You’d think Albanese will announce it at the Garma festival on August 4 or 5 because that is where he announced the wording of the referendum. Best bets: the referendum date of October 14 will be announced in the first week of August to avoid colliding with football finals, overseas travel and parliamentary sittings." - Dennis Shanahan - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188911

#30 - Part 54

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 14

>>19050994 Anthony Albanese seeks to place legal limits on Aboriginal voice amid debate over Australia Day - Anthony Albanese is seeking to place legal limits on the scope of the Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government by assuring Australians its remit would be restricted to issues that “specifically or differently” affect Aboriginal people. With falling support for the voice in the polls and confusion around how it will work and what it will advise on, Mr Albanese said Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus’s second reading speech on the government’s Constitution Alteration Bill would have “legal ­consequences” for any High Court interpretation of what the voice can advise on.

>>19051005 Anthony Albanese rejects Peter Dutton’s request to delay or change the referendum - Anthony Albanese has rejected Peter Dutton’s “offer of friendship” to delay or change the referendum on an Indigenous voice to parliament, ramping up a scathing personal attack against the Opposition Leader in a bid to counter accusations Australians are being starved of detail. As the final parliamentary sitting week before the winter break came to a close, Mr Dutton declared Australians weren’t ready to vote on the voice because of a lack of detail.

>>19051030 Anthony Albanese’s missed opportunity to modulate the voice - "For almost a year, Anthony Albanese chose not to make the one change that could have handed him overwhelming support in the coming referendum. The Prime Minister ignored repeated entreaties to change the scope of the proposed Indigenous voice so it would focus only on matters that affect Indigenous people - and them alone. The fact that Albanese has now embraced this idea - or at least has given a public impression of embracing this view – shows that the government implicitly accepts its design for the voice is flawed." - Chris Merritt, vice-president of the Rule of Law Institute of Australia - theaustralian.com.au

>>19058008 Peter Dutton doubles down, says Voice risks reconciliation - Peter Dutton is refusing to back down from claims the Voice to parliament referendum is a risky manoeuvre that threatens reconciliation despite the Prime Minister accusing him of speaking “without a heart”. Days after the parliament passed the necessary legislation to set up the referendum, Mr Dutton on Friday doubled down on his argument that Australians are not ready to vote on the Voice due to a lack of detail and said the government should amend its plans for constitutional recognition. Capping off a week of intense questioning in parliament by the opposition on the extent of the Voice’s powers, Mr Dutton warned the proposal risked “splitting the country in half”.

>>19058029 Anthony Albanese says the voice will have no power of veto yet some senators persist with allegations - Anthony Albanese has accused some politicians who oppose the Indigenous voice to parliament of dishonesty by proposing scenarios they know to be impossible. Mr Albanese said the voice would not have any veto right over any parliamentary legislation, yet some opponents persisted with claims that it would. “I don’t believe that senators arguing that a road in Victoria was going to be the subject of the voice believe that that’s the case,” he said.

>>19058047 BHP joins Rio Tinto in donating to Yes campaign for the Voice - Mining giant BHP has donated $2m to the campaign to back the campaign for an Indigenous Voice to Parliament, matching the donation of Rio Tinto. BHP confirmed the donation on Friday, as the company released the latest update to its reconciliation action plan, which reiterates BHP’s ongoing support for a yes vote at the referendum and promises to “connect our workforce to information about a Voice and the matters it is seeking to address”. BHP backed the movement to recognise an Indigenous voice in 2019, in its statement of support for the Uluru Statement from the Heart, and has maintained support ever since.

>>19069463 Anthony Albanese rejects Peter Dutton’s call to put Voice referendum on ice - Anthony Albanese has rejected calls from Peter Dutton to put the Indigenous Voice referendum on ice as some opinion polling shows support for the proposal is lagging. The Prime Minister conceded it would “undoubtedly” be a setback for reconciliation if the referendum failed but said “no one ever won an Ashes Test by staying in the sheds”. “The referendum will be held in the last quarter of this year. Peter Dutton unfortunately has raised a number of issues that he knows, I think, are just not right,” Mr Albanese told Sky News.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188912

#30 - Part 55

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 15

>>19075409 Albanese at record low approval ratings as No vote overtakes Yes for first time on voice: Newspoll - The referendum to enshrine an Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government would fail if a vote were held next weekend, with more voters for the first time opposed to altering the Constitution to achieve it and a majority of states lined up to deliver a “No” vote. An exclusive Newspoll conducted for The Australian shows the referendum on a path to possible defeat, with the “Yes” campaign falling short of achieving the double majority test of more than 50 per cent of the national vote and majorities in a majority of states. The special Newspoll of 2303 voters conducted between June 16 and June 24, coinciding with the referendum bill’s passage through parliament and an intensifying political debate over the remit of the voice, shows the “Yes” vote falling three points to a new low of just 43 per cent. The “No” vote rose four points to 47 per cent, confirming for the first time that more people are opposed to the Albanese government’s referendum model than those who support it.

>>19075436 Albanese’s political fortunes hang on voice referendum - "Anthony Albanese is now beginning to burn through political capital. His short-term fortunes are undoubtedly tied to the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum’s success or failure. And perhaps the Prime Minister’s long-term fortunes as well, depending on the outcome. The latest Newspoll numbers are unquestionably bad for the voice. Likely worse than expected. It is not surprising that Albanese’s personal numbers have taken a hit given how closely tied he is personally to the referendum debate and how much of parliament has been occupied with these issues. With 52 per cent satisfied with him as leader and 42 per cent dissatisfied, this is the worst outcome since the election." - Simon Benson - theaustralian.com.au

>>19082321 ‘No’ campaign starts to spook Labor MPs - Labor MPs are warning the push for an Indigenous voice to parliament is faltering and the No ­campaign is outmanoeuvring supporters of constitutional change, as the Yes camp faces growing calls within government ranks to urgently ramp up their operations. Senior sources said they were getting nervous about the slipping of support and urged for greater campaign activity in coming weeks, including door-knocking, signage and mass mailouts urging people to donate and join the Yes campaign. It comes as Yes 23 prepares to launch its major day of action this weekend -- which will include more than 20 events across the country – in what insiders called a “test” for the campaign to drum up support.

>>19082358 Unions will campaign for an Indigenous voice to parliament online and in workplaces - Trade unions, including the union of Indigenous land rights activist Eddie Mabo, are vowing to mobilise their members and actively campaign for a voice to parliament across social media, workplaces, universities and neighbourhoods, amid falling support for the advisory body. The Rail, Tram and Bus Union, the Electrical Trades Union, the Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association and the Transport Workers Union told The Australian they were invested in the campaign and members were being encouraged to engage and advocate during the referendum.

>>19087754 Peter Dutton sends six-page brochure to constituents outlining No case against the Indigenous voice to parliament - Peter Dutton says the High Court will determine the powers of the voice, not the parliament, and Australia will be “stuck with negative consequences” if the referendum succeeds, in an extensive brochure showcasing the central arguments of his No campaign. A six-page pamphlet was sent to residents in the Opposition Leader’s marginal Queensland electorate of Dickson within the past fortnight, which was delivered with a letter from Mr Dutton that states: “The government has overlooked the concerns of many legal experts. It is pursuing a voice that covers all areas of ‘executive government’ … Many legal experts warn this voice could risk years of litigation. The High Court would determine its powers, not the parliament.”

>>19099367 Anthony Albanese rejects ‘frankly diminishing’ Voice scare campaign - Anthony Albanese has reiterated the Voice to parliament will not have the power to veto government, taking aim at fear campaigns for suggesting otherwise. In the wake of lagging support in recent opinion polls, the Prime Minister called on those clinging to a “if it ain’t broke don’t fix it” mentality to consider the status quo is already “profoundly broken”. “Indigenous people have an eight-year gap in life expectancy, a suicide rate twice as high, and rates of disease and infant mortality and family violence so much worse than those of the general community,” he said.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188914

#30 - Part 56

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 16

>>19099380 Yes23 expects up to 50k volunteers to campaign on-the-ground for an Indigenous voice to parliament - Yes23 - the leading organisation in support of an Indigenous voice to parliament - is hoping to assemble an army of up to 50,000 on-the-ground volunteers by referendum day, as the Albanese government prepares to deliver a “supporting” political campaign. While the Prime Minister will inject himself into the centre of the Yes case, The Australian understands there will be no central federal Labor headquarters during the official campaign as there is ahead of an election. It was unclear whether Mr Albanese’s travel schedule would mirror an election campaign, according to government sources, and ministers were being invited to speak at events rather than ­directing the campaign. “Since day one, we’ve not wanted it to be ‘Anthony Albanese’s voice’. We can’t be leading this,” a senior government source said.

>>19099393 Mansell plea: ‘Stop polarising Voice referendum and negotiate compromise with progressive No campaigners’ - Veteran Aboriginal activist Michael Mansell is urging Anthony Albanese to cancel the voice referendum in the face of falling support and instead legislate an advisory body and start treaty talks. Mr Mansell, who is chair of the Aboriginal Land Council of Tasmania, told The Weekend Australian the Prime Minister should drop the referendum and negotiate with “progressive” voice opponents on alternatives. The lawyer and leading advocate for Indigenous Tasmanians since the 1970s said these could include legislating a voice, Aboriginal-designated parliamentary seats and a national treaty and truth-telling process.

>>19104269 Worried about the Indigenous voice to parliament? Wait until you see the treaty - "Australians will discover that if they vote Yes, the constitutionally entrenched Indigenous voice is not the conclusion of the intended makeover of our national governance arrangements. It is but the first step. While the voice is a major change to our Constitution, it is a mere enabler for activists’ overriding objective of a treaty with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. What few voters understand is that while the voice provides the necessary negotiating platform and leverage for activists to achieve the desired treaty, the new constitutionally enshrined race-based body is only secondary to the treaty. That is because the voice does not in itself give ATSI people the two things activists really want: namely, sovereignty and a form of self-government, and reparations. Only a treaty can do that. That’s why voters should realise that a Yes vote will likely guarantee many more years of agitation and division until, and perhaps even after, a treaty is achieved." - Janet Albrechtsen - theaustralian.com.au

>>19104284 Rio Tinto’s first Indigenous director Ben Wyatt says campaign against voice has likely had maximum impact - The campaign against the Indigenous voice to parliament has revealed its arguments and it has likely had it maximum impact­, ­according to Rio Tinto director Ben Wyatt. “Obviously the No campaign is having an impact, but I’m still quite optimistic about the outcome,” Mr Wyatt said. “I think the Yes campaign ­momentum will continue to increase and the No campaign, I think they’ve made their arguments, it’s probably had its maximum impact and then the Yes campaign certainly has the ­capacity now to deal with the concerns raised.”

>>19109625 Voice defeat will undermine Australia’s standing on world stage: Dodson - Labor senator and Indigenous elder Pat Dodson says Australia will have no integrity to criticise China over its human rights record if the Voice referendum fails, warning the country needs to have “clean hands” on the international stage. In his first interview since taking medical leave in April to fight a serious illness, Dodson said winning the referendum would be difficult but he believed Australians were “better than those who are currently running the No case”. He also said elevating the recognition of Indigenous Australians in the Constitution over the creation of the Voice, as some Yes campaigners have suggested, is the wrong approach.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188916

#30 - Part 57

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 17

>>19109631 Indigenous Voice to Parliament Yes camp intensify campaign as referendum draws closer - The Yes campaign for the Indigenous Voice believes there is enough time to turn around negative polling results revealing softening support for constitutional change. The Yes campaign, spearheaded by the organisation Yes23, is due to intensify this weekend with a series of community events, amid criticism it has failed to build the same head of steam as the No campaign despite the chance the referendum could be held in less than two months. Veteran campaign analyst Kos Samaras, a director at the Redbridge group, says the Yes campaign should have ramped up its efforts sooner. "In an environment where people are just not really keeping an eye out for this type of information, it really takes a fairly long time to actually get cut through," he said.

>>19109647 Voice to parliament: Yes23 holds rally blitz to bolster support for referendum - Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney has issued a rallying war cry for Australians to support an Indigenous Voice to Parliament, as more than 25 community rallies gathered on Sunday. “The eyes of the world are truly on Australia and I have every faith Australians will rally and vote yes in this referendum,” she said at the Brisbane event. “What we’re being asked in a few months time is not what the colour of the carpet is going to be, but whether or not we believe Aboriginal people should be recognised in the founding document of this nation: the Australian Constitution. And the answer is yes.”

>>19109659 The simple reason the 'Yes' campaign is dumping celebrities in a major backflip, as supporters are schooled in how to avoid debates about the facts: 'Aussies don't like being told what to do' - Yes campaigners will not be putting celebrities at the front and centre of their campaign in an extraordinary backflip. In April, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese intended to recruit Indigenous superstars, but the campaign has since shifted its focus to ordinary Australians. A source in the campaign said fears were raised using celebrities would backfire and the shift was made because Australians don't like being told what to do. Indigenous sporting superstars such as Cathy Freeman, footballers Adam Goodes and Johnathan Thurston and tennis legends Evonne Goolagong-Cawley and Ash Barty were hand-selected earlier in the year to promote the Yes campaign. The stars will still endorse the Voice, however they will not play a prominent role in the campaign.

>>19114941 Yes campaign pushes power of the positive - There was no brass band, not a bell or whistle to be heard when the Yes campaign on the voice finally took its no-frills pitch to the people. It was more a day on the green with the kids dancing in the warm Brisbane sun while Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney applied the soft-sell to the question that threatens to divide the nation ahead of a referendum later this year. Yes campaign director Dean Parkin appealed to people to join the movement. Don’t sit back or wait for an invitation; don’t be distracted by the “noise in the news”, he said. “It’s really simple: if only one in 10 of you here today are able to have a yarn with two people in your families or your communities and bring them on board to Yes, we will win this referendum.”

>>19114955 Peter Dutton says corporate Australia lacks ‘significant backbone’ for supporting an Indigenous voice to parliament - Big business is digging in behind an Indigenous voice to parliament despite a scathing attack from Peter Dutton, who accused some of Australia’s largest companies of lacking a “significant backbone” for supporting the constitutional reform. The Opposition Leader declared a constitutionally enshrined voice was not in the country’s or companies’ best interests after Rio Tinto, Wesfarmers and BHP each donated $2m to the Yes23 campaign. Mr Dutton, the leading No campaigner, said many people in corporate Australia were craving popularity and trying to appease those in the Twittersphere by supporting the voice, including through major donations.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188918

#30 - Part 58

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 18

>>19114964 Coalition open to working with Pauline Hanson on No pamphlet - Coalition frontbencher Jacinta Nampijinpa Price has left open the door to working with One Nation leader Pauline Hanson on the written No case to be published in the official Voice referendum pamphlet, after they met in Parliament House last month to discuss Hanson’s potential contribution. Hanson wants the No pamphlet to include the claim that the Voice will override the supremacy of parliament, which has been widely rejected by constitutional law experts, as well as unfounded assertions that it could pave the way for a separate Indigenous state and “racially exclusive” seats in parliament. Their document will form the opposing half of the official Yes/No referendum pamphlet that the Australian Electoral Commission is required to distribute to every Australian household at least 14 days before the vote. There is no legal requirement for the pamphlet to be truthful or accurate.

>>19120589 Liberals ‘have lost contact with mainstream’ over Indigenous voice to parliament, says Ken Wyatt - The Coalition risks descending into political irrelevance unless it can find a way to reconnect with middle Australia, former federal Liberal MP Ken Wyatt has warned. In his latest scathing broadside against the party he served for more than a decade, Wyatt -- who was the first Indigenous Australian elected to the House of Representatives, the first to serve as a government minister, and the first appointed to cabinet – said it was hard to see a ­future for the Liberals and the ­Nationals if they did not change their stand on a range of issues. “The party is going to have to consider its position in respect to the political landscape of the nation or face a period in which it’ll be ­irrelevant and its numbers will be small,” he told The Australian.

>>19126371 Indigenous voice to parliament: Linda Burney defines policy remit under her watch - Linda Burney has revealed health, education, jobs and housing as the four policy priorities on which she will ask the Indigenous voice to provide advice, as she is forced to define its remit and silence criticism from the No camp. In a full-throated defence of the advisory body, the Indigenous Australians Minister will use a major address in Canberra on Wednesday to outline more of her vision for the voice to parliament and the executive government, which is facing falling support in the polls as opponents home in on the lack of detail about it and warn it will divide Australia. Ms Burney will tell the National Press Club the voice will be active and engaged under her watch and offer new perspectives to old challenges from Indigenous Australians.

>>19126382 ‘The voice will be tasked with taking the long view’: Linda Burney - "From day one the voice will have a full in-tray. I will ask the voice to consider four main priority areas: health, education, jobs and housing. The voice will be tasked with taking the long-view. Unlike government, it won’t be distracted by the 3 year election cycles. It will plan for the next generation, not the next term. It will be focused on making a better future for the next generation. The time to make a generational difference is now. Friends, history is calling us. And I hope more than anything that the answer is Yes. Yes to the Uluru Statement from the Heart. Yes to a voice to parliament. And Yes to a better future." - The Hon Linda Burney, Minister for Indigenous Australians - theaustralian.com.au

>>19126388 Indigenous voice to parliament: Linda Burney in damage control over Yes campaign - "Linda Burney is now seeking to ameliorate the damage she and the government helped inflict on the Yes campaign for the voice in the final week of parliament before the winter break. The damage from a failure to supply detail, and the subsequent dispute over the remit of the voice in its advice to executive government and parliament, has been acute. It has become the central problem for the government. A new strategy was always going to be required for the government to halt the momentum of the No campaign. This was desperately needed weeks ago, if not months. Burney now says that under her watch as minister, she will be directing the voice to advise her on better Indigenous policy outcomes across four priority areas: health, education, employment and housing. This is the first time the government has articulated such an explicit set of policy areas it expects the functions of the voice to concentrate on. They should have been obvious from the outset." - Simon Benson - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188919

#30 - Part 59

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 19

>>19126399 Video: Linda Burney calls out ‘No’ campaign for running ‘Trump-style politics’, Jacinta Price hits back - Jacinta Nampijinpa Price has accused Linda Burney of launching an “arrogant” and “elitist” attack, after the Indigenous Australians Minister said Voice opponents were using “Trump-style politics”. Addressing the National Press Club on Wednesday during NAIDOC week, Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney said Fair Australia, the main campaign group against the upcoming Voice to parliament referendum, was threatening to divide Australia. “Fair Australia … is imposing Trump-style politics to Australia. It is post-truth and its aim is to polarise, to sow division in our society by making false claims, including providing advice to government would somehow impact the fundamental democratic principle of one vote, one value,” she said. Senator Price, a key proponent of the “No” vote and spokeswoman for Fair Australia, said Ms Burney had launched an “arrogant attack” on ordinary Australians voting no, proving the referendum was “about division”. “The good news is that mainstream Australians are wise to the division the ‘Yes’ campaign is trying to enshrine in our national rule book. We will not be standing idly by while Ms Burney launches her elitist attacks from the comfort of the Press Club.”

>>19126410 Linda Burney didn’t do enough to reset the voice narrative - "Linda Burney’s mission was simple. In her address to the press club on Wednesday, the Minister for Indigenous Australians needed to reset the narrative on the voice, clarify its function and begin a new conversation over what Australians are being asked to vote for. Instead, she lectured the media, warned against the importation of Trumpian politics and offered rhetorical answers to reasonable requests for more detail. It has been Burney’s inability to present a clear articulation of how the voice will function and what it may or may not provide advice on that has become the critical issue that has undermined her underlying conviction." - Simon Benson - theaustralian.com.au

>>19126419 Indigenous voice to parliament ‘an incredible opportunity’: Cate Blanchett backs Yes vote - Australian actor Cate Blanchett says this year’s referendum on an Indigenous voice to parliament is “an extraordinary time” for Australian history. The Oscar-winning actor made the comments alongside Kaytetye filmmaker Warwick Thornton while promoting their latest film, The New Boy, which opened the Sydney Film Festival last month. “It’s an extraordinary time for an extraordinary country,” she told 7.30. “We have this incredible opportunity to embrace our unique history, shared history, you know, with all of its missteps and all of its successes, to actually evolve into a really modern democracy, like New Zealand, like Canada.”

>>19132076 Why it’s all uphill for the Yes campaign for an Indigenous voice to parliament - "Constitutional change is not for the faint-hearted. The framers of our Constitution set the bar for success deliberately high. Reform requires a popular vote rather than mere parliamentary approval, as well as a double majority. A proposal must be supported by a majority of Australians and in a majority of states. Polling in the lead-up to this year’s referendum mirrors past votes, despite no referendum being held for nearly a quarter of a century. In the eight referendum proposals put to the people since 1977, the big states (NSW and, to a lesser extent, Victoria) have more readily supported constitutional change, while the smaller states have opposed it. Tasmania has been the nation’s bellwether state in most often voting in a way that reflects the outcome of the referendum. Only in votes held in 1910 and 1951 did the Tasmanian vote not match the final outcome. Other smaller states have been similarly reluctant to support referendums in past decades. WA, Queensland and SA have joined Tasmania in rejecting every one of the eight referendum proposals put to the people since 1977." - George Williams, deputy vice-chancellor and professor of law at the University of NSW - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188920

#30 - Part 60

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 20

>>19138429 Yes camp must explain how an Indigenous voice to parliament will close the gap - "The need to close the gap in health and wellbeing between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians was the centrepiece of Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney’s speech at the National Press Club, in which she spoke about the proposed Indigenous voice to parliament. But the proposed voice has its own gap: namely, the one between what proponents of the voice claim it will achieve and what it can realistically be expected to achieve. I believe it will achieve virtually nothing at best. At worst, it will leave many Australians, both Indigenous and non-Indigenous, disappointed and perhaps angry. The Yes camp insists the voice is what’s needed to close the gap in health and wellbeing; yet no clear plan has been offered about how to achieve this." - Anthony Dillon, researcher, academic and prominent Aboriginal affairs commentator - theaustralian.com.au

>>19138494 Nine apologises for running Voice No campaign ad criticised as ‘racist’ - Nine has apologised for running a Voice No campaign ad in The Australian Financial Review newspaper that has been heavily criticised as racist for its cartoon portrayal of Yes campaigner Thomas Mayo, who appeared to be dancing for money. The ad by conservative lobby group Advance Australia, which ran across a full page in the newspaper on Thursday, depicted Mayo reaching for a wad of cash from Wesfarmers chairman Michael Chaney in a cartoon that ridicules the financial support that big corporates have given the Yes campaign. A spokesman for Nine, which owns the paper and this masthead, said it regretted running the ad. “The political advertisement about the Voice referendum placed into today’s Financial Review should not have run, and we apologise for that. We want to encourage a mature debate from both sides and avoid personal and/or inappropriate attacks,” the spokesman said.

>>19138541 Video: Voice to Parliament 'damaging in the long term', former prime minister Tony Abbott says - Former prime minister Tony Abbott says a constitutionally enshrined Voice to Parliament is "wrong in principle" and will reinforce "separatism" in Australia. Mr Abbott is an advisory board member of the lobby group Advance Australia, which is supporting the No campaign in the upcoming referendum on creating a Voice to Parliament. He supports constitutional recognition of Indigenous Australians but is a fierce opponent of the Voice. "If this Voice gets up, I think it will be very damaging in the long term," he told 7.30. "It will entrench race into the constitution." Australia's constitution already contains references to race under Section 51 xxvi, which enables parliament to make laws for "the people of any race for whom it is deemed necessary to make special laws".

>>19138604 Indigenous voice to parliament: Million calls in No-vote survey - The campaign against the Indigenous voice to parliament made 1.1 million phone calls to households and mobiles on Thursday night using a recorded message by its most high-profile activist Jacinta Nampijinpa Price. Senator Price’s star power is considered Fair Australia’s big asset as it seeks to defeat the voice referendum due to be held between October and December. The No campaign was preparing to make 1.5 million more calls on Friday night using her voice. Fair Australia has called the phone blitz “the biggest community survey in the nation’s referendum history”. During each call, people are asked a series of questions and invited to respond using their phones. Fair Australia said it was particularly interested in understanding why soft Yes and No voters, along with undecided voters, might vote No.

>>19138642 Australia, New Zealand cleared to fly Indigenous flags at Women's World Cup - Global soccer governing body FIFA has agreed to requests from Australia and New Zealand to display Indigenous flags at the Women's World Cup, the co-hosts said on Friday. The Australian Aboriginal flag and the Torres Strait Islander flag will be on display at all 35 matches across Australia, with the Maori flag, known as 'Tino Rangatiratanga', to feature at all 29 matches in New Zealand. "Confirmation by FIFA that all official flags of Australia will be flown during the FIFA Women's World Cup is an important moment for all Australians, particularly First Nations People," Football Australia boss James Johnson said in a statement. Australia's World Cup squad includes Indigenous Australian players Kyah Simon and goalkeeper Lydia Williams.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188921

#30 - Part 61

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 21

>>19143769 Littleproud claims country ‘never at war’ with Indigenous Australians, rebuffs treaty position - David Littleproud has reiterated the National Party’s opposition to the Voice and to a treaty, claiming the country has “never been at war” with Indigenous Australians. The Nationals leader said his party would “stand convicted” for “standing up for regional Australia” while addressing supporters at the LNP State Conference in Brisbane. Asked about historic conflicts such as the frontier wars - violent wars, conflicts and massacres involving settlers and Indigenous Australians from the 18th century - Mr Littleproud acknowledged “mistakes” had been made. “There were mistakes in areas across our country, no-one is walking away from the fact they were made by settlers,” he said. “There was conflict between Indigenous tribes as well … but as a nation we have walked forward. We should also as a nation put our chin up and our chest out at what we have achieved together.”

>>19148884 Nationals leader David Littleproud urges government to create voice legislation before the referendum - Nationals leader David Littleproud says the government’s refusal to declare that it will legislate priorities for the indigenous voice to parliament goes to the heart of the dilemma facing Australian voters. On Sunday indigenous Australians minister Linda Burney was asked if the advisory body’s remit would be legislated and responded by saying decisions about what the indigenous voice would advise on would be “a two way process” between the government and the advisory body. Mr Littleproud believes the government’s decision to create the legislation for the voice after a successful referendum is causing difficulties for Australians trying to decide how to vote at the voice referendum due to be held between October and December. “Shouldn‘t the Australian people have that level of detail before they are asked to vote?” he said.

>>19148903 Voice advocate Thomas Mayo criticises media for publishing ‘negative headlines’ on ‘positive stories’ - Voice to parliament architect Thomas Mayo has condemned the media for publishing “negative headlines” on “positive stories” about the upcoming referendum and said such actions had harmed the yes campaign. Speaking at a University of Melbourne and Melbourne Press Club event, Mr Mayo said plenty of misinformation had been spread about the Voice. He also criticised some content published on social media platforms, labelling it “terrible”. “People tend to just read the headlines from time to time and that doesn’t help us.” Mr Mayo, a Kaurareg Aboriginal and Kalkalgal, Erubamle Torres Strait Islander man and union official, made the news last month after tweets he posted in 2018 revealed him saying it was necessary to have repatriations, give land back and pay rent to Indigenous people.

>>19154565 Social media company Meta said it will roll out measures to stamp out misinformation in the lead up to the voice referendum vote - Tech giant Meta has vowed to tackle misinformation about the voice referendum by providing “social media safety training” to MPs and advocacy groups, blocking fake accounts and significantly boosting its funding for fact-checkers. The US-based company - owner of popular platforms including Facebook and Instagram - said it had been preparing for the referendum for a long time and it would implement a “comprehensive strategy to combat misinformation, voter interference and other forms of abuse on our platforms”. Meta Australia’s director of public policy for Australia and NZ, Mia Garlick, said measures would include increasing artificial intelligence, which “can more effectively detect and block fake accounts” that were often behind the threats to elections and referendums.

>>19154602 Video: Fight breaks out over smoking ceremony - The opening of a freeway extension in Perth's northern suburbs was interrupted on Sunday when an argument broke out between two Indigenous men over who had the rights to conduct the traditional smoking ceremony. The incident occurred at the Romeo Road ribbon cutting ceremony that was being conducted by Transport Minister Rita Saffioti. It's the second cultural issue that has plagued the Cook government in as many days. On Saturday, a tree planting exercised was cancelled in Geraldton after a "respected local knowledge holder" stepped in citing WA's new Aboriginal cultural heritage laws which came into effect on July 1. The individual did not have any authority to do so according to Aboriginal Affairs Minister Tony Buti.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188922

#30 - Part 62

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 22

>>19154635 Video: New Aboriginal heritage laws ‘shut down’ tree planting event - Updated Aboriginal cultural heritage laws in WA have reportedly stopped a tree planting event to commemorate the late Queen Elizabeth II at the weekend. Geraldton mayor Shane van Styn said a well publicised, planned event to plant trees at Wonthella Bush Reserve had to be cancelled due to conflict and confusion caused by WA’s new heritage legislation, a week after it came into effect. “Despite checking the site online prior, for any Aboriginal heritage, of which there was none, a respected local knowledge holder shut down proceedings on the basis of ground disturbance and the new Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act and the ‘significance’ of the site to the family,” Mr van Styn said. Aboriginal Affairs Minister Tony Buti confirmed to The Australian the Elder acted without authority and has now called for the Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage to “investigate further”.

>>19154665 Video: 'Progressive No': Thorpe tells 60 Minutes voice to fail - Victorian senator Lidia Thorpe told Karl Stefanovic he was “not bad for a white guy” during a wide-ranging interview where she addressed her past scandals head-on. The fiery and outspoken politician appeared on 60 Minutes on Sunday where she explained her combativeness is “misunderstood”. Now a leader of the progressive No campaign against the upcoming voice to parliament, Senator Thorpe told Stefanovic she does not see the proposal getting up later this year. “I’m part of the progressive no, and … we want more,” she said.

>>19160107 Indigenous voice to parliament: WA heritage laws cast shadow over referendum - Separate incidents in different corners of Western Australia have underscored the difficult introduction of the state’s new Aboriginal cultural heritage laws and further complicated the Yes campaign for the voice in the west. Premier Roger Cook and Treasurer Rita Saffioti on Monday had to clarify the details of different matters, including the abandonment of a planned tree-planting in the Mid West city of Geraldton and a heated argument between two Indigenous men over who had the rights to conduct a smoking ceremony at the opening of a highway extension. Both incidents come as support among West Australians for an Indigenous voice to parliament appears to be waning. Federal MP Rick Wilson said he believed opposition to the voice was as high as 80 per cent in his vast West Australian electorate of O’Connor, citing the response of 1487 people to a survey emailed to his own database. Mr Wilson said the Geraldton tree-planting incident was exactly how he expected the new heritage act to play out and warned that a 20 per cent Yes vote in WA could be optimistic if the state government did not backflip on the new regulations.

>>19160117 Indigenous voice to parliament: ‘Last great chance for our communities’, says Noel Pearson - Noel Pearson has warned a voice to parliament is the “last great chance” for the nation’s remote Indigenous communities, as Cape York mayors ask how many more people have to die early before Australians do the right thing. Aboriginal leader Mr Pearson urged non-Indigenous Australians to vote Yes, and said he was confident the campaign could win over the “ground zero” state of Queensland despite recent polling tipping a majority No vote. He said while polling showed at least 80 per cent of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people backed the voice, Indigenous Australians made up only 3 per cent of the population. “We can’t win the referendum, our numbers just don’t count. It’s your 97 per cent that counts - you, the whitefellas. You’re the ones … it will fall to you, the 97 per cent, to decide whether we seize this opportunity.”

>>19165614 Labor MP scolded for spruiking Voice at ‘politically neutral’ citizenship ceremony - Federal Labor MP Jerome Laxale says he will not shy away from using council citizenship ceremonies to detail his reasons for voting Yes in the upcoming Voice referendum, after a Liberal-led Sydney council alleged it had received complaints that he was politicising the events. In a speech at a ceremony held by Ryde Council last Thursday, the Bennelong MP - a former Ryde Council mayor - urged a new cohort of Australian citizens to “do your research” about the referendum, which he referred to as a “simple offer” and an “opportunity that was too important to waste”.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188923

#30 - Part 63

Australia / China Tensions - Part 1

>>18929002 Australian citizen Daniel Duggan is accused of training Chinese military pilots by the US. His wife alleges he's caught in a 'political power play' - Daniel Duggan was born in the United States and served as a pilot in the Marines between 1989 and 2002. He's been an Australian citizen since 2012. He's now in custody in Lithgow Correctional Centre in NSW pending extradition to the US on charges of conspiracy, arms trafficking and money laundering. "He 100 per cent denies all accusations," Ms Duggan told 7.30. Key to the US government's pursuit of Mr Duggan is his time as a contractor with the Test Flying Academy of South Africa between 2010 and 2012. Mr Duggan says he provided training to civilian aviators. But in its indictment, the US government alleges the flying school had a contract with a state-owned entity in China to deliver training to military pilots.

>>18929024 Video: Wife of former US Marine accused of training Chinese military pilots by the US speaks out | 7.30 - Last October Australian authorities, acting on a request from the United States, arrested former Marine pilot Daniel Duggan for allegedly training pilots from the Chinese military. Duggan is being held in a maximum-security prison while he fights extradition to America. This report by Angelique Donnellan and Xanthe Kleinig. - ABC News In-depth

>>18939663 Closer China-Australia ties will not come at Taiwan's expense: Former Australian PM - “Taiwanese perspectives and experience are more important than ever,” according to former Prime Minister of Australia Malcolm Turnbull. Turnbull is in Taiwan for the first time to attend the Center for Asia-Pacific Resilience and Innovation (CAPRI) 2023 Annual Forum on Monday (May 29). When Taiwan News asked Turnbull if he thought improvements in the Australia-China relationship would come at the expense of Australia's relationship with Taiwan, Turnbull said he did not. “The Australian Government under (Prime Minister) Albanese has not taken one backward step on matters of substance as far as China's concerned,” he said, but “what has changed is the rhetoric.”

>>18939695 Let’s not forget Taiwan as we kowtow to China on trade - "Few countries understand China’s military thinking better than Taiwan. We run the risk of being called on to defend one of the few genuinely successful liberal democracies in the Indo-Pacific without having any substantive military or intelligence relationship. If Australia was serious about reducing the risk of conflict in the Indo-Pacific, the best way to do this would be to help Taiwan strengthen its own military forces. The bilateral relationship needs to be rethought. A start would be to send Trade Minister Don Farrell to Taipei to discuss Taiwan’s proposed membership of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership. It’s also time to reopen discussion of a free-trade agreement. The absence of one with our fifth largest export market is, to use a technical trade term, crazy." - Peter Jennings - theaustralian.com.au

>>18939721 Battle lines drawn on Albanese going to China - Now that the prime minister has received an official invitation to visit Beijing later this year, the political and diplomatic lines are being drawn. China’s informal bans on coal, copper, timber and cotton have eased, but restrictions on wine and live lobsters remain. All eyes are now on China’s expedited review of the tariffs it placed on barley. But consider this hypothetical: if the trade bans are all lifted before Albanese steps onto the tarmac in Beijing, “the result will be pocketed, with thanks, and soon forgotten”. Which could mean that the visit’s focus becomes the two Australians detained in China on murky charges: Cheng Lei and Yang Hengjun. Their imminent release is paramount: achieving it by the time the visit takes place, however, will prove difficult. In that case, Albanese will have to press the matter privately with Chinese leaders. This is a powerful bargaining chip in China’s uncaring hands.

>>18939748 ‘No timeframe or conditions’ on Albanese’s visit to China - Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles says there is no timeframe or conditions on Anthony Albanese’s upcoming visit to China, signalling the Australian government was managing expectations of trade sanction relief and the release of two detained Australians. The federal opposition has called on the government to secure a guarantee that all $20 billion in trade sanctions on half a dozen industries will be lifted by Beijing before the prime minister travels. Opposition foreign affairs spokesman Simon Birmingham has also labelled the ongoing detention of Australians Cheng Lei and Yang Hengjun “unacceptable”.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188924

#30 - Part 64

Australia / China Tensions - Part 2

>>18940061 Attack revived on AFP raid over Chinese pilot training - A former pilot suspected of training the Chinese military has tried once more to invalidate a federal police raid on his South Australian home. The Australian Federal Police executed a search warrant and seized items from the home of Keith Andrew Hartley, chief operating officer of the Test Flying Academy of South Africa (TFASA), in November. The warrant said Mr Hartley was suspected of breaking commonwealth law by organising and facilitating training to PLA pilots "in regard to military aircraft platforms and military doctrine, tactics and strategy". Mr Hartley's Federal Court bid to quash the warrant was dismissed in April. He has now filed an appeal in the Full Court seeking to set aside this dismissal.

>>18945189 Video: Albanese urges China to pick up the phone and keep line open to Australia, US - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has delivered a message to China that the risks of invading Taiwan far outweigh the rewards, while warning that a breakdown in communication in the contested Indo-Pacific could have devastating consequences for the world. The Australian leader also defended the country’s plan to acquire a fleet of nuclear-propelled submarines as he made the keynote address at the Shangri-La Dialogue defence forum in Singapore.

>>18945219 Avoiding extremes, Albanese defines his approach to Beijing as the middle ground - The prime minister has laid out his vision for Australia’s most pressing foreign policy challenge: managing the rise of China. In his first major foreign policy speech since becoming prime minister, Albanese criticised what he sees as two simplistic propositions: Australia could choose to engage with China and forget Beijing’s military and security ambitions, or it could focus on building up its defences and national security to stop the threat from Beijing. His middle path will require ongoing engagement with China, an openness to economic cooperation and constant reminders, however sincere, that Australia and its partners, particularly the United States and Japan, are not attempting to contain its economic ambitions.

>>18945286 Force against Taiwan still on cards, says China - China’s Defence Minister has declared the People’s Liberation Army will “absolutely not” renounce the use of force on Taiwan, as his American counterpart warned a military accident between the two superpowers could “very quickly spiral out of control” because of Beijing’s refusal to engage in talks. The scene setting comments by Minister Li Shangfu and Secretary Lloyd Austin were made on the eve of the Shangri-La Dialogue, the region’s most important security forum. The American and Chinese defence chiefs are both in Singapore for the three-day summit.

>>18945341 US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin backs Anthony Albanese’s call to China - US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin has backed Anthony Albanese’s call for Beijing to work with Washington to establish “guardrails” to avoid conflict and outlined Australia’s growing role in American-led efforts to deter Chinese military action in the region. President Joe Biden’s top defence official - speaking the morning after Prime Minister Albanese gave the opening address at a security conference in Singapore — said his frequent visits to the region had underscored a widespread and growing desire for a “free and open and secure Indo Pacific”. “As we all heard from Prime Minister Albanese last night, each country has a role to play. And the choices made by countries across the region reflect the deepening commitment to these shared principles,” Secretary Austin told delegates at the Shangri-La Dialogue, the region’s most important security forum

>>18949874 Chinese general threatens foreign navies after warships nearly collide in Taiwan Strait - China’s defence minister Li Shangfu has warned foreign naval vessels and warplanes to stay out of the Taiwan Strait, intensifying Beijing’s military posture a day after a Chinese warship nearly collided with an American destroyer in the contested waters. In a strident speech on Sunday that escalated China’s threats towards the democratic island of Taiwan, Li told other countries to “mind their own business”. “As the lyrics of a well-known Chinese song go, when friends visit us, we welcome them with fine wine. When jackals or wolves come, we will face them with shotguns,” he said.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188926

#30 - Part 65

Australia / China Tensions - Part 3

>>18949887 Richard Marles ‘haunted’ by prospect of US, China war in Indo-Pacific - Richard Marles says he is “haunted” by whether Russia’s war in Ukraine is a “forewarning of the contest to come” as China challenges America’s global dominance. Australia’s Defence Minister told Singapore’s Shangri-La security conference that Vladimir Putin’s invasion - launched months before the election of the Albanese government - had raised the prospect of war in the Indo-Pacific. “The question that haunted me then - and still does a year on - is whether the war in Ukraine is a ‘terminal spasm of Europe’s imperial past’, or a forewarning of the contest to come in a post-hegemonic world.”

>>18955315 China lobbies press club against Tibetan appearance - The Chinese government has been accused of undermining free speech in Australia by seeking to block the head of Tibet’s government-in-exile from making a scheduled appearance at the National Press Club this month. Officials from the Chinese embassy met with the press club’s chief executive, Maurice Reilly, in Canberra last week to convey their unhappiness about Penpa Tsering’s June 20 scheduled appearance and to ask for his invitation to be revoked. “China expresses strong dissatisfaction and firm opposition to Australia, in disregard of China’s position and concern, allowing him to use the NPC platform to engage in separatist activities,” the embassy argued in a letter handed to Reilly.

>>18960171 Xi Jinping’s message to the world: mind your own business - "Anthony Albanese acquitted himself with great dignity at the recent Shangri-la Dialogue in Singapore. He spoke fluently and without notes and rather eloquently articulated the case for a liberal rules-based international order and the need for collective security. He was clear and statesmanlike in his observations about what made for peace, stability and prosperity, and what could disrupt them. His problem and ours is that Xi Jinping does not see things that way. Beijing’s goal is to detach us from our alli­ances, to displace the US in Asia and to subject Taiwan to its dominion, as it has Hong Kong. All this was underscored when, later in the day at the Shangri-la, Chinese Defence Minister Li Shangfu bluntly told those present that, when it came to China’s territorial and maritime claims, others should “mind their own business”." - Paul Monk former head of the China desk in the Defence Intelligence Organisation and fellow of the Institute for Law and Strategy (London and New York) - theaustralian.com.au

>>18960196 Daniel Andrews’ speech at Melbourne pro-China forum a mystery as reporters barred from event - Premier Daniel Andrews delivered his speech, on behalf of Victoria, to the Post Pandemic China-Australia Economic Cooperation Forum on Monday night. But in a move described as “highly irregular”, those Victorians for whom Mr Andrews spoke cannot hear what he did or did not say. The Herald Sun turned up to the forum, at the Park Hyatt, tape recorder in hand. And was turned away from the super secretive talkfest ostensibly about navigating Chinese trade markets and opportunities. It appears that the Herald Sun, along with all Australian media, was left off the invitation list. A lady at the front desk said Chinese media only. Signs outside the function room warned guests not to take photos or videos inside.

>>18965896 Daniel Andrews responds to allegations reporters were barred from attending pro-China forum speech - Victoria Premier Daniel Andrews has come under scrutiny for refusing to release the speaking notes for his speech at a secretive Chinese forum, an event Australian journalists were reportedly barred from. “I didn’t organise the event. I didn’t invite anyone to the event. I didn’t prevent anyone from going to the event,” he said. “If you have a challenge or a problem or issues in relation to the event, then the event organisers would be the logical place to go.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188928

#30 - Part 66

Australia / China Tensions - Part 4

>>18965905 China used ‘god credential’ to spy on ByteDance users - Chinese Communist Party members used a “god credential” at TikTok parent ByteDance to examine the personal data of civil rights activists and protesters in Hong Kong, and identify and track them down, a former company executive said in a court filing. Yintao “Roger” Yu, a former head of engineering in the US for ByteDance, described a special committee of the Chinese government installed at the company’s Beijing offices that he said monitored all data on the platform, including that of users in the US, according to the filing. “This was a backdoor to any barrier ByteDance had supposedly installed to protect data from the Chinese Communist Party’s surveillance,” according to the filing in state court in San Francisco. The party’s “superuser credential,” also known as a “god credential,” was “commonly discussed between employees at various levels of the company, including senior executives,” Mr Yu said.

>>18987638 IAEA must not bend rules for AUKUS: China Daily editorial - "Li Song, China's permanent representative to the International Atomic Energy Agency, once again stressed that the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal is a cover for nuclear proliferation at the board meeting of the IAEA in Vienna on Thursday. No matter how far the de facto anti-China bloc has gone to justify the deal, they cannot deny its fundamental nature, which is the transfer of weapons-grade highly enriched uranium from two nuclear-weapon states to a non-nuclear-weapon state. That violates the principles and practices of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and severely undermines the international non-proliferation regime and the IAEA's safeguards system." - chinadaily.com.cn

>>19016566 Morrison warns against age of self-loathing, Western guilt - Scott Morrison says Chinese President Xi Jinping must be regarded as a serious figure who “means exactly what he says”, as he warned Beijing could be encouraged to seize Taiwan if the West does not strongly support Ukraine and start to reverse a fading belief in liberal values. The former prime minister used a speech to Britain’s Oxford Union, one of the world’s most prestigious debating chambers, to express concern that digital echo chambers and so-called cancel culture have fuelled enthusiasm for society to disown past transgressions without appreciating reasons for success. He told the democratic world it must be careful how it judges those responsible for abhorrent practices of the past, warning that the enemies of freedom will welcome an appetite for self-loathing with “open arms”.

>>19031657 Chinese hackers use G7 ruse to target Australian government officials - Australia is among four countries whose government officials were targeted by suspected China-based hackers after last month’s Group of Seven meeting in Japan, attempting to install malicious software on their devices and steal information. Following the meeting between G7 countries and leaders from Ukraine, Australia, Brazil, the Cook Islands, Comoros, India, Indonesia, Republic of Korea and Vietnam, a co-ordinated email campaign began targeting government officials, attempting to lure them into downloading a compromised Word document. Cybercriminals sent emails pretending to be part of Indonesia’s ministries of Foreign and Economic Affairs to government officials from Australia, France, Singapore and the United Kingdom.

>>19044115 ‘China is our best publicity agent’: Tibet urges tougher line on Beijing - Tibet’s exiled political leader says it is unfair for Australia to punish nations such as Iran and Russia for human rights abuses while letting China off the hook because it is Australia’s biggest trading partner. In his first trip to Australia since being elected the head of Tibet’s government-in-exile in 2021, Penpa Tsering urged Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to raise human rights with Chinese President Xi Jinping if he travels to Beijing later this year and to impose sanctions on Chinese officials for the mistreatment of ethnic minorities in Tibet and Xinjiang.

>>19044128 'Stolen generation': Tibet's fight to preserve culture - George Orwell's 1984 has become a reality in Tibet as the Chinese government aims to eradicate culture's identity through processes reminiscent of Australia's stolen generation, Tibet's leader-in-exile says. Tibet's exiled president Penpa Tsering said the situation in the region has deteriorated to a point comparable to South Sudan and Syria, accusing the Chinese regime of "striking the very identity of Tibetan people" in a bid to erase the culture. "If anyone has read George Orwell's 1984, that has come into reality in China and more so in the Tibetan region," Mr Tsering told the National Press Club in Canberra.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188929

#30 - Part 67

Australia / China Tensions - Part 5

>>19051180 Parliamentary plea for former pilot's prison release - A supporter of an Australian citizen facing extradition to the US on conspiracy charges has called for his release from prison in an emotional speech to parliament. Former marine Daniel Duggan was arrested in October 2022 after the US government accused him of money laundering and committing offences under US arms export control laws. Mr Duggan's wife Saffrine and his friend Warwick Ponder were on the floor of the Senate on Thursday during a speech by the Greens' David Shoebridge urging the US to release him from custody, where he has been in solitary confinement. "In the last few weeks, he's seen the sky only a handful of times but has otherwise been locked up completely alone. There are grave concerns with Dan's wellbeing," Senator Shoebridge told parliament.

>>19069501 Taiwan calls on Australia to send military attache to Taipei over China threats - Taiwan’s Foreign Minister has called on Canberra to install a military attache in the Australian Office in Taipei to help the two liberal democracies work together to prevent “the worst from happening” amid sustained threats of war from China. Foreign Minister Joseph Wu told The Australian that President Tsai Ing-wen’s government wanted Canberra to station a military officer in its de facto embassy in Taipei to liaise with Taiwanese security agencies, as countries including the US, Japan and Singapore have for decades. “I think it is very important when the Australian government is paying so much more attention to the regional security issues for the two countries to be able to share their observations, their assessment of the situation,” he told The Australian in an exclusive interview in Taipei.

>>19069536 China virus researchers were working on defence projects, declassified US intelligence says - Wuhan Institute of Virology researchers were working on defensive and biosecurity projects for the Chinese military and were not taking adequate biosafety precautions while handling coronaviruses, intelligence declassified by the United States has confirmed. The intelligence report on the potential links between the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the origin of the pandemic was released by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence late on Friday US-time, when Secretary of State Anthony Blinken’s visit to China had concluded. The report, which reveals the CIA is unable to determine whether a lab-leak or natural contact with an infected animal spawned the pandemic, was published after Congress voted unanimously to declassify the intelligence. - Sharri Markson - theaustralian.com.au

>>19087765 Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles landing in Solomon Islands for talks on the future of Australia's defence presence - Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles has suggested Australian troops and police might stay in Solomon Islands beyond this year, in a sign the federal government could push for an enduring security presence in the Pacific Island nation. Mr Marles will land in the country's capital Honiara later today for a two-day visit, where he'll hold talks with Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare and meet Australian police and soldiers deployed there. Both Australian Defence Force and Australian Federal Police personnel were sent to Honiara in late 2021, when Mr Sogavare asked for help to restore order after major riots broke out. Last year China's government supplied dozens of motorbikes and two water cannon trucks to the Royal Solomon Islands Police Force, as well as expanding training programs for local police both in China and across multiple provinces in Solomon Islands.

>>19094004 Bondi man Alexander Csergo was warned to leave China by American contact he suspected was a spy - A Sydney businessman accused of selling Australian defence and security secrets in China was warned to leave the country immediately by an American contact who he suspected was a US intelligence operative, his lawyer told a Sydney court. The Australian Federal Police (AFP) charged the man, Alexander Csergo, 55, with one count of reckless foreign interference in April. Mr Csergo is the first person to be charged with the offence, which attracts a jail term of up to 15 years under laws introduced by the Turnbull government in 2018.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188930

#30 - Part 68

Australia / China Tensions - Part 6

>>19094098 Corruption inquiry in Australia uncovers China links to state lawmaker - The former premier of Australia's most populous state engaged in corrupt conduct involving another lawmaker with whom she was in a secret romantic relationship, a years-long corruption inquiry that examined business dealings with China said on Thursday. The New South Wales Independent Commission into Corruption (ICAC) said in a report that Gladys Berejiklian had failed to notify the commission of her concerns that Daryl Maguire, a member of the state assembly with whom she was in a relationship during her term of office, may have engaged in corrupt conduct, and this undermined the ministerial code.

>>19104349 Australia, Solomon Islands to review security pact after China moves in - Australia and Solomon Islands will review their bilateral security treaty in a move experts say is aimed at checking China’s burgeoning security partnership with Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare’s government. Following a meeting with Mr Sogavare in Honiara, Defence Minister Richard Marles said the treaty would be updated to reflect the “contemporary” security environment in the Solomon Islands, including the presence of an Australian-led Pacific nations peacekeeping force.

>>19104518 Japan, Australia, US stage joint drill - Japan, Australia and the US are holding an annual joint drill in Queensland, northeastern Australia. It's aimed at streamlining defense cooperation as China ramps up its maritime activities. A record-high number of some 2,500 personnel from Japan's Ground Self-Defense Force, the Australian Army and the US Marine Corps are taking part in the exercise, called "Southern Jackaroo."

>>19104539 Australia and Japan conduct war games in contested waters, closely watched by Chinese military - An Australian warship and surveillance aircraft have conducted military exercises with Japan in the South China Sea under the close watch of the People's Liberation Army. The war games, which took place over the past weekend in strategically contested waters, focused on tactical operations, including anti-surface and anti-air warfare, but were not publicised by the Australian Defence Force (ADF). Sources with knowledge of the two-day exercises have confirmed China's People's Liberation Army-Navy (PLAN) was in "the vicinity" of the activity but did not interact directly with the Australian warship or aircraft. The Commander of Japan's first surface unit for the Indo-Pacific Deployment 2023, Rear Admiral Takahiro Nishiyama, said his nation and Australia were considered "special strategic partners". "Like our country, Australia, an ally of the United States, is a 'Special Strategic Partner' in the Indo-Pacific region, sharing not only universal values but also strategic interests in security," the rear admiral said in a statement.

>>19120607 Hong Kong police put bounty on two high-profile Australian residents - Hong Kong police have put a $HK1m ($191,800) bounty on Melbourne-based Australian lawyer Kevin Yam and Ted Hui, a former Hong Kong politician who now lives in Adelaide, in an unprecedented application of the Beijing-authored National Security Law. Announcing the bounties late on Monday, Chief Superintendent Steven Li said Hong Kong’s police force “won’t stop chasing them”, setting up a confrontation with an Australian government already straining to maintain the recent “stabilisation” of relations with China. “We are absolutely not staging any show or spreading fear. We are enforcing law,” said Superintendent Li at a press conference in Hong Kong.

>>19120614 ‘Hilarious’: Hong Kong activists in Australia slam China’s arrest threat - Hong Kong activists living in Australia who have had a bounty put on them by the Chinese government have dismissed the threat as a stunt, arguing it reveals how powerless Beijing has become against dissent overseas. The $HK1 million bounties ($192,000) were offered by Hong Kong police chief superintendent Steve Li on Monday night for information leading to the arrests of Melbourne lawyer Kevin Yam, who is an Australian citizen, and former Hong Kong legislator Ted Hui, who has settled in Adelaide with his family. Hui, a pro-democracy leader, has had multiple warrants issued for his arrest since he left Hong Kong in 2020 after his family’s accounts were locked by HSBC, Hang Seng Bank and Bank of China. Hui, who led protests against Beijing’s growing influence over Hong Kong in 2019, said he did not fear for his or his family’s safety in Australia. “I think the bounty is ridiculous and hilarious. It can only be a high-profile gesture without any legal effects. Free countries will not extradite us because of that. It only shows how powerless the Chinese Communist Party is in response to the Hong Kong diaspora who advocates for freedom and democracy.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188932

#30 - Part 69

Australia / China Tensions - Part 7

>>19126437 Australia PM says Hong Kong bounty on overseas activists 'unacceptable' - Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said on Wednesday it was "unacceptable" that Hong Kong has put bounties on two Australian residents who are among eight overseas democracy activists wanted under a national security law. Hong Kong Chief Executive John Lee said on Tuesday eight overseas-based Hong Kong activists who were issued with arrest warrants for alleged national security offences would be "pursued for life". "It's just unacceptable," Albanese said of the Hong Kong announcement in a Nine television interview. "We will continue to cooperate with China where we can, but we will disagree where we must. And we do disagree over human rights issues." Australia's opposition leader Peter Dutton said it was "completely unacceptable that Australians should be tracked down or hunted down".

>>19126468 Australian businesses in the dark about China’s new spy laws - Beijing’s new anti-espionage laws, which came into effect days before Hong Kong police put a bounty on two Australian residents, have further raised the risk Australian companies could have staff ­detained for what would be deemed ordinary business activities outside of China. The brazen extraterritorial application of Hong Kong’s sweeping National Security Law in Melbourne and Adelaide on Monday has underlined just how serious Xi Jinping’s regime is about snuffing out behaviour it deems “anti China” and a threat to the Communist Party’s rule. It shocked many Australians with dealings in China, a country already known for arbitrary detention. Concerns were already elevated over Beijing’s new anti-espionage laws, which took effect over the weekend. Opposition defence spokesman James Paterson said the Coalition was “gravely concerned” over the police bounties. “This represents an unacceptable attempt to silence and intimidate critics of the Chinese government living in Australia, and further demonstrates the corrosive effects of the National Security Law to democratic principles and the rule of law in Hong Kong,” Senator Paterson said

>>19126504 China tells Australia to stop harbouring Hong Kong 'fugitives', DFAT updates travel advice - China's Foreign Ministry has told Australia to stop sheltering fugitives, after Foreign Minister Penny Wong expressed deep concern over Hong Kong issuing arrest warrants for eight overseas-based activists, including two living in Australia. Australian citizen and legal scholar Kevin Yam, and former Hong Kong politician Ted Hui, who fled the island and now lives in Adelaide, were among the eight people wanted for alleged breaches under the controversial national security law. Asked about the condemnation from Western countries, China's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning alleged Mr Yam and the others had engaged in "anti-China activities aimed at destabilising Hong Kong". "We strongly deplore and firmly oppose individual countries' flagrant slandering against the national security law for Hong Kong and interference in the rule of law in Hong Kong," she said. "Relevant countries need to respect China's sovereignty and the rule of law in Hong Kong, stop lending support for anti-China elements destabilising Hong Kong, and stop providing a safe haven for fugitives."

>>19126523 Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Mao Ning’s Regular Press Conference on July 4, 2023 - "Kevin Yam and the others have long been engaging in anti-China activities aimed at destabilizing Hong Kong. After fleeing overseas, they have acted in an even more outrageous way to create trouble and continued to instigate the division of the country and subversion of state power, acting as pawns for external anti-China forces in their effort to interfere in Hong Kong affairs. Their abominable moves gravely violate the national security law for Hong Kong, seriously threaten the bottom line of One Country, Two Systems, severely harm the fundamental interests of Hong Kong and gravely jeopardize China’s sovereignty, security and development interests."

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188934

#30 - Part 70

Australia / China Tensions - Part 8

>>19126537 Anthony Albanese should reconsider rapprochement with China - "Penny Wong was right to warn the Chinese government of the existence of strong foreign interference legislation in Australia, after Hong Kong authorities ­issued arrest warrants for two democracy activists now resident in Australia. Hong Kong’s national security police also offered $HK1m rewards for information that leads to the capture of lawyer Kevin Yam, an Australian citizen, and former Hong Kong legislator Ted Hui, who lives in Adelaide. The Foreign Minister expressed her “deep disappointment” at the Chinese actions, and reiterated that Canberra had long held deep concerns about the ­application of national security laws in Hong Kong. Wong said: “I want to be very clear. Australia has a view about freedom of expression, we have a view about people’s right to express their views peacefully, and people in Australia who do so in accordance with our laws will be supported.” Her comments make it clear the official Chinese actions represent an ugly effort to intimidate Australia, to intimidate the diaspora and ethnic Chinese community within Australia, and to intimidate the two democracy ­activists named. The Australian government has an overwhelming operational responsibility now to make sure no agents of the Chinese government, and no one inspired by their effective call to persecution, can act against any Australians." - Greg Sheridan - theaustralian.com.au

>>19126550 Calls for Chinese-made DJI drones to be removed after 3000 devices found across government - More than 3000 drones and other devices manufactured by Chinese company DJI are owned by federal government agencies, despite the People’s Liberation Army-linked technology being black-listed in the US. A government-wide audit by opposition cyber security spokesman James Paterson has revealed 3114 drones, cameras and other DJI-manufactured devices were in the possession of agencies ranging from the National Portrait Gallery of Australia to the Australian Transport Safety Bureau. Some devices are batteries and gimbals - camera stabilisers that do not connect to the internet - but most are cameras and drones with internet connectivity. Senator Paterson said the widespread use of the DJI devices demonstrated the need for Australia to follow the example of Britain and introduce a new office within the Department of Home Affairs to assess risks posed by technology originating from “auth­oritarian countries.’’

>>19138979 Security concerns raised as state MPs plan China junket - Victorian state Labor MPs are planning a ten-day junket in China to learn the country’s culture and gather “three years’ worth of social media content”, prompting national security concerns from experts and the federal Coalition. The September trip’s itinerary, drafted by Victorian MP Will Fowles and leaked by Labor figures worried about the wisdom of the visit, also advised MPs how to utilise their $10,000 annual taxpayer-funded travel allowance by making bookings before June 30 so next financial year’s allowance remained. Occurring months after Premier Daniel Andrews faced scrutiny for a trip to China, the jaunt promises MPs “an appreciation of Chinese culture”, “a working understanding of how business in China operates”, and “an understanding of how Chinese government works”.

>>19139019 Hong Kong dissident and Labor member wants MPs’ China trip cancelled - An Australian lawyer and Labor Party member with a bounty on his head for criticising the China-led rights crackdown in Hong Kong has urged Andrews government MPs to abandon a planned trip to China, arguing the visit was a “propaganda” tour that insulted his plight. Kevin Yam, 47, is one of two Australia-based activists accused by Hong Kong police of national security offences, including foreign collusion. Authorities have offered $130,000 for information leading to his arrest and urged Australia to “stop providing a safe haven for fugitives”. Yam, who is also a rank and file member of the Australian Labor Party, told this masthead he was disappointed to learn of a 10-day September junket being planned by a group of state Labor MPs who intend to learn about Chinese culture and business. “You’ll never see the real China on these trips,” he said. “If you’re talking about a cultural exchange - we all know these sorts of trips are not really about that. It’s about China trying to show a positive side of itself to a bunch of unwitting regional-level Australian MPs. “And why now? Especially given in my case as an ALP member, I have a bounty over me and MPs are going on what they think is a cultural exchange. But really it is a propaganda trip. I certainly hope they would reconsider whether this is the right timing for something like this given an Australian citizen and fellow ALP member has got this over his head.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188935

#30 - Part 71

Australia / China Tensions - Part 9

>>19154798 Solomon Islands leader visits security partner China with focus on infrastructure - Solomon Islands Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare arrives in China on Sunday for his first visit since striking a security deal, pledging to "remain neutral" amid rising China-U.S. competition and prioritise his nation's development needs. Western analysts said Sogavare would be feted after signing the security pact that alarmed Washington and some Pacific Islands neighbours including Australia last year. Concern over China's naval ambitions in the strategically-located region prompted Washington to strike a defence agreement with Papua New Guinea last month.

>>19154815 Prime Minister Sogavare participates in the first High Level Meeting of Forum on Global Action for Shared Development in China - Prime Minister Hon. Manasseh Sogavare began his weeklong engagement with the Government of the People’s Republic of China this morning. Prime Minister Sogavare underscored the need to rise above those that want to create a divided world with ideological geopolitical fault lines.....“we must remain united in our focus in creating innovative paths of cooperation to close the gap between the haves and the have not. Share our development experience using frameworks such as the Belt and Road Initiative to convert our potentials into prosperity.” The Prime Minister thanked China for its commitment to construct a new comprehensive Public Medical Center in Solomon Islands National Referral Hospital. Solomon Islands is pleased that the People’s Liberation Army Naval Peace Ark will be visiting Solomon Islands, he stated.

>>19154823 Sogavare’s visit to deepen ties between China and Solomons - Prime Minister of the Solomon Islands Manasseh Sogavare arrived in Beijing to start his weeklong visit to China - his second - on Sunday, during which the leaders of the two countries will have in-depth exchanges of views on bilateral relations and international and regional issues of mutual interest. He will also inaugurate the country's embassy in China, meet company executives and visit East China's Jiangsu and South China's Guangdong provinces. As the two countries move forward their relationship under the principle of "mutual respect, mutual trust and mutual benefit," the tangible benefits the Solomon Islands receive come in sheer contrast to US and Western aid, which shrank quickly and was largely applied in political and ideological fields, Yu Lei, chief research fellow at the Research Center for Pacific Island Countries of Liaocheng University, told the Global Times on Sunday. - Zhang Han - globaltimes.cn

>>19154878 OPINION: On the weekend my footy team lost. On Monday, there was a $190k bounty on my head - "Along with seven others, there is now a warrant out on me for alleged national security offences. According to Hong Kong chief executive John Lee, we will be “pursued for life”. My alleged crimes were calling for action in response to China’s crackdown on Hong Kong in meetings with Australian members of parliament and the foreign minister, as well as testifying by video-link before United States Congress. The support I have received from across the spectrum in Australia and beyond has been overwhelming, including from Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. Friends from everywhere have congratulated me for earning a badge of honour in resisting authoritarian tyranny. If only living normally with a bounty over my head was so straightforward." - Kevin Yam, non-resident senior fellow of Georgetown University Centre for Asian Law and master of laws student at the University of Melbourne - theage.com.au

>>19160130 China, Solomon Islands take swipe at AUKUS in announcing new strategic partnership - China and the Solomon Islands have signed a deal on police cooperation as part of an upgrade of their relations to a “comprehensive strategic partnership”, four years after the Pacific nation switched ties from Taiwan to China. The police cooperation pact was among nine deals signed after Solomon Islands Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare met with Chinese Premier Li Qiang in Beijing, underlining his nation’s foreign policy shift. China will continue to provide assistance to the Solomon Islands to enhance its law enforcement capacity, according to a joint statement released by China’s official Xinhua news agency. It urged “relevant countries” to “prudently” handle issues such as the discharge of nuclear-contaminated water into the sea and cooperation on nuclear submarines, in a thinly veiled swipe at Japan and AUKUS, the alliance among Australia, the United States and Britain.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188938

#30 - Part 72

Australia / China Tensions - Part 10

>>19160144 Solomon Islands, China should publish details of police deal, Australia says - Australia said the Solomon Islands and China should "provide transparency of their intentions to Australia and the region" by immediately publishing details of a policing deal signed in Beijing. The police cooperation pact was among nine deals signed after Solomon Islands Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare met with Chinese Premier Li Qiang in Beijing. A spokesperson for Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong said Australia was aware of reports referencing a policing implementation plan linked to a deal signed between China and Solomon Islands in March 2022. "We are concerned that this development will invite further regional contest," the spokesperson said in a statement. "Solomon Islands and China should provide transparency of their intentions to Australia and the region by publishing the agreement immediately, so the Pacific family can collectively consider the implications for our shared security."

>>19160164 America walks the walk in battle for Pacific minds - "NATO leaders gather in the Lithuanian capital, Vilnius, this week and Ukraine will dominate the summit. Anthony Albanese will be there. Security is global so it’s positive that he is attending. But we can’t escape our own region. Fortunately, there’s good news here. The US is finally starting to walk the walk in the Pacific. In May, the US signed a Defence Co-operation Agreement with Papua New Guinea that allows the US military to deploy assets to select PNG military bases in the event of an emergency. It’s a nice counterpunch to what China’s got going with Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare in Solomon Islands. If the US-PNG agreement is properly funded and staffed, then PNG will become a key location for the US to build some real influence in Melanesia." - Anthony Bergin, senior fellow at Strategic Analysis Australia and expert associate at the National Security College - theaustralian.com.au

>>19160171 Video: 'Contempt': Popular Chinese social media platform WeChat refuses to front foreign interference probe after repeated requests - Popular Chinese social media platform WeChat has again refused to front a Senate inquiry into foreign interference prompting an outburst from shadow home affairs minister James Paterson. Senator Paterson, the chair of the Select Committee on Foreign Interference Through Social Media, has repeatedly requested WeChat appear at public hearings over concerns of its immense influence in the Chinese diaspora community. In response to the Senator’s July 4 letter, Tencent’s head of corporate affairs legal Elizabeth Byun again rejected the request. The company argued it was unable to attend the hearings on Tuesday because it does not have “local operations or employees based in Australia”.

>>19165653 'Visionary and insightful politician': Chinese media fawns over Paul Keating's criticism of NATO, saying he 'hit the nail on the head' - Chinese media have fawned over former Labor prime minister Paul Keating for his harsh criticism of NATO and its Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg. Mr Keating launched a blistering attack on the NATO chief on Sunday, calling him a "supreme fool" for looking to foster deeper connections with Asia as China's dominance grows. The former prime minister, who has continued to defend China's military rise, further accused Mr Stoltenberg of attempting to export "malicious poison" to Asia. China's Global Times, a tabloid newspaper owned by the Chinese Communist Party, published an opinion piece on Tuesday fawning over Mr Keating's remarks. The 800-word article praised the former prime minister for condemning NATO and its Secretary General "without reservation". "Keating is a visionary and insightful politician. We highly agree with his statement. No one has criticized NATO more accurately and vividly than Keating," the article read.

>>19165662 OPINION: Two stern warnings must be given to the arrogant NATO: Global Times editorial - "No one has criticized NATO more accurately and vividly than Keating. His words reflect a consensus among Asian countries. The transatlantic military alliance, which has been expanding and disrupting the security situation in Europe since the Cold War, is now extending its reach into the Asia-Pacific region. Its ulterior motives are well-known in the international community. Inciting division and hatred, creating group confrontations, and causing chaos in Europe, they now seek to disrupt the peace in the Asia-Pacific region. We firmly resist this, together with the majority of countries in the Asia-Pacific region." - Global Times - globaltimes.cn

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188940

#30 - Part 73

Australia / China Tensions - Part 11

>>19165673 NATO secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg shakes off criticism, and praises Australia - Jens Stoltenberg has brushed off “supreme fool” criticisms of his leadership of the NATO alliance as Anthony Albanese emphasised that Australia would be engaged in supporting the alliance’s efforts in Ukraine “for as long as necessary and to the best of our capacity’’. Mr Stoltenberg showed no agitation about the remarks of former prime minister Paul Keating, who criticised him for trying to set up a NATO office in the Indo-Pacific in what he ­ perceived as an anti-China ­manoeuvre. The Prime Minister countered that view with an effusive welcome to Mr Stoltenberg at the opening of the two-day summit, congratulating him on his reappointment for another year, noting “it is very well deserved”, and on his leadership of NATO and what the alliance was doing to promote regional security.

>>19165707 China tensions spur council’s sister city fears - A town on Western Australia‘s southern coast will consider severing ties with its Chinese sister city amid concerns from some councillors that the relationship could lead to “influence and interference” in its affairs and “pressures to sovereign integrity”. City of Albany councillor Thomas Brough will move a motion later this month proposing that the town “respectfully conclude” its sister city relationship with Linyi, in China’s Shandong province. “China has been engaged in economic warfare with Australia since 2020 and political warfare since the mid 2010s. This form of conflict is unfamiliar to many citizens of Western democracies but will be easily recognisable to those familiar with the Marxist-Leninist-Maoist modus operandi,” the report says. “To effectively counter and defeat CCP influence and interference there is a need to expose such operations to the intense sunlight of public scrutiny.” Dr Brough’s report said sister city relationships had been used by the Chinese Communist Party to help enable foreign influence.

>>19165734 Meta says China experimenting with Facebook influence tactics - Chinese agents are spreading targeted misinformation to journalists on Facebook as part of new efforts coming out of the Communist Party state to grow its influence. Meta, which owns the social media giant, removed 200 operations globally for “violating our policy against co-ordinated inauthentic behaviour, and these networks came from 68 countries and operated in 42 languages”, Meta regional director of policy Mia Garlick told the Senate Committee on Foreign Interference through Social Media on Tuesday. In the first quarter of 2023, Meta disrupted two so-called Co-ordinated Inauthentic Behaviour (CIB) networks originating out of China, and although they did not specifically target Australia, Meta said there had been a shift in tactics by China-based agents.

>>19165779 Solomon Islands officially opens embassy in Beijing, 'a big milestone' to further enhance relations between countries and people - Through a ceremony with applause and dances in Beijing, the Solomon Islands officially opened its embassy in China on Tuesday, almost four years after the two countries established diplomatic ties. The Tuesday event, as Solomon Islands Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare told the Global Times, is "a big milestone" that is expected to further enhance the relations between the two countries and their people. The ceremony, held in Beijing, was attended by Wang Yi, director of the Office of the Foreign Affairs Commission of the Communist Party of China (CPC) Central Committee, and Sogavare, who is on his second official visit to China. In the future, through the embassy, bilateral relations between the Solomon Islands and China, people-to-people ties, and shared values between the two countries will be further strengthened, Sogavare told the Global Times. He further noted that China is a great country, and for countries like the Solomon Islands and other similar Pacific Island countries, it would be "very stupid" not to increase cooperation with China and seize the development opportunities it offers. - Shan Jie, Bai Yunyi and Fan Anqi - globaltimes.cn

>>19165800 Zelensky 'to thank Albanese in person' for arms - Anthony Albanese still hopes to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Wednesday, the final day of the NATO summit in Lithuania, after a breakthrough saw alliance members agree on a 'clear path' for Ukraine’s NATO membership. The NATO members also discussed a “coercive” China and the risk that poses to security across Europe and the Atlantic. “China is not our adversary, and we should continue to engage,” NATO secretary general Jens Stoltenberg said, but warned: “Beijing’s increasing assertiveness affects our security” as well as challenging the rules-based international order.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188941

#30 - Part 74

Virginia Roberts Giuffre, Prince Andrew, Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell

>>18939346 EXCLUSIVE: Newly minted Virginia Giuffre stumbles outside NYC court as she's sued for $10M by Rina Oh for publicly naming her as recruiter for Jeffrey Epstein - Virginia Giuffre took a tumble outside Manhattan federal court after she faced Rina Oh who is suing her for $10 million for publicly naming her as a recruiter for Jeffrey Epstein. The two have been battling it out in court since 2021 when Oh filed the lawsuit against Giuffre for defamation, citing a series of year-old tweets that asserted that Oh was Epstein's girlfriend and recruited girls for him to abuse. Oh has said the authorities have agreed with her that she was also a young victim of Epstein 20 years ago and not a co-conspirator or part of his inner circle. The two women were back in court in New York on Wednesday. Giuffre was being escorted from the courthouse with a suit jacket over her head when she suddenly stumbled and fell to the pavement. Security rushed to her side and helped her up.

>>18939352 Q Post #4923 - https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1319071346282778624 Dearest Virginia - We stand with you. Now and always. Find peace through prayer. Never give up the good fight. God bless you. Q

>>18998381 Jeffery Epstein: JP Morgan pays out $429 million to victims, allegedly helped facilitate sex trafficking ring - JP Morgan last night settled a lawsuit for allegedly facilitating Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking ring for a reported $429 million. The US bank will pay the money to more than 100 victims of the late paedophile who claimed it turned a blind eye to his abuse of underage girls. Lawyers for the victims welcomed the settlement but David Boies, who previously represented Prince Andrew’s accuser Virginia Roberts, said it was “not enough but it’s close” - a line from the 1973 film The Sting.

>>19103702 US urges appeals court to uphold Ghislaine Maxwell's sex trafficking conviction - The U.S. government has urged an appeals court to uphold Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction and 20-year prison sentence for helping the disgraced late financier Jeffrey Epstein sexually abuse teenage girls. In a Thursday night filing with the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan, federal prosecutors said none of Maxwell's legal arguments about the fairness of her trial undermined their case, or justified a dismissal or new trial. In her appeal, Maxwell, daughter of late British media mogul Robert Maxwell, accused prosecutors of making her a scapegoat because Epstein was dead and "public outrage" demanded that someone else absorb the blame. Prosecutors rejected her claims that they waited too long to bring charges, and that Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement arising from alleged abuse at his Palm Beach, Florida mansion also immunized her. They also said the trial judge had discretion to conclude that Maxwell's jury was fair and impartial, though one juror failed to disclose during pre-trial questioning that he had been sexually abused as a child. "This case does not present the extraordinary circumstances that justify overturning a jury's verdict based on an error during voir dire," prosecutors said.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188944

#30 - Part 75

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 1

>>18928685 Survivor of former Townsville paedophile priest Neville Creen reveals toll the abuse took on her life - "He was supposed to be God's shepherd, but instead he was a wolf in shepherd's clothes, waiting to prey on our innocence and devour us," Megan said. "We had no power to fight him, that's how I feel. I felt I was trapped."

>>18928691 Taskforce Argos arrest 71yo Redbank Plains man at fast food restaurant for child sex offences - An elderly man who brought condoms and chocolates as gifts for a “young girl” he believed to be meeting for sex has been arrested by undercover detectives. The 71-year-old Redbank Plains man was taken into custody at a Brisbane fast-food outlet where he thought he was meeting a school-aged girl. Instead, he was met by detectives from Queensland Police Taskforce Argos who had been posing as the child online.

>>18928705 The Satanic Temple: Think you know about Satanists? Maybe you don't - The Satanic Temple is recognised as a religion by the US government, and has ministers and congregations in America, Europe and Australia. More than 830 people snapped up tickets for its late April convention, dubbed SatanCon. Members say they don't actually believe in a literal Lucifer or Hell. Instead, they say Satan is a metaphor for questioning authority, and grounding your beliefs in science. The sense of community around these shared values makes it a religion, they say. - Rebecca Seales - bbc.com

>>18928713 Q Post #4627 - One party discusses God. One party discusses Darkness. One party promotes God. One party eliminates God. Symbolism will be their downfall. The Great Deceiver(s).

>>18928713 Q Post #4429 - The Armor of God - Finally, be strong in the Lord and in his mighty power. Put on the full armor of God, so that you can take your stand against the devil’s schemes. For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms. Have faith in Humanity. Have faith in Yourself. Have faith in God. The Great Awakening. Q

>>18928713 Q Post #4396 - God wins. Q

>>18929116 Better the Devil You Know! Conspiracy theorists make shock claims that Kylie Minogue is part of a Satanic cult: 'The Illuminati has a new toy puppet' - Kylie Minogue is embroiled in a bizarre and baseless Satanic conspiracy theory. The Australian pop star, who is currently in the midst of a major career comeback thanks to her new single Padam Padam, has been accused of pushing satanic messaging in her music videos and album artwork. God-fearing conspiracy theorists have pointed out that the cover of the 55-year-old's upcoming album Tension features an Illuminati pose. The Illuminati are a group that conspiracy theorists assert controls the world's affairs and economy, and its members come from the worlds of politics, business and entertainment. In the Tension cover image, Kylie holds one hand over her eye, which conspiracy theorists believe is a reference to the 'evil eye'. 'I don't know who told you to pose like this but it is a symbol of Satanism,' one fan tweeted.

>>18929148 "...a bizarre and baseless Satanic conspiracy theory." - Q Post #3906 - Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements) - When you are awake, you are able to clearly see. The choice is yours, and yours alone. Trust and put faith in yourself. You are not alone and you are not in the minority. Difficult truths will soon see the light of day. WWG1WGA!!! Q

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188945

#30 - Part 76

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 2

>>18940046 Archbishop of Melbourne loses appeal of $2 million altar boy payout - A Catholic archbishop has lost a bid to reduce an almost $2 million court-ordered payout to an altar boy subjected to horrific sexual abuse by a pedophile priest. Archbishop of Melbourne Peter Comensoli launched an appeal of a Supreme Court decision to award $1.9 million in damages to one of former priest Desmond Gannon's victims, after being found vicariously liable for the abuse. Gannon sexually assaulted the man, who cannot be named for legal reasons, three times between 1968 and 1970 while he was an altar boy and pupil at a Catholic primary school in regional Victoria. The priest drove the boy out to a remote area where he molested and raped him. He was terrified Gannon would get a shovel, kill and bury him. Gannon was jailed for up to 25 months for the abuse in 2009. The victim said the abuse had impacted his entire life as he continued to suffer poor mental health, contemplated suicide and abused alcohol to numb his pain. He was awarded $1,908,647 in damages, including for economic loss and future treatment expenses, by Justice Andrew Keogh in June 2022, with the judge finding Gannon's abuse to be "horrific". Archbishop Comensoli appealed the payout, claiming it should be reduced because some of the victim's injuries were caused by factors outside of the abuse. But three justices rejected the appeal, finding the archbishop's arguments were unconvincing. The Court of Appeal judges said the victim continued to suffer the impact of the abuse to this day. "The abuse occurred at a time when the respondent was young, extremely vulnerable and dependent on those around him for care and support," Justices David Beach, Richard Niall and Stephen Kay said.

>>18945864 Former Malka Leifer student settles abuse claim with ultra-Orthodox school - A former student has settled a legal claim against Adass Israel School, the former employer of convicted rapist Malka Leifer, over new allegations of abuse connected to the ultra-Orthodox inner-Melbourne religious college. The woman, a member of the ultra-Orthodox Adass community, filed a suit against Leifer and the Adass Israel School over fresh allegations of abuse. She settled the case on Tuesday morning, hours before the trial was due to begin.

>>18945953 Police reopen probe into school board that allegedly helped Malka Leifer flee to Israel - Board members from an ultra-Orthodox Jewish school who in 2008 allegedly helped then-principal Malka Leifer flee Australia to Israel - where she for years avoided justice for sexually abusing students - are back under investigation, despite police previously ruling out charges. Former Victorian premier Ted Baillieu, a prominent advocate for the three sisters who accused Leifer of abusing them at the Adass Israel School in Elsternwick where they were students, confirmed Victoria Police Chief Commissioner Shane Patton wrote to him on Friday to say police had resumed their investigation into the school’s board.

>>18955324 Former head of Adass Israel School board defended sending sex offender Leifer overseas without informing police - The Adass Israel School board acted “as any normal person would act” in helping sex offender Malka Leifer flee Australia, the board’s former president once said. Yitzhak Benedikt, then school board president, was part of a small group who a court said hastily arranged Leifer’s departure at a meeting on March 5, 2008. In late-2016, when The Australian interviewed Mr Benedikt, he strongly defended the decision to help Leifer flee the country despite a count finding that he was aware of at least eight separate allegations of sexual misconduct against her. “We have acted as any normal person would act, we have responsibilities for our children and for our community,” Mr Benedikt said. “We could not allow a teacher like that to stay anywhere near the children. Don’t you agree with me that the best thing is that they don’t have any more to do with the children?”

>>18965915 Ex-MP Milton Orkopoulos taken to hospital after being bashed in jail - Convicted child sex offender and former NSW Labor minister Milton Orkopoulos has been taken to hospital with head, body and leg injuries after being bashed in custody. Orkopoulos, 65, was found injured at Long Bay jail and was taken to Prince of Wales Hospital. “A 65-year-old inmate has received treatment in hospital following an assault at the Metropolitan Special Programs Centre, at Long Bay,” a NSW Corrective Services spokeswoman said in a statement. “Corrective Services NSW takes great care to determine appropriate security classifications and placements for inmates to maintain the safety and security of our prisons.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188947

#30 - Part 77

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 3

>>18987672 ‘Red flags everywhere’: high court asks Catholic church why it didn’t investigate priest’s abuse 50 years ago - The high court has pressed the Catholic church to explain why it didn’t have an adequate opportunity 50 years ago to investigate the extent of a priest’s abuse of children, given there were “red flags everywhere” about his crimes. The court on Thursday began hearing a key case about a legal tactic now routinely being employed by the church and other institutions to permanently shield themselves from abuse survivors’ civil claims for compensation. Institutions are now regularly seeking permanent stays, or a permanent halt to proceedings, by arguing the death of alleged perpetrators and the inability to obtain their response to a survivor’s allegations leaves them unable to receive a fair trial. The approach has infuriated survivors and their advocates, who say the church is now effectively using the passage of time to avoid trial, despite the fact the church systemically and deliberately concealed abuse for decades in dioceses across Australia.

>>19011175 Hillsong founder Brian Houston accused of covering up father’s sexual abuse - Brian Houston concealed his paedophile father’s sexual abuse of a schoolboy amid a church-wide culture of keeping things “in house”, a court has been told. Mr Houston, 69, has pleaded not guilty to one count of concealing the serious indictable offence of another person, arguing he was merely abiding by the wishes of his father’s victim by not going to police. The former Hillsong pastor, at the NSW Local Court for a hearing, is accused of concealing that his late father Frank Houston had sexually assaulted a seven-year-old boy in January 1970. He argues that from September 1999 until his father’s death in 2004, he had a “reasonable excuse” not to go to police because of the man’s unwillingness to come forward.

>>19016485 Brian Houston told thousands of people about his father’s child sexual abuse, court told - Former Hillsong leader Brian Houston did not cover up his father’s sexual abuse of a child and actually told tens of thousands of people, including an annual church conference attended by the police commissioner, a court has heard. Houston, 69, is accused of concealing a serious indictable offence over failing to report the crime to police between learning of it in 1999 and his father’s death in 2004. He has pleaded not guilty. In closing submissions, defence barrister Phillip Boulten, SC, told Downing Centre Local Court his client had a reasonable excuse for not making a police report - that the victim, Brett Sengstock, did not want police involved. The court heard Houston confronted his father in November 1999 and the older man confessed to molesting Sengstock in the 1970s. Houston then informed his father he was no longer welcome to attend Hillsong.

>>19016533 Former football star Barry Cable ordered to pay damages in civil sexual abuse case - A Perth judge has ruled football "legend" Barry Cable sexually abused a young girl who decades later, has been awarded $818,700 for the "catastrophic" damage she suffered. The woman, who is now aged in her 60s, launched the civil action in 2019, claiming Cable started abusing her in the late 1960s when she was 12 years old. She further alleged that after she turned 17, the sexual contact continued, and Cable harassed her until she was in her mid-30s. She sued the now bankrupt former footballer for around $1 million and today District Court Judge Mark Herron ruled the woman was sexually abused by Cable as a child.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188948

#30 - Part 78

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 4

>>19037087 ‘It’s in the psyche of some people’: How predators get close to children - The NSW child abuse squad has arrested 10 alleged paedophiles every week this year and is convicting more and more offenders who infiltrate families, schools and social media to prey on children. But as victims and detectives pay the psychological toll, authorities warn online child abuse content is proliferating in Australia, where tech giants are yet to meet “minimum expectations” in key areas. Detective Superintendent Linda Howlett, in her 41 years with a badge, has questioned countless paedophiles. “It’s in the psyche of some people,” Howlett said. “They’re happy to talk to you about it, they’re trying to justify why they’ve done it. And they believe it.” Howlett commands the 240 officers of the child abuse squad across 19 locations. But they find the same stories everywhere: offenders who are not motivated by money, power or lifestyle but what Howlett calls a “unique mindset”. “Often they’re the people parents couldn’t talk highly enough about,” Howlett said. “They volunteer for school groups, camps, sporting activities, they look around for single parent families to help them go shopping or gardening. They not only groom children, they groom families. You’re not going to leave your children with someone you don’t trust.”

>>19044142 North Melbourne premiership great Barry Cable will be removed from the Australian Football Hall of Fame - Barry Cable will be stripped of his legend status and be booted from the Hall of Fame in the wake of the historical sexual abuses he was found to have committed. The unprecedented decision will be set in motion after next Tuesday’s Australian Football Hall of Fame dinner. Preceding the dinner, the AFL Commission will meet and among the agenda items will be Cable’s eligibility. Afterwards, the commission is certain to officially write to Cable and inform him he will be stripped of football’s highest honour. Cable, 79, is one of the sport’s most decorated players, having played 379 senior games for Perth, North Melbourne and East Perth. He was awarded legend status in 2012. Cable last week was found to have sexually abused a Perth girl for five years from the age of 12, starting at or around 1970.

>>19051251 Notorious paedophile Gerald Ridsdale pleads guilty to fresh charge relating to 72nd victim of abuse - Notorious prolific paedophile priest Gerald Ridsdale has pleaded guilty to another charge relating to a historical sex offences. Ridsdale was charged in 2022 with one count of indecent assault of a minor in the 1980s, and today he pleaded guilty to that charge. It comes after the victim-survivor came forward after he was assaulted at St Brigid's College in Horsham by the then-assistant priest between 1987 and 1988. The Ballarat Magistrates Court heard this afternoon the priest told the then-13-year-old boy "it's alright" as he molested him. He was acting as a counsellor to the teenager at the time. The college student is the 72nd known victim-survivor of Ridsdale's abuse.

>>19064589 Jailed pedophile priest David Edwin Rapson admits abusing more boys - A convicted pedophile and former priest who abused six schoolboys in Victoria has admitted historical sexual crimes against children in Tasmania. David Edwin Rapson was in 2015 found guilty of sexually abusing boys, aged between 11 and 16, at two Victorian boarding schools in the 1970s and 1980s. He is serving 12 years and six months behind bars, with a non-parole period of nine years and four months. Rapson, 69, appeared in the Supreme Court of Tasmania in Hobart on Friday, after pleading guilty to three counts of indecent assault against three boys in the 1980s. One survivor told the court the sexual abuse destroyed his faith in the Catholic church and people in general. "(Rapson's) actions caused my family relationships at the time to disintegrate and sent me into self-destructive behaviour, drug addiction, prostitution and petty crime," he said. He said he has dealt with decades of self-loathing and carrying blame and shame.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188949

#30 - Part 79

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 5

>>19082514 AFL Commission officially remove Barry Cable from Hall of Fame - The woman who was sexually abused by Barry Cable when she was a child says the AFL’s move to strip the former player and coach of the game’s highest honours has come “25 years too late”. Former North Melbourne player and coach Cable was immediately removed from the Australian Football Hall of Fame and had his Legend status stripped following harrowing evidence of historical child sexual abuse. As the league defended its handling of the situation, the AFL commission met and considered the matter, including a written submission from 79-year-old Cable, before unanimously voting to strip Cable of his football honours.

>>19087791 Victim of former principal Malka Leifer reveals she lost baby during sexual-abuse trial - A Melbourne court has heard one of convicted paedophile Malka Leifer's victims lost her baby during the trial. In April, Leifer was convicted in the County Court of Victoria of 18 offences, including rape and child sexual assault crimes. She was a principal at the Adass Israel School in Melbourne's south-east in the early 2000s when she was accused of abusing three sisters. She was convicted of abusing two of the sisters, Elly Sapper and Dassi Erlich, when they were teenagers. The sisters read victim impact statements today during a plea hearing in the County Court. Ms Sapper told the court she had been pregnant during the trial in April. She said while she had to be "torn apart on the stand" as she gave evidence, her child had been like a light, giving her strength. "It gave me the courage and strength to face every day in court," she said. But she said her baby did not survive the trial. "Six days before the verdict we lost our little girl, her heart stopped beating," she said. Ms Sapper said she would never know if the stress and trauma of Leifer's abuse and trial had contributed to the loss of her daughter. "She abused me and I am forced to inherit the consequences for the rest of my life," Ms Sapper told the courtroom, where people could be seen crying.

>>19087815 Malka Leifer: Impact of principal’s abuse laid bare as sisters share their stories - Former Jewish school principal Malka Leifer is “lonely, isolated and broken” inside prison following her conviction for sexually abusing two students. The former religious teacher and principal of Adass Israel School in Melbourne was convicted of sexually abusing two women while they were students and junior religious teachers following a two-month trial earlier this year. She remained still and expressionless as sisters Dassi Erlich and Elly Sapper read victim impact statements to the court. Ms Erlich told the packed court she trusted the powerful school community leader “completely” which had now left her feeling like a broken and traumatised adult. “I remember the first time Malka Leifer told me she cared, I was 16-years-old,” she said. “‘I love you like a mother’, she told me. “Malka Leifer you shattered my trust and stole my body and altered my life trajectory, but you could not take my spirit. Today I stand as a survivor.”

>>19087825 Sisters fight darkness after Orthodox principal's abuse - Sisters sexually abused by once revered ultra-Orthodox Jewish principal Malka Leifer refuse to be swallowed by the darkness of what happened to them. Elly Sapper yearned for love and Leifer was the first person to tell her she was loved. Her sister Dassi Erlich recalls the moment Leifer told her she loved her like a mother. It wasn't genuine love but a manipulation that led to years of sexual abuse and trauma. "Faced with the painful truth that her love wasn't real was a betrayal of such magnitude it left me broken," Ms Sapper told Leifer at a pre-sentence hearing in the Victorian County Court.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188951

#30 - Part 80

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 6

>>19087827 ‘Echoes of trauma’ as Malka Leifer victims detail impact statements in court - Persistent nightmares. Crippling mental health fallout. Possibly a lost pregnancy. These are three of many consequences Malka Leifer’s sexual abuse victims say her offending and criminal trial has had on their lives during impact statements given to Victoria’s County Court on the first day of the former principal’s plea hearing. Leifer, 56, watched remotely from a room in the Dame Phyllis Frost prison as sisters Elly Sapper and Dassi Erlich delivered summaries of the way her abuse had cast a shadow over their lives, including their relationships, mental health and ability to work. Ms Sapper and Ms Erlich’s sister Nicole Meyer also delivered a victim impact statement outside of court after the jury had acquitted Leifer of allegations made by her. “The scars both visible and invisible persist, no matter the verdict delivered by a jury,” she said. “Her manipulation, control and violation of my body and mind has had profound and devastating consequences in shaping the person I have become. The physical impact remained long after the abuse and continues to be present, with chronic pain, eating disorders and sleeping issues and PTSD.”

>>19087883 Video: ‘Leifer stole my body’: Sisters reveal lasting legacy of abuse by former principal - With the court lectern turned to address her rapist - former ultra-Orthodox school principal Malka Leifer - Elly Sapper stood up, gathered her courage and revealed that just six days before her abuser was convicted, she lost her unborn child. She didn’t know whether it was linked to her abuse, or the stress she had endured at the trial, but it was part of a story of exploitation and loss that began two decades ago and continued in the Melbourne County Court on Wednesday. “What can I do? Nothing,” Sapper told the court. “Because this trauma was done to me, and I am forced to inherit its pain and consequences for the rest of my life.” The miscarriage of her little girl is another cost that forms part of the decades-long fight that has cost three sisters - Sapper, Dassi Erlich and Nicole Meyer - an impossible toll for seeking justice, and one they are still paying.

>>19087902 Dassi Erlich Tweet: Today, was empowering and difficult. It was important to share in our words, the pain and trauma we endured. However, we also heard about the 'hardships' Leifer faces where she attempted to paint herself as a victim of her own consequences.

>>19094002 Inquiry to look at allegations of ‘vile’ historical child sexual abuse at Victorian state school - Allegations of “evil and vile” historical child sexual abuse at a Victorian state school in the 1960s and 1970s will be investigated by a special inquiry that will hear the testimonies of victim-survivors. The premier, Daniel Andrews, announced the board of inquiry on Wednesday morning and pledged to deliver a formal apology to recognise abuse victim-survivors who attended Beaumaris primary school, in Melbourne’s south-east. The apology will be separate to a wider apology the government is due to deliver later this year that will recognise historical child abuse in institutional care settings like orphanages.

>>19094129 Leifer faked mental illness and should be denied sentencing discount, prosecutor says - Malka Leifer should be denied a significant sentencing discount for her time in prison and under house arrest in Israel because she was feigning mental illness to frustrate her prosecution, a court has heard. Prosecutor Justin Lewis also told County Court Judge Mark Gamble that attempts by the former principal of a Jewish ultra-Orthodox school to thwart extradition to Australia may have been intended at preventing her trial for sexual crimes entirely. Leifer, a mother of eight, was found guilty by a jury in April of 18 charges including rape and indecent assault against two sisters, Elly Sapper and Dassi Erlich, who were former students of Adass Israel School. After a six-week trial, she was cleared of all charges relating to a third sister, Nicole Meyer.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188953

#30 - Part 81

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 7

>>19103576 Video: Glen was sexually abused at Beaumaris Primary School. For 50 years, he thought he was the only one - Glen Fearnett joined Beaumaris Primary School in 1971, as a knock-kneed grade 4 kid. By his first school camp, Fearnett had been sexually abused by one of a number of teachers who preyed on students, operating at the school with seeming impunity in the 1960s and ’70s. He thought he was the only one. It took him 50 years -- until other survivors began to come forward – to realise there were dozens of other victims who had suffered like he had. Fearnett believes at least 50 other children were sexually abused during the ’60s and ’70s at Beaumaris Primary School, and perhaps as many as 100 children. “It’s bigger than people could possibly imagine,” he said. “There’s three people [victims] I know who aren’t here with us anymore, for all sorts of reasons, and others whose lives were wrecked … And I think we needed some people needed to stand up and go, ‘Hey, this wasn’t okay’.” On Wednesday the Victorian government joined that chorus, announcing a Board of Inquiry into what Premier Daniel Andrews described as “vile, evil and incredibly damaging abuse” at the school in Melbourne’s south-east. Andrews said the investigation would acknowledge the “unique and evil goings-on” perpetrated in the past by at least three teachers at the school. It will also examine abuse by the same employees at other government schools.

>>19103632 Lack of apology spurred action on decades of school child abuse - It was the lack of an apology that spurred the action. When Beaumaris Primary School victim-survivor Glen Fearnett shared his story about historical child sexual abuse at the school with then Justice Party MP Stuart Grimley, his adviser Olivia Nicholls couldn’t believe the government hadn’t acknowledged what had occurred. Then Fearnett’s story snowballed. The more Nicholls scratched the surface, the more distressing stories she found: other accounts of historical abuse at Beaumaris Primary; evidence of accused teachers being shuffled from school to school; widespread claims of teachers abusing children in other state schools. Nicholls and Grimley spent a year working with Premier Daniel Andrews’ office to seek justice for victim-survivors before the MP lost his seat in the November state election. The government committed to an apology in February. But this week, it went further. Andrews on Wednesday announced a board of inquiry to examine what he described as “vile, evil and incredibly damaging” historical sexual abuse of children at Beaumaris Primary School in the 1960s and ’70s. At least three teachers were involved in perpetrating abuse at Beaumaris and other schools. More than 50 children are believed to have been abused.

>>19104755 Video: ‘I don’t get another chance to get justice’: Leifer accuser - Malka Leifer’s conviction was the triumphant culmination of an international campaign by three sisters - Nicole Meyer, Dassi Erlich and Elly Sapper – to extradite their former principal and teacher from Israel and bring her to trial in Australia. But as the three sisters held hands in the court listening to the jury’s verdict, there was a terrible sting in the tail. The 18 guilty verdicts against Leifer related only to the abuse of Dassi and Elly. For each of the five charges of rape and sexual abuse relating to Nicole, the jury found Leifer not guilty. The three sisters, so united in their marathon quest for justice, suddenly found themselves landing with a thud on different sides of the law. Nicole had fallen through the cracks, her legacy separated ­forever from her sisters by a jury verdict that had to be respected even if it didn’t pass the pub test given what Leifer did to Dassi and Elly. “I keep hearing ‘not guilty’ looping around in my head,” Nicole says. “I think the verdict has changed everything for me. It’s a very different journey to the one I expected.” Nicole says she now wants to focus on getting her life back on track. She plans to study law next year and hopes to one day become a criminal prosecutor as well as helping victims of sexual abuse. But mostly she just wants to move beyond the shadow of Leifer and the verdict. “I am 37 and she has been in my life since I was 16; that’s more than half my life,” she says. “I wanted so badly to move past having Leifer in my life but it is a lot harder now. I have to figure out a life without her in it. That is the hardest part for me. “But I know my truth and I’m grateful for the support from those who believe me.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188955

#30 - Part 82

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 8

>>19105014 After School Satan Club launches the first-ever summer club - On Friday, June 30, the After School Satan Club launched its first summer club at the Broome County Public Library. At the club, the kids made cat scratch pads made of recycled material. Campaign Director of the After School Satan Club, June Everett, said what goes on in the club is inspired by the 7 Satanic Tenants. Director of the Broome County Public Library, Josias Bartram, said they follow the First Amendment carefully and don’t want to intrude on anyone’s freedom of speech. “Our meeting rooms are available for any non-profit to book and that’s what happens with the Satanic Temple,” said Bartram. “This is not a Satanic Temple, and as with any non-profit that books our rooms, we’re not in any way endorsing them,” said Bartram. - Shabeli Acevedo - wbng.com

>>19105014 Q Post #4942 - https://time.com/collection/great-reset/ - This is not about R v D. This is about preserving our way of life. If America falls, the World falls. Patriots on guard. Q

>>19105014 Q Post #3967 - These people are pure evil. This is not about politics. You are ready. Q

>>19126586 Airport luggage search of Queensland man at Sydney Airport leads to the rescue of 16 children from alleged sexual abuse overseas - A search of a Queensland man's luggage at Sydney Airport has resulted in a record number of children being rescued from alleged sexual abuse overseas. Police say 16 children in the Philippines have been "removed from harm" by local authorities after a major international child protection investigation. The children, the youngest aged 10, were found during raids at four locations in Taguig and Nueva Vizcaya in the country's north. The operation began in January when Australian Border Force (ABF) officers at Sydney Airport examined a Queensland man's bags following his return from the Philippines. They searched the man's phone and allegedly found child abuse material and messages "detailing his intent" to pay someone to sexually abuse children overseas. ABF officers alerted the Australian Federal Police (AFP) who shared the information with the Philippine National Police (PNP) and the Philippine Internet Crimes Against Children Centre.

>>19143800 Hundreds caught up in crackdown on sex trafficking, organised crime - Officials have stopped almost two dozen women at the border suspected of being sex-trafficked into Australia, amid a crackdown on organised criminal syndicates rorting the visa system to enable human trafficking. The Australian Border Force is also targeting more than 175 people in Australia and overseas who are suspected of being involved with criminal groups. Since November last year, border officials have intercepted 22 women suspected of coming to Australia from overseas to work in the sex industry. Intelligence from law enforcement agencies suggests not all were entering Australia against their will. The women, who travelled from Vietnam, Thailand, Taiwan, Indonesia, China, Japan, Cambodia and South Korea, were refused entry into Australia on the grounds they were non-genuine travellers planning to work in breach of their visa conditions. Most were intercepted in Sydney and Cairns. Border Force has launched a month-long crackdown on migrant-worker abuses. Officers will visit more than 200 workplaces nationwide across the food, construction, mining and manufacturing industries.

>>19144068 Video: Satan Club returns for summer program - The After School Satan Club is inviting the community to participate in its summer program. The ASSC, sponsored by the Satanic Temple, is a national organization that recently established a presence at Homer Brink Elementary School in Endwell. The Satan Club summer program takes place at the Broome County Public Library. The campaign director for the club, June Everett, says that each meeting is unique and promotes activities that relate to the seven tenants of the Satanic Temple. Everett says that the purpose of the Satan Club is to teach kids how to be a good person, not to stir up controversy. “We’re not looking to create controversy, we’re not looking to upset the community, we just want to have an inclusive, fun, inviting place for those that don’t always feel comfortable sending their children to an Evangelical Christian Bible club,” said Everett.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188958

#30 - Part 83

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 9

>>19144068 Q Post #4545 - Humanity is good, but, when we let our guard down we allow darkness to infiltrate and destroy. Like past battles fought, we now face our greatest battle at present, a battle to save our Republic, our way of life, and what we decide (each of us) now will decide our future. Will we be a free nation under God? Or will we cede our freedom, rights and liberty to the enemy? If America falls so does the world. If America falls darkness will soon follow. Only when we stand together, only when we are united, can we defeat this highly entrenched dark enemy. This is not about politics. This is about preserving our way of life and protecting the generations that follow. We are living in Biblical times. Children of light vs children of darkness. United against the Invisible Enemy of all humanity. Q - https://qanon.pub/#4545

>>19165808 Barry Cable removed from Sport Australia Hall of Fame - Disgraced AFL footballer Barry Cable has been removed from the Sport Australia Hall of Fame. The decision comes after a Judge Mark Herron found in the District Court of Western Australia in June that Cable had repeatedly sexually assaulted a girl during his playing career. The civil matter was brought by the complainant, and was not a criminal prosecution. The judge also found there was compelling evidence Cable also abused other children. Sport Australia chair John Bertrand said his board decided on Friday to strip the once-esteemed footballer of the national honour that had been bestowed on him. In making the decision, the board said: “Induction into the Sport Australia Hall of Fame is reserved for the best of the best. Those who are inducted into this elite group have not only excelled in their chosen field, but uphold the character traits of dignity, integrity, courage, modesty and pride. “Cable’s actions are contrary to the values of the organisation, and as a result his SAHOF membership is revoked immediately.”

>>19165824 Police speaking with Barry Cable's sex abuse 'victim' - Police are speaking with a woman found to have been repeatedly sexually abused by Barry Cable amid the possibility of criminal charges against the disgraced footballer. After a civil trial in the District Court of Western Australia, Judge Mark Herron in June found Cable abused the victim over five years from 1968 when she was aged 12. Judge Herron said there was also compelling evidence the now 79-year-old, who has denied all allegations, had violated other children. WA Police Commissioner Col Blanch said he had to be cautious in commenting because of the sensitive nature of sexual offences. But he confirmed police were talking with the now 67-year-old woman. "We are speaking with the victim and the family, and we've got to make sure that we take every step appropriately through this and support any victim of any sex offence as best we can," he told ABC radio

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188959

#30 - Part 84

Qanon / Conspiracy Theory Hit Pieces, Australia and Worldwide

>>18939681 ‘Drowning in lies’: Turnbull warns Taipei audience of internal threat to democracy - Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull has told an audience in Taipei that lies and disinformation spread by “wicked” local actors poses the greater threat to democracy than from external threats such as authoritarian nations. Renewing his long-waged battle with Rupert Murdoch and his media stable, Turnbull cited Fox News, and said misinformation was not simply spread by conspiracy theorists at their keyboards but by established media. Fox News last month settled a $1.17 billion lawsuit with voting machine maker Dominion Systems for broadcasting lies peddled by Trump and his allies over the 2020 presidential election. - Jono Thomson - taiwannews.com.tw

>>19021795 ‘I was wrong’: Trump grows stronger, can beat Biden and topple US democracy, pollster fears - Leading US pollster Frank Luntz says Donald Trump can re-win the presidency and that if that happens, US democracy could collapse. Luntz said he was wrong to declare in 2021 that Trump would never again be president. “I now have to acknowledge that it is a distinct possibility that Donald Trump could be elected president - I did not believe that one year ago,” he said. “I did not believe that the search of Mar-a-Lago would be handled so badly, I did not believe that the indictment of him in New York would be handled so badly. “I did not believe that his opponents would be so inept as to actually strengthen him and the combination of all of those makes him now viable, not just in the Republican primary but in the general election.” - Latika Bourke - theage.com.au

>>19021837 Donald Trump could still have a shot at the presidency despite his legal troubles. But is Anthony Albanese prepared? - "Anthony Albanese probably didn't think there was much chance of Donald Trump returning to power when he openly criticised the then US president during his final days in the White House. Albanese, still opposition leader at the time, said Trump had "encouraged" the January 6 insurrection in 2021. He labelled it a direct assault on "the rule of law and democracy". The Labor leader also suggested Trump's foreign policy approach "saw the first steps in a retreat by the US from its historical role as leader of the post-war international order". These comments were made from a position of relative diplomatic safety. Trump had already lost to Joe Biden, who would be sworn into office within days. There was little risk in joining the chorus of criticism being levelled at such an outrageous president on his way out the door. Surely the man in the red MAGA cap was done. And yet, more than two years later, now Prime Minister Albanese is being urged to prepare for the very real possibility of a Trump return." - David Speers - abc.net.au

>>19021887 ‘Good morning #Australia’: Trump’s social network Truth Social comes Down Under - "Australians can now join the Donald Trump-founded social media platform Truth Social after geoblocking that prevented citizens from most countries from accessing the website was removed. Last week, former congressman and CEO of Truth Social Devin Nunes announced that the Twitter clone was available to users all over the world. Last Monday he “truthed” - the platform’s verb for posted - a message specifically welcoming Australians. “Good morning #Australia Glad to have you here @truthsocial,” he said, replying to a truth from an Australian user whose profile bio contained QAnon hashtags." - Cam Wilson - crikey.com.au

>>19051082 Australian Electoral Commissioner Tom Rogers reports rise in social media abuse, misinformation - "As Australia gears up for a referendum on an Indigenous Voice to Parliament, the national election watchdog has reported a rise in abuse from social media users spreading misinformation over its voting process. Australian Electoral Commissioner Tom Rogers said the tone of online comments on its posts about recent elections and the upcoming referendum voting information has been "aggressive". A rise in social media misinformation followed false claims made by former US President Donald Trump in relation to the voting process during the 2020 presidential election. Mr Trump accused an electronic voting system widely used by authorities in the US of deleting or switching votes in an attempt to pin the blame for his loss to President Joe Biden. Mr Rogers said the commission was working to address both the misinformation on the electoral process, as well as online threats to staff ahead of the upcoming referendum on the Indigenous Voice to Parliament." - Daryna Zadvirna - abc.net.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188962

File: be56f4ab657c907⋯.jpg (70.28 KB,400x400,1:1,OZ_Pepe.jpg)

File: 49c9e47c7fb3569⋯.jpg (232.75 KB,841x514,841:514,Q_479.jpg)

File: ccb3ea3d2932b3c⋯.jpg (300.17 KB,842x828,421:414,Q_908.jpg)

File: a6f1a731b3eccc9⋯.jpg (136.57 KB,842x302,421:151,Q_910.jpg)

PREVIOUSLY COLLECTED NOTABLES

Q Research AUSTRALIA #30 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/d4ab48e9

Q Research AUSTRALIA #29 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/7345bbf2

Q Research AUSTRALIA #28 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/f55ec192

Q Research AUSTRALIA #27 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/0b34604e

Q Research AUSTRALIA #26 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/9061e982

Q Research AUSTRALIA #25 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/767a7ba2

Q Research AUSTRALIA #24 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/8aa647c3

Q Research AUSTRALIA #23 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/d8746531

Q Research AUSTRALIA #22 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/0c91380d

Q Research AUSTRALIA #21 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/d1699b6f

Q Research AUSTRALIA #20 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/dd402760

Q Research AUSTRALIA #19 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/c2a98b43

Q Research AUSTRALIA #18 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/2ea866f7

Q Research AUSTRALIA #17 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/1df91700

Q Research AUSTRALIA #16 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/805b4829

Q Research AUSTRALIA #15 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/f975dc35

Q Research AUSTRALIA #14 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/62cdd4fd

Q Research AUSTRALIA #13 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/d2399cda

Q Research AUSTRALIA #12 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/558b72b8

Q Research AUSTRALIA #11 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/c17ab97f

Q Research AUSTRALIA #10 ————————————–——– https://controlc.com/bb780c9d

Q Research AUSTRALIA #9 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/6a61bec5

Q Research AUSTRALIA #8 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/7ee89fce

Q Research AUSTRALIA #7 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/239e467c

Q Research AUSTRALIA #6 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/c4932ea1

Q Research AUSTRALIA #5 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/5941506b

Q Research AUSTRALIA #4 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/acf74c16

Q Research AUSTRALIA #3 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/2021ac89

Q Research AUSTRALIA #2 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/b8855384

Q Research AUSTRALIA #1 ————————————––——– https://controlc.com/1e0dcd6e

THREAD ARCHIVES

Q Research AUSTRALIA #30 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/s33cO

Q Research AUSTRALIA #29 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/d8OqC

Q Research AUSTRALIA #28 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/cXDww

Q Research AUSTRALIA #27 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/KZ6Y0

Q Research AUSTRALIA #26 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/dJnda

Q Research AUSTRALIA #25 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/mWRzL

Q Research AUSTRALIA #24 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/uytYA

Q Research AUSTRALIA #23 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/R5AIe

Q Research AUSTRALIA #22 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/vwtO9

Q Research AUSTRALIA #21 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/Si585

Q Research AUSTRALIA #20 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/Q7NNa

Q Research AUSTRALIA #19 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/elcTK

Q Research AUSTRALIA #18 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/oV4MT

Q Research AUSTRALIA #17 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/NtfuF

Q Research AUSTRALIA #16 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/PFwgE

Q Research AUSTRALIA #15 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/5hP7I

Q Research AUSTRALIA #14 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/A85E8

Q Research AUSTRALIA #13 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/rdbq6

Q Research AUSTRALIA #12 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/PahoV

Q Research AUSTRALIA #11 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/VoY1C

Q Research AUSTRALIA #10 ————————————–——– https://archive.vn/lmbJh

Q Research AUSTRALIA #9 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/gOsSc

Q Research AUSTRALIA #8 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/xYtqT

Q Research AUSTRALIA #7 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/YT76p

Q Research AUSTRALIA #6 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/DGknZ

Q Research AUSTRALIA #5 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/vlHWs

Q Research AUSTRALIA #4 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/B0Z4l

Q Research AUSTRALIA #3 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/xznbY

Q Research AUSTRALIA #2 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/hlJ0W

Q Research AUSTRALIA #1 ————————————––——– https://archive.vn/vJ8oH

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188966

File: fc03f2897a3cf42⋯.jpg (3.11 MB,2800x2000,7:5,Chairman_of_the_Joint_Chie….jpg)

CURRENT DOUGH

https://controlc.com/c00cd368

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188991

File: 6c318436bead02f⋯.jpg (376.76 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_Virginia_class_attack_….jpg)

File: 7d81f9c9c6d0880⋯.jpg (324.61 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Kevin_Rudd_meets_Joe_Biden….jpg)

Powerful Senate committee signs off on transfer of nuclear submarines to Australia

ADAM CREIGHTON - JULY 16, 2023

1/2

The AUKUS security pact has passed a critical hurdle after a powerful Senate committee signed off on the transfer of nuclear-powered submarines to the navy and granted Australia a rare 20-year exemption from tough US defence technology export controls.

Senior Republican and Democrat senators, and Ambassador Kevin Rudd, hailed an amendment that was approved by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Friday (Saturday AEST), which would give the green light to Australia acquiring three Virginia class submarines, including one brand new, by the early 2030s.

The amendment, expected to gain the approval of the Senate and the House of Representatives in coming weeks, would provide Australia a national exemption from US export controls that otherwise would have hobbled AUKUS, the trilateral agreement that emerged in September 2021 that envisions the sharing of advanced military technology among the US, UK and Australia.

“Some may have said why share all this stuff with those crazy Australians; the bottom line is we’ve been sharing each other’s national secrets for three quarters of a century [via Five Eyes]… so the time has come to take that and then translate it in to how we share defence, science, industry and technology as well,” Mr Rudd said.

The ambassador was speaking alongside Democrat Senator Tim Kaine, chairman of the seapower subcommittee, in Hampton Roads, Virginia, on Friday (Saturday AEST), near where US shipbuilder Huntington Ingalls manufactures a significant proportion of the Virginia class attack submarine for the US navy.

“I know the business of making sausages can sometimes be untidy, messy, prolonged, but ultimately there’s a sausage at the end, and so it is with the passage of legislation,” Mr Rudd added, foreshadowing the possibility of “nips and tucks” as the bill passed through congress.

The amendment would also create a Submarine Security Account at the US Treasury to accept Australia’s promised contributions under AUKUS, expected to be around $3 billion in the first few years, for use by the US to develop its submarine capacity.

Anthony Albanese, UK prime minister Rishi Sunak and President Joe Biden unveiled the political expectations for the AUKUS pact in San Diego in March, including providing Australia with up to five Virginia class submarines by the 2030s, and construction of a new class of nuclear powered submarine, dubbed SSN AUKUS, by the 2040s.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19188997

File: 72f0d6215bd0f74⋯.jpg (4.44 MB,6555x4375,1311:875,The_Virginia_class_nuclear….jpg)

>>19188991

2/2

Republican senator Jim Risch said in a statement the amendment would “change our approach to defence trade with our closest allies, Australia and the United Kingdom – both of whom have an outstanding record in protecting US technology”.

The cost of the submarine program, up to an estimated $368bn through to the 2040s, has attracted criticism from elements in the Labor Party, amid separate concerns the US might ultimately fail to provide the Virginia class submarines, owing to supply bottlenecks that have dragged the domestic production rate down to 1.2 year rather than the 2 congress had demanded.

Republican congressman Rob Wittman last week told Breaking Defence, a trade publication, he wanted to cap the transfer of Virginia class submarines to Australia to two until the Biden administration could guarantee production rates of three new boats a year.

US Under Secretary of the navy Erik Raven, speaking alongside Mr Rudd and Senator Kaine, said the US was “absolutely” capable of ramping up production.

The senate amendment risks being caught up in intense negotiations between Democrats and Republicans in coming weeks as the two parties thrash out a final version of the Pentagon’s defence budget, which Republicans have made conditional on stripping back funding for abortions and ‘gender-affirming care’.

The National Defence Authorisation bill would also ban the teaching of ‘critical race theory’ in the military and rescind the role of chief diversity officer, including stopping paying anyone working in Diversity, Equity and Inclusion departments more than US$92,000 a year.

Democrat House leader Hakeem Jeffries said Republicans had turned what was usually a bipartisan bill into “hate-filled vessel for right-wing MAGA extremism” after almost all Democrats voted against it, setting the Republican-controlled House up for a showdown with the Democrat-controlled Senate.

The House bill provided a record US$886bn in defence funding for next financial year, including a 5.2 per cent pay rise for military personnel, an extra US$300 million for Ukraine and US$600 million to help counter China in the Indo-Pacific,

Senator Tim Kaine, once Hillary Clinton’s running mate in the 2016 presidential election, said he felt “very, very good” about the amendment’s passing both chambers by the end of the month.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/powerful-senate-committee-signs-off-on-transfer-of-nuclear-submarines-to-australia/news-story/4289c57f111e2364937c8ac889e0bd4e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19190812

File: c5a79b863a10d32⋯.jpg (140.6 KB,1279x720,1279:720,Peak_obstetricians_body_wa….jpg)

File: 47dac09f15ff3f2⋯.jpg (61.56 KB,1024x768,4:3,National_Association_of_Sp….jpg)

File: eae8f046cc045ee⋯.jpg (57.06 KB,1280x720,16:9,Catholic_Archbishop_of_Syd….jpg)

>>19160241 (pb)

>>19160276 (pb)

Peak obstetricians’ body warns women at risk after abortion pill access expanded

SARAH ISON - JULY 16, 2023

Anthony Albanese’s expansion of abortion pill access puts women at risk of complications, or even death, an obstetrician body says, raising alarm over the government not properly considering the unintended consequences of the policy.

National Association of Specialist Obstetricians and Gynae­cologists president Gino Pecoraro said allowing nurses to prescribe the abortion pill would see “lesser trained practitioners” handing out the medication.

“You can’t just start something like this, you have to have all the infrastructure in place to deal with all of the complications and it may simply be that it’s just not safe to do this everywhere,” he said.

“I’ve seen first-hand what can happen. I think what we need are health solutions and what’s been announced is a political solution.”

The Therapeutic Goods Administration earlier in July approved an application from the not-for-profit pharmaceutical company MS Health to amend restrictions on the medical abortion pill MS-2 Step, which can be taken up to nine weeks from conception.

As part of the change, nurse practitioners will be allowed to prescribe the pill and pharmacists will no longer need a “special certification” to dispense it.

Dr Pecoraro said he had been called in to help save the life of a 40-year-old woman earlier this year who was flown in from ­regional NSW after being prescribed the abortion pill and experiencing significant side effects and bleeding.

“She nearly died,” he said.

“It’s a dictum in medicine that you shouldn’t be prescribing something if you can’t deal with the complications of it. I’m just concerned that on the surface this looks like a wonderful thing to increase access to regional and remote disadvantaged women … but the first rule has to be do no harm, and I’m not convinced we’re not going to do harm.”

Of all medical abortions, he estimated about 5 per cent resulted in complications. “Someone could die because of this,” he said.

The Albanese government has been typically cautious in its response to calls for expanded abortion access, after its decision to take an ambitious policy to the 2019 election that tied public hospital funding to the provision of terminations was weaponised by the Coalition and religious groups.

While welcoming the move to expand access to the pill, the Australian Medical Association vice-president Danielle McMullen also stressed the need for appropriate training and support to be offered to health practitioners empowered to hand out the medication.

A spokesman for the health department said it was the responsibility of each state and territory to “determine the specific healthcare practitioner and appropriate ­qualifications for prescribing”, but he said the decision to expand prescribing power of MS-2 Step had been “supported by expert advice from the Advisory Committee on Medicine”.

Catholic and Anglican leaders across the country raised alarm over the lifting of regulations for practitioners to prescribe MS-2 Step, which they said represented a rolling back of necessary safeguards.

Catholic Archbishop of Sydney Anthony Fisher said the change expanded the reach of medical abortion “without any expansion of pregnancy support for women”.

“We can do better for mothers and their babies than to make it easier for them to access abortion without making it easier to access genuine medical care and support to go ahead with their pregnancy. It’s very lop-sided,” he said.

Anglican Archdeacon for Women’s Ministry Kara Hartley and Anglican Archbishop of Sydney Kanishka Raffel said the policy would make it “more dangerous” for women in regional areas with less access to support services after complications.

“The impact of allowing self-administration of medication which terminates the life of an unborn child up to nine weeks of gestation is profound,” Archbishop Raffel said.

“The rhetoric around this issue has been focused on access rather than the impacts of abortion.”

Catholic Archdiocese of Canberra and Goulburn Christopher Prowse said it was “absolutely tragic that so many women find themselves in a position where they believe that they have no choice but to cease a pregnancy”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/peak-obstetricians-body-warns-womens-lives-at-risk-after-abortion-pill-access-expanded/news-story/6a8fda27ce238232c73c56d53c8f06d2

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19194396

File: 355e64d773eb72d⋯.jpg (229.14 KB,Curtin_MP_Kate_Chaney_sixt….jpg)

File: 19ee20e50465eb0⋯.jpg (469.47 KB,Voice_to_parliament_July_1….jpg)

File: 47d5179ab1f1807⋯.jpg (73.57 KB,Gender_Region.jpg)

Women, regional voters lead rebellion on Indigenous voice to parliament: Newspoll

SIMON BENSON - JULY 17, 2023

1/2

The referendum for an Indigenous voice to parliament has suffered a collapse in support among women voters and in the regions as the referendum heads toward defeat, with just 41 per cent of voters now saying they will vote yes.

For the first time, women are now more likely than men to vote no, a central change to core support based on gender.

The No vote in the regions has also blown out to 62 per cent, confirming a widening demographic split between city and bush.

An exclusive Newspoll commissioned by The Australian showing a further decline in support for the voice in the past three weeks comes as both sides submit their official campaign pamphlets to the Australian Electoral Commission for release.

The Australian has confirmed the No campaign provided its pamphlet to the AEC on Friday, with the Yes23 group submitting its pamphlet on Monday.

Labor, the Greens, teal independents and Liberals for Yes will join forces this week to promote the Yes23 movement, while the No campaign gears up for a heavily funded digital campaign.

But the Albanese government faces a deteriorating outcome with overall support for the voice to parliament and executive government falling further in the past three weeks in the wake of confusion over its function and scope.

The latest Newspoll survey shows 48 per cent of voters say they now intend to vote no, confirming a widening margin between the two camps and the lowest level of backing for the model since it was first proposed by the Albanese government.

It confirms a downward trend in support, dropping from 46 per cent in favour in May, to 43 per cent in June and 41 per cent in the latest survey.

The No vote has risen from 43 per cent, to 47 per cent and now 48 per cent over the same period. No date has been set for the referendum, which is likely to be held in October.

But in a reflection of the targeted campaign by the No camp, the greatest shift in sentiment has been among women voters, with a 10-point fall in support in the past three weeks.

Just 38 per cent of female voters now say they approve.

By contrast, support among male voters increased seven points to 45 per cent with 47 opposed, while 49 per cent of female voters now indicated a No vote.

Support in regional communities has also fallen sharply from 40 per cent in favour in June, to 31 per cent in the latest survey, with the No vote rising from 51 per cent to 62 per cent. The only key demographics showing support above 50 per cent were among 18-to-34-year-olds and the university-educated. But even then, among these groups favourability has fallen.

In the previous survey 63 per cent of younger voters approved of the proposed referendum compared to 59 per cent in the latest poll – with a rise in the number who now say they are undecided.

The No vote has also hardened among the older demographics, while those aged between 35 to 49 showed a two-point rise in support to 46 per cent compared to 43 per cent opposed.

While there was little movement along party lines among Labor, Coalition and Greens supporters, support among those identifying as minor party or independent voters fell nine points to just 20 per cent.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19194398

File: 355e64d773eb72d⋯.jpg (229.14 KB,Curtin_MP_Kate_Chaney_sixt….jpg)

File: 19ee20e50465eb0⋯.jpg (469.47 KB,Voice_to_parliament_July_1….jpg)

File: 47d5179ab1f1807⋯.jpg (73.57 KB,Gender_Region.jpg)

Women, regional voters lead rebellion on Indigenous voice to parliament: Newspoll

SIMON BENSON - JULY 17, 2023

1/2

The referendum for an Indigenous voice to parliament has suffered a collapse in support among women voters and in the regions as the referendum heads toward defeat, with just 41 per cent of voters now saying they will vote yes.

For the first time, women are now more likely than men to vote no, a central change to core support based on gender.

The No vote in the regions has also blown out to 62 per cent, confirming a widening demographic split between city and bush.

An exclusive Newspoll commissioned by The Australian showing a further decline in support for the voice in the past three weeks comes as both sides submit their official campaign pamphlets to the Australian Electoral Commission for release.

The Australian has confirmed the No campaign provided its pamphlet to the AEC on Friday, with the Yes23 group submitting its pamphlet on Monday.

Labor, the Greens, teal independents and Liberals for Yes will join forces this week to promote the Yes23 movement, while the No campaign gears up for a heavily funded digital campaign.

But the Albanese government faces a deteriorating outcome with overall support for the voice to parliament and executive government falling further in the past three weeks in the wake of confusion over its function and scope.

The latest Newspoll survey shows 48 per cent of voters say they now intend to vote no, confirming a widening margin between the two camps and the lowest level of backing for the model since it was first proposed by the Albanese government.

It confirms a downward trend in support, dropping from 46 per cent in favour in May, to 43 per cent in June and 41 per cent in the latest survey.

The No vote has risen from 43 per cent, to 47 per cent and now 48 per cent over the same period. No date has been set for the referendum, which is likely to be held in October.

But in a reflection of the targeted campaign by the No camp, the greatest shift in sentiment has been among women voters, with a 10-point fall in support in the past three weeks.

Just 38 per cent of female voters now say they approve.

By contrast, support among male voters increased seven points to 45 per cent with 47 opposed, while 49 per cent of female voters now indicated a No vote.

Support in regional communities has also fallen sharply from 40 per cent in favour in June, to 31 per cent in the latest survey, with the No vote rising from 51 per cent to 62 per cent. The only key demographics showing support above 50 per cent were among 18-to-34-year-olds and the university-educated. But even then, among these groups favourability has fallen.

In the previous survey 63 per cent of younger voters approved of the proposed referendum compared to 59 per cent in the latest poll – with a rise in the number who now say they are undecided.

The No vote has also hardened among the older demographics, while those aged between 35 to 49 showed a two-point rise in support to 46 per cent compared to 43 per cent opposed.

While there was little movement along party lines among Labor, Coalition and Greens supporters, support among those identifying as minor party or independent voters fell nine points to just 20 per cent.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19194401

File: aec1a8912465808⋯.jpg (253.87 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Indigenous_Affairs_Ministe….jpg)

File: 112a8f4a8341046⋯.jpg (344.59 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Liberal_member_for_Bass_Br….jpg)

File: 40be1ceb1036f07⋯.jpg (179.33 KB,2048x1152,16:9,At_what_point_does_Prime_M….jpg)

>>19194398

2/2

The Newspoll was conducted between July 12 and July 15 and surveyed 1570 voters throughout Australia. Voters were asked if they approved of altering the Constitution to recognise First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voice.

This is the wording of the question to be put at the referendum.

The latest Newspoll covers a period in which the political debate in Canberra was largely focused on the voice’s functions, and a Press Club speech by Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney, a Wiradjuri woman, who sought to clarify what the voice would be able to advise government on.

In an attempt to extinguish concerns about the scope of the voice, Ms Burney pointed to four priority areas she wanted it to focus on, including health, education and employment, but was forced to clarify that the voice would decide what it did and didn’t seek to provide advice on.

Ahead of the release of the official Yes23 pamphlet, she claimed there was cross-party support.

“A voice is an idea many years in the making and many Indigenous Australians have put a great deal of hard work into achieving constitutional recognition,” Ms Burney said.

“I encourage Australians to join this national conversation about constitutional recognition through a voice and consider how we can make practical change that will improve lives.”

Coalition senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, a Warlpiri woman campaigning against the voice, said: “When I travel around the country it’s clear to me that support for the No campaign is growing, particularly in remote and rural communities.

“Australians out here want details, real consultation and transparency. Instead they’ve been given a proposal that is risky, full of unknowns and enshrines division in the Constitution.

“My colleagues and I have put together a pamphlet we believe outlines the strongest case, with a simple and clear message, say no to this risky, permanent and divisive voice. I encourage all Australians to read it.”

Greens First Nations spokeswoman senator Dorinda Cox, a Yamatji Noongar woman, said: “Now is the time for the country to come together and say yes to justice for First Nations people.

“By voting yes, we are saying First Nations people should have a say and this right can never be taken away. A successful referendum can be a big step … to truth and treaty for the country.”

Independent member for the Western Australian seat of Curtin, Kate Chaney, said the Yes23 pamphlet would provide a clear articulation for the yes case.

“The voice is a low-risk, high-return opportunity to unite all Australians,” she said. “Once people understand the practicalities of the voice as a means of long-overdue recognition, they start to see it as an exciting step in creating a fairer country.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/women-regional-voters-lead-rebellion-on-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-newspoll/news-story/d3ca1abea8a004a5cd3b1bb220e63d88

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19194411

File: 278ac17d77cc24a⋯.jpg (154.3 KB,Senator_Dorinda_Cox_left_B….jpg)

File: a2297cfed4cfb48⋯.jpg (118.67 KB,Liberal_MP_Rick_Wilson.jpg)

>>19194398

Thomas Mayo and Kate Chaney get plaudits in Perth, but WA regions rail against the voice

PAIGE TAYLOR - JULY 17, 2023

1/2

Night was falling when 650 people filed past the Olympic-sized swimming pool at Perth’s Newman College into Marist Auditorium. They came to listen to the case for an Indigenous voice to parliament.

The college is the alma mater of Formula One driver Daniel Ricciardo. It is geographically in the centre of one of the most advantaged electorates in Australia, the Golden Triangle of real estate between the Swan River and the Indian Ocean. It is 600km by road, and figuratively a million miles, from the Goldfields that built the state. There, Kalgoorlie-Boulder Mayor John Bowler believes locals have decided against the voice before pamphlets from either side of the debate arrive in their letterboxes.

Newman College is in the seat of Curtin, previously held by former foreign minister Julie Bishop. It was Western Australia’s safest Liberal seat until Kate Chaney of the high-achieving Chaney dynasty took it from Celia Hammond at the last federal election.

Chaney is a teal, but is campaigning on the voice with Greens senator Dorinda Cox and Labor minister Madeleine King.

She was helped during her campaign by her uncle Fred Chaney, the Aboriginal affairs minister in the Fraser government who had come to believe his old party was unfit to govern, largely because of Robodebt.

The voice forum was the former Anglicare executive’s biggest event yet. Some of the western suburbs’ favourite sons and daughters were there. Former chief justice of Australia Robert French was onstage with child health researcher Fiona Stanley, after whom the state’s biggest hospital is named. Janet Holmes a Court was in the audience.

There was a standing ovation for Yes campaigner Thomas Mayo after he recited the Uluru Statement from the Heart without notes. The Yes campaign believes it can still win WA. That is why Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney has just spent six days there, flying out on Sunday night after talks with Indigenous people from the south coast to the far north Kimberley. A campaign insider said the Albanese government was in possession of secret polling showing the No vote in WA was in the high 40s and the Yes vote was in the high 30s, but the key detail was that undecideds sat at 15 per cent.

Out in the WA farming and mining electorate of O’Connor, Liberal MP Rick Wilson sees baked-in opposition. In the last week of June, Wilson ran a survey of his own email database. Though it lacked any of the rigour of a poll, Wilson’s survey concluded 80.1 per cent of the 1487 respondents intended to vote No at the voice referendum later this year.

While Liberal MP Bridget Archer campaigned with Burney for the voice in Launceston for two days last week, Wilson will not help Burney.

“I won’t be campaigning with Linda but it would be fair to say she needs all the help she can get,” Wilson said.

The biggest regional centre in Wilson’s electorate is Kalgoorlie-Boulder, the division where in 1967 an unusually high 33.32 per cent of voters said No to constitutional changes that took away the states’ sole responsibility for laws governing Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

The WA Labor government’s new Aboriginal heritage laws have become a thorn in the side of the Yes campaign in O’Connor. The update to existing laws was broadly welcomed in the wake of the destruction of Juukan Gorge in 2020 but the legislation, enacted on July 1, has become ammunition for voice opponents. Though properties under 1100sq m are exempt, as are a long list of activities such as building a patio or installing a pool, wild claims have proliferated on social media. Noongar man Mervyn Eades was on the verge of tears after reading comments about those new laws on the Facebook page of WA Liberal leader Libby Mettam.

“The farmers are shitting themselves. They are scared. We don’t want nothing that’s theirs but they think we do,” Eades told The Australian.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19194416

File: 2dee309f34bdb70⋯.jpg (88.38 KB,Yes23_director_Thomas_Mayo….jpg)

>>19194411

2/2

Eades grew up in the farming town of Cranbrook in Wilson’s electorate and is now a director of the Wagyl Kaip Aboriginal Corporation, formed to help administer the biggest Native Title settlement in Australian history, the $1.3bn southwest land deal struck with the former Liberal Barnett government.

He said his old people cleared farms on Noongar country in arrangements akin to slave labour yet their descendants were being treated like thieves for wanting to protect the few remaining heritage sites in the region.

“This whole thing has made me realise how many racist people there are,” he said. “They don’t know what they don’t know but the hatred towards us, I can feel it. I just want to cry over it. Where is our rightful place in this country?”

Mayor Bowler is a former state resources minister in the Gallop Labor government who believes the Yes campaign has lost his hometown. He said residents of the town of 30,000 would have voted for the voice three months ago, but not now.

“The feedback I am getting is that the Yes case hasn’t articulated what it’s going to be,” Bowler said.

The apparently differing views of Bowler’s constituents and those at Chaney’s voice forum in Perth cannot be described neatly. It is not about haves and have nots. It is well understood by year 12s preparing for life after high school in WA that engineers, geologists and tradies in the mines earn more than many of the GPs and professionals who populate the leafy western suburbs of Curtin. The median household income in Chaney’s seat of Curtin in 2021 was $2309 per week. In Kalgoorlie it was $2095, well above the national average of $1770.

In Curtin, 0.7 per cent of residents identify as Indigenous, according to the ABS. In Kalgoorlie, it is 7.7 per cent.

“The issues in Kalgoorlie are crime and anti-social behaviour,” Bowler said. “Lack of jobs is not an issue. We have too many jobs.”

North of Kalgoorlie in the Shire of Ngaanyatjarraku, traditional owners were sceptical during the Morrison government years that the voice could represent them. Shire president Damian McLean said they were reconsidering.

In the southwest corner of Wilson’s electorate, Noongar elder Oscar Colbung wants the voice to help bring back the old work for the dole scheme called CDEP. Colbung, 76, said the replacement had been a decade-long failure that rewarded the private sector with fat fees for box ticking. “The result is our people unemployed, filling up the prison,” he said.

Chaney said it was refreshing to host a forum that was “a really substantive discussion about the voice, in contrast to the polarising politics that have dominated recent discussion”.

“People have a genuine interest in learning more about the potential benefits of the voice, its history and its constitutional context,” Chaney said. “We have had feedback that the event addressed concerns and that attendees will share this information with their friends and families.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/thomas-mayo-and-kate-chaney-get-plaudits-in-perth-but-wa-regions-rail-against-the-voice/news-story/74766038d15a48c0f9d3dd8170c805da

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19194426

File: 3b09f36d3bdee0b⋯.jpg (207.94 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Thomas_Mayo_said_the_voice….jpg)

>>19031624 (pb)

>>19037314 (pb)

>>19194398

Thomas Mayo says Indigenous voice to parliament will be ‘difficult to ignore’

ROSIE LEWIS - JULY 17, 2023

Prominent Yes campaigner Thomas Mayo says an Indigenous voice to parliament will be “difficult to ignore” as he hits out at “disappointing” personal attacks that he says have been hurtful.

Mr Mayo, an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander man who was depicted in a widely criticised No campaign advertisement receiving a handout from Wesfarmers chairman Michael Chaney, said the ad was “very disappointing”.

He would keep talking to Australians telling them the voice would be modest, meaningful, uniting and something that would be celebrated forever.

“Housing, health, education, employment, those are common issues across all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities and a voice will be so important to helping our people to offer the solutions to the parliament in a way that is transparent, in a way that is difficult to ignore, and we’ve been ignored for too long,” he told Sky News.

“That’s why we have the life expectancy gap of around eight years. Why we have such terribly high suicide rates amongst youth. I mean, these aren’t choices of us as Indigenous people ourselves, it’s a result of trauma and poor policy over a long period of time and a voice is absolutely vital to that.”

Mr Mayo said he wasn’t concerned by the latest Newspoll, which shows just 41 per cent of voters will vote Yes and the No vote in the regions growing to 62 per cent

“I’m not worried about the trends, most polls will go up and down,” he said.

“The feeling that I get out in the community when I’m travelling, I’ve been to Doomadgee and Mt Isa, the Pilbara and to cities – Perth, Sydney Melbourne – just in the last two weeks and, you know, it’s a great feeling that I get when people are informed.

Asked how he’d personally found the referendum campaign, Mr Mayo said: “Oh, it’s been difficult. It’s disappointing when you know these sorts of personal attacks happen but, you know, I just keep focusing on talking to Australians, just doing what I know I’m good at, which is communicating with people what the truth is about this.

“It’s hurtful when you see that stuff (attacks), but what keeps me going is addressing crowds of Australians … In Perth last week, you know, there was over 600 people gathered to hear myself and (independent MP) Kate Chaney and former chief justice of the High Court, Robert French, and just a great vibe.”

Videos unearthed by No campaign strategists showed Mr Mayo describing former prime minister John Howard as a “bastard” and threatening that politicians would be “punished” if they ignored the voice.

The militant unionist also raised the prospect of a voice being the first step towards reparations and compensation for Indigenous Australians.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/thomas-mayo-says-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-will-be-difficult-to-ignore/news-story/c1054506123f374e95905b4f178251e2

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19194442

File: 8b8b702644becff⋯.jpg (47.65 KB,1035x678,345:226,Thomas_Mayo_says_the_yes_c….jpg)

>>19194398

>>19194426

Thomas Mayo | Voice to Parliament will close gaps and address glaring issue at nation's heart

Thomas Mayo - July 17 2023

1/2

Our continent is vast and our peoples as diverse as the landscapes. We are a truly successful and vibrant multicultural country. But there is one glaring matter we are yet to address as Australians. More than 200 years since colonisation - with all of the brutality and marginalisation of the Indigenous peoples that followed - we are yet to recognise their proud 60,000-year heritage and culture as foundational to who we are.

All other like nations have some form of recognition of Indigenous peoples. In fact, we are at the back of the pack.

New Zealand has the Treaty of Waitangi as a founding document. Canada and the United States recognise Indigenous rights in their constitutions. And the Sami in Scandinavian countries are heard through a Sami Parliament, similar to the advisory Voice we are considering at the coming referendum.

How can we say we are the greatest country of all when we are the only like nation with no constitutional recognition of our original habitants. Far from great - Indigenous Australians are proportionately the most incarcerated people on the planet. We are the worst in the world in terms of Indigenous health, education and employment outcomes.

Myself, with many other advocates, have been crisscrossing our great continent for more than six years now, working hard to help both Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians to understand how we can close these gaps by voting "yes" in the coming referendum.

The proposed Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice is not my idea alone, nor of any other individual. It is not the idea of a political party of self-interested politician. The question we will be asked later this year is from a powerful national consensus reached in the heart of the nation. An invitation delivered into all Australians through the Uluru Statement from the Heart.

The Uluru Statement was endorsed by Indigenous delegates from across the nation. They were from the remotest of communities such as One Arm Point in the Kimberley and Angurugu in the NT; regional towns such as Carnarvon in Western Australia and Thursday Island in the Torres Strait; and all of the capital cities.

Though the process that led to the proposal for the Voice was unprecedentedly extensive and well-informed, it should be understandable that some Indigenous people have not yet heard of the Uluru Statement or how and why we have come to this constitutional moment. The Uluru Statement was immediately dismissed by the government of the day. Until recently, there has been barely any resources to inform the Australian public, let alone the hardest to reach of communities.

With the support of my union, who seconded me to help take the message in the Uluru Statement to the people at the request of Indigenous elders, I have worked hard for six years now at this task. Others have done so too, at their own expense, or with the support of their university, corporate employer or Indigenous-controlled organisation. We have done this work not for personal profit, but for the love of our families and our country.

In the remaining months to the referendum, the "yes" campaign will be doing our utmost to reach even the most regional and remote communities. And we will be listening as well - listening for people who want to learn more, who are calling out to be informed.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19194443

File: e96860259294d24⋯.jpg (274.54 KB,2048x1318,1024:659,Voice_to_Parliament_will_c….jpg)

>>19194442

2/2

We are working hard to inform people about the reasons for a Voice. One of the reasons is to better be able to inform people in regional and remote communities about current affairs. A Voice establishes the means for better informed communities, empowering them to better inform the policy and law makers of this land. All the evidence shows that a Voice such as this is the key to closing the gap.

I don't believe it's newsworthy when there is reporting of a single Indigenous person in a regional or remote community who does not know about the referendum. What we should be focused on instead is listening to the feedback and hearing the stories. You'll hear the same feedback and stories that were told to me in the debate and discussion that led to the proposal for a Voice in the first place: "we are tired of not being heard."

The measure for support for recognition through a Voice for Indigenous people in this coming referendum should not be that every single person should know about it. I could go to any electorate in the country and find a resident that does not know who their elected member of Parliament is. I could find a person who is on a waitlist for social housing that is completely unaware of the debate about this crucial issue in Parliament House.

We would do nothing if the prerequisite for taking action on Indigenous matters required 100 per cent support from the people who are affected. Yet at present, numerous polls are showing that over 80 per cent Indigenous people will vote "yes".

The only measure required to move forward should be if you agree with the truth of what this change will be. At the referendum, we are responding to a simple and modest proposition: should our constitution include recognition of the First Peoples of Australia by granting them the fairness of a say.

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/8270544/voice-will-close-gaps-and-address-glaring-issue-at-nations-heart/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19194448

File: 0b87a4795ad8c94⋯.jpg (151.6 KB,Anthony_Albanese_believes_….jpg)

File: 3e2a05c4b469c16⋯.jpg (196.49 KB,Minister_for_Indigenous_Au….jpg)

>>19194398

Anthony Albanese confident ‘focus’ will lead to Yes vote for Indigenous voice to parliament referendum

DENNIS SHANAHAN - JULY 17, 2023

Anthony Albanese has declared the referendum for the Indigenous voice to parliament will be supported by a majority of the people and a majority of the states on the back of a short, five or six week campaign which will be the chance to turn around the negative polling.

The Prime Minister has brushed off the latest Newspoll survey showing No support well ahead of the Yes campaign -48 to 41 per cent – arguing that Australians will not “focus” until the formal campaign begins and people can see the referendum question.

“Most Australians will focus when the referendum is being held,” Albanese told Sky News as he foreshadowed a referendum campaign of just five or six weeks.

While conceding the Yes campaign “needs to be stronger making their case” Albanese would not entertain any idea of deferring the referendum or changing the approach expressing his confidence and faith in the Australian people to do the right thing.

But the PM’s confidence flies in the face of the national polling, including the latest Newspoll on the voice, which demonstrate that the more voters see of the proposed voice the less they like it.

On the eve of the release of the formal Yes and No pamphlets support for the voice to parliament has fallen in every category – except Green voters – in terms of net support for the voice.

The trend in net support tells the story of an accelerating decline in the number of Yes voters across the board as more people move into the don’t know category or directly into the No camp.

While there are still positive net ratings the difference between support for Yes and No – among Green voters (plus 61 per cent), ALP supporters (plus 33 per cent), 18-34 year-olds (plus 30 per cent), university education (plus 11 per cent), metropolitan areas plus 4 per cent) and 35 to 49 year olds (plus 3 per cent) there have been falls across the board in net terms since June.

Even the net difference within Green voters on the Yes and No sides dropped a point to plus five in the latest Newspoll survey.

The latest Newspoll shows a net change – the difference between Yes and No – of minus 7 per cent page points in total support but since the legislation was debated there has been a fall of ten percentage points in support for the voice.

Net falls in support for the voice since June now range from minus 2 for men to minus 31 for regional Australia.

The only demographic group with a positive trend of net approval for the voice is Green voters – plus five per cent in the latest Newspoll – and even that net support fell from six points in the previous Newspoll.

Even support among Labor voters has fallen in net terms by six points and among 18-34 year olds has fallen in net terms by 14 points since the legislation was in parliament.

Female voters’ support has fallen 18 per cent age points in net terms since the legislation was passed while regional Australia’s support has dropped 31 per cent and even support among University graduates as had a net fall of 10 per cent age points.

All these are key demographic groups for any chance in shifting support back to the voice and Albanese’s confidence the trend will reverse in a short sharp campaign fly in the face of the results so far.

There are still months before the poll will be announced – not at the Garma festival in August – and the likelihood all these declining trends will continue and be almost impossible to turn around.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/anthony-albanese-confident-focus-will-lead-to-yes-vote-for-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-referendum/news-story/af0995b2c2e7f46c55db6a2d9821da6c

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19194465

File: 0315cd432c509ed⋯.jpg (225.35 KB,Indigenous_Australians_Min….jpg)

File: 97eb1dd66973cd7⋯.jpg (289.7 KB,Historian_Bain_Attwood.jpg)

>>19194398

Details aside, the vibe won’t win voice referendum

CHRIS MITCHELL - JULY 16, 2023

1/2

Only months out from the referendum on the Aboriginal voice to parliament many Yes and No arguments remain riddled with irony.

Yes case advocates may have misunderstood the lessons of the 2017 same-sex marriage plebiscite and last year’s federal election that brought a Labor left faction prime minister to power. Voice advocates see both as signs Australia has moved left. Hence criticism from media opponents such as Sky News hosts Peta Credlin and Andrew Bolt that PM Anthony Albanese has been hoping the voice would sail through “on the vibe”.

Yet the last election was a rejection of former prime minister Scott Morrison rather than a deliberate move left. Albanese campaigned as a small target with few actual policies other than pay rises, power price cuts and federal subsidies for aged care workers’ wages.

The same-sex marriage plebiscite signalled Australians believed gay and heterosexual family members and friends deserved the same treatment.

The voice is different. It is susceptible to the sort of campaign Pauline Hanson’s One Nation used against benefits paid to Aboriginal people in the 1990s.

Similar fairness concerns dominate arguments against the voice. Opponents believe the voice will give one group, Aboriginal people, more rights simply because of their race. Yet the same opponents may support recognition in the Constitution and want Aboriginal lives to improve.

Historian Bain Attwood made similar points in Friday’s Australian Financial Review, contrasting public attitudes at the time of the 1967 Aboriginal referendum to those of today. He says the rationale used by campaigners then was about equality, and middle Australia overwhelmingly supported change.

Today, “economic and social policies (have) impoverished many non-Indigenous Australians at the same time … (leaving) them feeling they have been deserted by mainstream political parties … Not surprisingly, many of those people resent a form of politics that appears to talk a great deal about oppression and inequality in reference to race … but hardly ever discusses what used to be signified by the word ‘class’.”

In other words, compassion is easier for the rich.

It’s similar to the Left’s misunderstanding of the asylum seeker issue in the late noughties. The biggest backlash against Labor’s fumbling was in seats with large Middle Eastern migrant populations who preferred family reunion for their own relatives to people smuggling.

Voice supporter Chris Kenny has argued here and on Sky News that the biggest flaw in Opposition leader Peter Dutton’s No campaign is his commitment a future Coalition government would support a legislated voice, even if the referendum fails. That is, Mr Dutton supports a voice and constitutional recognition but not a voice in the Constitution. This is a tacit admission a voice could help address Aboriginal disadvantage.

Similar irony abounds in the multiple positions of conservative voice supporters such as former Liberal spokesman on Indigenous Affairs Julian Leeser, and constitutional lawyer and former Australian Catholic University vice-chancellor Greg Craven. Both were passionate supporters of the referendum last year.

Earlier this year both began arguing the government should tighten the referendum question to make clear the Voice could only give advice to parliament, rather than to executive government. Then having lost that battle, they now wholeheartedly support a proposition they argued against only a few months ago.

Even more ironic have been regular demands from voice advocates such as Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney, Mr Albanese and Cape York leader and voice co-designer Noel Pearson for civility in the voice debate. This trio has claimed the Yes campaign will be respectful: that when No advocates go low, Yes advocates will go high. In practice they have done the opposite.

In her speech to the National Press Club on July 5, Burney deliberately diverted from the set text to accuse the No campaign of sowing division with Trump-style tactics. Twitter lit up during questions after the speech criticising journalists for asking Burney to give details of voice operations. Twitter lit up again the following Sunday when Insiders host David Speers also asked Burney perfectly reasonable questions.

On both occasions Burney seemed impervious to reasonable journalistic requests for detail and smiled as she repeatedly said she was not contemplating defeat. This won’t do. Critics of journalists who seek voice detail are simply playing into the hands of No case campaigners. The vibe will not win this referendum.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19194470

File: a6da2238672fb73⋯.jpg (292.65 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Former_Australian_Catholic….jpg)

File: a6ade8f4f64e9cb⋯.jpg (184.63 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Chris_Kenny.jpg)

>>19194465

2/2

Celebrity Yes campaigning by actors, sports bodies and big business might be counter-productive. And as Kenny noted in an excellent column on July 8, advocates need to respect doubters rather than demonise them. Indeed just as US voters turned against Hillary Clinton in 2016 when she called some of them “deplorables”, branding voice opponents as racists will only hurt the Yes case. This column, which suggested right back in January that Yes polling was collapsing, has a few additional suggestions.

First, Albanese and the Aboriginal leadership should acknowledge Australia across all levels of government spends about $50bn a year on Aboriginal programs that Yes case leaders and Burney admit have done little. This column would argue much of that money is swallowed by government and Aboriginal bureaucracies.

Scrap these programs and the thousands of Aboriginal organisations and corporations funded by governments and promise all future spending of taxpayers’ money on Aboriginal welfare will be overseen by the voice. Then promise to hold the voice accountable for the results.

Second, Albanese should rethink the need for bipartisanship. The voice’s remit should be pared back to advising parliament, not executive government. It should be tasked in the referendum question with targeting the four areas Burney told the Press Club she wanted the voice to focus on but in effect will have zero power to demand it do so: health, housing, jobs and education.

There is no point in Yes campaigners screaming “disinformation” when voice critics argue the present referendum wording could give the voice a say over any areas of public policy. The critics are technically correct; Aboriginal voice advocates have publicly admitted as much.

Nor is it any good Albanese and Burney claiming the voice would not want a say over interest rates, for example, because it would be too busy with other things.

Voice supporters also need to distance themselves from the Aboriginal left. Voters will not support a proposal they believe is seeking to punish today’s Australians for the misdeeds of colonists 200 years ago. Recent migrants will be the most hostile to that.

This column opened on January 30 saying, “Underlying hesitancy about the voice … is a suspicion that metropolitan rights campaigners care little for the plight of displaced Indigenous people in remote Australia.”

It singled out the failure of the former ATSIC (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission) to make progress on Aboriginal wellbeing. Yes campaigners want the voice in the Constitution so it can never be abolished the way ATSIC was in 2005. Yet ATSIC met the fate it deserved after various corruption findings.

The onus now is on the government to adjust the voice proposal to take account of reasonable voter scepticism.

Attwood concluded his AFR piece by suggesting Albanese shelve the referendum for now and legislate a voice. Certainly changing the referendum question or delaying the vote would be better than a defeat this column believes will be similar in size to the 1999 republic referendum.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/details-aside-the-vibe-wont-win-voice-referendum/news-story/86aff2465a6215d848f8e80ebf5c4d0e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19194492

File: 772ef8ff33193b1⋯.jpg (270.28 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Former_prime_minister_Tony….jpg)

File: 9c5fff3ec84134e⋯.jpg (184.49 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Warren_Mundine_has_publicl….jpg)

>>19194398

Tony Abbott accuses companies supporting The Voice of ‘shareholder abuse’

Former prime minister Tony Abbott has accused “woke companies” of “shareholder abuse” by publicly supporting the referendum.

Jessica Wang - July 17, 2023

1/2

Former Prime Minister Tony Abbott has accused major companies who are supporting an Indigenous Voice to parliament of “shareholder abuse”.

Speaking to 2GB’s weekend host Michael McLaren, the anti-Voice spokesman went as far to accuse public companies of attempting to “curry favour” with the government.

While he didn’t name anyone specifically, he unleashed a tirade against “woke foundations and woke billionaires pouring in their virtue signalling money”.

“I think that if money can buy a referendum, this referendum will be bought for the Yes case,” he said on Sunday.

“A lot of businesses, they work a lot with government, (and) a lot of these big sporting groups need government grants, and I think they’re both virtue signalling and currying favour.

“I don’t have any shares in public companies but frankly, if I did … I would sell them because it’s shareholder abuse.”

The former politician added there was “absolutely no doubt that the new left establishment is massively behind this Voice for all sorts of reasons.”

His rant comes as some of Australia’s largest companies, including CBA, Qantas, Rio Tinto, and BHP, have publicly backed the Yes vote, which aims to enshrine and Indigenous Voice in the Australian constitution.

In June, it was revealed Wesfarmers, BHP and Rio Tinto donated $2m each to the Yes23 campaign.

In March, Nine Newspapers reported Australian billionaire and Visy executive Anthony Pratt donated $1m to the Yes campaign.

31 of Australia’s leading philanthropic foundations have also pledged $17m to the yes campaign in April, including the Australian Communities Foundation, the Besen Family Foundation, and Mecca founder Jo Horgan’s MECCA M-Power.

In the No camp, Australian Electoral Commission third party return documents revealed Advance Australia, of which Mr Abbott is an adviser for, received $507,500 in donations in the 2021-22 tax year.

This includes $75,000 over three donations from Louis Denton, who is the chief operating officer of Devcos International, which works with health and beauty brands on packaging, and logistics.

The group also received $50,000 from the Silver River Investment Holdings, owned by former fund manager Simon Fenwick and Elizabeth Fenwick. The holding company also donated $650,000 to Advance Australia in the 2020-21 financial year.

Fair Australia, led by Liberal Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price and Indigenous businessman Warren Mundine, is another prominent anti-Voice campaign, with supporters able to make tax deductible donations through their website.

Previously Mr Mundine has said donors are less likely to publicly disclose their support.

“One of the main reasons we don’t talk about our donors is because of threats. Investors in my business have been threatened over my position,” he told The Australian in May.

“We will comply with all the laws on disclosure but it will come out after the referendum.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19194494

File: a76b100ab5065f6⋯.jpg (151.56 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Opposition_Leader_Peter_Du….jpg)

>>19194492

2/2

Mr Abbott has been vocal in his opposition against an Indigenous Voice to parliament, which he claimed would “entrench racism” and “contradicts” equality in the constitution.

“This isn’t about recognition. The Voice is a special entity which will give less than 4 per cent of the population a special say over how 100 per cent of us are governed. That’s why it’s a problem,” he said.

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has also lashed companies of “lacking a significant backbone,” and said it wasn’t a debate “corporate Australia should be involved in”.

“At the moment I don’t think they’re paying due consideration to the views of their workforce, to the views of the community,” he said on Sky News.

“There are a lot of CEOs and chairs who have very different conversations with you in private than what they say publicly because they‘re worried about ESG (environmental, social and governance) and remuneration packages being voted down at AGMs.

“It’s time they started to stand up for what’s in our country’s best interests.”

Although the date of the vote has yet to be revealed, The Voice referendum will decide whether the constitution will be amended to recognise Indigenous Australians by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice to parliament.

A Newspoll survey published in The Australian on Monday showed a further decline in the Yes vote, which fell from 43 per cent to 41 per cent. People in the No camp also grew slightly from 47 per cent in June, to 48 per cent in the most recent poll.

For the first time, the data revealed women were more likely to vote against The Voice than men, with support for the No vote increasing to 62 per cent in regional communities.

In order to achieve constitutional change, a majority of states must vote yes in the referendum, which will happen later this year.

https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/tony-abbott-accuses-companies-supporting-the-voice-of-shareholder-abuse/news-story/148af67ec4a32fc899a9cb6f95cf11e5

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19194500

File: 532f3418af5da67⋯.jpg (322.28 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Aboriginal_Affairs_ministe….jpg)

>>19154602 (pb)

>>19154635 (pb)

>>19160107 (pb)

Indigenous group demands $2.5m for WA tree planting events

JENNA CLARKE - JULY 17, 2023

More tree planting events in WA were cancelled at the weekend due to claims by a peak environmental body that a Perth-based Indigenous corporation is withholding approvals until $2.5m in compensation is received.

It is the second time in as many weeks community groups and Indigenous representatives have clashed since the updated Aboriginal cultural heritage laws came into effect on July 1.

The South East Regional Centre for Urban Landcare had organised about 120 volunteers to plant more than 5000 seedlings around the south eastern suburbs of Canning and Gosnells before it was called off.

Representatives and city mayors are now calling for guidance from the state government after learning about the alleged demands from Whadjuk Aboriginal Corporation chief executive David Collard.

Mr Collard reportedly told the various land care groups, that have long maintained and regenerated patches of land along the Canning River, they would not be permitted to go ahead with the tree planting due to ongoing disputes with the indigenous group and WA government.

The Canning River is a recognised site of Aboriginal cultural significance in the Perth region.

Aboriginal Affairs Minister Tony Buti said the issues had “nothing to do with” WA’s “modernised laws”. Instead the stand off is reportedly over the WAC’s request for a $2.5m portion of the federal government’s $10m commitment to restore the Canning waterways.

Shadow defence minister Andrew Hastie – who is the federal member for Canning – called for Premier Roger Cook to scrap the laws.

“The Aboriginal cultural heritage laws are only two weeks old and already an Indigenous corporation is using them to demand millions of dollars,” Mr Hastie said on Sunday.

It follows WA Opposition Leader Shane Love vowing to overturn the Act and rewrite new legislation if there is a change of government at the next WA election, due in 2025.

“Make no mistake, the WA National Party understands the value of Aboriginal cultural heritage, but what we have is an unworkable situation, which is throwing thousands and thousands and thousands of dollars of costs, which are not necessary, onto private industry private landowners, and making life very difficult for small business, making life almost impossible for farmers to know what they can do next,” Mr Love told the WA Nationals state conference on Saturday.

He said the Nationals primary concern with the Act is that claims of cultural significance from an Aboriginal entity were not contestable with an independent third party.

Approved Indigenous representatives who will be empowered to approve or deny plans and projects, like tree planting, are yet to be appointed by the government.

The WA Liberals have also adopted the same policy position and confirmed last week the party will also scrap the laws.

Mr Cook fired back calling the opposition parties “irrelevant” and requested they “butt out” of the debate.

“They are desperate and desperately clinging to any issue they can find to give them relevance.

“Everyone knows that they are irrelevant and everyone knows that they voted for this legislation in the first place.”

The legislation was one of the first bills put to parliament following Labor’s historic election win in 2021, which reduced the Liberals to just two members in the lower house.

Opposition MPs were briefed just two days before the legislation was tabled to the parliament.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/indigenous-group-demands-25m-for-wa-tree-planting-events/news-story/2588d183e7b75cc0c8be0dc17cd0be78

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19194509

File: 78e7bf6b4ee8d0d⋯.jpg (101.77 KB,1790x1007,1790:1007,Bruce_Lehrmann_and_Brittan….jpg)

File: 2b21f975a2cf465⋯.jpg (147.34 KB,2048x1152,16:9,A_screenshot_of_the_footag….jpg)

File: 9e6d70aea9481f1⋯.jpg (221.83 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann_is_taking_d….jpg)

File: 9d1ea4919013420⋯.jpg (110.37 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann_and_Brittan….jpg)

File: 492b497776b2030⋯.jpg (338.71 KB,2048x2048,1:1,Mr_Lehrmann_is_suing_Netwo….jpg)

>>19058165 (pb)

Brittany Higgins, Bruce Lehrmann parliament CCTV footage handed to court

ELLIE DUDLEY - JULY 17, 2023

Critical CCTV footage of Bruce Lehrmann and Brittany Higgins in parliament house on the night of her alleged rape has been handed over to court, after a top silk in the defamation proceedings demanded to know why it wasn’t produced earlier.

Seven Network delivered the footage to the federal court on Monday as part of the high-profile defamation action between Mr Lehrmann, Network Ten and journalist Lisa Wilkinson, and a separate matter concerning Mr Lehrmann and the ABC.

Snippets of the CCTV video, showing Mr Lehrmann and Ms Higgins passing through parliament house security on the night of the alleged rape in 2019, were aired in the Seven Network’s Spotlight program last month.

The raw tapes were subpoenaed from the Seven Network as the Department of Parliamentary Services failed to provide any footage of Mr Lehrmann and Ms Higgins in parliament house.

Defamation barrister Sue Chrysanthou SC, acting for Lisa Wilkinson, earlier this month told the court that the fact the Department of Parliamentary Services said it had no CCTV footage to produce from the night of the alleged rape was concerning.

“We think there should be some explanation as to why that material hasn’t been produced,” she said at the time.

However, Network Ten barrister Tim Senior on Monday told the court he was satisfied the Department of Parliamentary Services had made every effort to comply with the subpoena, but were unable to produce the footage as it hadn’t been “quarantined”.

“Searches have been carried out to see whether that material was one of the server somewhere but apparently it‘s not,” he said.

Mr Lehrmann, who has consistently denied the rape allegations, is suing Network 10 and Ms Wilkinson over an interview with Ms Higgins that aired on The Project in February 2021 detailing allegations Mr Lehrmann raped Ms Higgins in parliament house, but not naming Mr Lehrmann as the alleged attacker.

While the raw CCTV footage had been produced by the Seven Network, Mr Senior foreshadowed issues regarding whether or not the network had fully complied with the subpoena.

“There is another issue in relation to a subpoena that had been issued to Seven Network Operations,” Mr Senior told the court on Monday.

“Your Honour might recall on the last occasion, there was some additional production in response to that subpoena.

“The subpoena called on raw footage relating to the Spotlight broadcast, so there have been two tranches of material produced.

“We are still reviewing the second tranche from the last occasion, so I wanted to raise it with Your Honour, just to flag that it may not be spent, but we are in the process of reviewing it to see whether we’re satisfied that that material that’s been has been complied with.”

Mr Lehrmann is also suing the ABC over the broadcast of a ­National Press Club address given by Ms Higgins.

ABC journalist Laura Tingle and publisher Random House on Monday produced documents in relation to the defamation action.

Earlier this month the court heard Nine columnist Peter FitzSimons had been subpoenaed to produce documents relating to a book deal he helped secure for former ministerial staffer Brittany Higgins believed to be worth $325,000.

The matter will return for case management on August 28.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/brittany-higgins-bruce-lehrmann-parliament-cctv-footage-handed-to-court/news-story/4f390ec634f5bf94aa7b04bae14d2758

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19194520

File: c59a2b12b4522b7⋯.jpg (907.74 KB,2445x1630,3:2,Manasseh_Sogavare_has_lash….jpg)

File: 7af91111303351a⋯.jpg (3.12 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Manasseh_Sogavare_right_sa….jpg)

>>19154798 (pb)

Solomon Islands PM accuses Australia of pulling budget support, foreign interference

Stephen Dziedzic - 17 July 2023

1/2

The prime minister of Solomon Islands says China has agreed to provide funding to prop up the country's troubled budget, and also accused Australia and development partners of suddenly withdrawing financial support worth millions of dollars.

Manasseh Sogavare has once again taken aim at Australia and the United States for criticising his country's policing pact with China, and has declared that "nothing" can stop him asking from Beijing to send police to help if disorder breaks out again in Solomon Islands and other countries are slow to respond.

And he has also mused about the possibility of Solomon Islands setting up its own military forces, saying he discussed the idea with Richard Marles during the deputy prime minister's recent visit to the Pacific Island country.

The prime minister revealed Beijing had offered to provide budget support during an explosive press conference at Honiara's airport on return from a week-long trip to China.

Anger over funding from 'traditional' donors

Mr Sogavare said Australia and New Zealand had initially promised "12 and 15 million dollars respectively" to help the budget. Although it is not clear whether those figures are in Australian dollars, or in Solomon Islands dollars, which would represent only $2 and $2.6 million in Australian currency.

But he said the decision by "traditional" donors had made life difficult for Solomon Islands finance officials, particularly as the country prepared for the Pacific Games in November this year.

"Some of our donor partners who have committed to providing budget support to us this year have since changed their position and delayed their assistance for us and we are struggling to finance the 2023 budget," he said.

"This has left this country and people in a predicament. But I am glad to announce and delighted to announce the People's Republic of China have really stepped up to provide this budget support needed for 2023."

Mr Sogavare said China would provide the support through "projects" but did not provide any further details.

In a statement, the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) denied the Australian government had backtracked on any formal commitments.

"Australia has delivered on our budget support commitments to Solomon Islands this year," a DFAT spokesperson said.

"This support has been provided across numerous sectors in Solomon Islands including health, education and elections," they said.

"We continue to discuss development and budget support needs with the Solomon Islands government."

Australia has announced several tranches of direct support in the past two years, including $25 million for running elections in 2024, and almost $17 million for the Pacific Games.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19194522

File: 315c48595cecb76⋯.jpg (67.99 KB,579x446,579:446,Manasseh_Sogavare_right_sa….jpg)

>>19194520

2/2

Australia accused of foreign interference

Mr Sogavare also berated Australia and the United States for raising concerns about deepening police cooperation between China and Solomon Islands.

"The narrow and coercive diplomatic approach of targeting China-Solomon Islands relations, and I want to use this word, is unneighbourly … this is nothing but interference of foreign states in the internal affairs of Solomon Islands," he said.

"China has not invaded or colonised any other nation-state. Australia and the United States should not fear China's police support."

Australia is increasingly anxious that China might send police to the Pacific Island country if the country is once again hit by disorder like the rioting which shook Honiara in late 2021.

Mr Sogavare stressed that Australia, New Zealand and other Pacific nations remained the security "partner of choice" for Solomon Islands, and he said if riots broke out once again then he would call them first for help.

"We have a standing, a current arrangement with SIAF (Solomon Islands Assistance Forces) with Australia, New Zealand, PNG, Fiji, but now we'll need to dialogue with them, as we are consistent that they are our partner of choice," he said.

"For that matter we'll need to call on them first. The police commissioner is working very closely with these countries and from the police commissioner's briefing, the arrangements are set."

Sogavare says China's forces only nine hours away

But he also stressed that Solomon Islands had a "standing arrangement" with China as well, and if there was a "delay" getting help then "it takes only nine hours' flight from China to land forces here".

"Nothing is actually stopping me from that if there are some hiccups along the way," he said.

"We can invoke our security arrangements. Nothing will stop this sovereign country."

The prime minister said China was also providing invaluable support in a host of other development areas, including infrastructure, health, agriculture, sport and tackling climate change.

Mr Sogavare said China might "very well be the answer to — not all — but most of our challenges", and Solomon Islands had to free itself from the "yolk" of dependency on others.

He also mused about Solomon Islands setting up its own armed forces, saying its police force was far too small to deal with a rapidly growing population.

But that would be a significant departure for Solomon Islands, which has long been troubled by domestic turmoil but does not maintain a standing army.

Mr Sogavare said he "sounded out" the issue with Mr Marles, and suggested the Australian deputy prime minister might have been supportive.

"We talked about so many other things including the establishment of a full military force in this country," he said

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-17/solomon-islands-pm-says-china-filled-gap-left-by-aus-nz/102609050

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19194528

File: fca904f4278cf13⋯.jpg (263.66 KB,1628x1051,1628:1051,Gymnastics_Australia_says_….jpg)

File: b0440846584f2c1⋯.jpg (1.45 MB,4608x3456,4:3,Alison_Quigley_says_Gymnas….jpg)

Gymnastics Australia backs away from pledge to assist survivors of childhood sexual abuse

Russell Jackson - 17 July 2023

Three years after publicly pledging its commitment to a redress scheme that could offer apologies and compensation to gymnasts who suffered childhood sexual abuse, Gymnastics Australia has declared itself financially incapable of assisting abuse survivors.

In its 2020 annual report, Gymnastics Australia said it had "continued to engage with the National Redress Scheme throughout the year and has formally commenced the on-boarding process".

But in a move that has frustrated survivors of childhood sexual abuse in the sport, Gymnastics Australia chief executive Alexandra Ash has confirmed the governing body is still "in a financial position that prevented it from being accepted by the scheme", which offers personal apologies and compensation capped at $150,000 for individual claims.

Gymnastics Australia's position was confirmed in a May submission to the Joint Standing Committee on Implementation of the National Redress Scheme. The committee asked Ash to respond to a series of questions from athlete rights advocate Alison Quigley, a survivor of childhood sexual abuse in gymnastics now undertaking a doctorate in law, studying child-safe policies in Australian gymnastics.

In another response to the committee, Ms Ash confirmed that the Australian Olympic Committee had declined an opportunity to financially underwrite Gymnastics Australia's assistance to survivors of abuse, in an arrangement that would have been similar to Cricket Australia's recent bankrolling of Cricket ACT's obligations under the scheme.

"It is understood that the National Redress Scheme formally approached Australian Olympic Committee to fund Gymnastics Australia's application to the scheme, of which was declined," Ash told the committee.

"Gymnastics Australia is working directly with the National Redress Scheme on options to engage with the scheme."

In response to questions from ABC Sport, Gymnastics Australia declined to comment further on the Australian Olympic Committee's stance.

In June 2022, Ms Ash had privately confirmed to Ms Quigley that Gymnastics Australia was financially incapable of meeting the requirements of the scheme.

Ms Quigley confirmed to ABC Sport that although she appreciated Ms Ash's "open line of communication" and frankness in admitting a year ago that Gymnastics Australia could not yet fund hers and other claims, she "needed this in a written format to bring more accountability and transparency to this process".

"A CEO's quiet word to one survivor is not public accountability," Ms Quigley said.

"The time to sign on was then [in 2020]. Why would they not? They were in good financial shape. And from what was said in the press, they knew sex offenders had been circulating in the sport and they were issuing generalised apologies.

"But the next few financial cycles have come and gone and they still haven't joined the redress scheme."

In response to questions from ABC Sport, Gymnastics Australia declined to explain why it hadn't publicly clarified its National Redress Scheme status.

Ms Quigley said Gymnastics Australia's multi-million-dollar annual funding and recent increases in the sport's participation base were factors that frustrated survivors whose redress claims had laid unattended for up to two years.

"In short, Gymnastics Australia receives approximately $4 million per year from the Australian Sports Commission, from grants process and other government bodies.

"In 2021, when I submitted my redress application, they posted an operational surplus of more than $286,000."

"In their 2022 annual report, they noted an increase in membership — and an increase in the number of children under 12 participating in the sport — and they noted their grants were $4.7 million, but they reported a $66,000 loss and survivors get nothing."

"I am curious to know how their money is spent and how they are short."

Gymnastics Australia did not respond to questions about its funding model, but provided ABC Sport with a statement.

"Gymnastics Australia is committed to the delivery of redress for victims of child sexual abuse," the statement said.

"We support the principles of the National Redress Scheme and acknowledge the important avenue it provides in supporting those who have been abused."

"Gymnastics Australia continues to work proactively and collaboratively with the National Redress Scheme and are progressing to declaration."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-17/gymnastics-australia-backs-away-assist-survivors-of-abuse/102607510

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19199716

File: 3f0dacf4baeea9d⋯.jpg (578.7 KB,1282x1627,1282:1627,The_YES_Case.jpg)

File: 10935af4c550ffc⋯.jpg (669.52 KB,1262x2070,631:1035,Who_is_quoted_in_the_Yes_p….jpg)

File: 7795ad40283664f⋯.jpg (588.03 KB,2482x1755,2482:1755,Y1_2.jpg)

File: e67ab3a48e52c42⋯.jpg (394.31 KB,2482x1755,2482:1755,Y3_4.jpg)

File: f9ce679a0c24c72⋯.jpg (689.91 KB,2482x1755,2482:1755,Y5_6.jpg)

Speaking out: opposing camps state their reasons for and against an Indigenous voice to parliament

ROSIE LEWIS and SIMON BENSON - JULY 18, 2023

1/2

Australians will be told the ­Indigenous voice to parliament is a “leap into the unknown” when they receive the official No pamphlet in the mail, while the Yes ­brochure promises constitutional recognition with concrete results, as Anthony Albanese concedes the Yes case needs to be made stronger.

The Prime Minister revealed he wouldn’t announce the referendum date until September at the earliest as the Yes and No pamphlets were lodged with the Australian Electoral Commission, which will publish the respective 2000-word essays on its website on Tuesday and mail them out to 12.5 million households at least two weeks before polling day.

The No campaign cites 10 reasons why Australians should oppose the voice ahead of rolling out a $1m social media blitz designed to “explode the myth” that it was supported unanimously by the ­Indigenous community.

The Yes campaign lays out eight reasons voters should back the referendum, saying it is about constitutional recognition, listening to advice from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people about matters affecting them, and making practical progress in Indigenous health, education, employment and housing to improve people’s lives.

Mr Albanese insisted the referendum was not “dead in the water” after the latest Newspoll showed a continued downwards trend with just 41 per cent of Australians saying they would vote Yes and 48 per cent saying they would vote No.

He vowed to “have a crack” and put the government’s model for constitutional recognition and a voice – endorsed by Indigenous leaders in Labor’s referendum working group – to the Australian people in the final quarter of the year.

“Most Australians … will focus when the referendum is actually being held. It’s a while to go yet,” Mr Albanese told Sky News.

“What we know is that there’s been a considerable No campaign already that is out there just trying to sow doubt. The Yes campaign needs to be stronger in putting the case because we know that referendums in Australia have been difficult in the past. Only eight out of 48 (have succeeded) but this is a clear and simple proposition for recognition and then listening in order to achieve better outcomes for Indigenous Australians.”

The date for the referendum is not expected to be announced until 33 days before the vote, or slightly earlier.

Government insiders had previously believed the date would be announced at the Garma festival at the start of August but Mr Albanese said he did not think the campaign needed to be very long.

If the referendum is in October, as most voice supporters expect, the date would be announced in September.

The Yes pamphlet, featuring Indigenous sport stars Evonne Goolagong Cawley and Johnathan Thurston, offers eight “key facts” on what the voice is, leading with it being an idea that came from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, and says it will bring Australia together, save taxpayers money and make government work better.

“The idea of a voice has been decades in the making. Many Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have put in a great deal of hard work and goodwill,” the Yes case states.

“Voting No means nothing will change. It means accepting we can’t do better. Don’t risk more of the same: worse life expectancy, worse results in education and ­employment, worse outcomes in health. Vote Yes to break this cycle and unite our nation.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19199717

File: 799f5456e35c62a⋯.jpg (373.59 KB,2482x1755,2482:1755,Y7_8.jpg)

File: 7c67046644b83ff⋯.jpg (314.91 KB,2482x1755,2482:1755,Y9_10.jpg)

File: 2533ef5e009575c⋯.jpg (392.94 KB,2482x1755,2482:1755,Y11_12.jpg)

File: 2c16d1f8a7fe44e⋯.jpg (208.29 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,Y0013.jpg)

File: 532c66f284da38a⋯.pdf (68.13 KB,Yes_Case_pamphlet.pdf)

>>19199716

2/2

The No pamphlet, obtained by The Australian, argues that a constitutionally enshrined voice to parliament and executive government is legally risky, provides no detail on how it would work, would divide Australians, fail to help Indigenous communities, and no issue would be beyond its scope.

It also argues that the voice, being permanent, would cause dysfunction within parliament, open the door to activists and be costly and bureaucratic.

“This referendum is not simply about ‘recognition’,” it says.

“This voice proposal goes much further. If passed, it would represent the biggest change to our Constitution in our history. It is ­legally risky, with unknown consequences. It would be divisive and permanent. It is a leap into the unknown. This voice has not been road tested. There is no comparable constitutional body like this anywhere in the world.”

The official No campaign will this week launch as second phase of its advertising campaign aiming to expose divisions among leading Aboriginal figures over the need for a voice to be enshrined in the Constitution. Spearheaded by Nyunggai Warren Mundine, Fair Australia will run a mini documentary nationally across special media platforms and television in which the Indigenous leader claims the voice would not improve people’s lives. Called Not My Voice, the campaign is based on Mr Mundine’s personal story of growing up in regional Australia and becoming one of Australia’s most prominent political and business leaders. “I have never needed a separate voice based on the colour of my skin,” Mr Mundine says.

He makes the case that the divisive voice to parliament is a “project of inner-city elite Indigenous activists”. “They’re the same people who have been on government boards and committees for decades and now they want to be in the Constitution,” Mr Mundine says. “They don’t speak for me and they don’t speak for many other Aboriginals.”

Liberals for Yes spokesman ­Julian Leeser, who quit the frontbench over his party’s opposition to a constitutionally enshrined voice, rejected arguments put by Mr Mundine and his colleagues that the voice would mark “the end of democracy, (with) more power going to so-called elites, the end of parliamentary sovereignty, with increased costs resulting from a dangerous, permanent change”.

“This is a change that is safe, and a change that is about practical outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians,” Mr Leeser said in a Yes campaign speech in Wagga Wagga.

“The voice will advise government – just like DFAT, the Productivity Commission, the security agencies and the Chief Scientist and the Chief Medical Officer do every day. It will be up to the government to weigh that advice. As they do now.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/speaking-out-opposing-camps-state-their-reasons-for-and-against-an-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/e73c3cc7eee2d90a249423d3452d09f7

https://origin.go.theaustralian.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Yes-Case-pamphlet.pdf

https://www.aec.gov.au/referendums/pamphlet.htm

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19199725

File: f6c3d043ffdbdd8⋯.jpg (98.04 KB,1280x720,16:9,Constitutional_lawyer_Greg….jpg)

File: 90f006ce9bf7f9b⋯.jpg (456.21 KB,1280x1620,64:81,The_No_Case.jpg)

File: c9942f8b7665a33⋯.jpg (978.86 KB,1262x3005,1262:3005,Who_is_quoted_in_the_No_pa….jpg)

File: 4620d2ecd6929d0⋯.jpg (766.96 KB,1162x1393,166:199,10_reasons_to_vote_No.jpg)

File: e8ae22aa3530f17⋯.jpg (724.89 KB,2482x1755,2482:1755,N1_2.jpg)

>>19199716

Greg Craven ‘beside myself with rage’ after Indigenous voice to parliament No pamphlet quotes him

ROSIE LEWIS - JULY 18, 2023

1/2

Conservative constitutional lawyer and prominent Yes campaigner Greg Craven says he’s “beside myself with rage” after one of his quotes criticising the government’s preferred model for an Indigenous voice to parliament was used in the official No pamphlet.

Professor Craven told The Australian he would now formally lodge a complaint with the Australian Electoral Commission against No material quoting him, after he communicated with Peter Dutton’s office before the pamphlet was released expressing his “extreme opposition” to his words being used as part of the No campaign.

“I am beside myself with rage. I’ve never found myself in worse company,” he said of the No pamphlet.

“Putting those words up effectively without any acknowledgment that I’ve consistently said I’ll support and campaign for the voice is simply deceptive.

“It’s perfectly obvious to anyone in this debate, including the No case and for that matter the opposition, that I am implacably committed to the voice and I will campaign for it. That’s because I’ve always said that from the beginning and because also since the (constitutional amendment) words in dispute were settled I’ve gone out of my way to make my position clear.”

The No pamphlet states: “In the words of a constitutional law professor who supports the voice: ‘I think it’s fatally flawed because what it does is retain the full range of review of executive action. This means the voice can comment on everything from submarines to parking tickets … We will have regular judicial interventions.’ (Professor Greg Craven AO).”

The comments were made by Professor Craven in March, as he was arguing the government’s proposal should be amended to clarify it would be up to parliament to decide what obligations the executive government has to consider and respond to the voice’s representations.

Professor Craven said his only real option now was to campaign even harder for the Yes case, as he did not believe there was any real remedy the AEC could offer.

“Some of the most dedicated No campaigners have their own interesting history of where they stood. Peter Dutton originally said that he would be looking at it carefully and had an open mind. Now apparently it’s constitutional illiteracy,” Professor Craven said.

“Warren Mundine was one of the chartered signatories to Uphold and Recognise. Apparently those changes of position are fine but the thing I would say is I’ve never changed my position. I’ve always been in favour of it.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19199728

File: 8c6411d78017e22⋯.jpg (124.86 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_yes_and_no_voice_campa….jpg)

File: 90f349620f0cf63⋯.jpg (793.4 KB,2482x1755,2482:1755,N3_4.jpg)

File: 2b086b840744870⋯.jpg (818.69 KB,2482x1755,2482:1755,N5_6.jpg)

File: 007cf57a7e4c8b6⋯.jpg (344.89 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,0007.jpg)

File: 78d9ec43f5d6146⋯.pdf (289.05 KB,No_Case_pamphlet.pdf)

>>19199725

2/2

Opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, who was the authorised chair of the No case put in the pamphlet, said Professor Craven had some very pertinent concerns early in the conversation about the voice.

“It’s only right that we should be able to promote those concerns that somebody on the Yes side has with this constitutional change,” she said.

“Contrary to claims being made, the No case does make a point of stating that Professor Craven is a supporter of the voice. I don’t understand why anybody that has such concerns would want to support the Yes campaign going forward.”

Queensland Liberal senator Paul Scarr, who was deputy chair of the No case, said Professor Craven did not deserve an apology because there had been full disclosure of his support for the voice.

“One of the reasons for voting No in relation to this referendum is that this proposed voice will have no limit on the scope of what it can engage in. That is the point which Professor Greg Craven alluded to in the point which he is quoted on,” Senator Scarr told Sky News.

“It’s absolutely vital that the Australian people understand the ramifications of this proposed change to the Constitution. And one of those changes is that this voice would be able to make representations and engage on any issues at both a parliamentary level but also an executive government level.”

Prominent No campaigner Warren Mundine said Professor Craven could not deny he said the quote and should move on.

“You live and die by what you say,” Mr Mundine said.

“We’re trying to have a normal, non-vitriolic debate. He comes out with that nonsense. He just needs to calm down and move on because what was put there was factual. He said it. He’s just spewing because he got caught out.”

Professor Craven said the No side had adopted a high-risk strategy.

“What it means is you’ve got one of your main pieces of evidence loudly saying ‘no, no, no, that’s not true’. I would’ve thought that would be problematic to the No case, just as I think it would be problematic if people went back and looked through the records of people like Dutton and Mundine and said ‘why have you changed your position? What’s happened to make this (the voice) so terrible?’” he said.

The Opposition Leader is on leave, though Coalition sources noted he had no control over the No pamphlet, was not on the committee that helped write the essay and did not put the material together.

The sources said Professor Craven had taken issue with Liberal Party and Coalition promotional material against the voice and he had asked that material specify he was a voice supporter - which the pamphlet does.

The Liberal Party material was updated on Tuesday when a new website was launched.

Mr Mundine said he accepted he was involved in Uphold and Recognise but then he discovered the voice would be a “big bureaucracy and not going to change a single thing on the ground”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/greg-craven-beside-myself-with-rage-after-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-no-pamphlet-quotes-him/news-story/6d52c11bd5d226648d56166a794fbf44

https://origin.go.theaustralian.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/No-Case-pamphlet.pdf

https://www.aec.gov.au/referendums/pamphlet.htm

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19199734

File: 046b87c77a35886⋯.jpg (129.89 KB,1280x720,16:9,Indigenous_people_thriving….jpg)

>>19199716

Indigenous people thriving without voice: Mundine

ELLIE DUDLEY - 18 July 2023

No campaign leader Warren Mundine says the world "wouldn't give a bugger" if the Indigenous voice was shot down at the referendum, arguing Australia is already taking great steps to improve the lives of Aboriginal people.

Mr Mundine, speaking as the official pamphlets for both the Yes and No campaigns were released publicly, predicted Yes support would continue to spiral due to underwhelming support and skepticism from Australians.

Asked what he thought of Labor frontbencher Stephen Jones' comments that the country wouldn't be able to hold its head up if the No case prevailed, Mr Mundine said the world "wouldn't give a bugger" if the referendum failed.

"There is a lot of evidence out there as one of the greatest multicultural countries in the world," he told Sky News. "We are doing great things in this country."

Support for the voice has dwindled from 80 per cent in August last year to 41 per cent this week, Mr Mundine said.

"People in regional Australia know the population of their town, they know what the vibe is," he said.

"25 per cent of Aboriginal people are going to vote not, 45 per cent haven't even heard of it and don't know what it is. That's 70 per cent right there."

Mr Mundine said he had received positive responses whilst doorknocking, claiming the Yes campaign has got "real problems" at the moment.

He said he had read the Yes campaign's pamphlet, and said it was "very nice."

"It's like they're saying we've got a magic wand to fix everything," he said.

Mr Mundine urged Australians to vote no, saying he did not trust the Labor government following their decision to lift alcohol bans in Indigenous communities.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politicsnow-yes-and-no-camps-voice-their-reasons/live-coverage/513d2c6c3f8a290e0d0d91c19e756632#108228

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19199738

File: 6d1c03e24ae7f42⋯.jpg (62.21 KB,1280x720,16:9,Julian_Leeser.jpg)

>>19199716

No campaign 'outdated, missed opportunity': Leeser

ELLIE DUDLEY - 18 July 2023

Liberal backbencher Julian Leeser has criticised Peter Dutton's arguments against the voice, claiming the No campaign is outdated and could lead to a "missed opportunity" for Australians.

Speaking on the day formal pamphlets from the Yes and No campaigns were released, Mr Leeser said voters were "hungry for information" and eager to learn more ahead of the referendum.

However he lambasted the No campaign, touted by the opposition leader, for pushing an outdated argument that the voice is divisive.

"I'm on the Yes case, and I resigned from the front bench of my party to campaign, so I disagree with the arguments of the No case," he told ABC Radio National.

"Many of the arguments that we hear in the No case today are echoes of arguments that we've heard other times in our history. Some of the arguments echo arguments against Federation over 120 years ago. Imagine if Australians had voted against Federation, we wouldn't be one country Australia.

"We shouldn't miss this opportunity because it's not going to come around again. It's an opportunity to recognise Aboriginal people and ensure that we get better policies and better outcomes."

Mr Leeser said his main concern was that Australians "have not really paid attention" to the voice yet.

"There are millions of Australians who haven't twigged to the fact we're actually having a referendum this year," he said.

"When the date is announced, that will start people focusing on these issues. What I'm seeing as I went around yesterday … is that people are hungry for information. They've got questions, they've heard little bits and things and they want to have their questions answered."

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politicsnow-yes-and-no-camps-voice-their-reasons/live-coverage/513d2c6c3f8a290e0d0d91c19e756632#108217

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19199762

File: 3b09f36d3bdee0b⋯.jpg (207.94 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Thomas_Mayo_says_the_voice….jpg)

>>19138494 (pb)

>>19194426

>>19194442

>>19199716

NAB in firing line for hosting videos with Yes backer Thomas Mayo

ROSIE LEWIS - JULY 18, 2023

1/2

The Coalition has hit out at NAB for hosting pro-voice videos with Thomas Mayo on its website, in which the prominent Yes campaigner declares the advisory body “must be respected and its advice acted upon”.

Liberal National Party MP Garth Hamilton, deputy chair of federal parliament’s Standing Committee on Economics, questioned if NAB chief executive Ross McEwan agreed with all Mr Mayo’s views – such as whether the voice could be used for reparations and compensation for Indigenous people – or had thought through the bank’s position on the advisory body.

“Does the NAB CEO agree with Thomas Mayo – should his customers who are struggling to pay their mortgages also have to ‘pay the rent’?” Mr Hamilton said.

“I want to know if NAB is all in behind Mayo or is their support just crass corporate virtue-signalling? Polling shows the CEO is out of touch with his customers. Things are going to get a lot tougher for mortgage holders, he should be focusing on helping his customers through these challenges.”

NAB, which announced its support for constitutional recognition and the voice last July, did not respond directly to Mr Hamilton.

Bank sources said NAB recognised it was not its role to tell people how they should vote and it was on all Australians to make an informed decision.

Mr McEwan fronted the economics committee last week but Mr Hamilton said he did not attend that part of the hearing to ask him questions about the voice because he was helping write the No pamphlet. The big four banks have come out in support of a voice enshrined in the Constitution.

In one of the NAB videos, published in February, Mr Mayo says: “Some might criticise that it can only give advice to parliament but advice coming through firstly a referendum of Australian people saying ‘this voice must be respected and its advice acted upon’ is a powerful thing.

“The Australian people can see what advice has been given so it makes it much more politically precarious for politicians to blatantly ignore it, and that our own people can see what our representatives are saying on our behalf in a transparent way.”

Mr Mayo on Monday hit out at “disappointing” personal attacks against him during the voice campaign he said had been hurtful, after he was depicted in a widely criticised No campaign ad receiving a handout from Wesfarmers chairman Michael Chaney.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19199764

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19199762

2/2

The Northern Territory-based Kaurareg Aboriginal and Kalkalgal, Erubamle Torres Strait Islander man said he would keep talking to Australians about how the voice would be modest, meaningful, uniting and something that would be celebrated forever.

“Housing, health, education, employment, those are common issues across all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities and a voice will be so important to helping our people to offer the solutions to the parliament in a way that is transparent, in a way that is difficult to ignore, and we’ve been ignored for too long,” he told Sky News.

“That’s why we have the life expectancy gap of around eight years. Why we have such terribly high suicide rates amongst youth. I mean, these aren’t choices of us as Indigenous people ourselves, it’s a result of trauma and poor policy over a long period of time and a voice is absolutely vital to that.”

Asked how he’d personally found the campaign, Mr Mayo said: “Oh, it’s been difficult. It’s disappointing when you know these sorts of personal attacks happen but, you know, I just keep focusing on talking to Australians, just doing what I know I’m good at, which is communicating with people what the truth is about this.”

“It’s hurtful when you see that stuff (attacks), but what keeps me going is addressing crowds of Australians … In Perth last week, you know, there was over 600 people gathered to hear myself and (independent MP) Kate Chaney and former chief justice of the High Court, Robert French, and just a great vibe.”

Mr Mayo said he wasn’t concerned by the latest Newspoll showing just 41 per cent of voters would vote Yes while the No vote in the regions has grown to 62 per cent

“I’m not worried about the trends, most polls will go up and down,” he said.

“The feeling that I get out in the community when I’m travelling, I’ve been to Doomadgee and Mt Isa, the Pilbara and to cities – Perth, Sydney Melbourne – just in the last two weeks and, you know, it’s a great feeling that I get when people are informed.”

Videos unearthed by No campaign strategists showed Mr Mayo describing former prime minister John Howard as a “bastard” and threatening that politicians would be “punished” if they ignored the voice.

The militant unionist has raised the prospect of a voice being the first step towards reparations and compensation for Indigenous Australians.

“‘Pay the Rent’ for example, how do we do that in a way that is transparent and that actually sees reparations and compensation to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people beyond what we say and do at a rally?” he said previously.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/thomas-mayo-says-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-will-be-difficult-to-ignore/news-story/c1054506123f374e95905b4f178251e2

https://news.nab.com.au/news/understanding-the-voice-to-parliament-with-thomas-mayor/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=655mzGRmkZw

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19199781

File: 5f5a77dfd953e8f⋯.jpg (179.24 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Australian_citizen_Kevin_Y….jpg)

File: 39787fae5047e86⋯.jpg (377.89 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Ted_Hui_a_pro_democracy_le….jpg)

File: 4dafb2f036b6456⋯.jpg (519.95 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Riot_police_secure_an_area….jpg)

>>19120607 (pb)

>>19126504 (pb)

>>19154878 (pb)

Democracy activists welcome here say Aussie MPs, as new figures show few Hongkongers seek visas

ELLEN WHINNETT - JULY 18, 2023

People fleeing Chinese oppression in Hong Kong should consider Australia as a destination, the leaders of a bipartisan group of parliamentarians say, as new figures show barely a handful of protection visas are granted to Hongkongers by Australia each year.

Labor MP Peter Khalil and Liberal senator James Paterson, the co-chairs of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China, said Australia should be a destination of choice for Hongkongers targeted by authorities following the 2020 imposition of Beijing’s national security laws on the former British colony

The issue has taken on new impetus after the Hong Kong police offered bounties for the arrests of eight Hong Kong democracy activists now based overseas, including Australian citizen Kevin Yam and resident Ted Hui, who lives in Australia on a temporary bridging visa.

In a joint statement, Mr Khalil and Senator Paterson condemned the bounties, which were announced early this month and accompanied by threats that Hong Kong’s police would “not stop chasing’’ the activists accused of breaking national security laws by Beijing.

“The arrest warrants and bounties on the heads of an Australian citizen and resident by the Hong Kong authorities are utterly unacceptable,’’ the pair told The Australian.

“Their rights to engage in free speech and political activism in Australia are protected and should never be interfered with by external parties.’’

Department of Home Affairs figures show that only small numbers of Hong Kong passport holders apply for protection in Australia each year, and barely a handful of protection visa are granted.

The figures show fewer than 350 Hongkongers in total applied for protection in the past three years. This compares to the more than 250 Indian passport holders who apply each month while already in Australia, and about 150 mainland Chinese citizens who also apply every month.

Hong Kong retained some independence from Beijing after it came back under Chinese rule in 1997, but widespread protests against creeping political interference in 2019 led to the imposition of mainland China’s national security laws in 2020.

In the last year before the laws came into effect, 2018-2019, just 62 holders of Hong Kong passports applied for Australian protection visas, with none granted.

The following year, covering the protest period, 164 people applied, with none granted as the Covid crisis began to take hold.

In financial year 2020-2021, 186 people applied as authorities came down hard on criticism of Beijing’s masters.

By 2021-2022, the number of applications had fallen to 85, and last financial year, numbers fell further, with just 70 applications. In each of those financial years, fewer than five protection visas were granted each year.

Home Affairs does not report specific visa numbers if the numbers are lower than five, meaning it could be as few as a single visa a year issued.

Many Hongkongers have instead taken advantage of their historic links to the UK and generous resettlement options, and instead gone to England, where the government was preparing for almost 500,000 people to apply for visas.

“Australia should aspire to be a destination of choice for the people of Hong Kong given the continued deterioration of freedoms and undermining of the rule of law,’’ Mr Khalil and Senator Paterson said. “Whether they choose to come as students, skilled workers or humanitarian applicants, our country will be better for their presence.”

The Australian arm of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China is part of a global network of parliamentarians from democracies that works to hold China to account for human rights abuses, foreign influence and creeping authoritarianism.

The bounties on the democracy activists were issued on July 4 and accused the eight people living in Australia, Canada, the US and Britain of breaching national security laws.

Mr Yam, a Melbourne-born lawyer and academic who lived for years in Hong Kong before returning to his city of birth, is an Australian citizen.

Mr Hui, a pro-democracy parliamentarian, was invited to Australia with his family on a tourist visa after being forced to flee Hong Kong.

While he is now on a temporary bridging visa, sources in Canberra have told The Australian the issuing of the bounty made it all but guaranteed he would receive permanent residency or citizenship rights in Australia.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/democracy-activists-welcome-here-say-aussie-mps-as-new-figures-show-few-hongkongers-seek-visas/news-story/1569bf3afa5f98e9ad490fd3a991787b

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19199832

File: 6ce6c8127a9807f⋯.jpg (216.31 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Countries_including_the_UK….jpg)

File: 0a6711a9e052f09⋯.jpg (261.52 KB,1920x1080,16:9,El_Chaston_AFLW_player_on_….jpg)

File: 4e4810ce7f55329⋯.jpg (74.75 KB,1280x960,4:3,El_Chaston.jpg)

File: 6f2bba72dc228ab⋯.jpg (592.84 KB,1112x817,1112:817,_torilittle_.jpg)

>>18992091 (pb)

>>19154951 (pb)

>>19139080 (pb)

>>19139143 (pb)

Doctors’ plea for answers on transgender treatment in Australia

NATASHA ROBINSON - JULY 14, 2023

1/2

The specialist youth and adolescent arm of the nation’s peak psychiatry college is pushing for national guidelines on the care of young people with gender distress and gender dysphoria as doctors around the country say they feel muzzled and fearful of expressing professional views on gender medicine.

The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists’ Faculty of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry bi-national committee held an extraordinary meeting this week to discuss member concerns over the provision of services for young people presenting with gender dysphoria and incongruence.

“During this meeting, some members expressed their hesitancy to discuss gender issues or raise concerns and raised the importance of robust, evidence-based debate,” according to a communique issued after the meeting and sent to psychiatrists. The committee unanimously agreed to support any psychiatrist or trainee to raise concerns during the course of their employment about any aspect of practice.

Some child psychiatrists at the meeting, which was called in the wake of gender-critical Queensland psychiatrist Jillian Spencer being stood down from clinical duties, expressed concerns about the lack of evidence underpinning medicalised affirmative care of young people with gender incongruence, and uncertainty over whether treating such children with puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones reduced mental distress.

This issue is the subject of fierce international debate as paediatric specialists at the front line of gender medicine from six countries challenged the global Endocrine Society’s claims that gender-affirming care improves the wellbeing of transgender and gender-diverse people and reduces the risk of suicide. The international experts, in an extraordinary public letter, said the claim was not supported by the best available evidence.

The RANZCP’s FCAP bi-national committee in its meeting this week said it would be advocating via the college for the federal government to step in.

“Given the complexity and challenges in this area, and the significant community concerns and media interest, the committee felt that a national approach which includes Australian federal, NZ and state governments is critically needed,” it said.

Currently, children’s hospitals around the country follow the AusPath standards of care which gender affirmative physicians regard as world’s best practice, but which are not accepted by all doctors because they represent the position of Royal Children’s Hospital paediatricians who drafted them and declared them to be national standards.

The FCAP committee resolved to advocate via RANZCP for “better access to and consistency of care through the development of a national framework (along with necessary resources) including guiding principles for service provision and outcomes monitoring”, as well as pushing for “the development of a robust evidence base, including co-ordinating and providing funding for research on the interventions and outcomes for the treatment of gender incongruence”.

They also resolved to lobby for resources and fact sheets for young people and their families.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19199835

File: 3c301195726a652⋯.jpg (48.56 KB,650x1000,13:20,El_Chaston_2.jpg)

File: 9a76c836ba6c87b⋯.jpg (54.01 KB,650x1000,13:20,El_Chaston_3.jpg)

File: fb9bc1ad3b65686⋯.jpg (68.34 KB,1280x720,16:9,El_Chaston_pictured_gettin….jpg)

2/2

The committee discussed whether there was a need for a systematic review to be held in Australia, but given comprehensive recent reviews in the UK, including the Cass Report, the final report of which is pending, decided there would be little merit in undertaking a local review. The committee had established that the Cass review was set to hand down a final finding that did not find evidence of benefit from the prescription of hormone drugs to children, members were told.

The interim findings of the Cass Review in the UK found children were rushed down a medical pathway without full exploration of their mental health, prompting the closure of the Tavistock Clinic and an NHS decree that puberty blockers can only be prescribed to children in the context of clinical trials.

The Australian FCAP committee felt there was an urgent need to update the RANZCP’s position statement on the treatment of young people with gender distress and gender dysphoria. Psychiatrists were told a steering committee is working on updating the position statement, which was most overhauled most recently in 2021 when it stepped back from full endorsement of the gender-affirmative model and stressed the need for focus on holistic psychotherapy.

Increasingly, discussion of gender-affirmative medicine among Australian doctors reflects developments around the world. Countries including the UK, Sweden, Norway and France have placed greater safeguards around the prescription of hormone drugs.

The Endocrine Society in Australia fully embraces the position of the international Endocrine Society in endorsing the World Professional Association for Transgender Health model of care, but many Australian specialists, especially paediatric endocrinologists, hold concerns.

The split in the profession over the issue is so deep that the peak professional body for paediatric endocrinologists, the Australia and New Zealand Society for Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, has for several years refrained from input into transgender care due to wide concerns.

On Friday in the Wall Street Journal, 21 clinicians and researchers from nine countries published a letter challenging Endocrine Society Stephen Hammes’ recent statement that “more than 2000 studies published since 1975 form a clear picture: gender-affirming care improves the wellbeing of transgender and gender-diverse people and reduces the risk of suicide.”

“This claim is not supported by the best available evidence,” the gender specialists said.

“Every systematic review of evidence … has found the evidence for mental health benefits of hormonal interventions for minors to be of low or very low certainty.”

The 21 clinicians in the WSJ letter said, in view of significant risks, that doctors internationally are recommending psychotherapy rather than hormones and surgeries as the first line of treatment for gender-dysphoric youth.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/doctors-plea-for-answers-on-transgender-treatment/news-story/f42ae8c5c077b9f72be18f8cefd7dc0e

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/former-aflw-player-el-chaston-opens-up-on-lifechanging-breast-removal-surgery-to-find-their-true-self/news-story/597e0adc7e23c033d987e7d108daa2f8

https://archive.vn/sq0Qv

https://twitter.com/LaurenHeraldSun/status/1659381054913019904

https://www.instagram.com/p/CnROE6ovkgx/

https://www.valleyplasticsurgery.com.au/dr-alys-saylor/

https://www.instagram.com/topsurgerybris/

>Think logically.

>Ask yourself - is this normal?

>Conspiracy?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19199855

File: 4c70126ac673894⋯.jpg (48.14 KB,800x600,4:3,David_Edwin_Rapson_has_bee….jpg)

>>19064589 (pb)

Pedophile priest David Edwin Rapson sentenced for further child abuse

Ethan James - July 18 2023

A former Catholic priest serving jail time for sexually abusing students in Victoria has been given a "minimum" additional prison sentence for historical crimes against schoolboys in Tasmania.

David Edwin Rapson, 69, was working at Hobart's Dominic College in the 1980s when he used alcohol and cigarettes to befriend the three students, aged either 14 or 15.

He abused them on three separate occasions at a college dormitory, in a house during an altar boy trip, as well as in his office.

Rapson earlier pleaded guilty to three counts of indecent assault after being extradited to Tasmania from Victoria in May to face the charges.

He was already serving 12 years and six months' jail, with a non-parole period of nine years and four months, after being found guilty in 2015 of sexually abusing several boys at Victorian boarding schools in the 1970s and '80s.

In sentencing remarks published on Tuesday, Supreme Court of Tasmania Justice David Porter described Rapson's abuse of the three boys as a grave breach of trust.

"In two cases, the offence was in the context of mild or heavy intoxication of the victim from alcohol supplied," Justice Porter said.

"In the third case, the defendant took direct advantage of the victim's emotional state."

Justice Porter said if he was sentencing for each crime independently, Rapson would have received 18 months' jail on each count of indecent assault.

"However, the law requires me to take into account, among the other things I have mentioned, the lengthy sentence which you are presently serving," he said.

"I take the view that an additional minimum time in prison to that which you are presently subject is necessary."

Rapson was given a total sentence of three years' jail backdated to March, when he became eligible for parole from his Victorian sentence, with a non-parole period of 18 months.

Justice Porter said he was satisfied there were "very strong" signs of Rapson's rehabilitation.

He noted Rapson had an abusive childhood at the hands of his physically violent stepfather and two other men.

Justice Porter said Rapson had undergone therapy and described it as "very beneficial, allowing him to understand his offending and provide him with the skills to avoid further aberrant behaviour".

Justice Porter said he had to take into account the fact the offending was within the period covered by the Victorian sentence and the significant length of the 2015 non-parole period.

One survivor told the court Rapson's abuse had destroyed his faith in the Catholic church and pushed him toward self-destructive behaviours.

Another survivor said he tried to take his own life after being "consumed" by an article about Rapson's abuse in Victoria and feeling guilty for not doing anything about it.

1800 RESPECT - Confidential information, counselling and support service (1800 737 732)

https://www.1800respect.org.au/

National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service (1800 211 028)

https://fullstop.org.au/get-help/our-services

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/8274770/pedophile-priest-sentenced-for-further-child-abuse/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19199925

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Daniel Andrews reveals Victoria’s 2026 Commonwealth Games will not go ahead

Australia’s Commonwealth Games chief says scrapping the Games is embarrassing for Melbourne’s claim to be the sporting capital, while he questioned the sums used to justify the decision.

Kieran Rooney, Mitch Clarke, Brooke Grebert-Craig and Jade Gailberger - July 18, 2023

1/3

Australia’s Commonwealth Games chief has slammed Victoria’s decision to pull out of the event, questioning the sums used to justify the call.

Premier Daniel Andrews on Tuesday morning confirmed the event would not go ahead in Victoria in 2026 and blamed a higher-than-forecast cost for the sudden cancellation.

But Commonwealth Games Australia chief executive Craig Phillips AM said the Andrews government’s move was “beyond disappointing”.

He said the multi-city regional model was pitched to the Commonwealth Games Federation after it sought interest from multiple states.

“They did not step in as hosts at the last minute, as indicated by the Premier earlier today,” Mr Phillips said.

“The detailed budgetary implications announced today have not been sighted or discussed with the CGF or CGA ahead of being notified of the government’s decision.

“The stated costs overrun, in our opinion, are a gross exaggeration and not reflective of the operational costs presented to the Victoria 2026 Organising Committee board as recently as June.

“Beyond this, the Victorian government wilfully ignored recommendations to move events to purpose-built stadia in Melbourne …”.

Mr Phillips said Commonwealth Games Australia had pushed to bring down costs by moving some events in Melbourne but there was a “slavish” desire within the government to keep all events in the regions.

“Certainly the cost of some of those temporary builds, particularly with limited legacy value to them, were of concern to us, and we made that known to the Victorian government,” he said.

“Some of the costs were heading north because of inflationary factors that there were some measures which could have brought some of the venues back into Melbourne without compromising the desire to have content in regional Victoria.

“The velodrome is the best example of that, you have a purpose-built velodrome here at John Cain Arena but the we were continuing to prosecute running a Games in a temporary venue in Bendigo that would have no legacy value.

“These are the type of conversations we had with the government over some months about how the Games’ costs could be contained but (they) didn’t want to hear it.”

Mr Phillips said this pressures had likely led to cost increases but not to the extent reported by the government.

He said he found it hard to believe the government’s claims it would cost $4bn to run the games in Melbourne, with the Gold Coast event costing about $1.2bn to run while Birmingham’s was about $1.8bn.

“I’m not sure how we get a leap of more than double that to run the Games,” Mr Phillips said.

Mr Phillips said the news was embarrassing for Melbourne’s claim to be the nation’s sporting capital.

“The most recent figures on a survey that’s done globally about sporting cities, Melbourne have already slipped from 10 to 23.

“I can’t see going north after today’s announcement.

“I’d be very careful if I was an international sporting body coming and doing business in the states in the future.

“I don’t think I’ve had many days in my career that would rank with this one in terms of the level of disappointment.

“A state that prides itself on being the sporting capital of the world, I’m not sure this is a great look.”

Mr Phillips said his organisation would welcome the opportunity to review the government’s financial analysis, which alleged the Games could now cost up to $7bn.

“The Victorian government, however, has jeopardised Melbourne and Victoria’s standing as a sporting capital of the world,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19199933

File: 1f9a5ef06215934⋯.jpg (329.87 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Jeroen_Weimar_Jacinta_Alla….jpg)

File: f51d2c2bcd392e3⋯.jpg (215.2 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Commonwealth_Games_Austral….jpg)

File: 1d89a9161639907⋯.jpg (221.43 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Commonwealth_Games_Victori….jpg)

>>19199925

2/3

Premier won’t reveal cost to taxpayers

Daniel Andrews won’t reveal how much Victorian taxpayers could fork out to tear up the Commonwealth Games contract, as he also refused to apologise to athletes and regional Victoria for the embarrassing backflip.

The 12-day event was due to cost $2.6bn but the Andrews government on Tuesday admitted projections had blown out to more than $6bn.

Last year, Victoria agreed to host the event across five regional centres, with major cities Geelong, Bendigo, Ballarat, Shepprton and Gippsland to be transformed into mini hubs.

But on Tuesday, Mr Andrews abruptly cancelled the event because of higher than predicted costs.

“The Games will not proceed here in Victoria in 2026,” he said.

“This is not a difficult decision in many respects … I cannot stand here and say I have any confidence that even $7bn would appropriately and adequately fund these games. I think it could be more than that.

“Six to seven billion dollars is truly too much for a 12-day sporting event. I will not take money out of hospitals and schools in order to fund an event that is three times the cost as estimated and budgeted for last year.”

Following a cabinet meeting on Monday evening, Mr Andrews said the government informed the Commonwealth Games Federation and Commonwealth Games Australia of its decision to terminate the contract.

Mr Andrews said “amicable and productive” meetings occurred in London last night, and would continue later today.

He refused to say how much taxpayers could be forced to pay to break the contract.

In August 2018, former Queensland Commonwealth Games Minister Kate Jones said legal advice indicated the costs of breaking the contract for the 2018 Gold Coast event, would be “in excess of $1bn”.

The cost of breaking the contract has not yet been determined, Mr Andrews said.

“There’ll be a full accounting of the cost of the break of this contract. That’s not settled. It’s simply not finished yet,” he said.

“It would be bad faith and frankly against the interest of taxpayers and all Victorians if I was to try and conduct that negotiation from the other side of the world at a press conference.”

Mr Andrews said he didn’t feel a need to apologise to athletes or Victorian communities and businesses who had been gearing up for the event.

“No. I’m not here to apologise for not spending $7bn … we are not delivering it at any cost,” he said.

He added that federal funding wasn’t a consideration in suspending the event completely.

The Commonwealth was informed of the decision on Tuesday morning.

Moving the event to Melbourne, which boasts existing infrastructure, or proceeding with fewer events was canvassed as a cost-cutting exercise.

But Mr Andrews said costs would still be too high, with a Melbourne event expected to cost upwards of $4bn.

Commonwealth Games Victoria chief executive Jeroen Weimar said his project team of about 100 staff would now be disbanded.

The government confirmed that job losses were inevitable.

“We are suspending operations given that the government has made this really, really difficult decision,” Mr Weimar said.

“For all of us this has come as a huge shock.

“We built a world class team to do something which was incredibly difficult to deliver these games in a record time in a new decentralised model.

“The disappointment for us is that we can’t go on and deliver (but) … we can’t flinch away from the reality of bringing these games to life and what that’s going to cost.”

Mr Weimar said concerns about costs had been “emerging over the last few weeks and few months”.

Both Commonwealth Games Delivery Minister Jacinta Allan, who had to end her leave period early to make the announcement, and Commonwealth Games Legacy Minister Harriet Shing will have their portfolios stripped.

The government has confirmed that every permanent new and upgraded sporting infrastructure projects planned as part of the Games will still proceed.

This includes a new aquatic centre at Armstrong Creek, a six-court indoor stadium at Waurn Ponds, an upgraded Eureka Stadium at Ballarat and BMX trails in Shepparton.

And the government will commit an additional $1bn to deliver more than 1300 new homes across regional Victoria.

The new homes will include a mix of social and affordable housing.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19199935

File: f792f622ce7daf0⋯.jpg (218.74 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_Premier_has_blamed_a_c….jpg)

File: 063bdddc0a99b9b⋯.jpg (732.31 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_decision_to_scrap_the_….jpg)

File: 91e7605190f00fe⋯.jpg (196.11 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>19199933

3/3

Disappointment over ‘eight hours’ notice’

A Commonwealth Games Federation spokesman said the organisation was “disappointed” they were only given eight hours’ notice about the decision.

“We were informed today that the Victorian government has walked away from their agreement to host the 2026 Commonwealth Games,” he said.

“We are disappointed that we were only given eight hours’ notice and that no consideration was given to discussing the situation to jointly find solutions prior to this decision being reached by the government.

“Up until this point, the government had advised that sufficient funding was available to deliver the Victoria 2026 Commonwealth Games.

“We are taking advice on the options available to us and remain committed to finding a solution for the Games in 2026 that is in the best interest of our athletes and the wider Commonwealth Sport Movement.”

The spokesman said the Victorian government chose a “unique regional” model, which contributed to the cost blowout.

“The reasons given are financial. The numbers quoted to us today of $6bn are 50 per cent more than those advised to the organising committee board at its meeting in June,” he said.

“These figures are attributed to price escalation primarily due to the unique regional delivery model that Victoria chose for these Games, and in particular relate to village and venue builds and transport infrastructure.

“Since awarding Victoria the Games, the government has made decisions to include more sports and an additional regional hub, and changed plans for venues, all of which have added considerable expense, often against the advice of the Commonwealth Games Federation and Commonwealth Games Australia.”

Asked if the decision to cancel the games was embarrassing for Australia, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the decision was made by the state government.

“I’ll leave the Victorian government to go through those details,” Mr Albanese said.

“I’m certainly focused on a sporting event that will happen in two days time with the Matildas and I think that the whole of Australia will be cheering them on with the opportunity that we have of hosting a World Cup here.

“The World Cup is the third largest sporting event held in the world, only beaten by the men’s football World Cup and the Olympic Games, and we’re hosting it.

“We’re hosting the Olympics in southeast Queensland of course in 2032 and Australia has a fine record of hosting events.”

Treasurer Jim Chalmers said it was disappointing but the federal government did understand that when you signed up for big events, such as the Commonwealth Games, it did have to be a good investment.

“You have to get value for money,” he said.

Mr Andrews said the Commonwealth was told on Tuesday morning.

He rejected suggestions his decision was based on the Commonwealth’s willingness to stump up cash.

He said he would not be prepared to greenlight the event, even if the Prime Minister did agree to pay half.

“If there’s money available out of Canberra, then it won’t be spent on a $6bn or $7bn Commonwealth Games, it’ll be spent in hospitals, schools, road and rail, and all manner of other things,” Mr Andrews said.

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/fears-grow-over-looming-changes-to-victorias-commonwealth-games/news-story/a799de241572eee999ae92a932d648c0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3E76XPo94g

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19204775

File: e9ac2001745e22d⋯.jpg (141.9 KB,1280x720,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_and_2GB_h….jpg)

>>19199716

Anthony Albanese: government will reject Indigenous voice advice if it disagrees

ROSIE LEWIS - JULY 19, 2023

1/2

Anthony Albanese has declared an Indigenous voice to parliament is not about treaty or compensating Aboriginal people and says his government will absolutely reject its advice – including if it suggests changing Australia Day – if Labor disagrees.

In an intense and lengthy exchange with 2GB’s Ben Fordham, the Prime Minister also disagreed with claims made by prominent Yes campaigner Thomas Mayo on what the voice was about while insisting the advisory body wouldn’t be able to talk to the Reserve Bank of Australia.

One of the architects of the Uluru statement from the heart, Megan Davis, has said the voice will be able to speak to all parts of the government including the RBA.

“I can’t talk directly to the RBA board and I’m the Prime Minister,” Mr Albanese said.

“This is not about a treaty. This is the issue here, we’ve had a debate about things that aren’t happening rather than about things that are.

“Read the question, which you’re going to be asked about. It isn’t about anything else. It’s not about treaty, it’s not about compensation, it’s simply about listening in order to get better outcomes.”

In May, Mr Albanese said treaty and truth-telling would be “part of the next phase” if the referendum succeeded, with the voice able to talk about Makarrata. The Uluru statement called for a voice followed by a Makarrata Commission – to supervise treaties – and truth-telling.

When Fordham put various comments made by Mr Mayo to Mr Albanese about the voice, including that it could be used for reparations and compensation for Indigenous Australians, the Prime Minister said there would be no reparations.

“I disagree with that,” he said.

“People need to not raise red herrings. If this is successful and there’s a voice, it won’t have a right of veto. Get on board. You’re in a position to make a difference and to help it succeed, as are other people in the media, by talking about what’s it’s about, not by raising things that aren’t going to be relevant – what Thomas Mayo or any individual thinks.”

The Prime Minister conceded support for the voice was trending downwards but accused politicians and the media of focusing on “things this isn’t about”.

He dismissed the Coalition’s request to pursue constitutional recognition while legislating the voice, after Fordham described the proposal as a “win-win”.

“I’m a pragmatic guy but one of the things that has occurred here is that Indigenous Australians themselves, this hasn’t come from politicians, this hasn’t come from Canberra, Indigenous Australians have had a constitutional convention back in 2017 and they said they don’t just want the symbolism of recognition, they want something that will make a practical change to their lives,” Mr Albanese said.

“This isn’t about me. This is about Indigenous Australians and their request that they have made.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19204778

File: 121e89deff21c4d⋯.jpg (255.77 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_with_the_….jpg)

>>19204775

2/2

“One of the principles put forward and in the Yes pamphlet makes it very clear, the voice will not have the right of veto. Government decision stays the same. If people listen to some of the debate that’s gone on over the last few months, they don’t know that.

“They think that this is about creating special rights above everyone else. Now our system of government will not change. There won’t be someone sitting in the cabinet room. There won’t be someone who’s not elected sitting in the parliament.

“That’s why I say this is a modest request, this is just an opportunity to listen. The concern that Indigenous Australians have is about the practical outcomes of health and education and housing and incarceration rates. We need to do better.”

Mr Albanese again said his government had no plans to change Australia Day and it would “absolutely” say no to the voice if it made representations suggesting otherwise.

“Absolutely (we’ll say no),” he said.

“Of course we will, if we don’t agree with them, of course we will. As was made very clear by the wording that’s put forward is the parliament remains prime, supreme.”

Asked if enshrining the voice in the Constitution would put one group of Australians above all others, he responded: “Talking about Indigenous Australians having special rights ignores the fact that this is the most disadvantaged group in Australia.

“There’s an eight-year life expectancy gap, a greater chance of an Indigenous young male going to jail than going to university.”

Opposition treasury spokesman Angus Taylor accused Mr Albanese of making a number of misleading claims in the Fordham interview, saying the voice’s scope was broader than the government was making out.

“The truth of the matter is, if he restricts the voice, that can be challenged in the High Court,” Mr Taylor said.

“This is a very broad wording that we are voting on, which will give the voice capacity to intervene on a very broad range of matters, well beyond Indigenous affairs, and any attempt from the government to restrict that, of course, can be challenged in the High Court.

“The Prime Minister needs to be honest with Australians about the breadth of what is being proposed here.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/anthony-albanese-government-will-reject-indigenous-voice-advice-if-it-disagrees/news-story/7762e1a7b7501307b037d2f603c296e2

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19204786

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19199716

>>19204775

Anthony Albanese reveals deepening Indigenous voice to parliament frustration during clash with 2GB Radio host Ben Fordham

SIMON BENSON - JULY 19, 2023

Anthony Albanese has publicly revealed what is clearly a deepening personal frustration over where the voice referendum is heading.

In an interview with 2GB radio host Ben Fordham Wednesday morning the Prime Minister allowed himself to become audibly vexed and abrasive by the questioning.

At one point he accused the host of reading off the no pamphlet before denying he had levelled such a charge, triggering an on-air squabble.

It wasn’t all his fault. He was talked over and goaded.

But this was not the demeanour that the nation’s leader will have wanted to present in prosecuting the argument for the yes case.

Particularly to an audience such as Fordham’s, which is one the yes campaign needs to reach. It is this demographic likely to possess the deepest antipathy.

But Albanese’s stoush with Fordham reflected the exasperation that he clearly feels over the no campaign’s ability so far to steer the debate.

He even conceded that the polls were an accurate portrayal of where public support was.

This follows his call on Monday for the yes campaign to lift its game and present a stronger case.

The Prime Minister needed to take control of the issue. This interview was an attempt to do so.

He sought to clearly set out the case for the referendum but got bogged down over trivialities before being led down the road of treaty, compensation and reparations. All of which he denied were on the table or even relevant to the voice.

The Prime Minister was at least emphatic about what the government would and would not entertain when it came to the range of advice that may come from the voice.

There will be no change to Australia Day, even if the voice decided it wanted it on the agenda.

And it won’t be giving advice to the Reserve Bank of Australia. As he pointed out, even he can’t do that as prime minister. As much as he may like to.

In doing so he was adamant that Labor would ignore the advice of the voice if it chose to.

Albanese maintains that once people read the question that they will be asked at the referendum then consider the material in the Yes and No pamphlets, people will come down in favour of constitutional change.

This relies on a majority of people reading the material, which many may not.

In the absence of that, it will be interviews like the Fordham one that people will be listening to when considering the question to be asked of them.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/anthony-albanese-reveals-deepening-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-frustration-during-clash-with-2gb-radio-host-ben-fordham/news-story/9dd118199f7841b31dbafb5582524d42

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wUuC1BC7Wkc

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19204809

File: cdca152b8248833⋯.jpg (231.13 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Shane_Drumgold_has_come_un….jpg)

File: b971b445346bbb3⋯.jpg (131.27 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Ms_Reynolds_says_Shane_Dru….jpg)

>>19194509

‘Recklessly indifferent to truth’: Linda Reynolds blasts DPP Shane Drumgold over Brittany Higgins case

JANET ALBRECHTSEN and STEPHEN RICE - JULY 19, 2023

1/2

Former Defence Minister Linda Reynolds has launched a blistering attack on ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold, accusing him of making “baseless and unsubstantiated allegations” that she was motivated by political forces to suppress Brittany Higgins’ rape complaint.

In a submission to the Sofronoff inquiry obtained by The Australian Senator Reynolds asks chairman Walter Sofronoff KC to find that Mr Drumgold “was recklessly indifferent to the truth of this mistaken belief, and was otherwise prepared to assert a position that had no evidentiary basis despite being an officer of the Court with ethical and prosecutorial duties that attach.”

Senator Reynolds alleges multiple breaches by Mr Drumgold of the Barristers Rules, the Legal Profession Act, the Director of Public Prosecutions Policy, the Freedom of Information Act and the Human Rights Act over the trial of Bruce Lehrmann.

The allegation that she had tried to pervert the course of justice would have remained unchallenged, she submitted, but for the intervention of Mr Sofronoff, who elicited from Mr Drumgold the startling admission during the inquiry that he no longer believed his own claims.

“The evidence of the DPP at the Inquiry demonstrated that there was no basis to make such a serious allegation during the trial or at any time before or after the trial. It was a baseless and unsubstantiated allegation made irresponsibly and has damaged the reputation of Senator Reynolds irreparably,” her submission states.

The Liberal MP reveals her shock at being declared a hostile (or “unfavourable”) witness in the trial by the DPP who, without warning, suddenly cross-examined her on her credibility.

That included questioning about the presence of her husband, Robert Reid, sitting in the courtroom, even though no one had suggested there was anything wrong with this, including the DPP, who had met and was aware that Mr Reid was her partner. An ODPP solicitor had even approached Mr Reid in the court to ask if Senator Reynolds could appear sooner than previously scheduled.

Senator Reynolds was also cross examined over a text message she sent to Bruce Lehrmann’s defence counsel, Steve Whybrow, requesting a transcript of the trial. She said she had not been aware this was not permitted.

She says Mr Drumgold “ambushed” her in the trial and had given her no indication beforehand in discussions that he intended to do this, even though he was already well aware that Ms Higgins’ was claiming political interference to suppress her complaint.

“I was shocked and frustrated at this approach as it appeared the DPP was seeking to undermine my credibility (and that of Senator Cash) in an effort to re-assert the credibility of Ms Higgins and increase his prospect of securing a conviction. Alleging that a politician was motivated by ‘political forces’ was an easy line to run.”

The DPP repeatedly asked questions which alleged Senator Reynolds was motivated by “political forces,” she said, even though he was well aware from her statement that it was she who had suggested to Ms Higgins she should talk to the police and assured her the AFP had expertise in handling sensitive personal matters.

In his summing up Mr Drumgold told the jury that “it is abundantly clear from the evidence and actions of Senator Reynolds during this trial that those political forces were still a factor.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19204813

File: 130c115d154073e⋯.jpg (242.17 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Ms_Reynolds_alleged_Mr_Dru….jpg)

>>19204809

2/2

Senator Reynolds alleges Mr Drumgold had breached the Barristers Rules as his allegations were made “principally in order to discredit or embarrass” her and requested that Mr Sofronoff recommend the DPP’s conduct be investigated by the ACT Bar Council.

Senator Reynolds said that contrary to the requirements of the FOI Act she was not consulted before Mr Drumgold released a copy of his letter to ACT police chief Neil Gaughan complaining about the conduct of police in the Lehrmann investigation and trial.

In the letter Mr Drumgold had presented his personal characterisation of Senator Reynolds’ actions as statements of fact, she said, including allegations she had solicited trial transcripts “to tailor her evidence” and had “engaged in direct coaching of defence cross-examination of the complainant”.

Senator Reynolds asked the Inquiry to find that the DPP breached Barrister Rules by “knowingly making a misleading statement to the court” when he suggested that Senator Reynolds was not co-operating in accordance with a subpoena served on her to give evidence.

Senator Reynolds also submitted that the ACT Crimes Act should be amended to deter individuals from using the media and/or Parliamentary forums in relation to an alleged criminal offence that ought properly be the subject of the criminal justice processes.

She pointed to a section of the NSW Crimes Act that makes it an offence for anyone who knows or believes that a serious indictable offence has been committed and fails to report it to police.

Senator Reynolds said Labor Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus had declined to approve her applications for legal assistance at the Inquiry, meaning she had been unrepresented despite volumes of evidence that concerned her, including some taken in closed session, to which she still had no access.

Mr Sofronoff is due to hand down his report on potential misconduct by the DPP and the AFP by 31 July.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/recklessly-indifferent-to-truth-linda-reynolds-blasts-dpp-shane-drumgold-over-brittany-higgins-case/news-story/ce2fcbc7ff67c5bfd276e9b3045dadda

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19204858

File: d39d3abceb07be8⋯.mp4 (15.94 MB,1280x720,16:9,Sex_book_for_children_ange….mp4)

Yumi Stynes and Dr Melissa Kang’s sex book for kids sold at Big W sparks debate

Parents have raised concerns about a “graphic” sex book for children as young as eight sold at Big W, while others have voiced their support.

Brooke Rolfe - July 18, 2023

1/2

Disgruntled parents have raised concerns about a “graphic” sex book targeted at children as young as eight being sold at Big W.

Dr Melissa Kang and Yumi Stynes’ book, Welcome to Sex: Your no-silly-questions guide to sexuality, pleasure and figuring it out, released in May, is billed as a “frank, age-appropriate introductory guide to sex and sexuality for teens of all genders”.

But the Woolworths-owned department store has come under fire after an Instagram video from podcast host Chris Primod showing some of the book’s pages went viral.

Critics have argued the content is far too mature for its intended readership.

“Why is Big W selling this GRAPHIC SEX GUIDE FOR KIDS in Aus which includes how-tos for anal/oral sex, masturbation & heavily pushes gender ideology?” Rachael Wong, chief executive of Women’s Forum Australia, wrote on Twitter, sharing the video.

“Co-author [Yumi Stynes] says the book is for 10-15 yo but she’d ‘be happy with a mature 8-yo having a flick through’.”

The book, on sale for $16, contains detailed explanations behind sexual activities including oral sex, fingering, anal sex, scissoring, hand jobs, porn, sexuality and gender identity.

Reviews for the product on Big W’s site have been turned off after it had earlier been bombarded with negative feedback, prompting a response from the retailer’s customer service team defending it as “educational, age-appropriate and inclusive”.

Stynes and Dr Kang have been contacted for comment.

In response to Ms Wong’s post, some social media users branded the book “disgraceful”.

“They have no right to interfere with parental rights, not to indoctrinate children,” one response read.

“Shamelessly destroying young lives. It would be a crime in any civilised society. Sadly, there aren’t any of those anymore,” another complained.

Someone else suggested the book was attempting to “sexualise” people prematurely.

“I’ve seen kids on their own perusing the book section in Big W. Younger kids could easily ‘have a flick through’ this book. Why do they want to sexualise children? It doesn’t take Einstein to figure that one out,” they wrote.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19204866

File: 362eaf50422e6e3⋯.jpg (125.56 KB,1080x1350,4:5,341752801_6094636017278689….jpg)

File: 0ed0f87b57b4475⋯.jpg (103.04 KB,650x998,325:499,Some_argued_it_was_inappro….jpg)

>>19204858

2/2

In an Instagram post promoting the release, Stynes explained the book’s purpose was to begin teaching children about sex and consent at a young age to combat the “putrid effects of porn on real-world sex”.

“I like to think of it as a bit like the book L-platers read before hitting the road,” she wrote.

“It is a book for young ones who aren’t necessarily practising any partnered sexual activities but who are curious enough to Google – and whose parents would prefer this early (and influential!) info come from legitimate and researched sources who understand exactly who their audience is — rather than the unbounded limitlessness of the internet.

“YES, it’s frank, and YES, it talks about stuff that parents might find embarrassing. Research shows that kids don’t necessarily want to talk about sex with their parents. It’s common. But parents? I hope this is a reassuring resource that you can slap down on your kid’s desk feeling confident that this info is setting them up for safer, happier lives.”

Her post received a mixed reaction — some parents couldn’t wait to purchase a copy for their children, while others vowed to campaign against retailers that stocked the book.

“What 10-year-old needs to learn about this? What planet are you living on?” one critic wrote, with another commenting that it was “not age appropriate at all for our little ones”.

Meanwhile, others could not have been more excited.

“Can’t wait to purchase this. Your period book took away the fear for my 10-year-old daughter (and me!) so much. Forever grateful,” one parent wrote.

“Ohhh congratulations! I recommend this series all the time,” another said.

A spokesperson for Big W defended the retailer’s decision to stock the product, disputing claims the book was inappropriate for children.

“Big W has a wide range of books and products that represent a diverse Australian community,” the spokesperson said.

“Welcome to Sex is an educational, age-appropriate and inclusive book featuring content from adolescent health experts that matches the development and early experiences of teens aged 12-15. It is shelved in parenting in our books section so parents can make their own decisions on what is appropriate for their family.”

https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/parenting/teens/yumi-stynes-and-dr-melissa-kangs-sex-book-for-kids-sold-at-big-w-sparks-debate/news-story/5be175b508950c0775ca83cc41e77c12

https://web.archive.org/web/20230718025013/https://twitter.com/RachaelWongAus/status/1680793224653475842

https://www.instagram.com/p/CrM8jnUB2Rc/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19204881

File: 4f8647b2f28ccb3⋯.jpg (53.05 KB,1240x832,155:104,Cathy_Csergo_whose_son_Ale….jpg)

File: a5c2c2ebaa2c1f0⋯.jpg (53.77 KB,1240x744,5:3,Alexander_Csergo_and_his_a….jpg)

‘My son is innocent’: mother of imprisoned Australian businessman denies he’s a Chinese spy

Lawyers say Alexander Csergo brought home list of requests from aspiring Chinese handlers to ensure he would be believed by Australian authorities

Ben Doherty - 19 Jul 2023

1/2

An Australian businessman facing a foreign interference charge brought home a “shopping list” given to him by two Chinese intelligence officials as evidence of China’s overt and ultimately unsuccessful efforts to cultivate him as a source, his lawyers say.

The list, which Alexander Csergo slipped between the pages of a magazine to spirit out of China, requests information about whether Australia’s new Aukus alliance is “preparing for [a] Taiwan war”, about competition between the US and China in the Pacific, and about the Five Eyes intelligence alliance.

Titled “shopping list for reference”, the list seeks to establish contacts inside the prime minister’s office, within spy agency Asio, and with Australian federal police officers and members of the judiciary. It also asks for information on Australian foreign policy: “us/aus coordination and conflicts on china policy, approaching the cabinet or ministerial level.”

Csergo was arrested in April and charged with one count of reckless foreign interference. His legal team says he provided none of the information requested on the list by his aspiring Chinese handlers – known to him by the anglicised names Ken and Evelyn – and told police that Csergo brought the document back to Australia to demonstrate to Australian authorities the Chinese attempts to groom him.

Guardian Australia has seen a copy of the shopping list but has chosen not to reproduce it publicly.

“To ensure he would be believed by Australian authorities, he brought with him a complete archive of all his efforts to divert his questioners and convince them he should be permitted to leave China,” Csergo’s barrister, Bernard Collaery, told Guardian Australia.

“This included preserving in hard copy a ‘shopping list’ given to him by those seeking to groom him.”

From her Sydney home, Csergo’s elderly mother, Cathy, said “my son is innocent”.

“His whole life, he has worked hard, he has been honest, he has never been involved with the police. When the police came they asked him questions for hours and hours and he said to me, ‘I just told them the truth. I haven’t done anything wrong’.”

Cathy Csergo said public allegations that her son was involved in espionage were devastating to her family and that his isolation was cruel and unjustified.

“They say these things and they are not true. He’s a good man. I’m heartbroken. I go to jail and I can’t hug him.”

Alexander Csergo, a marketing executive, had worked in China and across Asia for more than two decades when he was first approached by two people – whom he assumed to be representatives of China’s powerful ministry of state security (MSS) – during the height of Shanghai’s highly restrictive Covid lockdowns in 2020.

Police allege the pair gave their names as Ken and Evelyn, and offered to pay Csergo for reports on Australian politics, economics and foreign relations.

Essentially trapped in China by the Covid restrictions, Csergo sought to keep his would-be handlers placated by providing them reports filled with “anodyne information”, his lawyers say, all of which was available through open sources and none of which had national security implications. A court hearing was told he was paid in cash, delivered in envelopes.

When lockdown restrictions lifted, he told Ken and Evelyn he needed to return to Australia to care for his elderly and unwell mother.

Having returned in February, Csergo participated in more than five hours of interviews with Asio and the AFP in March, during which, his lawyers say, he explained his tactics to avoid arbitrary detention until he could get out of China. He was arrested a month later, on 14 April, at his Bondi home.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19204884

File: 4275990288a5a46⋯.jpg (82.64 KB,1240x744,5:3,Cathy_Csergo_at_her_Bondi_….jpg)

File: e3094d903b6809b⋯.jpg (54.3 KB,1240x828,310:207,Cathy_Csergo_holds_a_pictu….jpg)

>>19204881

2/2

Csergo’s lawyers fear ‘show trial’

Csergo’s legal team have argued a “misconceived and overzealous police prosecution is a cruel response to our client’s courage and candour”, and say they fear a “show trial”.

Collaery said the grooming approach to Csergo appeared to be an MSS provocation, to which Australian authorities had dramatically overreacted.

The “vague and overly broad” laws under which Csergo has been charged were further evidence of “Australia’s drift into authoritarian governance”, Collaery said.

“Alex [Csergo] has done what every captured defence or intelligence official is trained to do: cooperate as harmlessly as possible. If this trial goes ahead, a jury is going to see him as resourceful and courageous.”

Csergo, 55, has been charged with one count of reckless foreign interference, the first time that charge has been laid in Australia. The new law was part of a suite of legislation introduced by then prime minister Malcolm Turnbull in late 2017.

Sources with knowledge of the case say there has been no evidence yet presented that Csergo provided any sensitive information to foreign officials, or jeopardised Australia’s national security, arguing the case against him is “weak”.

Csergo is being held at the Parklea Correctional Centre in Sydney’s north-west. He has been refused bail and is in isolation. The publicly broadcast police allegation that he is a spy for China is widely known in the prison, putting a “target on his back”, a source said.

Csergo’s communication to the outside world has been severely curtailed, and his ability to prepare a defence limited. His phone access to his wife and family has been cut; the only number he can call is that of his elderly mother, for brief conversations that are recorded and monitored.

His lawyers say they have been refused access to see him at the door of the prison, and a scheduled two-hour virtual legal meeting was cut to 15 minutes and monitored. More than three months after being arrested, Csergo has still not had a face-to-face meeting with his lawyers.

The AFP issued a statement when Csergo was arrested, saying “it is alleged that on a number of occasions [Csergo] met with two individuals … who offered [him] money to obtain information about Australian defence, economic and national security arrangements”.

In court last month, commonwealth prosecutor Conor McCraith said the “shopping list” was discovered by Asio and had not been declared by Csergo. He alleged Csergo had remained in contact with Ken – via WeChat – from Australia.

Magistrate Julia Virgo refused Csergo’s most recent bail application, citing his “substantial connection to a foreign government” and his behaviour once he returned to Australia.

“It is concerning to me that Mr Csergo himself did not volunteer this information [about attempts to groom him] on his arrival into this country,” Virgo said. The case returns to court in August.

The federal attorney general, who must consent to Csergo’s prosecution, declined to comment on when or how that decision would be made.

The shopping list given to Csergo details information Csergo’s aspirant handlers were seeking.

Undated, without a letterhead and written in imperfect English, the document asks for information on: “Five eyes-intel communitychina spycyber security, as well as information on the Belt-and-Road Initiative, bribery and corruption cases, and ‘other sensitive storys’ (sic).”

It urges: “Focus on: strategy level – following the fresh geopolitics backgrounds, show top leaders real thinking attitude and mutual talking points, bring out the consensus and conflicts between the main figures.”

Csergo brought the list home to Australia in hard copy, placed inside the pages of a magazine, and carried it onboard the plane that brought him out of China.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/jul/19/australian-businessman-alex-csergo-mother-denies-chinese-spy

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19204894

File: d1d7e0a7ce832d6⋯.jpg (1.76 MB,5408x3605,5408:3605,Defence_Minister_Richard_M….jpg)

Blinken, Austin to visit Brisbane for AUSMIN talks

Phillip Coorey - Jul 19, 2023

United States Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin and Secretary of State Antony Blinken will visit Brisbane next week for the annual dialogue with their Australian counterparts Richard Marles and Penny Wong, at the same time the ALP membership continues to agitate against AUKUS.

Following the talks, Mr Marles and Mr Austin will travel to north Queensland to witness the annual Talisman Sabre joint training exercise involving Australian and US forces and 11 other partner nations.

Choosing Queensland as the venue for the AUSMIN talks, which the two countries take turns in hosting each year, will also give the Albanese government an opportunity to lift its political stocks in a state which is critical to its fortunes at the next federal election.

The talks come against the backdrop of Australia thawing its relationship with China, with Treasurer Jim Chalmers meeting his Chinese counterpart Liu Kun on the sidelines of the G20 finance ministers meeting in India on Tuesday night.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has yet to accept an invitation to visit Beijing this year and Dr Chalmers hinted on Tuesday night the Chinese would have to move further on lifting trade sanctions if the visit were to go ahead.

“The message that I was able to convey to Minister Liu was we would like to see these trade restrictions lifted, and we’d like to make progress on that in advance of a prime ministerial visit to China ideally later in the year,” he said.

It also comes against the backdrop of rising discontent in the Labor rank-and-file over the tripartite AUKUS security pact involving Australia, the US and the United Kingdom.

That dissent is expected to be on display at Labor’s triennial national conference to be held next month, also in Brisbane.

On Tuesday night, AUKUS was condemned in a motion passed by the Sydney Federal Electoral Council of the ALP.

Maintaining regional stability

“AUKUS is not in the interests of the Australian people, threatens a regional arms race, and could take Australia into an unnecessary and devastating war,” it said.

“The ALP should prioritise spending commitments that contribute to the social good of our society rather than wasting hundreds of billions of dollars on a dangerous and unnecessary weapons program.

“The values of the ALP and trade-union movement dictate that the focus of public funds should be on public education, public health, aged care, housing, social security, the manufacturing industry, and the transition to a renewable energy economy.”

It called on the Australian government “to withdraw from the AUKUS alliance and cease any program in pursuit of the acquisition of nuclear submarines”.

A similar motion is expected to be put at National Conference, but factional bosses will ensure it is defeated so as not to embarrass the government.

In a statement confirming AUSMIN, Mr Marles said: “Australia’s defence cooperation with the United States is unprecedented in scale, scope and significance.”

“Our partnership is built on an enduring foundation of trust, a long record of achievement and a shared vision for upholding the global rules-based order.

“Australia will continue to work with our partners, including the United States, to build a region that is peaceful, stable and prosperous, including through the longstanding US Force Posture Initiatives in Australia.”

Senator Wong said it was an important part of maintaining regional stability.

“Our Alliance is continuing to evolve with our strategic circumstances. We are broadening AUSMIN to integrate new areas for cooperation in line with the region’s priorities, including emerging technologies, the clean energy transition and the essential role of critical minerals,” she said.

“Australia and the United States want to better support our partners in the region, and to promote peace, protect sovereignty and foster prosperity.”

https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/blinken-austin-to-visit-brisbane-for-ausmin-talks-20230719-p5dphn

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19204909

File: 8a4567fa4f275bc⋯.mp4 (8.17 MB,540x960,9:16,361948043_577525967909052_….mp4)

Talisman Sabre Facebook Post

19 July 2023

3 days to go!

3 days left until the start of #TalismanSabre2023!

https://www.facebook.com/talismansabre/videos/3-days-to-go/245807178265970/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19204923

File: 4a4dbc549e4ec7f⋯.jpg (102.95 KB,1240x744,5:3,The_Haiwangxing_a_Chinese_….jpg)

>>19204909

Chinese intelligence expected to monitor Australia’s Talisman Sabre military exercises

Thirteen countries, including the US, Japan and Indonesia, are part of the two-week training exercises, which have logistics as a key focus

Daniel Hurst - 19 Jul 2023

1/2

The Australian defence force expects that Chinese intelligence will seek to monitor Talisman Sabre, a military training exercise involving 30,000 personnel from 13 countries including the US and Pacific neighbours.

There is precedent for such monitoring attempts. In 2021, the Australian government said it was keeping an eye on the Chinese auxiliary general intelligence vessel Tianwangxing as it approached Australia’s east coast in the run-up to Talisman Sabre.

Germany and Indonesia will be among the countries participating for the first time in Talisman Sabre. The two-week exercise begins on Friday and will be held across numerous locations including Queensland’s Shoalwater Bay.

The director of the exercise, Brigadier Damian Hill, said he expected Chinese intelligence to seek to monitor the event again this year.

“Even though they’re not invited, they still turn up,” he said. “But they haven’t asked to be invited either.”

Hill said such monitoring had not impeded previous Talisman Sabre exercises, and Australia’s expectation was that any such vessels operate in accordance with international law.

In 2021, the Tianwangxing was reported to remain outside Australian territorial waters but within Australia’s exclusive economic zone.

Hill declined to say whether the ADF had already detected any Chinese vessels in transit, saying it was “not within my remit to do so” but added: “Our expectation is that there will be.”

He confirmed that Australia and other countries put in place measures to protect communications during the exercise: “Absolutely we do.”

Hill said it was “fantastic” to have Germany participate in Talisman Sabre for the first time and for South Korea to be making an “expanded commitment” since the last exercise. Japan, he said, would fire its type 12 surface-to-ship missile in Jervis Bay, south of Sydney.

“It’s really great to see more nations - specifically nations that either have a Pacific strategy or are actually in the Indo-Pacific – participating in the exercise,” he said.

Indonesia, which will be a full participant in Talisman Sabre for the first time, would have two focus areas.

“The first one is integrating and undertaking amphibious activities, so they’ll be integrating with us some Indonesian marines,” Hill said.

“The second one is they’ll undertake a parachute insertion into Shoalwater Bay in early August alongside our US friends as well, which is a particular interest to them.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19204925

File: 3ccc1ff43a13542⋯.jpg (192.28 KB,1098x732,3:2,Australian_soldiers_take_p….jpg)

>>19204923

2/2

Hill said it was also the first time a number of Pacific nations – including Fiji, Papua New Guinea and Tonga – would be integrated within the ADF units in Talisman Sabre.

“So we’ve had them around the exercise before, but not in the nature that we have this time. What we’ve tried to do is incorporate them more fully into the exercise,” he said.

“We share the same region, we are effectively geographic families and so we should be working more closely together more often.

“The great benefit of working with people in the region is that if there is a disaster, or something that needs to be done, we can immediately speak to the person who we may have exercised with a year ago or five minutes ago.”

The prime minister, Anthony Albanese, told reporters in New Delhi in March that India had been invited to participate in Talisman Sabre – but the country has since confirmed that it won’t join this year.

Hill said India was fully committed to the upcoming exercise Malabar and had “made a careful decision based upon what they can and cannot do”.

“But it’s great that we’ve got four Indian officers participating once again as observers – and we’re working very hard with India to offer them the opportunity to participate fully in 2025.”

Logistics will be a key focus of this year’s exercise, with the US planning to build a 540m-long temporary pier in Bowen in north Queensland over 10 days.

“Then we’ll bring some US army and other amphibious vessels alongside and then effectively deliver vehicles, armoured vehicles and the like from offshore onshore and then drive them through the streets of Bowen – carefully – and then up to the exercise area in Townsville,” Hill said.

Australia and the US are also planning to establish a logistics and medical headquarters at Gallipoli barracks in Brisbane, with “nodes” connected to all of the areas where the exercises will be happening.

“The exercise is more geographically spread than it ever has been … it’s about 6,000km from the westernmost part of the exercise to the easternmost part, which is the distance between Hawaii and Chicago.

“It requires very careful logistics and medical planning. So we’ve created two combined headquarters, that are specifically looking at how do we support and protect the people operating across vast distances.

“Even though we’re doing this in Australia, it absolutely could be replicated if we were operating in the region.”

The US defence secretary, Lloyd Austin, and the Australian deputy prime minister, Richard Marles, are expected to visit troops participating in the exercise in north Queensland.

Austin and the US secretary of state, Antony Blinken, will first travel to Brisbane next week for annual talks with Marles and the foreign affairs minister, Penny Wong.

The Australian government said the meeting would focus on “ways to deepen collaboration across the breadth of the relationship, including on defence and security cooperation, climate and clean energy and economic resilience”.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/jul/19/chinese-intelligence-monitor-australia-talisman-sabre-military-excercise-tianwangxing

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19204951

File: 956500543d89132⋯.jpg (138.93 KB,1606x1091,1606:1091,Japan_will_demonstrate_its….jpg)

>>19204909

Japan to fire advanced ship-killing missile on Australia's shores

Andrew Greene - 19 July 2023

Japanese forces will fire their most advanced anti-ship missile into Australian waters for the first time, ahead of large-scale multinational military exercises that begin later this week.

The ABC can reveal Japan's Self Defense Force (JSDF) is preparing to soon conduct a live fire demonstration of its Type 12 Surface-to-Ship missile (SSM) at a weapons range in Jervis Bay, south of Sydney.

Friday's activity will occur on the same day Exercise Talisman Sabre 2023 is formally opened in Sydney, which will this year see South Korea also showcase its much-lauded Chunmoo multiple rocket launcher system.

Chief of staff for Japan's Ground Self-Defense Force, General Morishita Yasunori, has told the ABC his country's participation in the biennial military exercise is expanding.

"Exercise Talisman Sabre is important because it strengthens cooperation with Australia and the US, which will help maintain and strengthen a free and open Indo-Pacific," General Yasunori said in a statement.

"I believe the SSM firing exercise in conjunction with the Australian Navy will enhance a high level of trust between Australia and Japan."

The Type 12 Surface-to-Ship missile is a truck-mounted weapon developed by Japan's Mitsubishi Heavy Industries in 2012 which has a range of around 200 kilometres.

Japan has begun working to induct an upgraded ship-launched variant of the Type 12 SSM by 2026, which will boast an extended range of between 200km and 1,000km.

A senior defence source told the ABC this week's Japanese missile firing on Australian soil is a logical progression for the growing military relationship with the former World War II enemy.

"It makes a lot of sense for Japan to test fire these missiles in Australia's relatively open space rather than its own crowded and contested neighbourhood," the high-ranking officer said, speaking on the condition of anonymity.

Over recent years Australian and Japanese forces have conducted more frequent and ambitious defence exercises together as both nations become increasingly concerned over China's military ambitions in the region.

Talisman Sabre exercise director Brigadier Damian Hill confirmed the JSDF would fire its Type 12 SSM from Beecroft Weapons Range into the East Australia Exercise Area off the coast of Jervis Bay.

"This is the first time the JSDF have tested this capability in Australia and is an example of how our partnership continues to grow and deepen," Brigadier Hill told the ABC in a statement.

"Exercise Talisman Sabre 2023 will also involve a live-fire activity at Shoalwater Bay Training Area, incorporating Multi-domain Strike."

"Multi-domain Strike is one of the ADF's newest joint war-fighting concepts and involves synchronisation of kinetic and non-kinetic actions from all joint war-fighting domains (Land, Maritime, Air, Space and Information & Cyber)."

The 10th iteration of Exercise Talisman Sabre will run from July 22 until August 3 and will be the largest on record, with more than 30,000 military personnel participating from 13 nations.

This month, Japanese soldiers conducted live-fire artillery support for Australian troops in Queensland as part of Exercise Southern Jackaroo, a lead-up activity to Talisman Sabre, which also included US forces.

South Korea to showcase rocket technology rivalling America's HiMars weapon

South Korean forces are this year participating in Exercise Talisman Sabre for the second time, bringing with them two warships and self-propelled howitzers, as well as a multiple launch rocket system (MLRS) known as Chunmoo, which is similar to the American HiMARS technology.

Approximately 720 personnel from South Korea's Navy and Marine Corps will take part in Talisman Sabre after the country was first invited to the exercises as official observers in 2019.

During Talisman Sabre, South Korea's Chunmoo MLRS will be fired on Australian soil for the first time, as part of a large firepower demonstration at the Shoalwater Bay Training area in Queensland.

Unlike other militaries, Australia's Defence Force has so far been reluctant to consider acquiring the Chunmoo technology despite it being equipped with double the number of rockets compared to the American HiMARS, as well as boasting in-flight correction.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-19/japan-to-conduct-live-missile-firing-on-australias-shores/102616950

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19204962

File: b591721021467e2⋯.jpg (576.1 KB,2048x1152,16:9,A_burnt_out_Army_tank_at_t….jpg)

File: d171a4677863a06⋯.jpg (237.85 KB,2046x1151,2046:1151,Emergency_services_on_scen….jpg)

File: 8d87ab7dc77f68f⋯.jpg (160.3 KB,1080x1440,3:4,Paramedics_are_on_the_scen….jpg)

>>19204909

American tank on way to Talisman Sabre in big central Queensland car crash

SARAH ELKS - JULY 19, 2023

A US military tank – believed to be on the way to the Talisman Sabre military training exercise – has been caught in a fiery multi-vehicle crash on the Bruce Highway in central Queensland.

Six people were taken to the Rockhampton and Gladstone hospitals, three with suspected spinal injuries.

Queensland Police confirmed the forensic crash unit was investigating after the accident at Bajool, south of Rockhampton, at about 11.30am on Wednesday, involving seven vehicles.

“Upon arrival, three vehicles were located on fire and another four were extensively damaged, including a B-double truck, a semi-trailer (carrying a military tank), a flat-bed truck carrying two caravans, three cars, and a four-wheel-drive towing a caravan,” a Queensland Police Service statement said.

Motorists were told to avoid the area or expect long delays because the highway would be closed for an extended period.

A Defence spokeswoman said a truck carrying a US Abrams tank was involved in the incident.

“Defence will provide support as required,” she said.

Exercise Talisman Sabre will run from July 22 to August 4, and is the largest combined training activity between the Australian Defence Force and the US military.

Exercise locations in central Queensland include the Shoalwater Bay Training Area, which is about 130km north of Bajool.

The crash sent a huge plume of smoke into the sky and sparked grassfires near the highway.

Queensland’s Fire and Emergency Services said three vehicles caught fire in the crash, spreading to the surrounding grass area.

“The fire is now under control,” the QFES said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/american-tank-on-way-to-talisman-sabre-in-big-central-queensland-car-crash/news-story/2d0c15248ccaa09062154cc2c744cc1b

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19205012

File: a5835f32cf385af⋯.mp4 (7.97 MB,960x540,16:9,US_military_tank_involved_….mp4)

File: 0c548c42cb62c04⋯.mp4 (8 MB,960x540,16:9,Multiple_people_injured_in….mp4)

>>19204909

>>19204962

Multiple people injured in Bruce Highway crash involving US military tank

Rachel McGhee, Jasmine Hines, and Katrina Beavan - 19 July 2023

A United States military tank, multiple caravans and a B-double truck have been involved in a seven-vehicle crash on the Bruce Highway south of Rockhampton, injuring several people.

The incident happened late this morning on the highway near Bajool.

Police said vehicles in the crash included a semi-trailer carrying a US military tank, a flat bed truck carrying two caravans, a B-double truck, three cars and a four-wheel drive towing a caravan.

Three of the vehicles were on fire when police arrived at the scene and the other four were extensively damaged.

Video shows military police and numerous emergency vehicles and personnel at the scene.

Police have revoked an emergency declaration made under the Public Preservation Act and the exclusion zone established earlier has been dissolved.

Motorists are still being urged to avoid the area while the incident is investigated.

Defence Minister Richard Marles said the US tank involved was being taken by truck from Gladstone Port to the Shoalwater Bay Military Training Area when the crash happened.

"Thankfully there were no fatalities but it was a serious crash," he said.

“There will obviously be an investigation by the relevant authorities … wherever Defence can assist, it will.”

Six hospitalised

Officer in charge of the North Rockhampton ambulance station Dominique Johnson said six people involved in the crash were taken to hospitals in Rockhampton and Gladstone.

One of the patients taken to Rockhampton was in a serious condition and the other two were stable.

All three people taken to Gladstone Hospital were stable.

"It's extremely fortunate that no one was severely injured here today… given the impact on … the vehicles," Ms Johnson said.

She said there were a range of injuries sustained, including spinal injuries and burns.

The Bruce Highway is closed and there were a number of fires in the area as a result of the crash.

Queensland Fire and Emergency Services zone commander Superintendent John Pappas said a significant number of resources were needed to get the situation under control.

"With two semi-trailers involved in the fire, as well as fuel from the various vehicles, it has taken a number of hours to render the area safe," he said.

"The loads of the two semi-trailers were on fire, as well as the trucks themselves, which were carrying several hundred litres of fuel — that's the fuel that has been burning this afternoon.

"It is quite remarkable that the people have survived this impact and fire today."

Superintendent Pappas said crews were also hampered by a lack of water to the location of the crash.

Senior Sergeant Hedy Farrell said forensic officers were investigating, but at this stage the cause of the crash was still unknown.

"This section of road is not known to be a particularly dangerous section," he said.

"But we have had a number of heavy vehicles … one carrying a military tank vehicle and a number of civilian cars in the area at a narrow bridge way."

Freight operator Aurizon has confirmed that a portion of rail line in the area has been closed at the request of emergency services.

The incident comes ahead of Exercise Talisman Sabre, a biennial training event involving Australian and US troops, which is set to begin at Shoalwater Bay in central Queensland on Saturday.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-19/us-military-tank-in-bruce-highway-crash-bajool/102619784

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19205022

File: 00a0720bade01c7⋯.jpg (342.45 KB,2048x1152,16:9,USS_Canberra_arrived_in_Sy….jpg)

File: 50bb8b91cc26c68⋯.jpg (365.62 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_USS_Canberra_s_bridge.jpg)

File: a06756ffd3d20be⋯.jpg (470.03 KB,2048x1152,16:9,US_sailors_on_board_the_US….jpg)

USS Canberra strengthens ties with US, littorally

BEN PACKHAM - JULY 19, 2023

They’re derided by many as ­“Little Crappy Ships”, but a senior US Navy officer says the Littoral Combat Ship USS Canberra will play an important role in the ­contested Indo-Pacific.

The US Navy vessel cruised into Sydney Harbour on Tuesday ahead of its official commissioning on Saturday.

The vessel, designed by Australian-owned Austal USA, will be the second US ship to be named in honour of the original HMAS Canberra, sunk by the Japanese in 1942.

Littoral Combat Ship Squadron One Commodore Captain Marc Crawford said the move was a tribute to the “unbreakable alliance” between the allies.

“It says very clearly, ‘We are with you’,” he said.

The USS Canberra is an Independence-class Littoral Combat Ship, one of two LCS variants designed for high-speed operations in coastal waters.

Captain Crawford said the trimaran-design vessel was suited to the task, and could also operate in blue water roles “keeping the Indo-Pacific open and free”.

But the class has been heavily criticised for being poorly armed, with senior Pentagon figures warning the ships are highly ­vulnerable in contested waters.

A report last year compiled by the US Government Accountability Office concluded that the LCS fleet had “not demonstrated the operational capabilities” it was designed to deliver. Half of the US Navy’s LCS fleet was also revealed to be suffering from structural cracking, potentially limiting their usefulness in heavy seas.

But Captain Crawford insisted that such issues were not all that unusual for naval warships, and the vessels’ problems had been ironed out. “That’s not a description I would agree with,” he said of the vessels’ alternative derogatory moniker.

The San Diego-based ship undertook offshore manoeuvres with its Australian sister ship, the landing helicopter dock HMAS Canberra, before entering Sydney Harbour. It also took on an Australian officer, who will continue to sail with the vessel when it returns to its home port.

Captain Crawford said a Royal Australian Navy member would always be present on the ship in recognition of its Australian links.

US Studies Centre defence policy director Peter Dean said LCS was a “controversial capability” that had suffered from a shift in strategic circumstances.

He said the ships were now considered to be undergunned, lacking the combat power needed to survive encounters with peer adversaries.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/uss-canberra-strengthens-ties-with-us-littorally/news-story/0e0ac96876ae639b8c6667373223c10f

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19205027

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19205022

USS Canberra arrives in Sydney to be commissioned for the US Navy

7NEWS Australia

Jul 18, 2023

Today saw a historic moment in Australia's military alliance with the US, as an American warship arrived in Sydney to be commissioned into the US Navy. The USS Canberra will be named in honour of a piece of our own military history.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9BeKxb0R7A

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19205037

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19205022

USS Canberra arrives in Sydney to be commissioned

Sky News Australia

Jul 18, 2023

USS Canberra has arrived in Sydney ahead of the first ever commissioning of a US navy ship in an allied country, making it a historic moment for Australia’s military alliance.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7EglKe76DI

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19205053

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19205022

USS Canberra arrives in Sydney

Defence Australia

Jul 19, 2023

Australia welcomed the USS Canberra to Sydney Harbour, with HMAS Canberra guiding the Independence-variant littoral combat ship to berth alongside Fleet Base East ahead of the formal commissioning on 22 July.

The crews of HMAS Canberra and USS Canberra will focus on joint activities during commissioning week, including playing sport, ship tours and sharing their countries' culture and traditions. This ceremonial commissioning emphasizes the more than 100 years of mateship built on friendship, history, democracy, and respect.

The two countries have fought side-by-side in every major conflict since World War I. Canberra’s namesake is a reminder of the shared responsibility the U.S. and Australia have to each other as allies.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WvCaIzzSexk

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19210574

File: 52d2fb0dd8aa2d9⋯.jpg (1010.61 KB,5655x3729,1885:1243,1st_Battalion_1st_Marines_….jpg)

Test…

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19210696

File: d79226e751bd432⋯.mp4 (15.96 MB,640x360,16:9,This_is_the_last_time_Chin….mp4)

How China's foreign minister going MIA could affect diplomacy with Australia

Bang Xiao - 19 July 2023

1/2

China's Foreign Minister Qin Gang has disappeared from public view after his last public appearance about three weeks ago.

Experts say it is the first time a senior minister in the Chinese government has been out of the public eye for more than 20 days without explanation.

As one of Chinese President Xi Jinping's most trusted high-ranking officials, Mr Qin has held the dual positions of China's foreign minister and state councillor since late last year.

His disappearance has led to much speculation in China and in the Chinese diaspora around the world about possible changes in the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

This is despite discussion of Mr Qin being subject to extremely strict censorship on Chinese social media platforms Weibo and WeChat.

Mr Qin's last public appearance was a meeting with his Sri Lankan counterpart in Beijing on June 25.

Earlier this month, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin announced Mr Qin would not be attending the ASEAN Foreign Ministers' Meeting in Indonesia, citing "health reasons".

When asked when Mr Qin would return to his role, Mr Wang silently looked down and flipped through documents for 16 seconds before skipping over the question.

The ministry's official transcript of the press conference did not include the mention of Mr Qin's health.

Mr Qin had been expected to visit Australia later this month for the Australia-China Diplomatic and Strategic Dialogue.

The Chinese embassy in Australia did not respond to the ABC's questions regarding Mr Qin.

Australia's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) told the ABC that Foreign Minister Penny Wong looked forward to the next opportunity to meet with Mr Qin.

Who is Qin Gang?

At 57 years old, Mr Qin is China's youngest foreign minister in more than half a century.

He joined the Ministry of Foreign Affairs at the age of 22, and since then has served as the minister's assistant, a spokesperson, and a vice-minister.

He served as ambassador to the United States for only 18 months before being appointed foreign minister.

His rapid promotion was seen as the biggest surprise in Mr Xi's leadership team as the president entered his third term.

Mr Qin's diplomatic language has in the past been notably cautious, gentle and with a sense of humour. When engaging with foreign media, he has usually refrained from using provocative language.

Among his first acts as minister to gain attention was to remove Zhao Lijian, a strident exponent of China's "wolf-warrior" diplomacy, from the role of foreign ministry spokesperson and out of public view.

While his position as foreign minister is significant, Mr Qin's other role as a state councillor is considered more important in the Chinese government.

He ranks only below the premier and vice-premier in importance on the State Council.

Deng Yuwen, a former editor of a Communist Party newspaper who now lives in the US, told the ABC the appointment showed he was "firmly trusted by Xi".

"It has to be a position for Xi's loyal follower to convey the president's instructions," he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19210708

File: 33f75e39a5f7507⋯.jpg (471.9 KB,2286x1524,3:2,Foreign_Minister_Qin_Gang_….jpg)

File: 85b1de36a9ef92e⋯.jpg (1.25 MB,3937x2625,3937:2625,Qin_Gang_has_been_consider….jpg)

File: 85ebe520c82e711⋯.jpg (1.53 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Qin_Gang_met_with_US_Secre….jpg)

File: 1997a0683cea56a⋯.jpg (1.45 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Former_Chinese_foreign_min….jpg)

File: 5014c04ece1db34⋯.jpg (112.06 KB,1024x682,512:341,Qin_Gang_s_absence_could_d….jpg)

>>19210696

2/2

Why Qin's disappearance is significant

Beijing rarely discloses senior officials' health problems.

Even after high-level dignitaries leave office, their health status is considered taboo in the media and social media.

The mention of Mr Qin's health provoked intense interest from China watchers and the overseas Chinese diaspora.

Despite the censorship, there has been speculation that Mr Qin's disappearance could be linked to an alleged personal indiscretion or internal power struggle in the CCP.

"It's extremely rare for a foreign minister to disappear for so long. It hasn't happened during more than 40 years of the reform and opening up," Mr Deng said.

"Qin has just been in office for six months and has made no obvious mistakes, hence the possibility of a high-level tug-of-war is very unlikely.

"It's possible that he is really sick, but with rumours swirling during his disappearance, we can't rule out the possibility that someone is using these theories against Xi."

What does Qin's absence mean for Australia?

Mr Qin's disappearance comes at a time of intense diplomatic activity as Mr Xi looks to push through his diplomatic agenda.

Mr Qin's superior, director of the CCP's Central Commission for Foreign Affairs Wang Yi, is likely to attend several important events in his stead.

The timing means the Diplomatic and Strategic Dialogue, scheduled for the end of July, has been put on the backburner for now.

Meanwhile, the tenure of Australian ambassador to China Graham Fletcher is coming to an end in August.

Mr Qin's continued absence as the most senior official in China's foreign ministry could postpone the appointment of Mr Fletcher's successor.

This is because China's foreign minister is required to co-sign a letter of credence - a diplomatic letter that designates a foreign ambassador - along with the president.

Without the approval for the new envoy to China, diplomatic activities including conversations about Mr Albanese's visit to China may be postponed.

Mr Deng said China would not leave the foreign minister's role vacant for too long, to the detriment of both domestic political stability and foreign relations.

"The conclusion will probably come in the next few days," he said.

"It's nothing more than Qin Gang continuing in his post, or the announcement of an acting minister."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-19/chinas-foreign-minister-qin-gang-disappears-from-public-view/102615228

https://edition.cnn.com/videos/world/2023/07/18/qin-gang-china-foreign-minister-xi-aide-ripley-contd-ebof-vpx.cnn

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19211137

File: 0ca8279b3016096⋯.jpg (74.68 KB,1619x911,1619:911,Anthony_Albanese_said_the_….jpg)

>>19199716

>>19204786

Indigenous voice to parliament: Anthony Albanese undermined on treaty claim

ROSIE LEWIS - JULY 19, 2023

Supporters of an Indigenous voice have said the body must be established so it can negotiate treaty, undermining Anthony Albanese’s declaration that the referendum is “not about a treaty”.

The Coalition accused the Prime Minister of making misleading claims in a heated and lengthy interview with 2GB’s Ben Fordham on Wednesday, in which Mr Albanese contradicted one of the architects of the Uluru Statement from the Heart Megan Davis by saying the voice wouldn’t be able to talk to the ­Reserve Bank of Australia.

Mr Albanese also said the voice was not about compensating Aboriginal people, and vowed that his government would absolutely reject its advice at times – including if it suggested changing Australia Day.

“This is not about a treaty. This is the issue here – we’ve had a debate about things that aren’t happening rather than about things that are,” Mr Albanese said. “Read the (referendum) question, which you’re going to be asked about. It isn’t about anything else. It’s not about treaty, it’s not about compensation, it’s simply about ­listening in order to get better ­outcomes.”

The Prime Minister was asked in May if the voice would lead to a treaty and truth-telling, and said: “They are very much a part of the next phase, if you like.

“And one of the things that a voice to parliament would be able to do is to talk about Makarrata – the need for agreement-making and coming together after a ­conflict.”

UNSW Law School professor Gabrielle Appleby and senior Uluru Dialogue member Eddie Synot wrote in March: “Voice precedes treaty because fair, modern treaty negotiations require first the establishment of a representative Indigenous body to negotiate the rules of the game with the state.

“It can’t be left to the state alone, and the state must have a group of people with whom to negotiate.”

The Uluru statement called for a voice followed by a Makarrata Commission – to supervise treaties – and truth-telling.

The Prime Minister on Wednesday ­rejected previous comments made by prominent Yes campaigner Thomas Mayo, including that the voice could be used for reparations and compensation for Indigenous Australians, and ­conceded support for the advisory body was trending downwards.

“People need to not raise red herrings. If this is successful and there’s a voice, it won’t have a right of veto,” he said.

“Get on board. You’re in a position to make a difference and to help it succeed, as are other people in the media, by talking about what’s it’s about, not by raising things that aren’t going to be relevant – what Thomas Mayo or any individual thinks.”

Conservative constitutional lawyer Greg Craven said Mr Albanese’s concise language on the voice was a huge improvement for the Yes campaign but warned a five to six-week official campaign as flagged by the Prime Minister earlier this week was “categorically the wrong strategy” because referendums were inherently different to elections.

“Once a person decides they’re going to vote no, they’ve decided. It’s over,” Professor Craven told The Australian.

“If you’ve got lots of people deciding to vote no now, which they clearly are, how are you going to win them back? The artillery needs to start firing from the beginning, so we’re ­behind.

“It really needs to come out – I can’t understate how important that is. We need guns and heavy cavalry and we need them now. There’s no point winning the last six weeks of the campaign. It’ll be too far gone.”

Opposition Treasury spokesman Angus Taylor said the voice had a broad scope and would be able to advise on matters beyond Indigenous affairs. The Albanese government’s proposed constitutional amendment states the voice “make representations to the parliament and the executive government of the commonwealth on matters relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples”, Mr Taylor said.

“The Prime Minister made a number of claims this morning that are misleading. The truth of the matter is, if he ­restricts the voice, that can be ­challenged in the High Court,” Mr Taylor said.

Mr Mayo and Professor Davis declined to comment.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-anthony-albanese-undermined-on-treaty-claim/news-story/a9545d9373603624d262b2d044c9c266

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19211159

File: 1921ee3416638c3⋯.jpg (1.88 MB,4270x2847,4270:2847,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 2fcc44eed8326c7⋯.jpg (1.31 MB,2362x1577,2362:1577,Voice_supporters_gather_fo….jpg)

>>19199716

‘Failure is not an option’: Dreyfus optimistic Voice referendum will overcome opposition

Farrah Tomazin - July 20, 2023

1/2

Toronto: Federal Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus says he is confident most Australians will support the Indigenous Voice to parliament once they are engaged with the issue, declaring change is long overdue and “failure is not an option”.

Speaking in Canada – where Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has tied his legacy to improving the lives of Indigenous people – Dreyfus also hit out at the No campaign, accusing it of stoking fear, raising “red herrings” and trying to confuse voters with misinformation ahead of this year’s referendum.

The referendum, which is expected to take place in October or November, will ask voters if they want to change the Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia and set up an advisory body allowing the parliament and the government to listen to what they have to about to say about the policies that affect them.

Asked how the government would ensure the Yes case would cut through given polls showed public support was waning, Dreyfus said campaigning would step up but added: “Some Australians won’t take a great deal of interest in this until much closer to the referendum date.”

“We have not set the date yet. As is always the case with Australian political events – like elections, or like the marriage equality plebiscite that we had – they get more intense as the day approaches,” he told this masthead.

“We can see that many people have still not engaged … I’m confident that Australians are going to support this.”

Dreyfus was in North America attending the Australia-Canada Economic Leadership Forum, which is co-chaired by former foreign affairs minister Julie Bishop and seeks to identify where the two countries can work more closely on trade, investment, climate change and foreign policy.

Indigenous issues were also a hot topic; Trudeau cited reconciliation as a shared value between the two nations while former Liberal Indigenous Australians Minister Ken Wyatt – who is now on the board of Energy Resources Australia – sat on a panel discussing Indigenous economic development.

Wyatt quit his party after Peter Dutton announced it would support the No case, while Trudeau has made it his mission to improve the fortunes of First Nations (Indians), Métis and Inuit citizens who make up Canada’s Indigenous peoples, which represent about 5 per per cent of the population.

In 2015, Trudeau campaigned for office promising further improvements in everything from infrastructure and education to new “nation to nation” relationships with the hundreds of Indigenous groups in Canada.

Tens of billions of dollars in reparations have also been paid by successive governments for various harms caused over the years.

“They are further advanced on the road to reconciliation and recognition than we are,” Dreyfus said, noting that Australia could learn from Canada’s experience, despite it not being perfect.

“We still haven’t achieved recognition in our constitutional for our First Peoples.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19211160

File: 3bba6ad528e5484⋯.jpg (486.18 KB,825x942,275:314,JT_3.jpg)

File: 8528e6ba851a804⋯.jpg (403.78 KB,2048x1362,1024:681,F1V_cwhWAAQUR3Z.jpg)

>>19211159

2/2

The attorney-general’s comments came as The Australian Electoral Commission published the official Yes and No cases on its website on Tuesday morning, which will be sent to all Australian households before the referendum.

While the Yes side argues that an Indigenous Voice would “unite the nation”, the No camp argues doing this would be “risky, unknown, divisive and opens the door to treaty and reparations”.

Its pamphlet also quoted constitutional expert and Indigenous voice supporter Professor Greg Craven, sparking a potential complaint to the electoral commission on the basis that he was taken out of context.

Professor Peter Yu, the inaugural vice president of the First Nations portfolio at the Australian National University, said the Yes campaign needed to do more to build momentum and consistently cut through the uncertainty that had been created.

Wyatt agreed, but said he was optimistic the majority of Australians would vote for change. Published opinion polls, however, do not look promising at this stage.

Last month, an exclusive survey conducted for this masthead by Resolve Strategic showed support had fallen from 53 to 49 per cent. Queensland, Western Australia and South Australia backed the no case, while Victoria and NSW were in favour.

Dreyfus said the No campaign’s approach was designed “to raise red herrings, to raise complications which aren’t there, to raise fears which shouldn’t be there – and in effect to misstate what this change to the Constitution is”.

When asked who would be to blame if the referendum failed, Dreyfus replied: “It’s not going to fail. Failure is not an option for me.”

https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/failure-is-not-an-option-dreyfus-optimistic-voice-referendum-will-overcome-opposition-20230720-p5dps5.html

https://twitter.com/JustinTrudeau/status/1681390172095512592

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19211168

File: d7a8c0d3aed110a⋯.jpg (4.85 MB,5300x3533,5300:3533,The_seafood_shop_in_the_Ho….jpg)

File: e9be9a45373c1b1⋯.jpg (2.9 MB,5294x3529,5294:3529,Indigenous_leader_Noel_Pea….jpg)

File: a896e3085e78df4⋯.jpg (3.03 MB,4938x3292,3:2,Indigenous_leader_Noel_Pea….jpg)

File: d8d981cfac8ffcc⋯.jpg (2.37 MB,4975x3317,4975:3317,Indigenous_leader_Noel_Pea….jpg)

>>19199716

‘I’m living on optimism’: Pearson finds hope for Voice in a Sydney Westfield

Caitlin Fitzsimmons - July 20, 2023

For Noel Pearson, a visit to the Liberal heartland of Hornsby on Thursday to campaign for the Indigenous Voice to parliament became a whistlestop foodie tour as friendly shopkeepers pushed samples of olives, seafood, doughnuts and coffee on the First Nations leader.

Joined by Liberal politicians and prominent Yes supporters, local federal MP Julian Leeser and local state MP Matt Kean, Pearson visited several shops in the Hornsby Westfield and also spoke to customers and stallholders at the outdoor food market.

Most people who spoke to Pearson, Kean and Leeser said they would be voting Yes in the referendum, which will be between October and December this year. Many asked for selfies.

Pearson agreed with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, who said earlier this week the Yes campaign “needed to be stronger in putting the case”.

“We need to get out there – this referendum is ours to win,” Pearson said.

Pearson, who comes from Cape York, said NSW was the third leg of his tour after the Sunshine Coast in Queensland and Tasmania. It also included an event with Labor MP Tanya Plibersek, and campaigning in Newcastle with the Catholic Archdiocese.

Pearson said getting out and meeting people made him optimistic about the outcome of the referendum.

“I’m really pleased with the reaction, it’s a shot in the arm talking to ordinary people in the street,” Pearson said. “I’m living on optimism and hope, and I’m getting it.”

Pearson said it was important to campaign with both Liberal and Labor politicians, so voters did not construe it as a partisan matter.

Kean said he was actively trying to get Yes supporters in the Liberal Party to join the campaign.

Pearson said the opposition to the Voice came from the far right and the far left, and that should comfort mainstream Australians.

“The Voice is right down the middle, it’s a sensible balance,” Pearson said.

“It’s substantive, it’s meaningful, but it’s not radical. The measure for that is that we’ve got both extreme ends against it, whereas down the middle is the Voice.”

Gita Sundarji, who lives near Hornsby, said Indigenous people “should absolutely have a say in everything that’s going on in the country”.

Local Liberal party branch members John Ringrose, 77, and his wife Meg said they supported the Voice. Meg said she was a Wiradjuri woman who grew up mostly in Sydney.

Trevor Davis, 83, backed “a Yes to the Voice and a yes to compassion”, but he regularly received anti-Voice emails from about three “conservative email friends”.

Ivan Bosnich said he was always talking up the Voice down at the Hornsby Men’s Shed where he runs the toys program.

“Indigenous people need to be respected and to be included, and after all, it was their land,” Bosnich said.

He said the 170-odd members of the Men’s Shed come from “different walks of life”, so his views had a mixed reception.

Christa, a stallholder selling honey who declined to give her surname, said she was undecided because it was unclear if all Aboriginal people wanted it.

Pearson told her about the opinion polls saying the Voice had 80 per cent support among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, the highest of any group.

He told the Herald the level of Indigenous support was one of the most common questions he got when he was out campaigning, along with whether it would deliver practical outcomes.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/nsw/i-m-living-on-optimism-pearson-finds-hope-for-the-voice-in-a-sydney-westfield-20230720-p5dpwi.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19211171

File: 23355047c6b0d9e⋯.jpg (649.5 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_Northern_Territory_wil….jpg)

>>19199716

Alice Springs alcohol restrictions to continue for at least two years after drops in NT crime rates

LIAM MENDES and SARAH ISON - JULY 20, 2023

The Northern Territory will ­extend alcohol restrictions in Alice Springs for at least two years after incidents of domestic violence and assault plummeted by more than a third.

The move follows an outcry from locals who had demanded for months that grog bans be ­implemented.

As the restrictions were ­extended, pressure on Anthony Albanese over the Indigenous voice referendum intensified, with supporters saying the body must be established so it can negotiate a treaty, undermining the Prime Minister’s declaration that the referendum was “not about a treaty”.

In January Mr Albanese ­announced alcohol restrictions would be implemented in Alice Springs after The Australian revealed the extent of the crime wave gripping the town following the expiry of federal “Stronger Futures” restrictions in July 2022.

The restrictions introduced takeaway alcohol bans on Mondays and Tuesdays, and limits to the purchasing of alcohol during the rest of the week, and town camps and communities reverted back to being complete dry zones in February.

The Australian understands the decision, to be announced on Thursday morning, was made following “extensive” analysis of crime data by the NT ­government. But it has rattled the travel and hospitality industries which fear they will bear the brunt of the decision.

One government source said there were “huge amounts of data” behind the decision, which would “save women and children”. Figures analysed by The Australian in June showed total recorded assaults in Alice Springs dropped from more than 260 in January to 170 in April. At the time, an NT government spokeswoman said it was clear the measures did work. “Over the last three months we have seen these alcohol ­restrictions work, and support our community and frontline workers,” she said.

“Domestic violence has dropped by a third in the months since the takeaway alcohol restrictions were reintroduced into the Northern Territory town.”

In December, weeks before the NT government reinstated alcohol restrictions, assaults in Alice Springs reached a record high, at 368 incidents in a month.

It is the second time the restrictions have been extended, with a previous extension occurring in April.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/alice-springs-alcohol-restrictions-to-continue-for-at-least-two-years-after-drops-in-nt-crime-rates/news-story/e67364def543b81e29a67cc333e5db31

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19211199

File: 26ea40fbb883c79⋯.jpg (209.43 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_has_recen….jpg)

File: 4e7e0302c0e1c1b⋯.jpg (176.38 KB,1280x719,1280:719,Brittany_Higgins_holiday_p….jpg)

File: 58f222b29d4c0da⋯.jpg (68 KB,1280x720,16:9,Former_Minister_for_Defenc….jpg)

File: 28ebbf0946ec4a1⋯.jpg (406.43 KB,825x1253,825:1253,BHiggins_5.jpg)

File: fd570c11f62c3cc⋯.jpg (170.1 KB,825x408,275:136,BHiggins_6.jpg)

>>19194509

>>19204809

‘Prefer to silence victims’: Brittany Higgins blasts Linda Reynolds

STEPHEN RICE - JULY 20, 2023

Brittany Higgins has blasted former defence minister Linda Reynolds for suggesting it should be illegal for anyone who believes a crime has been committed to fail to report it to police, saying “instead of solving the problem, there are people who would prefer to just silence victims”.

In an increasingly bitter public stoush between the two women, Ms Higgins has claimed that the proposal by Senator Reynolds “completely undermines all the crucial work done by the #LetHerSpeak campaign and the #March4Justice movement.”

In a submission to the Sofronoff Inquiry, revealed by The Australian on Wednesday, Senator Reynolds argued that the ACT Crimes Act should be amended to deter individuals from using the media and/or Parliamentary forums in relation to an alleged criminal offence that ought properly be the subject of the criminal justice processes.

Senator Reynolds pointed to a section of the NSW Crimes Act that makes it an offence for anyone who knows or believes that a serious indictable offence has been committed and fails to report it to police.

On Thursday Ms Higgins, while not directly naming Senator Reynolds, posted an extract from the article on Twitter.

“Imagine being the person earnestly attempting to change the Crimes Act to make it illegal for alleged sexual assault survivors to talk about their lived experience? As opposed to, you know, reforming the justice system to actually prosecuting perpetrators,” Ms Higgins wrote.

The former political staffer has recently been in Geneva, Switzerland, where she interned at the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women.

Ms Higgins alleges she was sexually assaulted by fellow Liberal staffer Bruce Lehrmann in Senator Reynolds parliamentary office in March 2019 – a claim he has vehemently denied.

Ms Higgins’ rebuke comes just two weeks after she claimed the Liberal MP “continues to harass me through the media and in the parliament”.

Ms Higgins posted on social media a series of newspaper headlines that she claimed originated “from a current Australian Senator who continues to harass me through the media and in the parliament”.

“This has been going on for years now. It is time to stop,” Ms Higgins said.

“My boss who has publicly apologised for mishandling my rape allegation. Who has had to publicly apologise after defaming me in the workplace. Who had a whole bunch of questionable conduct during my rape trial. Who is suing my fiance for a tweet.”

Senator Reynolds’ lawyers sent Ms Higgins a concerns notice – which is a -precursor to a defamation lawsuit – threatening legal action over the post.

Ms Higgins responded that she was “considering my legal options”.

Senator Reynolds is already suing Ms Higgins’ fiance, David Sharaz, for defamation over two tweets that he posted last year but had not been able to serve him with a summons.

Earlier this month she was granted permission by the court to allow service of the summons to be effected by email to Mr Sharaz’s personal email accounts, as well as to Ms Higgins’ lawyer.

Senator Reynolds has indicated she will refer Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus to the new National Anti-Corruption Commission over the payment of more than $2.5m in compensation to her former staffer following Ms Higgins’ claims her allegations of rape were mishandled.

“The basis for the settlement and the reasons why the Attorney-General barred me and Senator (Michaelia) Cash from defending serious allegations against us have not been explained to us or to the Australian people,” she said.

Mr Dreyfus has consistently refused to answer questions regarding Ms Higgins’ multi¬million-dollar payout, which was provided without the consultation of former senior Liberal ministers who were at the centre of her claims.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/prefer-to-silence-victims-brittany-higgins-blasts-linda-reynolds/news-story/2edbb81946c9e0a3106cb6b99b282ba5

https://twitter.com/BrittHiggins_/status/1681842657688190976

https://twitter.com/BrittHiggins_/status/1681842661874077697

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19211235

File: 6a4198e2c688d79⋯.jpg (527.32 KB,2400x1440,5:3,The_Australian_government_….jpg)

>>19188991

Australia to gain priority access to US military equipment under Washington proposal

AUKUS requests would be handled faster than almost all applications ‘other than from Taiwan and Ukraine’

Daniel Hurst - 20 Jul 2023

1/2

Australian requests for US military equipment would be handled faster than almost all applications “other than from Taiwan and Ukraine” under a proposal before the US Senate.

The Australian government has long viewed the complex web of US export controls as a potential barrier to the AUKUS security partnership.

But US senators are pushing to ease export control bottlenecks, as well as demanding regular reports on how measures under the AUKUS deal are “strengthening the United States strategic position in Asia”.

The AUKUS deal extends beyond the high-profile project for Australia to acquire eight nuclear-powered submarines. The US and the UK also want to collaborate on advanced capabilities such as hypersonic weapons, quantum technologies, artificial intelligence and undersea technologies.

Australia has generally preferred to push for export-control reforms out of the public eye, although a Defence official made unusually frank comments in May about “a permafrost layer of middle management”.

Under a proposal that has garnered bipartisan support in the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Australia and the UK would gain priority access to transfer defence equipment and services related to AUKUS.

The legislation – proposed by the committee chair, Bob Menendez – says the US president should ensure such requests “receive expedited consideration and processing relative to all other letters of request other than from Taiwan and Ukraine”.

The proposal is to be added to the annual Department of State Authorization Act.

Elsewhere, the proposed legislation argues the US should be proactive and not necessarily wait for letters of request.

The administration, it says, should draw up “a list of advanced military platforms, technologies, and equipment that are pre-cleared and prioritized for sale and release to Australia, the United Kingdom and Canada”.

The legislation also sets up a process to exempt AUKUS countries from licensing and approval requirements, so long as the secretary of state, Antony Blinken, makes an assessment that those countries have export controls comparable to US standards.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19211239

File: 16086640a8c889a⋯.jpg (2.53 MB,4256x2832,266:177,A_Virginia_class_attack_su….jpg)

>>19211235

2/2

Under Menendez’s proposal, the US administration would have to submit a report to congressional committees every two years setting out progress on AUKUS.

It says the report should identify “the defensive military capability gaps and capacity shortfalls that the AUKUS partnership seeks to offset” and the total costs to the US of the submarine project.

Congressional committees would also be seeking “a detailed explanation of how enhanced access to the industrial base of Australia is contributing to strengthening the United States strategic position in Asia”.

The report would provide a “detailed explanation of the military and strategic benefit provided by the improved access provided by naval bases of Australia”.

It would include “a detailed assessment of how Australia’s sovereign conventionally armed nuclear attack submarines contribute to United States defense and deterrence objectives in the Indo-Pacific region”.

Kurt Campbell, the White House Indo-Pacific coordinator, told a thinktank last month: “When submarines are provided from the United States to Australia, it’s not like they’re lost. They will just be deployed by the closest possible allied force.”

However, the Australian government has repeatedly said it will maintain sovereign control of the submarines, including at least three Virginia-class submarines that it will buy from the US in the 2030s.

While AUKUS has bipartisan support in the US, it remains unclear what version of the legislation will make it to the president’s desk for signing.

Menendez said his amendment “streamlines the export of US military technology, while ensuring that technology is safeguarded from adversarial espionage”.

“I look forward to working with my colleagues in both the Senate and House to pass this bill which will cement the AUKUS partnership for decades to come,” he said in a statement last week.

AUKUS will be on the agenda when Blinken and the US defence secretary, Lloyd Austin, travel to Australia for annual talks with foreign affairs minister, Penny Wong, and defence minister, Richard Marles.

The meeting will be held in Brisbane late next week. Marles and Austin are due to travel to north Queensland afterwards to watch troops participating in the Talisman Sabre exercise.

Marles told ABC TV on Wednesday there had been “a significant move forward in terms of force posture initiatives in Australia”, including the planned rotation of US submarines in Western Australia from 2027.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jul/20/australia-us-aukus-military-defence-equipment-priority-access-export-control

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19211252

File: 7a65ab56c7a8d47⋯.jpg (237.58 KB,1350x1080,5:4,Three_vehicles_involved_in….jpg)

File: 1dc7cddb0bfb82d⋯.jpg (264.35 KB,1350x1080,5:4,Crews_worked_through_the_n….jpg)

File: 89e858de2fee293⋯.jpg (1.16 MB,2776x2082,4:3,Truck_driver_Charitha_Schi….jpg)

>>19204909

>>19204962

>>19205012

Bruce Highway reopens after multi-vehicle crash involving US tank

Katrina Beavan, Paul Culliver, and Jasmine Hines - 20 July 2023

Both lanes of the Bruce Highway are now open, as investigators piece together the chain of events that led to a fiery multi-vehicle crash involving a US military tank in central Queensland.

The seven-vehicle crash happened near Bajool, south of Rockhampton, yesterday morning.

It involved multiple caravans, a B-double truck and a semi-trailer carrying a US army tank en route to a military exercise.

Three of the vehicles were on fire when police arrived.

Six people were taken to hospital.

Two remain in stable conditions and others have been discharged.

Capricornia District Police Inspector Ben Carroll said earlier this morning there was still one vehicle being removed from the scene.

"The heat of that fire would've melted a lot of the [bitumen] so we'll have to do a lot of work to clean it up," he said.

'Absolute mess'

Inspector Carroll said police were still piecing together the cause of the crash but initial investigations suggest a passenger vehicle failed to stop for an escort vehicle accompanying the semi-trailer carrying the tank, causing a domino effect.

The tank was being transported from Gladstone port to the Shoalwater Bay training area for Exercise Talisman Sabre, a biennial training event involving Australian and US troops.

"That's our initial understanding … our crash investigators are still piecing it together," Inspector Carroll said.

"We were absolutely flabbergasted that no-one was killed out of that crash.

"[That] was the most pleasing thing, because it was an absolute mess."

Truck driver Charitha Schivanka said he felt incredibly lucky to walk away from the crash.

"It all happened in a couple of seconds," he said.

"The first thing I did was get out of the truck … and there's a huge fire and one of the cabins is burning — it was really hard to see.

"It was massive, flames and tyres blasting.

"It was burning for a good couple of hours."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-20/bruce-highway-partially-reopens-after-fiery-crash/102623750

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19211276

File: a120d3b18379f8e⋯.mp4 (15.62 MB,640x360,16:9,Troops_are_arriving_for_in….mp4)

>>19204909

Talisman Sabre military exercise brings foreign troops to Australia for war games

Lily Nothling and Mia Knight - 20 July 2023

Thousands of troops from 13 countries have descended on Queensland for the Talisman Sabre war games, the largest to date.

The biennial military exercise involving Australia and the United States has expanded over the past decade to include military partners and observers from many more countries in the Indo-Pacific region.

Tent cities have been set up to accommodate an influx of 30,000 troops across the state's north, which has become a hive of activity with armoured vehicles, warships and aircraft.

"It's the biggest, most ambitious military exercise Australia has conducted in recent memory," Commander of the Australian Army's Combat Training Centre, Colonel Ben McLennan, said.

"People have come from all over the world, equipment has come from all over the world, building up over months to get to this point."

The exercise is designed to strengthen international ties and test warfighting capabilities.

Military personnel from France, the United Kingdom, Japan, Indonesia and Pacific nations such as Papua New Guinea, Fiji and Tonga are among those taking part.

Germans join the fold

For the first time, Germany has joined the exercise, sending 170 paratroopers to participate amid rising tensions in the Indo-Pacific.

German army chief, Lieutenant General Alfons Mais, told the ABC the country wanted to boost its presence in the contested region.

"When the international rule-based order is under question or challenge I think it's good to get into contact with partners in order to understand what's going on, what are the dynamics and what are the key players?" Lt Gen. Mais said.

"That's why we are here.

"We want to send a message that we are interested in what's going on here, we want to portray ourselves as a reliable partner, where we share common values with Australia and other partners in the region."

Lieutenant General Mais said the new terrain would test the German soldiers.

"The German Army has never been in Australia and the environment here is completely different than in Central Europe… and the climate."

Tent cities

Much of the activity during Talisman Sabre will be concentrated around the Townsville Field Training Area.

Thousands of soldiers from participating countries will sleep side-by-side in a sprawling tent city called Camp Star.

The camp's kitchen manager, Sergeant Shaun Brennan, is responsible for keeping hungry troops fed during the exercise.

"This area has about 7,000 soldiers out here at this time – we're feeding 3,200 meals a day," he said.

The kitchen operates 24 hours a day, but those not allocated a meal rely on ration packs.

"No one is going more than one or two days of being fed a fresh meal," Sergeant Brennan said.

“Everyone loves a steak between two pieces of bread and some sauce – that’s generally what I find the soldiers enjoy the most.”

Another tent city has been set up at Australia's largest army base – Lavarack Barracks in Townsville.

Base manager Michelle Miller said the barracks, which was usually the base for about 4,000 soldiers, would host an additional 4,500 troops over the duration of the exercise.

"Because of the amount of people … that need to be accommodated, we have used up every available bed in a building on the base," she said.

Talisman Sabre runs until August 4.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-20/talisman-sabre-war-games-townsville-tent-city/102611442

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19211280

File: e35d0979eebf95d⋯.jpg (523.38 KB,4000x2667,4000:2667,German_army_chief_Lieutena….jpg)

>>19204909

>>19211276

Boxers and boots on the ground: tightening military ties with Germany

Andrew Tillett - Jul 20, 2023

Germany’s army chief has downplayed the prospect of a lucrative arms export deal for Australian-made armoured cars being canned, even if the Albanese government snubs a German design in favour of a Korean bid for a separate military vehicle contract.

Visiting Australia to mark the inaugural involvement of German troops in Australia’s premier war games, Lieutenant-General Alfons Mais also indicated his country’s armed forces, known as the Bundeswehr, planned to deepen ties with Indo-Pacific militaries as democracies unite to stand up for the international rules-based order.

“Germany’s commitment in the Indo-Pacific region is permanent and comprises a wide range of areas,” he said.

“We are here to strengthen relationships with partners. Not only the Australian Defence Force, but the US and France are participating, so partners we know already. It’s a signal to show the relevance of the region and where we can contribute.”

About 170 German paratroopers and 40 infantry from the navy’s Sea Battalion have come to Australia for Exercise Talisman Sabre, which begins on Saturday.

This year’s Talisman Sabre involves 30,000 military personnel from 13 countries taking part in fortnight-long military drills, including troops from Japan, Britain, New Zealand, Indonesia, Papua New Guinea and South Korea.

For the Germans, it’s a far cry from their usual training scenarios involving land-locked European exercises, exposing them to amphibious operations.

“We will … practice fighting in the Australian jungle together with our international partners,” General Mais said.

He said German personnel would be back for 2025’s Talisman Sabre. It is understood the German navy and air force will also return to Australia next year after deployments in 2021 and 2022 respectively.

General Mais visited German arms manufacturer Rheinmetall’s factory near Brisbane on Tuesday. The factory is producing Boxer combat vehicles for the Australian army, and an export deal worth $1 billion has been struck for Rheinmetall to produce 100 of the variants for the German army.

However, there are concerns this deal is tied to the Albanese government selecting Rheinmetall’s Lynx design for the army’s new infantry fighting vehicle contract ahead of Korean rival Hanwha’s Redback design. A decision could come as early as next week.

General Mais said Australian-made Boxers would play a pivotal role in meeting the German army’s requirements, amid a scramble among militaries for new armoured vehicles following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

“I’m totally convinced, and I hope that our parliament will decide in the fourth quarter of 2023 that the contract can be signed. I’m expecting the first vehicle in 2025,” he said.

General Mais said the response to “Russia’s war of aggression” against Ukraine had been unequivocal, with increased security co-operation among partners, a focus on collective defence, and resolute support for Ukraine for as long as it takes.

“The whole military world is influenced by what we see in Ukraine, that’s for sure,” he said.

https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/boxers-and-boots-on-the-ground-tightening-military-ties-with-germany-20230720-p5dpva

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19211309

File: ce5cee9aefa9652⋯.jpg (1.13 MB,3957x2968,3957:2968,Jesse_Noble_is_a_captain_i….jpg)

File: b206f46fd2d4c68⋯.jpg (1.75 MB,3861x2722,3861:2722,Captain_Jesse_Noble_leads_….jpg)

File: d5a80c821ba42a3⋯.jpg (1.23 MB,3398x1911,3398:1911,Jesse_spoke_of_their_journ….jpg)

ADF captain's choice to wear female army uniform overhauls gender diverse policy

Nicole Curby - 14 Jul 2023

1/2

When Captain Jesse Noble realised they were gender diverse, it "was kind of like getting hit in the face with a truck".

"I really associate with both genders," Captain Noble said.

"It's this middle ground of the two."

At 35 years old, they had spent their entire life in the Pentecostal Church. They had a career as a captain in the Australian Army.

Their life seemed completely at odds with a genuine expression of their gender identity.

"I was very closeted about it," Captain Noble said.

"And I thought that I was basically going to tell maybe three people in my whole life."

Despite that, in February, Captain Noble took their heart in their hands and fronted up to their boss at Darwin's First Combat Signals Regiment.

"I said, 'Hey, so I'm going to be putting some paperwork up to you,'" they said.

"I'm gender diverse. I'm non-binary, and I am going to be opting for the female uniform."

Male dress standards in the army are stringent: hair must be cut shorter than 4 centimetres. No piercing, make-up or fingernail polish is permitted.

Captain Noble told their boss the female dress standards provided a greater range of gender expression in terms of who they were as a person.

According to army rules, non-binary and intersex people are not entitled to choose their uniforms.

Not knowing how the request would be received, Captain Noble pushed on.

"That's a really important step for me," they said.

"And I think it's an important step for the army as well."

Confronting change

It wasn't just the army Captain Noble had to confront.

"I was in a relationship that I really cared about," they said.

"The person that I was with loved Jesse, the big masculine but sensitive, strong army kind of guy.

"I knew it was going to be really, really challenging," they said.

Captain Noble approached their partner: "I don't really know how to go through this with you, but I love you, and I still want to be with you. Can we go on that journey?"

Rewriting defence policy

Captain Noble's boss gave immediate interim approval to wear the female uniform, and the request was then escalated up the chain of command.

In April, the forces command issued a new directive stipulating that gender-fluid, non-binary and intersex people could choose the uniform, grooming, physical standards and accommodation that best aligned with their gender identity.

The new policy impacts forces command, which makes up about 85 per cent of Australian Army personnel, and a similar policy is in place across the Royal Australian Air Force.

The navy is yet to adopt the changes, although wider change may be on the horizon.

"Defence is in the process of developing a new policy in relation to supporting transgender, gender-affirming, non-binary and all gender-diverse defence members," an Australian Defence Force spokesperson said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19211315

File: 25ccbcca6fdfef1⋯.jpg (1.4 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Lisa_Annese_says_gender_is….jpg)

File: 7a6af42598fa091⋯.jpg (426.18 KB,2048x2048,1:1,In_2010_Bridget_Clinch_was….jpg)

>>19211309

2/2

Changes to uniform and gender requirements are taking place across other industries, such as aviation, where Qantas and Jetstar scrapped male and female uniform categories in June 2023.

"It should be non-controversial to do something like this," said Lisa Annese, chief executive of Diversity Council Australia.

"Making uniform policies inclusive is easy to do. I think it's a no-brainer. It costs nothing."

But, she said, creating a genuinely inclusive workplace required broader structural and cultural change.

"Creating inclusive policies for gender diverse people, that's just one aspect of a more complex approach to diversity and inclusion, which focuses on safe workplaces, getting women represented in leadership, on equal pay, workplace flexibility, anti-racism," Ms Annese said.

Decades of fighting for ADF inclusion

Until 1992, openly gay people were banned from serving in the ADF.

When Chief Petty Officer Anita van der Meer was threatened with dismissal for being in a lesbian relationship, she took her case to the Australian Human Rights Commission.

That led to then-prime minister Paul Keating lifting the ban on people in same-sex relationships serving in defence forces.

Eighteen years later, in 2010, Captain Bridget Clinch was served a discharge notice when she informed her chain of command she planned to transition.

Challenging the decision, Captain Clinch ultimately won the right for transgender and gender-diverse people to serve in the ADF.

Female fashion every day

In Captain Noble's personal life, their gender expression is fluid, including some masculine elements and a new and joyful exploration of female fashion.

In the army, dress standards are not to be mixed; individuals must choose one uniform and stick to it.

Even though Captain Noble often wears camouflage in their daily duties, their options have expanded.

"I can wear make-up now. My ears are pierced at work. I have longer hair than most male-presenting people do at work. My fingernails are painted," they said.

"I can choose how I present myself."

Captain Noble's relationship ultimately ended.

But some aspects of their gender journey have been easier than they anticipated.

"When I look at how much struggle and challenge queer people before me have gone through in terms of work, it's almost embarrassing how easy it's been," Captain Noble said.

"I guess that's where it's our responsibility to use the platform and the privilege we have to make change for others who may not have the same voice, who may not have had the same opportunities."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-14/adf-overhauls-gender-diverse-policy-captain-wears-female-uniform/102594080

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19211365

File: 55e27d22d73aa9c⋯.jpg (186.53 KB,1537x865,1537:865,Yumi_Stynes_and_Dr_Melissa….jpg)

File: f84a1d381f39860⋯.jpg (377.02 KB,1958x2500,979:1250,Welcome_to_Sex_has_been_pu….jpg)

>>19204858

Welcome to Sex guide for kids rockets to No. 1 after Big W removes it from the shelves

'CAROLINE OVERINGTON - JULY 20, 2023

A sex education guide for children has shot to No. 1 on the Amazon online sales charts after being pulled from the shelves at Big W and Target.

Welcome to Sex by the former “Dolly Doctor” Melissa Kang and ABC presenter Yumi Stynes contains frank descriptions of sex, alongside cartoon drawings.

It has been the subject of a boycott movement by some parents who say the sex tips it offers are far too graphic for children.

The book explains how to experience oral sex and anal sex. The “hand job” page shows a drawing of a hand on an erect penis. The “scissoring” page shows two naked women engaged with each other (in the spirit of inclusivity, one of them has only one arm.)

It refers to men as “penis-­owners” and females as “vagina-owners” and people are engaged in all manner of sex positions.

“A 69 is when two people are giving oral sex to each other at the same time,” it says. “Your sense of taste and smell can get more switched on.”

The page on anal sex has one drawing of a bar of soap, and another of a bottle of lubricant.

Welcome To Sex is being sold in the children’s book section at Dymocks.

Big W had been selling it in the “parenting” section before it was pulled.

The book was released in May but controversy erupted this week, when the chief executive of Women’s Forum, Rachael Wang, saw a copy in her local Big W.

Appalled by the content, she made a short video, which she posted to Instagram.

“Why is Big W selling this GRAPHIC SEX GUIDE FOR KIDS in Aus which includes how-tos for anal/oral sex, masturbation & heavily pushes gender ideology?” she wrote.

A campaign to have the book removed from Big W and other department stores was soon underway. On the face of it, the campaign would seem to have been successful, with Big W on Wednesday announcing its decision to pull the book from shelves.

However, that decision was made not because of the content but because staff were being ­abused by angry customers.

In a statement, Big W said: “We know there has been a wide range of views about the book, but it’s disappointing there have been multiple incidents of abuse directed at our store team members in the past 24 hours … To keep our team and customers safe, the book will be available to customers online-only from later today.”

The campaign has fuelled sales, however, with the book shooting to No. 1 on Amazon, and No.1 in the children’s section at online retailer Booktopia.

Amazon at time of writing was describing it as “No. 1” and “out of stock”, which suggests a massive rush of sales.

Despite that, it has a lowly two-star rating, which suggests those opposed to it are flooding the page with bad reviews.

In a statement on Instagram, Stynes said she was proud of the book, and hoped it would be read by children who might otherwise go to Google and end up who-knows-where on the internet.

The publisher, Hardie Grant Children’s Publishing, is also standing by the book, describing it as “a little book packed with honest advice … It aims to keep sex fun, real, and shame-free.”

Literary agent Benython Oldfield said on Instagram: “Very proud to be associated with ­‘Welcome to Sex’. To the lovely people who have abused floor staff at Big W, you have managed to give this book an immense amount of coverage and created a bestseller.”

In a post on Instagram, Stynes said children needed to learn about sex and consent at a young age to combat the “putrid effects of porn on real-world sex”.

She criticised those customers who “think it’s OK to abuse retail staff and business owners for stocking a book. They also think it‘s OK to abuse me and others for posting about the book”.

“I’m really proud of Welcome to Sex,” Stynes wrote.

“It’s a book, people. If you don’t want to read it, by all means, don’t read it. If you don’t want your kids to read it, you REALLY don’t have to buy it for them.”

She said the book was aimed at “keeping us all safe in moments of intimacy – and starting that teaching young.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/arts/books/welcome-to-sex-guide-for-kids-rockets-to-no-1-after-big-w-removes-it-from-the-shelves/news-story/1e0689e20855aeb281e4d5a5bcaca114

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19211387

File: 24de40cad5df984⋯.jpg (77.52 KB,1200x675,16:9,Yumi_Stynes_and_Dr_Melissa….jpg)

File: 362eaf50422e6e3⋯.jpg (125.56 KB,1080x1350,4:5,341752801_6094636017278689….jpg)

File: 96b3bb15f3e97bb⋯.jpg (38.47 KB,479x702,479:702,Susan_McLean_is_a_cybersec….jpg)

>>18992091 (pb)

>>19139080 (pb)

>>19204858

>>19211365

'No, your kids shouldn't send nudes even with their faces removed. Here's why'

“They are encouraging behaviour which is likely to cause a young person to be arrested and charged and that is not ok.”

Cindy Lever - July 20, 2023

1/2

A cyber safety expert has condemned a controversial book written for children as young as eight, describing it as “dangerous” and “complete misinformation”.

The book, Welcome to Sex: Your no-silly-questions guide to sexuality, pleasure and figuring it out by Yumi Stynes and Dr Melissa Kang, has sparked debate around sex education for children, with many parents furious.

Big W, which was criticised for stocking it, bowed to pressure this week and removed it from sale.

One section of the book discusses sending nude pictures and sexting, which Dr Kang likens to love letters that were once sent before phones, ignoring the innocence of those letters, which were generally written by adults, compared to the explicit pictures and videos that can be sent today and shared to the world instantly.

The authors write that if they were talking to their own children about sending nudes, they’d advise them to crop their heads off just in case, because once a picture is out there you have no control over it.

However, cyber safety expert with 27 years in law enforcement, Susan McLean, said she was concerned about the peddling of misinformation on such an important topic.

“These people haven’t a clue about the reality of the digital world,” she stresses.

“They are encouraging behaviour which is likely to cause a young person to be arrested and charged and that is not ok.

“The head is not the important part; you are still creating child abuse material which is a very serious offence.”

"Once you send an image you have lost control over it"

Ms McLean said minors sending nudes was a crime in Australia, except for Victoria in certain situations, and if convicted, kids could become registered sex offenders.

“Once you send an image you have lost control over it,” she said.

“A naked image is very attractive to a child sex offender, and they can end up on the computer of a paedophile or traded in a paedophile forum.”

She says parents and their children need to be made aware that the offence of making, possessing, and transmitting child abuse material is very serious.

“I have seen children become blackmailed at school. It became a competition among the boys of ‘guess the body’ from a headless nude photo,” McLean says.

“I’ve seen paedophiles tell children to just chop their head off and eventually they get a full nude photo.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19211391

File: 63d8c5efd8872b0⋯.jpg (167.87 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Psychiatrist_Jillian_Spenc….jpg)

>>19211387

2/2

"This book needs a lot of explanation and discussion"

Ms McLean provides cyber security education covering nude photos and consent to primary and high schools across Australia daily, and says her classes are done in a way that is age and developmentally appropriate and not encouraging illegal behaviours.

“It is a battle,” she says of raising awareness on this issue.

“There is a lack of understanding of the digital world and many parents don’t have a clue, which is fine, but if they end up finding this resource it’s a disaster.

“Parents should educate themselves and make sure they are using a legitimate and factually correct resource.”

Ms McLean said the fact the book was available in school libraries, where children were sneaking a look rather than taking it home, was very concerning because it did not allow for adults to engage with children while they were reading.

“This book needs lots of explanation and discussion,” McLean says.

"It tells them their naked body is the primary focus"

Child psychiatrist, Dr Jillian Spencer says she has seen children charged by police with the distribution of child exploitation material in her practice.

“Encouraging children to chop their head off naked images sends an uncomfortable message,” she said.

“It tells them their naked body is the primary focus when attempting to connect and form relationships with other people.

“It is important that we don’t strip away from children the truth: that attraction between people is a bit uncontrollable and a bit magic and is influenced by factors that aren’t always visible or easily described.”

Dr Spencer explains that exposure to sexual concepts needs to occur gradually and tailored to the child’s individual stage of development.

“The book appears to inundate children with a lot of graphic adult sexual information and pictures,” she says.

“It describes sex acts without any relationship context.

“It is likely to frighten some children and encourage children to view sex as a series of acts that are separate from any emotional connection with another person.”

"Unless we speak up it will end in tears for too many young people"

McLean agrees that it reduces a young woman to the sum of her body parts, which is not empowering.

“It is misleading, dangerous and damaging content,” she stated.

“Unless we all speak up it will end in tears for far too many young people.”

She also stressed the age of consent is stated as 16 in the book, but it can be 18 if the person is a sport coach, youth coach, pastor or teacher or person in authority, which is not mentioned anywhere in the book.

“We need resources to counteract pornography, but this is not one of them,” McLean states emphatically.

https://www.kidspot.com.au/news/no-your-kids-shouldnt-send-nudes-even-with-their-faces-removed-heres-why/news-story/2cdf13b7bc9e332374ba528a72a36a4b

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

01db62 No.19211404

File: 65c2f21d15e5cde⋯.jpg (12.41 MB,7136x4392,892:549,SouthAfricaSatanists5.jpg)

Elon Musk

Evergreen

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19211499

File: 6db76dcda6d7a89⋯.jpg (627.54 KB,2500x1667,2500:1667,Jim_Caviezel_plays_real_li….jpg)

File: 5d86aaa4295079c⋯.jpg (521.09 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Jim_Caviezel_in_Sound_of_F….jpg)

File: 6f983447a82aeec⋯.jpg (393.22 KB,825x1235,165:247,RJ_1.jpg)

File: d1a92d451ad8b83⋯.mp4 (14.27 MB,540x960,9:16,pAKVrGfLEP0XnZ0S.mp4)

The QAnon-adjacent film that’s become a massive box office hit

Garry Maddox - July 20, 2023

1/2

It’s the surprise hit in American cinemas – a thriller about rescuing sex-trafficked children – that has sparked debate about its links to QAnon conspiracies.

On the way to breaking $US100 million any day now, Sound of Freedom has been championed by such far-right figures as Steve Bannon and My Pillow proprietor Mike Lindell. And now Donald Trump is hosting a screening at one of his golf clubs.

The film has Jim Caviezel playing a real-life Homeland Security agent, Tim Ballard, who quits his government job for a mission to rescue children from sex traffickers in Colombia.

It has taken $US96.1 million ($142 million) at the US box office since opening on Independence Day, a stunning performance for a film made outside the Hollywood studio system and released without a major publicity campaign.

While most of the attention has been on the latest Indiana Jones and Mission: Impossible movies before Barbie and Oppenheimer open this week, box office for Sound of Freedom jumped 37 per cent on its second weekend.

Noting that the film is non-partisan, industry website Deadline Hollywood said ticket sales had been fuelled by right-wing groups and the faith-based audience of distributor Angel Studios.

The real-life Ballard founded the charity Operation Underground Railroad, which claims to have rescued thousands of children and women from traffickers since 2013. In the Trump presidency, he co-chaired a council established to guide federal anti-trafficking policymaking.

The film’s producer, Eduardo Verastegui, was a member of Trump’s Advisory Commission on Hispanic Prosperity.

The former president is hosting a screening at his Bedminster golf club in New Jersey, with Caviezel, Ballard and Verastegui set to attend.

Directed by little-known Alejandro Monteverde, Sound of Freedom plays into conspiracy theories about so-called elites sexually enslaving children, which have flourished on right-wing social media since the 2016 presidential election.

The most infamous example resulted in a North Carolina man firing shots in a Washington pizza parlour he believed, from a bizarre fake news conspiracy, was a front for a paedophile ring.

Caviezel has often starred in faith-based movies since playing Jesus in Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ almost two decades ago. In late 2021, he spoke at a QAnon convention in Las Vegas, referring to the fight against liberal values and citing the popular QAnon phrase “the storm is upon us”.

His character declares in the film that “God’s children are not for sale” after learning that sex trafficking is “the fastest growing international crime network that the world has ever seen”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19211527

File: 72aa31de9b7f916⋯.jpg (243.35 KB,825x1103,825:1103,LF_1.jpg)

File: 4f76a15d5bbcbd8⋯.mp4 (15.45 MB,540x960,9:16,3Oz7lSfnrrTX9DBM.mp4)

File: 9ca7a16b3c0b5a6⋯.jpg (119.32 KB,852x318,142:53,Q_3635.jpg)

>>19211499

2/2

American reviews for Sound of Freedom have been mixed and have often reflected on either its ethics or the way it has been co-opted for political reasons.

Variety called it “a compelling movie that shines an authentic light on one of the crucial criminal horrors of our time, one that Hollywood has mostly shied away from”. But only after noting that “the film could be seen as adjacent to the alt-right paranoia that was originally stoked by 4Chan and QAnon” that “the whole culture of liberalism is a racket to protect and cover up a cabal of paedophiles”.

Rolling Stone described it as a “QAnon-tinged thriller about child-trafficking [that] is designed to appeal to the conscience of a conspiracy-addled boomer”.

A reviewer for The New York Times said he felt queasy in the first 30 minutes.

“There are the scenes in which actual child actors perform being prepped for provocative pictures by adult groomers,” he wrote. “What are the ethics of depiction here?”

After noting the real-life Ballard had been accused of exaggerating his rescue narratives, the Times summed up the film as “kind of dull”.

On Twitter, Sound Of Freedom has been a hot topic, with claims that cinemas are inventing spurious technical and airconditioning problems to stop patrons watching the film and counterclaims that right-wing groups are booking out sessions that no-one attends to boost box office.

So far, there are no signs of an Australian cinema release.

The chief executive of Palace Cinemas, Benjamin Zeccola, said the film did not have a distributor here yet but there had been some demand from customers wanting to watch it.

“First and foremost, we’d need to see the film,” he said. “And until we see the film, we can’t really make a judgement on it.”

But Zeccola was concerned about its championing by far-right figures in the US.

“Any association with QAnon or any of that rubbish would be deeply regrettable,” he said. “From what I can see [in the media coverage] the content in the film isn’t that controversial. The controversy comes from these weird sects that are supporting it and promoting it or claiming it.”

Another industry executive, who asked not to be identified so he could speak freely, had no doubt Sound of Freedom would get a cinema release.

“It’s been so phenomenally successful in the US that there’s clearly going to be an appetite for it globally,” he said. While faith-based films tended to be less successful in this country than in the US, “that audience does exist here and it’s very potent”.

Garry Maddox is a Senior Writer for The Sydney Morning Herald.

https://www.smh.com.au/culture/movies/the-qanon-adjacent-film-that-s-become-a-massive-box-office-hit-20230719-p5dpeo.html

https://variety.com/2023/film/reviews/sound-of-freedom-review-jim-caviezel-1235660035/

https://www.rollingstone.com/tv-movies/tv-movie-reviews/sound-of-freedom-jim-caviezel-child-trafficking-qanon-movie-1234783837/

https://twitter.com/MAGAlydiafree/status/1681274130950242305

https://twitter.com/GeoRebekah/status/1681443594144718848

Q Post #3635

Nov 25 2019 16:34:40 (EST)

Sometimes a good 'movie' can provide a lot of truth and/or background.

'Official Secrets.'

Relevant today?

Enjoy the show!

Q

https://qanon.pub/#3635

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19217202

File: f1bcadba3cf5aa6⋯.jpg (182.55 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Big_W_had_been_broadcastin….jpg)

>>19199716

Big W pulls Indigenous voice to parliament plugs from in-store messages

PAIGE TAYLOR - JULY 21, 2023

Big W has pulled public address announcements about the Uluru Statement from the Heart and the Indigenous voice to parliament from all its stores, citing feedback from customers and staff.

The retail chain, owned by Woolworths Group, had been broadcasting an acknowledgment of country in Big W stores for more than a year and will revert to those, The Australian has confirmed.

However, this month, to coincide with the NAIDOC Week annual celebration of Indigenous culture, Big W launched a new acknowledgment of country that included a reference to the 2017 Uluru Statement from the Heart and its call for a voice. The Woolworths Group was one of the first big corporates to support the Uluru Statement and its call for an Indigenous voice to parliament.

“Last year we began playing an acknowledgment of country across our store network,” a Big W spokesperson said.

“As a part of NAIDOC Week, a new acknowledgment of country was launched in Big W stores that referenced the Uluru Statement from the Heart.

“Based on customer and store team feedback, we will be reverting to the previous acknowledgment of country in-store message. We recognise and respect our team and customers have varying views and perspectives.”

The Australian found one complaint about the announcements on Woolworths’ Facebook page on Thursday.

An account under the name Tony Hinton posted: “I object strongly to BigW making in-store announcements supporting the Uluru Statement from the Heart and telling customers how important it is for the company that you vote ‘Yes’ in The Voice referendum.”

While the abandoned version of the acknowledgment of country made it clear Big W supports the Indigenous voice, the announcements did not explicitly tell customers to vote yes.

The words of the previous messages were:

“Hi, my name is XXX, proud XXX man / woman and I am a Big W XXX (position – team leader, team member, etc).

“We acknowledge the many traditional owners of the lands on which we operate, and pay our respects to their elders past and present. We recognise their strengths and enduring connection to lands, waters and skies as the custodians of the oldest continuing cultures on the planet.

“We remain committed to actively contributing to Australia’s reconciliation journey through listening and learning, empowering more diverse voices and working together for a better tomorrow. We reaffirm our support for the Uluru Statement from the Heart, and its calls for a First Nations voice to parliament enshrined in the Constitution.”

Woolworths Group was criticised for not listening to Indigenous communities over its push to establish a Dan Murphy’s in Darwin within a short distance of three dry Indigenous communities. After a five-year legal and political battle, the company abandoned its plan in 2021. It has since established a First Nations Advisory Board “to improve engagement with Indigenous communities and continue to make a meaningful contribution towards Closing the Gap and Reconciliation within Australia”.

The advisory board’s founding members included Sean Gordon – a member of Anthony Albanese’s referendum working group – and AFL champion Adam Goodes, who co-founded the Indigenous Defence and Infrastructure Consortium that provides education, skill training and employment opportunities for Indigenous Australians to support large defence and infrastructure projects.

The board counsels the Woolworths Group on matters including internal policies, advocacy positions, informing commercial and partnering decisions and Indigenous community engagement and empowerment.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/big-w-pulls-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-plugs-from-instore-messages/news-story/017d6e1ca51ab01175b35f446aaf58ff

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19217224

File: eded3452f8ee60d⋯.jpg (193.83 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Nyunggai_Warren_Mundine.jpg)

File: 35bf98de5746957⋯.jpg (210.65 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Professor_Greg_Craven.jpg)

>>19199716

>>19199725

Yes supporters of the Indigenous voice to parliament have raised some of the best reasons to vote No

NYUNGGAI WARREN MUNDINE - JULY 21, 2023

1/2

Official Yes and No campaign pamphlets for the referendum have been released. Yes campaigners are upset the No pamphlet quotes extensively from the voice’s supporters.

Greg Craven had the most explosive reaction, saying he was beside himself with rage that the No pamphlet included this statement he made about the proposed constitutional amendment in an interview with 2GB: “I think it’s fatally flawed because what it does is retain the full range of review of executive action. This means the voice can comment on everything from submarines to parking tickets … We will have regular judicial interventions.”

Craven accuses the No pamphlet writers of quoting him out of context. The context was the release of the constitutional amendment wording. The additional context is that he also said the voice had gone “off track” and that: “Over the past year, it’s really … been colonised by left-leaning ideologues from among the Indigenous community, trying to turn it from a model that was not run by the judges, to a model that absolutely guarantees judicial intervention.”

And: “The reality is that you really will have a situation where any person who wants to create difficulty for a government, tear its decisions down, will end up going to the High Court, either to say that the process hasn’t been properly followed or there’s some legal flaw … it will be very, very difficult for government to operate either because it will be constantly delayed, tied up in knots, or indeed because the courts end up intervening directly in the decision. It will be very hard for government to operate.”

For even more context, people can find Craven expressing the same views on the ABC and in The Australian. This week he says he was concerned about a “niggling drafting issue”. In March he said the amendment wording was a “ruthless con job”. The wording hasn’t changed. Craven declined to retract his views when given an opportunity this week on Sky News. In fact, he conceded the voice would have “great width” on what it could comment on, and the parliament would have to pass “very, very careful legislation to make sure the voice does not exceed its own position”.

But that’s impossible because the voice will have a constitutional right to make representations on any matter relating to Indigenous peoples. That’s everything.

Yes campaigners like to claim the voice’s remit will be limited to matters specific to Indigenous people or which affect Indigenous people differently because these two limbs were highlighted very, very carefully in bullet points in the Second Reading speech. But those words came after the word “include”. There’s no limitation.

Craven also claims the No pamphlet included his quote “without any acknowledgment” that he’s a supporter and campaigner for the voice. But the No pamphlet clearly and prominently states he “supports the voice”. Perhaps Craven overlooked those words like voice supporters overlook the word “include” in the Second Reading speech.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19217230

File: b20d4473d877e98⋯.jpg (757.99 KB,2048x2731,2048:2731,Noel_Pearson.jpg)

>>19217224

2/2

In his outburst Craven even took the opportunity to have a shot at me because of my previous collaboration with an organisation called Uphold & Recognise, which now supports the voice, saying, somewhat accusingly, that I have an “interesting history” on this topic and suggesting I’ve changed my position.

It’s no secret I published an essay six years ago for Uphold & Recognise, written before the Uluru Statement, advocating for a model of recognition that supports traditional owner groups having a say on their own languages, cultures, heritage, land and sea. And that’s a key reason I don’t support the voice. Because a national, representative Indigenous body will undermine traditional owner rights to speak for their own countries. Craven may have read my essay but clearly doesn’t understand it. In any event, I don’t see how it’s relevant to his unretracted and damning criticism of the proposal in March.

Craven claims in The Australian the Yes pamphlet is “so sincere and reasoned you want to slap it”. I needed to slap myself after reading the Yes campaign’s story of a magical wand called the voice that will miraculously cure all the problems. It also features one of the great myths of the campaign, that 80 per cent of Indigenous people support the voice. This claim is based on two polls of only 300 and 738 people.

The ABC has sent journalists to remote communities with larger populations than these survey pools to find almost everyone had never heard of the voice or didn’t understand what it was. And research for a pro-voice organisation, Passing the Message Stick, found 45 per cent of Indigenous people had never heard of it or didn’t understand it and 25 per cent of Indigenous people intend to vote No.

Craven’s defence of himself paints the now typical picture that the Yes campaign is on the side of the angels and the No campaign is “nasty” and “vicious”. I’m a bit sick of this kind of hypocrisy. Yes campaigners have hurled some of the most egregious abuse at Jacinta Nampijinpa Price and myself, including Noel Pearson, who accused us both of being “glove puppets” for white people, a comment I regard as a disgraceful piece of racial abuse.

If the Yes pamphlet was being sincere it would tell people the truth: neither symbolic recognition nor a great big new bureaucracy, as outlined in the Calma/Langton report, are capable of solving the problems facing many Aboriginal people. Only economic participation can do this: kids in school, adults in jobs, people able to create businesses and own their own homes. That isn’t achieved with a magic wand. It’s achievable only through hard graft and political courage.

The fact is that advocates for the voice have provided some of the most compelling reasons to vote No. In a few months, Australians will be asked to vote for exactly the same “con job” Craven warned us about in March. It would have been remiss of the parliamentarians who prepared the No pamphlet not to quote him.

Nyunggai Warren Mundine is Indigenous Forum director at the Centre for Independent Studies.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/yes-supporters-to-the-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-have-raised-some-of-the-best-reasons-to-vote-no/news-story/9f1e7e612f51db592e284594cb0fb65f

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19217244

File: 9d1401c95050add⋯.jpg (250.33 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Australian_Jewish_Associat….jpg)

File: f0add1861785d48⋯.jpg (241.02 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Jewish_Community_Council_o….jpg)

>>19199716

Australian Jewish Association says Indigenous voice to parliament advocacy goes against values

ROSIE LEWIS - JULY 21, 2023

A conservative pro-Israel community organisation that opposes an Indigenous voice to parliament has hit out at representative bodies for actively campaigning on the referendum, saying the ­Albanese government’s proposal was “contrary to Jewish values and community interests”.

Many major Jewish organisations have backed the voice, ­saying it resonates with them ­because they understand what it’s like to be voiceless.

But Australian Jewish Association president David Adler, who sits on the advisory board of No organisation Advance Australia, took issue with Jewish Community Appeal – which asks the community for money to help fund organisations’ ­programs and services to those in need – giving money to a group advocating for the voice.

The NSW-based JCA gave ­social justice group Stand Up, which is running the Kol Halev Jewish voice for Yes campaign, a $200,000 grant.

Stand Up said that money had not been used for its voice campaign, which hosted prominent Yes campaigner Thomas Mayo at an event in Sydney on Thursday night. Its Victorian arm hosted Indigenous leader Marcia Langton in Melbourne this month.

The Jewish Community Council of Victoria, the recognised roof body and voice of Victorian Jewry, supported Stand Up’s Melbourne launch.

“The Jewish community comprises a range of diverse opinions like the wider Australian community, yet some of the elitists in leadership positions seem to prioritise various left-wing and non-Jewish activism,” Dr Adler said.

“Will the JCA be making a $200,000 dollar grant to a Jewish group advocating for the No campaign? Many in our community would also be shocked that a body like the Jewish Community Council of Victoria, which claims to represent the entire Jewish community in its state, would be involved in divisive activism siding with the Yes campaign.

“AJA holds that the voice as proposed is contrary to Jewish values and community interests.”

AJA committee member and former NSW Zionist Council president Brian Levitan said he could not recall a case where funds for the Jewish community were diverted to an organisation backing one side of a political campaign “in such a blatant manner”. “Many would consider that a wholly inappropriate use of community funds,” he said.

JCA donor Terry Davis said he would hesitate before donating again. JCA was approached for comment.

Stand Up did not want to respond directly to AJA’s criticisms but told The Australian the launch events were exclusively funded by ticket sales, with around 300 attending the Melbourne event and more than 150 paid for the Sydney event.

“No funds from the JCA or JCCV have been used on the event, or on the Kol Halev campaign. The campaign is funded by individual donors who have decided to give directly to our community campaign,” Stand Up chair Dean Levitan said.

“As a community, we know, from our own history what it’s like to be voiceless. We believe that every community deserves a voice, a chance to be heard and to be listened to.”

JCCV president Daniel ­Aghion KC said: “Members voted unanimously to endorse the Uluru Statement from the Heart, and the voice to parliament. The JCCV’s support for the voice stems from this vote.”

AJA public affairs director Robert Gregory said it initially ­remained neutral on the voice but came out against it when other Jewish organisations publicly supported the Yes case. It is considering running No events.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/australian-jewish-association-says-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-advocacy-goes-against-values/news-story/2e923e29f19d3d14ca075cf64dcc1145

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19220640

File: 75a4a17c9244b85⋯.jpg (356 KB,2400x1440,5:3,Liberal_senator_Andrew_Bra….jpg)

>>19199716

Pro-voice Liberal Andrew Bragg calls for referendum delay to 2024 to ‘save the concept’

Bragg, who is campaigning for a yes vote, calls for months more work to find a model for the voice that would win bipartisan support

Amy Remeikis - 21 Jul 2023

One of the few Liberal MPs who support the Indigenous voice to parliament has appealed to the government to delay the referendum to next year.

Andrew Bragg, who is campaigning for a yes vote, said not enough “middle ground” had been established and he feared that lack of consensus had doomed the referendum to failure.

It was time to recalibrate to “save the concept”, he said, before running a referendum in mid-2024.

Polls show support for the voice has declined over this year, with the double majority needed to pass the referendum in doubt.

“They need to have a proper effort at building bipartisan support that can improve the product,” Bragg said in an interview with Sydney radio 2GB.

“Because it’s the product which is in question here. Not the marketing.”

Bragg said he did not think it was the “right thing” to let go of a constitutionally enshrined Indigenous voice to parliament, but he thought the government approach to establishing the wording of the referendum had left people behind.

“They should have established a committee last year to look at how you can build some consensus around the legal wording and also the detail,” he said. “On the marriage debate, only just five or six years ago, there was a bill on the table, which people could look at before they voted on.

“I would have thought on the voice, there would have been at least an exposure draft bill that could have been considered alongside the referendum question.”

The government says the specific details of the voice, including how many members it has and how they would be chosen, would be set by the parliament if the referendum was successful. Broad design principles of how the voice would operate have been available since March.

A bipartisan parliamentary committee examined the referendum legislation for four weeks and no changes were made to the question put forward by the government, which was informed by the voice working group.

The Nationals said they would be opposing the voice before the question was put forward. The Liberal party had been running a soft no campaign ahead of the referendum legislation debate before officially announcing it would also oppose the referendum.

The prime minister, Anthony Albanese, has said that given the Coalition’s opposition, he did not believe it would engage in any committee process in good faith and finding a bipartisan middle ground would have been impossible.

Bragg said delaying the referendum to allow a “four or five month” committee process could help to “recalibrate” the debate.

“I believe that there are different ways you can work the voice, there are more simple amendments that could have been considered,” he said.

“I mean, we had a shambolic committee process that ran for just four weeks, earlier this year, which recommended that the voice could not be improved in any way.

“Now, this is a concept which has been drafted in dozens of different ways over the last few years. So to argue that it can’t be improved is just intellectually dishonest.”

Albanese has previously said there were no circumstances in which he would consider delaying the vote.

“You only win when you run on the field and engage … we’re all in,” he said in May.

By law, the vote to alter the constitution must be held between two and six months of the referendum legislation passing. If the referendum was to be delayed, the parliament would have to pass new legislation setting it up, beginning the process from scratch.

Albanese has said the referendum will be held following a short campaign sometime between October and December.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/jul/21/delay-voice-to-parliament-referendum-2024-liberal-andrew-bragg

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19220746

File: 072b3e191b9dfae⋯.jpg (256.17 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Former_chief_of_the_defenc….jpg)

File: e98c9afb3b01053⋯.jpg (147.42 KB,1279x719,1279:719,Former_SAS_soldier_Ben_Rob….jpg)

>>18934029 (pb)

Why Ben Roberts-Smith defamation ruling has a long way to play out

CHRIS MERRITT - JULY 21, 2023

1/2

In order to make sense of the Ben Roberts-Smith case, one important point needs to be kept in mind: this was not a war crimes trial or a murder trial – at least not officially.

Allegations of murder and war crimes were at the heart of the argument. But the reality is that this was merely an expensive, complex private dispute.

The media defended the truth of reports that this man, a recipient of the Victoria Cross, murdered people in Afghanistan.

This vindicated the three journalists who had pursued him: Nick McKenzie, Chris Masters and David Wroe. But this affair is not over.

The judge’s ruling is subject to appeal and media reports say Roberts-Smith – who I will refer to as BRS – is under investigation by the Office of the Special Investigator.

This is the federal agency responsible for pursuing suspected war crimes and preparing briefs of evidence for the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions.

But BRS is still entitled to a presumption of innocence.

That flows from one of the fundamental principles of the rule of law: that everyone is entitled to a presumption of innocence until a criminal court rules otherwise.

That has not happened. And there is no certainty it will ever happen.

A criminal trial would use a higher standard of proof than the standard that was applied in the defamation case.

There are also significant procedural differences in criminal justice to ensure the immense power of the state does not result in unfairness when that power is directed against individuals.

Prosecutors, for example, have a duty of fairness that requires them to disclose not just details of the prosecution case, but details that the prosecution uncovers that could benefit the accused.

The judge in the defamation case recognised these differences when he referred to arguments that his court did not have all the evidence that would ordinarily be available in a criminal trial.

That last point – about missing evidence – is troubling.

It means the court made a finding of murder on the civil standard of proof without having all of the evidence that would have been available in a criminal trial.

So even if the outcome of the defamation case is upheld on appeal, any criminal prosecution would have different procedures, different rules and different evidence.

That means the prospect of a different outcome – that is, an acquittal – cannot be ruled out.

All this puts us in a very strange position.

The journalists in this case have successfully defended their reports that BRS committed murder. His reputation is in tatters. So is it legitimate to refer to him as a murderer?

Those who choose to refer to him in that manner can find support in the findings of fact in the massive judgment that was produced by Federal Court Justice Anthony Besanko.

But describing BRS as a murderer, without clearly explaining the significant differences between defamation and criminal justice, adds to confusion and could eventually undermine public confidence in Australian justice.

Consider the alternative: If, after the defamation case, it is legitimate to refer to BRS in an unqualified manner as a murderer, imagine the ludicrous situation that would arise if he were to be tried on criminal charges and acquitted?

He would simultaneously be a “murderer” and acquitted of murder.

This is why it is important to be clear about the difference between civil and criminal justice.

Even if the different standards of proof are put to one side, the judge’s finding that the murders took place was made on the available evidence – which falls short of the evidence that would have been available to a criminal court.

It must therefore be less reliable than a finding by a criminal court.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19220748

File: 4074b17c91f04e7⋯.jpg (105.2 KB,1694x953,1694:953,Justice_Anthony_Besanko_du….jpg)

>>19220746

2/2

For BRS, his decision to sue has been a disaster.

In retrospect, he should have bided his time and waited to fight these accusations in a criminal court, where he would have the benefit of a higher standard of proof.

There is no guarantee that a criminal prosecution would succeed.

The incidents that formed the basis for Justice Besanko’s findings are now up to 14 years old and will be much older by the time any criminal charges come to court. Memories fade with the passage of time.

The courts have long been wary about how much weight should be placed on memories of historical events.

The late Sir Laurence Street, a former chief justice of NSW, expressed those suspicions cogently in a 1983 report of a commission of inquiry into events that had taken place five or six years in the past.

Street wrote: “In the intervening five or six years, rumours waxed and waned. In some cases suspicion underwent subtle change to belief, which itself progressed to reconstruction, which in turn escalated to recollection.”

If a brief of evidence were given to the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions today, it would be startling if the prosecutors were to make an independent assessment of that material within six months.

If criminal charges were then laid, preliminary jousting in court might take up to a year and that would mean a criminal trial might not start until late next year or early 2025.

At that point witnesses would be giving evidence about events that took place up to 16 years in the past – three times longer than the delay of five or six years that so concerned Sir Laurence.

Chris Merritt is vice-president of the Rule of Law Institute of Australia. This is an edited extract of a paper to be delivered on Friday at a conference of the Business Educators Association of Queensland.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/legal-affairs/why-ben-robertssmith-defamation-ruling-has-a-long-way-to-play-out/news-story/4d30081286be7aa95f76a8daea58a1fe

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19220783

File: 6a67e4b47d72750⋯.jpg (161.17 KB,2048x1152,16:9,James_Paterson_has_called_….jpg)

China’s spy threat to our solar energy grid

CAMERON STEWART - JULY 21, 2023

1/2

Australia’s fast-growing solar energy grid is being dominated by Chinese firms with links to the Chinese Communist Party, raising fears of the potential for ­Beijing to sabotage, surveil or disrupt solar energy supplies.

The country’s solar grid is increasingly reliant on “smart inverters” to convert energy from rooftop solar panels into usable electricity for homes and businesses. But new research shows Chinese companies dominate 58 per cent of the Australian inverter market, making the devices, which are internet-connected and can be remotely controlled, potentially vulnerable to any Chinese attempt to target the solar electricity grid.

Under China’s national intelligence laws, the companies supplying these solar inverters could be ordered by Beijing to sabotage, surveil or disrupt power supplies to Australian homes, companies or government.

The two largest suppliers in the Australian solar inverter market, Sydney-based Sungrow and Melbourne-based GoodWe, are Chinese-owned and have links with the Chinese Communist Party.

Sungrow’s major shareholder, Professor Cao Renxian, is also president of the state-run China Voltaic Industry Association, which is required to “adhere to the (CCP) party’s line, principle and policies”.

Huawei, the Chinese firm blocked from participating in Australia’s 5G rollout in 2018 because of national security concerns, is also a supplier of solar inverters to Australia.

Although the federal government has stepped up efforts to protect Australia’s energy system from potential foreign interference, there are no secure measures currently in place to prevent malicious actors from using solar inverters to disrupt the solar electricity grid.

James Paterson, opposition home affairs and cyber security spokesman, who has commissioned research into the potential threat from Chinese solar inverters, said the government was rushing to secure renewable energy without taking measures to protect new energy sources from malicious actors.

“If companies like Huawei are not safe to be the backbone of our telecommunications network then they can hardly be safe as the backbone of our new electricity grid,” Senator Paterson told The Australian. “Yet that’s exactly what’s happening under the Albanese government’s rush to renewables with no cyber security mitigations.”

“We cannot afford for our electricity grid to be riddled with exploitable cyber security vulnerabilities in the most dangerous strategic environment since World War II. We know that critical infrastructure networks like power are of great interest to signals intelligence agencies in foreign authoritarian states, including China.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19220787

File: 45bbe276698939f⋯.jpg (239.75 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Home_Affairs_Minister_Clar….jpg)

>>19220783

2/2

Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil said the government was working to expand domestic manufacturing to reduce the reliance on “high-risk vendors” to provide vital solar technology.

“Our government is working across the economy to identify threats to our national security, which have been ignored for the last decade under a government which was asleep at the wheel on cyber security and the need to protect the infrastructure that Australians rely on every day,” a spokesman for Ms O’Neil said.

“Specifically in solar, we are examining ways to massively expand domestic manufacturing and end our reliance on importation of this vital technology, a common-sense policy change.”

The government has said that for Australia to reach its 43 per cent emissions reduction target there will need to be 22,000 500-watt solar panels installed each day and a total of 60 million by 2030.

China already dominates the global production of solar panels, with an 85 per cent market share – a fact that Prime Minister ­Anthony Albanese has previously described as a national ­security issue.

But it is the growing reliance on Chinese-produced solar smart inverters that turn direct current (DC) from solar panels into alternating current (AC) for homes and businesses that is causing most concern.

South Australia has mandated the use of smart inverters in all new solar systems, while Victoria will mandate their use from March next year as they gradually become the standard technology for new rooftop solar systems across the country.

Up to a million rooftop solar systems in Australia are expected to use smart inverters within three years. “In about two to three years, I think there will be a critical mass (of controllable smart inverters),” says Grace Young, chief innovation officer with clean tech device company Wattwatchers.

“I can see it becoming quite a serious threat in certain contexts and circumstances if it was done nefariously and, therefore, yes we absolutely have to take it seriously,” Ms Young said.

The Netherlands government last year launched an investigation into the potential to infiltrate solar systems via smart inverters after a hacker gained access to data and customers by controlling the remote inverters.

In the US, Republican Senator Marco Rubio has urged the banning of Huawei-made solar inverters from the US market on national security grounds.

Energy systems, and especially electricity grids, have increasingly been a target in global conflicts, with Russian-affiliated groups launching cyber attacks on energy utilities in Ukraine and in other NATO countries since Russia‘s invasion of Ukraine.

Earlier this year, the federal government began the process of removing numerous Chinese-made surveillance cameras from defence premises and other ­sensitive national security areas amid concerns that they could be exploited by Beijing for intelligence purposes.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/chinas-spy-threat-to-our-solar-energy-grid/news-story/92eb1e9558c86d8eb3cd214ee640c89a

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19220977

File: 0cea8e8d01db3e4⋯.jpg (144.18 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Victorian_Labor_MP_Meng_He….jpg)

File: 7c4a1bcb39fa65b⋯.jpg (419.32 KB,1832x1221,1832:1221,Cambodian_leader_Hun_Sen_a….jpg)

Victorian MP sent ‘hit list’ letter threatening critics of Cambodian leader Hun Sen

Chris Barrett - July 20, 2023

1/2

Phnom Penh: Police in Australia are investigating a threatening letter received by a Victorian state MP which warned that he and other critics of Cambodian strongman Hun Sen in Australia would be targeted by an assassination team.

The letter was sent to the Melbourne office of Labor’s Meng Heang Tak before Sunday’s election in Cambodia, and said his name appeared on a hit list, along with other vocal opponents of the government in Phnom Penh.

“These people including yourself will be targeted for death by my Cambodian third hand squad who will be flying there to do the clean-up,” the letter said.

The one-page, typed warning said the same fate would apply to any members of the ruling Cambodian People’s Party (CPP) who opposed the plan of Prime Minister Hun Sen to pass the leadership baton to his eldest son, Hun Manet, after almost four decades in charge.

It also contained a threat to “any Australian member of parliament” who challenged the Cambodian regime, and any members of the Cambodian community in Australia who were against Hun Sen. The letter also singled out former Victorian MP Hong Lim and Chea Youhorn, the former mayor of the City of Greater Dandenong and the president of the Cambodian Association of Victoria.

“There was a death threat to myself and my family and it’s [the subject of] an ongoing investigation by the Australian Federal Police and Victorian police,” said Tak, a former lawyer who was born in Cambodia and relocated to Australia at age 16.

Victoria Police confirmed it was leading the probe into the anonymous letter, which was received by the MP on June 8.

News of the letter comes five years after a written death threat was made to Lim and Bou Rachana, the widow of slain Cambodian political commentator Kem Ley. Bou Rachana was granted asylum in Australia after her husband was shot dead in Phnom Penh in 2016.

It was received soon after Hun Sen – the longest serving prime minister in the world – had told protesters in Australia that he would “pursue them to their homes and beat them up” if they burnt an effigy of him during his visit to Sydney for an Australia-ASEAN summit.

The new threat was sent six weeks before the CPP’s election victory became certain, as political rivals were marginalised during a sustained crackdown on dissent in recent years, and the only serious opposition party was barred from contesting the polls on a technicality.

However, Hun Sen and his party, which holds all 125 seats in Cambodia’s National Assembly, are also bidding to consolidate control ahead of the foreshadowed transition of power, in which 45-year-old Hun Manet, the West Point-trained chief of the Royal Cambodian Army, would become prime minister.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19220982

File: a95f61ccb05d19e⋯.jpg (1.9 MB,6000x3979,6000:3979,Hun_Manet_Hun_Sen_s_eldest….jpg)

>>19220977

2/2

In Australia, members of the Cambodian community – as recently as at a demonstration on Sunday – have called on the Albanese government not to recognise the “undemocratic elections”, but say they have faced pressure from loyalists to the CPP, which has established networks in most capital cities in Australia.

“It’s an open secret, this intimidation,” Tak said. “If you want to express something at all, if you want to participate in community activities, if you want to participate in protests like last Sunday, people think twice before they participate due to that threat being created through CPP activities in Melbourne and in Australia.”

In an interview in Phnom Penh, CPP spokesman Sok Eysan denied the party was involved in any intimidation of diaspora communities in Australia.

“The Cambodian People’s Party have sent their own people to work in Australia and they were accused of putting threats against the Cambodian community in Australia,” he said.

“I know this accusation. This is the accusation by the opposition and some Australian parliamentarians. Our position is it’s not based on fact.”

Asked about the letter sent to Tak, he added: “I don’t know about this threat. If there is a threat against someone, one should report to the local authority of Australia. [The] Cambodian government is not involved in this threat in the foreign country.”

Sawathey Ek, a Sydney lawyer and head of the Cambodian Action Group, said the tentacles of the Cambodian ruling party in Australia exposed the shortcomings of foreign interference legislation.

He is calling for a federal parliamentary inquiry into CPP activities in major cities and for extra conditions to be attached to visas for Cambodian students in Australia.

The Coalition is expected to propose a motion after parliament resumes on July 31 that urges the Albanese government to fully investigate claims of infiltration and monitoring of the Cambodian community in Australia, and reports of multi-million dollar property purchases in Australia by wealthy members of the ruling elite in Phnom Penh.

Federal Labor MP Julian Hill has been a critic of high-level Cambodian officials being permitted to visit Australia to give weight to the CPP presence in the country. He has alleged there has been interference in temples and temple elections in Australia and that fake charity events were held to raise money.

“This is an organised outfit,” he told parliament in March. “I know of people, both Cambodian-Australians and Cambodians studying in Australia, who were forced to join these [propaganda] events and the implicit threat … was, ‘We know who you are, we know where you are and most importantly we know where your family is in Cambodia’.

“Cambodian-Australians and others from diaspora communities must be able to exercise their democratic rights and freedoms without being threatened or coerced. It’s a difficult problem to tackle and the government is doing what we can.”

Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil’s office was contacted for comment.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/asia/victorian-mp-sent-hit-list-letter-threatening-critics-of-cambodian-leader-hun-sen-20230720-p5dpvk.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19220996

File: 51fdded79283510⋯.jpg (244.68 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_and_US_Pr….jpg)

File: a41ddce33ad0144⋯.jpg (388.89 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_future_Virginia_class_….jpg)

File: 0a6abc3e297e588⋯.jpg (289.11 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Senate_Armed_Services_Comm….jpg)

>>19188991

US Republicans hold subs plan to ransom in bid to boost domestic submarine production

BEN PACKHAM - JULY 21, 2023

US Senate Republicans are threatening to block the transfer of Virginia-class submarines to Australia under the AUKUS pact unless Joe Biden boosts funding for domestic submarine production.

The move is being led by the ranking Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, Senator Roger Wicker, who ruled out language this week to authorise the nuclear submarine transfer in the latest version of the nation’s annual defence policy bill.

Senator Wicker told Politico that the Biden administration needed to “be sure we have enough submarines for our own security needs before we endorse that pillar of the (AUKUS) agreement”.

“The president needs to submit a supplemental request to give us an adequate number of submarines,” he said.

Senator Wicker told Politico that Australia’s promised US$3bn investment in the US submarine industrial base would be insufficient to ensure sufficient boats to meet both countries’ needs.

“We need a concrete plan that includes not only the authorisation and money for an adequate number of attack submarines, but a plan for the industrial base to actually get there.”

The brawl comes despite the endorsement of the submarine transfer by the Senate’s Foreign Relations Committee last week, which approved legislation granting Australia a 20-year exemption from strict technology export rules.

It follows a government-wide spending cap under a debt limit deal between Joe Biden and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy.

US defence policy expert Ashley Townshend, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said a three-way battle was unfolding over the submarine plan between the Biden administration and defence and deficit hawks.

“It beggars belief these issues weren’t foreseen,” he said.

“All parties should have known that industrial base concerns would be a big issue on Capitol Hill, and the administration should have had a concrete plan to address them.”

He said getting additional funding through Congress will be difficult.

“Republicans are politically committed to a strict debt ceiling, so there will be internal party tension between defence hawks and deficit hawks if a supplemental spending bill is sought.

“Even if the Biden administration is willing to pursue a defence supplemental (budget), Democrats on the Hill will want this to be matched with spending on social security.

“These familiar ‘guns and butter’ dynamics won’t be easy to solve, though the White House might try to pull rank on something as big as AUKUS which is deemed too big to fail.”

Senator Wicker argued in a Wall St Journal opinion piece published last Sunday that US submarine production needed to be doubled to meet the needs of both countries.

“As it stands, the AUKUS plan would transfer US Virginia-class submarines to a partner nation before we have met our own navy’s requirements,” Senator Wicker wrote.

The US Navy currently has 49 nuclear attack submarines – well under the service’s goal of 66. The fleet is expected to fall to 46 by 2030 as older boats retire faster than they can be replaced.

Senator Wicker said to deliver on the AUKUS commitment to supply at least three Virginia-class submarines to Australia from 2030, US production needed to rise from the current 1.2 boats per year to between 2.3 and 2.5.

He warned improvements to submarine maintenance were also needed, with nearly 40 per cent of US attack submarines unable to be deployed due to maintenance delays.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/us-republicans-hold-subs-plan-to-ransom-in-bid-to-boost-domestic-submarine-production/news-story/3214bd6ba657fcf8adbcf904d6017cfd

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19221161

File: 15800de8f136285⋯.jpg (2.14 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,The_Japanese_surface_to_sh….jpg)

File: 67bb308e64a2dca⋯.jpg (1.75 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,A_Japanese_Type_12_Surface….jpg)

File: 46097cc2409c7da⋯.jpg (1.59 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,General_Yoshihide_Yoshida_….jpg)

File: caabe935d25e80e⋯.jpg (1.47 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Brigadier_Damian_Hill_says….jpg)

File: 800f358ab4e39e3⋯.jpg (1.47 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,General_Yoshihide_Yoshida_….jpg)

>>19204909

>>19204951

Japan's top general inspects anti-ship missile ahead of historic Australian launch

Tim Fernandez - 22 July 2023

Japan's top military officer is in Australia inspecting his country's most advanced anti-ship weapon as part of his country's largest ever participation in joint military exercises.

Japan's Self Defence Force (JSDF) was scheduled to carry out a live test of its Type 12 Surface-to-Ship missile (SSM) for just the second time outside of Japan at the Beecroft Weapons Range on the New South Wales south coast.

But the Australian Defence Force has delayed the exercise due to unfavourable sea conditions, and plans to resume the launch over the next few days.

The exercise is part of the biennial military operation Exercise Talisman Sabre, with Japan sending its largest military deployment to the war games.

Among the senior military figures in attendance was JSDF Chief of Staff Yoshihide Yoshida, Japan's top military officer.

Brigadier Damien Hill, the exercise director for Talisman Sabre, said it shows the strengthening of ties between Japan and Australia.

"It's great to see General Yoshida here amongst a number of other Japanese dignitaries," he said.

"The exercise will host upwards of up to 1,500 Japanese defence force personnel which is the largest contribution they've made to Exercise Talisman Sabre."

The missile test will give the ADF first-hand experience of the weapon's capability which Australia currently does not possess.

Carrying out the test in Australia will also avoid the difficulties of firing a missile into the waters off the coast of Japan.

"It is a great opportunity for them to operate outside of a region that they live in, which is quite complex, and it reduces any uncertainty about operating any missile systems in their region," Brigadier Hill said.

Japan 'leaning forward'

The increased participation in the war games reflects recent changes to the Japanese military amid growing concerns about China's military ambitions in the region.

In 2014 Japan announced a change in its post-WWII military policy to permit counter strike capability against Japan or an ally.

Last year the government announced plans to spend $320 billion over five years to build up its missile arsenal.

The country also developed a strategy to increase cooperation with allies such as the United States and Australia.

"I think it is true recognition of how they are applying changes to their constitution," Brigadier Hill said.

"It is great to see the Japanese leaning forward."

Fellow Pacific ally South Korea will also be taking part in Talisman Sabre for just the second time.

They will be testing the K239 Chunmoo multiple rocket launcher for the first time in Queensland at the Shoalwater Bay Training Area.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-21/japanese-top-brass-attend-historic-rocket-launch-in-australia/102631954

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19221167

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19204909

>>19204923

Chinese 'spy ships' expected to sit off Darwin and Central Queensland during Talisman Sabre military exercises

Andrew Greene - 22 July 2023

Officials are preparing for two Chinese "spy ships" to arrive off Australia's coast next week to monitor the multinational Talisman Sabre military exercises opening in Sydney this morning.

Since 2017, China's Navy has deployed at least one Auxiliary General Intelligence (AGI) vessel to snoop on each of the biennial training drills involving the United States, as well as other partner nations.

Defence and security sources told the ABC they were expecting a pair of People's Liberation Army-Navy (PLAN) vessels to head towards Australia over the next few days.

Brigadier Damien Hill, the director of Talisman Sabre 23, said Defence would again take appropriate precautions to protect sensitive military information and the Chinese were free to operate in Australia's exclusive economic zone.

"We monitor our borders very carefully and that includes nations such as the PLA operating — and as long as they do so in accordance with international law there will be no issues from us," he said.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, one official said the ADF was anticipating one Chinese vessel could station off the Northern Territory coast, while the second would monitor activity around Queensland's Shoalwater Bay Training Area.

Brigadier Hill has declined to comment on the assessment, but acknowledges this year's military drills are spread widely across the country.

"The exercise is quite expanded as far as geography is concerned — that's part of the exercise construct itself — there'll be activity from Western Australia to Norfolk Island," he said.

A record 30,000 personnel from 13 countries are taking part in Talisman Sabre this year, though Brigadier Hill said China had not requested to be an official observer or participant.

"They've never asked, so I don't say never is never, but at this stage they haven't asked to participate," he said.

"But if they do, I'm sure that the powers-that-be will make a very careful decision."

Rain delays start of Talisman Sabre

A planned live firing of a Japanese anti-ship missile in Australian waters has been postponed due to adverse weather conditions.

This morning, Japan's Self Defence Force was scheduled to demonstrate its Type 12 surface-to-ship missile in a foreign country for only the second time.

Officials say rough seas at Jervis Bay, south of Sydney, mean the live firing, which was to coincide with today's formal opening of Exercise Talisman Sabre, will have to be delayed.

On Friday afternoon, Defence Minister Richard Marles will join US Navy Secretary Carlos Del Toro on board HMAS Canberra at Sydney's Garden Island Naval Base to officially open Exercise Talisman Sabre 23.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-21/china-spy-ships-to-sit-on-australia-coast-during-talisman-sabre/102629390

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_klRU3gZ_E

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19221187

File: 08b7ad277831531⋯.jpg (395.64 KB,1999x1333,1999:1333,Co_author_Yumi_Stynes_book….jpg)

>>19204858

>>19211387

‘Taking a leaf out of Trumpism’: Yumi Stynes on the ‘misguided’ backlash to sex book

Nell Geraets and Osman Faruqi - July 20, 2023

1/2

A new Australian sex education book has topped Amazon’s bestseller list and some local bookshops are running out of copies, after a conservative backlash led to it being pulled from the shelves of major retailer Big W.

Welcome to Sex, written by Yumi Stynes and Dr Melissa Kang, the longest-serving expert behind Dolly Doctor, reached the top of the Amazon charts on Thursday, two months after its release on May 17. It overtook global hits such as Rebecca Kuang’s Yellowface and James Clear’s Atomic Habits and has also temporarily sold out on Amazon.

The book has been criticised by campaigners including Rachael Wong, the chief executive of Women’s Forum Australia, an organisation critical of pro-trans activism. Speaking to 2GB’s Ben Fordham on Tuesday, Wong called it a “graphic sex guide for children”, adding that she felt “physically ill at the thought of children reading it”. Other conservative media figures have amplified the criticism.

“For those saying the book is sex education, there is a huge difference between giving children age-appropriate information, and prematurely exposing them to graphic, highly sexualised material,” Wong told this masthead.

The following day, Big W said it would pull the book from its physical stores after a number of employees reported instances of abuse from customers.

Stynes said she was surprised by the backlash.

“We really have a lot of credentials,” she said. “We’ve got an army of professors, who fact-checked and contributed to the book. So for people to try and shame us or make us feel like we haven’t done the work, it’s just really misguided. It does make me think that they’re taking a leaf out of the book of Trumpism and fearmongering there.”

Stynes added that journalists from the Daily Mail camped outside her house this week.

Welcome to Sex is the fourth in a series of guides for adolescents, following Welcome to Your Period, Welcome to Your Boobs and Welcome to Consent.

Described on the inside cover as “the only guide you need to navigate consent for tweens and teens of all genders”, it covers a range of topics such as dating (including ghosting and how to respectfully break up) and sex (including the intricacies of consent, premature ejaculation and the clitoris). It also debunks common myths around sex and sexuality, for example, that the size of a penis matters, and that there is only one way to orgasm.

“We were pitched the idea of writing something together. [We thought] what’s the most pressing thing?” Stynes explained. “Periods started the convo, and then consent was a burning issue. Like, we’re gonna write about consent.

“The one that was going to be an opus, we knew it was going to be big and require a lot of diligence and research and consultation, was sex. So, we’re going to give ourselves lots of time and lots of space to put it together and really be thoughtful about it. This book was a response to genuine questions asked by adolescents to Dolly Doctor for more than 20 years. She was exposed to what kids were too ashamed to ask anyone else.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19221192

File: 95cb0d6a02692d2⋯.jpg (1.69 MB,4032x3024,4:3,Sales_of_Welcome_to_Sex_ha….jpg)

>>19221187

2/2

As well as it selling out on Amazon, Dymocks’ online store lists Welcome to Sex as the most popular publication in the parenting category. Sales have also increased in bricks-and-mortar stores across Australia. Some bookshops sold out soon after the title made its way into news headlines.

Co-owner of Brisbane’s Avid Reader stores Fiona Stager said Welcome to Sex had sold well since its May release. However, sales skyrocketed so much after the conservative backlash that the store had now sold out.

“People are interested in the book, they want to see it for themselves. But I think there’s also a level of support for the authors,” Stager said. “It’s in solidarity that they’re buying the book.”

Dani Solomon, manager of Readings Kids in Carlton, Melbourne, said the number of copies sold in the past few days made up roughly a quarter of the book’s overall sales, noting a particular spike in online purchases.

“We have had overwhelmingly positive feedback in the last few days, with only a few negative responses,” Solomon said. “The negative feedback has not been particularly relevant to the contents of the book.”

Stynes is known best for co-hosting the ABC’s Ladies, We Need to Talk podcast. Co-author Kang is a trained GP who became a household name by writing Dolly magazine’s Dolly Doctor column.

Following Welcome to Sex’s rise to the top of the Amazon charts, two of the previous books in the Welcome to series, Welcome to your Period (2019) and Welcome to Consent (2021), climbed to No.10 and No.18 on Amazon’s bestseller list, respectively.

“I really, really feel strongly that Australian people are smarter than we give them credit for,” Stynes said. “I don’t think that they are quick to react and hop into a pile-on. I think that a lot of mainstream Australians are just watching and kind of making up their own minds.

The backlash to Welcome to Sex mimics similar campaigns in the US that in recent years have targeted books about sex and sexuality.

When told about the book’s sales boost, Stynes said she felt “really glad, and I hope that parents read it, and then make up their own minds about whether they want their kids to read it. I really know deep down in my soul that parents will get something fantastic out of it for themselves.”

https://www.theage.com.au/culture/books/taking-a-leaf-from-trumpism-yumi-stynes-on-the-misguided-backlash-to-sex-book-20230720-p5dpvm.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19222693

File: d3cb26cb5600eba⋯.jpg (445.39 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Yes_campaigners_in_Sydney.jpg)

>>19199716

>>19199725

Indigenous voice to parliament’s No pamphlet casts light where Yes prefers shadows

LOUISE CLEGG - JULY 22, 2023

1/2

As we count down towards the most significant referendum since Federation, the picture that has emerged in the Yes and No pamphlets is both telling and saddening.

At first glance both sides have been restrained. For the Yes side, this is necessary. It has always been the case that detail will derail the project. The vibe is king and the whole thing is sold on heartfelt claims about desperately needed beneficial outcomes for Indigenous people. The case is simple: recognition and listening will lead to better results. Fair enough; bare assertions will be enough for many compassionate voters who are willing the referendum to be carried and succeed in operation.

The No side has avoided overreach and calmly stated what is by now self-evident: the voice is risky, unknown, divisive and permanent.

These are not bare assertions. Affording a small group of people an elevated right above all others to a say on everything in a liberal democratic constitution has never been done here or anywhere else before. We don’t know how and where it ends up.

The restraint on both sides is likely to be the result of intense polling and focus groups. Both sides know that while exaggeration can appeal to the converted, the undecided voter is a different beast altogether. Typically not politically motivated or inclined, the undecided voter is apathetic and cynical, or genuinely looking to understand so when the time comes to vote they can do the right thing for Indigenous people, themselves and the entire country.

To this end, the Yes camp has changed tack from the strategy of months past. Gone are the claims of racism and other personal and negative attacks. The obvious learning has been that by and large we are not a racist country and everyday Australians respond negatively to the messenger when race is weaponised in any way.

Yet this has left the Yes case somewhat exposed, unable or unprepared to give specifics about how the voice will operate in real­ity. The No camp has filled the void with words from the architects and proponents of the amendment.

This has resulted in claims of foul play, but that is a bit rich. If the Yes case is not prepared to tell Australians what it says the voice really is and how it will operate, then the No camp is surely entitled to remind voters what voice proponents themselves say about it.

But here lies the problem for Yes. As time has gone on the sales pitch has not gained traction with middle Australia: “(The voice) is a way to further what we need for … treaties and … abolishment of institutions, the old colonial institutions that harms us.” And that the voice will advise “all parts of government, including the cabinet, ministers, public servants, independent offices and agencies – such as the Reserve Bank – it can’t shut the voice up”.

These words or words like them have not been uttered once, or inadvertently, or been taken out of context. You can find such words or themes in speeches, blogs, opinion pieces and even peer-reviewed papers. This shows the enormous disconnect between ordinary Australians and the tiny group who imagined middle Australia would blithely accept an experimental entrenched special constitutional right that extends to all Indigenous people but never to them.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19222694

File: 7a47554cdcdbdda⋯.jpg (180.65 KB,1024x768,4:3,The_No_campaign_has_avoide….jpg)

>>19222693

2/2

The abandonment of the basic product is so complete that the Yes camp is walking away from even the most elemental description of the voice. Under its definitive section in the Yes pamphlet, What is the Voice?, it is described as a committee that will give advice – when it is nothing of the sort. A committee implies something small, temporary and designed to address a specific, well-defined issue. Everyone knows committees are formed within sports clubs, under company boards, at CWAs and Rotary clubs. Liberal democratic constitutions do not entrench committees.

Rather, constitutions entrench bodies. In our Constitution the operative bodies are the parliament, the executive and the High Court.

Eminent law professors Nicholas Aroney and Peter Gerangelos have pointed out that the voice is established by an entirely new chapter in the Constitution and will assume a constitutional status similar to these three other bodies.

Even the proposed s129(1) declares: “There shall be a body, to be called the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice.” Given its text and place in the Constitution, one of its architects, law professor Gabrielle Appleby, says the voice will be “a foundational institution of state” and imagines the voice as a fourth arm of government. It is a significant new body that will introduce profound changes to our system of government.

As we enter the home straight, the decision taken by the Yes camp in the pamphlet to describe a proposed new institution of state as a committee suggests a new desperation. It is obfuscation at best and outright deception at worst.

The problem for this maximalist version of the voice is that it is too big and radical and, when properly explained, extends way beyond what is acceptable to most Australians. An honest assessment of the content of the Yes and No pamphlets shows why. In its pitch to the nation the Yes camp’s careful misdescription of the voice in the Constitution is simply sad. It is an admission that the essence of this voice is unsaleable.

Taken together, the pamphlets leave the voice looking like a spirited, hopeful but wildly experimental empty vessel. It is a national tragedy that because of an absence of proper process and terrible overreach this highly important project looks as if it will run aground.

Louise Clegg is a barrister.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/indigenous-voice-to-parliaments-no-pamphlet-casts-light-where-yes-prefers-shadows/news-story/6fbe47376a025d8fee8a8dec201cbbc3

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19222723

File: 2144bce7a7e2911⋯.jpg (336.19 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Thomas_Mayo_who_is_quoted_….jpg)

File: d365ecd8a6a0e21⋯.jpg (190.39 KB,855x1140,3:4,Greg_Craven.jpg)

>>19194426

>>19199716

>>19199725

Making the case for No to Indigenous voice to parliament, straight from horse’s mouth

JANET ALBRECHTSEN - JULY 22, 2023

1/2

The only thing Yes activists hate more than No campaigners misquoting them is No campaigners quoting them accurately.

There are two reasons for that. First, the whole Yes case was predicated on a marketing strategy to sell the voice on the vibe and steer away from the facts. The plan is to win on the back of a soft-focus ad campaign full of acoustic guitars, emotional messages about recognition and generosity, with celebrity endorsements devoid of fact and with as little mention as possible of the consequences of the voice itself.

When the No campaign injects some basic curiosity about the voice’s actual powers and about the real agenda of its core supporters, it upsets that carefully crafted spin.

Second, nobody makes mincemeat of the Yes case arguments anywhere near as effectively as the Yes advocates. The Yes case is most powerfully condemned out of the mouths of its own supporters.

It was no surprise, then, though highly amusing, to read that constitutional law professor Greg Craven said he “was beside myself with rage” after one of his quotes was repeated, perfectly accurately, in the official No pamphlet. Craven had said: “I think it’s fatally flawed because what it does is retain the full range of review of executive action. This means the voice can comment on everything from submarines to parking tickets … We will have regular judicial interventions.”

Craven claims he was taken out of context because he is a Yes voter. Being a Yes voter doesn’t alter the substance of what he said. He was right to point to the fatal flaw. Craven should be grateful the No pamphlet didn’t quote some of his other equally accurate and incisive comments. For example, writing in The Australian on March 24, Craven described “Anthony Albanese’s much-hyped revelation of his constitutional words for the voice” as “a ruthless con job”. Why should we doubt him?

Similarly, Julian Leeser, who appears to be on a bridge-burning drill within the Liberal Party, condemned the use by the No pamphlet of quotes from Thomas Mayo, a member of the government’s hand-picked Referendum Working Group.

It’s not surprising Leeser and Yes campaigners wanted to keep Mayo’s views under wraps. Mayo was quoted, again completely accurately, as saying the voice “is the first step, it’s a vital step and it puts all the explanation behind it. ‘Pay the Rent’ for example, how do we do that in a way that is transparent and that actually sees reparations and compensation to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People?”

Mayo is not some random maverick. It is quite possible, perhaps likely, he would be a member of the voice if it comes into existence. His views not only informed the design of the voice but are likely to be highly influential on the voice itself if the referendum is successful.

It is understandable that Leeser wants Mayo to disappear, or at least be given some media training, but is this fair to the Australian people? Don’t we deserve to know the views of key people driving the voice? Did Leeser so underestimate those of us who are curious about the voice that he imagined we wouldn’t do some basic homework?

Mayo’s other views on the voice’s likely agenda, if the referendum is successful, are also relevant. On June 28 the Daily Mail quoted what it called “damning tweets” by Mayo about changing the date of Australia Day. It said: “Voice to Parliament architect Thomas Mayo spent years insisting it would be the only way for the nation to determine ‘how and when we should celebrate Australia Day’ ” but had “sensationally backflipped, falling into step with a Labor government which remains adamant a date change would not be of interest to an advisory body”.

So which view will Mayo hold if he is appointed to the voice next year? His 2021 views before becoming a member of the government’s working group or his more recent views?

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19222726

File: 3241236bb9e0629⋯.jpg (141.7 KB,1280x720,16:9,Making_the_case_for_No_to_….jpg)

>>19222723

2/2

On the same theme, the No pamphlet might have asked if Noel Pearson still holds his view expressed in 2012: “As long as the allowance of racial discrimination remains in our Constitution, it continues, in both subtle and unsubtle ways, to affect our relationships with each other. Though it has historically hurt my people more than others, racial categorisations dehumanise us all. It dehumanises us because we are each individuals, and we should be judged as individuals. We should be rewarded on our merits and assisted in our needs. Race should not matter.”

An influential member of the Referendum Engagement Group, Teela Reid, is in no doubt about the evils of Australia Day. The No pamphlet quoted her too: “It’s always been #abolish Australia Day, changing the date is a cop out.” Leeser and other Yes campaigners no doubt want her to shut up, too.

But these people are powerful forces, deliberately chosen by the government to help design the voice. Don’t Australians need to know that these are the views from within the voice’s engine-room?

It’s understandable that a diehard voice supporter such as Leeser may not want to advertise the views of Aboriginal leaders such as Mayo and Reid lest voters discover what the real agenda of the voice’s proponents is, but this is surely no way to build trust or show respect for Australians. The last thing Yes campaigners should want is a voice won by suppressing the real agenda. A voice won by misrepresentation is a fraudulent voice that will never have legitimacy.

Leeser and others should be happy, in the spirit of a fully informed electorate, to have the full agenda of Aboriginal leaders on display. The shame is that the No pamphlet didn’t include another 10 pages of quotes from the Yes side.

For example, it could have included Marcia Langton’s words, quoted by the Lowitja Institute: “People who are opposing (the voice referendum) are saying we are destroying the fabric of their sacred Constitution. Yes, that’s right, that’s exactly what we’re doing.” Or Langton’s threat in an interview with this newspaper a few months ago that if Australians were so ungrateful as to vote No, they could forget about asking her to do a welcome to country: “I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she said. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a traditional owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”

Given we would be changing our Constitution we do need the Prime Minister to lead a new spirit of full disclosure to voters by clarifying his remarks on Ben Fordham’s 2GB radio program on Wednesday. Albanese said “it’s not about treaty, it’s not about compensation”. However, he has said numerous times that his government is fully committed to the Uluru Statement from the Heart, which is crystal clear that a makarrata commission to supervise the making of a treaty is the “culmination of our agenda”. And as we know from the book Treaty by George Williams and Harry Hobbs, the aims of a treaty will include shared sovereignty and compensation. In fact, there is a large body of work on treaty, sovereignty and reparations by activist legal academics, led by Megan Davis, Williams, Gabrielle Appleby and others, that Albanese can no longer deny or ignore.

If the Prime Minister is walking away from the full agenda of the Uluru Statement and the associated academic work on co-sovereignty and reparations, the leader of the nation needs to make that clear to us. If he is not walking away from this, then it really is time that he should be honest and admit the much bigger project afoot here.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/making-the-case-for-no-to-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-straight-from-horses-mouth/news-story/6e9e3b776e219258cd7c5b42be1f25cf

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19222755

File: 7fbf96046b3f22a⋯.jpg (337.83 KB,1046x1304,523:652,Yes_vote_support_by_state_….jpg)

File: 028fd2ac214e86d⋯.jpg (248.12 KB,1031x789,1031:789,Vote_over_time_July_2023.jpg)

>>19194398

>>19199716

>>19199725

NSW slip into No camp puts Voice on track for defeat

James Massola - July 22, 2023

1/2

The Indigenous Voice to parliament is headed towards a referendum defeat, with most NSW voters supporting the No campaign for the first time and just 31 per cent of Australians expecting the Yes vote to succeed.

The move of NSW into the No camp – alongside Queensland, Western Australia and South Australia – underscores its status as a crucial swing state that will help decide the fate of the referendum.

The findings are the latest in a string of polls that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has conceded are trending down just as the Yes and No campaigns ramp up, prompting even prominent Voice supporter and Liberal MP Andrew Bragg to call for the vote to be delayed.

The Resolve Political Monitor survey, conducted last week exclusively for this masthead, shows support for the Voice in NSW slipped to 49 per cent over June and July, from 53 per cent in May-June, while it softened from 56 per cent to 52 per cent in Victoria.

The only other state in which the Voice enjoys majority support is Tasmania, on 54 per cent, though the sample size was small. Support for the proposal is lowest in Queensland (42 per cent, down from 44 per cent) followed by WA and SA at 49 per cent. For the referendum to pass, it must be backed by a double majority of states and the national vote.

The survey found 36 per cent of voters supported the Voice, down from 42 per cent of voters last month, while 42 per cent opposed it (up from 40 per cent) when asked about the proposed constitutional change. The number of undecided voters has also grown significantly to 22 per cent, from 17 per cent last month.

The number of people who said they would definitely vote Yes fell 6 percentage points to 19 per cent, while those definitely voting No rose 4 percentage points to 32 per cent.

When voters were asked a second question that allowed only a Yes or No answer, as they will be required to give at the referendum, 48 per cent said they would vote Yes and 52 per cent said they would vote No, down from 49 to 51 per cent last month and 58 to 42 per cent as recently as April.

Albanese has resisted calls to alter the referendum question and refused to name the date, saying only that it would be in the final quarter of the year.

But while the prime minister insists many voters will pay attention only in the final weeks, the official Yes and No referendum pamphlets that will be sent to Australian households were launched this week, and both campaigns are furiously fundraising and holding town hall meetings. No campaign outfit Advance on Friday asked supporters to chip in $825,000 for an advertising blitz.

Resolve director Jim Reed said the latest survey showed the overall result was still quite close, “but the referendum requires that the Yes vote wins in a majority of states too, and that goal is looking like a more distant prospect”.

“NSW is now the fourth state to be voting No, and Victoria and Tasmania are trending in the same direction. The current position, combined with the unwavering trend, certainly makes a No result the most likely outcome at this stage,” he said.

Bragg said on Friday the referendum should be delayed to ensure it was not defeated and the question being put to voters should be altered.

“A simple, clean amendment would have been much easier to attract more support and an exposure draft bill would have meant the detail questions [from the No camp] were not there,” he said.

“It’s clear the centre ground is falling away and NSW was always going to be the barometer state. It’s the product, not the marketing, that needs close examination at this juncture.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19222761

File: d88bc3f7d81b4a5⋯.jpg (275.53 KB,1042x823,1042:823,Vote_for_constitutional_In….jpg)

File: c32ed1e998cebe9⋯.jpg (286.69 KB,1015x1145,203:229,Corporate_involvement_JULY….jpg)

>>19222755

2/2

A spokeswoman for the prime minister pointed to his refrain of “if not now, when” regarding the timing of the referendum.

Bragg’s fellow NSW Liberal MP and Yes supporter, Julian Leeser, said he did not support delaying the vote and argued that while people had doubts, the rise in the number of undecided voters showed there was still a chance to win people over.

“I think there is a lot on the minds of Australians at the moment and they just haven’t focused. Once the cases [for Yes and No] arrive in letterboxes, once the date has been set, that’s when people start to focus,” he said.

“It’s a good change, a safe change and it will make a difference for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.”

But one of the No campaign leaders, Nyunggai Warren Mundine, said the Yes campaign had treated Australians like mugs and insulted them by suggesting a vote for No was racist.

“I always thought this would be like the republic referendum. It will lose every state and the national vote. It will be a complete loss for the Yes campaign,” he said.

Support for the Voice held steady at 63 per cent among Labor voters – the same figure as June but down from 75 per cent in April – and at 26 per cent among Coalition voters. It increased by 2 percentage points among Greens voters to 83 per cent, while 72 per cent of “other” voters opposed it.

The Resolve survey found just 31 per cent of voters now believed the referendum would succeed, down from 38 per cent last month. Forty-seven per cent of voters expected the No campaign to win, up from 30 per cent, while 22 per cent were unsure, down from 32 per cent a month ago.

Voters did not welcome big business support for the Voice campaign – something Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has criticised – with just 29 per cent agreeing that corporate involvement was appropriate and 44 per cent saying it was not.

And following a recent call from Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney for the Voice to focus on health, education, jobs and housing, the poll found 33 per cent of voters believed improved healthcare should be its priority, 32 per cent of people nominated improved services in remote communities, 30 per cent chose tackling crime, and 26 per cent said education services. People were able to choose up to four priorities.

About a third of voters, at 32 per cent, said the Voice should be able to provide advice on issues that affected only Indigenous Australians, 29 per cent backed the body providing advice on issues that mainly affected Indigenous Australians, and 18 per cent favoured it giving advice on any issues, with the rest undecided.

While the national figures reported here come from a survey of 1610 voters conducted from July 12 to 15, the state-by-state results are drawn from two surveys in June and July to gain a higher sample size. The questions were identical in the two surveys and the national results have a margin of error 2.4 per cent.

The state figures are based on questions to 3216 voters, including 1012 in NSW and 1003 in Victoria, along with smaller groups in smaller states.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/nsw-slip-into-no-camp-puts-voice-on-track-for-defeat-20230720-p5dpxs.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19222789

File: 2fcc44eed8326c7⋯.jpg (1.31 MB,2362x1577,2362:1577,Voice_supporters_gather_fo….jpg)

File: 2b1c4f9344f5424⋯.jpg (675.46 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Faltering_Yes_campaign_lik….jpg)

File: de6d9b9d5bbfb83⋯.jpg (221.5 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Australian_Prime_Minister_….jpg)

>>19222755

OPINION: Faltering Yes campaign like watching a slow-motion car crash

James Massola, National affairs editor - July 22, 2023

Time is running out for the Yes group to turn around its faltering campaign to enshrine a Voice to parliament in the Constitution.

It may already be too late.

If the government is not yet asking itself hard questions about an exit plan, it needs to start planning an escape route now.

The latest Resolve Political Monitor confirms a months-long downward trend in public support for the proposal.

From a high of 64 per cent public support in September last year, the trend has been all one way, sinking to 48 per cent support in this latest survey. For the first time, this survey shows more people expect the referendum will be defeated than think it will succeed. For the first time, four states would vote No if the national vote were held tomorrow.

Remember, a successful referendum requires at least four states to vote Yes and an outright majority of the national vote. This constitutional reform appears to have neither.

Yes, polls are a snapshot of a moment in time and, yes, there is still time to turn it around.

The question is how? The No campaign’s argument could not be simpler: if you don’t know, vote no.

What is Yes’s proposition? Is this about giving Indigenous Australians a say in the decisions that affect them? Is it about constitutional recognition? Is it about doing the right thing by our First peoples?

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s formulation about the Voice being a modest proposal and an opportunity to listen to Indigenous Australians is no longer cutting through.

It’s not all on Albanese. The public Yes campaign has only recently begun to ramp up its efforts after a cautious start. The working group has been phenomenally dedicated to getting this right, but the forces backing Yes have been way too slow out the blocks, compared with those promoting a vote for No.

The Voice proposal has been around a decade or more. Umpteen reports have been prepared, parliamentary hearings held, models proposed.

But it is Albanese who has taken the risk and committed to a referendum – and ultimately it is on this prime minister to save the Voice, or to pull it if it is destined to fail.

To save itself, the Yes campaign must pull out all the stops. Releasing draft legislation would be a good place to start, as it would deny the No camp the most crucial aspect of its campaign – the ability to trade on uncertainty.

Albanese and the Yes campaign need to stop shying away from having a fight over the detail and just have it.

By keeping the actual date of the referendum quiet, the prime minister has bought a little wriggle room if he wants to delay a couple of months. The latest poll also shows that there are growing number of undecided voters (up from 17 per cent to 22 per cent), so there are votes in play.

Before the last election, Albanese was fond of saying Labor would “kick with the wind in the final quarter” and win the federal election.

But what chance does the Yes campaign have of winning if it finds itself 10 goals down at three-quarter time?

If the downward trend in Voice support can’t be reversed in the next couple of months, the referendum should be pulled – because defeat would be devastating.

James Massola is national affairs editor. He has previously been Sunday political correspondent and South-East Asia correspondent.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/faltering-yes-campaign-like-watching-a-slow-motion-car-crash-20230721-p5dq8s.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19222811

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19222755

PM issues plea to Labor to support Voice to Parliament

9 News Australia

Jul 22, 2023

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has issued an urgent plea to the Labor faithful to get behind the Indigenous Voice to Parliament, as the latest opinion poll indicates it's heading towards defeat.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3-IcLYt8K8

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19226413

File: a01bb26016ff85e⋯.jpg (2.1 MB,3600x2280,30:19,USS_Canberra_sails_into_Sy….jpg)

File: 3a90aa07f0055e5⋯.jpg (370.23 KB,1800x1200,3:2,U_S_Navy_Ceremonial_Guard_….jpg)

File: 96bc81414f94dfc⋯.jpg (171.99 KB,1620x1080,3:2,Chief_of_Naval_Operations_….jpg)

File: f137381361bc80c⋯.jpg (384.62 KB,1800x1200,3:2,U_S_Navy_Petty_Officer_2nd….jpg)

>>19205022

USS Canberra Commissions in Rare Overseas Ceremony

Benjamin Felton - July 22, 2023

1/2

SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA – Leaders of the U.S. Navy joined their Australian counterparts on a windy winter day at the ancestral home of the Royal Australian Navy to welcome USS Canberra (LCS-30) to the American fleet.

Moored at the RAN naval base HMAS Kuttabul in the middle of Sydney harbor, Littoral Combat Ship Canberra (LCS-30), was commissioned in a rare overseas ceremony on Saturday.

The LCS’ commissioning was a “celebration” and demonstration of the alliance between Australia and the United States, Australia Governor-General David Hurley said at the ceremony. It is a “very very visible example of our nations’ shared history, contemporary partnership and commitment to the future… [all] which is now honored in the name Canberra,” he said.

Canberra is the second Navy ship to bear the name of Australia’s capital city. The ship’s namesake, HMAS Canberra (D33), sunk while fighting alongside U.S. forces during the Battle of Savo Island in World War II. As a result of Canberra’s actions during the battle, Marines of the 1st Marine Division were able to continue the fight on Guadalcanal, Solomon Islands. In recognition of HMAS Canberra’s sacrifice to protect U.S. Forces, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt ordered the under-construction cruiser USS Pittsburgh to be renamed USS Canberra (CA-41).

Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro said that while the world is very different to the 1940s, when the first USS Canberra (CA-70) was commissioned, Australia and the United States are once again facing “significant challenges” in the Indo-Pacific region.

“We, along with our allies and partners around the world, are facing significant challenges in every environment that we operate,” he said. “The People’s Republic of China continues the rapid expansion of its navy, leveraging its maritime organizational strength to coerce and intimidate its neighbors into accepting illegitimate maritime claims.”

LCS Canberra will play a critical role in defending the maritime commons which are so critical to both nations, Del Toro said.

“This ship before us, along with HMAS Canberra, and our combined Naval fleet play a crucial role in securing our ability to conduct unencumbered maritime trade across the globe, promoting the wealth and strength of our two nations, along with those of our allies and partners.”

While Adm. Mike Gilday, the outgoing chief of naval operations, said that the ship will closely integrate with the Royal Australian Navy. He did not go so far as to provide a timeline for its first deployment.

“Today, we commissioned USS Canberra into service, not just part of Littoral Combat Ship Squadron One, not just part of the United States Pacific Fleet. Today, we commissioned this ship into service as a combat unit that will integrate with the Australian fleet and with the combined maritime force of allies and partners who stand united across the entire Indo-Pacific,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19226416

File: 203186209bf6cd0⋯.jpg (421.49 KB,1399x1800,1399:1800,LCS_30_USS_Canberra.jpg)

>>19226413

2/2

The commissioning ceremony comes as the U.S. and Australia are formalizing deeper security ties as part of the AUKUS technology-sharing agreement. In the next several years, U.S. and U.K. Royal Navy nuclear submarines will forward deploy to western Australia with the goal of the RAN operating their own Virginia-class submarines bought from the U.S.

For Canberra In the short term, the LCS will return home to San Diego. There, it will be fitted with specialist anti-surface warfare (ASuW) and mine countermeasure (MCM) systems before leaving on its first deployment, USNI News understands.

Both the Blue and Gold crews will also complete various remaining certifications ahead of entering a standard deployment cycle, which will likely include a rotational deployment to Destroyer Squadron Seven (DESRON 7), based out of Singapore, USNI News understands.

Cmdr. Bobby Barber, commander of USS Canberra Gold Crew, told USNI News that he’s “hopeful” a deployment will take place soon.

In the longer term, continued uncertainty about the fate of the Navy’s Littoral Combat Ships means that the vessel may or may not see out its full lifespan. In June, the House Armed Services Committee authorized the Navy to decommission two of Canberra’s sister ships, USS Jackson (LCS-6) and USS Montgomery (LCS-8), after less than 10 years of service.

Wherever Canberra operates it will carry a little bit of Australia wherever it goes. During the ceremony, Vice Adm. Mark Hammond, chief of the Royal Australian Navy, said that he had given permission for Canberra to sail with a modified version of the Red Kangaroo which adorns all Australian warships as a funnel emblem. He also confirmed that, for as long as Canberra is in service, at least one Australian officer or sailor will be aboard due to a permanent exchange program.

The Red Kangaroo, Hammond said, was originally adopted by the Royal Australian Navy to distinguish it from the Royal Navy. Gifting the symbol to Canberra, was Australia’s way of making an “indelible mark” on the historic commissioning ceremony.

“There will always be an Australian sailor or officer posted to this ship,” he said. “An Australian Navy lieutenant is part of the ship’s company today and all of you, when you look to the superstructure you will see your own special Australian kangaroo.”

https://news.usni.org/2023/07/22/video-uss-canberra-commissions-in-rare-overseas-ceremony

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19226422

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19226413

USS Canberra officially launched into duty in Australia making history

7NEWS Australia

Jul 22, 2023

A US warship has been officially launched into duty in Australia making history.

The new USS Canberra will be based on this side of the Pacific but the all-American celebration was overshadowed by a stoush over submarines.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UzAE7I5K-Eg

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19226423

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19226413

US Navy warship USS Canberra commissioned in Sydney

Sky News Australia

Jul 22, 2023

Combat ship USS Canberra has been officially commissioned in Sydney on Saturday, making it the first-ever commissioning of a US Navy ship in an allied country.

Australian and American dignitaries have reflected on the significance of the event.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwQPcMerAV8

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19226427

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19226413

USS Canberra (LCS 30) Commissioning on 22 July, 2023.

Defense Now

Jul 22, 2023

USS Canberra (LCS 30) has arrived at the Royal Australian Navy’s Fleet Base East in Sydney for a one-of-a-kind commissioning later this week.

The United States Navy’s 16th Independence Class littoral combat ship arrived on 18 July ahead of its commissioning on 22 July, before returning to its homeport of San Diego. US Navy officials will also reportedly make a visit to Canberra after commissioning.

Canberra is the first US Navy warship to be commissioned in an allied country and the second US Navy ship to bear the namesake of Canberra. The ship, launched in June 2021, was named Canberra after the Australian cruiser HMAS Canberra which was sunk following the Battle of Savo Island against Japanese forces on 9 August 1942.

Officials in attendance at the commissioning are expected to include US Navy littoral combat ship Squadron One Commodore Captain Marc Crawford, USS Canberra Gold crew Commanding Officer, US Navy Commander Bobby Barber, and HMAS Canberra (III) Commanding Officer, Royal Australian Navy Captain Brendan O’Hara.

Former Australian minister of foreign affairs Marise Payne originally attended the ship’s keel-laying ceremony in Alabama in 2020 and the ship was named by Australia’s Defence Assistant Secretary for Industrial Capability Planning in the Nuclear Submarines Taskforce Alison Petchell in 2021.

Littoral combat ships operate as near-shore and open-ocean surface ships, equipped with surface-to-air missiles and a fully automatic 57mm Mark 110 gun for surface, anti-submarine and mine countermeasure missions.

The littoral combat ship has amassed significant scrutiny during its development with reports the ships were not required in their current role, excess to needs and without required lethality or survivability.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmTTSbCiZzc

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19226439

File: becad74aeee0ade⋯.jpg (275.7 KB,1429x1429,1:1,TALISMAN_SABRE_2023.jpg)

File: 5c34a7e09f67766⋯.jpg (810.3 KB,2048x1366,1024:683,362275208_653712683453392_….jpg)

File: a4dc286c70b3da4⋯.jpg (400.3 KB,2048x1366,1024:683,362296577_653712863453374_….jpg)

File: f72d7ab0766239b⋯.jpg (564.46 KB,2048x1366,1024:683,362615123_653712933453367_….jpg)

File: ff0185249d5d61e⋯.jpg (489 KB,2048x1365,2048:1365,362279265_653712850120042_….jpg)

>>19204909

Talisman Sabre 2023: Firepower demonstrations 1,000 miles apart signal start of massive exercise in Australia

ALEX WILSON, STARS AND STRIPES - July 23, 2023

SHOALWATER BAY TRAINING AREA, Australia — Dozens of mortar shells and rockets screamed across the Australian bush into a mountainside over the weekend, one of two live-fire demonstrations that kicked off the largest-ever Talisman Sabre exercise.

Troops from seven countries gathered at Shoalwater Bay Training Area — 442 miles north of Brisbane in eastern Australia — on Saturday to watch American, Australian, South Korean and Japanese crews fire artillery during a simulated attack. Behind the scenes, support personnel from France, Germany and New Zealand also participated.

“This event here is very, very important for us, because it’s not just the missiles shooting, it’s about us working with each other; being able to work with another military or another nation is about the human connectivity,” Brig. Gen. Nicholas Foxall, commander of the Australian army’s 1st Brigade, told reporters before the demonstration. “That is what this event is all about.”

At Beecroft Weapons Range, 1,000 miles south of Shoalwater Bay near Jervis Bay on Australia’s eastern coast, the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force kicked off Talisman Sabre with its own live-fire demo. It launched a Type 12 surface-to-ship missile from Australian soil for the first time, the Australian Defence Force said in a Saturday news release.

Now in its 10th year, the biennial Talisman Sabre is expected bring more than 30,000 personnel, nearly double the number of troops deployed in 2021 during the COVID-19 pandemic, with additional participants from the United Kingdom, Canada, Indonesia, Fiji, Tonga and Papua New Guinea.

The exercise provides an opportunity for the individual nations to practice teamwork and communication in the event of “whatever crisis may exist in our region in the future,” Lt. Gen. Greg Bilton, the Australian Defence Force chief of joint operations, said Friday during the exercise’s opening ceremony in Garden Island, Australia.

That threat isn’t from any specific country, according to Talisman Sabre officials.

A Chinese surveillance ship was already off Australia’s east coast, not an unusual event, Bilton said at the ceremony, according an Australian Defence Force transcript.

“They've done this for a number of years,” he said. “We're well prepared for it.”

Foxall said every nation has the right to navigate international waters.

“We just expect those who are in those international borders to respect our rights and we ask them for that space,” he told reporters Saturday.

Saturday’s three-hour demonstration at Shoalwater began with four U.S. Marine Corps F-35B Lightning II stealth fighters from the amphibious assault ship USS America waiting off the coast. The jets launched 500-pound laser-guided missiles at a fictitious enemy stronghold.

U.S. Army, Marine Corps and Australian army crews quickly followed the strike with their own barrage from M777 howitzers. South Korean crews manning a K9A1 Thunder howitzer, and a K239 Chunmoo missile launcher entered the fray as well. The exercise also marked the first use of a Chunmoo on Australian soil.

A U.S. AC-130 Ghost Rider gunship followed up with covering fire ahead of two series of launches from four High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems, or HIMARS, by the U.S. Army and Marine Corps.

A Japanese Type-03 Chu surface-to-air missile system scheduled for its first operational use in Australia failed to fire due to radar issues, Australian army Maj. Gen. Greg Bilton told reporters after the demonstration.

The system fired successfully during the previous day’s rehearsal, exercise spokeswoman Emma Brown told Stars and Stripes after the event.

https://www.stripes.com/branches/marine_corps/2023-07-23/talisman-sabre-live-fire-exercise-australia-10827285.html

https://www.facebook.com/talismansabre/posts/653712716786722

>Talisman Sabre

>MAGIC SWORD

https://qalerts.pub/?q=Operation+Specialists

https://qalerts.pub/?q=magic

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19226465

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19226439

Talisman Sabre: Chinese spy ships moving into position to monitor war game exercise

Sky News Australia

Jul 23, 2023

Live demonstrations of the latest military firepower are on display as part of the largest ever US and Australia-led war gaming exercise, Talisman Sabre.

Chinese spy ships are moving into position to monitor the exercise for the next fortnight.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbaPtjZy9qk

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19226476

File: fc10bff9fb2b948⋯.jpg (182.74 KB,1200x720,5:3,Artillery_is_fired_during_….jpg)

>>19226439

>>19226465

Largest ever Australia-US joint military exercise a ‘paper tiger,’ experts say

GT staff reporters - Jul 22, 2023

1/2

The largest ever ongoing Australia-US joint military exercise, which involves 13 countries, has been deemed as a "paper tiger" by Chinese experts. Though impressive on paper, the exercise cannot really persuade all participants to serve the US' purpose, experts said.

The two-week-long military exercise, known as Talisman Sabre 2023, officially commenced on Friday. It is the largest since 2005, with more than 30,000 military personnel from 13 countries participating, according to media reports. Reuters described it as a "show of force and unity at a time when China has emerged as an increasingly assertive power in the Indo-Pacific."

"The most important message that China can take from this exercise and anything that our allies and partners do together, is that we are extremely tied by the core values that exist amongst our many nations," US Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro was quoted as saying by Reuters during an opening ceremony in Sydney.

The US' purpose of roping in countries such as Australia and other allies in its Indo-Pacific military encirclement of China, as well as preparing for future military adventures, is evident through the "unprecedented" military exercise, Chen Hong, executive director at the Asia Pacific Studies Center of East China Normal University, told the Global Times on Saturday.

Chen criticized the US for continuously exacerbating regional tensions and insecurity.

The military exercise also coincides with the upcoming visit of US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin to visit Papua New Guinea and Australia next week, during which Austin plans to join US Secretary of State Blinken to attend Australia-US Ministerial Consultations (AUSMIN) and observe military exercises.

However, the military excise that has been labeled by the West as "the largest in the 18-year history of the exercise" that is intended to send a clear message to China was more of a "paper tiger," Chen noted.

US officials often brag about the "core values" shared by their allies and partners. However, Chinese military expert Song Zhongping told the Global Times that the US has been trying to coerce these countries in the name of "defending their security and democratic values" and kidnap them by hyping up threats involving China, Russia and North Korea.

By playing word games, the US is only aiming to maintain its own global hegemony and participating countries also have their own petty calculations, Song noted.

Though impressive on paper, the exercise cannot really persuade all participants to serve the US' purpose, even Australia has certain reluctance, not to mention the rest, the two experts noted.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19226478

File: e6dcbec7d27f36f⋯.jpg (105.68 KB,800x480,5:3,Magnifying_legal_Chinese_s….jpg)

>>19226476

2/2

Media reports claimed this year is the first time that Germany has participated in the exercise, sending 210 paratroopers and marines. Chinese experts said since Merkel left office, Germany's diplomatic independence has been undermined, but they questioned whether Germany would really take more actions to back the US military adventure and the symbolic significance of Germany's participation in the exercise far outweighs the substantive significance.

For Australia, Chen said located in the South Pacific region where is safe and peaceful, Australia can be hardly challenged in terms of security, but unfortunately, it has been growingly pushed into a blind alley by the manipulation of the US and has become a pawn in the US' chess game. Australia will be equipped with nuclear-powered submarines under the AUKUS deal and has become more aggressive militarily by investing more in the development of military equipment, the expert noted.

Chen reminded Australia to maintain its strategic independence in order to protect its national interests. Excessive military adventurism will only put Australia on a more insecure position and hinder its own development, Chen warned.

Japan's Self Defense Force is scheduled to conduct a live fire demonstration of its Type 12 Surface-to-Ship missile (SSM) at a weapons range at Jervis Bay, south of Sydney on Friday, according to ABC.

South Korea has brought two warships and self-propelled howitzers as well as a multiple launch rocket system (MLRS) known as Chunmoo to the exercise. It will showcase its rocket technology during the Talisman Sabre, the ABC report said.

Song told the Global Times that both Japan and South Korea have their own intentions in developing their military industries by attending the Talisman Sabre. Testing equipment in Australia is taken as a way to prove their equipment can well adapt to different climates and be utilized across the globe, which will boost their arms exports.

Chinese experts also slammed Western hype surrounding the sailing of a Chinese ship off the coast of Australia that labeled it as a spy ship.

Rebuking commentators from the US and Australia who described China's act of sending ships to regional waters as "aggressive," Chen said such claims are baseless and unfounded, and that the US and Australia should respect the right of other countries to exercise freedom of navigation and overflight in international seas and airspace.

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202307/1294863.shtml

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19226500

File: f9615e9151f3cdd⋯.jpg (286.64 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Former_Clarinda_MP_Hong_Li….jpg)

File: 7c9d167ad501a63⋯.jpg (277.52 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Cambodia_s_Prime_Minister_….jpg)

>>19220977

‘Don’t wait until one of us dies in a pool of blood’: MPs on hit list for criticising Cambodian leader

STEPHEN RICE - JULY 23, 2023

1/2

A former Victorian Labor MP named on a “death list” of Australian critics of Cambodian strongman Hun Sen says the Albanese government is still allowing the dictator’s enforcers to enter Australia despite promises to crack down on foreign interference by the regime.

Former Clarinda MP Hong Lim was among several community leaders targeted in an anonymous letter sent to his successor in the seat, Labor MP Meng Heang Tak, who was also warned he would be killed if he did not stop his criticism of Hun Sen.

Mr Lim said the Cambodian regime had the capability to send professional assassins to Australia, with visas still being approved for government officials and military officers.

“They are making a fool of us - you just embolden Hun Sen, making him more and more daring and escalating,” said Mr Lim, who has had discussions with the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation and the Australian Federal Police.

“Every time I meet up with ASIO or the AFP I say – don’t wait until one of us dies in a pool of blood like our friend Kem Ley did,” he said.

Kem Ley was a prominent broadcaster and critic of Hun Sen shot dead in broad daylight while drinking coffee at a Phnom Penh petrol station.

Last year The Australian revealed how Hun Sen has divided Australia into seven zones, each controlled from Phnom Penh by a high-ranking military officer or official in the regime, in which Cambodian-Australians are rewarded for allegiance to the dictator or singled out for punishment as traitors.

The network is used to conduct surveillance and provide reports to the regime on local opponents of Hun Sen, and has previously directly threatened violence against Cambodian-Australians, including Mr Lim.

The Australian zones – which take in every state and territory except Tasmania – are overseen by Hun Sen’s eldest son, Hun Manet, who is likely to assume power soon, after a tightly-controlled election held on Sunday with rival parties banned.

Hundreds of uniformed members of Hun Sen’s Cambodian People’s Party have attended meetings in every state around Australia over the past month ahead of the sham election.

“If this is not foreign interference in our country, I don’t know what is,” Mr Lim said. “It makes the whole country look so weak, that they can come and go at any time.

“People are fearful of them. They have meetings with sometimes 500 people, give free dinners. When we protest they take photos and videos of us.

“At one meeting two or three years ago they put my photo on their board. It means that now we are targeted and so Hun Sen only has to say, yes, do it, and somebody would want to do it because they would want to be promoted.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19226503

File: e6d09047c7ed53c⋯.jpg (370.81 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Hong_Lim_speaks_at_a_rally….jpg)

File: f9564003ed74156⋯.jpg (146.99 KB,1536x863,1536:863,Labor_MP_Meng_Heang_Tak_wa….jpg)

>>19226500

2/2

The death threat list includes the president of the Cambodian Association of Victoria Chea Youhorn and “any Australian member of parliament” or any member of the Khmer community who opposed Hun Sen or his decision to hand over power to his son Hun Manet.

“I want to tell you that a hit list has been prepared to solve many problems that you and so call democratic voice in Australia and around the world,” the anonymous writer says.

“These people including yourself will be targeted for death by my Cambodian third hand squad who will be flying there to do the clean up. Take this as a warning.”

Mr Tak, the current state MP for Clarinda and recipient of the death threat letter, said the Hun Sen regime could carry out the threat if it chose to.

“If it wanted to, whilst I’m not alleging who’s responsible for this letter, of course, but he is capable of that, given he has got a network and those who are prepared to carry out activities like this. You have to take it very seriously.”

The local Cambodian community has pleaded with the Albanese government to live up to its pre-election rhetoric and ban regime officials who use the threat of violence to enforce obedience by Australian citizens to Hun Sen.

Mr Lim says Australia needs to use its visa powers to restrict entry and its Magnitsky laws to target human rights abusers and super-rich cronies of the regime who use Australia to stash their wealth and educate their children.

“Labor was supposed to implement the Magnitsky Act but they haven’t done anything. I’m choking with emotion, I’m talking about my own party, Labor, in power, being even more cowardly and weak than the coalition government.

“This is just sad that we’re going down that vortex of shame, and in my own party.”

Federal Labor MP Julian Hill, whose Victorian electorate is home to a significant Cambodian population and who has been a longtime critic of the Hun Sen regime said the CPP’s foreign interference operations were “a poor man’s version of the Chinese Communist Party’s very sophisticated activities.”

“It’s just not acceptable that these gangster thugs come to Australia to interfere in our democratic rights with the aim of suppressing legitimate criticism of Cambodia’s government.

“There’s a lot the government has done and is doing, although there are natural limits that any democratic government faces in combating this kind of behaviour.”

Victoria Police have confirmed Moorabbin Crime Investigation Unit detectives are investigating the letter, which was typed and appears to have been posted in Dandenong.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/dont-wait-until-one-of-us-dies-in-a-pool-of-blood-mps-on-hit-list-for-criticising-cambodian-leader/news-story/779df06293da19064bf3a0cec2473347

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19226522

File: f05750f9a0647f9⋯.jpg (353.11 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Daniel_Duggan_with_his_chi….jpg)

File: c089cba619ef3e0⋯.jpg (735.67 KB,2016x1511,2016:1511,Lawyer_Glen_Kolomeitz_visi….jpg)

>>18929002 (pb)

>>18998407 (pb)

Battle to save Aussie dad from ‘justice’ in America

Cydonee Mardon - July 22, 2023

1/2

Lawyers for an Australian father locked up in prison for nine months over claims he trained Chinese military pilots will front a Sydney Court this week to apply for a temporary stay of proceedings.

Dan Duggan has been in solitary confinement awaiting extradition to the US based on 11-year-old allegations he trained Chinese military pilots in South Africa from 2010 to 2012.

Mr Duggan, who is being held at Lithgow Correctional Centre, has not been charged with anything in Australia and no other pilots at the same South African flying school, including Australian and UK pilots, have been charged. The flying school says it has been “cleared” by the FBI.

The allegations, which Mr Duggan strenuously denies, are detailed in a US indictment filed in 2017, at the same time that US foreign policy towards China took a dramatic turn.

The key allegation, from which the other charges flow, is that Mr Duggan trained military pilots without permission from the Department of Justice. This allegation has a statute of limitations of five years but is still being pursued a decade later.

In total, Mr Duggan faces as much as 65 years in jail if found guilty in the United States.

International lawyer and veteran Dr Glenn Kolomeitz, who is assisting the Duggan family, has spent hours with Mr Duggan in Lithgow jail and has analysed this case in depth.

The Sunday Telegraph has been shown the Australian-US extradition treaty, which says that Australia will not confirm that any offences alleged in an extradition request from the US “are properly charged and supported by legally admissible evidence”.

Mr Kolomeitz said the US told Australia that they “don’t need to prove anything” but, rather, we should just accept whatever US public servant lawyers and a US grand jury says.

“Australia, in the exercise of lapdog diplomacy, obligingly agreed,” he said. “Unfortunately, in the US they say that a grand jury will ‘indict a ham sandwich’. I’ve torn the indictment of the grand jury in this case apart. It is riddled with inflammatory and irrelevant statements and the word ‘conspiracy’ 178 times alongside the word ‘China’, such that of course a grand jury is going to indict.

“What it doesn’t have is evidence linking Dan to those words. In fact, the indictment has so many holes in it, it’s a Swiss cheese and ham sandwich.”

Almost 13,000 people have signed a petition protesting the treatment of Mr Duggan, who grew up in Boston and served as a pilot in the Marines.

The 54-year-old moved to Australia in 2002, set up a tourism business running jet joy flights, and became a citizen in 2012, automatically losing his US citizenship.

The couple and their children also spent some years living in China where they ran a fashion business, Mr Duggan consulted to the civil aviation sector and also ran a bar in Beijing for a short time.

Mr Duggan’s Australian wife Saffrine and their six children aged ­between 6 and 18 are living on her ­father’s property near Orange.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19226527

File: 4456573099056b8⋯.jpg (482.33 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Jack_9_Saffrine_Hazel_7_an….jpg)

File: 4b6f8d7829a989c⋯.jpg (255.75 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Dan_Duggan_established_a_t….jpg)

>>19226522

2/2

Expressing his shock at Mr Duggan’s arrest, his former commanding officer Ben Hanock described him as a loyal and dedicated marine. He said he believed him to be not guilty of the charges, adding: “You get to know a person very well and their true colour and nature when you spend months on a Navy ship in a hostile desert-tent environment as we did while land-based in Kuwait”.

The case against Mr Duggan is the subject of a rare Inquiry by the Australian Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security’s (IGIS) into the legality of ASIO’s actions.

The IGIS Inquiry will look at a range of issues, many of which cannot be discussed publicly due to Australian secrecy laws.

Mr Duggan’s lawyers argue the extradition should be withdrawn until the independent IGIS inquiry concludes, in order to avoid an abuse of legal process.

They say a cardinal principle of International Law is the noninterference in the domestic affairs of a sovereign state and as such the United States should withdraw.

In her written complaint to the NSW Ombudsman, Mrs Duggan said Dan’s mental health is suffering and seriously deteriorating.

“There is a growing body of research that shows that solitary confinement as it is used today, including in NSW, can cause a variety of severe psychological problems.”

She said Dan was first held for 65 days before even knowing what he was falsely accused of, and access to his family or lawyers was extremely restricted.

“This is completely unacceptable in an apparently democratic and ‘free’ society like Australia where citizens are innocent until proven guilty. Until December 2022, and without convictions or history of violence, Dan was held under the harshest possible prison classification in NSW – ‘extreme high risk restricted inmate’, which is normally reserved for the most violent criminals.”

Mr Duggan’s stay application will be heard in the Downing Centre Local Court on Tuesday.

Supporters will gather at Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s office in Marrickville on Sunday at 1pm.

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/battle-to-save-aussie-dad-from-justice-in-america/news-story/9c657ec5d7729e1f2b27fcc174a2b1aa

https://www.change.org/p/release-my-husband-australian-daniel-duggan-and-refuse-his-extradition-to-the-us

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19226545

File: 886fbd12c2f8897⋯.jpg (259.95 KB,930x1240,3:4,Daniel_Duggan_with_two_of_….jpg)

File: ff3db4c80c77989⋯.jpg (139.45 KB,1188x1159,1188:1159,Duggan_formerly_operated_s….jpg)

File: b8df19f71f486ac⋯.jpg (2.85 MB,4854x3236,3:2,Supporters_of_Daniel_Dugga….jpg)

>>19226522

Australian ‘Top Gun’ accused of training Chinese is backed by US marine

Georgina Mitchell - July 23, 2023

A former high-ranking member of the United States military has thrown his support behind Daniel Duggan, an Australian citizen and former marine who is being held in maximum security over accusations he trained Chinese military pilots more than a decade ago.

Duggan, 54, who lives near Orange in regional NSW with his wife and six children, has been in custody since October last year after the US indicated it would request his extradition. He denies any wrongdoing.

His lawyers have indicated he will challenge the extradition on at least two grounds: that the case against him is a political one, which would make him ineligible for surrender overseas, and because the charges against him do not exist in Australia, a requirement known as dual criminality.

In a letter written last week, retired marine colonel Ben Hancock said he had known Duggan for 25 years, including serving in the same squadron for two years, working closely on a six-month ship deployment, and being deployed in Kuwait.

He described Duggan as a “loyal patriot” and team player who served the US honourably and could be counted on in difficult circumstances.

“Dan literally risked his life almost daily while flying the AV-8B Harrier jet countless times at sea, at night, in poor weather and no place to land except back on the US Navy ship,” Hancock said.

“He did everything I asked him to and more. He was an officer I could count on in both peacetime operations and in combat, and I trusted my life to him while flying together. I do not believe him to be anything but a hard-working, loyal and dedicated individual.”

Hancock said Duggan had been a “highly trained and skilled” pilot specialising in weapons and tactics, who voluntarily extended his time in the marine corps to deploy overseas.

He said he had kept in touch with Duggan over email, and was “very surprised” to read the allegations about him in media reports.

“The allegations do not match the character of the Dan Duggan that I knew and respected as a US marine,” Hancock said. “I look forward to the dismissal of these charges and Dan returning home to his wife and children.”

The US wants Duggan to be extradited over claims he trained Chinese pilots through a South African flight school between 2011 and 2012, without seeking authorisation from the US government.

Duggan became an Australian citizen in 2012 and has renounced his US citizenship.

In March, national spy watchdog the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security (IGIS) confirmed it had launched a formal inquiry into the circumstances of Duggan’s case, including his contact with Australian security agencies.

Duggan’s lawyer, Dennis Miralis, previously raised concerns that ASIO may have acted “illegally or improperly” in dealings with Duggan over an extended period of time, including luring him back to Australia to be arrested.

The extradition proceedings will return to Downing Centre Local Court on Tuesday, where barrister Bret Walker, SC, will appear for Duggan.

Walker is expected to argue that the extradition proceedings should be temporarily stayed while the IGIS investigation takes place. If this argument is successful, there will be an application for Duggan to be released on bail.

Duggan’s family was recently able to visit him at Lithgow Correctional Centre, the first time they had seen him in the months since his arrest.

He was initially classified as an “extreme high-risk restricted inmate” in October 2022. This status was revoked two months later, but his maximum security classification remains.

Duggan formerly operated Top Gun Tasmania, a business in Hobart offering scenic flights in fighter planes.

https://www.smh.com.au/national/australian-top-gun-accused-of-training-chinese-is-backed-by-us-marine-20230722-p5dqf2.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19231753

File: 18eee67d8fe7505⋯.mp4 (5.59 MB,1024x576,16:9,1024x576_MP4_6429595435592….mp4)

File: 3a5b847a81394c3⋯.jpg (68.88 KB,1280x719,1280:719,Anthony_Albanese_at_a_Midn….jpg)

File: 7599503673f93fd⋯.jpg (173.07 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Former_PM_Tony_Abbott.jpg)

>>19222755

Tony Abbott blasts PM’s voice ‘not about a treaty’ line

JOANNA PANAGOPOULOS - JULY 24, 2023

Former Prime Minister Tony Abbott has slammed Prime Minister Anthony Albanese for claiming the voice was “not about a treaty” with Indigenous Australians, as a video resurfaced of the Prime Minister wearing a “Voice, Treaty, Truth” T-shirt.

The Prime Minister made the statement last week in a fiery conversation with radio host Ben Fordham on Sydney’s 2GB, becoming frustrated with questioning as he sought to set out the case for the referendum.

“I just say to you and I say to your listeners, read the question you are going to be asked about. It’s not about treaty, it’s not about compensation. It’s just about listening in order to get better governance,” Mr Albanese said.

In an interview with Mr Abbott on Monday, Fordham referred to a video shared by the Daily Mail in October 2022, where the Prime Minister wore the Midnight Oil’s “Voice, Treaty, Truth” T-shirt to their concert.

“Last week Anthony Albanese was here and he said to me that this is not about treaty but over the weekend someone sent me a video of the Prime Minister dancing at the Midnight Oil concert wearing a T-shirt that says ‘Voice, Treaty, Truth’,” Mr Fordham said.

Mr Abbott, replied: “Indeed. And I suppose this is the problem when you turn yourself into a billboard,” Mr Abbott said on the same program on Monday morning.

“And quite apart from anything the Prime Minister chose to wear at a concert, I go back to that initial statement he made as Prime Minister. The new government is committed to the Uluru statement from the Heart in full – in other words, voice, treaty, truth in full.

“It was, as I said, a moment of amnesia for the Prime Minister to deny here in this chair last week that the voice had anything to do with treaty. It has everything to do with treaty.

“The whole point of having a voice, if the activists are to be believed, is to start the treaty making process, and government minister’s have said as much.”

When the Prime Minister was asked in May if the voice would lead to a treaty and truth-telling, he said: “They are very much a part of the next phase, if you like”.

Supporters of an Indigenous voice have also said the body must be established so it can negotiate treaty.

The Prime Minister told 2GB last week, people should “not raise red herrings” and rejected suggestions he shouldn’t risk constitutional recognition for a “mildly popular voice”.

“We’re having a crack here … There isn’t one person (who worked on the Uluru statement) saying we shouldn’t do this. They’re saying this is an opportunity for Australians.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/tony-abbott-blasts-pms-voice-not-about-a-treaty-line/news-story/efa205b4a789eb7165614479aa118d42

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11277855/Anthony-Albaneses-dad-dancing-Midnight-Oil-gig-Jodie-Haydon-Sydneys-Hordern-Pavilion.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19231792

File: 3bd71a4a33bc5fa⋯.jpg (94.5 KB,1280x721,1280:721,Anthony_Albanese_wearing_a….jpg)

File: bdd6ed122384b75⋯.jpg (95.6 KB,1620x912,135:76,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 72f16b6385c5741⋯.jpg (243.15 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Tony_Abbott_says_the_propo….jpg)

>>19220640

>>19222755

>>19231753

Tony Abbott unleashes on the Voice, Anthony Albanese

Anthony Albanese has come under fire over his decision to wear a T-shirt with a three-word slogan on it to a Midnight Oil concert.

Carla Mascarenhas - July 24, 2023

Former Prime Minister Tony Abbott has unleashed on the Indigenous Voice to Parliament, describing it as a “power grab by activists”.

In a scathing critique of the Yes campaign, Mr Abbott told 2GB’s Ben Fordham this morning that he did not want to see Australia “divided by ancestry or race”.

“I don’t want to see Indigenous separatism reinforced in our constitution.”

He claimed if the Voice passed it would lead to “massive demands for compensation or reparations and even more restrictions on what people can do with their land”.

Mr Abbott also took aim at Mr Albanese for saying previously the Voice was “not about a treaty”, questioning his decision to wear a shirt with the slogan “Voice, Treaty, Truth”.

Mr Albanese was spotted wearing the shirt at a Midnight Oil concert late last year.

“This is what happens when you turn yourself into a billboard,” Mr Abbott said.

“I go back to that initial statement he made as Prime Minister - ‘The new government is committed to the Uluru statement from the Heart in full’ – in other words, voice, treaty, truth in full,” he said.

“It was a moment of amnesia for the Prime Minister to deny here in this chair last week that the Voice had anything to do with the treaty.

“It has everything to do with treaty. The whole point of having a Voice – if the activists are to be believed – is to start the treaty making process, and government ministers have said as much.”

The interview Mr Abbott was referring to was a heated clash between Mr Albanese and Mr Fordham last week.

During that interview, Mr Albanese was grilled about whether the Voice to Parliament was a step towards reparations and treaty.

“This is not about a treaty," Mr Albanese repeated four times.

“I can’t say it any clearer, compensation has nothing to do with what people will vote on later this year.”

Mr Albanese has committed to executing the 2017 Uluru Statement from the Heart in full, including a Makaratta Commission to oversee “treaty” and “truth-telling” with Indigenous Australians.

News.com.au has contacted Mr Albanese and Yes23 for comment.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19231794

File: b404dabfd113eb8⋯.jpg (260.71 KB,825x514,825:514,LT_1.jpg)

>>19231792

2/2

Yes campaigners push for referendum delay as support plummets

The interview comes as some Yes supporters urge for the referendum to be delayed or even called off as polls show support plummeting.

A poll by Resolve Political Monitor over the weekend shows a majority of NSW voters are now supporting the No campaign.

The No campaign, according to polls, also has a majority in Queensland, Tasmania, South Australia and Western Australia.

For a referendum to be successful, the Yes vote must receive a majority of voters across a majority of states.

Liberal senator Andrew Bragg, who is campaigning for a Yes vote, said not enough “middle ground” had been established and he feared that lack of consensus had doomed the referendum to failure.

Senator Bragg said it was time to “save the concept” before running a referendum in mid-2024.

Over the weekend businesswoman Lucy Turnbull asked Yes supporters how keen they were for the referendum to go ahead “if it is likely going to be lost, possibly by a big margin”.

“I am very troubled and torn about it,” she wrote on Twitter.

But constitutional law expert Professor George Williams told news.com.au holding the referendum this year was “mandatory” as legislation to set up the referendum had “passed by both houses”.

He said while referendums have been withdrawn in the past (1915, 1965, 1983, 2013) there was always the possibility of a high court challenge.

Prof Williams said the government could go the “awkward and unconstitutional” route of delaying the referendum which would mean it would have to go through parliament again as there was a six-month window on when a referendum had to be held once it had passed parliament.

He compared referendums to “freight trains, once they are going they are hard to stop, they build up momentum”.

“At the moment I think there is a lot of over-reaction, we just need to see how it plays out … there is no perfect time to hold a referendum,” he said.

Prof Williams said the key issue was what do Indigenous people want.

“They have made it clear they would see it as a breach of faith if it was pulled against their wishes.”

https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/tony-abbott-unleashes-on-the-voice-anthony-albanese/news-story/91f0fffcfcabd5c8f2d29dce4a7be96f

https://twitter.com/LucyTurnbull_AO/status/1682597783197597696

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19231811

File: 26267ba4f73af9e⋯.jpg (195.1 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Tom_Calma_says_he_is_flabb….jpg)

File: ccf646d72b1fee2⋯.jpg (630.79 KB,2048x2731,2048:2731,Sean_Gordon.jpg)

>>19220640

>>19222755

>>19231792

Indigenous voice to parliament supporters say Anthony Albanese shouldn’t delay referendum

ROSIE LEWIS - JULY 23, 2023

1/2

Voice co-architect and senior Australian of the Year Tom Calma says the referendum must be held this year and a delay will not change the will of the people, as Anthony Albanese is told to “go the course” by Yes advocates.

Liberal for Yes co-convener Sean Gordon also rejected the suggestion the referendum be pulled because of a fear of failure or that the country may look bad in the eyes of the rest of the world, warning Australia shouldn’t shy away from a proposal put forward by Indigenous people.

It comes after NSW Liberal senator Andrew Bragg urged the Prime Minister, who has repeatedly said the referendum will be held between October and December, to delay the poll until the middle of next year and find a middle ground so reconciliation was not defeated. “In the meantime, the inertia is no, the momentum is yes. And we’ve got our work cut out,” he said.

Professor Calma, who wrote the voice co-design process report with Indigenous leader ­Marcia Langton, said the vote should happen this year and his on-the-ground experience was not reflected in the falling support in the polls.

“Will the delay – if it was proposed – going to change the situation or not? I don’t believe it will. It’s either the will of the people, if we can trust the polls, seems to be declining so delaying – is that going to turn it around? I doubt it,” Professor Calma told The Australian.

“If people are shortsighted and that’s how they want to be, then that’s how they’ll vote. But I think I would be supportive of maintaining that it happens this year and we take what the people are going to do. I’m a bit flabbergasted actually as to why the polls are reflecting what they are.

“We’ve seen how accurate the polls have been in past elections. We’ll see what happens on the day and hopefully people will have given it a good, considered view and gone beyond the misinformation that’s floating around and make an informed position.”

Mr Gordon said he wasn’t fearful of what the referendum result would be at this stage and insisted the voice would help address the disadvantage Aboriginal people faced, pointing out a two-litre bottle of milk cost $8.40 in a remote community.

“To now suggest that we should pull that process (for constitutional recognition) up because there is fear of failure, I definitely don’t agree with that. My position is to go the course,” he said.

“If the referendum fails then we as a nation need to have a long, hard look at ourselves and really understand what is the relationship between non-Indigenous Australians and Indigenous people of the country? What is the way forward when it comes to addressing the disadvantage between non-Indigenous and Indigenous people?

“The success of Indigenous people over the many decades (has) come from incremental change. For us, this is a further step in that journey. We shouldn’t be shying away from a position that was put forward by Indigenous people for the fear that it may fail and the country may look bad in the eyes of the rest of the world.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19231816

File: 804f3afa3b90096⋯.jpg (142.02 KB,1280x720,16:9,Johannes_Leak_s_view.jpg)

>>19231811

2/2

Mr Albanese has conceded the Yes case needs to be made stronger and public support for the voice has been slipping, sparking debate over what supporters can do to win back lost ground.

Indigenous leader Noel Pearson, who like Professor Calma and Mr Gordon is a member of the Albanese government’s referendum working group, said Liberal pollster and Yes23 director Mark Textor had advised him up to 40 per cent of the population were not yet engaged in the referendum.

“We’ve got three months to engage them,” Mr Pearson told Sky News, backing Mr Albanese’s five-to-six-week referendum campaign.

Businesswoman Lucy Turnbull asked Yes supporters over the weekend how keen they were for the referendum to go ahead “if it is likely going to be lost, possibly by a big margin”.

“I am very troubled and torn about it,” she said.

Empowered Communities responded: “Indigenous people have made an offer and proposal for the way forward. It’s been a long time coming.

“The Australian people must now respond. We think the Australian people will take the hand of friendship and love outstretched.”

Both Professor Calma and Mr Gordon believed the referendum would succeed.

Leading No campaigner Warren Mundine said Mr Albanese should cancel the referendum and hand taxpayers’ money spent on the poll to Aboriginal communities that needed help.

“All these corporate sports bodies and everyone else should do the same thing with all the millions of dollars that they have put into this,” Mr Mundine said.

“It’s a total waste of money. They (the government) should be putting it into communities to help those people who are in need and stop wasting taxpayers’ money.”

An alliance of young Indigenous voice supporters on Sunday described the referendum as “a once-in-many-lifetimes opportunity”, and asked fellow Australians to “seize the opportunity with us”.

The 28 Indigenous campaigners spent the weekend in Brisbane planning the work they will do in every state and territory in the months before the referendum, issuing a declaration of their intent to work towards a successful poll.

Aged 18 to 35, the young Indigenous men and women from Western Australia, Queensland, Victoria and NSW are Uluru Youth Dialogue ambassadors, working under the leadership and guidance of the Uluru Dialogue campaign since 2019.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-supporters-say-anthony-albanese-shouldnt-delay-referendum/news-story/497358d2b83539d3e0b64ede619902a9

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19231841

File: 8b44b2f3d462ed9⋯.jpg (254.9 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_will_hold….jpg)

File: 35bf98de5746957⋯.jpg (210.65 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Professor_Greg_Craven.jpg)

File: 5a732fba05621f9⋯.jpg (216.68 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Julian_Leeser.jpg)

>>19220640

>>19222755

>>19231792

Indigenous voice to parliament late-year poll ‘to harmonise voice’

ROSIE LEWIS - JULY 24, 2023

Conservative Yes campaigner Greg Craven says it would be sensible for Anthony Albanese to push the referendum as far as he can to mid-November or early December in the hope voice ­advocates can claw back support and the millions of dollars in ­donations can have the greatest impact.

However Liberals for Yes convener Julian Leeser said the referendum needed to be held soon so the government could focus on pressing cost-of-living pressures.

Constitutional law expert ­George Williams said the major football grand finals in late September and early October would provide the best opportunities to resonate with voters in the final weeks of the campaign.

“If you want to connect to the greater body of Australians, what are those set piece moments in a year that grab the eyeballs and attention of people? They tend to be the footy grand finals,” Professor Williams said.

“Will there be a better opportunity to resonate with people through something people care deeply about? If you build goodwill, recognition, why would you give the No case time to chip away at that and raise doubts (by going later in the year)?”

This comes as former prime minister Tony Abbott says the No side should not become complacent because there was “still an avalanche of money” being donated by “woke public companies, woke foundations and billionaires” to the Yes case that could “buy a referendum outcome”.

Mr Abbott also accused the Prime Minister of having a “momentary attack of amnesia” when he said last week that the voice referendum was “not about a treaty”, after a 2022 video resurfaced of him wearing a “voice, truth, treaty” T-shirt – as per the demands in the Uluru Statement from the Heart.

Mr Albanese has flagged a five-to-six-week formal referendum campaign, like a federal election, meaning the poll date won’t be announced until September at the earliest. The most likely date flagged by voice supporters is October 14.

Prominent voice campaigners have urged the Prime Minister to “go the course” and hold the referendum this year, after NSW Liberal senator Andrew Bragg urged Mr Albanese, who has repeatedly said the referendum would be held between October and December, to delay the poll until the middle of next year and find a middle ground so reconciliation was not defeated.

Professor Craven, who like Professor Williams is a member of the government’s constitutional expert group, said he held great respect for Senator Bragg but the proposal was impractical because the government was already fully behind a referendum this year.

If it pulled it, “the clear implication would be it’s so flawed that you don’t know what you’re doing … and people would not forget that”.

“Given the polls are not going well, it might be wiser for the government to delay it until later this year,” Professor Craven said.

“There’s good argument for that because the polls are really not good. It would give the Yes case much more time to deploy money, which is really one of the crucial things the Yes case has. So far, that hasn’t really joined the battle and you’ve got to give it enough time (to make an impact).

“I know that’s dangerous in one sense – more time could make (public support) go lower – but I think the polls are bad enough now that it would be sensible to push it out as far as can be done.”

December 19 is the latest Mr Albanese can hold the referendum.

Professor Craven conceded holding it too close to Christmas would not be appreciated and Professor Williams said December was usually a time people didn’t want politics in their lives.

“It might be seen as desperate to leave it to the very last moment,” he said.

Mr Leeser said he would argue Yes whenever the referendum was held, warning it was a serious act of persuasion and required everyone who wanted to make a difference to get out and argue for it.

“Referenda are all-consuming exercises,” he said.

“A short campaign has been flagged and I support that. We need to hold the referendum soon so that the government can focus on the pressing cost-of-living challenges facing Australians.”

Jim Chalmers, the government’s most senior Queensland MP, said he’d enthusiastically campaign in his home state and around the country.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-lateyear-poll-to-harmonise-voice/news-story/88305f2205553ee7666a8a6490ffc0de

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19231869

File: f8d79047e7fe8af⋯.jpg (260.28 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Jacinta_Nampijinpa_Price_h….jpg)

File: f769d2c728fe08a⋯.jpg (283.78 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Senator_Price_said_everyth….jpg)

File: adbda364616ac7f⋯.jpg (249.88 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Tony_Abbott_said_the_refer….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19231792

Jacinta Price pans Indigenous ‘experts’ in Melbourne

HUGO TIMMS - JULY 24, 2023

Northern Territory senator and prominent No campaigner Jacinta Nampijinpa Price has taken aim at Victoria and sporting codes over their support for the Voice to parliament.

Speaking on 3AW on Monday, Senator Price said Victoria was a state where “everything is about ideology and not common sense”, and sporting codes should not be “telling Australians how to suck eggs” in the public support for the Yes case.

“There’s so many experts in Melbourne on the plight of Indigenous Australians from places that I come from and the communities that I come from, but unfortunately their lives are completely and utterly removed,” the senator said.

Ms Price’s comments come after recent polling showed that only Victoria and Tasmania were likely to vote Yes in the upcoming referendum.

For a referendum to be successful, four states must be vote in favour of the proposition as well as a majority of voters in what is called a “double majority”.

“You only have to look at who’s running the show here in Victoria and the level of activism that takes place,” she said.

“Victoria is one of those places where everything is about ideology and not common sense.”

Ms Price also took aim at the major sporting codes and clubs.

“I’m really disappointed there are clubs who have come out and said they support it,” she said.

“They can’t describe to an Indigenous person in a remote community how it’s going to improve their lives.

“Why should they be telling Australians how to suck eggs?”

Also on Tuesday, former prime minister Tony Abbott, speaking on 2GB, said the referendum was “not going well” for the Yes campaign but cautioned the impact of funding from “woke billionaires” into the campaign.

“It’s not going well for the Yes campaign, but I don’t think the No campaign can be complacent,” Mr Abbott said.

“There is still an avalanche of money being provided by woke companies, woke foundations and billionaires.

“If it is possible to buy a referendum outcome, I think the Yes campaign will do it.”

“This isn’t about recognition – this is a power grab by activists.”

While a date is yet to be formally fixed for the referendum, it is widely predicted Australians will head to the polls in October.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/jacinta-price-pans-indigenous-experts-in-melbourne/news-story/6c3b3f052fbf8005c1bd9a8cc77e1a54

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19231877

File: 0cb42593ef16ad5⋯.jpg (243.57 KB,2031x1142,2031:1142,United_States_Submarine_US….jpg)

>>19188991

>>19220996

AUKUS: Republican Senator John Wicker expects congressional approval by end of year

ADAM CREIGHTON - JULY 24, 2023

Republican senator John Wicker, who last week held up critical US legislation that would enable the transfer of nuclear powered submarines to Australia, said he expected the impasse to be resolved by the end of the year, enough time to facilitate the landmark AUKUS security pact.

Senator Wicker, the ranking member of the powerful Senate Armed Services Committee, refused to allow a special amendment to proceed in the upper house unless the Biden administration promised to boost spending on the US submarine industrial base, which is struggling to meet congressional production targets.

“There is strong bipartisan support for the AUKUS deal; I am calling on President Biden to show leadership and send Congress a request for the resources necessary to expand the US submarine industrial base to support the needs of the United States and Australia for years to come,” he said.

“That is the key that will unlock the potential of AUKUS, and I am confident we can get it done by the end of this year,” he told The Australian via email.

As part of the AUKUS agreement, announced in September 2021, the navy is meant to acquire between three and five Virginia-class US submarines by the early 2030s, and the government will pay US$3 billion to the US to help expand its submarine building capacity.

“It makes sense to be sure we have enough submarines for our own security needs before we endorse that pillar of the [AUKUS] agreement,” Senator Wicker said last week after blocking the amendment.

“The president needs to submit a supplemental request to give us an adequate number of submarines,” he added, without putting a figure on how much extra funding would be required.

The US Senate Foreign Relations Committee last week signed off on the transfer of nuclear-powered submarines to the navy and granted Australia a rare 20-year exemption from tough US defence technology export controls.

“We are actually really encouraged by the pace at which this is proceeding through the Congress, the attention that it is receiving,” Defence Minister Richard Marles said last week in response to the hold up.

Republican Congressman Rob Wittman told defence publication Breaking News earlier this month that he would add an amendment in the House of Representatives to prevent the transfer of more than two Virginia class submarines to Australia until the US submarine production increased to three per year, up from around 1.2.

The Biden administration’s need for congressional approval for the AUKUS submarine deal has given Republicans, who control the House of Representatives, added political leverage as the two major parties squabble over the details of this year’s US$850bn annual defence bill.

Democrat senator Bob Menendez, chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, which had earlier approved the AUKUS measure, slammed senator Wicker’s veto as “foolish”.

The usually bipartisan National Defence Authorisation Act remains in limbo in congress after Republican members insisted the Pentagon cease abortion funding and pare back ‘diversity’ training, alongside demands for further funding for submarines.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/aukus-republican-senator-john-wicker-expects-congressional-approval-by-end-of-year/news-story/b5e3b6114c8bdd915a38056c55aebc11

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19231918

File: edce197a8360de4⋯.jpg (244.29 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_and_Joe_B….jpg)

File: a41ddce33ad0144⋯.jpg (388.89 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_future_Virginia_class_….jpg)

>>19026316 (pb)

>>18960157 (pb)

>>19188991

Doug Cameron warns Anthony Albanese of contest over nuke subs, Palestine at conference

BEN PACKHAM, GREG BROWN and JOANNA PANAGOPOULOS - JULY 24, 2023

1/2

Left-wing former senator Doug Cameron has warned Anthony Albanese he faces a contest at the ALP national conference over nuclear submarines and Palestine.

Anthony Albanese has warned Labor’s powerful policy forum he wants the AUKUS nuclear submarine plan to go unchallenged at the ALP national conference, as hard-Left figures prepare to attack the government’s cornerstone national security policy.

Federal Labor MPs are working to head off disunity on AUKUS and Left-wing demands for a timeline on recognising Palestine, in line with the Prime Minister’s directions this month to Labor’s national policymaking committee.

Mr Cameron said he would be “gobsmacked” if national delegates listened to the PM’s calls not to challenge the issues when they meet in Brisbane next month.

“The ALP Left have a proud history of challenging bad policy at ALP Nat Conference,” Mr Cameron tweeted.

“Would be gobsmacked if nuclear subs, regressive tax cuts and Palestine are not debated. Political discipline does not mean the Left subjugate themselves to leadership decrees on what can be debated.”

Union members from Victoria, including members from ­construction, manufacturing, electrical and public transport, are planning to revisit the challenge when national delegates meet in Brisbane next month.

The move comes amid criticism of the AUKUS pact by senior party figures including Paul Keating, Bob Carr and Gareth Evans, who have argued the nuclear subs plan is ill-conceived, overpriced, and will bind Australia’s strategic fate to America’s.

A hostile motion on AUKUS would be embarrassing for Mr Albanese, who stood beside US President Joe Biden and British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak in March to announce Australia would buy three to five US Virginia-class subs and build eight new UK-designed boats in Adelaide.

Any change to the party’s position on Palestine would also represent a challenge to the Prime Minister’s authority, and that of Foreign Minister Penny Wong.

Supporters of Israel are concerned the government’s reluctance to debate AUKUS on the floor of the national conference could result in a deal in which the party calls on the government to recognise the Palestinian state within this term of parliament.

A similar motion passed at the Victorian ALP conference in a factional deal under which an anti-AUKUS motion pulled from the agenda at the last minute.

The withdrawn motion would have called on the federal government to “suspend any further involvement in the AUKUS pact, including the development of nuclear-powered submarines”.

A Victorian Labor source said “categorically” that a similar motion would be moved in Brisbane next month. There are concerns some Queensland delegates could also speak out against the nuclear submarine deal.

The state’s ALP conference in June voted down a motion “congratulating” the Albanese government on the AUKUS pact, with Queensland Labor president John Battams and two state MPs – Ali King and Jonty Bush – among those who voted against it.

Fears of policy brawls over AUKUS and Palestine have been compounded by the factional make-up of national conference delegates, with the Left to have a clear majority on the floor for the first time in decades.

However, the dynamics of the summit are difficult to predict, as Mr Albanese and Senator Wong are both key figures within the Left faction. Senior Left-aligned MPs are also working hard to keep a lid on potential policy challenges.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19231925

File: d73d94da099a06f⋯.jpg (300.71 KB,2048x1152,16:9,A_Free_Palestine_rally_for….jpg)

File: 19106dea53b76c6⋯.jpg (322.07 KB,825x902,75:82,DC_1.jpg)

>>19231918

2/2

Opposition defence spokesman Andrew Hastie said the conference’s consideration of AUKUS loomed as a critical test for the Prime Minister. “It is a multigenerational pact that requires stewardship from the major parties, and our elected national leadership,” he said. “If he can’t deliver union support for AUKUS, how is he going to deliver nuclear submarines?”

Mr Albanese told Labor’s national policy forum in Sydney two weeks ago that he expected party delegates to toe the line, backing an updated national platform without controversy.

The platform says on AUKUS: “Our self-reliant defence policy will be enhanced by strong bilateral and multilateral defence relationships, including AUKUS. Where appropriate, Labor will strengthen existing defence ties with our key allies and through the United Nations, as well as building new and strengthening existing relationships within the Indo-Pacific region.”

On Palestine, it calls for the government “to recognise Palestine as a state”, and says it “expects that this issue will be an important priority for the Australian government”.

Strategic Analysis Australia director Peter Jennings said Mr Albanese needed to tackle any “rearguard action” on AUKUS.

“There’s already in American minds some degree of concern that some senior people on the Left of Australian politics don’t support AUKUS,” Mr Jennings said. “Albanese, I think, desperately needs to make a stand on this and be seen to be fighting inside the party for what he‘s been prepared to endorse.”

United States Studies Centre defence policy program director Peter Dean said opposition to AUKUS from Labor’s Left was expected.

“So far this has come from unions in Queensland and Victoria - states where AUKUS will have less of an impact in terms of jobs,” he said. “It will be interesting to see how the unions in SA and WA respond and how much the left of the party in NSW falls in behind the PM.

Professor Dean said the government needed to do more work to build greater social licence for AUKUS, given its strategic importance.

“This is the foundation for a program this size; the core of why we are embarking on such a large nation building program,” he said.

Executive Council of Australian Jewry chief executive Peter Wertheim urged ALP delegates to stick to Senator Wong’s position that recognition of a Palestinian state was “ultimately a decision … for government”.

Australia Palestine Advocacy Network president Nasser Mashni said “justice for Palestine” was clearly a priority” for Labor, noting the last federal conference called for recognition of a Palestinian state.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/anthony-albanese-warns-labor-to-leave-aukus-and-palestine-position-untouched-at-conference/news-story/16e436ebac8398e8b90ca603c5272300

https://twitter.com/DougCameron51/status/1683240110400368640

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19231951

File: beff68bec7cae89⋯.jpg (107.45 KB,1200x800,3:2,Australia_to_buy_20_C_130_….jpg)

File: 18f6eb2f3c1f6f3⋯.jpg (106.98 KB,1280x720,16:9,There_are_plans_to_almost_….jpg)

File: 4c0fbfc323b8d82⋯.jpg (182.32 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_C_130J_are_sued_in_a_r….jpg)

File: fade4ea42a184f1⋯.jpg (95.13 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_C_130J_aircraft_is_wid….jpg)

>>19226439

Australia to buy 20 C-130 Hercules aircraft from the US for $6.6 billion

Australia says it will buy 20 new C-130 Hercules planes from the United States in a $6.6 billion deal that will increase by two-thirds the number of the Australian air force’s second-largest heavy transport aircraft

ROD McGUIRK - July 24, 2023

CANBERRA, Australia - Australia said Monday it will buy 20 new C-130 Hercules from the United States in a 9.8 billion Australian dollar ($6.6 billion) deal that will increase by two-thirds the size of the Australian air force’s fleet of its second-largest heavy transport aircraft.

The announcement follows the U.S. Congress' approval last year of a larger sale of 24 of the Lockheed Martin-manufactured propeller-driven aircraft.

The United States and Australia are currently conducting their biennial Talisman Sabre military exercise along the Australian coast that this year involves 13 nations and more than 30,000 personnel as global concerns intensify over an increasingly assertive China.

The first of the new four-engine Hercules is expected to be delivered in 2027 and the new aircraft will eventually replace the fleet of 12 Hercules currently operated by the Royal Australian Air Force from RAAF Base Richmond near Sydney, Defense Industry Minister Pat Conroy said.

The purchase "will almost double the fleet and represents a massive uplift in capability, in mobility and transport for the Royal Australian Air Force,” Conroy told reporters.

“Almost doubling the fleet gives us more capacity to deploy them on multiple operations at the same time, and that’s the critical driver,” Conroy added.

The Australian air force also operates eight of the larger Boeing C-17A Globemaster heavy transport jet aircraft.

The deal was confirmed ahead of U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and Secretary of State Antony Blinken meeting with their Australian counterparts for annual talks late this week in the Australian city of Brisbane.

It is Blinken’s third trip to Asia in less than two months, highlighting U.S. efforts to counter growing Chinese influence in the region.

A closer bilateral military relationship with Australia was underscored Saturday when the USS Canberra was commissioned in Sydney. The Independence-variant littoral combat ship, built by Australian manufacturer Austal, became the first U.S. warship to be commissioned in a foreign port.

The original Canberra was a U.S. cruiser launched in 1943 and named after the Australian cruiser HMAS Canberra, which was torpedoed by the Japanese in 1942 with a loss of 193 lives while supporting U.S. Marines landings in the Solomon Islands. The Australian warship was named for Australia's capital.

The Solomons are again a security concern for the United States and its allies over recent security agreements that the South Pacific nation signed with China.

Conroy, who is also Australia's minister for international development and the Pacific, flew to the Solomons later Monday to mark the 20th anniversary of the arrival in the capital, Honiara, of an Australian-led force of Pacific Islands troops and police.

The Regional Assurance Mission to Solomon Islands was invited by the Solomons government to end years of civil unrest. The force left in 2017, but Australian police and military personnel returned in late 2021 at Solomons Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare’s request to quell anti-government and anti-China rioting. Australian peacekeepers remain in Honiara.

https://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/australia-buy-20-130-hercules-aircraft-us-66-101596578

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/latest-news/adf-to-buy-20-c130j-hercules-from-us-in-98bn-deal/news-story/9c98dfd5dce146451650f4ee060212db

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19231969

File: 425f31236d90db1⋯.jpg (534.63 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Australian_surveillance_ai….jpg)

File: 81ea48e37cc7598⋯.jpg (2.45 MB,4800x3200,3:2,Lieutenant_General_Greg_Bi….jpg)

>>19226439

>>19226465

First image emerges of RAAF's encounter with Chinese spy ship during Talisman Sabre

Andrew Greene - 24 July 2023

An aerial photograph showing an RAAF P-8 Poseidon plane flying over a Chinese surveillance ship as it headed towards Australia last week has been obtained by the ABC.

The image of the Dongdiao Class Auxiliary General Intelligence (AGI) vessel was taken from on board another Australian military aircraft over international waters in the Coral Sea.

On Sunday the Chinese vessel, carrying the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) fleet designation number 793, was believed to be positioned off the Queensland coast, possibly as far south as Shoalwater Bay, trying to collect sensitive information on the international Exercise Talisman Sabre.

Chief of Joint Operations Lieutenant General Greg Bilton told the ABC he deployed a P-8 surveillance aircraft on Thursday morning to make contact with the ship.

"It located the AGI, we hailed the AGI, we got a courteous response as you'd expect in normal interactions in international waters," General Bilton told the ABC while observing Exercise Talisman Sabre activities.

"They'll passively collect, and we'll adjust — there's some things we don't necessarily want to give away and we have methods of being able to employ our forces without giving those more sensitive aspects of our training away".

General Bilton said it was still possible the Chinese AGI could shift its position from central Queensland to Australia's top end, but that seemed unlikely.

"It is a fair few days' sail time, so to get from here to Darwin is four to six days, so I think it's going to stay in the region and observe the activities we're doing on the east coast".

The operations chief said the ADF also expected the high-tech spy ship would remain outside Australia's territorial waters as it observed the large-scale military drills.

"It will stay outside of our contiguous zones, so 24 nautical miles beyond, that's consistent with international law – their [PLAN's] behaviours on previous exercises have been exactly that and I don't expect to change."

Pressed on whether any Australian or United States submarines had also been deployed to snoop on the visiting Chinese vessel, General Bilton responded: "no comment".

Defence and security figures had initially anticipated China would again send two spy ships to Talisman Sabre this year given the vast scale of the activity taking place from Western Australia, the Northern Territory and down Australia's east coast.

RAAF to get new cargo transport planes

It came as Australia confirmed it would buy 20 new American-made military cargo planes, with Defence also examining plans to purchase new air-to-air refuelling aircraft.

Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy said the government would proceed with a purchase of 20 C-130 Hercules aircraft, down from 24 initially approved for sale by the US Congress last year.

Costing almost $10 billion, the new batch of Hercules will replace 12 older C-130s based at Richmond Air Base in Sydney.

Defence sources said the government could soon also announce it is buying two new KC-30s, which can refuel other RAAF aircraft mid-air.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-24/first-image-of-australian-encounter-with-chinese-spy-ship/102637528

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19231979

File: d6b11644d2b2228⋯.jpg (313.38 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Part_of_one_of_the_plaques….jpg)

>>19220746

War Memorial installs plaques noting ‘gravity’ of Ben Roberts-Smith defamation case

Natassia Chrysanthos - July 24, 2023

The Australian War Memorial has installed plaques next to displays honouring disgraced former soldier Ben Roberts-Smith that say the museum is considering what further content should be added to the exhibits after a landmark defamation case found he was a murderer and war criminal.

Signs featuring a statement by War Memorial Council chair and former Labor leader Kim Beazley have been included next to two displays in the museum after Beazley last month confirmed Roberts-Smith’s uniform, medals and portraits would remain in place despite the court ruling.

According to photos supplied to and verified by this masthead, the plaques read: “The memorial assists in remembering, interpreting and understanding Australia’s experience of war and its enduring impact. This includes the causes, conduct and consequences of war.

“The memorial acknowledges the gravity of the decision in the Ben Roberts-Smith VC MG defamation case and its broader impact on all involved in the Australian community. This is the outcome of a civil legal case, and one step in a longer process.

“Collection items relating to Ben Roberts-Smith VC MG, including his uniform, equipment, medals and associated artworks, are on display in the memorial’s galleries.

“We are considering carefully the additional content and context to be included in these displays. The memorial acknowledges Afghanistan veterans and their families, who may be affected at this time.”

One of the plaques has been installed next to an exhibit of Roberts-Smith’s uniform outside the Hall of Valour, and the other next to two artworks of the soldier that were commissioned by the War Memorial in 2012 and are displayed as part of the Afghanistan War gallery.

The first display describes Roberts-Smith as “an imposing figure on the battlefield” who was “instrumental in inflicting a significant defeat upon a determined and well-entrenched enemy” in the Afghan village of Tizak in 2010.

The second, which features two portraits by Australian artist Michael Zavros, includes the following quote from Zavros: “We see him momentarily isolated, at one with himself, potentially in a moment of reflection. Less the brave war hero, rather a man, singled out and celebrated. It is an honour that sits well on him at the same time that it sits heavily.”

There is no plaque or annotation next to Roberts-Smith’s medals in the Hall of Valour itself, which honours the 101 Australians who have received the Victoria Cross and the nine Australian Defence Force personnel who have directly been awarded the George Cross.

The Greens had called on the War Memorial to remove Roberts-Smith’s artefacts, while international law professor Ben Saul said they should be recontextualised to show the soldier committed horrific acts in addition to his bravery. Last month, Beazley said the memorial would consider ways to add context to the exhibits, rather than remove them.

Beazley said on Monday the plaques had been displayed “for several weeks now” following a council decision on June 2.

“They went up after some deliberation on what should be the response at this point as we continue to consider carefully additional context and content,” he said.

“In the frame of that consideration, adjustments will be made. We note that Mr Roberts-Smith VC MG is appealing the decision.”

Roberts-Smith, a former Special Air Service corporal, launched defamation action against The Age, The Sydney Morning Herald and The Canberra Times in 2018 over a series of stories alleging he committed war crimes in Afghanistan.

After years of legal proceedings, Federal Court Justice Anthony Besanko dismissed the multimillion-dollar defamation case on June 1. Besanko found the newspapers had proven to the civil standard – on the balance of probabilities – that Roberts-Smith was a war criminal who was complicit in the murder of four unarmed prisoners in Afghanistan.

Roberts-Smith is seeking to overturn the findings as part of an appeal launched this month.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/war-memorial-installs-plaques-noting-gravity-of-ben-roberts-smith-libel-case-20230724-p5dqr2.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19231995

File: 4d85028c8b5c8e2⋯.jpg (236.73 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Ben_Roberts_Smith_with_the….jpg)

File: 432ec5d925dc5bb⋯.jpg (229.44 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Mr_Roberts_Smith_examines_….jpg)

File: 4b53eb5a5049993⋯.jpg (362.92 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Five_year_old_Max_Taylor_l….jpg)

>>19220746

>>19231979

War Memorial ‘acknowledges gravity’ of Ben Robert-Smith murder finding

STEPHEN RICE - JULY 24, 2023

The Australian War Memorial has quietly added a notice to its displays honouring Ben ­Roberts-Smith “acknowledging the gravity” of the finding in his failed defamation case that he murdered unarmed detainees in Afghanistan.

The AWM has previously stated it would leave displays featuring Mr Roberts-Smith in place, despite calls for the collections to be removed from display or contextualised with information about defamation court findings.

The notices have been installed next to collections featuring the Victoria Cross recipient’s uniforms and portrait, bearing a statement from AWM chairman Kim Beazley AC, on behalf of the war memorial’s council.

“The memorial assists in remembering, interpreting and understanding Australia’s experience of war and its enduring impact. This includes the causes, conduct and consequences of war,” the notice reads.

“The memorial acknowledges the gravity of the decision in the Ben Roberts-Smith VC MG defamation case and its broader impact on all involved in the Australian community.”

The wording of the notices reflect a statement issued by Mr Beazley soon after judge Anthony Besanko handed down his findings almost two months ago that several allegations of war crimes against Mr Roberts-Smith by newspapers he was suing were substantially true.

Mr Beazley noted “this is the outcome of a civil legal case, and one step in a longer process”.

“We are considering carefully the additional content and context to be included in these displays. The memorial acknow­ledges Afghanistan veterans and their families who may be affected at this time.”

Greens senator David Shoebridge has called for these items to be removed from display immediately, while former principal AWM historian Peter Stanley has suggested “we might pause before effacing him from our national war museum”.

“Removing his portrait and uniform might satisfy a modish desire to obliterate the memory of his actions but by “cancelling” him, we would lose the chance to tell the truth; to explain how the trial’s evidence contradicts the heroic story that the memorial, among others, cultivated,” Professor Stanley said.

The War Memorial holds Mr Roberts-Smith’s VC and other medals. The memorial galleries also display two portraits of him by artist Michael Zavros, one in formal uniform, the other in a combat stance holding a pistol.

Zavros is quoted in AWM collection material stating: “I like the idea that we see him momentarily isolated, at one with himself, potentially in a moment of reflection. Less the brave war hero, rather a man, singled out and celebrated. It is an honour that sits well on him at the same time that it sits heavily.”

Former AWM director Brendan Nelson was a notable supporter of Mr Roberts-Smith during the trial, and the case was largely bankrolled by billionaire Kerry Stokes, a former chair of the memorial’s council. Both provided character references for the soldier.

Dr Nelson awarded the former soldier greater prominence at the memorial than many other VC recipients, extolling his courage and commitment.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/war-memorial-acknowledges-gravity-of-ben-robertsmith-murder-finding/news-story/3387c4d35922698a3bae460aecbbfbff

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19232078

File: 62ba140459a62bf⋯.jpg (483.01 KB,814x1220,407:610,POTUS_30.jpg)

File: bd174344be5a7e2⋯.jpg (171.24 KB,827x1025,827:1025,ef73513911ee1009.jpg)

File: 19ca9931aa32469⋯.jpg (108.57 KB,852x227,852:227,Q_4944.jpg)

Donald J. Trump ReTruth

https://truthsocial.com/@KickDreaming/posts/110767012220636077

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump

Q Post #4944

Oct 31 2020 17:44:04 (EST)

Are you ready to finish what we started?

'Nothing can stop what is coming' is not just a catch-phrase.

Q

https://qanon.pub/#4944

https://qalerts.pub/?q=nothing+can+stop

https://qalerts.pub/?q=NCSWIC

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19237663

File: 2a20eb91ce6085e⋯.jpg (281.15 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_has_laugh….jpg)

File: aa17820a1f8ae9f⋯.jpg (84.31 KB,1280x720,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_at_a_Midn….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19231792

‘Who knew’: Anthony Albanese responds to furore over picture of him in Midnight Oil T-shirt

COURTNEY GOULD - JULY 25, 2023

Anthony Albanese has laughed off claims he misled Australians when he said the Voice to parliament was not about a treaty after a picture of him wearing a “Voice, Treaty, Truth” T-shirt resurfaced.

The Prime Minister made the statement last week in a tense interview on 2GB’s Ben Fordham in which the pair traded barbs as the radio host grilled him about the upcoming referendum.

But an old video of Mr Albanese dancing at a Midnight Oil concert and wearing the T-shirt last October prompted former prime minister Tony Abbott to unleash on the leader.

“I suppose this is the problem when you turn yourself into a billboard,” Mr Abbott said during an interview with Fordham on Monday.

“And quite apart from anything the Prime Minister chose to wear at a concert, I go back to that initial statement he made as prime minister. The new government is committed to the Uluru statement from the Heart in full – in other words, voice, treaty, truth in full.

“It was, as I said, a moment of amnesia for the Prime Minister to deny here in this chair last week that the Voice had anything to do with treaty. It has everything to do with treaty.

“The whole point of having a voice, if the activists are to be believed, is to start the treaty-making process, and government ministers have said as much.”

When asked about the controversy on Shoalhaven’s Power FM on Tuesday morning, Mr Albanese said the whole thing gave him a laugh.

“Who knew someone would wear a Midnight Oil T-shirt at a Midnight Oil concert? I did see that and have a laugh. Frankly, it shows the desperation of people,” the Labor leader chuckled.

He urged the No camp to run a “legitimate, sensible campaign” and listen to people in the local community.

“On a big scale, we need to listen to Indigenous Australians in order to get better outcomes to close the gap, and that's what it’s about,” he continued.

“Every day I see more furphies put up of why people shouldn’t support this sensible proposal … All the scare campaigns don’t really have substance to them.

“The Yes case is positive. It’s about hope. The No camp is all about fear really and raising issues that are designed to sow doubt.”

Mr Albanese committed to the 2017 Uluru Statement from the Heart in full, including a Makaratta Commission to oversee “treaty” and “truth-telling” with Indigenous Australians.

Asked in May if the Voice would lead to treaty and truth-telling, Mr Albanese said: “They are very much a part of the next phase, if you like.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/who-knew-anthony-albanese-responds-to-furore-over-picture-of-him-in-midnight-oil-tshirt/news-story/5e0fe5030f078053e9178fc2f468dc53

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19237674

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19222755

No campaign stands by Gary Johns amid controversy

ROSIE LEWIS - JULY 25, 2023

The No campaign against an Indigenous voice to parliament is standing by Gary Johns despite growing calls for him to resign or be sacked over a series of comments and proposals that include blood tests for Aboriginal welfare recipients and a public holiday celebrating intermarriage between black and white Australians.

Liberals for Yes co-convener Kate Carnell and NSW opposition health spokesman Matt Kean, also a Liberal, said Mr Johns should quit or be forced out of his role as president of leading No organisation Recognise a Better Way because of his “repugnant” views.

It comes as a video emerges of Mr Johns, a former Labor minister in the Keating government, speaking at the Mannkal Economic Education Foundation’s Christmas party last year, in which he said: “As I have said at some places in Sydney, looking out over Sydney Harbour, words to the effect of – if this was an invasion, it was a bloody good one.

“Because we have built a wonderful liberal society which would never have been built but for a civilisation arriving here, overtaking people who were our forebears. We all were hunter gatherers but we moved on.”

In his 2022 book, The Burden of Culture: How to Dismantle the Aboriginal Industry and Give Hope to its Victims, Mr Johns sets out “16 ways to save lives and overcome Aboriginal colonisation”.

They include abolishing all annual Indigenous celebrations, including NAIDOC week, in favour of a single day commemorating the 1967 election; starting an annual event celebrating intermarriage as it is “the most common form of relations between black and white Australia”; and making all benefits and programs that are specific to Indigenous people conditional on a blood test for Indigenous heritage.

Mr Johns defended the comments on Sky News on Monday night and said he had nothing to apologise for, adding he’d prefer not to have a race-based system but if one was in place then blood tests were needed.

Leading No campaigner Warren Mundine said Mr Johns was an important part of the No campaign and he was comfortable with him remaining on the No side, despite disagreeing with some of his views.

“Gary Johns is like any other Australian. He’s entitled to his viewpoints and I’m a great believer in free speech. Now me and him, we will have discussions about that and we disagree on different angles of it but there’s no way I’m going to be calling for him to step down,” Mr Mundine told Sky News.

“Just because people complain about him and that, at least he’s honest about his approach to these things and I’m very pleased to have him on our committee and to have him as an adviser to us.”

Ms Carnell said the voice referendum was not about these sorts of things.

“We do think that the leaders of the No campaign should really publicly say to Mr Johns that this is simply unacceptable and possibly he should resign as a board member of the No campaign,” she told Sky News.

In an earlier statement, Ms Carnell said: “The statements made by Mr Gary Johns last night calling for all recipients of Indigenous benefits to be blood tested, and for the introduction of a national public holiday celebrating intermarriage between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians, are deeply disturbing comments that should have no place in Australian political debate.

“There should be no room in this important debate for statements that evoke deeply discredited and racially discriminatory policies and practices that have been left in the dustbin of history.”

Mr Kean and NSW opposition multiculturalism spokesman Matt Coure said Mr Johns’ remarks, including a 2007 comment that Aboriginal people would “find acceptable a period in jail as a respite from a distraught life”, had no place in the national conversation.

“His views are repugnant to everything this country stands for - fairness, decency, and respect for our fellow Australians. If Mr Johns refuses to resign from the board of the official No campaign today, the No campaign should do the decent and honourable thing and fire him,” they said.

Victorian Labor senator Jana Stewart, a Mutthi Mutthi and Wamba Wamba woman, has also called on the No campaign to explain whether it thinks Mr Johns’ views “are acceptable and, if not, why does he remain on their campaign committee.”

The Australian revealed last week that Mr Johns said in June that most Aboriginal people were “grateful for that gift” of modernisation and defended the work of churches and their involvement with the Stolen Generations, in comments made while campaigning against the voice.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/there-are-increasing-calls-for-gary-johns-to-resign-from-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-no-campaign/news-story/2a75ae4f0fcbf29dd3658aaf88a5b355

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WR4RtocpFbs

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19237694

File: 3501ee13560784b⋯.jpg (199.93 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Power_play_Chinese_Foreign….jpg)

File: d07385df70b4269⋯.jpg (71.71 KB,768x530,384:265,Chinese_Foreign_Minister_Q….jpg)

File: 7023b041f95217e⋯.jpg (1.73 MB,5000x3329,5000:3329,Chinese_Foreign_Minister_Q….jpg)

>>19210696

‘I think he is gone’: The strange disappearance of China’s foreign minister Qin Gang

Eryk Bagshaw - July 25, 2023

1/2

June 25 was a busy day for China’s Foreign Minister Qin Gang. He met with foreign ministers from Russia, Vietnam and Sri Lanka.

There was talk of enhancing Belt and Road cooperation, “neighbourhood diplomacy” and the implementation of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s global development initiative.

It was also the last time Qin was seen in public.

The 57-year-old, whose meteoric rise through the foreign ministry saw him win fast friends and new enemies has not been seen in a month.

On Tuesday, China’s national legislature is due to convene an emergency session to review a draft criminal law amendment and “a decision on official appointment and removal”.

The details are thin – and the discussion may not include Qin – but the rumours swirling around his disappearance from illness to an extra-marital affair to a foreign ministry power play have heightened expectations his fate will be decided this week.

“I think he is gone,” said Willy Wo-Lap Lam, a senior fellow at the Jamestown Foundation and expert on Chinese elite politics from Hong Kong.

“His career is finished. There is no way that he will be allowed to resume his position.”

Since March 2013, the National People’s Congress has held nine non-regularly scheduled sessions, out of 75 sessions in total.

“What makes Tuesday’s session a true emergency session and sets it apart from those nine special sessions is the haste with which it was convened,” said Bill Bishop from Sinocism, a newsletter that specialises in Chinese politics.

“It was called just a day earlier, unlike the previous ones, which were all scheduled at least seven days in advance, as required by law in non-emergency situations.”

Beijing’s official line had been that Qin has been unwell. The explanation held for a couple of weeks, but few experts now believe that one of China’s top foreign affairs officials has been bedridden for a month without an update on his condition. Illness has also been used previously as an excuse by the Chinese government for officials who have fallen suddenly out of favour and disappeared.

Last week foreign ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning was left to front reporters without an answer. “I don’t know about the matter,” she said repeatedly.

Qin has missed meetings with leaders from the US, Europe, South East Asia and the Pacific during the past month.

“They could engineer any situation – he has a terminal case of cancer or whatever – but few people will believe this excuse,” said Lam.

China’s elite politics is a black box and confirmation of the reason for his absence may never materialise, but the silence has been filled with furious speculation in China and abroad.

The more intriguing and salacious reasons for his disappearance are a power struggle at the top of the foreign affairs ministry between Qin and his predecessor Wang Yi, dissatisfaction with his performance in failing to bring Europe closer to Beijing, and a rumoured affair with Chinese state TV anchor Fu Xiaotian, who hinted on Weibo that Qin may be the father of her child.

Qin rose, rapidly, too quickly for some, to the post of foreign minister. He was the first ambassador to the United States to be appointed directly to foreign minister in more than two decades, skipping over the vice foreign minister position in Beijing that his predecessors had occupied.

But he had a powerful ally in Xi.

The former foreign ministry spokesman served as Xi’s aide, organising his trips overseas and became a confidant of the most powerful Chinese leader since Mao Zedong.

That relationship saw him posted to Washington, and then within two years back to Beijing, to take up the foreign minister’s role which Wang had occupied for almost a decade.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19237700

File: 7848c20185c836c⋯.jpg (787.12 KB,3000x2000,3:2,Chinese_Foreign_Minister_Q….jpg)

File: a804c5d50d7441c⋯.jpg (265.23 KB,1576x1080,197:135,TV_anchor_Fu_Xiaotian_inte….jpg)

>>19237694

2/2

Wang and his boss Yang Jiechi had formed a formidable duo at the top of China’s foreign affairs hierarchy for most of Xi’s time in power.

But when Yang retired last year, Qin, one of a group of Chinese officials aged in their 50s who have tied their rise to Xi’s growing control, stepped up.

“How they’re going to finesse this situation is a serious challenge because of his formerly close relationship with Xi. His helicopter ride to the top was made possible only because of Xi Jinping. Now it’s part of a power struggle within the foreign ministry,” said Lam.

“Xi Jinping is very good at policy statements but bad at basic administration.”

Qin oversaw a deterioration in US-China relations in Washington and had few other notable accomplishments to his name before becoming foreign minister.

His record has not improved in his six months in office, particularly in managing China’s relations with Europe, where Xi had hoped to draw more governments away from the US-led order. Instead, Qin’s tenure has seen the opposite occur (with the exception of France) as Germany, Italy and Britain move closer to the foreign policy goals of Washington and Brussels.

But it is the rumours of the affair with Fu, a glamorous TV anchor who is said to hold US citizenship and has interviewed International Olympic Committee chief Thomas Bach and fashion designer Diane von Furstenberg in the past year, that has lit up Chinese social media.

“It’s impossible to impose a water-tight control over the media and what people are thinking about,” said Lam.

Fu’s last tweet was of her in a private jet with her baby son.

“Last time flying alone with this aircraft was from LA to DC for a work visit, and that both happily and sadly turned to be the very last interview I did with Talk with World Leaders,” she wrote, next to a photo of her with Qin.

On Weibo on March 19, Qin’s birthday, she wished “Happy Birthday Dad” with a photo of her son, but did not name the married father-of-one.

Fu has not been heard from publicly since.

The match would suit the urbane Qin, a fan of poet T.S. Eliot who attempted to moderate China-US relations and failed. In one of his last appearances in the US in December, he shot free throws at the Washington Wizards NBA game.

If he is replaced, Ma Zhaoxu - a former ambassador to Australia and one of Canberra’s key contacts in negotiations over economic sanctions and detained Australians Cheng Lei and Yang Hengjun - is tipped to move into the foreign minister’s role.

Ma’s elevation could be beneficial for Australia, but the ongoing instability has been counterproductive for Beijing and the world.

“The episode illustrates that the opaque way of doing things could be detrimental to the interests of the party and also the country’s foreign policy,” said Lam.

“It has a chilling effect because it shows that Chinese foreign policy is hostage to a power struggle within the party.”

https://www. theage. com. au/ world/ asia/ i-think-he-is-gone- the-strange-disappearance -of-china-s-foreign-minister -qin-gang- 20230725- p5dr2v. html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19237718

File: 210d2635d214db9⋯.jpg (238.44 KB,1842x1036,921:518,Lia_Thomas_L_dominated_the….jpg)

File: c16e355b6d8a1ae⋯.jpg (289 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Transgender_swimmers_to_co….jpg)

Transgender swimmers to compete in world-first test event later in 2023

JULIAN LINDEN - JULY 25, 2023

International swimming bosses are preparing to take the plunge and push ahead with a world-first event for elite transgender competitors.

The details of where and when the test event will take place remain top secret, at least for now, because World Aquatics, the global governing body for the swimming, knows just how politically divisive the issue is.

However, highly-placed sources have told this masthead that the sport’s leaders have made the decision to proceed with a test event later in 2023.

It is understood that a formal announcement will be made at the World Aquatics annual Congress, taking place in Fukuoka, Japan on Tuesday.

The issue is considered so sensitive that none of the attending delegates, which will include representatives from Swimming Australia, have been told about the announcement, so will hear it for the first time.

Swimming’s top brass have deliberately kept things under wraps because they are paranoid that any leaks could torpedo their chances of trying to find a solution to the murkiest issue in world sport.

While most other major sports have gone running for cover, swimming’s decision to take a stand has been both applauded and condemned.

Formally known as FINA, World Aquatics found that out the hard way at last year’s Congress in Budapest when they voted 71 per cent in favour of banning trans athletes from women’s elite competitions, such as the Olympics and world championships, while creating a separate ‘open’ category for athletes who are not eligible for the female category because they have advantages specific to male development.

Exactly how that works has not been announced yet, and won’t be on Tuesday because World Aquatics wants to keep as many details as possible to themselves, partly to protect competitors who sign up from the intense scrutiny they will face.

Officials have said they wanted to create a column for competitors to compete regardless of their sex, their legal gender or their gender identity but sources said they don’t know how many competitors will actually enter and show up at the test event.

What is known is that trans swimmers such as American Lia Thomas would be welcome to compete, if they met the participation rules and qualifying times.

It’s understood that a framework has been completed by a working group, involving industry-leading specialists from all over the world, including scientists, human rights advocates, lawyers and athletes, who have spent a year figuring out coming up with recommendations.

British swimmer Sharron Davies, one of the most vocal critics of transgender athletes competing in women’s events, is on record saying she supports the idea of an open category.

She has just published a book: ‘ Unfair Play: The Battle For Women’s Sport ‘, in which she wrote in favour of the proposal.

“An ‘open’ category is the way forward. It’s the only way to ensure that boundaries are respected and female athletes get the same level of fair play as their male counterparts. Yet everyone is included.

“In the back rooms of debate about what ‘open’ would look like, differences in the trans population have been a sticking point. Transmen and transwomen are not the same: one is still male and one still female, no matter how they choose to identify.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/olympics/transgender-swimmers-to-compete-in-worldfirst-test-event-later-in-2023/news-story/47625ca886a952b33991546867e65f59

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19237725

File: c8bccc0be6718fd⋯.jpg (222.79 KB,1933x1087,1933:1087,Convicted_child_sex_offend….jpg)

Accountant defends paedophile asset shed ‘plan of action’, tells court unaware of victim compensation claim

MATTHEW DENHOLM - JULY 25, 2023

An accountant has confirmed he enacted a plan to divest a paedophile’s multimillion-dollar asset portfolio to family and friends ahead of his sentencing, but denied orchestrating the scheme.

The Federal Court on Tuesday heard Launceston accountant Ken Davey developed “a plan of action” by which assets of child abuser John Wayne Millwood were sold to family and friends and the proceeds then gifted to them.

Millwood later declared bankruptcy and has far avoiding paying a cent of $5.3m in civil compensation awarded to his victim, whom he repeatedly abused over five years in the 1980s.

Mr Davey - a partner with Findex Group, of which Malcolm Turnbull is a director – told the court it was “pretty obvious” Millwood wanted to urgently dispose of assets before December 7, 2016, when he was due to be sentenced and when solicitors foreshadowed a compensation application.

However, Mr Davey said he was not informed of this motivation for quick asset sales at the time. “They didn’t tell me that but … it must have because it’s so timely,” he said. “I can’t see any other reason.”

As exclusively revealed by The Weekend Australian in 2022, Millwood – a wealthy colonial art collector and former pathology practice manager – shed millions in assets before declaring bankruptcy and avoiding the civil payout.

Bankruptcy trustee Sheahan Lock Partners is attempting to claw back proceeds from the disposal of Millwood’s property, shares and art works, on behalf of his largest creditor – the survivor of his abuse.

In Federal Court proceedings in Hobart in pursuit of that quest, Mr Davey, Millwood’s longstanding accountant, on Tuesday insisted he did not “orchestrate” Millwood’s divestment plan and only implemented the wishes of his longstanding client.

Under questioning by counsel for Sheahan Lock, Stuart Lewin, Mr Davey agreed “a plan of action” he prepared saw three of Millwood’s Launceston properties sold to trusts controlled by either Millwood’s daughter or his former partner, with the proceeds then effectively gifted to them, also.

Along with the sale of contents, this left nothing in Millwood’s estate. “That’s correct yes,” Mr Davey said.

“Sell the assets and give away the proceeds?” Mr Lewin asked, to which Mr Davey replied: “That’s what he (Millwood) wanted to do.”

Mr Davey was also questioned about what Mr Lewin described as “sham” loans to Millwood from his daughter, Sarah, and his former partner, Sonia Ann Finlay, but the accountant rejected this characterisation of the debts.

He agreed Millwood’s concern about a potential claim by his victim was “part of the reason” for his asset-shedding, as well as having “debts he wanted to pay”.

Mr Lewin put it to Mr Davey he was “tasked with ensuring that John Millwood’s assets were put beyond the reach of his victims”.

“No,” Mr Davey replied. “I was tasked with making sure his affairs were in order.”

Mr Lewin suggested “by putting his affairs in order the millions and millions of dollars in assets that he held were reduced to nothing”. “That was the end result,” Mr Davey said.

Hearings continue, with Millwood, who has been receiving a government pension, due to give evidence.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/accountant-defends-paedophile-asset-shed-plan-of-action-tells-court-unaware-of-victim-compensation-claim/news-story/5317b867beab3e1f1fb5bc0954be49f2

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19237732

File: ca037d89522910d⋯.jpg (336.01 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Launceston_businessman_Joh….jpg)

File: 0e9600bad25b022⋯.jpg (507.05 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Portrait_John_Millwood_wit….jpg)

File: 08cb848c9b94df5⋯.jpg (220.44 KB,1071x1428,3:4,Art_collector_John_Millwoo….jpg)

>>19237725

Disgraced businessman and child abuser John Wayne Millwood to give evidence in bankruptcy case

Amber Wilson - July 25, 2023

Disgraced Launceston arts patron and child sexual abuser John Wayne Millwood will finally be grilled on the witness stand after divesting his multimillion-dollar portfolio and declaring himself bankrupt.

Millwood, 77, was convicted of child sexual abuse crimes in 2016 and jailed after he pleaded guilty to sexually abusing a boy in the 1980s.

In December 2021, he was ordered to pay what was believed to be an Australian record-breaking amount of $5.3 million to his victim, following a civil trial in which Millwood did not appear once.

But the victim, known only by a court pseudonym of ZAB, still hasn’t received a cent.

Millwood declared bankruptcy last year after divesting himself of his Launceston homes, his considerable colonial art collection, company shares and superannuation.

This week, the Federal Court of Australia in Hobart is hearing a stoush waged by bankruptcy trustee, Sheahan Lock Partners, against Millwood’s bankrupt estate.

The firm is attempting to regain proceeds from the estate on behalf of Millwood’s biggest creditor, ZAB.

Millwood, who has been absent from court proceedings for years, will be called to give evidence on Wednesday.

On Tuesday, Millwood’s former accountant, Findex partner Ken Davey, gave evidence before Registrar Timothy Luxton about the convicted paedophile’s “divestment strategy”.

He denied there was a plan in place to strip Millwood of his assets in order to put them “beyond the reach of his victim”.

Sheahan Lock lawyer Stuart Lewin asked why Millwood’s daughter was “gifted” valuable artwork, and why properties were transferred into the names of family members and friends, while Millwood himself walked away “without a dollar”.

Mr Davey denied there had been a “sham” agreement in place when he divested the assets in December 2016, at the time Millwood’s sentencing for child sexual abuse was “imminent”.

He also denied the divestment strategy was planned when it was clear changes to the Tasmanian statute of limitations laws were “on the cards” – which meant historical victims of child sexual abuse would be able to lodge damages claims from decades prior.

Mr Lewin said the strategy resulted in Millwood going from “millions and millions in dollars” of assets to nothing.

But Mr Davey said although being divested of every asset was the outcome, it was not Millwood’s direct instruction.

“Those instructions were never given. There were a series of transitions that ended up with that result,” he said.

Mr Davey said Millwood claimed he was in poor health and wanted his affairs “tidied up” as he expected to die behind bars.

The Mercury does not suggest any wrongdoing by Millwood’s family members or associates.

Millwood denies wrongdoing in the divestment of his assets.

https://www.themercury.com.au/truecrimeaustralia/police-courts-tasmania/disgraced-businessman-and-child-abuser-john-wayne-millwood-to-give-evidence-in-bankruptcy-case/news-story/efad48f7c873713e3e9c2d23a616c4da

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19237744

File: 6203c54e4e33510⋯.jpg (125.9 KB,910x568,455:284,Over_10_days_troops_in_Tow….jpg)

File: e8a9bf56640feb4⋯.jpg (107.59 KB,910x568,455:284,Col_Ben_McLennan_commander….jpg)

File: 238dd953b0fa7b4⋯.jpg (66.53 KB,910x568,455:284,U_S_Army_Col_Bryan_Martin_….jpg)

>>19226439

‘Olympics of war games’: This year’s Talisman Sabre is most ambitious ever, official says

ALEX WILSON, STARS AND STRIPES - July 25, 2023

TOWNSVILLE FIELD TRAINING AREA, Australia — This year’s Talisman Sabre is the “biggest and most ambitious” version of the multinational exercise ever and Australia’s largest military undertaking in more than a century, according to U.S. and Australian military officials.

The exercise, with 30,000 troops from 13 countries, kicked off with a ceremony Friday but swung into gear with two live-fire drills the following day at sites 1,000 miles apart. Talisman Sabre, led by the U.S. and hosted by Australia along its eastern coast, is scheduled to conclude Aug. 4.

More than a third of those troops are operating out of a training area in Townsville, about 840 miles northwest of Brisbane, where the largest ground-based drills are taking place, said Col. Ben McLennan, commander of the Australian army’s Combat Training Center.

Over 10 days, the 10 participating forces there will maneuver throughout a 17,000-square-mile area in a force-on-force exercise pitting two halves of the international coalition against each other, he said. The size of the operation alone for the Australian military is matched only by its operations on the Western Front during World War I.

“This is a demonstration; I don’t know how more tangible you need to get. Doing this is not easy. It’s really hard; it’s really complex,” he told reporters touring the training area on Monday. “This activity is a demonstration of our wide commitment to a peaceful, prosperous region and that demonstration will resonate in Australia and our region and across the world.”

The forces are using tactics employed during the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine, including extensive drone coverage, cyberwarfare, attempts to conceal or disguise assets and the use of dragon teeth — sharp, pyramid-shaped anti-tank fortification, McLennan said.

“This activity that’s occurring here is just the richest and most immersive, most realistic, no-consequence training environment that we can possibly create,” McLennan said. “We’re calling it the ‘Olympics of war games,’ because it’s the biggest, most ambitious Talisman Sabre ever.”

Standing in front of a massive map of northeastern Australia, McLennan detailed a scenario the Townsville-based troops will be acting out. The Blue Force, scripted as the “good guys,” are squaring up against the enemy Red Force, which “comprehensively” outmatches the Blue Force in every way possible, from numbers to equipment.

“That enemy element has all the capabilities across space, cyber, land, maritime and air that one would anticipate a peer threat being able to bring to bear against an Australian-United States coalition,” he said.

The exercise is only nominally scripted and “highly adaptive,” McLennan said.

“Cognitively and physically, it’s a contest of wills,” he said.

Leading the exercise is the U.S. Army’s 25th Infantry Division out of Oahu, Hawaii, and the Australian army’s 1st Division, headquartered in Brisbane. This is the first time the two militaries have fully combined their combat training centers, said U.S. Army Col. Bryan Martin, operations group commander for the Joint Pacific Multinational Readiness Group.

“If you’re going to run a forge, you’ve got to be a pretty strong blacksmith,” he told reporters during the tour. “By working together and figuring out each other’s techniques, different tactics and procedures for running the forge, if you will, you’ll just make a better-quality product for the forces and their training.”

https://www.stripes.com/theaters/asia_pacific/2023-07-25/talisman-sabre-australia-force-on-force-10846769.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19237763

File: 9310dbfcf447040⋯.jpg (247.21 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Former_top_gun_pilot_Danie….jpg)

File: 7af986fc1604c25⋯.jpg (428.47 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Saffrine_Duggan_with_her_k….jpg)

>>19226522

Former top gun pilot Daniel Duggan fights ‘political extradition’ to United States

REMY VARGA - JULY 25, 2023

Former top gun pilot Daniel Duggan’s lawyers say there is a political character to the charges against their client and will present expert evidence on deteriorating relations between the United States and China.

Lawyers for the 54-year-old Australian citizen are fighting his extradition to the United States to face charges over the alleged training of Chinese fighter pilots.

Duggan’s supporters gathered on the steps of Sydney’s Downing Centre on Tuesday ahead of the hearing, brandishing a banner emblazoned with the Orange father’s face that said “Free Dan Duggan”.

Inside court Mr Duggan’s lawyer, top silk Bret Walker SC, said he was unable to discuss in open court all of the material given to the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security, which is investigating alleged misconduct by the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation.

Lawyers for Mr Duggan are seeking to halt the extradition until the IGS investigation has completed.

Mt Walker said the alleged offending and conduct after the offending involved co-operation with security agencies that may “give a political character to the offence in question.”

“Your honour should not proceed on the basis that is confined to conduct in Australia,” Mr Walker said, before clarifying the conduct was “in the interest of Australia”.

The court heard that the deterioration in the diplomatic relationship between China and the US since the alleged conduct would form part of the case, with Mr Walker saying he would “gather experts on those matters”.

Mr Walker said his submissions would ask whether “a political character can be given after all the circumstances of the commission of offence have happened”.

Magistrate Daniel Reiss said the relevance of material handed to IGS may be relevant as to whether the charges against Mr Duggan were political and noted such offences were a rarity.

“It‘s a door that’s not sought very often to be opened and walked through,” he said.

Mr Duggan was arrested by the Australian Federal Police at the request of US authorities in Orange in NSW in October last year and has spent the majority of his time in solitary confinement.

The 54-year-old has denied allegations he received 12 payments of more than $116,000 from a Chinese-based business which was responsible for acquiring military training, equipment and technical data for China’s government and military, for “personal development training”.

The offences are alleged to have occurred before Mr Duggan became an Australian citizen in late 2012 and his legal team have previously said the charges are not crimes in Australia.

Mr Duggan has further accused the US of trying to turn him into a “political example” amid deteriorating international relations with China.

The hearing will resume at 2pm.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/former-top-gun-pilot-daniel-duggan-fights-political-extradition-to-united-states/news-story/cb1fb3830f4ae10eaac858428a3dccdb

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19237802

File: ccbc19b29408d2c⋯.jpg (166.74 KB,1280x720,16:9,Former_Marine_pilot_Daniel….jpg)

File: 07acd4f5a35fe83⋯.jpg (211.2 KB,1280x720,16:9,Saffrine_Duggan_speaks_to_….jpg)

>>19226522

Ex-US Marine accused of training Chinese military pilots fights extradition to the US

Hilary Whiteman, Angus Watson and Paul Devitt - July 24, 2023

1/3

Brisbane, Australia (CNN) - Former Marine Daniel Duggan once flew Harrier jets for the United States, taking off and landing on Navy carriers during international missions as part of Marine Attack Squadron 214, based in Yuma, Arizona.

That was over 20 years ago, but his activity since leaving the service is now the subject of a US indictment that alleges he used his specialist skills to teach Chinese pilots how to land planes on aircraft carriers, claims he denies.

Since last October, Duggan, 54, has been held in a maximum-security prison in regional Australia as his lawyers fight an extradition order, approved by Australia’s attorney general, to return him to the US to face trial on charges including money laundering and conspiracy to export US defense services.

On Tuesday, Duggan’s lawyers argued for a stay of extradition while Australia’s Office of the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security (IGIS) investigates claims of improper action by Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO), including that Duggan was “lured” from China, where he was living, to Australia, where the US had legal reach to arrest him.

The case comes as the US and its allies seek to unite against China in the Indo-Pacific, where Beijing has been fortifying islands with military installations that they fear may one day be used in a regional conflict.

From Lithgow Correctional Centre, where he’s being held, Duggan told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) that he was “living a nightmare.” “I strenuously reject the indictment in its entirety,” he said.

Duggan’s wife Saffrine wants Australian officials to block his extradition, and on Tuesday she and some of their six children stood outside court, holding signs calling for him to be freed.

“We’re horrified that something like this could happen, not only to us, but to anyone,” Saffrine Duggan told her supporters.

“I would never have thought this could ever happen in Australia, let alone to our family. My family is brave and strong and so are our friends, and so is my husband, but we are all terribly torn apart.”

The allegations

After completing his final mission as a Major with the US Marines, Duggan moved to Australia in 2002. He met Saffrine in 2011, and a year later he became an Australian citizen, renounced his US citizenship, and the family moved to China.

Saffrine and the children moved back to Australia in 2018, and Duggan joined them in September 2022, after receiving Australian security clearance for an aviation licence, his supporters say.

But within weeks, that clearance was revoked and he was taken into custody.

The charges relate to a period between November 2009 and November 2012, when Duggan – then a US citizen – was alleged to have trained Chinese military pilots in China, according to a 2017 indictment that was unsealed last December.

The indictment said that “as early as 2008,” Duggan received an email from the US State Department telling him he was required to register with the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls and apply for permission to train a foreign air force.

Instead, it claims he conspired with others – including the Test Flying Academy of South Africa (TFASA) – to export defense services in violation of an arms embargo on China.

In a statement to CNN, TFASA said it complies with the laws of every jurisdiction in which it operates.

The statement said Duggan undertook one test pilot contract for the company in South Africa between November and December 2012, and “never worked for TFASA on any of its training mandates in China.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19237805

File: 015ff75a71ec7e3⋯.jpg (215.88 KB,1280x720,16:9,An_undated_image_of_former….jpg)

File: 8a993530d656821⋯.jpg (246.51 KB,1280x720,16:9,Daniel_Duggan_s_children_j….jpg)

>>19237802

2/3

The indictment alleges Duggan negotiated directly with a Chinese firm to provide other defense services for a fee, including “the evaluation of pilot trainees, testing of naval aviation related equipment, instruction on tactics, techniques, and procedures for launching planes from, and landing on, a naval aircraft carrier.”

Duggan told the ABC that none of the training involved the disclosure of secret or proprietary information. “It’s all public domain, open-source information that anybody, if they’re interested in, could Google it or look it up on Wikipedia,” he said.

The training offered by TFASA allegedly involved the use of a T-2 Buckeye, a twin-engine, straight-wing airplane, purchased in the US and exported to South Africa, without authorization from the US.

In its statement to CNN, TFASA said it only leased the plane from a business associate in South Africa, and never attempted to purchase it. Duggan flew the T-2, among other planes, during his contract, but the company ceased using the aircraft when approached by officials from the US Embassy in South Africa, TFASA added.

Training Chinese pilots

Duggan doesn’t deny training Chinese pilots, but he maintains they were civilians – plane enthusiasts seeking to improve their skills or prospective members of China’s then rapidly expanding aviation industry.

Glenn Kolomeitz, a former member of the Australian Defence Force and lawyer, who is advocating for the family, told CNN that it is “very, very common for people to leave the military and go work overseas.”

“Dan was just an instructor, just a pilot trainer. That’s it,” he told CNN.

“He wasn’t a part of the company (TFASA), he wasn’t in any way involved in any of the administration, the management, and how could he possibly have thought, or have even considered that there would be any illegality in this, when there are so many people, including high levels from the RAF, the British air force, involved in this training.”

On October 18, three days before Duggan was arrested in Australia, the UK Defence Ministry issued a statement warning that it was taking “decisive steps to stop Chinese recruitment schemes attempting to headhunt serving and former UK Armed Forces pilots.”

The next day, Australia’s Defence Minister Richard Marles said he had asked his department to investigate reports that former Australian military pilots had also been recruited by TFASA to work in China. And a spokesperson for New Zealand’s Defence Force confirmed to Reuters that four of its former military pilots had been recruited by the company.

Two days after that, Duggan was taken into custody near his home in rural New South Wales, and only learned of the allegations against him 62 days later, Saffrine said. He faces up to 65 years in prison if found guilty.

“It has been devastating. The kids and I distraught. It’s just a struggle. It’s a daily struggle. The kids have lots of questions. Constant tears. I mean, it’s horrific,” she told CNN.

Since Duggan’s arrest, the UK and Australia have moved to tighten laws for former service members who train foreign forces.

“The new legislation being developed will remove any doubts about the application of these laws to the full breadth of our defence secrets,” said a spokesperson for Marles.

In a speech in February, Mike Burgess, Australia’s director-general of security and the head of ASIO, said a “small but concerning” number of Australian veterans were willing to put “cash before country.”

“These individuals are lackeys, more ‘top tools’ than ‘top guns.’ Selling our warfighting skills is no different to selling our secrets – especially when the training and tactics are being transferred to countries that will use them to close capability gaps, and could use them against us or our allies at some time in the future,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19237806

File: f9b7daed77bc739⋯.jpg (116.18 KB,1280x720,16:9,Former_US_fighter_pilot_Da….jpg)

File: 378fab378c4de94⋯.jpg (87.17 KB,1280x720,16:9,Aircraft_from_Training_Squ….jpg)

File: 2c1ae03a0fb5d95⋯.jpg (184.81 KB,1280x720,16:9,US_Vice_President_Joe_Bide….jpg)

>>19237805

3/3

The T-2 Buckeye

News of Duggan’s arrest has spread through the ranks of former US Marines, says Ben Hancock, a retired colonel who served a rank above Duggan in the late ’90s when he was forward deployed on missions that took him to the Persian Gulf and around Asia, with a final stop in Townsville, Australia.

“He was what we called a weapons and tactics instructor, which is the highest instructor qualification you can get in the Marine Corps,” he said.

“It’s a very expensive course, you have to be hand-picked to be sent to it. And then once you return, you become the training guru for everybody else in the squadron,” he said. “He was top-notch. I trusted him with my life.”

Hancock said Duggan left the service as an “honorable Marine,” and while he hadn’t spoken to him since his arrest, they had kept in touch by email sporadically over the years.

Hancock said the T-2 Buckeye was used for many generations by US Navy and Marine Corps pilots to learn maneuvers on a ship – how to catapult off and trap aircraft as well as make arrested landings.

He said it was “unusual” to see a T-2 Buckeye at a civilian flight school, because most of them had been “mothballed,” but described it as a great introductory aircraft for military training.

“It’s great aerobatic airplane if you want to teach a guy to fly a twin-engine jet, how to handle jets, the speed of jet over propeller airplanes, and then do aerobatics and stall series … It’s a great airplane to train anybody in extreme flying environments that allow you to recover the airplane safely,” he said.

He said he hasn’t seen the evidence against Duggan, but questions why no one else has been charged and says the vast majority of Duggan’s experience was piloting Harriers that take off and land vertically, which requires a different approach.

“As Harrier pilots, all our time at sea, we did short takeoffs using the Harrier’s capability, not a catapult. We’d pick up under own power and then we did every landing was a vertical landing. And the Chinese don’t have in those kinds of jets,” he said. “So Dan didn’t have the expertise, in my opinion, to be training guys for that. It’s the wrong type of approach and landing.”

In its statement to CNN, TFASA denied teaching aircraft carrier approach and landing techniques to Chinese military pilots.

“TFASA provides training to test pilots, flight test engineers, and basic operational instructor pilots under closely controlled security conditions. All training aspects and material are strictly unclassified, and provided either from open source or the clients themselves. No training involves classified tactics or other information, nor any frontline activities,” the statement said.

Duggan’s supporters believe he’s been caught up in a hardened approach by Western allies towards China under leader Xi Jinping, who in recent years has expanded the military and expressed his intention to “reunify” the democratic island of Taiwan with the mainland, despite never having controlled it.

At the time Duggan was alleged to have been training Chinese military pilots, Xi was stepping out onto the international stage, visiting the US to meet then Vice President Joe Biden and proposing to strengthen their cooperation.

Several years later, under former President Donald Trump, relations deteriorated as both countries engaged in a trade war and ties remain deeply strained to this day.

Duggan’s arrest in 2022 came as the US, UK and Australia formed a stronger security bond under AUKUS, the deal they signed in 2021 to join forces in the Pacific to counter an increasingly assertive China.

Kolomeitz, the family’s supporter, says Duggan is being used to send a message to Beijing to back off from hiring its former military personnel.

“Don’t be recruiting Western former military people – that’s what it’s all about. Right?” he said. “It’s sending a message to China, and it’s helping to push through the legislative agendas of these agencies.”

The court is hearing arguments Tuesday, and will return its ruling at a later date on whether a stay will be granted.

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/07/24/australia/australia-us-fighter-pilot-extradition-hearing-intl-hnk/index.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19237815

File: ff3db4c80c77989⋯.jpg (139.45 KB,1188x1159,1188:1159,Daniel_Duggan_was_arrested….jpg)

File: 70a2e14657bde63⋯.jpg (820.53 KB,3150x2100,3:2,Saffrine_Duggan_and_one_of….jpg)

>>19226522

Jailed pilot will rely on novel defence never used in Australia

Georgina Mitchell - July 25, 2023

One of Australia’s top barristers will seek to expand the legal definition of a political offence during a challenge to the extradition of Daniel Duggan, an Australian man accused of training Chinese military pilots overseas.

Duggan, 54, has been in custody since October last year after he was arrested at the request of the United States. An indictment in the US accuses him of training pilots when he was an instructor at a South African flight academy between 2010 and 2012.

The father-of-six has denied the allegations, telling the ABC’s 7.30 in an interview from Lithgow correctional centre: “I strenuously reject the indictment in its entirety.”

“I went as an employee with other western pilots, including other Australians, and trained civilian Chinese test pilots,” Duggan said. “Now I’m in prison, and no one else is.”

Duggan was a highly-regarded pilot with the US Marine Corps before moving to Australia, where he renounced his US citizenship and became an Australian citizen.

On Tuesday, during a preliminary hearing at Downing Centre Local Court, barrister Bret Walker SC initially indicated he would apply for a temporary stay in Duggan’s case, however this did not eventuate and the case was adjourned.

The court heard Duggan’s legal team is awaiting the outcome of an inquiry into the case by the spy watchdog, the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security (IGIS).

Walker said he was unable to detail precisely what IGIS was examining, aside from the fact it related to “circumstances subsequent to the alleged offending” and possible cooperation between security agencies in Australia and the United States.

“That fact is, in our submission, well within the orbit of material which may give a political character to the offence in question,” Walker said.

Extradition can be challenged on several grounds, including by arguing a person is being extradited to face a political offence. If this is proven, a person may be ineligible for surrender to the requesting country.

Walker said a political offence does not have a precise definition, with the Extradition Act defining it as an offence of a political character because of the circumstances in which it is committed, “or otherwise”.

He said no case law exists setting out the interpretation of those two words, “or otherwise”.

“This will be it,” Walker said. “There’s been no case of this kind argued or decided before.”

Magistrate Daniel Reiss said the lack of case law suggested the interpretation of the phrase was not as broad as Walker suggested.

“The rarity suggests it’s not a very broad definition,” Reiss said.

The magistrate adjourned the case to October, with the extradition hearing set down for November 24. Walker indicated there may be a further application for an adjournment.

Speaking outside court on Tuesday morning, Duggan’s wife Saffrine said he had been imprisoned for more than nine months “without any Australian charges, convictions, or history of violence – on the say-so of the United States government”.

“We are all determined to fight this terrible injustice,” she said.

“We’re saddened, we’re mortified, we’re horrified that something like this could happen – not only to us, but to anyone … I would never have thought this could ever happen in Australia.”

The case will return to court on October 23.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/nsw/jailed-pilot-will-rely-on-novel-defence-never-used-in-australia-20230725-p5dr4p.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19237833

File: 4b4bcceca6e033e⋯.jpg (589.99 KB,2400x1440,5:3,Former_US_marine_pilot_Dan….jpg)

>>19226522

Daniel Duggan: flight school where former US marine taught says syllabus ‘totally unclassified’

South African academy defends material as Australian citizen fights extradition to US over allegations he trained Chinese fighter pilots

Ben Doherty - 25 Jul 2023

1/2

The flight school where former marine Daniel Duggan allegedly helped train Chinese fighter pilots insists all of his teaching was legal, in line with international standards and “totally unclassified”.

Duggan, 54, a former US marine pilot who is now a naturalised Australian, was arrested in October at the request of the US government, which is seeking his extradition on charges of arms trafficking and money laundering arising from his alleged training of Chinese fighter pilots at a South African flight school more than a decade ago.

The allegations have not been tested in court.

Duggan, who has not been charged with a crime in Australia and has no criminal history anywhere in the world, denies the charges and is fighting his extradition from prison, a process that could take months or years to resolve.

The father of six faces a potential 60-year prison term if convicted in the US.

The flight school where he taught after resigning from the US Marines – the Test Flying Academy of South Africa (TFASA) – says it has strict protocols and a code of conduct to ensure no information is shared that might be legally or operationally sensitive – or security classified.

“All TFASA training materials have always been either open source or provided by clients. The syllabus of the course that Mr Duggan was part of delivering was in line with international standards and totally unclassified,” a spokesperson for TFASA told Guardian Australia.

Asked whether TFASA believed Duggan’s fulfilment of his contract was in keeping with his, and the flight school’s, legal obligations, a spokesperson said: “Yes. TFASA has always complied with its legal obligations and worked hard to ensure the same of any and all employees or contractors.”

The spokesperson said: “TFASA has had no contact whatsoever with Mr Duggan since the conclusion of the single contract he undertook for the company 10 years ago.”

Duggan has been imprisoned for 277 days while he fights extradition and has faced significant isolation, having been classified as a high-risk prisoner.

In March, Australia’s inspector general of intelligence and security (IGIS) launched a formal investigation into Duggan’s ongoing incarceration and the circumstances of his arrest, after allegations were raised by his legal team he may have been “lured” back to Australia by intelligence officials before his arrest.

Duggan’s case returns to court on Tuesday. Barrister Bret Walker SC is expected to appear for Duggan and to argue extradition proceedings should be temporarily stayed while the IGIS investigation is under way.

If that argument is successful, Duggan’s legal team expects to make an application for him to be released on bail.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19237835

File: 472eddaf575cdf4⋯.jpg (375.17 KB,2400x1440,5:3,Saffrine_Duggan_the_wife_o….jpg)

>>19237833

2/2

Duggan told the ABC’s 7.30 the allegations against him were false.

“I strenuously reject the indictment in its entirety… I’ve done nothing wrong.”

He said the pilots he trained were not members of the Chinese military, but were “civilian test pilots”.

Duggan reiterated earlier statements he held little faith in the US justice system if he were extradited.

US-born Duggan served more than a decade flying in the US Marine Corps, rising to the rank of major and working as a military tactical flight instructor.

He left the military in 2002 and moved to Australia, becoming an Australian citizen in 2012 and renouncing his US citizenship in 2017. He has lived in Australia and China since leaving the US Marines.

A 2017 US grand jury indictment alleges Duggan trained Chinese pilots to land fighter jets on aircraft carriers, in defiance of arms trafficking laws, and engaged in a conspiracy to launder money.

The indictment details payments Duggan allegedly received in 2011 and 2012 for allegedly training Chinese fighter pilots at a test flight academy “based in South Africa with a presence in the People’s Republic of China”.

Duggan “provided military training to PRC pilots”, according the indictment, including “instruction on the tactics, techniques and procedures associated with launching aircraft from, and landing aircraft on, a naval aircraft carrier”.

The indictment says he failed to obtain authorisation from the US state department’s Directorate of Defense Trade Controls to export defence services or providing training to Chinese nationals, as he had been instructed was required.

Duggan’s legal team has maintained the US extradition request was politically motivated and catalysed by the US’s deepening geopolitical contest with China. Australia’s extradition treaty with the US states that extradition requests should be refused if they are for an alleged “political offence”.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/jul/25/daniel-duggan-flight-school-where-former-us-marine-taught-says-syllabus-totally-unclassified

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19237861

File: 37d802225f1ae8a⋯.jpg (442.69 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Saffrine_Duggan_with_her_k….jpg)

File: 88bf7ee3f14c127⋯.jpg (242.45 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Former_US_marine_pilot_Dan….jpg)

File: c626955135905e2⋯.jpg (289.7 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Mrs_Duggan_says_her_husban….jpg)

File: 7e04a057d6811ab⋯.jpg (464.45 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,The_couple_s_children_made….jpg)

>>19226522

Wife of ex-Top Gun pilot slams ‘terrible injustice’ in extradition fight

Adelaide Lang - July 25, 2023

1/2

A former US marine pilot will remain in limbo for at least another four months as he fights against an extradition order which has been called a “terrible injustice”.

Daniel Edmund Duggan has been in custody since October last year after the US indicated it would seek his extradition for charges of conspiracy, arms trafficking and money laundering.

On Tuesday, his wife Saffrine Duggan stood outside Sydney Downing Centre Court with the couple’s six children amid a crowd of protesters holding signs demanding Mr Duggan’s release.

“Not only are we standing up for a loving husband, a father, and a friend – we’re standing up for Australian sovereignty,” she said over a megaphone.

“We are all determined to fight this terrible injustice and to demand that Australian sovereignty is respected in Australia.”

She told the crowd her husband had been detained in solitary confinement for more than nine months, even though he had no criminal record and was not charged with any offences in Australia.

US authorities allege the 54-year-old breached money laundering and arms export control laws while teaching foreign pilots.

The former US marine corps aviator allegedly trained Chinese military pilots while working at an international flying academy more than 10 years ago.

He is also accused of breaching US arms control laws by instructing pilots on how to land on an aircraft carrier.

The US authorities allege he was paid thousands of dollars for his expertise but had not sought US approval to teach foreign pilots.

Mr Duggan has repeatedly denied the allegations.

“Dan was kidnapped after dropping our beautiful children off to school with a cake in his hand for the school fete,” Mrs Duggan said as she choked back tears.

“We all should be very worried about what’s happening.”

She explained the US bid to extradite her husband had taken a “horrendous” toll on her family and their children, who have “all been terribly torn apart”.

“We are saddened, we’re mortified, we’re horrified that something like this could happen. Not only to us but to anyone,” Mrs Duggan said in her emotional address to the crowd.

“We all need to stand up and stop it and let him free. Let him come home to us where he belongs.”

The protesters held signs declaring Mr Duggan was a “political prisoner in solitary” confinement at Lithgow Correctional Centre and demanding his release.

“Let him go!” read a sign held by the couple’s young son, while another proclaimed “I love you” under a rainbow.

After more than nine months of struggling with his absence, Mrs Duggan gave a stirring call to action in her husband’s own words.

“It takes a certain brave relentless persistence to push back and ultimately overcome such abuses of power,” she quoted.

“Today we are the brave ones.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19237865

File: 9e76002ea97b521⋯.jpg (70.38 KB,1280x719,1280:719,Mr_Duggan_ran_a_business_c….jpg)

File: 3c8d456d57e2595⋯.jpg (385.54 KB,1210x1613,1210:1613,Saffrine_Duggan_has_been_a….jpg)

File: 39d9cf6d3416458⋯.jpg (349.4 KB,1465x1954,1465:1954,Mr_Duggan_had_been_living_….jpg)

>>19237861

2/2

Mr Duggan’s legal team appeared in the Downing Centre Local Court on Tuesday to fight for a temporary stay on the US efforts to extradite him to North America.

The international tug of war took a turn in March when Australia’s Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security (IGIS) confirmed it had launched a formal inquiry into the case.

The investigation will assess the circumstances of Mr Duggan’s arrest after his legal team raised concerns the former fighter pilot had been lured back to Australia to be arrested.

On Tuesday, his barrister Bret Walker SC applied for the US extradition to be put on hold until the IGIS investigation is complete.

He argued that material gathered during the inquiry would prove that the alleged offence was politically motivated – a classification that would allow Australia to refuse Mr Duggan’s extradition request.

The court was told the material would include expert analyses of foreign policy and the deterioration of diplomatic relations between the US and China in the years since Mr Duggan was a flight instructor.

The lawyer representing the US, Stephen Lloyd SC, objected to the “contentious” characterisation of Mr Duggan’s alleged offence as politically charged.

The discussion of “what’s political and what falls outside of that” will be ventilated during the extradition hearing on November 24.

Mr Duggan’s legal team previously indicated they would argue the US charges were politically motivated and their client was the pawn in a geopolitical tussle between the US and China.

A magistrate in the local court will determine whether Mr Duggan is legally eligible for surrender to the US, but the ultimate decision will fall to federal Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus.

If the IGIS inquiry is not concluded before the hearing date in November, Mr Walker foreshadowed another request for an adjournment.

Mr Duggan spent 12 years flying in the US Marines before he moved to Australia with his family and relinquished his US citizenship.

He had been living in Orange, in central western NSW, with his wife and six children when he was arrested.

https://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-act/courts-law/wife-of-extop-gun-pilot-slams-terrible-injustice-in-extradition-fight/news-story/866f86b4b45b7bd04f72d571d2eef308

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19237876

File: 4a946a1d0d2660f⋯.jpg (43.46 KB,604x403,604:403,Former_pilot_Daniel_Duggan….jpg)

File: 23f6d93e99a4a3c⋯.jpg (284.25 KB,1511x1134,1511:1134,Mr_Duggan_s_wife_Saffrine_….jpg)

>>19226522

Court date set for jailed ex-pilot Daniel Duggan to fight US extradition over claims he trained Chinese pilots

Jamie McKinnell - 25 July 2023

The wife of former US marine pilot Daniel Duggan says the impact of his ongoing incarceration on their family is "horrendous".

The 54-year-old denies allegations he helped train Chinese military pilots more than a decade ago, which relate to his work at the Test Flying Academy of South Africa.

As his lawyers argued for a temporary stay of the proceedings in Sydney's Downing Centre Local Court, a group of supporters joined Mr Duggan's wife outside.

Saffrine Duggan said they were determined to fight against the "terrible injustice" of her husband being held in custody for nine months since his arrest.

She also demanded that Australian sovereignties be respected.

"This is a loving, caring father having to go through a tragedy and we all need to stand up and stop and let him free," Ms Duggan said.

"Let him come home to us where he belongs."

Ms Duggan said she had received messages of support from around the world.

"The toll on our kids and family is horrendous," she told the crowd.

"We are sad and we're mortified. We're horrified that something like this could happen — not only to us but to anyone."

Inside, barrister Bret Walker SC, representing Mr Duggan, raised arguments about whether there may be a political character to the alleged offence.

Mr Duggan's legal team says the Inspector General of Intelligence and Security (IGIS) is investigating the role ASIO played in the lead-up to his arrest, which could impact the case.

Magistrate Daniel Reiss said it was clear there was an objection being raised in relation to an alleged political offence, but he said it was "not a black and white issue in terms of the statutory formulation".

The Extradition Act specifically provides that a respondent be entitled to a reasonable time to prepare for an extradition proceeding, he noted.

An extradition hearing was set for November 24, however, the receipt of the IGIS inquiry report may delay that.

Outside court, lawyer Glenn Kolomeitz, who acts for the Duggan family, said Mr Duggan was stressed — and being told he now has to wait some 120 extra days in solitary confinement would not help.

Dr Kolomeitz said bail was "virtually impossible" under extradition legislation.

"It has its own bail provisions, which require extreme circumstances really to get bail, which flies in the face of the state bail legislation and the presumption in favour of bail in most cases," he said.

Dr Kolomeitz said Mr Duggan and his supporters were all holding out hope that something would stop the extradition.

"The extradition treaty is a disgrace," he said.

"The Extradition Act is a disgrace and the indictment is a disgrace.

"Whatever it takes to make this thing stop, if it's an IGIS inquiry report which is adverse to the Australian government, then so be it."

Dr Kolomeitz said the case "reeks of politics".

"This is a very bad treaty and a very bad piece of legislation which is being exploited by the United States."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-25/ex-pilot-daniel-duggan-to-fight-us-extradition-november-24/102646434

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19237884

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19226522

Pilot Daniel Duggan in Australia, accused of training Chinese military pilots | 7NEWS

7NEWS Australia

Jul 25, 2023

The wife of a former U.S top gun has choked back tears as her husband fights extradition from Australia to America, accused of training Chinese military pilots. Daniel Duggan has been locked up since late last year. His family and supporters today demanded his immediate release.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zzfUu5bYUw

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19237894

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19226522

Family of former US pilot protests outside Sydney court

9 News Australia

Jul 25, 2023

Family and friends of detained former American marine Daniel Duggan have held a peaceful protest outside a Sydney court, as the father fights extradition to the United States.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ye02DPZ9pg0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6c69dc No.19237895

one user?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

6c69dc No.19237899

>>19237895

>3 UIDs

wtf

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19237929

File: 05f25c69940a3e2⋯.jpg (104.06 KB,1280x720,16:9,Daniel_Duggan_renounced_hi….jpg)

File: e3074c3dba9c307⋯.jpg (253.67 KB,3000x1458,500:243,Bernard_Collaery_said_he_b….jpg)

File: 8648ae134b3957d⋯.jpg (3.62 MB,4032x3024,4:3,Daniel_Duggan_has_six_chil….jpg)

>>19226522

'Top Gun' pilot speaks from his Australian prison cell as he fights extradition to the US for allegedly training Chinese pilots

Angelique Donnellan - 25 July 2023

1/2

The phone rings. Then comes an automated message highlighting the gravity of the situation.

"You are about to receive a phone call from a correctional facility.

"The conversation will be recorded and may be monitored."

Daniel Duggan, 54, says "Hello". The Australian citizen and former US Marine pilot is calling from his maximum-security cell in New South Wales.

It's the first time he's spoken publicly. Talking to 7.30 comes with risk. His words could be used as evidence against him. He's been in isolation for nine months.

"It's not that I want to speak out or decided to speak out, but I feel that I've had a very unfair ability to defend myself," he told 7.30.

Mr Duggan's locked up indefinitely while he fights extradition to the United States over allegations he trained Chinese military pilots more than a decade ago.

"My emotion is on my sleeve, what you see is what you get and, I am an unfiltered person, truthful, straight to the face and I'll talk and… that's what I want to do."

Mr Duggan's facing charges of conspiracy, arms trafficking and money laundering brought by the US government. He faces up to 65 years in jail if he's found guilty.

"It's a death penalty is what that is, at my age," Mr Duggan said.

"I strenuously reject the indictment in its entirety.

"There's a sad joke amongst the (US) legal fraternity… they say you can indict a ham sandwich. So unfortunately, I happen to be the ham sandwich at the moment," he said.

The accusations against Mr Duggan stem from his work between 2010 and 2012 as an instructor at the Test Flying Academy of South Africa.

His lawyer Bernard Collaery told 7.30 he believed the charges were politically motivated amid tensions between the United States and China. He claimed Australia, as an ally of the US, had a conflict of interest.

"So far as China is concerned, we were conducting joint military exercises at sea between the Royal Australian Navy, and the PLA (People's Liberation Army) Navy at a time (2010) when Dan Duggan is accused of, as it were, consorting with the enemy. It's double-standard. It's hypocrisy," he said.

"You must agree it makes a good show trial in Washington where the United States system is known for it. If Australia does extradite him we're liable to see him become a pawn in this China game. It is very worrying."

'Now I'm in prison, and no one else is'

The US indictment alleges Mr Duggan received more than $182,000 for providing a range of services, including teaching Chinese pilots how to take off and land on an aircraft carrier.

7.30 put the allegation directly to him.

"I think the better question is, with all due respect, is that 'Was there any training that went on that was illegal?' And the answer to that is an emphatic 'no'.

"There was no, and I repeat, there was no secret information, or proprietary information, or anything like that, it's all public domain, open-source information that anybody if they're interested in, could Google it or look it up on Wikipedia," he told 7.30.

The indictment alleges Mr Duggan trained Chinese military pilots without permission from the US State Department. He's adamant he taught civilian test pilots.

"The truth of it is, that there was nothing wrong. I went as an employee, with other western pilots, including other Australians, and trained civilian Chinese test pilots.

"Test pilots, particularly advanced test pilots are doing training for all sorts of things at the extremes of aviation, such as stall and spin recovery.

"Now I'm in prison, and no one else is. I'm happy that no one else is because they shouldn't be, because there was no law broken," he told 7.30.

He also rejects concealing from authorities the payments he received for the training.

"Now all of a sudden that's laundering money. Money was paid into bank accounts in my name and declared on my taxes.

"I think, if you want to hide payments, you don't declare them on your taxes," he told 7.30.

The Test Flying Academy of South Africa has told 7.30 that none of its training involves classified methods nor any frontline activities or defence services.

The US State Department declined 7.30's request for an interview. A spokesman said as a matter of long-standing policy, the department did not comment publicly on extradition matters.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19237935

File: 733f22ce95b03c4⋯.jpg (73.41 KB,500x640,25:32,Retired_US_Marine_Colonel_….jpg)

File: 690ae83cdb80b05⋯.jpg (2.49 MB,4032x3024,4:3,Saffrine_Duggan_and_her_ch….jpg)

>>19237929

2/2

'A good man of character'

Mr Duggan served as a US Marine pilot between 1989 and 2002, attaining the rank of major.

"My father was a US Marine pilot. He served in World War II and in the Korean War.

"It was like a calling and I really really enjoyed everything about aviation. I'm a pilot's pilot, you know, I love the physical act of flying," he told 7.30.

Retired US Marine Colonel Ben Hancock served with Mr Duggan for two years and was his superior, including during an operation in the Persian Gulf in the late 1990s.

"Dan was what I called a Jedi Knight, cream of the crop.

"Hands down, highly respected, highly regarded, very proficient military jet pilot," he said.

"He was a weapons and tactics instructor, which is the highest tactical qualification you can get in the United States Marine Corps. It's essentially our version in many ways of Top Gun, if you will, on the Marine Corps side."

Mr Hancock said he was shocked by the allegations against Mr Duggan.

"My initial inclination is that Dan is innocent. He's a good man, a good man of character, a loyal citizen, pilot, patriot, who is simply trying to make a living, doing what he likes to do flying aeroplanes.

"If you didn't operate the school, you didn't start the school, didn't manage the school, it's not his job as an instructor, to vet the students," he said.

'Innocent until proven guilty'

Mr Duggan first came to live in Australia in the early 2000s. He met his now-wife Saffrine in 2011. They have six children between them.

"The family is under a lot of duress.

"It's a scary process for a young child to see prison guards locking doors and gates and it's just not a very nice environment," he said.

He renounced his US citizenship a decade ago.

"The fact that I am only an Australian citizen now is not because I'm anti-American, it's more so that I am pro-Australian," he said.

Mr Duggan was arrested by Australian police in regional New South Wales in October last year on behalf of the US government.

His case returns to court today where lawyers will argue for a temporary stay to his extradition.

Mr Collaery said the Extradition Act was inherently unfair.

"There is no presumption of innocence. In the extradition law of our country there is a prima facie test or probable cause test. But essentially, Australia accepts the allegations made by a foreign country," Mr Collaery said.

The Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus declined 7.30's request for an interview but a spokesman said there were two remaining stages of the extradition process. A magistrate determines whether a person is eligible for surrender and a decision by the Attorney-General as to whether the person should be surrendered.

At this time, the person has the opportunity to raise any additional reasons as to why the extradition should not proceed.

"The Extradition Act is urgently in need of review," Mr Collaery said.

Under the Extradition Act, Mr Collaery said it was also extremely difficult for Mr Duggan to get bail.

"He's been nine months away from his wife and six children. He has no risk of flight… and he should be granted bail," he said.

Mr Duggan's team said the Inspector General of Intelligence and Security was also investigating the role ASIO played in the lead-up to his arrest, which could impact the case.

A spokesman for ASIO has previously told 7.30 the organisation operated within the letter and spirit of the law but could not comment further.

Mr Duggan's mounting legal bills have meant he and Saffrine are having to sell the house they were building.

"The US has absolutely nothing to lose in this.

"I'm paying of course for my own legal defence with money I don't have. I'm going to be in debt, millions of dollars.

He doesn't believe he'll get a fair trial if he's extradited to the US.

"Innocent until proven guilty," he told 7.30.

"I'm living a nightmare and every day I wake up thinking that 'Oh, my god, that was an absolutely horrible, horrible nightmare'.

"Then I open my eyes and realise that the nightmare is not just a nightmare, it's reality."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-25/daniel-duggan-speaks-from-australian-prison-cell-730/102639750

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19237940

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19226522

>>19237929

Former US Marine pilot proclaims innocence from Australian prison cell | 7.30

ABC News In-depth

'Jul 24, 2023

For nine months, Australian citizen Daniel Duggan has been locked up in a maximum security prison while he fights extradition to the United States. The US Department of Justice wants to prosecute the former marine Major, for allegedly training Chinese fighter pilots more than a decade ago.

Tonight, Duggan speaks publicly for the first time. Angelique Donnellan has this exclusive report.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FVtSwemZFfs

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19243329

File: e6c94a2b1056935⋯.jpg (236.48 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Noel_Pearson_founder_of_th….jpg)

>>19222755

Indigenous voice to parliament ‘will let us make real deals’, says Noel Pearson

ROSIE LEWIS and SARAH ISON - JULY 26, 2023

1/2

Indigenous leader Noel Pearson says the voice will conduct negotiations with the government of the day and make “real deals” to improve the lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, raising fresh questions from the No campaign.

In a Sky News documentary that aired on Tuesday night examining the voice referendum, Mr Pearson said: “There’ll be no ­bureaucracy. What we want to set up is the people of Yuendumu on one side of the table with the government, with the local council, with the commonwealth government, sit down and say ‘What do we need to do here in Yuendumu?’

“The voice at the end of the day is a table, a partnership table where we conduct negotiations with the government. And let’s make a real deal. OK, the government provides the resources, the community commits to the things that it will do – it can’t just be the government doing everything. It’ll never work, we’ll have no success.”

Anthony Albanese has repeatedly said the voice would be subservient to parliament and his government would reject its advice – including if it suggested changing Australia Day – if it disagreed.

Opposition Indigenous affairs spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, who has family living in the remote Northern Territory community of Yuendumu, said Mr Pearson could “suggest all he wants” but the government kept saying the voice would be determined by parliament after a successful referendum.

“Noel’s comments don’t clarify who at Yuendumu would be doing the negotiating with government and this is deeply concerning, given I’m consistently fielding calls from Yuendumu about vulnerable women who are living under threat of violence and who are always seeking to escape the violence of the community despite the supposed leadership in the community,” Senator Price said.

“Australians just don’t know what it is we’re signing up to.”

Also on Tuesday night, Mr Pearson told a La Trobe University event Indigenous people had been treated as a “sideshow” by past governments and that the referendum represented a move towards a “more dignified power relationship”.

“We‘ve been focused on this need to empower the mouse to put the mouse in a relationship with the big creature of government,” he said.

He added that the days of continuing to fear Aboriginal people “has some day soon got to come to an end”.

“We can’t finish a third century of fearing the original people,” he said.

The Prime Minister would not say in the Sky News documentary if he had a Plan B if the referendum was voted down but he said he remained optimistic about a Yes vote. “It will be, obviously, disappointing if that doesn’t occur, but we know that constitutional change is hard in this country,” he said.

Senator Price said she’d do everything in her power to make sure the voice wasn’t “an entity that has ultimate power to run roughshod over parliament and over our democracy”.

“This referendum has probably been our nation’s most divisive. And whether it’s successful or not, there’s going to have to be a lot of work done to fix those fractures … as a result of this referendum,” she told Sky News.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19243332

File: 967f142ffb76236⋯.jpg (121.51 KB,1283x722,1283:722,Opposition_Indigenous_affa….jpg)

>>19243329

2/2

Mr Pearson said the wording of the constitutional amendment to be voted on by Australians later this year had been simplified to make it absolutely clear the voice was not a structure of the parliament. “This was a structure outside of the parliament providing advice to the parliament,” he said.

“The drafting we have today, you could not get a more safe and a more thoroughly examined proposition than the one that the Albanese government has adopted.”

He said it was reasonable to ask for more detail and the voice needed to be interrogated, but solutions also needed to be listened to.

At the La Trobe event, Mr Pearson said the constitutional amendment - which states the voice would make representations on “matters relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples” - was unlikely to extend to issues such as parking fines, rejecting a key No campaign argument.

“I just don‘t know how you squeeze parking tickets and nuclear submarines and so on into that clause, as a purpose of this voice. The purpose is clear that it’s on matters relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples,” he said.

CFMEU national secretary Zach Smith on Tuesday joined calls from prominent Indigenous leaders not to delay the referendum. “We are seeing a lot of misinformation getting out there around the voice being able to override democratic decisions with the government or influence defence policy, or basically play a role, which just isn’t a reality. It is an advisory body,” Mr Smith told the National Press Club.

“It will give First Nations people in this country a voice that is so, so long overdue. There is a real issue that the Yes campaign and those of us that support the Yes vote need to contend with, which is misinformation; trade ­unions and civil society have a role to play in combating that.”

Under the referendum working group’s design principles, the voice would be able to make representations proactively and respond to requests for representations from the parliament and the executive.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-will-let-us-make-real-deals-says-noel-pearson/news-story/5b163f1d191c43b941c2d175c35a492a

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19243381

File: ef054690779c1dd⋯.jpg (1.22 MB,5472x3648,3:2,WikiLeaks_founder_Julian_A….jpg)

File: c94d090e72ae338⋯.jpg (1.34 MB,3405x2270,3:2,The_Member_for_Bruce_Julia….jpg)

Key Assange supporter says Wikileaks founder could cut deal to secure freedom

Latika Bourke - July 26, 2023

London: One of federal parliament’s leading supporters of Julian Assange says the WikiLeaks founder could cut a deal with prosecutors and plead guilty to “whatever nonsense” necessary to secure his release from prison.

Labor MP Julian Hill, the member for Bruce, tried unsuccessfully to visit Assange in Belmarsh prison, where he has been held since 2019, during a private trip to Europe recently.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has directly lobbied US President Joe Biden for the Queenslander’s release but has so far failed to secure it, and has hinted that Assange may have to accept a plea deal.

“The reality is that Australia cannot force the United States to [release Assange], and if they refuse, then no Australian should judge Mr Assange if he chooses to just cut a deal and end this matter,” said Hill.

“His health is deteriorating and if the US refuses to do the right thing and drop the charges then no one would think less of him for crossing his fingers and toes, pleading guilty to whatever nonsense he has to and getting the hell out of there.”

Hill, a member of a cross-party group of MPs who support Assange’s release, also hit out at supporters who he sees as fixated on having Assange suffer as a martyr and continue to languish in prison as he faces extradition to the United States.

“It worries me greatly that there are some Assange supporters who would rather he be a martyr than a free man, but ultimately it’s important for everyone to respect what Julian himself chooses to do,” he said.

His wife Stella Assange has repeatedly warned his health has deteriorated badly due to his incarceration over the last four years.

The couple were married in a prison ceremony in 2022 and have two sons together, born when Assange was holed up in the Ecuadorian embassy seeking asylum to defy a separate extradition to Sweden. He was wanted there for questioning over now-lapsed sexual assault allegations.

Assange is on his final appeal in the British courts against extradition to the US, on charges under the Espionage Act relating to the theft and publication of hundreds of thousands of classified cables more than a decade ago.

Stella Assange has not said if her husband will accept any plea deal, urging instead that the Biden administration force the US Department of Justice to drop the case, which began under the former Trump administration.

The Assanges argue that the prosecution is a political witch-hunt, but the British courts have ruled that he should be extradited to the US.

Hill said there was only one priority as the case continued to drag on and that was “bringing him home safely to be with his family”.

“I’m not privy to the negotiations that may be occurring but frankly the parliamentarians would back him to the hilt in cutting a deal if that’s what he chose,” he said.

“That’s a message that I wanted to convey personally and hear from him what he wants.”

The Australian High Commission in London tried to help Hill visit Assange on July 1, but the request was denied at the last minute by prison authorities.

“It was incredibly frustrating and disappointing that the Belmarsh Prison authorities failed to approve Mr Assange’s request for me to visit him,” Hill said. “The required paperwork was completed by Julian multiple times.

“However it mysteriously got lost and mislaid until the day before the scheduled visit when they said it was too short notice. It’s up to them to explain whether it’s a conspiracy or a stuff up, but it’s profoundly disappointing to the cross-parliamentary group.”

Jenny Louis, the governor of Belmarsh Prison, was contacted for comment.

https://www.smh.com.au/world/europe/key-assange-supporter-says-wikileaks-founder-could-cut-deal-to-secure-freedom-20230725-p5dr7n.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19243388

File: d04070428cc7236⋯.jpg (226.78 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Anthony_Albanese_s_bromanc….jpg)

>>19243381

OPINION: If Albanese’s such a buddy of Biden’s, why is Assange still in jail?

Bob Carr - July 26, 2023

1/2

Julian Assange is in his fourth year in Britain’s Belmarsh prison. If the current appeal fails, he will be shackled and driven off in a prison van and flown across the Atlantic on a CIA aircraft for a long trial. He faces likely life imprisonment in a federal jail, perhaps in Oklahoma.

In 2021, then opposition leader Anthony Albanese said, “Enough is enough. I don’t have sympathy for many of his actions, but essentially, I can’t see what is served by keeping him incarcerated.”

As prime minister, Albanese said he had already made his position clear to the Biden administration. “We are working through diplomatic channels,” he said, “but we’re making very clear what our position is on Mr Assange’s case.”

So we can assume that at one of his seven meetings with US President Joe Biden he has raised Assange, even on the fringes of the Quad or at one of two NATO summits. Or perhaps in San Diego when they launched AUKUS, under which Australia will make the largest transfer of wealth ever made outside this country. This $368 billion is a whopping subsidy to American naval shipyards and to the troubled, chronically tardy British naval builder BAE Systems.

But it clinches Australia’s reputation as a deliriously loyal, entirely gullible US ally. It gives President Biden the justification for telling Republicans or Clinton loyalists in his own party that he had no alternative but to end the pursuit of Assange. “Those Aussies insisted on it. They’re doing us all these favours … we can’t say no.”

In addition to the grandiose AUKUS deal, Biden could list other decisions by the Albanese government that render Australia a military stronghold to help US regional dominance while materially weakening our own security.

Candid words, but they aren’t mine. They belong to Sam Roggeveen of the Lowy Institute in this month’s edition of Australian Foreign Affairs. In a seminally important piece of analysis, Roggeveen nominated Australia’s decision to fully service six American B52 bombers at RAAF Tindal, in the Northern Territory, as belonging on that list. It is assumed these are aimed at China’s nuclear infrastructure such as missile silos. “It is hard to overstate the sensitivity involved in threatening another nation’s nuclear forces,” Roggeveen writes.

In his article, he reminds us we’ve also agreed to host four US nuclear subs on our west coast at something to be called “Submarine Rotational Force-West”. Their mission would be destroying Chinese warships or enforcing a blockade of Chinese ports.

The east coast submarine base, planned most likely for Port Kembla, will also directly support US military operations. It’s another nuclear target. As Roggeveen says, all these locations raise Australia’s profile in the eyes of the Chinese military planners designing their response in the event of war with the US.

In this context, I can’t believe the US president is not on the point of agreeing to the prime minister’s request to drop charges against Assange.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19243393

File: 9f1bc2739c5e92c⋯.jpg (201.03 KB,1213x754,1213:754,If_Albanese_s_such_a_buddy….jpg)

>>19243388

2/2

Apart from the titanic strategic favours, two killer facts help our case. One, former US president Barack Obama commuted the sentence of Chelsea Manning, who had supplied Assange with the information he published. The Yank is free, the Aussie still pursued.

Two, the crimes Manning and Assange exposed involved US troops on a helicopter gunning down unarmed civilians in Baghdad. They are directly comparable to the alleged Australian battlefield murders in Afghanistan we are currently prosecuting.

An initial refusal from Biden is only an invitation to ask a second time, in a firmer voice.

It’s possible to imagine an Australian PM – Fraser, Hawke, Keating, Howard or Rudd – being appropriately forceful with a US president. There would be an inflection point in their exchange – prime minister to president – when the glint-eyed Australian says, “Mr President, it’s gone on too long. Both sides of our politics are united. Your old boss commuted Chelsea Manning, an American, in the same case.”

A pause. A beat. Then the killer summation. “Mr President, I speak for Australia.”

Surely this counts.

I don’t believe the president can shake his head and say, “nope”, given all we have gifted – the potent symbolism of B52s, nuclear subs and bases on the east and west coast. It would look like we have sunk into the role of US territory, as much a dependency as Guam or Puerto Rico.

US counter-intelligence conceded during court proceedings there is no evidence of a life being lost because of Assange’s revelations. Our Defence Department reached the same view.

If Assange walks out the gates of Belmarsh into the arms of his wife and children it will show we are worth a crumb or two off the table of the imperium. If it’s a van to the airport, then making ourselves a more likely target has conferred no standing at all. We are a client state, almost officially.

Bob Carr is a former foreign affairs minister of Australia and was the longest-serving premier of NSW.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/if-albanese-s-such-a-buddy-of-biden-s-why-is-assange-still-in-jail-20230721-p5dqci.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19243408

File: 54e7d0604db0e0f⋯.jpg (115.11 KB,1280x721,1280:721,Convicted_paedophile_John_….jpg)

File: 633843bae8b9533⋯.jpg (358.85 KB,1419x2184,473:728,Convicted_paedophile_John_….jpg)

File: 7ba7cfc7eb836db⋯.jpg (117.06 KB,1540x866,770:433,Convicted_paedophile_John_….jpg)

>>19237725

>>19237732

‘I was expecting to die’: Convicted paedophile John Millwood defends multimillion-dollar asset shed

Convicted paedophile John Wayne Millwood claims he didn’t shed his multimillion-dollar estate behind bars because he knew he would be sued, but because he thought he would die in jail.

Amber Wilson - July 26, 2023

Convicted paedophile John Wayne Millwood has vehemently denied under oath that he shed millions of dollars in assets to block a pending damages claim from his victim – claiming instead he believed he would die behind bars.

The disgraced former Launceston arts patron and businessman, and former manager of Launceston Pathology, gave evidence about his bankrupt estate in the Federal Court of Australia on Wednesday.

Before Registrar Timothy Luxton, Millwood said he divested his assets because he thought he would die in prison from prostate cancer so needed to get his “affairs in order”.

Millwood was sentenced to jail time on December 7, 2016. This was the same day his victim-survivor lodged a civil claim for damages and the same day Millwood’s “trusted adviser” and accountant Ken Davey started emptying his estate.

In addition, Tasmania’s state government had already announced at this time that it planned to abolish its statute of limitations for child sexual abuse claims.

But on Wednesday, Millwood denied this had anything to do with his divestment strategy. He proclaimed he was “totally unaware” of the pending legislative changes and “unaware” his victim had lodged a claim.

He told the court that his custodial prison term came as a “total shock”, and that he never would have pleaded guilty if he knew that would be the outcome.

“I believed a deal had been done with the DPP (Director of Public Prosecutions) that I wouldn’t be going to prison,” Millwood said.

He said he didn’t want to die behind bars and for his victim-survivor to access his estate – but instead wanted his wealth to go to his daughter.

“(My doctor) said I’d have two to five years because I had aggressive prostate cancer,” Millwood said.

“I thought I really needed to get my things in order as I didn’t believe I’d survive in prison.

“I wanted all my bits and pieces to go to my daughter.”

Millwood denied he’d given specific instructions to Mr Davey to empty his estate, but also denied the accountant acted without his permission.

He said he was unable to speak with his accountant from prison, because staff would cut off his phone calls if he was heard speaking about business matters.

“I gave instructions to give my affairs in order, that’s abundantly clear. The process of how that happened was left to others,” Millwood said.

“I was expecting to die, that was the whole issue.

“I just asked them to do what they needed to do. I wasn’t in a position to give specific instructions.”

In December 2021, Millwood’s victim-survivor was awarded a record-breaking $5.3 million in damages.

But with Millwood declaring himself bankrupt last year after his estate was emptied, his victim has not yet seen a cent.

This week’s Federal Court proceedings has been brought by bankruptcy trustee, Sheahan Lock Partners, against Millwood’s bankrupt estate.

The firm is attempting to regain proceeds from the divested estate, which included several properties, a valuable colonial art collection, company shares and about $1.5 million in superannuation, on behalf of the survivor.

Millwood has been recalled to the witness stand when the matter resumes on November 13.

It is also expected his daughter, Sarah Millwood, will give evidence at that time.

https://www.themercury.com.au/truecrimeaustralia/police-courts-tasmania/i-was-expecting-to-die-convicted-paedophile-john-millwood-defends-multimilliondollar-asset-shed/news-story/709366a6bff5cfb2284d14cb1ddf3a50

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19243436

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19210696

Chinese foreign minister Qin Gang removed from office

CHUN HAN WONG - JULY 26, 2023

1/2

Chinese leader Xi Jinping removed his handpicked foreign minister after less than seven months on the job, a surprise move that leaves more questions than answers around China’s black-box political system.

Qin Gang’s removal comes after his mysterious absence from the public stage over the past month, a disappearance that has sparked speculation about his fate and cast a global spotlight on the Communist Party’s opaque governance of the world’s second-largest economy.

At a hastily convened session Tuesday, the Chinese legislature’s standing committee decided that Wang Yi, the former foreign minister and currently China’s top diplomat, would retake his old post, which he had relinquished late last year.

The lawmakers didn’t provide a reason for their decision to remove the 57-year-old Qin, who had succeeded Wang after enjoying an unusually rapid rise through the foreign-service ranks in recent years. Qin’s absence from major diplomatic engagements since late June had fueled rumors inside and outside China about what happened to him.

China’s Foreign Ministry previously cited health reasons for Qin’s absence from a regional diplomatic meeting in Indonesia earlier this month.

Wang, a 69-year-old member of the Communist Party’s elite 24-member Politburo, served as foreign minister from early 2013 until December last year. He became China’s top diplomat when he joined the Politburo in October as its leading foreign-affairs specialist.

In China’s political system, the foreign minister isn’t necessarily the country’s highest-ranking diplomat. That role resides with the most senior foreign-policy official by party rank, who is currently Wang, the director of the office of the party’s Central Foreign Affairs Commission.

State media reports didn’t mention any change to Wang’s party roles, suggesting he would occupy his Politburo and Foreign Ministry positions concurrently – an arrangement that has in the past taken place during a transition period between officeholders.

Political analysts say Wang’s return as foreign minister appears to be an interim appointment to buy time while Xi and other senior officials figure out longer-term arrangements.

“Qin’s removal shouldn’t be interpreted as a diminishment of Xi Jinping’s power, which extends far wider and deeper than any one single appointment,” said Jude Blanchette, a China analyst at the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies. “And the fact that, for now, Qin keeps some of his party and government positions indicates that there are some unresolved internal issues.” State media readouts from Tuesday’s session of the National People’s Congress standing committee didn’t mention any change to Qin’s role as state councilor, a senior government rank in the State Council, China’s cabinet. The State Council’s website continued to list Qin as a state councilor as of Tuesday evening.

Party authorities haven’t announced any change to Qin’s status as one of 205 full members of the party’s Central Committee, which he joined in October while he was China’s ambassador to the U.S.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19243443

File: d1471f0d8324054⋯.jpg (258.97 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Chinese_foreign_minister_Q….jpg)

>>19243436

2/2

Tuesday’s legislative session was arranged just one day in advance, an unusually short notice, and outside the typical two-month cycle for regular standing committee sessions. This extraordinary session came right after a Politburo meeting on Monday, chaired by Xi.

“Overall foreign policy won’t likely change in the wake of Qin’s removal, as his role was simply to implement key decisions made by Xi Jinping,” said Blanchette.

The mystery around Qin has prompted new questions about China’s governance under Xi, whose Communist Party has doubled down on its penchant for secrecy and frustrated outsiders’ efforts to access information about developments in a leading economic powerhouse.

Considered a trusted aide to Xi, Qin had enjoyed an unusually rapid rise within China’s foreign service in recent years after serving as protocol chief for the Chinese leader. Qin was appointed Beijing’s ambassador to Washington in 2021 despite having no formal background directly handling U.S. relations, before joining the Central Committee and winning promotion to foreign minister late last year – bucking precedent in a system that traditionally has valued experience in addition to political connections.

Political analysts say Qin’s close association with Xi has made his absence particularly intriguing. A dearth of information about Qin’s whereabouts has fueled speculation on social media, including around the possibility of an extramarital affair.

The Chinese foreign ministry first addressed Qin’s disappearance on July 11, when it said at a regular news briefing that he wouldn’t attend an international gathering of foreign ministers in Jakarta because of health reasons, without giving any details. Since then, the ministry’s spokespeople have generally sidestepped questions about Qin.

In China’s opaque political system, health issues are often cited as the reason for a senior official’s absence. While the explanation is often genuine, party insiders say, it can sometimes serve as cover for political problems.

When Wang Lijun, the former police chief in the inland megacity of Chongqing, went missing in February 2012, municipal authorities said he was taking “vacation-style treatment” for stress and overwork, though in reality he had fled to the U.S. consulate in the nearby city of Chengdu to seek asylum.

Beijing’s move to replace Qin as foreign minister won’t quell speculation around his fate, since it leaves many questions about what caused his prolonged absence, said Alfred Wu, an associate professor at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy in Singapore.

At Tuesday’s legislative session, lawmakers also named Pan Gongsheng as governor of the People’s Bank of China. The move had been expected after the 60-year-old Pan, who had been deputy governor since 2012, was appointed as the central bank’s top party official earlier this month.

The veteran economist and banker had been getting ready to retire in the weeks before Xi picked him to lead the central bank at a time when the Chinese yuan has been on a downward slide, The Wall Street Journal has reported.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/chinese-foreign-minister-qin-gang-removed-from-office/news-story/db97e4a0b173959804215b72189d1b29

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4333UHQnBGw

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19243465

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19210696

>>19243436

Chinese minister replaced amid claim of affair with TV host

RICHARD LLOYD PARRY - JULY 26, 2023

China’s foreign minister has been abruptly replaced following weeks of speculation about his disappearance from public view and speculation that he has been sacked for an affair with a newsreader.

A hastily summoned gathering of the National People’s Congress standing committee announced on Tuesday that Qin Gang had been removed from his post. He has been replaced by his predecessor, Wang Yi, after a month in which he made no public appearances.

Qin, 57, is a career diplomat who was formerly the ambassador to Washington. His abrupt dismissal marks the end of an unusually short tenure for an aggressive Chinese diplomat who was appointed to the role of foreign minister last December and was regarded as one of President Xi’s most trusted aides.

He was last seen in public on June 25, when he met his Sri Lankan counterpart. The Chinese government has refused to offer detailed explanations about his disappearance, simply attributing it to “health reasons”.

Since his absence, Wang, China’s top diplomat, has stepped in and attended several significant talks with foreign officials.

Qin’s mysterious disappearance has triggered a wave of speculation online. Media in Taiwan and Hong Kong claimed that his disappearance was associated with a rumour of his “extramarital affair” with the prominent Hong Kong television presenter and interviewer Fu Xiaotian. Around the same time as Qin vanished from public view, the Cambridge-educated Fu and her son also disappeared.

Some online comments pointed to Fu’s interview with Qin, which was broadcast by Phoenix Television in March last year when he was the ambassador to the US, as evidence of their “unusual relationship”.

In the interview, Qin gave his views about American history, but Chinese netizens argued that the two were “flirting” throughout the entire clip. The interview was Fu’s last television appearance.

These rumours have raised more questions about the reason behind Qin’s disappearance, and the Chinese foreign ministry has struggled to offer a reasonable explanation.

Experts say Qin’s disappearance reflects the opaque nature of the inner politics of the Chinese Communist Party.

Alfred Wu, an expert on Chinese politics at the National University of Singapore, told The Times that if Qin had truly been removed from his role because of serious health reasons, as the government has insisted, then it was unlikely he would return to the foreign policy system.

“It seems that China still has some problems within their system, but the priority is to remove Qin, as they need someone to help steer China’s foreign policy as it faces multiple international challenges,” he said.

Wang, who is in charge of foreign policy for the Communist Party, has further consolidated his power. He will now also be at the helm of China’s foreign policy system on the government side.

Wu said the unexpected removal of Qin would deepen foreign countries’ scepticism about China, because the general lack of transparency in Beijing’s decision-making process would reduce foreign governments’ confidence in engaging with China.

“The incident will reinforce foreign countries’ negative perception of China,” Wu said.

The abrupt personnel reshuffling reflects Xi’s tendency to make appointments based on personal preference, rather than following the traditional practice of stringently reviewing each candidate’s background and qualifications.

As well as serving in Washington, Qin was Xi’s head of protocol. He joined the central committee of the Chinese Communist Party and was promoted in December to foreign minister.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/the-times/chinese-minister-replaced-amid-claim-of-affair-with-tv-host/news-story/33711170dca5c3d3449c063d6bd01cdf

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLf2r8le790

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19243492

File: 10941afae1fc5b7⋯.jpg (3.72 MB,6000x4000,3:2,Until_his_demise_Qin_Gang_….jpg)

File: 02b318787d89ab9⋯.jpg (3.9 MB,6818x5464,3409:2732,Penny_Wong_with_her_former….jpg)

File: 82ae3018d74b212⋯.jpg (1.86 MB,5355x3570,3:2,Wang_Yi_with_Russian_Forei….jpg)

>>19210696

>>19243436

Chinese Foreign Ministry scrubs missing minister from its records

Eryk Bagshaw - July 26, 2023

China’s Foreign Ministry has removed all mention of Qin Gang from its online records, purging the former foreign minister’s name and his meetings with world leaders.

It follows President Xi Jinping’s decision to sack Qin from his role on Tuesday night after rumours ranging from illness to an extramarital affair with a high-profile TV presenter, to a power struggle at the top of the Chinese Communist Party, dogged the rising former ambassador to the United States.

An emergency session of the standing committee on Tuesday voted on the “decision on official appointment and removal” but no reasons were given for Qin’s disappearance.

Qin, who has not been seen for a month, has not commented publicly on the dismissal.

But his six months as foreign minister has now disappeared from official records, including his meetings with Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong in March, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in May and US Secretary of State Antony Blinken in June.

Chinese government censors worked fast to remove all information, transcripts and photos of the relatively moderate former minister from the foreign ministry website by early Wednesday morning.

“It reflects how opaque the public personnel and public governance is in China,” said Alfred Wu, an expert in Chinese politics from the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy. “It’s embarrassing for China.”

Wu said Beijing still did not want to announce the real reason for Qin’s dismissal.

“The situation is even worse because of one-man politics,” he said. “So, everything needs to wait for Xi Jinping’s decision.”

Until his demise, Qin was one of the Chinese president’s proteges. Xi had promoted him from foreign ministry spokesman to personal aide to US Ambassador and finally to foreign minister.

The 57-year-old’s rapid rise sidelined the foreign ministry, which had historically expected senior ministers to serve their time in more junior roles, but it was enabled by Xi who has wielded unprecedented power over all ministerial appointments.

Qin has yet to be removed from his second post as state councillor, a title applied to high-ranking officials in the Chinese government executive, equivalent to a cabinet.

Wen-Ti Sung, a Chinese political scientist at the Australian National University suggested it may be a signal that he is in professional trouble but “not politically dead yet”.

Sung said keeping Qin in the state councillor role could signal that Beijing still does not know the result of an active investigation into his activities while ensuring that there is someone capable of filling the foreign minister role to meet other world leaders.

“[For] foreigners, almost nobody knows what a ‘state councillor’ is. But almost every single human on earth understands what a foreign minister is,” said Sung.

“China not having one makes it look bad on a daily basis.”

Wang Yi, Qin’s predecessor has been re-appointed as foreign minister. The 69-year-old veteran served in the role for a decade before being promoted to director of the Office of the Central Foreign Affairs Commission, China’s top diplomatic position.

The move means he will hold Beijing’s top two diplomatic posts, but he is well-known by foreign governments including Australia.

Wong, who met with Wang in Beijing in December, was contacted for comment.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/asia/chinese-foreign-ministry-scrubs-missing-minister-from-its-records-20230726-p5drf2.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19243524

File: 7109dc71bbfb156⋯.jpg (166.03 KB,1200x720,5:3,Wang_Yi_left_director_of_t….jpg)

>>19210696

>>19243436

Top legislature appoints officials, reviews law

Wang Yi appointed as foreign minister, Pan Gongsheng as central bank governor

GT staff reporters - Jul 25, 2023

China's top legislature voted to appoint Wang Yi as foreign minister and Pan Gongsheng as central bank governor, as it convened a session on Tuesday.

Qin Gang was removed from the post of foreign minister he concurrently held; Yi Gang was removed from the post of governor of the People's Bank of China, according to a decision adopted at the fourth session of the Standing Committee of the 14th National People's Congress (NPC).

President Xi Jinping signed a presidential order to effectuate the decision.

Zhao Leji, chairman of the NPC Standing Committee, presided over the session, which opened on Tuesday morning.

A draft amendment to the Criminal Law was reviewed at the session.

The amendment focuses on better implementing the Party Central Committee's principles and policies regarding the fight against corruption and the protection of private enterprises in accordance with the law.

It refines stipulations concerning the crime of offering bribes as well as corruption conducted by private enterprise personnel.

On Tuesday afternoon, Zhao presided over a meeting of the Council of Chairpersons of the NPC Standing Committee before the closing meeting of the session.

The closing meeting, attended by 169 members of the NPC Standing Committee, approved the personnel appointments and removals.

Wang Yi, a 70-year-old veteran diplomat who served as the Chinese ambassador to Japan from 2004 to 2007, began his career in the foreign ministry in 1982. Besides working in the foreign ministry, Wang also served as director of the Taiwan Work Office of the CPC Central Committee, and minister of the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council from 2008 to 2013.

Between 2013 and 2018, Wang served as the minister and deputy secretary of the CPC Committee of the foreign ministry. From 2018, he served as the State Councilor, member of the Leading CPC Members Group of the State Council, and foreign minister before Qin took up the position in 2022.

Qin was promoted to the vice minister of the Foreign Ministry in 2018 and three years later became Chinese ambassador to the US. He arrived in the US in July 2021 to take his post as Chinese ambassador.

He was appointed as Chinese foreign minister, according to a decision made by the 13th National People's Congress Standing Committee, on December 30, 2022.

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202307/1295035.shtml

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19243535

File: 9c04f193fce1617⋯.jpg (119.27 KB,800x480,5:3,The_entrance_to_the_Chines….jpg)

>>19210696

>>19243436

China's top legislature adopts a decision of removing Qin Gang as foreign minister, appoints Wang Yi as foreign minister

Chen Qingqing - Jul 25, 2023

China's top legislature convened a session on Tuesday to review a draft criminal law amendment and a decision on official appointment and removal. Qin Gang has been removed of his position as Foreign Minister. Wang Yi was appointed as the Chinese Foreign Minister. Tuesday's decision has not touched on Qin's title of State Councilor.

Wang, 70-year-old veteran diplomat, began his career in the foreign ministry in 1982, and became the counselor at the Chinese Embassy in Japan in 1989 and then the minister counselor in April 1993. He then was appointed as the deputy director general of the department of Asian Affairs at the ministry in 1994 and then the director general of the department of Asian Affairs from 1995 to 1998.

Wang served as the Vice Minister and CPC Committee member of the ministry from 2001 to 2004 before he was appointed as the Chinese ambassador to Japan.

Wang also served as the director of the Taiwan Work Office of the CPC Central Committee and Minister of Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council from 2008 to 2013. Between 2013 and 2018, Wang served as the minister and deputy secretary of CPC Committee of foreign ministry, and since 2018, he served as the State Councilor, member of the Leading CPC Members Group of the State Council, and Minister of Foreign Affairs before Qin took up the position in 2022.

Born in 1966 in North China's Tianjin, Qin began working at the Chinese Foreign Ministry in 1988 and became the attaché and third secretary of Department of West European Affairs of the ministry from 1992 to 1995.

He then worked as the third secretary and second secretary of the Chinese Embassy in the UK from 1995 to 1999 and then became the second secretary and deputy division director. He was later appointed as the division director of the department of West European Affairs of the ministry.

He was the counselor of the Chinese Embassy in the UK from 2002 to 2005, after which he returned to China to work as the ministry's spokesperson from 2005 to 2010.

Qin was promoted to the director-general of the information department of the ministry in 2011 after he finished his tenure as a minister of the Chinese Embassy in the UK from 2010 to 2011. In 2014, he became the director-general of the protocol department of the ministry.

Qin was promoted to the vice minister of the Foreign Ministry in 2018 and three years later became the Chinese Ambassador to the US. He arrived in the US in July, 2021 to take his post as the Chinese Ambassador.

Qin was appointed as the Chinese Foreign Minister, according to a decision made by the 13th National People's Congress (NPC) Standing Committee, on December 30, 2022.

The last time Qin made a public appearance was on June 25 for meetings with the Russian, Vietnamese, and Sri Lankan foreign ministers, according to media reports.

Answering a question from the Global Times during his first press conference as the Chinese Foreign Minister on the sidelines of the two sessions in March about some Western countries' hype that China could provide weapons to Russia or the notion that only China can end the Ukraine crisis, Qin said China is not the creator of the crisis, nor a party directly concerned.

"What has China done to be blamed, or even sanctioned and threatened? This is absolutely unacceptable," he said.

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202307/1295010.shtml

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19243607

File: 645b97c844e0cbf⋯.mp4 (15.95 MB,960x540,16:9,Submarine_spotted_off_Quee….mp4)

>>19226439

Submarine spotted off Queensland coast one of several navy vessels headed to massive war games

Queensland’s massive war games prove to be a shipspotter’s delight as a submarine was among several foreign and Australian navy vessels spied off the coast. See the video and list of military ships in Australian waters.

Jodie Munro O'Brien - July 26, 2023

1/3

A submarine has been spotted cruising off the coast of Queensland, much to the surprise and delight of locals.

Doug Bazley, 63, of Caloundra on the Sunshine Coast, said he had been on Golden Beach for about two hours Friday afternoon when he noticed some unusual “spray and mist” in front of a container ship heading through the spitfire channel about 3.45pm.

The keen photographer said he grabbed his binoculars and soon spied the surfaced Royal Australian Navy Collins Class submarine about 5km off coast, complete with a person standing on top and at the front of the sub.

“It was going faster than the container ship … which was doing about 15 knots,” he said.

“It was interesting to see it so close.”

The submarine, one of six owned by Australia, had also had also been spotted going past Tangalooma, near Moreton Island off the coast of Brisbane, about 1pm the same day.

Mr Bazley, who had recently also observed some foreign war ships heading along the coast, said he suspected the submarine was heading north to take part in the 10th iteration of Exercise Talisman Sabre 2023 (TS23), Australia’s largest biennial military training exercise with the US.

“It’s something we don’t see here very often, but I wasn’t surprised because I knew Talisman Sabre was on,” he said.

“Occasionally we see the (HMAS) Brisbane come in and out, but we don’t often see the foreign ships … so I love seeing them.”

Mr Bazley said he had also watched the USS America and USS New Orleans head north about a week ago, while Japanese warships the JS Izumo and JS Shimokita were also spotted sailing past over the weekend after being docked in Brisbane from July 17-22.

They are among 22 ships from at least five nations participating in the maritime component of the TS23 – which comprises more than 31,000 military personnel from 13 countries – throughout Queensland, parts of northern NSW, the Northern Territory and Western Australia from now though to early August.

The Australia-US bilaterally planned, multilaterally executed training exercise culminates in a mock war between all military branches on land, sea and in the air, is designed to train forces in all aspects of combined operations to help improve the combat readiness and interoperability between the Australian Defence Force and its allies.

SHIPSPOTTER’S DELIGHT

Some of the navy ships involved this year include the USS America, which has the US Marine Corps 31st Expeditionary Unit embarked, the USS Green Bay and the USS New Orleans – all of which have already made port stops in Brisbane, with the America also recently spending a day Townsville.

The aircraft carrier the USS Ronald Regan is also returning to Talisman Sabre for the third time, but will be based off the northwest coast of Australia this year.

Besides submarines, the RAN ships participating include the HMAS Adelaide (Landing Helicopter Dock), HMAS Choules (Landing Ship Dock), HMAS Brisbane (Guided Missile Destroyer), HMAS Stalwart (Auxiliary Oiler Replenishment ship), HMAS Huon (Minehunter, Coastal) and the HMAS Shepparton (Survey Ship, Coastal).

Members of the British Royal Marine Commandos and the Indonesian National Armed Forces embarked on the HMAS Adelaide in Townsville over the weekend.

The Royal Canadian warship the HMCS Montréal and The Republic of Korea’s ROKS Marado amphibious landing ship and ROKS Munmu the Great destroyer are among some of the other foreign navy vessels taking part in TS23.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19243609

File: 9f6890bd1b0c1b5⋯.jpg (174.96 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_RAN_s_HMAS_Adelaide_is….jpg)

File: 52561c9d454d1fb⋯.jpg (237.9 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Japanese_helicopter_carrie….jpg)

File: ba7e61835746fc9⋯.jpg (352.51 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Commander_Naoki_Shirasaka_….jpg)

File: f3e3c31da0ceec7⋯.jpg (230.32 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Japanese_navy_personnel_gr….jpg)

>>19243607

2/3

A helicopter destroyer designed for antisubmarine warfare, the JS Izumo – the flagship of the Japanese Maritime Self Defense Force (JMSDF) has five helicopters and two search and rescue choppers on board but can carry several more.

JS Izumo’s executive officer, Commander Naoki Shirasaka, 43, said the 248m-long ship had 400 sailors and soldiers embarked for TS23 but could cater for up to 1000, while the 178m-long JS Shimokita, an Osumi-class tank landing ship, had about 200 personnel on board.

Commander Shirasaka said five choppers could operate off the Izumo's’s flight deck simultaneously.

“Helicopters can find a submarine in the sea, also they can protect a submarine by themselves and their speed is very quick and fast,” he said.

“Besides that we can conduct … humanitarian assistances and disaster relief.”

Commander Shirasaka said the Izumo was one of two Japanese ships being converted into multipurpose escort destroyers to accommodate F35 Bravo Lightning II stealth fighter jets in coming years, thanks to the Japanese government ordering 42 F35Bs and 63 F35A Conventional Take off and landing aircraft from the US in 2020.

It is the third time Japan has participated in Talisman Sabre but the first time Japan Ground Self-Defense Force (JGSDF) has fired live missiles in the country in an Australian military first.

The Japanese forces conducted a live-fire demonstration of a Type 12 Surface-to-Ship Missile (SSM) from the East Australia Exercise Area at Beecroft Weapons Range, New South Wales on Saturday.

That same day, other soldiers including from the Republic of Korea – who are participating in TS23 for the second time – Australia, Japan the US conducted a combined joint live-fire demonstration at the Shoalwater Bay Training Area outside of Rockhampton in Central Queensland.

Commander Shirasaka said training between the Japanese forces as well as others from like-minded countries was important.

“We think some of the amphibious operation and capability is quite important to the defence of Japan,” he said.

“In that sense we need more collaboration between the Japan army and Japan navy as well as a collaboration with other navies and other armies of the world.

“We need to share the experiences among the like-minded countries to support stability in the region and safety and peace over the world.”

The officer said, as an island nation, submarines were the “biggest threat to Japan.”

“Japan is surrounded by the sea so that means if we lose sea lines of communication our people will be cut off,” he said.

A written statement released by the JMSDF earlier this month said those embarked on the Izumo and the Shimokita would carry out amphibious training with the Amphibious Rapid Deployment Brigade (ARDB), the Mine Warfare Force, the JGSDF and the 1st Helicopter Brigade.

The objective for TS23 was to “to develop our operational capabilities, tactical skills, and interoperability regarding multilaterally integrated Maritime and Amphibious Operations, Anti-Air Operations and Joint Anti-Ship Operations including live-fire with Type-03 Surface-to-Air Missile (Chu-SAM) and the Type-12 Surface-to-Ship Missile (12-SSM), by utilising the excellent training environment of Australia,” the statement said.

One of the several goals listed by the JGSDF was to conduct a series of amphibious operations with the US and Germany, comprising maritime manoeuvres, amphibious assaults, and combined arms warfare following landing.

It is the first time Germany has participated in Talisman Sabre, underlining Berlin’s increasing focus on the Indo-Pacific as tensions with China rise within the region.

About 240 people from the German armed forces, known as the Bundeswehr, including 170 paratroopers and 40 marines, have been sent to take part.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19243614

File: 8c5c3d6cacf0442⋯.jpg (501.98 KB,2048x1536,4:3,The_USS_Green_Bay_is_among….jpg)

File: 007f070c41445c3⋯.jpg (227.25 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Chief_of_the_German_Army_L….jpg)

File: 3c3e40a0df6680f⋯.jpg (308.43 KB,2048x1152,16:9,An_Australian_soldier_from….jpg)

>>19243609

3/3

TIES STRENGTHENED

Chief of the German Army, Lieutenant General Alfons Mais, recently visited the Townsville Field Training Area in Far North Queensland, where he inspected the capabilities of the Australian-made Boxer combat reconnaissance vehicle (CRV) and toured the surrounding bush.

He said getting used to the Australian conditions was one of the challenges for the Germans in TS23.

“The distances, the terrain and the climate are completely different than in Central Europe,” he said.

“This exercise is very exciting for our personnel and, as well as testing our preparedness and procedures, I want our personnel to gain experience of the country and build relationships.

“We share a lot in common with Australia and the region and we want to portray ourselves as a reliable partner.”

This week, Lieutenant General Mais visited Japan’s Ministry of Defence at Camp Ichigaya in Tokyo where he discussed further co-operation between the Japanese and German militaries, according to a statement release by the Japan Self-Defense Force on Tuesday.

“Appreciation is expressed to the German Army’s further commitment to the Indo-Pacific region by joining Talisman Sabre … and LTG Mais also agreed on further promotion of defense co-operation of Japan and German land forces in the Indo-Pacific region to maintain and strengthen (free and open Indo-Pacific),” it read.

More than 31,000 personnel from 13 nations are in Australia for TS23, including more than 18,500 from the US, about 1300 from Japan, 700 from the Republic of Korea and more than 300 from New Zealand.

There are also more than 250 armed forces personnel from Canada, about 240 from Germany, 160 from the United Kingdom, 130 from France, 65 from Indonesia, 50 from Fiji, 40 from the Kingdom of Tonga and about 35 from Papua New Guinea.

Six other nations are also attending TS23 as observers.

The exercise is taking place across a number of locations, using both Defence and non-Defence training areas across Queensland, NSW, the NT and WA from now through to August 4.

Maritime Safety Queensland has put strict contingency and port safety plans in place for all Queensland ports for warship visits to Brisbane, Gladstone, Townsville and Cairns.

Queensland Police have also established a marine exclusion zone approximately three nautical miles, or about 5.5km, off the coast of Kings Beach, near McCanes Bay, in Bowen from now to August 19 while the military exercise is underway.

https://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/submarine-spotted-off-queensland-coast-one-of-several-navy-vessels-headed-to-massive-war-games/news-story/3faca2c3e24324d1df78167ebf7e3e14

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19243643

File: 381892669d1e81e⋯.jpg (479.44 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Joe_Jackson_Les_Gilles_and….jpg)

File: 9a614db17230a03⋯.jpg (704.72 KB,2048x1536,4:3,US_Marine_squad_leader_Bre….jpg)

File: 3ea0c297c6f2655⋯.jpg (396 KB,2048x1537,2048:1537,Forces_from_Australia_the_….jpg)

File: 0e89c029ab7128b⋯.jpg (325.9 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Another_part_of_Talisman_S….jpg)

File: 87ac90f12f4fbec⋯.jpg (1.13 MB,2048x1537,2048:1537,Another_part_of_Talisman_S….jpg)

>>19226439

Midge Point community marvels as Operation Talisman Sabre unfolds in their backyard

The residents of a secluded North Queensland beachside community were in awe as a large scale military assault between American, Japanese and German forces played out in their backyard.

Estelle Sanchez - July 26, 2023

The shores of a secluded beach in the Whitsundays set the scene for a large scale military attack between American, Japanese and German forces.

Three impressive landing craft air cushioned boats were deployed to Midge Point beach, where marine troops then worked to secure the area.

The Midge Point community were able to watch the mock operation, carried out on July 26 as part of a three-day rehearsal under Talisman Sabre 23.

Resident Robyn Crawford said “awesome” was the only word to describe what she had just seen.

It was windy and rainy when the operation commenced. The massive LCAH boats sent gusts of wind and sand towards the participants as soon as it moved away from the beach, disappearing behind the cloud of dust it created.

Held biennially, Talisman Sabre is the largest combined Australia-US training activity.

Over two weeks more than 31,000 military personnel including soldiers, sailors and pilots from 13 nations will take part in different missions across the state.

The military units involved in the Midge Point exercise were the 31st US Marine Expeditionary unit, the Amphibious Rapid Deployment Brigade as part of the Japan Self Defense Forces and German army paratroopers.

Joe Jackson, who said he was one of the eldest residents at Midge Point and had spent all his life in the beachside community, said he had “never seen an operation like this” take place in his backyard before.

While Les Gilles said watching the operation unfold reminded of when he was a cadet with the Australian Army in Rockhampton.

“It would be exciting to do an operation like this,” he said.

Officer in Charge of the operation Lieutenant Colonel Adam Murgatroyd said all the activities on the beach were safe “because they’re well rehearsed”.

He said the “safety architecture” was designed to co-ordinate police, ambulances, aero evacuation services and combat rescue units to ensure the best support was available in case someone got hurt.

“The most common injury in Australia is heat injuries, especially for foreign troops who aren’t used to operating in these conditions,” he said.

“I don’t think we’ll have that issue today.”

He said the Australian Army played a role of logistician for the Midge Point exercise but no troops were directly involved.

The Australian troops also acted as “community liaison” with residents, holding a town meeting five weeks earlier.

“We gave them the opportunity to ask questions and [explained] what we were doing to make sure the environment was going to be looked after, ” he said.

Marilyn Nevill said she had moved to Midge Point only nine months ago from Brisbane to find a “quiet place to retire”.

And although the operation wasn’t exactly quiet, she said army officials had chatted to her and her husband to let them know what unfold.

Another part of the operation was occurred at Lakeside Airpark Aerodrome near Bloomsbury, where the troops were divided in two teams for a simulated vertical assault.

An attacking force, wearing sand-coloured uniforms, arrived via two helicopters with orders to take control of the area, while the opposing forces in green uniforms defended the perimeter.

https://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/whitsunday/community/midge-point-community-marvels-as-operation-talisman-sabre-unfolds-in-their-backyard/news-story/55609d4cc722a30acca0b35c9b8650b6

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19243661

File: a9abc5d744b82f0⋯.jpg (85.39 KB,900x600,3:2,Photo_taken_on_June_22_202….jpg)

>>19226439

>>19226465

>>19226476

Talisman Sabre 2023 a risky geopolitical game

Emilia Fernandez - 2023-07-26

1/2

In this ever-changing global geopolitical landscape, the ongoing Australia-US joint military exercise, known as Talisman Sabre 2023, has garnered considerable global attention. Since 2005, this war game with various branches of armed forces has been conducted as a biennial joint exercise, and the current one is considered to be the largest in its 18-year history, involving more than 30,000 troops and participants from 13 countries. Though it appears impressive on paper under the pretext of "defending security and democratic values", this multi-nation logistics exercise will ultimately exacerbate regional tensions by implementing Washington's hidden agenda. It is high time to analyze the underlying motives and the negative implications of this massive military drill, thinking beyond its grandeur and spectacle.

For a long time, the United States has been pursuing strategies to contain China's growing influence in the "Indo-Pacific" region. As a part of Washington's broader strategies, the recent US-led military endeavor serves dual ulterior purposes behind the shadow of the field training exercise. Firstly, it aims to enhance combined military capabilities and preparedness for potential conflict involving China. Noteworthy, this is a clear manifestation of the broader US aim to ensure its dominance and hegemony in the Pacific region. Secondly, this exercise intends to develop a network of military alliances to encircle and contain China's growing influence in the region. Not to mention, Washington's intention is not solely limited to regional power dynamics but rather curbing China's expanding global influence. Hence, experts tag this aggressive military exercise as counterproductive as it will lead to heightened tensions and regional instability instead of promoting peaceful coexistence and cooperation.

This military exercise has become a concern not only for China but also for the rest of the world for two alarming reasons which should not be overlooked. Firstly, the non-participant country may interpret this multi-country military exercise as "exclusionary" and "discriminatory", potentially creating more divisions and groupings within the region. Secondly, the coercive nature of tactics used by Washington to convince these countries to participate in this military drill is really unjustifiable. By forcing countries to participate in the name of protecting their shared interest and common values, Washington is actually putting the participant countries at risk of damaging their stable diplomatic and economic relations with China, the world's second-largest economy and major global power. Such coercive measures will breed nothing but immediate "resentment and retaliation" and hinder the prospects of "dialogues and discussions" in the long run.

Though the US and Australia present this large-scale exercise as routine military training aimed at enhancing regional security and interoperability among their allies, this exercise will undoubtedly dense the ongoing geopolitical rivalry between the US and China. Despite the claim of defensive intentions, China may decode the exercise's offensive actions as a demonstration of force and preparation for a probable conflict. Such interpretation may add fuel to the feelings of insecurity and paranoia among China's common people. Subsequently, feelings of insecurity could prompt China to respond by ramping up its own military preparedness and increasing defensive postures. Hence, this high-profile military exercise, as a confrontational approach, would contribute to the arms race, a prolonged cycle of escalation and an unstable security dilemma in the region.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19243663

File: df464e1c5e6086a⋯.jpg (643.46 KB,2560x1707,2560:1707,Australia_to_host_largest_….jpg)

>>19243661

2/2

Ironically, the visible display of military prowess in this two-week-long military exercise overshadows the pressing need for diplomatic discussions to identify common interests and manage differences in the "Indo-Pacific" region. Undoubtedly, a sustainable and secure "Indo-Pacific" warrants a multifaceted approach ranging from diplomatic to economic to political to security dimensions. An overemphasis on military projection, as a means of boosting security, may initially satisfy the US allies by showcasing strengths, but it fails to address the underlying requirements needed to ease tension in this region as it diverts attention from peaceful negotiations and conflict resolution.

While "Exercise Talisman Sabre" may appear as an impressive military practice, its unintended consequences must not be understated. The aggressive posturing and heightened military readiness exhibited during drills can inadvertently increase uncertainty and anxiety among regional actors, leading to misconceptions, miscalculations, and misunderstandings. Besides, this hostile drill risks perpetuating a cycle of strategic mistrust, insecurity and confrontation in the region. Also, this US-backed drill provokes other regional powers especially China for countermeasures as Beijing may perceive it as a threat to its national interests and security.

Rather than ensuring regional peace and prosperity, this provocative military drill could inadvertently push countries further apart, deepen divides and create a dangerous zero-sum game. On top of that, the involvement of multiple nations in this military drill adds layers to its complexities and makes the Pacific region a potential flashpoint for geopolitical tension. In order to promote lasting peace and security in this region, an inclusive and comprehensive approach, based on diplomatic maneuvers, should take precedence over militaristic demonstrations of power and capabilities.

Emilia Fernandez is a security and political analyst with a focus on South Asian geopolitics, a PhD researcher at the University of Lucerne, Switzerland. The views don't necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

https://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202307/26/WS64c07cdaa31035260b8188f3.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19243683

File: aadf02a6d424daf⋯.jpg (127.75 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Two_subsidiaries_of_Facebo….jpg)

Facebook owner Meta ordered to pay $20m fine to Australian government

DAVID SWAN - JULY 26, 2023

Two subsidiaries of Facebook parent company Meta have been ordered to pay the federal government $20m in penalties for contraventions of Australian consumer law, over claims the subsidiaries secretly collected and aggregated users’ personal data for Facebook’s commercial benefit.

The Federal Court action brought by the Australian competition and consumer watchdog related to Facebook’s Onavo Protect mobile app, which provided a virtual private network for users. Facebook shut down that app in 2019 after it had been downloaded more than 270,000 times by Australian users.

The Australian Competition & Consumer Commission alleged that between February 2016 and October 2017, Facebook misled Australian customers by telling them the Onavo app would keep users’ personal data private and secure, when instead Facebook used the data to support its market research activities, including potential future acquisition targets.

Justice Wendy Abraham ordered on Wednesday that the two subsidiaries each pay $10m to the Commonwealth.

“Facebook Israel and Onavo admit that … the listings that contained the statements were likely to mislead or deceive and liable to mislead the public, in the absence of sufficient disclosures to Australian consumers (which they admit were not made in those listings) of the fact that Australian users’ data would be used for purposes other than providing Onavo Protect,” Justice Abraham said in her ruling.

ACCC Chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb said that anonymised and aggregated data shared with Meta included data about users’ internet and app activity, such as records of every app they accessed and time they spent using those apps.

“We took this case knowing that many consumers are concerned about how their data is captured, stored and used by digital platforms,” Ms Cass-Gottlieb said on Wednesday.

“We believe Australian consumers should be able to make an informed choice about what happens to their data based on clear information that is not misleading.

“In the case of the Onavo Protect app, we were concerned that consumers seeking to protect their privacy through a virtual private network were not clearly told that in downloading and using this app they were actually facilitating the use of their data for Meta’s commercial benefit.”

Facebook Israel and Onavo were also ordered to pay a contribution to the ACCC’s costs and made joint submissions with the ACCC in relation to penalties.

“The Federal Court of Australia has approved the penalty Facebook Israel and Onavo Inc jointly proposed with the ACCC regarding disclosures by the app Onavo Protect in the Apple App Store and Google Play Store in 2016 and 2017,” a Meta spokeswoman said in a statement to The Australian.

“The ACCC acknowledged in the joint filing that the Onavo Protect listings were not deliberately misleading and disclosures were made in the app’s Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Furthermore, all user data was anonymised and aggregated before it was used by Meta.

“The Onavo Protect app did provide users with a free, useful VPN service and it did function properly as an online security tool. There was no allegation by the ACCC that the app did not function properly as an online security tool.

“Protecting the privacy and security of people’s data is fundamental to how Meta’s business works. Over the last several years, we have built tools to give people more transparency and control over how their data is used, and we design every new product and feature with privacy in mind.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/technology/facebook-owner-meta-ordered-to-pay-20m-fine-to-australian-government/news-story/88b8050d2285b9a7446cbd0b1edb805f

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19243709

File: 31e2b6e4500e594⋯.jpg (171.08 KB,2048x1152,16:9,TikTok_has_kicked_off_17_m….jpg)

File: b1c016b925c94ad⋯.jpg (128.73 KB,1844x1037,1844:1037,TikTok_director_of_public_….jpg)

File: 35271340ebba984⋯.jpg (140.8 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Senator_David_Shoebridge_s….jpg)

TikTok tells senate inquiry how it’s tackling online child exploitation material

Aisling Brennan - July 26, 2023

TikTok kicks 190,000 users off its platform a day for lying about being older than 13 years old, a senate inquiry has been told.

The inquiry is examining how Australia’s law enforcement agencies tackle child exploitation, including online trends for explicit material and access to child abuse material.

It’s also considering the role technology providers have in assisting law enforcement agencies to combat child exploitation.

During Wednesday’s senate hearing, TikTok director of public policy Ella Woods-Joyce confirmed the online platform closed 17 million accounts in the last financial quarter of 2022.

It’s the equivalent of 190,000 users per day being banned.

Those cancelled accounts were determined by TikTok’s 40,000 trust and safety professionals who found they were being operated by a person under the age of 13, which is against TikTok’s eligibility policy to use the platform.

With more than 8.5 million Australian users coming to the online video platform per month, Ms Woods-Joyce said online child safety was TikTok’s “top priority”.

“We have a zero tolerance approach for child exploitation as well as any content that may exploit or danger minors,” she said.

The inquiry was told users under the age of 15 didn’t have access to direct messages, couldn’t use the live feature and parents could link their own accounts to their children’s accounts to monitor their content.

Ms Woods-Joyce said TikTok alerts the appropriate law enforcement whenever it had confirmed child abuse material present on its platform.

“We do this because we know law enforcement has finite resources, where we can detect an imminent risk,” she said.

“Our law enforcement outreach team maintains very good relationships with all law enforcements in Australia.

“Inside those teams we have specialised child safety teams.

“In the context of child sexual exploitation, we do have specialists who work to keep our community safe.”

TikTok alerted authorities in February to an incident in the ACT where a 50-year-old woman was accused of repeatedly sexually abusing her young granddaughter and posting the abuse material on TikTok.

The Australian Federal Police Child Protection Triage Unit began investigating the case after being alerted to newly produced child abuse material being uploaded to social media on January 27.

TikTok had reported the material to the Australian Centre To Counter Child Exploitation and subsequently assisted police with their investigation.

The investigation was handed over to the Sexual Assault and Child Abuse team and the ACT Joint Anti Child Exploitation Team before the woman’s arrest.

She remains before the court charged with a string of child exploitation offences.

Ms Woods-Joyce said this was an example of the work TikTok did daily to monitor any threats of child exploitation material on its platform.

“It speaks to the vigilance of our teams in identifying those underage users,” she said.

“We have over one billion users on our platform.

“We’re continually working hard to make sure they’re 13 (years old) and above and their experience is appropriate for their age.”

Senator David Shoebridge criticised TikTok’s limitations to signing up to the platform, stating people could easily lie about their age when joining.

“Something is seriously wrong if you have to scrap out 190,000 accounts of people identified under 12,” he said.

Ms Woods-Joyce said the platform must also obey privacy laws as well as maintaining users safety.

“The balance for privacy is a big priority for online platforms like ours,” she said.

“We must always balance our privacy obligations with our safety obligations.

“We’re very invested into safety of our users.”

https://www.news.com.au/technology/online/social/tiktok-tells-senate-inquiry-how-its-tackling-online-child-exploitation-material/news-story/f4cda23f576a0dd5bf4033b58ddbc04e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19250147

File: e7abe4e1fdaa9cc⋯.jpg (225.46 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_is_greete….jpg)

File: c04b8fed28a8ebb⋯.jpg (333.17 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Mr_Albanese_was_greeted_by….jpg)

File: f2c2d6b4faea2c0⋯.jpg (223.04 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_and_Chris….jpg)

>>19222755

Chris Hipkins signals support for Indigenous voice to parliament through NZ example

ROSIE LEWIS - JULY 27, 2023

New Zealand Prime Minister Chris Hipkins has held up his country as one that has successfully embraced reconciliation with its Indigenous people, in a strong signal of trans-Tasman support for the voice referendum.

Standing alongside Anthony Albanese in Wellington, Mr Hipkins would not comment directly on the looming poll on an Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government – acknowledging that it was a matter for the Australian people – but said New Zealand was a stronger country because of its Treaty of Waitangi.

While there had been controversies in New Zealand’s path to reconcil­iation, Mr Hipkins assured Australians that life had moved on.

“I am firmly of the view that the process of reconciliation that New Zealand has been going through for a number of decades has been overwhelmingly positive for New Zealand. That doesn’t mean that there haven’t been bumps in the road, that doesn’t mean there haven’t been periods where it has been very controversial,” Mr Hipkins said following the Australia-New Zealand leaders’ meeting.

“But when I look back at some of those controversies, many of which have happened during my lifetime and actually during my adult lifetime, things moved on. Yes, they were controversial at the time and now many people would look back on them and wonder what was so controversial about them, because the reconciliation process has ulti­mately been very positive.”

Mr Albanese stressed on numerous occasions that Australia’s and New Zealand’s histories were different but said there was a consciousness about the voice referendum when he spoke to people in the Pacific.

New Zealand is increasingly embedding its Maori heritage in its national affairs.

“Of all the First World nations that would form colonies, we are alone in not recognising the First Nations peoples … Our history in Australia goes back before 1788 and that should be acknowledged in our nation’s founding document,” the Australian Prime Minister said.

“What is being asked to vote for (at the referendum) is very clear and very specific … It’s important that people know what the vote is for and what it is not.

“It is for those specific things of recognition, listening in order to achieve better outcomes.”

As the polls show falling support for the voice, which is due to be voted on between October and December, leading No campaigner Warren Mundine declared there was nothing specific or clear about the referendum.

“That’s the problem. Polling shows people are confused about it, that’s the No. 1 issue they raise,” he said.

“No one know what a voice is. It’s just totally bizarre (Mr Albanese’s claim). The good news is that the Australian public want recognition of Aboriginal people in the Constitution and want practical outcomes for Aboriginal people – they don’t see the voice as bringing about those practical outcomes.”

Former deputy Liberal leader Julie Bishop on Wednesday threw her support behind the voice, saying it would be a “a step in the right direction” and had to be given a chance.

She conceded the referendum was made more complex by two Indigenous leaders fronting the Yes and No cases in Noel Pearson and Mr Mundine, saying it put its success at greater risk and confused Australians.

“It is a step in the right direction. I sat through too many of those Closing the Gap speeches in parliament to sense that what we were doing was working to close the disparity and the inequality between Indigenous and non-indigenous populations,” she told the National Press Club.

“In some instances, the key measures were getting worse, not better. So it’s not a question of money, it’s not a question of politicians coming up with policies, it’s a question of giving Indigenous people the franchise to make decisions to implement policies that will work. We have got to give it a chance.”

Ms Bishop would not say whether she was disappointed her party was campaigning against the voice or that Peter Dutton had labelled it divisive, Orwellian and something that would “re-racialise” Australia.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/chris-hipkins-signals-support-for-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-through-nz-example/news-story/358fa16ac89c14edd44b90abe9b067ab

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19250156

File: d6b3d421ee9e4c1⋯.jpg (324.25 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Former_foreign_minister_Ju….jpg)

>>19210696

>>19243436

‘Don’t wait’ to go to Beijing, Julie Bishop tells Anthony Albanese

BEN PACKHAM - JULY 26, 2023

Julie Bishop says China’s ­reappointment of Wang Yi as Foreign Minister ­“augurs well” for Australia’s relationship with Beijing, and has urged Anthony Albanese to travel to Beijing as soon as possible to accelerate the thaw in bilateral ties.

Ms Bishop, a former foreign minister and now ANU chancellor, told the National Press Club that China would always be a “challenging partner”, but Australia had strong economic and strategic reasons to get the relationship back on track.

The Prime Minister is currently weighing an invitation from Xi Jinping to visit China by the end of the year or delay the trip until Beijing drops its trade bans and ­releases detained Australians Cheng Lei and Yang Hengjun.

Ms Bishop said Mr Albanese shouldn’t wait for the issues to be resolved. “I would accept the ­invitation. I would attend graciously. The trade barriers and the outstanding thawing of relations would be at the top of my agenda,” she said.

Ms Bishop, who was publicly dressed down by Mr Wang on her first trip to Beijing as foreign minister, said her former Chinese counterpart was a “highly professional diplomat” who understood Australia.

Mr Wang was reappointed this week as China’s Foreign Minister after the disappearance of the incumbent, rising star Qin Gang, in mysterious circumstances. Mr Qin has not been seen for a month and is the subject of rumours of an affair with a prominent Hong Kong television presenter.

Ms Bishop said: “I know Wang Yi well. He has an unceasing ability to promote China‘s national interests. He knows Australia well. I think he augurs well for the relationship.”

She said she always had professional dealings with Mr Wang except on one occasion, “but we won’t go into that”.

In December 2013, Mr Wang opened a meeting with Ms ­Bishop by declaring Australia had “jeopardised bilateral mutual trust”. The comment followed her decision to haul in Beijing’s ambassador to protest a Chinese air identification zone in the East China Sea.

Ms Bishop said in her speech that “megatrends” ­including ­artificial intelligence, global power shifts, climate change and the backlash over globalisation were reshaping the world.

She called for Australia to play a mediating role between the great powers to de-escalate tensions on Taiwan, and said it was time the UN called a forum along the lines of its Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to develop safeguards around the development of artificial intelligence.

Amid rumours of a potential return to diplomatic life, Ms Bishop refused to say whether she had been sounded out by the Albanese government as Australia’s next ambassador to France, saying she would not play the “rule in, rule out” game.

“That would be a matter ­between me and whoever was doing the asking,” she said. “But I can assure you that I am more than delighted with my role at the Australian National ­University.”

The Productivity Commission has reported that China’s long-running trade bans on Australian exports have had virtually zero impact on the economy, underlining the ­nation’s resilience to such coercive conduct.

Ms Bishop said China’s ­actions had forced Australian exporters to diversify, which was “good trade policy”.

She said Australia should continue to look for new export markets, but should not hesitate to re-engage with its biggest trading partner. “We need to be part of the global economy and China is a significant part of that economy,” she said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/dont-wait-to-go-to-beijing-julie-bishop-tells-anthony-albanese/news-story/6cd9b52208a184335808d8cf294792d7

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19250231

File: 3eb9ae8aca3971b⋯.jpg (1.31 MB,3136x2091,3136:2091,Antony_Blinken_and_New_Zea….jpg)

File: 9f8fc0467939bbf⋯.jpg (1 MB,5000x3308,1250:827,Emmanuel_Macron_says_Pacif….jpg)

>>19188991

United States says 'door is open' for New Zealand to join AUKUS as Blinken, Macron continue Pacific tour

Nick Sas, Emily Clark and Tim Swanston - 27 July 2023

1/2

The United States says "the door is open" for New Zealand to join AUKUS, as geopolitical competition reaches fever pitch in the Pacific, with three of the world's most influential leaders continuing lightning tours of the region.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken is in New Zealand after opening the new US embassy in Tonga yesterday.

He has met with New Zealand Prime Minister Chris Hipkins and Foreign Minister Nanaia Mahuta.

His tour comes as French President Emmanuel Macron visits Vanuatu, where he has given a speech in the capital Port Vila warning that Pacific "sovereignty and independence" is being shaken by what he describes as "new imperialisms".

Mr Macron is in Vanuatu after visiting French territory New Caledonia this week, where he made a separate speech flagging more military personnel for the territory and warning that independence could mean a "Chinese naval base tomorrow".

The Indigenous kanak population has been agitating for independence, with some boycotting Mr Macron's visit. But Pacific watchers say Mr Macron is keen to see the territory in French hands to counter China's lingering threat in the region.

In the speech in Port Vila on Thursday, Mr Macron again referred to China's aggressive push in the Pacific — although he did not mention the nation by name.

"First of all, there is the predation of the major powers: foreign ships fish illegally in the exclusive economic zone, numerous loans [that] are literally strangling development in the region," Mr Macron said.

"Commercial practices are being increasingly distorted, interference is multiplying, and new imperialisms are emerging in the Indo-Pacific, particularly in Oceania, and a logic of power is threatening the sovereignty of many states, the smallest and often the most fragile."

Mr Macron, the first French president to tour a non-French Pacific island, is set to leave Vanuatu for Papua New Guinea on Thursday night.

The US Pacific tour

United States Secretary of Defence Lloyd Austin arrived in Papua New Guinea on Wednesday, amid US attempts to cement its relations in the region's most populous nation.

Mr Austin held a bilateral meeting PNG's Prime Minister James Marape this morning, as PNG itself looks to leverage the US's renewed interest in the region and ratify a defence agreement between the two nations.

The Defence Cooperation Agreement (DCA) was signed between PNG and the United States when Mr Blinken visited Port Moresby earlier this year.

Mr Marape has faced domestic pushback over the agreement, with protests at the time of its signing and a possible legal challenge flagged by PNG's opposition leader over certain provisions of the document.

Speaking on Thursday, Mr Austin revealed a US Coast Guard ship would arrive in Papua New Guinea next month, and that the US was not seeking "permanent basing" in the country.

Yet, the agreement would give the United States access to key PNG bases for the next 15 years.

It still has not been ratified by the country's parliament, with debate over the document adjourned until next month.

On Thursday, Mr Lloyd said the United States' goal was to strengthen PNG's defence forces. He said the agreement would "expand PNG capacity" to modernise its forces and increase interoperability.

"We're not seeking permanent basing — this is a foundational framework to deepen that defence relationship," he said.

Mr Marape told reporters that US defence personnel would visit the country from September, looking firstly at infrastructure development in PNG's second-largest city, Lae.

"[The DCA] means infrastructure is developed, not just our defence infrastructure and utilities, but more importantly the supporting infrastructures in and around the footprint of where the defence presence will be," he said.

"I'm looking forward to the full rollout of the 15-year program we have with US defence force."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19250232

File: bbd8dec4c90cda5⋯.jpg (138.61 KB,1240x643,1240:643,Secretary_of_Defence_Lloyd….jpg)

File: ccce742f0162739⋯.jpg (1.4 MB,4000x2667,4000:2667,Antony_Blinken_and_New_Zea….jpg)

>>19250231

2/2

Blinken says 'door is open'

In New Zealand, Mr Blinken met with the New Zealand prime minister and foreign minister as he continued his lightning tour of the region.

They met at New Zealand's parliament buildings, known as the Beehive, where they held a joint press conference, but not before the US delegation was welcomed to Aotearoa with a powhiri — a Maori ceremony Mr Blinken said was something he would not forget.

"As we further develop AUKUS, the door is open to engagement," Mr Blinken said.

"As we continue to work on the second pillar, the door is very much open for NZ and other partners to engage as they see appropriate going forward.

"NZ is a deeply trusted partner, a Five Eyes member, we've long worked together on the most important national security issues."

Ms Mahuta reiterated her country was "not prepared to compromise or change" its nuclear-free position, but flagged the nation was exploring "pillar two opportunities".

Mr Blinken also said New Zealand and the US stood ready to support "a just and lasting peace" in Ukraine "based on the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity and independence".

"These are the same principles that underlie the rules-based international order that we have been working to uphold in this region, and indeed, against those who seek to undermine them or advance an alternative version anywhere in the world," he said.

"We'll support all nations freely determining their relationships and their partnerships.

"We also believe together that we should use those relationships both with allies and partners, and other nations, to defend and advance our affirmative vision for the Indo-Pacific, in which nations make their own sovereign decisions free from coercion."

Mr Blinken said New Zealand had been a leader "on every issue of consequence" in the Pacific, especially as the US was seeking to revitalise its presence in the region.

Ms Mahuta said New Zealand viewed the US among its "closest friends" and valued their "security relationship and strong defence connections".

"We discussed the rules-based international system, which has been fundamental to our prosperity, and the challenges it faces in a more contested global environment and our Pacific region," she said.

Ms Mahuta was asked about New Zealand's position on Solomon Islands' security agreement with China.

"We'll continue to push on the Solomon Islands PM [Manasseh] Sogavare to make clear what the full extent of those arrangements are so we can assess what it means for our region," she said.

Ms Mahuta said New Zealand welcomed the increased US presence in the region, referencing Mr Blinken's visit to Tonga yesterday where he opened a new embassy.

Mr Blinken is due to attend the United States versus Norway World Cup game in Wellington today.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-27/blinken-macron-lloyd-us-french-pacific-tour/102655292

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19250241

File: 760246c0269666c⋯.jpg (176.83 KB,1200x720,5:3,US_coercion_will_ultimatel….jpg)

>>19188991

>>19250231

US coercion will ultimately lead to strong opposition from people of Australia, Pacific Island Countries

Chen Hong - Jul 26, 2023

1/2

On Monday, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken began his trip to Tonga, New Zealand, and Australia, while on Tuesday local time, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin departed Washington on a multiday trip to the Indo-Pacific region, including Papua New Guinea. Austin will join Blinken in Australia to attend this year's Australia-US Ministerial Consultations (AUSMIN).

The South Pacific tour of the two high-ranking US officials coincides with "Talisman Sabre 2023," the joint military exercise conducted by the US and Australia along with 11 other partner countries.

The recent couple of years have seen Washington paying unprecedented and extraordinary attention to the Pacific region. Alongside high-level visits, the US has also been promising prodigious sums of financial aid to countries in the region which it used to overlook or ignore. Previously deserted diplomatic missions were reopened while new ones were unveiled in eye-dazzling succession.

Apparently, the US has afforded a brand-new strategic role to the Pacific Island Countries (PICs) as well as its partners in the region, Australia and New Zealand. Blinken and Austin expect to rein in the US' allies and pressure them further onward in the orbit of Washington's anti-China strategy.

The recent two US administrations have been feverishly advancing the "Indo-Pacific strategy," which is purported to contain, deter and disrupt China's development. Given its declining economic power, Washington has resorted to the desperate tactic of rallying its allies and partners to act as pawns for the US hegemony. It contrives to coax and coerce countries in the Asia Pacific to align with it under its ideological banner, and spearhead the anti-China campaign.

What the US has miscalculated about is the fact that for all its sugar-coated seduction with political and economic enticements, countries in the region have their own national political wisdom and judgment when making strategic decisions.

Australia, New Zealand, and the Pacific Island countries are vigilant enough to see through the US' maneuvers to induce them to serve its own hegemonic interest, reluctant to be pulled into Washington's chessboard of its self-interested power game.

Washington has taken for granted that Canberra will always obediently go along with its commands and demands; it has obviously misjudged the situation. As a sovereign and independent country, Australia of course has to prioritize its own national interests. In particular since the Labor government under Anthony Albanese took office in May last year, Australia has no longer been unquestioningly compliant to Washington's whims at all its expenses as the previous Morrison administration.

Although New Zealand is a member of the Five Eyes alliance, Wellington has historically maintained a sensible stance toward the US' impositions. In the 1980s, New Zealand, as a member of the Treaty on the Nuclear Non-Proliferation, refused to allow US warships possibly carrying nuclear weapons to dock at its ports, resulting in the US imposing suspension on New Zealand's inclusion in the ANZUS pact.

Last month, New Zealand's Prime Minister Chris Hipkins successfully visited China. According to Hipkins, both countries enjoy a very constructive and positive relationship, which is incredibly important for New Zealand. Wellington evidently has been adhering to its sovereignty and strategic autonomy when dealing with diplomatic and security matters.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19250245

File: 42c0d437ea45cd3⋯.jpg (164.63 KB,1200x720,5:3,US_Australia_have_no_inter….jpg)

>>19250241

2/2

Furthermore, as the US has been persistently pulling together political, security and economic cliques to counter China, the South Pacific has been designed to ostracize cooperation with China.

At last year's summit between the US and leaders and representatives from 14 Pacific Island states, Washington alleged that the region must stave off China's "economic coercion." Empty promises of further aid were made with the hope to procure the countries' allegiance. Rumors and propagandistic fabrications such as the "debt trap" and "China threat" have continued to be propagated, attempting to lure the South Pacific countries away from their to-date successful and mutually beneficial cooperation with China.

This malicious ploy, as a matter of fact, underestimates the wisdom of the governments and people in South Pacific countries. What the South Pacific countries need to tackle are the existential crisis posed by climate change and the economic difficulties they have been suffering, rather than the non-existent "China threat." Therefore, the US' baiting and coercion, driven by explicit political purposes, will ultimately result in the strong opposition from the peoples in the Pacific.

The US and its allies have long been engaged in political manipulation in the region, with the purported aim to impose its own political and economic will on the PICs. More often than not, US aid programs are camouflaged instruments of political influence to shape and reshape the local political landscape.

In contrast, China's relationship with countries in the South Pacific region has always been based on the principle of mutual respect, mutual trust and mutual benefit. China's assistance to the countries has significantly improved the local infrastructure, speeded up the economic development and elevated the people's livelihood with tangible fruitful outcomes and enduring benefits.

Manasseh Sogavare, Prime Minister of the Solomon Islands, concluded his visit to China earlier this month, during which nine important agreements and memorandums were signed between the two countries. The cooperation between China and the Solomon Islands, as well as other PICs, has reaped substantial benefits, setting a good example for the South-South cooperation in today's world which aspires peace and development.

The author is a professor and executive director of Asia Pacific Studies Centre at East China Normal University. opinion@globaltimes.com.cn

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202307/1295085.shtml

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19250260

File: 4ae88f989e05b16⋯.jpg (486.68 KB,1280x853,1280:853,U_S_and_Indonesian_Army_so….jpg)

File: b755ace31488ae8⋯.jpg (177.87 KB,1280x853,1280:853,Australian_Army_Col_Ben_Mc….jpg)

File: 8af70657df316de⋯.jpg (345.09 KB,1280x853,1280:853,U_S_and_German_soldiers_cl….jpg)

File: 47b32ac18f508df⋯.jpg (402.29 KB,1280x853,1280:853,U_S_and_Indonesian_soldier….jpg)

File: 98ae81f7616b012⋯.jpg (391.65 KB,1280x853,1280:853,Fuelers_assigned_to_Battle….jpg)

>>19226439

>>19237744

Talisman Sabre 23 Field Exercise Sets Benchmark for Combined Military Training in Indo-Pacific

Joseph Clark - July 26, 2023

Inside a small tent on a sprawling military training range on Australia's northeast coast, U.S. and Australian exercise planners are immersed as the product of years of painstaking preparation unfolds in real time.

A large screen at one end displays red and blue dots overlayed on a digital topographic map depicting the real-time positions of thousands of troops from 10 different nations.

Just outside the tent, military helicopters take off and land as U.S. and Australian troops patrol the training area's sprawling ranges alongside their partner forces.

"You're currently standing in what we call the Field of Dreams," said Australian Army Col. Ben McLennan, commander of the Australian Defense Force's Combat Training Centre, as he welcomed reporters on Monday to the Townsville Field Training Area. The training area is the epicenter of the 10-day field training exercise taking place during Talisman Sabre 23.

"This activity that's occurring here is just the richest, most immersive and most realistic, no-consequence training environment that we can possibly create," he said. "We're calling it the Olympics of war games because it's the biggest, most ambitious Talisman Sabre ever."

This year marks the 10th iteration of Talisman Sabre, a biennial exercise designed to advance a free and open Indo-Pacific by strengthening partnerships and interoperability among key allies. The spelling of the name — sabre vs. saber — reflects which country is leading the exercise: Talisman Sabre when Australia leads and Talisman Saber when the U.S. leads.

Thirteen nations from Japan to Germany are participating in this year's full exercise.

The 15-day exercise includes a variety of large-scale logistics and amphibious assault training operations and multinational firepower demonstrations, in addition to the field training exercise. Several Pacific Island partners — including Papua New Guinea, Fiji and Tonga — are participating for the first time.

Ten nations will make up the combined force that will face off, as part of the field-training portion of the exercise, against an enemy designed to have "comprehensive overmatch" over the coalition forces across all warfighting functions.

"That enemy element has all the capabilities across space, cyber, land, maritime and air that one would anticipate a peer threat to be able to bring to bear against Australia, United States and coalition partners," McLennan said.

U.S. Army Col. Ben Martin, operations commander for the Joint Pacific Multinational Readiness Center, said the scenario "reads right out of the most recent, emerging doctrine from both of our countries."

He said putting that doctrine into practice in a realistic and dynamic training environment is critical for being prepared to win in the next conflict.

"Big exercises like this are where we can induce the fog and friction of stress, the closest we can get to actual real combat on our respective combined forces, so that when that day comes, that they're trained and they're ready," he said.

Creating that environment, which was designed with input from both U.S. and Australian planners, is the product of tireless planning and unprecedented execution.

Participating countries have, for weeks leading up to the exercise, undergone the planning and manpower-intensive process of moving equipment into theater. Many of the units will be deploying a variety of capabilities for the first time on such a large scale. There are 30,000 troops participating in the full exercise and 10,000 participating in the field portion.

McLennan said the training itself serves as a "demonstration of collective resolve" on behalf of each nation to train and operate together to preserve the rules-based order in the Indo-Pacific.

"United States and Australia have been aligned, have been close allies, and have been working together, training together for generations. But what we're achieving here is really an amazing break into a new chapter in our story when it comes to how we train together, learning how we might operate together, how we might fight together," he said.

"This is historic," McLennan said.

https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/3471278/talisman-sabre-23-field-exercise-sets-benchmark-for-combined-military-training/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19250270

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19226439

NZ soldiers perform Haka Tu in warning to mock enemy in Australian war games

A contingent of New Zealand soldiers have declared their readiness to head into battle on Australian soil by performing a traditional war challenge to intimidate their enemy.

In a video released Wednesday, the soldiers performed the Haka Tu in front of counterparts from Australia, the US, Fiji and France in the Queensland bush to mark the start Exercise Talisman Sabre 2023.

The haka, an ancient ceremonial war dance or challenge in NZ Indigenous Māori culture, is traditionally used to represent a display of a tribe’s strength, pride and unity.

There are three versions of the haka, with the NZ Army version called Tu Taua a Tumatauenga, meaning the “standing columns of the God of War”, according to a New Zealand Defence Force website.

It is designed to be performed without weapons and in uniform by all, regardless of race, rank or gender.

The battle cry was traditionally performed by men before going to war, with the aggressive facial expressions intended to scare the opponents while the chant itself was to motivate the group heading into combat.

Traditional Maori dress, weapons or simulated facial tattoos are not worn or carried in the Haka Tu, which is dedicated to all soldiers who have died either on active service or after service in the NZ Army.

If there are any women in the unit, they begin and end the haka as the Haka Tu is also to acknowledge ‘mana wahine’ or the ‘prestige of women’ in the service, according to the NZDF description.

The Kiwis are among the 31,000 people from 13 nations taking part in the 10th iteration of the Australia-US bilaterally planned, multilaterally executed Exercise Talisman Sabre, which is expected to culminate in a mock war between all military branches on land, sea and in the air.

The war games, from July 22-August 4 throughout Queensland and select other parts of Australia, are designed to train forces in all aspects of combined operations to help improve the combat readiness and interoperability between the Australian Defence Force and its allies.

The NZDF have sent about 300 people to take part, including two Army infantry platoons, along with 20 Light Armoured Vehicles, nine Medium Heavy Operation Vehicles, a Royal New Zealand air force rotary wing detachment with three NH90 helicopters, hydrographers from the Royal New Zealand navy and some augmentee staff.

With 19 nations involved, TS23 is now believed to be the largest multilateral military training exercise in the southern hemisphere.

Military units from the US, NZ, Japan, Canada, the UK, the Republic of Korea, Fiji, Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, Tonga, France and Germany are actively involved in the TS23 drills, while personnel from India, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand are attending as observers.

Representatives from the Netherlands Ministry of Defence and the United Arab Emirates Armed Forces are also on their inaugural visit to small section of the training.

The US has sent about 18,500 troops to take part, while there are about 1300 military personnel from Japan, 700 from the Republic of Korea, 250 from Canada, about 240 people from Germany, 160 from the UK, 130 from France, 65 from Indonesia, 50 from Fiji, 40 from the Kingdom of Tonga and about 35 military participants from Papua New Guinea.

The “high end” warfighting scenarios are mostly conducted along various parts of the Queensland coast, throughout the ADF’s 2437 sq km Townsville Field Training Area, sbout 60km southwest of Townsville, the 4545 sq km Shoalwater Bay training area near Rockhampton and in adjacent maritime and airspace areas of the Coral Sea.

This year there are also components in Norfolk Island, parts of NSW, the NT and WA and operating out of various Royal Australian Air Force bases.

https://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/nz-soldiers-perform-haka-tu-in-warning-to-mock-enemy-in-australian-war-games/news-story/1ede10c20ba3ec4093066af4a7176e32

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lS5FEG8RZCQ

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19250288

File: 3b1031975079db3⋯.jpg (918.3 KB,3855x2569,3855:2569,Kevin_Spacey_speaks_to_pre….jpg)

File: 606991e308083f4⋯.jpg (1.05 MB,1910x1512,955:756,A_court_artist_s_sketch_of….jpg)

File: 84865c8570a16b9⋯.jpg (455.16 KB,852x914,426:457,Q_4590.jpg)

File: 06e20e05177a562⋯.jpg (555.88 KB,1467x1650,489:550,cover7_Q_4590.jpg)

Jury acquits Kevin Spacey of all nine sexual offence charges in London trial

Brian Melley - July 27, 2023

London: A London jury acquitted Kevin Spacey on sexual assault charges on Wednesday after a four-week trial in which the actor said he was a “big flirt” who had consensual flings with men and whose only misstep was touching a man’s groin while making a “clumsy pass.”

Three men accused the Oscar winner of aggressively grabbing their crotches. A fourth, an aspiring actor seeking mentorship, said he awoke to the actor performing oral sex on him after going to Spacey’s London apartment for a beer and either falling asleep or passing out.

All the men said the contact was unwanted but Spacey testified that the young actor and another man had willingly participated in consensual acts. He said a third man’s allegation that he grabbed his privates like a striking “cobra” backstage at a theatre was “pure fantasy.”

He said he didn’t remember a fourth incident at a small party at a home he rented in the country but accepted that he touched the groin of a man he had met at a pub during a night of heavy drinking. He said he had misread the man’s interest in him and said he had probably made an awkward pass.

Defence lawyer Patrick Gibbs said three of the men were liars and incidents had been “reimagined with a sinister spin.” He accused most of them of hopping on a “bandwagon” of complaints in the hope of striking it rich.

Prosecutor Christine Agnew told jurors that Spacey was a “sexual bully” who took what he wanted when he wanted. She said he was shielded by a “trinity of protection”: he knew men were unlikely to complain; they wouldn’t be believed if they did complain; and if they did complain, no action would be taken because he was powerful.

Spacey, who turned 64 on Wednesday, faced nine charges, including multiple counts of sexual assault and one count of causing a person to engage in penetrative sexual activity without consent.

The accusations date from 2001 to 2013 and include a period when Spacey – after winning Academy Awards for The Usual Suspects and American Beauty – had returned to the theatre, his first love. During most of that period he was artistic director of the Old Vic Theatre in London.

The men came forward after an American actor accused Spacey of an incident of sexual misconduct as the #MeToo movement heated up in 2017.

Several of the men said they had been haunted by the abuse and couldn’t bear to watch Spacey’s films.

One of the men broke down when speaking with police as he provided details in a videotaped interview about the oral sex incident that he said he’d never told anyone before. Another man said he was angry about the abuse that occurred sporadically over several years and began to drink and work out more to cope with it.

Spacey choked up and became teary eyed in the witness box as he described the emotional and financial turmoil that the US accusations brought and the barrage of criticism that followed on social media.

“My world exploded,” Spacey testified. “There was a rush to judgment and before the first question was asked or answered I lost my job, I lost my reputation, I lost everything in a matter of days.”

Gibbs said Spacey was being “monstered” on the internet every night and became toxic in the industry.

Spacey was booted from Netflix’s House of Cards and his scenes in Ridley Scott’s All the Money in the World were scrubbed and he was replaced by Christopher Plummer. Aside from some small projects, he has barely worked as an actor in six years.

A New York jury last year swiftly cleared Spacey in a $US40 million lawsuit by Star Trek: Discovery actor Anthony Rapp on allegations dating back three decades.

Spacey had viewed the London case as a chance for redemption, telling German magazine Zeit last month that there were “people right now who are ready to hire me the moment I am cleared of these charges in London.”

https://www.theage.com.au/culture/celebrity/kevin-spacey-acquitted-of-all-nine-sexual-offence-charges-in-london-trial-20230726-p5drk9.html

Q Post #4590

Jul 18 2020 11:18:04 (EST)

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/kevin-spacey-accuser-dies-by-suicide-day-after-actor-posts-kill-them-with-kindness-video

"This marks the third Spacey accuser to die in 2019."

At what point does it become painfully obvious?

Q

https://qanon.pub/#4590

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19250307

File: 11987363e51688a⋯.jpg (396.84 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Former_Australian_prime_mi….jpg)

File: 2f5e231d3152216⋯.jpg (249.93 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Former_Australian_prime_Mi….jpg)

File: a3a46a5333917a6⋯.jpg (199.03 KB,1885x1060,377:212,US_President_Barack_Obama_….jpg)

Julia Gillard’s ex Tim Mathieson to plead guilty to sexual assault

TRICIA RIVERA - JULY 27, 2023

Julia Gillard’s former partner, Tim Mathieson, will plead guilty to sexually touching a woman without her consent.

The 66-year-old hairdresser, who became the first Australian man to be nicknamed the nation’s “first bloke” when Ms Gillard ousted Kevin Rudd as Labor leader in 2010, is expected to admit to sucking a woman’s nipple without her consent in an incident that took place in Brunswick on March 13 last year.

Ms Gillard revealed her split from Mr Mathieson to the Adelaide Advertiser two weeks before the sexual assault allegedly took place, stating the pair broke up more than a year ago.

Mr Mathieson, who was charged on May 23, appeared before the court via video link on Thursday where his defence lawyer, Brad Penno, told the court the matter had been “resolved”.

“It has resolved on the basis that Mr Mathieson will plead guilty to charge one,” Mr Penno said.

The Melbourne Magistrates Court charge sheet read: “The accused at Brunswick East in Victoria on (March 13 last year) intentionally sexually touched (the complainant) by sucking her nipple without consent in circumstances where the accused did not reasonably believe that (the complainant) consented to the touching.”

Two other charges were withdrawn by the police prosecutor.

Requests for CCTV footage, photos and tendered statements were denied.

Ms Gillard started dating Mr Mathieson when she was Labor’s deputy leader in 2006. The pair were the first unmarried couple to live together at The Lodge.

Ms Gillard revealed in her 2014 autobiography she was introduced to Mr Mathieson at a Melbourne hair salon he was working at in 2004.

She said she would go in “every four of five weeks” on a Sunday morning and began chatting with Mr Mathieson about politics.

The first female prime minister’s ex-boyfriend is no stranger to controversy. In 2013 he told members of the West Indian cricket team “a small female Asian ­doctor” would be best to conduct prostate cancer checks. Ms ­Gillard was standing behind him when the comment was made. He later apologised for his ­remarks.

“It was meant as a joke and on reflection I accept it was in poor taste. I apologise for any offence caused,” Mr Mathieson said.

In 2007, his brother Jon criticised Mr Mathieson for going back on a business agreement to open a salon in Shepparton.

“We set the business up for him because he wanted to come home. We gave it a go here and then he decided his place wasn’t here so he went back to Melbourne,” Jon Mathieson told the Herald Sun at the time.

“We don’t see him much but he’s got a fairly busy life now. He’s always been flamboyant. He’s always been out there.’’

A profile on the National Archives website states: “During his time as prime ministerial spouse, Mathieson undertook voluntary work for Kidney Health Australia, Indigenous Diabetes Association and mental health group Beyond Blue.

“He was also patron of the Australian Men’s Shed Association, dedicated to encouraging men to meet and discuss problems in a comfortable environment.”

Mr Mathieson’s lawyer told the court one outstanding issue was whether his client was eligible for a diversion, a way for first-time and low-level offenders to avoid a criminal record by undertaking conditions that benefit the victim.

The court was told police would need time to consider whether a diversion would be an appropriate outcome.

The court heard the complainant would need to be contacted for their opinion.

Magistrate Roslyn Porter adjourned the case to August 31.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/former-prime-minister-julia-gillards-ex-tim-mathieson-admits-to-sex-assault-charge/news-story/05cfa2e13b78df9bf040f7bd9d8e44a1

https://www.naa.gov.au/explore-collection/australias-prime-ministers/julia-gillard/partner

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19250326

File: 9b095f005f86cd8⋯.jpg (2.42 MB,4500x3001,4500:3001,Anthony_Fauci_has_taken_up….jpg)

File: edf76fc16a542b3⋯.jpg (1.33 MB,4574x3049,4574:3049,Then_president_Donald_Trum….jpg)

Anthony Fauci on Australia’s COVID response, AI and the next pandemic

Angus Thomson - July 27, 2023

The man who became the face of the coronavirus response in the United States says Australia’s willingness to accept science and resist conspiracy theories will help the country stave off future pandemics, but is concerned growing animosity and threats towards scientists will stifle the next generation of experts inspired by the events of the past three years.

In an interview with the Sydney Morning Herald and The Age, Dr Anthony Fauci also said the responsible use of artificial intelligence would help scientists anticipate future variants of COVID-19 and predict other problem diseases before they reach pandemic level.

“Obviously, there are books now being written about the dangers of artificial intelligence,” he said. “But I think if you look at it under a controlled situation, there are many, many advantages for artificial intelligence in every aspect of medicine and health, from reading X-rays to skin biopsies to … responding to the next pandemic.”

Fauci retired from public service in December after spending 54 years with the National Institutes of Health and 38 years as the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease.

But retirement has not slowed down Fauci. The 82-year-old has taken on a teaching role at Georgetown University, is writing his memoirs due in November, and this week appeared at the International Aids Society conference in Brisbane.

As the public health face of America’s pandemic response, Fauci was often called upon in real-time to diplomatically correct false claims made by then-president Donald Trump on hydroxychloroquine, progress toward vaccines and the comparative dangers of coronavirus and the flu.

Medical school applications jumped 18 per cent in 2020, according to the Association of American Medical Colleges, in a phenomenon some in the US dubbed the “Fauci effect”. But Fauci himself said the death threats he and other scientists received as the pandemic progressed had somewhat soured the excitement of pursuing a career in medicine and public health.

“I think there’s still that feeling, but … there has been a phenomenal degree of political divisiveness, which spilled over into how we looked and acted towards the pandemic,” he said. “Students and young people who were enthusiastic about getting involved in science and public service see that scientists are being threatened, they’re being harassed, and they’re being disrespected.”

The hostility towards scientists that hampered America’s coronavirus response was not as prevalent in Australia, Fauci said, but warned the politics of divisiveness would always appeal to the minority who were sceptical of the science.

“Those who promote falsehoods and disinformation can always find some outlier of a scientist or some outlier of a public health person to get up in front of a hearing or in front of the television and say something that’s absolutely not true.”

He said Australian scientists, including renowned virologist Professor Eddie Holmes and the Doherty Institute’s Professor Sharon Lewin, had contributed “enormously” to international efforts to fight the coronavirus and other infectious diseases including HIV.

“[Australia] has some of the best science that’s around, for a country with a relatively small population,” he said. “Ever since I was a student, I was always impressed by some of the original scientists, Peter Doherty and people like that, that have always been leaders in the field. And I think that Australian tradition continues.”

In a Journal of Infectious Diseases article, yet to be published, Fauci outlines 10 lessons from COVID-19 for pandemic preparedness.

“The scientific approach, the preparation, with new platform technologies, and new imaging design was a resounding success story,” he said. “Our public health response, not so much.”

History has taught us, Fauci said, that the collective memory of events such as pandemics fades over time, and he remains sceptical that the public and policymakers will take the appropriate lessons from COVID-19.

“We’ve lost already, and counting, 1.13 million people [in America] and the world, although it’s reported to have lost only 7 million people, it’s more likely closer to 20 million people,” he said. “That’s a lesson we can’t forget.”

https://www.smh.com.au/national/anthony-fauci-on-australia-s-covid-response-ai-and-the-next-pandemic-20230727-p5drm8.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19250396

File: fd8c3679fdc5145⋯.jpg (636.55 KB,1483x745,1483:745,hoytsaustralia_1.jpg)

File: 2cdcbc38635fb6a⋯.jpg (1.28 MB,1188x4618,594:2309,BRING_SOUND_OF_FREEDOM_TO_….jpg)

File: b5e91856e764eec⋯.jpg (707.96 KB,1188x2330,594:1165,flicks_com_au_sound_of_fre….jpg)

File: ad4c96db882d7cf⋯.jpg (855.48 KB,1188x1833,396:611,hoyts_com_au_sound_of_free….jpg)

File: 5310af0c6f80a38⋯.jpg (1.04 MB,1188x2514,198:419,eventcinemas_com_au_sound_….jpg)

>>19211499

Controversial blockbuster Sound of Freedom heads to Australian cinemas

Garry Maddox - July 27, 2023

The controversial American hit film Sound of Freedom, about a Homeland Security agent who quits his job to take on child traffickers, is headed for Australian cinemas.

The unheralded thriller has stormed to stunning box office success in the US - taking more than $US130 million ($191 million) in three weeks - after being released by self-described faith-based distributor Angel Studios.

While it tells a non-partisan story, the film has been championed by both mainstream conservatives and far-right figures including Steve Bannon and My Pillow proprietor Mike Lindell as well as followers of the QAnon movement.

“The film has been a gift to exhibition and has dynamited the red flyover states and faith-based audience … who have been intrigued by the anti-child trafficking topic,” industry website Deadline Hollywood reported.

Written and directed by Alejandro Monteverde, Sound of Freedom stars Jim Caviezel (The Passion of the Christ, Person of Interest) as Tim Ballard, a real-life former Homeland Security agent who founded the charity Operation Underground Railroad to rescue children and women from sex traffickers.

It will be released in Australia by Icon Film Distribution on August 24.

“Since Sound of Freedom launched in the US, demand has been building around the world in dozens of regions and languages,” Angel Studios’ executive Jared Geesey said. “Child trafficking is a global issue and we hope to build on the incredible momentum here in the States and share the film’s powerful message worldwide.”

While its success has been overshadowed by the latest Mission Impossible, Barbie and Oppenheimer releases, the film has been a new front in America’s culture wars.

A press release issued by the Trump 2024 campaign to announce the former president would host a screening at his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey, said “liberal media outlets like The New York Times, Los Angeles Times and The Hollywood Reporter” had refused to review the film and “publications like Rolling Stone, Washington Post, CNN and The Guardian have trashed the film and mocked the millions of movie-goers who purchased tickets to screenings”.

On Twitter, there have been claims that American cinemas are inventing spurious technical and airconditioning problems to stop people watching the film and counterclaims that right-wing groups are booking out sessions that no-one attends to boost ticket sales.

https://www.smh.com.au/culture/movies/controversial-blockbuster-sound-of-freedom-heads-to-australian-cinemas-20230727-p5drs7.html

https://www.instagram.com/p/CvLorNHoCMm/

https://www.change.org/p/bring-sound-of-freedom-to-australian-cinema-s

https://www.flicks.com.au/movie/sound-of-freedom/

https://www.hoyts.com.au/movies/sound-of-freedom

https://www.eventcinemas.com.au/Movie/Sound-Of-Freedom#date=2023-08-24

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

a035d5 No.19252375

General Research #23645 >>19252351

New Zealand government funds project to discredit anyone who questions safety of vaccines

It’s not only the UK government that’s refusing to acknowledge excess deaths since the mass covid injection campaign began, the New Zealand government is doing the same. Is it because they are afraid to admit that those who are raising awareness about the unsafety of the vaccines might be right?

Silence is one thing but the New Zealand Prime Minister’s office is taking things further. It is actively funding a disinformation project dedicated to discrediting anyone who asks questions about vaccine safety.

Something is Happening, But What? RNZ Wants Us to Fantasise About It

By Dr. Guy Hatchard

On Saturday, the UK Daily Express headlined a story, ‘Experts call for urgent investigation as excess deaths spark ‘dangerous’ theories‘. UK excess deaths in 2023 have risen to levels commensurate with 2020 alpha variant deaths during the height of the pandemic, but the article admits that the 2023 excess is not due to Covid. Most concerning is the death toll in the 15-44 age group, which exceeds 2020 and prior years. An age group which was mostly just mildly affected by Covid.

As they are here in New Zealand, where our rates of excess death are measurably higher than in the UK, the Government is keeping quiet and looking the other way. Dr. Charles Levinson, Medical Director of private GP service Doctorcall, said the “silence” from the Government was allowing conspiracy theories to flourish, including from anti-vaxxers, and added:

“A refusal to openly discuss these statistics is an abdication of responsibility from parts of the scientific community [and the government], leading to an irreversible erosion of trust by parts of society.”

We agree.

Why Aren’t Governments Investigating?

So, we are not conspiracy theorists when we warn that excess deaths are up, mainstream scientists agree with us, but understandably they don’t want the jabs they administered and pushed on people to be revealed as the cause or even openly discussed. That could be very embarrassing.

Why aren’t governments investigating? It might be a fair guess at this point to suggest that governments are actually aware of excess deaths and very afraid to investigate because what limited data they have released suggests very clearly that those asking questions about vaccine safety might very well be right about the cause.

Excess deaths appear to be clustered around a range of cardiac events scientifically proven and acknowledged to be related to mRNA injections and cancers suspected to be. The Boston Globe, for example, headlines, ‘Rise in cancer among younger people worries and puzzles doctors’. Indian doctor Feruzi Mehta from Mumbai tweets that heart attack deaths among younger people now make up 15-20% of the total, when it was just 1-2% ten years ago.

Doctors like Mehta speaking up are risking de-registration. Therefore most others, faced by the rising incidence of illness and death, especially among the young, are remaining silent. However, some diehards are doubling down or even succumbing to the irrational.

Silence is one thing, but our Prime Minister’s office is actively funding a disinformation project dedicated to discrediting anyone who asks questions about vaccine safety, labelling them violent extremists, paedophiles, Satanists, anti-Semites, animal torturers, white supremacists, neo-Nazis, and anti-transgender. Saying that “all these interests ultimately merge into one,” beginning with a concern about vaccine mandates (???).

Time to Press the Pause Button

All the wild and incredible accusations listed in the preceding paragraph are explicitly made during the first 12 minutes of the first episode of a seven-part podcast series produced by RNZ Radio called Undercurrent, in which they interview government-funded disinformation experts (???). 12 minutes of this half-baked smear campaign was enough exposure for me to press the pause button.

The problem with the RNZ podcast so far (aside from its lengthy episodes and unrelenting madness) is that it doesn’t actually discuss vaccine injuries or unprecedented rates of excess deaths – or even mention that there are such things. RNZ began putting the podcast series together more than 10 months ago. Since that time, it has become apparent that worrying excess death rates have persisted, but RNZ has apparently decided to avoid mentioning the problem. There is a possible reason for this. Once you get into inventing causes of excess deaths, you really do begin to sound very mad indeed.

https://expose-news.com/2023/07/27/nz-gov-funds-project-to-discredit/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

672ace No.19255376

File: 44ee1ae7a4bd26c⋯.png (1002.49 KB,1080x810,4:3,098172435jkhasdfg65tg3jf.png)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19256826

File: 3052873c2d05dc4⋯.jpg (181.45 KB,2048x1152,16:9,National_Farmers_Federatio….jpg)

File: 18813e9a7b3b086⋯.jpg (279.44 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_and_Tanya….jpg)

>>19160107 (pb)

>>19222755

Farmers’ revolt threatens to stifle the Indigenous voice to parliament

JOE KELLY and SARAH ISON - JULY 28, 2023

1/2

The nation’s peak agricultural lobby says West Australian farmers are “paralysed with fear” and uncertain “what they can do on their own land” because of new Aboriginal cultural heritage laws that loom as a key threat to the voice referendum and Labor’s political dominance in the state.

The National Farmers Federation has sounded an alarm over Anthony Albanese’s plan to legislate a stand-alone national framework for Indigenous cultural heritage protections, saying the rollout of separate federal rules could “intensify the confusion in WA with overlapping federal laws”.

NFF chief executive Tony Mahar said “the (federal) government needs to learn from the mistakes of WA” following a fierce backlash to the introduction of the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act in the state on July 1. “Nobody wants to damage cultural heritage, but at the moment the (state) laws are too open to interpretation. We’re hearing from farmers who are paralysed with fear, not certain what they can now do on their own land,” he said. “That shouldn’t be the case – it should be clear cut.”

WA Pastoralists and Graziers Association president Tony Seabrook said the shake-up to heritage laws in WA represented the “greatest attack on private property rights since federation”.

He urged the government to scrap them, saying the new cultural heritage laws had eroded support for Labor under Premier Roger Cook and would result in the state voting No in the voice referendum.

“They’ve rewritten the book on how to do the maximum amount of harm in the shortest amount of time,” Mr Seabrook said. “The voice is dead over here. The Premier has absolutely cooked it. If this can be imposed upon us without a Yes vote in the referendum, God save us if the voice gets up.”

Speaking in parliament on Nov­ember 24 last year, Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek linked the government’s plan for a national rollout of cultural heritage protections to the voice – a connection that some Labor figures now believe could undermine the chances of a successful Yes vote.

“We’re protecting Indigenous cultural heritage for the same reason we’re supporting the Uluru Statement from the Heart and the voice to parliament,” she said.

“We are always a better country … when we give everyone a seat at the table.”

One senior WA Labor source told The Weekend Australian that “the voice has dominated the last three months and then that’s been conflated here with Aboriginal cultural heritage”.

“It’s looked like Labor is only focused on those issues which, for most people, are completely niche,” the source said.

“I’ve always thought that the voice was going to go down over here … people still don’t understand what the voice is and why we need to do it. I think the Yes camp and the government has failed to mount a retail argument for how this is going to help anybody.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19256831

File: 5d0eb84904e1864⋯.jpg (96.57 KB,1200x675,16:9,Cook_Government_s_light_to….jpg)

>>19256826

2/2

The WA state laws establish a complex three-tiered system requiring landholders to organise potentially costly heritage assessments through local Indigenous corporations before undertaking basic work on properties larger than 1100sq m.

Permits could be required for ground excavations of up to a depth of 1m, with Mr Seabrook saying this could include anything from “putting up a fence, laying a pipe underground to a water-point, putting up some sheep-yards or putting up a shed.”

The Albanese government agreed to legislate a national ­cultural heritage framework as recommended by a 2021 parlia­men­tary inquiry into the ­destruction of the caves at Juukan Gorge containing evidence of human life dating back 46,000 years.

The framework would be developed through a process of “co-design with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples” and set a series of minimum standards for state and territory protections.

Speculation has grown the government will wait until after the voice referendum before advancing any legislation, with a spokeswoman for Ms Plibersek saying: “We want to make sure we take the time necessary to get this right. We are committed to improving protections for First Nations cultural heritage and to provide clarity … for business.”

Opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Price said it would be “absolutely within the scope of the voice” to demand a national rollout of the WA laws while WA Liberal MP Andrew Hastie said the backlash to the new state laws from landholders was a just a “foretaste of what is to come from the voice”.

Yes supporters said WA cultural heritage laws were being exploited by the No campaign.

WA teal independent Kate Chaney said the “confused rollout of this updated law has been weaponised against the much bigger issue of the proposed voice”.

Former Coalition Indigenous Australians spokesman Julian Leeser said “the focus on the WA law is a clever scare tactic of the No campaign, but that law has absolutely nothing to do with the voice. It was created without a voice. The voice is about advice. It doesn’t make decisions.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/farmers-revolt-threatens-to-stifle-the-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/73d6c1196a7069fbf1a3f0e971d59185

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19256860

File: e21661df0595734⋯.jpg (373.63 KB,2048x1152,16:9,US_Senate_Majority_Leader_….jpg)

File: 1ce4bd964548132⋯.jpg (278.47 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Joe_Biden_and_Anthony_Alba….jpg)

>>19188991

>>19220996

>>19231877

AUKUS: Republicans demand doubling of submarine production before backing pact

ADAM CREIGHTON - JULY 28, 2023

A group of Republican congressmen including Senate leader Mitch McConnell have demanded a more than 100 per cent increase in US submarine production as a condition for supporting the transfer of nuclear-powered submarines to Australia as part of the AUKUS security pact.

As annual AUSMIN discussions kick off in Brisbane between the foreign and defence ministers of Australia and the US, 23 Republicans in congress have asked the White House to “immediately” provide a plan, including a request for extra money, to lift production of Virginia class submarines from 1.2 to “a minimum of 2.5” per year.

“The administration’s current plan requires the transfer of three US Virginia-class attack submarines to Australia from the existing US submarine fleet without a clear plan for replacing these submarines,” the letter, signed by influential Republicans including Ted Cruz and Susan Collins, said.

“This plan, if implemented without change, would unacceptably weaken the US fleet even as China seeks to expand its military power and influence”.

Provisions to green light the transfer of Virginia class submarines to Australia, which is expected to buy between three and five of the nuclear-powered submarines from the US in the early 2030s have been bogged down in debate in congress as Republicans and Democrats thrash out an annual defence spending bill.

Last week Senator John Wicker, ranking member on a powerful Senate Armed Services committee, held up Senate legislation that would have enabled the transfer of nuclear submarines to Australia, as promised under the September 2021 AUKUS agreement between the US, Australia and the UK.

The House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee on Wednesday (Thursday AEST) proposed legislation to sell up to two submarines to Australia, stopping short of granting a blanket exemption to Australia for technology transfer, which the Senate had earlier approved.

“To make up for the sale of at least three attack submarines to Australia, the U.S. would have to produce somewhere between 2.3 to 2.5 submarines per year to avoid further shrinking our fleet’s operational capacity,” the Republican letter read, noting the current production rate of 1.2 was already below a forecast two per year.

Senator Wicker told The Australian last week he expected the submarine approval, which has become a bargaining tool for Republicans in the context of a broader fight over defence spending, to be granted “by the end of the year”.

The group stressed their support for the “vitally important” AUKUS agreement but expressed concern the agreement risked undermining the US fleet of attack submarines, which had fallen short of the military’s requirement of 66.

“Today, there are only 49 in the fleet. Further, as older nuclear submarines retire faster than they are replaced, the Navy projects the inventory will decline to 46 by 2030,” the letter said.

Australia has promised to make a US$3 billion contribution to the US government as part of the AUKUS agreement, to help expand US domestic submarine production, but Republicans doubt that will be enough additional funding to significantly boost production.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin will meet their counterparts Penny Wong and Richard Marles in Brisbane on Friday, the first AUSMIN meeting to be hosted by Australia since 2019 when Donald Trump was president.

Along with AUKUS, the meeting is expected to included discussion about bilateral efforts to thwart China’s encroachment on Taiwan, and the two nations’ ongoing support for Ukraine in its efforts to expel Russia.

It will be the highest level meeting between the two governments since Joe Biden abruptly cancelled a scheduled trip to Australia in May in order to help Democrats negotiate an increase in the congressional debt ceiling.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/aukus-republicans-demand-doubling-of-submarine-production-before-backing-pact/news-story/89b8a6938a1342d49fb21d62368e2d61

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19256893

File: d432054dcc990cc⋯.jpg (3.79 MB,6555x4375,1311:875,The_United_States_is_suppo….jpg)

File: ffef3470143cde9⋯.jpg (342.92 KB,825x895,165:179,AT_1.jpg)

File: d6c8ea26a8832a0⋯.jpg (230.04 KB,1170x1455,78:97,F2DGnaDaEAIWRv0.jpg)

File: bcf1fc26a90f84d⋯.jpg (120.9 KB,1170x1450,117:145,F2DGnZ6aEAAA82Q.jpg)

File: 36767a50e3ee371⋯.jpg (114.87 KB,1170x1461,390:487,F2DGnaLaYAAZ2fV.jpg)

>>19188991

>>19220996

>>19231877

‘A risk we should not take’: Republican resistance mounts to nuclear submarine plan

Matthew Knott - July 28, 2023

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has declared he remains confident Australia will secure Virginia-class submarines from the United States, even as almost half of all Republican senators came out against the current plan on the grounds it would dangerously weaken the US Navy as it competes with China.

Twenty-three Republican senators, including Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell, wrote to President Joe Biden on Thursday (Australian time) saying they did not support the proposal to provide nuclear-powered submarines to Australia unless the US doubled its own domestic production capacity.

Despite the growing AUKUS backlash in the American capital, US ambassador to Australia Caroline Kennedy insisted that the submarine plan was “not at risk at all”.

While noting that the AUKUS pact had broad bipartisan support in Washington, the senators wrote: “The administration’s current plan requires the transfer of three US Virginia-class attack submarines from the existing US submarine fleet without a clear plan for replacing these submarines.

“This plan, if implemented without change, would unacceptably weaken the US fleet even as China seeks to expand its military power and influence.”

The Republican senators noted that the US said it required 66 attack-class submarines, but the number of boats in its fleet is set to decline to 46 by 2030.

“Under the current AUKUS plan to transfer US Virginia-class submarines to a partner nation before meeting the Navy’s own requirements, the number of available nuclear submarines in the US submarine fleet would be lowered further,” they wrote.

“This is a risk we cannot take.”

Roger Wicker, the top Republican on the Senate armed services committee, previously vowed to block the submarine transfer unless the Biden administration funded a massive increase in the US domestic production capacity.

The letter shows these concerns are widely held among Senate Republicans.

The senators say in their letter the US would have to produce up to 2.5 submarines a year – up from 1.2 boats currently – to make up for the sale of up to three submarines to Australia and avoid shrinking the US Navy’s operational capacity.

Speaking in Brisbane ahead of the annual Australia-US Ministerial (AUSMIN) consultations, Albanese said he was “very confident” Australia would secure Virginia-class submarines from the US.

“I met with Republicans and Democrats in Lithuania just a couple of weeks ago and what struck me was their unanimous support for AUKUS, the unanimous support for the relationship between the Australia and United States,” he said.

“It’s never been stronger.”

Albanese said that, just as in Australia, all legislation does not pass through the US Congress unanimously.

US ambassador Caroline Kennedy said on Friday she did not believe the AUKUS legislation had stalled as it was expected to take some time to pass through Congress.

“This is a hugely complex part of our annual defence appropriation budget and so there’s a lot of issues that go into that,” she said.

“There is absolutely bipartisan support for AUKUS in the US and the Australian alliance.”

Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Defence Minister Richard Marles are holding meetings with their US counterparts, Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin, on Friday before the joint AUSMIN dialogue on Saturday.

Opposition foreign affairs spokesman Simon Birmingham said the government faced “a critical test for Australian diplomacy to ensure that we maintain as broad a possible bipartisan support for the AUKUS arrangement throughout US politics and right across the US Congress”.

“And so it is critical that any concerns that are raised through those congressional proceedings are ones that we are across and that we are engaging and responding thoughtfully to, to make sure that support is strong, is bipartisan and is ongoing and consistent throughout the very long life that AUKUS has.”

The Republicans’ concerns seem to be mostly limited to the Senate given the US House of Representatives foreign affairs committee voted unanimously on Thursday (Australian time) to authorise the sale of up to two nuclear-powered Virginia-class submarines to Australia.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/a-risk-we-should-not-take-republican-resistance-mounts-to-nuclear-submarine-plan-20230728-p5ds0c.html

https://twitter.com/ashleytownshend/status/1684564646177689602

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19256945

File: 527604db9c16189⋯.jpg (173.31 KB,2048x1152,16:9,US_Secretary_of_State_Anto….jpg)

>>19188991

>>19250231

NZ Foreign Minister Nanaia Mahuta slams door shut on AUKUS

ANNE BARROWCLOUGH - JULY 28, 2023

A split has appeared in New Zealand’s leadership over AUKUS, as the country’s Foreign Minister ruled out joining the pact, only a day after Prime Minister Chris Hipkinsheld the door open to negotiations.

Hours after fronting the media with US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, who said the door was “very much open” for NZ to engage with AUKUS “as a trusted partner,” Nanaia Mahuta appeared to slam that door shut.

“I’ll be really clear, we’re not contemplating joining AUKUS,” Ms Mahuta told reporters.

On a visit to NZ’s capital on Thursday, Mr Blinken said Washington wanted to use Wellington’s “complex” relationship with countries in the region, “to defend the Indo-Pacific so nations make their own decisions free from coercion,” – a pointed dig at China.

Ms Mahuta had appeared cautiously positive about NZ joining pillar 2 of the pact – the non-nuclear aspect that includes the sharing of advanced technologies - during a press conference with Mr Blinken, saying that “at an official level”, the government was exploring what participating in Aukus would look like before it was taken to cabinet.

Mr Hipkins’ strongly positive comments the previous day were seen as a significant move toward AUKUS. Just two months ago Mr Hipkins had dismissed the pillar two issue as “purely hypothetical.”

Ms Mahuta’s remarks reflect unease in Labour – which introduced its non-nuclear policy in the mid 1980s – over the pact. Many in the party believe that even joining pillar 2 would be a step too far, not just for a wary NZ public but for its valued relationship with Pacific nations and with China, NZ’s largest trading partner.

Senior politicians on both sides of the political divide, from Gerry Brownlee, former foreign minister in John Key’s National government to former Labour PM Helen Clark, have also warned against any such move.

Ms Clark, who signed NZ’s Free Trade Agreement with China in 2008, believes any association with AUKUS would damage NZ’s reputation for an independent foreign policy, while Mr Brownlee has warned against seeing China as the enemy.

While Australia weathered China’s bad tempered economic coercion and found new export markets, NZ could not survive equivalent bullying by a country that is responsible for one third of it exports.

The fear is justifiable, says Geoffrey Miller, geopolitical analyst at the Democracy Project.

“Joining AUKUS, even the non-nuclear pillar, would be a red line for China,” he told The Australian. “Beijing has tolerated a lot from NZ, even Chris Hipkins going to NATO. But NATO was focused on Russia, while AUKUS is centred on China. Signing up to it would be crossing the rubicon and NZ would have to be prepared for repercussions.”

Others question the value in signing up, pointing out that while NZ would have access to technologies, AI and sophisticated undersea capabilities, much of this would be accessible to Wellington anyway while military technologies would be of limited use to a small country with a small defence force far away from the super powers.

“We don’t need military technology in peace time and if we were going to have to fight we’d never have to go it alone,” said Benjamin Macintyre of the NZ Initiative.

”In time of war we would always be fighting alongside Australia and the US.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/nz-foreign-minister-nanaia-mahuta-slams-door-shut-on-aukus/news-story/cc35ea98e8eb12226a142f0f1d5f2d0e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19256981

File: 6a3b52a41da65b0⋯.jpg (335.2 KB,2000x1334,1000:667,US_Secretary_of_Defence_Ll….jpg)

File: f65b85f21b35b4b⋯.jpg (3.98 MB,7430x4956,3715:2478,The_drive_to_accelerate_mi….jpg)

>>19188991

>>19250231

‘Hugely significant’: Australia to manufacture and export missiles to US

Matthew Knott - July 28, 2023

Australia is set to begin manufacturing its own missiles within two years under an ambitious plan that will allow the country to supply guided weapons to the United States and possibly export them to other nations.

The push to accelerate the creation of a local missile manufacturing industry in co-operation with the US will be one of the centrepiece announcements at the Australia-United States Ministerial (AUSMIN) consultations on Saturday.

Both US and Australian officials are seeking to play down concerns the AUKUS pact could be derailed by division in the US Congress after 23 Senate Republicans warned they would not support the proposal to provide nuclear-powered submarines to Australia unless the US Navy doubled its own production capacity.

The joint missile manufacturing effort is being driven by the war in Ukraine, which has highlighted a troubling lack of ammunition stocks in Western nations including the US.

“This is really important for the industrial base of both of our countries,” Defence Minister Richard Marles said on Friday after meeting with US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin in Brisbane.

“It is hugely significant in terms of developing Australia’s defence industry. It will be very important in ensuring Australia has the necessary war stocks in the future.”

Marles said the announcement would significantly bring forward the planned opening of local missile factories, which had been expected to take several years to get off the ground.

As well as creating local jobs, a domestic missile manufacturing industry will make Australia less reliant on imports and provide a trusted additional source of munitions for the US.

US defence contracting giants Lockheed Martin and Raytheon have been selected by the government as preferred partners for its guided weapons and explosive ordnance enterprise, which was identified as a priority by the recent defence strategic review.

The US and Australia will also announce plans to upgrade air bases in northern Australia so they can be used for training exercises by both Australian and American troops.

The Scherger and Curtin air bases, located in Queensland and Western Australia respectively, are regarded as bare bases, meaning they have limited infrastructure and are run by a small caretaker staff.

In a sign of a growing backlash to the submarine plan in Washington DC, 23 Republican senators, including the party’s Senate leader Mitch McConnell, wrote in a letter to US President Joe Biden: “The administration’s current plan requires the transfer of three US Virginia-class attack submarines from the existing US submarine fleet without a clear plan for replacing these submarines.

“This plan, if implemented without change, would unacceptably weaken the US fleet even as China seeks to expand its military power and influence.”

The Republican senators said the US required 66 Attack-class submarines, but the number of boats in its fleet is set to decline to 46 by 2030.

While noting that AUKUS enjoyed strong in-principle bipartisan support, the senators said: “Under the current AUKUS plan to transfer US Virginia-class submarines to a partner nation before meeting the Navy’s own requirements, the number of available nuclear submarines in the US submarine fleet would be lowered further.

“This is a risk we cannot take.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19256986

File: 76e8b22bec69939⋯.jpg (2.99 MB,6000x4000,3:2,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>19256981

2/2

Describing the congressional negotiations as “colour and movement”, Marles said: “We’re not worried about that … I’m confident about the progress of Australia acquiring a nuclear-powered submarine capability. We are encouraged by the progress of legislation through Congress.”

US ambassador to Australia Caroline Kennedy insisted that the submarine plan was “not at risk at all” and dismissed suggestions negotiations had stalled.

“This is a hugely complex part of our annual defence appropriation budget and so there’s a lot of issues that go into that,” she told ABC radio. “There is absolutely bipartisan support for AUKUS in the US and the Australian alliance.”

Speaking before a meeting with Foreign Minister Penny Wong on Friday, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said: “We have no greater friend, no greater partner, no greater ally than Australia. And I don’t think that alliance or partnership has ever been stronger, at least in my experience.”

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said he was “very confident” Australia would secure at least three Virginia-class submarines from the US.

“I met with Republicans and Democrats in Lithuania just a couple of weeks ago and what struck me was their unanimous support for AUKUS, the unanimous support for the relationship between the Australia and United States,” he said.

Ashley Townshend, a senior fellow for Indo-Pacific security at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said it would take several billion dollars in extra investment from the US government to meet the Republican senators’ demand to increase submarine production from 1.2 to 2.5 vessels a year.

The AUKUS legislation was still likely to pass through Congress this year, but the process would be “messy”, he said.

Opposition foreign affairs spokesman Simon Birmingham said the government faced “a critical test for Australian diplomacy to ensure that we maintain as broad as possible bipartisan support for the AUKUS arrangement throughout US politics and right across the US Congress”.

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/hugely-significant-australia-to-manufacture-and-export-missiles-to-us-20230728-p5ds5e.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19257022

File: 505443064782d84⋯.jpg (3.65 MB,5230x3487,5230:3487,A_mural_depicting_Julian_A….jpg)

>>19243381

Assange supporters call for release ahead of US talks

Andrew Brown - July 28 2023

Julian Assange supporters are urging Australia's senior ministers to push for the WikiLeaks founder's release from prison when they meet officials from the United States.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese joined his defence and foreign affairs ministers at meetings with the US secretary of state and defence secretary in Brisbane on Friday.

Further meetings will take place over the weekend.

The brother for Mr Assange, Gabriel Shipton, said the talks were one of the last face-to-face meetings between the ministers before the 51-year-old faced extradition from England to the US.

"Julian is inches away from extradition to the USA," Mr Shipton said in a statement.

"The meeting between the secretary of state and the prime minister could be the last chance to put a stop to Julian's nightmare."

Assange has been held in prison in London since 2019, after thousands of documents were leaked in 2010 about US operations in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

In 2021, a British judge ruled Assange not be extradited to the US due to concerns for his mental health, but the decision was overturned on appeal.

While Mr Albanese has previously raised Mr Assange's plight with US President Joe Biden, Mr Shipton said the case needed to brought to attention at the latest talks.

"Each day the US administration ignores the Australian public on Julian's freedom it becomes clearer and clearer Australia's true standing in the alliance," he said.

US ambassador to Australia Caroline Kennedy said she understood the concerns raised by Assange supporters.

"For Julian Assange, it means a lot that he has this kind of support, but we're just going to have to see what happens," she told ABC Radio.

"This has been raised at the highest levels of our government, but it is an ongoing legal case, so the Department of Justice is really in charge."

Opposition foreign affairs spokesman Simon Birmingham said relations between the US and Australia would not be damaged if Mr Assange's plight was raised.

"No doubt it would be in everybody's best interest to see the matters resolved more expeditiously than has proven to be the case so far," he said.

"Obviously a lot of the delays in the Julian Assange case that has dragged on for so many years have in part been a function of Mr Assange's own decisions, including the very long period of time that he chose to put himself in the Ecuadorian embassy in London and avoid any type of legal proceedings."

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/8286859/assange-supporters-call-for-release-ahead-of-us-talks/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19257040

File: 0c907d34fad4262⋯.jpg (350.23 KB,2048x1152,16:9,A_ship_laden_with_iron_ore….jpg)

File: a998cfa282925af⋯.jpg (2.27 MB,4946x3297,4946:3297,China_s_Ambassador_to_Aust….jpg)

Darwin port review ‘holds back’ China ties

BEN PACKHAM - JULY 28, 2023

Uncertainty over the future of the Chinese-owned Port of Darwin has emerged as a barrier to the restoration of relations with Beijing, which says tensions over the “blue bridge” between the countries could slow the relaxation of trade sanctions on Australian exports.

As Anthony Albanese weighs an invitation to visit Beijing before the end of the year, a senior Chinese government official urged the “quick conclusion” of a review of the port’s Chinese ownership, saying the issue was undermining the stabilisation of bilateral ties.

The official said the port’s owner, Landbridge, was having difficulties sourcing finance from Chinese banks amid ongoing doubts over its tenure, while the treatment of Chinese investors by the Foreign Investment Review Board remained a key irritant.

The warning came as China’s ambassador to Australia, Xiao Qian, declared relations between the countries were at a “critical juncture” and called on the Albanese government to “stay on the right path to get along”.

Despite China’s ongoing coercive trade sanctions and its detention of Australians Cheng Lei and Yang Hengjun, Mr Xiao said China-Australia relations were “stabilising and improving”.

“It is time for the two sides to earnestly implement the important consensus reached by our leaders, uphold the original aspiration of establishing diplomatic ties, and stay on the right path to get along,” he said.

Mr Xiao hosted Australian and foreign defence attaches at the Chinese embassy in Canberra on Thursday at a reception to mark the 96th anniversary of the formation of China’s People’s Liberation Army.

He said the PLA was an “army of victory, discipline and peace”, and China’s military modernisation “will not pose a threat to any other country”.

The officer cadet band from the Royal Military College at Duntroon entertained guests at the function, playing the Chinese and Australian national anthems. Australia was represented by an army brigadier and a senior defence public servant.

A video extolling the PLA’s virtues played on large television screens, casting the two million-strong force as “undaunted by danger” and “ready to extend benevolence and love across oceans”.

The Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet confirmed it had completed a review of Landbridge’s 99-year lease over the Port of Darwin at the Prime Minister’s request.

The review was now under consideration by the government, a PM&C spokesman said.

It follows a previous review for the Morrison government that reportedly found no grounds to overturn the lease, which was originally signed in 2015, although its control of the key strategic asset has been branded by many as a security risk, and an impediment to greater use of Darwin’s harbour by the US military.

Beijing is also mains furious at Australia’s ban on “high risk” telcos Huawei and ZTE, and government concerns on TikTok and Chinese-made security cameras.

The function came as a Chinese spy ship shadowed Australian and international forces participating in the ADF’s biggest exercise, Talisman Sabre.

The Dongdiao-class auxiliary general intelligence vessel is in international waters off the Queensland coast trying to collect information on participating militaries, including those of Australia, the US, and Japan.

Australia’s defence relationship with the US is set to be strengthened further at the weekend when US Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin join Australian counterparts Penny Wong and Richard Marles for AUSMIN talks in Brisbane.

The Chinese government wants Mr Albanese to visit Beijing by the end of the year, but the trip is yet to be finalised amid concerns China is yet to make significant concessions to Australia.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/darwin-port-review-holds-back-china-ties/news-story/f20a8ed95050d88046cc400d3a29f6ac

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19257074

File: b25e5307331f5ce⋯.jpg (442.97 KB,1920x1044,160:87,United_States_German_and_J….jpg)

File: b531c57d897a11a⋯.jpg (306.05 KB,1620x1080,3:2,United_States_German_and_J….jpg)

File: a4a6fa3b4470234⋯.jpg (408.05 KB,1733x1080,1733:1080,United_States_German_and_J….jpg)

File: c00d9b210aafc0a⋯.jpg (231.21 KB,1286x1080,643:540,United_States_German_and_J….jpg)

File: 5ce35f0af08126e⋯.jpg (252.15 KB,1835x1080,367:216,United_States_German_and_J….jpg)

>>19226439

>>19243643

United States, German and Japanese Military Forces Conduct Joint Amphibious Assault during Talisman Sabre 23

Staff Sgt. Jessica Elbouab, 133rd Mobile Public Affairs - July 27, 2023

MIDGE POINT, Australia - Sailors from USS New Orleans transported the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, German Army, and Japanese Self-Defense Forces service members ashore via a landing craft, air cushion operation as part of Talisman Sabre 23 at Midge Point, Australia on July 25, 2023.

Amphibious operations provide a combined-joint force commander the capability to rapidly project power ashore in support of crisis response at the desired time and location. The 31st MEU is continuously forward-deployed and provides a flexible and lethal force ready to perform a wide range of military operations.

“The exercise here is important because of all the joint forces - we integrate and we do all our training together,” said Sgt. Jorge Bravo, a U.S. Marine with the 31st MEU. “They have their own way of doing things, we have our own way of doing things, and we find the common ground in the middle - and we were better because of it.”

TS23 provides a key opportunity for bilateral collaboration and coordination required to carry out the entire suite of amphibious Marine Air Ground Task Force missions across air, sea, and land. Sustained operations at remote destinations while balancing the complexities of modern crisis are the backbone of the 31st MEU’s capabilities.

“The reason these types of activities are important is to make sure that when we work together as partner nations, things like your tactics, techniques and procedures are known and issues such as communications and language barriers are overcome,” said Lt. Col. Adam Murgatroyd, Australian Defense Forces, Officer In Charge, Midge Point, Talisman Sabre 23. “So, when we conduct activities for real, that confusion is not present.”

World events underscore the urgency to develop the multi-domain operating capability, especially here in the Indo-Pacific.

https://www.pacom.mil/Media/News/News-Article-View/Article/3474110/united-states-german-and-japanese-military-forces-conduct-joint-amphibious-assa/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19257140

File: 2666be0e963b226⋯.jpg (172.07 KB,1986x1117,1986:1117,Brittany_Higgins_outside_t….jpg)

File: 8cc0e0836e895d4⋯.jpg (107.88 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Board_of_inquiry_chair_Wal….jpg)

>>19194509

>>19204809

Who will take the fall for the Lehrmann controversy?

CHRIS MERRITT - JULY 27, 2023

1/2

There is really only one issue to look for next week when Walter Sofronoff gives the government of the ACT the report of his inquiry into the disastrous Brittany Higgins rape trial.

Will anyone take the fall for the now abandoned rape prosecution of Bruce Lehrmann?

Will blame be divided among the individuals who were targeted by the ACT government in the terms of reference it drew up for Sofronoff’s inquiry?

Or will Sofronoff take a broader approach, one that would enable him to consider the impact of legal structures that have been put in place by the government itself?

Before the collapse of this prosecution, some of those structures might have seemed unremarkable – or even beneficial.

But if the ACT is to avoid a repeat of this affair, policymakers might need to reassess the system they created.

Would it be useful, for example, to draw a distinction between those people who merely believe they are victims of criminal conduct, and those whose accusations have been tested and proven in court?

Some might dismiss this as nitpicking. But ignoring this distinction can erode the presumption of innocence, prejudice potential jurors and lead to bizarre outcomes.

Why, for example, did the ACT government leave the way open for Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates to accompany Brittany Higgins during media appearances when she was a complainant, but not a proven victim of crime?

What sort of signal does that send to potential jurors?

It might also be time to take another look at the future role of the Director of Public Prosecutions and whether it needs to focus exclusively on the core business of prosecuting.

One of the benefits of having an independent DPP is that it distances prosecutors from other arms of the state including the government which, by definition, is subject to political influence.

Yet in his submission to Sofronoff, DPP Shane Drumgold had this to say: “The current VCC, Ms Heidi Yates, and I are both executives in the ACT government and, as such, we both attend the joint executive committee regularly.”

Sofronoff has all the authority he needs in order to look beyond the conduct of individuals and identify systemic problems that might have contributed to the collapse of this prosecution.

The preamble to his terms of reference says the government is concerned to ensure that the framework for criminal prosecutions is robust, fair and respects the rights of those involved.

None of those qualities was apparent in the Lehrmann case.

It is unrealistic to expect Chief Justice Lucy McCallum to overcome structural unfairness caused by others of which she was unaware.

Drumgold, who is now on extended leave, conceded during the inquiry that he had misled the Chief Justice, albeit inadvertently.

That incident alone makes it difficult to imagine he could ever return to work.

It concerned a file note that was incorrectly described to the judge as a contemporaneous record of his discussion with television journalist Lisa Wilkinson.

A critical part of that note was not contemporaneous. It was not written immediately after his discussion with Wilkinson. It was an addendum written by Drumgold after Wilkinson’s speech at a Logies ceremony caused a furore that delayed the criminal trial.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19257149

File: 457a039f6aa9328⋯.jpg (88.53 KB,922x1229,922:1229,CCTV_footage_of_Brittany_H….jpg)

File: 20a9e8c5bf4e95d⋯.jpg (59.38 KB,1541x867,1541:867,Bruce_Lehrmann_has_relentl….jpg)

>>19257140

2/2

Allegations were also made that Drumgold attempted to withhold police documents from Lehrmann’s defence lawyers, read Higgins’ confidential counselling notes and undermined Lehrmann’s presumption of innocence.

After the first trial was aborted because of juror misconduct, Drumgold declined to run a second trial but said he was still confident he could secure a conviction against Lehrmann.

His difficulties continued at the inquiry. Within 24 hours he changed his mind and withdrew an accusation that it was possible, if not probable, there had been a political conspiracy to prevent the case against Lehrmann from proceeding.

Anyone who watched the webcast of this inquiry could not help but be impressed by Sofronoff’s fairness and calm determination to uncover the facts.

But the seriousness of this affair is hard to overstate: the criminal justice system of the ACT failed at its core task.

It was incapable of providing Lehrmann with one of the most important rights that is supposed to be available to all Australians, regardless where they live: the right to a fair trial.

That right can protect individuals not just from the immense power of governments, but from those who are prepared to bypass the law and impugn others in the court of public opinion.

Before the trial was aborted, the prosecution case was in trouble. Key elements of Higgins’ testimony had been called into question.

By declining to run a second trial, Drumgold deprived Lehrmann of his day in court. And that means this affair will never be resolved.

It will divide the community into those who side with Lehrmann and those who side with Higgins. That division can never be overcome.

But there is a subset of disputes that are likely to be resolved in next week’s report. That should put an end to arguments that broke out during the inquiry as key players sought to offload odium on each other.

• Defence barrister Steven Whybrow had blamed Drumgold for what he said were breaches of his duty as an impartial prosecutor.

• Lisa Wilkinson sought to offload odium to Drumgold on the ground that he failed to explicitly instruct her not to make the Logies speech that delayed the trial.

• Drumgold sought to blame the AFP for what his counsel, Mark Tedeschi, said was its bizarre attitude to the Lehrmann prosecution and its failure to charge more people over sexual assault complaints.

Chris Merritt is vice-president of the Rule of Law Institute of Australia

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/legal-affairs/who-will-take-the-fall-for-the-lehrmann-controversy/news-story/bd2b59844ad9a9d9f7f1ca29a102cd3e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19257187

File: f5b965d031e12cb⋯.jpg (328.77 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Dr_Anthony_Fauci_now_a_dis….jpg)

>>19250326

Anthony Fauci has hailed Australia’s success in virtually eradicating HIV in inner Sydney

NATASHA ROBINSON - JULY 28, 2023

Top US medical advisor Anthony Fauci says Australia has demonstrated “proof of concept” that HIV can be eradicated, with the pockets of inner Sydney with large gay populations that have effectively stamped out the virus providing a powerful incentive to the world.

“It shows it can be done,” Dr Fauci told The Australian. “I think Australia as a nation and Sydney as a city should be congratulated on doing that, because once you prove a concept, it becomes an incentive.”

Dr Fauci, the chief medical advisor to seven US presidents who now holds the post of Distinguished Professor in the School of Medicine Georgetown University in Washington DC, has joined the International AIDS Society conference in Brisbane this week and spoken of his hopes for an HIV cure.

As the long-time director of the US’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and an immunologist, Dr Fauci has made major contributions to HIV research during his 50-plus years at the apex of public health.

He said he believes cancer immunotherapy drugs combined with a vaccine hold the best chance of providing a cure for HIV, saying “the science is looking promising”. But he’s not sure if it will be in his lifetime and is reluctant to put a timeframe on the venture.

“I think having been through this with my colleagues throughout the world including in Australia, it really is in many respects folly to make a time prediction,” Dr Fauci said. “

We’re making very important advances forward but we’re not there yet. We don’t know when or if we’re going to get there, but the science is looking promising.”

The IAS launched the Towards an HIV Cure program in 2011. At the time, Australian doctor Sharon Lewin, a pioneer and world expert in HIV research, said interventions that lead to a meaningful cure were “at least decades away”. Dr Lewin, now the president of the IAS, has said monoclonal antibody therapies were showing a lot of promise in HIV.

But in the meantime, it looks likely that many cities around the world will have effectively eradicated HIV by the time a cure comes to pass.

Research released by the Kirby Institute this week showed diagnoses of HIV in NSW had fallen 56 per cent over the past decade, similar to national trends, and inner-city Sydney from Potts Point to Marrickville, where more than 20 per cent of men are gay and bisexual, has had an 88 per cent decline in the number of HIV diagnoses from 2010 to 2022.

That means those areas have virtually met the international definition of having ended AIDS as a public health threat.

“It is very, very clear that you can suppress the virus to such a low level that the person who is being treated has actually essentially almost a normal life expectancy if treated early enough,” Dr Fauci said. “And the secondary effect is that is it’s impossible for that person to transmit the virus to somebody else. That’s not a cure but it’s a highly effective therapy.”

Scientists put the dramatic reduction in spread of HIV in parts of Sydney down to very high rates of testing, treatment and preventive measures. Ninety per cent of high-risk gay men in NSW were tested in the past 12 months and 80 per cent used PrEP.

Globally, HIV incidence has fallen by 38 per cent. Declines of about 50 per cent or more have been documented in the Netherlands, UK, Singapore and parts of the US, including New York and San Francisco. Zimbabwe, Nepal, Rwanda Eritrea, Lesotho, Eswatini and Malawi have had a greater than 70 per cent decline.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/anthony-fauci-has-hailed-australias-success-in-virtually-eradicating-hiv-in-inner-sydney/news-story/62e20b2e24029403430873ec7b4bbac4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19257272

File: e2671010af0f56f⋯.jpg (330.8 KB,2400x1440,5:3,Jim_Caviezel_who_stars_in_….jpg)

File: faff20d2b464e1c⋯.jpg (356.2 KB,825x1363,825:1363,DC_1.jpg)

File: de94ddb084a6bf9⋯.jpg (95.71 KB,1188x682,54:31,Dendy_Cinemas_1.jpg)

File: 8fe9ea4657c64bd⋯.jpg (588.31 KB,1188x1830,198:305,Dendy_Canberra_1.jpg)

>>19211499

>>19250396

US conservative hit Sound of Freedom to be shown in Australian cinemas

Dendy cinemas among those suggesting it will screen movie promoted by American right wing ‘due to overwhelming demand’, despite questions as to actual popularity

Josh Taylor - 28 Jul 2023

The “QAnon adjacent” film Sound of Freedom will be shown in several Australian cinemas in August, with the Mel Gibson co-owned chain Dendy among those saying it would screen the movie, citing “overwhelming demand”.

Sound of Freedom is based on the true story of Tim Ballard, a former homeland security department agent who tried to rescue children from sex traffickers in Colombia. Ballard is played by Jim Caviezel, who played Jesus Christ in Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ.

The film does not directly reference QAnon, a baseless conspiracy theory that asserts Democrats are a cabal of Satan worshippers who traffic children for sex. However, Caviezel has pushed claims of the conspiracy theory in the past, and when promoting the film on Steve Bannon’s podcast, dropped the QAnon line “there is a big storm coming”.

The $15m film has passed $100m in sales in the United States, but questions have been raised over how many people are actually seeing it. A social media campaign from QAnon followers that encouraged watchers to buy up seats for “someone who would otherwise not be able to see the film” has reportedly resulted in cinemas selling out sessions but with many vacant seats during the sessions.

Sound of Freedom will be released in Australia and New Zealand on 24 August, and Dendy – the cinema chain co-owned by Gibson – posted on social media on Thursday that “due to overwhelming demand” it would screen the film.

Dendy did not say which cinemas would run the film, but the company has five cinemas across New South Wales, Queensland and the ACT.

The film is also listed as coming soon on the websites of Hoyts, Orpheum and Event cinemas. Guardian Australia sought comment from those cinemas, as well as Dendy.

Event Cinemas said: “As part of our wide variety of programming, Event Cinemas is working with the local distributor of Sound of Freedom to screen locally from 24 August.”

The biggest support for the film from the rightwing comes from former US president Donald Trump, who last week hosted a screening at Trump National golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey. The event was attended by Ballard, Caviezel, Bannon and Kari Lake, a former candidate for governor of Arizona who promoted the “big lie” of the stolen election.

In an email after the event, Trump said the film “has been a national sensation and a colossal success at the box office, really big numbers, everyone should see it”.

“This is a very important film and very important movie and it’s a very important documentary all wrapped up in one. It’s really about an issue that has to be discussed.”

The production company, Angel Studios, clarified in a recent blog post that the film “took creative liberties in depicting the different methods of child trafficking”. It said other aspects of the film, such as Ballard killing someone and going solo into the jungle, were fiction.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jul/28/australian-cinema-chain-co-owned-by-mel-gibson-to-screen-us-conservative-hit-sound-of-freedom

https://twitter.com/DendyCinemas/status/1684370773840994305

https://www.dendy.com.au/

https://canberra.dendy.com.au/movie/sound-of-freedom

https://newtown.dendy.com.au/movie/sound-of-freedom

https://southport.dendy.com.au/movie/sound-of-freedom

https://portside.dendy.com.au/movie/sound-of-freedom

https://coorparoo.dendy.com.au/movie/sound-of-freedom

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19257385

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19211499

>>19250396

>>19257272

QAnon-link film gets local release

The low-budget film about child sex trafficking, starring Jim Caviezel, has been widely embraced by conservative and right-wing commentators, will premiere in August

GEORDIE GRAY - July 28, 2023

Sound of Freedom, a micro-budget independent film with links to QAnon that became an unlikely box office hit in America, will be released in Australia in August.

The film, made on a budget of $US14.5 million ($21.6 million), has taken in an astonishing $US130 million ($191 million) at the box office since its opening on July 4th.

Sound of Freedom stars Jim Caviezel as Tim Ballard, a former federal agent who founded the anti-trafficking organisation Operation Underground Railroad. It follows his mission through Colombia to save a girl from child traffickers. During the Trump presidency, Ballard co-chaired a council established to guide federal anti-trafficking policymaking.

Sound of Freedom was released by the ‘faith-based’ distributor Angel Studios, whose previous successes include The Chosen, a streaming series about the life of Jesus. Angel relies on crowd-funding to boost its projects. The New York Times reports that more than 7,000 “angel investors” raised USD$5 million ($7.45 million) in exchange for revenue-sharing to market Sound of Freedom.

Though the film tells a nonpartisan story, it has been championed by both mainstream conservatives and far-right figures in America. South Carolina Senator Tim Scott called it an “amazing, gut-wrenching, emotive movie,” while Senator Ted Cruz of Texas encouraged his followers on Twitter to see it: “Wow. Wow. Wow.”

In July, former President Donald Trump hosted a screening of the film at his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey, with Caviezel, Ballard, and actor Eduardo Verástegui in attendance. In an email after the event, Trump wrote, “This is a very important film and a very important movie, and it’s a very important documentary all wrapped up in one. It’s really about an issue that has to be discussed.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19257404

File: f1338e091061309⋯.jpg (130.23 KB,1280x720,16:9,Luc_s_Avila_and_Jim_Caviez….jpg)

File: 5ec78e1ad869db1⋯.jpg (274.97 KB,825x762,275:254,TC_1.jpg)

File: 9fc584310053b01⋯.jpg (129.77 KB,1280x720,16:9,Caviezel_with_director_Mel….jpg)

File: 9ca7a16b3c0b5a6⋯.jpg (119.32 KB,852x318,142:53,Q_3635.jpg)

>>19257385

2/2

The film has become a lightning rod, with some critics saying it appeals to the QAnon movement, which posits a baseless conspiracy theory accusing progressive elites of paedophilia.

The film’s star, Caviezel, who played the title role in Mel Gibson’s 2004 film The Passion of the Christ, seemed to allude to QAnon while promoting Sound of Freedom on the podcast of far-right figure and former Trump adviser Steve Bannon, repeating the movement’s motto “there is a big storm coming” and mentioning “adrenochrome,” a hormone that QAnon believers say elites harvest from their child victims.

Despite Caviezel’s comments, Sound of Freedom itself doesn‘t contain any references to adrenochrome or other conspiracy theories. Neal Harmon, Angel’s chief executive, said, “Anybody who watches this film knows that this film is not about conspiracy theories,” adding, ”it’s not about politics.”

Anticipation for the film’s Australian premiere is soaring, with Icon Film Distribution slated to release it on August 24th. Dendy Theatres, co-owned by actor Mel Gibson, has already announced its screening in response to an overwhelming public demand.

“Since Sound of Freedom launched in the US, demand has been building around the world in dozens of regions and languages,” Angel Studios‘ executive Jared Geesey said. “Child trafficking is a global issue, and we hope to build on the incredible momentum here in the States and share the film’s powerful message worldwide.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/arts/unlikely-blockbuster-sound-of-freedom-heads-to-australian-theatres/news-story/5a9b1038010c8004bb2208cc03e0ba89

https://twitter.com/tedcruz/status/1676794946391625728

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rt0kp4VW1cI

Q Post #3635

Nov 25 2019 16:34:40 (EST)

Sometimes a good 'movie' can provide a lot of truth and/or background.

'Official Secrets.'

Relevant today?

Enjoy the show!

Q

https://qanon.pub/#3635

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19262114

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19226439

Four feared dead after military chopper crashes near Hamilton Island

BEN PACKHAM and TRICIA RIVERA - JULY 29, 2023

1/2

Four Australian Defence Force members are missing, feared dead, after a helicopter crash during the Talisman Sabre military exercise in Queensland.

A search and rescue mission involving Australian and US Defence Force personnel is underway off Hamilton Island for the crew of the MRH-90 helicopter, which went down about 10.30pm on Friday.

Emerging from Australia-United States Ministerial Consultation (AUSMIN) talks in Brisbane on Saturday, Defence Minister Richard Marles said the meeting was conducted with “heavy hearts”.

Mr Marles and Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong met with United States Secretary of State Antony Blinken and US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin.

“Exercise Talisman Sabre involves a number of countries, but it is fundamentally a bilateral exercise between Australia and the United States. It’s jointly planned by our two countries and jointly run by our two countries. It is so important for both of our defence forces,” Mr Marles said.

“It’s serious. It is dangerous. And it does carry risk. And as we have contemplated that during the course of our deliberations today. We are reminded that, as our Defence Force personnel have been conducted side-by-side today, they have been side-by-side for more than a century, during which Australians and Americans have fought together in every conflict during that time.”

Earlier on Saturday, the Deputy Prime Minister said a second helicopter involved in the exercise immediately began the search, but the four were yet to be found.

“The families of the four aircrew have been notified of this incident and our hopes and our thoughts are very much with the aircrew and their families,” he said.

“Our hopes are very much with the efforts of the search and rescue crews as they go about their work right now.”

“They carry risk and as we desperately hope for better news during the course of this time, we are reminded about the gravity of the act which comes with wearing our nation’s uniform.”

Senator Wong praised the US as a “vital ally” and said her thoughts are with the missing ADF members families and search and rescue crews.

“We are reminded that those who serve our country do so recognising the risk that that service entails and demonstrating, every day, the courage to take on that risk on our behalf. And we thank them for it,” she said.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, appearing in a press conference alongside his Australian hosts, said his heart is “full of concern” following the crash overnight.

“And our hearts are full, too, because they were performing their duties alongside American servicemen and women to further strengthen our alliance, our partnership, and the work we‘re doing together around the world. They have been on our minds throughout today. They remain very much on our minds right now,” he said.

Mr Blinken also spoke of his deep connection with Australia, sharing that his late stepfather studied in the country.

“It also holds a special place in the hearts of so many Americans. Indeed, in Australia, Americans know they have one of their dearest friends, their staunchest allies, their closest partners.”

US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin said America was ready to throw its support behind Australia to locate the missing crew.

“The United States is assisting with search-and-rescue efforts, and we will continue to help in any way that we can. I’ve told the Deputy Prime Minister that whatever he needs, we stand ready to provide assistance,” he said.

“Our meetings today reaffirm the strength of our unbreakable alliance. And the strategic alignment between our countries has never been greater. We share a common vision of a free and open Indo Pacific. We‘re committed to investing further in our alliance to uphold this vision.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19262129

File: 7ef6f93228745cc⋯.jpg (258.68 KB,825x1070,165:214,AA_12.jpg)

File: 8c6ab375796b236⋯.jpg (364.41 KB,825x1235,165:247,PCMP_1.jpg)

File: ad2ae5776dff7d2⋯.jpg (139.54 KB,768x1024,3:4,A_search_and_rescue_missio….jpg)

File: 9feea7b20d38925⋯.jpg (272.55 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Talisman_Sabre_is_the_coun….jpg)

>>19262114

2/2

Anthony Albanese also issued a statement and said his thoughts were with the loved ones of the ADF members yet to be found.

“All Australians hold them in our hearts and we hold on to hope as the search and rescue teams go about their work right now. We have the utmost confidence in their professionalism and skill,” the Prime Minister said.

Talisman Sabre Exercise Director Brigadier Damian Hill confirmed that as of Saturday night the pilots are still missing.

He said the pause on the exercise had been lifted, with limited activity commencing mostly in Western Australia and the Northern Territory.

“As a precaution the ADF has established an operational pause for all of our MRH-90 fleet. And again for those service members, those veterans, and those members of the community that are suffering as a consequence of this, I ask that you reach out to the relevant support networks,” Brigadier Hill said.

Queensland Police Acting Assistant Commissioner Douglas McDonald said the mission remains a search and rescue.

“At this time we have located a number items of debris that would appear to be from the missing helicopter. They will form part of the investigation as we move forward into what has occurred up there,” he said.

The Chief of the Defence Force Angus Campbell said the ADF’s focus was “finding our people and supporting their families”.

“This is indeed a terrible moment,” General Campbell said.

The US military is assisting with the search, along with Queensland Police and the Australian Maritime Safety Agency.

Liberal MP and manager of opposition business Paul Fletcher called the news of the missing ADF members “absolutely devastating”.

“Part of Operation Talisman Sabre, which is a very important military exercise [to] Australia, the US, a whole range of other countries, it’s very important that our military are training for the job that they may have to do one day, we all hope they never have to do, but they may have to do one day,” he said on Sky News.

“But it is an inherently dangerous job serving our country, so I know all of us will be thinking of their families at this difficult time and obviously awaiting what sadly we expect will be the official confirmation of loss of life.”

The crash follows another in March involving an army MRH-90.

In that incident, 10 ADF personnel, including special forces members, escaped when the helicopter they were in crashed off Jervis Bay in NSW.

The helicopter was flying over the water during a counter-terrorism training exercise when it lost power to its main rotor, forcing it to ditch in the water.

The European-designed MRH-90s, which are being replaced by US-made Black Hawks, have experienced long-running maintenance problems and poor reliability.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/four-feared-dead-after-military-chopper-crashes-near-hamilton-island/news-story/dc732cbeeec64701934c7cd540c2591e

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBiG_YtqhoE

https://twitter.com/AlboMP/status/1685086073939169280

https://twitter.com/PatConroy1/status/1685103910187646976

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19262158

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19226439

>>19262114

Crashed military helicopter has history of safety issues

Amber Schultz - July 29, 2023

The military helicopter involved in a horror crash off the coast of Queensland, leaving four feared dead, has a problematic history with nearly a dozen recorded safety incidents linked to MRH-90 Taipan helicopters.

The helicopter ditched into the water about 10.30pm on Friday off the coast of Hamilton Island while on a two-helicopter mission as part of the Talisman Sabre joint exercise with America.

It is the second incident this year, following a crash in Jervis Bay in March during a counterterrorism military training exercise.

That helicopter was forced to make an emergency landing after an engine failure. Of the ten soldiers on board, two suffered minor injuries.

Defence Minister Richard Marles confirmed at that time that a decision had been made to replace the helicopters and argued that they had been in use for a “considerable amount of time”.

In 2021, then-defence minister Peter Dutton announced the European-made helicopters would be replaced with new Black Hawks and Seahawks imported from the United States.

“Taipan has been a project of concern for the last decade; it’s had nine instances where it’s been unsuitable to fly,” Dutton said at the time.

Former prime minister John Howard had originally been advised by Defence to purchase the Black Hawks over the Taipan back in 2004.

Since being added to the Australian Defence Force fleet in 2007, the multi-role helicopters, which weigh more than six tonnes, have been involved in a raft of other safety incidents.

In 2019, the 47-strong Taipan fleet was grounded after a helicopter was forced to land due to a tail rotor vibration.

The fleet was also limited on certain missions due to problems with the auxiliary power unit that prevented the aircraft from shutting down its main engines.

In 2020, 27 helicopters were grounded after cabin sliding door rails were deemed unserviceable. Officials later revealed the doors were too narrow to allow its gun to fire while troops were descending from the aircraft.

In 2021, Defence revealed it hired civilian helicopters in Townsville to maintain capacity due to long-running issues with the MRH-90, at a cost of over $37 million.

As revealed in parliament late last year, the helicopters had an estimated hourly operational cost of $48,000. Base maintenance costs remained the same regardless of whether the aircraft was being flown or not.

The government has listed the Taipan as a “project of concern” since 2013.

A 2014 Australian National Audit Office report found the MRH-90 Program was “dealing with a range of challenges related to immaturity in the MRH-90 system design and the support system”.

The helicopters needed a range of design reworks to enable them to operate in high-threat environments, leading to costs ballooning to over four times the original $1 billion budgeted, the report found.

Australian Defence Force chief Angus Campbell said the crash was a terrible moment.

“Our focus at the moment is finding our people and supporting their families and the rest of our team,” he said.

Marles said on Saturday morning his hopes were with the efforts of the search and rescue crews. “As we desperately hope for better news during the course of this day, we are reminded about the gravity of the act which comes with wearing our nation’s uniform.”

https://www.theage.com.au/national/crashed-military-chopper-has-problematic-history-of-safety-issues-20230729-p5ds82.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVezF_TUxEM

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19262255

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19226439

>>19262114

Talisman Sabre helicopter crash: Hopes fade for missing air crew

Greg Stolz, Madura McCormack, Janessa Eckert, Charles Miranda and Samantha Scott - July 30, 2023

1/2

Four Australian Army aviators are feared dead after a horror chopper crash over the Whitsundays in what looms as the nation’s worst peacetime military disaster since 2005.

Wreckage was recovered from the waters off Hamilton Island on Saturday, more than 12 hours after the chopper went down in the middle of major international war game exercises.

In what Australia’s Defence chief described as “a terrible moment”, the MRH-90 Taipan ditched into the sea just before 11pm on Friday during Exercise Talisman Sabre.

It is feared the incident could become one of Australia’s worst peacetime military disasters since two Black Hawk helicopters collided near Townsville in 1996, killing 18 personnel, and the 2005 Nias Island Sea King crash which killed nine personnel.

Authorities were still publicly clinging to fading hopes the missing Taipan crew might still be found alive late on Saturday, saying they were still conducting a search and rescue mission.

The trouble-plagued Taipans – which have featured in Brisbane’s annual Riverfire festival and assisted in last year’s NSW and Victorian flood disasters – were earmarked to be “binned” due to significant reliability issues which resulted in the fleet grounded being in March this year after a choppers carrying 10 commandos was forced to ditch in shallow water at Jervis Bay.

The aviators aboard the stricken aircraft on Friday night were confirmed as being from Sydney’s 6th Aviation Regiment, Holsworthy Barracks.

On Saturday afternoon, rescue crews on a barge recovered what was believed to be the tail section of the Taipan.

A crane line was lowered into waters about 45m deep, 1.7 nautical miles off Denman Island.

Major pieces of the aircraft, including the cockpit, still remained under water on Saturday night as strong currents continued to hamper recovery efforts. Police boat Damien Leeding and Volunteer Marine Rescue vessel Midge Point also recovered debris as authorities established a 1km exclusion zone around the crash area in the Whitsunday Passage.

Navy fast boats, RACQ CQ Rescue and the Australian Coast Guard were also involved in the search and rescue mission involving 800 Australian, US and Canadian military personnel, 16 aircraft, navy ships, police and other authorities.

Specialist police and navy divers, as well as sonar equipment, are also being deployed.

Queensland Police Acting Assistant Commissioner Douglas McDonald confirmed the joint search and rescue mission with the Australian Defence Force had located items “that would appear to be from the missing helicopter”.

“They will form part of the investigation as we move forward into what has occurred up there,” he said.

“It remains a search and rescue operation.”

Mr McDonald urged beachgoers in the area who found debris washed up on the sand to contact police immediately.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19262268

File: 60521e3d5402d2a⋯.jpg (181.62 KB,1106x830,553:415,A_barge_anchored_at_the_si….jpg)

File: 074dc1ab8bc6a78⋯.jpg (176.87 KB,1535x1152,1535:1152,Wreckage_from_the_MRH_90_T….jpg)

File: e9de3d4bda3befc⋯.jpg (437.76 KB,1010x843,1010:843,ADF_helicopter_crash.jpg)

File: bf41419786a4593⋯.jpg (323.64 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Talisman_Sabre_Exercise_Di….jpg)

File: 6157b997ed4264b⋯.jpg (266.12 KB,2048x1152,16:9,All_47_of_the_European_des….jpg)

>>19262255

2/2

Defence Minister Richard Marles said the search and rescue mission was able to begin immediately due to the presence of the other helicopter taking part in the exercise.

“The families of the four aircrew have been notified of this incident and our hopes and our thoughts with the aircrew and their families,” he said.

“Our hopes are very much with the search and rescue crews as they go about their work right now.”

Chief of Defence General Angus Campbell said “our focus at the moment is finding the personnel and supporting their families and the rest of our team”.

“This is indeed a terrible moment,” he said.

“I really deeply appreciate the assistance that’s been provided by a variety of civil agencies; the Queensland Police, the Australian Maritime Safety Agency, and the public as well as our US allies, all of whom have come together to assist to continue the search and rescue and to find our people.”

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Australia’s thoughts were with the loved ones of the missing personnel.

“All Australians hold them in our hearts and we hold on to hope as the search and rescue teams go about their work right now,” he said in a statement.

“We have the utmost confidence in their professionalism and skill.”

Exercise Talisman Sabre, a biennial military exercise involving the more than 30,000 troops from the Australian and US defence forces and 13 other nations, was paused in the wake of the disaster.

TS23 director Brigadier Damian Hill said on Saturday afternoon that limited exercises had resumed in Western Australia and the Northern Territory, but all activities involving the Taipans remained grounded.

“I wanted our people to contact their families to let them know they were safe and what was happening,” Brigadier Hill said. “The families of the missing personnel have been notified.

“ I’d like to reiterate it is Defence’s priority to look after those families, their members, their teammates and those that know them.

“For those service members, those veterans and those members of the community that are suffering as a consequence of this, I ask that you reach out to the relevant support networks for those of us in the ADF.”

Australia’s issue-plagued fleet of MRH90 choppers was grounded in March after the incident at Jervis Bay.

All 10 personnel were recovered from the aircraft with no major injuries after that incident.

It is unclear if any of those personnel were involved in this latest incident.

All 47 of the European-designed MRH-90 Taipans were grounded as a result of the March incident, and the entire $3.8bn fleet was to be permanently abandoned by December 24, at least 13 years earlier than expected.

The operational pause on flying operations for the Taipans was lifted on April 6 with “risk mitigations in place,” a defence spokeswoman said.

The “risk mitigations” were not disclosed at the time.

https://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/talisman-sabre-helicopter-crash-hopes-fade-for-missing-air-crew/news-story/51f6d8267ecccb6f59922ac27809e282

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZqFmDXiV2Y

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19262307

File: 53d4eebe2caa1b9⋯.jpg (342.93 KB,2048x1152,16:9,US_Secretary_of_State_Anto….jpg)

>>19226439

>>19262114

US pledge to stand by Aussies after Talisman Sabre crash tragedy

Madura McCormack - July 30, 2023

Top military officials from Australia and the United States have declared their unwavering commitment to Exercise Talisman Sabre as they expressed sorrow for four personnel still missing after a catastrophic crash during war-games in north Queensland.

The disastrous ditching of an MRH90 Taipan during night-time exercise off Lindeman Island loomed large over high-level talks between Australian and American defence and foreign affairs officials in Brisbane.

The annual AUSMIN talks delivered significant progress in deepening Australian and US military ties and cementing itself in an increasingly contested Pacific, but the timing was inextricably linked to what is set to be the nation’s worst peacetime disaster in at least two decades.

The crash happened about 11pm on Friday night hours before Defence Minister Richard Marles and Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong were due to host their US counterparts Lloyd Austin and Antony Blinken 1000km away.

The incident cast a sombre mood over the start of the talks which also involved high profile ambassadors Kevin Rudd and Caroline Kennedy, and top military brass including Chief of Defence General Angus Campbell and Defence Department Secretary Greg Moriarty.

“We really are reminded as our two countries are exercising together in Talisman Sabre, that this is serious work, it is risky work,” Mr Marles said in his AUSMIN opening remarks.

Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong said the group’s thoughts were with the families of the aircrew still missing after the crash.

“We are reminded that those who serve our country do so recognising the risk that service entails and demonstrating every day the courage to take on that risk on our behalf,” she said.

The “unbreakable bond” between Australia and the United States was on full display, with American troops involved in the major search and rescue effort near Lindeman Island involving at least 1000 people across defence and Queensland emergency services.

Secretary of Defense Austin said the Americans stood ready to help Australia “in any way that we can” in the search and rescue of four aircrew personnel missing in North Queensland.

“I’ve told the Deputy Prime Minister that whatever he needs, we stand ready to provide,” he said.

The Sunday Mail has confirmed top defence officials from both nations will travel to North Queensland on Sunday to meet troops involved in Talisman Sabre as planned.

It’s understood military top brass advised the visit of leaders from both nations would have a positive impact on troops, with officials agreeing to continue on as planned on the proviso resources allocated to the search and rescue were not impacted.

Mr Marles backed the long-running Talisman Sabre war-games — which now involves more than 30,000 troops from 13 nations — as Australia’s “most important” biennial military exercise.

“It is so important for both of our defence forces. It’s serious, it is dangerous,” he said.

“You can’t have a capable defence force without it being match fit and it can’t be match fit unless it engages in training and exercises.

“Talisman Sabre is about … the Australian Defence Force and the US … making sure that we are capable in terms of the various skills and capacities that our defence forces have.

“But importantly, that we are capable in terms of the way in which we operate together and that interoperability is at the highest level possible.”

Mr Austin, who commanded US troops in Iraq, reflected on how “tough” it can be to have accidents in training.

“Our guys tend to make this look easy, and they make it look easy because they’re so well-exercised and versed in training and this is unfortunately part of that, what it takes to get them to what we need them to be,” he said.

https://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/us-pledge-to-stand-by-aussies-after-talisman-sabre-crash-tragedy/news-story/181e6d18f3c077b0e94b3d9aadcba56e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19262368

File: 4568cc1293645d8⋯.jpg (380.49 KB,1104x1303,1104:1303,TS_29.jpg)

File: 217eec774840573⋯.jpg (109.62 KB,1080x1080,1:1,364178109_657421883082472_….jpg)

>>19226439

>>19262114

Talisman Sabre Facebook Post

28 July 2023

Statement issued by Defence

Defence can confirm an Australian Army MRH-90 Taipan helicopter has impacted waters near Lindeman Island, off the Queensland coast. The aircraft was participating in a night-time training activity as part of Exercise Talisman Sabre 2023 when it was reported missing late Friday night, 28 July 2023. Four crew were on board the aircraft at the time of the incident and are currently missing.

Military and civilian search and rescue aircraft and watercraft are currently conducting search and rescue operations at the incident site.

At this time Defence’s priority is supporting our ADF members and their families. Families of affected personnel have been notified.

Families seeking information and support can call the Defence Member and Family Helpline at 1800 624 608.

Additional support services are available at https://www.defence.gov.au/adf-members-families/crisis-support/helpline.

https://www.facebook.com/talismansabre/posts/657421886415805

https://www.defence.gov.au/news-events/releases/2023-07-29/exercise-talisman-sabre-incident

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19262419

File: 9c411056da5b300⋯.jpg (280.96 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Australian_Defence_Ministe….jpg)

>>19204894

>>19256981

Secret space deal agreed to in AUSMIN talks as US green lights missile production in Australia

BEN PACKHAM - JULY 29, 2023

1/2

The US and Australia will embark on a secret new space partnership amid Chinese technological leaps that threaten US supremacy in the key military domain.

The initiative, which is likely to include the development of offensive space-based capabilities, was agreed at AUSMIN talks in Brisbane, where the US also vowed to help Australia to produce advanced new missile systems within three years.

US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin, Secretary of State Antony Blinken met with their Australian counterparts Richard Marles and Penny Wong on Saturday, declaring “enhanced space cooperation” a new priority for the nations’ “unbreakable alliance”.

Mr Marles refused to provide details of the cooperation when asked directly whether it would involve the development of space-based weapons.

“Space domain awareness will form part of the co-operation that we engage in between our two countries in terms of force posture arrangements in this area,” the Defence Minister said.

“That’ll probably be the extent of what any of us will ever say about what else we do in respect of co-operation involving space.”

The meeting occurred against the solemn backdrop of the feared deaths of four Australian Army soldiers in a helicopter accident off Hamilton Island, with all of the participants paying tribute to lost personnel.

Mr Austin said the US was stepping-up its force posture initiatives in Australia, with the new areas of cooperation requiring the nations to “sharpen our technological edge and strengthen our defence industrial bases”.

He said the Biden administration was “racing” to provide Australia will access to priority munitions, giving the green light for Australia to build US-designed Guided Multiple Launch Rocket Systems, known as GMLRS.

The joint AUSMIN statement said: “This is key to expanding the combined industrial power of the alliance and to building Australia’s industrial infrastructure and skilled workforce.”

The US will invest in upgrades to Australia’s northern bases and step-up the rotations of its military forces through Australia, with annual deployments of US Army watercraft units to operate with Australian counterparts.

The counterparts also announced plans for “more regular and longer visits” of US nuclear-powered submarines to Australia ahead of the deployment of US and British boats to Western Australia from 2027.

In addition to upgrades already underway at RAAF Bases Darwin and Tindal, preliminary work will be undertaken to upgrade so-called “bare bases” at Scherger and Curtin.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19262429

File: 06ce3fdabe5f041⋯.jpg (118.51 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Australia_will_have_access….jpg)

>>19262419

2/2

The Australian Defence Force’s Space Commander, Air Vice-Marshal Cath Roberts, has previously revealed Australia is working on a plan to acquire “soft-kill” capabilities to neutralise enemy satellites without creating destructive debris clouds.

China and Russia both have the ability to destroy, disable or move satellites in orbit.

The Lockheed Martin-manufactured GMLRS, which can be fired by HIMARS launchers being acquired by Australia, have a range of more than 70km and are highly accurate.

The AUSMIN talks ranged across the breadth of the nations’ “unbreakable” alliance and included a call by Senator Wong for the US to bring “to a conclusion” its case against Australian WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.

But Secretary Blinken told reporters that the US would not drop its pursuit of Mr Assange, who is fighting US attempts to extradite him from the UK, saying he was wanted for jeopardising the country’s security and putting intelligence operatives at risk.

“Mr Assange was charged with very serious criminal conduct in the United States, in connection with his alleged role in one of the largest compromises of classified information in the history of our country,” Mr Blinken said.

“The actions that he is alleged to have committed risked very serious harm to our national security, to the benefit of our adversaries, and put named human sources at grave risk, grave risk of physical harm, grave risk of detention.”

The meeting came amid a standoff in the US Congress over the nation’s nuclear submarine partnership, with Republicans demanding a more than 100 per cent increase in US submarine production before they will allow Virginia-class boaters to be transferred to Australia.

Mr Marles said the US visitors had “absolutely assured” Australia there was no threat to America’s AUKUS commitment to provide Australia with three to five nuclear submarines.

The talks focussed heavily on the strategic threat posed by China’s growing influence across the region and its surging military modernisation.

Mr Austin said the US would support any Australian effort to help Solomon Islands establish a military force amid a request by the country’s Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare, whose relationship with Beijing is a serious concerns for the allies.

“We share a common vision of a free and open Indo-Pacific,” he said. “We‘re committed to investing further in our alliance to uphold this vision.”

The counterparts affirmed their “strong opposition to destabilising actions in the South China Sea”, including China’s militarisation of disputed islands and reefs, and the unsafe behaviour of its ships and aircraft.

They also voiced concerns over China’s activities in the East China Sea, where it is developing natural resources in disputed areas, and warned against any “unilateral changes to the status quo” in relation to Taiwan.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/us-to-send-missiles-more-troops-to-australia/news-story/a0cf645c5c25377d20719662db792fc1

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19262483

File: f4bc63ba3fc16aa⋯.jpg (299.6 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Linda_Burney_is_no_match_f….jpg)

File: ce96fc84ecc0ca9⋯.jpg (124.79 KB,500x700,5:7,Prof_Ramesh_Thakur.jpg)

>>19222755

Reject race-based ‘poison’, privilege the Indigenous voice to parliament will deliver

RAMESH THAKUR - JULY 29, 2023

1/2

The voice referendum deserves to be defeated on the ethics of conviction and consequences. I write as a proud Australian of Indian heritage. I pay my respects to the Aboriginal communities that have lived here since Dreamtime; but also to the pioneers who established modern Australia as a stable and prosperous democracy, and to the visionary leaders who strove tirelessly to create a society that grants equal citizenship to everyone in a vibrant multicultural country.

I seek no privilege, right or obligation of citizenship not available to every Australian. I do claim, for myself and my descendants, every opportunity to participate in civic life. This is the ethic of conviction.

Using sectarian ancestry as the organising principle to add a chapter to the nation’s foundational governance document will inject the poison of race-based preferential access to parliament and government into the heart of the body politic.

In a curious juxtaposition, the US Supreme Court struck down race-based affirmative action policies in university admissions. Against efforts under way at de-racialising America, the Albanese government is bent on re-racialising Australia. I suspect most Australians do not realise the US suit was brought by Asian-Americans who have been the biggest victims of Harvard’s discriminatory admissions policies.

The ethic of conviction also rejects the soft bigotry of low expectations that cannot conceive of Aboriginal Australians as anything but dependent wards of the state. In 2007, US Chief Justice John Roberts argued: “The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.” The best way to harden and institutionalise racial identity is to carve it into the Constitution.

Hundreds of millions of people around the world are born into all manner of disadvantage. Some allow themselves to be sucked into a self-destructive cycle of victimhood and grievance; others resign themselves to a lifetime of disadvantage; but some, trapped in identical circumstances, apply themselves to escape the cycle through education, skills, ambition and application.

The number of successful Indigenous people across all sectors of Australian life has been growing. That is as much a reality of modern Australia as the persistent disadvantages and sorry statistics that continue to define Aboriginal life as “nasty, brutish and short”. Aboriginal leaders should forget the cheese of a voice and instead focus on escaping the trap of grievance-fuelling victimhood.

The first component of the ethic of consequences is a “sin of omission”. The overriding goal of the voice should be the difference it will make on the ground, not making us feel virtuous the morning after the referendum. Yet it will deliver no practical outcomes. I am yet to hear anyone describe a single effective, or even potentially effective, measure that cannot be implemented now by government without the voice, or one that will be helped in any form with the voice. Australians are familiar with the litany of failures afflicting Aboriginal communities. The voice will make little practical difference in remote communities to the metrics of life expectancy, literacy, housing, violence, incarceration rates, suicide rates, community safety and so on.

Most Australians would actively and wholeheartedly support practical and effective measures to bring an end to this woeful pathology. Entrenching the voice in the Constitution is a cynical ploy to substitute symbolism for substance, to codify both an alibi for inaction on the government’s part and the sense of grievance on Indigenous Australians’ part.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19262487

File: 951953f5fd15392⋯.jpg (505.98 KB,2048x2730,1024:1365,Indigenous_Australians_Min….jpg)

>>19262483

2/2

The ethic of consequences argues even more strongly on “sins of commission”. The harms the voice will cause to Australia will be many, substantial and long-lasting. The proposal has already caused polarisation and bitterness, dividing Aboriginal spokespeople, constitutional lawyers, jurists and citizens. Going by experience elsewhere, power, resources and influence will be concentrated in an elite dependent for continued existence and expanded power and resources on identifying ongoing disadvantage and grievance.

It will vastly complicate Australia’s challenge of effective and timely governance in the national interest for the common good. It will risk governmental paralysis, be complex in its bureaucratic sprawl, attract grifters and rent-seekers, prove costly in implementation and heighten disconnection and disenchantment on the ground.

The most powerful tool yet invented to make any governance problem permanent is to give it its own permanent bureaucracy.

That’s how bureaucracies work. Just look at how the DIE (diversity, inclusiveness and equity) industry has insinuated itself into every institution in the public and educational sectors, businesses, media and even sporting codes.

Polls indicate moral intimidation by the self-appointed custodians of public virtue to shame Australians into voting yes isn’t working. In part this is because the sales assistants are not on top of their game. Linda Burney is no match for the hard-hitting intellectual firepower and cut-through messaging skills of Jacinta Nampijinpa Price.

The sales pitch is also deeply flawed, riddled with confusion and mixed messages. How would another body solve Aboriginal disadvantages when all existing bodies with a $30bn combined annual budget have failed? At a time of falling trust in politicians, Anthony Albanese wants voters to sign on the dotted line and trust politicians to fill in the blanks later. To keep faith with Aboriginal people demanding a voice with punch, he assures them it will be meaningful and substantive. To allay concerns in the broader community, he insists it will be modest and symbolic.

Mostly, however, public support is slipping because the product itself is flawed. Its major effects will be to entrench identity politics, make Australia a more racially divided society, empower a new bureaucracy, make the task of governing more complicated, cumbersome and litigious, give oxygen to radicals making more extreme demands – and all for little practical gain in the daily lives of the vast majority of Aborigines.

The voice speaks not to all Australians’ better angels but to some white Australians’ guilt complex. Permanently codifying racial grievance into the Constitution will guarantee it is weaponised and monetised sometime in the future by activists making increasingly radical demands and stoking resentment and backlash. If approved, the voice will not mark the end of a successful process of reconciliation but the beginning of fresh claims for co-sovereignty, treaty and reparations, using the Constitution’s authority as the enabling mechanism.

Ramesh Thakur is emeritus professor at ANU’s Crawford School of Public Policy and is a former UN assistant secretary-general.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/reject-racebased-poison-privilege-the-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-will-deliver/news-story/3219ffaea3f8cf58183bf0a73329c891

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19262537

File: 1d47fc3cc539139⋯.jpg (990.06 KB,3233x2095,3233:2095,WikiLeaks_founder_Julian_A….jpg)

>>19243381

Julian Assange case has 'dragged on for too long', Australia's Wong says

Sam McKeith - July 29, 2023

SYDNEY, July 29 (Reuters) - Australia's Foreign Minister Penny Wong said on Saturday the long-running case of imprisoned Wikileaks founder Julian Assange had gone on too long and needs to be completed.

Assange, an Australian citizen being held in Britain, is battling extradition to the United States, where he is wanted on 18 charges over the release of confidential U.S. military records and diplomatic cables in 2010.

At a press conference in Brisbane after an Australia-U.S. meeting, Wong said Canberra had made it clear that "Mr Assange's case has dragged for too long, and our desire that it be brought to a conclusion".

Speaking alongside Defence Minister Richard Marles, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, Wong said representations had been made on behalf of Assange in public and private but there were limits on what could be done until his legal proceedings concluded.

"I understand that Mr Assange has filed a renewal of appeal application in the UK. The Australian government is not party to these legal proceedings, nor can we intervene," she said.

Blinken confirmed that Assange's case had been raised in the bilateral talks, saying he understood the views of Australians on the sensitive issue.

"Mr Assange was charged with very serious criminal conduct in the United States in connection with his alleged role in one of the largest compromises of classified information in the history of our country," Blinken told the press conference.

"The actions that he has alleged to have committed risk very serious harm to our national security."

Australia is backing a drive for Assange's release ahead of his possible extradition to the U.S. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said in May he was "frustrated" over the ongoing detention.

https://www.reuters.com/world/julian-assange-case-has-dragged-too-long-australias-wong-says-2023-07-29/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19262570

File: 066d9a7377f3257⋯.jpg (2.55 MB,6000x4000,3:2,Australian_Prime_Minister_….jpg)

>>19243381

Assange ‘endangered lives’: Top official urges Australia to understand US concerns

Matthew Knott - July 29, 2023

1/2

The United States’ top foreign policy official has urged Australians to understand American concerns about Julian Assange’s publishing of leaked classified information, saying the WikiLeaks founder is alleged to have endangered lives and put US national security at risk.

In the sharpest and most detailed remarks from a Biden administration official about the matter, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said Assange had been involved in one of the largest breaches of classified information in American history and had been charged with serious criminal conduct in the US.

Blinken’s comments, which represent a rare public display of disagreement between the US and Australia, highlighted the difficult task the Albanese government faces in its bid to convince the Biden administration to end its pursuit of Assange.

The US is seeking to extradite Assange from London’s Belmarsh prison to face 17 counts of breaching the US Espionage Act plus a separate hacking-related charge.

Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong said she had raised the federal government’s view in her discussions with US officials that Assange’s case had dragged on too long, but noted he had never faced trial, unlike Chelsea Manning, the freed former soldier who leaked top secret information to WikiLeaks in 2010.

Blinken and Wong were speaking in Brisbane following the annual Australia-United States Ministerial (AUSMIN) consultations, where the two nations agreed to work together on a plan for Australia to begin manufacturing guided multiple-launch rocket systems by 2025.

The nations also agreed to deepen co-operation on space technologies to counter China’s rapid investment in this domain, as well as fortifying Australia’s northern bases and increasing rotations of US troops through Australia.

Asked about the Biden administration’s position on the Assange case, Blinken said: “I really do understand and can certainly confirm what Penny said about the fact that this matter was raised with us, as it has been in the past.

“And I understand the sensitivities. I understand the concerns and views of Australians.

“I think it’s very important that our friends here understand our concerns about this matter.”

Blinken, who met Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on Friday, continued: “What our Department of Justice has already said repeatedly, publicly, is this: Mr Assange was charged with very serious criminal conduct in the United States in connection with his alleged role in one of the largest compromises of classified information in the history of our country.

“The actions that he is alleged to have committed risked very serious harm to our national security, to the benefit of our adversaries, and put named human sources at grave risk of physical harm, grave risk of detention.

“So I say that only because just as we understand sensitivities here, it’s important that our friends understand sensitivities in the United States.”

Wong said that “we have made clear our view that Mr Assange’s case has dragged on for too long and our desire that it be brought to a conclusion, and we’ve said that publicly, and you would anticipate that that reflects also the position we articulate in private”.

She added there were limits to what could be achieved until Assange’s legal processes had concluded. Manning’s case had reached a “different point in terms of legal proceedings” than that of Assange when Barack Obama commuted her sentence to a seven-year jail term.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19262577

File: dd42329cbe7a5c2⋯.jpg (2.23 MB,5184x3456,3:2,Assange_in_a_police_vehicl….jpg)

>>19262570

2/2

This masthead revealed earlier this year that US law-enforcement authorities were seeking to gather new evidence about Assange by attempting to interview his former ghostwriter, acclaimed British writer Andrew O’Hagan.

Assange’s supporters reacted angrily to Blinken’s comments. Greg Barns, a legal adviser to the Australian Assange campaign, said: “Australia is the US’s closest ally. Mr Blinken needs to understand the overwhelming view of Australians which is that enough is enough.

“Julian must be released immediately and be able to rejoin his family.”

US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin said the AUSMIN talks had resulted in an “exceptional set of achievements”, including a US commitment to help Australia produce guided multiple-launch rocket systems, known as GMBRLS, by 2025.

“And we’re racing to accelerate Australia’s access to priority munitions through a streamlined acquisition process,” Austin said.

“We’re also thrilled to announce that we’re taking steps to enable Australia to maintain, repair and overhaul critical US and US-source munitions.”

Defence Minister Richard Marles said the joint plan to begin manufacturing missiles in Australia within two years, revealed on Friday, represented a “very significant step forward in our relationship”.

Marles said he had been “absolutely assured” by both Austin and Blinken that plans were on track for the US to supply Australia with at least three Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarines, despite 23 Senate Republicans saying they opposed the transfer without a massive increase in America’s production capacity.

“We are completely sanguine about what we are seeing in America and understand that that is just part of the process,” he said.

Blinken said there continued to be “robust bipartisan support” for the AUKUS pact in the US Congress.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/assange-endangered-lives-top-official-urges-australia-to-understand-us-concerns-20230729-p5ds8t.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19262626

File: 6ca25a693ee9653⋯.jpg (205.9 KB,2048x1152,16:9,ACT_Director_of_Public_Pro….jpg)

File: 78bc5a5bbe57ece⋯.jpg (151.44 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Justice_Walter_Sofronoff.jpg)

>>19194509

>>19204809

Sofronoff findings on DPP Shane Drumgold to be kept secret for weeks

STEPHEN RICE - JULY 29, 2023

1/2

In a shock move, the ACT government will keep secret the findings of the Sofronoff inquiry into the prosecution for rape of Bruce Lehrmann for at least a month as it ponders how to deal with what are expected to be serious adverse findings against chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold.

It had been anticipated that when inquiry head Walter Sof­ronoff KC delivered his much-­anticipated report on Monday, it would be released immediately but the government will now consider the report “through a proper cabinet” process that ACT Chief Minister Andrew Barr said would take three to four weeks, with the Legislative Assembly “updated” at the end of ­August.

It is believed at least two of the potential findings against Mr Drumgold, who has been on leave since May and is not due to return until August 30, would be grounds for his dismissal as ACT Director of Public Prosecutions.

In a statement released to The Weekend Australian, Mr Barr said that subject to the contents of the report, and any legal implications, he intended to table all, or part, of the report during the August parliamentary sitting and “may provide an interim response to some, or all, of the recommendations” at that time.

“Subject to the recommendations, a final government response may take several months,” he said.

The most serious allegations of misconduct against Mr Drumgold involve episodes where he misled Chief Justice Lucy McCallum during the course of the proceedings against Mr Lehrmann.

Mr Drumgold has already admitted two breaches but claimed they were unintentional.

If Mr Sofronoff finds his actions were designed to deliberately mislead the court, his position as DPP will be untenable.

Even without findings of serious misconduct against him, legal observers say it is difficult to see how the ACT criminal justice system can function effectively with Mr Drumgold at the helm.

The relationship between Mr Drumgold and ACT Policing, already poisoned during the Lehrmann prosecution, has been further damaged by claims and counter-claims in the inquiry.

Mr Sofronoff is likely to find Mr Drumgold was entitled to bring the prosecution against Mr Lehrmann – none of the parties to the case, including the police, has disputed that – but both the DPP and some senior police may be found to have lost objectivity at various points in the case.

Mr Drumgold conceded at the inquiry that he had formed a view Mr Lehrmann should be charged before he had been interviewed.

The AFP and some senior officers are also likely to come in for trenchant criticism from Mr Sof­ronoff over the handling of ­aspects of the case but none is expected to lose their job.

Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates may be the subject of some criticism over claims her constant presence at Brittany Higgins’s side during the trial was effectively a declaration that the young woman was a victim of crime and that Mr Lehrmann must therefore be guilty.

However, the police walked back much of their earlier criticism of Ms Yates during the inquiry and Mr Sofronoff may look towards recommendations such as a suggestion he raised during the hearings that her title be changed to “complainants of crime commissioner” to avoid any inference of guilt.

Possibly the most serious allegation against Mr Drumgold relates to a so-called contem­por­aneous note made of the now-infamous conference he held with TV personality Lisa Wilkinson four days before her Logies speech.

He says he warned the then-The Project host about the danger of prejudicing Mr Lehrmann’s upcoming rape trial. Wilkinson rejects that, saying Mr Drumgold “did not at any time” give her the warning he claimed.

Mr Sofronoff may take the view that while the experienced journalist should have known better, Mr Drumgold could have been more proactive in warning that the speech would risk delaying the trial by several months – which is what then occurred.

Far more dangerous for Mr Drumgold is the note of the conference with Wilkinson, which the DPP presented to Chief Justice McCallum as if it had been written contemporaneously by a junior lawyer present at the meeting. It hadn’t. It was effectively written by Mr Drum­gold days later after Wilkinson gave her speech.

At the inquiry, Mr Sofronoff questioned Mr Drumgold’s concession that his submissions to the Chief Justice “could” have had the effect of misleading her. “It must have had the effect of causing Her Honour to think that the note was a contemporary note of the conference,” Mr Sofronoff said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19262630

File: 6855f327d8e5f3c⋯.jpg (147.29 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,The_Brittany_Higgins_inter….jpg)

File: 5f6d48d4b647ba4⋯.jpg (179.41 KB,2000x1125,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_and_Lisa_….jpg)

>>19262626

2/2

“How could it not have had that effect, having regard to the appearance of the document, and the absence of anything that would suggest that part of it was made five days later?”

A finding by Mr Sofronoff that Mr Drumgold failed to appropriately warn an experienced journalist of risks posed by the Logies speech might be surviv­able for the DPP; a finding he deceived the Chief Justice would not.

The second major threat to Mr Drumgold’s job comes from the so-called Moller report, first revealed by The Australian, part of which detailed discrepancies in Ms Higgins’s evidence and suggested police didn’t think there was enough evidence to prosecute Mr Lehrmann.

Mr Drumgold tried to stop the defence obtaining the document, claiming it was subject to legal professional privilege – without having read it and without checking with Detective Superintendent Scott Moller, who wrote it.

That goes against basic principles of a prosecutor’s duties of disclosure, which require any relevant evidence, particularly matters adverse to their case, must be revealed to the defence.

Mr Sofronoff made no secret of his alarm at Mr Drumgold’s approach, asking at one point: “You could not possibly, as a barrister, say ‘I’m prepared to give an opinion about this’ without proof from the man who made the document, could you? You would need some facts. And you don’t seem to have any facts, Mr Drumgold.”

Mr Drumgold also ordered the same junior lawyer, barely six months into his legal career, to draw up an affidavit saying the document had been inadvertently listed as not subject to privilege.

This too was unintentional, Mr Drumgold told the inquiry. But again, a finding that he deliberately misled Chief Justice McCallum would make it near impossible for him to remain in office.

Mr Sofronoff could also make adverse findings about Mr Drumgold’s conduct when he announced in December that he was abandoning the trial out of concern for Ms Higgins’s mental health but suggested he still believed Mr Lehrmann was guilty.

The speech left many in the legal profession aghast.

Counsel assisting the inquiry Erin Longbottom asked Mr Drumgold: “Did you turn your mind to the impact that statement might have on Mr Lehrmann, who was entitled to the presumption of innocence?”

“Possibly not as much as I should have,” Mr Drumgold replied.

Similarly, Mr Sofronoff is expected to make a finding on allegations Mr Drumgold improperly attempted to discredit former defence minister Linda Reynolds during cross-examination when she appeared as a trial witness.

Mr Drumgold questioned Senator Reynolds about the presence of her partner in the court, even though no one had suggested there was anything wrong with this, and about a text message she sent to Mr Lehrmann’s defence counsel requesting a transcript of the trial.

At the inquiry, Mr Drumgold sensationally retracted his claim of political interference in the case.

A finding by Mr Sofronoff that the cross examination was improper would be controversial because by rights Chief Justice McCallum herself could have intervened to stop the line of questioning. It is not within Mr Sofronoff’s terms of reference to examine the conduct of the Chief Justice.

The Australian Federal Police and some senior officers are unlikely to escape censure.

The AFP was confronted during the hearings with claims it was applying the wrong test to charge sexual assault suspects and that, as a result, the ACT had some of the lowest rates of charging (and conviction) of sexual assaults cases in the country.

Police admitted they made a grave error in providing Ms Higgins confidential counselling notes to a defence lawyer, but said it had been done accidentally.

That lawyer did not access the sensitive documents, but Mr Drumgold did.

AFP officers were also alleged to have conducted an unnecessary formal interview with Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates so that she would become a potential witness and therefore would not be able to support Ms Higgins in court.

The inquiry heard that police only charged Mr Lehrmann after receiving a phone call from Ms Higgins’ boyfriend, David Sharaz, threatening to publicly condemn the time being taken.

Detective Superintendent Scott Moller said that within an hour of Mr Sharaz calling Detective Inspector Marcus Boorman, he was given instructions to serve a summons on Mr Lehrmann for one count of sexual intercourse without consent.

Superintendent Moller said his investigators did not believe they had met the evidentiary threshold to charge Mr Lehrmann so he signed the summons himself.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/sofronoff-findings-on-dpp-to-be-kept-secret-for-weeks/news-story/9fe3b37d25087b8a8567e883b5494e5c

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19262682

File: 9204c41e9256f94⋯.jpg (287.1 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Dr_Anthony_Fauci_This_was_….jpg)

>>19250326

Covid cover-up: how the science was silenced

Anthony Fauci deliberately downplayed suspicions from scientists that Covid-19 came from a lab to protect his reputation and deflect from risky research his agency had funded, his boss says.

SHARRI MARKSON - July 28, 2023

1/3

America’s top infectious diseases adviser, Anthony Fauci, delib­erately decided to downplay ­suspicions from scientists that Covid-19 came from a laboratory to protect his reputation and deflect from the risky coronavirus research his agency had funded, according to his boss, one of the most senior US health officials during the pandemic.

In an exclusive interview, Robert Kadlec – former assistant secretary for preparedness and response at the US Department of Health – told The Weekend Australian that he, Dr Fauci and National Institutes of Health director Francis Collins privately discussed how to “turn down the temperature” on accusations against China in the early days of the pandemic while they were trying to encourage Beijing to co-operate and share a sample of the virus.

But the senior US health official – who worked for George W. Bush and Donald Trump and went on to lead American efforts to develop a Covid-19 vaccine – said Dr Fauci mostly kept his knowledge of virologists’ concerns about a lab leak from Wuhan to himself.

The Weekend Australian revealed in 2021 that the National Institutes of Health and other US agencies funded 65 scientific ­projects at the Wuhan Institute of Virology over the past decade, many involving risky research on bat coronaviruses.

‘Vaccine research was the proximate cause’

Dr Kadlec’s comments give the closest insight to date on how Dr Fauci – who led coronavirus policy for two presidents and influenced the worldwide ­approach to the pandemic – handled the link between Covid-19 and China. They came as US congressional investigations in the past month revealed how scientists worked to silence concerns about a lab leak.

“I think Tony Fauci was ­trying to protect his institution and his own reputation from the possibility that his agency was funding the Wuhan ­Institute of Virology researchers who, beyond the scope of the grants received from the ­National Institutes of Health, may have been working with People’s Liberation Army researchers on defensive coronavirus vaccines,” Dr Kadlec said.

“I think it’s evident from his later released emails (obtained via Freedom of Information requests) that he had more sense of what his institute had funded at that moment. This was a reputational risk to him and his ­institute and certainly he probably sided with the international scientists that ­believed that false or unsubstantiated accusations could have a chilling effect on scientific collaboration between the western world and China.”

Dr Kadlec, in his first ever media interview, added: “We think vaccine research resulted in the pandemic – that vaccine ­research was the proximate cause.”

In an extraordinary admission, Dr Kadlec said they decided to try to encourage a group of leading international scientists to calm down speculation on the origins of the virus.

The scientists held a phone call on February 1, 2020, in which they discussed concerns that SARS-CoV-2 looked like it may have been genetically engineered.

“When we talked about this in advance of that call, he (Fauci) would just try and see if he could get the scientists to take the temperature down, turn the rhetoric down. to at least find, we’re going to look into this but we don’t know,” Dr Kadlec said.

As both Mr Bush’s biodefence adviser and Mr Trump’s assistant health secretary for preparedness, Dr Kadlec has decades of experience in fighting public health crises. He created Operation Warp Speed, the plan to accelerate the development of a Covid-19 ­vaccine, and is credited for leading the push to vaccinate Americans. In 2018, he warned Congress the US was ill-prepared for a pandemic.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19262686

File: 5445e2f7a66f91c⋯.jpg (287.36 KB,2031x1142,2031:1142,Dr_Robert_Kadlec_right_and….jpg)

>>19262682

2/3

‘Turn the temperature down’

Dr Kadlec’s personal approach was to ask the National Academy of Sciences in late January 2020, to formally examine the sequence of SARS-CoV-2, to understand its origin. But publicly, he felt it was important to achieve co-operation from China from a public health perspective. Beijing had not yet shared a sample of the virus, critical for developing an effective vaccine.

“We decided to engage our national experts to look at this, the National Academy of Sciences,” he said. “It would take time to figure out what was going on. We were trying to prevent people from saying this was a bioweapon when we didn’t really know. That was my intent. It was Dr Fauci’s idea to see if he could get international scientists to examine the origins in a similar fashion. The object was to prevent speculation and turn the temperature down. There was something that could be said to turn the temperature of rhetoric down and avoid the wild speculation, of a bioweapon, that had already started at that point in time.”

That phone call was at the instigation of Dr Fauci after he spoke with scientist Kristian Andersen who expressed concern that SARS-Cov-2 may have been genetically engineered, because of its unusual features. In an email, Dr Andersen said “some of the features (potentially) look engineered” and several leading virologists “all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory.”

Dr Kadlec said Dr Fauci kept these suspicions, privately expressed by leading virologists that the virus had been engineered in a laboratory, mostly to himself.

The full extent of those suspicions is now laid bare in emails subpoenaed by US congress and published in recent weeks. In those emails, some scientists discussed the “shit show” that would eventuate if anyone serious accused China of, even accidentally, starting the pandemic. They also discussed the impact such an accusation would have on scientific research and international relations. But, publicly, they insisted the possibility of an inadvertent laboratory leak was a conspiracy and authored a paper published in Nature Medicine, that argued SARS-Cov-2 was almost certainly a natural virus. Dr Kadlec acknowledges the power of that paper, titled the Proximal Origins of SARS-CoV-2, as becoming the official word that a laboratory leak was a conspiracy theory.

“Their paper did result in casting the die for what would then be the international scientific response going forward,” he said.

“I found it really odd that in light of the now revealed private musings of some of the scientists indicated the sequence looked unusual, that the authors decided to draft a letter as an opinion piece.

“Many people were confused or mistaken by what they wrote as more of a peer-reviewed paper.”

Wuhan ‘fingerprints’

Dr Kadlec accused the scientists of having personal agendas that might have influenced their decision to author a paper that suggested a laboratory leak was a conspiracy theory. “Their initial opinion was likely shaded by their personal professional equities or the belief that what was going on in the US – statements by political leaders- could be problematic for world relations for China but also their professional interests in science,” he said.

Dr Kadlec alluded to the febrile political atmosphere in the US under Mr Trump as a likely influence on the scientists, although the scientists’ deliberations began in late January, and the former president did not make any public comment about a potential laboratory origin of Covid-19 until April.

The authors of the Proximal Origins paper have argued in the media and congressional hearings that later virus research had led them to scotch their first fears of a lab leak – and to conclude instead that the origins of Covid-19 were zoonotic: i.e. the virus had been passed from animal to human, possibly via a Wuhan wet market.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19262691

File: 19ae780551c896c⋯.jpg (653.65 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_P4_laboratory_on_the_c….jpg)

>>19262686

3/3

However, new emails and posts over the Slack messaging platform that have surfaced in recent weeks pinpoint the ­moment this group began steering world attention away from the Wuhan lab. It was not months, or even weeks, but within days and hours of their realisation that the virus may contain “fingerprints” that connected it to the Wuhan ­Institute of Virology. The scientists are facing allegations that they embarked on a campaign of subterfuge that has rocked Washington.

’Blueprint for Covid-19’

Dr Kadlec has now spent a year and a half formally investigating the origins of the pandemic, putting together an A and B team to gather evidence for both a natural and laboratory origin respectively.

Gain-of-function research was banned by the Obama administration but lifted during the Trump era. Dr Kadlec says this was at the behest of the NIH. “Francis Collins and Fauci both had a similar world view which was scientists know best and there should be few restrictions on research,” he said.

The Wuhan Institute of Virology and EcoHealth Alliance drew up a proposal for grant funding for coronavirus research, which international scientists now believe could be the “blueprint” of Covid-19. Dr Kadlec chaired a committee to authorise whether gain-of-function could proceed. The proposal from the Wuhan institute was bouncing around US Government agencies, in search of funding, but it never went through his committee. “It shows you the fallibility or vulnerability of the oversight system,” he said.

Dr Fauci has denied his agency funded gain-of-function research, but Dr Kadlec said this wasn’t true. “It’s evident NIH supported research that has the potential for, and it at least one case resulted in gain of function,” he said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/weekend-australian-magazine/covid-coverup-wuhan-lab-leak-suspicions-anthony-fauci-and-how-the-science-was-silenced/news-story/3e2669c7983b6a66a2bcc535c1e4c6be

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19262728

File: 6904cb7f1017079⋯.jpg (443.38 KB,1463x1097,1463:1097,A_Covid_patient_in_China_i….jpg)

>>19262682

Who made Covid? US spy agencies have a name

He’s a decorated Chinese military scientist - and now he’s dead. But the FBI has found a crucial new witness.

SHARRI MARKSON - July 28, 2023

US intelligence agencies are understood to be examining the possibility that Chinese military scientist Zhou Yusen’s research to develop a coronavirus vaccine led to the creation of Covid-19, and the first cluster of the pandemic.

The decorated Chinese scientist died about May 2020 in circumstances that Five Eyes intelligence agencies have long suspected was at the hands of the People’s Liberation Army. The Weekend Australian can reveal that the FBI has, on at least two occasions since mid-last year, spoken with a close relative of Zhou who is now residing in the US. The individual is understood to be a crucial new witness.

For the individual’s safety and protection, The Weekend Australian has chosen not to name the relative, who is understood to be “nervous”. The family member did not respond to requests for comment in the weeks leading up to publication of this article.

The FBI declined to comment.

FBI director Christopher Wray has said publicly that a laboratory leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology led to the pandemic.

“The FBI has assessed for quite some time that the origins … are a potential lab incident in Wuhan,” Mr Wray told Fox News in April.

“You’re talking about a potential leak from a Chinese government-controlled lab that killed millions of Americans.”

‘Highest-risk’ vaccine research

In June 2021, The Australian revealed that Zhou was listed as the lead inventor on Chinese ­patent documents, translated by The Australian, for a Covid-19 vaccine. The patent was dated February 24, 2020.

Zhou died about three months later. Despite his illustrious career, there were no published mentions of this celebrated military scientist in the Chinese press.

Five Eyes intelligence agencies suspected he had been killed.

Separate intelligence declassified by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence in June this year confirmed that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was engaged in vaccine research.

One intelligence agency states that by the end of 2019, the Wuhan Institute of Virology had teams focusing on MERS and SARS-related coronaviruses, which both “used transgenic mouse models to better understand how the viruses infect ­humans as well as related vaccine and therapeutics research”.

Former US assistant health secretary Robert Kadlec said vaccine research might have sparked the pandemic.

“We think vaccine research ­resulted in the pandemic, that vaccine ­research was the proximate cause,” Dr Kadlec said.

“Animal-challenge studies used in vaccination are some of the highest-risk research that you can do with an infectious disease agent.”

Dr Kadlec noted that the type of coronavirus vaccine ­research in which Zhou was involved was “very high risk” because it ­involved infecting live animals, administering some of them with the vaccine and using others as a control, and then keeping them alive for a period of days or even weeks before eventually euthanising them.

The risk of contamination at the Wuhan Institute of ­Virology was especially acute because the laboratory was experiencing problems with its air ventilation systems.

“The process where you have to manage the infected ­animals – collecting serial samples of blood, urine or saliva for a period of days or weeks – puts a high demand for biosafety,” Dr Kadlec said.

“(You have to be) very careful and safe and all your systems have to work. It’s very high risk.”

Ben Hu

It is possible Zhou was working at the Wuhan Institute of ­Virology with researcher Ben Hu, who fell sick with Covid-like symptoms in early November 2019.

“We don’t have all the answers here, but perhaps Ben Hu was ­assisting the visiting professor, Zhou Yusen,” Dr Kadlec said.

“He was an accomplished ­vaccinologist. He had developed vaccines for flu, MERS and the like, and perhaps somebody said, ‘Make sure that Dr Zhou gets what he needs’.”

Dr Kadlec said the Wuhan ­Institute of Virology was “likely working on a ­vaccine, it looks like they had a bio-containment failure, possibly an autoclave, and that’s the period when Ben Hu and his colleagues fell sick, likely with Covid”.

“It all clusters in the November 11-17 time frame when the WHO SAGO (the World Health Organisation’s Scientific Advisory Group for Origins of Novel Pathogens) says there was an outbreak of influenza,” he said. “That would imply some kind of event.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/weekend-australian-magazine/covid19-origins-may-be-traced-to-chinese-military-scientist-zhou-yusen/news-story/916e55a6285b243c0a357c6dcb560c66

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

a035d5 No.19262808

File: 2eb953ead331e32⋯.png (341.38 KB,1920x919,1920:919,Screenshot_2023_07_29_at_1….png)

File: 16a00251dc0d07f⋯.png (411.6 KB,1920x919,1920:919,Screenshot_2023_07_29_at_1….png)

>>19262255

Only two vessels around at present, but considering it getting towards 3 in the morning locally I would say several hours before more SAR vessels will be out there

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19262914

File: 45ebe1046f2416e⋯.jpg (353.99 KB,2048x1152,16:9,_Turn_the_temperature_down….jpg)

File: 9087b632fcef68c⋯.jpg (439.61 KB,775x1328,775:1328,WHO_S_WHO.jpg)

File: 3af74bccc12eb5d⋯.mp4 (15.03 MB,306x540,17:30,_New_crucial_witness_How_d….mp4)

>>19262682

>>19262728

‘Turn the temperature down’: how the Covid cover-up began

A ‘nightmare’ of circumstantial evidence showed the virus could have been genetically engineered. But instead of disclosing their lab-leak suspicions Anthony Fauci and his peers pivoted to distract attention from contentious research funded by the US.

SHARRI MARKSON - July 28, 2023

1/8

As the hour grew late on the night of January 31, 2020, the chief medical adviser to the United States President, Anthony Fauci, was frantically exchanging emails with some of the world’s ­leading virologists.

A highly infectious virus was on the brink of contaminating the globe. President Donald Trump had hours earlier announced a ban on flights into the US from China, and the question loomed large, how did this virus start?

Emails that night and into the next day between Fauci – then director of the National Institute of Allergy and ­Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at the US National ­Institutes of Health (NIH) – and scientists show their first responses to examination of the virus. The correspondence, some of it secret until this month, betrays alarm that the new ­coronavirus showed signs it could have been genetically engineered in a Wuhan laboratory as the ­result of highly fraught research known as “gain of ­function” that can make ­viruses vastly more contagious and dangerous to humans.

At 10.30pm on January 31, Kristian Andersen, a leading scientist working at Scripps Research in California, wrote to Fauci to say: “The unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the genome so one has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features [potentially] look engineered.”

Andersen – with reference to colleagues including ­Australian Eddie Holmes, a professor of virology at the ­University of Sydney and an honorary professor in Shanghai – also stated that “after discussions earlier today, Eddie, Bob, Mike and myself all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory”.

Inconsistent with evolutionary theory.

Fauci was to grow even more concerned when his deputy, Hugh Auchincloss, emailed on February 1 to say this ­particular gain of function research could have been funded by the United States Government in breach of strict rules the US had imposed on such experiments in coronavirus ­research.

During this 24-hour period, Andersen would locate a scientific paper documenting the Wuhan Institute of ­Virology’s genetic engineering of coronaviruses – it was practically a “how-to-manual for building the Wuhan ­coronavirus in a laboratory”, according to Dr Jeremy Farrar, a British medical researcher and member of the UK ­Government’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies, writing in a memoir. Farrar recalls that Holmes’s reaction to seeing that paper was: “F..k, this is bad,” before jumping on a call to discuss the matter with him. Farrar would later see fit to acquire a burner phone.

What the scientists did next is shocking.

Instead of disclosing their suspicions to the world, Fauci and his NIH colleagues engineered a narrative to distract attention from contentious research funded by the US, and convince the world this was more likely a natural born killer rather than one created by scientists.

Robert Kadlec, who was Assistant Secretary for the US Department of Health during the pandemic – and formerly Anthony Fauci’s boss – has given an interview to The Weekend Australian Magazine. He has disclosed that publicly the NIH was eager to secure cooperation from China in the hope that Beijing would share a sample of the virus. “There was something that could be said to turn the temperature of rhetoric down,” says Kadlec, who would later go on to lead the US government’s Operation Warp Speed, the race to develop a Covid-19 vaccine. “We were trying to prevent people from saying this was a bioweapon when we didn’t really know.”

The NIH would ask the National Academy of Sciences to ­further probe the origins of the virus, he adds. Kadlec would never be informed by Fauci as to the scientists’ earliest observations, or their decision to bury their fears to protect their research. He says: “Their initial opinion was likely shaded by their personal professional equities or the belief that what was going on in the US – statements by political leaders – could be problematic for world relations for China [and] also their professional interests in science.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19262921

File: 628cc33ffed2b65⋯.jpg (866.08 KB,2048x1152,16:9,How_the_Covid_cover_up_beg….jpg)

File: 086a495b54dbed7⋯.jpg (702.27 KB,2048x1152,16:9,How_the_Covid_cover_up_beg….jpg)

>>19262914

2/8

When confronted over their initial assessment of the virus, the scientists have argued variously in media and in congressional hearings that subsequent investigation into the virus had led them to scotch their first fears of a lab leak – and to conclude instead that the origins of Covid-19 were zoonotic, i.e. the virus had been passed from animal to human, possibly via a Wuhan wet market.

However, new correspondence subpoenaed and ­disclosed by US Congress in recent weeks pinpoints the ­moment this group began steering world attention away from the Wuhan lab. It was not months, or even weeks, but within days and hours of their realisation that the virus may contain “fingerprints” that connected it to the Wuhan ­Institute of Virology. The scientists are facing allegations that they embarked on a campaign of subterfuge that has rocked Washington. The consequences of their actions have been catastrophic – our understanding of a virus that went on to change the world has been shrouded in secrecy. Crucially, it stymied the hunt for patient zero – the first known case – from the start.

In my investigation into the origins of Covid-19, now spanning three years, I’ve reported on classified intelligence and unearthed documents about the Wuhan Institute of ­Virology that the World Health Organisation had failed to discover. The fruits of this investigation have been cited in several congressional reports. One of these revelations was that a Wuhan Institute of Virology scientist I identified as Ben Hu had been conducting “gain of function” research projects right before the outbreak of the pandemic, along with his boss Shi Zhengli, the so-called “bat lady” who ­became the face of coronavirus experimentation in China.

As a result of their work, Ben Hu was awarded grants to study two new SARS-related coronaviruses, and significantly, to investigate if these viruses could infect humans – work that commenced in January 2019. Last month Ben Hu was named by independent media as the most likely patient zero, the first known person to be infected with Covid-19.

And yet the burning question remains, how did the ­pandemic start?

In a front-page story in June 2021, The Weekend Australian revealed that intelligence agencies from the Five Eyes (an alliance between Australia, the US, the UK, Canada and New Zealand) were investigating the unexplained death of a People’s Liberation Army scientist named Zhou Yusen, who had conducted risky coronavirus research while developing one of the world’s first Covid-19 vaccines on behalf of the Chinese military.

There is now, The Weekend Australian Magazine can ­reveal, a growing school of thought within the US intelligence services that work by Zhou Yusen to develop a vaccine for the Chinese military could have inadvertently led to the creation of Covid-19 and the first cluster of the pandemic. Intelligence agencies believe the scientist was killed by the People’s Liberation Army – and it’s understood that a close family member, who is currently residing in the US, has been interviewed on multiple occasions by the FBI.

November 2019. Months before the world had heard of Covid-19 and the prospect of a pandemic sparking stay-at-home orders was as remote as alien arrivals, a piece of ­intelligence collected from a foreign government was passed to US agencies. The intelligence told of how ­several researchers at a laboratory in the biggest city in ­central China were sick with a virus and some had been ­hospitalised. Some of the symptoms were indicative of Covid-19, including a loss of taste and smell, while others were consistent with seasonal flus and viruses.

At the moment this communication intercept was ­collected, it was deemed so insignificant as to go unnoticed – its importance would only be understood when a covert team inside the US State Department began investigating the origins of the pandemic in September 2020. That team was led by acting Assistant Secretary of State Thomas ­DiNanno at the Bureau of Arms Control, Verification and Compliance. While not conclusive about the particular ­origins of the virus, the intelligence was of explosive ­significance to DiNanno’s team because they believed it linked the earliest known cases of Covid-19 to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19262930

File: 5d381e3c4e1d288⋯.jpg (851.79 KB,775x1339,775:1339,Ben_Hu_s_Research.jpg)

>>19262921

3/8

In March 2021, half a world away from the US State ­Department, on the front page of The Australian newspaper we revealed the classified intelligence that Wuhan Institute of Virology researchers had fallen ill. In our report, headlined “China Covid researchers ‘in first cluster’”, we reported: “Wuhan Institute of Virology researchers working on corona­viruses were hospitalised with symptoms consistent with Covid-19 in early November 2019 in what US officials suspect could have been the first cluster.”

Almost this precise paragraph would feature in the New York Times two years later. Following The Wall Street Journal’s report on the cluster in May 2021, President Joe Biden ordered the US intelligence agencies to conduct a 90-day probe into the origins of the pandemic. It would conclude both a natural origin and inadvertent laboratory incident were plausible explanations for the pandemic.

Significantly, The Australian’s story went on to reveal that “the US is also examining whether the Wuhan ­institute developed SARS-CoV-2 [the virus that causes Covid-19] while working on a coronavirus vaccine” – a statement based on classified intelligence that would ­finally be released to the public in June this year, after both sides of Congress voted unanimously to declassify intelligence related to the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the origin of the pandemic.

Ben Hu and his colleagues Yu Ping and Yan Zhu were identified in media reports in June 2023 as the three workers who fell sick. All were from Shi Zhengli’s laboratory at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Intelligence has suggested they were hospitalised in the first and second week of November – well before a cluster of cases in December were traced back to the Wuhan wet market. There may be cases we do not know about yet, but Ben Hu and his two colleagues were indeed the first victims of the new coronavirus known to intelligence agencies. In a statement given to the US journal Science, Ben Hu denies ever having fallen ill.

So could Ben Hu’s work have resulted in the creation of SARS-CoV-2? In short, yes – he was conducting gain of function experiments to make coronaviruses more transmissible to humans, creating chimeric viruses and devising a new reverse genetics technique.

The two viruses from his experiment right before the pandemic (see fact box below) have never been ­published. These are not the only viruses from the Wuhan Institute to remain secret. The Wuhan institute of Virology’s database, containing more than 22,000 viruses, was taken offline in September 2019, and Chinese officials have refused to make it available to world health investigators ever since.

I have interviewed the former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo twice on the origins of the pandemic. He certainly believed Ben Hu and his colleagues were, from everything he had seen, the first cluster of the pandemic. Epidemiological analysis has shown they would have likely been exposed to the virus in late October. Given the incubation period, symptoms often appear in the second week of infection by the coronavirus.

Some within the United States Government – including Kadlec – now suspect it was vaccine research by People’s Liberation Army scientist Zhou Yusen that may have led to the pandemic. Like Ben Hu, Zhou was also close to Shi Zhengli. Zhou was a decorated Chinese military scientist who worked on coronaviruses at the Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, which is part of the Chinese Academy of Military Medical Sciences and sits under the control of the People’s Liberation Army. His work for the Chinese military was extensive and he often worked alongside the Wuhan Institute of Virology and Shi Zhengli.

As we revealed in a global exclusive published on the front page of The Weekend Australian, a patent application for a Covid-19 vaccine had been filed by the Institute of Military Medicine, Academy of Military Sciences of the People’s Liberation Army on February 24, 2020. The application listed Zhou Yusen as lead inventor and came just one month after China admitted Covid-19 was capable of human-to-human transmission. The patent would likely have resulted from work on a vaccine starting in November, according to leading vaccinologists consulted by US health officials.

The Weekend Australian Magazine has now learned it is specifically Yusen’s work for the military on coronavirus vaccines that US intelligence agencies are examining as a possible cause of the pandemic.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19262935

File: fdda27c5a015d3c⋯.jpg (705.53 KB,2048x1152,16:9,How_the_Covid_cover_up_beg….jpg)

>>19262930

4/8

Three months after he filed the patent for one of the world’s earliest Covid vaccines, Zhou is believed to have died. Despite an illustrious career his death went almost unreported in China, although there is a mention that he is “deceased” on a paper he authored. As Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Vice Chairman Marco Rubio’s report on China’s response to the pandemic (which credits my book What Really Happened in Wuhan with first reporting on Zhou publicly) observes: “No PRC [People’s Republic of China] media reports disclosed the cause of his death.”

We discovered and reported in June 2021 as part of our investigation into the origins of the pandemic that Five Eyes intelligence agencies were ­investigating Zhou’s unexplained death as part of their probe into Covid-19. This was classified intelligence that would subsequently be republished by NBC News, Vanity Fair and The Sunday Times in the UK.

Perhaps no one has analysed more of Zhou Yusen’s ­papers than Bob Kadlec, one of the top health officials in the US administration at the time of the pandemic. “We think vaccine research resulted in the pandemic – that vaccine ­research was the proximate cause,” he tells this magazine.

Kadlec notes that the type of coronavirus vaccine ­research Zhou Yusen was involved in was “very high risk” because it involved infecting live animals, administering some of them with the vaccine and using others as a control, and then keeping them alive for a period of days or even weeks before eventually euthanising them.

The risk of contamination at the Wuhan Institute of ­Virology was especially acute because the laboratory was experiencing problems with its air ventilation systems.

“The process where you have to manage the infected ­animals – collecting serial samples of blood, urine or saliva for a period of days or weeks – puts a high demand for biosafety,” Kadlec says. “[You have to be] very careful and safe and all your systems have to work. It’s very high-risk.”

The research team for my book analysed some 136 ­tenders dating back to the set-up of the Wuhan Institute of Virology in 2014. A winning bid for air incinerators and ­testing services worth $US43,000 – in the critical month of December 2019 – is evidence that there was concern about ventilation and the risk of an infectious aerosol escape.

Kadlec’s own investigation, published as a report in April 2023, originally commissioned by Senator Richard Burr, confirms that the Wuhan Institute published 13 patents ­correcting biocontainment-related problems.

Kadlec gives this incisive assessment of the scenario that led to the first cluster: “They were likely working on a ­vaccine, it looks like they had a bio-containment failure, possibly an autoclave, and that’s the period when Ben Hu and his colleagues fell sick, likely with Covid.

“It all clusters in the November 11-17 timeframe when the WHO SAGO [the World Health Organisation’s Scientific Advisory Group for Origins of Novel Pathogens] says there was an outbreak of influenza. That would imply some kind of event.”

Just as this article was going to press, news agency Bloomberg reported that the Biden administration was taking steps to impose a 10-year ban on funding for the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The NIH’s conclusion that the Wuhan lab “likely violated protocols of the NIH regarding biosafety is undisputed”, wrote an official in a memo obtained by a Congressional sub-committee.

Kadlec suggests Ben Hu may have been working with military scientist Zhou Yusen. “We don’t have all the ­answers here but perhaps Ben Hu was assisting the visiting professor, Zhou Yusen. He was an accomplished vaccinologist. He had developed vaccines for flu, MERS and the like, and perhaps somebody said, ‘Make sure that Dr Zhou gets what he needs.”

A close relative of Zhou Yusen lives in the US; although I reported this fact in my book, I withheld the individual’s name for their privacy and security. I have learned that ­following the book’s publication the family member’s ­significance and whereabouts came to the attention of an intelligence agency in the United States and The Weekend Australian Magazine now understands the FBI has twice spoken to this crucial witness in the hope they hold clues to the origin of the pandemic. The FBI declined to comment.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19262943

File: 3900076d5587423⋯.jpg (291.74 KB,1950x1097,1950:1097,How_the_Covid_cover_up_beg….jpg)

>>19262935

5/8

The FBI’s first interview was understood to have taken place in 2022, while another occurred earlier this year. FBI director Christopher Wray told Fox in April: “The FBI has assessed for quite some time that the origins … are a potential lab incident in Wuhan. You’re talking about a potential leak from a Chinese-government controlled lab that killed millions of Americans …”

The family member did not respond to requests for comment in the weeks leading up to publication of this article. The Weekend Australian Magazine has also refrained from disclosing this person’s name and place of work in the US.

We now return to early 2020, as January gave way to ­February and the world sleep-walked toward lockdowns spurred by the fear, mystery and secrecy surrounding the origins of coronavirus. Within weeks, Tony Fauci would ­become “America’s doctor” – reassuringly doling out advice on mask-wearing and handwashing.

But on January 31, 2020, hearing virologists’ concerns that SARS-CoV-2 appeared genetically engineered, and fully aware that his institution, the NIAID, had funded risky research in Wuhan, Fauci appeared to be panicking.

This email from Fauci to his deputy Hugh Auchincloss not long after midnight came to light after a Freedom of ­Information Act inquiry from BuzzFeed in 2021: “It is essential that we speak this am. Keep your cell phone on. I have a conference call at 7.45am with [Health Secretary Alex] Azar. It likely will be over by 8.45am. Read this paper as well as the email that I will forward you now. You have tasks today that must be done.” The paper attached detailed the 2015 gain of function research where a deadly new virus was created by Shi Zhengli with the University of Carolina’s Ralph Baric. It was indeed funded by the NIH. The subject of Fauci’s email was: “Baric, Shi et al – Nature Medicine – SARS Gain of function”, a reference to the Nature Medicine ­journal that would publish a narrative on the origins of Covid-19 two months later.

The reply the next morning at 11.47am from Auchincloss held answers that were not what Fauci was hoping for. “The paper you sent me says the experiments were performed before the gain of function pause but have since been reviewed and approved by NIH. Not sure what that means … ” Auchincloss said there was an effort to “try to determine if we have any distant ties to this work abroad”.

Fauci had emailed Jeremy Farrar on the afternoon of January 31 to say: “Jeremy, I just got off the phone with Kristian Andersen and he related to me his concern about the Furine [sic] site mutation in the spike protein of the ­currently circulating 2019-nCoV … I told him that as soon as possible he and Eddie Holmes should get a group of ­evolutionary biologists together to examine carefully the data to determine if his concerns are validated. He should do this very quickly and if everyone agrees with his ­concern, they should report it to the appropriate authorities. I would imagine that in the USA this would be the FBI and in the UK it would be the MI5.”

Taking up Fauci’s suggestion, the group of evolutionary biologists held a call the very next day where they decided to write a paper that would be titled “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2”. Fauci and National Institute Health director Francis Collins were on the call.

Robert Kadlec was unaware of the extent of the virologists’ concerns that SARS-CoV-2 was the result of laboratory research. In fact, two and a half hours after the email to his deputy, at nearly 3am, Fauci took a different tone when he sought to reassure his boss that everything was under control. Fauci instead shared a paper that downplayed the likelihood of a laboratory leak; he made no mention of the suspicions expressed by some of the world’s leading virologists, on that very night, that the virus could have been genetically engineered.

The email sent at 2.48am from Fauci to Kadlec was the first sign that a concerted cover-up was underway.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19262964

File: 7d723b1343b37a2⋯.jpg (231.07 KB,2048x1152,16:9,How_the_Covid_cover_up_beg….jpg)

>>19262943

6/8

Kadlec tells this magazine: “I think Tony Fauci was ­trying to protect his institution and his own reputation from the possibility that his agency was funding the Wuhan ­Institute of Virology researchers who, beyond the scope of the grants received from the NIH, may have been working with People’s Liberation Army researchers on defensive coronavirus vaccines. I think it’s evident from his later released emails [obtained via Freedom of Information requests] that it was more he had more sense of what his institute had funded at that moment. This was a reputational risk to him and his ­institute and certainly he probably sided with the international scientists that believed that false or unsubstantiated accusations could have a chilling effect on scientific collaboration between the western world and China.”

Fauci has not responded to requests for comment.

Among hundreds of new emails and Slack messages subpoenaed by Congress that came to light on July 11 this year is the following email, from Fauci’s senior adviser David Morens to a journalist at Bloomberg News: “ … today, to my total surprise, my boss Tony actually ASKED me to speak to the National Geographic on the record about origins. I interpret this to mean that our government is lightening up but that Tony doesn’t want his fingerprints on origin stories”.

Along with tens of hours of recorded interviews, the cache of correspondence has provided the clearest picture yet of how some of the scientists who were worried this was a lab leak ended up insisting a potential laboratory origin was a conspiracy theory.

On February 2, the distinguished British evolutionary ­biologist Andrew Rambaut wrote on a group channel on the messaging platform Slack: “Given the shit show that would happen if anyone serious accused the Chinese of even accidental release, my feeling is we should say that given there is no evidence of a specifically engineered virus, we cannot possibly distinguish between natural evolution and escape so we are content with ascribing it to natural processes.”

Andersen replied, according to the Slack messages contained in the House Select Committee’s July 2023 report: “Yep, I totally agree that that’s a very reasonable conclusion. Although I hate when politics is injected into science – but it’s impossible not to, especially given the circumstances.”

On the same date, another scientist, Professor Ron Fouchier from the Erasmus Medical Centre in Rotterdam, sent an email suggesting they should put on hold further discussions about a potential lab leak – and that these suggestions would need to be ­“supported by strong data, beyond reasonable doubt”. (It’s worth ­noting that any ­theories as to a natural origin for Covid-19 were never subject to the need to be ­supported beyond reasonable doubt.) Fouchier wrote: “It is good that this possibility was ­discussed in detail with a team of experts. However, further debate about such accusations would unnecessarily distract top researchers from their ­active duties and do unnecessary harm to science in general and science in China in particular”.

Fauci’s NIH colleague Collins sent an email, also on February 2, 2020, agreeing with Fouchier’s overall position. “Though the arguments from Ron Fouchier and Christian Drosten are presented with more forcefulness than necessary, I am coming around to the view that a natural origin is more likely,” he wrote to Farrar, Fauci and others. “But I share your view that a swift convening of experts in a ­confidence-inspiring framework (WHO seems really the only option) is needed, or the voices of conspiracy will quickly dominate, doing great potential harm to science and international harmony.”

Several days later, Fouchier expressed his view even more explicitly that including the possibility of a laboratory leak could directly impact on science experiments.

On February 8, Fouchier wrote to Farrar, Holmes, ­Rambaut and the others: “This manuscript would be much stronger if it focused on the likelihood of the first two ­scenarios as compared to intentional or accidental release. This would also limit the chance of new biosafety discussions that would unnecessarily obstruct future attempts of virus culturing for research and diagnostic purposes for any (emerging/zoonotic) virus.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19262971

File: 5c03c25295a5e48⋯.jpg (407.27 KB,2048x1152,16:9,How_the_Covid_cover_up_beg….jpg)

>>19262964

7/8

Two days later, Holmes shared a draft of their paper with Farrar, who immediately sent it to Fauci and Collins.

“In response to the draft, both Dr Fauci and Dr Collins expressed concern regarding the paper’s inclusion of serial passage in a lab as a viable origin option,” the oversight committee wrote in its report on its proceedings published earlier this month.

Farrar requested a specific change to their paper, saying: “Sorry to micro-manage/microedit!” He asked them to change the wording that it was “unlikely” that Covid-19 emerged through laboratory manipulation of an existing SARS-related coronavirus to “improbable”.

When epidemiologist Ian Lipkin emailed Farrar to thank him for “shepherding this paper”, he expressed concerns that “rumours of bio weaponeering are now circulating in China”. Farrar responded: “Yes I know and in US – why so keen to get out ASAP. I will push Nature.”

That same day, Lipkin, whose name was ultimately ­included on the eventual Proximal Origins paper, appeared to raise fresh concerns that Covid-19 came from a ­laboratory. “Ian Lipkin just called – very worried about the furin cleavage site and says that high ups are as well, inc. intel,” Holmes wrote in an email to Rambaut on February 10, 2020.

After a draft of the paper was shared with him, Lipkin wrote: “It’s well reasoned and provides a plausible argument against genetic engineering. It does not eliminate the possibility of inadvertent release following adaptation through selection culture in the institute in Wuhan. Given the scale of the bat CoV research pursued there and the site of emergence of the first human cases we have a nightmare of circumstantial evidence to assess.”

They would never assess that “circumstantial” evidence – which I began to unpick just two months later, in April 2020. Instead, the group forged ahead. The paper that ­Nature Medicine published on March 17, 2020 was designed to quash any suggestion of a laboratory leak. It states: “Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus,” adding: “We do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible.”

These words, published by a prestigious journal, became gospel – cited as the first and last word on the origins of the virus. As Collins would comment shortly after publication, “This study leaves little room to refute a natural origin for Covid-19”.

Kadlec, revealing for the first time what unfolded ­behind the scenes, explains: “When we talked about this in advance of that call, he [Fauci] would just try and see if he could get the scientists to take the temperature down, turn the rhetoric down … we’re going to look into this but we don’t know … There was something that could be said to turn the ­temperature of rhetoric down and avoid the wild ­speculation of a bioweapon that had already started at that point in time,” he says.

“We decided to engage our national experts to look at this, the National Academy of Sciences. It would take time to figure out what was going on.

“That was my intent, it was Dr Fauci’s idea to see if we could get international scientists to examine the origins in a similar fashion. The objective was to prevent speculation and turn the temperature down.”

However, Kadlec says, he found it “really odd … in light of the now revealed private musings” of the scientists who thought features of the virus looked unusual but then drafted an opinion piece arguing the opposite – and that, further, “many people were confused or mistaken by what they wrote as more of a peer reviewed paper.

“Their initial opinion was likely shaded by their personal professional equities or the belief that what was going on in the US – statements by political leaders – could be problematic for world relations for China [and] also their professional interests in science,” he tells this magazine.

“Their paper did result in casting the die for what would then be the international scientific response going forward.”

Eddie Holmes, one of the scientists on that email correspondence and a co-author of the Proximal Origins paper published in Nature Medicine, still maintains there’s no evidence Covid-19 originated in a laboratory. “He strongly defends the integrity and independence of his research, and the many papers he has co-authored have undergone rigorous peer-review prior to publication in line with proper scientific process,” a University of Sydney spokeswoman says.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19262974

File: 992909217e39e7f⋯.jpg (815.75 KB,775x1201,775:1201,The_Furin_Cleavage_Site_A_….jpg)

>>19262971

8/8

Notwithstanding the blinding power of the Proximal ­Origins report, some of the most senior scientists within the intelligence community vehemently disagreed with the Proximal Origins analysis. The argument put forward in Proximal Origins is dismantled in a paper by the Pentagon-based Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), which tracks foreign militaries, dated May 26 2020 but which has only surfaced recently, titled “Critical analysis of Andersen et al. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2”.

Authors Commander Jean-Paul Chretien, who led the Pandemic Warning Team at the DIA’s Center for Medical Intelligence, and Dr Greg Cutlip, a senior DIA research scientist, stated that the Proximal Origins paper “does not prove that the virus arose naturally. In fact, the features of SARS-CoV-2 noted by Andersen et al. are consistent with another scenario: that SARS-CoV-2 was developed in a laboratory, by methods that leading coronavirus researchers commonly use to investigate how the viruses infect cells and cause ­disease, assess the potential for animal coronaviruses to jump to humans, and develop drugs and vaccines.”

Their paper concludes that the Proximal Origin authors’ arguments “are based not on scientific analysis, but on ­unwarranted assumptions”.

Former State Department lead investigator in ­DiNanno’s team, David Asher, says: “Chretien wrote this well before we had any idea that Andersen et al came to much the same conclusion – as now evidenced by the Slack messages and emails [brought to light via Freedom of ­Information requests].”

At the time of writing, intelligence agencies ­remain divided on what they believe sparked the pandemic. Four unnamed agencies still support the theory of a zoonotic transmission, while the FBI and Department of Energy, which oversees ­America’s bio-defence laboratories, state that a ­laboratory leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology led to Covid-19.

At least one of these agencies believes the virus was genetically engineered, but most don’t.

The CIA and another agency are not prepared to definitively declare how they think the pandemic started, seemingly gun-shy after one too many wrong intelligence calls.

There is a preponderance of evidence that ties the Wuhan Institute of Virology to the outbreak: the nature of its research, its hospitalised scientists well before the wet market cluster, its spending spree on security and safety equipment and – as ­detailed in my book – the temporary shutdown of the Wuhan laboratory, along with the silencing and disappearance of whistleblowers.

Solving the mystery of how the pandemic began isn’t an inconceivable or unattainable aspiration. It’s not an impenetrable problem for world leaders to shrug their shoulders at while maximum containment labs around the world – there are three in Australia alone – continue to ­embark on cutting edge research, some of it with the potential to spark another pandemic.

While there are clues within the genomic sequence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself, which have been analysed by the likes of Jean-Paul Chretien, we do not yet know why Zhou Yusen met his untimely end and are yet to discover the thousands of unpublished viruses in the missing Wuhan Institute of Virology database.

There are several indicators that senior Chinese Communist Party officials know precisely how Covid-19 arose to ­become the most infectious virus in a century, shutting down major world economies and killing millions of people. Now, as the misinformation perpetuated by scientists is ­exposed and intelligence efforts persist, the rest of the world inches closer to the truth, too.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/weekend-australian-magazine/what-really-happened-in-wuhan-new-lab-leak-evidence-over-the-origin-of-covid19/news-story/92c74fb80e5f2fcefb52bd9434a5ab38

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19267202

File: 1ff321127fe68b2⋯.jpg (133.08 KB,1024x683,1024:683,An_MRH_90_helicopter.jpg)

File: 3dab0d477ff6f31⋯.jpg (1013.51 KB,1179x1819,1179:1819,The_rescue_plane_s_search_….jpg)

>>19226439

>>19262114

>>19262808

Investigation launched into military helicopter crash, four feared dead

Matthew Knott, Cloe Read and Amber Schultz - July 29, 2023

1/2

The federal government has launched an investigation into the cause of a helicopter crash that authorities fear has led to the death of four missing Defence Force personnel, making it Australia’s worst peacetime military accident in almost 20 years.

Australia and the United States’ most senior defence and foreign policy officials expressed their dismay over the horror accident, which has revived longstanding concerns about the technical problems that have plagued the MRH-90 Taipan, the aircraft involved in the crash.

The downing of the army helicopter during a late-night joint military drill with the US triggered the temporary suspension of Talisman Sabre, the country’s biggest war-gaming exercise, and cast a spectre over the high-level Australia-United States Ministerial (AUSMIN) consultations in Brisbane.

About 800 defence and emergency services personnel have been scouring the site of the crash, near Hamilton Island in the Whitsundays, for the four personnel who have been missing since 10.30pm on Friday.

Defence officials revealed on Saturday evening that the helicopter’s crew were members of the army’s 6th Aviation Regiment based in Holsworthy, Sydney.

Authorities have found several pieces of debris that appear to be from a helicopter in water off the Queensland coast.

Defence Minister Richard Marles said the AUSMIN meetings had been conducted with “heavy hearts”, and the accident highlighted the bravery of Australian military personnel.

“It’s serious, it is dangerous and it does carry risk,” he said of military exercises such as Talisman Sabre.

Speaking earlier in the day, Marles said: “The families of the four aircrew have been notified of this incident and our hopes and thoughts are very much with the aircrew and their families.”

If the missing army personnel did not survive the incident, it is believed it would be the country’s worst peacetime military accident since 2005, when nine Australian service personnel were killed after a navy helicopter crashed in Indonesia during earthquake relief operations.

Foreign Minister Penny Wong said: “We are reminded that those who serve our country do so recognising the risk that that service entails and demonstrating, every day, the courage to take on that risk on our behalf.”

Brigadier Damian Hill, the officer in charge of Talisman Sabre, confirmed the crew were from the Sydney’s 6th Aviation Regiment at Holsworthy Barracks.

“The aircraft accident investigation team will arrive Saturday afternoon and will commence an investigation into the incident,” he said.

HMAS Adelaide and HMAS Huon will join the search on Sunday, when more experienced divers are expected to search the water.

Hill said that Talisman Sabre exercises had resumed in the Northern Territory and Western Australia but that an operational pause remained in place for the entire Taipan fleet.

Queensland Police Assistant Commissioner Douglas McDonald said debris recovered from the Whitsundays “appears to be from a helicopter at this stage”.

“It’s very early to confirm which parts are from the helicopter – that will form part of the investigation. At this time it remains a search-and-rescue operation,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19267207

File: f509aa8a66dc1a9⋯.jpg (3.56 MB,7400x5134,3700:2567,US_Defence_Secretary_Lloyd….jpg)

>>19267202

2/2

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said his heart was “full of concern” following the crash.

“And our hearts are full, too, because they were performing their duties alongside American servicemen and women to further strengthen our alliance, our partnership, and the work we’re doing together around the world,” he said.

“They have been on our minds throughout today. They remain very much on our minds right now.”

US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin, a retired US Army four-star general, expressed his support for the families of the missing service members, saying that “the reason that we train to such high standards is so that we can be successful and we can protect lives when we are called to answer any kind of crisis”.

“It’s always tough when you have accidents in training,” he said.

Marles and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said in a statement they had the utmost confidence in the search-and-rescue teams’ professionalism and skill.

“Our first thoughts are with the loved ones of the missing,” they said. “All Australians hold them in our hearts, and we hold onto hope as the search-and-rescue teams go about their work right now.”

Australian Defence Force Chief Angus Campbell said the crash was “a terrible moment” for the nation.

“Our focus at the moment is finding our people and supporting their families and the rest of our team,” he said.

A Maritime Safety Authority plane has been circling the area as part of the search.

Exercise Talisman Sabre, which runs until August 4, involves thousands of people from the defence forces of Australia and the United States.

Two days ago, a US Air Force commander said this exercise was the “biggest, most complex Talisman Sabre we’ve undertaken”.

Opposition defence spokesman Andrew Hastie said: “Our thoughts and prayers are with the four missing aircrew and their families involved in the ADF MRH-90 helicopter crash late last night in Queensland.”

Greens defence spokesman David Shoebridge expressed incredulity that MRH-90 Taipans were allowed to participate in the military drills given one of the helicopters crashed in shallow waters in Jervis Bay in March with 10 Defence Force personnel on board.

The late-night Jervis Bay crash, which caused minor injuries to two soldiers on board, has been linked to a failure to install upgrades to the helicopters’ software and followed previous technical glitches.

The Defence Force is set to begin phasing out its fleet of Taipans this year, a decade ahead of schedule, and replace it with 40 Black Hawk helicopters purchased from the US.

The Taipan fleet, which was grounded in 2019 because of tail rotor blade issues, had been labelled a “project of concern” by the Australian National Audit Office.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/queensland/grave-fears-after-reports-of-military-helicopter-crash-in-the-whitsundays-20230729-p5ds75.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19267242

File: a19229ff68d4d32⋯.jpg (69.93 KB,768x1025,768:1025,Lieutenant_Maxwell_Nugent.jpg)

File: 822cc2427b63b8d⋯.jpg (85.87 KB,768x1024,3:4,Warrant_Officer_Class_Two_….jpg)

File: 8ab2d3517be701d⋯.jpg (92.26 KB,768x1025,768:1025,Corporal_Alexander_Naggs.jpg)

File: 8dc25441a5828d1⋯.jpg (143.87 KB,768x1023,256:341,Captain_Daniel_Lyon.jpg)

File: e9de3d4bda3befc⋯.jpg (437.76 KB,1010x843,1010:843,ADF_helicopter_crash.jpg)

>>19226439

>>19262114

>>19262808

Police officer’s son among four feared dead in crash near Hamilton Island

The four people on board a downed military helicopter have been named after wreckage was found in the waters near Hamilton Island.

Courtney Gould, Nathan Schmidt and Jessica Wang - July 30, 2023

1/2

The four men feared dead after a Defence helicopter went down in waters off the Whitsunday Islands have been identified.

Captain Daniel Lyon, Lieutenant Maxwell Nugent, Warrant Officer Class Two Joseph Laycock, and Corporal Alexander Naggs were named by the Chief of Army, Lieutenant General Simon Stuart, as the four involved in the crash.

The crew were members of the Australian Army Aviation’s 6th Aviation Regiment based at the Holsworthy Army barracks in Sydney.

Lieutenant General Stuart said the men’s names had been released with permission from their families.

“I’m focussed on three things: The first and most pressing is to bring Daniel, Alexander, Joseph and Maxwell home to their families,” he said at the Holsworthy barracks on Sunday.

“The second is to support their families and their mates. And the third is to support the important work of the air safety team as they work out what went wrong and why.”

Search and rescue teams resumed the search for the crew of the missing MRH-90 Taipan on Sunday but it’s feared the crew members are unlikely to still be alive.

Chief of Joint Operations, Lieutenant General Greg Bilton said the large-scale search could be impeded by the conditions in the Whitsundays, which is “renowned for currents”.

“So you do get movement of any debris in the water. So that is a very important factor that affects search and rescue,” he said.

“The waves and the actual conditions at the moment are moderate. So there’s some challenge but it’s not insurmountable. It’s not stopping operations.”

He said he was “confident,” the Australian Defence Force (ADF) was capable of finding the fuselage and “our four mates”.

The chopper was conducting joint military joint military exercises as part of Operation Talisman Sabre when it crashed at about 10:30pm on Friday.

Defence Minister Richard Marles said on Sunday there was a “very real sense of poignancy and an anxiety” associated with the search and rescue.

“Our thoughts are very much with the aircrew and of course their families,” Mr Marles told troops participating in the Talisman Sabre drills in Townsville on Sunday.

“This accident makes very clear what this exercise means, the dangers that are involved, the risks that inevitably come with it.

“The significance of it all, particularly given the events of Friday night, is made very plain and very clear. We owe all of you an enormous debt of gratitude.”

In a brief statement in Canberra, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the nation’s “thoughts and prayers” were with the families of the missing crewmen.

Earlier, NSW Premier Chris Minns said his heart was with the families who “must be hurting this morning”.

He confirmed one of those feared dead was the son of a senior NSW police officer.

“(They’re) a family that’s given so much to the people of this state, of this country,” he told Sky News on Sunday.

“I can only imagine what they’re going through today. It’s just devastating.”

More than 800 personnel across military and emergency services are joined the search and rescue mission, including specialist navy divers.

Defence Force Chief General Angus Campbell said “a number” of Australian and US ships were involved in the search, including the HMAS Adelaide, HMAS Brisbane and the USS Miguel Keith.

He also acknowledged the support provided by the Queensland Police Service, the state’s emergency services, and the ADF’s international partners.

“I’d just like to acknowledge the reach out and the support that’s been provided by our allies and partners, particularly the United States,” he said.

“Once again, the same resolute support that we’re receiving now, as we’ve received in the past and we’re grateful for it.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19267248

File: ed3e5a64b262d59⋯.jpg (204.42 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Mr_Albanese_said_the_natio….jpg)

File: 94f6dc93984a300⋯.jpg (323.9 KB,1252x1669,1252:1669,Rescue_aircraft_are_search….jpg)

File: 7b6ec15947847aa⋯.jpg (333.78 KB,1262x1682,631:841,Rescue_aircraft_are_search….jpg)

File: 9e4a7800f552037⋯.jpg (107.35 KB,1280x720,16:9,An_MRH_90_helicopter_pract….jpg)

>>19267242

2/2

An investigation has been launched into the cause of the crash. The entire MH-90 Taipan fleet have been grounded until further notice.

It’s the second time an Australian MH-90 has been involved in an emergency this year after a helicopter ditched into Jervis Bay on the NSW south coast during routine training.

But Lieutenant General Stuart has rejected suggestions the four men should not have flown the Taipan due to known issues with the chopper.

“We’ve understood those issues and we have worked to ensure that we’ve mitigated those risks,” he said.

“We don’t fly if we don’t think it's safe and that continues to be the case.”

An exclusion zone remains in place in waters south of Hamilton Island and incorporates waters from the southern tip of Long Island, east to Perseverance Island, south to Cole Island, and west to the mainland at Round Head.

Exclusion zones also extend to 1000m from any military vessel.

It is understood all debris is being delivered to nearby warship Brisbane.

Members of the pubic who locate debris are urged not to handle it and to contact police.

Talisman Sabre exercise director Brigadier Damian Hill said the water is “quite deep” in the area being searched and the arrival of HMAS Huon on Sunday would assist with the search.

“HMAS Huon has some of our more experienced divers should we need to look under the water for wreckage as the search and rescue continues,” he said.

What is Exercise Talisman Sabre?

The chopper was taking part in Exercise Talisman Sabre, which has been paused in light of the accident.

According to the Australian Army, the MRH-90 Taipan aircraft is one of the “most advanced tactical troop transport helicopters of the 21st century.”

The ADF currently has 47 of the choppers – which can reach maximum speeds of 300km per hour – through the Advanced Helicopter Program for Australia.

The MRH-90 also reportedly has the “highest crashworthy standards”.

It comes only a week after Talisman Sabre commenced, with the deputy prime minister kicked off the exercise in an opening ceremony in Canberra.

“It is a privilege to officially open Talisman Sabre 2023 and welcome all participating nations,” Mr Marles said on July 21.

Talisman Sabre, is the ADF’s biggest training exercise, involving more than 31,000 soldiers, marines, sailors and pilots from across 13 countries.

US Marines and Australian soldiers have been conducting exercises together in the Whitsundays as part of Talisman Sabre.

Australian and US forces have been joined by officers from Canada, Fiji, Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, Tonga, Japan, Korea, New Zealand, the UK, France and Germany.

Support services for ADF personnel

Defence all-hours support line 1800 628 036

Defence Member and Family Helpline 1800 624 608

For information on how to access mental health professionals 1800 IMSICK (1800 467 425)

Open Arms – Veterans & Families Counselling (formerly VVCS) 1800 011 046

Department of Veterans’ Affairs 1800 838 372

https://www.news.com.au/technology/innovation/military/four-feared-dead-after-military-chopper-crashes-near-hamilton-island/news-story/88b9e579d9db560f2c0af67adb091d02

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19267266

File: afe9ff19c87596a⋯.jpg (2.05 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Royal_Australian_Navy_sail….jpg)

File: df6da6a6158e4d3⋯.jpg (64.92 KB,960x720,4:3,Warrant_Officer_Class_Two_….jpg)

File: ae0558f06ca51c3⋯.jpg (146.39 KB,844x839,844:839,Captain_Danniel_Lyon.jpg)

File: 21a92732bb870b7⋯.jpg (102.71 KB,960x960,1:1,Lieutenant_Max_Nugent.jpg)

File: bb947395d06f410⋯.jpg (112.34 KB,864x836,216:209,Corporal_Alexander_Naggs.jpg)

>>19226439

>>19262114

>>19262808

Four missing defence aviators identified, search-and-rescue mission continues near Hamilton Island after Taipan helicopter crash

abc.net.au - 30 July 2023

1/2

Four Australian Defence Force (ADF) personnel who were on board a Taipan helicopter that crashed into waters near Hamilton Island have been identified.

Captain Danniel Lyon, Lieutenant Maxwell Nugent, Warrant Officer Class Two Joseph Laycock and Corporal Alexander Naggs were on board the MRH90 helicopter that ditched into the ocean during a training exercise as part of Exercise Talisman Sabre on Friday night.

All were members of the 6th Aviation Regiment.

Lieutenant General Simon Stuart, the Chief of the Australian Army, said the families of the men were being supported by the ADF and had consented to the names of the missing men being released.

"My thoughts and prayers are with their families and their mates here at the 6th Aviation Regiment as they wait for more news about their loved ones," Lieutenant General Stuart said.

"We will continue to support their families and their mates in the coming days and weeks, months and years, no matter the outcome."

Defence Minister Richard Marles confirmed that while parts of the helicopter had been located, the main body of the airframe had not yet been found.

"There are specialist assets that are on task right now that are doing that job," he said.

Lieutenant General Stuart said the investigation into the cause of the crash is still ongoing.

He said the 6th Aviation Regiment is a "highly professional and highly skilled" unit.

"This is the aviation unit that supports and performs our special operations set of missions," he said.

"I couldn't be more proud of them as professionals, as soldiers and as people."

Parts of the helicopter were recovered from waters near Lindeman Island on Saturday, with specialist divers today searching underwater in the area where the crash occurred.

ADF Chief of Joint Operations Lieutenant General Greg Bilton said broader Talisman Sabre exercises had recommenced, but special operations activities in the Whitsundays remained on hold.

"The Whitsundays area is renowned for currents, so you do get some movement of any debris in the water," he said.

"That is a very important factor that affects searching and rescue.

"The waves and the actual conditions at the moment are moderate, so there's some challenge but it's not insurmountable, it's not stopping operations."

Lieutenant General Bilton said he was confident in the capability of those on the ground to find "our four mates".

Mr Marles spoke to ADF personnel and others involved in Exercise Talisman Sabre in Townsville earlier on Sunday alongside US Secretary of Defence Lloyd Austin.

"This accident makes very real what this exercise means, the dangers that are involved, and the risks that inevitably come with it," he said.

Mr Austin said the US was assisting with the search-and-rescue efforts.

"My thoughts are with the four Australians who were involved in the helicopter crash yesterday, and our hearts go out to their loved ones during this terribly difficult time," he said.

"As I told the deputy prime minister, the United States stands ready to provide any further assistance that we can."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19267268

File: e46ba09b2cf57ed⋯.jpg (84.21 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Wreckage_was_pulled_from_w….jpg)

File: 44c2ed9758d4c0c⋯.jpg (1.67 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,An_Australian_Army_MRH_90_….jpg)

File: 4583f040019c4d8⋯.jpg (82.15 KB,845x563,845:563,The_police_exclusion_zone_….jpg)

File: 00cd3bbf4bba1f9⋯.jpg (575.06 KB,1505x809,1505:809,Defence_support_services_W….jpg)

>>19267266

2/2

Federal MP for Herbert and ex-serviceman Phillip Thompson said news of the crash was unexpected and "gut-wrenching" for the North Queensland and wider defence community.

He said it had been "all hands on deck" to find the missing men.

"Our thoughts, prayers and love go out to the family, and soldiers from around Australia and sailors and aviators are stopping everything and will stop at nothing to ensure that they find these four Australian soldiers," Mr Thompson said.

"I've had friends of mine who are in the water now searching, and they were in the water last night as well.

"They've told me that they won't be stopping until they find their mates."

Police have implemented an exclusion zone in waters south of Hamilton Island, which includes waters within 1,000m of any military vessel.

"Navy and Queensland police divers have commenced operations today to assist in the search and rescue operation," the Queensland Police Service (QPS) said in a statement.

"Members of the public who locate debris are urged not to handle it and to contact police.

"Handling of any debris could impact on investigations or cause injury."

In a short address from Parliament House Canberra on Sunday afternoon, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said "every Australian" was feeling for the families, friends and colleagues of those missing.

"This is a stark reminder that there are no safe or easy days for those who serve in our country's name," Mr Albanese said.

"All Australians owe a debt to the brave men and women who wear our uniform and serve in order to protect our way of life here in Australia."

Phillip Thompson, who served in the Australian Army and was injured while on deployment to Afghanistan in 2009, said the Defence Force's decision to ground its Taipan fleet was "the right decision".

"I'm not a fan of the MRH90 and I've been very public about that … but we are still unsure of the extent of what caused this accident," he said.

"It's still too early to know."

Defence chief Angus Campbell yesterday described the crash as a "terrible moment".

"I really deeply appreciate the assistance that has been provided by a variety of civil agencies — the Queensland Police, the Australian Maritime Safety Agency, and the public as well as our US allies," he said.

The incident comes just months after another incident involving a Taipan helicopter off the New South Wales south coast where 10 ADF personnel — including special forces soldiers — had to be rescued after the MRH90 ditched into the sea at Jervis Bay during counterterrorism exercises.

The ADF had plans to withdraw Taipans from service in 2024.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-30/adf-taipan-helicopter-crash-missing-aviators-missing/102665898

https://www.defence.gov.au/adf-members-families/health-well-being

https://www.openarms.gov.au/

https://soldieron.org.au/supporting-you/health-and-wellbeing/

https://www.defenceveteranslegalservice.org.au/Home

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19267275

File: 8c7a1b003afb0ee⋯.jpg (279.3 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Yes_advocate_Megan_Davis_h….jpg)

File: 6959adfeacfd1b0⋯.jpg (247.51 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Noel_Pearson.jpg)

>>19222755

Key voice architect Megan Davis criticises media for coverage of the voice referendum

SOPHIE ELSWORTH - JULY 30, 2023

Key voice to parliament architects have accused the media of “driving sentiment” towards a no vote while conceding their own messaging needs to be positive.

Numerous polls in recent months have shown declining support for a yes vote at the upcoming referendum and advocates Megan Davis and Noel Pearson are among those to criticise the mainstream media’s coverage of the debate.

Professor Davis, the Balnaves chair in constitutional law at the University of NSW, lambasted the media last week and said she had seen significant support for a yes vote while visiting communities across the country, which was at odds to negative media coverage showing falling support.

“We are having deep conversations with Aussies and we are not picking up, nor is Yes23, the kind of sentiment that we are seeing in the media, where they are driving the sentiment … downwards, to no,” she told ABC presenter Phillip Adams on his Late Night Live program last week.

“We don’t believe it will be a no, we believe it will be a yes. We absolutely believe in the fundamental decency of Australians to understand the voice and the exigency of the voice and why this is one of our last chances at change.”

Prof Davis criticised politicians leading the voice debate including Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, Opposition Leader Peter Dutton and opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price while taking a veiled swipe at the media.

“All (people) are hearing is Albo, Jacinta, Dutton, politician, politician, politician,” she said.

“The Uluru Statement from the Heart was issued to the Australian people because we know how the media behave and we know how retail politics happens in Australia.”

Mr Albanese has yet to set a date for the referendum and this month admitted the yes campaign must “be stronger” in putting forward its arguments.

Mr Pearson was careful in his criticisms of the media when he addressed a La Trobe University online event last week but said the yes campaign had to be positive.

“Well it is what it is, there’s not much I can do about that (the media) and not much anyone can do about that other than to persist with our case with dignity, with perseverance, with not shying away from our objective, we have got to be positive,” he said.

“There’s a lot of reason for grief and discombobulation but I just think we have got to keep our eyes on the prize, we have got to keep going.

“I’ll leave it to the historians to tell us about how the media covered this campaign.”

Mr Pearson sparked fury last year after he accused Senator Price of being trapped in a “redneck celebrity vortex” and using right-wing think tanks including the Centre for Independent Studies and Institute of Public Affairs to “punch down on other black fellas”.

Mr Pearson doubled down on these comments in an opinion article published in The Australian in May and said Warren Mundine and Senator Price were “glove puppets” for the think tanks. “The fists inside the puppets punching down on Indigenous people are white,” he wrote.

Constitutional lawyer Shireen Morris, a yes campaigner, moderated the La Trobe event and said they had constantly had to deal with “lies” said about the voice.

“We have to answer the lies with facts, we have to deal in the truth,” she said.

This month The Australian reported on another voice architect, Thomas Mayo, who condemned the media for publishing “negative headlines” on “positive stories” about the voice saying it was harming the yes campaign.

Indigenous lawyer Teela Reid – an adviser on the Indigenous voice to parliament – also criticised social media and said people without authority in the Aboriginal community were getting traction when they shouldn’t be.

“Often, especially around social media … what you’ll find is that there are the most popular voices (that) get traction or the most controversial opinions go viral and they are often not those people with authority in our community,” she said on a recent episode of her podcast, Blak Matters, on Southern Cross Austereo’s LiSTNR platform.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/key-voice-architect-megan-davis-criticises-media-for-coverage-of-the-voice-referendum/news-story/20f021a882f71162e82d874ab37dad28

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19267283

File: b620f71cdf59339⋯.jpg (81.48 KB,1280x720,16:9,Megan_Davis.jpg)

File: 411eb446bcf436b⋯.jpg (91.22 KB,1280x720,16:9,Professor_George_Williams_….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19267275

Without the Indigenous voice to parliament, a treaty is vulnerable

MEGAN DAVIS and GEORGE WILLIAMS - JULY 29, 2023

1/2

The Uluru Statement from the Heart called for a constitutionally protected voice to parliament, treaty and truth. The reforms are listed in a sequence. The sequence is deliberate, and understanding the order is central to the message of the Uluru statement. It was based on recognition that public institutions, politicians and political parties rarely listen to what Indigenous peoples say about their lives and aspirations. Too often these bodies rewrite, reinterpret and rearrange the things that First Peoples themselves say on matters of reform.

The process was predicated on an amendment to the text of the Australian Constitution through a referendum of the Australian people. The voice to parliament is that reform. A treaty does not require constitutional amendment, nor does “truth-telling”, at least in the way treaty and truth were contemplated by those involved in the dialogues.

The voice to parliament is a structural reform. It is a change to the structure of Australia’s public institutions and would redistribute public power via the Constitution, Australia’s highest law. The reform will create an institutional relationship between governments and First Nations that will compel the state to listen to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in policy and decision-making.

The next phase of the sequence of the Uluru reforms is a makarrata, a process of agreement-making and truth-telling. Treaty has been a long-time aspiration for Aboriginal people. Negotiating a treaty is a nation-to-nation process that requires leverage and resources. Having a voice to parliament will increase the likelihood that treaty negotiations will be productive and successful.

The voice will be an enabling mechanism for First Nations people in any treaty negotiations. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are in a poor negotiating position compared with the state. The voice would create the commission that will support First Nations in those negotiations. Without the voice, a treaty is vulnerable because of the considerable legal power of the commonwealth. State treaty processes are also particularly vulnerable, including those that are ongoing in Australia. Each runs the risk of being undermined by the commonwealth.

The First Nations Regional Dialogues unanimously ranked a voice to the Australian parliament as the No.1 priority in their region and for constitutional recognition.

The idea of a voice to parliament stems from the experience of many Indigenous peoples globally who seek to find pragmatic and functional ways of influencing government. After all, many Indigenous peoples are vulnerable to the state, whose laws and policies often shape the way their lives are lived.

Democracies also function in a way that centres elections as the primary method by which community sentiment is determined. And the ballot box, based on free and fair periodic elections, is a numbers game, given that the representative with the greatest number of votes wins the opportunity to represent the community. The numbers game of elections plays against Indigenous peoples’ issues. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples may be the First Peoples, but they are less than 3 per cent of the Australian population. Majority vote at the ballot box and in parliament means it is difficult for their voice to be heard and for them to influence laws that are made about them. It is not surprising, then, that Indigenous peoples have argued for political representation and fairer consultation for more than a century.

In 2007, the UN General Assembly adopted a framework of Indigenous peoples’ rights that reflected global agreement on the minimum standards that should be afforded by the state. In 2009, Australia endorsed the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which emphasises the importance of genuine Indigenous participation and consultation in political decisions made about their rights. However, no formal processes for this to occur have yet been implemented in Australia.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19267284

File: b42863ba4fc92ed⋯.jpg (331.74 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Megan_Davis_re_reads_the_S….jpg)

>>19267283

2/2

The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples sets out treaties and agreements as separate to the kind of constitutional power envisaged by the voice. Treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements are critical for the state and Indigenous peoples to negotiate partnership and rights. These may be recognised constitutionally, legislatively or by way of private law in contract. However, they are separate and in addition to the kind of structural power enabled by constitutional recognition for the voice.

While a treaty might contemplate issues that are exclusively for First Nations to lead on, the reality is that most matters will have some input from different levels of government. The idea behind a voice to parliament is that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are engaged in the development and implementation of laws, policies and programs that always affect them and their rights. This is the only way to achieve better quality policies and laws and a fairer relationship with government.

This is one of the compelling reasons the First Nations dialogues thought the Constitution should be amended by establishing an Indigenous body – as many other countries have – to advise parliament on laws and policies relating to Indigenous affairs.

Such a body would ensure that the views of First Peoples are heard by lawmakers and could help parliament enact better and more effective laws. Other countries with a similar structure include Norway, Sweden and Finland, which all have a First Nations parliament with various degrees of authority over some matters and a right to be consulted on legislation. In New Zealand, there are seven seats reserved in parliament for Maori people. In Colombia, there is a constitutional provision that requires government to consult with Indigenous peoples before allowing natural resource exploitation on Indigenous lands.

These examples, and the proposed voice in Australia, are all consistent with the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, particularly article 18, which states: “Indigenous peoples have the right to participate in decision-making in matters which would affect their rights, through representatives chosen by themselves in accordance with their own procedures, as well as to maintain and develop their own indigenous decision-making institutions”.

The idea that a voice could scrutinise or monitor the commonwealth’s use of power as it relates to Indigenous peoples is not new in Australia’s constitutional system. There are many mechanisms that inform and advise the federal parliament on such matters. The Productivity Commission, the Australian Law Reform Commission, the Auditor-General and the Australian National Audit Office are examples. Another example of such monitoring work is the scrutiny of proposed laws under the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011. All of these mechanisms are intended to improve the quality of law and policymaking by the commonwealth.

As constitutional law professor Anne Twomey has said: “It is hard to imagine that anyone would argue that it is better for parliament to be ignorant and ill-informed, its laws ineffective and its expenditure wasteful. There can be no harm in listening to the views of others and using them to improve outcomes.”

Such reforms have been frequently suggested over the years. The Barunga Statement in 1988 called for a “national elected Aboriginal and Islander organisation to oversee Aboriginal and Islander affairs”. The Barunga Statement also called for “the commonwealth parliament to negotiate with us a treaty recognising our prior ownership, continued occupation and sovereignty and affirming our human rights and freedom”.

The calls for reform over the past century reveal advocacy for a voice within the democratic framework of the state as a pragmatic way of First Nations adapting to the legal and political environment imposed on them.

There is also advocacy for a framework for a treaty that would enable communities to practise self-determination. This two-tier approach is common in countries with significant Indigenous populations to ensure every possible mechanism can be adopted to influence the state and to leverage public power to drive change in communities.

This is an edited extract from Everything You Need to Know About the Voice by the co-author of the Uluru Statement from the Heart, Cobble Cobble woman Megan Davis, and fellow constitutional expert George Williams, published by NewSouth Books, out Tuesday.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/without-the-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-a-treaty-is-vulnerable/news-story/c981e109347357241dd87c435a89b2de

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19267290

File: bda8c421847e11e⋯.jpg (1.36 MB,1840x1228,460:307,Anthony_Albanese_says_the_….jpg)

>>19222755

One third of voters undecided or open to change: Voice poll

Phillip Coorey - Jul 27, 2023

A nationwide polling exercise of more than 14,000 people undertaken by federal Labor shows almost a third of voters are either undecided or can be swayed towards voting Yes for the Indigenous Voice to Parliament, leading the government to conclude the referendum is not lost yet.

The Australian Financial Review has learned that earlier this month, over a period of two weeks, Labor surveyed 14,300 voters in what was the most comprehensive polling exercise the party has undertaken outside last year’s federal election campaign.

The polling, which drilled down into voter intention and attitudes across all demographics, found on a superficial basis there was 48 per cent support for the Yes vote, 47 per cent for the No vote, and 5 per cent were undecided.

But when voters were pushed and the responses further distilled, 32 per cent of all voters were classified as either undecided or “soft”, which meant they were still open to changing their minds.

Moreover, the hard Yes vote was just shy of 40 per cent, while the hard No vote was much lower at around 30 per cent.

A referendum needs a double majority to pass, meaning it needs a national majority, and a majority of votes in each of at least four of the six states.

Labor’s research showed the Yes vote was ahead of the No vote in Victoria, South Australia and Tasmania, tied at 47-47 in NSW, while in Queensland and Western Australia, 28 per cent of No voters were open to changing their minds.

The research findings come a day after The Australian Financial Review reported that internal research by the government, the Yes23 campaign and allied third parties all had similar findings: that the headline No vote as reported by the published opinion polls was a lot softer than the Yes vote.

A separate Roy Morgan poll of more than 2700 people taken a month ago found a solid 48.2 per cent Yes vote, in that they were very certain or certain that was how they would vote.

The solid No vote was 27.9 per cent while 23.9 per cent were considered “up for grabs”.

The findings of Labor’s research coincided with a strategic shift by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese two weeks ago designed to salvage the referendum.

He dumped plans to announce the referendum date when he attends the Garma Festival in Arnhem land at the end of next week and will instead announce the date later in the year, as if he were calling an election.

A minimum five to six-week campaign will follow during which the government and the Yes23 campaign will focus on the large swath of undecided voters.

By not announcing a date much further out, it reduces the risk of people feeling pressured to make up their mind now.

Recently, a Newspoll showed a fall in support among female voters, leading to assumptions that those most concerned about the cost of living were turning against the Voice.

But one pro-Voice strategist argued these women traditionally were a compassionate demographic and most likely, in the privacy of a polling booth, would be inclined to vote Yes.

The most likely date for the referendum is October 14, although Mr Albanese could push it to the first Saturday in November if need be. Beyond that, the onset of the wet season in the north will hinder the ability of people to vote, including many Indigenous people.

https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/one-third-of-voters-undecided-or-open-to-change-voice-poll-20230727-p5drlm

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19267294

File: 5e934b1396fe121⋯.jpg (219.77 KB,1499x843,1499:843,Mark_Zuckerberg_s_Facebook….jpg)

File: 2286e56ca73f6ad⋯.jpg (146.64 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Crime_agencies_say_end_to_….jpg)

>>19243683

Nations unite against Facebook over encryption plans ‘that endanger children’

CAROLINE WHEELER and DIPESH GADHER - JULY 30, 2023

1/2

Britain’s home secretary has been building an international alliance to take on Facebook over its plans to introduce default end-to-end encryption for its messaging apps.

Suella Braverman has warned Mark Zuckerberg, the boss of Meta, Facebook’s parent company, that “there will be no let-up” amid fears about the technology’s use by pedophiles and other criminals.

End-to-end encryption stops anyone but the sender and recipient of a message seeing it, meaning the companies cannot police the content, making it an ideal tool for criminals. Meta will introduce it on Facebook Messenger and Instagram Direct chats this year.

Braverman spoke last week to Alejandro Mayorkas, the US homeland security secretary, to enlist his support for the campaign, which has the backing of Britain’s Five Eyes security partners, including Australia and New Zealand.

A government source said: “Meta’s introduction of end-to-end encryption without the safeguards which are currently in place will provide an online haven for pedophiles, organised criminals and fraudsters. It’s crucial for the safety of our children and citizens that they think again. The whole of government is clear about the terrible threat that this poses and the home secretary and security minister are pushing hard to drive this message home to Meta. There will be no let-up.”

Meta scans all messages on its platforms and is obliged by US law to report any suspected child abuse activity, including obscene images, to the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. Of the 32 million referrals made by tech companies last year, more than 21 million came from Facebook and just over five million were from Instagram.

Leads that might involve offences committed in the UK are passed to the National Crime Agency and then to police forces. Content from Facebook and Instagram is one of the biggest sources of evidence for British police, who arrest about 800 suspected pedophiles a month. The evidence collected helps to protect up to 1200 children each month. Crime agencies say that end-to-end encryption would severely hamper this.

Rob Jones, director-general of operations at the NCA, said: “The continuing rollout of privacy-enhancing technologies like end-to-end encryption means that the light that has been shone on child abuse on the internet will be switched off.

“Slowly but surely, 25 years of insight into online child abuse will be killed. And that insight, day on day, results in children being rescued and people who are involved in child abuse being arrested. It’s as simple as that.

“The relationship with Meta is vital to UK law enforcement. They provide 25 per cent of all the referrals in relation to online child abuse that we act on in the UK. These figures represent children that are at risk and offenders trying to abuse children. Our ability to act is based on these referrals.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19267296

File: 0735858387cc05b⋯.jpg (136.97 KB,1280x720,16:9,Pedophiles_regularly_use_F….jpg)

>>19267294

2/2

Meta has been under increasing pressure to compete with its newer encrypted messenger rivals, such as Telegram and Signal, particularly in the US.

In the wake of the Capitol riot in January 2021, when Donald Trump supporters stormed Congress, tens of millions of people switched to more secure messaging apps. They were reacting to tech giants, including Facebook and Twitter, removing thousands of right-wing and far-right accounts, including Trump’s.

In the UK last month, Apple became the latest organisation to criticise powers in the Online Safety Bill that could be used to force encrypted messaging tools, such as iMessage, WhatsApp and Signal, to scan messages for child abuse. Privacy campaigners and tech firms argue the system is needed to protect personal privacy and data security.

Pedophiles regularly use Facebook Messenger and Instagram chats to identify potential victims, often by posing as teenagers. Jordan Croft, jailed for 26 years last November after abusing girls as young as 12, is believed to have targeted some of his victims through Facebook and Instagram.

Croft, 26, later ordered them to switch to Telegram, an encrypted app, where he blackmailed the girls into sending him images and videos carrying out sexually degrading acts on themselves and others.

Meta said: “The overwhelming majority of Brits already rely on apps that use encryption. We don’t think people want us reading their private messages, so have developed safety measures that prevent, detect and allow us to take action against this heinous abuse, while maintaining online privacy and security … We remain committed to working with law enforcement and child safety experts to ensure that our platforms are safe for young people.”

Meta restricts adults from sending private messages to teenagers who do not follow them, and finds and removes suspicious accounts using machine-learning technology.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/the-times/nations-unite-against-facebook-over-encryption-plans-that-endanger-children/news-story/cd9df44f2f0a8d6fda9fef64f529f6b4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19267311

File: 52a63aeff9333c7⋯.jpg (790.56 KB,3000x2000,3:2,Anti_fascist_protesters_ma….jpg)

File: 935a507a1cf44b2⋯.jpg (1.26 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Police_kept_protesters_sep….jpg)

File: eda15654731e8d0⋯.jpg (183.68 KB,1280x853,1280:853,Dozens_of_far_right_activi….jpg)

Anti-fascist protesters rally outside neo-Nazi weightlifting event

Marta Pascual Juanola - July 29, 2023

Police stopped anti-fascism protesters from clashing with a group of neo-Nazis holding a “white powerlifting competition” at a boxing gym in Melbourne’s west on Saturday.

Dozens of anti-fascism protesters marched to the Legacy Boxing Gym in Sunshine West, walking down Industrial Drive just before 3pm chanting “unite, unite, unite to fight the right”, before calling on the white supremacists to face them in the street.

The neo-Nazi group waved at the protesters and performed Sieg Heil salutes from behind a fence, but did not leave the gym – previously linked to far-right groups – while demonstrators were outside.

The protest ended about 3.30pm.

Before the protest began, a small group of balaclava-clad white supremacists walked outside the gym, which was adorned with Nazi symbolism.

Barricades, two police lines and a buffer zone separated both groups. Victoria Police had declared the area around the gym a designated area, allowing officers to search people and vehicles for weapons, and remove anyone from the area they suspected intended to brawl.

White supremacist groups the National Socialist Network and the European Australian Movement were holding a two-day event for members of the “nationalist community” at the gym, which has been connected to some of Victoria’s most prominent neo-Nazis.

The event was organised by prominent white supremacy activist Thomas Sewell and was promoted in flyers circulated on encrypted chats as a “white powerlifting competition” and luncheon, with speeches and seminars to be held at a secret location for pre-approved guests only.

“Neo-Nazis are desperately trying to build a following, and they’re doing it in the heart of one of Melbourne’s most multicultural suburbs,” rally organiser Jasmine Duff said.

“Their aim, as always, is to draw in more angry, violent men and build a movement that preaches hate, discrimination, and violence against the rest of Australia.”

An investigation by The Age last year uncovered links between Legacy Boxing Gym, well-known Neo-Nazi activists, and a growing community of young men boxing at the gym.

Images posted in encrypted far-right chat groups captured a secret event at the gym last year, which was adorned with swastika and SS flags, as well as other far-right symbolism.

Sewell, who was convicted of assaulting a Channel Nine security guard earlier this year, was photographed at the event posing with a child and dozens of other far-right supporters.

This masthead also uncovered several pictures showing gym director Timothy Holger Lutze and young members of the gym making Nazi salutes.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/anti-fascist-protesters-rally-outside-neo-nazi-weightlifting-event-20230728-p5ds0t.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19267329

File: 286a28a990f226a⋯.jpg (242.66 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Keith_Hartley_is_an_Austra….jpg)

File: 3feaa240d10de04⋯.jpg (273.03 KB,1600x1600,1:1,Test_pilot_Keith_Hartley.jpg)

File: 90cdefa71ebd85a⋯.jpg (108.02 KB,800x1068,200:267,Daniel_Duggan_a_pilot_accu….jpg)

>>18940061 (pb)

>>19226522

Adelaide top gun Keith Hartley provided training for Chinese airmen, search warrant claims

LIAM MENDES - JULY 30, 2023

An Adelaide-based former jet fighter pilot is accused of conducting training for military exercises that were “directed, funded or supervised’’ by China’s People’s Liberation Army.

Former RAF top gun Keith Andrew Hartley, 74, is suspected of providing “training involving the use of arms or practising military exercises” to PLA pilots between June 2018 and January 2022.

The allegations emerged after Mr Hartley lost a Federal Court bid to have the Australian Federal Police search warrant used to search his home in November voided. He has not been charged with any offence.

The raid related to his role as chief operating officer of controversial South African company Test Flying Academy of South Africa (TFASA).

While refusing to go into details of his case, Mr Hartley, who flew for the RAF under the call sign “Hooligan”, said: “Of course I’m innocent.”

“I know full well why it’s happening, but that’s not for the moment for me to say,” he said.

He is the second Australian-based former military fighter pilot being investigated for his involvement in the alleged training of Chinese fighter pilots, with former US Marine pilot Dan Duggan incarcerated while he fights an extradition request by the US government.

“Dan is separate from me, and from the South African Academy, but his back story is very similar to it and it’s other people that are playing the game, and they’re just using whoever they think can give value to their cause to support it, that’s it,” Mr Hartley said.

He did not elaborate due to ongoing legal proceedings.

Mr Hartley launched Federal Court proceedings in December seeking an order that the warrant – issued by South Australian magistrate Lynette Duncan – be deemed invalid, and he applied for an injunction preventing the AFP from “accessing, reviewing [or] ­divulging” the seized material.

The search warrant allowed investigators to collect fingerprints at the premises and granted to the AFP the ability to seize “evidential material” in relation to a list of 35 military entities, people, aircraft, companies and countries investigators might find in his possession.

Mr Hartley argued in the Federal Court the search warrant was “ambiguous” and contained “multiple … errors”.

Lawyers for Mr Hartley challenged how the alleged training was “directed, funded or supervised” by the PLA.

But in her judgment, obtained by The Australian, Justice Wendy Abraham disagreed. “It is plain from the warrant that the applicant is alleged to have ‘provided training’, that is, he is a principal offender,” she said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/adelaide-top-gun-keith-hartley-provided-training-for-chinese-airmen-search-warrant-claims/news-story/e12d49fbf987b5b63447cb8ae8dcaec6

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19272518

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19226439

>>19262114

‘No hope’ of finding ADF servicemen alive: Richard Marles

JOE KELLY - JULY 31, 2023

There is no longer any hope of finding alive the four men aboard the MRH-90 Taipan helicopter when it crashed into the ocean off Queensland’s Whitsunday Islands on Friday night, with the government shifting the search and rescue mission to a recovery operation.

Defence Minister Richard Marles on Monday said the nation’s fleet of MRH-90 helicopters would be grounded and not flown until a full investigation had been conducted, casting doubt on whether the aircraft would be used again.

“We will not be flying MRH-90s until we understand what’s happened,” he said. “There will be a full investigation of what has happened. We will come to understand, as a result of that, exactly what has occurred and we will learn the lessons from that.”

“The investigation is going to be thorough. We need to understand what occurred. If there are steps which then need to be taken, we need to take those steps. And until all of that has happened the MRH-90s will not fly.”

Mr Marles said the “significant wreckage” from the helicopter — which crashed during the joint Australia-US Talisman Sabre military exercise taking place across northern Queensland — had revealed a “catastrophic” incident had occurred.

The comments reveal the government’s conviction that the four men on the MRH-90 helicopter on Friday have been killed and could not have survived the crash in what is shaping up as the worst peacetime military accident in Australia in almost 20 years.

“There was a catastrophic incident,” Mr Marles said. “And with every passing hour it is now clear that any hope of finding captain Captain [Daniel] Lyon, Lieutenant [Maxwell] Nugent, [Joseph] Laycock and [Alexander] Naggs are lost,” Mr Marles said. “As such, the nature of the activities which are being undertaken in the Whitsundays have transferred from being ones of search and rescue to an activity of recovery.”

The families of the four men were notified this morning and Mr Marles said he had spoken to each of them.

“I do want to assure them and assure the nation that the determined recovery effort involving hundreds of defence force personnel will continue,” he said. “What we do know is that defence exercises are serious. They carry risk and are such they are dangerous. But they are so important. These exercises have played a critical part in providing for the collective security and peace of the region.”

“The loss of these four men is as significant and meaningful as the loss of anyone who has worn our nation’s uniform. If it is as we imagine it to be, they died on Friday night making a difference.”

Chief of the Defence Force, Angus Campbell, said the recovery operation was challenging and was taking place in the waters around the Whitsunday Islands “where there are quite strong currents and tidal movements.”

He said the waters moved below the depth of a standard diving operation, meaning sonar equipment was needed to identify pieces of the wreckage and that specialist divers would be required. “This is not an easy operation,” he said.

“The investigation … will scrutinise every aspect of this event. And we will be seeking to recover as much as possible of the (helicopter) and for as long as required.”

“There are data recording systems, so that will be of assistance. But the material and mechanical state of the (helicopter) as in other air investigations can be meticulously put back together and hence understood.

“That’s for investigators. But it is not time now for careless or speculative comments.”

General Campbell provided an assurance that the Talisman Sabre exercises would be continuing, but would be “adjusted or changed” in the vicinity of the crash site “in a way that enables the recovery effort to continue at scale.”

Questioned on the history of problems with the Taipan helicopters over a period of years, Mr Marles also provided an assurance that they had been “certified to fly” in the military exercises.

“They won’t fly again until we understand what has happened.”

No details were provided on who would lead the crash investigation.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/no-hope-of-finding-adf-servicemen-alive-richard-marles/news-story/5fd5075c04090f1a972b954062a1c09f

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0phKUV5dB0o

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19272527

File: 79a090ebdcf4c1f⋯.jpg (199.58 KB,1200x801,400:267,Defence_Minister_Richard_M….jpg)

File: 6e1a2178e6b96d0⋯.jpg (1.33 MB,5000x3270,500:327,Mr_Marles_did_not_go_into_….jpg)

File: 60e0f895aa2d777⋯.jpg (2.17 MB,5000x3172,1250:793,The_AUSMIN_talks_were_held….jpg)

>>19226439

>>19262419

US military analysts to embed in Australia's defence department to monitor regional threats in wake of AUSMIN talks

Stephen Dziedzic - 31 July 2023

American military analysts will soon be sent to work at the Defence Intelligence Organisation (DIO) in Canberra as both allies intensify joint efforts to scrutinise the moves of states like China, Russia and North Korea in the region.

The US and Australia announced that they would establish a "Combined Intelligence Centre — Australia" within the DIO by next year, saying the new entity would "enhance long-standing intelligence cooperation".

It comes in the wake of the AUSMIN talks between the two nations on Saturday

Defence Minister Richard Marles said that while the US and Australia already had deep intelligence ties and shared large amounts of information, the announcement represented a "significant step forward" towards "seamless" intelligence ties.

"It does enable us to do joint work and you will then see more joint [intelligence] products coming out of this," he said.

"This is a unit which is going to produce intelligence for both of our defence forces … and I think that's important."

"You'll get an American perspective into the American system seen from Australia. And that is not insignificant."

Mr Marles' declined to say what the joint intelligence centre would work on, and the joint communique issued after AUSMIN says only that it will look at "analysing issues of shared strategic concern in the Indo-Pacific."

But US analysts from the Defense Intelligence Agency and their Australian counterparts say they are very likely to focus sharply on China's military footprint in the region and its moves to cement security ties with countries across Asia and the Pacific.

The Defence Minister also denied the United States was making the move because it had been unsettled by the security pact signed by China and Solomon Islands last year — a move which blindsided Australian officials and undermined American confidence in Canberra's intelligence capabilities in the Pacific.

Mr Marles made the comments after travelling to Townsville with US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin on Sunday, the day after they held joint talks with Foreign Minister Penny Wong and US Secretary of State Antony Blinken in Brisbane on Saturday.

The two men travelled to Lavarack Barracks to meet some of the thousands of military personnel taking part in the massive Operation Talisman Sabre military exercises.

Both paid tribute to the four Australian aviators who are still missing after crashing into waters off Queensland's coast, and met with soldiers from all the 13 nations who are participating in the war games this year.

Mr Austin said the exercises strengthened the "unbreakable alliance" between Australia and the United States, while Mr Marles declared it would boost "connectedness" between the participating nations and "enhance the security of the Indo-Pacific".

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-30/us-military-analysts-defence-regional-security-richard-marles/102666972

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19272537

File: fff45c8ddf3b470⋯.jpg (211.65 KB,1200x720,5:3,US_to_further_military_foo….jpg)

>>19226439

>>19262419

>>19272527

US to further military footprint in Australia to suppress China; Washington 'source of tension' in Asia-Pacific

Washington 'source of tension' fueling security situation in Asia-Pacific

GT staff reporters - Jul 30, 2023

1/2

Chinese analysts on Sunday warned of a more volatile and unstable Asia-Pacific region where the US would provoke a regional arms race with more large-scale military drills and more strategic weapons deployments, after the latest move between the US and Australia that reached an agreement to expand the US military footprint on the southern continent to contain China's development.

The US and Australia will deepen military ties after reaching an agreement that expands military cooperation as both countries work to suppress China's growing influence and try to interfere in the Taiwan question and South China Sea affairs, according to media reports on Saturday.

According to Bloomberg and Australian media outlet ABC, the changes include more frequent and longer visits by US submarines to Australia, a regular rotation of US Army watercraft and collaborating on guided missile production and working to establish deeper security relationships with other countries in the region, most notably Japan.

Chinese analysts said the new military deal reveals that the US is using Australia as its forward base while strengthening its military presence in the southern Pacific country. It wants to build Australia into a part of the US military industrial chain, share the load of producing weapons and equipment. This is clearly adding fuel to the security situation in the Asia-Pacific, warned analysts, who slammed the US as the real source of regional tension.

Analysts believe as the US has found that its other allies such as Japan, South Korea and the Philippines on the first island chain are too close to China as forward bases, and as China builds up its military capabilities, these locations as well as Guam on the second island chain are no longer safe if there is a conflict. Australia is further away from China, so the US is promoting the construction of bases and increasing the rotation and deployment of American troops there.

US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin said on Saturday that the US will help Australia develop guided missiles by 2025, and analysts said this is to enable Australia to have a stronger military research and development capability, so that Australia can produce missiles and ammunition for the US.

Song Zhongping, a Chinese military expert and TV commentator, told the Global Times on Sunday that in the event of war, Australia, the US' important supply base and ammunition depot, could also become a target of attack - that is, the US would sacrifice Australia to preserve the security of its domestic production base.

In the Russia-Ukraine conflict, the large consumption of ammunition of US military aid has exposed the production capacity problem of the US military industrial chain, so the country is urgently trying to make up for this shortcoming.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19272538

File: 61f561e5b4ec050⋯.jpg (95.24 KB,1200x720,5:3,Australian_foreign_policy_….jpg)

>>19272537

2/2

Citing the Pacific Deterrence Initiative proposed by the US in March, Song noted that the US aims to build more military bases, so that it can move between them in case some of them are destroyed, and those in Australia and Guam are important replacement bases for the US in case of a conflict, Song said.

According to the joint statement released by the US and Australia, a more visible presence will be the arrival of "regular and longer" visits by US submarines to HMAS Stirling naval base in western Australia. "These visits would help build Australia's capacity in preparation for Submarine Rotational Force-West, an important milestone for the AUKUS Optimal Pathway that would commence as early as 2027," said the statement.

Yu Lei, chief research fellow at the Research Center for Pacific Island Countries at Liaocheng University, predicted that the US would provide Australia with more advanced weapons and military technology to enhance the combat effectiveness of the Australian army, which in fact risks the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction in Australia.

"This is causing unease in neighboring countries like Indonesia and even India," Yu noted.

The US is well prepared to sacrifice the national security of its allies to achieve its own hegemony, Song revealed.

Under such circumstances, US military aircraft, ships, nuclear submarines, including the future AUKUS nuclear submarines and other weapons and equipment will more frequently take Australia as a base to conduct close-in reconnaissance and provocative exercises around China, analysts predicted.

They warned that the US and Australia will accumulate more ammunition and equipment to try to intervene in the Taiwan Straits.

Despite the hype by some Western media smearing China as the source of regional tensions, all the moves again expose that the root cause of the unstable situation is the US and its allies who are attempting to suppress China's development, interfere in China's internal affairs and militarily provoke China, analysts stressed.

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202307/1295319.shtml

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19272546

File: 990fed1aea20652⋯.jpg (125.23 KB,1200x720,5:3,Being_an_offensive_bridgeh….jpg)

>>19226439

>>19262419

>>19272527

Being an offensive bridgehead not in Australia's national interests: Global Times editorial

Global Times - Jul 31, 2023

1/2

On Saturday, the US and Australia held the "2+2" meeting between the foreign and defense ministers in Brisbane. After the meeting, the two sides announced a series of defense cooperation plans to strengthen and expand the military alliance between the two countries. In addition to increasing the rotating presence of the US forces at military bases in northern Australia and the longer and more frequent visits by US nuclear submarines to Australia, that the US will help Australia develop missile production capabilities has also sparked widespread coverage and comments. Australian Defense Minister Richard Marles expressed hope that Australia could start producing missiles within two years, adding that "Australia at this moment has no better friend than America."

The reason why the missile production capacity has received attention has a lot to do with the impact of the prolonged Ukraine crisis on the global military equipment, especially the supply of weapons and ammunition. Deeply entangled in the Ukraine crisis, while keeping its eyes on Beijing and bent on deterring China, Washington has developed anxiety about the capabilities of its defense industry and the supply of weapons and ammunition.

Therefore, the US hopes to improve its own capabilities and at the same time bring its allies, especially the Asia-Pacific allies, into its defense industry production chain, not only to solve the problem of Ukraine's shortage of weapons and ammunition, but more importantly, to show China the US' ability to launch a protracted war and support the Taiwan island. From the content of the US-Australia "2+2" talks, it can be seen that Australia has undoubtedly become the first choice of the US. But the question is, will this really be the embodiment of "no better friend," as Marles claimed?

In fact, on the contrary, Canberra is gradually stepping into the strategic sickness of "sacrificing its own interests to support US interests" as warned by some domestic strategic scholars in recent years, and the nightmarish scenario of "unknowingly" going to war with China. Not only did the media interpret this US-Australia military cooperation upgrade as "countering China," even US Secretary of State Antony Blinken himself said that such cooperation is very important if the US and Australia can "oppose China's efforts to disrupt freedom of navigation and overflight in the South and East China Seas," which directly target at China. For Washington, the more fundamental idea behind helping Australia develop its missile production capabilities is to position Australia as a bridgehead for attacks against China.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19272548

File: 0f9f6a4834a3836⋯.jpg (183.56 KB,1200x720,5:3,Australia_warned_not_to_be….jpg)

>>19272546

2/2

For a period of time, Canberra has generally taken the initiative to cater to Washington's strategic vision, emphasizing its "long-range strike capability" and "effective projection" in its military development. The Defence Strategic Review released in April this year, considered as the most important review since World War II, showed an obvious "offensive" ideological tendency. The 20 C-130J Hercules transport aircraft and 220 Tomahawk missiles worthy of tens of billions are the very example. The deployment of B-52 bombers capable of carrying nuclear warheads by the US at the base in northern Australia is also considered to be a signal to China that Australia is willing to become a "surprise vanguard."

Behind Canberra's compliance with Washington lies its desire to expand its own influence. When Marles said that Australia has no better friend than the US, these words might conceal Australia's self-satisfaction of being the self-proclaimed "deputy sheriff." It is understandable for Australia to develop missiles for defense purposes, but it must be said that the true cost of Washington's so-called "assistance" which aims at curbing and deterring China, laced with a display of military provocation, is likely too high for Canberra to bear.

Australia has been involved in nearly every overseas war initiated by the US, seemingly falling into a path of habitual dependency on supporting and participating in American adventurism. However, in terms of its own territory, Australia has never faced a genuine external threat and lacks the necessary risk awareness. By serving as the frontline base for Washington's aggression toward China, Australia is essentially tying itself with explosives and placing the lit fuse in the hands of Washington politicians known for their adventurous and provocative thinking toward China. If Australia provides a stronghold or arms for deterring or attacking China, it will undoubtedly face resolute retaliation from China. This is not alarmist talk but military common sense; Australia must not harbor any illusions.

We note that some insightful individuals in Australia have concerns about this. The current government has made efforts to improve bilateral relations, but the US-Australia military agreement has significantly offset those previous efforts and created a substantial impediment to the substantive improvement and development of China-Australia relations. We want to emphasize that, in matters related to China's core interests and Australia's own future and destiny, the Australian government has no room for making foolish decisions.

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202307/1295353.shtml

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19272561

File: f744ce83f196688⋯.jpg (203.06 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Noel_Pearson_at_North_Bond….jpg)

File: 2b8b5fbde8e7d6a⋯.jpg (561.95 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Noel_Pearson_features_in_a….jpg)

File: bb03023c0b5196e⋯.jpg (428.32 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Noel_Pearson_hands_out_Yes….jpg)

>>19220640

>>19222755

‘Furphy’: Noel Pearson dismisses calls to delay voice poll

REMY VARGA - JULY 30, 2023

Prominent Indigenous leader Noel Pearson has dismissed calls to delay the date of the constitutional referendum on the proposed Indigenous voice to parliament as he urged voters to rise above allegiances to the major political parties when they cast their vote in the looming poll.

On the promenade of Bondi Beach on Sunday Mr Pearson was mobbed by Yes supporters, including Wentworth MP Allegra Spender and North Shore MP ­Felicity Wilson.

Wearing a Yes campaign shirt and a black fedora, he descended on the sand followed by the crowd, largely dressed in different shades of blue, to take a group photograph under the bright winter sun.

Mr Pearson, who rose to prominence as an advocate for Indigenous land rights, said calls to delay the referendum were a furphy and cited the Constitution’s rules around referendums, which stipulate a national vote must take place between two and six months after legislation passes parliament.

“It’s just a furphy, it’s just a distraction for people to talk about delaying the referendum date,” he said.

“Our Constitution says once you get it out of the hands of the politicians, you’ve got to have the referendum no later than six months and no earlier than two months from that date.

“So that means in October-­November it will be the last opportunity to have the referendum and I’m sure the government will ­announce one of those weekends.”

Liberal MP Andrew Bragg, who backs the voice, has called for the vote to be delayed to allow the Yes side to recalibrate and build bipartisan support for the referendum after polling revealed ­declining support amid voter confusion.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and voice co-architect Tom Calma have previously ruled out delaying the referendum vote.

Mr Pearson said on Sunday that the Yes camp had ironed out the kinks in the campaign, drawing an analogy with nailing the line and length in cricket.

“Obviously it takes a while to get your line and length right,” he said.

“Our messages are very clear now about the opportunity that recognition represents for the country and you know at the end of the day the old cliche is completely correct.

“The only poll that counts is the poll on referendum day.”

The campaigner said there was growing support among voters in Liberal-held seats in Queensland’s Sunshine Coast region to northern Sydney and the eastern suburbs but stressed the voice ­referendum was not a federal ­election.

“This is a referendum about ­altering our Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia and we can do that,” he said.

“Liberals can do that and a ­National Party voter can do that. A Greens voter can do that and a Labor voter can do that.

“This is not about party affiliation, this is about the country; we have to put our country first at this referendum and say to ourselves, yeah I don’t like that political party.”

Federal Opposition Leader Peter Dutton is opposing the proposed voice to parliament, which has the support of Labor, the Greens, some Liberal politicians and the teal independents.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/furphy-noel-pearson-dismisses-calls-to-delay-voice-poll/news-story/6cf4b74ca445fd4f9b1f035dbb8039c4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19272598

File: e2f7c631971be72⋯.jpg (337.44 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Professor_Eddie_Holmes_mai….jpg)

File: e4c44b49c0b508f⋯.jpg (253.16 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Wuhan_Institute_of_Virolog….jpg)

>>19262682

>>19262728

>>19262914

Australian professor Eddie Holmes privately discussed signs Covid-19 could have been engineered

SHARRI MARKSON and NOAH YIM - JULY 31, 2023

1/2

A leading Australian virologist privately discussed signs Covid-19 may have been genetically engineered, writing “the furin cleavage site is an issue” and “it’s the epidemiology that I find most worrying” before publicly insisting a laboratory leak was a conspiracy theory.

Some scientists say the presence of a furin cleavage site in SARS- CoV2 - which is unusual in that location in similar viruses - indicates it could have been developed in a laboratory.

Evolutionary biologist Eddie Holmes, who was awarded the Prime Minister’s Prize for Science – worth $250,000 – and the NSW Premier’s Prize for Science and Engineering for publishing the genomic sequence of Covid-19, has come under international scrutiny for his role in co-authoring a journal paper that claimed scientific analysis showed the virus was natural.

Emails subpoenaed by the US congress show Professor Holmes and his colleagues privately acknowledged a laboratory leak was plausible – some even felt it was likely – and there were no scientific data to distinguish a natural or laboratory-engineered virus.

Despite this, they authored a paper, titled the Proximal Origins of SARS-CoV-2, that was designed to stifle suggestions of a laboratory leak.

British medical researcher Jeremy Farrar, who was in regular contact with America’s top medical adviser, Anthony Fauci, and head of the US National Institutes of Health, Francis Collins, pushed them to speed up its release.

Professor Holmes acknowledged this in an email on February 16, 2020 where he apologised to lead author, Scripps Institute scientist Kristian Andersen, for finishing the paper without him.

“Sorry the last bit had to be done without you … pressure from on high,” he wrote.

In a comment on messaging platform Slack, dated April 17, 2020, Professor Holmes wrote: “Let’s face it, unless there is a whistleblower from the WIV (Wuhan Institute of Virology) who is doing (sic) to defect and live in the west under a new identity, we are NEVER going to know (what) happened in that lab. Never.”

The comment followed renewed concerns from Professor Andersen that he was not “fully convinced that no culture was involved”.

They discussed whether or not gain-of-function research, which aims to make viruses more infectious and deadlier, often to humans, was being conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

In Professor Holmes’ response, he said: “I think the simplest explanation is very likely the correct one: that the virus originated in bats, jumped to an as yet unknown intermediate host and then jumped to humans in that market shortly before we detected it.”

He added he was “very concerned” that other scientists “are going to try use this to end GOF (gain-of-function) research when I think this is going to be the time when we need it the most”.

In a private email, Professor Holmes wrote to colleague Ian Lipkin, an epidemiology professor and director of Columbia University’s Centre of Infection and Immunity, on February 10, 2020: “I favour natural evolution myself, but the furin cleavage site is an issue.”

Professor Lipkin emailed Professor Holmes to say the Proximal Origins draft paper is “well reasoned and provides a plausible argument against genetic engineering”.

But Professor Lipkin added: “It does not eliminate the possibility of inadvertent release following adaptation through selection in culture at the institute in Wuhan. Given the scale of the bat CoV research pursued there and the site of emergence of the first human cases we have a nightmare of circumstantial evidence to assess.”

In this email chain with Professor Lipkin, Professor Holmes replied: “I agree … It is indeed striking that this virus is so closely related to SARS yet is behaving so differently. Seems to have been pre-adapted for human spread since the get go. It’s the epidemiology that I find most worrying.”

The genomic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 shows there is a furin cleavage site at a very particular location in its spike protein that greatly expands the ability of the virus to jump between species and could make it more transmissible.

Richard Ebright, from Rutgers University in New Jersey, explains in the book What Really Happened in Wuhan that “the furin cleavage site is located at a position that previously has been used to engineer coronaviruses having enhanced infectivity”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19272604

File: a8c9de7d8a6df8c⋯.jpg (648.52 KB,2048x1536,4:3,The_Wuhan_Institute_of_Vir….jpg)

File: 530bd5b0225efbe⋯.jpg (560.58 KB,2048x1152,16:9,This_aerial_view_shows_the….jpg)

>>19272598

2/2

Professor Lipkin, listed as a co-author on the Proximal Origins paper, has since withdrawn support for it after discovering dangerous coronavirus research was taking place in BSL-2 laboratories at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

There are now calls from leading international scientists for prestigious journal Nature Medicine to retract the paper.

Nature Medicine has so far rejected these calls on the grounds that the Proximal Origins paper was, in effect, a comment piece.

Lead author Professor Andersen clearly stated the scientists could not rule out a laboratory release in correspondence with the Nature scientific journal.

“Unfortunately none of this helps refute a lab origin and the possibility must be considered as a serious scientific theory (which is what we do) and not dismissed out of hand as another ‘conspiracy’ theory,” he wrote in an email he sent to Nature editor Clare Thomas on February 20.

“We all really, really wish that we could do that (that’s how this got started), but unfortunately it’s just not possible given the data.”

But publicly, Professor Holmes’ comments did not reflect the uncertainty among the scientists about a laboratory origin. Instead he described it as a conspiracy. “There’s nothing in there at all that is a signature of laboratory manipulation. So I think you can pretty safely put … those conspiracy theories to bed,” he said in a webcast for the Australian Academy of Science on March 31, 2020.

And in an interview with The Sydney Morning Herald in October 2020, Professor Holmes is quoted as saying: “Our conclusion was no, we couldn’t see anything to indicate this could be anything other than a natural event.”

In response to questions from The Australian, he said accusations of a cover-up by the scientific community are “wrong, misleading and suggest a lack of understanding of scientific concepts, process and rigour”.

“It is both incorrect and deceptive to use selective quotes out of context – for example, in selective comments based on private correspondence recently published by The Australian I was categorically not questioning a market origin but the place where selection for the furin cleavage site occurred. This is clear when the context is provided,” he said.

“Mounting scientific evidence continues to make it clear that a lab leak is an unsubstantiated allegation and was classed as ‘extremely unlikely’ by the World Health Organisation origins investigation. I stand by the conclusions made in the Proximal Origins paper. Calls to retract the paper are baseless and entirely unwarranted.”

The University of Sydney has rejected multiple freedom of information requests for Professor Holmes’ correspondence.

It justified the decision to The Australian by saying Professor Holmes has been subject to continuing extreme vilification and harassment, including death threats. “As a result, the university has not released Professor Holmes’ correspondence to applicants who have sought access under New South Wales freedom of information legislation,” a spokesman said.

Asked about the contradiction between Professor Holmes’ public and private comments, the university spokesman said “these are selective quotes taken from private correspondence between collaborating scientists during a moment in time showing scientists assessing new information and evidence as it emerged”.

“Ultimately, Professor Holmes and his colleagues concluded there was no evidence the virus originated in a laboratory, something Professor Holmes maintains to this day.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/australian-professor-eddie-holmes-privately-discussed-signs-covid19-could-have-been-engineered/news-story/534128cd069f3b3e04cafbc46e15e3b7

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19272640

File: 84c00527c08edde⋯.jpg (215.77 KB,2400x1710,80:57,Alexander_Csergo_as_seen_o….jpg)

File: 2824d8e184fd84d⋯.jpg (62.89 KB,768x768,1:1,Sydney_businessman_Alexand….jpg)

>>19094004 (pb)

>>19204881

Australian businessman ‘in survival mode’ when he placated Chinese intelligence with open-source information, documents claim

Federal police statement of facts tendered to court say Alexander Csergo was in ‘an enhanced state of paranoia’ about being detained in Shanghai

Ben Doherty - 31 Jul 2023

1/2

Alexander Csergo says his Chinese intelligence handlers would nominate where to meet.

When he would arrive, Ken and Evelyn – he only ever knew them by a single Anglicised name – would already be waiting and the restaurant otherwise empty of people: cleared, he believed, specifically for their meeting.

Csergo would hand over a report - filled, he says, with open-source, anodyne information and occasionally, “fabricated material”, including, on one occasion, a falsified interview with a prime minister. In exchange, a police statement states, he would be given an envelope containing cash.

Csergo would always leave the meetings first. Ken and Evelyn would remain after he departed.

In an interview with police in Australia, Csergo said he was “in survival mode”, trying to stay free until he could get out of China.

Csergo, 55, a Sydney businessman, has been charged with one count of reckless foreign interference, with police alleging he provided reports to his handlers whom he knew were part of China’s vast state intelligence apparatus.

But, as Csergo told police in an interview detailed in the police statement of facts tendered to a New South Wales court, he says he felt essentially trapped in China – most acutely during the height of Shanghai’s highly restrictive Covid lockdowns – and that he needed to placate his handlers or risk being detained in the country.

The police statement of facts says “during this time he experienced high levels of anxiety and was in ‘survival mode’... an enhanced state of paranoia”.

“He understood the MSS would not let someone who they perceive to be a risk or threat leave China.”

Csergo told police he believed his handlers worked for China’s secretive and powerful Ministry of State Security (MSS). Their modus operandi matched that of operatives of the MSS’s Shanghai State Security Bureau.

“He believed Ken and Evelyn were tasked to keep tabs on him and ascertain his sentiment towards the Chinese government. He thought Ken and Evelyn were grooming him to see whether he could be used for anything in the future,” the police document says.

Csergo had worked in China since 2002 and owned a digital solutions company, Conversys, which in late 2019, had begun work on a project with one of China’s largest state-owned telecommunications companies.

The police document says that in early 2021, Csergo was approached, through LinkedIn, by a man unknown to him who claimed to work for a “risk-related geopolitical thinktank”. The man introduced him to a colleague, Evelyn, who introduced him to her boss, Ken. Csergo immediately suspected he was being surveilled, and likely groomed, by Chinese intelligence agents.

Csergo was asked to write reports on varied subjects, the police statement says, including lithium mining in Australia, the change in the German government, and Australia’s Quad and Aukus alliances. He was paid RMB20,000 (AU$4,300), in cash, for each report, which he did not bank, but spent.

Csergo told police he used only information available on open-source websites and did not make contact with anyone in Australia to write the reports. He said “he often fabricated source material”.

“He was convinced Ken worked for the MSS and attempted to create a feedback loop when providing the reports,” the police statement says. “His fictitious sources became even more extreme … he claimed that he interviewed the Australian prime minister.

“He was waiting for someone to claim that he was fabricating the sources or otherwise stop requesting these reports. This never happened.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19272645

File: 80f028ffe6d991d⋯.jpg (131.97 KB,1280x720,16:9,Alexander_Csergo_has_been_….jpg)

File: 0a64325f18931a7⋯.jpg (128.17 KB,1279x720,1279:720,Alexander_Csergo_has_been_….jpg)

>>19272640

2/2

In his police interview, Csergo said he developed a “paranoia” he was being surveilled and kept copies of his reports as evidence of what he’d been asked to do.

When he told his handlers in February this year he needed to return to Australia to care for his elderly mother, he was given a “shopping list” of information they wanted.

Guardian Australia has seen the list. Literally titled “shopping list for reference”, the document is illuminating as to the concerns, even obsessions, of China’s intelligence service.

The list requests information about whether Australia’s new Aukus alliance is “preparing for [a] Taiwan war”, about competition between the US and China in the Pacific, and about the Five Eyes intelligence alliance.

The document also seeks to establish contacts inside the prime minister’s office, within spy agency Asio, and with Australian federal police officers and members of the judiciary. It asks for cabinet-level information on Australian foreign policy: “us/aus coordination and conflicts on china policy, approaching the cabinet or ministerial level.”

Csergo told police in Australia he never completed any of the tasks on the list “and never intended to”.

He says he kept the document – police found it in a magazine stand in his home – as “insurance” so that people would believe he’d been approached by Chinese intelligence.

“He did not tell anyone about ‘the shopping list’ when he arrived in Australia because he did not know who he could tell,” the police statement of facts says.

The AFP, in their statement of facts, alleges Csergo “undertook research … to complete tasks assigned by Ken and/or Evelyn, reckless as to whether it supported the intelligence activities of a foreign principal”.

And, the police argue, Csergo, “had no intention” to contact any Australian government agency to report his contact with his handlers, or his possession of the shopping list.

“Csergo believed Ken and Evelyn worked for the MSS and undertook intelligence collection activities on their behalf.”

But Csergo’s mother Cathy told Guardian Australia earlier this month “my son is innocent”.

“His whole life, he has worked hard, he has been honest, he has never been involved with the police.

“He’s a good man. I’m heartbroken. I go to jail and I can’t hug him.”

Csergo’s legal team has argued the police prosecution is “misconceived and overzealous”. He faces a potential 15-year prison sentence if convicted.

“Alex [Csergo] has done what every captured defence or intelligence official is trained to do,” his lawyer, Bernard Collaery, said, “cooperate as harmlessly as possible. If this trial goes ahead, a jury is going to see him as resourceful and courageous.”

Csergo has been in prison awaiting trial – held in isolation and with limited outside communication – since he was arrested in April.

His case returns to court on 11 August.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/jul/31/australian-businessman-placated-chinese-intelligence-with-open-source-information-documents-claim

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19272701

File: eb5e8bb9eac9c72⋯.jpg (206.4 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Daniel_Duggan_the_Australi….jpg)

File: 1eddfa504a0083b⋯.jpg (321.74 KB,2048x1536,4:3,The_Test_Flying_Academy_of….jpg)

File: 0c3a99ded679f8f⋯.jpg (337.97 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Mr_Duggan_is_a_father_of_s….jpg)

>>19226522

>>19237929

>>19267329

Spies may have known for a decade that top gun Daniel Duggan was training China pilots

ELLEN WHINNETT - JULY 31, 2023

1/3

Australia’s intelligence watchdog is investigating whether Western spy agencies knew for more than a decade that former top gun Daniel ­Edmund Duggan was training ­Chinese pilots through a controversial South African flying academy.

The Office of the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security is examining what interactions Australia’s intelligence services had with Mr Duggan, following a complaint from his defence team that the domestic spy agency ASIO may have been involved in “luring’’ him back to Australia in order to enable his arrest.

The allegation against ASIO was made in the context of the former US marine fighting a bid by the US to extradite him to face charges alleging he illegally trained People’s Liberation Army pilots, conspired with others to enable the training, and money-laundering.

While the claim against ASIO, and the fact the IGIS had agreed to investigate, has been made publicly, The Australian understand the intelligence watchdog is ­ examining broader complaints, including whether intelligence agencies were aware Western ­pilots, including Mr Duggan, were training Chinese pilots through the Test Flying Academy of South Africa.

The academy, which denies any wrongdoing, has direct links to Chinese state-owned enterprises including aviation giant COMAC and is being scrutinised by intelligence agencies from the Five-Eyes alliance comprising the US, Britain, Australia, Canada and New Zealand.

It is believed that the Inspector-General, former Federal Court judge Christopher Jessup KC, is ­investigating any interactions ­between Mr Duggan and Western intelligence agencies, understood to include the period 2010-12, when he undertook a training contract with the academy. At the time he was an American citizen based in Australia. He became an Australian citizen in 2012.

The IGIS declined to comment on what timeframe its investigation was focused.

The possibility a Western ­intelligence agency – likely one of the US’s vast cyber-monitoring agencies – was aware of the activities of Mr Duggan and other Westerners in training Chinese ­pilots through the academy raises further intrigue about the timing of the charges laid against him.

Mr Duggan was arrested on a provisional warrant in the NSW city of Orange, where he lived with his wife Saffrine and their family of six children on a family farm, on October 21, three days after British media reported up to 30 RAF pilots had gone to China to train military pilots in return for big salaries.

Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus agreed to accept the extradition request from the US, a preliminary decision that allows the matter to go to court in Australia.

Mr Duggan strongly denies any wrongdoing.

His lawyer Bernard Collaery told The Australian that “I lose sleep over this family”.

Magistrates have to find a person is eligible and there is a probable cause to return them in order to sign an extradition. To determine if a person is eligible for ­extradition, the magistrate has to satisfy themselves that the offence alleged does not carry the death penalty, does not put the person at risk of torture, and was not of a political character.

Mr Duggan’s lawyers have told the court they believe the extradition application does involve matters of a political character.

If the magistrates does agree to extradition, Mr Dreyfus will make the final decision on whether to send Mr Duggan to the US. Mr Dreyfus has consistently declined to comment on the case.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19272705

File: 136ff6bdb4e6a97⋯.jpg (87.09 KB,1024x768,4:3,Chinese_Canadian_hacker_St….jpg)

File: 97e377ab1908638⋯.jpg (353.63 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Daniel_Duggan_s_wife_Saffr….jpg)

File: 88eb2e9e88f3248⋯.jpg (248.55 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Daniel_Duggan_when_managin….jpg)

>>19272701

2/3

One issue in the case is the ­relationship Mr Duggan had with Chinese-Canadian man Su Bin, also known as Stephen Subin, who was jailed in unrelated matters in 2016 for working with Chinese military officials seeking to hack into the systems of US ­defence contractors, including Boeing, hunting for military secrets.

Mr Duggan, who lived and worked in China for many years, was known to be familiar with Su, and shared an address with him there. The indictment says Su was the owner of a Chinese firm that “acquired military training, equipment and technical data for the PRC government military”.

Mr Duggan was also ­acquainted with former British top gun Keith Hartley, who was the chief operating office of the South African academy, and whose house in Adelaide was raided by police in November.

The academy, Mr Hartley and Su are known to be three of the eight unnamed co-conspirators cited in the indictment against Mr Duggan. Mr Hartley has not been charged, but the search warrants indicates police interest in him for the period 2018-22 – long after Mr Duggan’s contract with the flying school.

Another curious matter involves the money-laundering charges. Mr Duggan received 19 payments for his academy work, totalling $182,000. The payments appeared to have been deposited into his Commonwealth Bank ­accounts in Australia where he declared them to the Australian Taxation Office, and paid tax.

While not commenting on any specific case, Austrac, which monitors financial transactions, has told The Australian that all international transactions were automatically reported to it via financial institutions such as banks.

“There is not a skerrick of evidence suggesting any concealed payments,’’ Mr Collaery said. “This is an opportunistic misuse of the term money-laundering as understood in the Australian legal system.’’

Mr Duggan, who turned 55 on Saturday, has been behind bars for nine months and is in Lithgow jail.

His case, riven with claims and counter claims, geopolitics, complex legal arguments and intriguing hints about intelligence agencies, is underpinned by a solid public pressure campaign run by PR firm pCOMZ and helped along by public appearances by Mr Duggan’s family.

He has also retained Australia’s most expensive barrister, Bret Walker SC. He told the ABC in a jailhouse interview that he is selling his house and going into debt to fund the case, which he has said will cost “millions”. A crowd-funding campaign has raised just $14,000.

There is legal dispute over whether Mr Duggan’s case passes the “dual criminality’’ test, where an extradition requires the alleged offences offshore to also be a crime in Australia.

While Section 83.3 of Australia’s Criminal Code goes close, and restricts those with classified knowledge or skills learned in Australia from passing them on to foreign powers, it is not a direct mirror of the US laws. Defence Minister Richard Marles is reviewing whether any other Australian pilots have been involved in similar work to Mr Duggan, and said new legislation would be introduced to eliminate any doubt or confusion about eligibility to conduct such work.

Further documentation relating to what the US alleges has not been released. Lawyers appearing for the US government have said they have no objections to documents being released which contain more detail, but the court has declined to release the information to the media, with Mr Duggan’s legal team objecting to it on the basis it may be prejudicial.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19272715

File: 32a585091022cfd⋯.jpg (254.19 KB,1695x954,565:318,Daniel_Duggan_s_2017_Austr….jpg)

File: 66d2b2cc68474db⋯.jpg (286.48 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Daniel_Duggan_left_speakin….jpg)

File: 0dae0eea0e6b115⋯.jpg (153.98 KB,1280x721,1280:721,Daniel_Duggan_s_former_bus….jpg)

>>19272705

3/3

What is known publicly is that the US says Mr Duggan went by a number of “aliases”, including Ding San Xing, Din San Qing, DSQ and Ivan. The US also references emails sent by Mr Duggan to Su about other business opportunities which “carry no risk”. This, the US argues, shows Mr Duggan was aware that “exporting defence services to PRC pilots was risky”.

Mr Duggan is accused of failing to obtain an export licence from the US State Department, something that is required if a person intends to perform a service for the benefit of a foreign person.

The US allege these services provided by Mr Duggan included “the evaluation of military pilot trainees, testing of naval aviation related equipment and instruction on the tactics, techniques and procedures associated with launching aircraft from, and landing on, a naval aircraft carrier”.

A court has yet to test whether Mr Duggan was providing training to civilian or military PRC pilots, and whether that affected his obligations to obtain an export license.

If IGIS does find western intelligence knew of western pilots training Chinese aviators, it’s unlikely to make any public comment on whether the spy agencies had any concerns about those activities at the time.

In the years Mr Duggan undertook the contract with the TFASA, the relationship between China and the west was very different. Xi Jinping wasn’t elected to the presidency until 2013, and enjoyed a few years of relatively hospitable relations with global leaders, before his muscular Chinese nationalism and expansionist ambitions soured relations.

In 2014, President Xi visited Brisbane for the G20 talks, where he was warmly welcomed and photographed alongside leaders Barack Obama, Shinzo Abe, Angela Merkel, David Cameron, and Narendra Modi. On that occasion, months after the downing of MH17, Russian President Vladimir Putin was the villain of the summit.

Mr Xi then walked through a corridor in Parliament House adored with Chinese and Australian flags, was given the rare privilege of addressing the Australian Parliament, was the guest of honour at a lavish banquet in Parliament’s Great Hall, and was lauded by then-prime minister Tony Abbott.

In 2015 on a visit to the UK, Mr Cameron took him to a local pub near Chequers, the prime minister’s country retreat, for a pint of lager and a quintessentially British meal of fish and chips. Amusingly, the pub was bought out by a Chinese investment firm a year later.

And in the same year, Australia and China signed a free trade agreement, a deal years in the making which promised to smooth the provision and trade and services between the two countries.

“They are in effect accusing him of consorting or aiding the enemy at a time when the US and Australia were expanding and promoting their trade opportunities with China,’’ Mr Collaery said.

“For Australia in particular, we were negotiating the China Australia Free Trade Agreement in which the services section contained no reservation (exemptions) by Australia.’’

The case returns to court in Sydney on November 24.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/spies-may-have-known-for-a-decade-that-top-gun-daniel-duggan-was-training-china-pilots/news-story/3da4013b4d752df3d62e9231fc8009b1

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/arrested-former-fighter-pilot-friendly-with-man-jailed-for-bid-to-hack-us-military-secrets/news-story/4aa3183cd3607670bd4a975401937c6d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19272789

File: 9a083d130c3a25d⋯.jpg (327.98 KB,1138x969,1138:969,Donald_Trump_Jr_LIVE_.jpg)

File: 3f65ebcee22d136⋯.jpg (154.75 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Donald_Trump_Jr_was_initia….jpg)

File: fac5dbe982cd8e2⋯.jpg (359.36 KB,825x1176,275:392,SM_1.jpg)

File: aac020013902847⋯.jpg (378 KB,825x1537,825:1537,JP_3.jpg)

File: bf7ed88114c6550⋯.jpg (349.7 KB,481x970,481:970,Donald_Trump_Jr_slaps_down….jpg)

>>19105135 (pb)

>>19132052 (pb)

>>19132063 (pb)

>>19139383 (pb)

New dates revealed for Donald Trump Jr’s Australian tour after visa fracas

A visa fracas led to the postponing of his tour and a war of words - but the son of former US President Donald Trump is now set to come to Australian shores.

Lachlan Leeming and Angira Bharadwaj - July 30, 2023

Donald Trump Jnr will hit Australian shores in September, with the political firebrand to touch down following a visa fracas which led to his string of shows being postponed.

New dates for the son of former US President Donald Trump have been released including shows in Brisbane (September 25), Melbourne (September 26) and Sydney (September 27).

Guests are set to include former British politician Nigel Farage and conservative South Australian Liberal Senator Alex Antic.

It comes after a visa stoush delayed Trump Jnr’s initial Australian tour dates set down for July.

Tour organiser Turning Point Australia’s website stated the son of the former President is “fearlessly outspoken, anti-politically correct stance has captured the imagination of conservatives from around the world”.

A spokesman for Home Affairs, when quizzed on Trump Jnr’s current visa status, said the department “does not comment on individual cases”.

The postponement of Trump Jnr’s tour in July sparked a war of words between event organisers and federal politicians.

In a social media post then, organisers Turning Point Australia blamed the government for visa delays which led to the postponement, saying “It seems America isn’t the only country that makes it difficult for the Trumps”.

Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neill then labelled Trump Jnr “a big baby” and “sore loser” on social media post, before deleting the comments.

Coalition home affairs spokesman James Paterson described Ms O’Neil’s comments at the time as “childish”.

Immigration Minister Andrew Giles at the time said ticket sales and a “lack of enthusiasm” as a potential reason for the tour delay, adding the visa application had been treated the same as any other.

Tickets for the Australian tour range from $89 to attend and hear Trump Jnr speak, with VIP meet-and-greets, backstage passes and even an intimate, 20-strong champagne reception also on offer for higher prices.

Turning Point Australia didn’t respond to a request for comment regarding the new tour dates.

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/new-dates-revealed-for-donald-trump-jrs-australian-tour-after-visa-fracas/news-story/9665c8c58c5bc7d5a19389ff142908a1

https://twitter.com/sharrimarkson/status/1676794861578776577

https://twitter.com/SenPaterson/status/1676792534671163392

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12273465/Donald-Trump-Jr-slams-cowardly-Australian-MP-Claire-ONeil-called-big-baby-amid-visa-row.html

https://www.trumplive.com.au/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19278192

File: 9652ca7e49a249a⋯.jpg (336.51 KB,2048x1152,16:9,University_of_Sydney_profe….jpg)

>>19262914

>>19272598

Edward Holmes claims ‘bad memory’ for not declaring writing a paper with a Wuhan scientist

SHARRI MARKSON - AUGUST 1, 2023

Leading Australian virologist Edward Holmes said a “bad memory” was behind the reason he didn’t disclose he was listed on a paper submitted to medical journals alongside a Wuhan Institute of Virology scientist.

Professor Holmes was co-author of a paper titled the Proximal Origins of SARS-CoV-2 that claimed Covid-19 was a natural virus and “improbable” it was a laboratory construct. But when authorising that paper, he did not disclose his work on a previous paper with a Wuhan scientist.

He said he forgot his name was listed on a January 2018 paper about bat coronaviruses with a Wuhan Institute of Virology researcher, Jie Cui, a former postdoctoral student of his. The paper was rejected by multiple medical journals and never published.

Professor Holmes later blamed his “bad memory” and said it was an “extraordinary story.”

“It shows my bad memory … In late July this year, these 163 new bat coronavirus sequences appeared on GenBank for the Wuhan Institute of Virology, with no paper, just this kind of posting,” he said in an online interview in September 2022.

“The really shocking thing is my name is on the GenBank submission. When I saw this, I thought, ‘What is this?’. I could not, I couldn’t compute, thinking why am I on this. And then I look back, and … it turns out there was actually a paper that was never published. He (Mr Jie) did this one study on bat coronaviruses that they’d sequenced.”

The unpublished paper included the partial sequence of RaTG13, one of the closest known genetic relatives to SARS-CoV-2.

“I think it gives you a snapshot of what they were working on in that lab the year before the pandemic starts,” Professor Holmes said, claiming they were working on SARS1.

A key basis for Professor Holmes’s position that Covid-19 was not lab-engineered is a claim the Wuhan Institute has no progenitor virus to SARS-CoV-2.

Declassified intelligence repeatedly states the Wuhan Institute was working on classified projects for the Chinese military that are not in the public domain.

The Wuhan Institute took its virus database offline in September 2019 and has never made it public, even to health officials.

On April 16, 2020, the University of Sydney released a statement from Professor Holmes prompted by “unfounded speculation on the origins” of Covid-19.

“There is no evidence that SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes Covid-19 in humans, originated in a laboratory in Wuhan, China,” he said in the statement.

“The abundance, diversity and evolution of coronaviruses in wildlife strongly suggests that this virus is of natural origin.”

One of his co-authors of the Proximal Origins paper, in an email, disputed that there would be a “signature” of laboratory manipulation, making the point that he conducts genetic engineering and doesn’t leave a trace.

During the email discussion between the scientists, Ron Fouchier, from the Erasmus Medical Centre in Rotterdam, disagreed with fellow scientist Andrew Rambaut that the sequence data “clearly and unambiguously rules out any form of lab construct or engineering of the virus”.

Professor Fouchier stated: “Molecular biologists like myself can generate perfect copies of viruses without leaving a trace … The arguments for and against passaging and engineering are the same if you ask me.”

When discussing the order of the scientists’ names to be listed on the Proximal Origins paper, Professor Holmes wrote: “I’d be nervous about putting my name there (last) as I am amateur on the specific virological stuff we discuss. I feel I have only contributed to the writing.”

The Proximal Origins paper was used by governments, intelligence agencies and senior health officials to publicly counter questions over whether Covid-19 had inadvertently leaked from a Wuhan laboratory that houses the world’s largest collection of coronaviruses and was conducting risky gain-of-function research.

In response to questions from The Australian, Professor Holmes said accusations of a cover-up by the scientific community are “wrong, misleading and suggest a lack of understanding of scientific concepts, process and rigour”.

“Mounting scientific evidence continues to make it clear that a lab leak is an unsubstantiated allegation and was classed as ‘extremely unlikely’ by the World Health Organisation origins investigation. I stand by the conclusions made in the Proximal Origins paper,” he told The Australian.

“Calls to retract the paper are baseless and entirely unwarranted.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/edward-holmes-claims-bad-memory-for-not-declaring-writing-a-paper-with-a-wuhan-scientist/news-story/219257fdabee3299db0b190e5e06d8f1

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19278196

File: e1afebfaea00cdd⋯.jpg (228.83 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Republican_senator_Rand_Pa….jpg)

File: ada3cac37546f0a⋯.jpg (274.73 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Virologist_Shi_Zheng_li_le….jpg)

>>19262682

>>19262914

US academics ‘may be prosecuted’ over Covid-19 lab leak: top scientist

ADAM CREIGHTON - AUGUST 1, 2023

1/2

A leading US scientist expects academics who played down the idea Covid-19 leaked from a Chinese laboratory, despite their private doubts, will face criminal prosecution for fraud and has praised journalist Sharri Markson for her dogged investigation of the so-called “lab leak theory”.

Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist and professor at Rutgers University, told The Australian the “preponderance of evidence” available supported the notion the new virus emerged from research-related activities at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, before rapidly spreading throughout the world in early 2020.

Professor Ebright, a long term advocate for reducing the risk of biological weapons programs, said the arguments over the origin of Covid-19 was “moving out of the scientific community arena, into the congressional arena, and ultimately it will move into the judicial arena”.

“There will be referrals for prosecution of violations of law, including, based on what we know already, very clear evidence for criminal fraud, for criminal conspiracy to defraud or criminal misuse of federal funds,” he said.

In February 2020 a group of scientists with research links to the Wuhan lab authored a paper “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2” that in effect ruled out the possibility the new virus, which displayed unique characteristics that made it particularly infectious for humans.

The release of numerous emails and private correspondence among the authors earlier this month by the House of Representatives Oversight Committee, which revealed their significant private doubts about that conclusion, have prompted allegations of fraud and cast fresh doubts on the once more widely belief the virus emerged from animals in a Wuhan wet market.

Professor Ebright’s comments came days after Republican Senator Rand Paul, who has led congressional efforts to uncover the true origin, referred Dr Anthony Fauci, a former top US health bureaucrat, to the Department of Justice for prosecution over allegations he lied to Congress over the extent of US funding that had been directed to the Wuhan lab.

“There’s no question in my mind that [Tony] Fauci committed a felony on each of those three occasions, and it’s disappointing that he has not been held accountable,” Professor Ebright said.

“Lying to Congress is a felony and the penalty is five years in prison; there have been at least three instances”.

All the scientists involved in writing the suspect paper along with Dr Fauci and other senior US health bureaucrats have denied any wrongdoing, arguing the private correspondence reflected their rapidly evolving views.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19278199

File: 76032d52cd1953d⋯.jpg (149.21 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Sharri_Markson.jpg)

>>19278196

2/2

US intelligence agencies remain publicly split over whether the lab leak or natural emergencies theories is the more likely explanation, although they have failed to declassify their internal investigations, despite a March law signed by President Joe Biden requiring them to do so by June.

Sharri Markson provided evidence in The Weekend Australian that Sars-Cov2 may have emerged accidentally as result of Chinese government research into coronavirus vaccines, based on interviews with former US assistant health secretary Robert Kadlec.

Professor Ebright said the best scientific evidence that Sar-Cov2 emerged from research activities was not the recent batch of incriminating private messages, but two sets of research funding documents released in 2021, which laid out the Wuhan lab’s progress in producing new viruses with remarkable similarities to Sars-Cov2.

“These projects were virus discovery, virus enhancement and virus characterisation … they showed that by 2018 the researchers had achieved their aim of constructing novel viruses that have a highly enhanced ability to infect and replicate in human cells,” he said.

“One now has essentially a full step by step outline of the steps that would be required to create the virus we know as Sars-Cov2,” he added, pointing out the viruses that had been created, according to the research funding documents, were 10,000 times more lethal and infectious than those found naturally.

Professor Ebright also said hot mic comments that emerged on Monday, where some Australian journalists privately conceded at a press conference, seemingly grudgingly, that Ms Markson’s reporting on the origin of Covid-19 was correct, was “her vindication”.

“Listening to them, it is just clear how dismissive they are and how difficult it is for them to acknowledge that they were the gullible ones not she,” he told The Australian.

Jamie Metzl, a scientist who testified before congress in March that Sars-Cov2 more likely than not emerged from a lab, said on Monday (Tuesday AEST) that most journalists had “got the story 100 per cent wrong”

“Every one of them should be scrambling to amend or retract their indefensible previous work,” he said on social media, attaching a link to Markson’s latest series of stories in The Australian.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/us-academics-may-be-prosecuted-over-covid19-lab-leak-top-scientist/news-story/31013bb87b159711183b0a8a5a3a6a0b

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19278203

File: 68e4c6d749ab294⋯.jpg (215.19 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Liberal_senator_James_Pate….jpg)

>>19160171 (pb)

China lodges complaint over foreign interference inquiry, WeChat criticism

RHIANNON DOWN - JULY 31, 2023

Liberal senator James Paterson has accused the Chinese embassy of complaining to the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade about a Senate inquiry into foreign interference on social media probing the influence of WeChat.

The Australian can reveal an official from DFAT’s China external and co-ordination branch emailed Senator Paterson’s committee secretariat seeking clarification about the parliament’s powers to compel foreign actors to front public hearings.

The official questioned if it was accurate to say Chinese social media giant WeChat’s refusal to appear at the senate hearing “demonstrated contempt”.

The select committee on foreign interference through social media will release its final report on Tuesday after a wide-ranging inquiry hearing evidence from tech giants and security experts on the espionage risk from foreign actors operating on social media.

WeChat was the only platform that declined to appear and refused multiple requests to front the committee or answer written questions.

Senator Paterson, a prominent critic of China and national security hawk, said the complaint confirmed the Chinese government’s influence over the social media service and warned that Beijing’s “displeasure” would not deter the parliament from pursuing them.

“It says everything you need to know about WeChat’s close connections to the Chinese Communist Party that China’s embassy has been complaining to the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade about a senate committee seeking entirely legitimate information about the operation of an app with hundreds of thousands of Australian users,” Senator Paterson told The Australian. “The Chinese government’s displeasure with the work of the select committee will not deter us from completing our important work.”

The DFAT official also asked the secretariat to clarify the committee’s powers to compel foreign entities to appear before the senate or answer questions.

“Thanks for speaking with me earlier and confirming that the select committee on foreign interference through social media is unable to compel foreign entities to participate in a hearing, nor answer questions in writing,” the DFAT official said in the email.

“One additional detail that would (be) helpful to know is how best to characterise a decision by a foreign company not to participate in a hearing. We have seen suggestions that declining to participate in a hearing would ‘demonstrate contempt’ for parliament and would welcome confirmation of if this is accurate.”

Throughout the inquiry, senators heard expert evidence that WeChat engages in surveillance, censorship and foreign interference on its platform.

In the public hearings, Senator Paterson said WeChat had “demonstrated contempt for the parliament of Australia” by declining to front the inquiry.

The Senate has powers to compel witnesses to attend a public hearing, though they do not apply extra-territorially. WeChat has no Australian-based employees, which meant the committee was unable to compel the platform to participate.

The report’s release comes as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese weighs an invitation to visit China later this year, as the two governments work to dismantle coercive trade sanctions imposed on Australian goods by Beijing.

China’s ambassador to Australia Xiao Qian said relations between the two countries were at a “critical juncture” recently and called on the Albanese government to “stay on the right path to get along”.

Social media giants Meta – which owns Facebook and Instagram – Twitter, TikTok, Google and YouTube fronted the committee during the inquiry.

The Australian spokeswoman for China-based platform TikTok, Ella Woods-Joyce, repeatedly evaded senators’ questions about the company’s ties to Beijing and denied the video-sharing app had been asked to supply users’ data.

However, Senator Paterson pointed out this would be in breach of Chinese law.

Senator Paterson sent a list of more than 50 detailed questions to WeChat asking if it had any Chinese Communist Party members on its board, if it ­censors criticism of the Chinese government or cooperates with Australian authorities in relation to foreign interference or ­espionage offences conducted on the platform.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/china-lodges-complaint-over-foreign-interference-inquiry-wechat-criticism/news-story/770d787e2bc0686710c00f8771a21128

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19278210

File: 47afd33fa3b3abe⋯.jpg (284.74 KB,2400x1600,3:2,Independent_MP_Andrew_Wilk….jpg)

>>19243381

Julian Assange supporters in Australian parliament urge US to get him out of maximum security prison

Julian Hill, Andrew Wilkie and Bridget Archer respond after US secretary of state Antony Blinken claims WikiLeaks founder ‘risked very serious harm’ to national security

Daniel Hurst - 1 Aug 2023

1/2

Julian Assange’s supporters in the Australian parliament have implored the US government to “get him the hell out of a maximum security prison” regardless of diplomatic friction over the WikiLeaks founder’s eventual fate.

The US secretary of state, Antony Blinken, has pushed back at the Australian government’s complaints that the pursuit of Assange had dragged on too long, with the top diplomat declaring that the WikiLeaks founder is alleged to have “risked very serious harm to our national security”.

The Australian citizen remains in Belmarsh prison in London as he fights a US attempt to extradite him to face charges in connection with the publication of hundreds of thousands of leaked documents about the Afghanistan and Iraq wars as well as diplomatic cables.

Labor MP Julian Hill, a member of the Bring Julian Assange Home Parliamentary Group, said he had “a fundamentally different view of the substance of the matter than secretary Blinken expressed”.

“But I appreciate that at least his remarks are candid and direct,” Hill told Guardian Australia on Monday.

“In the same vein, I would say back to the United States: at the very least, take Julian Assange’s health issues seriously and go into court in the United Kingdom and get him the hell out of a maximum security prison where he’s at risk of dying without medical care if he has another stroke.”

Hill, who said last week no one would think less of Assange if he struck a plea deal, added that improving the prison conditions “should not be difficult to do even while argument continues about resolution of this matter”.

After talks in Brisbane largely focused on military cooperation on Saturday, Blinken confirmed that the Australian government had raised the case with the US on multiple occasions, and said he understood “the concerns and views of Australians”.

But Blinken pointedly added that it was “very important that our friends here” in Australia understood US concerns about Assange’s “alleged role in one of the largest compromises of classified information in the history of our country”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19278212

File: 4e1fb85da8a1645⋯.jpg (177.91 KB,2400x1440,5:3,Julian_Assange_s_father_Jo….jpg)

>>19278210

2/2

The independent MP Andrew Wilkie, co-chair of the parliamentary group, said Assange was “not the villain” in the story “and if the US wasn’t obsessed with revenge it would drop the extradition charge as soon as possible”.

“Antony Blinken’s allegation that Julian Assange risked very serious harm to US national security is patent nonsense,” Wilkie said.

“Mr Blinken would be well aware of the inquiries in both the US and Australia which found that the relevant WikiLeaks disclosures did not result in harm to anyone.”

Referring to an incident in Iraq on 12 July 2007 – video footage of which WikiLeaks later released – Wilkie said: “The only deadly behaviour was by US forces … exposed by WikiLeaks, like the Apache crew who gunned down Iraqi civilians and Reuters journalists.”

Liberal MP Bridget Archer, another co-chair of the parliamentary group, acknowledged that the US had its own domestic political concerns, but said Assange had been “incarcerated overseas for a protracted period of time”.

“He continues to suffer mentally and physically, as does his family, and the government should redouble their efforts to secure his release and return to Australia,” Archer said.

On Saturday the foreign affairs minister, Penny Wong, standing next to Blinken, confirmed that the Australian government had “made clear our view that Mr Assange’s case has dragged for too long, and our desire that it be brought to a conclusion”.

Wong added, however, that there were limits to what could be achieved in talks between governments “until Mr Assange’s processes have concluded”.

A parliamentarian who supports Assange’s release, speaking on condition of anonymity given the sensitivity of the topic, said they believed the original decision to bring the charges against the publisher was political.

But they said the Australian government’s request to the US government was politically difficult in the current environment, given that the former president Donald Trump is facing numerous charges and the administration has stressed that the Department of Justice has acted independently.

It is understood that is why some Assange supporters now see him accepting a plea deal as the most achievable way to bring him back to Australia, where he could serve out a suspended sentence.

However, many of his supporters are wary of such a step, arguing he must fight the extradition and should not plead guilty.

Assange’s brother, Gabriel Shipton, described Blinken’s comments as a “snub” and said the prime minister, Anthony Albanese, must “put Australians’ views in front of the president himself” during a forthcoming visit to the US.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2023/aug/01/supporters-in-australian-parliament-urge-us-to-get-julian-assange-out-of-maximum-security-prison

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19278214

File: d68fcfecb720cc7⋯.jpg (141.41 KB,1923x1082,1923:1082,Shane_Drumgold_SC_speaking….jpg)

File: 0aea96d06172789⋯.jpg (183.14 KB,2048x1152,16:9,ACT_Chief_Minister_Andrew_….jpg)

File: 443eb9ec993d998⋯.jpg (342.19 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_and_Bruce….jpg)

>>19194509

>>19204809

’No excuse’ for report on Lehrmann rape case to be secret

STEPHEN RICE - JULY 31, 2023

The dispiriting mess of the Brittany Higgins-Bruce Lehrmann saga has bred hundreds of conspiracy theories, almost all of them based on ­ignorance and absence of facts.

Now, just when we were about to get the first independent, cool-headed look at what went wrong in the prosecution of the case, the ACT government has decreed that the findings of inquiry chair Walter Sofronoff KC – to be ­delivered on Monday – will be kept secret for at least another month.

The territory government has a reputation for own goals, but for sheer contempt of its own constituents, this one takes the trophy.

There is no excuse for such a delay; not that Chief Minister ­Andrew Barr has bothered to offer one.

Barr says he “currently intends” to table some or all of the report at the end of August, at which time he “may” provide an interim response, pending a final response that “may take several months”.

Perhaps the government hopes the public interest in this matter will fade over time.

Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold SC demanded this inquiry after alleging political interference by Liberal MPs and police sabotage of his prosecution. He can’t complain now that it has not gone the way he wanted.

The ACT’s Labor-Greens coalition government happily commissioned the inquiry, no doubt anticipating some political scalps. It can’t bury the report now that it has not gone the way it expected.

The inquiry’s terms of reference were already so limited that Sofronoff had to ask that they be widened to ­include Drumgold’s conduct in the preparation of the proceedings and in the hearings.

The reasons for that are now obvious.

There are a number of potential adverse findings against Drumgold. Depending on what, if any, such findings are made against him, it could result in his instant dismissal.

The government set Sofronoff a gruelingly tight deadline to ­establish the facts, but has given itself a free pass to mull over the spin. When did this cabal plan to ­announce that the report wasn’t going to see the light of day for at least a month?

If The Australian hadn’t picked up a whiff of panic from the government and requested details of the release – the response to which arrived at 5.22pm on Friday; a time-honoured technique known as “putting out the trash” – we might still be none the wiser.

There is no evidence that ­Sofronoff has asked that the ­release of his report be delayed.

If there are parts of the report the commissioner thinks should be kept confidential, there is no reason to suppose he hasn’t made provision for that.

When Sofronoff handed down his report last year into Queensland’s failed forensic DNA testing, Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk immediately released the findings and within 48 hours had accepted all 123 recommendations and ­announced $95m in funding to fix the problems.

Many lives have been damaged by the Lehrmann-Higgins case, and more pain has been inflicted thanks to an inquiry demanded by Drumgold, only for him to admit that his claims about political interference and police conspiring against him were wholly misconceived.

Lehrmann and Higgins are both entitled to know what ­Sofronoff has found about the way they were treated by police and prosecutors without it being parsed through “a proper cabinet process”.

Just as importantly, the criminal justice system in the ACT is in disarray.

Trust between ACT Policing and the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions evaporated during the Lehrmann investigation, with morale at an all-time low and cases stagnating.

Both sides are waiting warily to see what comes of the inquiry.

Sofronoff’s report could well be the circuit-breaker needed to restore a viable working relationship between the two agencies. Another month, or more, of speculation and turmoil will only add to the hostility already rampant.

If there are rules to be changed, laws to be fixed, that is a debate we should be having in public.

The government needs to take a leaf out of Sofronoff’s book: just get on with the job and do it openly and transparently.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/no-excuse-for-report-on-lehrmann-rape-case-to-be-secret/news-story/e752afccaad65106592c628a27126b01

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19278237

File: c2e1db1f156d01c⋯.jpg (277.95 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann.jpg)

File: 15a3ea2dc53a7f7⋯.jpg (172.06 KB,2048x1152,16:9,ACT_Director_of_Public_Pro….jpg)

File: ffde9f081bc5a70⋯.jpg (342.86 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Brittany_Higgins.jpg)

File: e9aad57eda5802a⋯.jpg (145.41 KB,634x1127,634:1127,Bruce_Lehrmann_has_slammed….jpg)

>>19194509

>>19204809

Revenge of Bruce Lehrmann: ACT DPP on trial

JANET ALBRECHTSEN and STEPHEN RICE - AUGUST 1, 2023

Bruce Lehrmann will lodge a multimillion-dollar claim for compensation against the ACT Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions as the territory government examines what are expected to be serious adverse findings against chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold.

Mr Lehrmann’s explosive claim of malfeasance by the ODPP emerged on the same day the ACT government received the Sofronoff report into misconduct in the prosecution case against the former Liberal staffer.

ACT Chief Minister Andrew Barr has drawn fire over his decision to delay public release of the report, with former defence minister Linda Reynolds condemning the “inexplicable suppression” of Mr Sofronoff’s findings.

On Friday Mr Barr said the government would consider the report “through a proper cabinet process” that would take three to four weeks, with the Legislative Assembly updated at the end of August. It is believed at least two of the potential findings against Mr Drumgold, who has been on leave since May and is not due to return until August 30, would be grounds for his dismissal as Director of Public Prosecutions and for removal from the roll of barristers.

On Monday afternoon, hours after Mr Sofronoff handed his report to Mr Barr, Mr Lehrmann told The Australian: “I will be guided by the report and call for its release as a matter of urgency.

“If it finds the director acted with malice or against his duties as DPP and as an officer of the court, I will be considering a multimillion claim for damages and compensation from the ODPP and the ACT government.”

Mr Lehrmann said he had appointed solicitors and a team of barristers to provide advice and was considering options in anticipation of the report being made public. Mr Lehrmann is already suing the ABC, Network Ten and journalist Lisa Wilkinson for defamation over news broadcasts relating to allegations he raped Brittany Higgins in Parliament House in March 2019. He has always denied the allegations.

On the weekend, Mr Lehrmann responded angrily to the delay in releasing Mr Sofronoff’s report, posting on social media: “Absolute disgrace! I remember someone saying that sunlight is the best disinfectant … The Drumgold protection racket continues. The chief minister should hang his head in shame.”

Earlier this year the federal government paid Ms Higgins compensation believed to be worth more than $2m after she claimed her allegations of rape were mishandled. Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus has refused to answer questions regarding the payout, which was provided without consultation with former senior Liberal ministers, including Senator Reynolds, who were at the centre of her claims.

On Monday Senator Reynolds criticised the delay in releasing Mr Sofronoff’s report. “The ACT government’s inexplicable suppression of the Sofronoff report for up to a month is deeply distressing for those whose lives and reputations have been negatively impacted by the conduct of this trial,” she said.

Mr Barr said that, subject to the contents of the report, and any legal implications, he intended to table all, or part, of the report during the August parliamentary sitting and “may provide an interim response to some, or all, of the recommendations” at that time.

The most serious allegations of misconduct against Mr Drumgold involve episodes where he misled Chief Justice Lucy McCallum during the course of the proceedings against Mr Lehrmann.

Mr Drumgold has already admitted two breaches but claimed they were unintentional.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/revenge-of-bruce-lehrmann-act-dpp-on-trial/news-story/e8fcd8d616beea893589ca1b42ad16c9

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12350705/Bruce-Lehrmann-responds-revelation-ACT-government-findings-Sofronoff-inquiry-prosecution-DPP-director-Shane-Drumgold.html

https://www.instagram.com/bruceel95/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19278301

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Breakthrough that led police to alleged abuser of 91 girls at daycare centres

DAVID MURRAY and MACKENZIE SCOTT - AUGUST 1, 2023

1/2

A trusted childcare worker was ­secretly able to prey on 91 young girls across 15 years, and was only exposed as one of the nation’s most heinous paedophiles when investigators traced bed sheets seen in a horrific video back to one of his centres, police allege.

In a case some of Australia’s most senior officers have described as “unfathomable” and “beyond the realm of anyone’s ­imagination”, the 45-year-old Gold Coast man allegedly targeted vulnerable pre-pubescent girls in 10 childcare centres in Brisbane, one in Sydney and another overseas before his arrest in August last year.

Authorities and the centres face questions about how the man could have roamed from one workplace to the next and allegedly offended with impunity for so long - and how he appears to have been able to keep his Blue Card to work with children in Queensland despite two reports to police about him.

The former childcare worker has been charged with 1623 child abuse offences, including 136 counts of rape and 110 counts of sexual intercourse with a child under 10. The charges against the man involved 87 child victims from Australia, and four overseas, police allege.

Queensland Police said they received the two reports about the man in 2021 and last year without being able to prove he was involved in wrongdoing at the time.

Acting Queensland assistant commissioner Col Briggs said: “Both reports were subject to ­investigation. However, there was insufficient evidence to take action against any person based on the evidence available to ­investigators at that time.”

NSW Police Assistant Commissioner Michael Fitzgerald said it was “beyond the realms of anyone’s imagination what this person did to these children”

“This is one of the most horrific child abuse cases that I have seen in nearly 40 years of policing,” Mr Fitzgerald said.

Police allege the man recorded his offending on phones and ­cameras while working in Brisbane child care centres between 2007 and 2013, an overseas location in 2013 and 2014, the Sydney centre between 2014 and 2017, and again in Brisbane between 2018 and 2022.

He was only tracked down and stopped after investigators last year allegedly traced bed sheets – pictured in the background of ­horrific images and videos he posted on the dark web between 2013 and 2014 – to a Brisbane childcare centre.

Queensland Attorney-General Yvette D’Ath on Tuesday was seeking urgent briefings on how the man kept his Working with Children pass, as the opposition questioned the strengths of the Palaszczuk government’s child-protection regime.

Childcare centre owners could face payouts to the alleged paedophile’s victims, as the co-chair of the National Office for Child Safety’s advisory board, Hetty Johnston, said children should never be left alone with any adult in a childcare centre and owners would be held responsible.

AFP assistant commissioner Justine Gough said the man “had all the qualifications that he needed to work in the centres”.

Ms Gough said what the police investigation named Operation Tenterfield had uncovered would “seem unfathomable”. It was “chilling and shocking news for any parent”, she said at a joint news conference with Mr Briggs and NSW Police assistant commissioner Michael Fitzgerald.

“I can assure members of the Australian public that if you have not been contacted by law enforcement, it is extremely unlikely your child was allegedly offended against by the man,” Ms Gough said.

Under Queensland laws, the man cannot be identified.

“The man worked at other childcare centres but the AFP is highly confident the man did not allegedly offend at those centres,” the AFP said in a joint statement with Queensland and NSW counterparts.

“The AFP is also highly confident that all 87 Australian children who were recorded in the alleged child abuse material have been identified. The AFP believes the man recorded all his alleged offending. The parents of all the Australian children recorded in the alleged child abuse material have been informed of the investigation.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19278308

File: 64c6631e4dfbbd4⋯.jpg (216.87 KB,2048x1152,16:9,AFP_Assistant_Commissioner….jpg)

File: 3b8e551a5489e87⋯.jpg (276.1 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_AFP_announced_a_signif….jpg)

File: 1620a478021e1c9⋯.jpg (661.92 KB,775x1103,775:1103,ABUSE_ON_A_HORRIFYING_SCAL….jpg)

File: c61650240a87308⋯.jpg (725.11 KB,775x1068,775:1068,OPERATION_TENTERFIELD_TIME….jpg)

File: cdfef746be8f51d⋯.jpg (477.39 KB,1032x668,258:167,Where_to_find_help_2023.jpg)

>>19278301

2/2

Mr Briggs said Queensland Police Task Force Argos came across images on the dark web in 2014 that involved the man’s abuse of children.

If police suspected the offender was Australian they were unable to identify him, despite some of the world’s leading child victim identification experts and investigators being based in Brisbane with Argos and the AFP-led Australian Centre to Counter Child Exploitation.

Following the man’s arrest last August, Queensland Police conducted an internal review of the investigations that were carried out in relation to reports received about the man in 2021 and earlier in 2022. The review revealed the matters were appropriately investigated, that there was insufficient evidence to lay charges, and that the investigations were conducted in accordance with Queensland Police policy, Mr Briggs said.

One of the reports from 2021 or 2022 is now the subject of charges against the man, following evidence seized by police following his arrest, The Australian understands.

“I commend each and every investigator for their relentless work to put this offender before the court,” Mr Briggs said.

Ms D’Ath said the allegations were “shocking, horrific and extremely serious” and the matter was being investigated. Anyone working in early childhood is required to pass working-with-children checks, which in Queensland means they must hold a Blue Card.

“I am seeking an urgent brief on the status of the Blue Card in this case,” Ms D’Ath said.

“Queensland has one of the toughest working-with-children check systems in the country, including a ‘no card, no start’ scheme, but it’s imperative we investigate to see if there are any areas in the system that need urgent action.”

A Queensland Blue Card holder’s police information is monitored daily by police, with Blue Card Services notified of changes to a person’s criminal history if they are charged with a relevant offence. If suspended, the person can no longer work with children, and the relevant employer is notified.

A similar process is undertaken in NSW, with a working with children check requiring renewal every five years.

Queensland opposition child-safety spokeswoman Amanda Camm said the investigation had raised “serious questions” about the effectiveness of working-with-children checks.

“These allegations will shake parents to the core,” Ms Camm said. “Families expect the Palaszczuk government to ensure all checks and processes are followed to keep children safe”

Ms Gough declined to comment about the level of scrutiny of childcare centre workers.

Asked how the man was able to commit the crimes over such a long period without being red-flagged, she said: “The AFP did not receive any reports from parents or any other person prior to this man being charged.”

Ms Gough also declined to comment on the reaction of the childcare centres but said they had been cooperative.

The accused man has been in custody since his arrest, when he was initially charged with two counts of making child exploitation material and one of using a carriage service for child exploitation material. NSW Police have issued a first instance warrant for the man’s future extradition in relation to 180 charges laid against him in that state.

If you or anyone you know needs support call the National Sexual Assault, Domestic Family Violence Counselling Service at 1800RESPECT (1800 737 732), Lifeline (13 11 14), the Suicide Call Back Service (1300 659 467), Beyond Blue (1300 22 4636) and Kids Helpline (1800 55 1800).

https://www.1800respect.org.au/

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

https://www.suicidecallbackservice.org.au/

https://www.beyondblue.org.au/

https://www.kidshelpline.com.au/

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/childcare-worker-abused-91-kids/news-story/f0c6225d71225664adf98f56f53f9f24

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAXffmlmxzk

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

8bc9eb No.19280809

File: 6b94bc1c63df34d⋯.png (1.41 MB,1908x1200,159:100,ClipboardImage.png)

File: f1cd6650a116b1b⋯.png (487.63 KB,981x981,1:1,ClipboardImage.png)

File: abe6e334d51c18a⋯.png (381.46 KB,986x986,1:1,ClipboardImage.png)

File: da541c9ea48600c⋯.png (361.75 KB,1006x902,503:451,ClipboardImage.png)

FOI Response Proves Australian Government Is Actively Censoring Citizens Posts About Covid Vaccine Injuries On Social Media

https://www.truth11.com/untitled-1190/

Yesterday, a response was received to a Freedom of Information Act (“FOI”) request which includes evidence that the Australian Department of Health and Aged Care (“DHAC”) were colluding with Facebook to censor posts about covid vaccine injuries. The FOI response is heavily redacted but the evidence is clear. Continue…

FOI Document Source: https://www.health.gov.au/resources/foi-disclosure-log/foi-4293-internal-review-facebook-posts-and-tweets-categorised-as-misleading-information

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19283925

File: 18571705c642814⋯.jpg (180.96 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 5407087cccd9aa4⋯.jpg (310.1 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Indigenous_Australians_Min….jpg)

File: 946333e4f539d9c⋯.jpg (355.79 KB,1280x1174,640:587,CHANGING_TONES_ON_TREATY.jpg)

>>19222755

Labor’s national platform reveals treaty to be pursued this term of government

SARAH ISON - and ROSIE LEWIS - AUGUST 2, 2023

1/2

Labor has vowed to take steps ­towards a treaty with Indigenous Australians in this term of parliament in the latest draft of its ­national platform, as Anthony ­Albanese refuses to link a Makarrata commission and agreement-making with the referendum.

The Prime Minister and Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney are facing increased pressure from the Coalition to ­explain if they still support a treaty and the Uluru Statement from the Heart in full – after Mr Albanese declared on 2GB last month the voice was not about treaty – with senior Liberals questioning Ms Burney’s ability to remain minister.

The Australian can reveal Labor’s latest national platform draft, which will be taken to the party’s conference later this month, states: “Labor supports all elements of the Uluru Statement from the Heart, including a constitutionally enshrined voice to parliament, a Makarrata commission for agreement-making and a national process of truth-telling.

“Labor will take steps to ­implement all three elements of the Uluru Statement from the Heart in this term of ­government.”

The Australian understands the government is not planning to pursue the commission before the referendum to be held between October and December.

A Makarrata commission was envisaged by the Uluru Statement as an independent body to “oversee agreement-making and truth-telling”, with Ms Burney in February declaring further details on such processes and on the commission itself were imminent.

An earlier draft of Labor’s platform – which is compiled by a group of Labor MPs, party members and unionists known as the national policy forum – reinforced Labor’s commitment to implementing the Uluru Statement from the Heart in full, but did not include any time frame or specific reference to the Makarrata commission.

Both versions of the platform included a commitment to ensure First Nations people are provided the “opportunities to seek economic benefits from managing and leveraging treaty, native title and Aboriginal and Torres Strait ­Islander land”.

Ms Burney on Tuesday would not say if the government still supported a Makarrata commission to oversee agreement-making and truth-telling.

Deputy Liberal leader Sussan Ley asked twice in question time if the government still backed the commission and queried what exactly it would do, after the government committed $5.8m in last year’s October ­budget to commence work on establishing the independent body.

Ms Burney responded by saying the 2023 referendum was about constitutional recognition through a voice, prompting Speaker Milton Dick to invite her to return to Ms Ley’s question.

The Minister would not ­answer the question, instead quoting NRL legend Johnathan Thurston from the Yes pamphlet on the voice.

Ms Burney finished her ­answer with: “I say to Australians, vote Yes for unity, hope and to make a positive difference.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19283934

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19283925

2/2

Ms Ley said Ms Burney’s failure to answer questions was “not acceptable and not the standard we should accept from a minister of any government”.

“Asked time and time again she refused to confirm if she was still committed to Makarrata, even as the taxpayer, at her direction, is ploughing millions of dollars into it,” she said.

Speaking later to Sky News, Ms Ley said: “I don’t think I’ve seen such an incompetent performance in my parliamentary lifetime.”

Peter Dutton also ramped up his attack against Mr Albanese over the voice, saying his credibility was at stake and he was conducting a “tricky tap dance” on the referendum.

The Opposition Leader told the Coalition party room the Prime Minister had made the commitment to the Uluru Statement from the Heart in full more than 34 times.

“The government clearly has to implement the whole of the Uluru Statement from the Heart,” the Opposition Leader told the joint partyroom.

“We all want better outcomes for Indigenous Australians but the voice is no guarantee that this will be delivered, and may indeed be a risk to effective government in the future. What the government’s proposing is not in our country’s best interests.”

Facing sustained questioning from the Coalition, Mr Albanese accused the No campaign of talking about things that were irrelevant to the referendum, saying it exposed the weakness of their case.

“If you believe that there is something wrong with the question that Australians will actually vote for between October and December this year, then put that case. But you are incapable of doing so,” Mr Albanese said.

“The No campaign continues to raise things that are not a part of the question that is before the Australian people. The (constitutional) question that was in legislation that the Leader of the Opposition sat over here and voted for, voted for it to be put to the Australian people.

“Over coming weeks and indeed months, the Australian people will have the opportunity to have their say; to embrace the opportunity that is there for recognition and for listening to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in order to achieve better outcomes. I say if not now, when? We need to embrace this opportunity to enlarge our nation by voting Yes.”

Ms Burney in February said the government was committed to implementing the Uluru Statement from the Heart in full, foreshadowing an announcement on the Makarrata commission within weeks.

“The Uluru Statement … asks for voice, treaty and truth. In the next couple of weeks we will be making announcements about a Makarrata commission and how we are going to advance treaty and truth,” she told a the ABC’s Party Room podcast.

In response to questions from The Australian on whether the government still supported a Makarrata commission, a spokesman for Ms Burney said: “the government’s focus is on the referendum and on achieving constitutional recognition through a voice”.

Greens First Nations spokeswoman, Dorinda Cox, said the government needed to make good on its promise at the election to establish a Makarrata commission.

“The government made a $27.7m election commitment to Makarrata and we expect them to follow through on that,” she said.

“We understand the government is committed to implementing the Uluru Statement from the Heart in full.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/labors-national-platform-reveals-treaty-to-be-pursued-this-term-of-government/news-story/58071870c459b30fe30ebd8c3d3eec1b

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3AQxbRBMOUM

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19283990

File: 5cb7bdea3964c26⋯.jpg (199.42 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Voice_to_parliament_Anthon….jpg)

File: 814afd8ae2bce4d⋯.jpg (516.47 KB,891x1876,891:1876,The_Voice_referendum_Six_t….jpg)

>>19204775

>>19222755

>>19283925

Indigenous voice to parliament: Why Anthony Albanese can no longer say he supports a treaty

JOE KELLY - AUGUST 2, 2023

Why can’t Anthony Albanese provide a simple answer to the question – “do you support a treaty?”

The reason is the politics of the voice referendum have forced the Prime Minister into concealing the extent of Labor’s agenda on treaty and truth-telling. This is not a tenable long-term position.

With support for the voice trending down, Albanese does not want his constitutionally enshrined voice to parliament to become entwined in the public mind with a complex process of agreement making between governments and Indigenous Australians over the legacy of European settlement.

This became obvious this morning when Albanese was unable to answer a very simple question on ABC radio – did he support a treaty?

This should require a simple answer. But many listeners must have been left confused.

“Look, what is before the Australian people is a referendum which is about voice which is the first part of the Uluru statement from the heart. It’s about recognition. It’s about listening and it’s about better results,” he said.

Mr Albanese said that state governments were already pursuing their own treaty processes.

“Do you support a treaty?” Radio National host Patricia Karvelas asked him.

“Well, the processes are occurring,” said Albanese.

“But federally you’ve committed to the Uluru statement,” Karvelas said.

“It’s not ‘a’ treaty,” Albanese said.

“No, there are potentially many treaties right?” Karvelas said.

“Yeah – that’s occurring. That’s like saying do you support the sun coming up,” Albanese replied. “It’s occurring in Victoria … It’s occurring in Queensland. It’s occurring in the Northern Territory.”

Mr Albanese has repeatedly said in the past that he supports the implementation of the Uluru statement from the heart “in full”.

The Uluru statement from the heart calls for the establishment of a Makarrata Commission to oversee a process of agreement-making and truth telling, in addition to the creation of a voice to parliament.

The draft Labor platform commits the government to taking action on all three of these steps within this term of government.

But the Prime Minister will not concede these points. This strategy risks entrenching in the public mind a sense of suspicion that Albanese and the Yes campaign are not being genuine about the voice to parliament and its role in advancing the treaty process.

This looms as a considerable problem with the nation now just months away from a referendum with major implications for the national reconciliation project.

Albanese will not be able to continue dodging questions about Labor’s position on the treaty process and the voice.

He needs a new formula.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/why-anthony-albanese-can-no-longer-say-he-supports-a-treaty/news-story/6b59d5259b990d6eac0e0f81aa35769f

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19284007

File: 50bc641b09d3ca3⋯.jpg (315.24 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Indigenous_Australians_Min….jpg)

File: 294229277fd970e⋯.jpg (208.54 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_speaks_at….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19283925

Inflexible Linda Burney doing more harm than good to Indigenous voice to parliament

DENNIS SHANAHAN - AUGUST 2, 2023

Anthony Albanese and the Labor government are trying desperately to separate the troubled proposal for an Indigenous voice to parliament from the even more controversial and politically damaging ideas of a treaty and truth-telling to rescue the referendum.

It is a dismal failure because, as Indigenous Australians Minister and the government face of the campaign, Linda Burney is incapable of the task.

The Prime Minister happily ridicules claims the voice referendum is ultimately about a treaty with Indigenous Australians and truth-telling, declaring that his wearing a “Voice, Treaty, Truth” T-shirt last year was just a tribute to Midnight Oil at a concert.

Albanese, despite previous statements and the text of the Uluru Statement, has denied the voice had anything to do with treaty because he could see the damage being done to his referendum campaign and the need to separate the two ideas.

Tanya Plibersek professionally parries Coalition questions about any possibility of a controversial WA-style cultural heritage regime and Jim Chalmers says a voice to parliament is “good economic policy”.

But Burney is struck dumb, incapable of shifting focus or moving off an outdated and backward-looking script unsuited for dynamic debate, although circumstances, expectations, claims and facts have all changed.

Her parliamentary responses to perfectly reasonable requests for information about either the voice or, more recently, Labor’s own $5.8m Makarrata commission – which she announced – to oversee treaty and truth-telling, is embarrassing.

Even parliamentary Speaker Milton Dick, who has been good as a parliamentary umpire and has shown great patience and sympathy for Burney when she is under pressure, had no choice but to call on her twice to be relevant to the question in Tuesday’s question time.

On both occasions Burney ignored the Speaker’s ruling and continued to read from the same page she uses for every answer – with every line inexplicably highlighted in yellow – which sets out the barest of outlines of what the voice will be and does not address the devastating linking of treaty to the voice.

When asked if the government still backed the Makarrata commission and what exactly it would do – Labor has already spent $900,000 of the allocated $5.8m on the commission, for which Burney has ministerial responsibility – she read from her unrelated, outdated but highlighted script.

This is about more than just a minister’s inability to justify the spending of almost a million dollars so far on a commission she announced because it continues the nexus between the voice to parliament, treaty and truth-telling.

Burney’s colleagues do their best to support and protect her where they can but her incapacity to frame a cogent political response is doing her and the cause of the Indigenous voice to parliament serious harm.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/inflexible-linda-burney-doing-more-harm-than-good-to-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/a1333a061b5c17e85a6b8ee01ed85bdc

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19284047

File: 9d1b24299fbc6a1⋯.jpg (122.66 KB,1993x1121,1993:1121,ACT_Director_of_Public_Pro….jpg)

File: 73f5ccaa39bc4bb⋯.jpg (161.73 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Justice_Walter_Sofronoff.jpg)

File: 1accd63f3a8cecf⋯.jpg (210.75 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Former_crown_prosecutor_Ga….jpg)

>>19262626

>>19278237

ACT DPP Shane Drumgold ‘at risk of charges’ if he misled court

JANET ALBRECHTSEN and STEPHEN RICE - AUGUST 2, 2023

If ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold is found to have knowingly made false statements to the Supreme Court to prevent defence lawyers obtaining police documents, he may face an investi­gation for attempting to pervert the course of justice.

A number of senior lawyers have told The Australian that if Mr Drumgold is found by the Sofronoff inquiry to have deliberately misled ACT Chief Justice Lucy McCallum during the course of Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial last year, it could lead to criminal ­charges against him.

During the inquiry conducted by Walter Sofronoff KC, Mr Drumgold admitted two occasions on which he misled Chief Justice McCallum but claimed he had done so unintentionally.

The ACT government is considering Mr Sofronoff’s report, which it received on Monday, but has refused to release the findings until the end of the month.

It is believed some potential findings against Mr Drumgold, who has been on leave since May and is not due to return until Aug­ust 30, would be grounds for his dismissal as Director of Public Prosecutions and for removal from the roll of barristers.

They could also lead to his ­potential prosecution.

Melbourne silk Gavin Silbert KC told The Australian: “In a situation where a director of public prosecutions lies wilfully (and) misstates the truth to a judge, quite clearly that could constitute an ­attempt to pervert the course of justice.”

“If the elements of it were made out, I don’t see that there’s any doubt that it would,” said Mr Silbert, who was chief crown prosecutor for 10 years until 2018 and acted as director of public prosecutions on many occasions.

Mr Silbert, who has practised law for more than 40 years and is a member of the Victorian Bar Council, said: “I’ve done plenty of crime cases over the last 30 years to be experienced enough to have a view on this. In a situation where he arranged for a junior [legal] officer in his department to swear a false affidavit, again, it would clearly be an attempt to pervert the course of justice.

“If the elements are made out they would constitute offences.”

Mr Drumgold tried to stop the defence obtaining a document known as the Moller report, which detailed police concerns over the reliability of Brittany Higgins’s ­allegations of rape against Mr Lehrmann.

Mr Drumgold ordered a junior DPP lawyer to swear an affidavit saying the document had been inadvertently listed as not subject to privilege. That was not true, yet it was presented to Chief Justice McCallum. It was unintentional, Mr Drumgold told the inquiry.

He also presented to Chief Justice McCallum a note of a conference he had held with TV presenter Lisa Wilkinson, as if it had been written contemporaneously by the same junior lawyer present at the meeting. It had not.

It was effectively written by Mr Drumgold days later, after Wilkinson gave her speech.

At the inquiry, Mr Sofronoff questioned Mr Drumgold’s concession that his submissions to the Chief Justice “could” have had the effect of misleading her.

“How could it not have had that effect, having regard to the appearance of the document, and the absence of anything that would suggest that part of it was made five days later?” he asked.

A finding by Mr Sofronoff that Mr Drumgold deliberately misled Chief Justice McCallum would be grounds for his dismissal as Director of Public Prosecutions and for his removal from the roll of ­barristers.

The case has drawn comparisons with that of Marcus Einfeld, the former Federal Court judge convicted of perverting the course of justice after falsely claiming that someone else had been driving a car for which he had received a $77 speeding ticket.

Mr Einfeld was expelled from the legal profession, stripped of being a QC and had to serve two years in prison

“If Marcus Einfeld went to jail for a dodgy stat dec over a speeding ticket, this is many, many, many times worse, particularly by someone who has an obligation of honesty towards the court, forgetting that he’s even the DPP,” Mr Silbert said.

ACT Chief Minister Andrew Barr has drawn fire over the decision to delay public release of the Sofronoff report, with former federal Coalition defence minister Linda Reynolds condemning the “inexplicable suppression” of Mr Sofronoff’s findings.

Mr Barr said the government would be considering the report “through a proper cabinet process” that would take three to four weeks, with the Legislative Assembly scheduled to be updated at the end of August.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/legal-affairs/act-dpp-shane-drumgold-at-risk-of-charges-if-he-misled-court/news-story/d7209e400550f05341965a0526d34062

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19284078

File: d468a2048ae6e68⋯.jpg (82.46 KB,1620x912,135:76,Bruce_Lehrmann_outside_the….jpg)

File: 369e43e1fd156c0⋯.jpg (359.51 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Walter_Sofronoff_QC.jpg)

File: d8e37f3a81a33c9⋯.jpg (91.76 KB,768x1023,256:341,Brittany_Higgins_with_form….jpg)

File: 0a8fcef98b0b238⋯.jpg (310.69 KB,1611x2148,3:4,Higgins_at_the_Canberra_Wo….jpg)

>>19262626

>>19278237

Former judge Walter Sofronoff KC finds police were right to charge Bruce Lehrmann but lashed DPP’s conduct

Samantha Maiden - August 2, 2023

1/2

EXCLUSIVE

A landmark inquiry into the trial of Bruce Lehrmann has found the prosecution was properly brought but made damning findings about the conduct of the Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold.

Sources who have been briefed on the contents of the report have told news.com.au that Walter Sofronoff KC, a former Supreme Court judge in Queensland, finds that police acted lawfully when they charged Mr Lehrmann.

It also finds that the decision of the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions to prosecute based on the evidence available was correct.

That finding is not a reflection on the guilt or innocence of the former Liberal staffer.

It is a finding on the conduct of the police and the Office of Director of Public Prosecutions.

Mr Lehrmann remains an innocent man under the law as he was never convicted before the trial collapsed following an allegation of juror misconduct.

He always maintained his innocence and told police nothing sexual occurred.

Sofronoff findings on police decision to charge

In his final report, Mr Sofronoff notes that no person before him said the prosecution should not properly have been brought.

The former judge states that he had reviewed the brief in its entirety and has found that the prosecution should have been brought.

During the ACT board of inquiry, chairman Walter Sofronoff reminded lawyers present he was not holding an inquiry into Bruce Lehrmann’s guilt or innocence.

“I’m not interested in how the trial should have concluded. I am not interested in whether Mr Lehrmann is guilty or not guilty. I’m not interested in Miss Higgins,” he said.

“However, I have to deal with the question of whether the charge should have been brought.

“Can I ask if anybody is going to be submitting at the end that I should conclude that Mr Drumgold ought not to have submitted an indictment?’’ Mr Sofronoff asked during a hearing in May.

No barristers present said they planned to suggest that Mr Drumgold should not have presented an indictment.

“Nobody has suggested the contrary. And I don’t read in the police evidence that any witness asserts to the contrary.”

The Sofronoff inquiry was established by the ACT government in the wake of the abandoned prosecution of Mr Lehrmann. A single charge of sexual assault was dropped by the DPP late last year.

The Director of Public Prosecutions’ barrister Mark Tedeschi SC also told the inquiry it was reasonable for the police to charge and the DPP to prosecute.

“It was a case that was overwhelmingly in need of charging,’’ Mr Tedeschi told the inquiry.

In making these arguments, he was not making any reflection of the guilt or innocence of the man accused, who maintains his innocence.

Rather, Mr Tedeschi was arguing that the police response was in fact emblematic of a deeper problem in the Australian Federal Police at the time.

Mr Tedeschi said it was only because of the publicity that the DPP reviewed the case and expressed the view that there were grounds to charge.

In fact, it was Mr Tedeschi’s submission to the inquiry that this was “to highlight to you, Chairman, how bizarre the police approach was.

“And that this was a classic example of it,’’ he said.

Mr Tedeschi argued the ACT police were undercharging rape complaints and if it wasn’t for the publicity Ms Higgins may have faced a similar fate.

“Had it not been for all the publicity, had it not been that the alleged offence occurred in Parliament House, this matter would have been dealt with like the other – I think it’s 250-something matters that had been, in effect, just ignored by the police.”

The Board of Inquiry report will examine what really went on behind the scenes of the nation’s most high profile rape trial in Australian history and featured weeks of bombshell evidence from the DPP, police and the Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates.

It was handed to the ACT Government on Monday. The Barr Government has decided against the immediate release of the document, a decision that has been criticised.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19284084

File: f61ce1350fd8985⋯.jpg (202.87 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Bruce_Lehrmann.jpg)

File: b5b28cee4fd1ccd⋯.jpg (243.76 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Director_of_Public_Prosecu….jpg)

File: 44078ad61c76d47⋯.jpg (84.75 KB,1524x857,1524:857,CCTV_footage_Ms_Higgins_be….jpg)

>>19284078

2/2

Lehrmann plots multimillion dollar compo case

The expected finding that the charge and the prosecution was properly brought follows Mr Lehrmann’s public comments that he plans to lodge a multimillion-dollar claim for compensation against the ACT Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (ODPP).

“I will be guided by the report and call for its release as a matter of urgency,’’ Mr Lehrmann said.

“If it finds the director acted with malice or against his duties as DPP and as an officer of the court, I will be considering a multimillion claim for damages and compensation from the ODPP and the ACT government.”

Ms Higgins secured compensation believed to be worth more than $2m from the Commonwealth last year after arguing the Morrison Government mistreated her during her employment.

The former Liberal staffer Mr Lehrmann, who is now suing the ABC and Channel 10 for defamation, called for the report to be released immediately in the wake of revelations that ACT government may suppress the findings while it mulls the future of Mr Drumgold.

On the weekend, Mr Lehrmann complained on Instagram about the plan to delay the release of Mr Sofronoff’s report.

“Absolute disgrace! I remember someone saying that sunlight is the best disinfectant … The Drumgold protection racket continues. The chief minister should hang his head in shame,’’ he said.

DPP Shane Drumgold faces damning findings

The report is expected to consider and make findings on grave allegations regarding the conduct of Mr Drumgold during the trial including claims he tried to withhold material from the defence and told the ACT Supreme Courts that notes of meeting with Lisa Wilkinson before her Logies speech were contemporaneous when they were not.

Police made mistakes but not malicious

It will also find that the Australian Federal Police made errors and mistakes but this conduct was not malicious. This includes the decision to hand Ms Higgins private counselling notes to his original defence team and the improper disclosure of a video of an interview with police.

One of the most senior police involved in the investigation of Ms Higgins’ rape allegation admitted during the hearings that providing her private counselling notes to the defence legal team and prosecutors “was a mistake”.

In his first day of evidence, Detective Superintendent Scott Moller also revealed investigators initially didn’t think there was enough evidence to charge Mr Lehrmann, who maintains his innocence.

But he told the inquiry he was subsequently personally convinced by Mr Drumgold that “reasonable suspicion” of a crime was present.

The disclosure of the counselling notes is now the subject of a probe by both the Sofronoff inquiry and the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity.

“Look, we shouldn’t have given them and that’s that, that’s the bottom line we shouldn’t have handed them over,’’ Det Supt Moller said. “And it’s a mistake that we made.”

Police ‘confusion’ over charge test

Police officers who investigated Ms Higgins’ rape allegation also admitted during the inquiry that they did not understand the legal test required to charge a suspect.

Senior Constable Emma Frizzell, who works in the Australian Federal Police sexual assault and child abuse team (SACAT), told the inquiry that she had believed the legal test to charge a suspect was having a reasonable belief the evidence supported the prospects of a conviction.

However, she told the inquiry she now understood she was wrong.

“I would concede that I don’t have it right. What I’ve written in my statement is not right,” Sen Cont Frizzell told the inquiry.

Asked if there was still confusion among police about what the legal test to charge a suspect is, Sen Const. Frizzel said: “Yes I would say that there is.”

https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/former-judge-walter-sofronoff-kc-finds-police-were-right-to-charge-bruce-lehrmann-but-lashed-dpps-conduct/news-story/a1c115cc9bfc80e31cb6d1fe56975ffd

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19284103

File: f010d271c069248⋯.jpg (977.58 KB,3141x2359,3141:2359,The_AFP_arrested_the_man_i….jpg)

File: 756a9d0a295abe2⋯.jpg (1.69 MB,4240x2826,2120:1413,Hetty_Johnston_said_childc….jpg)

File: 2e3ec07114547a7⋯.jpg (242.18 KB,900x633,300:211,Sexual_assault_help_and_su….jpg)

>>19278301

Man charged with child sex offences known to be involved with photography at a childcare centre, ABC confirms

Rory Callinan, George Roberts, and Antonia O'Flaherty - 2 August 2023

A former childcare worker charged with 1,623 child abuse offences worked at a centre associated with a tertiary education facility and was known to be involved in photography, the ABC has confirmed.

The Gold Coast man, 45, has been charged with 136 counts of rape and 110 counts of sexual intercourse with a child under 10.

An investigation involving the Australian Federal Police (AFP) as well as Queensland and New South Wales police led to the arrest of the man, with offences allegedly committed in Brisbane, Sydney and overseas between 2007 and 2022.

He has been in custody in Queensland since August 2022 when the AFP arrested and charged him with two counts of making child exploitation material and one count of using a carriage service for child abuse material.

The ABC has confirmed that one of the man's employers was a childcare centre associated with a tertiary facility.

The man was also known to have been associated with unofficial photography duties at the facility.

Efforts to contact the operators of the childcare centre were unsuccessful.

The allegations revealed by the AFP as part of Operation Tenterfield have raised concerns about the strength and suitability of background checks for people working with children.

'Shocking and horrific' allegations

Queensland Attorney-General Yvette D'Ath, whose department is responsible for approving childcare workers, said the allegations were "shocking, horrific and extremely serious".

"My thoughts are of course with the affected families," Ms D'Ath said in a statement.

She has ordered an urgent briefing of the status of the alleged offender's approval to work with children.

"Queensland has one of the toughest 'Working with Children Check' systems in the country including a 'No Card, No Start' Scheme but it's imperative we investigate to see if there are any areas in the system that need urgent action," she said.

Child Safety Minister Craig Crawford said he shared "the collective horror" felt across the nation over Operation Tenterfield's findings.

"We need to demand better data sharing across jurisdictions, agencies and state borders," he said.

"I spoke today with my child safety counterpart in New South Wales to discuss how we can further protect children.

"I support the call for an urgent out-of-session state and territory ministers' meeting."

The minister responsible for early learning and childcare Grace Grace said the Queensland government will continue to help the AFP in any way it can.

"I was appalled to hear about the abhorrent nature of the charges laid against this individual, and the profound breach of trust represented by the alleged offending."

Under Queensland law, people working and volunteering with children need what's known as a blue card.

A blue card application goes beyond a police check.

First, it is run through a National Reference system database to see if another state or territory has made "an adverse working with children decision" about the applicant.

Other checks include whether a person has a charge or conviction of any offence in Australia, child protection orders and any allegations of serious child-related sexual offences – even if no charges were laid.

The Queensland government says blue card holders are "monitored daily" by police, in case there is a change to their information.

'Phones should not be allowed'

Child safety advocate Hetty Johnston said, as a general rule, childcare centre staff should not carry phones or cameras while working.

"It goes in the staff room and you check that in breaks," she said,

"There's no reason why anyone should have a camera on them at all times, [in a] childcare centre, regardless of the gender."

Ms Johnston said children should always be visible to other staff.

"No solid walls in childcare centres, lots of windows, lots of glass, lots of seeing, it has to be a line of sight," she said.

"No person should ever be alone with a child without a line of sight or someone watching."

She also said centres need to make sure their staff are trained to look for worrying behaviours.

"[Training on] what are you looking for in an offender, what do they do, what are the idiosyncrasies of offenders," Ms Johnston said.

Ms Johnston said there should be an audit to make sure centres are complying with the national child safe principles.

"Every government across this country, including the federal government, has to prioritise these kids," she said.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-08-02/childcare-child-sex-offence-arrest-blue-card/102673708

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19284162

File: 7c7990a5053ddf0⋯.mp4 (3.93 MB,640x360,16:9,_I_d_want_him_dead_Ben_For….mp4)

>>19278301

Calls for Australia to introduce the death penalty for paedophiles after a Gold Coast childcare worker is accused of sexually abusing 91 children

JESSE HYLAND - 2 August 2023

1/2

There are growing calls for the death penalty to be discussed as a punishment for paedophiles after a childcare worker was charged with a litany of horrific child sex offences this week.

The former Gold Coast childcare centre worker, 45, was charged with 1,623 offences against 91 young girls this week.

They include 136 counts of rape and 110 counts of sexual intercourse with a child under 10 in Brisbane, Sydney and overseas between 2007 and 2022.

Liberal National Party Senator Matt Canavan said it was time for discussion about punishments more serious than life imprisonment in such cases.

'Life imprisonment seems too soft a penalty for a crime this heinous,' he told Daily Mail Australia on Wednesday.

'We really should consider the death penalty for people that have ruined so many other lives.

'I was just absolutely shocked at the vileness and evilness of this conduct and also just the scale of it and how this happened over so many years to so many people and why wasn't it stopped.

'There has to be a proper inquiry here about how information was shared, why this couldn't have been stopped earlier and how can we make sure that this kind of thing doesn't happen again.

'I mean, surely we don't have a penalty on the books strong enough for this heinous individual.'

Senator Canavan described life imprisonment as a 'slap on the wrist for this kind of conduct'.

'Maybe we do need a debate about should there be a death penalty for these types of offences,' he added.

'This is so bad there has to be in my mind something even stronger than life imprisonment.'

2GB host Ben Fordham also argued for capital punishment.

'We don't have the death penalty in Australia, but would anyone seriously argue against it in the case of this paedophile pig?' he said.

'He has destroyed hundreds of lives and if my child was one of the victims I'd want him dead.'

The NSW government is expected to call for a national response to strengthen child protection laws following the sickening charges.

NSW Education and Early Leaning Minister Prue Car will call for an 'immediate meeting of federal and state ministers to demand progress' to strengthen protections.

During question time on Wednesday, NSW Premier Chris Minns said Ms Car was already in discussions with interstate and national jurisdictions to establish more stringent 'safe and transparent data sharing across borders and across agencies'.

Ms Car will also be tasked with reviewing oversights to tighten measures to spot 'red flags' before the information is shared with other state and territory jurisdictions and relevant agencies.

'I want NSW to lead in this important area of national reform,' Mr Minns said.

'We will apply this to the early childhood sector and of course the school sector as well.'

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19284164

File: b367019117c6ef2⋯.jpg (68.81 KB,634x602,317:301,Liberal_National_Party_Sen….jpg)

File: 68671368344765c⋯.jpg (47.82 KB,634x423,634:423,The_man_45_who_was_a_forme….jpg)

File: 40cfa2e2a7dc5fc⋯.jpg (55.68 KB,634x424,317:212,The_One_Nation_leader_beli….jpg)

File: 0604ee42f9b59ba⋯.jpg (42.59 KB,634x357,634:357,AFP_Assistant_Commissioner….jpg)

>>19284162

2/2

Senator Canavan's push for discussion on capital punishment follows a similar argument for extreme punishment for child sex offenders from Pauline Hanson.

The One Nation leader believes convicted paedophiles should be chemically castrated and put on a national database.

'I support chemical castration and tougher penalties for paedophiles, and the establishment of a national database of paedophiles,' she told Daily Mail Australia.

'People are very concerned about their children's safety and they want strong laws and penalties for those convicted of paedophilia.

'For sex offences not involving children, I consider it appropriate for the presiding magistrate or judge to determine the appropriate penalty under the relevant law.'

However, despite Ms Hanson's support for a national paedophile register, she may face opposition if she does decide to introduce legislation to make it happen with state politicians opposing a similar idea backed by the Coalition in 2020.

Then-Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton announced the Coalition federal government was putting $7.8million toward a public register of convicted sex offenders in January 2019 - just before the 2019 election in May.

Under the policy, the names, aliases, photos and nature of sex offenders' crimes would be made publicly accessible, as would their general location.

Despite the federal government making the funds available, it was up to state governments to introduce the project in their jurisdictions.

Queensland Premier Annastasia Palasczcuk's government voted down a motion supporting such a register, in a move Mr Dutton's spokeswoman slammed as 'very frustrating'.

The man at the centre of the charges revealed this week has spent the last year in custody after he was initially charged with two counts of making child exploitation material and one count of using a carriage service for child pornography material.

AFP Assistant Commissioner Justine Gough warned the details would be 'deeply distressing' for the community as police revealed the allegations on Tuesday.

NSW Assistant Commissioner Michael Fitzgerald described the matter as 'one of the most horrific child abuse cases he had seen in his 40-year career'.

Police allege there were 91 young victims. All were young girls - 87 Australian and four from overseas.

They claim the man recorded all of the offences on phones and cameras while working in 10 childcare centres in Brisbane between 2007 to 2013, and 2018 to 2022; an early learning centre attached to a school overseas in 2013 and 2014; and one centre in Sydney between 2014 and 2017.

Police would not comment on the locations of the alleged abuse in order to protect the identities of victims.

It's not yet known why the alleged abuse went unnoticed for so long and what roles the man held within the childcare centres he worked at.

The man has spent the last 12 months behind bars and his matter is scheduled to be next mentioned in Brisbane Magistrates Court on August 21.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12362713/Calls-Australia-introduce-death-penalty-paedophiles-Gold-Coast-childcare-worker-accused-sexually-abusing-91-children.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19289705

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19262626

>>19284047

Sofronoff report reveals Shane Drumgold lied during Bruce Lehrmann rape case

JANET ALBRECHTSEN and STEPHEN RICE - AUGUST 3, 2023

1/8

ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold knowingly lied to the Supreme Court, engaged in serious malpractice and grossly unethical conduct, “preyed on a junior lawyer’s inexperience”, ­betrayed that junior lawyer who trusted him, and treated criminal litigation as “a poker game in which a prosecutor can hide the cards,” the Sofronoff Inquiry has found.

In findings that are certain to end Mr Drumgold’s career as ACT Director of Public Prosecutions and may lead to criminal prosecution against him for perverting the course of justice, inquiry head Walter Sofronoff KC ruled that every one of the allegations made by Mr Drumgold that sparked the inquiry was baseless.

In the report, obtained by The Australian, Mr Sofronoff found that Mr Drumgold had lost objectivity during the prosecution of Bruce Lehrmann for the alleged rape of Brittany Higgins and “did not act with fairness and detachment as was required by his role”.

The ACT government received Mr Sofronoff’s report on Monday but has refused to release the findings until the end of the month, as senior officials pore over the 600-page document.

Mr Sofronoff said he was “deeply disturbed” by Mr Drumgold’s ignorance of ethical principles and accused him of a “Pilate-like detachment”, invoking the moment Pontius Pilate washed his hands of Jesus’s fate, letting the mob decide who should be ­crucified.

Among the astonishing catalogue of misconduct and dishonesty found by the inquiry against Mr Drumgold are:

- That he made representations to the Chief Justice Lucy McCallum in the proceedings against Mr Lehrmann that were “untrue” and “an invention of his own”;

- That he was guilty of a “serious breach of duty” by failing to comply with the “golden rule” of disclosure that sits at the heart of a fair trial by failing to disclose documents where there was “simply no doubt” that those police investigation documents should have been disclosed;

- That the DPP failed to adopt the rule of thumb used by wise and experienced prosecutors – “if in doubt, disclose”;

- That the DPP “kept the defence in the dark about the steps he was taking to deny them the documents that meant they were in no position to mount a challenge”;

And that he “constructed a false narrative to support a claim of legal professional privilege”.

“The result has been a public inquiry, which was not justified by any of his allegations, that has caused lasting pain to many people and which has demonstrated his allegations to be not just incorrect, but wholly false and without any rational basis,” Mr Sofronoff concluded.

“The cost of a six-month public inquiry – in time and money, in lost work, and personal and professional consequences – has been huge,” he said.

Even if Mr Drumgold had succeeded in dishonestly preventing Mr Lehrmann from obtaining ­material that could have helped his defence, any conviction would have been set aside on the ground of a miscarriage of justice, Mr ­Sofronoff concluded.

In one of many particularly pointed findings, he said he preferred the evidence of TV presenter Lisa Wilkinson and prosecutor Skye Jerome over Mr Drumgold.

“I do not believe any part of Mr Drumgold’s purported recollection unless it is consistent with the recollection of those witnesses,” he said.

Mr Sofronoff said he had considered whether he should invite Mr Drumgold to make a submission as to whether he was a fit and proper person to remain on the roll of barristers and to hold ­office as the Director of Public Prosecutions.

He said he accepted the submission of Mr Drumgold’s counsel, Mark Tedeschi SC, that it was not within his terms of reference, and that, in any case, “it would not be right for me to do so”.

However, several senior lawyers have told The Australian that if Mr Drumgold was found to have deliberately misled the court to prevent defence lawyers obtaining police documents, he may face an investigation for attempting to pervert the course of justice.

The Office of the DPP will now also face a multimillion-dollar claim by Mr Lehrmann on the grounds of malfeasance, following Mr Sofronoff’s findings of gross misconduct by Mr Drumgold.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19289711

File: 9e7a70f97d918ae⋯.jpg (424.47 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_ACT_prose….jpg)

File: 3381e31a5f0abef⋯.jpg (165.46 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Drumgold_SC_under_question….jpg)

>>19289705

2/8

By contrast, Mr Sofronoff found that police investigators and their immediate superior officers “performed their duties in absolute good faith, with great determination although faced with obstacles, and put together a sound case”. They conducted “a thorough investigation,” Mr ­Sofronoff found.

Although police had made mistakes, some of which had caused Ms Higgins unnecessary pain, “none of these mistakes actually affected the substance of the investigation and none of them prejudiced the case,” he said.

Likewise, Mr Sofronoff found that Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates, who often appeared at Ms Higgins’ side during the trial, had been subjected to “a degree of unjustified public criticism” because of a general lack of understanding about what the law required her to do.

Ms Yates’ presence at Ms Higgins’ prejudicial speech after the jury was discharged was also due to no fault of her own, he said.

“Her sole purpose at that time, consistently with her statutory duty as well as with human decency, was to ensure, so far as she could, the wellbeing of her client.”

The only substantial finding by the inquiry in Mr Drumgold’s favour was that he was justified in bringing the prosecution against Mr Lehrmann. However, no one, including the police, had submitted he was wrong to do so.

Drumgold’s failure to disclose Moller Report

Perhaps the most serious finding by Mr Sofronoff concerns Mr Drumgold’s repeated attempts to keep the so-called Moller Report out of the hands of Mr Lehrmann’s defence team, even though they were legally entitled to have it.

The Moller Report, first revealed by The Australian, consisted of an internal police executive briefing note by Detective Superintendent Scott Moller that detailed discrepancies in Ms Higgins’ evidence and suggested police didn’t think there was enough evidence to prosecute Mr Lehrmann.

Mr Drumgold tried to stop the defence obtaining this and other documents that became known as the Investigative Review Documents.

First, the DPP claimed these documents were not disclosable to Mr Lehrmann’s defence team.

In his report, Mr Sofronoff said that “wise and experienced prosecutors always adopt the rule of thumb, ‘if in doubt, disclose’ ”.

In fact here, there was “simply no doubt” that the investigative review documents should have been disclosed to the defence.

Mr Drumgold had breached the prosecutors “golden rule” of disclosure.

On the second day of the public hearings, Mr Drumgold told the inquiry that he thought disclosure of internal police investigations that suggested inconsistencies in her evidence would be “crushing” to Ms Higgins.

That, said Mr Sofronoff, “is not a proper basis for a prosecutor to resist disclosure of documents”.

Mr Drumgold’s next claim, that the documents were subject to legal professional privilege – made without him having read them all, and without checking with police – was also “wrong and untenable”.

Mr Drumgold knew that legal privilege over these documents was for the police, not him, to claim. He never picked up the phone to ask police.

Mr Sofronoff found that Mr Drumgold knew the AFP had not made a claim of legal professional privilege over these documents and that the AFP made no mention of intending to make such a claim.

When Mr Lehrmann’s legal team made an application to the court for disclosure, Mr Drumgold instructed solicitors in his office to draft an affidavit to support non-disclosure on the basis that the documents were protected by legal professional privilege.

Mr Drumgold emailed two solicitors in his office about drafting the affidavit.

He had sidelined the more senior member of his staff who had queried the source of the information and instead “procured a youngster to do the job”.

“Mr Drumgold could not name a source (for the privilege claim) in his instructions to his staff member because, as Mr Drumgold admitted in his evidence, he himself was the source.” Instead, he “required his fledging staff member, newly admitted”, to unknowingly swear an affidavit that did not comply with the rules about the source of information being sworn. Mr Drumgold sent this most junior lawyer wording for the affidavit that claimed the police documents sought by the defence were privileged.

“Mr Drumgold knew, or ought to have known, that when relying upon hearsay evidence in the circumstances, the deponent is required to identify the source of the information and the grounds for the belief.

“If he did not know, that is a very serious instance of gross incompetence. If he did know, he was intending to mislead the court by deliberate deception. I am of the opinion that Mr Drumgold knew the rule.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19289722

File: 8a6e216504422c0⋯.jpg (291.5 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Drumgold_outside_his_Canbe….jpg)

>>19289711

3/8

Mr Sofronoff found that by submissions and by the false affidavit, Mr Drumgold “deliberately advanced a false claim of legal professional privilege and misled the court.

Mr Drumgold made statements of fact to the Chief Justice that the AFP were making a claim of privilege over documents when he knew they had not.

The DPP’s claim that the documents were covered by legal professional privilege “had no factual basis … and no such opinion could honestly be formed by a competent lawyer”, Mr Sofronoff said.

The inquiry found that Mr Drumgold had tried to use “dishonest means to prevent a person he was prosecuting from lawfully obtaining material”.

“Had the defence, by their professionalism and persistence, not obtained (the internal police investigative documents) despite the improper obstruction they faced, and had the documents come to light after a conviction, in my opinion the conviction would have been set aside on the ground of a miscarriage of justice.

“This would have meant ­wasted expense for the government and for Mr Lehrmann and it would have meant ­additional anxiety for those involved,” Mr ­Sofronoff said.

“Mr Drumgold kept the defence in the dark about steps he was taking to deny them the documents,” Mr Sofronoff said. That meant defence lawyers were in no position to mount a challenge.

“Criminal litigation is not a poker game in which a prosecutor can hide the cards,” he observed.

Mr Sofronoff described Mr Drumgold’s submission to the inquiry that it was not appropriate for him to give legal advice to the AFP over disclosing the Moller Report as “Pilate-like detachment”, which was at odds with his “later vigorous assertion of a claim of privilege”.

Mr Drumgold’s representation that it was an error that the documents had been listed as disclosable in a document known as the Disclosure Certificate served on the defence was untrue and was “an invention of his own”.

Mr Sofronoff found that Mr Drumgold’s claim about the disclosure certificate was “another invention”. “Mr Drumgold con­structed a false narrative to supp­ort a claim of legal professional privilege” that was “utterly untenable”. Nor was Mr Drumgold “confused”, as Mr Tedeschi had suggested to the inquiry.

Mr Drumgold knew exactly what he was doing, when having been “foiled” by a more senior DPP lawyer, he asked a junior staffer “to do something improper”.

“Quite apart from Mr Drumgold’s misconduct in misleading the Supreme Court in a criminal case … he egregiously abused his authority and betrayed the trust of his young staff member to whom he owed a duty to be a mentor and role model.

“Mr Drumgold preyed on the junior lawyer’s inexperience,” Mr Sofronoff said.

“Had the defence, by their professionalism and persistence, not obtained (the police documents) despite the improper obstruction they faced, and had the documents come to light after a conviction, in my opinion, the conviction would have been set aside on the ground of a miscarriage of justice.”

The Logies speech and the note

Mr Sofronoff made serious adverse findings against Mr Drumgold over his use of a supposedly contemporaneous note made of a discussion he held with Lisa Wilkinson four days before her Logies speech.

Mr Drumgold said he warned her about the danger of prejudicing Mr Lehrmann’s upcoming rape trial. Wilkinson rejected that, saying Mr Drumgold “did not at any time” give her the warning he claimed.

Mr Drumgold presented a note of the conference to Chief Justice McCallum as if it had been written contemporaneously by a junior lawyer present at the meeting. It hadn’t.

That part of the note that was critical to the Chief Justice was effectively written by Mr Drumgold days later after Wilkinson gave her speech – and after it became clear the upcoming trial was in jeopardy because of it.

Mr Sofronoff found that Mr Drumgold “knowingly lied to the Chief Justice”.

“For the Chief Justice’s purposes, the note was not contemporaneous. (The junior DPP staffer) had not made the note. Mr Drumgold’s statements to the Chief Justice were false. The note was nothing more than a copy of an email which Mr Drumgold had written five days after the meeting and which purported only to record his ‘best recollection’.”

Mr Sofronoff dismissed a claim by Mr Drumgold’s counsel that those untruthful statements were just a mistake.

“I reject that a prudent and experienced barrister would behave in that way or make a mistake of this calibre,” Mr Sofronoff said. “This is a wholly untenable excuse for a barrister of the seniority and experience of Mr Drumgold.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19289727

File: 1af957059e8a872⋯.jpg (512.44 KB,2048x2731,2048:2731,Bruce_Lehrmann_leaves_cour….jpg)

>>19289722

4/8

“He could not have forgotten that the material words in the note were words that he had written himself (choosing to do so in the third person) on the day before.”

Mr Drumgold had “ample opportunity to correct his untruths at many points” but did not do so.

“He must have known that (Chief Justice) McCallum had found, as a matter of fact, that Ms Wilkinson had engaged in wilful defiance of his ‘appropriate’ warning and that her finding was based entirely on the proofing note.

“I do not accept that Mr Drumgold’s misstatements about the ­nature of the note were a mere mistake that he made.”

Mr Sofronoff said it was true that Wilkinson was a very experienced broadcaster who should have appreciated the likely effect of her intended words, but Mr Drumgold’s duty of care was not to her but to the court, “to do what is required to preserve the integrity of the administration of criminal justice”.

“Instead, he did nothing and thereby left alive a threat to the trial. A postponement might have endangered Ms Higgins’ health, which Mr Drumgold knew was fragile. It imperilled Mr Lehrmann’s right to the presumption of innocence. It left Ms Wilkinson under the false impression that she was at liberty to give the speech.”

Mr Sofronoff agreed with Mr Lehrmann’s barrister Steven Whybrow’s submission that after the Logies speech, an application for a temporary stay of the imminent trial “should be brought by the Director, not opposed by the Director”.

It was, however, no surprise that the DPP opposed the stay. After all, Mr Sofronoff found that while Wilkinson had been wrongly accused in court of causing the stay, in fact “a successful application for a stay had resulted from (Mr Drumgold’s) failure to warn” Wilkinson.

Baseless claims of political interference

At the trial, Mr Drumgold told the jury that “political forces” explained the delay in Ms Higgins’ complaint to the police, and that “it is abundantly clear from the evidence and ­actions of ­Senator (Linda) Reynolds during this trial that those political forces were still a factor.

Mr Drumgold alleged strong political forces on numerous occasions during the trial. Mr Sofronoff found that “there was not a single piece of evidence that anyone had applied pressure upon Ms Higgins that could legitimately be described as ‘strong political forces’ ”.

During the trial, Senator Reynolds strongly denied discouraging the young staffer from making a complaint for political or other reasons. “Notwithstanding this evidence, Mr Drumgold submitted to the jury that the ‘evidence and actions of Senator Reynolds during this trial’ indicated that ‘political forces’ were still extant,” Mr Sofronoff said.

In his cross-examination of Senator Reynolds, Mr Drumgold claimed she “arranged” for her partner to attend court and that he had been discussing Ms Higgins’ evidence with her. But there was no evidence of this and it was “tantamount to an allegation of an attempt to pervert the course of justice”, Mr Sofronoff said.

It is a fundamental principle of ethical legal practice that suggestions to a witness should not be made unless they are supported by reliable information. Otherwise, the barrister could abuse the privilege of immunity from defamation afforded to counsel in order to seek an unfair advantage.

“Mr Drumgold was examined about his understanding of this ethical principle. His ignorance deeply disturbed me … He fails to understand the difference between putting forward to a witness an allegation of misconduct as a fact and asking a witness whether or not something is a fact.”

Mr Drumgold had also attempted to discredit Senator Reynolds by questioning her about a text she had sent to Mr Whybrow requesting a copy of the trial transcript to be sent to her lawyer.

“Mr Drumgold had no basis upon which to put that suggestion which was intended to impute impropriety in Senator Reynolds in the eyes of the jurors,” Mr Sofronoff said. Ms Higgins had issued legal proceedings against Senator Reynolds and she had been advised by her lawyer to get the trial transcript in order to provide her with advice.

“A phone call to the lawyer would have revealed the truth about that matter to Mr Drumgold,” Mr Sofronoff said.

The same could be said about the presence in court of Senator Reynolds’ partner, Mr Sofronoff observed. Relatives and friends of witnesses frequently attended cases to observe proceedings. In this case, some friends and supporters of Ms Higgins attended.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19289730

File: e4141bcb9b08c63⋯.jpg (100.13 KB,1517x853,1517:853,Lisa_Wilkinson_reading_her….jpg)

>>19289727

5/8

“The suggestion that Senator Reynolds as well as her partner were engaging in potentially criminal conduct was an improper one and should not have been made,” Mr Sofronoff said.

“Likewise, it was improper to put to Senator Reynolds that she was ‘politically invested’ in the outcome of the trial. There was not only no basis for this but the nature of the political investment, why it might be important politically for there to be an acquittal, was never identified.”

Mr Sofronoff said that he accepted Mr Drumgold’s submission that “he acted out of ignorance but I must say that I am taken aback that a senior counsel holding the office of DPP should be so ignorant of this fundamental principle”.

“The suggestions made by Mr Drumgold had no basis at all and should not have been made.

“They were intended to, and might have, affected the outcome of the trial adversely to Mr Lehrmann and the conduct was, therefore, grossly unethical.”

Fiona Brown treatment

Another disclosure issue during the trial concerned an email sent to the Office of the DPP during the trial by Fiona Brown. Ms Brown was described by Mr Whybrow as the most important witness, after Ms Higgins, because she spoke to Ms Higgins soon after the now infamous security breach at Parliament House.

Ms Brown emailed the ODPP to express her view that Ms Higgins, upon her return to the witness box after a break of some days, gave demonstrably false evidence. Ms Brown was concerned that the jury had been left with the wrong impression that Ms Higgins had said Ms Brown had offered to pay her out to go to the Gold Coast during the election.

Ms Brown had done no such thing. She did not have the power to offer such a payment; indeed, it would have been improper for her to do so.

Mr Sofronoff found that the full context of what Ms Higgins had said in the witness box about being offered to work from the Gold Coast diminished the probative significance of Ms Brown’s email.

Mr Sofronoff found that Mr Drumgold’s submission that he did not need to disclose Ms Brown’s email to defence “followed a sound application of the threshold of disclosure, but it produced the result that the defence were deprived the opportunity to explore a legitimate forensic ­inquiry.”

“Such an outcome is inconsistent with the purpose of disclosure to facilitate a fair trial and assist the court to arrive at the truth.”

Brittany Higgins’ counselling notes

Mr Sofronoff found that the police had erred in handing Ms Higgins’ confidential counselling notes to the defence and to the prosecution but accepted it had not been done intentionally.

Evidence at the inquiry revealed that the only person who read the protected counselling notes was Mr Drumgold. Mr Sofronoff was highly critical of Mr Drumgold, who said he had read the counselling notes to determine “how much harm” the disclosure to the defence could cause to Ms Higgins. He was not permitted to do so, Mr Sofronoff found, because there is “no kind of exception made in favour of the prosecutor” in the Evidence Act.

“Having read the notes, Mr Drumgold was in a position where he held information about the matter that the defence did not … This was unfair because it gave him a forensic advantage.

“This demonstrated a disturbing lack of awareness in Mr Drumgold’s understanding of his prosecutorial duties…”

Mr Sofronoff said that having wrongly put himself at an advantage, Mr Drumgold had three choices open to him: he could have withdrawn from the case; he could have brought an application to enable him to disclose their content to the defence; or he could have supported any such application brought by the defence.

“By doing none of these things, Mr Drumgold breached his duty as prosecutor,” Mr Sofronoff said.

“It is hard to see how there could be a fair trial in these circumstances,” he concluded.

DPP’s relationship with police

On November 1, 2022, Mr Drumgold wrote an angry letter to ACT Chief Police Officer Neil Gaughan making a series of what Mr Sofronoff called “scandalous allegations” about political interference in the investigation and trial of Mr Lehrmann.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19289737

File: 23d8497894f19dd⋯.jpg (259.41 KB,2047x1536,2047:1536,Lisa_Wilkinson_and_Brittan….jpg)

>>19289730

6/8

“The adverse suspicions that Mr Drumgold formed during his early interactions with the investigators predisposed him to see non-existent malignancy in benign interactions between the police and the defence at the trial,” Mr Sofronoff found. Mr Drumgold and members of his team had complained police were speaking with the defence at the trial during adjournments. However, Mr Sofronoff found Mr Drumgold’s claim the interactions amounted to interference in the case was “baseless”. It was not surprising, said Mr Sofronoff, that the police felt deep antipathy towards the DPP, since the feeling was mutual.

“Mr Drumgold did not seem to appreciate that mutual trust is a two-way street. It was he who, at the first opportunity, formed the baseless opinion that the investigators were improperly trying to thwart a prosecution.”

Mr Sofronoff found that Mr Drumgold “advanced nothing resembling evidence to support the serious allegations of impropriety that he levelled against the police, defence and Senator Reynolds”.

Instead, “as was submitted on his behalf, he was relying upon ‘perceptions, suspicions, or concerns’ ”. Mr Drumgold claimed he had no choice but to write his letter to the Chief Police Officer, but Mr Sofronoff pointed out that he could have reported his concerns to the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity (now part of the National Anti-Corruption Commission), which ended up investigating the case anyway.

“As we now know, that agency’s valuable time has been wasted by the need to investigate very serious allegations made by a high officer of government that he has finally admitted were baseless.”

Mr Sofronoff said that allegations of wrongdoing in the public sector “require discretion and confidentiality while the matters are investigated. Allegations of corruption are extremely serious and, without a proper basis, are defamatory. They can damage public confidence in institutions if not handled properly.

“This inquiry has thoroughly examined the allegations in Mr Drumgold’s letter. Each allegation has been exposed to be baseless. Late in giving his oral evidence, Mr Drumgold finally resiled from his scandalous allegations.”

Mr Sofronoff said that “any official writing a letter of that kind would also know that copies of the letter would have to pass through many hands and that there was a real risk that it would be made public. In fact, it was with the help of Mr Drumgold himself that the letter defaming others made its way into a newspaper.

“The allegation of political interference was particularly wicked because it was an allegation that had a tendency to lessen the community’s confidence in the system of administration of justice and was made without the slightest evidence to support it.”

Drumgold’s speech at the courthouse

On November 9, 2022, Ms Higgins’ lawyer contacted Mr Drumgold to say the young woman did not want to proceed with a retrial because of mental health concerns. Two weeks later, the lawyer sent Mr Drumgold two psy­chiatrists’ reports and requested on behalf of Ms Higgins that Mr Drumgold discontinue the prosecution.

On the morning of December 1, 2022, legal representatives for the parties attended the Chief Justice’s chambers and Mr Drumgold informed them he would be discontinuing the prosecution “because the ongoing trauma associated with the prosecution presented a significant and unacceptable risk” to Ms Higgins’ life.

Mr Sofronoff found Mr Drumgold had made the correct ­decision. “In the circumstances, Mr Drumgold’s decision to discontinue the prosecution was right. He could not have reasonably continued knowing the grave risk to Ms Higgins’ health,” he said.

However, when Mr Drumgold made a speech outside court announcing his decision, he stated that he still believed there was a reasonable prospect of convicting Mr Lehrmann and applauded Ms Higgins for her “bravery, grace and dignity”.

“Mr Drumgold’s comments were improper. They undermined the public’s confidence in the administration of justice and (it) was a failure in his duty as DPP,” Mr Sofronoff said.

He said there was a well-established principle that a prosecutor should not make any public comment about a trial which they have prosecuted.

Mr Drumgold’s comments implied that he “personally believed Ms Higgins’ complaint of rape was true and that, as a consequence, Mr Lehrmann was guilty”.

“The comments were improper and should not have been made.

“It was not necessary for Mr Drumgold to express his views on the prospects of conviction at the time of discontinuance.

“Nor was it his function to identify himself with the complainant to a degree that he made a public statement of support.

“The motive for this was good; the decision was bad.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19289741

File: afb6aae57fe007f⋯.jpg (505.18 KB,2048x2731,2048:2731,Detective_Superintendent_S….jpg)

>>19289737

7/8

Mr Drumgold owed Mr Lehrmann the presumption of innocence and was not entitled to “use his high office to impute guilt in a public forum”.

FOI release of letter

On the morning of Saturday December 3, 2022, The Australian published an article with the headline, Police doubted Brittany Higgins but case was ‘political’, that revealed senior police officers believed there was insufficient evidence to prosecute Mr Lehrmann but could not stop Mr Drumgold from proceeding because “there is too much political interference”, according to diary notes made by Superintendent Moller.

The article also revealed that in a separate executive briefing, Superintendent Moller advised that investigators “have serious concerns in relation to the strength and reliability of (Ms Higgins’) evidence, but also more importantly her mental health and how any future prosecution may affect her wellbeing”.

The day before the article appeared, Mr Drumgold had withdrawn the charges against Mr Lehrmann, citing concerns for Ms Higgins’ mental health, so his retrial would no longer proceed.

In his report, Mr Sofronoff said he had required Mr Whybrow, police and DPP staff to disclose their communications with the media about the case, but “there is no evidence tendered before me that explains how and when the briefing documents and the diary note were disclosed to The Australian”. That Saturday morning, Guardian journalist Christopher Knaus called Mr Drumgold and alerted him to the article, which Mr Drumgold read while on the phone to the reporter.

Mr Drumgold said he felt “‘highly emotional at the personal attack and the unfounded accusations of misconduct” that the article was directing at him”.

He “felt a sense of absolute devastation”. He had never been the subject of such a “malicious, serious and unfounded personal public attack” before, he said.

Mr Drumgold gave the journalist a written response: “I am greatly concerned that potentially legally protected material may have again been unlawfully distributed. Given myself and others have already raised concerns about matters that are currently under investigation, it would not be appropriate to comment further whilst investigations are under way.”

In fact, there were no “investigations under way”.

On the Monday following, Mr Knaus submitted a Freedom of Information application for “a copy of any documented complaint made by the DPP about the conduct of police during the matter of R v Lehrmann, which was sent to ACTP in the months of October or November 2022”.

Mr Drumgold authorised the release of the unredacted letter containing the DPP’s suspicions of impropriety against named police officers and Senator Reynolds, without any of the consultations or redactions required by law.

The letter contained legal advice over which the AFP could have claimed privilege, the viability of which could have been affected by public disclosure of the letter, Mr Sofronoff said.

“So much would have been blindingly obvious to any rational person with Mr Drumgold’s knowledge of the matter,” Mr ­Sofronoff said.

The FOI application was determined and executed within four hours of being considered for the first time.

When the Chief Police Officer discovered the letter had been released and rang to complain, Mr Drumgold told him that “he did not know about the FOI or the fact that it had been released”.

“Mr Drumgold’s statements to him were false”, Mr Sofronoff concluded.

Mr Drumgold’s office later sent out a redacted version of the letter.

The Guardian had already published an article quoting Mr Drumgold’s allegations “but acting with scrupulous adherence to the ethics of journalism, Mr Knaus did not name the individuals concerned”, Mr Sofronoff said.

Chief Police Officer Neil Gaughan made a complaint to the Ombudsman about the release of the letter. Mr Drumgold explained his failure at the inquiry by asserting that it was up to an executive officer of the ODPP, Katie Cantwell, to decide on requirements being met under the FOI Act.

Mr Sofronoff said: “I reject Mr Drumgold’s explanation as false.”

Mr Drumgold had given Ms Cantwell “an unambiguous verbal instruction to her to release the unredacted letter” to The Guardian.

Mr Sofronoff concluded that “the evidence before me has revealed that the explanations proffered by Mr Drumgold to the Ombudsman, ACTP and to me were untrue. It is also clear to me that he has shamefully tried falsely to attribute blame to Ms Cantwell who, in every respect, performed her duty assiduously and in accordance with instructions that she was bound to follow from the Director.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19289746

File: 2e3682965bdcd0d⋯.jpg (395.58 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Heidi_Yates_left_with_Brit….jpg)

>>19289741

8/8

Conduct of police

The police who conducted the investigation into Brittany Higgins’ rape claims were largely exonerated by Mr Sofronoff, who found that no officers had breached a duty or acted improperly.

“The evidence before me showed that the investigators consistently acted in good faith and conducted a thorough investigation … Nobody suggested to me that the investigation was flawed in any way.

“On the contrary, the course of evidence demonstrated to me that the investigators and their immediate superior officers performed their duties in absolute good faith, with great determination although faced with obstacles and put together a sound case.”

The police had made mistakes, Mr Sofronoff said, including conducting a second interview with Ms Higgins that was not likely to produce anything useful and which caused her distress.

“None of these mistakes actually affected the substance of the investigation and none of them prejudiced the case.”

There was also a lack of understanding by police about the discretion to lay a charge which Mr Sofronoff found concerning. “That was not the fault of individual officers but of the AFP in its failure to have a clear policy”, he said.

Mr Sofronoff also examined statements by police first revealed in The Australian that there was insufficient evidence to prosecute Mr Lehrmann but that they could not stop Mr Drumgold from proceeding because “there is too much political interference”.

Mr Sofronoff found that police were not alleging a deliberate attempt by any person to interfere but referring to “the environment that we were in at the time” and the collective pressure that they were feeling.

It was this reference, discovered by Mr Drumgold, which fuelled the DPP’s suspicions that police were deliberately undermining the prosecution, a belief Mr Drumgold later conceded was wrong.

Conduct of Victims of Crime Commissioner

Mr Sofronoff likewise made no findings against Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates who, he said, was subjected to a degree of unjustified public criticism because of a general lack of understanding about what the law required her to do.

During the trial, Ms Yates attended court with Ms Higgins and her attendance was noted by the media.

“The conspicuous presence at the side of a rape complainant of a public officer whose duty it is to support ‘victims’ of crime led many public commentators to question whether the Commissioner’s actions were prone to prejudice the presumption of innocence to which Mr Lehrmann was entitled.

“Yet, one of the ways in which the Victims of Crime Act permits victims to be supported is by the attendance at court of a representative of the Commissioner’s office, not excluding the Commissioner herself,” Mr Sofronoff said

“It seems to me that, having regard to the way in which this matter unfolded, both in the conduct of the police and lawyers and the actions of media outlets, it was inevitable that the person assigned by the Victims of Crime Commissioner to aid Ms Higgins under the statute would become a fixture until, at least, the conclusion of the trial.

“The Commissioner’s presence at Ms Higgins’ (speech after the jury was discharged) was unfortunate because of the impression it made but it was due to no fault of her own. Her attention was upon her duty to Ms Higgins.

“I have found that a combination of circumstances which were not of her making put her into a spot which implied that she was endorsing a speech by Ms Higgins that was capable of impugning Mr Bruce Lehrmann’s entitlement to a presumption of innocence.

“Her sole purpose at that time, consistently with her statutory duty as well as with human decency, was to ensure, so far as she could, the wellbeing of her client. It was natural and right for her to think and act this way.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/sofronoff-report-reveals-shane-drumgold-lied-during-bruce-lehrmann-rape-case/news-story/07d25b9c79364a10473806e3df48dfa7

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_pXsHLo4Pk

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19289796

File: 4426d29de0cec70⋯.jpg (187.78 KB,2048x1152,16:9,ACT_Director_of_Public_Pro….jpg)

>>19289705

Sofronoff inquiry: ACT DPP Shane Drumgold ‘threw his newest junior under the bus’

JANET ALBRECHTSEN and STEPHEN RICE - AUGUST 3, 2023

1/2

Spare a thought for Shane Drumgold’s hidden victims – the trusting junior staff who unwittingly did the chief prosecutor’s dirty work only to be thrown under the bus as his web of lies unravelled.

Drumgold’s betrayal of his loyal team ranged from directing an inexperienced young lawyer to swear a false affidavit to blaming an office administrator for wrongly releasing a document under Freedom of Information laws when he ordered her to do it.

Inquiry chief Walter Sofronoff KC was clearly infuriated by Drumgold’s willingness to abuse the trust of innocent members of his team, labelling it “shameful” and an abuse of his authority.

In one case, the chief prosecutor desperately wanted to keep a police document out of the hands of the defence, claiming it was subject to legal professional privilege, even though police had not claimed it was.

Drumgold asked a senior lawyer in his office to draw up an affidavit advancing the false claim of legal privilege but his plan was “foiled” when that lawyer queried the source of the information.

Drumgold – who was the only source – told her not to worry.

“Drumgold’s reaction to this correct insistence upon the application of the law was to sideline the too-knowledgeable lawyer and to procure a youngster to do the job,” Mr Sofronoff said.

Mr Drumgold emailed the most junior member of his team, setting out the wording for the affidavit he required the young man to swear. “The affidavit that Mr Drumgold required his fledgling staff member, newly admitted, unknowingly to swear did not comply with rule 6711 [of Court Procedure Rules].”

Mr Sofronoff found in doing so, Drumgold “egregiously abused his authority and betrayed the trust of his young staff member to whom he owed a duty to be a mentor and role model”.

In one of the more scathing findings, Mr Sofronoff states: “I emphasise that I find not the slightest fault in anything that the junior lawyer did … He received a direct instruction from the highest authority in the office to prepare an affidavit using particular words and he had no reason to think that the DPP himself was abusing his position of trust and authority.

“For as long as the profession has existed, it has had a tradition of mentorship. The more senior barristers lead and teach junior barristers both by instruction and by example. This was the converse; Mr Drumgold preyed on the junior lawyer’s inexperience.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19289802

File: cc143f5f2a8a732⋯.jpg (320.05 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Walter_Sofronoff_KC.jpg)

>>19289796

2/2

Another betrayal occurred when Drumgold decided to release to The Guardian newspaper a letter he had written to ACT police chief Neil Gaughan complaining about the conduct of investigators in the case. The Guardian journalist emailed an FOI request, which was picked up by the DPP’s information officer, Katie Cantwell.

Her role in the DPP’s FOI process was purely “a co-ordination capacity”. She had never been involved in the making of a decision whether to release requested information and had no knowledge of the intricacies of FOI releases.

When she received The Guardian request, she emailed Drumgold, attaching the FOI request and expressing her view that “surely any document sent regarding this would be subject to legal/professional privilege?”

When Drumgold sent her his letter to the police chief, she asked whether “this is the letter you are happy for me to release under FOI to the Guardian?”

Drumgold responded 15 minutes later: “I am happy for it to go out.” Ms Cantwell emailed the letter to the journalist that evening.

Drumgold had authorised the release of the unredacted letter containing the DPP’s suspicions of impropriety against named police officers and senator Linda Reynolds without any of the consultation required by law and within four hours of it being considered.

He later apologised to the police, saying the failure to consult them was “due to an internal communication and training issue”.

He noted he had “arranged further training” for Ms Cantwell.

Drumgold told Mr Sofronoff that Ms Cantwell may have wrongly interpreted his email as telling her to send the letter “without further consideration of other relevant FOI considerations”.

He claimed it was Ms Cantwell’s responsibility to consider a host of issues such as whether disclosure of the information would be in the public interest or whether consultation with third parties, such as the AFP, would be required and whether parts should be redacted.

Mr Sofronoff rejected Mr Drumgold’s explanation as false.

“It is also clear to me that he has shamefully tried falsely to attribute blame to Ms Cantwell who, in every respect, performed her duty assiduously and in accordance with instructions that she was bound to follow from the director,” Mr Sofronoff found.

Ms Cantwell did not “interpret” Mr Drumgold’s email incorrectly. He had given her an unambiguous verbal instruction to her to release the unredacted letter and never directed her to redact any names or to consult anybody, Mr Sofronoff said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/legal-affairs/sofronoff-inquiry-act-dpp-shane-drumgold-threw-his-newest-junior-underthe-bus/news-story/54b4447fe9d44d1232030d2a5bbd1867

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19289813

File: 5da588ba8061c35⋯.jpg (113.18 KB,1516x853,1516:853,Lisa_Wilkinson_accepts_a_2….jpg)

File: 9eeb42a77e7daa5⋯.jpg (227.09 KB,2048x1152,16:9,ACT_DPP_Shane_Drumgold_out….jpg)

File: b731dac5ab13893⋯.jpg (180.22 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_is_interv….jpg)

>>19289705

Lisa Wilkinson, Shane Drumgold and the Logies speech lie

JANET ALBRECHTSEN and STEPHEN RICE - AUGUST 3, 2023

TV host Lisa Wilkinson’s now-infamous Logies speech has come back to bite ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold, after he was caught lying about it to a Supreme Court judge.

In his damning report into the ACT justice system, Board of Inquiry head Walter Sofronoff KC made serious adverse findings against Mr Drumgold over his use of a supposedly contemporaneous note made of a discussion he held with Wilkinson four days before her televised address.

Mr Drumgold said he warned the star — who first aired Brittany Higgins’ rape allegations on Ten’s The Project in 2021 — about the danger of prejudicing Bruce Lehrmann’s upcoming rape trial before she gave the speech accepting a Logie award for her reporting.

Wilkinson rejected that, saying Mr Drumgold “did not at any time” give her the warning he claimed.

Mr Drumgold presented a note of the conference to Chief Justice McCallum as if it had been written contemporaneously by a junior lawyer present at the meeting. It hadn’t.

That part of the note that was critical to the Chief Justice was effectively written by Mr Drumgold days later after Wilkinson gave her speech – and after it became clear the upcoming trial was in jeopardy because of it.

Mr Sofronoff found that Mr Drumgold “knowingly lied to the Chief Justice”.

“For the Chief Justice’s purposes, the note was not contemporaneous. (The junior DPP staffer) had not made the note. Mr Drumgold’s statements to the Chief Justice were false. The note was nothing more than a copy of an email which Mr Drumgold had written five days after the meeting and which purported only to record his ‘best recollection’.”

Mr Sofronoff dismissed a claim by Mr Drumgold’s counsel that those untruthful statements were just a mistake.

“I reject that a prudent and experienced barrister would behave in that way or make a mistake of this calibre,” Mr Sofronoff said. “This is a wholly untenable excuse for a barrister of the seniority and experience of Mr Drumgold.

“He could not have forgotten that the material words in the note were words that he had written himself (choosing to do so in the third person) on the day before.”

Mr Drumgold had “ample opportunity to correct his untruths at many points” but did not do so.

“He must have known that (Chief Justice) McCallum had found, as a matter of fact, that Ms Wilkinson had engaged in wilful defiance of his ‘appropriate’ warning and that her finding was based entirely on the proofing note.

“I do not accept that Mr Drumgold’s misstatements about the ­nature of the note were a mere mistake that he made.”

Mr Sofronoff said it was true that Wilkinson was a very experienced broadcaster who should have appreciated the likely effect of her intended words, but Mr Drumgold’s duty of care was not to her but to the court, “to do what is required to preserve the integrity of the administration of criminal justice”.

“Instead, he did nothing and thereby left alive a threat to the trial. A postponement might have endangered Ms Higgins’ health, which Mr Drumgold knew was fragile. It imperilled Mr Lehrmann’s right to the presumption of innocence. It left Ms Wilkinson under the false impression that she was at liberty to give the speech.”

Mr Sofronoff agreed with Mr Lehrmann’s barrister Steven Whybrow’s submission that after the Logies speech, an application for a temporary stay of the imminent trial “should be brought by the Director, not opposed by the Director”.

It was, however, no surprise that the DPP opposed the stay. After all, Mr Sofronoff found that while Wilkinson had been wrongly accused in court of causing the stay, in fact “a successful application for a stay had resulted from (Mr Drumgold’s) failure to warn” Wilkinson.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/lisa-wilkinson-shane-drumgold-and-the-logies-speech-lie/news-story/7f7e1035bb0b450ea0eca60bf2b079c6

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19289859

File: a11dbe888274297⋯.jpg (177.62 KB,2048x1152,16:9,ACT_Director_of_Public_Pro….jpg)

>>19289705

Shane Drumgold’s time as DPP is surely at an end

CHRIS MERRITT - AUGUST 3, 2023

1/2

Shane Drumgold is without a doubt the biggest loser in Walter Sofronoff’s report on what went wrong during the Brittany Higgins rape trial. But he might not be alone.

The next biggest loser might turn out to be the ACT government – which was already on notice that the contents of this report would determine whether it would be hit with a damages bill worth millions of dollars.

That warning was issued last week by Bruce Lehrmann, the man who had been prosecuted in the now abandoned rape trial.

Lehrmann, who has denied any wrongdoing, said he would sue if Sofronoff found that Drumgold acted with malice or breached his duties either as ACT Director of Public Prosecutions or as an officer of the court.

Those conditions seem to based on the exceptions to the statutory immunity from liability that is granted to the DPP under section 33A of the Director of Public Prosecutions Act.

This provision means that if the DPP acted in good faith, he would be immune from liability for acts done or omitted in the performance of his duty.

Based on what has been reported in this newspaper by Janet Albrechtsen and Stephen Rice, there does not appear to be a finding of malice in Sofranoff’s report.

So did Drumgold breach his duties as DPP and an officer of the court?

The Australian’s report says Sofronoff found that Drumgold engaged in serious malpractice and grossly unethical conduct, had failed to disclose information to Lehrmann’s lawyers that might have helped his defence, had preyed on a junior lawyer’s inexperience and had betrayed that junior lawyer’s trust.

Because the Sofronoff report has not been officially released by the ACT government, there are limits on what can be said about the consequences of its findings without running into the law of defamation.

But what can be said is that the ACT government needs to abandon its original strategy of keeping this report secret until the end of the month while it considered whether to redact any passages that had legal implications.

That would have placed Lehrmann at a disadvantage. His litigation threat would have been placed on hold while the government would have been free to prepare a response at its leisure.

There was also a risk, implicit in the government’s explanation, that the suppression of key parts of the report might have continued beyond this month.

In explaining his position, Chief Minister Andrew Barr said he intended to table all or part of the report during August – subject to any legal implications.

Whoever leaked the full report to Albrechtsen and Rice acted in the public interest.

This person deprived the government of the ability to decide what the community should be told about the problems that afflicted the Lehrmann prosecution.

The most important issues are, by definition, those with legal implications and that seems to be exactly what the ACT government was considering keeping to itself.

The material that has been made public in The Australian is incredibly significant. It seems likely that Drumgold will lose his job.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19289866

File: 1483bf9f5811d8f⋯.jpg (274.31 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Crown_Prosecutor_Shane_Dru….jpg)

>>19289859

2/2

Other possible consequences will require a detailed response from the government and the public release of this report so it can be examined by interested parties such as the ACT Bar Association.

The option of selective suppression is no longer on the table.

If the Sofronoff report does trigger a compensation claim from Lehrmann, the government might face a some uncomfortable questions from ACT taxpayers.

They would be justified in seeking an explanation for how Drumgold managed to become the territory’s top prosecutor when his appointment marked such a sharp departure from normal practice.

He had worked in the Office of the DPP for 17 years before his 2019 appointment. Yet he only took silk and the rank of senior counsel when he was appointed to the top job.

For the sake of comparison, the DPP in NSW, Sally Dowling SC, took silk eight years before making it to the top job. In Victoria, Kerri Judd KC was appointed DPP 11 years after taking silk.

So compared to his interstate counterparts, Drumgold was – and is – a relative newcomer to the top ranks of the legal profession.

After Sofronoff’s report was leaked to this newspaper, it is clear that he cannot survive as the territory’s top prosecutor.

At this point it is important to keep in mind that Sofronoff’s inquiry was not governed by the rules of evidence that would apply in a court and his findings, while devastating, are no more than unproven accusations.

Drumgold, just like Lehrmann, is entitled to a presumption of innocence.

It is also worth considering just how far this man has fallen since February 3, 2020, when he delivered an address at a dinner in the High Court for newly admitted silks.

This is what he said: “Despite its long, complex evolution, the significance of the institution of silk has not diminished, and the values it embodies remain just as important today as at any time in history.

“Being labelled silk must weigh heavy upon our shoulders. We must carry the burden of being labelled learned by, at all times, displaying learned qualities.

“We set the standards of skill, of integrity, of honesty.

“In us, the independence of our role must be on display every day. Our diligence must be worthy of our new standing.

“We must be worthy beacons, because those in our profession today and those who will join our profession in the coming decades will wish to emulate us, and the standards we set,” Drumgold said.

Chris Merritt is vice-president of the Rule of Law Institute of Australia.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/legal-affairs/shane-drumgolds-time-as-dpp-is-surely-at-an-end/news-story/2e2bfff1cc152308e10411070e565650

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19289887

File: 114696c91bffcc2⋯.jpg (375.84 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Linda_Reynolds_claims_Brit….jpg)

>>19132091 (pb)

>>19132103 (pb)

>>19289705

Linda Reynolds sues Brittany Higgins for defamation over Instagram post

Jesinta Burton - August 3, 2023

Liberal senator Linda Reynolds has made good on her threat to sue Brittany Higgins for defamation for a social media post accusing her of harassment, issuing a writ against her former staffer in the West Australian Supreme Court.

According to the writ lodged on Monday, Reynolds is suing Higgins for aggravated damages over an Instagram story on July 4 and a Twitter post on July 20, both of which she claimed were defamatory of her.

The former defence minister is also claiming the posts constituted a breach of a deed of settlement and release the pair signed back in March 2021, which contained a non-disparagement clause.

Reynolds is demanding two injunctions preventing Higgins from publishing defamatory material about her and preventing her from further breaches of the deed.

The news comes just weeks after Higgins took to social media accusing her former boss of harassment and confirming she had received a legal letter from Reynolds’ lawyers.

On Thursday, Reynolds confirmed she had launched defamation proceedings after sending a concerns notice and receiving a “wholly unsatisfactory response” from Higgins’ lawyers.

“Ms Higgins continues to use the media to make defamatory comments about my conduct notwithstanding the existence of facts and evidence to the contrary and without regard to a non-disparagement clause she agreed to,” Reynolds said.

She said the concerns noticed issued on July 5 requested Higgins refrain from defaming the senator, “however her conduct following receipt of that notice ... and the unsatisfactory response received from her lawyer is evidence that she has no intention of stopping”.

A spokesperson for Arnold Bloch Leibler confirmed Higgins had retained the law firm’s services and intended to defend the claim vigorously.

In 2021, Higgins alleged she had been raped in Reynolds’ parliamentary office by her colleague Bruce Lehrmann.

Lehrmann has repeatedly denied the allegation and a criminal trial was aborted late last year due to juror misconduct, with a retrial ruled out over fears about its potential impact on Higgins’ mental health.

Reynolds is also locked in a defamation battle with Higgins’ partner, David Sharaz, who she has accused of “trolling” her in tweets she claims were false and defamatory of her and caused her, her family and staff stress and anguish.

The lawsuit was later amended to include a further three social media posts from other platforms.

Reynolds is demanding the former press gallery journalist pay damages, as well as aggravated damages, over five social media posts. She also seeks an injunction preventing the material from surfacing again.

Last month Reynolds claimed she had been targeted with “unwarranted criticism and abuse”.

“Despite [Higgins’] repeated defamation of my character, until now I have not taken any action against her personally – even though I considered her words to breach our previous settlement agreement,” Reynolds said in a statement at the time.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/western-australia/wa-senator-linda-reynolds-sues-brittany-higgins-for-defamation-over-instagram-post-20230803-p5dtlc.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19289915

File: 5252ca90fbb6256⋯.jpg (237.57 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_invited_P….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19283925

Indigenous voice to parliament Yes side insists treaties decades away

ROSIE LEWIS and SARAH ISON - AUGUST 3, 2023

1/2

The Yes campaign has insisted treaties take decades to finalise as it seeks to distance the process from the voice referendum and Anthony Albanese rules out the commonwealth pursuing agreements with Indigenous Australians in this term of parliament.

The Prime Minister said states were leading treaty negotiations but left open the possibility of the federal government playing a role, while refusing to say if he personally supported a treaty.

Labor’s draft national platform says the party will take steps to implement all three elements of the Uluru Statement from the Heart – voice, treaty and truth – in this term of government.

Peter Dutton, who won’t attend Australia’s largest Indigenous gathering at the Garma festival on the weekend, is continuing to ­attack Mr Albanese’s credibility on the voice and Uluru Statement from the Heart, asking when Australians would “hear a straight word” from the Prime Minister about his position on treaty.

After three days of Coalition questioning on treaty, Yes23 campaign director Dean Parkin hit back at the Opposition Leader’s “scare campaign”. “The only person talking about treaty right now is Peter Dutton,” Mr Parkin said.

“It’s important to understand that treaty processes, as the Leader of the Opposition well understands, are decades-long processes. We want to make it very clear to people that this referendum is about one thing and one thing only, and that is about getting an Aboriginal and Torres Strait ­Islander voice to close the gap and help fix issues facing our communities now.”

Asked if the Albanese government would try to negotiate a ­treaty or treaties in this term of parliament if the referendum succeeded, the Prime Minister said: “No, because that’s occurring with the states right now.”

He rejected the notion the commonwealth would never play a role in negotiating treaties and pointed out the Uluru Statement from the Heart didn’t specify the federal government being involved. “It doesn’t speak about the commonwealth negotiating treaties,” Mr Albanese told ABC radio.

“What the No campaign want to do is to focus on everything that’s not happening, and nothing that is. What is happening is a vote in the last quarter of this year for a voice to parliament. And what that is about is recognising First ­Nations people in our Constitution and then listening to Indigenous Australians so as to get better results.”

Mr Dutton labelled the interview a train wreck and said Mr ­Albanese had committed to the Uluru Statement in full on 34 ­occasions. “In a train wreck Radio National interview this morning, he was asked seven times whether he supported treaty and seven times refused to give a direct answer. When will we hear a straight word from this Prime Minister?” Mr Dutton said in question time.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19289918

File: c8c8d44be1c1126⋯.jpg (253.18 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Peter_Dutton_compared_Anth….jpg)

>>19289915

2/2

Uluru Statement from the Heart architect Megan Davis said there was nothing in the constitutional change that could “prevent a treaty”.

“There’s nothing in here, with constitutional recognition and voice provisions that can prevent the commonwealth participating in that treaty activity,” Professor Davis said at an event at the Australian National University on Wednesday. “Legally, there’s nothing in the recognition provision that would prevent negotiations on treaty.” Also at the ANU event, Indigenous Labor senator Jana Stewart said it was “an indictment on our country that recognition of ­Indigenous Australians in our constitution hasn’t happened ­already”.

Liberal senator Andrew Bragg said the voice referendum was “salvageable” despite what he ­described as a mismanagement of the yes campaign by the government. The pro-voice Liberal said he had tried not to criticise Labor’s process too much because he feared injuring the campaign, but admitted he regretted that now.

“I’m probably kicking myself now that I wasn’t more forthright,” he said. “Because I think there is a lack of what I would call sensible middle ground that would be desirable for this to be successful.”

Artist and member of the government’s referendum working group Sally Scales hit back at suggestions the process had been mismanaged, pointing to the six years of work that had taken place since the Uluru dialogues in 2017.

The government has already spent nearly $900,000 of $5.8m set aside in the October budget to establish the Makarrata commission but Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney would not say what that money had gone towards. Ms Burney said last month the Makarrata commission would have two jobs: “First, the national process of truth telling and a ­national agreement making, which is really code for ‘treaty’ without saying it.”

There are treaty processes under way in Victoria, Queensland and the Northern Territory. Marcus Stewart, outgoing co-chair of the First Peoples’ ­Assembly of Victoria, said his state began its treaty journey in 2016 and had just landed the architecture to start negotiations.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-yes-side-insists-treaties-decades-away/news-story/0288bdd7f55d28856cabf9c2cfda96f9

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19289945

File: a7e20136a519744⋯.jpg (223.4 KB,1915x1077,1915:1077,The_man_allegedly_shared_s….jpg)

>>19278301

Australia’s alleged worst pedophile ‘first detected in police sting’

DAVID MURRAY, MACKENZIE SCOTT and LYDIA LYNCH - AUGUST 3, 2023

One of the nation’s worst alleged pedophiles went deeper underground after a dark web child-sex ring was busted by Australian authorities almost a decade ago.

The childcare worker, now charged with the rape and sexual abuse of 91 young girls in 10 centres in Queensland, one in NSW and one overseas, allegedly shared images and videos on the dark web with members of a site called The Love Zone in 2013 and 2014, The Australian understands.

The Queensland Police Service’s internationally renowned Task Force Argos investigators infiltrated and then secretly took over the global network of child-sex offenders in 2014 after the head administrator had been identified as South Australian public servant Shannon Grant McCoole, who sexually abused at least seven children in his care.

Among images and videos of abuse scooped up in the operation were those shared by the 45-year-old Gold Coast-based childcare worker, who the Australian Federal Police this week announced had been charged with 1623 child abuse offences over the 15 years leading up to his arrest last ­August.

It was only his sharing of those images that led to his identification and arrest, with AFP victim identification team members cracking the case when they were last year able to trace bedsheets in the background to a Brisbane childcare centre at which he worked.

After The Love Zone sting, Task Force Argos moved into a new undercover operation, secretly taking over and running a child abuse forum called Childs Play on the dark web so they could covertly gather details on members and identify victims.

Meanwhile, having narrowly escaped detection and arrest, the Australian childcare worker is believed to have become more cautious about material he shared, The Australian has been told.

More than 100 children were rescued in the Childs Play operation. Lawyers, military personnel, IT workers and a healthcare professional working with children were among those arrested.

The Love Zone operation led to the arrest of “Britain’s worst pedophile”, Richard Huckle, who was convicted of the rape and sexual assault of 23 children from Malaysia and Cambodia.

Investigations into the childcare worker are understood to have taken a toll on the Australian victim identification experts and investigators, some of whom had children in childcare, with counselling offered to help them deal with the trauma of their work.

Disturbingly, the childcare worker had the confidence to allegedly abuse children in centres across Brisbane, home city of some of the world’s best victim identification experts and investigators, from Argos and the Australian Centre to Counter Child Exploitation.

The AFP alleges the man recorded his offending on phones and cameras while working in childcare centres in Brisbane between 2007 and 2013, at an overseas centre in 2013 and 2014, at a Sydney centre between 2014 and 2017, and again in Brisbane from 2018 to 2022.

AFP assistant commissioner Justine Gough on Wednesday said the childcare worker “had all the qualifications he needed to work in the centres”.

The Attorney-General, Yvette D’Ath, said Queensland’s pro­tection watchdog had “acted ­appropriately”.

“After being briefed by my department on the shocking case involving dozens of child abuse allegations, I’m advised our Blue Card Services acted appropriately,” she said.

“Queensland’s Blue Card system is one of if not the most stringent in the nation.”

Ms D’Ath said the man’s working with children approval was suspended and employers alerted the day Blue Card Services was notified by the AFP of the alleged disqualifying offences.

The efforts of the AFP, and NSW and Queensland police were applauded by NSW Premier Chris Minns, who went on to call for a tightening of loopholes in relation to working with children checks, including better communication and information sharing between state and territory jurisdictions.

“It would be an unimaginable job to go through this investigation,” he said.

“And the fact that their vigilance, their dedication, their caring and their empathy for victims is what drives them to this public service is so important for law enforcement and the protection of children.

“We owe you a huge debt of gratitude and we thank you for your service.”

Queensland’s Child Safety Minister Craig Crawford supported Mr Minns’s calls.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/australias-alleged-worst-pedophile-first-detected-in-police-sting/news-story/bf7403d6f074504cb454431be6488695

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19289982

File: d197968e48cfe34⋯.jpg (231.61 KB,1861x1047,1861:1047,Governments_are_reviewing_….jpg)

>>19278301

>>19284162

Sex offenders must be identified to protect children, Peter Dutton demands

NATASHA BITA - AUGUST 3, 2023

1/2

A national register of child sex ­offenders will be considered by state and territory governments after police charged a childcare worker over the alleged serial rape of dozens of young girls.

Federal Education Minister Jason Clare has ordered a review of “working with children’’ checks to close a loophole that may let paedophiles move interstate to work with children undetected.

And Peter Dutton is pushing for a national register of pedophiles to help schools and childcare centres identify predators.

New rules for the use of smartphones and tablets in childcare centres, as well as the open-plan design of childcare centres and tougher requirements for staffing and supervision, will be considered by the nation’s education ministers in October.

Mr Clare on Wednesday said he had triggered a review of child safety laws after a secret police briefing last October.

Ten months before laying charges against a former childcare worker on Tuesday, the AFP had briefed Mr Clare about Operation Tenterfield – Australia’s worst ­alleged pedophilia case involving the abuse of 91 children in daycare centres spanning 16 years.

“These are shocking allegations,’’ Mr Clare said.

“I have requested a review of child safety arrangements be conducted by the Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority. It is looking at child protection safeguards nationally and within states and territories, including working-with-children check processes, mandatory reporting, and teacher-registration processes.

“The safety and protection of children attending early childhood education is the highest priority for all governments,” he added.

Mr Clare said he had instructed ACECQA to “work closely with the AFP” to fix flaws in childcare safety.

The AFP charged a 45-year-old Gold Coast man on Tuesday with 1623 child abuse offences including 136 counts of rape and 110 counts of sexual intercourse with a child under the age of 10.

Police say the alleged abuse of little girls took place in 10 childcare centres in Brisbane, one in Sydney and one overseas between 2007 and 2022.

Police have not named the man or the centres, but they revealed they were alerted to the alleged abuse by photos posted online, and tracked the alleged offender by identifying a bed sheet.

A furious NSW Premier Chris Minns on Wednesday demanded that all states share information about “red flags’’ over teachers and childcare workers.

He called for an “immediate meeting of federal and state ministers to demand progress urgently on better information sharing between jurisdictions’’.

“We are taking steps to look at any gaps in our system, and our regulations, to strengthen child protection in this state,’’ he told state parliament. “I want NSW to lead in this important area of national reform.’’

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19289988

File: 43e66d7765bf729⋯.jpg (191.26 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Education_Minister_Jason_C….jpg)

>>19289982

2/2

NSW Education Minister Prue Car said she would stop offenders “jumping between sectors’’ to avoid detection.

The existing working-with-children checks differ in each state and territory, and disciplinary action or dismissals do not show up in national police checks, which focus on charges and convictions.

Ms Car called for a streamlined national check and better data sharing between states and territories, as well as government agencies.

“I will be reviewing whether oversights could be strengthened and streamlined so that any red flags in one sector are visible to other agencies and other jurisdictions,’’ she said.

“We will apply this to the early childhood and school sector.

“I’ll be talking to colleagues in the independent and Catholic sectors to ensure there are no way offenders can jump between sectors to avoid detection.’’

Queensland Child Safety Minister Craig Crawford phoned NSW Families and Communities Minister Kate Washington “to discuss how we can further protect children’’.

“I support the call for an urgent out-of-session state and territory ministers’ meeting,’’ he said. “We need to demand better data sharing across jurisdictions, agencies and state borders.’’

Mr Dutton – a former policeman whose wife Kirilly sold her childcare centre in Brisbane last year – called for a national registry of child sex offenders.

“The registry might have been one element that could have averted further victims falling at the hands of this individual in relation to the alleged offences that have taken place,’’ the Opposition Leader told federal parliament.

The Parenthood, an advocacy group for families, demanded national cabinet make child protection a priority. “Where discrepancies exist between states and territories on working-with-children checks, this is the time to unite and iron them out to create a single system that makes it easy for (childcare) operators to confidently hire the qualified staff they so sorely need,’’ acting chief executive Jessica Rudd said.

“We have seen what can happen when governments work in lock-step, we saw this during the pandemic.

“We would like this to be a priority so we can ensure our children are safe and checks conducted on people working with children are consistent no matter where they live.’’

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/sex-offenders-must-be-identified-to-protect-children-peter-dutton-demands/news-story/73a2ce0692726dce031fbf37c6a6ab84

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19290021

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19226439

>>19262114

>>19272518

Human remains found after army helicopter crash

Matthew Knott - August 3, 2023

Human remains and parts of a cockpit have been found in the area where four army aircrew members died when their helicopter crashed last week off the Queensland coast.

Lieutenant-General Greg Bilton told reporters the search-and-recovery mission had identified a “further debris field” in the sea near Hamilton Island that was consistent with a catastrophic, high-impact crash.

“Sadly, I can confirm human remains have also been observed in this location by [a] remote underwater vehicle,” he said. “Due to the nature of the debris field, positive identification of the remains is unlikely to occur until we recover more of the wreckage.”

Warrant Officer Class 2 Joseph “Phil” Laycock, Corporal Alexander Naggs, Troop Commander Captain Daniel Lyon and Lieutenant Maxwell Nugent were on board the MRH-90 Taipan helicopter when it crashed during military training exercises on Friday night.

Defence Minister Richard Marles announced on Monday that all four crew members were presumed dead and the search-and-rescue mission had become a recovery mission.

Bilton said Australian Defence Vessel Reliant, a modern navy auxiliary ship, had been called in to assist with the search-and-recovery effort.

He said those involved were searching at a depth of 40 metres, but the strong currents in the Whitsundays made the recovery effort difficult.

Bilton said the black box inside the aircraft was still missing, adding: “All communications were normal before the aircraft impacted the water.

“The black box is critical in helping us understand what has actually taken place … It is important to collect as much of the debris as we can, so we can fully understand how this incident occurred.”

The helicopter was taking part in Talisman Sabre, the nation’s biggest military training exercise.

The entire Taipan fleet has been grounded following the accident, and the government has said it will not fly again until the cause of the crash has been identified.

The Taipans have been plagued with technical problems during their term of service, and the fleet of 47 aircraft was suspended from use in March when one of the helicopters crashed into shallow waters off Jervis Bay on the NSW South Coast.

The federal opposition is calling on the government to try to accelerate the replacement of the Taipans with a $2.8 billion fleet of Black Hawks from the United States before the scheduled date of December 2024.

“I do not think that can come soon enough, frankly,” opposition defence spokesman Andrew Hastie, a former Special Air Service captain, said this week.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/human-remains-found-after-army-helicopter-crash-20230803-p5dtnw.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EP31L8imwdg

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19290208

File: bac3014db015c68⋯.jpg (3.63 MB,5010x3340,3:2,Emma_Doyle_People_think_be….jpg)

File: d66628457ffddad⋯.jpg (3.06 MB,2749x1833,2749:1833,Joe_Hockey_staffer_Emma_Do….jpg)

Joe Hockey’s ‘Trump whisperer’ predicts the Don’s likely return

The former deputy chief of staff to Donald Trump says “there’s a very big chance” he will be re-elected, but Australia has nothing to fear.

Patrick Durkin - Aug 3, 2023

1/2

The former deputy chief of staff to Donald Trump says “there’s a very big chance” he will be re-elected US president next year, but that Australia and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese have nothing to fear.

Emma Doyle, who worked for Mr Trump between 2018 and 2020, now works for Australia’s former ambassador to the US Joe Hockey and his advisory Bondi Partners, where she is privately dubbed “the Trump whisperer”.

Ms Doyle said the key to surviving under the former president was “not going to work every day afraid of being fired. If you get fired, you get fired.”

“I was always very direct, never threw people under the bus and would say: ‘we’ve looked at this six different ways and here are two options’.”

Ms Doyle was in Melbourne with Mr Hockey for a private dinner with clients on Thursday night to discuss opportunities for Australian energy companies through the Inflation Reduction Act.

She told The Australian Financial Review that while Mr Trump’s indictment would be a factor in the polls, US President Joe Biden’s health and the economy would also be key.

“If the primary were tomorrow [Mr Trump] would win,” she said. “The polling shows he’s dominating the Republican primary, he’s neck and neck with Biden, but a big part of our election is always turnout.”

Ms Doyle agreed with others that while mounting criminal proceedings could consume Mr Trump’s campaign funds, the former president could also leverage them for political benefit.

“He said in 2016 that he could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue and not lose any voters, they are that loyal,” she said. But she conceded the timing of any proceedings in the lead-up to Super Tuesday on March 5 next year was also important.

The 80-year-old President Biden has announced he will run again in 2024 but “people are concerned about Biden’s age, and his age is becoming visible in increasing ways”, Ms Doyle said.

She said if Mr Biden did have to step aside, Vice President Kamala Harris would “probably not” secure the nomination and “the Democrats would have to scramble and then it’s anyone’s game”.

But the 35-year-old Washington insider predicted the US economy would be among the biggest factors for voters. US markets fell this week after ratings agency Fitch downgraded US debt from a AAA rating to AA+.

“A lot turns on the economy,” she said. “The economy feels somewhat better but crime feels worse. There’s a sense things are getting back to normal but they still don’t feel good.

“Our elections tend to be very emotionally driven. How do you feel? Do you feel like you’re better off than you were four years ago?”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19290221

File: e3ca65df011c810⋯.jpg (295.13 KB,1280x960,4:3,Joe_Hockey_speaks_with_the….jpg)

File: ed890b111e6a5e6⋯.jpg (85.13 KB,1200x800,3:2,Trump_s_Australia_by_comme….jpg)

>>19290208

2/2

Ms Doyle, who has also lobbied for Ford Motor Company and worked for Republican Members of Congress in the House and Senate, dismissed as a “bad take” the concerns expressed in Bruce Wolpe’s new book Trump’s Australia, over the implications of Mr Trump’s return for Australia.

“If he’s president again, he is going to deal professionally with whoever the prime minister of Australia is. I sincerely believe that,” she said.

“The two countries have been side by side in every war since World War I, and we’ve had leaders that in both countries feel strongly about that, and the alliance has survived and is closer than ever.”

She dismissed suggestions a re-elected Mr Trump could tear up AUKUS or insist Virginia-class submarines be made in the US.

“This is where people think because they see Trump doing things out of the norm he’s entirely irrational, and he’s not,” she said.

“I could just as easily see him saying, ‘of course they want our submarines, they’re the best in the world, we make the very best’,” she said, employing a well-known Trump impression.

She said Bondi Partners were discussing the enormous opportunities for Australian companies in the US, especially across the energy sector.

“There’s a really bipartisan movement in the US to shore up our supply chain and start to strip China out of it,” she said. “We are taking a much more expansive view of national security and including energy and supply chain security.”

“There’s legislation pending in the Senate right now that would enable Australian companies to have access to money under the Defence Protection Act for operations in Australia, which would be completely new. There aren’t very many countries we would consider doing that for.”

Ms Doyle also said there were a lot of “inaccurate takes” about Mr Trump.

“I don’t think Trump hates unions,” she said. “He was a lifelong Democrat from New York who was in construction, and you can’t build anything in New York without using union labour.

“People seem to either think he’s incredibly strategic and there’s always a plan or that there’s absolutely no plan and he can do anything and it’s total chaos.

“He has excellent political instincts,” she said. “He’s at his best at a rally speech, reading the room and going off the cuff.”

“He doesn’t like being disliked, he wants to be liked,” she said.

“He likes to be personally in the room. He wanted to meet with Kim Jong-un because he thought, ‘if I can get in the room, if anyone has got a shot, I do’.”

https://www.afr.com/policy/foreign-affairs/joe-hockey-s-trump-whisperer-predicts-the-don-s-likely-return-20230803-p5dtm2

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19297168

File: c8c8d44be1c1126⋯.jpg (253.18 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Peter_Dutton_compared_Anth….jpg)

File: 7251bac9ebc5f33⋯.jpg (241.51 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_in_questi….jpg)

File: 6f356631efd04f0⋯.jpg (299.11 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Indigenous_Australians_Min….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19283925

Anthony Albanese and Peter Dutton trade barbs over an Indigenous voice to parliament

ROSIE LEWIS and PAIGE TAYLOR - AUGUST 4, 2023

1/2

Peter Dutton has broadened the No campaign’s attack against ­Anthony Albanese and the Indigenous voice to parliament, attempting to link the Prime Minister’s competency and management of the referendum to ­delivering government services and cost-of-living relief.

After a week in which the ­Coalition continued to pressure the government over voice and treaty, Mr Albanese accused opponents of the advisory body of “confected outrage” and undermining Indigenous Australians to gain political advantage.

Both sides ratcheted up their campaigns in federal parliament as Yes23 on Friday launched a $1m digital advertising blitz – its biggest yet – with Indigenous Australians explaining why a voice to parliament will help their communities.

The new front in the political battle came as the younger brother of land rights giant Yunupingu prepared to welcome thousands of visitors to Northeast Arnhem Land at the Garma Festival with a prediction that Australia is about to change regardless of the result of the voice referendum.

“Together we will change the nation. One way or another the nation will change,” Djawa Yunu­pingu said.

It came as the Opposition Leader accused the Prime Minister of “deliberately and willingly” withholding information on the voice, and demanded detail not only on the advisory body but on a Makarrata Commission and the length and cost of a treaty-making process.

Mr Albanese fired back at Mr Dutton by questioning how the Coalition could stoke confusion over the referendum when it also supported a legislated voice.

“You can’t say that it will change the entire system of government and then say you will legislate the voice – because that is what you’re saying,” the Prime Minister said.

“You can’t say it will promote racial division and then say you will legislate for the voice … because clearly they don’t see it as radical or divisive or any of the other noise or confusion that they are seeking to inject into the referendum. Otherwise, why would they legislate?”

The clash followed a motion moved by Mr Dutton – which was voted down by 90 to 52 – condemning Mr Albanese “for his complete inability to be upfront and honest with the Australian people” on the Uluru Statement from the Heart, and attacking ­Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney for treating the parliament “with contempt by repeatedly and consistently failing to answer direct questions”.

Mr Dutton questioned if the Prime Minister had any coherent explanation to Australians as to how the voice would work, what outcomes it would deliver, its breadth, and how it would be interpreted by the High Court and change a system of government.

“Then perhaps there would be some chance of convincing those 29 per cent of Labor voters (who don’t support the voice), but the Prime Minister is deliberately and willingly withholding information from Labor voters and from the Australian public and that is why this situation goes from bad to worse,” Mr Dutton said.

“The Australian Prime Minister is seeking to divide this nation. That is what is happening here. The best case scenario of this incompetent Prime Minister’s approach to the voice is that you might get a 51-49 Yes outcome, bearing in mind that you need a double majority.

“That splits our country straight down the middle. No prime minister in good conscience would (preside) over such a process unless he was seeking political advantage or unless he was out of his depth.

“Australian families at the moment are paying more for their electricity bills; they’re paying more at the grocery checkout; they’re paying more for their insurance; they’re paying more for their mortgages because of this incompetent government. The incompetency is not just demonstrated in terms of the Prime Minister’s management around the voice, it is every aspect of government delivery at the moment. That’s what the Australian public is experiencing.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19297172

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19297168

2/2

In the most emotional part of his response, Mr Albanese labelled Mr Dutton more divisive than Scott Morrison and blasted him for walking out on the apology to the Stolen Generations.

“In the lead-up to this parliamentary sitting week we were told it was going to be about cost of living. But they have given up on cost of living and decided to stick with dividing,” Mr Albanese said.

“The Leader of the Opposition not only opposed it (the national apology), threatened to resign from the frontbench over it, and walked out. Walked out on that event.

“So terrible was it that in that moment of national unity, there were only a few people who were so determined to sew division that they just couldn’t cop the concept of saying sorry for the wrong thing being done, for children being stolen from mothers, fathers and grandparents, families and communities. Could not stomach it.”

The Yes campaign will spend at least $1m in the coming weeks promoting a series of short videos across its digital platforms that highlight how listening to local voices has delivered better outcomes in communities like Kununurra, Alice Springs and Halls Creek.

The campaign’s focus groups and research indicates Australians want to know what Indigenous people think about the voice but have still only heard from politicians so far and are absorbing politics, not information, about the referendum.

In one of the ads, Yura Yungi Medical Service Aboriginal Corporation chief executive Brenda Garstone says: “It’s really, really important for Aboriginal people to lead in health because we understand our people, we are able to build trust really quickly. A lot of our people are in need of immediate health treatment and we can’t wait around to build trust so that at the end of the day our mob will get a great health service.”

Viewers then see the words: “A voice will allow local solutions to be heard nationally.”

Mr Yunupingu offered a message of hope and unity in his first year as host of Garma, which was founded 24 years ago by his late brother, now known for cultural reasons as Yunupingu, the Gumatj clan leader, and Dr M Yunupingu, the Yothu Yindi musician, who died in 2013.

Djawa Yunupingu likened the referendum to a fire that could cleanse or do harm. Fire was Yunupingu’s totem.

“It’s a moment in time that offers the promise of a new world,” he said. “The brilliance of a fire that lights up the land, cleanses the past and creates new life and new opportunity. Or the fire that leaves charcoal, white ash and a memory of what might have been. I choose the fire that burns bright and lights the way to unity with our ancient southern land.”

The Albanese government will announce $6.4m to support the Yothu Yindi Foundation’s design and development of a new tertiary and vocational educational facility to be known as the Garma Institute.

Consultations with community and stakeholders about the curriculum offered in the new facility will begin at this year’s Garma Festival.

Mr Dutton will not attend Garma for the second year in a row. Opposition Indigenous Affairs spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price attended Garma last year but will not be there this weekend.

Yunupingu played a role in every chapter of the Indigenous rights movement, and part of the festival will be devoted to honouring how he transformed Garma into an important forum for discussions on Indigenous affairs and public policy.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/anthony-albanese-and-peter-dutton-traded-barbs-over-an-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/4e31ac43bbe6c9afeb0eca02a3031ce6

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lLdba77rCxo

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19297215

File: bd8ad5e3a15a45f⋯.jpg (266.41 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Opposition_leader_Peter_Du….jpg)

File: b7234ec8d86c946⋯.jpg (382.16 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Albanese_s_flawed_voice_fa….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19283925

Albanese is now presiding over repeated tactical failures on the voice

SIMON BENSON - AUGUST 3, 2023

Anthony Albanese prides himself on his tactical prowess with Labor having become hubristically accustomed to dominating the politics in parliament.

But the prime minister is rapidly turning one of Labor’s strengths into an unexpected and unfamiliar point of vulnerability, undermined by repeating tactical failures over the voice.

Political advantage for the government normally offered by question time is being eroded by an accumulation of confused and tortured explanations.

It is no longer just about the lack of detail on how the voice would operate. A new element has been injected into the debate which is potentially more damaging.

Labor has a well-publicised commitment to delivering the Uluru statement in full. This involves treaty and truth telling, with the voice being the first priority.

There is nothing new in this.

But the government’s apparent lack of a strategy to deal with inevitable attempts to link the voice to treaty is bewildering.

Albanese’s response to questions on this have been punctuated by contradiction and imprecision. The Coalition accuses the prime minister of deception.

Suddenly the political battle has been widened.

When Albanese accepted Peter Dutton‘s challenge to debate the issue in a suspension of standing orders, the Liberal leader asked pointed questions, to which no answers were provided. He accused Albanese of “wilfully” withholding detail.

Albanese responded accusing Dutton of fueling division for political advantage, goading him for his refusal to attend the Garma festival this weekend.

As one senior Labor source said Thursday, as the Coalition continued to entrap the government into talking about the voice: “If the voice isn’t close to dead after this week, it’s got to be on life support.”

It can still be revived. But the task has just become harder.

Dutton believes he has little to lose in doubling down in his attacks. Few people take any notice of what an Opposition says or does in Canberra. They are far more likely to pay attention to what the government is doing.

And the Coalition is succeeding in making it appear that Labor is consumed by the voice, with little attention being paid to the primary concern for most - cost of living.

The focus of the Opposition’s attack this week was once again, unsurprisingly, the minister for Indigenous Australians Linda Burney.

Dutton’s goal is to exploit a conclusion that the voice will be a path to treaty, adding yet another layer of confusion to the referendum question.

The ultimate aim is to render the debate so excessively complicated that even in the minds of people who may otherwise be inclined to vote yes, seeds of doubt are planted.

You don’t need to raise too many concerns in people’s minds for them to say no.

Burney has not helped the cause with her repeated refusals to directly answer questions, often adding new levels of puzzlement when she does.

Albanese, who holds commendable protective instincts when it comes to Burney, has been forced into obfuscation about the government’s post voice agenda.

He has no other choice. The Labor leader cannot allow the referendum to be polluted by other issues. This would almost ensure its failure.

As a consequence, there are now two issues the government is being forced to defend.

It must unravel attempts by the Coalition to inject treaty into the voice as a logical conclusion.

It must also resolve the underlying problem, which is confusion over the function of the voice itself.

Albanese is now so invested in the referendum that in the face of growing community doubt, the prime minister has no other choice than to push harder in demonstrating his commitment to it.

Apart from the belief that it is a worthy thing for Labor to be supporting, it becomes a question of Albanese’s convictions.

Any change of emphasis or direction would dangerously weaken his authority.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/albanese-is-now-presiding-over-repeated-tactical-failures-on-the-voice/news-story/288dec94903d7c59c8872431c167da7c

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19297296

File: dde29b9e073152b⋯.jpg (149.47 KB,1620x912,135:76,Artist_Sally_Scales_is_a_m….jpg)

File: 8b25c1ebd953135⋯.jpg (926.8 KB,2048x2731,2048:2731,Linda_Burney.jpg)

File: 7dfab1486f15bd1⋯.jpg (779.18 KB,1957x2610,1957:2610,Noel_Pearson.jpg)

>>19188991

>>19222755

>>19243329

Indigenous voice to parliament: Claims of ‘no say’ on AUKUS nuclear subs torpedoed by referendum adviser

SARAH ISON - AUGUST 4, 2023

A member of Anthony Albanese’s referendum advisory group says the AUKUS nuclear submarine project has the potential to impact Indigenous communities, signalling she backs the voice to parliament advising government on the key pillar of Australia’s defence policy.

Artist Sally Scales said Aboriginal communities should be consulted on aspects of the nuclear subs deal, including where they will be docked.

“I don’t care about the nuts and the bolts of the submarines. But what do I care about? Where’s that nuclear waste going to go for (those) submarines?” Ms Scales told an event at the Australian National University on Wednesday night.

“If we’re going to build new ports for these submarines, where are those ports going to be? How (are) those Aboriginal communities going to be consulted and worked with?”

Ms Scales was a member of the government’s referendum advisory group that provided guidance to Anthony Albanese on the wording for amending the Constitution to enshrine a voice.

The comments contradict statements made last week by Indigenous leader Noel Pearson, who was also a member of the referendum advisory group.

Mr Pearson told a La Trobe University event the constitutional amendment – which states the voice would make representations on “matters relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples” – was unlikely to extend to issues such as parking fines and submarines, a rejection of a key No campaign argument.

“I just don’t know how you squeeze parking tickets and ­nuclear submarines and so on into that clause, as a purpose of this voice. The purpose is clear that it’s on matters relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait ­Islander peoples,” he said.

The differing comments from voice supporters come as the government faces scrutiny over the potential remit of the body, and seeks to downplay claims it would be far-reaching.

Under pressure from the No campaign over the scope of the voice, Mr Albanese in June told parliament it would only advise on issues that would impact Indigenous people “differently” from other Australians.

In July, Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney said she would ask the body to focus on four areas: health, education, housing and jobs.

But Ms Burney said the composition and functions of the voice would ultimately be determined by legislation after a successful referendum.

“The way that I see it as the minister is that the scope should be a respectful discussion with the voice,” she said.

“I have identified very clearly what I think the priorities are, but obviously there are other ­issues like baby birth weights, like life expectancy.

“But I really say very clearly there is nothing to lose and everything to gain from this ­establishment of a voice.”

The Prime Minister has slammed questions on the scope of the voice and whether it would advise on matters such as the safeguard mechanism, describing them as nothing more than “distractions”.

But referendum working group member and UNSW law professor Megan Davis said the voice “would be able to speak to all parts of the government”.

“(This includes) the cabinet, ministers, public servants and ­independent statutory offices and agencies – such as the ­Reserve Bank, as well as a wide array of other agencies ­including, to name a few, ­Centrelink, the Great Barrier Marine Park Authority and the ombudsman – on matters relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. This isn’t to be feared,” Professor Davis said at the time.

Fellow referendum working group member Sean Gordon said the No campaign’s focus on whether the voice would advise on issues such as the nuclear submarines “missed the point”.

“If people understood native title and if people understood cultural heritage laws in each state and territory, Indigenous people already get a say on those things,” he said.

“We already get a say in ­regards to whether a nuclear waste dump is going to be built somewhere … or whether they’re going to build a port off wherever.

“Planning laws specifically state that Aboriginal people must be consulted in regards to Aboriginal cultural heritage and ensure minimal impact in ­regards to the damage of particularly significant sites. That ­already exists.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-claims-of-no-say-onsubs-torpedoed-by-poll-adviser/news-story/4f4aa9ffaee8b7f8c2155fe02175f7ec

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19297392

File: 1ca1dfd47a99dfd⋯.jpg (446.67 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Gove_residents_carry_an_im….jpg)

File: 1c4d4d4cfb856aa⋯.jpg (438.67 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Anthony_Albanese_with_Yoln….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19283925

Anthony Albanese at top voice: no retreat on Indigenous referendum

JOE KELLY - AUGUST 4, 2023

1/2

Anthony Albanese has promised there will be no retreat on the referendum, declaring a constitutionally enshrined voice would bring a “new day” of unity to the nation and act as a “vehicle for progress” in tackling Indigenous advantage.

In his strongest and most ­impassioned defence of the voice, to be delivered at the Garma festival in northeast Arnhem Land on Saturday, the Prime Minister will invoke the spirit and vision of the late Yolngu elder Yunupingu to promote the “coming-together of two worlds”.

In a draft of his speech obtained by The Weekend Australian, Mr Albanese says voting Yes is a “once-in-a-generation opportunity for real, overdue and much-needed change” and promises there would be “no delaying or ­deferring this referendum”.

“We will not deny the urgency of this moment,” he says.

“We will not kick the can down the road.”

While he does not nominate a date for the national vote, Mr ­Albanese dissects the meaning of a No result for the country: an ­acceptance of entrenched Aboriginal disadvantage that would guarantee “more of the same”.

“An eight-year gap in life ­expectancy, in the home of the fair go,” he says. “A suicide rate twice as high, in the lucky country. Shocking rates of disease, in a ­nation with some of the world’s best healthcare. Only four out of 19 Closing the Gap targets on track.

“Surely no leader can honestly say this is good enough. Surely no leader can imagine that change is not desperately and urgently needed.”

Addressing calls to split the voice to parliament from the issue of constitutional recognition, amid polling showing support for the Yes case trending down, Mr Albanese says he is not for turning. “We will not abandon substance for symbolism or retreat to platitudes at the express of progress,” he says. “Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have been clear. The form of constitutional ­recognition they are seeking is a voice.

“Not our sympathy, not a symbol – a vehicle for progress, a practical tool to make their children’s lives better.”

A refusal to put the voice in the Constitution would mean “rejecting the form of recognition that Aboriginal and Torres Strait ­Islander people have requested”.

Mr Albanese says a voice to parliament would ensure the “Garma spirit of learning and co-operation and shared progress” would no longer be confined to “this one part of Australia and one group of Australians for four days a year”.

“It is shared with our nation, to serve our whole nation,” the Prime Minister says. “To ensure that ­Aboriginal and Torres Strait ­Islander people everywhere have the opportunity of a better life.

“So instead of the inspiring success stories we see around us being shining exceptions, like stars in the night sky, there can be a new day.”

The address comes as it was ­reported Western Australia’s controversial Aboriginal heritage laws, which had loomed as a threat to the voice referendum, are to be scrapped just a month after they were introduced.

WA Indigenous Affairs Minister Tony Buti contacted organisations that represent native title holders on Friday to say he would announce “significant changes” to the laws on Tuesday.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19297405

File: 95efb24a9e34f06⋯.jpg (410.39 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Gumatj_clan_members_sing_a….jpg)

File: 4d279d2ad2f7b21⋯.jpg (379.3 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Pro_voice_Liberal_MP_Julia….jpg)

>>19297392

2/2

Mr Albanese arrived at Garma on Friday after Peter Dutton – who will not attend the nation’s largest Indigenous gathering – used parliament this week to accuse the Prime Minister of withholding information on the voice and concealing Labor’s plans for the establishment of a Makarrata commission and treaty-­making process.

The Coalition is pursuing the government over how $900,000 of the $5.8m allocated in the ­October budget to establish the Makarrata commission has been spent. Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney has ­declined to say where the money has gone.

On Friday, the Opposition Leader said the voice to parliament represented the “biggest change” to the Constitution since federation and that Mr Albanese had “a deliberate strategy” not to provide detail on how it would work.

“Every Australian wants to see a better outcomes for Indigenous Australians. We want to see kids going to school, housing, jobs,” Mr Dutton told the Nine Network’s Today. “But setting up a new body which will have an influence on every area of government policy and consideration is something the Australian public, I don’t think, are going to tolerate.

“Let’s do constitutional recognition. I think there’d be 80 per cent support for it. The Prime Minister supports it. I support it.

“I just don’t think the country is ready for the voice question ­because they don’t understand what it is about.”

In his Garma address, Mr Albanese says there is “nothing to fear, and so much to gain” from voting Yes, arguing that Australians have a rare opportunity.

“The No campaign are desperate to talk about anything but the actual question before the Australian people,” the Prime Minister says. “Because even they understand more of the same is not just unacceptable, it is indefensible.

“We can bring our two worlds together. With our hearts and with our heads … the power to reach for a better Australia is in our hands.”

The voice was framed by Mr ­Albanese as a tool for achieving improvements for Indigenous Australians in the areas of health, education, employment and housing. He likened it to a “practical tool” that would help “more families know the stability of a roof over their head” and ensure more communities were “safer, happier and healthier”.

“That’s what the voice is about: advice,” he says.

“Advice that will ensure government benefits from the perspective and experience of the people on the ground.”

Speaking on Friday after ­arriving in Gulkula in northeast Arnhem Land, Mr Albanese said there would be a greater focus on the choice before Australians in the weeks leading up to the ­referendum and he was unsurprised there was a large number of undecided voters.

“I saw research early on that had a very high figure for how many people didn’t know that we had a Constitution,” he said. “There hasn’t been a referendum held this century.

“I don’t think people want a date announced many months in advance and then a long day-to-day campaign. There will be a focus in the weeks leading up to people voting, particularly in the four weeks leading up.”

Mr Albanese said he respected people with a different view from his own on the voice, but dismissed attempts to link the referendum to issues that had “nothing to do with what people will vote on” as illegitimate.

He also rejected the argument the voice would concern itself with the AUKUS agreement for ­nuclear submarines, despite a member of the referendum advisory group, Sally Scales, saying ­Aboriginal communities should be consulted on where the submarines would be docked and what would happen to the nuclear waste they produced.

In his Garma address, Mr Albanese argues there is a strong foundation of support for the voice across society ranging from different sporting codes, faiths, political parties and businesses, but cautions that there are “no guarantees of success”.

“That’s not a reason to delay. It’s why we have to hold to the courage of our convictions … All of us have a part to play,” he said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/anthony-albanese-at-top-voice-no-retreat-on-indigenous-referendum/news-story/93b7293e2fec4c4c328cc8ca3363c668

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19297569

File: 4ad84414963d0ac⋯.jpg (427.86 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19297392

An Indigenous voice to parliament — like Garma — is two cultures embracing for the betterment of both

ANTHONY ALBANESE - AUGUST 4, 2023

1/4

In May this year I had the honour of paying tribute to the life and legacy of a truly great Australian. A man it is hard to imagine Garma without. Yunupingu walked in two worlds: with authority, power and grace. And he sought – always – to make those two worlds whole.

His very name meant “the place on the horizon where the sea merges with the sky”. How fitting that he devoted his life to seeking change in a spirit of unity. Momentous national change, yet also practical local change.

That was his vision for the community he helped to build, the opportunities he worked to create, the lives and country he sought to change for the better. Not a conflict between two identities, not a clash of two cultures, but an embrace of both, for the betterment of both.

Like here at Garma, the saltwater meeting the fresh, and flowing on together.

Friends, this is the very same aspiration the Uluru Statement from the Heart holds for every Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander child. As it says, so memorably: “When we have power over our destiny our children will flourish. They will walk in two worlds and their culture will be a gift to their country.”

Think about those words: “A gift to their country”. Even in expressing the most fundamental and elemental hope every parent has for their child: the chance to flourish, the opportunity of a better life even in that moment, there is still that spirit of generosity to others, the offer of a gift to us all.

The understanding that both our worlds have so much to gain from listening to each other, learning from one another, working together. And the genius of the Uluru Statement from the Heart and all the elders and leaders and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who poured their hopes and aspirations and effort and goodwill into it is that it doesn’t just articulate the noble goal of a better future; it offers Australia the practical means to achieve it.

My government supports the Uluru Statement from the Heart and its call for an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voice in our Constitution, which is what the coming referendum is about.

A vehicle for real and practical progress. A committee of Indigenous Australians, chosen by Indigenous Australians, to work for Indigenous Australians in every part of our nation: the regions and remote communities, big cities and the Torres Strait Islands. Giving parliament and government the advice to drive better results in health, education, employment and housing.

That’s what the voice is about: advice. Advice that will ensure government benefits from the perspective and experience of the people on the ground. So we listen to communities, make better decisions and achieve better results.

Here at Garma, you don’t need to imagine what that would look like. You can see it, all around you. You can share in the vision for Australia that those elders and leaders endorsed at Uluru.

Walking around this festival, you can see for yourself how much can be achieved when Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are heard and empowered. The fantastic local schools working side-by-side with their communities to boost attendance and achieve great results. Indigenous rangers, managing land and sea country. Employers instilling the new pride and confidence that comes from having a good job.

Training programs and job pathways ensuring young people gain a greater sense of belonging and self-belief.

Medical services helping children grow up healthy and safe, making sure communities can get the treatment and services they need, on country.

Or the Dilak Council, who I met with yesterday. Bringing together representatives from the 13 clans of northeast Arnhem Land, connecting culture and local knowledge to government decision-making, taking responsibility for a better future.

Many of these programs and initiatives have been built up through decades of hard work and goodwill, often run on a shoestring. Providing generations with the basis for a better life – and more than that, giving people the skills and capacity and opportunity to thrive. To flourish. That’s what can be achieved by listening to locals.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19297572

File: 19a11bf204d771f⋯.jpg (378.9 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Yolngu_elders_meet_with_th….jpg)

>>19297569

2/4

And something else happens when governments listen: investment is effective. Because the funding actually gets to the people and communities who need it. The money is invested in things that work: in creating jobs and building secure homes and backing local schools and keeping people healthy.

And, friends, here at Garma, we can also see how the coming-together of two worlds enlarges and enriches both. We see Australians of all ages and backgrounds, all faiths and traditions, all walks of life, all sides of politics, sharing in the welcoming beauty and joy of this place.

Children from Melbourne and Adelaide and Perth kicking the footy in the red dirt with Gumatj boys and girls.

Australians of all ages from every part of the country, lining-up to share a meal and talk about what they’ve seen and learned and enjoyed that day.

Artists and students from all over Australia witnessing the majesty of song and dance and painting that speaks for 65,000 years of love of the land and waters.

All of us here, thinking how lucky we are, as Australians, to be part of this continuing story. The great treasure we gain from embracing the fullness of our history, a heritage and tradition unique in all the nations of the world.

At this year’s referendum, we have the opportunity to recognise and celebrate this culture and connection in our Constitution.

And through a voice we can ensure that the Garma spirit of learning and co-operation and shared progress is not confined to this one part of Australia and one group of Australians, for four days a year.

It is shared with our nation, to serve our whole nation. To ensure that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people everywhere have the opportunity of a better life. So instead of the inspiring success stories we see around us being shining exceptions, like stars in the night sky, there can be a new day. An Australia where more Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children are going to school, finishing school and finding a path to a qualification they want for a job they love.

Where more families know the stability of a roof over their head.

Where communities are safer, happier and healthier – shaped and secured by the voices and expertise and passion and vision of the people who call them home.

This is what voting Yes represents. A once-in-a-generation opportunity for real, overdue and much-needed change.

And that is why today I can promise all of you – and all Australians – there will be no delaying or deferring this referendum.

We will not deny the urgency of this moment. We will not kick the can down the road. We will not abandon substance for symbolism or retreat to platitudes at the expense of progress.

Prime ministers and governments may have come and gone but Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have been clear. The form of constitutional recognition they are seeking is a voice. Not our sympathy, not a symbol – a vehicle for progress, a practical tool to make their children’s lives better.

Not just something that will feel good – something that will do good, that will make a positive difference. We can get this done, together. And we can get this done, now. Because if not us, who? And if not now, when? Together, let’s get this done.

In the months ahead, just as we will continue to make it clear what voting Yes will achieve Australians should be equally clear about what voting No means: it is more of the same.

Not only rejecting the opportunity to do better but accepting that what we have is somehow good enough.

An eight-year gap in life expectancy, in the home of the fair go. A suicide rate twice as high, in the lucky country. Shocking rates of disease, in a nation with some of the world’s best healthcare. Only four out of 19 Closing the Gap targets on track. Surely no leader can honestly say this is good enough. Surely no leader can pretend “it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”. Surely no leader can imagine that change is not desperately and urgently needed.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19297578

File: 16b0387c6f58228⋯.jpg (524.2 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Gumatj_clan_members_and_fa….jpg)

>>19297572

3/4

And that’s why, with every passing day, it becomes more and more obvious that the No campaign is desperate to talk about anything but the actual question before the Australian people. Because even they understand that more of the same is not just unacceptable, it is indefensible.

And this is where the Uluru Statement from the Heart is also such a clear and practical appeal to the head. To the compassion we all feel in our hearts – but also the truth we know in our heads.

Because the principle of the voice is grounded in irresistible logic. In the unavoidable fact that if we continue to do the same things in the same way, we will get the same outcomes.

It’s a message reinforced by the Productivity Commission only last month. Warning that if we continue to assume that “government knows best”, then things will only get worse.

Of course, to all of you and indeed to a great many Australians, none of this is news. Over the years, people have heard these facts. Seen images of hardship, read stories of disadvantage. And perhaps, from time to time, imagined what it would be like to walk in someone else’s shoes. Imagined what it would be like for their daughter to be at greater risk in childbirth. Their son more likely to go to jail than university. Their community twice as likely to be shattered by suicide. Their friends and relatives more likely to be afflicted by diseases virtually eliminated elsewhere. And, naturally, in imagining this, Australians will have asked themselves: “But what can I do about it? What difference can I make?”

Well, this year, there is a simple answer: we can vote Yes. And friends, just as importantly, we can convince our fellow Australians to vote Yes as well. Because that is what will decide this referendum, that is what will deliver recognition through a voice.

The respectful, genuine discussions Australians have with one other. Engaging and explaining as neighbours and colleagues and friends. As teammates in community sporting clubs of every code, because every code has embraced this cause. As fellow worshippers in every faith, because leaders of all faiths have backed this change. As supporters of every political party, because representatives from right across the political spectrum are campaigning for Yes.

As employers and business leaders, who understand the value and power of a Yes vote.

As members of communities drawn from every corner of the world, because those who have added to the fabric of our great multicultural society know how much it means to have your traditions respected and your contribution recognised.

And, at the heart of it all is a conversation between generations. Young Australians talking to their parents and their grandparents about what this moment represents. Explaining just what voting Yes can mean for our country and our future. Making it clear that there is nothing to fear – and so much to gain. And making it plain that there is, indeed, no time to waste.

In any democracy, there is no such thing as a foregone conclusion. There are no guarantees of success. But that’s not a reason to delay – it’s why we have to hold to the courage of our convictions.

At this very venue, one year ago, when I confirmed that our government would fulfil our election commitment to hold a referendum for constitutional recognition, Yunupingu asked me: “Are you serious?”

I said: “Yes, we’re going to do it.”

And in our last conversation, on the very day that I stood alongside the Referendum Working Group to announce the clear proposition that every Australian will be voting on, he told me: “You spoke truth.”

Australians now have a chance to deliver this change. To take up the gracious request of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, to advance reconciliation. To take up the offer of the Uluru Statement of the Heart, a message extended “from all points of the southern sky”.

“We invite you to walk with us in a movement of the Australian people for a better future.”

That invitation is to all of us. And all of us have a part to play. All of us can make a difference. All of us can get this done.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19297584

File: ebd275aea437b49⋯.jpg (326.03 KB,1505x1129,1505:1129,Albanese_hopes_return_to_G….jpg)

>>19297578

4/4

Friends, one final point, I want to make about what’s ahead.

There are some in the No camp, including the leader of the federal Liberal Party, who say they support constitutional recognition but only a legislated voice.

Not only does this mean rejecting the form of recognition that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have requested. A form of recognition designed through more than a decade-long process of consultation, the majority of which occurred under the former Coalition government.

Their commitment to legislate a voice also undermines every other argument they make against it.

Clearly they acknowledge it is needed – otherwise why legislate it? Clearly they recognise it will make a positive difference – otherwise why legislate it? Clearly they don’t see it as divisive or radical or any of the other noise and confusion they are seeking to inject into the referendum – otherwise why legislate it?

The reason Aboriginal and Torres Islander people are seeking recognition – in Yunupingu’s words – “through serious constitutional reform” is so that the voice can’t simply be abolished with the stroke of a pen.

So it will have the stability to plan for the long-term, for the generational challenges we are facing but also the generational progress we can make, for lasting national unity.

Friends, more than 17 million of our fellow Australians are enrolled to vote in this referendum. The highest number of voters in our nation’s history, including a record number of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voters.

In this decisive moment, each of us holds an equal responsibility. And each of us has an equal opportunity. Yes, we can make history together.

More importantly, we can shape the future together.We can vote Yes, in a spirit of unity. We can vote Yes, with optimism and hope – not just for success at this referendum but for our greater success as a nation.

We can bring our country together. We can bring our two worlds together. With our hearts and with our heads.

This year, on referendum day, the power to reach for a better Australia is in our hands.

Let’s seize it together. Let’s vote Yes for recognition, let’s vote Yes for a voice and let’s vote yes for the better future that both will deliver, for all of us.

This is an edited extract of the speech Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will deliver at the Garma Festival on Saturday.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/an-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-like-garma-is-two-cultures-embracing-for-the-betterment-of-both/news-story/8d2acbd25b145bc7a2049978a895e5bf

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19297773

File: 04feb75ee8078fa⋯.jpg (392.56 KB,825x917,825:917,DA_3.jpg)

File: 83e3b8652399951⋯.mp4 (15.37 MB,640x360,16:9,UAdlhPeCVoZslEda.mp4)

>>19226439

>>19262114

Defence Australia Tweet

#TalismanSabre2023 is now officially closed.

#TS23 is the largest Australia-US bilaterally planned, multilaterally conducted exercise. This year is the largest iteration of the exercise, with 13 nations and more than 30,000 personnel participating. #YourADF

https://twitter.com/DefenceAust/status/1687408497812455424

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19297823

File: a72ed7d3c6e0525⋯.jpg (504.27 KB,825x830,165:166,TS_30.jpg)

File: 74abeefd396680f⋯.jpg (2.65 MB,4096x2731,4096:2731,F2rOXkeXkAASo5t.jpg)

File: 022345d94461a30⋯.jpg (1.08 MB,4096x2731,4096:2731,F2rOYq8XEAAig3Q.jpg)

File: 22e65b4d2cbfc2a⋯.jpg (1.3 MB,4096x2731,4096:2731,F2rOZsTXoAAxOTJ.jpg)

File: cae52ba67ae10c9⋯.jpg (1 MB,4096x2921,4096:2921,F2rOapuXsAAIVQD.jpg)

>>19226439

>>19262114

>>19297773

Talisman Sabre Tweet

Thank you to all of the personnel who have participated in the exercise, and to the local communities for their support.

#TalismanSabre2023 has officially come to a close.

https://twitter.com/TalismanSabre/status/1687387975234002944

>Talisman Sabre

>MAGIC SWORD

https://qalerts.pub/?q=Operation+Specialists

https://qalerts.pub/?q=magic

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19297859

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19188991

US nuclear submarine visits Western Australia as allies increase defence preparedness

Kirsty Needham - August 4, 2023

SYDNEY, Aug 4 (Reuters) - A U.S. Navy nuclear submarine arrived in Western Australia on Friday as allies Canberra and Washington deepen defence ties and prepare to transfer nuclear submarine capability to Australia.

The U.S. Navy Virginia-class submarine arrived at HMAS Stirling for a scheduled port visit as part of a patrol of the Indo-Pacific, officials said.

Port Stirling will undergo an A$8 billion expansion to become a base for U.S. and British nuclear submarines from 2027, under the AUKUS partnership of Australia, the United States and Britain.

Australia plans to buy three nuclear-powered and conventionally armed submarines next decade from the United States, before building a new nuclear submarine class in Australia in the 2040s.

The U.S. military does not have a base in Australia but it is increasing the type and number of forces it rotates there. It will also stockpile military stores this year and establish a joint intelligence centre next year, defence and foreign ministers from the two nations said on Saturday.

The United States will also be involved in upgrades to multiple air bases in Australia's north, missile production and space cooperation, they said.

Australia and the United States are conducting two major military exercises this month, as Australia seeks to boost its defence preparedness.

Two Indian navy ships will join the Malabar Exercise, with Quadrilateral Security Partners the U.S., Australia and Japan, off the east coast of Australia next Friday.

Talisman Sabre, involving 34,000 personnel from 13 nations closed on Friday. Chief of Joint Operations, Lieutenant General Greg Bilton, said the exercise "tested our combined capabilities across sea, land, air, cyber and space operations".

https://www.reuters.com/world/us-nuclear-submarine-visits-western-australia-allies-increase-defence-2023-08-04/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tx0mBkfQb4w

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19297936

File: 3dc6791765943c5⋯.mp4 (15.86 MB,640x360,16:9,US_military_shows_off_nucl….mp4)

>>19188991

>>19297859

US military shows off nuclear capable submarine in Western Australia

9News Staff - Aug 4, 2023

The United States military is flexing its nuclear fleet of submarines in Western Australia.

The arrival of the USS North Carolina is the first visit since a landmark defence deal was signed earlier this year.

Australia is buying eight of the nuclear-powered Virginia class submarines in a deal costing $368 billion.

Australia's Ambassador to the US Kevin Rudd was on Garden Island touring the 110-metre vessel which can go three months underwater.

WA will permanently house nuclear subs from next decade.

HMAS Stirling is set for an upgrade as thousands more submariners file through Perth.

It is part of plans to bolster the Indo Pacific against any Chinese naval threat.

The public is not allowed to know how long the North Carolina will be docked in Perth - that information is classified even from Australia's defence minister.

However, there have been reassurances the AUKUS deal is watertight regardless of who is in the White House.

Advisor to the US secretary of defence Abe Denmark said there has been broad bipartisan support.

Rudd described the move as an opportunity to step up the capabilities of the Royal Australian Navy and the sovereign capabilities of Australia "in a highly uncertain period strategically".

https://www.9news.com.au/national/us-military-shows-off-nuclear-capable-submarine-in-western-australia/9b152141-2e3f-4a2a-a73f-37b7a02738cb

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19297988

File: 1ff4d9159765325⋯.jpg (290.16 KB,1773x998,1773:998,The_aircraft_parking_area_….jpg)

File: 16c26176384532a⋯.jpg (256.28 KB,2100x1400,3:2,B_52s_can_deliver_long_ran….jpg)

File: a05ea9a3d99853a⋯.jpg (44.28 KB,1200x801,400:267,A_United_States_Air_Force_….jpg)

United States Air Force 'mission planning' and operations centre to be built in Darwin

Angus Grigg and Andrew Greene - 4 August 2023

A new US Air Force "mission planning" and operations centre will be built in Darwin, as part of $630 million in American spending across the top end over the next two to three years.

The "Squadron Operations Facility" in Darwin will add to its growing array of military assets in the north, raising fears Australia may be locked into any future military conflict between China and the US.

"The scale and speed of the US investment in Australia shows they understand the need for urgency, but unfortunately we don't seem to," says Michael Shoebridge, a director of think tank, Strategic Analysis Australia.

"This is about deterring a conflict and the best way to do that is through collective military power."

The spending plans are detailed in US budget filings and procurement documents uncovered by the ABC but have never been fully outlined by the Australian government.

It follows ABC's Four Corners program that revealed last year the US planned to build permanent facilities to support up to six, nuclear-capable B-52 bombers at the Tindal air base south of Darwin.

The tender documents say the Squadron Operations facility in Darwin will be used for maintenance, mission planning, intelligence and crew briefings — it is budgeted to cost $US26 million ($40 million).

The US is also building a parking apron at RAAF Darwin that is expected to cost $US258 million, according to budget documents.

This latest spending push follows the US outlaying around $270 million to build 11 giant jet fuel storage tanks near Darwin's main port.

Some of these fuel reserves were previously located at Pearl Harbour in Hawaii but are now being dispersed across the region.

The fuel storage will allow the US to run large-scale exercises and operations from Northern Australia, demonstrating how strategically important the top end has become for Washington.

“Being able to organise and deploy forces outside of the dense missile attacks that China is likely to use against places like Guam and Okinawa is part of the strategic logic,” Mr Shoebridge notes.

These upgrades are similar to those the US is funding at RAAF Tindal, south of Darwin.

The US has released detailed plans for a squadron operations facility and maintenance centre at Tindal.

"The [squadron operations] facility is required to support strategic operations and to run multiple 15-day training exercises during the NT dry season for deployed B-52 squadrons," the US tender documents say.

The aircraft parking area at Tindal will be able to accommodate six B-52 bombers and is due to be finished in late 2026.

All up, the US spending at Tindal is budgeted to cost $US130 million, not including jet fuel storage tanks and an ammunition bunker that have already been completed at the air base.

Mr Shoebridge, a former senior official at Defence, said it was "absurd" how little information about the US plans has been released by the Australian government.

"We should not have to get our information from [the] US," he says.

"A public debate needs to be enabled by information and you can't have a complete picture without knowing where the money is being spent."

Former diplomat Dr Alison Broinowski, now with the Independent and Peaceful Australia Network, warns the US military build-up in Australia’s north drags this country closer to a future war with China.

“It’s just another step in the same direction — a step that the government has been taking a series of for years; accepting whatever the United States wants to place on Australian soil.”

At last month's annual AUSMIN talks, held between the foreign and defence ministers and their US counterparts, they flagged upgrades to RAAF Darwin and Tindal, but gave few details.

A joint communique expressed an "intent to rotate US Navy Maritime Patrol and Reconnaissance Aircraft in Australia to enhance regional maritime domain awareness, with an ambition of inviting like-minded partners to participate in the future"."The principals affirmed their intention to continue to progress upgrades at key Australian bases in the north, including RAAF Bases Darwin and Tindal, supported by site surveys to scope additional upgrades at new locations, RAAF Bases Scherger and Curtin."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-08-04/us-mission-planning-centre-to-be-built-in-darwin/102683688

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19297998

File: af783537f53cdcc⋯.jpg (303.64 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Chief_of_the_Defence_Force….jpg)

>>19016850 (pb)

>>19220746

Defence blocks FOI on war crimes letters between the US and Australia

BEN PACKHAM - AUGUST 3, 2023

Defence has refused to release documents setting out US warnings that alleged war crimes by Australian troops in Afghanistan threatened to derail special forces co-operation between the allies.

The department rejected a Freedom of Information request on the matter by Greens senator David Shoebridge, who blasted the “wall of silence” over the fallout from the Brereton war crimes report on Australia-US military ties.

Defence said there were six separate items of correspondence on the matter but refused to release them on the grounds they could undermine Australia’s relations with the US.

The FOI followed Defence Chief Angus Campbell’s admission he received a March 2021 letter from the US defence attache in Canberra warning that the Brereton report’s allegations could trigger the US’s “Leahy Law” that bars co-operation with military units ­implicated in “gross human rights violations”.

Defence told The Australian on Wednesday that it provided assurances to the US that it was implementing the Brereton report’s recommendations and the matter was closed by the US in March 2022.

Senator Shoebridge said the department’s response to his request showed US concerns over potential human rights violations by Australian troops “involved much more than a single letter”.

He said history showed that “hiding the truth” about potential war crimes was more dangerous to Australia’s interests than releasing such information. “This is part of the wall of silence put up by Defence that prevents the public seeing what really underpins the relationship between the US and Australia,” he said.

“These documents would shed light on what, if anything, Defence is doing to address potential war crimes committed by Australian soldiers in Afghanistan.”

He said the Greens would seek a review of the department’s decision by the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner.

General Campbell told a Senate estimates committee in May that the US had been concerned Australia’s elite Special Air Service Regiment might be “tainted” by allegations of unlawful conduct. He said a “precautionary ­period” followed the defence attache’s March 2021 warning, during which co-operation arrange­ments were reassessed.

General Campbell said he was unable to recall what remediation was required, but the prospect of an end to co-operation was “not triggered”.

He said he knew of one individual whose “posted position was adjusted” in response to the issue being raised.

The November 2021 Brereton report found “credible information” that Australian soldiers killed 39 Afghan civilians and prisoners during the war.

It’s understood the Office of the Special Investigator is close to initiating further prosecutions against former special forces soldiers over the war crimes allegations, after former SAS operator Oliver Jordan Schulz was charged with murder in March.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/defence-blocks-foi-on-war-crimes-letters-between-the-us-and-australia/news-story/f22b4f59b06685962b147527d21de50e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19298066

File: 9e2d0f32a1eb5cd⋯.jpg (2.11 MB,4301x2868,4301:2868,China_s_overseas_police_li….jpg)

File: a2b56d8dbe11d44⋯.jpg (96.25 KB,690x771,230:257,An_internal_government_doc….jpg)

File: 26d621439a594d7⋯.jpg (1.09 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,The_AFP_s_Ian_McCartney_sa….jpg)

File: 895ac200a6aca40⋯.jpg (2.33 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,The_former_office_of_the_A….jpg)

China's overseas police 'contact point' joins the cloud and remains operational in Australia

Bang Xiao - 4 August 2023

1/2

China has been using cloud-based technology to implement a police service in Australia, the ABC can reveal.

China has set up dozens of police outreach centres in various cities across the world — which Beijing calls "contact points" — linked to the security departments of Chinese cities.

Beijing has maintained these are staffed by volunteers and are designed to help Chinese citizens abroad with administrative tasks such as renewing national identification cards, passports and drivers licences, but human rights experts are concerned the contact points could be used to intimidate Chinese dissidents living overseas.

At least one of these Chinese police liaison points, established in May last year, is still operating in Australia.

It works with the Hai'an police force in the eastern city of Nantong, and uses a cloud-based system without a fixed business address, according to an official internal government document uncovered by the ABC.

The cloud system, which combines Chinese technology-giant Tencent's cloud meeting platform (similar to Zoom) and app WeChat, provides a channel for Chinese nationals in Australia to connect with local police officers in China.

State-owned media outlet Xinhua Daily reported that international student leaders in Australia have been recruited as overseas liaison officers, to help people access the online system.

The online contact point would appear to have limited use for Chinese citizens in Australia who are not from Hai'an — which is not a major city — and some functions it says it will carry out could be performed at a consulate or embassy.

The Hai'an contact point is also affiliated with the city's All-China Federation of Returned Overseas Chinese, which is part of the Chinese Communist Party's United Front Work Department.

Observers of China describe the United Front as a key element of President Xi Jinping's strategy to conduct influence operations targeting foreign nations and overseas Chinese individuals.

This is the second Chinese police contact point identified in Australia, following the ABC's report last year that China had established an overseas liaison office in Sydney, linked to the local police in the city of Wenzhou and established in 2018.

However, Australian Federal Police Deputy Commissioner Ian McCartney told Senate estimates in November last year he did not believe that office was active.

The establishment of recent operations in Australia, the United States, New Zealand, Singapore, South Korea, Israel and Angola was to "establish a regular position for overseas compatriots to connect with their hometowns", Xinhua Daily reported in July last year.

These contact points will provide convenience services related to civil affairs, such as the renewal of drivers licences, and protect the lives and assets of Chinese nationals, the report said.

However, some observers have expressed concerns that these overseas police liaison services might be part of China's surveillance efforts in Australia, as their roles could easily be fulfilled by consulates or embassies.

'Tightly organised network'

The government document states that the Hai'an authorities will establish a "tightly organised network" and adhere to the "Great United Front" strategy.

A spokeswoman for Nantong Hai'an police confirmed to the ABC that the cloud-based system in Australia was operational.

She added a previous contact point with a physical location, also linked to the Nantong authorities, was no longer active and shut down its services during the COVID-19 pandemic.

That contact point had been established in 2016 at an address in the Sydney suburb of Rydalmere, registered to the Australia Nantong Association, which has links to the United Front Work Department of Nantong city.

The ABC has repeatedly approached the Australia Nantong Association for comment.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19298084

File: 5f8a70609608e9b⋯.jpg (1.68 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,The_Chinese_embassy_in_Aus….jpg)

File: 6b68b770bc52b2e⋯.jpg (25.2 KB,450x338,225:169,Alex_Deng_a_former_Chinese….jpg)

File: 83a0e7db404c937⋯.jpg (183.41 KB,1984x1488,4:3,Safeguard_Defenders_campai….jpg)

>>19298066

2/2

Similar operations have been identified in over 80 cities globally by the international human rights organisation Safeguard Defenders in the past year.

In February, the US Department of Justice charged two American citizens with conspiring to act as agents of the Chinese government without notifying US authorities, and with obstruction of justice.

This has prompted questions about whether the contact points in Australia have gone unnoticed by authorities.

A spokesperson for the Australian Federal Police said that the agency has received several enquiries regarding the Chinese police operations.

"The AFP has no concerns about this matter. This stance remains unchanged," the spokesperson stated.

None of the police contact points in Australia have been registered under the Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme.

The Attorney-General's department, which oversees that scheme, said it was aware of media reports and it was taking the allegations of a Chinese police presence in Australia seriously.

"[The AFP] does not believe there is an active Chinese police presence in Australia," the department said.

"Government agencies will persist in their efforts to deter acts of foreign interference and enforce our laws."

In a statement, the Chinese embassy in Canberra stressed: "China does not have any so-called overseas 'police stations' at all, and the relevant service platforms of overseas Chinese organisations are engaged in activities such as assisting Chinese citizens who are inconvenienced in returning to their home country".

"Relevant venues were provided by the local enthusiastic overseas Chinese organisations, and volunteers are local enthusiastic compatriots, not Chinese police personnel.

"They have no employment relationship with Chinese government departments," they said, adding that some services have switched to "online processing" and the service station has been closed.

"China has always adhered to the principle of non-interference in foreign country's internal affairs, strictly abides by international law and respects the judicial sovereignty of all countries," they said.

"We urge the relevant parties to stop spreading false information and smearing China."

Testing the limits

Alex Deng, a former Chinese police officer currently residing in the United States, suspected China's overseas contact points could be part of Beijing's national security police.

"It must be part of the national security police system," Mr Deng told the ABC, adding any local police operations overseas would require high-level approval from the party.

"Many of the CCP's operations are playing the line ball — a continuous testing of the line of the Western countries," Mr Deng said.

"They assume that if they take the risk and succeed, they will continue. If they meet any objections, then they will return the line ball."

Investigations into alleged Chinese police presence are "ongoing" in countries including Italy, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands, according to Safeguard Defenders' campaign director Laura Harth.

Ms Harth told the ABC that the G7 Leaders' statement in Hiroshima earlier this year put "great emphasis" on China's obligation to respect the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations and halt its "undermining of communities overseas in a direct rebuke of" Chinese overseas police operations.

"I see no reason why Australian authorities should take these allegations any less seriously than their allied partners," she said.

"Especially given the testimonies of courageous Australians that have been the target of relentless transnational repression efforts by the PRC [People's Republic of China] or its proxies."

The AFP has previously confirmed the agency would "discontinue" its police cooperation agreement with China, which will expire in December, given "the environment has changed", adding they were "never going to sign" a new one at present.

In a February Senate estimates regarding the Chinese police contact points, the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) director-general Mike Burgess said that he could "assure" that the agency will investigate things that "may be of concern in relation to security, things that could be used as platforms for espionage or foreign interference".

"I don't comment on specific operational matters," Mr Burgess said.

"But I will say this because I've said this publicly before: the threat of espionage and foreign interference is a real threat in this country. It is our principal security concern."

ASIO declined to comment.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-08-04/china-overseas-police-contact-point-australia-cloud/102683332

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19298140

File: 28d3652ea64cff8⋯.jpg (480.13 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Police_this_week_alleged_t….jpg)

>>19278301

Australia’s alleged worst pedophile reported to Queensland Police almost a year before arrest

REMY VARGA - AUGUST 4, 2023

One of the nation’s worst alleged pedophiles was reported to police almost a year before he was arrested for the alleged abuse of 91 girls after a colleague saw him kissing a girl at a daycare centre in Queensland.

Yolanda Borucki, who managed a chain of daycare centres, says she alerted Queensland Police to the alleged kissing in October 2021 and said the alleged offender would take children outside with a mattress and blankets to play in a fort.

“They [had] been placing a few mats under the fort when the children [had] been climbing and when they decided they want to have a little nap they will be able to lie down under the fort [sic],” she told Nine.

“He apparently was organising.”

Ms Borucki said on one occasion she saw the alleged offender rubbing a girl’s arm before he kissing her on the forehead.

She said when she later confronted him the alleged paedophile said “We are all here like a family.”

Police this week alleged the man raped and sexually abused 91 girls at 10 childcare centres in Brisbane, one in NSW and one overseas from 2007 to 2022.

The childcare worker allegedly shared images and videos on the dark web with members of a site called The Love Zone in 2013 and 2014, The Australian understands.

Ms Borucki said another childcare worker saw the alleged offender, who cannot be identified, kissing a girl inside the fort and a complaint was sent to Queensland Police who cleared the man but did not check his home or devices.

Ms Borucki said the man claimed to have been whispering in the girl’s ear to wake her up and the childcare worker who reported the kissing resigned after he was cleared.

“[Alleged offender] explanation was this person could not see very clearly under the fort because it’s quite [a] dark space,” she said.

Ms Borucki said the alleged offender would get close to the children’s families who continued to defend him as she tried to manage him out of the daycare centre.

After the man was charged, Ms Borucki said she copped backlash from parents for letting him stay at the centre.

“A few just walked in and took their child and said they are never going to be back,” she said.

Ms Borucki was made redundant one day before the man’s arrest on Monday and has been on sick leave since June after she was hospitalised for mental health reasons.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/australias-alleged-worst-pedophile-reported-to-queensland-police-almost-a-year-before-arrest/news-story/6f794af31b8aac02085949849e044c92

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19302884

File: f3321b39e1e7018⋯.jpg (206.71 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Noel_Pearson_speaks_during….jpg)

File: ad351ec643b7457⋯.jpg (286.01 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19297392

Voice campaign stepping up a gear, Noel Pearson signals at Garma Festival

PAIGE TAYLOR - AUGUST 5, 2023

1/2

Cape York leader Noel Pearson has signalled the voice campaign is moving into another gear, saying: “We’re going to love them on the beaches in this campaign.”

“We’re going to love them at every front door, we’re going to love them at the football. We’re going to leave no stone unturned,” he said.

Mr Pearson was speaking at the Garma festival in northeast Arnhem Land when he told the non-Indigenous people in the audience they were crucial to the result of the voice referendum to be held later this year.

He described it as the most important vote in the nation’s history and our “last best chance” to complete the constitution.

“At 3 per cent (of the population) it means we as Indigenous people can’t win the referendum on our numbers … it’s your 97 per cent that counts,” he said.

Mr Pearson urged the audience to talk to fellow Australians about the proposed constitutional amendment for the voice.

He said the words were in plain English and made it clear the voice’s limits. It was simply a body – in recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people – that can make representations to parliament and government. Parliament would decide its structures and functions.

Mr Pearson said the voice would address pressing health issues in Indigenous communities – such as rheumatic heart disease, a condition that exists in Bangladesh and India and eradicated from most of Australia except remote communities.

The result was that the Indigenous child or toddler with rheumatic heart disease risked dying suddenly in their teens, 20s or 30s.

“I’ve known too many in the middle of a football match who have collapsed of a heart attack,” he said.

It meant Indigenous children in remote communities had “a sword hanging over their heads”.

Mr Pearson said Hansard showed rheumatic heart disease had not been mentioned once in 26 years by the member representing Cape York. That would change if the voice was established, because it would press the issue.

Gumatj leader Djawa Yunupingu says non-Indigenous Australia is already part of the Yolngu constitution because it exists, and has asked that Indigenous people are in turn included in the nation’s rule book through a voice to parliament. The younger brother of the late land rights giant Yunupingu has formally opened the annual Garma Festival with an explanation of why his people want the voice referendum to succeed.

Around 2500 people have attended the festival in northeast Arnhem Land that Yunupingu turned into a showcase of Yolngu culture and one of the most important forums for Indigenous affairs discussions.

At the first festival since Yunupingu’s death aged 73 in April, Yunupingu’s close friend Jack Thompson continued as master of ceremonies. On Friday night the actor did poetry readings for a fireside crowd. He recited Australian classics including Clancy of the Overflow.

Djawa Yunupingu, who replaced Yunupingu as chairman of the Yothu Yindi Foundation, delivered his plea for an Indigenous voice to parliament in an outdoor auditorium at a bush escarpment called Gulkula.

“Where I stand today is Gulkula, the land of our ancestors, Mr Yunupingu said.

“This is the headquarters of Ganbulapula, a lawmaker for my people … He lives in us, as he is our law maker and law giver.

“This is his home, and it is also the home of Garrtjambal, the great Red Kangaroo. “Garrtjambal is a guardian for all Australians. He is on the Australian Coat of Arms and our Coat of Arms. In many ways he is the original Australian.

“So we honour him, as an ancestor and a part of our ancient history.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19302890

File: 23e72303a73f140⋯.jpg (302.75 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Noel_Pearson_says_the_voic….jpg)

File: 9719e6829ce2119⋯.jpg (275.3 KB,2048x1152,16:9,A_Yolngu_woman_with_ceremo….jpg)

>>19302884

2/2

Anthony Albanese addressed the festival on Saturday, promising not to delay the upcoming referendum.

“We will not deny the urgency of this moment. We will not kick the can down the road. We will not abandon substance for symbolism or retreat to platitudes at the expense of progress,” the Prime Minister said.

“Just as we will continue to make it clear what voting Yes will achieve Australians should be equally clear about what voting No means: it is more of the same.

“We can bring our country together. We can bring our two worlds together. With our hearts and with our heads.”

Meanwhile, Mr Yunupingu said sacred laws were made at Gulkula “and our world was put in order and the land that we share with all Australians was made right”.

Mr Yunupingu said all Australians were now part of Yolngu reality.

“We welcome you here, we listen to you, and we bring you in to our ceremony and the life of our people,” Mr Yunupingu said.

“We don’t expect you to know every detail … But we include you as fellow Australians.

“You are in our Constitution already, you are here, and we don’t deny the reality of who you and the lives that are lived in Modern Australia. “If we denied you, we would be denying the reality of the world around us.”

Mr Yunupingu said Yolgnu had hope for the future and a belief in a world that was better than the past.

“We love this country – it is Australia to us and we want it to be strong and powerful from north to south to east to west.

“And we want to be in it. Not sitting on the side waiting each year for Garma.

“We want each day to be a day when we are fully engaged in the life of the nation through the Rule Book that runs Australia – the Australian Constitution.”

Mr Yunulingu said Yolngu people respected their ancient laws. But those did not run the country. “The Australian constitution runs the country and governs the parliament, and the courts, and the taxes we pay, and the allies we make and the enemies we fight,” he said.

“Yet Australia is incomplete … Australian is built on ancient foundations.

“Let the voice of our people be in the Constitution. Let it be given shape by our parliament. Let us then have the conversations that make things right for the children that will inherit the nation from us.

“So, on behalf of my family, I say that it is time for the nation to believe that we can be complete. “It is time to trust ourselves as a nation. To trust our parliament. To trust our democracy. To trust each other.

“Myself I believe in this pathway to unity. I believe in this ancient southern land. I believe in Australians and I believe in Australia.”

On Saturday, Yes23 campaign director Dean Parkin welcomed reports that the West Australian government intends to scrap unpopular new Aboriginal cultural heritage laws that had become conflated with the Indigenous voice to parliament.

“From our perspective, it absolutely gives us a clear pathway through from now through to the referendum to be able to focus very closely on that very simple question of recognising Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the first because this country through a voice,” Mr Parkin said.

“Unfortunately some of those issues have been caught up a little bit with that debate about cultural heritage in WA.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/voice-campaign-stepping-up-a-gear-noel-pearson-signals-at-garma-festival/news-story/f06efd7820cebcd01aee7cbb7d306f81

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19302959

File: 30cd8de9020f376⋯.jpg (215.14 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Marcia_Langton_Indigenous_….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19297392

Indigenous voice to parliament our chance to lift Indigenous lives above lies and insults

MARCIA LANGTON - AUGUST 5, 2023

1/2

When Anthony Albanese announced his commitment to the Uluru Statement from the Heart and outlined a draft question at the Garma Festival in July last year, we could not have predicted the viciousness of the opposition to what had been refined into a just, practical and constitutionally sound proposition. In November the Nationals announced their opposition to the question, followed in April by Liberal leader Peter Dutton, who announced his parliamentary party’s hard No position, disallowing a conscience vote.

This alienated not only Julian Leeser, who resigned as opposition Indigenous Australians and legal affairs spokesman, but also other Liberals including premiers who followed him out the door. Former Indigenous Australians minister Ken Wyatt resigned from the party in protest.

The question to be put to the voters is a simple one – it seeks the recognition of Indigenous Australians in the Constitution through a voice that may make representations to the parliament and to the executive government on matters relating to Indigenous people. The “composition, functions, powers and procedures” of this advisory body will be legislated by the parliament and the details determined by the elected parliament – as is the case with much of the Constitution.

The proposition is the barest measure imaginable that would give Indigenous Australians a formal say in policies and legislation that affect them. The idea was developed by Noel Pearson following the rejection of the expert panel report on constitutional recognition in 2013.

Albanese’s government moved late last year to set up a process to ensure constitutional rigour in the final question. The Referendum Working Group, chaired by Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney, was advised by the Constitutional Working Group and worked with the Referendum Engagement Group. Along with Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus and other parliamentary members and senators, Indigenous leaders from around the country have advised the Albanese government on every step of the legal process required to alter the Constitution.

There were several technical, legal and constitutional matters to consider. We met officials from the Australian Electoral Commission who briefed us on their efforts to enrol Indigenous voters and several technical matters. The group was briefed on and agreed to amendments to the Referendum (Machinery Provisions) Act 1984 to overcome its inadequacies in 21st-century Australia. Among other things, it aligns postal voting procedures in referendums with equivalent procedures in federal elections and aligns authorisation requirements with the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918. This passed the Senate on March 22 this year.

On March 23, the Referendum Working Group released its advice to the government on the constitutional amendment and referendum question. I attended most of the Referendum Working Group meetings as a member and, not being a lawyer, was fascinated by the ensuing debates when we received the Solicitor-General’s advice. So much can turn on a word – each carries a conceptual history, and tentacles reach into other areas of law. Every risk was carefully and judicially assessed. The resulting final question has the public support of seven retired senior judges, at least two retired High Court judges, and most constitutional experts. The question to be asked of voters is clear and simple: “A Proposed Law: to alter the Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. Do you approve this proposed alteration?” After much debate, this question was unanimously supported by the Referendum Working Group. The Constitution Alteration (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice) 2023 passed the Senate on June 19.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19302966

File: baa9a518e0cb962⋯.jpg (349.45 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Indigenous_leaders_Noel_Pe….jpg)

>>19302959

2/2

Soon, every enrolled voter will receive in the mail a pamphlet as required by law, resulting from the amendments to the Referendum (Machinery Provisions) Act. The Yes case text in the pamphlet is entirely correct while the No case text is largely false.

With the lies from the No case landing in Australian mailboxes stamp-marked from the AEC, many Australians may believe the No pamphlet is accurate. It is most unfortunate there is no legal requirement for factual content. It is a legal loophole that the No case has exploited to hoodwink Australians into voting No with their slogan, “If you don’t know, vote No”.

What a backhander for Australians, who want to be informed and inform themselves. Supporters of the Yes case feel gaslighted and have returned fire with the slogan, “If you don’t know, find out”. Yes advocates who have campaigned for years for this referendum are asking for a simple resolution from the Australian people: that is, recognising the first peoples in the Constitution will be a meaningful and practical way to celebrate and share in 65,000 years of history, unify Australians and send a powerful message to the world about the kind of nation we have created. The voice will make a practical difference in our shared future.

The Opposition Leader met twice with the Referendum Working Group. During the first extraordinary encounter, he told a pointed story about domestic violence in communities from his long-ago time as a police officer. Outside after the second, he referred to the members as the “Canberra elite”.

One of our members was the great Dr Yunupingu, from northeast Arnhem Land, who died just days before Dutton uttered the insult. The overwhelming majority of our members live outside Canberra in their own communities. Dutton’s cliched dismissal of our lives and contributions and the parliamentary process signalled he was only ever going to play politics with a sensible reform that should be discussed with open minds and hearts. It is worth noting that members of the group included people such as Professor Tom Calma, who was the main protagonist who convinced Australian governments to formalise the Close the Gap strategy. Pat Turner convinced Australian governments to sign the national partnership to Close the Gap and collaborate to achieve the new targets.

The public square has been flooded with egregious lies about the referendum proposal. The result has been an upsurge in anti-Aboriginal sentiment and hateful trolling on social media of most Indigenous leaders. The No campaign groups have spent millions of dollars flooding the electorate with disinformation via social media and phone calls. A racist No campaign advertisement published in The Australian Financial Review was withdrawn with an apology after complaints.

Yes advocates have worked respectfully for years to put this simple proposition to our fellow citizens. We conducted Australia’s biggest grassroots engagement involving thousands of Indigenous people across the country. The result was a thorough and thoughtful reflection of their aspirations about recognition in the Constitution, which we are asking Australians to endorse. Thousands were consulted about the design of the voice reported in the Calma-Langton report, approved by Scott Morrison’s cabinet when Dutton was a member. Meanwhile, governments have not listened, and Closing the Gap metrics show the deteriorating life chances for most Indigenous Australians.

It is alarming yet unsurprising that politicians and some aspirants have been prepared to set up Indigenous people and their advocates for abuse and vilification for nothing more than transactional electoral motivations. Millions of Indigenous and non-Indigenous people are hoping we are all better than that; so many lives and our future rely on it. If the Opposition Leader were at the Garma Festival this weekend, listening, he would grasp why First Peoples respectfully ask him and all Australians to recognise us in the Constitution through a practical advisory body.

Marcia Langton is the Redmond Barry Distinguished Professor at the University of Melbourne.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-our-chance-to-lift-indigenous-lives-above-lies-and-insults/news-story/8a801fa59b3506d6a7e68aadc992ff54

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19303021

File: 41b346b39421c78⋯.jpg (712.52 KB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Roger_Cook_will_make_an_an….jpg)

File: b47cc4106141e5a⋯.jpg (1.21 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,WA_Aboriginal_Affairs_Mini….jpg)

File: 50d799bf676ff97⋯.jpg (228.89 KB,1616x1080,202:135,Libby_Mettam_described_int….jpg)

File: b16cf704b555ccf⋯.jpg (1.17 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Tony_Seabrook_says_the_mes….jpg)

File: af57c104969b259⋯.jpg (254.65 KB,1280x960,4:3,Michelle_Nelson_Cox_is_par….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19256826

>>19297392

Cook government to scrap Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act after months of controversy

James Carmody - 4 Aug 2023

The West Australian government will scrap its controversial Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Laws within days, the ABC understands.

Premier Roger Cook and Minister for Aboriginal Affairs Tony Buti will make an announcement early next week.

It follows months of harsh criticism of the laws and the government in the lead up to their implementation on July 1 and in the weeks following.

The criticism has been led by WA's opposition parties - the Nationals and Liberals - along with farmers groups including WAFarmers and the Pastoralists and Graziers Association.

It's understood the state will revert to operating under the 1972 Aboriginal Cultural Heritage legislation.

The new legislation came into force to 'modernise' the existing process, which saw major problems exposed in the wake of the destruction of Juukan Gorge.

The laws require some WA landowners to check for the presence of cultural heritage before conducting any activities that may compromise such sites.

Where a risk exists, landowners may need to seek permits or prepare management plans depending on the type of activity and the extent to which the land will be cleared or disturbed.

The government also made numerous exemptions for lower-level works that did not previously exist.

Tone shifts over laws

At the time, the legislation was moved through parliament quickly and the Opposition voted in favour, but say that was something they now have come to regret.

Key criticisms of the act were that it was too confusing and unclear, that it would be too time consuming and too expensive for landowners to meet the requirements of it, and that it would be open to abuse.

For weeks the government has defended the act, but the tone of ministers has shifted more recently.

But members of the state and federal governments as recently as this week suggested criticism of the act by the Liberal Party amounted to a scare campaign aimed at fostering divisions ahead of the referendum on the Voice.

WA Liberal leader Libby Mettam described the government's potential backflip as a "great win for landowners".

"We understand the Labor government will backflip on the Aboriginal cultural heritage act laws that they introduced earlier in the year," Ms Mettam said.

"We've always committed to scrapping the cultural heritage act and going back to the drawing board.

"They were quite clearly an overreach on private property rights.

"They went way too far.

"And it was extraordinary how the Minister for Aboriginal Affairs was even unable to answer really basic questions about how this act would actually work.

"It has been shambolic from the start."

Tony Seabrook is the president of the Pastoralists and Graziers Association WA, and said he wanted to see the act officially withdrawn.

"It's fantastic news. We can't ask for much more than what seems to have been what's announced," he said.

"There will be a lot of people all around regional Australia and a lot of landholders that will be sleeping a lot easier tonight than they were last night.

"I think the message has finally gotten through. This was a very poor piece of legislation and the community just didn't want it."

Mr Seabrook said "a very serious shot had been fired across the boughs" of people considering similar legislation in the eastern states.

Executive director of the Property Council WA Sandra Brewer said the group had held dozens of meetings this week with concerned members and industry groups.

“For some time, the property industry has had serious concerns about the operation of the act and had come to a position that the act was unworkable for various reasons,” she said.

“While the industry supports all of the intentions of the act to protect Aboriginal cultural heritage, it was found to have onerous requirements and wouldn’t have been successful in its current form.”

'Saddened and heartbroken'

South West Land and Sea Council board member Michelle Nelson-Cox said she was very upset by the news.

"I feel very saddened and heartbroken," she said.

"It was going to allow better negotiations and genuine community partnership agreements, better accountability and transparency and most importantly protection of Aboriginal heritage

"It just seems a shame after all of the work that's been put into this bill that the outcome is that it's not going to get over."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-08-04/wa-government-scrap-aboriginal-cultural-heritage-act-/102692282

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19303148

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19222755

>>19256826

>>19297392

Yes campaign relieved as WA set to scrap controversial heritage laws

Lisa Visentin - August 5, 2023

1/2

Gulkula, Northern Territory: An obstacle appears to have been cleared from the path of the Yes campaign with the Western Australian government expected to scrap controversial Aboriginal heritage laws that had become a flashpoint in the Voice referendum.

Reports of the move to ditch the laws were welcomed by the Yes campaign and Voice advocates at the Garma Festival in north-east Arnhem Land yesterday, after the federal Coalition sought to link the two issues and suggested the WA measures were a precursor to broader national changes that could infringe on property owners’ rights.

Yes 23 campaign director Dean Parkin said it gave his side clear air to sell the Voice as it ramps up its efforts to win over Australians ahead of an anticipated referendum date in October.

“It absolutely gives us a clear pathway … to be able to focus very closely on that very simple question on recognising Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the first people to this country through a voice.

“Unfortunately some of those issues have been caught up a little bit with that debate about cultural heritage in WA,” he said. Published polls show WA is likely to vote No in the referendum, but the fierce backlash to the heritage laws had threatened to spill into the broader national campaign.

Shadow attorney-general Michaelia Cash, a WA senator, said abandoning the laws would be a humiliating backdown and suggested it had been made because the controversy was turning Australians off the Voice.

“The chaos that was caused in Western Australia is an indication of what could happen if a Voice to parliament is enshrined in our Constitution,” Cash said.

The WA laws – introduced to heighten protection of cultural sites following the destruction of the ancient Juukan Gorge by Rio Tinto in 2020 – required landowners with properties larger than 1100 square metres to apply for permits or create management plans for work on their land that may impact an Aboriginal cultural heritage site, and have generated confusion over compliance.

The laws, which took effect in July, faced a fierce backlash from farmers, while the federal opposition pushed the Albanese government to rule out replicating the laws federally.

Speaking at the Garma festival, Rio Tinto Australia chief executive Kellie Parker said she would be seeking further details from the WA government, as she rejected criticism from the opposition about corporates supporting the Yes campaign.

“We tragically made massive mistakes at Juukan Gorge and have learned really, really deep lessons,” she said. “One of those is that if you listen, and you can co-manage country, you get a much better outcome … That’s what I think the Voice is. You’re listening to what Indigenous people want.”

Aboriginal land council leaders also sought to assuage public concerns about the Voice in light of the controversy around the WA laws.

Kimberley Land Council chief executive Tyronne Garstone condemned the rollout of the laws as “appalling”, saying the legislation had never been supported by Aboriginal people.

“We’ve always thought this is clearly two different issues that we’re dealing with. The act itself, the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act, is something else. But the Voice is the hope for the future for all of us.”

Peter Lansen from the Northern Land Council said: “We’re not here to steal your backyard. We are here to work with you. We are here to share our culture fully with you.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19303191

File: dd927328c3109a7⋯.jpg (3.8 MB,5074x3383,5074:3383,Dhalwangu_clan_dancers.jpg)

File: 59aef9d723ff85c⋯.jpg (2.73 MB,2648x1766,1324:883,Labor_Senator_Malarndirri_….jpg)

File: 2c0c346b42d18ad⋯.jpg (3.4 MB,5955x3970,3:2,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 2980ce22c0fbbf7⋯.jpg (2.44 MB,2512x1675,2512:1675,Actor_Jack_Thompson_with_P….jpg)

File: 9b02f09730ac41c⋯.jpg (2.59 MB,2811x1874,3:2,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>19303148

2/2

The four-day festival, a celebration of Yolngu culture and a testament to Aboriginal struggle and survival, draws a crowd of high-flying corporate executives, diplomats, politicians and representatives from government agencies who mingle with members from dozens of clans that comprise the Yolngu nation.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was given a standing ovation from the crowd after he delivered the keynote speech to the festival.

Departing briefly from his set remarks, which he used to declare there would be “no delaying or deferring this referendum”, he drew upon the Australian coat of arms to reinforce his claim that the Voice represented a path forward from the status quo for Indigenous Australians.

“I was reminded that the kangaroo and emu that sit on the crest, that sit on my letterhead, are two of the only animals in the world that never go backwards – they just go forwards,” Albanese said. “The referendum is about whether we retreat into ourselves or have the courage to advance forward. That is what it is about.”

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton turned down an invitation to attend Garma, describing the festival this week as “a love-in” for the Yes campaign and its corporate backers. Last month, Dutton singled out Rio Tinto, BHP and Wesfarmers, which have donated $2 million each to the Yes campaign, as he accused big business of lacking “a significant backbone” and failing to act in the country’s interest by supporting the Voice.

Cape York leader Noel Pearson told the festival the referendum was the “last best chance” to recognise Indigenous Australians in the constitution and set children up with a better future than their parents, as he pledged the Yes campaign would leave no stone unturned in its bid to convince voters.

“This is not about Anthony Albanese and Peter Dutton,” Pearson said on Saturday. “This is about whether we’re going to achieve a new Australia – and for our mob it is going to be new. It is going to be a new Australia for young Aboriginal children.”

At a corporate dinner at the Garma Festival last night, Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney told chief executives and business representatives backing the Voice that the No campaign was advocating for the unacceptable status quo facing many First Nations people to continue.

“If we say ‘No’ we are accepting that things cannot get better. Those arguing for ‘No’ are offering no solutions,” Burney said.

Earlier on Saturday, incoming AFL chief executive Andrew Dillon defended the organisation’s support for the Voice during a press conference at the festival.

“The AFL as an organisation has come out in support of a Yes vote,” Dillon said.

“We think that is very important from an AFL point of view with the number of First Nations players that we have, the number of First Nations men and women we have working in the AFL.

“What we say to the people of Australia is to make sure you educate yourself.”

https://www.theage.com.au/national/this-is-not-about-albanese-and-dutton-pearson-appeals-to-australia-at-garma-festival-20230805-p5du63.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKFKRLGWzKs

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19303272

File: c7404cf300204e7⋯.jpg (481.99 KB,825x1362,275:454,AD_25.jpg)

File: 0c0b4a08aa8b12f⋯.jpg (343.71 KB,1512x2016,3:4,F2tE00oXsAANikp.jpg)

File: a43abf07f1fa64e⋯.jpg (1.3 MB,852x1725,284:575,Q_1939.jpg)

Alexander Downer Tweet

Had a drink with friends yesterday where I met Papadopoulos in 2016. They’ve put up this plaque!!

https://twitter.com/AlexanderDowner/status/1687518177016631298

Q Post #1939

Aug 27 2018 23:02:11 (EST)

BO>>UK>>AUS

AUS>>UK>>BO

BO>>Alexander Downer (FVEY)(EX1)

FAKE NEWS BLAST

NARRATIVE SHIFT NEC

[Sample]

https://www.politico.eu/article/tony-blair-fire-and-fury-michael-wolff-calls-claims-he-warned-trump-of-uk-spying-complete-fabrication/

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jan/04/tony-blair-donald-trump-gchq-spied

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-spies-uk-blair-warning-latest-mi6-british-intelligence-a8140791.html

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/5264892/tony-blair-british-spooks-donald-trump-warning/

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/01/03/tony-blair-warned-trump-aides-britain-may-have-spied-election/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5233733/Blair-warned-Trump-aides-Brit-intelligence-spied-them.html

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/tony-blair-warned-donald-trump-11793848

https://metro.co.uk/2018/01/04/tony-blair-denies-warning-trump-uk-intelligence-agencies-may-spied-7202705/

https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-the-papers-42561216

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-42561680

https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/us/tony-blair-denies-warning-trump-that-uk-may-have-spied-on-him-1.3344803

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/899872/donald-trump-tony-blair-job-middle-east-jared-kushner-Michael-Wolff-book-gchq-iraq-war

BO unlocks UK / F_intel [FVEY]

UK / F_intel unlocks REQ

REQ = [Think Highest Levels]

[Focus 2]:

"This is the case with Halper, who is now proven to be a spy, possibly with (Australian Ambassador) Alexander Downer” who her husband met with in London."

https://saraacarter.com/whistleblower-exposes-key-player-in-fbi-russia-probe-it-was-all-a-set-up/

BO closed door necessary.

Red-Handed comms revealed to 'encourage truthful testimony'.

[19] phone calls today - DC/UK/AUS panic?

[WHO] ARE THE FIREWALLS?

What will the FAKE NEWS push tomorrow?

Q

https://qanon.pub/#1939

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19303385

File: 8d5a75751c50094⋯.jpg (233.27 KB,1420x797,1420:797,Part_of_The_Press_s_invest….jpg)

File: 8d65e0f9894ce62⋯.jpg (152.93 KB,1420x799,1420:799,Bernard_Kevin_McGrath_pict….jpg)

File: 04ae74e4ea24569⋯.jpg (1015.73 KB,1240x1754,620:877,0001.jpg)

File: 8af044044cdea07⋯.jpg (690.91 KB,1240x1754,620:877,0002.jpg)

File: af8530c3cb671a0⋯.jpg (684.13 KB,1240x1754,620:877,0003.jpg)

'Hell on earth': State and church enabled child sex abuse, damning report finds

Liz McDonald - Aug 02 2023

1/3

Graphic content

Hell on earth – a place where vulnerable children were subjected to depravity, sexual, physical and spiritual violence while the state looked away.

That’s the description in a damning new report of the Marylands School and the associated Hebron Trust run in Otautahi Christchurch from the 1950s to the 1980s by the Brothers of St John of God.

The report, titled Stolen Lives, Marked Souls, is part of the Abuse in Care Royal Commission of Inquiry and was tabled in Parliament on Wednesday.

It details the horrors of the abuse suffered by many of the young boys in the care of the brothers, their desperation to be believed and helped, and the “shameful” failure of the state and the Catholic Church to act. The victims were as young as 5.

“We are aware of no other circumstances or institution where the sexual abuse has been so extreme or has involved such a high proportion of perpetrators over the same extended period of time as that at Marylands School,” inquiry chairperson Coral Shaw said.

Her findings say parents sent their children to be cared for by the brothers, often on advice of the state, believing it was the best place for them. Many had learning or behavioural difficulties.

Instead, survivors experienced extreme abuse and neglect with lifelong consequences, Shaw said.

“Devastatingly, many (survivors) grew up to suffer painful, life-long physical injuries and illnesses caused by the abuse and neglect. Many survivors contemplated or even attempted suicide. Tragically, some have lost their lives this way.

“When children reported abuse, they were not believed. Not believed by social workers, police, the brothers or the Catholic Church.”

Two of the brothers were convicted of child sexual abuse – one remains in prison in Australia and the second has died. Other brothers accused were considered unfit to stand trial.

The report said although the state registered and financially supported Marylands as a special school, it failed to protect the boys and put a stop to the atrocities due to a lack of oversight of the brothers operating the school. In the 1970s, a quarter of the pupils were state wards.

Boys were referred to the Hebron Trust by police, the courts, and other social agencies.

The report said the Government did not adequately monitor state wards at the school and trust, state welfare staff did not audit the school, and many survivors had no memory of contact with a social worker while there.

Evidence shows the Crown may well have breached Te Tiriti o Waitangi and human rights obligations, it said.

“Survivors have suffered for years and been robbed of their potential because those who were meant to care for them shamefully enabled the abuse, ignored it or covered it up,” Shaw said.

“Without accountability, there can be no confidence that such events will not be able to occur again.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19303392

File: 583de4820c9b28c⋯.jpg (121.57 KB,1420x798,710:399,Roger_Moloney_at_the_time_….jpg)

File: 27a1a4fe7b59b7a⋯.jpg (754.45 KB,1240x1754,620:877,0004.jpg)

File: bc0f40918283d00⋯.jpg (645.6 KB,1240x1754,620:877,0005.jpg)

File: 57c5ff9123ea991⋯.jpg (662.61 KB,1240x1754,620:877,0006.jpg)

File: 699369ced73eff3⋯.jpg (604.3 KB,1240x1754,620:877,0007.jpg)

>>19303385

2/3

The report found the state, the Catholic Church, and the Order of St John of God have never been held accountable for their role in the abuse, or for failing to address the harm.

“When children did disclose abuse to police and social workers, they were not believed,” the report said.

Of the 537 boys who attended Marylands School in the suburb of Halswell, more than one in five (118) reported abuse while in the school's care. The report said the true number is likely to be much higher.

Children at the church’s adjacent St Joseph’s orphanage were also abused, after being handed by the nuns who ran it to the brothers for discipline.

Of the 37 brothers from the order who worked in the Christchurch community and Marylands, 21 had allegations of some form of abuse made against them.

Early complaints about abuse at the home, most relating to the 1970s, led to the order moving the brothers to other locations and paying financial settlements to victims in return for their silence.

The most prolific offender was Bernard McGrath, now 76, who has been convicted of more than 100 sexual abuse offences in New Zealand and Australia. He has been in prison since 2018 and will likely spend the rest of his life incarcerated.

McGrath previously served a prison sentence in New Zealand in the early 1990s for abuse at Marylands and later the Hebron Trust, and another from 2006 for abuse of children between 7 and 15 years old at Marylands.

Marylands’ former principal, Roger Moloney, was sentenced in 2008 in New Zealand to two years and nine months’ imprisonment on seven counts of sexual abuse of five children. He served 13 months before being deported to Australia, and died in 2019.

The royal commission’s hearings into the abuse by the brothers and the aftermath were held last year.

Among those giving evidence was Liz Tonks of the Network for Survivors of Abuse in Faith Based Institutions, who described Marylands as “in reality, a state supported church-run brothel that serviced the needs of paedophiles and the children were essentially sex slaves and labourers”.

Some of the survivors give evidence of being made to watch young animals being killed, and being threatened the same would happen to them if they did not keep quiet.

One survivor told the inquiry of being placed and supervised at the Hebron Trust as a teenager, by what was then the Social Welfare Department. From the age of 15 to 19, he was regularly bound, gagged, blindfolded and raped by McGrath, mostly in the monastery sleeping quarters.

“He became violent, sometimes choking me. I often thought I was going to die,” the man said in his evidence.

As an adult, the man joined a gang, served time in prison, and lived on the streets.

Survivors from Marylands told the inquiry sometimes two or more brothers abused a child at the same time, or made boys perform acts on each other in front of the brothers. Abuse happened not only behind closed doors, but in sight of other children as a punishment or threat.

“Children were threatened and physically beaten into complying with he wishes of the brothers and lived in constant fear,” the report said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19303421

File: f6c0f5c86987b5f⋯.jpg (129.32 KB,1420x798,710:399,A_gathering_in_2003_at_Rur….jpg)

File: edfd43eb4cdc129⋯.jpg (780.32 KB,1240x1754,620:877,0008.jpg)

File: 71ad7aaccb25208⋯.jpg (748.71 KB,1240x1754,620:877,0009.jpg)

File: 62404ff2c5fe149⋯.jpg (684.79 KB,1240x1754,620:877,0010.jpg)

File: bd5f271d7d13f58⋯.jpg (568 KB,1240x1754,620:877,0011.jpg)

3/3

The report details the harm done to survivors including physical injury and physical and mental health problems, self-harm and suicide, criminal offending and addiction including substance abuse, struggles with sexual and gender identity, financial hardship and homelessness, lack of education, an inability to trust and difficulties in personal relationships.

“This is not a story about ‘bad apples’,” the report said.

“This report spotlights that the Catholic Church, the order and state must each bear responsibility for the tukino that was suffered by so many boys, the impacts on their lives, and their whanau and their support networks, because it was the church, the order and state systems and institutions that shamefully enabled the abuse and ignored it or covered it up.”

Sexual violence: where to get help in New Zealand

Rape Crisis 0800 88 33 00.

Victim Support 0800 842 846.

https://www.victimsupport.org.nz/about-us/what-we-do

Safetalk text 4334, phone 0800 044 334, webchat safetotalk.nz or email support@safetotalk.nz

https://safetotalk.nz/

The Harbour Online support and information for people affected by sexual abuse.

http://www.theharbour.org.nz/

Women’s Refuge 0800 733 843

https://womensrefuge.org.nz/contact-us/find-your-local-refuge/

Male Survivors Aotearoa Helplines across NZ, click to find out more (males only).

https://malesurvivor.nz/contact/

If you or someone else is in immediate danger, call 111.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/132656451/hell-on-earth-state-and-church-enabled-child-sex-abuse-damning-report-finds

Stolen Lives, Marked Souls

The inquiry into the Order of the Brothers of St John of God at Marylands School and Hebron Trust

Te whakatewhatewhatanga o te Kahui o nga Parata o Hato Hoani o te Atua i te kura o Marylands me te Tarati o Hebron

https://www.abuseincare.org.nz/our-progress/reports/stolen-lives-marked-souls

https://www.abuseincare.org.nz/assets/page-banners/Stolen-Lives/Stolen-Lives-Marked-Souls.pdf

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19308103

File: 1974f3c5d2a471f⋯.jpg (1.85 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,David_Speers_and_Anthony_A….jpg)

File: 79e78ad70c7253c⋯.jpg (560.91 KB,2000x1333,2000:1333,The_PM_was_hugged_by_a_chi….jpg)

File: c641aee655385a5⋯.jpg (564.52 KB,2000x1333,2000:1333,NT_Chief_Minister_Natasha_….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19297392

'Not focused on hypotheticals': PM not considering other forms of Indigenous recognition if Voice fails

Carly Williams and David Speers - 6 August 2023

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has warned no other forms of Indigenous recognition will be on the table if the Voice referendum fails.

He told ABC's Insiders program, filmed at Garma Festival in north-east Arnhem Land, he will not back down from constitutional recognition in the form of a Voice to Parliament because that was the specific request First Nations people made in the Uluru Statement.

"This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity," he said.

"Many people in the Republic referendum thought it would come around again."

In 1999, Australia voted no in a referendum to break ties with the monarchy with many republicans not agreeing with the proposed model on offer.

The prime minster rejected an alternate form of recognition for Indigenous Australians if the Voice referendum fails.

"I'm focused on success, not on hypotheticals of what will occur if it is not [a] success," he said.

"They want constitutional recognition, they want a voice.

"If the referendum fails, it will be a clear sign that it doesn't have the support of the Australian people."

A Voice to Parliament, created via a referendum, was the key recommendation from hundreds of First Nations people at Uluru in 2017 through the Uluru Statement.

A Voice, enshrined in the Constitution, would be a body of First Nations people that would advise Parliament, and the executive government, on issues that effect them.

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has argued a simpler, more symbolic, form of recognition — without a Voice — would be overwhelmingly supported by the public.

Mr Dutton has said an alternate model of local and regional voices through legislation would be a more efficient advocate for Indigenous communities.

But the PM has rejected that argument.

He says a constitutionally enshrined Voice is the only formula for Indigenous recognition and said Mr Dutton is "not listening" to Indigenous Australians.

"There's a contradiction in Peter Dutton's position," he said.

"He says that he supports constitutional recognition, so both sides do. He says that he supports a legislated Voice, so both sides do. The difference here is he's saying don't put it in the Constitution.

"They (Indigenous Australians) want a form of constitutional recognition that has substance, not just style, that can't be just dismissed on a stroke of a pen.

"And Peter Dutton says he wants a Voice but legislated. But then not listen at the very first point is the form of recognition that they want."

The prime minister has ruled out delaying the referendum amid polls showing a slip in support for the yes case.

The referendum must be held between mid September and mid December and while he's yet to announce a date on the vote, the prime minister said he will keep the top end's wet season in mind.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-08-06/pm-warns-no-constitutional-indigenous-recognition-if-voice-fails/102693828

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19308109

File: 2f462dfd3ab1279⋯.jpg (467.67 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: a2cff2c5861783b⋯.jpg (170.72 KB,1280x720,16:9,Opposition_Leader_Peter_Du….jpg)

File: 68c1a4b5d3502d6⋯.jpg (194.08 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_PM_was_still_unable_to….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19297392

Labor in no-man’s land, not wanting to promote a treaty while also unable to say it won’t happen

DENNIS SHANAHAN - AUGUST 6, 2023

Anthony Albanese has launched a media blitz to reboot the failing campaign for a voice to parliament, warning there will be no second chance for constitutional recognition of indigenous Australians if the referendum fails.

He tries to suggest there may never be a commonwealth First Nations treaty but still can’t say where the millions of dollars for a Makarrata commission has gone or will go.

Amid the glow of an uplifting Garma festival of indigenous Australians, and against the idyllic backdrop of Arnhem Land, the Prime Minister is using his “spear of strength” to simultaneously promote the indigenous voice to parliament, warn there will be no watered-down versions of recognition, and to distance himself and the commonwealth from the Uluru Statement commitment to a treaty.

After a parliamentary week when Albanese and Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney were unable to answer basic questions, were drawn into the unpopular and the politically dangerous concept of a treaty, and were distracted from the public’s top priority of cost-of-living pressures the PM sought to recast the argument.

Albanese’s latest shift involves both threats and inducements – no constitutional recognition at all and better practical outcomes for Australia’s most disadvantaged – but, like much of his argument about the voice referendum, Albanese’s pitch is too political and glib.

Albanese can see the damage the unanswered questions about the effect on executive government, the reach of the voice, the prospect of a treaty and financial cost of the associated bureaucracy are doing to the referendum cause and his government.

This is not to mention the mounting political damage as a result of being seen to be giving the voice priority over the economy. But he has to fight for it because he believes in it and failure will be a disaster for him and the government.

In response to Peter Dutton’s offer to support constitutional recognition for indigenous people without a constitutional voice to parliament, Albanese headed off the prospect of a second chance and basically said it is constitutional recognition with a voice or none.

It was necessary for recognition to have “substance” he said.

“That is what Indigenous Australians have said.

“That it wasn’t just a style issue of putting words in the Constitution, that it had an ongoing impact of having better outcomes. That is what it is about,” he said as he ruled out any second referendum and pointed to the failure of the republican referendum, which has not been revisited.

Albanese is seeking to suggest there will be no treaty between the commonwealth and indigenous people and that the Makarrata commission, with $26 million pledged for it, will be there to assist state government treaties.

It’s a way of having a treaty at state levels, which is already happening, without drawing federal Labor into the dangerous waters of treaty and reparation.

Of course, he can’t say there will be no treaty because he has explicitly said there would eventually be a treaty phase as a result of the referendum and it is a condition of support from so many supporting the Yes campaign.

So, Labor is left in no-man’s land not wanting to promote a treaty, denigrating the No campaign for talking about it and, at the same time, unable to say it won’t happen.

For weeks Albanese has blamed some of the media for negative reporting and commentary but now the imperative for more information about the voice, and the shifting support into negative territory for the referendum, sees him facing perfectly respectful and legitimate questions from more and more outlets he has regarded as friendly.

Trapped in the bind about treaty and truth-telling Albanese was still unable to say, when he appeared on the ABC Insiders program on Sunday, where almost $1m had been spent on the truth-telling and treaty commission of Makarrata, what its role will be and where the rest of the $25m will be spent.

He’s also being asked to point out why a national voice to parliament is necessary when he is able to cite highly successful indigenous programs and communities operating now without a national voice.

Albanese insists the referendum will be successful because the public will focus during the four-week campaign, backed by tens of millions of dollars in advertising, and because there isn’t really a choice.

The Yes campaign may yet succeed but it’s falling support shows there has to be a herculean effort to turnaround the position and that Albanese will have to start with the confusion in his own stables of politics and argument.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/labor-in-nomans-land-not-wanting-to-promote-a-treaty-while-also-unable-to-say-it-wont-happen/news-story/9ecfc4808c6bf185bce259b3c3d61222

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19308112

File: c6a15f7e9430054⋯.jpg (446.97 KB,825x833,825:833,JN_1.jpg)

File: 07cda380519a976⋯.mp4 (13.3 MB,640x362,320:181,hYXyoKq6Q81IvfO2.mp4)

File: d1dc6cce11a8cfd⋯.jpg (229.37 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Senator_Jacinta_Price_labe….jpg)

File: c4c59ab03b9847a⋯.jpg (798.64 KB,2048x2731,2048:2731,John_Paul_Janke.jpg)

File: c89a58f6917330e⋯.jpg (696.45 KB,2048x2731,2048:2731,_Hilarious_says_Warren_Mun….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19297392

‘Complete lie’: Jacinta Price rejects claims No campaign using fake images of Indigenous people

ELLIE DUDLEY - AUGUST 6, 2023

1/2

No campaigner Warren Mundine and Country-Liberal senator Jacinta Price have knocked back “racist” allegations they have used AI-generated images of Aboriginal people to encourage people to oppose the Indigenous voice.

Former NAIDOC co-chair and journalist John Paul Janke on Sunday told ABC Insiders that voice opposers had created the AI-generated images “to try to look like it is an Indigenous person supporting the No campaign”.

“Online, the No campaign have multiple social media pages. Some of them are now using AI with a Blak Indigenous character to try to look like it is an Indigenous person supporting the No campaign,” he said, speaking from the Garma festival.

When host David Speers interjected to question whether it was the official No campaign or “some random”, Mr Janke doubled down.

“No, from the No campaign. They are supporting obviously different voices, and they are under the guise of moderate voices against the voice like it’s Australians for Unity, but they are using AI of a Blak character that is supporting the No case,” he said.

Senator Price labelled the accusations “racist” and “offensive” and said they were completely baseless.

“Of all the racist, offensive, inaccurate things that have been said about this No campaign, this is probably the worst,” she tweeted on Sunday afternoon. “According to the ABC, the No campaign @FairAusADV (Advance Australia) has created AI fake Indigenous Australians who are voting no,” she said. ”A complete and utter lie!”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19308115

File: db789181a59c2c7⋯.mp4 (15.18 MB,640x360,16:9,365696067_302665908898455_….mp4)

>>19308112

2/2

The Australian has discovered multiple AI-generated videos posted to Facebook by anti-voice group Constitutional Equality and authorised by its founder, Phillip Mobbs.

In the videos, an AI-generated man explains reasons to vote no in the referendum, including claims that up to 300,000 people who identify as Aboriginal are “not genuine”.

“Wow! I had never thought how voting YES combined with the trend in “race shifting” means that over time we are granting a constitutional power to frauds. A concerning video in under 3 mins,” the caption reads. “Cool AI too!”

Mr Mundine told The Australian he was completely unaware of AI-generated images or videos that pedalled the No campaign.

”I’d like to see some evidence of that,” he said. “The only thing I’ve seen is real people speaking.”

While Mr Mundine said he knew “nothing” of fake images or videos, he conceded he could only speak for himself. “If someone is doing it, it‘s definitely not us,” he said. “The only ones we’ve got are real people.”

Fresh RedBridge polling, published by the Daily Telegraph on Sunday, showed the No case was running ahead, carrying 56 per cent of the vote nationally, ahead of the Yes case’s 44 per cent.

Mr Mundine said he refused to be complacent, but said the polling was indicative of a strong campaign from his camp.

“They (the Yes campaign) got all the corporates, the law associations and the doctors on their side, and yet they’re in this position,” he said. “We haven’t been speaking to any boards, any CEOs, we’ve just been speaking to members and supporters. We didn’t have the resources they did, we just spoke directly to the members.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/complete-lie-jacinta-price-rejects-claims-no-campaign-using-fake-images-of-indigenous-people/news-story/4a175fca238439b9a9c15d7029f78396

https://www.facebook.com/100089110846559/videos/1350991848785118/

https://constitutionalequality.au/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19308125

File: 13eabb72e13f701⋯.jpg (210.59 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,ACT_DPP_Shane_Drumgold_ent….jpg)

File: 4b399b320bea4d5⋯.jpg (2.09 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Shane_Rattenbury_previousl….jpg)

File: 8ee4e2fa9be991f⋯.jpg (619.09 KB,2048x2730,1024:1365,Bruce_Lehrmann_leaves_the_….jpg)

>>19289705

DPP Shane Drumgold resigns in wake of misconduct findings

STEPHEN RICE - AUGUST 6, 2023

ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold has resigned in the wake of the damning findings of the Sofronoff Inquiry and is expected to retire.

On Sunday ACT Attorney-General Shane Rattenbury confirmed that he had spoken to Mr Drumgold last Thursday and “in light of the commentary in the report” the pair had “agreed that his position as Director of Public Prosecutions was no longer tenable”.

“On Friday, Mr Drumgold sent a letter advising me that he would be vacating his position as ACT Director of Public Prosecutions,” Mr Rattenbury said.

“I can also confirm Mr Drumgold has been provided a full copy of the Board of Inquiry Report.”

The Sofronoff Inquiry found Mr Drumgold knowingly lied to the Supreme Court, engaged in serious malpractice and grossly unethical conduct, “preyed on a junior lawyer’s inexperience”, betrayed that junior lawyer who trusted him, and treated criminal litigation as “a poker game in which a prosecutor can hide the cards”.

In the report, Mr Sofronoff found that Mr Drumgold had lost objectivity during the prosecution of Bruce Lehrmann for the alleged rape of Brittany Higgins and “did not act with fairness and detachment as was required by his role”.

Those findings were considered by legal experts as certain to end Mr Drumgold’s career as DPP and may lead to criminal prosecution against him for perverting the course of justice.

Inquiry head Walter Sofronoff KC ruled that every one of the allegations made by Mr Drumgold that sparked the inquiry was baseless.

The ACT government had earlier said it would not release the report until the end of August but back-flipped last week following publication of the findings in The Australian.

Mr Rattenbury said on Sunday the government would make a detailed statement in response to the Sofronoff Report early in the coming week.

The government is under growing pressure to conduct an inquiry into previous criminal cases prosecuted by Mr Drumgold.

Mr Drumgold has been contacted for comment.

More to come.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/dpp-shane-drumgold-to-resign-in-wake-of-misconduct-findings/news-story/01171c1c5ba23c95b80ec2efb0d2fa59

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19308139

File: 10d7582d7c51b64⋯.jpg (174.06 KB,1934x1088,967:544,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 67b0817ce66f71a⋯.jpg (303.33 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_Independent_and_Peacef….jpg)

>>19188991

>>19231918

Labor faces growing grassroots party revolt over AUKUS pact

TROY BRAMSTON - AUGUST 6, 2023

The Albanese government is facing a rank-and-file party revolt over the AUKUS defence pact, with about 40 local branches opposing it outright or calling for a review, and activists determined to have it debated at the party’s national conference despite attempts to dampen dissent.

Federal electorate councils covering the Labor seats of Sydney, held by Tanya Plibersek, Parramatta and Boothby, plus the seat of Mayo held by independent MP Rebekha Sharkie, have also passed resolutions opposing the trilateral AUKUS defence pact to acquire nuclear-powered submarines.

The grassroots campaign is being organised by the internal party network Labor Against War, which is incensed that senior figures from the Left and Right factions are trying to muzzle debate to avoid embarrassment for the Albanese government at the national conference.

A recent Left faction meeting decided against raising AUKUS for debate at the national conference and union leaders have been warned not to speak out against the defence agreement, with ministers eager to find a compromise resolution that emphasises job creation and industry capacity building.

Marcus Strom, spokesman for LAW, said it would be “a travesty of democracy” if the “monstrous” AUKUS defence agreement was not discussed at the national conference next week, especially given rising opposition from party members and unionists.

“AUKUS and its values are clearly at odds with Labor values and risk dragging us into a US-led war with China,” Mr Strom said. “This conference is just the start of the rank and file pushing back against AUKUS. We are working closely with affiliated unions that oppose the nuclear submarines.”

Hamish McPherson, president of Labor’s Benalla-Euroa Branch in Victoria, seconded a motion at the recent Victorian Labor Conference calling for a “rethink” on AUKUS that was referred to the National Policy Forum.

“There’s widespread opposition to the AUKUS pact among rank-and-file party members,” Mr McPherson told The Australian. “People know that signing up to nuclear-powered submarines and US war fighting capabilities based on Australian soil is unprecedented and dangerous.

“A lot of pressure is being applied to limit debate or opposition. Given that, if AUKUS is publicly debated on the floor of the conference it will be a real win for the rank and file and the wider movement against the pact.”

A spokesman for the ACTU confirmed it has not changed its policy opposing a nuclear defence industry. While the Right-aligned AWU supports AUKUS, the ETU and AMWU are expected to express opposition at the conference. However, the West Australian and South Australian branches of the AMWU could support AUKUS given promises over jobs and industry.

There is a push to have a variation of the AMWU/ETU motion that was taken to party’s National Policy Forum moved at the national conference, which ensures “Labor will not allow submarines to be nuclear-powered or nuclear enabled, nor permit their modification to enable future nuclear weapons to be installed.”

This is unlikely.

The party’s draft national platform says Labor’s “self-reliant defence policy will be enhanced by strong bilateral and multilateral defence relationships, including AUKUS”.

Ministers say they will not stifle debate at the conference from August 17-19 but are determined not to have the government embarrassed and do have the support to ensure AUKUS will be endorsed.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/labor-faces-growing-grassroots-party-revolt-over-aukus-pact/news-story/0b1b68c68b57d060a664ed3bc511b36d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19314716

File: f79207f8512eede⋯.jpg (300.13 KB,2048x1152,16:9,A_Yolngu_man_plays_the_Yid….jpg)

File: 7adb65aa5e4b2df⋯.jpg (277.88 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Balupalu_Yunupingu_gives_a….jpg)

File: 5af48991d452774⋯.jpg (403.96 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19297392

’Nothing to fear from Makaratta’, Anthony Albanese says after Garma boost for voice referendum

PAIGE TAYLOR - AUGUST 6, 2023

Anthony Albanese says there is nothing to fear from the second stage of the Uluru Statement from the Heart – a proposed Makarrata commission often referred to as treaty for short – because any agreement making would be mutual, not imposed.

After weeks of trying to separate the voice referendum from a Makaratta Commission, the Prime Minister said no Australian could deny the “struggle” of Indigenous Australians and that the commission would bring people together.

Mr Albanese and his partner Jodie Haydon were at the Garma Festival on Friday and Saturday when the campaign for an Indigenous voice got a boost from some of the nation’s most senior cultural ­authorities.

Land councils from across Australia’s north – from the Kimberley to the NT to Cape York – backed the voice at Garma while the most senior Indigenous leaders from 13 clan groups of northeast Arnhem Land also endorsed the campaign with the gift of a sacred message stick.

Yolngu cultural leader Balupalu Yunupingu gave the message stick to Yes23 director Noel Pearson on Sunday and said: “Take our voice straight to Canberra, so our voice will be heard.”

While he has reiterated that there will be no move on a Makarrata Commission before the ­referendum – despite $900,000 spent on the process in the federal budget – Mr Albanese said there was nothing to fear from the second part of the Uluru Statement.

“All that Makarrata represents is a Yolngu word for dialogue, basically, coming together, literally coming together after a struggle,” he told The Australian on Sunday.

“And no one can say that there hasn’t been a struggle.

“The very word Makarrata is something that no one should have any fear over because by definition, it’s about consensus, and working together, and that is something that we need to do as a nation.”

Mr Albanese said it was “absolutely critical” that Indigenous people’s support for the voice was seen. This was because the proposal came from Aboriginal people themselves through a years-long process, despite what opponents had suggested.

“You see (No campaigners) talking about the voice as if it was my idea that I came up with after the election,” he said.

“There is a resilience there from Indigenous Australians who are determined to give this a crack because they know that what’s been happening up to now isn’t ­working. And we need to try a better way.”

Asked to comment on why the prospect of a treaty between the Commonwealth and Indigenous people had begun to feature so prominently in the No campaign, Mr Albanese said: “They’re ­talking about it for the same reason that the No campaign raised (the voice) as a third chamber of parliament … in order to talk about anything but what the referendum is about.”

The 2017 Uluru Statement from the Heart, created by 1200 Indigenous people from every state and territory and the Torres Strait, calls for a voice first then says: “We seek a Makarrata ­Commission to supervise a process of agreement-making between governments and First Nations and truth telling about our history”.

Asked if this could be a commission to oversee agreements such as the ones already under way between state governments and Indigenous groups, Mr Albanese said: “Of course.”

He cited the treaty process at its early stages in Queensland before saying: “But that’s something for down the track. And it’s something by definition by consensus, it’s not something that’s imposed, it can’t be.”

As 20,000 Yes volunteers doorknocked on Sunday, Mr Albanese said he believed those one-to-one conversations between Yes volunteers and voters would win the referendum. It would be these conversations that would show the No campaign’s claims about the referendum were “just a distraction”.

“What I think is the (Yes) campaign will continue to concentrate on what this is about, and the no campaign, clearly, will continue to look for other issues,” he said.

“What we’ve seen up to now is a ramping up of a preparedness to talk about anything but the referendum.

“This is … what is before the Australian people is recognition, and a voice in order to get better outcomes.

“And that is all there is.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/nothing-to-fear-from-makaratta-anthony-albanese-says-after-garma-boost-for-voice-referendum/news-story/46109ade7d031974f8525b6b0cff4567

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19314741

File: 2ede6a877115401⋯.jpg (1.66 MB,5657x3771,5657:3771,ACT_Director_of_Public_Pro….jpg)

File: 7809900aea10e08⋯.jpg (125.13 KB,750x997,750:997,F20wpIdaUAAiwa0.jpg)

File: 649fc93e4c17f58⋯.jpg (75.56 KB,750x674,375:337,F20wpI1bEAATGRm.jpg)

>>19289705

>>19308125

ACT top prosecutor Shane Drumgold hits back against inquiry after resignation

Angus Thompson - August 6, 2023

1/2

ACT top prosecutor Shane Drumgold has accused the head of the inquiry into the Bruce Lehrmann rape case of denying him procedural fairness, and has disputed many of the probe’s findings after resigning from his high-profile role last week.

In a written statement on Sunday, Drumgold denied acting dishonestly or underhandedly after inquiry chair Walter Sofronoff, KC, found he had lied to the Supreme Court in the lead-up to the trial, and said the inquiry had missed the opportunity to focus on systemic issues in the justice system instead of focusing largely on him.

“Although I accept my conduct was less than perfect, my decisions were all made in good faith, under intense and sometimes crippling pressure, conducted within increasingly unmanageable workloads,” Drumgold said.

“The pre-emptive release of the report to the media has denied me procedural fairness. It has deprived the ACT Government of the opportunity of considering my conduct objectively.”

Sofronoff’s findings were published by The Australian on Thursday. An ACT government spokesperson rebuked Sofronoff, saying he had told the government he had given embargoed copies of the report to some journalists ahead of him providing it to the territory last Monday.

Sofronoff found Drumgold, a senior counsel who has been the territory’s director of public prosecutions for nearly five years, had lied to the Supreme Court in the lead-up to the trial and improperly questioned former Coalition minister Linda Reynolds on the stand, among other findings.

Drumgold said: “Having now read the report, I dispute many of its adverse findings about me. While I acknowledge I made mistakes, I strongly dispute that I engaged in deliberate or underhanded conduct in the trial or that I was dishonest.”

The territory’s attorney-general, Shane Rattenbury, said in a statement on Sunday that he had spoken with Drumgold on Thursday. The government has been forced to expedite the release of the report to this week following the leak, after it had originally planned to table it in parliament at the end of the month.

“Mr Drumgold and I agreed that his position as director of public prosecutions was no longer tenable,” Rattenbury said. “I can confirm that on Friday, Mr Drumgold sent a letter advising me that he would be vacating his position as ACT director of public prosecutions.”

Lehrmann pleaded not guilty to sexually assaulting former colleague Brittany Higgins in the Parliament House office of their then boss, Reynolds, after a night out drinking with friends in March 2019.

The trial was aborted in October due to juror misconduct, and Drumgold ruled out the prospect of a retrial in December due to concerns over Higgins’ mental health.

Lehrmann maintains his innocence, and now plans to sue the ACT government over its handling of his prosecution.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19314749

File: 87efc62aa284697⋯.jpg (1.04 MB,3171x2114,3:2,Bruce_Lehrmann_who_has_mai….jpg)

>>19314741

2/2

The inquiry was launched by the ACT government last year to examine the conduct of authorities in the trial after a public fallout between Drumgold and police. It was triggered by Drumgold’s November 2022 letter to ACT Chief Police Officer Neil Gaughan, in which he complained of police pressure against the case.

“In my mind, the handling of the case was reflective of the chronic problem in Australia with the way our legal institutions deal with allegations of sexual violence,” he said in his statement, citing statistics about lack of trust sexual violence survivors have in the justice system, and the low rate of charging in the ACT.

He said the inquiry “could have delivered a seminal moment in time, one to potentially rival the work of the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Sexual Assault,” and could have asked questions about how complainants’ private information could be weaponised by the media.

The report also makes findings against Drumgold’s conduct over his viewing of Higgins’ counselling notes, which he went to lengths to ensure no one else saw, as well as public comments made in support of her when he discontinued proceedings last year.

Drumgold also shocked the inquiry when he raised suspicions of federal political interference in the trial. He walked it back a day later, qualifying that he no longer held such suspicions, and conceding he should have made that clear the day before. It was among a number of concessions he made about his behaviour.

Drumgold said the findings relating to his trial decisions were difficult to reconcile with those decisions made in the context of a “robust adversarial process, with a strong and experienced defence team and an eminently qualified judge who presided over the trial”.

“My career has been driven by a fire burning within, lit by an early life spent surrounded by the pain of chronic inter-generational social injustice. This fire has fuelled a life that took me from a disadvantaged Housing Commission estate to an esteemed leadership role within the legal profession,” he said.

“Unfortunately, I find the fire has been extinguished, and try as I might, I cannot reignite it.“

Drumgold said that while he disputed the report’s findings, he accepted that its premature release meant the courts and the public couldn’t have faith in the discharge of his functions.

“Accordingly, I have decided to retire from my role, effective 1 September 2023. I hope everyone involved in this matter finds peace – and I wish you all well,” he said.

Lehrmann said in a statement Drumgold’s resignation “shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone” and added that his response was unacceptable, “insufficient and not worth the paper it is written on”.

Lehrmann’s defence barrister Steve Whybrow said Drumgold’s statement seemed to confirm what was “blindly apparent” to the defence during the trial, “that he saw himself as a social justice crusader than an independent minister for justice.”

“This apparent ‘end justifies means’ explanation for his conduct is frankly alarming coming from a DPP,” he said.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/act-top-prosecutor-shane-drumgold-resigns-20230806-p5duan.html

https://twitter.com/samanthamaiden/status/1688058923704799232

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19314830

File: 0c1254010c39315⋯.jpg (2.41 MB,4797x3198,3:2,ACT_Chief_Minister_Andrew_….jpg)

File: 28bbf719ae625e3⋯.jpg (506.17 KB,878x1241,878:1241,FINAL_REPORT.jpg)

>>19289705

>>19308125

Drumgold and Sofronoff face investigation in Lehrmann inquiry fallout

Angus Thompson and Natassia Chrysanthos - August 7, 2023

1/2

ACT Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold, SC, and Walter Sofronoff, KC, the former judge who led the high-profile inquiry into authorities’ handling of the Lehrmann trial, face investigations that could lead to them both having charges brought against them.

In their interim response to the inquiry’s 839-page report on the “case like no other”, ACT Chief Minister Andrew Barr and Attorney-General Shane Rattenbury foreshadowed further investigations into Drumgold, who was heavily criticised in the findings, and Sofronoff, who leaked them to select journalists.

“This should have drawn a line under this matter,” Barr said of the report at a press conference on Monday.

While Sofronoff found the prosecution was properly brought, he said Drumgold had lied to the ACT Supreme Court in the lead-up to the trial, improperly questioned former Coalition minister Linda Reynolds on the stand, and made “scandalous” claims about police conduct.

Rattenbury said the ACT Bar Association would consider Drumgold’s future as a barrister and noted the findings had met the statutory threshold for dismissal for misbehaviour in office.

Asked whether Drumgold, who resigned on Friday, should be prosecuted, Rattenbury replied: “That is a matter the government is still considering.”

Barr said revelations that Sofronoff had released his findings to two media outlets under embargo and had spoken to journalists during the probe raised the prospect of a potential referral to the ACT’s integrity commission, but ruled out another inquiry.

“I think that runs the risk of being quite ridiculous,” he said.

He said the government had sought advice about whether Sofronoff had breached the Inquiries Act and, asked whether he would like to see him charged, the chief minister responded: “We’re considering our options.”

“Unfortunately, whilst the recommendations, I believe, are sound, and we have accepted them, the whole process – the leaking, the engagement with journalists on the way through, leaves in the minds of many people, questions. Significant questions. And it is just so disappointing,” Barr said.

Comment has been sought from Drumgold, who on Sunday disputed many of the findings against him, denying that he had acted in a dishonest or underhanded way.

“Although I accept my conduct was less than perfect, my decisions were all made in good faith, under intense and sometimes crippling pressure, conducted within increasingly unmanageable workloads,” he said in a statement.

Sofronoff declined to comment.

Bruce Lehrmann pleaded not guilty to sexually assaulting Brittany Higgins, his former colleague, in the Parliament House office of their then-boss, former Coalition minister Linda Reynolds, after a night out drinking with friends in March 2019.

The trial was aborted in October due to juror misconduct and a retrial was abandoned due to concerns over Higgins’ mental health, with the charge dropped. Lehrmann maintains his innocence and is preparing to sue the ACT government over the prosecution.

Sofronoff found that Drumgold’s suspicions about police were baseless and had caused lasting pain to many.

“The adverse suspicions that Mr Drumgold formed during his early interactions with the investigators predisposed him to see non-existent malignancy in benign interactions between the police and the defence at the trial,” he said in the report.

“The cost of a six-month public inquiry – in time and money, in lost work and personal and professional consequences – has been huge.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19314835

File: c56682697158423⋯.jpg (109.5 KB,1241x1755,1241:1755,0001.jpg)

File: ce0c9da9da279aa⋯.jpg (425.11 KB,1755x1241,1755:1241,0002.jpg)

File: 3428b5c9a4cbdbc⋯.jpg (522.69 KB,1755x1241,1755:1241,0003.jpg)

File: d0cdeac3102b874⋯.jpg (481.56 KB,1755x1241,1755:1241,0004.jpg)

File: 26dc2fb06f10cfb⋯.jpg (298.34 KB,1755x1241,1755:1241,0005.jpg)

>>19314830

2/2

Sofronoff found Drumgold lied to ACT Supreme Court Chief Justice Lucy McCallum in the lead-up to the trial over notes made of a meeting with television personality Lisa Wilkinson ahead of a Logies speech that caused the trial to be delayed.

Drumgold – who has been criticised over whether he properly warned Wilkinson against making the speech – accepted during the inquiry that he had misled the court into believing the note was a contemporaneous account of the meeting, when it was compiled after her speech.

Drumgold said his conduct was unintentional, however, Sofronoff found he “knowingly lied to the chief justice”.

According to Sofronoff’s report, Drumgold also “preyed” on the inexperience of a junior solicitor who he asked to draft an affidavit supporting a wrongful legal privilege claim over police investigative notes that were critical of Higgins.

The inquiry chair was also critical of Drumgold’s handling of Higgins’ confidential counselling notes, which he tried to ensure Lehrmann’s defence team did not see after police mistakenly included them in the brief of evidence.

As a result of the findings, the ACT government undertook a preliminary review of other cases Drumgold had been involved in but Rattenbury said at this point it did not believe a more detailed examination was warranted.

Sofronoff also found police had made mistakes, and while the investigation was thorough, parts of it “caused unnecessary pain to Ms Higgins and others”. ACT Victims of Crime Commissioner Heidi Yates was subject to unjustified public criticism due to the lack of understanding over her role, he said.

The ACT government has agreed to most of Sofronoff’s recommendations, including overhauling laws around the handling of counselling notes, and clarifying the threshold to charging someone with an offence, following misgivings from many police involved in investigating Lehrmann.

Rattenbury said the ACT had failed to meet the needs of sexual assault survivors, but the report itself did not uncover fundamental issues with the territory’s justice system.

“It found instances of poor individual behaviour and poor choices compounded by our heightened media and political environment,” he said.

McCallum issued a note to all legal practitioners in the territory on Monday, warning against the “oppressive and unfair” toll of public scrutiny on lawyers in the justice system.

“The administration of justice in the ACT has been the subject of unprecedented attention in the past year. While public scrutiny is a welcome and necessary incident of open justice, a point can be reached where the personal toll on the practitioners concerned becomes oppressive and unfair,” McCallum said.

“I urge all practitioners to show kindness and respect towards each other at this time.”

Support is available from the National Sexual Assault, Domestic Family Violence Counselling Service at 1800RESPECT (1800 737 732) or the Men’s Referral Service on 1300 766 491.

https://www.1800respect.org.au/

https://www.ntv.org.au/

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/drumgold-and-sofronoff-face-investigation-in-lehrmann-inquiry-fallout-20230807-p5duf7.html

https://www.justice.act.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/2263980/ACT-Board-of-Inquiry-Criminal-Justice-System-Final-Report-31-July-2023.pdf

https://www.justice.act.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0015/2264010/Government-Response-Table-of-recommendations-from-the-Board-of-Inquiry-Report.pdf

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19314867

File: 45d33cf316a006c⋯.jpg (615.9 KB,2544x1383,848:461,Bernard_McGrath_left_and_R….jpg)

File: 18c81624f73e657⋯.jpg (1022.03 KB,3060x2412,85:67,Rodger_Moloney_at_the_St_J….jpg)

>>19303385

The letter that helped seal the fate of dozens of children

Harriet Alexander - August 6, 2023

1/2

In 1977, the then Sydney-based provincial of the Catholic brotherhood St John of God, Brother Brian O’Donnell, received an anonymous letter bearing disturbing news. The prior and one of the brothers at Marylands, the order’s school for students with intellectual disabilities in New Zealand, were sexually abusing a boy, the letter alleged.

Pausing at that moment now, as O’Donnell’s eyes flicker across the words on the page, there is an opportunity for dozens of children to avoid their fate, for boys who will later die by suicide to become grandfathers, and countless unhappy lives to take a different trajectory.

The junior brother mentioned in the letter was Bernard McGrath, who went on to become the most notorious perpetrator of child sexual abuse among religious orders in Australia and New Zealand and possibly the most prolific. When the letter arrived he had just been promoted by the prior, Rodger Moloney, whose role only emerged in detail in a report into abuse in care by a New Zealand royal commission last week. He was McGrath’s mentor.

But O’Donnell was disinclined to believe the allegations.

“I thought it was a trouble-causing letter,” he would tell Catholic Church Insurance Limited years later.

“I didn’t think it was based on fact and I thought it was members of staff at our school in Christchurch trying to get the brothers moved on.”

But O’Donnell did not do nothing. Moloney, an Australian, was his close friend and due shortly to be seconded to the Vatican to apply his original training as a pharmacist. O’Donnell allowed this appointment to go ahead. He applied with McGrath what became known as the “geographic cure” and transferred him to Kendall Grange, a boys’ home run by the order at Morisset Park on the NSW Central Coast.

Then O’Donnell boarded a plane to Christchurch. By this time he had received a second letter containing similar allegations and he brought with him a sample “in the hope that we could identify what I would call disguised handwriting”, he later told the insurers. Moloney – who had already departed for Rome – had previously arranged samples from each of the staff.

O’Donnell’s time in Christchurch appeared on the evidence before the royal commission to have been predominantly spent substantiating his “trouble-causing” theory. He did not conduct any interviews. One brother, who had been waiting until Moloney left to raise his suspicions about McGrath, brought his concerns to O’Donnell and was told to “leave it with me”. O’Donnell also spent some time examining the rolls to see if any boys’ parents lived in the suburbs identified on the letter, but none matched.

On his return to Sydney he wrote to Moloney in an avuncular mood.

“I am sure you would be pleased to hear from me that, after careful inquiries into the allegations made in regards to Marylands, I am convinced they were completely unfounded,” he wrote. “More than that, I am sure they are the work of a ruthless and vindictive member of the teaching staff. You need have no further concern about that matter … It was good to hear your voice on the phone the other night.”

He also destroyed the letters – “because of the harm they could do”, he later explained.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19314868

File: 73bdffd952b53a8⋯.jpg (58 KB,1024x576,16:9,Brother_Bernard_McGrath_in….jpg)

File: 85e6bad9e7ad401⋯.jpg (373.37 KB,1460x1916,365:479,Rodger_Moloney_outside_the….jpg)

>>19314867

2/2

But New Zealand’s royal commission would hear that the sexual abuse at Marylands went well beyond the allegations made in the anonymous letters.

One in five former students claims to have been abused, with 74 complaints against McGrath and 32 against Moloney. More than half the brothers who ministered in the Christchurch community had specific allegations of child sexual abuse made against them. A caregiver told the royal commission it was common for staff to have to apply cream medication for anal fissures.

On several occasions students disclosed to Moloney that they had been abused by other brothers, only to find nothing was done and the abuse worsened.

One former student, who was repeatedly abused by McGrath, said McGrath and Moloney were close and he would often see them emerge from a bedroom together. One night he alleged he was plucked from his bed and they attempted to abuse him, but he would not stay still – so McGrath whacked him with the plastic baseball bat he always kept nearby.

Another survivor claimed McGrath and Moloney normalised sexual abuse, and it later became common between the boys as well.

“The brothers made us perform sexual acts on each other,” he alleged. “This included sexual fondling and oral sex. At the time I thought this must be what boarding school was like because it was so common and normal at Marylands. Looking back at it now, I realise this isn’t normal behaviour.”

McGrath would become a notorious paedophile on both sides of the Tasman. He is currently serving two prison sentences for more than 100 child sex offences relating to his time at Kendall Grange, where he rose to become the head of the school. The Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse found 40 per cent of the brothers at Kendall Grange were child sex offenders.

But decades later McGrath would claim and receive $100,000 compensation from the order for the sexual abuse perpetrated by Moloney.

It was more than many of the child victims would receive.

Moloney spent six months in the Vatican before being transferred to Papua New Guinea, where he sat on the order’s Oceania provincial council, administering Australia, New Zealand and PNG. In the late 1990s he was transferred to Kendall Grange.

When the New Zealand government sought his extradition to face 30 charges of sexual abuse against 11 minors in 2003, the order’s lawyers spent three years and an estimated $1 million fighting for him to stay in Australia. After serving nine months of a 33-month sentence in New Zealand he returned to Australia and was welcomed back into the order. He died in their care in 2019.

The New Zealand royal commission found the order had missed a clear opportunity to respond to reports of abuse by Moloney and McGrath in 1977. McGrath was convicted of sexually abusing dozens of intellectually disabled children in his care over five trials in New Zealand and Australia between 1993 and 2019.

“Had the order taken appropriate action at that time, later prolific offending by these two brothers could have been prevented,” the commission reported.

It also queried the rationale for a $100,000 payment to McGrath in 2012 over the abuse he had been subjected to by Moloney and another brother in the 1970s. “The terms of the settlement were confidential and we were given no documents by the order that would explain the basis for a payment of this size, or why the payment was higher than many of [those] his victims received.”

A spokesman for the Brothers of St John of God said the order was considering the findings and was committed to participating in any redress scheme. “SJOG fully supported the inquiry and participated voluntarily when requested,” he said.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/nsw/the-letter-that-helped-seal-the-fate-of-dozens-of-children-20230803-p5dto9.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19314910

File: 59c1d300f4b70e0⋯.jpg (877.83 KB,2362x1701,2362:1701,Mike_Rogers_who_advised_US….jpg)

File: ff4f5ef0dcdf53e⋯.jpg (79.75 KB,852x227,852:227,Q_585.jpg)

File: e3a07134e40ed9f⋯.jpg (236.18 KB,852x409,852:409,Q_3389.jpg)

File: e1b5a9cf8e24499⋯.jpg (192.52 KB,852x439,852:439,Q_1866.jpg)

Don’t ban paying cyber ransoms, ex-US spy chief warns Australia

Ronald Mizen - Aug 6, 2023

A former US National Security Agency director says Australia should not impose a blanket ban on paying cyber ransoms but instead adopt a risk-based approach that considers a set of key criteria.

Retired admiral Michael Rogers, who headed the NSA and led United States Cyber Command from 2014 to 2018 under presidents Barack Obama and Donald Trump, also called for a shift in thinking on cyberattacks.

“This is what I used to tell the two presidents, ‘Sir, if the metric you’re going to use is anytime we have a significant penetration that is a failure, then you are going to be incredibly frustrated’,” Mr Rogers told The Australian Financial Review.

Instead, he called for businesses and policymakers to shift their perspective to measure success by how well attacks are responded to after they occur.

“How quickly are you recovering? How much are you able to mitigate this and stop it from spreading: both how quickly and how well? How well are you able to ensure you have appropriate control and knowledge over data?” he said.

“That’s a very different way of looking at the cybersecurity problem.”

Mr Rogers said that after decades working in both offensive and defence cyber capability in the US government, he had one clear takeaway.

“With a determined adversary who is focused on you as a target and who was prepared to commit resources, it is very difficult to ensure 100 per cent that they will not penetrate your system.”

The comments come ahead of the Albanese government’s much anticipated cybersecurity strategy, expected from Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil around mid- to late October after the Voice referendum.

Guidelines for appropriate payments

The strategy is expected to be wide-ranging and will set out how all areas of government will work together to protect against cyber threats, “with the aim of uplifting Australia’s cybersecurity capability to become the world’s most cyber secure nation by 2030”.

As part of the strategy, Ms O’Neil has been consulting industry on a legal framework for ransom payments and, while strongly opposed, it is understood her views have evolved to reflect the complexity of the issue.

Mr Rogers said he was wary of outlawing all ransom payments and a one-size-fits-all approach. He suggested a set of criteria should be adopted by government and industry for when a payment might be appropriate.

“I think we need to make this risk-based,” he told the Financial Review, suggesting factors such as loss of life, health, national security and economic stability being weighed against the risk of payment.

The weighing exercise should be done in co-operation with government rather than left to firms, which could face penalties for a wrong call.

“A partnership is a much better way to look at this,” he said, a view that was formed during the Colonial Pipeline ransomware attack in 2021 when a major US oil pipeline system was hit by hackers.

“The company was making significant decisions and not really talking to the government about it.”

The corporate watchdog earlier this year warned it would seek record penalties for breaches of market disclosure amid new findings that listed companies were acting illegally by failing to disclose material cyberattacks.

Mr Rogers, who is in Australia as a member of the global advisory board of cybersecurity firm CyberCX, said Australia was well-placed to play a leading role in cyber globally due to its government-forward approach.

“Australia has been very aggressive about the use of legislation, regulatory oversight, particularly in the form of critical infrastructure,” he said, an approach he acknowledged was not being followed by the regulation-shy US.

“Australia is very well-positioned to have a significant global role in cybersecurity. Australia can really help raise the level of capability, awareness, focus, and help create better strategies for nations.”

Abigail Bradshaw, the head of the Australian Cyber Security Centre, in November said reports of cyberattacks in financial year 2021-22 increased nearly 13 per cent to 76,000, one attack every seven minutes.

Recent high-profile breaches in Australia include Optus, Medibank Private, Meriton, Commonwealth Bank, IPH Limited and Latitude.

https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/don-t-ban-paying-cyber-ransoms-ex-us-spy-chief-warns-australia-20230806-p5du9q

https://cybercx.com.au/

https://cybercx.com.au/?s=rogers

https://qanon.pub/#585

https://qanon.pub/#3389

https://qanon.pub/#1866

https://qalerts.app/?q=Adm+R&sortasc=1

https://qalerts.app/?q=rogers&sortasc=1

https://qalerts.app/?q=NSA&sortasc=1

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19320661

File: 789121acd38faa1⋯.mp4 (14.51 MB,640x360,16:9,Roger_Cook_announces_the_r….mp4)

>>19222755

>>19303148

WA Premier Roger Cook announces repeal of Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Laws

Keane Bourke - 8 August 2023

1/2

WA Premier Roger Cook has confirmed his government will scrap its controversial Aboriginal cultural heritage legislation.

The laws have been in effect for only five weeks, and had been designed to avoid a repeat of Rio Tinto's destruction of 46,000-year-old culturally significant caves at Juukan Gorge in 2020.

But Mr Cook now says those laws went too far, were too complicated and placed unnecessary burdens on property owners.

"I understand that the legislation has unintentionally caused stress, confusion and division in the community and for that I am sorry," he told a press conference this morning.

Mr Cook says the legislation, passed in 2021, will be revoked and replaced with the original laws from 1972, with some key amendments.

"By reverting to original 50-year-old legislation we can reset, end all the confusion and importantly strike the right balance," he said.

No onus on property owners

Under the new regime, Mr Cook said "everyday" property owners would not be required to undertake surveys of their own land under any circumstances.

Those surveys had been a key concern for landowners, who were unsure when they would have to pay for cultural surveys to be undertaken, and how much they would cost, before they could do certain work on their property.

Instead, government will start a decade-long project to undertake cultural heritage surveys of land in "high priority" sections of the state, with the surveys to be publicly published.

The Local Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Services body, which had been established under the 2021 act to negotiate and facilitate land use proposals, will also be scrapped.

Mr Cook said existing native title groups would be supported to grow their capacity to work with government and industry.

"When I became premier eight weeks ago, I made a promise to the people of Western Australia. A promise that I would always govern in the interest of all Western Australians and that I would lead a government that uses common sense and above all listens to people," he said.

"Today I'm delivering on that commitment."

Voice link ruled out

Mr Cook denied there had been any pressure exerted by the federal government to repeal the laws, amid speculation that confusion surrounding the act was muddying the waters around the Voice referendum.

“I want to make this very clear, I have not had any communication with the prime minister’s office or any federal members in relation to these laws,” he said.

However, Federal Opposition Leader Peter Dutton continued to try to link the issues today while praising the decision to rescind the law, which he said had been "imposed in an ideological way."

"It was a well-intentioned piece of legislation, but it had unintended consequences," Mr Dutton told the Liberal partyroom.

"The good news, though, is because it was legislation … the harm can be undone.

"But that's not the case with the Voice.

"The changes to the Constitution proposed by the Albanese government would be permanent."

Continuing to sell the backflip as a result of the government listening to the community, Aboriginal Affairs Minister Tony Buti reiterated the intention was to avoid another incident like Juukan Gorge.

"We wanted to provide legislation equipped with greater certainty and protection for Aboriginal cultural heritage, but unfortunately it did not deliver the clarity and security that we desired," he said.

Aboriginal people treated as 'second class citizens': PKKP

The Traditional Owners of Juukan Gorge, represented by the Puutu Kunti Kurrama and Pinikura (PKKP) Aboriginal Corporation, said they only received a "phone call that lasted about five minutes" before the government announced its decision.

PKKP Land and Heritage Manager Dr Jordan Ralph said the decision to repeal the new laws demonstrated First Nations people were at the bottom of the government's list of priorities.

"People are feeling betrayed," he said.

"We're going back to pre-Native Title legislation that was never fit -for-purpose, that benefited industry over Aboriginal heritage and Aboriginal people. So, it is really a backward step."

Mr Ralph said the organisation had lost faith in the government's ability to adequately protect culturally significant sites.

"This is nothing short of a cluster and again, First Nations people are being treated as second class citizens in their own Country."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19320669

File: 33470277ce13126⋯.jpg (2.52 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Mr_Cook_denied_there_had_b….jpg)

File: c566f47e01e1a9d⋯.jpg (442.57 KB,1569x1154,1569:1154,Farmers_and_pastoralists_h….jpg)

File: e28c1b198565eac⋯.jpg (1.27 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Rio_Tinto_was_given_permis….jpg)

File: d3b282741a54ffe⋯.jpg (187.56 KB,1024x768,4:3,Michael_Woodley_says_the_1….jpg)

File: 41cfcd4bee1ed5d⋯.jpg (900.45 KB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Opposition_Leader_Shane_Lo….jpg)

>>19320661

2/2

The destruction of Juukan Gorge was allowed under what's known as a "section 18" process under the old legislation, which allowed the minister to approve the destruction of cultural heritage sites.

Mr Buti said while section 18 would be revived by reverting to that legislation, it would be "strengthened" under the changes announced today.

That includes granting native title groups the right to appeal section 18 decisions – a right which had previously only been afforded to the companies applying to destroy heritage sites, and which Aboriginal groups had been asking for since Juukan Gorge.

Landowners will also have to notify government if they learn new information about any site subject to a section 18 order, and will not be able to gag traditional owners from doing the same.

Yinjibarndi Aboriginal Corporation chief executive Michael Woodley said he's disappointed by the debate around the changes.

"The disappointing part of it is the outside noises from most of the people who've been raising concern about it, kind of takes us back in terms of our relationship and what we're trying to build together," he said.

"So the reconciliation process for first nations people and non-Indigenous people kind of takes a step back as well."

'We got it wrong': Attorney General

Attorney-General John Quigley described the impacts on smaller landowners like farmers as "unintended consequences".

"Everyone's focus was on what was happening up in the mining area and Juukan Gorge and how to stop it," he said of the process of passing the now-defunct reforms through parliament.

"And a lot of work went into that, but there's been unintended consequences. We got it wrong."

The government said the changes announced today would not be rushed through parliament but could be accelerated if the opposition wanted it.

As Parliament sat for the first time after the winter recess today, Mr Buti began the formal process of repealing the 2021 legislation.

'People power' in action

Addressing a rally of hundreds of farmers on the steps of Parliament House, opposition leader Shane Love said the government's backdown was a "great testament to people power" over a "failed act".

"You cannot trust the Labor government, you cannot trust that this will not come back in another guise," he said.

"The only way that we can stop them is to push back, and today is a great day for you and for the communities that you come from that you've been able to exert such pressure that the government has buckled under it.

"But don't trust them, you can't trust them. You can't trust Tony Buti, you can't trust Roger Cook, you cannot trust the Labor government."

Liberal Leader Libby Mettam had a similar message for the crowd.

"It's extraordinary what this Labor government will try to get away with if given the chance," she said.

"That's why we need to keep the pressure on this government until 2025, until we get that opportunity to overthrow a government who are increasingly out of touch with the needs of ordinary, hard working Western Australians."

Repealed laws 'draconian'

Across the country in Canberra, federal Nationals leader David Littleproud described the backflip as "a small win for common sense".

"It was draconian, it was an overreach and it needed to be addressed," he said.

"The admission today by the Western Australian government that they got it wrong, that they didn't listen, they didn't understand the implications of what they were imposing on the people of Western Australia is a big lesson to the Albanese government not to overreach, not to do the same thing."

The federal government is currently considering what steps it can take to protect First Nations cultural heritage.

Mr Littleproud called on the Albanese government to make clear it would not introduce laws similar to what WA will soon repeal.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-08-08/roger-cook-repeals-aboriginal-cultural-heritage-laws/102699678

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19320682

File: a666d1a863d2745⋯.jpg (57.25 KB,1187x668,1187:668,WA_Premier_Roger_Cook.jpg)

>>19222755

>>19303148

>>19320661

WA backtrack on heritage laws is a reminder the Indigenous voice to parliament can’t be scrapped

JOE KELLY - AUGUST 8, 2023

The “forever” nature of Anthony Albanese’s constitutionally enshrined voice to parliament has been put up in lights by the West Australian retreat over introduction of Indigenous cultural heritage laws.

This is the obvious point: there can be no backdown over a voice to parliament that has been cemented into the Constitution.

If the voice proves unpopular, something goes wrong with the advisory body or there are unintended consequences, the entity cannot be scrapped.

While bad governments can be voted out and bad laws can be repealed, the voice is permanent.

The backlash to the WA Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act, which entered into force on July 1, shows why governments must sometimes retreat on key policy matters and make corrections when required.

This is part of the ebb and flow of democracy.

The confusion caused by the new WA laws was weakening Labor’s political position in the key state that delivered it majority government. It was turning voters against the voice to parliament and jeopardising success of the referendum.

Farmers feared losing control of their own land and those with properties of more than 1100sq m were being drawn into the chaos.

Action was required to stem the political damage.

At the weekend, news of the WA government backdown was welcomed by Yes23 campaign director Dean Parkin, who said it would provide clear air leading into the referendum.

It also provided a sense of relief to federal Labor, which has come under pressure over its rollout of a planned federal framework for cultural heritage protections.

Yet Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney argued on Monday that permanence of a constitutionally enshrined voice was a key strength of the proposal being put to the Australian people.

“The beauty, the absolute beauty, of this proposition is it is protected by the Constitution. So a government cannot get rid of this voice by the stroke of a pen, which has happened too often in the past,” she told ABC radio.

The WA example speaks to the risks involved in this approach. The No campaign will use the backdown by the WA government to remind Australians there can be no retreating from the voice.

Remember that Albanese’s constitutional amendment guarantees the voice the ability to make representations to parliament and executive government on “matters relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples”.

The amendment guarantees the voice will have input across the policy spectrum. And this cannot be easily changed by future governments with the stroke of a pen.

Australians will need to decide later this year whether this highlights the “beauty” of the voice proposal or its dangers.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/wa-backtrack-on-heritage-laws-is-a-reminder-the-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-cant-be-scrapped/news-story/5c74307e675bd291adc139056c0c5be6

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19320706

File: a862d44e33bbcc5⋯.jpg (159.08 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Opposition_Indigenous_Aust….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19297392

Indigenous voice to parliament No camp fears rush of the late engagers

GEOFF CHAMBERS and JOE KELLY - AUGUST 8, 2023

1/2

Senior No campaigners have warned of complacency, fears that 20 to 30 per cent of voters will remain undecided on the voice until polls open and a “cooling” in fundraising and volunteer support, according to a leaked memo sent to Australians for Unity board members.

The No campaign, which leads Yes23 in internal and public polling, holds serious concerns it will be outspent and outnumbered in the weeks leading up to the expected October 14 referendum asking Australians to enshrine a voice advisory body in the Constitution.

A leaked memo sent to No campaign board members on Sunday, ahead of a meeting this week, said some senior Coalition figures were threatening the campaign by embracing an “air of inevitability and complacency”.

With 20,000 volunteers already signed up, the Yes23 campaign is preparing a big-spending, election-style campaign to win over soft and undecided voters in the weeks leading up to referendum day.

In a coup for Anthony Albanese and Yes23 campaigners, WA Premier Roger Cook is expected to make major amendments to controversial Aboriginal Cultural Heritage laws that have sparked confusion and pushback from farmers, landholders and environmental groups.

The Australian understands the WA Labor government was told by senior ALP figures that its contentious three-tiered system imposing cultural assessments for ground excavation on properties exceeding 1100 sqm was damaging the Yes campaign.

Despite the No campaign extending its dominance nationally in recent months, strategists have privately warned senior Fair Australia figures the Yes campaign’s $50m-plus war chest will likely trim their lead.

“There are a number of key influencers in and around the Liberal and National parties that are not seeing the data that we are and this is leading to an air of inevitability and complacency,” the memo says. “This is absolutely a threat to the campaign and every effort must be made to counter this narrative. Further, this has led to all fundraising channels ‘cooling’ over the past four weeks. It remains our position that the Yes campaign will spend in excess of $50m when counting both donations and government advertising.

“The Yes campaign has both enough time and, more importantly, money to mount the biggest spend by a non-party campaign in the history of Australia. This level of market share in the closing weeks of the campaign could have a catastrophic impact on the No campaign.”

Yes campaigners recently said their polling showed high levels of soft votes. The No memo says: “While there is consistency with the overall trajectory of voting intention, our internal polling is showing a much stronger trendline of soft and undecided voters.

“Our belief (is) that this is coming from a cohort of voters that still have little or no awareness of the voice and the referendum.

“To be clear – these are not undecided voters in the traditional sense, these are voters who are not engaged on the issue at all. The number of these voters is incredibly high and there is nothing we have seen that suggests our initial projection of 20-30 per cent undecided voters on election day will be wrong.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19320711

File: e899cb4d1340397⋯.jpg (214.34 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Yes23_campaign_director_De….jpg)

>>19320706

2/2

Attempting to shift pressure to Peter Dutton, the Prime Minister has repeatedly accused the Opposition Leader of supporting a legislated voice and argued that this contradicts the Coalition’s decision to back the No campaign.

“You can’t say that it will change the entire system of government and then say you will legislate for the voice,” Mr Albanese said. “That is what you are saying. You can’t say it will promote racial division and then say you will legislate for the voice.

“Clearly they don’t see it as radical or divisive, or any of the other noise of confusion that they are seeking to inject into the referendum. Otherwise, why would they legislate for it.”

Speaking on the ABC’s Insiders, Mr Albanese suggested the only difference in Mr Dutton’s position was that he didn’t want to put a voice in the Constitution.

Mr Dutton said on Monday that “once again, the PM is clutching at straws, making things up as he goes along, and refusing to provide the details of his voice, treaty, truth proposal to the Australian people”.

“Our position is clear: we support constitutional recognition, which we think would be a unifying moment and which would be supported by the vast majority of Australians – and as I said back in April, we support the establishment of local and regional bodies,” Mr Dutton said. “We do not support Mr Albanese’s divisive national voice proposal, and it’s becoming increasingly clear that many Australians don’t either.”

The No campaign memo says that while it continues to outperform the Yes campaign “particularly in organic content metrics, the unprecedented volume of advertising would be incredibly difficult to counter based on our fundraising projections”.

“Our summary position is that all that has been achieved so far by us is to create a competitive campaign. The result is by no means a foregone conclusion. There is the threat of the fundraising deficit and the increasing sense of complacency colliding to form a critical risk.”

With Queensland and WA tracking towards a No vote, South Australia and Tasmania remain battlegrounds that could fall either way. South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas will play a central role in Labor’s Yes push.

Asked in the upper-house whether federal Labor pressured the WA government over its cultural heritage laws, government Senate leader Penny Wong claimed to “have no knowledge of any such discussions being had”.

Julian Leeser, the most prominent Liberal supporter for the voice, said the cultural heritage laws in WA were a “distraction”.

“I’m glad the WA government have walked away from them,” Mr Leeser said. “It was clear the issue had become conflated with the referendum.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-no-camp-fears-rush-of-the-late-engagers/news-story/14ef00cd416cdb019f58e51b49273c6a

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19320737

File: cec5a212d0a0177⋯.jpg (163.54 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Inquiry_head_Walter_Sofron….jpg)

File: 5e6f7f2982fcfcf⋯.jpg (90.65 KB,1280x720,16:9,ACT_director_of_public_pro….jpg)

File: 8b1b674beb41caf⋯.jpg (84.01 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_full_report_from_the_S….jpg)

>>19289705

>>19308125

>>19314741

‘Fair go for Shane Drumgold’ case springs a giant leak

JANET ALBRECHTSEN - AUGUST 8, 2023

Shane Drumgold has claimed that the leak of the Sofronoff Report denied him procedural fairness.

The same notion has been echoed by other people who appear more concerned about a leak to a newspaper than the substance of a report that found that the chief prosecutor was guilty of serious misconduct in office.

So let’s interrogate that argument to see if it holds water.

Drumgold called for this public inquiry. He was invited to participate in a public inquiry led by Walter Sofronoff KC.

Drumgold made a lengthy written 80-page submission to that inquiry.

He attached exhibits to his statement that numbered more than 200. In the interests of fairness and transparency, submissions by the various parties making allegations about other parties were circulated to other parties, including Drumgold.

In other words, the chief prosecutor had advance warning of the possible lines of questioning in the witness box.

Further submissions could be made to Sofronoff by any of the parties, including by Drumgold, at any time during this inquiry on matters the subject of this inquiry.

In May, Drumgold gave ­evidence over many days in the witness box.

He was represented by a very experienced silk, and former senior crown prosecutor, Mark Tedeschi. The barrister cross-examined many of the other witnesses who gave evidence during those public hearings. Oral submissions were made by Tedeschi defending his client throughout the inquiry.

In June, Drumgold was provided with a 10-page Notice of Proposed Adverse Findings putting him on notice of what Sofronoff may find given evidence revealed to the inquiry.

Drumgold responded, in more than 100 pages, with submissions to Sofronoff as to why those findings should not be made.

In order words, Drumgold received procedural fairness – in spades. Indeed, given the findings about Drumgold by Sofronoff, one could put it this way: more effort was put into ensuring this would be a fair inquiry than Drumgold, as the ACT chief prosecutor, put into ensuring a fair trial for Bruce Lehrmann. Drumgold should have known what was headed his way. All he needed was self-awareness.

He admitted to misconduct in the witness box. He said he made innocent mistakes.

In just about every instance, Sofronoff disagreed with that claim, finding, for example, that Drumgold deliberately misled the court.

Drumgold, along with sections of the media, and the ACT Labor government, can excite themselves all they wish about leaks to a newspaper. The Australian did not breach an embargo and will not reveal the source of the leak.

It’s curious that those who have spent years defending Julian Assange for leaking stories that may have undermined national security are now hot and bothered about a leaked report that found a DPP who wields enormous state power against citizens behaved improperly.

A case of politics or sore losers? Maybe both.

Indeed, unless the government was proposing to suppress the report, in part or in whole, the government can’t complain about the fact of publication, only about its timing.

The real story for the media and the ACT government – when they catch up – is the substance of the Sofronoff report. The former chief prosecutor was found to have deliberately misled a chief justice in order to withhold material from ­defence lawyers – material that should have been disclosed so that lawyers could properly defend a young man potentially facing jail.

At every stage, Drumgold was provided with procedural fairness. By the truckload.

In his final report, Sofronoff attached copies of the potential adverse findings relevant to each party so that we, the people – including the media – can compare the potential adverse findings with the findings in the final report. In other words, we can decide whether Sofronoff’s report is fair on Drumgold, and other parties.

When kvetching about leaks comes to an end, when responsible media outlets turn their attention to that fair process and those findings, they will discover that the Sofronoff Report is solid, and its ramifications for the criminal justice system very serious indeed.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/fair-go-for-shane-drumgold-case-springs-a-giant-leak/news-story/e6097590b08e92c1306f27df88e9f3ab

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19320818

File: 80676c4460a8ba4⋯.jpg (153.01 KB,1280x1707,1280:1707,Rivkin_in_his_office_in_De….jpg)

File: 660d9892ab73a7f⋯.jpg (1.13 MB,1193x2019,1193:2019,Maximilian_Rivkin_TRANSNAT….jpg)

File: f30efcc9e80cbbe⋯.jpg (144.4 KB,1024x767,1024:767,Australia_s_most_wanted_ma….jpg)

The US and Sweden have put a bounty on the head of alleged AN0M gangster Maximilian Rivkin

ELLEN WHINNETT - AUGUST 7, 2023

1/2

A $7.6m bounty has been placed on the head of a fugitive Swedish gangster who targeted Australia’s drug market and is a key lieutenant of Australia’s most wanted man, Hakan Ayik.

News of the reward offered for the arrest of Maximilian Rivkin comes as another of the 17 men indicted over the encrypted app AN0M, Seyyed Hossein Hosseini, is extradited to the US, taking to five the number of international alleged gangsters now facing the US justice system on racketeering charges.

The US State Department and the Swedish Police Authority jointly offered a $US5m reward for information leading to the arrest of Rivkin, a Serbian-born Swedish citizen whose last known location was Turkey.

In a statement, the department said it was offering the reward for information leading to the arrest and/or conviction of Rivkin for “conspiring to participate in or attempting to participate in trans­national organised crime.

“Specifically, Rivkin was administrator and influencer of an encrypted communication service used by criminals worldwide. His communications on the platform implicated him in several nefarious activities, including his alleged participation in drug trafficking, money laundering, murder conspiracy and other violent acts,’’ the statement said.

“This reward offer is being announced jointly with the Swedish Police Authority, who charged Rivkin with narcotics smuggling and trafficking.’’

The 40-year-old Rivkin was named on a US grand jury indictment unsealed in June 2021 and accused of being part of a criminal enterprise running the app.

He was also reportedly caught bragging via the app about his capacity to service the drug market in Australia, with de-encrypted texts reportedly released by Swedish police showing him boasting “I have a line to Australia” and “I am now with the biggest people in the world”.

The app, which was pushed by the likes of Australian drug kingpin Hakan Ayik, was marketed as a secure way to avoid law enforcement, but was in fact a Trojan horse app being run and monitored by the FBI and Australian Federal Police. While 17 people were indicted over running the criminal enterprise behind the app, more than 1300 people were charged globally with a number of crimes as a result of the sting.

Five of the alleged AN0M 17 have been extradited to the US to face charges on the original indictment, and another four men are in custody in their home countries, including two in Australia. Eight people remain on the run, including Rivkin, Ayik and two other Australians believed to be hiding out in Turkey, Baris Tukel and Erkan Dogan.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19320821

File: 9ed217be4ebb2f9⋯.jpg (718.99 KB,2550x3300,17:22,Reward_Poster_for_Maxmilia….jpg)

>>19320818

2/2

The State Department said Rivkin was charged in the US with “international racketeering conspiracy involving drug trafficking and money laundering’’.

“This joint reward offer re­inforces US efforts to disrupt and deter transnational criminal activity globally and to build a global coalition to address synthetic drug threats,’’ it said.

“Transnational organised crime and illicit drug trafficking threaten economic prosperity and challenge the stability of governments and societies around the world. The US stands with our allies against transnational organised crime and its associated violence across the globe.’’

Announcing the reward in June, on the second-year anniversary of the AN0M sting being make public, the State Department said Rivkin, who used the aliases Maximillan Rivkin, Milos Jankovic and the nicknames Maximilan, Malmo, Teamsters, Microsoft and Max, was one of several people whose “criminal conversations’’ had been uncovered since AN0M was infiltrated in 2018.

“From December 2020 through the spring of 2021, the FBI shared copies of Rivkin’s criminal conversations with the Swedish Police Authority, which implicated Rivkin in participating in a murder conspiracy, drug trafficking conspiracy, money laundering conspiracy, and kidnapping conspiracy,’’ it said.

As international law enforcement continues to close in on those exposed by the AN0M sting, one of Rivkin’s associates, Seyyed Hossein Hosseini, is believed to have been extradited to the US.

A resident and citizen of The Netherlands, he is accused of being a distributor of the AN0M app and devices.

Under Operation Ironside, the AFP read and copied more than 28 million messages from the AN0M platform between 2018 and 2021, after the FBI bought the app from a tech-savvy drug dealer.

The world-first operation, dubbed the sting of the century, is being challenged in the courts, with a new motion filed in the US on behalf of three of the AN0M 17, including Australian man Edwin Harmendra Kumar, who was extradited early this year.

A team of lawyers has asked a judge in the Southern District of California to reveal the unnamed European country the AN0M messages were routed through.

In Sydney, a group of 66 people accused of mainly drug offences as a result of the AN0M sting have teemed up to challenge the validity of the technology used.

The case, known informally as AN0M 66, is listed for a committal hearing before a magistrate in Sydney in September.

A similar challenge in South Australia’s Supreme Court ended in April with a judge ruling the technology underpinning Operation Ironside was used legally.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/the-us-and-sweden-have-put-a-bounty-on-the-head-of-alleged-an0m-gangster-maximilian-rivkin/news-story/1a92d24061aa3cf4d1e55bf458bd1de9

https://www.state.gov/maximilian-rivkin/

https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Reward-Poster-for-Maxmilian-Rivki-June-2023-Accessible-060623.pdf

https://qresear.ch/?q=AN0M

https://qresear.ch/?q=ANOM

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19320920

File: 47925acc9efb667⋯.mp4 (15.54 MB,640x360,16:9,AFP_announces_19_men_arres….mp4)

File: ea17068c45c0e40⋯.jpg (376.34 KB,1754x1241,1754:1241,Operation_Bakis.jpg)

AFP announced 19 men arrested, 13 children removed from harm in major online child abuse investigation

Adam Vidler - Aug 8, 2023

Police have removed 13 Australian children from harm and arrested 19 men during an investigation into a "technologically sophisticated" online child abuse network sparked by the murder of two FBI agents in the US.

FBI Special Agents Daniel Alfin and Laura Schwartzenberger were shot dead by suspect David Lee Huber as they executed a search warrant on a related case in Florida in 2021.

The Australian Federal Police-led Australian Centre to Counter Child Exploitation began its investigation in 2022 after the FBI shared intelligence about Australian members of a peer-to-peer network allegedly sharing child abuse material on the dark web.

Two Australian offenders have been sentenced, with other men who were arrested remaining before the courts.

Most of the alleged Australian offenders, some of whom are also accused of having produced their own child abuse material, were employed in occupations that required a high degree of information and communications technology knowledge.

Members used software to anonymously share files, chat on message boards and access websites within the network.

Network members were able to search for and distribute images and videos of child abuse material and allegedly used encryption and other methods.

The alleged Australian offenders were aged between 32 and 81 years old.

It will be alleged some of the children removed had been directly abused, and that others were removed as a child safety precaution.

"Today we celebrate the rescue of 13 children," FBI legal attache Nitiana Mann said at a press conference in Brisbane this morning.

AFP Commander Helen Schneider said some of those arrested had "potentially" been committing child abuse offences for up to 10 years.

In the ACT, five children have been removed from harm and two alleged offenders are facing 54 charges.

A public servant living in the ACT was sentenced in June to 14 years and six months' jail after pleading guilty to 24 charges in the ACT Supreme Court.

In NSW, two children have been removed from harm and five men are facing 13 charges.

A call centre operator on the NSW Central Coast was sentenced in June to five years' imprisonment after pleading guilty to possessing an estimated five terabytes of child abuse material.

In Queensland, four children have been removed from harm, and five men are facing 45 charges.

In South Australia, two children have been removed from harm and five alleged offenders are facing 16 charges.

In Tasmania, one alleged offender is facing five charges.

In Western Australia, one man is facing five charges.

The related FBI investigation has led to 79 people being arrested for their alleged involvement in the network.

Police are not ruling out further arrests.

Support is available from the National Sexual Assault, Domestic Family Violence Counselling Service at 1800RESPECT (1800 737 732).

https://www.1800respect.org.au/

https://www.9news.com.au/national/fbi-afp-child-abuse-network-uncovered-children-removed-arrests-made/8e9ae2a6-0828-429a-af4d-f65bb38a509b

https://www.afp.gov.au/news-media/media-releases/australian-children-removed-harm-and-19-men-charged-child-abuse-offences

2 FBI agents fatally shot and 3 injured while serving warrant in Florida

ZOE CHRISTEN JONES - FEBRUARY 2, 2021

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fbi-agents-shot-dead-wounded-sunrise-florida/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19320928

File: be73b2bdca5fd7c⋯.jpg (642.36 KB,2400x1440,5:3,A_father_has_filed_a_claim….jpg)

Catholic church seeks to stop family’s lawsuit over George Pell child abuse allegations

Melbourne archdiocese challenges legal ruling that would allow father of a choirboy to sue for damages

Australian Associated Press - 8 Aug 2023

The Catholic church is seeking to challenge a legal ruling in Victoria that would allow the father of a choirboy to sue for damages over allegations of child sexual abuse by Cardinal George Pell.

The father, who cannot be named for legal reasons, filed a claim against the Catholic archdiocese of Melbourne and Pell. He claims to have suffered nervous shock after learning of allegations that Pell sexually abused his now deceased son in the mid-1990s.

Pell, who died in January, had five convictions for abusing the man’s son and another boy overturned by the high court in 2020. He always maintained his innocence.

The Catholic church tried to be excused from proceedings by relying on the Ellis defence, arguing the father could not sue because he was not the direct victim of the alleged abuse.

The church was able to use the defence until it was abolished in 2018 by the Victoria’s Legal Identity of Defendants Act.

In August 2022, the supreme court justice Michael McDonald ruled that the law allowed claims from alleged secondary victims, including the boy’s father.

“The plain meaning of the words ‘founded on or arising from child abuse’ … includes a claim for nervous shock brought by a parent of a child alleged to have been sexually abused,” he ruled.

But in a challenge to the court of appeal on Tuesday, Georgina Costello KC argued for the right to appeal that finding.

She said relevant legislation did not define what a plaintiff in a child abuse case was, but did define child abuse by reference to “a person” and “the person”.

She argued it was a person who, falling under the definition of child abuse, was the class of person who could be a plaintiff and no one else.

Further reference to potential defendants as being “liable for child abuse” reinforced that the law was confined to acts against a person who was themselves subject to child abuse, Costello said.

But Andrew Clements KC, acting for the father, said the Archdiocese’s case held no real prospect of success.

He said the legislation’s repeated use of the phrase “arising from child abuse” was an unsurmountable obstacle for their challenge.

“Even if we had no other good points, and we would submit that we do, the repeated use of that phrase is sufficient reason not to grant the appeal in this case,” he said.

The three appeal justices have reserved their decision.

The father, known as RWQ in court documents, has claimed the Catholic church was vicariously liable for his son’s alleged abuse at St Patrick’s Cathedral when he was 13.

He says he suffered financial loss because of medical expenses and a loss of earning capacity because of his suffering from several psychological conditions.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/aug/08/george-pell-child-abuse-allegations-melbourne-catholic-church-lawsuit-seeking-to-stop-appeal

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19321039

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Fireball that lit up Melbourne night sky was most likely debris from Russian rocket

Lachlan Abbott - August 8, 2023

1/2

A large flaming object that lit up Melbourne’s sky overnight is thought to be debris from a Russian rocket used to send a satellite into space.

Victorians captured videos showing a bright fireball travelling across the night sky late on Monday, close to midnight.

Social media posts indicate it was seen from Melbourne’s CBD as well as outer suburbs such as Sunbury and Mornington. Residents in regional Victoria and South Australia also reported seeing the flashes of light.

The Australian Space Agency said that the flashes of light were likely the remnants of a Russian Soyuz-2 rocket re-entering Earth’s atmosphere.

“Launch of the Soyuz-2 rocket occurred from Plesetsk Cosmodrome earlier in the evening. According to Russian authorities, the launch placed a new generation ‘GLONASS-K2’ global navigation satellite into orbit,” the space agency said in a statement.

“This launch was notified and remnants of the rocket were planned to safely re-enter the atmosphere into the ocean off the south-east coast of Tasmania.”

Professor Alan Duffy, a Swinburne University astronomer, told 3AW: “It was the biggest light show that I’ve ever seen, in terms of a re-entry of some kind of material from orbit.”

Duffy said the streak of light was burning brightly and moving slowly while breaking up midair, indicating it was likely man-made, rather than a meteor or comet.

Dr Gail Iles, a physicist from RMIT University, said there was a chance the fireball was a meteor, as the sighting coincided with this weekend’s Perseid meteor shower, but “it’s far more likely that this is a piece of a rocket”.

“The common consensus seems to be that the Russians launched a Soyuz rocket from Plesetsk – that’s their northern launch site in Russia – and they were launching a navigation satellite at exactly the time that everyone would have seen this space debris,” Iles said on 3AW.

The United States’ National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency website shows a “HYDROPAC” navigational warning was issued days ago for space debris tracking over the western South Pacific Ocean.

“So if you look at that space track, then you will see that it passes directly over Australia, it passes over South Australia into Victoria, and then kind of bends around over Tasmania, and is likely to have ended up in the ocean,” Iles said.

Iles said the Russian satellite was launched about 10pm AEST on Monday. The sighting over Melbourne was likely to be of the second-stage rocket returning to Earth after burning out roughly 170 kilometres above the ground, she said.

“It is steadily decreasing size, so the thing that we saw was probably one to two metres by that point. And I would say by the time it hit the ocean, it was much smaller,” Iles said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19321056

File: 86652eb06e90c37⋯.mp4 (7.74 MB,576x1024,9:16,_fhd_vn.mp4)

File: 9649ba22a2790c7⋯.jpg (373.58 KB,1047x1048,1047:1048,Soyuz_rocket_re_entry.jpg)

>>19321039

2/2

Associate Professor Alice Gorman, a space archaeologist from Flinders University, said Victorians and Tasmanians saw an identical rocket – which weighs 105 tonnes and is 25 metres long – burning-up in May 2020.

She said any remnants of this rocket would’ve ended up in the sea after last night’s “spectacular fireworks show”.

“There were also reports of a sonic boom and people felt their houses shake,” Gorman said.

“Although it was moving much slower than a meteor, the rocket was still fast enough to break the sound barrier. When the US Skylab space station fell back to Earth over Western Australia in 1979, there was also a sonic boom and farmers reported animals being agitated.”

Associate Professor Michael Brown, from the School of Physics and Astronomy at Monash University, said it was rare for space junk to damage property, although another Soyuz rocket re-entered over Melbourne back in 2014, and some pieces of the rocket were found in rural NSW afterwards.

“Space junk re-entries are sometimes confused with meteors, which are also spectacular but usually far shorter events as they slam into the atmosphere at over 10 kilometres per second,” Brown said.

“As orbital rocket launches have increased over the past decade, and everyone has cameras in their phones, more and more people are seeing space junk re-entries and recognising them for what they are.”

Iles, a lecturer at RMIT, said a shallow angle of re-entry helped Victorians view the space debris burn across the sky for a considerable amount of time.

The physicist added: “This was very controlled. This was predicted. It has been announced on the HYDROPAC website for days. We were going to see this for sure.”

Duffy, the Swinburne University astronomer, said reports of people hearing sounds from the nighttime fireball were “extraordinary”.

He said space junk re-entering the atmosphere usually prompted planes in the area to be put on hold to avoid an unlikely – but not impossible – midair collision.

Professor Richard de Grijs, a Macquarie University astrophysicist and executive director of the International Space Science Institute – Beijing in China, said the chances of a piece of space junk falling back to Earth were increasing year-on-year.

“Astronauts on their way to or at the International Space Station or, for that matter, those travelling to Tiangong, the Chinese Space Station, are more and more at risk of being hit by random bits of junk,” de Grijs said.

“We can expect to see more of such bright, man-made ‘meteors’ if we don’t find a way to deal with our unbridled ambitions in space, which will soon make the ‘Great Pacific Garbage Patch’ pale in comparison.”

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/mystery-object-lights-up-melbourne-night-sky-20230808-p5duok.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Vt-MSEaE6o

https://www.tiktok.com/@fhd_vn/video/7264589652168936706

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19321154

File: d88d74411f37969⋯.jpg (255.9 KB,1862x1047,1862:1047,Donald_Trump_makes_his_way….jpg)

File: 9220214307d0b9f⋯.jpg (409.62 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Supporters_of_US_President….jpg)

>>19105135 (pb)

Donald Trump remains an existential threat to the survival of US democracy

TROY BRAMSTON - AUGUST 8, 2023

1/2

Donald Trump’s orchestrated efforts to subvert the will of the voters and attempt to overturn the result of the 2020 US presidential election, to effectively instigate a coup d’état, is the most serious and egregious charge that can be made against anyone who believes in democracy, freedom and the rule of law.

Trump’s long overdue indictment for a series of crimes relating to the last presidential election follows indictments for keeping boxes of classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago home in Florida and falsifying business records to cover up hush-money payments to porn star Stormy Daniels before the 2016 presidential election.

While not discounting the others, this latest indictment is the most significant because if the defeated president had succeeded, the US would have slid towards autocracy led by a demagogue. And there is still more to come, with Trump likely to face charges in Georgia after he was recorded pressuring officials to find him thousands of votes in the days after the 2020 presidential election.

Nobody, not even a president or former president, is above the law. This is a cornerstone of all liberal democracies.

Yet in December, Trump called for the “termination” of the US constitution as he again claimed Joe Biden was fraudulently elected President and urged his return to the White House.

Mike Pence, Trump’s former vice-president, said the indictment “serves as an important reminder” that “anyone who puts himself over the constitution should never be president”. Trump tried to force Pence not to certify the results of the electoral college on January 6, 2021 and overturn the election.

The indictment by a federal grand jury lists four counts: conspiracy to defraud the US; conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding (the US congress’s certification of Biden’s electoral victory); obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding, and; conspiracy against rights.

In previous columns on this page, I argued that Trump deserved to be indicted and would likely be guilty of violating at least two federal criminal statutes: conspiracy to defraud the US and obstruction of an official proceeding. (“Second Trump presidency a threat to US democracy”, July 27, 2022).

The weight of evidence against Trump is overwhelming. He was repeatedly told by advisers and officials in his administration that his claims of electoral fraud could not be substantiated and that Biden had won the election. Some have even testified that Trump conceded this to be true.

Special Counsel Jack Smith makes it clear Trump was entitled to exercise his right to freedom of speech and claim, however falsely, there had been fraud and he had actually won the election. He was entitled to legally challenge the results, which he did. But he was not entitled to “pursue unlawful means” of discounting votes and subverting the results.

Accordingly, the indictment does not charge Trump with responsibility for the attack on the US Capitol but does say he exploited it. Nevertheless, remember what then Republican majority leader Mitch McConnell told the Senate about Trump’s culpability in the deadly and destructive riot at the US Capitol, following the then president’s second impeachment trial?

“There is no question that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of that day,” McConnell said. “The people who stormed this building believed they were acting on the wishes and instructions of their president. And their having that belief was a foreseeable consequence of the growing crescendo of false statements, conspiracy theories, and reckless hyperbole which the defeated president kept shouting into the largest megaphone on planet Earth.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19321168

File: acad5a26fff546b⋯.jpg (451.68 KB,1920x1080,16:9,Trump_waves_before_enterin….jpg)

>>19321154

2/2

Trump can be entangled in multiple trials and still run for president. He could even be convicted and jailed for these or other crimes and still run for president. To be sure, Trump is using this indictment for political and financial gain. There is no doubt it has energised his already strong support among Republicans.

It has always been likely Trump would win the Republican nomination for president. His legal woes have done nothing to alter this. But these multiple indictments are likely to damage him in the election campaign. It is a turn-off for some Republican voters and especially for registered independent voters.

The legal strategy that Trump is following is also inexorably linked with his political strategy. He will struggle to defeat each of these indictments. But, if convicted and elected president, he can perhaps use the untrammelled presidential pardon power to quash any sentence.

This remains untested and would be subject to Supreme Court challenge, where conservatives are in the majority. That is why, in the final analysis, only a defeat of Trump at the 2024 presidential election will ensure the future of the republic.

The US founders, through the Constitutional Convention, deliberated and devised a constitution and a set of legal institutions that had as one of its aims preventing anti-democrats and demagogues like Trump from undermining the electoral process. We are now seeing this system, designed principally by James Madison and Alexander Hamilton, work.

The prospect, though, of Trump being re-elected as president challenges the survival of this system. Trump has also shattered the norms and conventions of US politics; namely, the principle of the peaceful transfer of power embodied by George Washington, who retired after two terms. No previous US president, however upset at their defeat, sowed disinformation and discord like Trump.

Trump remains a disgusting, disgraceful, dangerous individual. He is the first US president to be charged with a criminal offence. Trump’s indictment for attempting to overturn the presidential election of 2020 will be one of the great trials of our time. It is imperative, for the survival of US democracy, that he is found guilty of these crimes and does not return to power.

Troy Bramston is a senior writer and columnist with The Australian. He has interviewed politicians, presidents and prime ministers from multiple countries along with writers, actors, directors, producers and several pop-culture icons. He is an award-winning and best-selling author or editor of 11 books, including Bob Hawke: Demons and Destiny, Paul Keating: The Big-Picture Leader and Robert Menzies: The Art of Politics. He co-authored The Truth of the Palace Letters and The Dismissal with Paul Kelly.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/donald-trump-remains-an-existential-threat-to-the-survival-of-us-democracy/news-story/428da2df8ee481076c6e0913a9b423af

https://qresear.ch/?q=Troy+Bramston

>You attack those who threaten you the most.

>What does FEAR look like?

>What does PANIC look like?

>These people are stupid.

>Enjoy the show!

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19326680

File: df09195582667d8⋯.jpg (142.22 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Detective_Superintendent_S….jpg)

File: 02bdf45784b2757⋯.jpg (100.34 KB,1455x819,485:273,AFP_Commander_Michael_Chew.jpg)

File: 768b96540964bb7⋯.jpg (401.91 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Detective_Inspector_Marcus….jpg)

File: 0674cea6152f4be⋯.jpg (143.65 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Former_ACT_DPP_Shane_Drumg….jpg)

File: 26a810cd8e42a35⋯.jpg (135.87 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Walter_Sofronoff_KC.jpg)

>>19289705

>>19308125

Police careers destroyed by ACT DPP Shane Drumgold’s false claims

JANET ALBRECHTSEN and STEPHEN RICE - AUGUST 9, 2023

1/2

Many senior and junior police involved in the investigation of Brittany Higgins’s rape claims have lost their jobs or gone on long-term sick leave and will never return to policing in the wake of baseless accusations against them by ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold.

Thirteen Australian Federal Police officers involved in the investigation of the claims, including Detective Superintendent Scott Moller, have told The Australian of catastrophic damage to their lives and careers from the inquiry he demanded.

“It must not be understated exactly what harm these baseless allegations have caused to individual police officers,” said lawyer Calvin Gnech, on behalf of his clients. “Careers have been lost and reputations severely damaged, all of which was entirely unnecessary.”

The Sofronoff inquiry found that although mistakes were made by police, none had engaged in misconduct and investigators “performed their duties in absolute good faith, with great determination although faced with obstacles, and put together a sound case”.

The Australian understands there may be claims for compensation made by police arising from the psychological impact on them from the investigation and inquiry.

Mr Gnech said the 13 officers he represented, who include Detective Inspector Marcus Boorman and Commander Michael Chew, had never claimed to be perfect “but they certainly claimed to have conducted a comprehensive investigation without any element of corruption or conspiracy. Senior and junior police officers have accessed long-term sick leave directly because of this matter.”

Mr Gnech added: “Highly experienced career police officers involved in this matter are likely never going to return to ­policing directly because of this matter and there are also young aspiring officers who have now transferred out of sex crimes never to return.

“There has been further unmeasurable personal and professional detriment caused which will never be undone and which, again, was all entirely unnecessary and needless.”

The ACT Bar Association said on Tuesday that Mr Drumgold’s certificate to practise law in the territory was valid only while he was working as DPP and would expire when he left office on September 1.

“The Bar Council notes with grave concern the findings of misconduct in the (Sofronoff) report regarding the person with primary carriage of the prosecution of Mr (Bruce) Lehrmann, Mr Shane Drumgold SC, the ACT Director of Public Prosecutions,” ACT Bar Council president Marcus Hassall said. “Those findings are patently serious and will ­receive careful consideration by the ACT Bar Council in the context of its role as the professional regulator of the ACT Bar.” The council said any application by Mr Drumgold for a new or unrestricted practising certificate would need the bar council’s approval.

Giving evidence to the Sofronoff inquiry, Superintendent Moller said many detectives went on stress leave because they were under so much pressure to progress the case, despite their having a professional belief that there was not enough evidence to charge Mr Lehrmann over the alleged rape of Ms Higgins.

Mr Lehrmann’s defence lawyer told the inquiry Inspector Boorman had said he would quit if the former Liberal staffer was found guilty and he appeared to be experiencing a “moral trauma” at the time.

Inspector Boorman seemed “anxious and agitated” when they arranged to meet, barrister Steven Whybrow said.

He was “quite distressed” about the prosecution, and thought Mr Lehrmann was innocent, Mr Whybrow said.

It is understood Inspector Boorman’s mental health has deteriorated to the point where he is unlikely ever to return to policing and those mental health issues explain why he did not give evidence in person at the inquiry.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19326684

File: f265052ec4f6451⋯.jpg (325.18 KB,2048x1152,16:9,DPP_Shane_Drumgold_wanted_….jpg)

File: 8b1b674beb41caf⋯.jpg (84.01 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_full_report_from_the_S….jpg)

>>19326680

2/2

The inquiry was sparked by a letter Mr Drumgold wrote to ACT police chief Neil Gaughan alleging “clear investigator interference in the criminal justice process” in the Lehrmann case.

He said Superintendent Moller had tried to persuade him that Mr Lehrmann should not be charged and that the policeman had prepared a document that “contained blatant misrepresentations of evidence”.

Giving evidence at the inquiry, Superintendent Moller rejected the claims, revealing at one point that he was himself a sexual assault survivor.

“I lived with that for 45 years, and that has driven my desire to work with police and to work with victims.”

He said he found it offensive that Mr Drumgold had alleged police held “rape myths” and outdated stereotypes about victim behaviour that made them reluctant to charge suspects “because I’ve lived with that, and it’s difficult”.

“The team that work on sexual assault investigations are a dedicated, professional group of investigators,” he said.

Mr Drumgold denigrated the police in court during the Lehrmann trial, remarking that the quality of the police interview with Ms Higgins “is determined by the skillsets of those police officers asking the questions … which in this case was not high.”

The Sofronoff inquiry heard that during a break in the trial, Mr Drumgold had called the investigating police “boofheads”.

Mr Drumgold claimed that Superintendent Moller, Inspector Boorman and a number of other current and former SACAT members had been attending key parts of the trial, and “I have noted they have also been regularly conferencing with the defence team during the breaks”.

Mr Sofronoff found that Mr Drumgold “advanced nothing resembling evidence to support the serious allegations of impropriety that he levelled against the police”.

“This inquiry has thoroughly examined the allegations in Mr Drumgold’s letter. Each allegation has been exposed to be baseless. Late in giving his oral evidence, Mr Drumgold finally resiled from his scandalous allegations.

“The frankly stated opinions of police to the DPP about the weakness of the prosecution case were incapable of supporting a conclusion that they had acted in breach of their duty,” Mr Sofronoff said.

“Their association with defence during the trial was capable of demonstrating nothing more than their strong antipathy towards the DPP, something that was not surprising given that the feeling was mutual. Mr Drumgold did not seem to appreciate that mutual trust is a two-way street.

“It was he who, at the first opportunity, formed the baseless opinion that the investigators were improperly trying to thwart a prosecution.

“The allegation of political interference was particularly wicked because it was an allegation that had a tendency to lessen community confidence in the system of administration of justice and was made without the slightest evidence to support it.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/police-careers-destroyed-by-act-dpp-shane-drumgolds-false-claims/news-story/ef527c17da91df30f54aeea41909835b

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19326705

File: 043e6db22b70746⋯.jpg (282.91 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_has_broke….jpg)

File: 17a2270670ab0aa⋯.jpg (236.32 KB,750x695,150:139,David_Sharaz_1.jpg)

File: 50c08780fe9f9f0⋯.jpg (168.79 KB,1600x1600,1:1,F3C3LDFWYAASH2d.jpg)

File: f4330b6f970d5b4⋯.jpg (159.46 KB,1600x1600,1:1,F3C3LDRWAAADAN9.jpg)

File: e064848f3d0aee0⋯.jpg (137.55 KB,1600x1600,1:1,F3C3LDPXUAArFLd.jpg)

>>19289705

>>19308125

>>19326680

'Absolutely awful to me': Brittany Higgins hits out at police in response to damning Sofronoff Inquiry findings

Brittany Higgins has used her boyfriend’s social media to break her silence on the damning findings of the Sofronoff report after recently deleting her Twitter as she fights legal action from Liberal Senator Linda Reynolds.

Tyrone Clarke - August 9, 2023

Brittany Higgins has blasted investigators in the Bruce Lehrmann rape case in a statement published on her boyfriend’s social media after she deleted her own Twitter account.

Ms Higgins’ statement is her first public response to the damning findings of the Sofronoff Inquiry into the handling of the investigation and trial of Mr Lehrmann.

While inquiry chair Walter Sofronoff KC was scathing of the conduct of former ACT Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold – which was described as “grossly unethical” – he praised police for performing their duties in “absolute good faith”.

However, Ms Higgins slammed investigating officers and accused them of being “absolutely awful to me”.

In reference to a police executive summary outlining discrepancies in her story – which was found to have been withheld from Mr Lehrmann’s defence team by Mr Drumgold – Ms Higgins said officers tried to “discredit” her.

“They wrongly handed over my most private thoughts taken over years in counselling sessions at the Rape Crisis Centre to defence,” Ms Higgins said via her boyfriend David Sharaz’s Twitter account.

“These men were absolutely awful to me. They made me feel violated at every turn.

“I will always remember how small I felt having five senior police officers I’ve never met in a room belittling me – after I had just spent hours giving evidence in a second EIC (evidence in chief) interview.

“They cast judgements about the merits of my advocacy and regularly reiterated the reasons why they though that I shouldn’t proceed with pressing charges.

“I do not celebrate the misfortune of others. However, these officers were disgraced by their conduct not by the DPP.”

The Twitter post then showed a screenshot of an article in which 13 police officers involved in the investigation claimed their careers had been “lost and reputations severely damaged” after Mr Drumgold made false claims of impropriety to the Sofronoff Inquiry.

In his report, Mr Sofronoff conceded the police made a mistake in handing over the counselling notes to the defence and the prosecution but said it was not done intentionally.

Ms Higgins did not publish the statement herself after she recently deleted her Twitter account following legal action launched against her by Liberal Senator Linda Reynolds.

The Liberal Senator launched a lawsuit last week for aggravated damages over an Instagram story posted in July and a follow-up Tweet.

Ms Higgins claimed on Instagram Senator Reynolds “continues to harass me through the media”, before urging her former boss to “stop”.

The writ filed in the Western Australian Supreme Court also shows Senator Reynolds is claiming Ms Higgins’ social media activity represent a breach of a March 2021 deed settlement which included a non-disparagement clause.

She is seeking two injunctions which would prohibit Ms Higgins from further publishing defamatory material and from future breaches of the deed.

Ms Higgins took to Twitter on July 6 to claim Senator Reynolds issued the concerns notice and said she was “considering my legal options”.

She then deleted her account only days after hitting out at the continued release of her text message correspondence in late July.

Mr Drumgold, who resigned from the office on Sunday, conceded he made mistakes in the high-profile rape case.

But the former DPP disputed many of the report’s adverse findings levelled at him, and denied that he “engaged in deliberate or underhanded conduct” in the trial.

The trial of Mr Lehrmann was delayed multiple times before commencing in October last year. After more than a week of deliberation the jury was dismissed over juror misconduct.

While the retrial was given a tentative date of February 20, 2023, Mr Drumgold decided against proceeding on the grounds of concern for Ms Higgins’ mental health.

Mr Lehrmann pleaded not guilty and has maintained he never had sexual relations with Ms Higgins.

https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/politics/absolutely-awful-to-me-brittany-higgins-hits-out-at-police-in-response-to-damning-sofronoff-inquiry-findings/news-story/3e87ae0dfbd9a0a5ab926cb6c568c9e9

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19326721

File: 5d42fb6746f6b20⋯.jpg (302.81 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Liberal_senator_Linda_Reyn….jpg)

File: 5e6f7f2982fcfcf⋯.jpg (90.65 KB,1280x720,16:9,ACT_director_of_public_pro….jpg)

>>19289705

>>19308125

>>19289887

Linda Reynolds blasts ‘social crusader’ ACT DPP Shane Drumgold

JANET ALBRECHTSEN and STEPHEN RICE - AUGUST 8, 2023

Former defence minister Linda Reynolds has criticised outgoing ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold for his treatment of her in the witness box during the rape trial of Bruce Lehrmann, and for comments he made as he resigned from the position, saying when she first read them, she “thought it was a joke”.

“If there was ever any doubt of the need for the Sofronoff inquiry, the DPP’s own statement justified it,” Senator Reynolds told The Australian. “It was clearly the voice of a social crusader, not a DPP, and it was clear to me that it was in his mind, the ends justified the means.”

Senator Reynolds gave evidence at the rape trial of Mr Lehrmann after Brittany Higgins claimed she had told her then boss she had been raped. Senator Reynolds testified that Ms Higgins had never made that claim.

During the trial, Mr Drumgold told the jury “political forces” explained the delay in Ms Higgins’ complaint to the police, and that “it is abundantly clear from the evidence and actions of Senator Reynolds during this trial that those political forces were still a factor”.

Mr Drumgold alleged strong political forces on numerous occasions during the trial.

However, Mr Sofronoff found “there was not a single piece of evidence that anyone had applied pressure upon Ms Higgins that could legitimately be described as ‘strong political forces’”.

During the inquiry Mr Drumgold admitted he was wrong to believe there had been any kind of political interference in the case.

Senator Reynolds said: “It sounds like the plot of a great political thriller, that these forces were at play in Parliament House, but anybody who knows anything knows there is no way that as a minister, either Michaelia Cash or I could have influenced the conduct of an investigation by the Australian Federal Police.

“It’s just such a serious allegation, it’s saying that we perverted the course of justice. Well, I think this has shown that he’s the one – by being an activist – who’s perverted the course of justice.”

In his resignation statement Mr Drumgold said he had complained about the way police handled the case because it was “reflective of the chronic problem in Australia with the way our legal institutions deal with allegations of sexual violence”.

He highlighted several statistics he said showed low numbers of sexual assault cases reported and prosecuted, especially in the ACT.

“He’s admitted that’s how he handled the case – because the numbers were low,” Senator Reynolds said. “But each case in our judicial system has to be conducted on its merits in accordance with the rules.

“You can’t just turn this into a quota to say, ‘well, my numbers are low so therefore I’m going to do everything I can to get this conviction regardless of the truth’, and treat witnesses like myself and others in a way that’s most likely to result in a conviction.

“Justice has to be blind and he lost sight of that. As Mr Sofronoff found, he was not truthful, he lied. It’s untenable for our justice system because everybody, whether you are a defendant or a complainant, you need to have confidence that the justice system is going to be objective and focused on the truth.”

Senator Reynolds said it was no excuse for Mr Drumgold to say he had come from an underprivileged background, or grown up on a Housing Commission estate.

“There can be no excuse for a DPP to lie to the judge. Statistics, background, nothing, no excuses. They’re not fit to be a DPP, because it doesn’t matter what your background is, you have to be fair and equal to everybody.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/linda-reynolds-blasts-social-crusader-act-dpp-shane-drumgold/news-story/d99e072639b05186d922150da62f5dab

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19326748

File: 54e117166083d9e⋯.jpg (198.13 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Shane_Drumgold_resigned_at….jpg)

File: 98a91de6140190b⋯.jpg (119.94 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann_is_question….jpg)

>>19284047

>>19289705

>>19308125

ACT government weighs charges against Shane Drumgold after Sofronoff report

STEPHEN RICE - AUGUST 8, 2023

1/2

The ACT government has ­endorsed findings that its chief prosecutor, Shane ­Drumgold, acted grossly unethically, but the capital’s Labor-Greens administration will not investigate other cases he led and has not decided whether to charge him.

On Monday afternoon, the Barr government released the full ­report of the Sofronoff inquiry, announcing it supported its 10 recommendations but saying it did not consider it necessary to look at any of the 18 cases Mr Drumgold conducted or participated in since his appointment as Director of Public Prosecutions in 2019.

Mr Drumgold has announced his resignation as DPP and conceded he made mistakes in his prosecution of Bruce Lehrmann for the alleged rape of Brittany Higgins but rejected the key findings of the inquiry that he had lied to the Supreme Court and engaged in serious malpractice and grossly unethical conduct.

In an extraordinary move, ACT Chief Minister Andrew Barr suggested inquiry chairman Walter Sofronoff could face charges or a referral to the national corruption watchdog over the premature leaking of his report into the handling of the trial of former Liberal staffer Bruce Lehrmann.

Mr Drumgold claimed the early release of the report had ­“denied him procedural fairness”.

ACT Attorney-General Shane Rattenbury on Monday said the government was reviewing its ­options following the findings of the Sofronoff review and had written to Mr ­Drumgold inviting a response “before the government takes a final ­decision.”

Mr Rattenbury said the report, in his view, “meets the threshold under Section 28 of the Director of Public Prosecutions Act, which is the standard of misbehaviour in office which can lead to dismissal”.

“On that basis, the government is also considering what other ­options may be available to it,” the Attorney-General said.

Mr Drumgold could face ­charges of attempting to pervert the course of justice or the common law offence of misconduct in public office.

The Office of the DPP will now also face a multimillion-dollar claim by Mr Lehrmann on the grounds of malfeasance, following Mr Sofronoff’s findings of gross misconduct by Mr Drumgold.

By contrast, Mr Sofronoff found police investigators and their immediate superior officers “performed their duties in absolute good faith, with great determination although faced with obstacles, and put together a sound case”.

The key findings of the ­Sofronoff report were leaked to The Australian and published last week.

Mr Barr criticised the leaking of the report to media outlets prior to its official release, saying the move was very disappointing.

“Mr Sofronoff has confirmed to me in writing that he provided a copy of the report to a newspaper columnist and a broadcast journalist,” Mr Barr said, suggesting these had been provided under embargo.

The Australian did not breach an embargo and will not reveal the source of the leak.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19326751

File: a328118a7974d92⋯.jpg (378.46 KB,1280x1440,8:9,THE_SOFRONOFF_INQUIRY_S_KE….jpg)

>>19326748

2/2

Mr Barr said “a reasonably straight reading” of the Inquiries Act would indicate Mr Sofronoff had breached the law by providing journalists with copies of the ­report prior to its release by the government.

“We will consider our position in relation to that,” the Chief Minister said.

“I’m not making any pre-judgments at this point. I think there is a degree of objectivity that is required in assessing whether this constitutes a breach.”

Mr Barr said Mr Sofronoff’s actions had been “a significant lapse of judgment” but “a question of whether there are any mitigating circumstances remains to be seen”.

Mr Barr also suggested the government might refer the ­conduct of the inquiry to the ACT Integrity Commission but said he remained confident in Mr ­Sofronoff’s findings and recommendations.

The government said it had written to Mr Sofronoff and received a response from him that was now subject to a Freedom of Information request.

It would also consider changes to the Inquiries Act to strengthen provisions relating to the obligation of non-disclosure of information prior to the formal release of an inquiry report.

The government said its examination of Mr Drumgold’s previous cases found most were appellate, meaning the facts and evidence had already been determined and what was in issue was the findings or sentence based on those facts.

He appeared at first instance, or was briefed to appear at first instance, in only three matters, the government said, two of which were not the subject of any significant dispute between the parties.

The other matter involved a trial for murder of which Mr Drumgold had carriage until approximately two weeks before the trial commenced, at which point it was re-briefed to a private barrister who appeared as counsel for the prosecution during the trial.

The Barr government said on the material available at this point, it did not consider a more detailed examination was warranted. “Defendants in historic and current matters have the opportunity to raise any specific concerns through existing judicial processes,” it said.

Mr Sofronoff ruled that every one of the allegations made by Mr Drumgold that sparked the inquiry was baseless and the chief prosecutor “did not act with fairness and detachment as was required by his role”.

“The result has been a public inquiry, which was not justified by any of his allegations, that has caused lasting pain to many people and which has demonstrated his allegations to be not just incorrect, but wholly false and without any rational basis,” he concluded.

“The cost of a six-month public inquiry … has been huge.”

Deputy DPP Anthony Williamson SC, who has been acting in the position since Mr Drumgold went on leave in May, will continue in the role while the government considers who will get the top job.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/act-government-wont-look-at-shane-drumgolds-past-cases-will-investigate-sofronoff-report-leak/news-story/610b35221c967150b421e28559285d99

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19326761

File: fe3356a36403049⋯.jpg (53.57 KB,800x600,4:3,Ambassador_to_the_US_Kevin….jpg)

>>19243381

Assange pursuit 'gone on for too long', Kevin Rudd says

Tess Ikonomou - August 9 2023

Kevin Rudd says the United States' pursuit of Julian Assange has "gone on for too long" and he will continue to express Australia's concerns.

During a visit to Australia as part of high level talks, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said Mr Assange was accused of "very serious criminal conduct" .

Asked how he was continuing to press Australia's position to the US as ambassador, Mr Rudd said his responsibility to engage on behalf of all Australians included Mr Assange.

"As for Secretary Blinken's statements recently, that's to be anticipated from the administration, reflecting their concerns about the history of the case," he told reporters in Canberra on Wednesday.

"We in Australia have our own concerns that we continue to reflect and my job as Australia's leading diplomat in the US is to engage effectively, which usually means silently with the US administration, in order to maximise our prospects.

"The prime minister has already made clear that this has gone on for too long. I agree with him."

Since winning office in 2022, the Albanese government has been advocating for the US pursuit of Assange to end.

Mr Assange, an Australian citizen, published a trove of classified documents more than a decade ago.

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/8302256/assange-pursuit-gone-on-for-too-long-kevin-rudd-says/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19326780

File: f4af3017064c457⋯.jpg (306.67 KB,2400x1440,5:3,Prior_to_his_appointment_a….jpg)

>>19321154

Trump’s potential return to White House up to American people, says Kevin Rudd

Australian ambassador to US takes more diplomatic angle after previously saying Trump re-election could ‘fray’ support for US-Australia alliance

Daniel Hurst - 9 Aug 2023

1/2

The Australian ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, says it is up to the American people whether Donald Trump returns to the White House – an outcome he previously said would “fray” support for the US alliance in Australia.

The former Australian prime minister said on Wednesday that US politics was “a complex beast” and he was focused on keeping on good terms with both sides of the aisle, including former Trump officials.

Rudd said he was also focused on securing US legislation to enable tech collaboration under the Aukus pact, but likened it to “a complex process of sausage-making”.

Rudd is well connected in Washington and is close to senior figures in the Biden administration and establishment Republicans, but has previously been an outspoken critic of Trump.

Prior to his appointment as ambassador, which took effect earlier this year, Rudd called Trump “the most destructive president in history”.

Rudd told Guardian Australia before the 2020 election that if Trump were re-elected, “the overall fabric of domestic political support in this country and among other American allies around the world will begin to more fundamentally fray”.

Rudd had a more diplomatic message when he spoke to reporters outside Old Parliament House in Canberra on Wednesday.

Asked what preparations he was making for the possibility of another Trump administration, Rudd said both the US and Australia were “robust democracies”.

Since taking up the diplomatic posting, Rudd said he had “worked comfortably and seamlessly” with House Speaker, Kevin McCarthy, and Senate minority leader, Mitch McConnell.

Rudd said he had also spoken with Republican House and Senate leaders from across the US congressional system “and also with former members of the Trump administration from last time round”.

“That’s our job as an embassy and that’s my job as ambassador. What the good burghers [people] of the United States choose to do in their own electoral process is a matter for them – from which, thankfully, Australian ambassadors are immune from comment.”

Rudd’s comment was an adaptation of “the good burghers of Griffith” – a phrase he had previously used in reference to the voters in the electorate he previously held in the Australian parliament.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19326786

File: 0e8907e5e59e617⋯.jpg (487.21 KB,825x941,825:941,KR_15.jpg)

>>19326780

2/2

Despite Trump facing multiple indictments, including over the attempt to overturn the 2020 election results, the former president remains the frontrunner to secure the Republican nomination for the 2024 election.

Although it remains very early in the cycle, the current general election polling suggests Joe Biden and Trump are closely matched.

Rudd expressed confidence in the prospect of passing US legislation to enable both elements of the Aukus: Australia’s acquisition of nuclear-powered submarines and collaboration on other advanced defence technology.

After speaking with committee chairs and ranking members in the US Senate and Congress, Rudd said Aukus enjoyed “quite a remarkable level of bipartisan support” but there would always be “pretty colourful debate”.

Republicans have raised concerns the US could fall short on its own needs when selling Australia at least three Virginia-class submarines in the 2030s, but Rudd said it was normal for elected members to reflect “their own industry policy concerns and their own constituency concerns”.

Australia has already earmarked about $3bn over the next four years to boost the submarine sustainment and production capacity of the US and the UK.

Most of this is expected to go to the US, and Rudd played down the idea Australia would be asked to tip in more funds.

“No one that I’ve met in the United States has challenged what we’re proposing to do and the impact of what we ourselves will do in terms of adding to their industrial capacity,” he said.

Hinting the US may make further investments in its own submarine industrial base, Rudd predicted the issue would be resolved through negotiations “between the administration and relevant senators”.

Rudd said he would continue to convey the Australian government’s position that the case against the WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange had “gone on for too long”, but likely behind the scenes “in order to maximise our prospects”.

Rudd was speaking on his way into a Tech Council of Australia event, where he said Australia and the US were serious about collaborating on renewable energy and critical minerals.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/aug/09/donald-trump-2024-us-election-kevin-rudd

Kevin Rudd Tweet

Donald Trump is a traitor to the West. Murdoch was Trump’s biggest backer. And Murdoch’s Fox Television backs Putin too. What rancid treachery.

https://twitter.com/MrKRudd/status/1497863031497564161

https://archive.ph/gbMyl

Trump defends praise of Putin, makes strongest hint yet of a run for president in 2024

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/02/26/trump-2024/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19326823

File: ab1c89b6c0f2f1e⋯.jpg (56.14 KB,1279x720,1279:720,An_AI_generated_image_in_N….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19308112

Indigenous voice to parliament: AI No group denies relationship with Warren Mundine and Jacinta Price

REMY VARGA - AUGUST 7, 2023

The man behind a No campaign group that has drawn criticism for using AI generated videos has denied having a formal or informal relationship with Warren Mundine or Country-Liberal senator Jacinta Price.

The ABC was forced to issue a statement of clarification after former NAIDOC co-chair and journalist John Paul Janke said voice opponents were using AI to make it appear “like it is an ­Indigenous person supporting the No campaign”.

Phillip Mobbs, who is running Constitutional Equality, said AI was a cost-effective way to create campaign videos that reflected multicultural Australia. “What you’ll observe is the avatar is clearly not Indigenous but (it) does reflect the multicultural society we live in,” he said.

“It is a person of colour, a brown person of colour, who reflects the vast bulk of our wonderful multicultural society.

“It’s a false accusation [and] again notice the Yes campaign is introducing race into the debate.”

Mr Mobbs, whose background is in education, said he had no relationship with Senator Price, Mr Mundine or No campaign group Advance Australia.

The Constitutional Equality Facebook page is followed by about 2000 people.

Janke on Sunday told ABC program Insiders that the No campaign was behind the use of AI and doubled down when questioned by host David Speers on whether it was the official No campaign or a random group.

“They are supporting obviously different voices, and they are under the guise of moderate ­voices against the voice like it’s Australians for Unity, but they are using AI of a Blak character supporting the No case,” he said.

The ABC later issued a statement clarifying that the Australians for Unity campaign, which is co-ordinated by Mr Mundine and Senator Price, was not affiliated with the AI generated videos.

An SBS spokesman said it continued to support Janke for raising awareness of misinformation and disinformation around the proposed voice on social media.

“Some of these videos using AI have attracted over 85,000 views and his comments highlight the important discussion needed around the nature of such campaign techniques,” he said.

“On NITV and through our coverage across the SBS network, we’re focused on ensuring all ­Australians have access to accurate news and information during this debate.”

Mr Mundine and Senator Price deny using AI in their campaign materials.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-ai-no-group-denies-relationship-with-warren-mundine-and-jacinta-price/news-story/8ed2cb98096a74098ad482ca1a84c943

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19326866

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19222755

>>19297392

>>19314716

Indigenous voice to parliament referendum ‘the best chance to shape treaty’, says Thomas Mayo

ROSIE LEWIS - AUGUST 9, 2023

1/2

Prominent Yes campaigner Thomas Mayo says Indigenous Australians who signed the Uluru Statement from the Heart ­wanted to pursue a voice first “so that we could have the best possible say on the Makarrata commission” to oversee agreement-making and truth-telling.

Mr Mayo made the direct link between the voice and treaty as fellow leading Yes supporters – including Megan Davis and Tom Calma – backed Anthony Albanese in warning this referendum would be Australians’ only chance to pass constitutional recognition in a generation.

The Prime Minister, who has faced constant questioning over a Makarrata commission and treaty after declaring the voice wasn’t about treaty, declared the No “scare campaign” was “running out of steam”.

He accused the Coalition of being “obsessed” with the voice while refusing to say if he supported a national treaty during a question time that both sides of politics used to scrutinise the referendum.

Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney acknowledged the government had committed funds for a Makarrata commission after vowing to spend $27.7m to implement the Uluru Statement from the Heart – which asks for voice, treaty and truth – as the Coalition questioned why $21.9m had been provisioned in the contingency reserve towards the body.

In a Zoom panel on Tuesday with independent Wentworth MP Allegra Spender and journalist Kerry O’Brien, Mr Mayo recalled presenting the strategy of the 250 signatories to the Uluru Statement from the Heart shortly before the statement was read by Professor Davis for the first time in 2017.

“Here I was, a fella that hadn’t been involved in national, really national campaigns before, presenting the strategy going forward, which was simply that first we would pursue a voice and so that we could have the best possible say on the Makarrata commission to supervise agreement-making and truth-telling to the nation,” Mr Mayo said.

“One thing that we predicted was that it (the Uluru Statement from the Heart) would be likely that it would be dismissed to begin with, because you know, it wasn’t just symbolic reform. It’s a form of recognition that gives our people greater fairness.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19326877

File: 8115d338e96498d⋯.jpg (203.16 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Thomas_Mayo_told_a_Wentwor….jpg)

>>19326866

2/2

Professor Davis, an architect of the Uluru Statement from the Heart, and Professor Calma, who with Marcia Langton co-designed the voice in their report, as well as conservative voice campaigners Julian Leeser and Greg Craven on Tuesday agreed with Mr Albanese the coming referendum was a once-in-a-generation opportunity.

Professors Davis and Calma ­rejected the Coalition’s call for constitutional recognition alongside legislated local and regional voices.

“Referendums are too costly to conduct, including working to inform the community, to expect another referendum on this subject will be conducted again,” Professor Calma said.

“The disinformation that they (the Coalition) are peddling re the voice gives me no confidence that they would support a future referendum even if it was just specifically about recognition. Many will fade into obscurity by the next election and they will be ‘OK’ – they have nothing to lose and have lost nothing.”

Professor Davis said the Coalition’s DNA was not about listening and the gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians widened during its eight years in power “and so did the group of self-serving elites who gorge off an industry of disadvantage”.

“Albanese is the first prime minister in a long time to understand what we are saying about the structural problem that plagues communities,” she said.

“We don’t contemplate a loss. We never have. A loss in this referendum is more of the same. A loss is equivalent to doing nothing. It’s an endorsement of the status quo. A No vote does nothing for mob on the ground. This time and opportunity will never come again.”

Mr Leeser, who quit the Liberal frontbench and his position as opposition Indigenous Australians spokesman so he could campaign in support of the voice, said referendums happened rarely because their debates were all consuming – noting the last time constitutional recognition was put to the Australian people was in 1999 on the ­republic.

“The debates demand a country’s attention for an extended period. That’s why this is a once-in-a-generation shot,” he said.

“With pressing economic problems, I don’t believe the assertion that somehow we can revisit this again in a few years. This is the time for our generation to complete the Constitution.”

Professor Craven said the message to undecided voters who wanted constitutional recognition but were unsure about the voice was: “If you do want constitutional recognition you are going to have to take this package. It is literally insane to assume that some better package is going to appear magically out of the ether.”

Professor Craven said a future referendum solely on constitutional recognition, without an enshrined voice, would also fail.

“The public would say ‘we’ve decided this issue, why are you asking us again’?”

Attempting to defuse Mr Albanese’s attack, Peter Dutton told his party room on Tuesday the opposition supported constitutional recognition and local bodies.

“The changes to the Constitution proposed by the Albanese government would be permanent. Unintended consequences would also be permanent and any notion that a future government would attempt to go back to the Australian public and ask to wind it back are fanciful,” the Opposition Leader said, according to a Coalition spokeswoman.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-referendum-the-best-chance-to-shape-treaty-says-thomas-mayo/news-story/f1beb463cd38d711a2585d9c948198eb

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDQMqb0EPdU

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19327086

File: 3c83d9818f13bd6⋯.mp4 (15.85 MB,640x360,16:9,House_Question_Time_8_Augu….mp4)

>>19222755

>>19297392

Senator says Uluru Statement ‘confirmed’ as 26 pages by NIAA, after Albo blasts claim as ‘QAnon’ conspiracy

Senator Jacinta Price says the full Uluru Statement, which talks of “reparations”, has been “confirmed” as being 26 pages long by the agency that produced the documents.

Frank Chung - August 9, 2023

1/2

Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price says the Uluru Statement from the Heart has been “confirmed” as being 26 pages long by the agency that produced the documents under freedom of information, as she called on Anthony Albanese to “come clean” after the Prime Minister derided the claim as a “QAnon” style conspiracy theory on Tuesday.

The Opposition’s Indigenous Australians spokeswoman told Sky News on Tuesday night that the National Indigenous Australians Agency (NIAA) had confirmed to her office that the full statement, contained in a lengthy FOI release to the Northern Territory Senator earlier this year, was indeed 26 pages.

“My office today sought clarification from the FOI team at NIAA to determine whether the Uluru Statement from the Heart is simply one page or the full 26 pages,” she told Sky News host Peta Credlin. “My staff got a phone call at 12.54 this afternoon with a verbal clarification that the document is, in fact, the 26 pages and not just, of course, the one page.”

In a statement to news.com.au on Wednesday, an NIAA spokeswoman said the Uluru Statement from the Heart “is a one-page document, confirmed by the authors Noel Pearson, Pat Anderson AO and Professor Dr Megan Davis”.

“The National Indigenous Australians Agency (NIAA) released a document under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (FOI Act), containing the one-page Uluru Statement from the Heart, followed by 25 pages of background information and excerpts of regional dialogues that informed the one-page Uluru Statement from the Heart,” she said.

“Jody Broun, NIAA chief executive officer, has written to Senator Price to provide clarification.”

Debate over the 2017 document has been raging since last week, after Credlin accused Mr Albanese of misleading voters by repeatedly claiming the Uluru Statement — which he has likened to the Gettysburg Address — was a “two-minute” read that can “fit on one A4 page”.

Credlin urged Australians to read the “full” 26 pages, the tenor of which she said was one of “anger, grievance, separatism, and the need to undo, as far as possible, the last 240 years of Australian history”.

The NIAA documents, which also include minutes from 13 “regional dialogue” consultation events with around 1200 Indigenous people that informed the final wording of the Uluru Statement, raise the prospect of a “financial settlement” and “reparations” to Indigenous Australians for “past, present and future criminal acts” under a proposed treaty, with suggestions that “a fixed percentage” of GDP be handed over through “rates, land tax and royalties”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19327118

File: 845e6d50cdb43c8⋯.jpg (754.72 KB,1240x1754,620:877,House_of_Representatives_2….jpg)

File: 2bffe857012bb63⋯.jpg (301.56 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Anthony_Albanese_holds_up_….jpg)

File: 84a6c852a0a3cb7⋯.jpg (348.54 KB,2048x1536,4:3,The_PM_mocked_the_QAnon_co….jpg)

File: 0897ebe2894da4a⋯.jpg (351.5 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Senator_Jacinta_Nampijinpa….jpg)

File: 745b88f7abbd025⋯.pdf (1.88 MB,foi_2223_016.pdf)

>>19327086

2/2

The 26-page version of the Uluru Statement states that “Makarrata”, or treaty-making, was the “culmination of our agenda” and that “by making agreements at the highest level, the negotiation process with the Australian government allows First Nations to express our sovereignty”.

The Coalition last week seized on Mr Albanese’s promise after entering office to enact the Uluru Statement “in full”, using the prospect of a treaty to attack the Voice referendum as public support for the proposal plummets nationwide.

Mr Albanese used Question Time on Tuesday to blast the claims as a “QAnon” style conspiracy theory.

“That is a conspiracy in search of a theory, Mr Speaker,” the PM said.

“It is something that has been out there, like a whole lot of the QAnon theories, we have all sorts of conspiracy stuff out there, but this is a ripper. That is the Uluru Statement from the Heart on an A4 bit of paper. That is it. But what we have here is the conspiracy theories colliding with each other. They’re struggling to get their scares straight. I mean, what role did Marcia Langton play in the faking of the moon landing, Mr Speaker? What was the role of the Uluru Statement from the Heart in that?”

He stressed it was “absolutely nonsense”.

“There’s a whole lot of projection going on here, Mr Speaker, more projection than a film festival,” he said.

“And it’s coming from those opposite, who do not want to debate the facts. Take what is in the Uluru Statement, that is an eloquent request from Indigenous Australians to come together as a nation.”

Labor MP Tanya Plibersek also branded the claims a “conspiracy theory”.

“Libs and Nats jumped the shark today on the Voice,” she tweeted.

“In question time they are asking about an internet conspiracy theory that the Uluru Statement from the Heart is not one page — but 26! Sigh. Of course people are entitled to their own opinions, but they’re not entitled to their own facts.”

https://www.news.com.au/finance/economy/australian-economy/senator-says-uluru-statement-confirmed-as-26-pages-by-niaa-after-albo-blasts-claim-as-qanon-conspiracy/news-story/407fdb76c427f16a6b8f6e457143466e

https://www.righttoknow.org.au/request/uluru_statement_from_the_heart

https://www.niaa.gov.au/sites/default/files/foi-log/foi-2223-016.pdf

https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Hansard/Hansard_Display?bid=chamber/hansardr/27159/&sid=0000

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FS9t1ug86hM

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19333302

File: 89235f7f1b88936⋯.jpg (253.33 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_in_questi….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19327086

Indigenous voice to parliament: Anthony Albanese strikes back on length of Uluru Statement

ROSIE LEWIS and PAIGE TAYLOR - AUGUST 10, 2023

1/2

Anthony Albanese has attempted to slap down Coalition accusations the Uluru Statement from the Heart is more than one page as “absolute conspiracy and nonsense”, amid claims the Indigenous Australians agency has faced political pressure to fall into line with the government.

The No campaign is intensifying debate over whether the Uluru statement is one or more pages as the Coalition points to previous comments from Megan Davis – an architect of the statement – that it was actually about 18 to 20 pages.

The Coalition is claiming the government is wrong to say the Uluru Statement is one page, arguing the document is 26 pages and includes statements about invasion, treaty and genocide.

“Professor Megan Davis, a key member of the Prime Minister’s referendum working group, has said and I quote, ‘the Uluru Statement from the Heart isn’t just the first one-page statement, it’s actually a very lengthy document of about 18 to 20 pages’. Does the Prime Minister agree?” asked Deputy Liberal leader ­Sussan Ley.

Mr Albanese fired back, referencing Professor Davis’s statement from Wednesday instead, in which she said: “Professor Megan Davis confirms the Uluru Statement from the Heart is one page, comprising 439 words.

“The Uluru statement is supported by other documents contained in the publicly available Referendum Council report that reflect and document the many regional dialogues and consultations leading up to the establishment of the Uluru statement.”

Writing exclusively in The Australian, Professor Davis says: “Politicians of bad faith like Pauline Hanson and the Coalition, who are on a unity ticket, are pointing to a Henry Parkes Oration I gave in 2018, where I say the Uluru Statement is not only the one pager, that there’s 18 to 20 more pages for Australians to read. This is alluding to the many pieces of information that informed the Uluru Statement or provide context to the statement.

“I can assure everyone that if the Statement from the Heart was 26 random pages, as some are contending, we would have read 26 pages out, footnotes and all. If it was 26 pages, it would be called Uluru War & Peace. But it’s not. It is a one-page invitation to the Australian people; a hand of friendship, compelling for its brevity and its generosity.”

Professor Davis was countering The Australian’s columnist and Sky News host Peta Credlin, a critic of the voice to parliament, who said Mr Albanese wanted to pretend the longer version of the statement “doesn’t exist or has no status”.

Mr Albanese, who tabled various fact checks about claims on the length and substance of the Uluru Statement in parliament, dismissed the idea his government was trying to cover up a longer version.

“This is absolute conspiracy and nonsense that shows that they’ve become a fringe political party. They are making One Nation look like a mainstream political party with this nonsense,” he said.

“(Former Referendum Council co-chair) Mark Leibler made it clear last night that, again, ‘I was at Uluru for the national convention and witnessed the adoption of the statement – it was one page’.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19333306

File: 763620e3a5493a9⋯.jpg (1.01 MB,2048x1152,16:9,The_Uluru_Statement_from_t….jpg)

>>19333302

2/2

Opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price received a letter on Wednesday from National Indigenous Australians Agency chief executive Jody Broun, saying the statement was one page.

“The Uluru Statement from the Heart is one page, signed by the delegates at the National Convention in 2017,” Ms Broun wrote.

“The authors of the Uluru Statement from the Heart have confirmed this.”

In a letter responding to Ms Broun, Senator Nampijinpa Price said the claims were at odds with previous advice provided to her by the agency’s Freedom of Information team.

Senator Nampijinpa Price said the NIAA’s FOI team had in July confirmed to her office that “Document 14” in the FOI release – which is 26 pages long – was the Uluru statement and that email confirmation would be forthcoming later in the day. That email was never delivered.

“I note the escalation of this issue from the FOI team to the CEO of the NIAA likewise raises questions,” Senator Nampijinpa Price wrote.

“One very serious question raised is what political pressure has been applied to the NIAA that led to this change in position? Australians deserve transparency and accountability. My colleagues and I look forward to pursuing this matter vigorously in Senate estimates.”

Senator Nampijinpa Price said that previous NIAA advice regarding the “long” Uluru Statement was at odds with comments made by Professor Davis.

“On multiple occasions, Professor Davis has referred to a longer version of the Uluru Statement from the Heart,” she wrote. “I’m sure you will appreciate these conflicting accounts raise serious questions and concerns.”

The Referendum Council’s 2017 final report includes extracts from what it says is the Uluru Statement from the Heart. Those extracts include quotes that are identical to those in the 26-page document referred to by the Coalition and released by the NIAA under Freedom of Information.

The extracts include statements such as the invasion that started at Botany Bay is the origin of the fundamental grievance between the old and new Australians; that treaty or agreement-making through Makarrata is the culmination of Indigenous Australia’s agenda; and that the Tasmanian genocide and the Black War waged by the colonists reveals the truth about the evil time of the frontier wars.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-anthony-albanese-strikes-back-on-length-of-uluru-statement/news-story/eefa5e6fe132cdc77ffb03d18c754918

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19333351

File: ecf4dcc4ccd3fa2⋯.jpg (356.47 KB,1429x1906,1429:1906,Anthony_Albanese.jpg)

File: 4798f58c6e734bc⋯.jpg (676.92 KB,1959x2611,1959:2611,Professor_Megan_Davis.jpg)

File: e61f020efd108a3⋯.jpg (1.17 MB,2482x1755,2482:1755,1_2.jpg)

File: 0a8b2d054217ff6⋯.jpg (1.22 MB,2482x1755,2482:1755,3_4.jpg)

File: 748c7e8a0bc33e9⋯.jpg (1.32 MB,2482x1755,2482:1755,5_6.jpg)

>>19222755

>>19327086

Why PM’s backtrack on the Uluru Statement from the Heart won’t wash

PETA CREDLIN - AUGUST 10, 2023

1/3

This week in parliament, Anthony Albanese doubled down on his claim that the Uluru Statement from the Heart is just a simple one-page statement – almost an Australian version, he’s said, of the Gettysburg Address.

He’s doing this because he needs the Uluru Statement to be a benign, uplifting document in order to get his voice referendum passed by voters, and because he needs to deny that the voice is just the first step in “Voice, Treaty, Truth” – a lengthy and complex process that will lead to multi-­billion dollar reparations payments (on top of the near $40bn a year that’s currently spent on Indigenous Australians) and the rewriting of our history as a story of shame.

He’s so keen to bluff people out of referencing the full statement that he denounced the claim that it’s actually a 26-page document as a “conspiracy” worthy of QAnon.

On Wednesday, to justify his claim in the parliament the day before, Albanese produced a statement from Megan Davis, which she issued late on Tuesday night. “The Uluru Statement is just one page,” the statement read. There’s only one problem with this. It’s not what Professor Davis has said repeatedly for years in official speeches, documents and in her many media appearances.

Professor Davis, who was one of the Uluru Statement’s main ­authors and a key member of the PM’s hand-picked Referendum Working Group, said in her 2018 Parkes Oration: “The Uluru Statement from the Heart isn’t just the first one-page statement; it’s actually a very lengthy document of about 18 to 20 pages, and a very powerful part of this document reflects what happened in the dialogues”.

In May 2022, she wrote in this newspaper that: “The Uluru Statement … is occasionally mistaken as merely a one-page document ….in totality (it) is closer to 18 pages and includes … a lengthy narrative called ‘Our Story’.”

And in November last year, she spoke at the Sydney Peace Prize Award Ceremony and Lecture saying: “It’s very important for Australians to read the (Uluru) Statement, and the statement is also much bigger, it’s actually 18 pages.”

It’s because this part – after page one – is so full of anger, entitlement and the demand to atone for the past 240 years of Australian history that the PM now wants to pretend that it doesn’t exist or has no status. In other words, it is political dynamite.

Then there’s the official report of the Referendum Council, co-chaired by Pat Anderson and Mark Leibler, about the constitutional consultations that culminated in the 2017 Uluru meeting that endorsed the Statement from the Heart, which is the foundation of the voice campaign.

The council’s final report starts with the one-page version of the Uluru Statement that the PM so frequently eulogises. But then, from page 16 of the final report, there are many passages of what it says are “extracts from the Uluru Statement from the Heart” including “Our Story”, as referenced by Professor Davis.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19333356

File: a1d3d5d727d635a⋯.jpg (1.13 MB,2482x1755,2482:1755,7_8.jpg)

File: 244808109b366bf⋯.jpg (1.23 MB,2482x1755,2482:1755,9_10.jpg)

File: 0bb1a46e9c5ad27⋯.jpg (1.17 MB,2482x1755,2482:1755,11_12.jpg)

File: da3525124888406⋯.jpg (1.04 MB,2482x1755,2482:1755,13_14.jpg)

File: de858752a4117f5⋯.jpg (728.45 KB,2482x1755,2482:1755,15_16.jpg)

>>19333351

2/3

Here are some representative quotes: “The invasion that started at Botany Bay is the origin of the fundamental grievance between the old and new Australians.”

“This is the time of the Frontier Wars when massacres, disease and poison decimated First Nations … The Tasmanian Genocide and the Black War waged by the colonists reveals the truth about this evil time.”

“The taking of our land without consent represents our funda­mental grievance against the … Crown.” “Makarrata is another word for Treaty … it is the culmination of our agenda.” “Any voice to parliament should be designed so that it could support and promote a treaty making process.”

“Treaty would be the vehicle to achieve self-determination, autonomy and self-government.” “The true history of colonisation must be told: the genocides, the massacres, the wars and the ongoing injustices and discrimination.”

Lest there be any doubt, these are all passages from the larger Uluru Statement as highlighted and confirmed in the Referendum Council’s final report. These passages are identical with those in the 26-page document, released in March under FOI, which the National Indigenous Australians Agency officially described as the Uluru Statement from the Heart – or did until Wednesday.

On Wednesday, the National Indigenous Australians Agency’s chief executive wrote to Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price and said that “the Uluru Statement from the Heart is one page, signed by the delegates at the National Convention in 2017. The authors of the statement … have confirmed this. The additional pages … are background and excerpts from the regional dialogues”.

The problem with this letter – and why it smacks of bullying by the government – is that the NIAA had confirmed just a fortnight back that the full-26 page “Document 14”, released under FOI, is indeed the Statement from the Heart.

Consider this email exchange between the FOI applicant and the NIAA.

On July 19, the applicant wrote: “for the avoidance of doubt, I am seeking access to the complete un-redacted document that is referred to as the Uluru Statement from the Heart”. The next day, the official reply came back: “the information you have requested is published on the NIAA disclosure log … as Document 14”. For further confirmation, the FOI applicant then asked: “can you confirm that the document you referred me to (Document 14 …) is the Uluru Statement from the Heart…?”

The following day came official confirmation “that the extracts in the Referendum Council’s final ­report are taken from the Uluru Statement from the Heart”.

As someone with long personal experience, I think I can surmise what’s just happened between the government and the bureaucracy. At some point in the past couple of days – once the full Statement for the Heart became a big political headache for the PM – the backroom operators started scrambling because they knew the full Uluru Statement would only harden voters against the voice. When Jacinta Price’s office then had oral confirmation that matched the FOI written advice, the NIAA boss was forced to weigh in and backtrack.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19333375

File: 4492d618f15405e⋯.jpg (1.35 MB,2482x1755,2482:1755,17_18.jpg)

File: 8d9bf6da247fae1⋯.jpg (1.27 MB,2482x1755,2482:1755,19_20.jpg)

File: f20190f3bd9c9bd⋯.jpg (1005.91 KB,2482x1755,2482:1755,21_22.jpg)

File: 1b7ed1a7d7deab6⋯.jpg (755.07 KB,3723x1755,1241:585,23_24.jpg)

File: 02fe12981efd04c⋯.jpg (466.07 KB,3510x1241,3510:1241,25_26.jpg)

>>19333356

3/3

It’s hard to avoid the conclusion that, under pressure from the government, junior officials have been thrown under a bus in a tawdry attempt to rescue the PM from a hole of his own making.

In fairness to the PM, who is not a details man, he may not have known about the other 25 pages of the Uluru Statement when he pledged at least 34 times to implement it “in full”. But the activists who drafted the statement certainly knew what it contained, as Professor Davis’s repeated statements show. She cannot now credibly backtrack and nor can the NIAA.

The use of the term Makarrata, even in the sanitised one-page Uluru summary, gives the game away. This is a Yolngu word meaning a retribution ritual, a disabling spearing, to atone for a wrong that’s been committed. Hence the Makarrata Commission – which even the one-page version of the statement demands – is essentially a payback punishment for the ­supposed injustice of the settlement of Australia.The very fact that the government now wants to bury the full statement says everything about what will happen to Australia if the voice gets up: Voice. Treaty. Truth. Voice first. Then Treaty and Truth.

It’s more like a log of claims against the Australian nation for a litany of wrongs (unrelieved by any countervailing benefits) that have supposedly been perpetrated against Aboriginal people. This is what all Australians should be familiar with before casting their votes.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/why-pms-backtrack-on-the-uluru-statement-from-the-heart-wont-wash/news-story/79c2acd753138aa7dfc57c7d25a75ddf

https://www.skynews.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Document-14-1.pdf

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19333412

File: a840c0a8f5ec248⋯.jpg (249.87 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_Uluru_Statement_from_t….jpg)

File: 7d795f313f177e5⋯.jpg (256.74 KB,1429x1905,1429:1905,Pat_Anderson_and_Megan_Dav….jpg)

File: e1ee355d9ad1222⋯.jpg (652.75 KB,1429x1906,1429:1906,Anthony_Albanese.jpg)

>>19222755

>>19327086

Uluru smear job reeks of desperation from No camp

MEGAN DAVIS - AUGUST 10, 2023

1/2

The Uluru Statement from the Heart is one page. It’s very simple. The unceasing attempts from the No campaign to take draft documents from conference rooms seven years ago and transcriptions of butchers paper seven years ago to manufacture a controversy over the Uluru Statement is farcical. It reeks of desperation.

Who would knowingly and willingly mislead the Australian people? Not us. The Referendum Council report and website contains the official documents and they’ve been live online since 2017. It shows the one-page Uluru Statement from the Heart.

Politicians of bad faith like Pauline Hanson and the Coalition, who are on a unity ticket, are pointing to a Henry Parkes Oration I gave in 2018, where I say the Uluru Statement is not only the one pager, that there’s 18-20 more pages for Australians to read. This is alluding to the many pieces of information that informed the Uluru Statement or provide context to the statement.

The 2018 Henry Parkes speech occurred in a post-Turnbull rejection time. It was a community ­education phase and we were encouraging Aussies to read not just the 439-word Uluru one-pager but “Our Story”, the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander story of Australian history. It shows the nuanced stories communities raised in their regions that speak to Australian history and the exigency of a voice. There has never been any attempt to hide it; tellingly, I read “Our Story” in the Henry Parkes Oration in full. It goes to show how deceptive and trivial misinformation is.

I can assure everyone that if the Statement from the Heart was 26 random pages, as some are contending, we would have read 26 pages out, footnotes and all. If it was 26 pages, it would be called Uluru War & Peace. But it’s not. It is a one-page invitation to the Australian people; a hand of friendship, compelling for its brevity and its generosity.

But there is nothing stopping Aussies to go ahead and read the pages that follow to learn more about our history and the work of the dialogues. Pat Anderson and I led that process alongside Noel Pearson, Dalassa Yorkston and Dean Parkin.

We contributed to the early design, with Patrick Dodson, Mick Gooda, Tanya Hosch and many others. We had been tasked by an LNP government and Labor opposition to ask our people what form of constitutional recognition would be meaningful to communities. This was no small exercise.

Few people know more about Indigenous advocacy and engagement than Aunty Pat, who has dedicated her life to listening to our mob to find practical ways to improve their lives. Together, the Indigenous sub-committee for the Referendum Council painstakingly designed and implemented a process that involved 13 meetings, or “dialogues”, held with more than 1200 First Nations people around Australia to discuss the idea of constitutional recognition.

Each of these regional dialogues took place over three days and canvassed the passion, the pain and the hope of those attending. Robust conversations took place, tears were shed, stories were shared. All ideas were discussed – spanning the ultra-conservative to the most radical. The fair and inclusive process run meant everything was put on the table.

The pages now alleged to be a “Trojan Horse” are part of a public report, documenting the distress of our mob and many, many ideas for change. We faithfully recorded them all. Like most conferences do.

After the three days, those present nominated their representatives to attend a constitutional convention at Uluru where a similar deliberative process was run. The result of this significant consultation, including many notes on butchers paper, is the lengthy Referendum Council report and ultimately the middle ground consensus position reflected in the poetic Uluru Statement from the Heart.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19333415

File: 32d89e786488483⋯.jpg (481.7 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_crowd_at_Come_Together….jpg)

>>19333412

2/2

Routinely we have implored Australians over seven years to read the one pager, “Our Story” and the explanation for the reform. The truth-telling element is our story, an Aboriginal version of Australian history. It was written because our people in the dialogues asked why Australians didn’t want to know what has happened to them. But the invitation to the Australian people is one page. The opportunity before us in 2017 was constitutional recognition. The voice is what a robust sample of communities said was recognition.

Had I been warned that a few months out from a historic referendum, some leading No advocates would abandon any semblance of good faith adhesion to the facts in favour of a strategy designed to terrify and confuse Australians, I probably wouldn’t have believed it.

But here we are: forced to respond to the bizarre claims that the Statement from the Heart is not actually the 439-word, one-page document that has been publicly available for seven years – but a random selection of 26 pages of meeting notes and footnotes.

It is hard to explain this confusion. But that is what we now have to do, starting with a refresher here on how the Uluru Statement from the Heart came to be. As co-conveners of the Uluru Dialogue, the unerring focus of Aunty Pat Anderson and me has always been to give Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders a chance to discuss how to construct a brighter future for all of us – and critically, to have their opinions recorded and heard.

We won’t apologise for conducting a process aimed at improving the lives of communities and comprehensively including their voices. And this utterly manufactured smear campaign aimed at increasing the No vote through falsehoods says a lot about the opponents of the voice.

They aren’t interested in Closing the Gap or empowering communities. They are champions of the status quo and seek to maintain First Nations as a political football game with no rules in perpetuity. And the base cynicism these people have for Australians is why their primary vote plummeted to the low thirties in the 2022 federal election.

Like climate change and federal corruption, Australians want solutions not opportunistic politicians. That’s the opportunity Anthony Albanese has provided. Vision and solutions, not more of the same.

Megan Davis is a Cobble Cobble woman who is the Balnaves Chair in Constitutional Law, director of the Indigenous Law Centre at UNSW Law and pro vice-chancellor at UNSW.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/uluru-smear-job-reeks-of-desperation-from-no-camp/news-story/6674a2e58308dee6d23b0afcd93bf163

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19333451

File: 3d7ab31f1cbb4d2⋯.jpg (6.72 MB,7621x5081,7621:5081,Co_chairs_of_the_First_Peo….jpg)

File: eda352915b9d85a⋯.jpg (4.51 MB,8256x5504,3:2,Gary_Murray_speaking_outsi….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19297392

First Peoples’ Assembly members issue warning on ‘No’ vote push

Jack Latimore - August 9, 2023

A rift in the Victorian First Peoples’ Assembly over its support for a national Indigenous Voice to parliament has sparked warnings that looming treaty negotiations with the state government will suffer from any disunity.

The push from a minority faction to reverse the assembly’s formal endorsement of the Voice will be discussed at a meeting of the board on Thursday, but nine members of the representative body say the attempt is doomed to fail.

New member Gary Murray – a community leader descended from multiple clan groups – is part of the faction urging a revisit of the body’s endorsement of the Voice, saying he would put a motion to the floor to reopen debate on the issue, and potentially seek another vote which, he says, could reverse the formal support.

Murray, a long-time critic of the representative structure of the assembly, said a “new batch of members” elected to the 32-member assembly in June did not support the position adopted by the previous assembly.

“We have got to have the discussion. We have got to revisit the position. We need a thorough debate looking at: do we want that position, or how do we improve it? It may be that we reject it,” he said.

But nine assembly members have said the attempt to repeal an endorsement of the Indigenous Voice undermined its strength as it readies to open negotiation talks with the government later this year.

The First Peoples’ Assembly was established in 2019 and is the representative body of traditional owners and First Peoples in Victoria. It is tasked with commencing negotiations on a statewide treaty over the next four years.

Speaking anonymously, the members also said the matter would be discussed at a board meeting on Thursday, but any vote – should a motion be put to the floor – would yield the same result.

One described the bid as a “disappointing and unnecessary distraction”.

“Do we have to re-examine every decision made by the first assembly? It’s not productive. We should be focused on the job ahead,” the member said.

Another member said it would be “extremely difficult” to reverse the formal endorsement of the Voice, since more than half of the newly elected assembly were returning members who voted in favour of it during the last assembly.

Gunditjmara man Rueben Berg, and Wamba Wamba, Yorta Yorta, Dhudhuroa and Dja Dja Wurrung woman Ngarra Murray – the daughter of Gary Murray – have both expressed full support for the Indigenous Voice after they were elected to their roles as co-chairs of the new assembly.

“I dare them to bring a motion to the floor. It will be an ‘own goal’ if this were to proceed. Let’s see what happens,” another member said.

Another member said: “a ‘No vote’ resolution would result in the cannibalisation of the assembly’s standing and authority.”

As reported in The Guardian on Monday, the representative member for the metro area, Tracey Evans – a Gunditjmara and Bundjalung woman – said the assembly should revisit its endorsement of the Voice.

“We need to have another conversation with the current members that have been elected in on what their position is,” Evans said.

Murray, who two weeks ago used his first speech to call for an “elders’ authority” that would operate under a “sovereign constitution”, said the Voice was a furphy and instead proposed a different model.

“The real game is a new body, a national body that fits in neatly with what we’ve got in Victoria, and that body should have a sovereign constitution that shouldn’t be legalised around a federal government or state government incorporation rules,” Murray said at the time.

He also called for a series of statewide meetings that would include clans or nations that he said were not represented in the assembly governance structure. Another member said there was next to no support among the assembly majority for Murray’s views.

“Everybody had the right to respond to it when it was raised during first chamber last month, and his speech was met with silence. Nobody sitting in chamber responded in support,” the member said.

Co-chair Ngarra Murray said in a statement that the assembly urged everyone to vote Yes in the upcoming referendum.

“We get far better outcomes when Aboriginal people are involved in creating the programs and policies that affect us. That’s what the Voice is all about. The vast majority of Aboriginal people support the Voice to parliament, and that’s the same in our assembly,” she said.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/first-peoples-assembly-holds-emergency-meeting-on-no-vote-push-20230809-p5dv0y.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19333459

File: 17ad9a01982cb2c⋯.jpg (329.63 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Liberal_senator_Linda_Reyn….jpg)

>>19289705

>>19289887

>>19326721

Linda Reynolds’ defamation case against David Sharaz gets trial date

Holly Thompson and Jesinta Burton - August 9, 2023

Brittany Higgins’ partner David Sharaz will front court in a defamation case levelled against him by West Australian Liberal Senator Linda Reynolds in a three-week trial provisionally set for May 2024.

Reynolds is demanding the former press gallery journalist pay damages, as well as aggravated damages, over five social media posts, and has requested an injunction preventing the material from surfacing in future.

At a court hearing in Perth on Wednesday afternoon, Justice Marcus Solomon said he was setting the trial dates far in advance to avoid “skirmishes” between the two parties from developing “a life of their own” and dragging the case out.

The case has already been beset by delays, with the court having to issue special orders in July just to serve Sharaz with defamation papers, after Reynolds’ lawyers spent six months trying to track him down.

Sharaz’s lawyer Jason MacLaurin said he planned to submit a strikeout claim against all imputations against his client, but this was an issue he wanted to raise with Reynolds’ team before officially doing so.

He also said Reynolds had decided to sue a private citizen in the WA Supreme Court when the case had nothing to do with the state, and there were grounds to consider that the matter should be heard under ACT laws, as Reynolds was only known as a senator.

Reynolds’ lawyer Martin Bennett said that claim “grasps at an imaginary straw to bog this matter down”, and it was “inappropriate for my friend across the table to make such an outrageous comment” about what Reynolds was known for.

“She is a senator for WA, elected by voters in WA … her reputation is one grounded in WA,” he said.

Bennett also said it was “farfetched and ambitious” to say the imputations were false.

Solomon told the court that dismissing Reynolds’ position in WA “minimises the significance of that to a degree I find a little surprising”.

He said everything he had heard highlighted his concern the back-and-forth between parties would drag on if he did not set a preliminary trial date.

“It’s amazing how fast these issues can be sorted with trial dates in sight,” Solomon said.

The next court hearing will be on August 24, for the matters raised by MacLaurin to be addressed. The preliminary trial has been set for three weeks, starting on May 7.

Wednesday’s hearing comes just days after Reynolds made good on her threat to sue Higgins for damages over two social media posts in which she accused Reynolds of using the press to harass her.

The former defence minister also said the posts were a breach of a deed of settlement and release the pair signed in March 2021, which contained a non-disparagement clause.

She has asked for two injunctions preventing Higgins from publishing defamatory material about her and preventing her from further breaches of the deed.

In 2021, Higgins alleged she was raped in Reynolds’ parliamentary office by her colleague Bruce Lehrmann.

A criminal trial against Lehrmann, who has maintained his innocence throughout, was aborted last year due to juror misconduct, and the charge was dropped and a retrial dismissed over fears for Higgins’ mental health.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/western-australia/linda-reynolds-defamation-case-against-david-sharaz-gets-trial-date-20230809-p5dv7u.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19333477

File: 3cc662141fe4577⋯.jpg (592.19 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>19188991

>>19231877

Australia, US urged to ramp up AUKUS as PM invited to White House

Matthew Knott - August 10, 2023

1/2

Australia and the United States are being urged to turbocharge the AUKUS pact by jointly producing long-range missiles and using Australia as a testing ground for hypersonic weapons as Anthony Albanese prepares to make his first prime ministerial visit to the US capital.

Albanese will be feted at a rare state dinner in Washington, DC, in late October at the invitation of US President Joe Biden, just days before he has been tipped to make an as-yet-unconfirmed visit to Beijing.

Republican congressman Mike Gallagher, considered a rising star of American politics, used a speech in Canberra on Thursday night to say the AUKUS pact had the potential to “bring this region from the brink of war” if the three member nations expanded their ambitions and put their nations on a preventative “war footing”.

Gallagher, the chair of the US House of Representatives select committee on the Chinese Communist Party, said wargaming exercises conducted for Congress had found the American military would run out of munitions after just six days if a war broke out with China over Taiwan.

“Consequently, as much as Australia is relying on the US for submarine delivery, the US is likewise going to rely on Australia to co-develop and supplement our munitions stockpiles,” Gallagher, the co-chair of the Congressional Friends of Australia Caucus, told the Australian American Leadership Dialogue.

“With that in mind, we must prioritise the trilateral co-production of next-generation long-range missiles under pillar two of AUKUS, particularly with the help of next-generation energetic materials that can make our weapons more lethal and our defence supply chains less reliant on China.”

Pillar one of the AUKUS pact refers to the sharing of nuclear-powered submarine technology, while pillar two refers to other technologies such as hypersonic weapons, artificial intelligence and quantum computing.

“The point is that the potential for AUKUS – from the undersea domain, to munitions and critical technologies, to logistics – is limited only by our willpower and our imagination,” Gallagher said.

“Which brings us to the paradox of the present day: to prevent war, AUKUS must in a sense adopt a war footing.

“We must wage peace with the same alacrity, creativity and vigilance with which we have together waged past wars.”

US Secretary of the Army Christine Wormuth separately said that, under the AUKUS pact, Australia could be used as a testing ground for American hypersonic weapons.

“One thing Australia has in spades is long distances and relatively unpopulated land,” she told the Agence France-Presse news agency.

“A challenge for us in the United States when it comes to hypersonics or even some of our things like the precision strike missile – which is not a hypersonic weapon but has very long ranges in some of its increments – for us to find open spaces in the United States where we can actually test these weapons, it’s a challenge.

“Australia obviously has a tremendous amount of territory where that testing is a little bit more doable – so I think that’s a unique thing, as an example, that the Australians bring to the table.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19333479

File: 9da7351dcd12e1a⋯.jpg (249.29 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Chair_of_the_US_House_Sele….jpg)

>>19333477

2/2

Last month, 22 Republican senators and three House members said they did not support the sale of at least three Virginia-class submarines to Australia unless the US dramatically increased its own production capacity.

While acknowledging it would take “billions more in investment by the US” to meet America’s own submarine requirements, Gallagher said: “I know there has been some hand-wringing on this point so I want to be clear: AUKUS will be successful, and America will fulfil its commitment to its friends.”

In a statement on Thursday morning, Albanese said: “I am honoured to accept President Biden’s invitation to undertake an official visit to Washington, DC.

“Australia and the United States have a longstanding relationship, based on deep friendship and trust and a shared commitment to peace, the rule of law and the values of democracy.

“My visit is an important opportunity to discuss our ambitious climate and clean energy transition, and shared goal of a strong, secure and prosperous Indo-Pacific.”

The invitation comes after Biden was forced to cancel a planned trip to Canberra and Sydney earlier this year because of emergency US debt ceiling negotiations.

The state dinner, which will be the fourth of Biden’s presidency, will take place on October 25.

Biden has previously hosted French President Emmanuel Macron, South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi for state dinners at the White House, an honour usually reserved for the US’s closest and most important allies.

Former president Donald Trump hosted former prime minister Scott Morrison for a state dinner in 2019.

It has long been speculated that Albanese could visit Beijing for a meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping around October 31, a date that would coincide with a historic trip by Gough Whitlam 50 years ago in which he became the first Australian prime minister to visit the Chinese capital.

Albanese said this week he looked forward to meeting Xi on the sidelines of the G20 summit in New Delhi next month.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/albanese-to-meet-us-president-joe-biden-at-white-house-in-october-20230810-p5dvgm.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19333508

File: c36ce3988513154⋯.jpg (238.34 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 813ba08374de94f⋯.jpg (350.4 KB,1036x885,1036:885,REFERENDUM_WINDOW_CLOSING.jpg)

File: 70e20bef4a719db⋯.jpg (220.87 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_Coalition_has_unleashe….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19297392

>>19333477

Anthony Albanese’s trip to the US firms up October 14 as Indigenous voice to parliament referendum date

ROSIE LEWIS and PAIGE TAYLOR - AUGUST 10, 2023

Anthony Albanese’s late October visit to the United States has left little doubt October 14 is the preferred date for the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum, according to constitutional law expert George Williams.

The Prime Minister now has three likely overseas trips in late October and early to mid-November, making that period too crowded for a referendum.

He is expected to be in Australia between September 11 (after the G20 on September 9-10) and his visit to the White House on October 23, which would allow a short four to five-week campaign.

During that time there is just one parliamentary sitting week from September 11-14 and then four weeks of a break, which would give the Yes campaign clear air to prosecute its case.

“Everything has already pointed to the 14th (of October) but this leaves little doubt it is the preferred date,” Professor Williams, from the University of New South Wales, said of Mr Albanese’s official visit to the US announced on Thursday.

“You can’t imagine he’d leave the country during the campaign and it was already the preferred date because of the footy grand finals and parliament not sitting. This may well be timed for after the referendum.”

The Coalition has used the sitting fortnight to pepper the government with questions over the voice, treaty and Uluru Statement from the Heart in a parliamentary tactic designed to stoke confusion over the referendum while demanding detail over what Labor is putting forward.

Professor Williams said October 14 was ideal for Mr Albanese to go to the polls because of the four-week parliamentary break in the lead up.

The Prime Minister has also previously said he wants to hold the referendum before the wet season, which begins in November.

“What it (parliament sitting) does is focuses the debate at a high political level. It means the debate is focused on conflict between the Prime Minister and Opposition Leader and it’s focused on our political parties and it’s very hard to cut through with a message about how this might improve lives or relate to local communities,” Professor Williams said.

“The latter favours the Yes case, the former favours the No case. The more people see our politicians fighting about this the more likely they’d be turned (against it).”

The Coalition asked Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney if the Albanese government would negotiate a treaty in this term but did not not pursue questions on Thursday over whether the Uluru Statement from the Heart was actually 26 pages and included comments about invasion, treaty and genocide.

Referendum Council co-chair Mark Leibler rejected these claims, saying he was there when the statement passed and read out for the first time by Indigenous leader Megan Davis in 2017.

“I was in a breakout room next door where there might have been not more than two other non-Indigenous people and we actually saw it on the monitor. What was passed was the one-page Uluru Statement,” he said.

“All this fuss about what is obviously further material, clearly this is minutes of meetings incorporated from the various (Uluru) dialogues.

“The minutes that were reproduced contained comments by a number of people included in the over 1000 people who participated in the various dialogues. However what really counts is the conclusion which they ultimately reached. What really counts is what they were prepared to settle for itself.”

US ambassador Kevin Rudd, who was in Parliament House for the unveiling of his portrait, drew parallels between the fearmongering before the national apology he delivered in 2008 and the fears being raised on the voice today.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/anthony-albaneses-trip-to-the-us-firms-up-october-14-as-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-referendum-date/news-story/a8bf009eccfe637154cfd33f982b160d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19333536

File: 7ec37b3544261e3⋯.jpg (105.07 KB,1280x720,16:9,Elon_Musk_has_taken_a_swip….jpg)

File: afdfa1d5436d561⋯.jpg (199.73 KB,2048x1152,16:9,ABC_Managing_Director_Davi….jpg)

File: d49454780d6d3b4⋯.jpg (369.04 KB,750x952,375:476,EM_1.jpg)

>>19051042 (pb)

>>19051054 (pb)

Elon Musk lashes the ABC over its decision to abandon his social media platform X

SOPHIE ELSWORTH - AUGUST 10, 2023

Billionaire businessman Elon Musk has lashed out at the ABC over its decision to abandon his platform and accused the public broadcaster of favouring “censorship-friendly social media”.

Musk purchased X (formerly Twitter) in 2022 and has made many changes to the platform, including rebranding it, sacking thousands of staff and introducing charges for verification, but its overhaul has not been welcomed by the public broadcaster.

The reasons behind the ABC’s decision to stop using the platform included blaming toxic interactions, costs and lack of trust but it was met with annoyance by Musk who took to social media to scold the taxpayer-funded organisation.

Hours after the decision was announced by the ABC, Musk responded on X to a post about the ABC’s move by writing, “Well of course they prefer censorship-friendly social media. The Australian public does not”.

Mr Musk did not specifically name any social media platforms in his post.

The ABC’s managing director David Andersen announced on Wednesday in an all-staff email that the public broadcaster would stop using all accounts on X, apart from four accounts, while at the same time praising Chinese-owned platform TikTok.

“The vast majority of the ABC’s social media audience is located on official sites on YouTube, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok, with TikTok forecast to have the strongest growth over the next four years,” he said.

“We want to focus our effort and resources on where our audiences are.”

By Thursday lunchtime Musk’s post had been viewed more than 106,000 times, had more than 470 re-posts and 3500 likes.

Mr Anderson said the ABC’s decision to stop using X was made after resounding success following a decision that was made earlier this year to stop using its Insiders program, breakfast news and politics Twitter accounts.

“In February the ABC closed three program accounts and the results from that have been positive, with negligible reduction in referral traffic from Twitter to ABC content,” he said in his all-staff email.

“The vast majority of the ABC’s social media audience is located on other platforms and we want to focus our effort and resources where our audiences are.

“X is introducing charges which are making the platform increasingly costly to use.”

The ABC will continue to post from four selected accounts including @abcnews, @abcsport, @abcchinese and @abcaustralia.

The ABC declined to comment.

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1689180254680522752

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-08-09/abc-abandons-the-majority-of-twitter-accounts/102706816

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/elon-musk-lashes-the-abc-over-its-decision-to-abandon-his-social-media-platform-x/news-story/46ce834d17393a21710977f83011aadd

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19333564

File: 7d81f9c9c6d0880⋯.jpg (324.61 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Kevin_Rudd_meets_Joe_Biden….jpg)

File: 0e8907e5e59e617⋯.jpg (487.21 KB,825x941,825:941,KR_15.jpg)

>>19321154

>>19326780

Kevin Rudd in ‘traitor Donald Trump’ U-turn

BEN PACKHAM - AUGUST 10, 2023

Australia’s ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, says he could work with a re-elected Donald Trump – who he attacked last year as a “traitor” – if the “good burghers” of the United States put the Republican frontrunner back in the White House.

Dr Rudd, who is in Canberra for the unveiling of his prime ministerial portrait on Thursday, said he had worked “comfortably and seamlessly” with congressional Republicans and with former members of the Trump administration since his arrival in Washington in March.

“Our job as the Australian Embassy in Washington is to work with both sides of the aisle,” Dr Rudd said.

“What the good burghers of the United States choose to do in their own electoral process is a matter for them.”

The former Labor prime ­minister said he was confident Republicans would support the transfer of nuclear submarines to Australia, despite the party’s threat to scuttle the deal unless Joe Biden boosts funding for domestic sub construction.

Dr Rudd added that the business of congress was a “complex process of sausage making” that would ultimately “end up with a sausage”.

“This actually is normal. This is what happens when legislation goes through the United States congress,” Dr Rudd said.

His comments came after the ranking Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, Senator Roger Wicker, ruled out language to authorise the nuclear submarine transfer in the nation’s annual defence policy bill.

Senator Wicker said the Biden administration needed to “be sure we have enough submarines for our own security needs before we endorse that pillar of the (AUKUS) agreement”.

The prospect of a Trump victory in November next year is seen as a risk to the AUKUS plan, given his unpredictability even when dealing with allies.

Dr Rudd made clear in February last year - before he knew he would become ambassador to the US - what he thought of Mr Trump, describing the ex-president as a “traitor to the West” and accusing him of “rancid treachery”.

Dr Rudd said he was using his position as ambassador to lobby the Biden administration on behalf of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who the US is trying to extradite to face charges over the leaking of hundreds of thousands of classified documents.

He said US Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s recent declaration in Australia that Mr Assange’s actions “risked very serious harm to our national security” were unsurprising.

“That’s to be anticipated from the administration, reflecting their concerns about the history of the case. We in Australia have our own concerns that we continue to reflect,” Dr Rudd said.

The ambassador on Wednesday released a new report by The Tech Council of Australia, Microsoft and LinkedIn revealing US technology workers are crucial to the growth of Australia’s tech ecosystem.

It found 4000 US tech alumni transitioned to Australia each year, delivering a $2.2bn annual contribution to the economy.

One in five Australian tech graduates are employed by an American firm, and half of Australia’s successful start-ups are started or scaled with US tech-experienced talent.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/kevin-rudd-in-traitor-donald-trump-uturn/news-story/e16bfacca5a053438ba104c6ce39d8fc

Kevin Rudd Tweet

Donald Trump is a traitor to the West. Murdoch was Trump’s biggest backer. And Murdoch’s Fox Television backs Putin too. What rancid treachery.

https://twitter.com/MrKRudd/status/1497863031497564161

https://archive.ph/gbMyl

Trump defends praise of Putin, makes strongest hint yet of a run for president in 2024

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/02/26/trump-2024/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19333643

File: 1a437fc969a96dd⋯.jpg (45.07 KB,800x533,800:533,Retired_US_Admiral_Mike_Ro….jpg)

File: 50abc5a538b60bc⋯.jpg (84.23 KB,768x960,4:5,Admiral_Mike_Rogers_receiv….jpg)

>>19314910

Former NSA director and commander of US Cyber Command says America can learn ‘a lot’ about cybersecurity from Australia

A former NSA Director who commanded the United States Cyber Command has declared there are "a lot of things" America can learn from Australia's approach to cyber security.

Patrick Hannaford - August 9, 2023

The former head of America’s National Security Agency has declared there are “a lot of things” the United States can learn about cybersecurity from Australia.

Former NSA Director and Commander of the United States Cyber Command, Mike Rogers, said that while there are “significant challenges” with respect to cyber security in Australia, the country also has “a lot of good things going for it.”

“What works in one nation may not work in another… but I think there's a lot of things the United States can learn from Australia with respect to cyber security,” Admiral Rogers told Sky News Australia.

The former Admiral, who lead the NSA and the US cyber command from 2014 until 2018, cited the fact that Australian governments from both sides of politics had been “very aggressive” and “very focused on cyber security.”

“(There have been) differences of opinion about what's the best way to do it but still a fundamental commitment at a leadership level and government level,” he said.

The former intelligence official also cited the willingness to harness the power and authority of government to work with the private sector as a key difference between how Australia approached cyber security compared to the US.

“You look at the legislation now you've seen in Australia with respect to core infrastructure,” he said.

“There's no equivalent in the United States. We have no cybersecurity law. We have no privacy law. We have no data law.

“Our inclination in the United States historically has been less direct government involvement in the form of legal regimes, and more in the form of government focusing on specific areas – but not broadly.”

“I think you're starting to see that change in the US.”

The former NSA director also credited Australia with prohibiting Chinese company Huawei from being involved in the country’s 5G network “well in advance” of both the US and the United Kingdom.

However, Admiral Rogers said he did not think this had made Australia more of a target for cyber attacks but that cyber exists in a broader context.

“The activity you see in cyber is often reflective of that broader context,” he said.

“As Australia has assumed an ever-increasing role in global activity; as it has drawn closer with the United States, as it has entered… formal structures like AUKUS; as it has shown a willingness to stand up to China.

“There's a flip side to that and one of those flip sides is the higher potential for criminals to be interested in Australia. Look at how cyber-criminal activity is increasing.”

Admiral Rogers also pointed to the increasing nation-state activity in the cyber realm.

“Think about how nation-state activity has increased… I don't remember Russia being a significant actor in cyber 5-10 years ago in cyber, that’s the case now,” he said.

“The Chinese have become more aggressive. And take a look at what you're seeing in Ukraine, for example, where cyber is a dimension, an element, of the conflict that's going on between Russia and Ukraine.

"It certainly will be an element if we get into – and let's hope we don't, but if we do, it will certainly be a dimension or an element of a conflict with respect to a potential Chinese invasion or significant pressures directed against Taiwan."

“So the reality is, this is a world we live in now. It isn't going to go away, and I don't see it fundamentally changing.”

https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/former-nsa-director-and-commander-of-us-cyber-command-says-america-can-learn-a-lot-about-cybersecurity-from-australia/news-story/2596945be9ee22848c35e597bf4d4b54

https://qalerts.app/?q=Adm+R&sortasc=1

https://qalerts.app/?q=rogers&sortasc=1

https://qalerts.app/?q=NSA&sortasc=1

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19340214

File: fb9a70fde2317b9⋯.mp4 (13.05 MB,640x360,16:9,_This_is_not_costless_.mp4)

>>19222755

>>19297392

Noel Pearson warns of high cost if No vote on Indigenous voice to parliament succeeds

PAIGE TAYLOR - AUGUST 11, 2023

Cape York leader Noel Pearson has issued a subtle message for the “progressive No” campaign against the Indigenous voice to parliament, hinting that a failed referendum would be a big loss for them too.

While Anthony Albanese has repeatedly characterised the voice as modest in his appeals to undecided and conservative voters, the radical and hard left see this as its flaw.

Independent senator Lidia Thorpe is among those who consider the voice as weak.

Mr Pearson was speaking at a voice forum in the Torres Strait this week when he indirectly addressed any voter who believes Australia should hold out for something more substantial than an advisory body with no power of veto.

“I want to tell you a No outcome will come at a great cost to the country,” Mr Pearson said. “We and the country will pay a big cost if we lose this referendum

“It’s not like football game: ‘we lost last weekend’.

“It’s not even like a grand final: ‘yeah bit of pain but we look forward to next year to have another go’.

“It’s not like that. This is something that we might never have a go at again for a very, very long time.”

A video and audio recording of the forum shows Mr Pearson using hand gestures to indicate the voice was at head height while other, more ambitious proposals were high up in the air. If the voice failed at head height, he indicated, a sky-high proposal would not succeed.

Still gesturing with his hands, Mr Pearson argued that a failed referendum would leave Indigenous Australians asking for less not more.

“And if they say no to that (the voice), you think they’re going to say yes to that (more ambitious proposal)?’” he said.

Mr Pearson lowered his hand to waist height as he told the forum: “If they say no (to the voice), next time you will be talking about whether they will say yes to this (less ambitious proposal)”.

“This is why it’s so important,” Mr Pearson said.

“This is not costless. It has a cost attached to it.”

The Yes campaign has demonstrated broad Indigenous support for the voice, including from cultural leaders in some of the nation’s most remote communities such as across northeast Arnhem Land, in the central western desert, in the Torres Strait and in the Pilbara, Gascoyne and Murchison regions of Western Australia.

Elected land councils across the breadth of Australia’s north are also united in their support.

Tasmanian Aboriginal Land Council chair Michael Mansell is opposed in part because he prefers a quota system of Indigenous seats in parliament.

One of the most active voice opponents from the “progressive No” camp has recently decided to vote Yes. South West Aboriginal Land and Sea Council chairwoman Megan Krakouer, who represents 30,000 Noongar people from Perth and communities to its south and east, had previously expressed disappointment with the voice. She now believes it is needed to help co-ordinate an effective response to the state’s Indigenous youth suicide crisis.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/noel-pearson-warns-ofhigh-cost-if-novote-on-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-succeeds/news-story/40700c526cc36324a7030fc941b2c728

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19340240

File: 9d66a800d7dc495⋯.jpg (180.12 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Former_PM_Tony_Abbott.jpg)

>>19222755

>>19297392

Tony Abbott loud in rejection of Indigenous voice to parliament

PAUL GARVEY - AUGUST 11, 2023

Former prime minister Tony Abbott has invoked the spirit of US civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr and late Labor legend Bob Hawke in an attack on an Indigenous voice to parliament.

Speaking at an Institute of Public Affairs event in Perth on Wednesday night, Mr Abbott said a successful referendum on the voice would “entrench victimhood in our constitution forever”.

“The past isn’t perfect, but our responsibility is to make the present and the future as good as we humanly can. This generation of migrants and the descendants of migrants are not oppressors. This generation of Indigenous people are not victims.

“Citing … the wonderful words of Bob Hawke back on Australia Day in 1988, ‘we are a country with no hierarchy of descent. We are a country with no privilege of origin’.

“Citing the immortal words of Martin Luther King from an earlier generation, ‘I want to live in a country where my four children are judged not by the colour of their skin, but by the content of their character’.

“My absolute desire is that we can go forward as one equal people and that’s why I’ll be voting no. Because I absolutely reject any suggestion that there is something fundamentally wrong with this great country, Australia.”

He said the coming referendum would also give Australians an opportunity to cast judgment on “some of the crazy things that have been happening in our country”.

“I’ll be voting no to a few things. I’ll be voting no to the voice, sure, but I’ll be voting no to the climate cult, I’ll be voting out … the virus hysteria, I’ll be voting no to the gender fluidity crisis, I’ll be voting no to the ‘Magic Pudding’ economics.

“And I’ll be voting no to this crazy cultural self-loathing that afflicts this country along with so many other countries of the English speaking world, which should know better.”

Mr Abbott’s visit to Perth follows the backflip earlier this year by the Western Australian Cook government on the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act. The act, which had only been in place for less than six weeks, is now being repealed after a strong backlash from WA farmers.

The former prime minister said an Indigenous voice to parliament would be like the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act “on steroids”.

“If you actually read the lengthy documents that stand as part of and behind the one-page Uluru statement, they are permeated by a sense of anger, grievance, entitlement and sovereignty,” he said.

“The essential thesis of the people who put together the Uluru statement and are pushing so hard for this voice, is that what happened in 1788 and subsequently was essentially illegal, unfair, unjust, and as far as is humanly possible needs to be atoned for and reversed.”

He said while Australia’s history had “many blemishes” and that efforts by the Crown to protect Aboriginal people “didn’t always work out”, the country’s history compared favourably with colonised nations like Argentina, Brazil or the Congo.

Mr Abbott received a standing ovation from the 250 attendees in the room.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/tony-abbott-loud-in-rejection-of-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/5f7267334913a5e2ec2f77fe1105a85e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19340258

File: 40ff2de5f8ae3de⋯.jpg (161.72 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Peter_Dutton_says_a_govern….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19297392

Peter Dutton says his government would ‘fight’ for constitutional recognition

DENNIS SHANAHAN and ROSIE LEWIS - AUGUST 11, 2023

Peter Dutton has committed the Coalition to “fighting for” constitutional recognition of Indigenous Australians, as he dismissed Anthony Albanese’s threat of Australia losing a once-in-a-generation chance for recognition as “arrogant and dismissive”.

In response to the Prime Minister’s warning that a No vote in the voice referendum would mean constitutional recognition would not come around again, the Opposition Leader committed a Dutton-led government to constitutional recognition.

He also vowed to legislate local and regional Indigenous voices but not a national voice.

“The unifying moment for our country would be to vote for constitutional recognition,” he said.

“A vote for the voice will divide our country; that’s why a Coa­lition government I lead will fight for constitutional recognition.”

At the Garma Festival in ­Arnhem Land last weekend, Mr Albanese warned voters that, like the republican referendum 20 years ago, a vote against the Indigenous voice to parliament would mean it would not come again.

“We know that this is a once-in-a-generation opportunity,” Mr Albanese said on the ABC’s Insiders program, hosted in Garma.

“Many people in the republic referendum thought it would come around again. And that’s why I say to those people, including people who say, ‘It doesn’t go far enough, so therefore, I’m going to vote No’, don’t think that other issues can be advanced by a No vote.

“A No vote will be a vote for more of the same.”

Mr Dutton said Mr Albanese was being dismissive and arrogant. “The Prime Minister is having a dummy spit when he says vote for the voice or you get nothing. His approach is arrogant and dismissive of the views of millions of Australians,” he said.

“The public just isn’t supportive of the voice but they will support constitutional recognition.

“When a prime minister turns his back on the country, people won’t forget that betrayal.

“The Australian public would overwhelmingly support constitutional recognition for Indigenous Australians but people won’t support the voice for many reasons but mainly because the Prime Minister won’t give the ­detail on how it will work.”

While Mr Albanese has not said whether he would seek to legislate an Indigenous voice if the referendum fails because he is concentrating on a successful poll, Mr Dutton said a Coalition government would legislate for local and regional voices to ensure bills could be withdrawn and corrected.

The government and voice supporters say it should be enshrined in the Constitution so future governments can’t get rid of it with the stroke of a pen.

“As we’ve seen in Western Australia, if you get a law wrong, even if there was good intent at the start, you can amend or ­abolish the law,” Mr Dutton said, referring to the West Australian government’s repeal of its controversial cultural heritage laws.

“If it’s in the Constitution there is no turning back. No amendment or abolition, you’re stuck with it.

“The beauty of our proposal is we propose constitutional recognition as well as a local and regional advisory body in legislation, not in the Constitution. In legislation you can make changes. No law can change the Constitution.”

Mr Dutton’s vow to take ­constitutional recognition to the next election without a voice is likely to infuriate the Yes camp, with many campaigners sceptical the Coalition would ­follow through with another ­referendum.

They argue the Coalition had nine years to deliver constitutional recognition – which was first proposed by John Howard – but failed to do so.

Leading Yes supporters this week backed Mr Albanese in warning this referendum would be Australians’ only chance to pass constitutional recognition in a generation.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-peter-dutton-says-his-government-would-fight-for-constitutional-recognition/news-story/c579b0043e418059ac048974277d8dd8

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19340296

File: bc3a3aa6d9617eb⋯.jpg (268.92 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Harry_and_Linda_Dare_oppos….jpg)

File: 8db51d17b3d0224⋯.jpg (235.36 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Resources_Minister_Madelei….jpg)

File: 3fea95b0cbf00f1⋯.jpg (363.62 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Lead_lawyer_for_the_Barnga….jpg)

>>19188991

>>19222755

>>19297392

AUKUS alarm after nuclear dump in South Australia is axed

BEN PACKHAM - AUGUST 10, 2023

The government has abandoned a decade-long process to establish a low-level radioactive waste dump near Kimba in South Australia, declaring it will not challenge a court ruling in favour of Indigenous people who argued that their voice was ignored in the site’s selection.

The Coalition suggested Australians should prepare for a surge of such outcomes under the proposed voice to parliament, and of ramifications for the AUKUS ­nuclear-powered submarine deal that requires Australia to establish a high-level nuclear waste dump.

Resources Minister Madeleine King on Thursday announced the government would not appeal the Federal Court decision barring the use of the former farming property as a radioactive dump, and would not revisit previously shortlisted sites elsewhere in SA.

Barngarla Determination Aboriginal Corporation chairman Jason Bilney said: “We are grateful as First Nations people that our voice has been heard.”

Judge Natalie Charlesworth on July 18 found there had been “apprehended bias” and “pre-judgment” in the site selection process by former resources minister Keith Pitt, who, she said, had displayed “a dismissive attitude to its key opponent, the Barngarla people”.

Anthony Albanese told parliament that Labor supported the Kimba site but the plan had faltered because of “the incompetence of the former minister”.

“It is completely the responsibility of the former government that this decision has been knocked over in the Federal Court,” the Prime Minister said.

Mr Pitt on Thursday said Indigenous groups empowered by a voice to parliament were likely to stymie future attempts to establish such facilities, undermining the national interest. “If one tribal group can stop a project of this significance on land that has no ­native title and is freehold, one can only imagine what the future holds under the Albanese government’s voice proposal,” he said.

“If Labor only intends to build infrastructure that has 100 per cent support from Aboriginal groups, very little infrastructure will ever be delivered.”

The decision leaves Australia without a planned permanent site to keep more than 13,000 cubic metres of low-level radioactive waste and more than 4300 cubic metres of intermediate-level waste currently stored at more than 100 locations, including in hospitals and science facilities and at universities.

The government needs to find a site for a high-level nuclear waste facility to store spent nuclear submarine fuel rods under the AUKUS partnership, which it has said will be established on ­Defence land.

Opposition foreign affairs spokesman Simon Birmingham said the government should have appealed the court ruling or legislated to overrule it, as it did to strip the Russian Federation of the site for a new embassy in Canberra.

“This gutless decision reeks of putting short-term politics ahead of Australia’s long-term interests,” Senator Birmingham said.

“The failure to deliver this site for storage of low-level radioactive waste not only creates huge uncertainties for nuclear medicines and leaves the waste at temporary city sites all over Australia, it also risks undermining confidence that Labor is capable of making the difficult decisions required to deliver nuclear-powered submarines under the AUKUS agreement.”

Ms King said the government remained committed to establishing a permanent low-level facility to store long-lasting radioactive waste “that can take thousands of years to decay”.

“Australia’s radioactive waste will grow into the future and while safe, these facilities are not ­purpose-built, and long-term management of Australia's waste at these locations is unsustainable,” she said.

“This is not where we wanted to be, but we have to start from where we are.”

The Gillard government passed legislation in 2012 to establish a national radioactive waste management facility.

The site selection process had been in train for seven years, with Mr Pitt announcing the property as the facility’s location in November 2021.

Ms King said the ruling was about the decision-making process, “not a claim of native title”.

“The judgement was clear, and the government is listening,” she told parliament.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/labor-abandons-sa-site-for-nuclear-waste-storage-facility/news-story/4c28691a42843e0f4ee14d92f2317ff3

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19340337

File: 6a1de30475c05e8⋯.jpg (412.95 KB,2000x1428,500:357,HMAS_Choules_will_be_among….jpg)

>>19188991

>>19333477

AUKUS partnership the 'beating heart of free world'

Kat Wong and Tess Ikonomou - August 11 2023

A leading United States congressman has described the AUKUS security pact as the "beating heart of the free world".

Chair of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, Republican Mike Gallagher, called for greater cooperation under the AUKUS agreement as a deterrent.

"My view is that the US-Australia alliance, and perhaps AUKUS more broadly, is the beating heart of the free world," he told ABC Radio on Friday.

"We have to make AUKUS a success, this is a no-fail endeavour.

"It will have a dramatic impact on our ability to deter a future war."

Recently, Republican lawmakers moved to block the legislation allowing the US to send nuclear-powered submarines to Australia, as leverage to boost military spending.

It comes as Sydney Harbour will be teeming with navy personnel as Australia hosts a key international exercise for the first time.

For the next 10 days, ships, helicopters and aircraft from the US, India and Japan will join with Australia to engage in a full spectrum of warfare activities as they increase military co-operation.

Defence Minister Richard Marles said it was an honour for Australia to host Exercise Malabar.

"Amid the current strategic circumstances, it is more important than ever we partner with our neighbours and deepen our defence partnerships," he said.

"Cooperation, shared understanding and knowledge coupled with training contributes to shared security and prosperity for our region."

As part of Exercise Malabar, the four nations who form the strategic security dialogue Quad will conduct air defence and anti-submarine training alongside aviation, communications and replenishment drills.

Notable Australian participants include HMAS Brisbane and HMAS Choules, MH60R helicopters alongside F-35A Lightning II, Hawk 127 and P-8A Poseidon air crafts.

Royal Australian Navy vice admiral Mark Hammond says the exercises help bolster relationships between the countries.

"'This esteemed exercise provides rich opportunities for our people to work and train together, to be prepared as high-functioning teams ready to face the complex challenges of the maritime domain," he said.

"In this way we complement diplomatic efforts to deepen our regional ties and contribute to a region based on trust and respect."

Exercise Malabar has taken place in different locations around the Indo-Pacific since 2002 and has generally been a bilateral event between India and the US.

Australia briefly joined the military activities in 2007 before a 13-year hiatus.

All four members of the Quad have taken part in since 2020.

US president Joe Biden is set to meet with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese at the White House in October.

The US will also host Pacific island leaders at the end of the year as part of Mr Biden's plan to strengthen America's standing in the region.

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/8304427/aukus-partnership-the-beating-heart-of-free-world/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19340415

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19340337

Exercise Malabar joint naval drills begin off Sydney coast

ABC News (Australia)

Aug 11, 2023

Warships from India, Japan and the United States have met in Sydney Harbour as Australia hosts the annual "Exercise Malabar" military drills for the first time.

The quad security partners deny their high-end warfare training is solely directed at China, but insist the activity is about promoting security in the region.

Defence correspondent Andrew Greene was onboard HMAS Brisbane as she made her way into Sydney.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prm5pieHB3Q

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19340466

File: 0791b087478d194⋯.jpg (222.58 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_with_form….jpg)

File: 4023d6e43c5ac0f⋯.jpg (289.02 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_with_form….jpg)

>>19154732 (pb)

>>19165653 (pb)

>>19308139

ALP conference to be a Paul Keating-free zone

GEOFF CHAMBERS - AUGUST 11, 2023

Former prime ministers Paul Keating, Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard will not attend the first in-person ALP national conference since 2018, as senior Labor figures scramble to avoid messy fights over AUKUS, economic and social policy, Palestine, trade and fossil fuels.

More than 2,000 party delegates and members, union officials, MPs and observers will meet over three days at the Brisbane Convention Centre next week at the first national conference held in Queensland since the 1970s.

Anthony Albanese will round-off the largest political gathering in Australia and the first conference with Labor in power since 2011 to springboard the government’s campaign supporting its referendum to constitutionally enshrine an Indigenous voice.

Seeking to avoid stoushes over AUKUS, trade, Palestine, climate change and migration, the government this week handed concessions to Left Faction bosses – who command a majority of votes at national conference – by hardening its position on Israel and establishing an inquiry into trade deals.

Immigration Minister Andrew Giles on Friday announced the government has increased the number of people resettled under the humanitarian program from 17,875 to 20,000 per year.

The ALP draft platform calls for Labor to “progressively increase” the intake to 27,000 places per year. While the final platform is considered “binding”, it acts as a guide for federal Labor with the Prime Minister and Cabinet ultimately deciding government policy.

Labor Premiers and Chief Ministers will attend national conference but are not expected to be present across all three days.

None of Labor’s three living former prime ministers, including Mr Keating who has been critical of the AUKUS defence deal, will attend.

ALP national president Wayne Swan will open the conference next Thursday followed by a keynote speech by Mr Albanese. With Labor keen to focus on cost-of-living pressures and economic policy, Treasurer Jim Chalmers will launch the first session titled “an economy that works for everyone”.

An expected clash over AUKUS will occur the following day during the “Australia’s place in a changing world” session led by Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong. Other sessions focus on climate change and the environment, health and social services, strengthening democracy, education, workplace relations and Indigenous Australians.

There are 402 delegates – including senior Labor MPs, state and territory leaders and delegations from rank-and-file members and trade unions – who can move amendments to the draft platform and put forward resolutions.

Elections to the 20-member ALP national executive and 15-member national Labor women’s network executive will occur next Friday. All Cabinet and junior ministers are attending except Health Minister Mark Butler who is representing the government at a G20 meeting in India.

Education Minister Jason Clare on Friday said the process of developing a national platform showed Labor was the “biggest and most open political party in the country” but stressed that Cabinet ultimately determines government policy.

Mr Clare said he wouldn’t describe differing opinions on the floor of conference as “fights”.

“This is a constructive exercise in developing the platform for the Labor Party. The chapter that I’ll lead is about … education and it’s skills. I’ll have an opportunity at the conference to talk about that and the sorts of policies we need to develop to fix that,” he said.

Amid a push by unions to renegotiate existing free trade agreements and claim greater control over future negotiations, opposition foreign affairs spokesman Simon Birmingham warned the government to not “kill the goose that’s laid the golden egg for Australia.

“Our economy has transformed over the last few decades, and it’s done that through opening up and opening up process that governments like the Hawke Government played a big role in,” Senator Birmingham said.

“During that time, we’ve seen essentially more than 30-years of continuous economic growth in Australia aside from that affected by the Covid lockdown.”

Senator Birmingham said “there’s been a lot of bones thrown to the union movement, to the Left-wing of the Labor Party over the last week ahead of the national conference”.

He accused Labor of promising Australia’s Jewish communities that “there would be no change and that they were in lock-step in terms of policy positions on Israel”.

“Now we’re seeing multiple changes. This is not the first one from the Albanese government. And so they keep breaking that promise they made.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/keating-free-zone-at-alp-conference/news-story/ab49aa60b7f459a346430381517bd288

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19340656

File: 1fc11f7d65b9b3d⋯.jpg (529.8 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Pictured_right_is_Western_….jpg)

>>18928944 (pb)

>>18928954 (pb)

From dining with top officials to a Chinese-born Labor poster child: How Beijing is slowly changing the face of Western Australian politics

A Sky News Australia investigation has revealed nearly a decade's worth of connections between WA Labor and the Chinese Communist Party's political apparatus.

Rocco Loiacono - August 11, 2023

1/2

The question of just how close the Chinese state is to the WA Labor government, and in particular to former premier Mark McGowan, has arisen repeatedly in recent years.

His government’s appointment of Dr Edward Zhang to a 15-member multicultural council in February 2021 raised eyebrows, given Zhang - while not personally linked to the Chinese Communist Party - is a founding member and honorary chairman of the WA branch of the Australian Council for the Promotion of Peaceful Reunification of China (ACPPRC).

This group is tied to Beijing’s United Front Work Department, an integral part of the state apparatus tasked with recruiting people at home and abroad to push the interests of the Communist Party.

Its Sydney president, billionaire political donor Huang Xiangmo, was banned from re-entering Australia in 2019 on the advice of intelligence officers.

Then there’s WA Labor backbencher Pierre Yang, who founded the Australian Chinese Labor Association (ACLA) in 2015.

The ACLA’s formation was announced within a matter of days on the United Front’s Chinese-language website.

Yang's preselection for the 2017 election has raised questions too since he had practically no experience in union activism, which is considered essential to get ahead in the ALP.

It emerged the following year that he had recruited a record 500 new members to the WA Labor Party, substantially boosting the party’s membership of 7,000 as well as Yang’s own clout in the party.

In his maiden speech to the state parliament, Pierre Yang MLC acknowledged Dr Zhang as his mentor, saying “he is like an uncle to me”.

As it was, Yang found himself in strife in 2018 because he hadn’t declared his membership of two community organisations with United Front links on his parliamentary register of interests.

Yang was reported saying at the time that he didn't legally have to disclose them, but should have done so and apologised to his colleagues.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19340674

File: 9470f8c932684f3⋯.jpg (240.79 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Sue_Ellery_MLC.jpg)

File: f9b49f383dfd879⋯.jpg (170.62 KB,970x2048,485:1024,Edward_Zhang_founder_unite….jpg)

>>19340656

2/2

Yang’s first political campaign was for the Gosnells City Council, in Perth’s east.

A 2013 news report from the Australian Chinese Times – a newspaper owned by Zhang – reported on Yang’s “campaign launch dinner”.

The guest line-up for that evening was unusual for a rally in support of a city council candidate.

These included several high-profile ALP politicians and union lobbyists, including Amber-Jade Sanderson.

She was the assistant secretary of the left-wing union United Voice and a Labor Party Member of the WA Legislative Council at the time.

In 2017 Sanderson moved to WA’s lower house, the Legislative Assembly, and was Parliamentary Secretary to Mark McGowan until 2021.

Now Sanderson is Health Minister, and looked for a few hours to be McGowan’s likely successor as premier after his resignation, only to be outmanoeuvred by Roger Cook.

On that night, Sanderson was photographed with some high-profile United Front operators in WA.

During Yang’s 2017 election campaign, Ellery gave him her most fulsome support, tweeting two images of the parliamentary hopeful and a brief message of endorsement.

After the 2017 ALP election win, Ellery became Education Minister.

She and Transport Minister (now Deputy Premier) Rita Saffioti accepted free trips and gifts from Huawei.

From 2017 to 2019 Pierre Yang attended at least one function on behalf of Sue Ellery; who herself attended a gala dinner in 2018 to celebrate the 20th anniversary of Dr Zhang’s newspaper.

What's more, Ellery - now the Minister for Finance, Commerce and Women's Interests - and a few other WA politicians were recently seen attending a New Year celebration at the Chinese Consulate in Perth with United Front operators, including Zhang.

It was considered an alarming scandal by several anti-CCP news media outlets and among the dissident communities in Australia.

While the consulate said it was a function to welcome Chinese students, photos shared by a Chinese dissident organisation, the Western Australia Association for Pan-Asian Democracy, show the gathering was much more than that.

In addition to Ellery, in attendance were David Honey, the former leader of the WA Liberal Party and Sally Dawkins, Director for DFAT's WA Office.

Most guests at the function left with at least one red gift bag in hand.

Among them, Ellery was seen trying to avoid the main entrance and snuck out through the back doors.

The items in the red gift bags were not disclosed.

All of this leads to one question.

Just how much is Beijing shaping politics in the WA ALP, and, by extension, in the rest of the state?

Dr Rocco Loiacono is a legal academic, writer and translator. Earlier in his career, he spent a decade practicing as a lawyer with Clayton Utz, one of Australia’s top law firms. As well as SkyNews.com.au, he regularly contributes opinion pieces, specialising in politics, freedom and the rule of law, to The Daily Telegraph, The Herald Sun and The Australian.

https://www.skynews.com.au/insights-and-analysis/from-dining-with-top-officials-to-a-chineseborn-labor-poster-child-how-beijing-is-slowly-changing-the-face-of-western-australian-politics/news-story/199896441ab1b8103c74296f51f9d578

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1911229582228240

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=473603151626289

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=473608398292431

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19340781

File: 4a2805e0e61b06f⋯.jpg (187.78 KB,1440x1080,4:3,Cheng_Lei_has_been_impriso….jpg)

File: d051240c1253afb⋯.jpg (472.69 KB,1234x908,617:454,Cheng_Lei_says_she_misses_….jpg)

File: cae28f79ec62d92⋯.jpg (1.26 MB,898x2082,449:1041,Ms_Cheng_Lei_public_messag….jpg)

>>18939721 (pb)

>>18939748 (pb)

Australian Cheng Lei's first message from Chinese prison describes harsh conditions

Sarah Ferguson and Marina Freri - 10 Aug 2023

1/2

Australian journalist Cheng Lei, who was arrested and jailed in China three years ago, has released her first public statement describing the harsh conditions of her imprisonment and how much she misses Australia.

"I miss the sun. In my cell, the sunlight shines through the window, but I can stand in it for only 10 hours a year," she writes from an undisclosed facility in Beijing.

"This is a love letter to 25 million people and 7 million square kilometres of land, land abundant in nature, beauty and space. It is not the same in here, I haven't seen a tree in three years."

7.30 received a copy of the statement dictated to an Australian consular official in Beijing and given to her partner, Nick Coyle.

In her message, Ms Cheng addresses the Australian public directly.

"G'day Aussies, excuse the daggy slang from someone in need of 'ockerism'," Ms Cheng writes.

Ms Cheng's parents and two children are in Australia. She speaks longingly of her life here, evoking a painful contrast with her imprisonment.

"Every year the bedding is taken into the sun for two hours to air. When it came back last time, I wrapped myself in the doona and pretended I was being hugged by my family under the sun."

Ms Cheng, now 48, was working as a broadcast journalist at Chinese state-owned media, CGTN, when she was arrested on August 13, 2020, accused of "supplying state secrets overseas" — an allegation she rejects.

She was put in Residential Surveillance at a Dedicated Facility (RSDF) — a form of detention criticised by human rights groups where detainees are unable to have contact with the outside world.

Ms Cheng was tried behind closed doors in March 2022 and she is yet to know what verdict was reached.

Speaking exclusively to 7.30, her partner of eight years, Nick Coyle, described the purpose of the statement.

“I think the fact that it's three years is very poignant for her,” Mr Coyle said.

"This is a message to the Australian people really. It's trying to communicate with the Australian people who she is and what she loves about her country. And it's a country that she feels very lucky to have come to at a very young age and had the benefit of our warmth and multicultural nature and education and way of life.

"So, she misses it."

Multicultural upbringing

"I miss the Australian people, the closing hours of food markets stalls, with butchers calling out end-of-day prices and Sunday flea markets, immigrant family-run takeaway shops."

Ms Cheng relocated to Brisbane from China aged 10 with her parents. She became an accountant before switching to a successful career in journalism.

"I received such kindness from strangers and friends, my ESL teacher who taught me hot and cold by running my hands under the tap … Growing up as Chinese Australian, I had two identities that would often fight for the upper hand depending on the context and company, but in humour, the Aussie humour wins hands down every time," she writes.

"Even though we speak different languages and eat different meals, we laugh the same and have an eye for the absurd."

In a prison landscape, largely devoid of stimulation, memories of her Australian upbringing are vivid.

"I miss the black humour of Melbourne weather, the tropical theatrics of Queensland and the never-ending blue skies of Western Australia. I miss the sweet encounters of wildlife in Australia, the sea salt whirling in my ear, the sand between my toes."

Mr Coyle said after exiting the Residential Surveillance at a Dedicated Facility system, Ms Cheng has been able to write a letter to her children and parents once a month.

He said in her correspondence, Ms Cheng tries to be optimistic to ensure her loved ones don't worry.

"She tries to, I think, be as upbeat and irreverent with her humour as she possibly can be, because I think that, you know, she gives strength back to those people who care about her as well," Mr Coyle told 7.30.

He says the Australian government has organised regular consular visits but Mr Coyle holds concerns for his partner's wellbeing.

"I definitely notice more and more the toll that it takes on her in terms of the long-term separation from her children, that is, without doubt, the most difficult thing."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19340797

File: 0df26f614e458a3⋯.jpg (128.78 KB,1080x1440,3:4,Nick_Coyle_says_Cheng_Lei_….jpg)

File: 3c22df0e75ef97d⋯.jpg (153.24 KB,869x1600,869:1600,Nick_Coyle_is_Cheng_Lei_s_….jpg)

File: e450fe3887e9f7b⋯.jpg (138.03 KB,750x401,750:401,SPW_6.jpg)

>>19340781

2/2

No warning before arrest

Ms Cheng's arrest happened eight months after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic when diplomatic relations between Australia and China had broken down.

Since the change of federal government in Australia, the relationship has improved, with Beijing issuing an invitation this year for the Australian prime minister to travel to China.

It is not known whether movement on Ms Cheng's case will be a condition of the prime minister accepting that invitation.

Mr Coyle, who until July 2022 used to be the head of the China-Australia Chamber of Commerce, said a resolution in Ms Cheng's case will bring the two countries closer together.

"What I would say is that Lei’s case I think is very important to improving the atmospherics," he said.

"So, the sooner this case is resolved compassionately, and expeditiously, the sooner, you know, people's minds can be focused on the positive aspects of bilateral engagement."

In a statement to 7.30, Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong said: "Australia has consistently advocated for Ms Cheng, and asked that basic standards of justice, procedural fairness and humane treatment to be met for Ms Cheng, in accordance with international norms."

The Chinese Embassy in Canberra told 7.30 that it was important to stress that "China is under the rule of law".

"China's judicial authorities have handled the case in accordance with the law, and the lawful rights of Cheng are under full protection," it said.

The embassy also said, "based on humanitarian considerations, China is ready to listen to Australia's demands and provide assistance within the scope of legal provisions."

Mr Coyle hopes his partner's case will be resolved quickly.

"You would like to think these things are above politics? I certainly hope it is. And let's just get it resolved in her home to her family, and so she can get on with her life, and her children can have their mother back."

'I miss my children'

In her statement, Cheng Lei makes a single mention of the possibility of freedom.

"I can't believe I used to avoid the sun when I was living back in Australia, although knowing Melbourne weather, it will probably rain for the first two weeks after I return."

Mr Coyle said Ms Cheng's children, aged 12 and 14, are doing their best to cope with a "horrible situation."

"She's missed her daughter going into high school, her son will go into high school next year. Those are times she can't get back, you know. Her daughter needs a mum going through these sorts of times … teenage adolescent, you know, time of life when mum's guidance can be so valuable."

The statement concludes with a brief line reminding the public of the most acute suffering caused by her imprisonment.

"Most of all, I miss my children," she said.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-08-10/cheng-leis-message-from-chinese-prison-730/102712716

https://twitter.com/SenatorWong/status/1689757748270190595

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19340831

File: ecff1c64b3c2135⋯.jpg (130.81 KB,1080x1440,3:4,In_a_letter_Cheng_Lei_desc….jpg)

>>19340781

China visit not conditional on Cheng Lei’s release, says Albanese

Michael Smith - Aug 11, 2023

Tokyo | Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says his planned visit to China this year is not conditional on the release of detained Australian journalist Cheng Lei, who has written an emotional letter on her three years in jail.

Mr Albanese called for the mother of two, detained in China on national security charges, to be released.

However, the prime minister would not call off his visit if this did not happen and said dialogue should not be transactional but was instead constructive to sort out disagreements with other countries.

“Visits and engagement and dialogue should not be transactional. Visits and dialogue are something that in themselves are constructive. The worst thing that can happen between nations that have disagreements is that they stop talking,” Mr Albanese told journalists on Friday.

He described as “moving” Ms Cheng’s first public message since her arrest, which was released in the form of a “love letter” to Australia’s 25 million people. She describes in the letter how she misses Australia and pretends to give her family members hugs from inside her jail cell.

“In my cell, the sunlight shines through the window, but I can stand in it for only 10 hours a year,” the letter said. “I haven’t seen a tree in 3 years.

“I relive every bushwalk, river, lake, beach with swims, and picnics and psychedelic sunsets, sky that’s lit up with stars, and the silent and secret symphony of the bush.”

Ms Cheng, 48, a high-profile television anchor with Chinese state television, was detained in August 2020. She has not been allowed to speak with her children, aged 14 and 11, who live in Melbourne with her mother.

Her trial was held behind closed doors in March, but the court has not yet handed down a verdict, and her sentencing has been repeatedly deferred.

There had been initial hopes that a thawing in Sino-Australian relations under the Albanese government would pave the way for Ms Cheng’s release, but there has been no significant progress so far.

Supporters are hopeful that Mr Albanese’s planned visit to China could be the catalyst for her release. But Beijing has given no indication yet that it is prepared to let her go despite repeated appeals by the Albanese government.

Last week, China lifted its tariffs on Australian barley as it winds back sanctions on $20 billion worth of exports amid improving relations.

On Friday, Mr Albanese said he wanted to visit China and would discuss a date going forward. He said trade sanctions as well as Ms Cheng’s release would be on the table.

“I believe it is clearly the case that Cheng Lei, who now has had three years in detention, this issue should be resolved. They should be resolved by Cheng Lei not being kept in detention in the way that she has,” he said.

“We will always stand up for the interests of Australian citizens. And we continue to do so. We have respectful discussions.”

Beijing has accused Ms Cheng of providing state secrets to a foreign country, but details of the accusations have never been made clear. Ms Cheng, who was born in China but grew up in Australia where she has citizenship, was detained at a time when tensions between Beijing and the former Morrison government were high.

China’s ambassador to Australia, Xiao Qian, told journalists in January that he hoped there would be a solution to her case “as soon as possible, but we need to respect the legal process”. Another Australian, writer Yang Hengjun, has also been detained in China.

https://www.afr.com/world/asia/albanese-says-china-visit-not-conditional-on-cheng-lei-s-release-20230811-p5dvtz

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19341000

File: 53d93e77d841ea6⋯.mp4 (10.34 MB,960x540,16:9,_After_School_Satan_Club_m….mp4)

File: 28aa8837d950de5⋯.jpg (204.63 KB,1080x1080,1:1,366889757_677169741103841_….jpg)

>>19105014 (pb)

>>19144068 (pb)

'After School Satan Club' meeting canceled by City of Chesapeake

Julia Varnier - Aug 10, 2023

CHESAPEAKE, Va. — We're seeing new developments between the city of Chesapeake and a controversial after-school club.

The Satanic Temple shared on social media that Thursday's meeting of the 'After School Satan Club' at Indian River Library had been canceled by the city.

Club leaders believe this is unconstitutional.

The city says their policies require groups to assure that events don't pose a threat to public health, safety or welfare. Their full response can be found below.

"The City has adopted uniform policies and user agreements which set forth the requirements, parameters, and expectations necessary to assure that events do not pose a threat to public health, safety or welfare or otherwise disrupt City operations. Individuals or organizations failing to comply with these polices and/or agreements are subject to having their facility usage cancelled by the City."

City leaders wouldn't say how this meeting violated those policies.

They say they sent specific details to the Satan Club, but would not share those elsewhere.

We've reached out to the Satan Club for comment and have not heard back.

https://www.wtkr.com/news/in-the-community/chesapeake/after-school-satan-club-meeting-canceled-by-city-of-chesapeake

https://www.instagram.com/p/CvvfdUlR4tO/

>Humanity is good, but, when we let our guard down we allow darkness to infiltrate and destroy.

>Like past battles fought, we now face our greatest battle at present, a battle to save our Republic, our way of life, and what we decide (each of us) now will decide our future.

>Will we be a free nation under God?

>Or will we cede our freedom, rights and liberty to the enemy?

>If America falls so does the world.

>If America falls darkness will soon follow.

>Only when we stand together, only when we are united, can we defeat this highly entrenched dark enemy.

>This is not about politics.

>This is about preserving our way of life and protecting the generations that follow.

>We are living in Biblical times.

>Children of light vs children of darkness.

>United against the Invisible Enemy of all humanity.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19346018

File: 25ba8361e049782⋯.jpg (1.44 MB,3671x2447,3671:2447,US_ambassador_Caroline_Ken….jpg)

>>19321154

>>19326780

>>19333564

Caroline Kennedy says alliance won’t sink if Trump elected

Peter Hartcher and Matthew Knott - August 12, 2023

US ambassador Caroline Kennedy says Australia will be able to count on America as a reliable ally in a crisis even if Donald Trump returns to the White House, adding she is hopeful Congress will this year pass laws to allow the transfer of America’s most sensitive military technology to Australia.

Congress is currently debating legislation to allow the sale of up to three nuclear-powered submarines to Australia, as proposed by the AUKUS agreement, and to grant its ally a broad exemption to tough defence export controls.

Amid rising concern at the prospect of US unpredictability under a second Trump presidency, Kennedy argued that overwhelming bipartisan support for the alliance with Australia would transcend the personalities in the White House.

“Everyone in the US loves Australia,” she told this masthead in the first extended interview of her term in Canberra.

Kennedy conceded there was “a lot of drama and attention” in American politics heading into next year’s presidential election. But asked whether Australia should prepare a Plan B in case of US unreliability under Trump, the ambassador said: “I think that foreign policy historically, and certainly now and certainly in this region, enjoys real bipartisan support. I’m confident that Australia should be able to count on us.”

Asked whether she was suggesting that Australia relax about the prospect of Trump’s return, she said: “I don’t know if I’d use the word ‘relax’,” but “everyone in the US Congress, everyone in the US loves Australia, appreciates Australia, [that] we have no more capable partner and ally.”

The two nations shared values, interests and goals, she added. “I know that what Australia and the US want is peace and stability.”

Kennedy said she was working hard to change US laws to enable the AUKUS agreement to be implemented as quickly as possible, including the sale of three to five of America’s nuclear-powered submarines, starting from 2032. But this is unprecedented and prohibited under US law.

Kennedy said there was “a tremendously complicated set of regulations and laws” that Congress needed to change, but that “hopefully, by the end of the year, it will be part of the Defence Authorisation Act”.

Senior Biden administration sources privately say that key legislation underpinning both of the so-called AUKUS pillars will pass this year, allowing the submarine transfer and deeper co-operation on other technologies such as cyber, electronic warfare, quantum technology, hypersonics, artificial intelligence and autonomous military capabilities.

While it may seem surprising that a Kennedy, as a member of one of America’s storied Democrat dynasties and the representative of Joe Biden, would defend Trump, “it’s fascinating and reassuring that she says that because it shows how committed her administration is to presenting a bipartisan front”, said Rory Medcalf, head of the ANU National Security College.

Medcalf said he found this comment “credible and reassuring” and “consistent with soundings I’ve taken inside the US system”, although “you can never be certain” about Congressional negotiations.

Kennedy said that Australia and the US needed to do more to help the Pacific island nations manage climate change. She starkly illustrated its effects through her family’s long connection to the Solomons Islands, where her father, John F. Kennedy, was marooned in World War II after a Japanese destroyer sank his patrol boat in August 1943.

“The island my father swam to is now two islands because of rising sea levels,” she said.

The ambassador recently visited the Solomons and recreated part of the ocean swim her father did before he was found by Solomons scouts and rescued by an Australian coastwatcher.

“Kennedy Island is half the size it used to be, so this is something that … doesn’t feel as urgent and imminent and existential in the US,” the ambassador said.

“There’s a huge effort going into this, but it can’t happen fast enough.”

Anyone who doubted that human activity was driving climate change should, she said, “just go outside in a tornado”.

Kennedy said that Australia and the US were aligned on many areas including democratic values, security interests and climate change but also culture, including a love of beer and sport.

“So I think, you know, that’s one of the great and most rewarding things about serving in a country that’s as aligned with the US and is just feeling that sort of joy in the partnership.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/caroline-kennedy-says-alliance-won-t-sink-if-trump-elected-20230811-p5dvt5.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19349726

File: de39417186a91c5⋯.jpg (190.43 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Senator_Jacinta_Nampijinpa….jpg)

File: d5d148be3aab49b⋯.jpg (205.06 KB,1182x1575,394:525,_Overdone_Peter_Dutton.jpg)

File: 99d4ac276158c77⋯.jpg (561.91 KB,2048x2731,2048:2731,_Over_the_top_David_Little….jpg)

File: fcc45c3d8b1da3e⋯.jpg (143.83 KB,1024x1367,1024:1367,_Sensible_management_requi….jpg)

File: a6234bbeb6ddf14⋯.jpg (155.81 KB,1665x2218,1665:2218,_Tiresome_and_divisive_Ale….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19297392

Jacinta Price says ‘Australians don’t need to be welcomed to their own country’

JOE KELLY - AUGUST 13, 2023

Opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman, Jacinta Price, has called for an end to welcome to country acknowledgments before every sporting event and public gathering because the practice is “wrong” and dividing the nation.

The attack comes after former prime minister Tony Abbott last week conceded he was “getting a little bit sick” of welcome to country, arguing the nation “belongs to all of us, not just to some of us.”

Senator Price, a Warlpiri-­Celtic woman who grew up in Alice Springs and the leading campaign spokeswoman against Anthony Albanese’s constitutionally enshrined voice to parliament, said “Australians don’t need to be welcomed to their own country”.

“There is no problem with acknowledging our history, but rolling out these performances before every sporting event or public gathering is definitely divisive,” Senator Price told The Australian.

“It’s not welcoming, it’s telling non-Indigenous Australians ‘this isn’t your country’ and that’s wrong. We are all Australians and we share this great land.”

Peter Dutton last week said he thought that welcome to country was a “respectful way to acknowledge the Indigenous heritage of our country” but argued the practice was overdone and often used as an exercise in virtue signalling.

“I do get the point that when you go to a function and there’s an MC who I think appropriately can do recognition, you then get the next five or 10 speakers who each do their own acknowledgment to country, and frankly, I think it detracts from the significance of the statement that’s being made,” he told 2GB. “I think there are a lot of corporates that just do it because they think it’s what people want to hear.”

An acknowledgment of country is made every sitting day alongside the Lord’s Prayer in both the Senate and House of Representatives – a practice that was introduced in 2010.

A number of Coalition MPs on Sunday supported the substance of Senator Price’s comments, with Nationals Leader David Littleproud saying that welcome to country had “just gone over the top.”

“I think unfortunately what’s happened – it’s not just sporting events – you can go to a meeting and everyone makes an acknowledgment,” Mr Littleproud said. “I think it’s gone overboard. It’s gone too far. Is it necessary? I think it’s a reasonable question to ask.”

MP Keith Pitt said the welcome to country was supposed to be “culturally significant.”

“If that’s the case they should be treated as such, not thrown around on T-shirts, email signatures, video conferences and aircraft arrivals,” he said. “I think sensible management would be widely welcomed.”

South Australian Liberal senator Alex Antic said the idea a “welcome” should be “constantly extended for Australians to be in their own country is tiresome and divisive”.

“Endless acknowledgments of country performed by white middle class professionals before meetings do little more than brick in their credentials in front of an imaginary court of wokeness approval,” he said.

“These clashes against Western values only subside when courage culture triumphs over cancel culture and the use of these gestures ceases.”

LNP senator Gerard Rennick said the welcome to country should be reserved for special occasions, arguing it was now an example of “virtue signalling that’s gone mad”.

“It’s overkill,” he said. “You feel like they are shoving it down your throat.”

In a piece for The Australian last November, Senator Price said welcome to country had become “a standard ritual practice before events, meetings and social gatherings” but argued she had received “more than my fill of being symbolically recognised”.

“It would be far more dignifying if we were recognised and respected as individuals in our own right who are not simply defined by our racial heritage but by the content of our character,” she said.

When he was prime minister, Scott Morrison adopted the practice of giving Australia’s veterans equal billing with Indigenous elders “past, present and emerging” when speaking at formal events and ceremonies.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/jacinta-price-says-australians-dont-need-to-be-welcomed-to-their-own-country/news-story/4e682cade18173932bddd51c749509b0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19349755

File: d7fcda25d69dfef⋯.jpg (302.57 KB,2048x1536,4:3,A_portrait_of_Jacinta_Namp….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19297392

>>19349726

The heart of the matter

All Australians are created equal, and they should be treated in the same manner.

JACINTA NAMPIJINPA PRICE - November 19, 2022

1/3

“When you want to help people, you tell them the truth. When you want to help yourself, you tell them what they want to hear.”

That’s one of my favourite quotes from Thomas Sowell, the great American writer and thinker. Sowell grew up in segregated North Carolina, and then lived in Harlem. His father died before he was born and his mother was unable to care for him; consequently, his brother and sisters had him adopted by his great-aunt. After Sowell dropped out of high school he was drafted into the US Marine Corps during the Korean War. After his discharge he studied at Harvard University, Columbia University and the University of Chicago, and he’s regarded as one of the most brilliant economists of his generation. Sowell has fought against ignorance and racism all his life and he’s done that on the basis that we are all individuals worthy of respect, regardless of our skin colour or background.

We are all entitled to the dignity of being treated as individuals who can make choices and have responsibilities. Unfortunately, this is not how the left see it. The left seek to divide us by pigeon-holing society into two classes, the oppressors and the oppressed. They have carefully manufactured gender stereotypes for men and women while, simultaneously, generating brand-new gender constructs. They have also developed racial stereotypes, enshrined within Critical Race Theory, to condemn the “white race” as oppressors, and subjugate “people of colour” as victims. If I were to follow leftist dogma and regard myself as nothing more than an oppressed Aboriginal woman, I would be wallowing in my victimhood and rationalising the notion that I am inferior to my oppressors. According to that dogma I have no agency in my life and no ability to make choices. This is dogma that we must reject, for many reasons, not the least because it is patronising and deeply dehumanising.

We are a lucky people living in a lucky nation. Our way of life, democracy, and freedoms are the envy of the world. We have welcomed millions of people to our shores and there are so many more people who would rather live in Australia than anywhere else. But we can never forget that nations, just like individuals, very much make their own luck. We are lucky Australia was settled by the British rather than colonialists from any other country. History cannot be undone, and the inevitable inquiring explorations of mankind have meant all corners of the Earth have been settled. This landmass we call home was never going to be left untouched by anyone other than our First Peoples. The British brought with them the rule of law, concepts such as freedom of speech and freedom of religion, and what became our democracy. Too often when young Australians are taught history, these gifts are either ignored or taken for granted. Yes, like every nation our history features dark and shameful incidents but that is not our whole history. We shouldn’t shy away from the fact that our history is made up of the good and the bad. There is much to celebrate from our efforts to strive to make better lives for all Australians.

Our nation’s schools’ sole responsibility should be to educate, not indoctrinate, but we have in recent times witnessed the overwhelming politicisation of our children. Children are now encouraged to skip school to be paraded as activist spearheads by adults who place the weight of the world on their shoulders. Meanwhile, children in remote communities, where school atten­dance rates are in some places as low as 19 per cent, do not have the privilege of gaining an education that the activist class take for granted. Everyone wants to be an activist – to push governments to solve their dilemmas – but no one wants to be responsible for themselves.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19349756

File: 00fda421a114f30⋯.jpg (219.38 KB,2048x1152,16:9,We_need_to_focus_on_nation….jpg)

>>19349755

2/3

Our aim should not be to blame our current democratic institutions for all our perceived failures but to encourage the individual responsibility of all Australians. We need to focus on nation building, not nation burning.

Cancel culture’s war on free thinking and free speech must be brought to an end. In order for future generations to benefit from common sense we must arm ourselves with the weapon of truth and stand unified with pride in our shared Australian values and national identity.

When we live in reality, when we call out and say “the emperor has no clothes”, we can begin to solve some of our most challenging problems and we can begin to lift our marginalised out of the pit of their despair. It is time to reassert the values that all good and decent people have fought the hard, long battle to impose through law, the right to freedom of speech, and the overcoming of racism and sexism. All it takes is courage and good sense.

When cultures collide, as happened in Australia over two centuries ago, everyone is affected, for good and for ill. My mother was born under a tree and lived within an original Warlpiri structured environment through a kinship system on Aboriginal land. Her first language was Warlpiri, and her parents, my grandparents, only came into contact with white settlers in their early adolescence in the 1940s. I’m proud my family are from the Northern Territory. In the Territory we call a spade a spade. We are realists and this is likely due to the direct connection to our environment. We have space to think, and the harsh reality of our country is that you need to be very aware of your surroundings and yourself; otherwise, you could perish rather quickly. We had the foundation of a sophisticated but brutal culture, where it was kill or be killed over resources such as water, women and later livestock – food for survival – or from doing the wrong thing like marrying the wrong way or sharing knowledge that’s not yours to share.

I can understand the widespread willingness to recognise Australia’s Indigenous heritage. But most of that “recognition” is virtue-signalling.

In Australia, we have experienced historically significant acts of symbolism that include the 2000 reconciliation walk across Sydney Harbour Bridge. For six hours, 250,000 Australians of all backgrounds walked together to demonstrate the fact that we are not racist but are overwhelmingly in support of Aboriginal Australia. We have spent a week every year since, commemorating this event and what it means.

Throughout Australia, the reinvention of culture has brought us welcome to country or recognition of country, a standard ritual practice before events, meetings and social gatherings by governments, corporates, institutions, primary schools, kindergartens, high schools, universities, workplaces, music festivals, gallery openings, conferences, airline broadcasts and so on and so forth. I personally have had more than my fill of being symbolically recognised.

Australians of Indigenous heritage haven’t only been racially stereotyped – we’ve been politically stereotyped too. Because of my skin colour I’m supposed to vote Labor. It was an exchange with the former leader of the Labor Party Bill Hayden, who conveyed this very stereotype, that compelled Neville Bonner to confirm his membership within the Liberal Party of Australia. Bonner had been handing out how-to-vote cards for a Liberal friend when Hayden exclaimed, “What are you doing handing out those how-to-vote cards? We do more for you bloody Aborigines than those bastards do.” “Well,” Bonner thought, “How dare someone come up to me and presume that, because I’m black, I should support a particular party!”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19349757

File: be943f47ec3bec0⋯.jpg (396.43 KB,1222x1629,1222:1629,Over_250_000_walking_acros….jpg)

>>19349756

3/3

It is the same attitude we hear with platitudes of motherhood statements from our now Prime Minister, who suggests, without any evidence whatsoever, that a Voice to parliament bestowed upon us through the virtuous act of symbolic gesture by this government is what is going to empower us. This government has yet to demonstrate how this proposed Voice will deliver practical outcomes and unite, rather than drive a wedge further between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australia. And, no, Prime Minister, we don’t need another handout, as you have described the Uluru statement to be. No – we Indigenous Australians have not come to agreement on this statement, as you have also claimed. It would be far more dignifying if we were recognised and respected as individuals in our own right who are not simply defined by our racial heritage but by the content of our character.

For all the symbolism and the “recognition” the left claims it provides to Indigenous Australians, the left continues to ignore Indigenous communities. The lifting of alcohol bans in dry communities, despite the warnings from elders, will see the scourge of alcoholism and violence return to those communities. Coupled with this, we see the removal of the cashless debit card, which allowed countless families on welfare to feed their children rather than seeing the money claimed by kinship demand from alcoholics, substance abusers and gamblers in their own family group. I could not offer two more appalling examples of legislation pushed by left-wing elites guaranteed to worsen the lives of Indigenous people. Yet at the same time we spend days and weeks each year recognising Aboriginal Australia in many ways – in symbolic gestures that fail to push the needle one micro-millimetre toward improving the lives of the most marginalised in any genuine way.

The left are more interested in symbolism than outcomes. Symbolism is easy. Creating a symbol is a one-off act that doesn’t require diligence and persistence. Once it’s done it’s done, and you can move on to the next symbol of your virtue. Achieving outcomes is hard. There are no easy wins and achievement is measured not on the front page of a newspaper but over years and decades of hard work.

More recently the emotional weaponisation of the word “heart” in Uluru Statement from the Heart, the Voice and now the repeated use of the question “if not now, then when?” have all been crafted to appeal to our emotions. But we have every right to question, seek clarity or outright disagree with a vague proposal that’s being sold as a completely new approach to resolving disadvantage.

I began this essay by quoting Thomas Sowell. Something else he said goes like this – “If you have always believed that everyone should play by the same rules and be judged by the same standards, that would have gotten you labelled a radical 60 years ago, a liberal 30 years ago and a racist today.” I believe one of our great strengths as a country is that, as Australians, we all play by the same rules and every Australian is entitled to equal dignity and respect, regardless of our background and upbringing, and regardless of how many generations our forebears have been here. Australia is a great country and our way of life is the envy of the world. I am proud to be Australian.

Jacinta Nampijinpa Price is a Country Liberal Party senator for the NT. This essay for Essays for Australia draws on some of her recent comments and writing.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/the-heart-of-the-matter-in-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/86ff25a16a7e71abe17854edba256840

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19349772

File: 1fa22f566a2ee76⋯.jpg (229.49 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_party_leaders_are_at_o….jpg)

File: 8621622990fdbf5⋯.jpg (211.38 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Mr_Dutton_has_supported_le….jpg)

File: 6733692d0494a44⋯.jpg (187.38 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Mr_Littleproud_said_he_has….jpg)

File: 5b0f08d10f683c4⋯.jpg (68.89 KB,1280x720,16:9,Deputy_Opposition_leader_S….jpg)

File: 6dd28ea12ead837⋯.jpg (152.39 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Mr_Albanese_is_yet_to_conf….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19340258

‘Real concern’: David Littleproud at odds with Peter Dutton over alternative to Voice referendum

ELLEN RANSLEY - AUGUST 13, 2023

The Coalition is split on what they would take to the next election should the Voice to parliament referendum fail.

While neither the Liberals or the Nationals support a Voice to parliament, both support constitutionally enshrined recognition of Indigenous Australians.

While Mr Dutton has pledged to legislate local and regional voices, a fracture has emerged over what the Coalition would take to voters at the next election should the referendum fail.

Speaking on ABC’s Insiders on Sunday, Nationals leader David Littleproud said he had concerns over “regional models”.

“What it means to us in regional and remote areas is hundreds of thousands of square kilometres – not 20 square kilometres across a couple of suburbs,” he told host David Speers.

Mr Littleproud said while the Nationals party room had not come to a final position, he said the party did not need to agree with the Liberal’s position on legislating local and regional voices.

“Well, that‘s OK. I’m in the National Party. And if the National Party doesn’t get comfort with that, that’s what we stand for,” he said.

Mr Littleproud said regional bodies would struggle to property represent massive land masses that were made up of “hundreds of diverse communities”.

He instead signalled his support for local Indigenous bodies, saying empowering local elders would deliver better outcomes for First Nations people.

Mr Dutton does not support a national Voice to parliament, but has thrown his support behind legislating local and regional voices.

The apparent split in the opposition comes a day after NSW Liberal leader Mark Speakman backed in the proposed Voice to parliament, saying the rewards “outweigh the risks”.

Mr Speakman said he came to his conclusion after having “taken the time to reflect carefully” on the proposed Voice.

“It is a proposal for a purely advisory body on behalf of Indigenous Australians, who are far and away the most disadvantaged people in our nation,” he said.

“On balance, I think the potential rewards outweigh the potential risks, and I personally support a Voice in the Australian Constitution.”

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese congratulated Mr Speakman for his “very clear statements” on Saturday as he made a pointed message to the Coalition, and undecided voters.

“There were people during the Republic Referendum who said, ‘Oh, I don’t particularly like this model. I will wait for the next vote.’ That was last century,” he said.

“It is 2023, we are still waiting and there is no vote on the horizon. I say to Australians, this is an opportunity. Don’t miss it.”

“(To Peter Dutton I say) Don’t use this issue to cause division. Don’t use this issue. It is something that I have pleaded with him on. I’ve put the case very strongly.

Mr Albanese has yet to set the date for the referendum, but after confirming a visit to the United States for late October, it’s increasingly likely Australians will head to the polls in the first few weeks of October.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/real-concern-david-littleproud-at-odds-with-peter-dutton-over-alternative-to-voice-referendum/news-story/3f2ec39edeb1c67920ddcf9858a3e337

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19349795

File: 7fd6ba99c972320⋯.jpg (284.09 KB,455x569,455:569,Lt_Gen_Stephen_D_Sklenka.jpg)

File: 9da7351dcd12e1a⋯.jpg (249.29 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Chair_of_the_US_House_Sele….jpg)

File: 1efd05b8bf1f1a4⋯.jpg (272.91 KB,1600x899,1600:899,The_Chinese_Coast_Guard_al….jpg)

>>19333477

>>19340337

China won’t take the US military’s calls. A top general claims that makes war more likely

Matthew Knott - August 13, 2023

China’s military is becoming dangerously arrogant and is fuelling the risk of war with the United States by refusing offers to communicate with commanders in the Indo-Pacific, one of America’s most senior military officials has warned.

Lieutenant General Stephen Sklenka, deputy commander of the US Indo-Pacific Command, said he feared that China would seek to establish a military base in Solomon Islands or another Pacific nation as it sought to dominate the region.

Sklenka added that he saw value in Republican congressman Mike Gallagher’s idea of positioning US hypersonic missiles in Australia and other key locations across the Pacific as a way to deter China from launching an invasion of the self-governing island of Taiwan.

“We do not want this fight to happen, and to do that you need to present a credible, combat-capable force west of the international date line,” he said in an interview on the sidelines of the Australian American Leadership Dialogue in Canberra.

“It’s my belief that the CCP [Chinese Communist Party] responds only to strength and that strength needs to be demonstrated persistently.”

Sklenka said trends in the region were “not going the right direction in many ways”, pointing to a rise in “unsafe and unprofessional activities” by the Chinese military.

The Philippines last week accused China’s coast guard of firing a water cannon at its vessels in the disputed waters of the South China Sea, an action it described as illegal and dangerous.

Sklenka said the US military’s top priority was preventing the breakout of a war with China, but this goal was being stymied by the “non-existent” dialogue between Chinese and American military commanders.

He said the lack of engagement at the “war-fighting level” increased the risk that a misunderstanding could morph into conflict.

“Admiral Aquilino [the head of the US Indo-Pacific Command] has had a standing invitation to talk with his eastern theatre and southern theatre counterparts but had received no response,” Sklenka said.

“I got to Indo-Pacific Command over four years ago, I’ve worked for two combatant commanders. Neither one of those gentlemen has ever been able to have a conversation with their counterpart. It’s dangerous.”

The Chinese military’s eastern theatre command covers the East China Sea and Taiwan Strait, while its southern theatre command includes the South China Sea.

Sklenka, who is based in Hawaii, continued: “The problem we’re having is that the Chinese treat communication as a reward for behaviour that suits their interests.

“My response is: that’s not what great powers do. Great powers talk to each other even when they don’t agree. They talk to each other because that’s the only way we’re going to understand each other and reduce the risk of a miscalculation occurring.”

Sklenka said he believed increased training by China’s People’s Liberation Army was breeding a new sense of confidence and assertiveness.

“That increased assertiveness is going to cause, I think, a hubris that turns into arrogance,” he said.

“And when they start getting arrogant that’s going to be a problem because the fact is that we’re all flying and operating high-performance machines.”

Former prime minister Kevin Rudd, now Australia’s ambassador to the US, said last week: “We are in a region where the risk of crisis, conflict and war is real – not a theory, it’s a real threat.”

While there was much focus on the possibility of a Chinese invasion of Taiwan, Sklenka said there were several possible triggers for a conflict between the US and China including an island grab by Beijing in the South China Sea.

He said he does not take Beijing at its word when it says it does not want to establish a military base in Solomon Islands, a nation with which it has signed far-reaching security and policing agreements.

He noted that Beijing denied having any plans to establish a base in the African nation of Djibouti before doing so in 2017.

“Despite the Chinese saying right now they have no intent to build a military base in Solomon Islands, we have to ask ourselves: do they have the capabilities? I think that they do. And I will be surprised if they don’t at least try.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/china-won-t-take-the-us-military-s-calls-a-top-general-claims-that-makes-war-more-likely-20230813-p5dw4e.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19355431

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19243381

‘There’s a way to resolve it’: United States ambassador Caroline Kennedy flags Assange plea deal

Matthew Knott - August 14, 2023

1/2

United States ambassador Caroline Kennedy has flagged a potential plea deal between Julian Assange and US authorities that could end America’s pursuit of the WikiLeaks founder and allow him to return to Australia.

As hopes fade among Assange’s supporters that the Biden administration will abandon its extradition request, a David Hicks-style plea bargain has emerged as the most likely way for Assange to avoid a drawn-out criminal trial on espionage charges and a possible lengthy jail term in a maximum security US prison.

Assange’s legal options to avoid being extradited from the United Kingdom to the US could be exhausted within two months, coinciding with a visit by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to Washington D.C. in late October.

Asked whether she believed it was possible for the US and Australia to reach a diplomatic outcome on the Assange matter, Kennedy said it was an “ongoing case” being handled by the Department of Justice.

“So it’s not really a diplomatic issue, but I think that there absolutely could be a resolution,” she said in an interview at her residence in Canberra.

Kennedy noted US Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s recent comments that the charges against Assange were serious and that he had allegedly endangered US national security by publishing leaked classified information.

“But there is a way to resolve it,” she emphasised, adding: “You can read the [newspapers] just like I can.”

Pressed on whether US authorities could strike a deal with Assange to reduce the charges against him in exchange for a guilty plea she said: “That’s up to the Justice Department.”

Assange’s brother Gabriel Shipton said: “Caroline Kennedy wouldn’t be saying these things if they didn’t want a way out.

“The Americans want this off their plate.”

Kennedy met with members of the Parliamentary Friends of Julian Assange Group in May, fuelling hopes of a breakthrough in his case.

The US is seeking to extradite Assange from London’s Belmarsh prison to face 17 counts of breaching the US Espionage Act plus a separate hacking-related charge.

Australian National University international law expert Don Rothwell said Kennedy’s comments reflected the fact the Biden administration was “very unlikely” to drop the charges against Assange outright.

Rothwell said the more realistic option was that US authorities could downgrade the charges against Assange in exchange for a guilty plea, taking into account the four years he has already spent in prison in the UK.

The remainder of any sentence could be served in Australia under a prisoner transfer agreement between the two countries, he said.

The complication was that Assange would be required to travel to the US and admit guilt, he said.

“Everything we know about Julian Assange suggests this would be a significant sticking point for him,” Rothwell said.

He added: “It’s not possible to strike a plea deal outside the relevant jurisdiction except in the most exceptional circumstances.”

But Shipton said the idea of his brother travelling to the US to strike a deal was a “non-starter” because of the risk it could lead him to attempt suicide.

“Julian cannot go to the US under any circumstances,” he said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19355433

File: 25ba8361e049782⋯.jpg (1.44 MB,3671x2447,3671:2447,US_ambassador_Caroline_Ken….jpg)

File: e147c7193837ab2⋯.jpg (1.91 MB,3080x3712,385:464,Julian_Assange_pictured_le….jpg)

File: f5e49012c34b323⋯.jpg (1.56 MB,3656x2437,3656:2437,Stella_Assange_wife_of_Jul….jpg)

>>19355431

2/2

Albanese alluded to a plea deal earlier this year when he that “a solution needs to be found that brings this matter to a conclusion”, adding that “Mr Assange needs to be a part of that, of course”.

Labor MP Julian Hill, a prominent Assange supporter, said: “I stand by my previous comments that no one should judge Mr Assange if he cuts a deal to get the hell out of there.

“In the meantime, I urge UK and US authorities to take concerns about Julian’s health more seriously and to move him out of maximum security prison as a sign of good faith.”

Assange lost his latest appeal against the US extradition order in June, and his supporters say he may have exhausted all appeal options by the time Albanese visits the US in late October.

Lawyer Greg Barns, an adviser to the Australian Assange campaign, said: “It is imperative that Anthony Albanese put Assange’s case on the official agenda for his meeting with Biden and to make clear that this matter goes to the heart of the US-Australia alliance.”

During a trip to Australia last month, Blinken pushed back on Australian calls for the charges against Assange to be dropped.

“Mr Assange was charged with very serious criminal conduct in the United States in connection with his alleged role in one of the largest compromises of classified information in the history of our country,” Blinken told reporters.

“The actions that he is alleged to have committed risked very serious harm to our national security, to the benefit of our adversaries, and put named human sources at grave risk of physical harm, grave risk of detention.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/there-s-a-way-to-resolve-it-caroline-kennedy-flags-assange-plea-deal-20230811-p5dvwd.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZB6JiIGV4I

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19355508

File: d661ff64916d318⋯.jpg (447.25 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Qantas_has_unveiled_its_ne….jpg)

File: a3106140f2ae9be⋯.jpg (241.13 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Former_Australian_rules_fo….jpg)

File: 7b8d7f3d1374cf4⋯.jpg (236.81 KB,1745x982,1745:982,Yananyi_Dreaming_the_Qanta….jpg)

File: 31a905a6411c904⋯.jpg (341.1 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Linda_Burney_and_Noel_Pear….jpg)

File: 4b09fef644154f1⋯.jpg (194.85 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19297392

Qantas takes support for the voice to parliament to the skies with ‘yes23’ livery

ROBYN IRONSIDE - AUGUST 14, 2023

Qantas will not rule out further measures to drum up support for the voice to parliament after painting three of its aircraft with the “Yes23” campaign logo.

The Qantas Boeing 737, Jetstar A320 and QantasLink Dash 8 were unveiled at a major event in Sydney on Monday attended by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, the voice architect Noel Pearson, former AFL star Adam Goodes and Qantas’ entire senior leadership team.

Outgoing chief executive Alan Joyce said they were backing the campaign because they believed “a formal voice to government would help close the gap for First Nations people in important areas like health, education and employment”.

“We’re doing that in a number of ways,” Mr Joyce said of Qantas’ support.

“First we’re helping the Yes23 team to get around the country and share their messages with people all over the Australia. We’re also helping the Uluru Dialogue to do the same thing.

“We’re also literally flying the flag — we have three aircraft with the Yes23 logo. These aircraft will cover a huge amount of the country — every major city, every major town will get to see this message.”

Beyond those measures, no decision had been made on other potential forms of support including in-flight announcements.

Mr Joyce said Qantas’ relationship with First Nations people went right back to their early days, when the airline’s founders were given assistance to locate suitable landing sites.

“Then of course Qantas was one of the first companies to have a reconciliation action plan,” he said.

“We have internships and trainee programs in schools to provide high quality jobs, and we also have a program working with First Nations suppliers.”

Qantas also introduced a brief “welcome to country” on its domestic and international flights in late 2021 in a move that won praise from the federal government.

Mr Joyce acknowledged that not everyone would agree with Qantas’ support for the voice, and said “we respect that”.

“I encourage people to find out more, to listen to First Nations voices and to make their own decisions,” he said.

Anthony Albanese told guests at the Qantas event he was proud to lead a government that would give “every Australian the opportunity to vote for constitutional recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people”.

“The spirit of Australia says yes, and the spirit of Australia says yes because this will assist recognition in a practical way,” said Mr Albanese.

“Qantas has a long history of doing its bit to carry the nation, to lift all of us a little bit higher, both literally and figuratively and this is what this is about.”

Opposition transport and infrastructure spokeswoman Bridget McKenzie said Qantas’ actions “effectively marginalised” customers, shareholders and staff who planned to “respectfully vote no to constitutionally enshrined voice”.

“Corporates who support only the yes campaign legitimately risk alienating Australians who respectfully disagree,” said Senator McKenzie.

Other companies to publicly state their support for the campaign included the ANZ, Wesfarmers, Woolworths, Coles, Commonwealth Bank, Rio Tinto, BHP and National Australia Bank.

Virgin Australia recognised the “critical importance of the referendum for Australia’s reconciliation journey” but would not be taking a more public stance on the issue.

Instead the rival carrier was of the view that individuals should vote as they saw fit.

The Qantas backing came as the airline faced intense scrutiny of its close relationship with the federal government and Anthony Albanese.

It followed the government’s rejection of an application by Qatar Airways to operate more flights into the country, following Qantas’ objection.

Transport Minister Catherine King has struggled to explain why the decision was made, telling parliament last week it was “not in the national interest”.

Mr Joyce recently defended the relationship, and denied the government was in Qantas’ thrall, highlighting his opposition to multi-employer bargaining laws.

He also pointed out Mr Albanese had criticised Qantas when Mr Joyce grounded the airline in 2011 over industrial action by three employee groups.

Following the announcement, Qantas shares dipped slightly, closing down 1.5 per cent for the day at $6.39.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/aviation/qantas-takes-support-for-the-voice-to-parliament-to-the-skies-with-yes23-livery/news-story/b114410aee64a90b977b66e13c90a26a

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19355518

File: d432054dcc990cc⋯.jpg (3.79 MB,6555x4375,1311:875,A_Virginia_class_submarine.jpg)

File: e1ceeff5624a83a⋯.jpg (98.9 KB,1280x720,16:9,Labor_members_eager_for_sh….jpg)

File: 0157e5ef90f2f3b⋯.jpg (556.06 KB,2048x2730,1024:1365,Daniel_Mulino.jpg)

File: e24e22551a71ebe⋯.jpg (450.58 KB,1709x2279,1709:2279,Marcus_Strom.jpg)

>>19188991

>>19308139

Labor members eager for showdown on AUKUS at the party’s national conference

TROY BRAMSTON - AUGUST 14, 2023

Richard Marles will attempt to allay simmering concerns over AUKUS among Labor Party members and trade unions with a special briefing on Monday night, as a showdown over the nuclear defence pact at national conference is certain.

The briefing by the Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister is open to all party members and affiliated trade unions to be conducted via Zoom as local Labor branches and federal electorate councils continue to express opposition to the trilateral nuclear submarine pact.

The federal electorate council of Macquarie in NSW, covering the seat held by Susan Templeman, is the latest in a string of party units to call for an inquiry into AUKUS, failing to endorse it, and also urging the Albanese government to sign the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons.

Federal Electorate Councils covering the Labor-held seats of Sydney, Parramatta and Boothby have passed resolutions opposing AUKUS, joining more than 40 local Labor branches who have opposed the defence pact outright or called for a formal review.

The Australian can reveal that several motions opposing AUKUS have been submitted for debate at Labor’s national conference beginning on Thursday. But party activists say they have not yet been informed which motions, and in what form, they will be allowed for debate.

NSW Labor upper house MP Anthony D’Adam told The Australian that he is determined to see his motion, seconded by Shannen Potter, to be debated at the conference.

Mr D’Adam’s motion notes the acquisition of nuclear-powered submarines “contributes to a regional arms race” and undermines provisions in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. It says AUKUS aligns Australian defence policy with the US and “increases the likelihood of our involvement in a disastrous US-led war in Asia”.

The motion calls for the stated support for AUKUS in the draft National Platform to be deleted given the debate within the party and union movement about the value and purpose of AUKUS.

“It is essential for the integrity of Labor’s policymaking process that an issue as controversial as AUKUS is debated at the conference,” Mr D’Adam said. “Issues of peace, disarmament and nuclear non-proliferation have been articles of faith for the Left of the party for generations. How AUKUS is dealt with at the conference will establish whether there remains a genuine left wing in the Labor Party.”

It is understood the national AMWU and ETU remain opposed to AUKUS, as does the ACTU, which has a long-held commitment to opposing a nuclear defence industry, and are in talks to move motions at the conference.

This is expected to be similar to the motion submitted to the National Policy Forum which stated: “Labor will not allow submarines to be nuclear-powered or nuclear-enabled, nor permit their modification to enable future nuclear weapons to be installed.”

Victorian federal Labor MP Daniel Mulino, who was secretary of the National Policy Forum, has an informal role in liaising with stakeholders on motions to be presented to conference and the nature of debate.

Marcus Strom, national convener of the party network Labor Against War, said the national conference was just the beginning of the fight against AUKUS.

“Rank-and-file members expect a Labor government to enact Labor values, not continue with a Scott Morrison war policy,” he said. “Having AUKUS debated at conference will just be our first victory. Working with the broader trade union and peace movement we will continue to pressure this government to adopt an independent, non-nuclear foreign policy consistent with Labor values.”

Most of Labor’s rank-and-file membership and affiliated union members oppose AUKUS and there is no chance it will win unanimous support at the national conference. Senior Labor ministers and faction leaders have said they are supremely confident the policy will be endorsed while accepting there will be a debate over AUKUS and opposition will be expressed at the conference.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/labor-members-eager-for-showdown-on-aukus-at-the-partys-national-conference/news-story/471efa619c1afee4504a8be2188ff0ff

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19355541

File: 000ae24914f4d42⋯.jpg (154.1 KB,1280x720,16:9,US_Navy_ships_sailing_in_f….jpg)

File: 1e5d7c410c56292⋯.jpg (1.01 MB,2048x2730,1024:1365,US_National_Security_Counc….jpg)

>>19188991

>>19349795

Two Americans Australia can count on

GREG SHERIDAN - AUGUST 14, 2023

1/2

The single purpose of the nuclear submarine AUKUS agreement between the US, UK and Australia, and its military technology sharing, is, by building deterrence, to prevent war with China. As with the Second World War, our security rests on US leadership. Through the Australian American Leadership Dialogue just held in Canberra (a brilliant event, completely upstaged on its last night by Sam Kerr and her heroic Matildas) I’ve just interviewed two of the most important Americans in Asian security.

Kurt Campbell, Indo-Pacific Coordinator in Joe Biden’s National Security Council, is Biden’s Asia tsar, having been assistant secretary for East Asia in Barack Obama’s first administration. Australia’s best friend in Washington, he’s a big personality, creative, sober, effective at the heart of power now for decades.

I asked him whether Beijing, having retired wolf warrior diplomacy, has modified its strategic ambitions.

Here is his response: “I think it’s probably premature to say wolf warrior diplomacy has been retired. The last year for Beijing was one of transition among its most senior ranks, which led to some stasis and caution, plus the circumstances surrounding the Russian invasion of Ukraine have been deeply unnerving. There is likely a new period ahead where China must rethink its confident predictions around a supposed hurtling American decline.

“Instead they are finding their efforts contested by America and its partners at every turn. China needs economic engagement with the US at this stage and they are deeply worried about further alienating the nations of Europe.

“These factors together perhaps moderate many Chinese undertakings at least for now, but most seasoned observers believe that President Xi and his leadership cohort remain unfalteringly determined to advance a dominant China that cannot be constrained or restrained. The US remains fundamentally committed to preserving peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait and our efforts in diplomacy and defence are around strengthening and stabilising the status quo.

“The US and its aligned partners must consistently focus on deterrence and seek to find pathways where cooler heads will prevail.”

That’s a sober and convincing assessment of Beijing’s strategic intent, so why aren’t US, and Australian, military budgets rising?

Campbell: “Military budgets are a critical measure of national effort and determination but it’s an incomplete metric. As important as the size of the defence budget is, the actual contents matter more. Where are the new investments that reflect the future? The US is in the process of a long-term reorientation of its military investments more towards long-range capabilities relevant to the vast Indo-Pacific than capabilities more geared to the military challenges of the Middle East and South Asia. This is a massive endeavour that will place substantial demands on the navy and air power. But the strategic competition will not be settled by military power alone. The key measurements will include the health and vitality of a nation’s alliance system, the bipartisan commitment to national priorities, its investments in critical industries and technologies, and a larger determination to persevere through challenges and inevitable setbacks. I think across each of these critical metrics both Australia and the US are constantly hitting its marks.

“Consider major American initiatives of the last few years – lifting the Quad to the leaders level, AUKUS, the enhanced defence spending and ‘strike’ agreements for Tomahawk (missiles) with Japan, enhanced cyber partnerships around the region, renewed security partnerships with The Philippines, strong and unprecedented Indo-Pacific support for Ukraine and, perhaps most importantly, the unambiguous step-up in technology and defence partnership with India. The alignments and realignments in the region favour freedom.”

In this pretty threatening context, how important, really, is AUKUS?

Campbell: “AUKUS is a fundamental statement about the future, about confidence to remain strategically aligned and intertwined for decades. It elevates Australia into the most rarefied air of America’s closest partners. It’s not an exaggeration to say that AUKUS has fundamentally shifted and accelerated the very course of the US-Australian alliance.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19355549

File: 7fd6ba99c972320⋯.jpg (284.09 KB,455x569,455:569,Lt_Gen_Stephen_D_Sklenka.jpg)

File: 375f35405f31a50⋯.jpg (611.46 KB,1897x2530,1897:2530,China_s_President_Xi_Jinpi….jpg)

>>19355541

2/2

Campbell is key to renewed US efforts in the South Pacific, but is this new Washington interest durable?

Campbell: “There’s a clear bipartisan sense in Washington that the US, in partnership with Australia, New Zealand and other friends, must step up its game in the Pacific. We have deep moral, historic, commercial and strategic interests. Some of those interests have been neglected in recent years. It’s important to face that fact directly. Still, the Pacific welcomes the substantial re-engagement of the US. We are here to stay in the Pacific.”

Hawaii-based Marine Lieutenant General Stephen Sklenka, an intellectual and a soldier, is the deputy commander of US forces in the Indo-Pacific. So, given the threat environment, do the US and its allies have effective deterrence today?

Sklenka: “Yes, I think so, clearly. Alliances and partnerships are our biggest asymmetric advantage. The Chinese Communist Party doesn’t like multilateral organisations because they can’t bully others as effectively there.”

The Marines have undertaken big reforms lately, getting rid of their tanks and becoming a lighter force. Why did they do this?

Sklenka: “The Marine Corps was too heavy for our mission. It took too much to lift us. We were almost a second land army. We needed a rapid response force linked in with our navy. The future of warfare is not going to be all about big equipment. It’s going to be an all-domain fight. The first shots in the next war may not be kinetic, but could be cyber, or information, or space. We need to be agile, rapid, mobile, more capable of operating within all domains. The Secretary of Defence has talked about integrated deterrence, which is an amalgamation of all the capabilities you’ve got at your disposal, not just military.”

Sklenka emphasises all the military forces the US has deployed near China. What, then, of the increased presence of US forces in Australia?

Sklenka: “Australian geography was important in World War II. Tactics and strategy may change. But geography doesn’t change. The survival of the force requires the dispersal of the force. You want to make it more complicated for an adversary to hit you. US-Australia military co-operation is always growing, always increasing. The interoperability and collaborative actions of our forces are increasing. On exercises they’re almost extensions of each other.”

What does he think of Beijing’s objections to AUKUS, and Australia’s proposed nuclear subs?

Sklenka: “We presume Chinese nuclear subs carry nuclear weapons. We know Australia’s AUKUS subs won’t have nuclear weapons. It’s hypocritical of the Chinese to decry Australia’s pursuit of nuclear subs. There’s no proliferation issue. The threat environment has shifted so substantially. What (Vladimir) Putin is going through in some ways is what Xi Jinping is going through. Putin thought he could divide NATO. Xi thought that by being more aggressive, more assertive, he could weaken US partnerships. He got the reverse of that. He certainly didn’t want AUKUS.”

Does Beijing want military bases in the South Pacific?

Sklenka: “You have to plan on the basis of capabilities rather than intent. China said it would never have overseas military bases, then came Djibouti, and the military capabilities they built on the South China Sea islands.”

No easy solutions. Just hard realities, looked in the face. Two Americans you can count on.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/two-americans-australia-can-count-on/news-story/003f403678ccc5cced4caa2053da7f8e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

a9c858 No.19359594

File: 818549539afb043⋯.jpeg (355.53 KB,1200x908,300:227,IMG_2912.jpeg)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19361889

File: b57dd4374117e9b⋯.jpg (173.77 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19308112

>>19326823

Prime Minister accuses No campaign of spreading AI misinformation

JOE KELLY - AUGUST 15, 2023

Anthony Albanese has accused the No campaign of spreading AI-generated misinformation ahead of the voice referendum, escalating his attack on media commentators opposed to his proposed constitutional change, including Peta Credlin and ­Andrew Bolt.

On WSFM radio with Amanda Keller and Brendan Jones, the Prime Minister said it was ­“pretty scary frankly, some of the No campaign and stuff that’s going into people’s Facebook posts which is designed to spread misinformation”.

“Some of it is AI-generated, some of it generated, of course, by people like the commentators that you have said.”

The commentators mentioned by Jones included Sky News hosts Credlin and Bolt, with Mr Albanese arguing on Monday that “some of the media outlets are pretty determined to promote the No campaign.”

His claim AI technology was being used to attack the voice was rejected by the No campaign, spokeswoman Jacinta Price accusing the government of a “campaign of misinformation, spin, and outright lies”.

“This time using the soft touch media of FM radio to slander the No campaign and media commentators with their divisive untruths around the use of AI,” Senator Price said. “I, and many Australians, are in disbelief that the PM seems to be able to speak in great detail about the No campaign, but unable to speak to any of the detail in his divisive voice proposal.”

It is the second time the No campaign has been forced to reject accusations it is using AI technology after former ­NAIDOC co-chair and journalist John Paul Janke made the claim on the ABC’s Insiders program on August 6.

Janke said the No campaign had used AI to make it appear “like it is an Indigenous person supporting the No campaign”.

The video Janke was referring to was made by a group called Constitutional Equality, run by cryptocurrency trader Phillip Mobbs, which has no connection with the No campaign.

Mr Mobbs told the ABC last week he had never had any contact with No campaign spokespeople Warren Mundine or Senator Price.

Bolt told The Australian he challenged Mr Albanese to “identify the misinformation he claims I’ve spread”.

“Many of my pieces have been written to correct his misinformation, including fake claims that the voice would only give advice on matters directly affecting Aboriginals and the voice wouldn’t ask the High Court to overrule the government,” Bolt said. “That is the misinformation that I think is extremely dangerous and deceitful.”

Mr Albanese singled out Credlin for particular criticism after the former chief-of-staff to Tony Abbott said the Uluru Statement from the Heart was a longer document than the 439-word statement made in 2017.

Credlin said the longer document was an “angry manifesto of grievance, separatism, division and compensation”.

Speaking on ABC radio on Monday, Mr Albanese said: “Peta Credlin is a smart person. She must know that that’s not true.

“She is saying things that she knows is not true. As is Peter Dutton … no serious person thinks that that’s the case.”

Credlin told The Australian: “The people wheeled out last week to bolster the PM’s claim that it’s just a … one-page poster are all the same people who for six years since Uluru have implored us to read what they regard as the full document of many pages in length.

“It just doesn’t stack up, that suddenly what’s been true for years is not true now … As to the slights and the slurs, quite honestly that just says to me we are getting closer and closer to the truth.”

While Mr Albanese told the ABC The Australian had provided “substantial coverage of the Yes campaign as well as the No campaign”, he has ramped up criticism of journalists who have covered the No campaign.

Speaking in parliament earlier this month, he took aim at both The Daily Telegraph’s ­national affairs editor James Morrow and 2GB radio host Ray Hadley.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/prime-minister-accuses-no-campaign-of-spreading-ai-misinformation/news-story/d3c351e1267b7c9802edebdb941ff4ab

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19361898

File: c5e1df3e5319c8b⋯.jpg (356.1 KB,1920x1280,3:2,David_Adler_s_comments_abo….jpg)

File: b2c42328a1ff946⋯.jpg (334.59 KB,750x754,375:377,DDA_1.jpg)

File: ff98918901a5994⋯.jpg (187.18 KB,1200x810,40:27,Fwt2aqlakAAwO3s.jpg)

File: d8f474aba8d504c⋯.jpg (115.57 KB,998x1302,499:651,Fwt2ePraUAARkt9.jpg)

File: 5865020f300285a⋯.jpg (46.42 KB,960x578,480:289,Fwt2hsCaYAI3B3O.jpg)

>>19222755

>>19297392

No campaigner’s comments on Stan Grant, Lidia Thorpe labelled ‘disgusting’, ‘grotesque’

Paul Sakkal - August 14, 2023

Remarks from a key figure in the Voice No campaign about Indigenous journalist Stan Grant and independent senator Lidia Thorpe have been condemned and labelled disgusting and grotesque.

Australian Jewish Association head David Adler, who sits on the advisory board of top No outfit Advance with former prime minister Tony Abbott, insists he was not trying to insult the prominent Indigenous pair when he questioned Thorpe’s Aboriginal heritage and repeatedly suggested Grant had artificially darkened his skin.

Days after Grant stepped down as host of the ABC’s Q+A citing racist abuse in May, Adler posted pictures of the Wiradjuri man on social media that he said showed “STAN GRANT’S COMPLEXION SEEMS TO HAVE CHANGED”.

“Look at the 3 pics. Can anyone explain?”

In March, Adler posted the same image with the caption: “IS STAN GRANT DOING ‘BLACK FACE’? If so, why?”

On four occasions in 2022, the Voice opponent, involved in the outfit closely linked to Coalition Indigenous affairs spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, also raised questions about Thorpe’s background.

“What % Aboriginal are you? You appear quite white,” he posted on social media in March 2022. “Not so sure she’s Blak (or Black).”

Adler, who has used his leadership of the Jewish association to castigate other Australian Jewish bodies for supporting the Voice, claimed in January that, “What is ‘racist’ is allowing people to drink themselves to death they bash/rape/murder the women/children & turning a blind eye to it because they are Aboriginal!”

In relation to the ABC, Adler has said, “If you self-identify as a black lesbian, you’ll get the job.”

When asked about the comments, Adler said he would not apologise for them and said he could not recall the remarks about Thorpe.

“I am 100 per cent zero racism. I have Aboriginal friends, the most prominent being [leading No campaigner] Warren Mundine, and you’ll see photos of me with him."

Advance is a right-wing campaigning group started in 2018 as a counterweight to activist group GetUp. It is led by Matthew Sheahan and claims it has a 250,000-strong supporter base fighting “woke politicians and elitist activist groups … taking Aussies for a ride with their radical agenda”.

Separate from the Liberal Party’s referendum campaign, it is the main referendum outfit on the No side.

The most senior members of the Liberal Party, including mainstream conservatives, are wary of the Coalition being dragged to the right by association with Advance.

Three sources, who asked to remain anonymous to speak freely, said Liberal officials had worked to ensure the party was not sharing its databases and resources with Advance as it campaigned against the Voice.

This masthead decided to publish Adler’s comments because of the active public debate about Australian race relations enlivened by the referendum. Advance, which publicly discloses few details about its operations, and its leading figures are also worthy of scrutiny given the important role the group has in running the No side.

Responding to Adler, Thorpe said the No campaign should be ashamed to work with groups such as Advance.

“I called it out early that there is a racist No campaign that is encouraging racists and hurting our people,” she said in a statement. “The government created this space for them and has failed in its responsibility to deal with the rise in racism.”

Grant declined to comment.

Australia/Israel and Jewish Affairs Council chairman Mark Leibler said Adler had recently used anti-Semitic tropes to delegitimise support for the Voice expressed by several Jewish groups.

Leibler, who co-chaired the 2012 expert panel on constitutional recognition of Indigenous Australians and the later council that culminated in the Uluru statement, added: “The notion that someone who leads a so-called ‘Jewish organisation’ could post such disgusting comments about anyone from another minority group, in this case the highly regarded journalist and author Stan Grant, is nothing short of grotesque.

“While the Jewish community is already well aware that the views of this fringe organisation and its president are utterly incompatible with Jewish values, this latest revelation should make it clear to the broader Australian community that Adler is simply an unrepresentative extremist.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/no-figure-s-stan-grant-lidia-thorpe-comments-labelled-disgusting-grotesque-20230814-p5dw9m.html

https://twitter.com/DrDavidAdler1/status/1660551657221160962

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19361927

File: 1b1dafc13a13a50⋯.jpg (261.04 KB,1480x800,37:20,STAN_GRANT.jpg)

File: f7f7a5263e64e70⋯.jpg (392.86 KB,750x738,125:123,DDA_2.jpg)

File: 11a2aa4a269d520⋯.jpg (321.52 KB,962x772,481:386,F2maifoacAAIvTP.jpg)

>>19222755

>>19297392

>>19361898

No campaign dumps campaigners over racist remarks, distances itself from Adler

'Paul Sakkal - August 15, 2023

No campaign leader Nyunggai Warren Mundine has revealed he pushed two people out of his referendum campaign over allegedly racist comments, as he distanced himself from under-fire No figure David Adler.

Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus said on Tuesday that Opposition Leader Peter Dutton should disassociate himself from Adler after this masthead reported he repeatedly questioned senator Lidia Thorpe’s Aboriginal heritage and suggested Indigenous journalist Stan Grant artificially darkened his skin.

Mundine said Adler’s comments were “bizarre” and, without referring directly to Adler, said questioning an Indigenous person’s cultural heritage constituted a “disgusting … racist attack”.

Speaking on ABC’s Radio National on Tuesday morning, Mundine said Adler was not involved in his No outfit, called Recognise a Better Way. Adler is involved in a separate body called Advance, on whose advisory board he sits alongside figures including former prime minister Tony Abbott.

Dreyfus, one of Australia’s most senior Jewish MPs, claimed Adler’s statements were disgraceful and said the Australian Jewish Association, run by Adler, was unrepresentative of the Jewish community.

“Mr Dutton needs to start dissociating himself from this kind of material,” Dreyfus said. “The No campaign needs to stop using disinformation and dissociate itself from the kind of hateful, revolting material that we’ve seen from people like Mr David Adler.”

Although Mundine distanced himself from Adler, the pair appear in photographs together that were taken in recent months, and Adler cited his relationship with Mundine as proof of his positive attitude towards Indigenous Australians.

As he responded to questions about Adler, Mundine disclosed he had let go two figures in his own No outfit due to offensive commentary. He declined to provide details on each case, other than to say the volunteers were not prominent and one made anti-Semitic comments.

“I’ve actually kicked several people off our campaign regarding their comments and I intend to keep on doing that,” the former Labor Party national president turned Liberal candidate said.

“I don’t appreciate racist comments … We’ve got to out these people.”

NSW Liberal MP Matt Kean, who is involved in the Yes campaign, said it was incumbent on Mundine to reveal all the details about the sackings.

“Warren Mundine just admitted to [ABC host Patricia Karvelas] that the No campaign has secretly sacked two campaign workers due to their racist views,” Kean posted on social media. “The No campaign can’t cover up this racism scandal. They must release the details, and explain why they sacked these two workers”.

Mundine defended Grant and said he was a “brother” whom he had known since university. Grant’s Indigenous heritage was not in question, Mundine stressed.

The anti-Voice activist accused Indigenous leader Noel Pearson of “one of the worst racial slurs an Aboriginal people can receive” for previously suggesting Mundine and fellow No campaigner Jacinta Price were puppets for white conservatives.

This masthead decided to publish Adler’s comments because of the active public debate about Australian race relations enlivened by the referendum. Advance, which publicly discloses few details about its operations, and its leading figures are also worthy of scrutiny given the important role the group has in running the No side.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/no-campaign-dumps-staff-over-racist-remarks-distances-itself-from-adler-20230815-p5dwm3.html

https://twitter.com/DrDavidAdler1/status/1687049511645138944

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19361940

File: 9b7ea5d7f1f54ea⋯.jpg (479.68 KB,1920x1280,3:2,High_profile_Labor_figures….jpg)

>>19188991

>>19308139

>>19355518

Albanese doubles down on AUKUS as union boss criticises ‘silence’ on internal debate

James Massola, Paul Sakkal and Matthew Knott - August 14, 2023

Anthony Albanese will crash through internal Labor opposition to the AUKUS agreement and declare the nuclear pact a central part of his government’s agenda, as an influential union chief criticised the party’s reluctance to debate the submarine deal.

Ahead of Labor’s national conference later this week, Defence Minister Richard Marles has sought to quell dissent inside the party about the deal in an online town hall meeting with hundreds of party members about AUKUS, framing the ALP as “very much the party of defence” and warning Australia will be left “exposed” without nuclear-powered submarines.

United Firefighters Union boss Peter Marshall, who is running for a spot on Labor’s powerful national executive, said the party’s factional system had stifled debate on totemic issues, arguing a political culture that discouraged debate was counterproductive.

“Whether you are for or against [AUKUS], previously there would have been significant debate about the rights and wrongs, whereas there has been complete silence,” he said.

“People are frightened… Debate makes good policy.”

Albanese will emphasise the importance of AUKUS in his personal foreword to the party’s national platform, which binds his government on policy positions, defying a push from a section of left-wing activists and some unions seeking to remove a reference to AUKUS from the platform.

Albanese’s foreword states: “We are taking carefully thought-out steps forward with AUKUS to strengthen Australia’s sovereignty and our region’s security.”

The decision to highlight the AUKUS deal in Albanese’s foreword underscores the prime minster’s determination to stare down internal critics of the AUKUS deal and position himself as a centrist leader of a party that is strong on national security.

A draft motion to be debated on the conference floor, authored by NSW state Labor MP Anthony D’Adam, is critical of the AUKUS deal, which it describes as costly and likely to spark an arms race that could see Australian dragged into a US war in Asia.

The motion states: “It is inappropriate to endorse the agreement in the [draft] national platform” and seeks to remove the reference to AUKUS from the document.

The AUKUS motion is expected to be defeated after it is debated on Friday.

National convener of the Labor Against War group Marcus Strom said it was a shame that “even getting AUKUS debated is a victory for the rank-and-file, but a victory it is, and it will be the first of many”.

“Tom Uren [a former deputy Labor leader and Albanese’s mentor] started out as a lone voice in the ALP opposing the Vietnam War and didn’t win at the first hurdle. While we don’t expect to win at this conference, we take inspiration from Uren’s fight for peace and against the nuclear industry.”

The triennial conference will open on Thursday, one day after a national cabinet meeting focussed on housing at which the prime minister hopes to gain agreement from state and territory leaders to overhaul the housing market.

Labor sources said senior government, union and rank-and-file figures were finalising an ambitious statement of intent calling on the parliamentary party to use tax reform, supply levers and rental policy to boost home ownership.

Amid an intense political battle with the Greens over Labor’s $10 billion housing fund, Julijana Todorovic, a national conference delegate who helps lead Labor for Housing, said her internal pressure group wanted to see extensive changes to Australia’s housing market.

“Labor for Housing is fully supportive of the Housing Affordability Future Fund and is examining measures to more equitably redistribute wealth in the housing market,” she said.

In the foreword to the platform, Albanese stresses his determination to lead a multi-term Labor government and focus on cost of living pressures, while listing the government’s achievements in its first year in power, including job creation, free TAFE, the National Anti-Corruption Commission, cheaper childcare and other policies.

“It is my deep hope that this is a long-term Labor government because real, enduring reforms that change a country for the better take time,” Albanese’s platform section states.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/albanese-doubles-down-on-aukus-as-union-boss-criticises-silence-on-internal-debate-20230814-p5dwdk.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19361989

File: 5d9109b6ff298ec⋯.jpg (86.71 KB,2048x1152,16:9,DJI_drones_have_been_groun….jpg)

File: edbc1c7f1df1cf4⋯.jpg (551.21 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_Pentagon_has_blacklist….jpg)

>>19126550 (pb)

Defence calls for Australian drone program to replace risky Chinese-made technology

ELLEN WHINNETT - AUGUST 14, 2023

1/2

The Defence Department is looking to turbocharge an ­Australia-made drone program as it turns its back permanently on high-risk Chinese-made DJI drones.

Defence has put out a request for information and responses from Australian industry and research institutes “in relation to development of sovereign uncrewed aerial systems (UAS) and trusted autonomy capabilities.’’

The request relates to small, unarmed drones to be used for training, photography and survey work.

The call comes three months after Defence decided to get rid of the more than 800 drones – known as UAS in Defence jargon – and other pieces of tech it owned that had been manufactured by DJI, the world’s largest drone company.

The grounding of the drones came after the company was black-listed by the Pentagon amid concerns over its links to the Chinese military, and further concerns that its internet-­connected drones posed an un­acceptable security risk.

The company – formally known as Da Jiang Innovations – is headquartered in Shenzen, China, meaning its data must be provided to Chinese intelligence agencies upon request.

Its technology has also been used to surveil the oppressed ­Uighur population in Xinjiang.

Defence’s new $3.4bn Advanced Strategic Capabilities Accelerator, tasked with getting cutting-edge military technologies into service sooner, has issued the request for information about sovereign drones as its “first innovation challenge’.’

In the industry call-out, the Defence accelerator noted that “sovereign capability means that the commonwealth of Australia will have the ability to access the capability within Australia in a crisis’’.

This appears to indicate that Australia expected to have priority access to drones and related systems in an emergency.

It’s believed the request for information does not rule out submissions from international companies, which may be able to contribute via partnerships with Australian companies.

Australia is also seeking to build its sovereign capability in a number of other areas after shortages of PPE and other essentials during the global Covid lockdowns brought into sharp focus Australia’s reliance on Chinese manufacturing.

“The widespread adoption of modular, cheap, commercial drones, manufactured at scale for a wide range of versatile purposes, has allowed militaries around the world to rapidly adapt these capabilities for new, asymmetric applications,’’ the request for information notes.

“However, the overseas production of these commercial systems carries security and supply chain risks.

“Defence seeks to support an Australian sovereign UAS and trusted autonomy industrial capability, in particular for small, general purpose systems that can be produced at greater scale, to service a wide range of applications.

“These systems should support flexibility and inter­operability via open architecture to enable future development of innovative applications.’’

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19361993

File: 108d019dc2a2d90⋯.jpg (371.54 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Senator_James_Paterson_at_….jpg)

>>19361989

2/2

The request noted that the development of the new drones system would include Defence-industry workshops and “collab­orative development’’.

The accelerator, announced early this year and which became operational only in July, said it was “seeking information to ­support an Australian sovereign uncrewed aerial system (UAS) and trusted autonomy industrial capability, in particular for small, general-purpose system that can be produced at greater scale than is currently possible to service a wide range of applications, but without the security imitations and supply chain vulnerability of current commercial suppliers.’’

It said the information would not be directly linked to procurement contracts but would shape Defence’s thinking “about the investment priorities, issues, risks and opportunities associated with developing sovereign Australian capability in uncrewed aerial systems and trusted autonomy.’’

It does not name any specific country or technology as causing the security risks and supply chain vulnerabilities, but the request has been issued as the Albanese government grapples with how to treat high-risk Chinese tech that is widely used across the public sector.

Opposition cyber security and home affairs spokesman senator James Paterson had been agitating for months about the use by Defence and other agencies such as Home Affairs of high-risk technology provided by Chinese companies, including DJI (drones), Dahua and HikVision (CCTV) and TikTok (social media).

All have gone on to be ­removed from government property.

“It’s very welcome that after being forced to finally ground their CCP-linked DJI fleet, Defence is now looking at sovereign options to provide drone capabilities,’’ he said.

“Australian defence industry deserves the opportunity to step up to fill this gap and help reduce our reliance on high-risk vendors from auth­oritarian countries.’’

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/defence-calls-for-australian-drone-program-to-replace-risky-chinesemade-technology/news-story/9da9e90d04175e0447be0d2cdb10a0d2

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19362008

File: acc17722446f5d1⋯.jpg (48.76 KB,634x824,317:412,Gerald_Ridsdale_89_earlier….jpg)

File: f08fd42397e3d81⋯.jpg (409.39 KB,1923x1270,1923:1270,Gerald_Ridsdale_outside_co….jpg)

>>19051251 (pb)

Gerald Ridsdale jailed for another year for abusing 13-year-old boy as paedophile priest is told he will likely die in jail

DAILY MAIL AUSTRALIA - 15 August 2023

A paedophile priest will 'probably die' behind bars after his prison sentence was extended for abusing another teenage boy.

Gerald Ridsdale, 89, earlier this year admitted abusing his 72nd victim and another year was added to his 39-year jail sentence at Ballarat Magistrates Court in Victoria on Tuesday.

Ridsdale, who has been in prison since 1994, abused children between 1961 and 1988 while he worked as a Roman Catholic priest in churches and schools across the state.

He admitted indecently assaulting his latest victim, a 13-year-old boy, at a Catholic school in Horsham in 1987.

Ridsdale grabbed the boy's arm and called him a 'big strong lad' before touching him inappropriately in the school's counsellor's office.

The victim, who is now in his 40s, ran out of the room after the assault took place, 9 News reported.

'It was like I was a passenger and had no control,' he said in a statement read to the court.

'This led me down a path of destruction.'

Magistrate Hugh Radford said Ridsdale should have been looking out for the boy's welfare and that he was supposed to be 'a man of God'.

He handed Ridsdale a 12-month prison sentence, taking his maximum term to 40 years. He will be eligible for parole after a minimum of 33-and-a-half years, meaning he could be freed in April 2028, when he is in his late 90s.

'You will probably die in custody,' Mr Radford said.

During his 29 years as a priest, Ridsdale was shuffled between 16 church posts. In 2017, a government inquiry into child sex abuse found his frequent relocations were evidence of the church covering up his crimes.

The inquiry found that the late Australian Cardinal George Pell, who became the third-highest ranking cleric in the Vatican in 2014, knew Ridsdale had been sexually abusing children years before his arrest. Pell denied any previous knowledge of criminal allegations against Ridsdale.

The Pell and Ridsdale families had long been close in Victoria. Pell spent 13 months in prison before his own child abuse convictions were overturned on appeal in 2020. Pell died in January.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12407971/Gerald-Ridsdale-paedophile-priest-Victoria-jailed.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19362015

File: 884a1e690b62b1a⋯.jpg (89.57 KB,1200x675,16:9,Former_priest_and_jailed_p….jpg)

Jailed pedophile ex-priest Peter Andrew Hansen stripped of law credentials

William Ton - 15 August 2023

A pedophile ex-priest and former Labor party official who preyed on young boys in Asian countries has been barred from practising law in Australia.

Peter Andrew Hansen was jailed in June 2021 for at least 14 years on 31 charges of producing child pornography in Vietnam and the Philippines, distributing child exploitation material and engaging in sexual activity with nine boys.

The chief clerk of the NSW Supreme Court applied in April to have Hansen struck off the law register and barred from practising due to his crimes.

In a joint judgment handed down on Tuesday, Justices Fabian Gleeson, Jeremy Kirk and John Basten declared Hansen was not a fit and proper person to remain on the roll of Australian lawyers and ordered his name be removed.

"It is not appropriate that a practitioner remain on the roll whilst in custody," they said.

The judges considered Hansen's physical and mental health and his ability to reliably practise law by the time of his release at age 75, but it was his conduct that sealed the decision.

"The repeated and prolonged exploitation of young boys in Vietnam and in the Philippines, who were between the ages of 10 and 14, demonstrates such a serious deficiency of character as to render (Hansen) currently and for the foreseeable future a person who is not a fit and proper person to be a legal practitioner," they said.

Hansen did not oppose the orders and was forced to pay the Supreme Court's legal costs.

The former Melbourne priest was arrested in October 2018 after police located a hard drive containing child sexual exploitation material when he arrived at Sydney Airport from Vietnam.

Further charges were added following a police investigation in the Philippines relating to sexual offences committed in 2016 involving nine male victims between the ages of 10 and 14.

A police search of Hansen's home led to the discovery of more abuse material dating back to April 2014.

Hansen was a Catholic priest in the Melbourne Archdiocese until he resigned in 2011.

He was sentenced to a full term of 19 years and will be eligible for parole in October 2032.

https://thewest.com.au/news/crime/jailed-pedophile-ex-priest-stripped-of-law-credentials-c-11597398

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19362026

File: 5cdac11a5591b56⋯.jpg (335.61 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_Wasp_class_amphibious_….jpg)

File: 912594f9110f284⋯.jpg (97.45 KB,1280x720,16:9,A_US_Marine_Corps_MV_22B_O….jpg)

File: f47b56c2bbbc3af⋯.jpg (265.65 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_USS_Essex_and_HMAS_Sup….jpg)

US sailors ‘sold secrets to China’

LIAM MENDES and ELLEN WHINNETT - AUGUST 14, 2023

Two US navy sailors have been charged with selling military ­secrets to China, with one ­accused of capturing photographs of military hardware during an international warfare exercise involving Australia.

Wei Jinchao 22, also known as Patrick Wei, is alleged to have captured and sent details of the world’s biggest international maritime wargames exercise – the Rim of the Pacific Exercise – involving Australia, the US, France, Canada and 22 other countries.

Mr Wei and another sailor, Zhao Wenheng, are China-born US citizens accused of sending sensitive military information to Chinese intelligence officers for cash, according to grand jury indictments from June 2022 and 2023 unsealed this month in the Southern and Central District of California district courts.

Both have pleaded not guilty.

Mr Wei, who had a security clearance that granted him access to highly classified information, was stationed on amphibious ­assault ship USS Essex as a ­machinist’s mate.

The USS Essex conducted training operations with Australian warships during the RIMPAC exercise in mid-2022.

According to Mr Wei’s indictment, he captured photographs of military hardware, including “guns, vehicles and planes”.

Documented operations between USS Essex and Australian warships include an oil replenishment exercise with HMAS Supply, and night exercises with HMAS Canberra involving US Marine Osprey aircraft flying ­between the two ships.

It is unclear whether any sensitive materials relating to Australian soldiers or assets participating in the training operation were captured and sent to China. A spokesman for the Australian Department of Defence said it did not comment on “intelligence matters’’.

RIMPAC, which ran from June 29 to August 4, 2022, was led by the US and involved 38 surface ships, more than 30 uncrewed systems, nine national land ­forces, three submarines and 170 aircraft. On top of HMAS Canberra and Supply, Australia also had HMAS Warramunga, P-8A Poseidon aircraft and a submarine involved.

On July 7 – during the exercise – Mr Wei is also accused of sending “multiple photographs of military equipment” to a Chinese intelligence officer.

The indictment alleges he began communicating with the intelligence officer in February 2022, including secretly sending the locations of various navy ships, providing manuals for systems aboard navy ships and other espionage-related activity.

Mr Wei faces two counts of transmitting defence information to a foreign government and exporting defence articles without a licence. He is also charged with two counts of conspiracy for those same alleged offences.

Authorities allege he was first approached by a Chinese intelligence operative in February 2022 – before he was a US citizen – and prosecutors say he was paid $US10,000 to $US15,000.

Last week, the federal court in San Diego heard Mr Wei’s mother allegedly encouraged him to co-operate with the Chinese intelligence officer, saying it could assist him with obtaining a job in the Chinese Communist Party in the future.

The second sailor, Zhao Wenheng, is charged with conspiracy and receipt of a bribe.

He is alleged to have worked with a Chinese intelligence officer from August 2021 to May 2023, allegedly selling blueprints of a radar system in Okinawa and ­operational plans for another US military exercise in the Indo-­Pacific.

His charge alleges he also sent video and photos of sensitive material and received at least $US14,886 in payments from a Chinese intelligence officer.

RIMPAC, an American naval-led exercise, is held every two years off Hawaii and the coast of California.

In 2014, China was invited to participate, sending four ships – and an uninvited spy ship, according to US media reports.

But as the relationship between China and the West deteriorated, such co-operation ended, with deep concerns in the West about the build-up of the Chinese military and its persistent cyber-hacking and foreign interference.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/us-sailors-sold-secrets-to-china/news-story/ec62a5f6bde3613c5f23bc5e68588081

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19367921

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19222755

>>19327086

>>19333302

>>19333412

‘Why would I?’: Anthony Albanese ‘hasn’t read’ additional 25 pages of Uluru Statement material

Anthony Albanese says he hasn’t read the additional 25 pages of material attached to the Uluru Statement, asking “Why would I?”

Frank Chung - August 16, 2023

1/2

Anthony Albanese says he hasn’t read the additional 25 pages attached to the Uluru Statement from the Heart, which talk of “reparations” to Indigenous Australians under a future treaty, despite the “divisive” material being seized upon by opponents of the Voice referendum in recent weeks.

Speaking to 3AW host Neil Mitchell in an hour-long interview on Monday, the Prime Minister accused the No campaign and Opposition leader Peter Dutton of playing dirty and “saying things that they know are not true”.

“Peter Dutton knows full well that a Voice will not have a say in where the submarines from AUKUS will go, they know the Uluru Statement from the Heart is one page, not hundreds of pages,” Mr Albanese said.

“But what are the other 25 pages? I’ve read them, what are they?” Mitchell said.

“What they are is a record of meetings … they’re records of the big lead-up that happened, in the lead-up to, ironically … the Uluru Statement from the Heart,” the PM said.

“Do you agree with most of what is said in those 25 pages?” Mitchell said.

“I haven’t read it,” Mr Albanese said.

“You haven’t read it?” Mitchell said.

“There’s 120 pages - why would I?” the PM said.

“I know what the conclusion is. The Uluru Statement from the Heart is one page. That’s the conclusion. [The No campaign knows] those pages have been on the website for years, put there under the former Coalition government. I respect people can look at the same thing and come to different conclusions, yes or no, there are legitimate reasons why people would do that. But I do wish people would debate what’s real rather than what they know is not real.”

‘Astonishing’ admission slammed

Sky News host Peta Credlin, who kicked off the controversy earlier this month after she accused Mr Albanese of misleading voters by not talking about the “full” Uluru Statement, slammed the PM’s comments on Tuesday.

“‘I haven’t read it,’ he says. ‘Why would I?’ he says,” she told viewers.

“Well how about the fact that as Prime Minister of this country, you’ve said dozens and dozens of times you’re going to implement it in full? Because surely, to sign us up to something you admit you haven’t even bothered to read is madness. How do you even know what it is in full if you’ve just read the cover and not the contents?”

Credlin said it was the “constitutional equivalent of giving a whole lot of Indigenous activists a blank cheque, and he admits it”.

“This is a politician who says he’s supported the Uluru push from day one, yet he admits that he’s failed to even flick through the very material that the Uluru authors say everyone must read,” she said.

2GB host Ben Fordham on Wednesday also described the PM’s comments as “astonishing”.

“Are you serious? Indigenous leaders say you should, PM,” Fordham said.

“They say to truly understand how they arrived at the Uluru Statement it helps to read the whole document, not just the glossy one-pager. I think you can handle 120 pages.”

Fordham said Mr Albanese was “constantly saying this proposal is based on what Indigenous Australians have been asking for”.

“So isn’t it worth reading 26 pages or 120 pages so you know for sure?” he said.

“Isn’t this whole debate about listening to voices? I thought it was astonishing that the Prime Minister confessed he’s never bothered to read all the information available.”

Aussies ‘not turning’ against Voice

Despite a series of polls showing support for the Voice plummeting nationwide, the PM insisted on Monday Australians were not turning against the proposal, while conceding “it’s always hard to change a constitution, and it’s so much easier to run a No campaign because you’re not trying to convince people of something positive”.

Last week, Mr Albanese accused the No campaign of spreading a “QAnon” style conspiracy theory by claiming the Uluru Statement was more than one page.

The contents of the more than 100 pages of additional Uluru Statement material were released under freedom of information by the National Indigenous Australians Agency (NIAA) earlier this year.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19367927

File: 080c3e63f843af4⋯.jpg (624.42 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Anthony_Albanese_at_the_Ga….jpg)

File: 05ce63c46f0e790⋯.jpg (332.32 KB,2048x1536,4:3,The_PM_slammed_the_QAnon_s….jpg)

File: 87e8b8d43ef0f2b⋯.jpg (246.58 KB,1913x1434,1913:1434,Sky_News_host_Peta_Credlin….jpg)

File: d09289ba5e788d8⋯.jpg (283.86 KB,2047x1535,2047:1535,Alan_Joyce_Anthony_Albanes….jpg)

>>19367921

2/2

An NIAA spokeswoman said last week that the Uluru Statement from the Heart “is a one-page document, confirmed by the authors Noel Pearson, Pat Anderson AO and Professor Dr Megan Davis”.

“The National Indigenous Australians Agency (NIAA) released a document under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (FOI Act), containing the one-page Uluru Statement from the Heart, followed by 25 pages of background information and excerpts of regional dialogues that informed the one-page Uluru Statement from the Heart,” she said.

Writing in The Australian on Thursday, Prof Davis slammed the No campaign’s “smear job”. “The Uluru Statement from the Heart is one page,” she wrote.

“It’s very simple. The unceasing attempts from the No campaign to take draft documents from conference rooms seven years ago and transcriptions of butchers paper seven years ago to manufacture a controversy over the Uluru Statement is farcical. It reeks of desperation.”

Ms Anderson, appearing on ABC’s 730 last Wednesday, was asked by host Sarah Ferguson to respond to one commentator describing the contents of the dialogues as “hate-filled and divisive”.

She explained that at the time, participants were “angry” at then Prime Minister Tony Abbott for pulling half a billion dollars in funding for Indigenous programs, causing a lot of services to disappear “overnight”.

“People were angry, upset, distressed,” Ms Anderson said.

“So the first few hours of every meeting was spent and we sat back and listened and heard what people said to us about what had happened to them … so that did cause a lot of anger and distress. We recorded everything that people said. That’s what’s in [the additional 25 pages, called] Our Story.”

Albo grilled on ‘reparations’

On 3AW on Monday, Mitchell pressed Mr Albanese on whether it was “unreasonable” for people to read those extra pages and ask the PM, “Well, what about a treaty, what about reparations, what about truth-telling — what is your view on those three things?”

But the PM said it was “not legitimate … to pretend that that is what the referendum is about”. “There’s nothing in the Uluru Statement about reparations,” he said. “There is truth telling — well is anyone actually against telling the truth?”

“What is your view on reparations?” Mitchell said.

“I don’t support reparations,” Mr Albanese said.

“Will we have to negotiate that at some time? Regardless of the Voice, some time down the track, do we face that?” Mitchell said.

“No,” the PM said.

“What is happening with treaty is that in WA, for example, the most significant treaty-type agreement is between the Noongar and Colin Barnett’s government in 2015. That was a very significant agreement over southwestern Australia. There is some advance in Queensland, there’s legislation that passed with the support of both parties, in Victoria there’s some advance there as well.”

“But what is your view?” Mitchell said.

“My view is that the Australian people, in October or November, are going to have the opportunity to, I think, genuinely advance reconciliation by voting yes,” the PM said.

Mitchell later grilled the PM on why the Voice needed to be enshrined in the constitution if, as Mr Albanese repeated during the interview, parliament would still have ultimate authority.

“It [the parliament] can emasculate it anyway,” Mitchell said.

“Of course,” Mr Albanese said.

“So why have it in the constitution?” Mitchell said.

“So that ‘there shall be a body’,” Mr Albanese said, quoting the wording of the proposed constitutional amendment.

“And that is the request. You can’t say we want a Voice because we want to listen to Indigenous Australians, but at the very first hurdle, the form of recognition that Indigenous Australians have asked for, you say, no we know better.”

Mitchell again suggested “you can give it to them without putting it in the constitution”.

“That is not what they have asked for,” the PM said. “And it’s such a modest request.”

He likened it to shaking hands with Mitchell when he arrived at the studio that day.

“That’s how we greet each other with respect,” he said.

“What’s happening with the Voice here and this constitutional change is that Indigenous Australians, in spite of what has occurred to them, are putting out their hand in a gesture of friendship and reconciliation and engagement. And what I say is that Australians should grasp that hand. It is a generous and gracious request.”

https://www.news.com.au/finance/economy/australian-economy/why-would-i-anthony-albanese-hasnt-read-additional-25-pages-of-uluru-statement-material/news-story/dc24efdd1546b9c7183418f82d3bf553

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1tsTh7OxWA

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19367937

File: b57dd4374117e9b⋯.jpg (173.77 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 6c4e950fcecf98c⋯.jpg (236.62 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Opposition_Leader_Peter_Du….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19340258

Albanese rules out legislating the voice if No campaign prevails

JOE KELLY and SARAH ISON - AUGUST 15, 2023

Anthony Albanese has ruled out legislating a voice to parliament if the referendum is defeated this year, pledging that he will honour a No vote and the decision of the Australian people.

In his most definitive comments to date on the issue, the Prime Minister said that simply legislating a voice, rather than enshrining the advisory body in the Constitution, also was not the outcome Indigenous leaders had asked of the Australian people.

“The Australian people – we are giving them a say,” he told an extended podcast with 3AW’s Neil Mitchell. “The idea that the Australian people vote ‘no’ and I say, ‘well, that’s OK, thanks very much for participating in the referendum, we are going to do it anyway’. No. I won’t do that.”

Mr Albanese made clear there was no point legislating a voice that could not be enshrined in the Constitution because “that is not what they (Indigenous Australians) have asked for”.

He said putting the voice in the nation’s foundational document was “such a modest request”.

“What’s happening with the voice here and this constitutional change is that Indigenous Australians – in spite of what has occurred to them – are putting out their hand in a gesture of friendship and reconciliation and engagement.”

The clarification from Mr Albanese came as Indigenous leader Tom Calma, a voice co-architect, called out the No campaign for “total inconsistency” after Warren Mundine, one of the leading opponents of the voice, reaffirmed his ongoing support for the treaty process.

Mr Mundine, a leading a spokesman for the No campaign, told ABC radio on Tuesday he supported “treaties between the First Nations and the commonwealth” and had done so consistently for the past three decades.

The stance puts him at odds with Peter Dutton, who has warned the treaty process would involve “billions and billions and billions of dollars” and “lawyers sitting round tables in Sydney and Melbourne negotiating this”.

Professor Calma, the Senior Australian of the Year, said the conflict between Mr Dutton and Mr Mundine showed “total inconsistency”.

“It needs to be called out,” he told The Australian.

“It’s just a distraction from the main game. Getting the referendum up, that’s what we are all focused on. The treaty-making process is the next thing to be considered. It’s not (being considered) now.

“States and territories are already doing it. We’re seeing those discussions on treaty and negotiations. People need to discern between what’s happening nationally and at a state level.”

Mr Mundine told ABC radio he thought the nation was “going down the wrong track on treaties at the moment”, arguing that treaties could only be negotiated between the commonwealth and each individual Aboriginal nation.

“I’ve always said this, for over 30 years … I don’t back away from that, unlike Albanese, who is sort of running from the treaty process at the moment,” he said. “I know some of my supporters don’t support that particular thing. But I’m always on principle on these things.”

He rejected the idea the No campaign was using the treaty process to wage a scare campaign against the voice, arguing it was a “campaign that is pointing out that there is not enough details about these things”.

Mr Mundine also revealed he had kicked two people off the No campaign because of racist comments.

“I don’t appreciate racist comments,” he said. “I’ve got rid of them and I don’t accept any racist comments from anyone in regard to these issues … we’ve got to out these people. And I don’t take people on who make comments like this.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/albanese-rules-out-legislating-the-voice-if-no-campaign-prevails/news-story/616ddb799d99adddadb200c483ceced5

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19367951

File: 14ec45818184383⋯.jpg (209.4 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Lidia_Thorpe_will_address_….jpg)

File: a421a8ecbdd8a78⋯.jpg (230.75 KB,1813x1020,1813:1020,Senator_Thorpe_says_she_wa….jpg)

>>19031608 (pb)

>>19222755

Lidia Thorpe addresses ‘hard truths’ about rights and sovereignty of Indigenous people

COURTNEY GOULD - AUGUST 16, 2023

1/2

An upcoming referendum on the Voice to parliament is “window dressing” and should be called off, senator Lidia Thorpe says.

The independent senator and face of the Blak Sovereign Movement outlined her criticism of the proposal in her first address to the National Press Club on Wednesday.

Senator Thorpe slammed the Uluru Statement from the Heart for promoting the Voice, which she called a “romanticised spiritual notion” of Indigenous sovereignty.

“When we talk about sovereignty, we are talking about much more than just the romanticised spiritual notion talked about in the Uluru Statement. We are talking about real political sovereign power,” she said.

“I know that might make people feel uncomfortable. But, too bad. That's why the government is scared to acknowledge it.

“We are talking about sovereign rights. Rights to our home lands. Our rights to nurture our lands, water, sea, country, and sky, as we have for millennia.”

THORPE CLAIMS VOICE A STEP IN THE WRONG DIRECTION

The Voice to parliament was a key recommendation of the Uluru Statement from the Heart and will be put to Australian voters in October.

But the Senator, a Djab Wurrung, Gunnai and Gunditjmara woman from Victoria, said it was just a continuation of the “colonial project”.

“This country, your system of government, has been built on lies. The referendum for the Voice to parliament is a continuation of these lies. It promise to finally fix the Aboriginal problem,” she told reporters.

“It is false hope, because it is tricking people into genuinely believing that a powerless advisory body is going to protect our country and sacred sites, save our lives, keep our babies at home.

“The voice is the window-dressing for Constitutional recognition. We have rejected Constitutional Recognition before.

“This is just another attempt by a colonial government to make clear that it has power over us, and force its rules upon us.”

But Senator Thorpe said ultimately the whole thing should just be called off.

“It has caused nothing but harm and division. And, for what?,” she asked.

“There won’t be change until this society changes. Until this society’s thinking, values, attitudes and systems have been revolutionised in order to ensure real self-determination, we cannot continue the legacy of the Australian colony.”

Support for the Voice has been flagging in recent months and only Tasmania and Victoria would return a Yes vote if the poll was held this week, according to the Resolve Political Monitor.

The poll, conducted for the Nine Newspapers, found support for the voice had fallen to 46 per cent, down from 63 per cent a year ago.

To succeed, a referendum must have a majority of voters across Australia and four out of six states to cast a Yes ballot.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19367955

File: 6b9b7ed92a36759⋯.jpg (195.04 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Senator_Thorpe_previously_….jpg)

File: 15d03584bdd8683⋯.jpg (185.6 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Senator_Thorpe_said_racist….jpg)

>>19367951

2/2

TREATY AND TRUTH THE BETTER PATH, THORPE SAYS

Senator Thorpe confirmed she would not be actively campaigning for a ‘no’ vote but was investing her energy in putting forward an alternative – a treaty.

She said treaty would provide Indigenous communities to negotiate on land and sea rights and other matters important to them.

“This is our chance to mature as a nation. To have the hard conversations with each other and ourselves. To confront the racism we have always been socially conditioned to accept. To sit with the uncomfortable truth,” she said.

“Treaty will bring peace.”

Australia Day celebrations would be replaced by a Treaty day, if the nation ever did sign an agreement with Indigenous communities.

“We don't want to protest no more. Understand, you are dancing on our graves on January 26. It’s Invasion Day,” she said.

“Let’s come up with a day that we can all celebrate. Let’s have a Treaty day.”

REPATRIATIONS WOULD SEND AUSTRALIA ‘BROKE’, SAYS SENATOR

In recent months, No campaigners have claimed the Voice would open the door to financial compensation being paid to Indigenous Australians.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese confirmed he did not support reparations in a podcast interview on Tuesday, insisting it was incorrect to suggest the referendum would lead to it.

Senator Thorpe said Australia would go broke if it paid what it is owed to First Nations people.

“There is a lot of money owed to first peoples. I mean, look at the resources that have been extracted over 200 years,” she said.

“You know, we don’t want to send the country broke. I’ll put that out there now. Otherwise, we could with what is owed.

“That’s why we need to negotiate.”

THORPE SAYS RACISM A ‘CANCER’ ON AUSTRALIA

Senator Thorpe is the most high-profile face of what has been labelled the progressive No campaign.

She has confirmed while she won’t be actively campaigning for a ‘no’ vote, she would not be silenced in advocating for treaty instead of the Voice.

Asked how she could reconcile aligning herself on basic level with fringe groups, such as One Nation, and groups who have questioned her own Indigenous heritage, the senator said they’d joined with her not the other way around.

“They’re aligning themselves with us. I don’t align myself with racists … It’s like a cancer. It’s a sickness. It makes us sick.

“I think it’s easy to put the Blak Sovereign Movement into the camp of racists, because that’s convenient.”

She said that whatever result the referendum returns, she would continue to fight for treaty.

“I don't think a Yes or No result is going to make any difference regardless of what it is. If it’s No, well, we know that the country is racist, like it is,” Senator Thorpe said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/lidia-thorpe-to-address-hard-truths-about-rights-and-sovereignty-of-indigenous-people-at-press-club/news-story/aa36bf93f6aad005237462a6330a5e4a

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19367972

File: d0fae92798b8718⋯.jpg (1.8 MB,4664x3130,2332:1565,Kindred_spirits_on_climate….jpg)

>>19326780

>>19333564

Rudd, Newsom get cosy on climate

Australia’s ambassador to the US found a lot of common ground with Gavin Newsom, the Californian governor being touted as a presidential hopeful for the Democrats.

Matthew Cranston - Aug 16, 2023

Washington | Under the five-metre-high ceilings of the Leland Stanford Mansion in Sacramento, Australia’s ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, showed just what a former prime minister has to do to become mates with the potential next president of the United States.

Californian governor Gavin Newsom, who many believe is planning a presidential run soon with a growing fund-raising base and an increasingly vulnerable Joe Biden at the helm, was courted on Tuesday (Wednesday AEST) by Rudd along with, as the ambassador put it, “a bunch of visiting Australian corporate buccaneers”.

Newsom, 55, who has been governor since 2019 and a politician for 20 years, is widely regarded as the next best option for the Democrats after Biden. A favourite hate figure of the Republican right for his progressive views, he governs a state that, with GDP of about $US3.6 trillion ($5.5 trillion), is the fifth biggest in the world, behind Germany and ahead of India.

He and Rudd met to announce a memorandum of understanding for five years of co-operation on clean energy, transportation and technology, green finance and investment, and research and development.

Rudd was insistent that this was a big deal. “It’s not just a bunch of pearly words. It’s not just a bunch of empty phrases,” he said.

Regardless of whether that’s true, Newsom was impressed at the cheer squad Rudd had delivered to his door.

“This is a hell of a turnout – we are not used to this many people, particularly for something like this,” he said, with genuine surprise.

But Newsom likes it when people come to California.

Since 2020, California’s population has shrunk by about 500,000 people, with high crime rates, taxes and the soaring cost of living driving the exodus. Most have gone to Texas, according to the US Census.

Talks on climate change, not business

San Francisco, in the grip of a crime and drug wave, has lost dozens of businesses, including retail giants Saks off 5th, H&M and Nordstrom, and big tech companies such as Meta and PayPal. So bad is business that the city’s largest convention complex, the Moscone Centre, is losing major events to groups such as IBM and Red Hat.

But California’s fading allure to business was not on the agenda when Rudd was in town; it was all about how to tackle climate change, where California, like Australia, is on the frontline.

“The natural dryness of so much of California and of Australia is now being compounded by this ever expanding climate crisis across the world,” Rudd said.

“I’ve been around for a long time on the climate change debate. Way back when I pronounced in Australia that climate change was the greatest economic, environmental and moral challenge of our generation I was ridiculed.

“I make no apology for saying it then. And I make no apology for repeating it now.”

If reducing emissions is the greatest moral challenge facing humanity, then Australia could learn something from California.

The Californian economy is more than twice the size of Australia’s, but its greenhouse gas emissions are 25 per cent less.

California’s regulators last year passed rules banning the sale of new petrol and diesel engine cars by 2035 and, depending on whose figures you look at, 37 per cent of the state’s electricity was generated by renewable sources such as solar and wind.

“California’s ability to set standards for new and emerging technologies makes it a critical partner as Australia becomes a renewable energy superpower,” the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade said in a press release.

Rudd doubled down by reminding Newsom in a speech that it was his government’s decision to “reduce our carbon footprint by 43 per cent by 2030, and to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050”.

“It’s a bit like saying to the poor, [coal-mining] state of West Virginia, ‘you shall by statute, have a renewable energy sector of a given quantum by a given time’. We were attacked at the time for being grossly intrusive in the operations of the free market, in the energy sector. Guess what? They were right. We were intrusive. God, you know something, statutes work.”

https://www.afr.com/world/north-america/rudd-newsom-get-cosy-on-climate-20230816-p5dwuy

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19367975

File: 07ad4fc1ac41a19⋯.jpg (308.16 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Kevin_Rudd_and_California_….jpg)

>>19326780

>>19333564

>>19367972

Kevin Rudd says he will never apologise for his 2007 climate change warning

The former PM turned US ambassador has stuck to his guns on one burning issue while hailing a new agreement with California.

Tom Minear - August 16, 2023

Kevin Rudd has revived his declaration that climate change is the greatest moral challenge of our time, saying he would never apologise for the warning he issued in 2007 even though it doomed his prime ministership when he abandoned his signature carbon pricing scheme.

The US ambassador, who unveiled a climate pact between Australia and California with Governor Gavin Newsom on Wednesday, said he was “ridiculed” for his comments at the time.

“I make no apology for saying it then and I make no apology for repeating it now, because it is,” Dr Rudd said.

He hailed the new agreement with California – which boasts an economy that is twice as large as Australia and bigger than all but four countries – as crucial to combating the “ever-expanding climate crisis”.

In particular, Dr Rudd thanked Mr Newsom for California’s ambitious plan to sell only zero-emission vehicles by 2035, saying it was “changing America and it’s changing the world”.

Under the memorandum of understanding, the Australian and Californian governments will co-operate on clean energy, transportation and technology solutions, as well as climate adaptation initiatives, green finance, and research and development.

Dr Rudd said the pact would also bolster crisis response arrangements, with firefighters already crossing the Pacific to assist in bushfire emergencies.

“It’s not just a bunch of pearly words, it’s not just a bunch of empty phrases,” he said.

“It’s about a program of action between us in order to take what we currently do and accelerate it, turbocharge it to a whole new level.”

“Together, we can do enormously good things in the world.”

Mr Newsom, who described Australia as America’s most important partner, said California was determined to “dominate” the economic opportunities in the clean energy transition.

“We have to move. It’s about the great implementation – it’s not about ambition any longer,” he said.

“I don’t know of any goals that we haven’t yet established. We’ve just got to deliver now, we’ve got to move with the speed that is required of this moment.”

Dr Rudd, in his first stint as prime minister, pursued an emissions trading scheme as the centrepiece of his climate policy. But it was defeated in the Senate, and after the disastrous 2009 Copenhagen climate summit, the government put the policy on ice.

Support for Dr Rudd plummeted and he was replaced by Julia Gillard within weeks.

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/national/kevin-rudd-says-he-will-never-apologise-for-his-2007-climate-change-warning/news-story/2c8b024ca6b12a779da57e93964c117d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19367987

File: ad8763e9e5436a1⋯.jpg (394.99 KB,750x788,375:394,KR_24.jpg)

File: cada918856d481d⋯.mp4 (2.01 MB,848x480,53:30,_dKcE9bm_YMmlWqy.mp4)

File: 18255a180db852f⋯.jpg (394.82 KB,852x887,852:887,Q_2782.jpg)

File: 68e13f2472f5842⋯.jpeg (105.36 KB,1280x720,16:9,7D41C3B5_45E7_41C7_B5B4_D….jpeg)

>>19326780

>>19333564

>>19367972

Kevin Rudd AC Tweet

Proud to join @CAGovernor @GavinNewsom in Sacramento today for the signing of a new landmark climate MoU between Australia and California. This MoU will enhance cooperation in areas including clean transportation, energy, climate-friendly business and R&D.

https://twitter.com/AmboRudd/status/1691625976034164833

Q Post #2782

Feb 18 2019 04:19:58 (EST)

[Example CA]

https://calmatters.org/articles/commentary/gavin-newsoms-keeping-it-all-in-the-family/amp/?

What ‘family’ runs CA?

They are all connected.

Wealth-Power-Influence

[RIGGED]

The More You Know….

Q

https://qanon.pub/#2782

https://calmatters.org/commentary/2019/01/gavin-newsoms-keeping-it-all-in-the-family/

https://qalerts.pub/?q=newsom

https://qalerts.pub/?q=california

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19368006

File: 0229c6012a9a4f6⋯.jpg (347.61 KB,750x675,10:9,USEA_20.jpg)

File: 10024ea6c050dd8⋯.jpg (257.43 KB,1600x918,800:459,F3m2SMma4AEKyCu.jpg)

File: c1d6a0c11605a95⋯.jpg (1012.64 KB,852x1689,284:563,Q_14.jpg)

File: 8d61006a7498026⋯.jpg (395.21 KB,852x810,142:135,Q_3800.jpg)

File: dbdb98701537e20⋯.jpg (55.05 KB,600x352,75:44,DurhamBoat.jpg)

U.S. Embassy Australia Tweet

https://twitter.com/USEmbAustralia/status/1691583564310306947

Q Post #14

Oct 31 2017 22:00:15 (EST)

SCI[F]

Military Intelligence.

What is 'State Secrets' and how upheld in the SC?

What must be completed to engage MI over other (3) letter agencies?

What must occur to allow for civilian trials?

Why is this relevant?

What was Flynn's background?

Why is this relevant?

Why did Adm R (NSA) meet Trump privately w/o auth?

Does POTUS know where the bodies are buried?

Does POTUS have the goods on most bad actors?

Was TRUMP asked to run for President?

Why?

By Who?

Was HRC next in line?

Was the election suppose to be rigged?

Did good people prevent the rigging?

Why did POTUS form a panel to investigate?

Has POTUS *ever* made a statement that did not become proven as true/fact?

What is POTUS in control of?

What is the one organization left that isn't corrupt?

Why does the military play such a vital role?

Why is POTUS surrounded by highly respected generals?

Who guards former Presidents?

Why is that relevant?

Who guards HRC?

Why is ANTIFA allowed to operate?

Why hasn't the MB been classified as a terrorist org?

What happens if Soros funded operations get violent and engage in domestic terrorism?

What happens if mayors/ police comms/chiefs do not enforce the law?

What authority does POTUS have specifically over the Marines?

Why is this important?

What is Mueller's background? Military?

Was Trump asked to run for President w/ assurances made to prevent tampering?

How is POTUS always 5-steps ahead?

Who is helping POTUS?

https://qanon.pub/#14

Q Post #3800

Jan 28 2020 14:46:22 (EST)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Durham_boat

Anons found the subtle hint dropped in the beginning.

Think Durham start.

Think 'Q' start.

You have more than you know.

Q

https://qanon.pub/#3800

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

92ce1d No.19370729

File: ccda6a5de4755a6⋯.png (652.89 KB,854x609,122:87,ClipboardImage.png)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19374396

File: c86d70428d6d307⋯.jpg (95.34 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Hillsong_founder_Brian_Hou….jpg)

File: 989cc72437a284e⋯.jpg (94.72 KB,1280x720,16:9,Frank_Houston.jpg)

File: db65e4dcd57c907⋯.jpg (97.84 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brett_Sengstock_left_with_….jpg)

>>19011175 (pb)

>>19016485 (pb)

Brian Houston not guilty of covering up pedo father’s abuse

Hillsong founder Brian Houston says the extent of his pedophile father’s vile acts may never be known after being found not guilty of covering up historic abuse.

Steve Zemek and Nathan Schmidt - August 17, 2023

1/3

WARNING: Graphic content.

Hillsong founder Brian Houston has called his late father a “serial pedophile” after being found not guilty of covering up the church leader’s abuse of a young boy in Sydney in the 1970s.

Mr Houston, 69, stood trial in Sydney’s Downing Centre Local Court having pleaded not guilty to one count of concealing the serious indictable offence of another person and denied allegations that he failed to pass onto police details of his father’s Frank Houston’s crimes.

Following a long-running hearing, Magistrate Gareth Christofi on Thursday found Mr Houston not guilty.

Outside of court, Mr Houston said he wanted to “impress his sadness” to his father’s victim, Brett Sengstock, and all the victims of the late New Zealand and Australian church leader.

“He (Frank Houston) was obviously a serial pedophile,” Mr Houston said.

“We will probably never know the extent of his paedophila.

“A lot of people have been hurt, and for that I am very sad.

“But, I am not my father. I did not commit this offence.

“I feel relief that the truth has come out.”

Mr Houston took a different tone in a video posted to Instagram following his court win.

“Here I am, just a few minutes after an overwhelming not guilty verdict,” he said.

“It‘s been 25 years of persecution, nine years since the royal commission, two years since I was charged.

“And, today the judgment was overwhelmingly supportive of not guilty - to the point where the judge said what I did was the exact opposite of a cover up.

“Lets always remember, the best is yet to come.”

Brett Sengstock was sexually assaulted by Frank Houston at his family’s Coogee home while Frank Houston was on a tour of Australia over 50 years ago.

At the time, Mr Sengstock was seven years old, and Frank Houston, then a New Zealand-based preacher, was a close friend of his parents.

Mr Houston’s legal team had argued the Pentecostal preacher had a “reasonable excuse” not to come forward because of Mr Sengstock’s wishes.

In delivering his judgment, Magistrate Christofi told the court Mr Houston was informed by Mr Sengstock and others that he did not wish to make a statement to police, and repeatedly relayed that information to church.

“I‘m not satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the Crown has proved that the accused, in not reporting the matter to the police, had no regard to the wishes of the complainant for that not to occur,” he said.

“Therefore, I am not satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused did not have a reasonable excuse for not reporting the information he had to the police.

“That being the case one of the elements of the offence before the court remains unproven and therefore must be not guilty.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19374398

File: 0776d037c7f8e90⋯.jpg (208.77 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Brian_Houston_was_swarmed_….jpg)

File: 4a7467667839c27⋯.jpg (359.2 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Brian_Houston.jpg)

>>19374396

2/3

The Crown prosecution alleged that from late 1999, when he learnt of his father’s pedophilia, until Frank Houston’s death in 2004, Brian Houston failed to disclose the information to authorities.

Mr Sengstock told the court during his evidence that he did not disclose the abuse until he was 16, when he told his mother.

In November 1998, Mr Sengstock’s mother, Rose Hardingham, told other members of the church including Barbara Taylor and Kevin “Mad Dog” Mudford, the court heard.

It was from there that Brian Houston was told of his father’s offending.

The Crown case hinged on a range of factors, including allegations Mr Houston had not reported the abuse in a desire to protect the church and had downplayed the vile acts in public speeches to the church congregation.

In a video played during the trial, Mr Houston addressed the Hillsong Conference at Sydney’s SuperDome in 2002 and told the 18000-strong crowd: “One of my staff came into my office and began to tell me a story where my own father, who is my hero, was accused of sexual abuse over 30 years ago when he was a pastor in New Zealand still.

“And I’ve got to tell you that what was being said left me so numb, so stunned, I could hardly believe what I was hearing … The best way I can describe it, it was like jets flying into the twin towers of my soul.”

Mr Houston later gave evidence that he regretted not being more explicit in his speeches, having told the court he’d convened multiple meetings with church leaders during which he disclosed the abuse and his father’s subsequent confession.

“The obvious conclusion to draw from the fact that the accused was speaking of the issue publicly to his congregation, to those watching the television broadcasts of the sermons around the world, and speaking to journalists, is that he wanted people to know about it.

“That is the very opposite that will cover up.”

“While the accused may have been euphemistic at times when speaking to large gatherings of 1000s of people, It would have been perfectly obvious to anyone what he was talking about,” Mr Christofi said.

Brian Houston learnt of his father’s offending via his business manager George Aghajanian before confronting his father inside his office at his church, the Hills Christian Life Centre, which would later become Hillsong.

Mr Houston during his evidence described it as a “tense” and “awkward” 45-minute meeting during which his father admitted to abusing Mr Sengstock.

“He simply said ‘that did happen’,” Mr Houston told the court.

“He told me it only happened once, he told me it involved fondling his genitals. He was, I think, a mix of embarrassed, humiliated, shamed, remorseful.”

Mr Houston told the court that during the meeting, he told his father that his credentials as a minister would be removed and that he would never preach again.

In late 1999, the national executive of the Assemblies of God was called to an urgent meeting at Sydney Airport to discuss revelations about Frank Houston.

According to minutes from that meeting, the AOG board had obtained legal advice indicating that it did not have to disclose the matter to police because by that time, Mr Sengstock was in his 30s and could make his own complaint.

The Crown prosecution argued that legal advice must have been relayed by Brian Houston as part of a cover-up; However Mr Houston’s legal team argued another member of the AOG board, Wayne Alcorn, had knowledge of Frank Houston’s offending before the meeting and may have been the source of the advice.

Ultimately, Mr Christofi ruled on Thursday that it was uncertain who provided the advice, stating that the Crown had not called a number of members present at the meeting to give evidence during the court hearing.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19374399

File: d89281d2caad88a⋯.jpg (122.5 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Brian_Houston_leaves_the_D….jpg)

File: cdfef746be8f51d⋯.jpg (477.39 KB,1032x668,258:167,Where_to_find_help_2023.jpg)

>>19374398

3/3

Mr Christofi described Mr Houston’s behaviour after receiving the complaint as being “not slow”, having made disclosures to church leadership and the “difficult decision” to challenge his father about the claims.

“He did not conceal the true nature of the allegations to the National Executive Committee or even attempt to do so,” Mr Christof said.

“Nor did he conceal from them the very significant piece of information that very few other people knew; namely, that his father had confessed.

“He did not seek to dictate how the committee would deal with the matter (and) informed them of Mr Sengstock’s wishes for anonymity and that he did not want to make a complaint.”

Mr Christofi told the court that when he received further allegations his father had sexually abused minors in New Zealand, Mr Houston recused himself and left the room when the committee discussed the matter.

Speaking on the church as a whole, Mr Christofi said the National Executive Committee was made up of senior pastors from different churches and “traditions”, rebuffing claims by the Crown the church was subject to a singular culture of secrecy.

Mr Christofi also ruled that he was not satisfied money transferred to Mr Sengstock by his father following a meeting at McDonalds in Thornleigh in North Sydney during which an agreement was scribbled on a napkin was an attempt to silence him.

“Quite clearly, it was wrong for the accused the President of the Assemblies of God (Mr Houston) to be involving himself at any level in an extra curial payment to the victim of child sexual abuse events where the perpetrator was a minister of an Assemblies of God church, not to mention his father,” Mr Christofi said.

“However, I cannot be satisfied the payment of this money was an attempt to silence Mr Sengstock, as opposed to some kind of informal form of financial compensation.

“On his own evidence, Mr Sengstock states that he was not at that time contemplating going to the police. He did not need to be silenced.

“He said that, notwithstanding the payment of this money, he did not want the matter to become public knowledge.”

Mr Houston will reappear before the court later this year when it is expected an application for costs will be made.

https://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-act/courts-law/brian-houston-not-guilty-of-covering-up-pedo-fathers-abuse/news-story/3ea82ffba9bbb5cf130730bf470a6b09

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19374447

File: 5c637eb990a14cc⋯.mp4 (7.52 MB,640x360,16:9,Hillsong_founder_Brian_Hou….mp4)

File: cd936d15bdc7762⋯.mp4 (7.97 MB,640x360,16:9,Victim_of_Frank_Houston_s_….mp4)

>>19011175 (pb)

>>19016485 (pb)

>>19374396

Hillsong founder Brian Houston found not guilty of concealing his father's sexual abuse of a child

Jamie McKinnell and Heath Parkes-Hupton - 17 August 2023

1/2

Hillsong founder Brian Houston has been found not guilty of concealing his father's sexual abuse of a child.

The 69-year-old has previously told a Sydney court he was left "speechless" in 1999 when he first learned of Frank Houston's abuse of a seven-year-old boy decades earlier.

But Brian Houston insisted he did not go to the police because he was respecting the wishes of the victim, Brett Sengstock, who by that time was aged in his 30s.

He pleaded not guilty to concealing a serious indictable offence.

Magistrate Gareth Christofi on Thursday found Brian Houston not guilty, after concluding he had a "reasonable excuse" for not reporting the matter.

In his judgement, Magistrate Christofi found Mr Houston knew or reasonably believed that Mr Sengstock did not want the matter reported to police.

The court heard Mr Sengstock gave evidence that his abuse at the hands of Frank Houston was a "hideous secret", and one he did not wish for others to know.

At a hearing last year, he gave evidence of feeling "betrayed" by his mother when she raised the allegations with a member of their local church in Sydney's west.

Magistrate Christofi found it would have been consistent with all the evidence that Mr Sengstock would have expressed that sentiment to Brian Houston during a phone call about the abuse in 1999.

"There is little doubt in my view that the accused knew or believed on reasonable grounds that Brett Sengstock did not want the matter reported to police," the magistrate said.

He also found that a $10,000 payment arranged by Frank Houston to Mr Sengstock could not be proven to be "hush money", or that Brian Houston had intended it to be so.

The court heard Mr Sengstock, then in his 30s, met with Frank Houston and another member of the Hills Christian Life Centre — the precursor to Hillsong — at Thornleigh McDonalds in 1999.

He signed a napkin and told the court Frank Houston said: "You'll get your money we can keep this between ourselves."

Mr Sengstock told the court he believed the money was to "buy his silence", and that he did not see the money until he chased up the deal with Brian Houston.

Magistrate Christofi found, however, that the terms of the agreement were "entirely unclear" and there was insufficient evidence that it was intended to stop Mr Sengstock from going to the police.

The Crown's case was also contradicted by Mr Sengstock's own evidence that he had not considered going to authorities, he found.

"[Mr Sengstock] did not need to be silenced."

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19374453

File: 197e214f9708895⋯.jpg (249.64 KB,1600x1066,800:533,Brian_and_Bobbie_Houston_e….jpg)

File: 604beffcb2058f5⋯.jpg (2.3 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,The_Magistrate_found_the_H….jpg)

File: 215269cf2f3ba84⋯.jpg (34.33 KB,612x408,3:2,Frank_Houston_was_stripped….jpg)

File: cf612e5f2b96da2⋯.jpg (277.32 KB,836x879,836:879,Sexual_assault_help_and_su….jpg)

>>19374447

2/2

'The very opposite of a cover-up'

Magistrate Christophi rejected the Crown's case that Brian Houston facilitated a "cover-up" to protect the church's reputation, saying the Hillsong founder spoke openly about his father's crimes.

During the special fixture hearing last year, Brian Houston described his father as a "serial paedophile".

He said that in 1999 and 2000, more victims had come forward from his father's time in New Zealand and steps were taken to remove Frank Houston from the ministry.

The court heard Brian Houston told "many people at various levels" of the church about Frank Houston's predatory behaviour and referenced it in sermons delivered to churchgoers.

Brian Houston also discussed it during an interview with a reporter for the Sydney Morning Herald in 2002, Magistrate Christofi noted.

"That is the very opposite of a cover up," the magistrate found.

"He spoke widely and freely about the matter in public settings."

Speaking outside court, Mr Sengstock said regardless of today's outcome he had been handed a "life sentence" having endured a 45-year battle.

"Today I've received some recognition for a seven-year-old child who was brutally abused at the hands of a self-confessed child rapist and coward, Frank Houston," he said.

"Frank Houston was no pioneer for Christianity, his legacy remains a faded memory of a paedophile."

He thanked prosecutors, police and his family for their support, and all those who worked to give survivors of clergy child sexual abuse "a voice in this country".

"Blaming the victim is as repulsive as the assaults themselves," Mr Sengstock said.

"It should not be this hard."

During last year's hearing, he gave evidence that in one of their 1999 phone calls an "angry" Brian Houston claimed his father had been "tempted" by a young Mr Sengstock.

Mr Houston denied this while being cross-examined, saying it was "absurd" to suggest he would blame someone who was abused as a child.

"It's nonsense. I mean, who would say that about a seven-year-old boy, or a 10-year-old boy … it's just an absurd notion."

Houston expresses sympathy to victim

Speaking outside court after the verdict, Mr Houston expressed sympathy with his father's victim but also hit out at police and prosecutors.

"I've been found not guilty today, but in fact, I've always been not guilty," he said.

"I want to express my sadness to Brett Sengstock… genuine sadness about what my father did to him, and all of his victims. He was obviously a serial paedophile. We probably will never know the extent of his paedophilia, and a lot of people 's lives have been tragically hurt, and for that I'll always be very sad."

However, Mr Houston said he had also been the victim of a "targeted attack".

"I'm not my father. I did not commit this offence," he said. "I feel a sense of relief that at last the truth has come out. If I wasn't Brian Houston from Hillson, this charge would never have happened. And I know a lot of people agree with me on that."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-08-17/hillsong-founder-brian-houston-not-guilty/102740394

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19374474

File: ff5d049fdf9d65c⋯.jpg (260.08 KB,2400x1440,5:3,The_Catholic_church_is_usi….jpg)

>>19320928

Catholic church uses death of paedophile priest in bid to stop survivor suing NSW diocese, court hears

Church claims it cannot get fair trial over alleged abuse by the notorious David Joseph Perrett in legal tactic that has drawn widespread criticism

Christopher Knaus - 17 Aug 2023

1/2

The Catholic church is seeking to use using the death of a “prolific paedophile” priest to permanently prevent a dying Indigenous man from seeking justice for alleged abuse suffered on camping trips in rural New South Wales.

Two survivors are suing the church’s Armidale diocese for the alleged abuse by notorious priest David Joseph Perrett during camping trips from an Aboriginal mission in the mid-1970s.

Perrett died in 2020 while awaiting criminal trial for more than 100 offences relating to the abuse of almost 40 young children – including the two plaintiffs now suing the church – in areas spanning Armidale, Walcha, Guyra and the broader New England region from the 1960s to the mid-1990s.

At the time the then bishop of Armidale, Michael Kennedy, said Perrett’s death would bring “significant disappointment” for alleged victims.

“His death means that survivors will not get to see these charges heard in court,” he said in 2020.

The church is now using Perrett’s death in a bid to shut down civil cases brought by the same survivors against the Armidale diocese.

The church argues it cannot get a fair trial against the two survivors’ civil claims because Perrett and other deceased church officials cannot give evidence about whether the abuse occurred, whether there was negligence by the church or whether the camping trips were conducted as part of Perrett’s role with the church, potentially making it vicariously liable for his actions.

The church is making the argument despite allegations it did nothing to investigate Perrett’s actions for decades after it learned he had been convicted and sentenced in 1996 for abusing children in north-west NSW.

The broader use of such tactics, first revealed by Guardian Australia, has prompted widespread criticism due to the church’s role in covering up abuse and delaying justice. Survivors take an average of 22 years to come forward, making the death of perpetrators and witnesses common.

Police investigated the two boys’ allegations and charged Perrett in 2017, three years before he died.

At the time Perrett gave instructions to his defence lawyer denying the allegations that he abused either boy. Those instructions were recorded in a statement and that statement is available to the church to help it defend itself from civil claims.

In a hearing in the NSW supreme court this week, the church claimed that the statement was not enough to enable it to fairly run its defence.

The church first learned that Perrett was convicted of sexual offences against children in the mid-1990s, the court heard, and placed him under “stringent” conditions to protect children in the diocese.

Perrett also confessed to being a paedophile during an exchange with a bishop in 2016, the court heard. Peter Tierney, counsel for the plaintiffs, said that despite this the church did nothing to investigate his past.

“We have this extraordinary declaration by Perrett saying he was no risk in the St Martin de Porres [adult church] community because ‘I am a paedophile,’” Tierney told the court on Wednesday.

“Remarkable in its frankness, but it must be alarming for bishop Kennedy to hear that from this man, in light of what was to come.

“Within a year he’s charged with 11 historic child sexual offences, and no investigation [by the church].”

The church did not approach Perrett after the charges were laid in 2017 to ask for his response to the allegations, despite the reasonable possibility the church would face a civil claim in the future, Tierney said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19374478

File: f4e76d61a8fe316⋯.jpg (227.81 KB,2400x1440,5:3,Survivor_Steven_who_was_ab….jpg)

>>19374474

2/2

But the diocese’s lawyers hit back at the suggestion that it should have taken steps to investigate the allegations prior to Perrett’s death.

It claimed it didn’t know the two plaintiffs were among the almost group of complainants who had gone to police, prompting the charges.

The diocese also claimed it would only have been able to put generalities about the allegations to Perrett for a response and that Perrett would have been highly unlikely to help the church with its investigations while he was defending himself from criminal charges.

The two plaintiffs brought their civil claim against the church after Perrett’s death in 2020.

Court documents allege he was a “prolific paedophile”, that there was a “body of knowledge of Perrett’s proclivities held by a number of boys on the mission” and that “it was foreseeable to the defendant that Perrett could unlawfully sexually assault an Aboriginal child from the mission”.

The church says the filing of the claim after Perrett’s death has denied it the ability to call him or seek a response to the detailed allegations.

The church said Perrett’s earlier statement to his criminal lawyers was of limited assistance in fairly defending the case.

“Your honour will appreciate that the foundational issue in the case is: did the abuse occur?” the diocese’s lawyers said.

“The plaintiff will give evidence that it did. In response to that we will say Mr Perrett is dead, we cannot call him, and we will tender this document to prove that he didn’t do it … That [document] is a far cry from being able to call Mr Perrett.”

Greg Choat, a solicitor for the plaintiffs, said one of his clients was a “dying man”.

“He’s got months to live and will spend some of his last days trying to force the church to deal with the merits of his case.”

Justice Richard Cavanagh has reserved his decision and is expecting to make a judgment by the end of next week.

The diocese was approached for a response but declined due to the ongoing court proceedings.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/aug/17/catholic-church-uses-death-of-paedophile-priest-in-bid-to-stop-survivor-suing-nsw-diocese-court-hears

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19374503

File: 3457768d6c84132⋯.jpg (4.41 MB,6000x4000,3:2,Pearl_Harbor_Naval_Shipyar….jpg)

>>19188991

>>19231877

Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility Welcomes First Contingent of AUKUS Personnel

navy.mil - 16 August 2023

1/2

PEARL HARBOR, Hawaii (Aug. 15, 2023) - Personnel from participating nations reported to Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility (PHNSY&IMF) in support of the Australia, United Kingdom, and United States (AUKUS) security partnership’s Pillar One initiative Aug. 14, 2023.

The Pillar One initiative is delivering a conventionally armed nuclear powered attack submarine (SSN) capability to Australia. The uniformed and civilian submarine maintenance subject matter experts from Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States comprise the Advance Verification Team (AVT) that, over the coming weeks, will work directly with shipyard personnel to gain a full understanding of the maintenance and industrial skills required to establish Submarine Rotational Force-West (SRF-W) in Australia as early as 2027.

At its height, SRF-W will host up to four Virginia class and one Royal Navy Astute class SSN. Initially, a combined Australian and U.S. team will execute maintenance on the U.S. flagged SSNs. Over time, as Australia grows its workforce and expertise, the U.S. will reduce its presence in Australia. The AVT is working to build a detailed understanding of the types of specialized skills and trades required to establish the SRF-W repair workforce.

AUKUS Pillar One has three distinct phases. Phase One involves establishing SRF-W through increased Virginia class visits to Australian designed to expand Australia’s knowledge of SSNs and the development of an Intermediate Level Maintenance capability. Phase Two begins in the early 2030s, pending approval from the U.S. Congress, with the United States selling Australia between three and five Virginia class submarines. Phase Three sees the combination of United Kingdom submarine design and advanced United States technology in the delivery of SSN-AUKUS, the future attack submarine for both Australia and the United Kingdom. Australia plans to deliver the first sovereign-built SSN-AUKUS in the early 2040s.

“Each phase builds on the previous one and SRF-W is the foundation upon which the Australian maintenance, sustainment and new construction workforce is built,” said Capt. Lincoln Reifsteck, the U.S. Navy’s AUKUS Integration and Acquisition Program Manager, who emphasizes the importance of the AVT’s role in the establishment of SRF-W .

“Australians are superior submariners,” said Capt. Richard A. Jones, PHNSY & IMF’s commanding officer. “They operate one of the best diesel-electric boat classes in the world in a highly complex area of operations. That said, there is a big step between the Australian Collins Class SSK [diesel-electric attack submarine] and Virginia class SSN. We are honored to host the AVT over the next several weeks to share as much as we can, answer their questions, and set them on the right course to building out a holistic sustainment plan.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19374507

File: 7d50983864d0746⋯.jpg (125.79 KB,600x600,1:1,Pearl_Harbor_Naval_Shipyar….jpg)

>>19374503

2/2

Once the AVT determines the skillsets and number of personnel required to execute intermediate-level maintenance, they will build an embedment plan to upskill and train Australian personnel within U.S. public naval shipyards.

“With an informed and specific plan, we will control costs by ensuring we send the right people, to the right places, to get the right training, at the right time to meet our requirements,” said Rear Adm. Matthew Buckley, the Australian Submarine Agency’s Head of Submarine Capability.

“Everything the AVT is doing works to grow Australia’s organic capabilities needed to keep our spear point, our attack submarines, sharp,” added Royal Australian Navy Capt. William McDougall, Director Submarine Rotational Force - West. “We are focused on ensuring the work taking place at [Australian base] HMAS Stirling fully supports SRF-West and we have been nothing but impressed by the dedication of our trilateral partners in setting us up for success.”

The AVT will remain in Pearl Harbor for several weeks, return home, and then travel to the United Kingdom to tour British shipyards to refine its plans. “In the UK we have fewer SSNs than the US. We are going to show the AVT how we maintain and modernize a smaller number of submarines, while still operating at the highest possible standards. Given the projected size of the RAN SSN force, Australia will not require facilities akin to the United States Naval Shipyards, but instead infrastructure comparable to those present in the UK. This experience will be enormously beneficial for both the AVT and our personnel, as we look to strengthen our mutual knowledge, and ongoing partnership,” said Rear Adm. Chris Shepherd, the Royal Navy’s Defence Nuclear Organisation AUKUS Director and Senior Responsible Owner for the Replacement Nuclear Submarine Programme.

The AUKUS partnership is a strategic endeavor that strengthens the three nations’ national security and promotes peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region. Australia will acquire conventionally armed SSNs for the Royal Australian Navy under AUKUS Pillar One via the Optimal Pathway announced by leaders of the three partner nations on March 13, 2023. The AUKUS Integration and Acquisition (I&A) Program Office is responsible for executing the trilateral partnership to deliver conventionally-armed, nuclear-powered attack submarines to the Royal Australian Navy at the earliest possible date while setting the highest nuclear stewardship standards.

https://www.navy.mil/Press-Office/Press-Releases/display-pressreleases/Article/3494400/pearl-harbor-naval-shipyard-and-intermediate-maintenance-facility-welcomes-firs/

https://www.facebook.com/PearlHarborNavalShipyard

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19382262

File: 29ed3cf43a15f55⋯.jpg (190.4 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_speaks_at….jpg)

File: 74def9f280a1c38⋯.jpg (170.49 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19297392

Anthony Albanese presses go to super-charge Indigenous voice to parliament campaign

GEOFF CHAMBERS - AUGUST 18, 2023

Anthony Albanese, senior cabinet ministers and state premiers are preparing a nationwide blitz of battleground states and electorates, as the ALP and union campaign machines swing behind the Yes23 grassroots movement ahead of the voice referendum.

The Prime Minister and Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney on Saturday will use speeches on the final day of the ALP national conference in Brisbane to springboard Labor’s Yes campaign ahead of an expected October 14 referendum.

Local Yes supporter groups, now established in every federal electorate and embedded with pro-Yes Labor and Liberal MPs, will be bolstered by more than 20,000 volunteers who will lead doorknocking, letterboxing and phone canvassing operations in coming weeks.

The Weekend Australian understands Ms Burney will use her conference address to energise the labour movement to join the Yes campaign and lead conversations in local communities to win the referendum.

Mr Albanese, along with senior colleagues and popular premiers including Peter Malinauskas, Daniel Andrews and Chris Minns, will step up efforts targeting soft voters when the prime minister fires the starting gun on the referendum campaign.

Government sources confirmed September 10 is the cut-off to call an October 14 referendum.

Pro-voice operatives said the interaction between political and grassroots campaigns would seek to avoid MPs leading the daily debate or taking control of the Yes23 strategy. While the Yes23 campaign will outspend No’s Fair Australia campaign across mass media markets in the final five to six weeks of the campaign, pro-voice backers are ramping up on-the-ground operations targeting train stations in peak periods, shopping centres and weekend markets.

The ALP’s campaign machine will unleash an election-style digital media advertising blitz aimed at reaching millions of Australians.

A campaign source said direct voter contact and face-to-face conversations explaining what the voice proposal entails were key to flipping soft voters.

Outside the capital cities, the Uluru Dialogue is leading the campaign push in the regions.

Liberals for Yes is also planning events led by former opposition Indigenous Australians spokesman Julian Leeser, Bass MP Brid­get Archer and Kate Carnell.

The Yes campaign is seeking to amplify the cross-party alliance in support of the voice, including Labor, Liberals, Greens and independents Helen Haines, Andrew Wilkie, Allegra Spender and David Pocock.

Prominent Yes campaigner Noel Pearson joined South Australian Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young in Adelaide on Friday, and Yes23 campaign director Dean Parkin held events with NSW Liberal MPs Matt Kean, James Griffin and Felicity Wilson last week.

Amid expectations that Queensland and Western Australia will oppose the voice, the No side will push hard to win South Australia or Tasmania.

Prominent No campaigners Warren Mundine and opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Price launched the WA Liberals for No campaign in Perth on Friday alongside Liberal senators Michaelia Cash and Kerrynne Liddle.

Ahead of national conference endorsing the voice, Mr Albanese said his Labor caucus and party were “united” on the referendum.

“This isn’t a matter of ­convenience. This is a matter of conviction.

“This is about recognising our First Nations people in our Constitution after 122 years, and then it’s simply about listening in order to get better results,” Mr Albanese said.

“We can’t continue to just do more of the same, And constitutional change isn’t easy. We know eight out of 48 referendums have passed, and only one that’s been put forward by the Labor Party has passed.”

Mr Albanese repeated his claim that if the referendum failed, “it will be a setback for reconciliation, and it will be a lost opportunity”.

“What we know from the Republic referendum that was held at the end of the last century, the last time we had a referendum, is not only has it not returned in the quarter of a century almost since, it’s not on the horizon in the next couple of years either,” he said.

“This is in the hands of the Australian people.

“I will do my best to promote a Yes vote. I was fully aware, when I said that we would hold a referendum, there were people who said that’s a risk.

“Of course, it’s a risk. Change is hard. But this is necessary.”

Mr Albanese said the referendum would be in October or November and the government was working with the AEC.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/pm-presses-go-on-alp-voice-campaign/news-story/8e925b701bd7800fde99a0c6c5097487

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19382273

File: 317776e745937c9⋯.jpg (477.08 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Indigenous_entrepreneur_Wa….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19297392

Warren Mundine to launch ‘vision’ at Conservative Political Action Conference

PAIGE TAYLOR - AUGUST 18, 2023

Indigenous entrepreneur Warren Mundine says it is time for Australian conservatives to rejoin discussions they once led on equality and rights. He flagged the Conservative Political Action Conference in Sydney as the forum to set out the movement’s commitments to Closing the Gap and economic prosperity for Indigenous Australians.

Mr Mundine and Northern Territory senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, the Coalition’s spokeswoman on Indigenous affairs, will speak at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Sydney on Saturday. They are expected to reiterate their arguments against the Indigenous voice to parliament, as fellow speakers, including Tony Abbott and Pauline Hanson, are predicted to do.

However, Mr Mundine told The Weekend Australian his speech was mainly his vision for building a conservative Australian movement that was not tied to any party. About 2000 people were due to attend the conference. Ticket prices ranged from $119 to $7000 for a platinum package that included access to speakers at a VIP welcome cocktail event on Friday night. “It’s about the battle of ideas, free markets, free speech, freedom of religion, small government and small taxation,” he said.

The former chairman of Mr Abbott’s Indigenous Advisory Council said conservative commitments to outcomes was important, “especially for me, as an Indigenous person”. “We need to talk about Closing the Gap and holding bureaucrats and governments across the country to account for all the billions of dollars they spend on Closing the Gap, and make sure they are getting clear outcomes,” he said.

Mr Mundine said that on this point and some others, he and Indigenous proponents of the voice to parliament agreed.

“The good news is that we are not far apart on some of these issues,” Mr Mundine said.

“And the Australian public too. They want recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in the Constitution as I do. The Closing the Gap people want practical outcomes like I do.

“We may differ on how we get there and how we do that but I will always open the door to conversations because we can have negotiations about how that happens. For example, how do we get economic prosperity for Aboriginal people? How do we get them living longer lives, better educated?”

Mr Mundine said these questions were the right ones for conservatives in Australia, and said this was in line with a history of post-war reforms by conservative Australian politicians beginning with the Menzies government’s 1962 Commonwealth Electoral Act granting all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people the option to enrol and vote in federal elections.

“Conservatives were the people who pushed for rights and equality, and now we are going to get back into that space,” Mr Mundine said. “We want to be part of those discussions again.”

Mr Mundine has argued for the merits of local and regional Indigenous voices to give traditional owner groups a say on their own languages, cultures, heritage, land and sea. However, he does not believe a national voice could properly represent those groups.

In an address to Torres Strait Islands residents this month, Cape York Partnerships founder Noel Pearson described how local and regional voices could work there. He outlined a scenario in which the 16 islands of the Torres Strait each chose one voice and the Torres Straits as a whole selected a regional voice from those people.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/warren-mundine-to-launch-vision-at-conservative-political-action-conference/news-story/250e63638b93af62f21d43e9bc352456

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19382314

File: 7a6c74397a4d821⋯.jpg (89.57 KB,1280x720,16:9,Defence_Minister_Richard_M….jpg)

File: 7fb5f5cc4b23355⋯.jpg (142.11 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Defence_Industry_Minister_….jpg)

>>19188991

>>19361940

Labor conference: ALP armed for keeping China at arm’s length

GEOFF CHAMBERS and SARAH ISON - AUGUST 18, 2023

1/2

Senior Labor ministers have warned that China will have 21 nuclear submarines and 200 major warships in the water by 2030, sparking an urgent need to deliver AUKUS submarines and defence technologies to ­prevent war in the Indo-Pacific.

Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy on Friday urged union and party delegates to back the “progressive” AUKUS defence pact, to help “prevent war” and protect Australians amid Beijing’s aggressive military build-up and rising US-China tensions.

“Strength deters war,” Mr Conroy said.

In an extraordinary slap down of anti-AUKUS elements inside the Australian Labor Party, the Left-faction powerbroker delivered a scathing attack on those who supported a “Robert Menzies ­appeasement” strategy.

Mr Conroy’s claim that anti-AUKUS delegates were appeasers sparked an angry backlash from Left-faction union leaders and colleagues, including federal Labor MP Josh Wilson who ­labelled the minister’s claim as “absurd”.

Mr Conroy and Defence Minister Richard Marles led the government’s assault against Left-wing unions and delegates who failed to win the backing needed to remove AUKUS from the ALP platform and extract “nuclear” when referring to Australia’s future submarine fleet.

Anthony Albanese – who on Saturday will rally support for the Indigenous voice at the 49th ALP national conference in Brisbane – joined his defence ministers to argue in favour of the AUKUS ­defence pact secured by Scott Morrison in 2021 and progressed by Labor in government.

“A bright future calls for more than sunny optimism,” he said.

“We have to analyse the world as it is, rather than as we would want it to be. We have to bring our defence capabilities up to speed and AUKUS is central to that.”

The Prime Minister declared that the partnership with two of Australia’s oldest friends – the UK and US – through the AUKUS pact was “consistent with the Labor values that I have been a part of my whole life”.

In contrast to Mr Conroy’s rhetoric, Mr Albanese said the government was “working towards stabilisation” with China.

“Having adult conversations between us; co-operating where we can, disagreeing where we must, but engaging in our national interest: that’s how serious people who are seriously concerned about Australia’s national interest and understanding the importance of diplomatic engagement are operating,” he said.

Mr Conroy, a factional ally of Mr Albanese and a former AMWU and CFMEU official, said that as “a middle power”, it was against Australia’s interest to have “one power dominate our ­region, especially one that breaches international laws”.

The Shortland MP, who was heckled by ALP delegates over the $268bn-$368bn cost of the submarines and accused of taking Australia “into war”, said AUKUS was a “progressive” policy that would deter conflict and “protect our people by having strong defence capabilities on our own”.

“The central question for delegates here is how to prevent war … The truth is, strength deters war … Appeasement invites conflict,“ Mr Conroy said.

“Delegates, do you want to be on the side of John Curtin or do you want to be on the side of pig-ironed Robert Menzies? That is the question here. Some people claim AUKUS will start a regional arms race. Well, they’re grievously out of touch because I’m here to tell you that arms race is already happening before our very eyes.

“If you’re pro-human rights, you need to be pro-AUKUS. If you’re pro-peace, you need to be pro-AUKUS. If you’re pro-advanced manufacturing, you need to be pro-AUKUS … this is in the national interest.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19382316

File: 5783ea08e8a5534⋯.jpg (237.2 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Fremantle_Labor_MP_Josh_Wi….jpg)

>>19382314

2/2

Mr Marles, who led negotiations with key Electrical Trades Union, AMWU, CFMEU and AWU officials, highlighted China’s military build-up to advocate in support of the AUKUS pact.

“We are witnessing the single biggest conventional military build-up in the world since the end of the Second World War,” Mr Marles said. “In the year 2000, China had six nuclear-powered submarines. By the end of this decade, they will have 21. In the year 2000, China had 57 major warships.

“By the end of this decade, they will have 200. Now these are not our decisions. These are not our choices. But this is the world in which we live. And it is our unavoidable obligation to navigate our way through it.”

Mr Conroy’s claim that anti-AUKUS delegates were appeasers sparked an angry backlash from Left-faction union leaders and colleagues, including federal Labor MP Josh Wilson, who labelled the minister as “absurd”.

Mr Wilson, a prominent Left-faction figure who is under pressure from the Greens in his Fremantle electorate, supported the ETU’s unsuccessful amendment to remove “nuclear” from the government’s 32-paragraph AUKUS statement included in the ALP platform.

The WA Labor MP, who has previously raised concerns about AUKUS with senior government figures, broke caucus solidarity ranks to speak out against the tripartite nuclear submarine pact and attack Mr Conroy’s “ridiculous” claim about appeasement.

Mr Wilson, who was granted permission to speak by Mr Albanese, said the decision to purchase submarines was “not justified and involves too many risks”.

The warning about China’s militarisation came after the ALP conference endorsed a lengthy critique of Beijing’s human rights record in the final policy platform, ahead of Mr Albanese’s expected meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Delhi next month.

After Chinese authorities removed tariffs on Australian barley products, the Albanese government is working behind the scenes to ease trade restrictions on wine, beef and lobsters.

The ALP platform, which is being closely monitored by foreign government observers, says Labor “strongly condemns human rights violations against the Uyghurs and other ethnic and religious minorities in Xinjiang and across China”.

The platform says Labor is “deeply concerned by reports of the erosion of educational, religious, cultural and linguistic rights and freedoms in Tibet” and the use of forced labour across China.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/labor-conference-alp-armed-for-keeping-china-atarms-length/news-story/30d8188926eeb0c0fc2c0d24f9d37399

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19382343

File: 0a3938678c45eb8⋯.jpg (147.64 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_at_the_AL….jpg)

File: 355d20d5f3f6712⋯.jpg (312.62 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Anthony_Albanese_Joe_Biden….jpg)

>>19188991

>>19361940

Chinese aggression has driven the ALP towards a nuclear compulsion on AUKUS

PAUL KELLY - AUGUST 18, 2023

The Labor Party has turned on the hinge of history. In an identity renovation, Labor has become the party of nuclear propulsion – with China the key to this dramatic transformation.

China is remaking the Labor Party today via its strategic assertion, just as Japan’s war re-made Labor in the 1940s.

In typical Labor fashion, the national conference embrace of nuclear propulsion has been sanctified with every Labor ritual – this is what Andrew Fisher, John Curtin and Kim Beazley would have done.

Nuclear propulsion has been sold to the party as a new Labor value, as the path to peace through deterrence, the vital contributor to self-reliance, industrial revitalisation and regional stability. Sections of the rank-and-file who cannot stomach these messages have succumbed before Albanese government dictum.

In moving the successful motion, Defence Minister Richard Marles put up in lights his political mission – to resurrect Labor “as the true party of Australia’s national defence”. Dismissing the Liberals as “defence dilettantes”, Marles said Australian history shows Labor, not the Liberals, as the authentic guardian of national security.

Marles knows Labor cannot commit to AUKUS and build nuclear-powered submarines without ideological and political permission – so great is the reversal from its anti-nuclear obsession originating in the 1970s. Marles aspires to rekindle the Australian culture of looking to Labor at times of strategic crisis.

The Albanese government pledged to AUKUS from day one. This week the party followed in its national conference vote on the voices. The anti-AUKUS minority interjected from the floor but staged a lost cause. The numbers weren’t counted but the government probably had a 75-25 majority among delegates.

The government has commanded the party. This is a powerful message to assure the AUKUS partners, Britain and America. Labor is not united but the executive government can proceed with a strong party mandate. Anthony Albanese was always going to win this vote but the messages and the way it happened is the story.

The public secret, of course, cannot be discussed: AUKUS was Scott Morrison’s idea and initiative. Labor now lays claim to political ownership of AUKUS. In his speech at the end of the debate Albanese told delegates he had reached a personal decision, based on advice, about nuclear-powered submarines as Australia’s future.

The personal nature of this decision is critical. Albanese’s message: he is a believer in nuclear propulsion. He embraces this as a personal decision that defines his leadership of the party. This caps AUKUS as a turning point in Labor history. A left-wing Labor PM has turned the party’s history abandoning his earlier beliefs.

It is a win for realism over nostalgia. Even a few years ago this decision would have been inconceivable.

Albanese called it seeing the world “as it is”. He said the AUKUS submarines would be sovereign to Australia, nuclear-powered, not carry nuclear weapons, and Australia’s non-proliferation obligations would be upheld. It was, therefore, an act of maturity.

In the debate Marles and Minister for Defence Industry Pat Conroy explicitly invoked China as justification for AUKUS. “In the year 2000, China had six nuclear-powered submarines,” Marles said. “By the end of this decade they will have 21. In the year 2000, China had 57 major warships. By the end of this decade, they will have 200. Now these are not our decisions. These are not our choices. But this is the world in which we live.”

It is the world that produced AUKUS.

The statement, endorsed by conference and now attached as part of the ALP platform, is titled “Enhancing Australia’s National Security” and seeks, above all, to incorporate nuclear-powered submarines as integral to Labor’s governing values.

Its philosophy is that Labor will use “all elements of our national power” to protect Australia and shape the world for the better. Diplomacy and deterrence are prime sources in this project. Defence policy is founded on sovereignty and self-reliance. The submarines will be commanded by Australian officers and under the control of the Australian government.

Significantly, the statement says Labor “will maintain the prohibition on the establishment of nuclear power plants”. Albanese is ready to fight the Coalition on civil nuclear power. Indeed, for Labor there was always a trade-off embedded in AUKUS: the price for accepting nuclear-powered submarines was rejection of any civil nuclear industry. That is a political axiom.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/chinese-aggression-has-driven-the-alp-towards-a-nuclear-compulsion-on-aukus/news-story/3c5b13818a4db5f811e1ccc20e3a8325

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19387384

File: 5a9c308a62acc70⋯.jpg (1.73 MB,4287x2858,3:2,Anthony_Albanese_revved_up….jpg)

File: d1e8ff15c1aa4e8⋯.jpg (1.77 MB,3997x2665,3997:2665,Max_Chandler_Mather_the_Gr….jpg)

File: 7b2fbef6734987a⋯.jpg (1.46 MB,5001x3334,3:2,Linda_Burney_at_Labor_s_na….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19382262

Albanese declares Voice an opportunity to make Australia greater

Paul Sakkal - August 19, 2023

The prime minister has rallied Labor members to campaign “like you’ve never campaigned before” for the Voice, to flip opinion polls showing the referendum in peril, at the party’s national conference in Brisbane.

Anthony Albanese said the Voice to parliament referendum was a tough undertaking for his first-term government, but Labor was committed to taking on issues “not because they’re convenient, but out of conviction”.

A Yes vote, Albanese argued, would “resound across our continent” and make “Australia, the greatest country on earth, just that little bit greater”.

“No one pretends winning a referendum is straightforward … We join the Labor Party to scale the peaks,” Albanese said.

“To change the country for the better in a way that outlasts all of us is a bold undertaking, but we take on these things because that has always been the Labor way. We take them on not because they’re convenient, but out of conviction.”

The Labor leader’s comments about the difficulty of winning the referendum came a day after he said in a TV interview that he would “do my best” to win, but that he knew at the outset that the referendum held some risk.

Albanese revved up his supporters about the upcoming referendum, to be held in October or November, on the final day of the Labor’s national conference, where the party shapes its policy manifesto.

The previously staunch left-winger cast himself as a consensus politician who would govern from the centre. Albanese departed the conference with his authority solidified having limited an outbreak of dissent over the AUKUS submarine deal, avoided left-wing demands to soften border protection policies, and killed off a divisive debate on Israel and recognition of a Palestinian state.

Labor unveiled a new slogan, “Working for Australia”, and delegates pushed progressive policies – from giving employees the “right to disconnect” to using corporate tax to build cheap houses – in part to counter the threat of the Greens on display at a protest outside the Brisbane convention centre.

Prominent Greens MP Max Chandler-Mather, directing his comments at the Labor MPs inside the building behind him, said: “They’re locking in stage three tax cuts that will see every Labor politician in there get $9,000 extra a year off … while they tell renters they get nothing.”

“You might see me or other people on the TV, but know that the only reason I’m standing there is because people like you stood up and fought back,” Chandler-Mather said.

Indigenous Affairs Minister Linda Burney said in a speech to the national conference that she could not carry the weight of the Voice referendum on her own.

“We must do it together,” she said. “We need to get out there, to knock on doors, have the conversations in your communities, delegates. When we have power over our destiny, our children will flourish.”

Albanese praised Liberal rebels who supported the Voice advisory body and said Labor’s party machine would be key to winning the referendum.

“I want you to give the answer to every Australian who has looked at the stark realities of Indigenous disadvantage and ask themselves: Well what can I do about it?

“Tap into that abiding instinct for fairness that is so much part of the Australian character,” he said.

”After this referendum, a bit like the apology to the Stolen Generations, a bit like Mabo and Wik, a bit like native title, the 1967 referendum – when all this is done, people will look back and go, why didn’t we do it earlier?

“Because there’s everything to gain and absolutely nothing to lose. No losers, just winners,” Albanese said.

“There is no more powerful force for change than our great Labor movement at its best and there is no cause more deserving of our support.

“This is not a journey that began with us. But it is a journey we have been given the great privilege of joining and a part of that privilege is a responsibility to make sure that all Australians hear the words that the authors of the Uluru Statement wrote them.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/albanese-says-winning-voice-tricky-not-about-convenience-20230819-p5dxto.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19387408

File: eaf8ad5ef3fe273⋯.jpg (713.72 KB,2048x2730,1024:1365,Marcus_Stewart.jpg)

>>19222755

>>19382273

A tale of two conferences: a choice between hope and despair

MARCUS STEWART - AUGUST 19, 2023

1/2

Allow me to borrow an idea from the great author Charles Dickens and tell you a tale of two political conferences. Both are occurring over the next week – and neither is the ALP national conference, which kicked off on Thursday in Brisbane and is already gaining plenty of attention.

But in Sydney, a very different meeting of political minds is occurring this weekend with CPAC Australia’s conference at The Star. Headlining the CPAC program are Warren Mundine and Jacinta Nampijinpa Price – so no prizes for guessing the No campaign against a voice to parliament will be a focus this year.

Then on Thursday, Uluru Youth Dialogue will launch its Hands On Heart conference at Barangaroo, with more than 100 young delegates expected to attend to learn more about the referendum and how they can educate and motivate others to vote yes.

There could be no better illustration of the differences between the Yes and No campaigns than these two contrasting conferences.

CPAC stands for Conservative Political Action Conference, which has been hosted by the American Conservative Union for almost 50 years. That’s right – the American Conservative Union. CPAC’s presence in Australia is a much more recent phenomenon, with the Americans only establishing a franchise here in 2019.

When CPAC was founded in America in the 1970s, it was known as a thoughtful gathering for Republicans; Ronald Reagan gave the inaugural address, his now famous “A Shining City Upon A Hill” speech. While conservative, the conference was nevertheless known for welcoming a variety of views from that end of the political spectrum, especially in the run-up to the presidential elections, when any Republican hoping to score the nomination would make an appearance.

More recently, however, CPAC has morphed into an unabashedly pro-Trump circus. This year, Donald Trump was the only potential Republican presidential candidate to show up – and the only one welcome, apparently. News reports documented sparse audiences gathering amid garish stands selling Trump paraphernalia. Meanwhile, the CPAC website spruiks a range of ultra-right campaigns, from opposing “socialised medicine” (to those of us in Australia, that’s the sort of public healthcare we enjoy with Medicare) to “stopping woke companies”.

CPAC chairman Matt Schlapp, a wealthy political adviser and lobbyist, will appear at the Australian conference this weekend alongside Matthew Whitaker, who served briefly as acting attorney-general to Trump, despite nine legal challenges to his appointment.

Australians love to think of themselves as larrikins who thumb their noses at suits and sophisticates. But not the CPAC Australia mob. Among the current and former Coalition MPs scrambling to share a stage with the grizzled men of the Grand Old Party are Tony Abbott, Barnaby Joyce, Bridget McKenzie, Keith Pitt, Alex Antic, Ted O’Brien and Bronwyn Bishop.

And, of course, Mundine and Price. This pair love to present themselves as champions of “average” Australians, squaring off against the “elites” of Canberra. But it’s hard to imagine a more elite look in politics than sharing a stage in a ballroom at The Star with two Trump loyalists.

That’s the No campaign. Full of doublespeak and hyperbole, happy to trade in misinformation and outright lies, and to demonise their opponents when called out. Just like Donald Trump.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19387410

File: 85246bc26ce02f6⋯.jpg (165.84 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Senator_Jacinta_Nampijinpa….jpg)

>>19387408

2/2

Contrast this to the energy and optimism of the Uluru Youth Dialogue. Co-chairs Allira Davis and Bridget Cama have been travelling Australia in recent months, engaging in hundreds of conversations with young people about the importance of enshrining a voice to parliament in the Constitution. It’s important work with a group of Australians who are often overlooked because they don’t (yet) wield the money or the political influence to command a headline.

Davis and Cama are smart enough to recognise fat cheques and political power are worth very little if you don’t have hope. And that is what their Hands on Heart conference is all about: generating hope for a future in which Australians are united, optimistic and proud to be part of a country with the oldest continuous culture on Earth. For three days, the young people will learn about the importance of the Constitution and the value of giving our Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders a voice to parliament, after generations of being locked out of decision-making about their futures. They will share ways to have respectful conversations with their peers, as opposed to trading in lies and misinformation, and to foster connection rather than division.

As I said, this is a tale of two conferences. To return to Dickens, and those enduring opening lines from A Tale Of Two Cities:

“It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us …”

Wisdom or belief? Hope or despair? Soon we will all have the chance to cast a vote for a better future. Let’s make it about what is truly Australian, about our shared history and an optimistic future, rather than the imported prejudices and darker spirits of another tired old political party.

Marcus Stewart is a Nira illim bulluk man of the Taungurung Nation and a member of the Uluru Dialogue.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/a-tale-of-two-conferences-a-choice-between-hope-and-despair/news-story/551f3e0810409a924b13b8043c02cb5a

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19387439

File: fbeb0176f221aa1⋯.jpg (627.54 KB,3500x2333,3500:2333,Coalition_frontbencher_and….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19382273

Inside the conservative forum rallying troops against the Voice

Lisa Visentin - August 19, 2023

1/2

Coalition firebrand senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price was treated to a rock star’s welcome as she strode onto the stage at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Sydney and rallied the crowd to do everything they could to oppose the Voice to parliament referendum.

The Voice was a central theme of this year’s CPAC Australia event on Saturday, as the who’s who of the No campaign rubbed shoulders with hundreds of conservative voters who paid up to $600 to attend the two-day conference. For those chasing the VIP experience and access to the after party, it was $7000.

Wearing a “Vote No” T-shirt, Price told attendees that while the polling was trending in the direction of a referendum defeat, they should not get complacent.

“We need every single one of you to sign up … to talk to your friends and family and your community. We need every single one of you to be relentless in your opposition to this dangerous, divisive referendum,” Price said.

In a speech that criticised the Yes campaign and Labor, Price said Prime Minister Anthony Albanese had “surrounded himself with the likes of Thomas Mayo and Teela Reid”, Aboriginal activists who served on the government’s referendums advisory panels.

The No campaigners have seized on tweets from Mayo and Reid calling for reparations and other demands to suggest there is a hidden agenda behind the Voice.

Price continued: “They don’t want the best for Indigenous Australians. They want the rent paid. They want to pay their respects to the elders of the communist party. They want to abolish Australia Day. They want reparations.”

There was no mention of the revelations this week that Australian Jewish Association head David Adler, who sits on the advisory board of top No outfit Advance, had repeatedly suggested on X (formerly Twitter) that Indigenous journalist Stan Grant had artificially darkened his skin, and had questioned Independent senator Lidia Thorpe’s Aboriginal heritage. Price is the spokeswoman for Advance’s anti-Voice campaign Fair Australia.

CPAC Australia organisers had no comment to questions about its sponsor Give Send Go, a Christian crowdfunding website appearing to host fundraising efforts for the legal costs for Australian neo-Nazi leader Thomas Sewell who was convicted last year of assaulting a Nine security guard. The site was also used to fundraise for medical costs for far-right leader Blair Cottrell.

This masthead does not suggest that the No campaign or CPAC Australia share the views of extremists who have used Give Send Go to fundraise.

The conference, held at Sydney’s The Star casino, is modelled on the American CPAC that has in recent years become aligned with former US president Donald Trump and his allies in the Republican Party.

The Sydney event was attended by a rollcall of conservative politicians, including former prime minister Tony Abbott, current Coalition MPs Ted O’Brien, Barnaby Joyce, Bridget McKenzie and Alex Antic, who gave speeches or appeared on panels. Media were welcomed to cover the proceedings, but their lanyard passes granting them entry were emblazoned with Trump’s “fake news” epithet.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19387449

File: 76db43d0bc78482⋯.jpg (838.47 KB,3500x2333,3500:2333,Former_prime_minister_Tony….jpg)

>>19387439

2/2

In his keynote address, Abbott told the crowd that defeating the Voice referendum was “the most important challenge we face as a nation right now”.

“This generation of Aboriginal Australians are not victims. This generation of non-Aboriginal Australians are not oppressors,” Abbott said.

“And the last thing that we should be doing right now is entrenching victimhood and institutionalising grievance in our governance arrangements and that’s why there can only be one response to this referendum proposal and that is an absolutely resounding No.”

Advance director Matthew Sheahan, who rarely speaks publicly about his controversial campaigning outfit, lifted the lid on its referendum strategy, saying research through polling and focus groups had informed its key messaging against the Voice as a proposal that is divisive.

“It was clear that division was the big, big factor for people voting No … But the big problem which we discovered and expected was that very few people knew about the referendum,” Sheahan said.

“This was an opportunity because it gave us a chance to shape the conversation, to talk about things like the Uluru Statement and treaty, all on our terms.” He urged the audience to sign up to staff pre-poll and polling booths on voting day, saying the No effort needed 40,000 volunteers to cover 170,000 volunteer hours.

CPAC chairman Warren Mundine, who along with Price are the two Indigenous leaders steering the No campaign, used his opening address to tell the crowd it was wrong to suggest that those who opposed the Voice were racist.

“All these people say that we’re racist. Are you racist?” he asked the crowd.

“No!” they responded.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/inside-the-conservative-forum-rallying-troops-against-the-voice-20230819-p5dxsx.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19387527

File: 62099093767bfb3⋯.jpg (261.13 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Senator_Price_lashed_the_p….jpg)

File: 5ea63d41047b005⋯.jpg (308.77 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Hundreds_of_people_filled_….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19382273

Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price lashes the prime minister over the Voice

Lauren Ferri - August 19, 2023

Indigenous Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price has lashed the prime minister, telling a conservative conference Anthony Albanese is “so concerned with his own popularity he’s willing to tear apart the country”.

The prominent No Campaigner has been vocal about how she doesn’t believe the Constitution should be amended to recognise Indigenous Australians as the nation’s First Peoples and enshrine a permanent, independent Aboriginal and Torres Strait advisory body, or “Voice”, to parliament and the executive government.

Senator Price walked onto the stage at the Conservative Political Action Conference on Saturday at The Star Convention Centre in Sydney to a roaring applause and standing ovation.

She told the audience the “leftie establishment, corporate elites and mainstream media” would be terrified to know there was a room full of “Australians who are completely unafraid to show their support for conservative politics”.

She introduced her talk by saying “absolutely nothing” had been done to improve the lives of the “most marginalised Australians”.

“Instead we have a prime minister so concerned with his own popularity that he’s willing to tear apart the country for some applause from the media, and of course his corporate elite,” Senator Price said.

“Shame.”

Senator Price said the gap did not exist between Indigenous and non Indigenous Australians, but rather between people who live in cities and those in remote areas.

She slammed Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s leadership and said the nation “can’t trust” the government.

“Albanese told us that Australians deserve a prime minister who shows up, takes responsibility and works for the people,” she said.

“Well, mate, it’s time to show up.

“It’s time to take responsibility. It’s time to be accountable for your government.”

Senator Price said it was “absolutely unbelievable” Mr Albanese didn’t have any details for the Voice.

She told the crowd the nation’s leader had lost “all credibility” and had no plan or solutions.

“Make no mistake, this is the most divisive referendum this country has ever faced,” she said.

“We need every single one of you to be relentless in your opposition to this dangerous, divisive and costly referendum.”

Fresh polling has cast doubt on the success of The Voice, with Victoria and Tasmania the only states returning a Yes vote.

The Resolve Political Monitor conducted for the Nine Newspapers found support for the voice had fallen to 46 per cent, down from 63 per cent a year ago.

To succeed a referendum must have a majority of voters across Australia and four out of six states to cast a yes ballot.

https://www.news.com.au/finance/work/leaders/senator-jacinta-nampijinpa-price-lashes-the-prime-minister-over-the-voice/news-story/d6c9fa17fa1c20d83695d79c9e01b0f1

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

9d8604 No.19392304

File: 285f67e2df50fb0⋯.png (600.25 KB,928x622,464:311,ClipboardImage.png)

>>19374503

>Phase One

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19392379

File: 21c3e7dbd8e967b⋯.jpg (214 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Foreign_Minister_Penny_Won….jpg)

File: e53d259a0364b9a⋯.jpg (155.41 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Lead_author_of_the_Defence….jpg)

>>19188991

>>19382314

China’s warning on AUKUS

GREG BROWN and SARAH ISON - AUGUST 20, 2023

1/2

China has warned against being made the target of the AUKUS agreement as union leaders vow to apply heavy scrutiny over the government’s jobs pledge for the construction of nuclear submarines.

After senior ministers warned at Labor’s national conference the AUKUS deal was needed to prevent war with China and limit its regional influence, a Chinese embassy spokesman said bilateral or multilateral defence agreements should be “conducive to world peace and stability and not target any third party or harm others’ interests”.

With Labor’s support for AUKUS cemented in its policy platform last week, Foreign Minister Penny Wong on Sunday said a nuclear submarine fleet would act as a balance to China’s growing influence in the Indo-Pacific region.

Senator Wong said the goal of strengthening military capability was to ensure that “no country ever thinks that conflict is worth it”.

“We are seeing more challenging strategic circumstances. The question is not commenting about it, the question is what we do about it, and what we have to do with other countries is to ensure that there is a strategic balance in the region,” Senator Wong told ABC’s Insiders program.

“That we want to make sure that no country ever thinks that conflict is worth it.

“That’s the calculation, we always have to change and we do that both by deterrence and reassurance.”

During the national conference debate about AUKUS on Friday, Defence Minister Richard Marles and Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy warned that China would have 21 nuclear submarines and 200 major warships in the water by 2030.

In a major slapdown of China, Mr Conroy said it was against Australia’s interest to have “one power dominate our ­region, especially one that breaches international laws”.

On Sunday, Senator Wong conceded not all workers on the submarine projects would be members of unions, despite the platform vowing to support thousands of “well-paid unionised jobs” through the AUKUS deal.

Australian Manufacturing Workers Union Victoria secretary Tony Mavromatis said Senator Wong should be backing union jobs for the submarine projects.

“Penny Wong probably needs to be reminded it is the unions that support the ALP,” Mr Mavromatis said.

“All workers enjoy the benefits of the union movement and they should participate in it to support their conditions and entitlements.

“My understanding of the agreement is it will create good jobs and union jobs.”

Mr Mavromatis said unions would be keeping a very close eye on whether the government keeps its jobs pledge for the AUKUS program.

“We will be watching how it all unfolds and making sure Australian jobs are participating in the build of AUKUS until they start building them in South Australia,” he said.

“We are disappointed, we spoke against (AUKUS) but we are just going to have to watch that they will do what they said they would do.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19392381

File: 63ccc2e162b4121⋯.jpg (1.76 MB,4674x3116,3:2,Defence_Industry_Minister_….jpg)

>>19392379

2/2

Mr Conroy stunned Labor delegates in his Friday speech by accusing those opposed to AUKUS of following a “Robert Menzies ­appeasement” strategy.

Left-leaning delegates and unionists said they were ropeable over Mr Conroy’s speech, which was described as “unnecessary” and “beyond the pale”.

“It was clear (Mr Conroy) was debating against Paul Keating. Those comments were for him,” one union source said.

“This was an audition to be (Anthony) Albanese’s spear carrier and it did not go well.

“The speech he gave angered people, it has become a focus point around… anti-AUKUS sentiment.”

Another source told The Australian that while the Labor Party platform had settled on its position on AUKUS through the conference process, Mr Conroy would likely encounter pushback from Left unions on other issues following his incendiary remarks.

“If he goes looking for support from parts of the left on other… things, they’d probably tell him to get nicked,” the union source said.

“Maybe he needs reminding he’s from the Left. To be honest, our union won’t forget this.”

Mr Conroy’s argument that any concerns aired over AUKUS equated to “appeasement” was met with outrage on the national conference floor on Friday, with Electrical Trade Union national secretary Michael Wright slamming the Defence Industry Minister for executing an “ad hominem, sloganeering debate”.

While Mr Wright had initially waived his right to speak after Mr Conroy’s address, the powerful union leader said he was unable to let go the inference that he and his union were akin to Robert Menzies and Neville Chamberlain.

“These sorts of ad hominem, sloganeering attacks do nothing to elevate the debate and do nothing to deliver close to resolution,” he said.

Fremantle MP Josh Wilson – who spoke in favour of reference to nuclear submarines being removed from the platform – told delegates the accusation that those raising concern about AUKUS were appeasers was “ridiculous”.

Lead author of the Defence Strategic Review and director of foreign policy at the United States Studies Centre, Peter Dean, said the AUKUS debate and resolution at conference was a significant moment.

Professor Dean said it showed the world that the Labor Party platform, not just the Albanese government, was behind AUKUS.

“It has shown we are now in a new era in Labor defence policy. There’s new Labor values that have been firmly hammered home, specifically the acceptance of nuclear submarines as a core part of deterrence,” he told the Australian.

“That’s big thing for a party that has in the past been against nuclear in all forms.”

Professor Dean said the resolution on AUKUS in the platform was a “signal” to the region that Australia was willing to do what it needed to in order to protect itself and its allies.

However, he noted the platform’s promise to fill 20,000 positions created by the AUKUS project with local, union jobs was challenging.

“The biggest risk here is actually can we find enough people to fill those jobs?” he said.

Professor Dean said the commitment, put in the platform to appease unions like the AMWU, needed to be accompanied with a closer look at migration and its role in filling the labour.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/chinas-warning-on-aukus/news-story/8a77d150c9381a16d9565a3e348783ca

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19392401

File: 8d768a717281489⋯.jpg (2.55 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Naotunne_Vijitha_Nayaka_Th….jpg)

File: ec21329e61b259f⋯.jpg (86.73 KB,800x532,200:133,The_Venerable_Naotunne_Vij….jpg)

File: 32937f9ad1ce899⋯.jpg (344.06 KB,1505x635,301:127,Counselling_and_support_se….jpg)

Melbourne Buddhist monk Naotunne Vijitha Nayaka Thero faces court on child sex abuse charges

Kristian Silva - 18 Aug 2023

A senior Buddhist monk has faced a Melbourne court, charged with child sex offences dating back to the 1990s and early 2000s.

The Venerable Naotunne Vijitha Nayaka Thero, who is the abbot of the Dhamma Sarana temple in Melbourne's south-east, is facing 13 charges including sexual penetration of a child under 16 and indecent act with a child under 16.

Police charged Mr Vijitha earlier this week, saying three complainants had come forward.

The incidents allegedly took place between 1996 and 2004, and police allege Mr Vijitha came into contact with the complainants through his role at the Keysborough temple.

Court documents reveal detectives from Victoria Police's sexual crimes squad charged Mr Vijitha with inappropriately touching several girls.

On Friday, the monk faced court dressed in traditional orange robes for a brief filing hearing.

He was not required to speak or enter a plea and was accompanied by senior figures from the temple.

The monk was released on bail, and the case was adjourned until November 10 for a committal mention.

According to the temple's website, Mr Vijitha arrived in Australia in 1993 to serve as the resident monk at the Sri Lankan Buddhist temple in Springvale.

He later took residence at a new temple in Keysborough in 2001.

According to the temple's website, Mr Vijitha is also the principal of its Sunday School, where students attend Sinhala language classes.

The Buddhist Council of Victoria has been contacted for comment.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-08-18/naotunne-vijitha-nayaka-thero-buddhist-monk-child-sex-charges/102747926

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19392419

File: 37ed3065fa80b67⋯.jpg (365.34 KB,1471x1103,1471:1103,The_Geelong_man_allegedly_….jpg)

File: dde8511554e16d0⋯.jpg (458.41 KB,1473x1105,1473:1105,Items_from_the_Geelong_hom….jpg)

AFP arrest man for allegedly creating child exploitation game in Victoria

Aisling Brennan - August 20, 2023

A 31-year-old man has been charged over allegedly creating and operating an online child exploitation game used by Australian and international paid subscribers.

The Geelong man was arrested after his home was raided by police on August 2.

Police will allege the 31-year-old man was the creator and operator of the game, which was allegedly accessed by a number of people across Australia and internationally.

Police allege those users had paid subscriptions to the game and their identities are currently being investigated.

The joint investigation was launched in May after information about an online child exploitation game was uncovered by the Australian Border Force and provided to police.

The platform is allegedly entirely comprised of animated child exploitation images, which is an offence in Australia.

The man was subsequently charged by Victoria Police detectives with the Commonwealth offences of controlling, producing and possessing child abuse material, as well as deal with proceeds of crime.

“This is a landmark investigation and one that really highlights the insidious nature of child exploitation and the many forms it can take,” Victoria Police Commander Paul O’Halloran said.

“For someone to create this kind of platform and treat this crime theme as a game, is completely horrifying, especially when that person is essentially in our own backyard.

“While the material on the platform does not involve live children, it has been created to mimic that and this is clearly of great concern to us.

“The work around removing the assets obtained through its creation are testament to the joint approach across many law enforcement agencies to target those involved in the creation of child abuse material and hold them to account.”

The AFP’s Criminal Assets Confiscation Taskforce (CACT) also successfully restrained all of the man’s property, including two vehicles, high-end televisions and audiovisual equipment, furniture and appliances which were seized at the warrants.

CACT Commander Paula Hudson said the man allegedly “obtained significant financial benefits from the creation and distribution of this online child exploitation platform”.

“This action shows that the AFP will not tolerate anyone trying to cash in on the abuse of children by enabling predators to pay for simulated exploitation of children. We will trace and locate any ill-gotten gains and take them from offenders,” CACT Commander Hudson said.

“This is the first time the AFP has restrained the assets of an alleged online child sex predator in Victoria, and we will continue to target the assets of offenders who profit from this abhorrent crime.”

Police will work with the eSafety Commissioner in relation to the removal of the game.

The investigation into this matter remains ongoing.

The man was granted bailed to appear again in Geelong Magistrates Court on December 5.

https://www.news.com.au/technology/online/internet/afp-arrest-man-for-allegedly-creating-child-exploitation-game-in-victoria/news-story/25ad47896ed3ee8d8039d866f860a0aa

https://www.afp.gov.au/news-media/media-releases/man-charged-following-jacet-investigation-child-exploitation-program

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19397621

File: 7946051dccc6f9a⋯.jpg (90.91 KB,2048x1152,16:9,_All_three_children_have_i….jpg)

>>19199832

>>19211309

>>19237718

Family Court judge rules father’s gender non-conformity ‘confused’ his children

ELLIE DUDLEY - AUGUST 21, 2023

1/2

A Family Court judge has determined that a father’s refusal to conform with traditional gender norms left his three children “confused” and encouraged them to “question their gender identity” after they all began identifying as non-binary, ruling the two youngest children will not be permitted to see their ­father for an extended period.

The matter regarded the breakdown of a 20-year relationship between a mother and a ­father, who identifies as male but occasionally wears gender non-conforming clothes, including a dress to his middle child’s first day of school.

Justice Kylie Beckhouse earlier this month ruled the two youngest children, known pseudonymously as Riley, 8, and Taylor, 13, will not be allowed to see their father for the next four months, after which period they will spend time with him on Sundays.

The eldest child, Jamie, 16, who is taking puberty blockers and wishes to undergo a mastectomy once he completes his HSC, will live with both parents in accordance with his wishes.

In making the orders, Justice Beckhouse said the father’s “right to self-expression is not a reflection or criticism of his parenting capacity”.

“However,” she continued, “it is possible that raising the children without adopting societal gender norms and expectations has led them to be confused and question their gender identity.”

“There is nothing obviously detrimental about a parent ­allowing their child to reject the prevailing societal gender norms and expectations. But arguably, it has the potential to make them more vulnerable when they are, at the same time, questioning their sense of belonging following a difficult parental separation.”

The case comes as the Family Court continues to grapple with the complexities of gender identity, especially in the context of children, medication and surgery.

Last month, the mother of a 13-year-old with gender dysphoria abruptly withdrew an application seeking a Family Court order to allow the child to take puberty blockers, after trying to have the independent children’s lawyer assigned to the matter thrown off the case.

In May, Family Court judges were presented with a legal paper from a top barrister arguing the court must reassess how scientific advancements should apply to the family law system.

The latest matter centres around two parents who met in 1999 and began living together in 2003. In 2009 the father was ­diagnosed with anxiety and depression, conditions that “intensified” until he became suicidal in 2018.

In 2019 he was diagnosed with ADHD and was prescribed medication to treat the symptoms. That same year, the couple physically separated and the father moved out of the former matrimonial home.

Jamie approached the parents in early 2020 to inform them he wished to be referred to by male pronouns, despite being biologically female. The father alleged the mother was “resistant” and became “distressed” at Jamie’s wishes to be referred to by male pronouns before he had begun to menstruate.

Jamie has lived with the father since June 2021, and Taylor moved in with them two months later. Riley spends equal time with both parents, although there have been times they have refused to spend time with the mother.

A psychiatrist involved in the proceedings, known as Dr S, observed Jamie had become “strongly aligned” with his father, and was reported to be avoiding contact with his mother because he viewed any reservations she expressed while he was transitioning as “sign of disrespect and lack of acceptance of his true self”.

Dr S also observed that “all three children had identified as non-binary, reflective of their father’s values”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19397628

File: ec15d925142ce15⋯.jpg (137.24 KB,1148x1529,1148:1529,Justice_Kylie_Beckhouse.jpg)

>>19397621

2/2

Throughout the court proceedings the mother claimed that she was supportive of Jamie’s transition, and had always wanted him to make an informed decision.

However, she was worried about how his transition was being managed with his psychological and emotional issues, including anxiety, depression and ADHD, which predated his gender dysphoria.

Further, she was “concerned that the father was overly invested and actively promoted (Jamie’s) transition rather than approaching the matter as an objective parent”.

In an affidavit tendered to the court, the mother said: “In managing Jamie’s treatment, (the father) will be unable to navigate processes; follow instructions correctly; identify the pertinent questions to ask; and approach the matter as a parent rather than as a friend or peer.”

The mother asserted she had been excluded by the father from making decisions in relation to the children, claiming there was a “lack of consultation around medical appointments, especially specialists including (Jamie’s) medical treatment for his gender dysphoria”.

While the father accused the mother of communicating “in a very hostile and illogical manner” Justice Beckhouse preferred the mother’s evidence in relation to the issue “as it was supported by evidence in the form of correspondence between the parties”.

The father made various assertions that the mother and her parents “posed a risk” to the children in failing to be wholly supportive of their gender identity.

Last November he filed and served a Notice of Child Abuse, Family Violence of Risk where he alleged that he had been a “victim of continuous domestic abuse since 2002” at the hands of his ex-partner and her father.

Justice Beckhouse disagreed with this, finding “there was no evidence before the court to support the father’s various assertions that the maternal family posed a risk to the children or that their actions were extremely dangerous”.

Dr S, who was cross-examined throughout the proceedings, found the father “sustained a negative narrative” regarding the mother, which was “unlikely to change”.

He found the father’s proposal for shared parental responsibility and suggestion for family therapy “was not realistic in the circumstances” and found the father’s disdain for the mother was “unlikely to change” and would likely “further amplify the children’s identification with the father and polarisation from the mother.”

Dr S also found the father was unable to provide basic care and stability for the children, or provide them with adequate accommodation.

Justice Beckhouse ultimately determined the father had a “strong and loving” relationship with all three children, but took a “rigid and negative view” of the mother.

“(The father) appeared unable to prioritise the children’s needs ahead of his own negative feelings for the mother,” Justice Beckhouse said.

“Through his actions and behaviour (he) has caused an enmeshed and co-dependent relationship with the children to develop.”

She said the father’s actions “have often undermined the mother and excluded her from participating in the children’s lives to the maximum extent possible”.

As part of her orders, Justice Beckhouse instructed the family must continue meeting with a raft of psychologists, psychiatrists and clinicians, and continue taking medications to mitigate the impact of the parents’ marriage breakdown.

The names of family members in this story have been changed.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/family-court-judge-rules-fathers-gender-nonconformity-confused-his-children/news-story/6b18e0341d4974c40bf0b18627162a56

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19397639

File: f69697b4f5abcbf⋯.jpg (224.19 KB,2010x1130,201:113,Defence_Industry_Minister_….jpg)

File: 30ed366223c970c⋯.jpg (193.11 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Defence_industry_minister_….jpg)

File: a5c5431e3bbbac3⋯.jpg (212.61 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Air_Vice_Marshall_Gerry_va….jpg)

>>19231951

>>19382314

Australia to spend $1.3bn on high-tech missiles

ELEANOR CAMPBELL - AUGUST 21, 2023

The former deputy prime minister has warned of China’s ability to target Australia from the mainland after the government announced it will spend $1.7bn on long-range strike missiles.

Barnaby Joyce flagged concerns after the defence minister finalised a major weapons deal with the US on Monday.

“China has certainly got missiles that can hit Australia, make no mistake,” Mr Joyce told Sunrise.

“They've got hypersonics. They’ve parked a spy ship off our coast. They’ve put shards of foil into one of our planes causing massive problems to one of our Orion aircraft.

“They've had fixed military lasers on our aircraft from ships that were floating in our exclusive economic zone. We want the world to be peaceful but we’ve got to be strong enough to defend ourselves.”

Mr Joyce’s comments come after the defence industry minister announced Australia will invest in “the most powerful and technologically advanced” weapons the country has ever seen.”

Under the new deal, Australia will acquire more than 200 Tomahawk cruise missiles from the US, making it only one of three nations to own the high-tech weaponry.

“As we enter what many are calling the missile age, these will be vital tools for the Australian Defence Force to do its job of defending Australians,” Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy said.

“We are buying these weapons now to deliver capability quickly – but we are also considering options to manufacture missiles domestically because of the importance of building sovereign Australian defence manufacturing capabilities.”

Tomahawk missiles have a strike range of 1500km, and a ship-launched version will be deployed on the Royal Australian Navy’s Hobart-class destroyers.

Defence Minister Richard Marles told Labor’s national conference last week that China would have 21 nuclear submarines and 200 major warships in the water by 2030.

“This is the world in which we live and it is our unavoidable obligation to navigate our way through it,” Mr Marles said.

“Our government is planning to replace six diesel-electric submarines with eight conventionally-armed, nuclear-powered submarines over the course of the next 30 years. Given what we face, it is a modest step.”

China issued an official warning to Australia on the weekend arguing that defence agreements should be “conducive to world peace, and not target any third party or harm others interests.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/latest-news/australia-to-spend-13bn-on-hightech-missiles/news-story/187546668bb9367c4ecfdf46060c1ce6

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19397646

File: 8a397e628068951⋯.jpg (330 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Noel_Pearson_partly_obscur….jpg)

File: 6aeb521c2bf4da6⋯.jpg (284.79 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Supporters_of_the_No_campa….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19297392

Penny Wong and Noel Pearson hit the churches and the temples to preach for the voice

PAIGE TAYLOR - AUGUST 21, 2023

1/2

After a weekend of preaching to the converted at Labor’s national conference, the ALP and the Yes campaign are hitting the temples and the churches to convert ­undecided voters to the voice.

Foreign Minister Penny Wong and voice co-architect Noel Pearson were invited to a Sikh temple in Adelaide’s Allenby Gardens on Sunday to speak to worshippers about constitutional change that would guarantee an Indigenous advisory body and, proponents argue, close the gap where previous attempts have failed. At the revered langar – the community kitchen of the temple – they served food to the worshippers, following the ancient Sikh tradition of feeding anyone who is hungry and in need.

Mr Pearson, who has taken a leading role in promoting the Yes case throughout the country in recent weeks, told The Australian religious leaders would play a ­pivotal role in the campaign.

“Faith traditions and people of faith share values of social justice, reconciliation, human equality, and peace. We share these aspirations and seek this through this recognition,” he said on Sunday.

“More than 50 per cent of ­Australians identify as people of faith, and faith leaders have the opportunity to present the critical facts to their communities about recognition through voice so they can make an informed decision based on facts, not fear.”

But in Perth, 2700km west of the City of Churches, the No campaign’s most faithful supporters were out in force.

More than 1000 people – many of them queuing for hours for the best seats – were eager to hear the voice gospel according to opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, South Australian senator Kerrynne Liddle and No case leader Nyunggai Warren Mundine. The Liberals for No campaign launch was a loud and strident ­critique of Anthony ­Albanese and a proposal that Senator Price said would divide the nation on race lines.

“I understand love and acceptance and tolerance … instead of gaslighting and emotional blackmail, which is what we’re seeing on a national scale being driven by our Prime Minister,” Senator Price said.

In Western Australia, senator Michaelia Cash has driven a ­potent campaign against the voice by linking it to the Cook Labor government’s unpopular Aboriginal heritage laws. When the Cook government abandoned the laws last week, Senator Cash was able to use it as a demonstration of the permanency of constitutional change.

She said: “They were bad laws and the fact that they were able to dump them says this: You can scrap a bad law, but guess what? If you change the Constitution, you cannot alter it. It is already changed.”

Yes campaign insiders claim the referendum is still up for grabs, despite polls suggesting ­opposition is starting to look baked in. This is partly because of polling it believes shows about 40 per cent of voters are either “soft no” or undecided.

The campaign sees South Australia as ­potentially the deciding state. Faith groups are also seen as ­important partly because they allow one-on-one conversations between Yes campaigners and people who may not have made up their minds.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19397649

File: 1a96b6cfbd9276f⋯.jpg (322.27 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Voice_to_parliament_suppor….jpg)

>>19397646

2/2

On Sunday at the Marion Church of Christ in the southern Adelaide suburb of Mitchell Park, Mr Pearson was with reverend Tim Costello as the Baptist minister explained why his faith led him to decide to vote Yes. He said he drew upon the sermon of the good Samaritan because it was about “seeing the humanity”.

“We didn’t see Indigenous people when we federated as a ­nation,” Dr Costello said.

“It is very important that we see and recognise them now. This is a very small, safe step.”

Dr Costello believes the church hymn Amazing Grace – the favourite of late land rights giant ­Yunupingu – is a reminder of the important role that Christians can play in important reforms. It was written by slavery abolitionist John Newton.

“This voice issue is I think within the DNA of Christians who sing Amazing Grace,” he said.

Asked if he could convert undecided voters, Dr Costello said: “I hope so. I like to say that I want my faith to influence my politics but I don’t want the ­reverse. The voice is not bipartisan and I wish it was. Christians do tend to go into their political tribes in an election, but this is not an election.

“I am encouraging people: ‘allow your faith to speak to you and rise above simply the partisanship’ of this now being a left-right issue.”

The Australian understands churches and local governments will be used more by the Yes case in order to usher undecided and soft No voters into the Yes camp.

While a multi-faith coalition of top religious leaders backed the voice last year, they have not been as vocal as some had expected in the lead up to the final stretch of the referendum.

The invitations from faith groups to Yes campaigners have been plentiful over the past month, however.

Dr Costello is amping up his advocacy for the voice and will visit Perth next.

Groups taking part in the campaign in recent days include the Sangha Association, mosques and Uniting Care.

On Sunday, senators Cash, Liddle and Nampijinpa Price criticised corporations that financially backed the voice and suggested they could instead make donations to help Indigenous people now, such as by donating to a women’s shelter, a school with troubled students in Alice Springs or by asking Indigenous communities how to make a difference.

Mr Pearson responded by ­arguing that corporates that supported the Yes campaign were also spending money on improving Indigenous people’s lives.

“They are doing initiatives to engage Indigenous people in employment and in business opportunities, and so on,” he said.

“The companies that are signing up to the Yes campaign are companies that have been doing this for a long time, helping Indigenous people to develop economically, with employment and other opportunities. That they are supporting the Yes campaign is at the invitation of our people. We want them to help us.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/penny-wong-and-noel-pearson-hit-the-churches-and-the-temples-to-preach-for-the-voice/news-story/b282f80874d02929e6637aad70eb1fb0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19404413

File: e9f0387ae161d3d⋯.jpg (488.22 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Ex_Liberal_MP_Pat_Farmer_i….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19297392

Anthony Albanese could announce the Indigenous voice to parliament poll date next week

ROSIE LEWIS - AUGUST 22, 2023

Anthony Albanese is preparing to announce the date for the voice referendum as early as next week, with the Prime Minister saying parliament “will still be in total control of its destiny” if the advisory body is enshrined in the ­Constitution.

Mr Albanese will head to Perth on Monday for a meeting of his cabinet ministers, who he wants to consult before kick starting the ­official campaign, and will attend a breakfast event on Tuesday.

Government sources confirmed the date won’t be revealed while he’s in Perth but said it was possible Australians could learn when they’ll head to the polls once Mr Albanese returned from Western Australia, with October 14 the most likely date. September 11 is the last possible day an October 14 poll can be ­announced. Mr Albanese will travel to Indonesia, The Philippines and India between September 6-10.

Announcing the date next week would mean there are two parliamentary sitting weeks (from September 4-7 and 11-14) at the front end of the official campaign, unless the government decides to move them.

Government sources said positivity from the Yes campaign was surmounting political conflict over the voice that played out when parliament was in session.

Appearing alongside ultra-marathon runner and former Liberal MP Pat Farmer, who is running an average of 80km a day to advocate for the voice, Mr Albanese on Tuesday said after a successful referendum people would “wonder why it wasn’t done ­before”.

“Just like the apology to the Stolen Generations, just like Mabo and Wik and native title, people will wonder what the fuss was about, because we will be stronger as a nation when we move forward together,” he said.

“It’s a positive campaign for Yes. And it compares with the No campaign, which is really about everything except for what the question is. They want all these distractions.

“People should read what the question is to recognise First ­Nations people through a voice. The clauses which are there are ­legally sound, they will not interfere with the way that the government operates on a day-to-day basis. Our parliament will still be in total control of its destiny.”

Opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman Jacinta Nampijinpa Price questioned how Mr Albanese expected Australians to believe the voice wouldn’t interfere with government or be divisive.

“The PM has put forward a referendum that is dividing Australians, but time and again refuses to explain himself,” she said. “Whenever he’s pressed for details or pushed on the consequences of the divisive voice, the PM retreats to his frankly unbelievable lines that this will somehow be ‘modest’ change.”

Nationals leader David Littleproud said the referendum would be decided by the “sensible centre” as he condemned comments from No campaigners – including Gary Johns – as irrational.

Mr Littleproud, whose party decided to oppose the voice last year, refused to say if Dr Johns should step down from the No campaign but said “there’d be very serious conversations with him today” if he was in the ­Nationals.

Dr Johns, a former Labor minister, told the Conservative Political Action Conference on Sunday: “If you want a voice, learn ­English.”

Self-described corporate comedian Rodney Marks also delivered a controversial speech in which he referred to traditional owners as “violent black men”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/anthony-albanese-could-announce-the-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-poll-date-next-week/news-story/041f535d0709b1c921957626d79b94aa

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19404456

File: ff56c8da1931731⋯.mp4 (15.54 MB,640x360,16:9,Inside_Operation_Ironside_….mp4)

File: 58c8a7f4dfb62e3⋯.jpg (441.61 KB,2016x1134,16:9,Edwin_Harmendra_Kumar_is_a….jpg)

>>19320818

AN0M accused Edwin Kumar asks FBI to give him names and messages from encrypted app

ELLEN WHINNETT and LIAM MENDES - AUGUST 21, 2023

1/2

An Australian man accused of providing encrypted AN0M devices to people who used them to organise drug trafficking is asking prosecutors to give him details of every message sent on every phone he is accused of providing.

The case against Edwin Harmendra Kumar, being heard in the US, has revealed fascinating details of the inner workings of Operation Ironside, the police sting of the century, built around the encrypted app AN0M.

Mr Kumar, who was extradited from Sydney to the US earlier this year to face racketeering (RICO) charges, is seeking details of all users and all messages sent via the devices prosecutors say he provided or serviced.

He is also seeking any reports of drug transactions allegedly involving him directly, or any end-user who allegedly used a device he had distributed or serviced.

“In the government’s view, Mr Kumar’s role in the RICO conspiracy was to distribute the AN0M devices to end-users, manage and receive subscription fees, and provide technical support,’’ an application by his lawyers state.

“The government further alleges that, in doing so, Mr Kumar knew or had reason to know [the end-users he worked with] participated in illegal activities, including international drug trafficking and money laundering.”

The application notes US authorities had claimed that Mr Kumar had, in August and September 2020, set up several devices for end-users of AN0M who later co-ordinated “a shipment of 156 kilograms of methamphetamine precursors from India to Sydney, Australia”.

“On February 25, 2021, a conversation between end-users to whom Kumar had supplied devices included co-ordination of a shipment of 6kg,’’ the lawyer said the prosecution had claimed.

“On March 1, 2021, Kumar engaged in a conversation with a co-defendant to co-ordinate the purchase of ‘rack of[f] the DW,’ or cocaine off the dark web, and its later sale in Sydney, Australia,” the FBI further alleges.

In a related case, Mr Kumar and two co-accused are demanding the US Department of Justice name the European country which secretly helped the FBI and the Australian Federal Police intercept more than 28 million messages sent on the AN0M app.

The app was marketed to the underworld as a secure way of communicating but was in fact a Trojan horse being run by the FBI and Australian Federal Police, who secretly obtained copies of every message that was sent.

Mr Kumar and his two co-accused, part of the group of 17 men indicted in the US on racketeering charges related to the distribution of the app, have advised they intend to fight the charges on the basis that US law does not allow them to be convicted of conspiring with a government agent or informer.

They are also seeking the name of the anonymous third country which helped the US and Australia pull off one of the world’s greatest stings and resulted in around 1000 people globally being charged with serious crimes including drug trafficking, money-laundering and conspiracy to murder.

“The (US) government admits it created the AN0M service at the heart of this case with a single goal: convincing criminals to use its encrypted phones, which the FBI could secretly monitor through a backdoor written into the software,’’ the application by Mr Kumar, Seyyed Hossein Hosseini and Alexander Dmitrienko, states.

“But because of the stringent constitutional and statutory requirements that such a program would trigger domestically within the United States, the government needed an international workaround. Using a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT), the government asked an unidentified, third-party country in Europe to intercept the messages and then provide the data directly to the FBI.’’

The name of the third country which hosted an iBot server that harvested the messages, forwarding them to US, has never been revealed, although prosecutors have confirmed it was a member of the European Union.

Weeks before the AN0M sting was revealed in June 2021, when police across Europe and Australia conducted multiple raids and charged hundreds of people, an anonymous cyber security expert wrote a blog post where he claimed AN0M was interacting with a server in the Romanian capital of Bucharest.

Romania is a member of the EU. The blogger also wrote that AN0M was interacting with servers which were located in countries which were part of the Five-Eyes intelligence agreement – the US, Britain, Australia, Canada and New Zealand.

“With ANOM I was able to locate all of their PROXY servers including their MAIN servers with minimal ease, all operating within the 5 eyes alliance,’’ the cyber expert claimed.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19404463

File: 577e2f34a1a8967⋯.jpg (63.5 KB,768x1023,256:341,Seyyed_Hossein_Hosseini_ha….jpg)

File: 410eb9bd7328ec2⋯.jpg (38.02 KB,1024x768,4:3,The_AN0M_app_was_created_a….jpg)

>>19404456

2/2

“If the authorities were to access ANOM’s server of 193.27.15.41 in ROMANIA which is a third world country that may state they take privacy seriously … they could easily infiltrate their Offshore Romanian Server and install special hardware devices on those servers without ANOM’s knowledge,’’ the prescient blog warned.

“Authorities could completely infiltrate every users devices as well as their operations and worse of all authorities would have the ability to decrypt and intercept their messages.’’

Weeks later, after the AN0M take-down was finalised, it was revealed the app had been sold to the FBI by a tech-savvy criminal seeking a lighter sentence over other criminal matters involving an earlier encrypted app known as Phantom Secure.

A member of the Australian Federal Police developed the key that allowed the messages to be decrypted in real time, and the FBI’s confidential source helped get AN0M devices – stripped back mobile phones – out into the criminal underworld.

The documents revealed the messages were routed through iBot servers, and blind carbon copies were secretly being taken of every message that was sent.

In documents filed in the District Court in the Southern District of California, lawyers acting for Mr Kumar, Mr Dmitrienko and Mr Hosseini noted that European country had sent the messages, unread, in batches to the FBI every Monday, Wednesday and Friday.

Their lawyers argued the prosecution needed to provide details of the third-party country’s involvement in the sting, as they intended to explore the legality of the operation, send investigators to that country to interview witnesses, and potentially seek to have the messages suppressed.

“That third-party country agreed, and the FBI helped arrange for a computer server to be placed in that country to intercept the message data,’’ the documents noted.

“Thereafter, without ever reviewing the contents of the messages, the third-party country provided the data to United States law enforcement multiple times per week.

“By the government’s own admission, most of the allegedly inculpatory evidence in this case came from and is contained within those intercepted messages.’’

People in Australia, New Zealand, Turkey, The Netherlands, Spain, Germany and Britain have been charged as a result of evidence obtained through AN0M messages but no Americans have been charged.

The court documents go some way to explain why, suggesting the government believed such interceptions there could be in breach of American laws.

“Given domestic constitutional and statutory constraints on electronic interceptions, the “FBI geo-fenced the U.S., meaning that any outgoing messages from a device with[in] [the] US … would not have any communications on the FBI iBot server” and would not be reviewed by U.S. law enforcement,’’ the documents state, citing responses from investigators.

The document states the third country sent data to the FBI right up until its local court order expired on June 7, 2021.

“This data comprises the encrypted messages of all of the users of AN0M with a few exceptions (eg the messages of approximately 15 AN0M users in the U.S. sent to any other AN0M device are not reviewed by FBI),’’ it notes.

“[The FBI] have translated the messages (where necessary and where translations are available) and have catalogued more than 20 million messages from a total of 11,800 devices … located in over 90 countries.’’

Mr Kumar and his co-accused have advised the court they intend to retain investigators in the European country to search for documents and witnesses to provide “first-hand information’’ about AN0M’s administration.

“The defence would be beyond remiss to rely on the government’s “official” story, without conducting an independent investigation,’’ the lawyers said in their affidavit.

“After all, “the ten most terrifying words in the English language may be, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help you,’ they said, quoting a precedent court case, Garcia-Aguilar v. United States District Court, 2008.

The challenge to AN0M’s operations in the US comes at the same time a group of 66 Australians accused of mainly drug offences as a result of the AN0M sting have teamed up to challenge the validity of the technology used. The case, known informally as AN0M 66, is listed for a committal hearing before a magistrate in Sydney in September.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/an0m-accused-edwin-kumar-asks-fbi-to-give-him-names-and-messages-from-encrypted-app/news-story/ef5272c1953ab03cd0bb49737d253f0b

https://qresear.ch/?q=AN0M

https://qresear.ch/?q=ANOM

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19404497

File: 0dd8fb2e3de0e5f⋯.jpg (178.89 KB,1620x1080,3:2,Jane_says_she_helpless_aft….jpg)

File: 3a471922f38d3dc⋯.jpg (282.24 KB,3000x2000,3:2,With_a_few_months_to_try_a….jpg)

>>19278301

How Taskforce Argos and the AFP tracked down the Gold Coast man accused of 1,623 child abuse offences

Antonia O'Flaherty - 22 August 2023

1/3

The Australian Federal Police (AFP) officer asks Kate to confirm her full name, her birthdate, and her parents' names.

It sounds like a scam call.

The phone call from a private number had come through when Kate* was relaxing in her room, on an otherwise uneventful weekday afternoon.

Then the officer mentions the name of her childcare centre.

Now Kate, who's over 18, knows it can't be a scammer - who else would know that?

The AFP officer says she needs to meet with her - soon. She can be available after hours, on weekends.

Kate says she'll find a time that works with her parents, hangs up the phone and walks out of her room to tell her father what's just happened.

About a week later, the AFP walked into their home and delivered news that changed the course of their lives - they believed Kate was one of dozens of alleged victims of a former childcare worker.

In the days prior, the family had been at a loss as to what the meeting with the AFP might be about. The family had talked, guessed, and even laughed about what information they could possibly have that could help the police.

The night of the phone call, Jane* got home from work, rehashed the conversation her daughter had with the officer, and searched their name online.

She learned the officer had worked on child exploitation cases.

"I just wanted to know that she was a real person, to be a little bit prepared, I didn't think the worst, I didn't jump to any conclusions," Jane said.

"Whatever it was, it couldn't have been that bad, that's how we framed it."

Jane admits she had pervasive thoughts about it, but mostly she felt impatient.

"It was the impatience more than anything, I thought, I want to know, I want to find out, sort this out and put it behind us."

When the AFP arrived at their home a week later, Jane said the officers appeared confident, capable and to-the-point, in a compassionate way.

But the allegations still came as a shock.

"We knew who he was, but we didn't actually, we didn't suspect him, we were really shocked, and I was actually very shocked, initially," she said.

"I felt a little bit sick. I felt sad. I felt actually helpless, very helpless, I felt really quite helpless."

Beyond grappling with the accusations and the looming charges, the family were now ensnared in a process and system they would have little control over.

"I sat there and thought, this is done, I can't change this, I can't make this better, I didn't know quite what to do with it. I was at a loss as to how to approach that," she said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19404498

File: 87cc150a7fe0140⋯.jpg (675.7 KB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Former_head_of_Argos_Jon_R….jpg)

File: 5c48c70ac880e86⋯.jpg (236.71 KB,2000x1332,500:333,Former_head_of_Argos_Jon_R….jpg)

>>19404497

2/3

Parents feel responsible

Jane says she can rationalise it wasn't her fault that they chose the particular centre, that they couldn't have known it would one day lead to allegations of abuse against their child, but as a parent, she still feels responsible.

"Everything you do is to protect your children from those sorts of things happening," she said.

"We chose the centre, we made the choices so it does feel like our fault and there were many other places we could have chosen but we didn't - it was chance," Jane said.

"I feel some responsibility for that.

"I want to share our story because the mothers - obviously the children are the [alleged] victims in this situation - but I think that the parents are the other untold victims."

The information forced the family to look back at the time when the alleged offending occurred.

"Initially we spent a lot of time as a family talking about it," Jane said.

With a few months to try and process the accusations, Jane said she felt prepared for when the AFP would go public with the charges.

Earlier this month, the AFP, Queensland police and New South Wales police revealed they had charged a 45-year-old Gold Coast man with 1,623 child abuse offences.

The announcement came about a year after police arrested the man — on two counts of making child exploitation material and one count of using a carriage service for child abuse material.

Court documents show those offences allegedly occurred against two girls at a childcare centre in a south-western suburb of Brisbane.

The ABC has confirmed the accused man had also worked at a childcare centre associated with a tertiary facility in Australia.

Jane said seeing the accusations in the media was "much harder" than she expected.

"I knew that there were these charges, I knew the person, I was prepared, we'd spoken about it … we thought about how we felt, it really vanished when I heard the press conference, and I felt the gravity of the charges."

Navigating what to do with the information they had been handed, how they would follow the court case, and how it would impact their family is something Jane said she is still trying to come to terms with.

She is bracing for if, and when, more details of the allegations are released— and whether the identity of the accused man is made public.

"I imagine when he does attend [court] in person there will be images potentially in the media of him, which will be another emotional hurdle to overcome and I don't know how we will navigate that but we will just do our best," she said.

"It will be hard, it will probably be harder than I expect.

"We'll really take it, one court appearance at a time."

After the accused man's arrest in 2022, the AFP launched Operation Tenterfield, and reviewed almost 4,000 images and videos of abuse material allegedly found in his home under a search warrant.

The AFP said it was "highly confident" that all 87 Australian children who were recorded in the alleged child abuse material had now been identified.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19404500

File: 8779d961e17e910⋯.jpg (696.68 KB,2768x1848,346:231,Detective_Inspector_Glen_D….jpg)

File: 32937f9ad1ce899⋯.jpg (344.06 KB,1505x635,301:127,Counselling_and_support_se….jpg)

>>19404498

3/3

The operation is linked back to the work of Queensland Police Services's specialist child sexual abuse team, Taskforce Argos, which rescued children and brought down a dark web forum called The Love Zone.

The anonymous TOR network first came to the attention of Taskforce Argos about a decade ago, after the arrest of a Queensland man who had VIP status on the dark web forum - as they followed leads from a Canadian operation called Project Spade.

Assuming the identity of the man on the forum, Argos intercepted the abuse material with the aim of rescuing the children being harmed, former head of the task force Jon Rouse said.

The abuse material was shared with the International Child Sexual Exploitation database, a global database where specialist victim identification teams work to identify and rescue children.

The Argos team would eventually identify the forum's administrator as Families South Australia paedophile Shannon McCoole and after his arrest in 2014, Argos assumed his role in the forum.

The former childcare worker currently facing 1,600 charges allegedly shared abuse material on the dark web.

Agencies examined the images, but they contained few distinguishable clues for investigators to follow, the AFP said.

But in August 2022 the AFP traced bedsheets in the abuse material back to a Brisbane childcare centre, leading to the accused man's arrest.

Officers praised for 'amazing' work

Former head of Argos Jon Rouse said the work was to be commended.

He said many of the people working on identifying the children in the abuse material from the dark web forum had children in child care at the time.

"It was a tough job," he said.

"Ultimately, it was one of the members from the AFP victim identification team at the ACCCE that broke through and managed to form an analysis of some of the fabric in the background.

"That was what broke the case, ultimately, so it took a long time, but victim identification takes, sometimes, a long time.

"There's thousands of children that sit on the Interpol database that have not been removed from harm yet because we just don't have the clues that help us find them."

When Rouse was moved to the ACCCE in 2019, Glen Donaldson took over command of Taskforce Argos.

The detective inspector said the work of Argos investigators had been incredible.

"Talking about that Love Zone investigation from 2014, the officer hours that went into that was amazing, you know, it was, it was very unique for its time in terms of the work that the officers did.

"The number of children across the world that's been removed from harm because of that, and subsequent investigations, is why they keep coming up and coming to work every day."

More than 2,000 children rescued

Argos police in partnership with national and international law enforcement agencies have helped rescue more than 2,000 children since 2017 through the investigation and analysis of seized data.

Detective Inspector Donaldson said the message for all offenders was clear.

"So, the message for the offenders is the next child that you speak to might actually be an undercover officer from Argos.

"We are not just on the clear net platforms, we are on the dark web, we are on gaming platforms, social media platforms, the metaverse, we will be out there, and we will be actively hunting you."

Looking forward, Jane believes the true sign of the impact will be felt on the next generation of her family, if her daughter decides to have children.

"I suspect I will be very hesitant and very reluctant probably, extremely anxious, about utilising child care," she said.

"I've lost that sense of trust and I don't know how that comes back."

*The ABC has changed the names of Kate and Jane to protect their identities.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-08-22/qld-police-child-abuse-operation-argos-childcare-worker/102745704

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19410335

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Testing…

Magic Sword - In The Face Of Evil

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G02wKufX3nw

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

339726 No.19410436

File: 70f516346f6da82⋯.png (1.96 MB,1920x1080,16:9,MS2.png)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

dbff5a No.19410437

File: 8ab2d66a8f45804⋯.jpg (30.73 KB,472x499,472:499,numberone.jpg)

Greetings you glorious limey bastards. test.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19417267

File: 09c6d9b70fde25d⋯.mp4 (15.97 MB,640x360,16:9,Graphic_scenes_of_PNG_conf….mp4)

Plea for Australian help to quell brutal PNG fighting as Canberra and China struggle for influence

BEN PACKHAM and GORETHY KENNETH - AUGUST 23, 2023

1/2

The governor of a remote Papua New Guinea province racked by tribal fighting has appealed for Australian help as the nation struggles to contain surging violence that has seen dead people dragged by four wheel-drives and a flood of automatic weapons into the country’s Highlands.

The Australian can reveal that multiple tribal conflicts have claimed the lives of an estimated 150 people this year, including two dozen lives in the past fortnight alone, and left thousands homeless.

The bloodshed in PNG’s Enga Province is threatening to further destabilise Australia’s nearest neighbour and biggest aid recipient, which is at the centre of an intense contest between Australia and China for regional influence.

The fighting comes as PNG faces a financial crisis and surging population growth that has strained the government’s ability to provide basic services, as Beijing looks to take advantage of any regional instability to further its own strategic interests.

Police have blamed politicians for fuelling the brutal violence, while local MPs, including Governor Sir Peter Ipatas, have accused police of failing to deal with the perpetrators.

At least three tribal fights are currently under way in the province, waged with high-powered military rifles, home-made guns and metre-long bush knives that leave victims with devastating wounds.

Grisly videos and images of the carnage are circulating on ­social media, including recent pictures of slain and naked fighters being towed by vines from a Toyota ute.

The International Committee of the Red Cross, which is on the ground in the province, said women and girls displaced by the fighting faced being “raped in ­really big numbers”.

Australia is alert to the issue, announcing $1.4bn in the May budget to support peace and security building across the Pacific but the Albanese government has not publicly advocated on what is seen by PNG as a highly sensitive matter.

PNG Prime Minister James Marape, an ally of Australia who has taken a wary approach to China, announced on Tuesday that those who engaged in tribal fighting would face life imprisonment under proposed new legislation aimed at ending the horrific violence.

The governor’s plea for Australian support comes just weeks after the Albanese government released its new foreign aid policy promising a whole-of-government effort to support Pacific partners to become “effective states.

Australia is on track to provide more than $600m worth of aid to PNG this year, on top of hundreds of millions in budget support loans.

Australia rapidly mobilised a peacekeeping force to send to Solomon Islands in 2021 after a request by Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare to quell rioting in the capital. Mr Sogavare has since signed a security pact with Beijing and Chinese police have been training Solomon Islands law enforcement officials.

There has been no such request for police help to Australia or any other country from Mr Marape.

PNG police commissioner David Manning has ordered his officers to use lethal force against armed tribesmen and mercenaries contracted by clans to fight on their behalf.

Enga’s provincial police commander, Superintendent George Kakas, said his officers were outgunned and legally unable to shoot fighters carrying weapons unless officers or civilians were in immediate danger.

The explosion in tribal violence is just the latest in PNG’s Highlands region, and comes as conflicts simmer in at least two other provinces – Hela and Southern Highlands.

Sir Peter, a “Grand Chief” of the PNG system who has served five terms, said the Royal Papua New Guinea Constabulary had shown “they are not able to effectively do their constitutional duty and that is to basically arrest criminals or offenders”.

“I have said many times that we do not have the capacity to fix this,” he told The Australian. “We need the government to ask the Australian government to give us some manpower so the police men and women in Australia can contribute to a contingent that would be sent to PNG to work alongside our policemen and women.”

Sir Peter said he wanted to see Australian police officers walking side by side in Enga with their local counterparts to prevent more violence, and to help PNG police to “develop the right culture to be a policeman or woman”.

“We need Australian police officers to help our (Central Intelligence Division), the prosecutors, and assist the provincial police commander in managing the province. There is a lot to be done.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19417272

File: 4e182989690f915⋯.jpg (321.53 KB,1800x1013,1800:1013,Fighters_in_Enga_Province_….jpg)

File: e33d542da7c0b66⋯.jpg (207.69 KB,1428x1904,3:4,The_bodies_of_killed_triba….jpg)

File: 95fb0c992f8f68a⋯.jpg (181.77 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Papua_New_Guinea_Prime_Min….jpg)

>>19417267

2/2

Another Engan leader, Kandep MP Don Polye, backed the call for Australian support, saying AFP officers were needed to train their PNG counterparts.

“Community policing is absent in PNG. In Kandeep for instance, I have I think four regular, properly trained policemen looking after 80,000 to 90,000 people in the electorate,” he said.

“We don’t want (AFP) doing operational stuff, but they could train police trainers, who could train police at the provincial level and the district level.”

The AFP currently has 32 sworn officers in PNG but none is specifically tasked with supporting efforts to tackle tribal violence.

They are constrained from carrying weapons or acting in frontline roles after a 2005 Supreme Court found they could not be granted legal immunities under PNG’s constitution.

Superintendent Kakas said there were three ongoing tribal fights in the province – all in Wapen­amanda District – that had so far claimed about 150 lives.

He said battles following last year’s national election in three other districts – Kompiam-Ambum, Porgera and Laiagam – were now under control after a combined 200 deaths.

Superintendent Kakas said he had a force of 260 police across the province, backed by 120 soldiers, but they were unable to contain the violence.

The provincial police commander said each tribe had 10-20 guns, and 200-300 mercenaries with military-style rifles had flooded the province, charging PGK1000 a day ($430) for their services.

“Enga has a culture of tribal fights but now we have seen a switch from the normal tribal fights over woman and land. Recently it is because of politics getting in the way,” he said.

“And we see the trend where they are going from bows and arrows and spears … to high-powered factory-made firearms.”

Superintendent Kakas said the weapons were flowing into the country from Indonesia and Australia, traded for drugs, money and women.

“It involves well-to-do people; people with connections; businessmen; and politicians who are bringing those guns in to protect their own territory and tribal land,” he said.

The Australian is not suggesting any Engan MP is encouraging the conflict, only that the ­allegation has been made.

The International Committee of the Red Cross told The Australian it was monitoring 23 tribal conflicts in PNG this year, some of which were ongoing and some that had subsided.

“That we know of, about 150 people have died during this year in different parts of the Highlands due to tribal fighting, but it could be more,” the ICRC’s Lorena Martin Redondo said.

She said an estimated 5600 people had been forced from their homes by recent fighting, while up to 50,000 had been displaced across the Highlands this year.

“They lose their houses, which are easily burned; they lose their agriculture, their animals, and their livelihoods,” she said. “They also lose civilian infrastructure such as schools or health centres.”

She said women and girls were particularly vulnerable. “Sexual violence is very prevalent in PNG, especially in the Highlands. When it comes to tribal fighting … women are raped in really big numbers.

“So we support victims of sexual violence with psychosocial support and making sure they get the appropriate treatment they need in the first 72 hours after the rape has happened.”

The Enga violence is complicating the scheduled reopening of the province’s Porgera goldmine, which is part-owned by Canadian multinational Barrick and China’s Zijin Mining Group, and which has itself been blighted by years of alleged human rights abuses.

The mine, which contributed almost 10 per cent of PNG exports, has been closed for three years as the nation’s government renegotiated its lease to secure a 51 per cent stake in the venture.

Former Australian high commissioner to PNG Ian Kemish, who is currently an expert associate at ANU’s National Security College, said economic development was key to addressing the surging violence affecting the country.

“Historically there is a clear correlation between the state of the economy and law and order across PNG,” Mr Kemish said.

“We saw it in the 1990s when the Panguna mine, which was one of the country’s economic mainstays, was shut down.

“We do need to see next steps in a number of big resource projects, including the Total-led new LNG project.

“But PNG also needs to find a way of actually delivering on the huge potential it has in agriculture and fisheries.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/plea-for-australian-help-to-quell-brutal-png-fighting-as-canberra-and-china-struggle-for-influence/news-story/4e38ca728bd0f58375d888f5b1ad3e2f

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19417281

File: d373babebc8ca63⋯.jpg (197.52 KB,2048x1152,16:9,PNG_Prime_Minister_James_M….jpg)

File: ca815d19f0153e5⋯.jpg (260.66 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Tribal_fighters_in_Papua_N….jpg)

>>19417267

Anthony Albanese restricted but ready to help troubled PNG and pro-Australia ally James Marape

BEN PACKHAM - AUGUST 22, 2023

Escalating tribal fighting in Papua New Guinea’s Highlands is a rolling human rights tragedy that the country’s government has been unable to contain.

It is also a difficult issue for federal Labor, which has remained ­silent on the fighting, despite an estimated 150 deaths this year.

Anthony Albanese has forged a strong personal relationship with PNG counterpart James Marape, who is standing firmly with Australia on the need to keep China at arm’s length.

Marape is happy for his country to reap the economic benefits from China, but – unlike Manasseh Sogavare in Solomon Islands – has rebuffed Chinese efforts to forge closer security ties.

The federal government doesn’t want to do anything to jeopardise this critical relationship, but knows that it cannot sit on its hands.

Tribal fighting in PNG has ­traditionally been undertaken under strict honour codes.

But hired mercenaries with automatic weapons now ignore such rules, dramatically escalating the violence. Images and videos of the carnage are circulating widely online, piling pressure on Prime Minister Marape to take action.

The problem highlights the country’s fragility, and deep economic problems.

When the Solomon Islands capital Honiara was burning in 2021, Sogavare asked for Australia to send in peacekeepers, who ­arrived within days.

Australia stands ready to assist PNG too, but has not been asked for help. Coming in heavy-handed would risk humiliating PNG, ­undermining years of relationship-building.

Australia’s ability to send in armed police and defence personnel is also highly constrained, after a court ruled that it was uncon­stitutional to grant AFP officers legal immunities to undertake frontline roles.

The same concerns over legal immunities are now holding up negotiations between Australia and PNG on a bilateral defence treaty. The treaty is crucial to locking in the Pacific country’s support for a more robust Aus­tralian and US security role in the region.

Foreign Minsiter Penny Wong and other senior Australian ministers discussed the challenges posed by tribal violence with their PNG counterparts in February.

A concrete support plan is ­likely to follow in coming months that could involve an increased role for unarmed AFP advisers on the ground in PNG.

On a deeper level, PNG also needs serious help to develop its economy and lift its people from poverty.

As the government’s new aid policy rightly states, “development underpins stability”.

Australia needs to seize on the current good relations with PNG to advocate a transformative ­development agenda.

Major infrastructure projects and support for PNG to develop its mineral resources, agriculture and fisheries will be critical, rather than hodgepodge health and ­education initiatives, and old-fashioned training for public ­servants.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/anthony-albanese-restricted-but-ready-to-help-troubled-png-and-proaustralia-ally-james-marape/news-story/7de60139e053fa041fda443f31657927

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19417286

File: 149bbea58d58f9a⋯.jpg (1.36 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,The_decision_to_announce_t….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19297392

Voice referendum date to be announced in South Australia next Wednesday

Evelyn Manfield - 23 August 2023

The date for the Voice to Parliament referendum will be announced at an event in Adelaide on Wednesday next week, the Prime Minister's Office has confirmed, as the battle to win voters in key states ramps up.

Anthony Albanese has previously said the vote will happen in October or November, with some speculation it will be held on October 14 due to travel commitments Mr Albanese has made in the coming months.

The question put to Australian voters will require a Yes or No response to whether an Indigenous Voice to Parliament — which would act as an independent advisory body for First Nations people — should be enshrined in the constitution.

Australians will be asked:

"A Proposed Law: to alter the Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. Do you approve this proposed alteration?"

The permanent body would represent First Nations people and offer advice to government on policies and laws which impact the lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.

For the referendum to be successful, it will need support from the majority of voters nationally, as well as the majority of voters in at least four states.

Votes cast outside of the states, such as from the Australian Capital Territory or the Northern Territory, are only counted towards the national total.

The decision to announce the date in South Australia suggests the government believes it will prove a key state for the Yes campaign to win. Meanwhile, the No campaign focused its weekend efforts on West Australia.

The 1967 referendum, that asked for Indigenous Australians to be counted as part of the population and allowed the Commonwealth to make laws for them, was also launched in SA.

In a statement, Mr Albanese said this would be a "once in a generation chance" to recognise First Nations people in the constitution.

"I will be campaigning for constitutional recognition. Because if not now, when?" he said.

South Australian Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young said her home state would be crucial to the success of the Voice referendum.

"SA is the state that will make or break this vote," she said.

"Our state will determine if the Voice to Parliament gets up or not."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-08-23/voice-referendum-date-to-be-announced-next-wednesday/102764710

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19417287

File: e04e7941378ca0f⋯.jpg (353.17 KB,2400x1440,5:3,The_NSW_supreme_court_said….jpg)

>>19374474

NSW court rules Catholic church can’t get a fair trial in civil case over paedophile priest

The Catholic church has successfully argued it can’t get a fair trial for alleged child abuse perpetrated by notorious priest David Joseph Perrett because Perrett and other key witnesses have died

Christopher Knaus - 23 Aug 2023

The Catholic church has successfully used the death of a known paedophile priest to permanently halt a civil claim by two Indigenous survivors, one of whom is dying of cancer.

The New South Wales supreme court ruled on Wednesday that the church could no longer receive a fair trial due to the death of assistant priest David Joseph Perrett, which, along with the deaths of other key witnesses, caused the church serious prejudice in attempting to mount a defence.

The church won the case despite allegations it had more than three decades to investigate Perrett’s past, but did nothing.

The church had been aware since 1995 Perrett abused children, after he pleaded guilty to offences against three boys in north-west NSW.

Perrett later confessed to a senior church official that he was a paedophile; by the time of his death in 2020, Perrett was awaiting criminal trial on more than 100 charges relating to almost 40 young children in areas spanning Armidale, Walcha, Guyra and the broader New England region from the 1960s to the mid-1990s.

The two plaintiffs alleged they were abused by Perrett on a camping trip to Georges Creek in 1976 while they lived on an Aboriginal mission in Armidale.

Their allegations prompted criminal charges in 2017, three years’ prior to Perrett’s death.

According to the survivors’ lawyers, this should have made it clear to the Armidale diocese that it would face future civil action for Perrett’s alleged crimes. They say the diocese should have taken steps to investigate the allegations against Perrett to prepare itself to defend future cases, including speaking to a list of 20 named church officials, lawyers, and police officers.

But the NSW supreme court rejected the argument on Wednesday, denying that the prejudice the church now faced was due to its own failure to investigate.

It described a suggestion that it should have begun investigating Perrett more broadly in 1995, when he was convicted of crimes against three other children, as “entirely speculative and highly unlikely”.

The court also rejected a suggestion that the church should have sought to obtain information from Perrett after 2017, when police charged him with abusing the two plaintiffs.

“The difficulty with that proposition is that Father Perrett was no longer part of the diocese or acting as a priest at the time,” the court ruled. “He had been charged with serious criminal offences and retained his own solicitors. The idea that Father Perrett would have spoken to the defendant in preparation for potential civil claims, when none had been foreshadowed and when he was in the midst of criminal proceedings, is difficult to accept.”

When he was charged in 2017, Perrett denied the allegations of the two boys, saying he had no or limited memory of any of his accusers.

A document outlining Perrett’s response to the allegations was available to the church to help it defend itself from civil action.

But the court found there were questions about whether that document would be admissible.

“The existence of a document held by a solicitor who represented Father Perrett on criminal charges never brought to trial may provide some basis for putting propositions to the plaintiff, but it does not overcome the prejudice which arises from the absence of Father Perrett on all the three causes of action pleaded by the plaintiff,” the court ruled.

The court ruled that the defendant was “unable to have a fair trial” and that exceptional circumstances existed warranting the permanent stay.

The church is using the deaths of perpetrators to stay cases more broadly. The broader use of such tactics was revealed in an investigation by Guardian Australia earlier this year, which prompted widespread criticism.

The child abuse royal commission said that institutions should retain the power to seek permanent stays. But it also found that delays are common – survivors take 22 years on average to come forward – and recommended removing any time barrier to survivors bringing claims to he courts.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/aug/23/david-joseph-perett-nsw-court-rules-catholic-church-cant-get-a-fair-trial-in-civil-case-against-paedophile-priest?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19417293

File: 909788ecae819b3⋯.jpg (4.58 MB,5568x3712,3:2,Willoughby_MP_Tim_James.jpg)

>>19211499

>>19250396

>>19257272

>>19257385

Liberal Party branch to host QAnon believers’ favourite movie

Kishor Napier-Raman and Liam Mannix - August 23, 2023

The NSW Liberals continue to behave like an outfit with their fingers squarely on the pulse.

Next week, the party’s Willoughby state electorate conference will hatch a bold new plan to win back teal voters by holding a movie night at the Hayden Orpheum in Cremorne.

Forget Barbie, Oppenheimer or any such woke nonsense. The branch members will be watching Sound of Freedom, a brawny Christian action thriller about child sex trafficking, which nudges and winks at unhinged QAnon conspiracy theories just enough to become a sleeper box office hit among the American right.

Former president Donald Trump even hosted a screening at his private club in New Jersey.

An event description put together by local party member Jeffery Wang praised the film as a “cinematic gem” and a “resounding call to rally against injustice” that was surging at the box office “despite concerted efforts by the Hollywood establishment and the mainstream media to tarnish its reputation, trying to associate it with so-called QAnon conspiracy theories”.

None of this left CBD any the wiser about the film’s relevance to NSW politics, unless your goal is to dog-whistle at a very particular type of conservative entryist. Wang referred us on to Willoughby MP Tim James, who confirmed his attendance and told CBD there had been plenty of interest in the movie around his electorate.

“I don’t think there’s anything controversial about a film based on a true story that’s speaking to how the world should and must tackle human trafficking,” James said of the controversy around the movie.

“Let’s judge it on its merits – people should see it for what it is.”

Sounds like a whole lot of good, wholesome fun.

https://www.smh.com.au/cbd/liberal-party-branch-to-host-qanon-believers-favourite-movie-20230822-p5dyld.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19417298

File: 5055c62267950cf⋯.jpg (651.73 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Jim_Caviezel_plays_former_….jpg)

File: ceb3bf76763419a⋯.jpg (1.44 MB,5145x3430,3:2,Tim_Ballard_who_is_played_….jpg)

File: d155d5e0567793c⋯.jpg (527.58 KB,1920x1280,3:2,The_movie_follows_Tim_Ball….jpg)

>>19211499

>>19250396

>>19257272

>>19257385

Former agent who inspired QAnon-linked thriller says critics have agendas

Garry Maddox - August 23, 2023

1/2

Tim Ballard has had it with being linked to QAnon conspiracies.

The former US Department of Homeland Security agent, who estimates he has gone on “several dozen” missions to rescue sex-trafficked children since founding Operation Underground Railroad a decade ago, has become the public face of the surprise American box office hit Sound of Freedom.

Ballard is played by Jim Caviezel from The Passion of the Christ in a dark low-budget thriller that has taken a stunning $US178 million – more than the latest Indiana Jones and Mission: Impossible movies – since faith-based distributor Angel Studios released it on Independence Day.

While it dramatises a mission to rescue sex-trafficked children in Colombia without taking sides politically, the movie has been championed by the far right in America’s fractious culture wars.

Its supporters have included Steve Bannon, MyPillow proprietor Mike Lindell, QAnon followers online, Mel Gibson, who is one of the executive producers, and former president Donald Trump, who held a private screening at his Bedminster golf club a month ago.

That leaves Ballard facing awkward questions, ahead of the movie’s opening in Australian cinemas this week, like whether he believes in the QAnon conspiracy that liberal elites run paedophilia rings.

“That gets into some conspiracy theories that I’m not a part of, even though I’ve been accused of being a part of this QAnon movement,” Ballard says on a patchy Zoom call after a premiere in Buenos Aires. “I’ve disavowed it so many times. But I will say that the sex addiction that brings the demand for child sex is everywhere.

“It’s on every level of every economic order, every type of person. Professionals, educators, law enforcement and politicians. Jeffrey Epstein is an example. So I don’t think it’s more prominent in elite circles. I think it’s really just everywhere.”

Ballard, who co-chaired a council established to guide federal anti-trafficking policymaking during the Trump presidency, describes human trafficking as a $US150 billion a year business around the world.

He claims his teams have rescued more than 7000 women and children and assisted in the arrest of 5000 paedophiles and traffickers. But in the storm of controversy that has surrounded Sound of Freedom, Ballard has been accused of self-mythologising and embellishing his exploits.

An attorney who is an authority on anti-trafficking, Erin Allbright, has described the movie as being so “divorced from reality” about how trafficking works that it could harm victims.

Ballard puts criticisms of the movie down to people with agendas and says its success reflects rising concern about the sexualisation of children.

“There’s a movement, for example, to change the name paedophile to ‘minor-attracted person’ in order to normalise all this,” he says. “We have a crisis at our border with 85,000 unaccompanied minors, thousands of them children under five years old, who have shown up and been released to whoever picks them up.

“And that’s into the country that’s [the biggest] consumer of child exploitation material in the world …The people that are pushing those agendas are doing all they can to stop Sound of Freedom and making false accusations. It’s like the battle lines have been drawn almost around this film about those who will stand up for children and those who are not going to.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19417301

File: 6db76dcda6d7a89⋯.jpg (627.54 KB,2500x1667,2500:1667,Jim_Caviezel_plays_real_li….jpg)

File: 9ca7a16b3c0b5a6⋯.jpg (119.32 KB,852x318,142:53,Q_3635.jpg)

>>19417298

2/2

Director Alejandro Monteverde has also distanced the movie from QAnon, telling The Los Angeles Times that becoming the rallying cry for conspiracy believers has been heartbreaking, hurtful and “discredits the purity of the work”.

Ballard says they are already discussing a sequel based on another mission that rescued 28 children from a trafficking ring in Haiti.

He and his wife, who live in Salt Lake City, adopted two of them and also have seven biological children.

The movie has Caviziel declaring that he is undertaking the risky undercover mission because “God’s children are not for sale”.

“The faith part is very, very important to me,” Ballard says. “I know that the director didn’t intend for [it] to be labelled a Christian film or a religious film but we definitely see those references laced throughout.”

Adding to the controversy around the movie is that Caviezel spoke at a QAnon conference in Las Vegas in late 2021, referring to the fight against liberal values and using the phrase “the storm is upon us” that is a slogan among believers.

“Jim is a very good friend,” Ballard says. “Jim went to a very dark place to learn about human trafficking to prepare for this role. He really dug deep [but] I didn’t know he spoke at a QAnon conference.”

Ballard says it was encouraging that Trump had hosted a screening. He has reached out to President Joe Biden and other presidential candidates including Robert F. Kennedy Jr to hold more of them.

“Congress also hosted a screening at the US Capitol,” he says. “These are people that have the ability to deploy resources. If Donald Trump becomes the president, I’m glad that he’s aware of human trafficking.”

https://www.theage.com.au/culture/movies/former-agent-who-inspired-qanon-linked-thriller-says-critics-have-agendas-20230818-p5dxli.html

Q Post #3635

Nov 25 2019 16:34:40 (EST)

Sometimes a good 'movie' can provide a lot of truth and/or background.

'Official Secrets.'

Relevant today?

Enjoy the show!

Q

https://qanon.pub/#3635

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19417576

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19222755

>>19297392

‘Tick will be accepted, cross will not’: AEC boss slammed for confusing Voice referendum rule

The head of the AEC has sparked backlash after suggesting that ticks will be counted as votes for Yes but crosses will not be counted as Nos.

Frank Chung - August 24, 2023

1/2

The head of the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) has sparked confusion after suggesting that ticks will be counted as Yes votes but crosses will not be counted as Nos in the Voice referendum.

Opposition leader Peter Dutton now says he will write to the AEC over what he called the “completely outrageous” situation.

On referendum day, widely expected to be October 14, Australians will be asked to write either “yes” or “no” in English on the ballot paper to the question, “A Proposed Law: to alter the Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. Do you approve this proposed alteration?”

But appearing on Sky News on Wednesday, Australian Electoral Commissioner Tom Rogers was asked by host Tom Connell whether vote counters would accept other types of marks inside the box.

“It’s a bit simpler than a normal election, it’s a yes or no — are you accepting anything inside the box?” Connell said. “A tick, a cross, a yes, a number one? How broad will you allow this, given the intention of people is going to be pretty clear, you’d think?”

Mr Rogers said it was a “great question” and again urged people to “make sure you write on that box ‘yes’ or ‘no’ in English”.

“Now there are some savings provisions, but I need to be very clear with people – when we look at that, it is likely that a tick will be accepted as a formal vote for yes, but a cross will not be accepted as a formal vote,” he said.

“We’re being very clear with people, part of our education campaign will talk about this, the materials in the polling place so people can look at it. But please, make sure you write ‘yes’ or ‘no’ clearly on the ballot paper in English. That way you can assure yourself that your vote will count.”

Connell suggested that accepting a tick but not a cross might “effectively inflate the ‘yes’ side”.

“The no side might say, well hang on, it’s a lower bar for the yes side,” he said.

“No not at all,” Mr Rogers said.

“That’s why we’re spending a lot of time talking to the community about what constitutes a valid vote. There will be very clear information on the ballot paper, in the polling place. We’re spending a lot of time on that issue and what we’re trying to do is make sure under the legislation, that when the voter’s intention is clear that those votes are included.”

Connell then asked, “What about ‘y’ or ‘n’?”

“Again the legislation says yes or no is a formal vote,” Mr Rogers said.

“There are some things called savings provisions and given the fact we’re trying to give effect to the voter’s intent, it is likely that a ‘y’ or an ‘n’ would be counted under the savings provisions. But I get nervous even talking about that because then people hear mixed messages. It’s just important to write either yes or no on that ballot paper.”

The AEC rules state that a vote is informal, meaning it does not count towards the total, if a cross is used on a referendum ballot paper with only one question “since a cross on its own may mean either ‘yes’ or ‘no’”.

2GB host Ben Fordham on Thursday slammed Mr Rogers’ comments.

“How bizarre,” he said. “A tick counts as yes but cross does not count as no. That sounds dodgy. If you’re going to count the ticks, you’ve got to count the crosses, don’t you? Otherwise the yes camp has an advantage. Surely he would see the unlevel playing field here. But apparently not.”

Fordham said the AEC “has one job”.

“We’re giving them $365 million to hold the referendum,” he said. “Tom Rogers is on more than the Prime Minister, he earns $600,000 a year. How hard is it to get this right?”

Fordham said it was “ironic” that Mr Rogers was “warning about fake news”.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19417583

File: 14ee9dcb5cef3f5⋯.jpg (93.94 KB,650x1001,50:77,A_sample_ballot_paper.jpg)

File: fbeb53da9bb5c44⋯.jpg (154.12 KB,1920x1440,4:3,Australian_Electoral_Commi….jpg)

File: 6bbcc81af034dd6⋯.jpg (285.78 KB,2048x1536,4:3,2GB_host_Ben_Fordham_said_….jpg)

File: 707e06db57ea4b0⋯.jpg (331.95 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Printing_of_the_Yes_No_pam….jpg)

File: 7506b622e6bf256⋯.jpg (646.57 KB,2048x1536,4:3,Anthony_Albanese_will_anno….jpg)

>>19417576

2/2

This week the AEC launched its referendum education campaign, Your Answer Matters, with Mr Rogers telling the ABC the Voice debate had generated the “highest level of mis- and-disinformation we’ve seen online”.

“Well Tom, I think you’ve just added to the confusion,” Fordham said.

Mr Dutton told 2GB he was urging Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to draft legislation to clarify what was allowed.

“It’s completely outrageous, to be honest,” he said.

“I mean, if a tick counts for Yes then a cross should count for No. It’s as clear as that. Otherwise it gives a very, very strong advantage to the Yes case. I just think Australians want a fair vote. They want to be informed. They want to have the detail before them.”

Earlier, former Prime Minister Tony Abbott appeared on 2GB, agreeing with the host that “it seems awfully confusing”.

“It does, and it’s quite simple, I would have thought,” Mr Abbott said.

“You either vote yes or you vote no, and I’m certainly urging people to vote no. But the problem with all of this is that there’s a suspicion that officialdom is trying to make it easier for one side. It seems that it’s going to be easier to get a yes vote than a no vote if a mere tick is going to count for a yes but you’ve got to specifically write ‘no’ to vote no. This is the worry all along that there is a lot of official bias in this whole referendum process.”

The former PM agreed with Fordham that “you’ve got to have the same rule for both camps”.

“I would have thought so, otherwise it’s not a level playing field, it’s not a fair fight,” Mr Abbott said.

“If a tick is a yes, why wouldn’t a cross be a no? And really the only way to get away from this kind of confusion is to make it absolutely crystal clear that you either vote no or you vote yes, but marks of one sort or another that are neither no nor yes don’t count.”

Mr Abbott added, “Unfortunately, I don’t want to be personally critical of the Electoral Commissioner, but nevertheless it does seem that this is causing confusion, and that’s a real problem.”

Mr Albanese will officially announce the date of the Voice referendum in the must-win state of South Australia next Wednesday and kick off a six-week campaign.

It’s widely anticipated Australians will head to the polls on October 14 to vote in the first referendum in 24 years.

The PM is set to join prominent Voice supporters in Adelaide next week to announce the date in a bid to turn the tide and rally support for the proposed constitutional change.

In order for a referendum to succeed, it must win the majority of votes in a majority of states.

Only eight of 44 referendums have succeeded in Australia’s 122-year history — all with bipartisan support.

The latest polls have support for the Voice slumping in every state, and according to the latest Newspoll surveys the “Yes” vote is ahead in only South Australia and NSW.

The votes are evenly split in Victoria, while the “No” vote is leading in Western Australia, Queensland, and Tasmania, with the No campaign confident it can win over voters.

In a statement, Mr Albanese said the referendum campaign would be a chance to “celebrate our shared history and build a better shared future”.

“Very soon, our nation will have a once-in-a-generation chance to recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in our Constitution and make a positive difference to their lives with a Voice,” he said.

“Next week, the date will be announced. I will be campaigning for constitutional recognition because if not now, when? Nothing to lose, everything to gain. Every Australian will get a say in this. Every Australian will have the opportunity to vote yes for a practical, positive difference in people’s lives.”

Mr Albanese has ruled out legislating a Voice to Parliament if the bid for constitutional reform falls short, saying he will respect Australia’s wishes.

https://www.news.com.au/finance/work/leaders/tick-will-be-accepted-cross-will-not-aec-boss-slammed-for-confusing-voice-referendum-rule/news-story/b8c6e57e6c7d4e9564ce32d183460bb2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsccdNOPJK4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19417591

File: 5b0e4a7105fc802⋯.jpg (2.07 MB,4747x3165,4747:3165,Australian_electoral_commi….jpg)

File: e278ba5b1249196⋯.jpg (196.72 KB,960x640,3:2,Examples_of_referendum_bal….jpg)

File: 754bd544ac34cc3⋯.jpg (3.7 MB,5023x3349,5023:3349,Dutton_cross_about_AEC_tic….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19297392

>>19417576

Dutton cross about AEC tick ruling on Voice referendum

James Massola - August 24, 2023

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has called for a re-think by the Australian Electoral Commission after it said a tick could be counted as a Yes vote in the Voice to parliament referendum, but a cross would not count as a No vote.

In an interview on Sky News on Wednesday, Electoral Commissioner Tom Rogers stressed that Australians should write either Yes or No on the referendum ballot paper in English. However, he then added: “There are some ‘savings provisions’, but I need to be very clear with people: when we look at that, it is likely that a tick will be accepted as a formal vote of ‘Yes’, but a cross will not be accepted as a formal vote.”

A spokesman for the AEC said the rules for referendums had been the same for a long time and the “savings provisions” – that is, the ability to count a vote where the instructions have not been followed but the voter’s intention is clear – had been in place for 30 years.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will formally announce the date of the referendum, which is widely expected to be October 14, in Adelaide next Wednesday.

Dutton seized on Rogers’ “outrageous” comments in an interview with radio station 2GB, claiming the ruling would give the Yes campaign a clear advantage.

“If a tick counts for Yes, then a cross should count for No – it’s as clear as that … I just think Australians want a fair vote, they want to be informed, they want to have the detail before them,” Dutton said.

“If legislation is required to clarify this, then we’ve got plenty of time. Parliament’s back the week after next, and we would support a sensible bill to clarify it that the prime minister can draft up … You can’t have a situation where they’re trying to provide favour to one side in a democratic election.”

In a letter to Rogers, Dutton said Australians expected the commission to act fairly and impartially in the execution of its duties.

“Counting a tick as a formal vote while simultaneously excluding a cross as informal could artificially skew the count towards the Yes vote, and fail to accurately reflect the will of the Australian people,” he wrote.

While saying he understood the AEC’s current approach was broadly consistent with that taken in previous referendums, Dutton called on it to reconsider so that “if a tick counts for Yes, a cross should count for No”.

In a statement, the AEC said the savings provisions existed for federal elections as well and the commission had no discretion to simply ignore them.

“They are a long-standing legislative requirement. The AEC’s accepted legal advice regarding the application of savings provisions to ticks and crosses since 1988 (over 30 years and multiple referendums) remains the same. This is not new,” the spokesman said.

“The issue with a cross is that on many forms people in Australia use in daily life, and in some other languages, it represents a ‘check mark’ indicating yes – it, therefore, leaves it open to interpretation or challenge by a scrutineer. A tick would also be open to interpretation and may not count depending on just how clear that mark is on the ballot paper.

“The same issues exist for just the letter ‘Y’ or ‘N’ – if the handwriting makes it unclear, it could risk an informal vote. This is why the commissioner and the AEC will be very clear and regular with our communication that people need to write the full word ‘yes’ or ‘no’ in English, in full.”

The spokesman added that the vast majority of voters would follow the AEC’s voting instructions and pointed out that in the 1999 referendum, just 0.86 per cent of votes cast were informal, and of those informal votes, only a few related to people using either a tick or a cross.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/peter-dutton-cross-about-aec-tick-ruling-on-voice-referendum-20230824-p5dz7q.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19417606

File: a9d6a8d4b6d7fb5⋯.jpg (266.8 KB,2048x1152,16:9,_Listening_to_an_Indigenou….jpg)

File: b04bfe5b6663954⋯.jpg (167.43 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Mark_Butler_is_the_federal….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19297392

An Indigenous voice will help fight against endemic disease

MARK BUTLER - AUGUST 24, 2023

Later this year Australians will get the chance to vote to change our Constitution to recognise the place of First Nations Australians.

It’s a chance to unify the country. As Health Minister, I can’t think of an area of policy where that voice will be more important and more valuable than in health.

With the best of intentions and substantial investment from both sides of the parliament, the current approach simply isn’t working.

Year after year, we hear the same reports of the yawning gap in health outcomes between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. There is an eight-year life expectancy gap between Indigenous Australians and non-Indigenous Australians.

Indigenous Australians face disabling and often fatal rheumatic heart disease. This is a disease that was eradicated in developed countries more than 50 years ago but still strikes remote Aboriginal communities at higher rates than anywhere else on the planet, including sub-Saharan Africa.

Many, if not all, of the same risk factors for rheumatic heart disease also drive avoidable blindness. Ninety per cent of vision loss for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults is preventable or treatable. Trachoma, a contagious bacterial infection of the eye that causes inflamed granulation on the inner surface of the eyelids, is the leading infectious cause of blindness worldwide.

In Australia, trachoma is found primarily in regional and remote First Nations populations. Australia has the dubious honour of being the only high-income country where trachoma is endemic. With one in 30 Indigenous children aged five to nine contracting trachoma, Australia is not on track to eliminate the condition as a public health issue in First Nations communities.

This is why the voice is so important. To fight endemic trachoma, we need to improve not only healthcare but also housing, basic amenities, and environmental conditions.

We need health, housing bodies and the environment department working together, listening to the voice of First Nations people to work towards preventing and eliminating trachoma.

I know we all care deeply about closing the gap, but we need a new approach. Just as a good doctor listens carefully to their patients, a voice to parliament involves listening to the voices of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people about better ways to make a real difference to their healthcare.

We know a voice will work for First Nations health because we’ve heard from health workers such as Georgia Corrie, a longstanding remote-area nurse in the Northern Territory.

She has seen the benefits of Indigenous-led healthcare but also the substandard outcomes of top-down approaches imposed on communities with little to no consultation. Corrie describes current healthcare policies as “walking between two different worlds” that do not talk to each other and do not listen to each other.

Importantly, as a First Nations healthcare worker, she sees the voice as an opportunity to bring those worlds closer together and, in doing so, to create solutions that actually work for Indigenous communities.

Listening to an Indigenous voice to parliament will give us a better insight into how better to spend the hundreds of millions of dollars of taxpayer money that goes into First Nations health – getting better outcomes and better value for money. Politicians don’t know best – we need to listen to communities to hear their solutions and ensure funding is getting to where it needs to go, ultimately to ensure better outcomes and longer lives.

A voice to the parliament and, frankly, to the health minister, whether they’re Labor or Liberal, is a chance to turn a new page in our national efforts to close the gap. The voice to parliament is a once-in-a-generation opportunity for the country to unite and break the cycle, making a real difference to the lives of Indigenous Australians.

Mark Butler is the federal Health and Aged Care Minister.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/an-indigenous-voice-will-help-fight-against-endemic-disease/news-story/c7e15d11478b835129683d78529df9b3

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19417616

File: 19906f3b82ca164⋯.jpg (291.89 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_advocates….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19297392

>>19417286

The No campaign against an Indigenous voice to parliament concedes a six-week campaign will be challenging

ROSIE LEWIS - AUGUST 23, 2023

The No campaign has hit out at Anthony Albanese for overseeing a six-week referendum campaign on an Indigenous voice to parliament, labelling it “an absolute slap in the face” to Australians struggling with cost-of-living pressures.

The Prime Minister has confirmed he will announce the date for the referendum next Wednesday in Adelaide, kickstarting a likely 46-day campaign – if the referendum is held on October 14 – from a crucial swing state that both camps are eyeing off.

A No campaign spokesman told The Australian their strategy would not change once the referendum campaign officially began, which was to communicate to battleground state voters it was a “terrible idea to divide the country with this proposal”.

Opponents to the voice are targeting South Australia, Tasmania, Western Australia and Queensland as the No camp only needs a majority in three states to defeat the referendum.

“The campaign is a challenge and six weeks is a long time,” the No campaign spokesman said.

“It’s obvious to us that the PM has chosen a six-week campaign as it suits both the Yes campaign and the government to spend the $100m we think they have set aside for advertising during the referendum. It is an absolute slap in the face to every Australian that while they are worried about rent and the cost of petrol, the PM will be using their money on this campaign.”

Yes23 has disputed donations will amount to anything close to $100m.

The Prime Minister’s spokeswoman rejected the No camp’s attack, saying the government’s top priority was cost-of-living relief.

She pointed to seven cost-of-living relief measures, including cheaper childcare for 1.2 million families and a plan to build 1.2 million homes this decade with the states and territories.

Government sources said the No campaign’s suggestion Yes23 would receive $100m in donations was “another invented distraction” by a group that wanted to talk about everything but the referendum question before Australians.

October 14 is the preferred date of the government and Yes campaign for the poll but it could also be held on October 7.

Leading Yes campaigner Thomas Mayo said over a thousand volunteers were joining up every four days and supporters were confident they could win in every state.

Writing in The Australian on Thursday, Mark Butler said the voice was a once-in-a-generation opportunity to break the cycle of poor health for Aboriginal Australians.

Mr Butler said the voice would tackle endemic trachoma in Indigenous communities, improving not just healthcare but housing, basic amenities and environmental conditions. Trachoma is a contagious bacterial eye infection primarily found in regional and remote Indigenous communities. “We need health, housing bodies and the environment department working together, listening to the voice of First Nations people to work towards preventing and eliminating trachoma,” Mr Butler writes.

“We all care deeply about Closing the Gap, but we need a new approach. Just like a good doctor listens carefully to their patients, a voice to parliament involves listening to … Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island people about better ways to make a real difference to their healthcare,” he wrote.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/the-no-campaign-against-an-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-concedes-a-sixweek-campaign-will-be-challenging/news-story/8071bdd9245c7163e0f92f8753a474b0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19417627

File: 42e313b38b33ca0⋯.jpg (452.11 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Armed_police_and_soldiers_….jpg)

File: b8852cc01a23e7e⋯.jpg (163.27 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Tribal_fighters_gather_in_….jpg)

File: 1d357c36eebcc87⋯.jpg (143.27 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Tribal_fighters_gather_in_….jpg)

>>19417267

James Marape mobilises elite squad to deal with PNG violence

BEN PACKHAM and GORETHY KENNETH - AUGUST 23, 2023

Papua New Guinea Prime Minister James Marape has vowed to mobilise a new joint force of heavily armed police and soldiers to stamp out tribal warfare in the country’s remote Enga Province, condemning the surging violence as “domestic terrorism”.

The pledge came as Australia’s Minister for the Pacific Pat Conroy vowed Australian support for PNG’s response, saying the Albanese government was “deeply committed” to the nations’ policing and security partnership.

Mr Marape declared on Wednesday he would not seek outside police support to deal with Enga’s ongoing tribal wars, despite calls by the province’s governor for Australian boots on the ground.

He said he would instead mobilise a combined new “special unit” that is due to arrive in Enga next week.

“So far, defence have their own operation and police have their own operation,“ Mr Marape said.

“We are ordering our police and defence (to look at) how they structure under one command.”

The Prime Minister, who visited the province this week to urge the reopening of the Porgera goldmine, said the combined force could in the future be rolled out “not just for Enga but … for the ­entire country”.

Mr Conroy said Australia shared PNG’s concerns over the tribal fighting – in which dead ­bodies have been dragged behind 4WD vehicles and reports of ­sexual violence have escalated – pledging to “continue to work with PNG to support its response”.

“Australia is a longstanding partner to PNG on policing and security, and is deeply committed to continuing our co-operation,” the minister said.

Opposition foreign affairs spokesman Simon Birmingham said the escalating violence in PNG was “deeply concerning”, and added the Coalition would seek an urgent briefing from the government on the matter.

“Australia should always stand ready to support the security needs of our Pacific neighbours and partners, especially when the lives of women and children are threatened,” Senator Birmingham said.

“We offer bipartisan support to Australian government efforts to work with PNG to ensure law and order in Enga is restored.”

Enga governor Sir Peter Ipatas told The Australian earlier this week that PNG was unable to quell the violence without outside help, calling on Mr Marape “to ask the Australian government to give us some manpower”.

The Australian Federal Police has 32 sworn officers in PNG but they are prevented from acting in frontline roles after the country’s Supreme Court found they could not be granted legal immunities under PNG’s constitution.

Meanwhile, Enga landowners threatened to block the reopening of the province’s Porgera goldmine – one of the country’s richest – until the national government contained the violence that has claimed some 150 lives this year.

Porgera Landowners’ Association Mark Tony Ekepa said gold from the mine must “not be stained by the blood of Engan women and children through unabated tribal conflicts and inhumane killings”.

“I must protest against the government and corporates’ insatiable appetite for gold and riches without concern for landowners’ safety and security,” Mr Ekepa said. He added the government “must intervene now to stop the violent killings in Enga and restore normalcy”.

The PNG government is desperate for the mine to reopen after negotiating a new lease with joint venture partners Barrick and China’s Zijin Mining Group to take a 51 per cent share of the operation. The mine has been closed for three years but was previously one of the PNG’s biggest earners, accounting for 10 per cent of the country’s exports.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/james-marape-mobilises-elite-squad-to-deal-with-png-violence/news-story/8fb9c93c044695335fb303fe60a7030d

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19417641

File: 618382fb22f9ab0⋯.jpg (269.37 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Gavin_Newsom_and_Kevin_Rud….jpg)

>>19367972

>>19367975

>>19367987

Australia-California: A climate partnership made in la-la land

ADAM CREIGHTON - AUGUST 24, 2023

1/2

Last week, Australian ambassador to the US Kevin Rudd and California Governor Gavin Newsom signed a memorandum of understanding in Sacramento on climate change. It should have been called a memorandum of waffle, as both governments jointly promised to do precisely nothing.

In what seemed like a classic Freudian slip, Governor Newsom expressed shock at the level of interest in the MOU. “This is a hell of a turnout – we are not used to this many people, particularly for something like this,” he said. Of course, he was right.

After ploughing through 1600 words of waffle, the reader learns the MOU “does not create any legally binding rights or obligations and creates no legally recognisable or enforceable rights or remedies, legal or equitable, in any forum whatsoever”.

“This MOU may be modified at any time by mutual consent,” it concluded unnecessarily, given neither party agreed to do anything. The high point of the small section on “specific activities” was “organising joint symposiums, seminars, workshops … hosting trade and investment missions”, which in practice translates to more taxpayer-funded business-class flights across the Pacific.

A better MOU would have spelled out how California’s and Australia’s energy policies have produced among the highest electricity prices in the world at the same time as their leaders have promised to reduce them, although even Newsom hasn’t had the audacity to promise household power bills would fall by $275 a year by 2025, as Labor did at the federal election last year.

California’s power prices are now the highest in the US, except for far-flung Hawaii and Alaska. In Los Angeles residents paid an average of 28c a kilowatt hour for electricity last month, according to the US Bureau of Labour Statistics.

Statewide prices are more than 77 per cent above the national average, up from 37 per cent above in 2012. But, unlike Australians, at least Californians can move to states with lower prices. Despite California’s salubrious weather and natural beauty, residents have been leaving the nation’s most populous state in droves – at first pushed out by extreme Covid-19 measures, but increasingly by a cost-of-living and a broader socio-economic crisis.

The state’s population, according to the government’s own figures, has declined three years in a row, to 39 million. In total that’s almost 600,000 people, more than the population of Tasmania or Wyoming, between April 2020 and January this year.

The MOU also promised to convene “policy dialogues” with “suitable government administrators, regulators, legislators and thought leaders”. It’s uncertain whether renowned Swedish climate expert Greta Thunberg, who once derided nuclear power as “extremely dangerous”, will make the cut. Last year Thunberg acknowledged turning off nuclear power stations in Europe was a mistake given the huge increases in fossil fuel power generation that had led to.

Indeed, the word nuclear isn’t mentioned once in the MOU, which advocated instead for “participation and leadership of Indigenous peoples in climate action” and “nature-based solutions and climate-smart land management” – what on earth these mean is anybody’s guess. Solar and wind generated abut 25 per cent of electricity in both Australia and California last year, and each are near equally ambitious.

Despite the obvious advan­tages in reliable and emissions-free power, Australia has ruled out any nuclear energy generation (except in submarines) while holding fast to its 82 per cent renewable power target by 2030.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19417644

File: cffb0c752171d6f⋯.jpg (164.41 KB,1046x1394,523:697,Environmental_activist_Gre….jpg)

File: 123733b27f650ee⋯.jpg (120.51 KB,1280x720,16:9,A_coal_fired_plant_in_Wyom….jpg)

>>19417641

2/2

California has legislated 90 per cent by 2035, although the Golden State has one big advantage over Australia achieving its goal: nuclear energy. Unreliable power evangelists aren’t stupid enough to plunge their economies into darkness just yet, knowing that could turn voters against their utopian project. In January, California rescinded an earlier decision to shut down its last nuclear power station at Diablo, a 2.2-gigawatt facility that is the state’s single biggest source of power, providing a little more than 10 per cent energy.

In the similarly strong Democrat state of Illinois – which maintains a similar brand of Democrat politics as California – 11 nuclear power plants generate about 50 per cent of the state’s electricity and the average electricity price was about half of California’s in 2021, according to the US Energy Information Administration.

A more honest MOU would have included a pledge to ignore scientific and economic reality. In France, which generates around 75 per cent of its electricity from nuclear power and has the among the lowest carbon dioxide emissions in the world per capita, a law was passed in May to pave the way for the construction of another six to eight nuclear reactors, rather than plaster the French countryside with hideous solar panels and gigantic windmills.

“I’ve been around for a long time on the climate change debate,” Rudd said at the Sacramento launch. “Way back when I pronounced in Australia that climate change was the greatest economic, environmental and moral challenge of our generation I was ridiculed. I make no apology for saying it then. And I make no apology for repeating it now.”

California’s departing residents may disagree, pointing to other more pressing challenges. San Francisco’s social decline has become so egregious that tour guides have started offering “doom loop” tours. Major department stores are leaving the state or locking up their products. Parts of Los Angeles and San Francisco look increasingly like an open-air asylum.

Even as California’s population shrinks, violent crime and property crime have increased since 2020 by 11 per cent and 7 per cent, respectively, according to the state attorney-general’s latest 2022 crime statistics.

Whatever agreements California and Australia make won’t make a scrap of difference to the global climate, given the near entirety of additional increases in carbon dioxide emissions now arise in India and China.

The idea of modern economies being powered entirely by wind and solar is a fantasy, technologically and economically, yet one that holds powerful sway among a very rich virtue-signalling elite, often living in gated communities, for whom California’s rising prices and crime mean relatively little.

California dreaming for the few, not the many.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/australiacalifornia-a-climate-partnership-made-in-lala-land/news-story/00b423852677ef0600e7ce64302710c4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19417651

File: df32d102ff45b2b⋯.jpg (518.79 KB,2037x1146,679:382,War_veteran_Ben_Roberts_Sm….jpg)

>>19220746

Ben Roberts-Smith will fight his defamation loss at a ten-day hearing

The disgraced Australian soldier has accused a judge of making a mistake and “cherry picking” evidence when he found newspapers proved he was a war criminal.

Lauren Ferri - August 24, 2023

1/2

War veteran Ben Roberts-Smith says a judge was mistaken in finding that he was involved in four murders of unarmed prisoners following a landmark defamation loss to three newspapers.

The Victoria Cross recipient sued The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age and The Canberra Times over a series of articles published in 2018 that accused him of war crimes.

Federal Court Justice Anthony Besanko dismissed the proceedings in June after finding the six articles proved – to the standard of the balance of probabilities – the most serious imputations.

He also found the newspapers made out the defence of contextual truth for the remainder of the untrue imputations.

With one day left until the deadline, Mr Roberts-Smiths’ legal team filed a notice of intention to appeal with the Federal Court on July 11.

The matter appeared in court on Thursday in front of Justice Nye Perram for the first case management hearing since the appeal was lodged.

Matthew Richardson, SC, acting for Mr Roberts-Smith, told the court that his side would be able to address the court within 3½ days.

He said the grounds of appeal arise from four murders of unarmed prisoners in Afghanistan between 2009 and 2012.

Nicholas Owens, SC, representing the newspapers, told the court that his submissions could be kept to five days, with Justice Perram setting the matter down for 10 days in total.

“It is obvious why the applicant would wish to, or the appellant or I should say, would wish to present the appeal, as if it can be reduced to a number of just very discreet little points about the evidence,” Mr Owens told the court.

“From my client’s point of view, an important part of making sure the Full Court is in a position to discharge its function on a re-hearing is overcoming that advantage and the corresponding disadvantage in the Full Court as best we can.”

The 10-day appeal will include sessions of closed court to accommodate sensitive Commonwealth information.

The appeal is aimed at finding error in Justice Besanko’s factual findings and is expected to cost about $1m, on top of the $25m already spent in legal fees throughout the case.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19417652

File: fa70ee3b5992126⋯.jpg (583.6 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Arthur_Moses_SC_represente….jpg)

>>19417651

2/2

In the notice of appeal, Mr Roberts-Smith’s lawyers said he “appeals from the whole of the judgment”.

His representatives argue that Justice Besanko “erred in his findings” Mr Roberts-Smith was involved in the four murders of unarmed prisoners.

Justice Besanko found the murder of Ali Jan at Darwan in September 2012 to be substantially true. Mr Roberts-Smith allegedly kicked the detained shepherd off a cliff while he was handcuffed.

Justice Besanko also found that Mr Roberts-Smith directed another soldier named Person 11 to drag the farmer and shoot him as he stood in the cornfield.

Mr Roberts-Smith’s lawyers claim the judge “erred by impermissible construing the evidence” of Person 41, who witnessed the execution of Ali Jan and should not have been regarded as a reliable witness.

“The primary judge added to and cherry picked the evidence of a witness whose evidence he otherwise found to be reliable without adequately explaining the basis for doing so,” the appeal states.

They also claim the judge denied procedural fairness, as he did not ask for the “rookie soldier”, known as Person 4, to give evidence about what happened at the compound and placed too great a weight on the evidence of Afghan villagers.

“The primary judge’s determination that Person 4 was not required to give evidence … denied, as a matter of procedural fairness, an opportunity to confront Person 4 (through cross-examination),” the appeal says.

“The primary judge placed significant weight on the evidence of the Afghan witnesses, including particularly relying on their evidence as corroborating the account of Person 4 when the evidence of those witnesses was not reliable to provide any corroboration.”

It was also found that Mr Roberts-Smith was involved in two murders during a mission at a compound named Whiskey 108, where two Afghan males were placed under confinement by Australian soldiers.

One of the men was executed by a rookie soldier at the direction of Mr Roberts-Smith, who killed the other man, the judge found.

Mr Roberts-Smith’s lawyers argue that Justice Besanko “did not adequately deal with the improbability that there was a widespread conspiracy to conceal the truth concerning the deaths of (the two men) … in the official reporting of the mission”.

Justice Besanko found witnesses brought by Mr Roberts-Smith were “unreliable”, but his lawyers claimed he erred in this finding.

Mr Roberts-Smith has consistently denied any wrongdoing.

The matter will be next before the court in September for a cost application.

https://www.news.com.au/technology/innovation/military/ben-robertssmith-will-fight-his-defamation-loss-at-a-tenday-hearing/news-story/1248dbd8d3eda0c8b3110b957fef00f1

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19417664

File: 8f35685540611a6⋯.jpg (350.39 KB,2048x1152,16:9,WA_Liberal_Senator_Linda_R….jpg)

File: 25874f41d865b30⋯.jpg (150.19 KB,1600x900,16:9,Lawyer_for_Senator_Linda_R….jpg)

File: 71b5dcd8f487eb2⋯.jpg (121.55 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_and_her_p….jpg)

>>19289705

>>19289887

>>19333459

Senator Linda Reynolds’ defamation case against Brittany Higgins’ fiance to ‘end in tears financially’, court told

The defence lawyer representing the fiance of Brittany Higgins in a defamation case brought by a Senator has told a court the matter will ‘end in tears financially’.

Anthony Anderson - August 24, 2023

The lawyer for the fiance of former political staffer Brittany Higgins has told the WA Supreme Court a defamation case against his client will “end in tears financially,” with legal costs potentially reaching millions of dollars.

Linda Reynolds is suing David Sharaz for defamation over five social media posts which allegedly defame the WA Liberal Senator.

The matter is set to go to trial in May, with lawyers for both Senator Reynolds and Mr Sharaz meeting before Supreme Court Justice Marcus Solomon on Thursday to discuss a security for costs application.

This means Senator Reynolds would need to put up hundreds of thousands of dollars to be held by the court, or mortgage her home, in order to prove she can cover any legal costs incurred by Mr Sharaz, should she fail to prove her case to the court.

In a hearing lasting nearly three hours, Mr Sharaz’s lawyer Jason MacLaurin argued the matter would “end in tears financially” for both parties, no matter the outcome, with legal bills amassing to “hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of dollars,” which would leave the parties “financially uncomfortable.”

Senator Reynolds’ lawyer Martin Bennett retorted such matters usually end in tears one way or the other.

Ultimately, Justice Solomon decided to adjourn the matter, and will deliver a decision on the security for costs application during another hearing on Friday afternoon.

Neither Senator Reynolds nor Mr Sharaz were present in the courtroom.

Other matters surrounding the high-profile case were discussed, including the possibility of mediation hearings in October or November, which, if successful, would negate the need for a trial.

Outside court, Mr Bennett said that’s often successful when the defendant says “I apologise.”

“Apologies are one of the things that best vindicate a reputation,” Mr Bennett said.

“Award of damages is the best a court can do because it can't order a defamer who’s lost their defamation case to apologise.”

Mr MacLaurin also tried to keep the option of transferring the matter to the ACT Supreme Court open, arguing Senator Reynolds was suing a private citizen in the WA Supreme Court when the matter has nothing to do with the state.

Mr Bennett, however, argues his client is a senator representing the state of Western Australia.

“She lives here, her family is here, her friends are here, her parliamentary colleagues and those within the Liberal Party are here, and her connection is with Western Australia, not Canberra,” Mr Bennett said, also slamming Mr MacLaurin’s argument as “irrelevant.”

Mr MacLaurin also questioned whether the Senator would be in a position to pay his client’s costs, should he be successful, given Senator Reynolds has also launched similar legal action against his client’s partner, Brittany Higgins.

The defence lawyer also noted statement concerns notices had been issued by the plaintiff against Federal Minister Tanya Plibersek, asking if the Minister would also be the target of a defamation case.

The matter of a potential legal threat issued to controversial blogger Shane Dowling was also aired, amid revelations on Thursday morning that Senator Reynolds was considering defamation action against him.

Mr Bennett said Mr Dowling had published an article about Senator Reynolds on his website, Kangaroo Court of Australia, before contacting Mr Bennett earlier this week with a series of questions for the Senator.

“I wrote back to him and said, effectively, your article’s defamatory, you know it’s defamatory, if you’re going to publish your article, you do so at your own peril,” Mr Bennett said.

But he also indicated nothing would come of the threat.

“I can’t speak for Senator Reynolds,” he said, “but you can’t sue every fringe commentator,” noting Mr Dowling is in a “unique position” over his apparent willingness to go to jail.

Mr Dowling has been imprisoned a number of times for contempt of court, and was once described by NSW Supreme Court Justice Helen Wilson as a “zealot, and one who is legally uninformed and factually deluded.”

Justice Solomon will hand down his decision on Friday afternoon.

https://www.news.com.au/finance/work/leaders/senator-linda-reynolds-defamation-case-against-brittany-higgins-fiance-to-end-in-tears-financially-court-told/news-story/aec3cd3837b3d356ca32b28b93e17b48

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19417697

File: e78d31f97573e1a⋯.jpg (135.83 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Malka_Leifer_was_convicted….jpg)

File: 1c12abaa1739dc6⋯.jpg (362.26 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Sisters_Elly_Sapper_Nicole….jpg)

File: 3a038d3481470e5⋯.jpg (184.92 KB,1731x2308,3:4,A_picture_of_Leifer_from_2….jpg)

>>19087791 (pb)

>>19087815 (pb)

>>19087825 (pb)

>>19087827 (pb)

Malka Leifer jailed for 15 years over sexual abuse of students at ultra-Orthodox Jewish school

ANGELICA SNOWDEN - AUGUST 24, 2023

1/2

Former school principal Malka Leifer has been jailed for 15 years over the sexual abuse of two former students.

The 56-year-old must serve at least 11-and-a-half years before she is eligible for parole. The court will consider her already having served 2069 days of that sentence, due to pre-sentence detention in Australia and Israel.

Leifer was convicted in April of 18 offences against sisters Elly Sapper and Dassi Erlich between 2003 and 2007.

The abuse occurred when the pair were pupils of Adass Israel School in Elsternwick, part of a small enclave of ultra-conservative Jewish families in Melbourne’s inner south-east.

Outside court, Ms Sapper said the sentence was a “momentous day”.

“We feel overwhelmed and grateful that the legal system has recognised and validated the extreme impact of abuse by female perpetrators. Malka Leifer has finally been held accountable.

“Today’s ruling of 15 years recognises the harm and pain that Malka Leifer caused each one of us to suffer over so many years. Trauma from sexual abuse is a lifelong sentence.

“While no amount of years will ever be sufficient, we are so relieved that Malka Leifer is now in prison … and cannot prey on anyone else.”

Outside the court, Ms Erlich said: “I could feel those emotions coming up as the judge was speaking, and then knowing that’s not where we are anymore, that we were not powerless anymore.”

PRINCIPAL GROOMED HER VICTIMS

Earlier on Thursday, the court heard Leifer groomed at least one of three sisters before sexually assaulting them.

At the outset of Leifer’s sentencing hearing, Judge Mark Gamble told Victoria’s county court of the sheltered upbringing of Leifer’s three complainants – Ms Erlich, Ms Sapper and Nicola Meyer.

“(They were) ignorant in sexual matters until shortly before they got married. They had no understanding of human anatomy, puberty or sexual relations,” he said.

Judge Gamble said Leifer started giving “private lessons” to Ms Erlich, where she told her she loved her and felt she was a mother to her.

He said Leifer “prepared” the complainant for offending and said he accepted this as “grooming”.

Judge Gamble noted the “delay” of 15 years between the offences taking place and when the trial was held.

He said he would take into account Ms Erlich’s and Ms Sapper’s impact statement statements, which were delivered in court and read aloud by the sisters in June.

“Ms Erich and Ms Sapper addressed ongoing impact during (the 15-year) period,” he said.

“It has been profound and life changing. To the extent that Ms Erlich and Ms Sapper feel personal guilt and shame, they should not.

“They were completely innocent victims of the predatory behaviour of Mrs Leifer.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19417701

File: b2838f6f9063704⋯.jpg (87.9 KB,1648x927,16:9,Leifer_is_taken_from_North….jpg)

File: 5ac24100680c82c⋯.jpg (367.95 KB,1595x897,1595:897,The_Adass_Israel_School_in….jpg)

>>19417697

2/2

‘NO REMORSE’ SHOWN BY LEIFER

Judge Gamble told the court Leifer has continued to deny she raped any of the three sisters, and had shown no remorse while in prison at the Dame Phylis Frost Centre in Victoria.

“She has strenuously maintained her innocence. She has (shown) no insight and no remorse,” he said.

As Judge Gamble described the nature of the offending committed by Leifer, she appeared to shed a tear.

“When viewed globally the sexual offending in which Mrs Leifer engaged must be considered as very serious,” he said.

Watching on via zoom, Leifer otherwise did not react to any of the statements made during the three hour hearing.

Judge Gamble said Leifer has already served a total of 2069 days in custody, including the periods of time she spent in jail in Israel and while she was under house arrest.

HIGH-PROFILE SUPPORT IN COURT

Among those in attendance at the full court room on Thursday was former Victorian premier Ted Baillieu and state opposition and Jewish MP David Southwick.

Leifer has been found guilty of six rape charges, six indecent assault charges, three sexual penetration of a 16 or 17 year old and three indecent act charges.

A maximum of 25 years jail can be handed down for rape charges, while those guilty of indecent act and sexual penetration of a minor can serve up to 10 years in jail per charge.

LEIFER GUILTY ON 18 CHARGES

Leifer was convicted in April on 18 charges of sexually abusing sisters Elly Sapper and Dassi Erlich during her time as principal of Adass Israel School.

She was acquitted of nine charges, including some relating to the alleged abuse of the pair’s elder sister, Nicole Meyer.

Leifer’s guilty verdicts relate to incidents where she raped and indecently assaulted children between 2004 and 2007 on school trips, at her Elsternwick home and backstage at a school play.

Leifer fled Australia in the dead of night in 2008 after the Adass ­Israel School in Melbourne learned about a number of complaints that she had abused her students.

The school paid for her ticket to Israel.

FAKED MENTAL ILLNESS

She was extradited to Australia from Israel in 2020 after she spent years fighting calls to face justice.

Prosecutor Justin Lewis KC told Victoria’s County Court in June that three separate panels of psychiatrists found Leifer faked mental problems to delay legal proceedings, and other experts reported psychotic breakdowns took place only in the days leading up to hearings in Israel as authorities were attempting to extradite her.

A 2011 judgment concluded she was fit to be extradited and “she had been essentially pretending to be ­mentally ill in order to avoid the extradition”.

In 2018, another two expert reports concluded the same, and in 2020 another panel of ­experts unanimously concluded Leifer was “fit to stand trial”, Mr Lewis said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/malka-leifer-sentencing-former-principal-groomed-at-least-one-victim-court-told/news-story/e4fbef369e07c325fc357c61cf2b05d4

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19417751

File: 397377f1a41076e⋯.mp4 (15.81 MB,640x360,16:9,Sisters_speak_after_Malka_….mp4)

>>19417697

A tear stains Leifer’s cheek as she is sentenced to 15 years for child sex abuse

David Estcourt and Caroline Schelle - August 24, 2023

1/3

A decades-long fight to bring justice to the victims of Malka Leifer has ended with the former principal of an ultra-Orthodox Jewish school in Melbourne sentenced to 15 years in prison for sexually abusing and raping two former students in her care.

Leifer, 56, will be eligible for parole in June 2029 after County Court Judge Mark Gamble imposed a non-parole period of 11½ years. Leifer has already served more than 2000 days in pre-sentence detention in Australia and Israel.

Gamble said on Thursday that Leifer was a predator who should feel guilty for sexually abusing the innocent sisters and that she used her position of influence over them to pursue her own sexual gratification.

Leifer watched the sentencing via video link from Dame Phyllis Frost Centre. A tear stained Leifer’s right cheek as Gamble reached the end of his sentencing remarks. It was the first time she showed any strong emotion throughout the trial.

Outside court sisters Elly Sapper, Dassi Erlich and Nicole Meyer spoke about the “momentous day”, elated that the legal system had finally recognised the abuse Sapper and Erlich had suffered.

“This fight was never just for us,” Erlich said. “Today really marks the end of this chapter of our lives and opens the chapter to us healing to any other survivors in this nightmare. You are never alone. We are all behind you.”

“Trauma from sexual abuse is a lifelong sentence,” Sapper said, “while no amount of years will ever be sufficient, we are so relieved that Malka Leifer is now in prison for 15 years and cannot prey on anyone else.”

The sisters have granted The Age permission to use their names.

After a six-week trial, a jury in April found Leifer guilty of assaulting and raping Sapper and Erlich between 2004 and 2007, when the pair were pupils at Adass Israel School in Elsternwick, part of a small enclave of ultra-conservative Jewish families in Melbourne’s inner south-east.

The jury found Leifer guilty of 18 rape and sexual assault charges and not guilty of nine. During the trial, she was acquitted of two other charges. Leifer was cleared of all charges relating third sister, Meyer.

Leifer’s years-long subversion and manipulation of Israel’s justice system to avoid extradition left the sisters, and advocates, with the fear that today would never come.

It also jeopardised the relationship between Australia and traditional ally Israel, who repeatedly clashed over failed attempts to extradite Leifer, leaving Australian politicians and the sisters frustrated.

Gamble addressed Erlich and Sapper, who in their evidence explained their own guilt at not stopping the abuse, saying: “They were completely innocent victims of the predatory behaviour of Mrs Leifer, and it is she and she alone who should feel guilty.

“This case is striking for just how vulnerable these victims were, and for the calculating way in which the offender, Mrs Leifer, took callous advantage of those vulnerabilities in order to sexually abuse them for her own sexual gratification.”

After Leifer was sentenced and Gamble left the courtroom, the sisters could be seen smiling and speaking to family and supporters. Leifer quickly walked out of the prison camera’s view.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19417760

File: 42878284aeb9e9f⋯.jpg (310.48 KB,1754x1240,877:620,A_court_sketch_of_Malka_Le….jpg)

File: 5a1ddde4caa59ef⋯.jpg (517.21 KB,824x838,412:419,MALKA_LEIFER_COURT_TRANSCR….jpg)

File: 5043b167c07bd38⋯.jpg (475.06 KB,825x727,825:727,MALKA_LEIFER_COURT_TRANSCR….jpg)

>>19417751

2/3

The sentence draws to a close a scandal that has seen the sisters transform from disempowered victims who knew little of the world outside their strict religious enclave, and who were preyed upon by Leifer, to survivor-advocates who now encourage others to report allegations of abuse, sometimes in defiance of their conservative upbringing.

Their unyielding pursuit of justice stretched over two decades and across several continents, taking the sisters into the halls of power as they pressed their case to former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull, Israel’s then-justice minister Ayelet Shaked, and other leaders.

It took upwards of 70 hearings to break through the inertia of Israeli authorities and finally have Leifer sent back to Australia.

About 20 years have passed since the sisters’ abuse inside Adass Israel School and this moment, with Leifer sitting in prison, a single tear rolling down her face as she shifted back and forth during the sentencing.

But outside the County Court, the youngest sister, Sapper, spoke of healing.

“I think the more time and distance we create we move further away from this trauma, the more ability we have to start healing,” she said.

“For me, healing looks like continuing to add to my family and starting to let go of all this.”

In his sentencing remarks, Gamble found that Leifer was unlikely to reoffend. The publicity of the case, he reasoned, meant it would be highly unlikely for her to gain access to children in a similar setting ever again – a finding the sisters rejected.

When the sisters were asked if they thought Leifer still posed a threat to young girls, Sapper responded, “We absolutely do”.

Meyer added: “That statement actually scared us because she has shown no remorse the entire process. I have looked at her so many times on the screen trying to read her, there is no remorse, so I do not believe for a minute that she would not re-offend if she has the opportunity.”

Gamble said Leifer abused the sisters at a time when they did not understand the sexual nature of the offending due to their ultra-Orthodox upbringing. He said the victims remained “ignorant in sexual matters” until marriage.

“In effect, each of them had no understanding of the sexual nature of the acts Mrs Leifer was engaging in,” Gamble said.

Gamble said the sisters had suffered at the hands of their mother before Leifer abused them. They were locked in a dark cupboard for lengthy periods, told they were no longer part of the family and dumped at a park. Food was often withheld.

“It was a miserable home life for the complainants who were starved of love and affection and left in a perpetual state of fear and confusion,” he said.

The control their mother held over them was relinquished when the Leifer intervened to request their attendance at school, school outings or at her own home. This was because of the “reverence that she [the mother] held Mrs Leifer in”, Gamble said.

Gamble said the victims gave evidence that the school was a safe haven until the sexual abuse began.

Leifer has been in custody since January 2021 when she returned to Australia, and was transported to court each day in a prison van away from public view. During the trial, she focused closely on her barrister Ian Hill, KC, and rarely looked at the jury.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19417762

File: 341a701d24ba1b7⋯.jpg (1.07 MB,3840x2560,3:2,Malka_Leifer_right_appears….jpg)

File: 4fc7360fe53c33e⋯.jpg (47.66 KB,747x500,747:500,County_Court_judge_Mark_Ga….jpg)

File: 6df9ef366ef2327⋯.jpg (2.01 MB,825x4340,165:868,Malka_Leifer_A_timeline_of….jpg)

>>19417760

3/3

Former Victorian premier Ted Baillieu and Caulfield MP David Southwick sat among the sisters’ supporters.

Southwick, who supported the sisters, said the sentence marks the end of a painful and traumatic saga for them and serves as a reminder of the work required to keep children safe.

“We must acknowledge a difficult truth: the school system utterly failed these women, who were innocent, vulnerable children when these horrendous crimes were committed against them. In the years since, they have waited and fought for justice to be served, despite years of heart-wrenching setbacks and uncertainty.”

Leifer’s charging and prosecution became an international scandal after she successfully fought attempts over several years to bring her to Australia to face the allegations by claiming she was incapable of travel due to a medical condition.

Gamble said Leifer’s lawyers in Israel successfully submitted she was unfit to stand trial, and the case was vacated, but after a police investigation of Leifer’s condition exposed allegations she was malingering, the extradition process resumed.

“It is … clear from the available evidence that Mrs Leifer exaggerated or intensified her mental health problems so as to delay and even frustrate the extradition proceedings,” Gamble said.

In June, Chief Commissioner Shane Patton confirmed that board members from Adass Israel School who allegedly helped Leifer flee to Israel were again under investigation.

A civil case brought against the school in 2015 revealed that several board members allegedly helped Leifer flee on a 1.20am flight to Israel after a meeting to discuss abuse allegations in March 2008.

“It’s amazing to think back to 2008 when the allegations first surfaced,” said Manny Waks, a childhood sexual abuse advocate who is himself a victim.

“Had those allegations been dealt with appropriately by Adass, by its leadership, then we wouldn’t be where we are today because this matter probably would have been resolved years ago.”

Justice Jack Rush found the circumstances of Leifer’s departure from Australia “extraordinary”.

“The conduct demonstrates a disdain for due process of criminal investigation in this state,” he said.

Patton said police suspended their school board investigation while separate criminal proceedings against Leifer were progressing, but reopened the probe after the verdict.

The police investigation was first discontinued in 2018 because there was “insufficient evidence to proceed with any charges at this time”. Police declined to comment on the investigation, but confirmed it was still under way. The Age is not suggesting the board members are likely to be charged.

If you need support, call the National Sexual Assault, Domestic and Family Violence Counselling Service on 1800RESPECT (1800 737 732).

https://1800respect.org.au/

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/judgment-day-for-malka-leifer-as-sentence-handed-down-over-student-sex-abuse-20230823-p5dyq7.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19427525

File: e20b3a812f23365⋯.jpg (683.62 KB,2700x2700,1:1,This_booking_photo_shows_f….jpg)

File: d83e5834b1369d2⋯.jpg (209.5 KB,750x1046,375:523,POTUS_31.jpg)

File: 5fc0fdfcfccc5b7⋯.jpg (63.38 KB,965x1065,193:213,F4Vymo9XsAAHLJV.jpg)

‘I did nothing wrong’: Donald Trump arrested over Georgia 2020 election charges

Farrah Tomazin - August 25, 2023

1/2

Atlanta, Georgia: Donald Trump has become the first former US president to have his mugshot taken as he turned himself in to face criminal charges at a Georgia jail plagued by violence, squalor and overcrowding.

In yet another extraordinary day in US presidential history, the 77-year-old Republican’s private plane touched down in Atlanta shortly after 7pm on Thursday (local time), where Trump surrendered over allegations that he was part of an alleged “criminal enterprise” designed to subvert the 2020 election results in that state.

The charges, which Trump denies, represent the fourth criminal case that he has faced in about five months.

However, in all the other cases, Trump was arraigned in court: firstly in New York over alleged hush-money payments; then in Miami over allegedly mishandling classified documents; followed by Washington, DC, over his role in trying to overturn President Joe Biden’s victory.

Here in Georgia, Trump was forced to surrender in the Fulton County Jail, an overcrowded detention centre about 20 minutes’ drive from downtown Atlanta that is so notorious it is now under investigation by the federal Justice Department.

Inside the facility, Trump was processed, fingerprinted and had his mugshot taken for the first time – something that campaign insiders were considering using to solicit donations for his bid to return to the White House.

In another first for a US president, he was also given an inmate number: P01135809.

“This is the photo that will win the 2024 presidential election,” Georgia congresswoman and Trump ally Marjorie Taylor Greene tweeted after the sheriff’s office released the photo.

The entire process lasted about 20 minutes before Trump left the jail to return to Atlanta Airport and then on to his Bedminster golf club in New Jersey.

Before taking off, he told reporters that it was a sad day for America and a “travesty of justice”.

“I did nothing wrong and everybody knows that,” he said. “They’re trying to interfere with an election. There’s never been anything like it in our country before. This is their way of campaigning.”

Hours after his visit to the jail, Trump took to X, the platform formerly known as Twitter.

“ELECTION INTERFERENCE,” he wrote, in an apparent reference to his legal woes. “NEVER SURRENDER!”

It was Trump’s first use of the platform since being kicked off it in 2021 following the riot at the Capitol that he was seen encouraging.

In an interview with axed Fox News host Tucker Carlson this week, which was designed to upstage the first Republican debate, Trump described the multiple indictments against him as “all trivia, all nonsense”.

“Bullshit, it’s all bullshit,” he said.

His surrender comes after several of his 18 alleged co-conspirators also turned themselves in, including key members of his former legal team: Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, Sidney Powell and Jenna Ellis.

Former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows was the latest to surrender for his alleged role in helping Trump to pressure Georgia officials to overturn Biden’s election victory.

The remaining co-defendants had until midday on Friday (US time) to do the same.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19427541

File: 3f500ec461bac08⋯.jpg (1.31 MB,4233x2822,3:2,Donald_Trump_s_motorcade_a….jpg)

File: 9fd0cefee7ad9b2⋯.jpg (2.82 MB,3024x4032,3:4,Virginia_Webb_of_north_eas….jpg)

>>19427525

2/2

Outside the jail ahead of his arrest, dozens of supporters began gathering around the entrance of the facility awaiting his arrival.

One man was seated opposite the main entrance of the jail with a handmade sign saying “Lock Biden Up”; another carried a sign saying “Trump Won – Save America”.

Others, such as Virginia Webb, from north-east Georgia, took a different view.

“It was almost a two-hour trip to come here, but I know how important it is,” she told this masthead, holding a sign saying, “Trump, go directly to jail”.

“Trump lost this election, but he tried to rig it, so he would get free votes here in Georgia.

“Thankfully we have elected officials – including Republican elected officials who are not afraid to stand up and do the right thing for Georgia citizens.”

Trump’s latest surrender, which was televised live on US cable networks, also threw the spotlight on the parlous state of the facility where he was to be booked.

Conditions at the Fulton County Jail are so bad that the federal justice department last month launched an investigation into “credible allegations that an incarcerated person died covered in insects and filth”.

The department raised concerns that the jail was “structurally unsafe, that prevalent violence has resulted in serious injuries and homicides, and that officers are being prosecuted for using excessive force.”

The jail is a few kilometres from the courthouse where Trump and 18 alleged co-conspirators were indicted by an Atlanta grand jury this month after a 2½-year investigation by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis.

The charges cover claims that Trump and his allies were part of a racketeering scheme that included setting up phoney electors to produce fake votes, making false representations to the courts, tampering with electronic voting machines, misusing the power of the Justice Department and pressuring state and federal officials not to certify Biden’s win.

The best-known part of the alleged scheme involves the now-infamous phone call Trump made to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, a fellow Republican, urging him to “find” the 11,780 votes he needed to put him ahead of Biden.

But 13 charges against Trump in Georgia are particularly troubling for the former president because he won’t have the power to pardon himself, should he be re-elected, as he otherwise could in a federal conviction.

The only option he would have would be to apply to Georgia’s State Board of Pardons and Paroles – and only after five years after serving his sentence.

The charges are also based on Georgia’s expansive Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organisations law – otherwise known as RICO – which is used to target mobsters involved in organised crime, such as money laundering, bribery, and drug trafficking. RICO carries a penalty of between five and 20 years in prison.

Willis has suggested she is ready to go to trial immediately and has nominated October 23 as the start date for all 19 defendants in the case.

https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/donald-trump-arrives-in-georgia-for-booking-on-2020-election-subversion-charges-20230825-p5dzc4.html

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1694886846050771321

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19427567

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19427525

Donald Trump’s mugshot a big gamble for the Democrats

ADAM CREIGHTON - AUGUST 25, 2023

Democrats have taken a big gamble in forcing Donald Trump to turn up at Fulton County Jail for finger printing and a mugshot, following the former president’s fourth indictment this year.

Never before in US history has a former president been treated like this, let alone one who is in effect the de facto opposition leader, and the frontrunner for the Republican nomination for president for 2024.

Former president Gerald Ford pardoned Richard Nixon over the Watergate scandal, explaining to the nation that he didn’t want to tear it apart politically.

Presidents following the Civil War even refrained from prosecuting military and political luminaries of the American South in the interests of national cohesion.

Democrats in this century have chosen a different path, the deliberate humiliation of a major political figure for contesting an election he lost and liaising with a handful of party officials, lawyers and bureaucrats to prepare alternative state electors if his bizarre legal theories ultimately stood up in court – which they were never going to.

Whatever the outcome of the four indictments in court rooms across America over the next few years, the Georgia mugshot will become the visual embodiment of Trump’s status as a martyr for Republicans, at the same time as it’s the symbol of his criminality for Democrats.

For many Democrats, the Georgia mugshot released on Thursday (Friday AEST) was the culmination of years of legal and political efforts to ‘get’ Donald Trump, for them the most dangerous politician in US history.

The four indictments were each brought by prosecutors with strong connections to the Democratic Party, especially in the case of New York and Georgia where the respective district attorneys had campaigned to prosecute the former president.

Naturally, Trump, speaking to reporters after his arrest, said it was a “very sad day for America”. “I thought the election was a rigged election, a stolen election, and I should have every right to do that.”

His supporters care little for the legal arguments. Trump might be a bastard, as the saying goes, but he’s their bastard, and in the US by the most prominent politician in memory who’s paid any attention the concerns of the massive lower and lower-middle class.

Trump himself sought to make the most of the ceremony of the fourth indictment, choosing to turn himself in to Fulton County Jail on Thursday evening, during prime-time broadcast hours, when he could have arrived anytime until Friday morning.

His campaign was selling US$47 tee-shirt emblazoned with his mugshot to supporters via email not even a few hours after he departed Georgia.

Could these indictments pave the way for one of the biggest political comebacks in US history?

So far, the polling isn’t auspicious for Democrats. Far from guaranteeing the end of his political career, the charges have successfully ratcheted up his political standing among Republicans to the point where he’s almost guaranteed to be the GOP nominee for president.

Next year’s primary season will be dotted with court appearance and legal arguments that will ensure the media focus remains on the trial and tribulations of Donald Trump rather than his GOP competitors who have been increasingly defined by their support for him.

After years of Covid-19 restrictions where alleged criminals were processed remotely, the Georgia process could have been handled less insultingly to a former head of state who still commands significant support.

Perhaps some Democrats are already worried the indictments won’t stick. Ironically some have started canvassing a novel constitutional theory that Trump may be ineligible to stand for president again because he allegedly participated in ‘an insurrection’.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/donald-trumps-mugshot-a-big-gamble-for-the-democrats/news-story/5d00d54f1da0b59c228aefe8c58b6716

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVsKy9urjJ0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19427643

File: bdb7d4a09b07a57⋯.jpg (228.46 KB,960x640,3:2,The_AEC_has_rebuked_Peter_….jpg)

File: 5c5007da3f88a08⋯.jpg (187.46 KB,960x640,3:2,Sample_ballot_papers_for_Y….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19417576

>>19417591

AEC ticks off Peter Dutton over ‘factually incorrect’ complaint

James Massola - August 25, 2023

1/2

The Australian Electoral Commission has rebuked Peter Dutton for making a “factually incorrect” complaint after the federal opposition leader complained that a tick on a Voice referendum ballot paper counting as a vote but a cross not counting would advantage the Yes camp.

On Thursday, Dutton called on the AEC to rethink counting ticks as a Yes vote but not counting crosses as a No vote on a referendum ballot paper – even though doing this has been standard practice for the commission in referendums for 30 years under so-called ‘savings provisions’.

As Prime Minister Anthony Albanese prepares to announce the referendum date on Wednesday – with October 14 widely expected to be named as polling day – AEC commissioner Tom Rogers this week warned that the level of mis- and disinformation online had reached new highs.

Voters will be clearly instructed to write either Yes or No on their referendum ballot papers but when they do not, the ‘savings provisions’ allow the commission to count a vote when a voter’s intention is clear.

Despite this, Dutton said that the AEC’s ruling gave the Yes campaign a clear advantage and called for the ruling to be re-thought or overturned, even suggesting that he would support legislation to make the change.

In a strongly worded statement issued on Friday, the AEC said Australians were rightly proud of their electoral system and while there was a high level of scrutiny and commentary on the looming referendum, “sometimes this commentary is immediate and based on emotion rather than the reality of the law which the AEC must administer”.

“There has been intense commentary online and in mainstream media regarding what will and will not be a formal vote for the 2023 referendum; specifically around whether or not a ‘tick’ or a ‘cross’ will be able to be counted,” the commission said.

“Much of that commentary is factually incorrect and ignores the law surrounding ‘savings provisions’; the longstanding legal advice regarding the use of ticks and crosses, and the decades-long and multi-referendum history of the application of that law and advice.

“The AEC completely and utterly rejects the suggestions by some that by transparently following the established, public and known legislative requirements we are undermining the impartiality and fairness of the referendum.”

The opposition’s legal affairs spokeswoman Michaelia Cash, however, hit back at the AEC statement and said allowing people to put a cross to denote a No vote was a “basic question of fairness”.

“If a tick counts for Yes, a cross should count for No. To do otherwise gives the Yes case an unfair advantage. The decision to treat ticks as ‘yes’ but crosses as ambiguous is a decision the AEC has made,” she said.

“Saying that there’s a savings provision is misleading. There is no savings provision that deals with ticks and crosses. The AEC says this approach is based on legal advice from the 1980s. But the Australian people have never seen that advice – and just because you’ve done something for a long time doesn’t mean it’s right.”

“The sensible thing would be to make a clear rule so that ticks and crosses are treated equally, and neither side gets an advantage.”

The AEC was asked for a copy of the legal advice.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19427650

File: 99b5eb69192926d⋯.jpg (292.45 KB,1920x1280,3:2,A_screenshot_from_Peter_Du….jpg)

>>19427643

2/2

In an interview with this masthead earlier this month, Rogers said some of the theories the AEC had seen online about the referendum being compromised were “truly nutty, tinfoil hat-wearing, bonkers conspiracy theories”.

“That doesn’t mean people can’t express those views but if they’re talking about the electoral system and trying to confuse people, it’s our job to fix it.”

The AEC has launched a campaign called stop and consider, Rogers said, to encourage people to think about the reliability of sources they accessed for election information.

ABC election analyst Antony Green suggested the No campaign may have raised concerns about crosses now to make the case that “the Yes case is getting all the advantages, with institutions all signed on” in support.

“This could have been raised earlier this year when the Referendum Act was reviewed, but no one raised this as an issue,” he said.

“The rules on what is called the ‘savings provision’, the Act says write Yes or No but the provision for formality gives leeway so that a vote with a clear intent to say Yes or No can count. So if someone writes ‘yeah’ or ‘hell no’ or ‘yessss’ or ‘no way’, that is not Yes or No but the intent is clear and it is counted.

“But when it comes to ticks and crosses there is a body of case law on the subject which rules on what the meaning of a tick and what the meaning of a cross is and it’s not all related to elections either. The AEC has solicitor-general’s advice on this. This looks perfectly sound to me.”

Despite Dutton’s insistence that an X should denote a No vote, in his 2022 election candidate nomination form he repeatedly placed an X in a box to indicate a Yes to questions about his citizenship and the country of his parents’ birth, for example.

Australian National University politics lecturer Jill Sheppard said the AEC had to deal with one of the world’s most complicated electoral systems because of compulsory voting and the preferential voting system.

“It is not an exaggeration to say they are really world-leading in election administration and we don’t give them enough credit. They export their knowledge around the world and particularly throughout Asia,” she said.

“In as much as this helps the No campaign, Peter Dutton knows what he is doing. He is pushing a narrative around complexity.”

The AEC noted in the 1999 referendum, just 0.86 per cent of votes cast were informal and of those informal votes, only a few related to people using either a tick or a cross rather than writing Yes or No on their ballot paper.

Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney said the AEC was a trusted entity in this country and the way that they are conducting this referendum is absolutely no different to previous national votes.

“The important thing is that Australians know their way around ballot papers. And this is a referendum that requires Australian people to write either ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ in the space provided. And my encouragement is to write ‘Yes’,” she said.

“Quite frankly, the AEC should be congratulated for having more people, Aboriginal people on the roll than ever before in our history, and working closely and collaboratively with people that want to see this as a fair and equitable referendum.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/aec-ticks-off-peter-dutton-over-factually-incorrect-complaint-20230825-p5dzga.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19427688

File: 79fdaa82ad37cd7⋯.jpg (162.19 KB,1927x1084,1927:1084,ABC_presenter_Leigh_Sales.jpg)

File: 2dd2b66fac303cc⋯.jpg (227.28 KB,2048x1152,16:9,ABC_Media_Watch_host_Paul_….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19333351

ABC management and Leigh Sales intervene in debate on Uluru Statement and argue it's a ‘one-page document’

SOPHIE ELSWORTH - AUGUST 25, 2023

1/2

ABC management and top journalist Leigh Sales have instructed staff at the public broadcaster that the Uluru Statement from the Heart is a “one-page document” and given them tactics to quash any arguments contrary to this.

The intervention from Sales and ABC management comes days after the broadcaster’s Media Watch program criticised attempts to label an editorial from Sky News host Peta Credlin arguing that the Uluru Statement was 26 pages long as “false information” on Facebook.

In correspondence sent by ABC management on Thursday, editorial policy chief Mark Maley said he wanted to “pass on some advice from one of the ABC’s best interviewers, Leigh Sales” on how to handle misinformation in interviews, including the length of the Uluru statement.

In the email, the former 7.30 host said a recent ­example of misinformation was “the claim that the Uluru statement is a 26-page document”.

“That is inaccurate”, she said. “The Uluru Statement from the Heart is a one-page document.”

The Uluru statement’s length has become a fierce topic of debate between pro and anti-voice camps. Pro-voice advocates, including Anthony Albanese, have derided claims it is more than one page; No supporters – including Credlin and opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman ­Jacinta Nampijinpa Price – point to FOI documents and statements from voice proponents to back claims it is 26 pages.

Sales even provides an exact script to ABC presenters and reporters on how to shut down the claim it is 26 pages long and counter No camp complaints of bias.

In the email, she told ABC staff that the “source of this misinformation is an FOI search relating to the Uluru statement which produced 25 pages of minutes from meetings held with Indigenous communities”.

“These were part of a consultation process that helped to inform the final – one-page – Uluru statement,” Sales wrote.

“Those pages do not form part of the final Uluru statement.”

Sales’s claims are at odds with Media Watch host Paul Barry, who on Monday said a “disputed” label should have been put on Credlin’s editorial that the Uluru statement is 26 pages long.

“The Uluru statement is expressed on one page, but there are many more pages of notes and background – where matters like a treaty and reparations are raised,” Barry said on Media Watch.

“And given that there may be some point in what Credlin is saying, we think a disputed label would be more appropriate.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19427702

File: bd6a6a4c4e73659⋯.jpg (322.68 KB,1940x1091,1940:1091,RMIT_FactLab_and_RMIT_ABC_….jpg)

>>19427688

2/2

In the email to staff, Sales said “journalists should not be afraid to stand up for the facts and correct misinformation”.

“It can be intimidating to do this live or to find a clear set of words under pressure,” she said.

Sales outlined phrases on what to say to interviewees if the 26-page Uluru claim arose.

“Ms X, respectfully, I’ll correct your claim that the Uluru statement is a 26-page document.

“It is a one-page document, the other 25 pages were minutes collected during a consultation phase that do not form part of the final document.”

Sales said the journalist should then “move on … to your next question”.

She said if the interviewee attacked the ABC journalist, including calling them “biased”, they should then say things such as “It is inaccurate to ­suggest I am correcting the record ­because the ABC is ‘biased’ ” or “The ABC is far from the only ­organisation to call out the spread of this misinformation”.

An ABC spokeswoman said “The email to staff is self-explanatory and we have nothing further to add”.

Sales was contacted for comment.

The RMIT University’s Fact­Lab, which deemed Credlin’s reporting that the Uluru statement was 26 pages as “false information”, earlier in the week explained on its website that it worked “hand in hand” with RMIT ABC Fact Check.

However, The Australian can reveal FactLab has completely overhauled its website since, removing the “hand in hand” reference, deleting images of the RMIT FactLab’s staff and having no mention of the ABC on its homepage.

The website has also slapped on a disclaimer at the top of its homepage: “To keep up with the rapidly changing media landscape, we’re always updating our website. Stay tuned!”

The RMIT ABC Fact Check and RMIT FactLab are both run by director Russell Skelton but he too has been removed from the FactLab’s homepage.

An RMIT spokeswoman on Thursday said the website was “regularly reviewed to ensure staff, students and the public have access to the most up to date information about the university’s operations”.

“FactLab is an RMIT-operated research hub dedicated to debunking misinformation online and developing critical awareness about its origins and spread,” she said.

“RMIT ABC Fact Check is a jointly funded partnership between RMIT University and the ABC, dedicated to determining the accuracy of claims by politicians, public figures, advocacy groups and institutions.”

The FactCheck quashing Credlin’s claim the Statement was 26 pages long this week added an editor’s note: “This article was updated on August 20 to include up-to-date information, including quotes from Professor Megan Davis, to provide more context”.

Voice architect Professor Davis publicly said at the Sydney Peace Price last year that the statement was more than one page but has in recent weeks said the Uluru statement is “one page. It’s that simple.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/abc-management-and-leigh-sales-intervene-in-debate-on-uluru-statement-and-argue-its-a-onepage-document/news-story/09f20c067c906b0fd3df43d7afbb7aa3

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

4b174f No.19427708

File: b2f064494fad106⋯.png (354.42 KB,685x364,685:364,ClipboardImage.png)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19427747

File: 7fbac06f831d38e⋯.jpg (95.3 KB,1280x720,16:9,ABC_presenter_Leigh_Sales.jpg)

File: cab46b51c45c5de⋯.jpg (134.48 KB,1416x797,1416:797,Jacinta_Nampijinpa_Price_w….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19333351

>>19427688

Edict over Uluru statement a step too far, says ABC host Tom Switzer

SOPHIE ELSWORTH - AUGUST 25, 2023

ABC Radio National presenter Tom Switzer says it’s “highly ­inappropriate” that the public broadcaster issued an edict to staff on what to say in a debate disputing that the Uluru Statement from the Heart is longer than a one-page document.

On Friday, The Australian ­revealed that ABC management and top journalist Leigh Sales told staff that the Uluru statement was a single-page document. Sales ­offered numerous tactics on ­addressing any arguments in ­opposition to this.

Switzer, who hosts the ­Between the Lines program on Radio ­National, said the ABC and individual staff members should not be arbiters on what is right and wrong in debate.

“Why should the ABC or any media outlet issue edicts to staff on highly contentious issues where opinion among even ABC staffers varies?” he said.

“Neither CBS nor the BBC would have solicited legends Walter Cronkite and Andrew Neil, ­respectively, to give rules to staff on what can or cannot be said about highly contentious ­issues. No one journalist is the foundation of all wisdom.”

Switzer said he was recently given direction that he must apply tougher scrutiny to opponents of the voice.

“The ABC seems more concerned about the voice debate than any other public policy issue,” he said. “I’ve been told to subject critics of the voice to more scrutiny yet the same ­direction has been lost on many of my ABC colleagues when they interview Yes supporters.”

In correspondence sent by ABC management on Thursday, editorial policy chief Mark Maley told staff he wanted to “pass on some advice from one of the ABC’s best interviewers, Leigh Sales” on tactics on how to handle misinformation in interviews, particularly surrounding the length of the Uluru Statement from the Heart.

“A common way for misinformation to occur is if inaccuracies or errors are stated in an interview as accepted facts and ­allowed to pass unchallenged,” he wrote in the email.

Sales, a former 7.30 host, provided further information about the Uluru statement, including the “claim that the Uluru statement is a 26-page document”.

“This is inaccurate,” she said. “The Uluru Statement from the Heart is a one-page document.”

The claims come after the ABC Media Watch program criticised attempts to shut down Sky News host Peta Credlin’s arguments that the statement is 26 pages.

Media Watch host Paul Barry said a “disputed” claim should have been put on a Credlin editorial posted on Sky News’s Facebook page, not “false information”.

Switzer said the ABC’s conduct was inappropriate. “To rule out definitively any disagreement is to act like an arbiter for the government,” he said.

The advice offered by Sales includes: “Ms X, respectfully, I’ll correct your claim that the Uluru Statement is a 26-page document. It is a one-page document, the other 25 pages were minutes collected during a consultation phase that do not form part of the final document.”

A spokeswoman said the ABC stood “by the information in the email, which is about using factual information to counter misinformation and errors, not to ‘close down debate’.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/edict-over-uluru-statement-a-step-too-far-says-abc-host-tom-switzer/news-story/80f0c85e915d7aa1988143230ee66815

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19427786

File: fb8fc037e543650⋯.jpg (416.29 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Sisters_Nicole_Meyer_Elly_….jpg)

>>19417697

Malka Leifer sentencing: No remorse as law catches up with a callous predator

CAMERON STEWART and ANGELICA SNOWDEN - AUGUST 24, 2023

1/2

As it dawned on Malka Leifer that she would spend another six years in an Australian jail, her head began to rock from side to side and a tear glistened on her cheek.

But it looked more like hollow self-pity from the convicted sex ­offender than remorse for the repeated rape and abuse of two ­former students of the ultra-­orthodox Jewish school where she was once the principal.

As Judge Mark Gamble said on handing Leifer a 15-year sentence, the 56-year-old has never shown any regret for her abuse and still insists she is innocent of all 18 sexual assault charges against her.

“I am not convinced Ms Leifer has in any way reformed,” he told Melbourne’s County Court.

He said Leifer’s repeated assaults on the students between 2004 and 2008 while she was principal of Melbourne’s Adass Israel school was a case of “callous” and deliberate grooming of highly vulnerable young women who were “completely ignorant about sexual matters”.

“This case is striking for just how vulnerable these victims were, and for the calculating way in which the offender, Ms Leifer, took callous advantage of those vulnerabilities in order to sexually abuse them for her own sexual gratification,” Judge Gamble said.

“It was predatory in nature involving the exploitation of two (women) over whom she had total control (and) it has had a devastating impact on each victim.”

As he spoke, the victims – sisters Dassi Erlich and Elly Sapper – sat in the court alongside their other sister, Nicole Meyer, each casting an occasional glance at Leifer who appeared via video from prison.

Leifer, who wore a black headdress, listened to the proceedings with her head cocked sideways and her hand covering her chin and mouth.

As the size of her sentence became apparent, the sisters in court could not help but smile, as much from relief as anything.

Their 13-year international quest for justice – which involved prime ministers, extradition, appeals and endless setbacks – had finally delivered the verdict they once feared they would never get.

“We wondered if this day would ever come … it’s quite unbelievable that we have got here,” Ms Erlich said outside the court.

“We are here today because we did not give up. And while we know that the onus of justice should not be up to survivors, this fight was never just for us.

“We are showing that the voices of survivors will not and cannot be silenced. This has been one of the most traumatising, destabilising and awful, painful paths to justice, but today really marks the end to this chapter of our lives,” she said.

Judge Gamble said the seriousness of the charges warranted a ­serious sentence. The jail term of 15 years with a non-parole period of 11½ years means Leifer will serve almost another six years after taking into account the 5½ years she has already served in jail in both Israel and Australia. She will be eligible for parole in June 2029.

The judge said his sentence took into account the “onerous” impact of jail on Ms Leifer. He said that as the only ultra-orthodox Jewish inmate of the Dame Phyllis Frost Centre in west Melbourne, she was an “isolated figure” who was cut off from all aspects of her life including her family, culture, religion and language.

He cited a character reference provided by one of Leifer’s former Adass Israel School colleagues, Malky Fixler, as saying Leifer, who has been in a prison since she was extradited from Israel in January 2020, was ”a depressed shadow of her former self”.

Judge Gamble said she was suffering from PTSD from prison life and was on medication for depression and anxiety.

He said when Leifer was eventually released from prison she would likely be deported because she had no Australian visa and that she had expressed a desire to return to Israel.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19427790

File: 28bb706bf69d6b5⋯.jpg (351.98 KB,1754x2337,1754:2337,Monochrome_court_sketch_of….jpg)

>>19427786

2/2

Leifer was found guilty of 18 charges out of 27 by a County Court jury in April, including rape, indecent assault and sexual penetration of a 16 or 17-year-old.

Judge Gamble went into explicit detail about each charge in court, saying the sisters’ sheltered upbringing in a strict ultra-orthodox Adass family meant they had no understanding of what Leifer was doing to them.

He said Leifer knew this and exploited the vulnerabilities of the girls, abusing them at the school, in her home and at a school camp.

He said the sisters had both expressed guilt about what happened to them but that this was misplaced. “They were completely innocent victims of the predatory behaviour of Ms Leifer and it is she and she alone who should feel guilty and ashamed,” he said.

Leifer was acquitted of all five charges relating to Ms Meyer, plus another three charges of indecent assault and one of rape that related to Ms Erlich.

Ms Meyer, who says she still struggles with the non-guilty verdicts in relation to the alleged abuse against her, stood side-by-side with her sisters in court, and also outside the building as they faced the media.

Ms Meyer said she felt a “huge intake of relief in the courtroom”.

“Our expectations were so low because female perpetrators are so under-reported. We just felt very grateful that we actually felt validated in that moment. It was almost unbelievable at the same time,” she said.

Asked if she believed Leifer was still a threat to children after Judge Gamble said her risk of reoffending was negligible, Ms Meyer said she thought she was.

“That statement actually scared us. She has shown no remorse the entire process. I do not believe for a minute that she would not reoffend if she had the opportunity to.”

Earlier, Ms Meyer recounted a timeline of Leifer’s flight from justice in 2008, saying it had been 15 years since she has been “aided and abetted” to flee Melbourne and escape justice.

“(It’s been) 12 years since we went into the police station and broke through the walls of silence in our community and found a choice we didn’t know we had,” she said.

“(It has been) six years since we stood in front of the world and fought for justice, reaching the highest levels of government in Australia and Israel.”

Leifer was sent to Israel from Australia in 2008 by the school board after it learned of allegations against her. Members of the Adass Israel school board gathered at the home of businessman Izzy Herzog on March 5, 2008, after they discovered Leifer was accused of abusing at least nine separate victims.

Present were Yitzhok Benedikt and Mark Ernst, barrister Norman Rosenbaum (now deceased), forensic psychologist Vicki Gordon and teacher Sharon Bromberg. Instead of reporting the allegations to police, they bought Leifer a ticket to Israel and she fled the country at 1.20am the following morning – an act which former Supreme Court justice Jack Rush described as “deplorable”.

During her time in Israel, Leifer was jailed and placed under house arrest but she repeatedly delayed her extradition, claiming she was mentally unfit for trial.

Judge Gamble condemned her for exaggerating or “intensifying” her adjustment disorder, saying she was “personally responsible for delaying the proceedings and extending her time under house arrest.

Leifer was finally returned to Melbourne in January 2020, after repeated attempts to delay extradition proceedings.

In June this year, Victoria Police backflipped on a previous decision and reopened its investigation into the former school board for its role in helping ­ Leifer flee ­Australia.

As Ms Erlich said after the sentence: “Trauma from sexual abuse is a lifelong sentence.

“In that courtroom today I felt the pain of my younger self that went through that abuse.

“While no amount of years will ever be sufficient, we are so relieved that Malka Leifer is now in prison for 15 years and cannot prey on anyone else.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/malka-leifer-sentencing-no-remorse-as-law-catches-up-with-a-callous-predator/news-story/34c2a5ad1e94a3b1ff9e919a6f16e170

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19427870

File: bab88583e4d4f9e⋯.jpg (3.15 MB,5000x3752,625:469,Dassi_Erlich_left_Elly_Sap….jpg)

File: c5f91523d2864aa⋯.jpg (3.27 MB,5000x3752,625:469,TV_crews_crowded_outside_t….jpg)

File: 19e1283e872b6c2⋯.jpg (2.95 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,David_Southwick_was_involv….jpg)

>>19417697

Elly Sapper, Dassi Erlich and Nicole Meyer speak after Malka Leifer's sentencing

Judd Boaz - 25 August 2023

1/2

Sequestered in a hotel room together on Thursday afternoon, Elly Sapper, Nicole Meyer and Dassi Erlich finally allowed the emotions of the day to sink in.

Earlier, the three sisters had walked through the doors of the County Court in Melbourne's CBD, the eye of a media storm made up of dozens of camera people and reporters from every major news organisation in the country.

Malka Leifer, their former school principal at Adass Israel School, had just been sentenced to 15 years in jail over 18 sexual offences against Ms Sapper and Ms Erlich.

Leifer was cleared by jurors of charges relating to Ms Meyer in April.

Hours after sentencing and media frenzy, Ms Sapper told ABC Melbourne radio that she was simply lying on the bed in her hotel room, "allowing the magnitude of the emotions" to come over her for the first time that day.

"Hearing those words, 15 years, I breathed a huge sigh of relief," she said.

Next to Ms Sapper was her sister Dassi, who experienced a sense of validation alongside relief.

"While no sentence really can validate what we've been through, we do feel grateful for the sentence that Malka Leifer received today, we feel that it does in some part validate the abuse that we've been through," Ms Erlich said.

It's a wait for validation that has lasted nearly two decades.

The three sisters came forward to accuse Leifer of abusing her position of authority to sexually abuse them between 2003 and 2007.

The sisters claimed the 56-year-old isolated and sexually abused them on campus, at school camps and in her home.

Since the abuse allegations came to light, the sisters have endured a long battle through the justice system, hampered by Leifer's flight to Israel, multiple court appearances and a delayed extradition process.

"The harder we were resisted against, the harder we fought," Ms Meyer said.

"When people started jumping on that train as well and giving us support, both locally — the outer Jewish community, Melbourne, Australia and across the world — that gave us the strength to keep going even through those incredibly tough times where we looked at each other and said 'will she ever come back?'

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19427882

File: 905e8c752d4edef⋯.jpg (2.83 MB,5000x3752,625:469,The_sisters_quest_for_just….jpg)

File: caa221b3b7700c3⋯.jpg (2.2 MB,3333x5000,3333:5000,Cathy_Kezelman_says_it_was….jpg)

File: dbd5e28068fb2e1⋯.jpg (257.72 KB,1000x787,1000:787,If_you_or_anyone_you_know_….jpg)

>>19427870

2/2

A community bound together in support of the three sisters

Outside the hotel room, allies and friends of the sisters from across Australia emerged to voice their support for the trio, and credit the three for their courage.

Member for Caulfield David Southwick has been an ally of the three sisters over the course of their fight for justice.

In 2017, the Liberal MP brought a petition with 17,000 signatures calling for the extradition of Leifer to Israeli politicians.

But Mr Southwick said members of the community from all sides of politics had joined together to support the sisters.

"It doesn't matter who you are and where you come from, when you see the pain and suffering that innocent women have had to go through from a perpetrator like Malka Leifer, then you do everything you possibly can to bring justice," Mr Southwick said.

"Today, justice has been served."

He said the sentencing had given the Jewish community closure, and praised the sisters for their courage in speaking out against abuse.

"The credit should all go to Dassi, Nicole, and Elly and what they've done in being able to bring justice and closure to this horrific situation," Mr Southwick said.

"The three brave sisters persisted through a really, really difficult time, and did what many people just don't do — speak out."

Sentence helps sisters avoid constant 'reliving' of trauma

For the most part, Leifer was stone-faced as her sentence was read out, appearing via video link from jail.

But the smiles on the faces of Ms Sapper, Ms Erlich and Ms Meyer outside the courtroom following the sentencing revealed the true sense of relief and closure the day had brought.

Cathy Kezelman is the president of the Blue Knot Foundation, the National Centre of Excellence for Complex Trauma, and said a resolution to the years long ordeal would bring an end to a cycle of trauma.

"Every time there's a delay and another legal obstruction, it puts victims back into the space of the trauma, reliving it," Dr Kezelman said.

"The very essence of having to prove that you're a victim, time and time again — reliving the memories, reliving the angst, reliving the distress, reliving the sense of helplessness and hopelessness — it's incredibly traumatic.

"As victims, no sentence will ever repair a childhood that's been snatched away, or opportunity that's been lost because of the challenges of the cumulative trauma that people experience," Dr Kezelman said.

"But 15 years is a substantial time, and it's great to see that even people in positions of authority are made to step up to the plate and be accountable."

With Leifer now sentenced, Ms Sapper said now would be the time for herself and her family to heal.

"Healing for myself looks like focusing more on my family and my career and what I'm passionate about, without having Leifer at the forefront," she said.

Leifer will not be eligible for parole until June 2029.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-08-25/malka-leifer-sentencing-reactions-dassi-erlich-elly-sapper/102771868

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19427909

File: b9e69a151a64679⋯.jpg (1.14 MB,2276x1517,2276:1517,Ben_Roberts_Smith_departs_….jpg)

>>19220746

>>19417651

Police, war crimes investigators seek access to documents in Roberts-Smith case

Michaela Whitbourn - August 25, 2023

The Australian Federal Police and war crimes investigators are seeking access to restricted documents from Ben Roberts-Smith’s failed defamation case amid dozens of active investigations into allegations that Australian soldiers broke the rules of engagement in Afghanistan.

Federal Court Justice Anthony Besanko revealed in a judgment on Friday that the Commonwealth had applied for changes to national security orders to allow the AFP and the Office of the Special Investigator to seek access to sensitive court documents. This would include transcripts of parts of the trial heard behind closed doors and documents tendered during those hearings.

The OSI is the agency investigating war crimes allegations against Australian soldiers in Afghanistan.

In a historic decision on June 1, Besanko dismissed Roberts-Smith’s multimillion-dollar defamation case against The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age.

Besanko found the newspapers had proven to the civil standard – on the balance of probabilities – that Roberts-Smith was a war criminal who was complicit in the murder of four unarmed prisoners in Afghanistan. He also found the news outlets had proven the former Special Air Service corporal had bullied a fellow soldier.

Roberts-Smith’s lawyers filed a notice of appeal in the Federal Court in July. The former soldier is appealing against the whole of Besanko’s judgment, and is seeking in particular to overturn damning findings that he murdered unarmed prisoners in Afghanistan.

Besanko said the OSI’s director of investigations, Ross Barnett, had advised in an affidavit filed in court that the agency was “currently conducting a number of joint investigations with the AFP into the alleged commission of criminal offences under Australian law arising from or related to breaches of the law of armed conflict by members of the ADF in Afghanistan from 2005 to 2016”.

“The joint investigations are collectively known as Operation Emerald,” Besanko said.

Besanko said Barnett had given evidence that “Operation Emerald currently consists of approximately 40 investigations”, all of which were active, although “the level of investigative focus varies across the investigations from time to time”.

“Criminal offences of the kind being investigated are extremely grave and their thorough investigation is of national and international importance,” Besanko said.

Besanko said the OSI’s director of investigations was “able to say that there is an overlap between the subject matter of the investigations and the subject matter of the defamation proceedings”.

Roberts-Smith’s lawyers applied to have a new judge decide the Commonwealth’s application for changes to national security orders, which were made in Roberts-Smith’s case in 2020 to protect sensitive information, and a separate application by the OSI for access to the court documents.

The former soldier’s application was made on the grounds of apprehended bias, which is not an allegation that a judge is, in fact, biased. It involves a consideration of whether a “fair-minded observer” might reasonably consider that a judge might not bring an impartial mind to resolving a matter.

“I consider the circumstances of this case are unusual, particularly in light of the strong findings I have made against [Roberts-Smith]. I have reached the conclusion … that the fair-minded lay observer might reasonably apprehend that I might not bring an impartial mind to the resolution of the Commonwealth’s applications (emphasis in original),” Besanko said in his decision on Friday.

He ordered that the Commonwealth’s application and the OSI’s request for access to documents “be referred to another judge for hearing and determination”.

“The legal test for apprehended bias does not involve an examination by the judge of his or her state of mind or tendencies,” Besanko said. “The issue is assessed and resolved by the use of a legal construct of the fair-minded observer or hypothetical reasonable observer to whom the law attributes certain characteristics, including a fair and reasonable approach.”

https://www.theage.com.au/national/police-war-crimes-investigators-seek-access-to-documents-in-roberts-smith-case-20230825-p5dzf9.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19427933

File: 4d92a434074ce84⋯.jpg (91.69 KB,1200x675,16:9,Milton_Orkopoulos_was_foun….jpg)

>>18965915 (pb)

'You ruined me': Orkopoulos victims reveal abuse trauma

William Ton - 25 August 2023

A pedophile former NSW politician who destroyed the lives of the young boys he abused has been confronted with the torment his victims face daily as a result of his actions.

In April, Milton Orkopoulos was found guilty on 26 charges of sexual offending against four underage boys and supplying them with drugs between 1993 and 2003.

Some of the offences were committed during his stint as a state MP.

"The life I wanted and deserved is so different to the life I got dealt because of what you did and the drugs you gave me," one survivor said in his victim impact statement.

Motivated by his sexual desire for young boys, the now 66-year-old opportunistically groomed his vulnerable victims by introducing them to cannabis before moving onto harder drugs like heroin.

He would apologise to them later when the sexual activity got too rough or painful.

A man abused as an 11-year-old, when Orkopoulous was 35, told of how his life changed forever and he didn't think he could get through life at times due to the abuse.

"I felt not wanted anywhere and would spend a lot of time on the streets, sometimes in dangerous situations and often had no food or money," he said in a victim impact statement read out in Downing Centre District Court on Friday.

"I've blamed myself and I've hated myself."

Another victim, who was 12 to 13 years old at the time of the offending, detailed the long list of issues he had suffered as a result of Orkopoulos's actions, including developing trust issues and rebelling against authority.

He told of his suicidal thoughts and relationship breakdowns with family and friends.

"My family didn't understand why I had changed because I did not confide in them," he said in his statement.

"I was alone with my trauma and basically tore my family apart and ruined my own life."

A third victim, whose grandmother took him to see the MP to discuss the boy's behaviour, told of how that fateful encounter resulted in a life of drug abuse and years in prison.

"My nan took me to see you as she thought you were someone to trust.

"She carried guilt and would say, 'where did I go wrong?', but I couldn't tell her what you did to me.

"You and the juvenile justice experience ruined me. It gave me a dirty taste of what was to come."

The 66-year-old was elected as the Labor member for the state seat of Swansea, in the NSW Hunter region, from 1999 until 2006, including a brief stint as a minister from 2005.

Then-premier Morris Iemma dismissed Orkopoulos in November 2006 after he was charged with a first round of offences, including child prostitution, sexual assault and using taxpayer money to pay a teenage boy for sex.

He was sentenced to 13 years and 11 months in jail in 2008 after being convicted of 28 offences relating to sexual assault of a minor, indecent assault and supplying heroin and cannabis.

He will be sentenced for the latest set of charges on November 17.

1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732)

https://www.1800respect.org.au/

National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service (1800 211 028)

https://fullstop.org.au/get-help/our-services

Lifeline (13 11 14)

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

Beyond Blue (1300 22 4636)

https://www.beyondblue.org.au/

https://thewest.com.au/news/crime/you-ruined-me-orkopoulos-victims-reveal-abuse-trauma-c-11702688

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19427976

File: b7097caea1af7c0⋯.jpg (2.31 MB,4928x3280,308:205,Cardinal_George_Pell_durin….jpg)

File: ee4b33044c239d7⋯.jpg (412.5 KB,1472x2000,92:125,George_Pell_in_Sydney_in_2….jpg)

>>19320928

Catholic Church loses bid to restrict family’s lawsuit against Pell and church

David Estcourt - August 25, 2023

The Catholic Church has lost a bid to restrict the family members of victims of child abuse by clergy from bringing civil cases against the institution.

The Court of Appeal on Friday rejected the church’s attempt to overturn a decision made by the Supreme Court in August last year that the father of a former choirboy who prosecutors had alleged was sexually abused by George Pell is entitled to sue the church.

The decision paves the way for affected family members of other victims to sue the church over the impact of their abuse.

The father alleged he had endured harm and suffering as a result of his son’s death, which he attributes to the actions of Pell.

Shine Lawyers senior associate Gabrielle Verhagen said the Catholic Church had sought to limit those who could bring actions against it to only those who had experienced the abuse themselves. She encouraged the church to not appeal against the decision in the High Court.

“I think [our client] and their family have been through enough, and we would appeal to them [the church] to not do that [appeal to the High Court],” Verhagen said.

“The justice system is recognising that it is not just the immediate effect of the abuse, but it has a ripple effect and does affect family, and does affect loved ones, and they deserve justice as well.

“This is a momentous decision.”

Pell was found guilty in 2018 by a County Court jury of abusing two teenage choirboys in Melbourne’s St Patrick’s Cathedral after a Sunday Mass in December 1996. Those convictions were quashed by the High Court in 2020 and Pell was released from prison after more than a year in custody. He died in January.

One of the choirboys died in his 30s in 2014 from an accidental heroin overdose, having never made a complaint against Pell. The deceased man’s father, referred to in court under the pseudonym RWQ, lodged a civil case in the Supreme Court in June 2020.

The archdiocese had argued that RWQ was not entitled to pursue civil action against it because the Legal Identity of Defendants Act, passed in 2018, made the church liable for financial compensation for damage inflicted only on abuse survivors, as “primary victims”, and not their families as “secondary victims”.

The three appeals court judges agreed with the Supreme Court judge, Michael McDonald, that the father is entitled to bring action under legislation passed by the Victorian government to allow family members to pursue claims as people affected by the abuse.

“Having considered the words, context and purpose of the act, we therefore consider that the judge’s construction was correct,” the appeals judges found.

The deceased choirboy’s father told The Age in 2019 that his son had become withdrawn as a teenager, had problems at school and began using drugs. As an adult, he did stints in jail.

RWQ now claims he suffered psychological harm, including anxiety, a depressed mood and a bereavement disorder. He claims he has endured injury, loss and damage, which include past and future medical costs.

He also claims Pell “was not a fit and proper person to serve as a priest, nor as archbishop of Melbourne”, and that the archdiocese breached its duty of care by failing to protect children.

The passing of the Legal Identity of Defendants Act closed a loophole for the church to avoid financial liability under the so-called Ellis defence, named after John Ellis, a former altar boy abused by a priest.

His case for compensation failed when the church successfully argued in a NSW court that it could not be sued as it did not exist in a legal sense because property assets were held in a trust immune to lawsuits.

While serving as archbishop of Sydney, Pell backed the use of the legal strategy when the church defended civil claims made by abuse victims. It is estimated the strategy saved the church from paying out many millions of dollars to abuse survivors.

A spokesperson for the Melbourne Archdiocese acknowledged the decision and said it would consider the implications in coming days.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/catholic-church-loses-bid-to-restrict-family-s-lawsuit-against-pell-and-church-20230825-p5dzc3.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19434487

File: 0245996f1d43533⋯.jpg (413.21 KB,2048x1536,4:3,US_President_Joe_Biden_Dr_….jpg)

File: 3eec7114ff0c05e⋯.jpg (344.08 KB,2048x1152,16:9,An_officer_stands_guard_as….jpg)

File: ab90e29bb57f461⋯.jpg (163.07 KB,1280x720,16:9,The_Pentagon_National_Cent….jpg)

>>19262682

Biden’s probe censored Covid ‘smoking gun’

The US President’s probe into the origins of Covid-19 censored the input of Pentagon scientists who concluded the virus was most likely genetically engineered.

SHARRI MARKSON - 26 August 2023

US President Joe Biden’s 90-day probe into the origins of Covid-19 censored the input of intelligence agency scientists who concluded the virus was most likely genetically engineered.

Mr Biden ordered the Intelligence Community in May 2021 to give him an assessment into how the pandemic began after revelations, first published by The Australian, that researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology had been hospitalised with Covid-like symptoms in November 2019 in the suspected first cluster of the pandemic.

When the report was published it concluded that most intelligence agencies assessed the virus, even if it had leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, was natural rather than manipulated in a laboratory

The Australian can reveal that this was not the assessments made by the four groups within the intelligence agencies that actually engaged in scientific analysis, who concurred that there was either a highly likely or reasonable chance the virus was genetically engineered.

At least 90 per cent of the work from one of those agencies — the Pentagon’s top intelligence group — was censored in the final report and Defence Department scientists were told to stop working with the FBI on their findings.

Scientists at the Defense Intelligence Agency’s National Centre for Medical Intelligence (DIA NCMI) had conducted rigorous research on the genomic sequence of the virus and firmly concluded that it was, most likely, a laboratory construct.

Well-placed sources familiar with the work that unfolded inside the intelligence agency and their interactions with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence for the 90-day probe spoke to The Australian for this investigation.

Covid-19 origin ‘smoking gun’

Their internal research at the Pentagon-based agency led to a finding that was described internally as a “smoking gun.”

One of the scientists discovered that the size and location of a fragment of Covid-19 resembled the same fragment in Wuhan Institute of Virology research from more than a decade earlier, in 2008. It was the same technique that the WIV had used in grant applications to make chimeric viruses.

“This paper is the smoking gun of everything. When the team reviewed this data, they thought ‘This is created in the lab. It’s a reverse genetics construct,” a source said.

But their input into the 90-day origins probe was censored.

Sources close to the inquiry estimated that about 90 per cent of the DIA NCMI edits were deleted or censored or simply weren’t included.

“They said the information was too technical to include in the ODNI assessment,” a source familiar with the process told The Australian.

“When the scientists saw the final document, they wondered were did all their edits go?”

They had been working with the FBI’s Weapons of Mass Destruction unit, until the co-operation between the two agencies was blocked, with a director at the Defense Intelligence Agency claiming the FBI was “off the reservation” on the topic of the origins of Covid-19.

The 90-day study also ignored coronavirus gain-of-function research underway in Wuhan and there was a lack of genomic data analysis.

The scientific team inside the DIA thought the 90-day report was scientifically inaccurate, according to sources familiar with the inquiry.

“There was a lot of erroneous information. There was no genomic analysis in the ODNI report, nothing about the rare codons or the poly basic cleavage site and the minimal cassette that is similar to prior work published by WIV scientists. This virus also had no apparent mutational signatures,” a source involved in the inquiry said.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/covid19-origin-joe-bidens-wuhan-probe-censored-pentagon-scientists-who-concluded-it-was-genetically-engineered/news-story/25dc85912c348e009ced79f69acc8e2e

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19434533

File: 549b8ab5528923a⋯.jpg (256.66 KB,1506x1129,1506:1129,The_origins_of_the_Covid_1….jpg)

File: be7797ac3727159⋯.jpg (160.69 KB,1024x768,4:3,Joe_Biden_left_and_the_US_….jpg)

>>19262682

>>19434487

Decade-old Wuhan clue that proved Covid’s origin

As secret US labs scrambled to crack the source of Covid-19, one scientist stumbled upon a fragment that led directly to the Chinese lab.

SHARRI MARKSON - 26 August 2023

1/4

Buried away inside one of the US intelligence agencies’ secret laboratories, a group of eminent scientists examined the structure of Covid-19 in order to determine its origin.

At the same time, another group of scientists, these ones happy to shape public opinion via social media, were fashioning a very different narrative, determined to turn the world’s gaze from the experimental lab in the middle of the ground-zero city – Wuhan.

While Anthony Fauci and his like-minded scientific foot-­soldiers were quickly latching on to and publicly endorsing a theory that the virus had a natural origin, keenly dismissing any talk of a lab leak as a conspiracy, these other, far less conspicuous scientists were quietly reaching a conclusion that was poles apart.

The scientists who wrote what is regarded as the seminal research on the natural origin theory – the Proximal Origins paper – have ­received global recognition, some amassing hundreds of thousands of social media followers.

But the scientists at the ­Defence ­Intelligence Agency’s National Centre for Medical Intelligence (NCMI) remain unknown and their endeavours to uncover the origins of Covid-19 have gone publicly unrecognised.

Worse, there have even been attempts, at the highest levels of the US government to censor them and keep their discoveries secret.

Unlike the Proximal Origins paper, downloaded and cited millions of times, their papers – some top secret, others unclassified – ­remain tucked away behind the impenetrable walls of Fort Detrick, Maryland.

Today, for the first time, we hear their extraordinary story and reveal the lengths taken to hide from the public their categorical discovery and scientific conclusions. Sources familiar with the work that unfolded inside the ­intelligence agency and the scientists’ interactions with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence spoke to The Australian for this investigation.

‘Evidence is there’

Stripped of scientific complexity, these highly experienced ­researchers conclude that Covid-19 was almost certainly the result of experiments in a lab, and was not of natural origin as the world has been led to believe.

They made a discovery that was ­described internally as a smoking gun.

One of the scientists discovered that the size and location of a fragment of Covid-19 resembled a fragment in Wuhan Institute of Virology research from more than a decade earlier, in 2008. It ­involved the same technique the Wuhan institute used in grant ­applications to make chimeric ­viruses. “This paper is the smoking gun of everything. When the team reviewed this data, they thought ‘This is created in the lab. It’s a ­reverse genetics construct’,” a source said.

Robert Greg Cutlip is a senior research scientist who had been employed by the DIA from 2010 to 2021 and is currently employed by the Institute for Defence Analyses. He has more than 30 years’ experience in lab-based biological and physiological research. He was a member of the coronavirus taskforce, providing intelligence to the president, and has written more than 60 peer-reviewed abstracts and book chapters.

He worked with Commander Jean-Paul Chretien, who led the pandemic warning team at the NCMI. Previously he worked as a senior policy ­adviser for biodefence in the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy.

Joining them in their endeavours was John Hardham, a Navy Reserve captain who specialises in chemical and biological defence programs and has served on several National Academies of Science committees. Hardham is a coronavirus expert who has ­licensed several coronavirus ­vaccines and worked directly with viral reverse genetics systems. He was on loan to the NCMI in late 2019.

Early in the pandemic they began analysing the genomic ­sequence of SARS-CoV-2. Very quickly, just as the authors of the Proximal Origins did, they saw unusual features in the virus that led them to question whether it might have been engineered.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19434535

File: e2404ddc9419336⋯.jpg (369.66 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Security_personnel_stand_g….jpg)

File: 59ceff06d2c17cf⋯.jpg (287.24 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Virologist_Shi_Zheng_li_le….jpg)

>>19434533

2/4

Unlike the Proximal Origins authors, their first concern was not the effect on scientific collaboration or funding – they focused purely on what the science told them about the origins of the virus.

When the Proximal Origins paper was published – claiming there was no evidence for a laboratory construct – Cutlip and his colleagues were stunned.

When Fauci and Francis Collins used it to insist the virus was natural, saying the matter had been settled, they were shocked.

These apolitical virologists could see beyond the inconclusive and biased commentary published by the esteemed medical journal.

They vehemently disagreed with the Proximal origin analysis.

They wrote an unclassified working paper, dated May 26, 2020, titled Critical Analysis of Anderson et al. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2.

Their paper was circulated within ­the NCMI and among multiple scientists within the intelligence community. It was also intended for wider publication, so that the public could have a greater understanding of the new virus sweeping the globe. But it was never allowed to be disseminated more broadly, in yet another cover-up of scientists who questioned the natural origins narrative perpetuated by senior officials.

The report was scathing of the Proximal Origin authors’ claim that Covid-19 had a natural origin.

“We consider the evidence they present and find that it does not prove that the virus arose naturally. In fact, the features of SARS-CoV-2 noted by Anderson et al. are consistent with another scenario: that SARS-CoV-2 was developed in a laboratory, by methods that leading coronavirus researchers commonly use to ­investigate how the viruses infect cells and cause disease, assess the potential for animal coronaviruses to jump to humans, and develop drugs and vaccines.”

While Kristian Anderson and the other authors wrote that the “high-affinity binding of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to human ACE2 is most likely the result of natural selection on a human or human-like ACE2”, Chretien, Cutlip and Hardham disagreed.

“This is not a scientific argument but rather an assumption of intent and methodology for a hypothesised scientist,” they wrote.

“Instead of aiming to design a virus that binds with high affinity to ACE2, a researcher may have chosen to investigate, empirically, the effect of one or more receptor binding domain variants on receptor binding or infectivity.

“In fact, leading coronavirus ­research laboratories have been doing this for years to study the ­potential for bat coronaviruses to infect humans.”

Wuhan link

The paper then provides examples of where these experiments happened at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

“In the context of this research, SARS-CoV-2 could have been synthesised by combining a backbone from a coronavirus similar to RaTG13 with the receptor binding domain of a coronavirus similar to the one recently isolated from pangolins. Such research might have aimed to investigate pangolins as possible intermediate hosts for bat coronaviruses potentially pathogenic for humans, and would have been consistent with the longstanding line of investigations described above.”

Chretien, Cutlip and Hardham also disagreed with Anderson et al’s argument that there was no known progenitor virus that could have led to the creation of SARS-CoV-2.

“However, the absence of a publication does not mean that the research was not done,” they wrote. Perhaps the experiments were aborted or not reported ­because of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak? Perhaps the results were never intended for publication?

“In a recent example of delayed publication from the Covid-19 pandemic, WIV researchers first reported RaTG13 in January 2020, but later stated that they had discovered the virus in 2013.

“The possibility of the SARS-CoV-2 furin site arising during passage in the laboratory cannot be dismissed.”

The esteemed authors go on to say that “laboratories also have ­directly inserted furin cleavage sites into coronaviruses”.

They cite several examples including the Shi Zhengli gain-of-function experiment with the University of North Carolina.

Their paper concludes that the Proximal Origin authors’ arguments “are based not on scientific analysis, but on unwarranted ­assumptions”.

“A long line of research shows that leading coronavirus laboratories do not work as described in the laboratory-origin scenario ­Anderson et al. consider and dismiss. SARS-CoV-2 – a bat coronavirus with pangolin coronavirus receptor binding domain – is consistent with the chimeric constructs these laboratories have developed and studied for more than a decade.

“We highlight the features of SARS-CoV-2, noted by Anderson et al, are consistent with longstanding and ongoing laboratory experiments; the evidence Anderson et al. present does not lessen the plausibility of laboratory origin.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19434536

File: 0f779f1710024cc⋯.jpg (165.75 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Dr_Anthony_Fauci_former_di….jpg)

File: 4918c69ff38818c⋯.jpg (81.97 KB,1280x721,1280:721,Institute_for_Defence_Anal….jpg)

>>19434535

3/4

Historic clue

After the group’s initial May 2020 paper, they continued to work on the virus, examining classified ­intelligence their agency and others collected, along with scientific papers in the public domain.

By June 2020, their genomic analysis of amino acids and ­nucleotides was producing fairly conclusive findings that Covid-19 was genetically engineered.

While their recommendations and working products are highly technical, there are four main reasons for why they found that SARS-CoV-2 was most likely ­genetically engineered.

They thought perhaps the backbone was related to the virus miners in Mojiang, China, caught in 2012 and had been modified.

Then came the discovery that was described internally as the smoking gun. The majority of the SARS-COV-2 virus genome is similar to bat coronaviruses. However, a small region of the spike gene, encoding the spike protein’s receptor binding domain (RBD), is identical to that of the pangolin coronavirus MP789.

Hardham reported to NCMI that the size and location of the pangolin fragment in SARS-CoV-2 was similar to the same RBD fragment described in one of Wuhan institute’s previous ­research publications.

In a 2008 paper by Shi Zhengli and Ren Wuze, the Wuhan researchers identified the minimal cassette that would be necessary to change the binding to different host ACE2 receptors – this refers to how the virus crosses from species to species.

Once the Wuhan researchers identified the minimal RBD cassette, they proposed using this same technique in their future work – including in grant proposals sent to the National Institutes of Health and the Defence ­Advanced Research Projects Agency.

This same technique (minimal cassette) is found in SARS-CoV-2.

They also found scientific ­papers in which Shi Zhengli, who was working with the University of North Carolina, was a contributor to engineering a novel furin cleavage site in a MERS-like bat coronavirus at the same location where one appeared in SARS-CoV-2.

“This paper is the smoking gun of everything. Figure 7 is literally the description of the pangolin RBD insert. When the team reviewed this data, they thought ‘This is created in the lab. It’s a reverse genetics construct.’ They identified the minimal cassette required to change the host range.”

‘We all agreed’

The NCMI findings were shared among scientific elements of the intelligence community. Their colleagues concurred with those findings, sources close to the group said.

Over the next year, their work and analysis continued, drawing in and involving other scientists from separate units, including the Institute for ­Advanced Technologies in Charlottesville, Virginia.

Their findings were shared and discussed with scientists from the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, the CIA, the FBI’s weapons of mass destruction unit and the US Army Medical ­Research Institute of Infectious Diseases.

The Australian understands that the scientists generally concurred that the virus was most likely genetically engineered.

“We briefed everyone on these findings. We were in alignment,” sources close to the inquiry said. “All four of the scientific groups concurred it was not a natural virus.”

But, on July 7, 2021, the group was blocked from sharing other findings with the FBI.

A director at NCMI is understood to have instructed them: “You may not speak with the FBI WMD anymore. They are off the reservation on this.”

And there was worse censorship still to come.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19434538

File: 5dabdbc9171ba7f⋯.jpg (153.18 KB,2048x1152,16:9,US_President_Joe_Biden_spe….jpg)

>>19434536

4/4

Input ignored

Joe Biden ordered a 90-day probe into the origins of Covid-19 in May 2021. A draft document was shared with agencies in the intelligence community for input. All of edits were inserted into the draft document and they were logged and tracked. The agencies would need to add a rationale for their edit. Any edit not accepted would also need a rationale provided.

The probe would ultimately conclude that most of the intelligence agencies, but not all, ­assessed with low confidence that SARS-CoV-2 was probably not ­genetically engineered. However, two agencies believed there was not sufficient evidence to make an assessment either way.

It was a finding contrary to the assessments made by scientists within the four groups from intelligence agencies that actually ­engaged in scientific analysis.

The group at the NCMI was surprised to see their edits didn’t make the version that appeared in public. Sources close to the inquiry estimated that about 90 per cent of the NCMI edits were deleted or censored. “They said the information was too technical to include in the ODNI (Office of the Director of National Intelligence) assessment,” a source familiar told The Australian.

“When the scientists saw the final document, they wondered were did all their edits go?”

They did manage to insert one paragraph into that document that related to the technique Ralph Baric had taught Shi Zhengli on how to engineer a virus without leaving a trace.

This technique is known as “no see em” reverse engineering because the signatures of genetic manipulation are removed during the process, leaving no trace.

The scientific team thought the 90-day report was scientifically inaccurate, according to sources familiar with the inquiry. “There was a lot of erroneous information. There was no genomic analysis in the ODNI report, nothing about the rare codons or the poly basic cleavage site and the minimal cassette that is similar to prior work published by WIV scientists. This virus also had no apparent mutational signatures.”

The scientists who had actually done the work were not even permitted to speak directly with the National Intelligence Council; they were told to go through a lower-qualified intermediary.

There was a strong sense that this amounted to a silencing of the scientists. It was very unusual, ­according to sources close to the matter. The scientists viewed their experience examining the origins of Covid, and their findings being blocked from entering the public domain of the intelligence community reports, as a cover-up.

They all say it was abundantly clear the NIC was “pushing the natural narrative”.

One of the employees at the ODNI also worked as an adviser for the World Health Organisation in a clear conflict of interest.

“They were all natural origin folks,” according to these sources.

While Hardham, Cutlip and Chretien, the scientists with expert knowledge of genomic sequencing, were silenced, the narrative of a natural origin was perpetuated by Anthony Fauci, Francis Collins and Jeremy Farrar.

Emails subpoenaed by US congress reveal how the scientists who authored the Proximal Origins paper privately discussed the possibility of a laboratory leak while insisting publicly that any such suggestion was a conspiracy.

Three and a half years since the NCMI scientists came to their strong view that SARS-CoV-2 was likely lab-engineered, the public perception to this day is that the virus was most likely natural.

And the intelligence community continues to insist, even in its most recent declassified update of 2023, that almost all agencies agree the virus has not been genetically engineered.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/us-intelligence-censored-over-scientists-findings-on-likely-origins-of-covid19/news-story/323ab746216f4ee8e328348686be1812

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19434568

File: 5a6cdb454ad9ab1⋯.jpg (548.79 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_P4_laboratory_left_on_….jpg)

File: b9b5972e36bc81c⋯.jpg (68.47 KB,768x1020,64:85,Jean_Paul_Chretien.jpg)

File: d12c8d208621d24⋯.jpg (74.59 KB,800x1067,800:1067,John_Hardham.jpg)

File: c2f3ee9ba96820b⋯.jpg (91.74 KB,1280x1706,640:853,Robert_Greg_Cutlip.jpg)

>>19262682

>>19434487

>>19434533

US Congress to probe claims Covid report was censored by intelligence community

SHARRI MARKSON - AUGUST 26, 2023

The US congress is set to probe revelations that officials at the highest levels of the intelligence community censored the input of scientists who concluded that Covid-19 was genetically engineered in a laboratory.

A homeland security committee senator has also called for the allegations to be “investigated immediately”.

The Australian and Sky News revealed on Friday that senior scientists working for the Defence Intelligence Organisation’s National Centre for Medical Intelligence – Robert Greg Cutlip, Jean-Paul Chretien and John Hardham – had 90 per cent of their input into a probe ordered by US President Joe Biden deleted.

They were stunned when the Office of the Director of National Intelligence’s study into the origins of Covid-19 was released and downplayed the likelihood that SARS-CoV-2 was the result of laboratory research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

US officials have expressed serious concerns at censorship of the scientists, saying the matter raised questions over the accuracy of the 90-day probe handed down by Mr Biden in August 2021.

The congressional select subcommittee on the coronavirus pandemic will now evaluate the allegations, with a spokesperson saying there were concerns about the accuracy of the intelligence agency’s public assessments.

“The select subcommittee on the coronavirus pandemic takes the reported allegations seriously,” a spokesperson said. “We are explicitly tasked with investigating the origins of Covid-19 and the purported information raises questions concerning the accuracy of the ODNI report and its conclusions.”

Separately, US senator Roger Marshall, who sits on the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee and is leading the Covid origins investigations, said he was exploring his options about how to take censorship of the scientists further and that the cover-up “must be fully investigated immediately”.

“We never trusted the Chinese Communist Party to come clean about the origins of Covid-19, but a potential cover-up by our own government and Defence agencies tasked with securing our ­nation should concern every American and must be fully investigated immediately,” he told The Weekend Australian.

“The intelligence community’s official inconclusive position about the origins of Covid-19 has never accurately reflected the classified intelligence we reviewed. Now we are learning insider censorship of US expert scientists may have influenced the report.”

Quantitative biologist Justin Kinney, associate professor at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, said the revelations were “very important”.

“The ODNI appeared to have intentionally suppressed critical scientific information to mislead the public about the origins of Covid-19,” he said. “The house subcommittee on the pandemic should investigate.”

It comes after The Australian and Sky News revealed a draft document was shared with agencies in the intelligence community for input when Mr Biden ordered the probe in May 2021.

Sources familiar with the work inside the ­intelligence agency and the scientists’ interactions with the ODNI said 90 per cent of their input was censored or deleted.

“They said the information was too technical to include in the ODNI assessment,” one said.

“When the scientists saw the final document, they wondered where did all their edits go?”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/us-congress-to-probe-claims-covid-report-was-censored-by-intelligence-community/news-story/798d862288dadc33082561bd8739e662

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19434584

File: c1026a565ec8f68⋯.jpg (278.46 KB,2048x1152,16:9,WA_Nationals_leader_Shane_….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19297392

WA Nationals backflip on voice, join federal party’s No push

PAIGE TAYLOR - AUGUST 26, 2023

The West Australian Nationals have fallen in line with the federal party on the Indigenous voice to parliament, backflipping on earlier support for the proposal.

WA Nationals leader Shane Love, who is also the WA opposition leader, had confirmed his support as recently as April for the proposal to amend the constitution with words guaranteeing the existence of an advisory body with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander members.

National leader David Littleproud and Nationals Senator for Victoria Bridget McKenzie were in the room for the vote at the state party’s conference at the Vines Resort in the Swan Valley, a winemaking region on the northeastern outskirts of Perth.

The WA Nationals’ state conference carried the motion: “That this State Convention of the Nationals WA does not support the constitutional amendment as proposed by the Federal Labor Government for the 2024 ‘Voice’ referendum.”

The WA Nationals’ supported the Uluru Statement from the Heart and its call for a voice under previous leader Mia Davies. Her predecessor Brendon Grylls is also a voice supporter.

However, the WA Nationals have come under pressure to revise their position on the voice after a campaign by the state Pastoral and Graziers Association to frame unpopular state Aboriginal cultural heritage laws as a sign of things to come if the voice referendum succeeded. New WA premier Roger Cook dumped the laws this month, describing them as too onerous for landowners.

The WA Nationals have also been influenced by the federal party’s stance. Mr Littleproud has taken an even harder line than Opposition leader Peter Dutton, who opposes a national voice but supports legislating local and regional Indigenous voices that could give advice on local and regional issues. Mr Littleproud has expressed concerns about regional voices.

“The National Party of Australia does not trust the Labor Party to get this right,” Mr Love said after the vote.

The WA Nationals’ about face on the voice means they are now also in sync with the WA Liberals. This could smooth the path to a formal coalition between the much-depleted state parties as they look for ways to claw back seats. Between them they have just six MPs in the WA lower house between – four Nationals and two Liberals. WA Labor has a thumping majority in both houses.

Ms Davies, who stepped down as WA Nationals leader in January citing fatigue, said she respected the state conference’s decision but she continued to believe the voice was sound and in line with her party’s beliefs about good government. Ms Davies is the member for the central wheatbelt of WA, where most of the state’s crops are grown.

“I am a member of the party because we fundamentally believe that including the people and communities we make decisions about in the process of developing legislation, funding programs, and infrastructure projects gets a better outcome for those communities and the taxpayer,” Ms Davies said.

“It’s a sound policy and philosophy to create a framework for advice to our parliament to assist in decisions that will go toward improving the lives and future of first nations people who have experienced decades of policy created for and about them that has effectively marginalised and diminished their opportunity to thrive.

“With political and community goodwill, I believe the Voice could play a part in shifting the dial on the issues we discuss so often – health outcomes, education attainment, suicide rates, and over-representation in the criminal justice system.

“It will not be a silver bullet, but it can be the start of a different conversation with our first nation people about our nation’s future.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/wa-nationals-backflip-on-voice-join-federal-partys-no-push/news-story/ef0a6fd6d856a8e85181d5f3ed194504

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19434646

File: 81f89c740d0f8a2⋯.mp4 (15.05 MB,640x360,16:9,Footage_covertly_recorded_….mp4)

>>19417697

How private investigators exposed Malka Leifer, infiltrating a small Israeli community to seal her extradition

Kristian Silva - 26 August 2023

1/2

Malka Leifer is smiling. Malka Leifer is buying a loaf of bread. Malka Leifer is waiting for the bus.

Malka Leifer's charade is about to be exposed.

Two hundred hours of undercover footage of the mother-of-eight going about her daily chores was the pivotal piece of evidence that led to her downfall.

When the vision was captured in 2017, Leifer was facing child sex abuse charges dating back to her time as principal of the Adass Israel School in Melbourne.

However, the Israeli courts had determined Leifer was so mentally incapacitated that she was unfit to be extradited to Australia.

The pictures told a different story.

The undercover sting was orchestrated by Israeli private investigator Tsafrir Tsahi and sex abuse victims advocate Shana Aaronson.

"You can say that we will remember this case," Mr Tsahi said with a grin, when interviewed by the ABC this week.

Mr Tsahi's investigations usually centre around business disputes.

This case was different, he said, requiring his team to carry out a fact finding mission to uncover "the real Malka Leifer life".

"It was to find her family, friends, her community, synagogue, everything we can find about her," he said.

The timing was key.

The Jewish Hanukkah holiday is a bustling period of celebration and gift-giving.

There was a chance Leifer's activity could be increased but, given she was living in a remote, religious town, it would be no simple task.

"Everyone knows everyone. So we needed to be very careful, to study the place, to be there and no-one will come and ask us who we are and what we are doing there," he said.

Mr Tsahi said the crew blended in by dressing up as construction workers. Five or six cameras were used in the operation, some hidden in cars and bottles of water.

"Everyone gets together so when we saw her go to do the shopping, to buy groceries or go to the post office to pay bills we understand she's a normal human being," he said of the footage.

The footage revealed she was capable of living independently, and did not appear to be mentally unfit or "a very sick woman", as her lawyer stated in 2016.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19434654

File: 1f460f8f2643ea7⋯.jpg (119.06 KB,1210x678,605:339,Undercover_investigators_d….jpg)

File: 1733d39409bdfa7⋯.jpg (215.4 KB,1620x1079,1620:1079,Tsafrir_Tsahi_had_to_ensur….jpg)

File: 31a3839cc217545⋯.jpg (343.09 KB,1680x3367,240:481,Shana_Aaronson_believes_ma….jpg)

File: c5f91523d2864aa⋯.jpg (3.27 MB,5000x3752,625:469,The_case_has_attracted_int….jpg)

File: 905e8c752d4edef⋯.jpg (2.83 MB,5000x3752,625:469,Elly_Sapper_flanked_by_her….jpg)

>>19434646

2/2

Footage seals extradition

Ms Aaronson met Leifer's accusers Nicole Meyer, Elly Sapper and Dassi Erlich through her advocacy work with Jewish Community Watch.

She said she was staggered when Mr Tsahi sent her the first snippets of evidence from his clandestine operation.

"There was this incredible arrogance," Ms Aaronson said of Leifer. "She had just absolute confidence that she had gotten away with this."

The footage was eventually turned over to Israeli police, who re-arrested Leifer. After more court hearings and delays, her extradition to Australia was completed in 2021.

"I still feel this incredible sense of relief that it worked, that it was able to be instrumental in this process," Ms Aaronson said.

On Thursday, Leifer was sentenced to 15 years jail for raping and sexually abusing Ms Sapper and Ms Erlich, although the former head of the Adass Israel School in Melbourne was cleared of charges relating to Ms Meyer.

In his sentencing remarks, County Court judge Mark Gamble said that while the 56-year-old had been diagnosed with adjustment disorder, it was clear she had "exaggerated or intensified her mental health problems so as to delay and even frustrate the extradition proceedings".

The news of Leifer's jail sentence made headline news in Israel.

Ms Aaronson now heads up Magen, which supports and advocates for sexual abuse victims in the orthodox Jewish community, and she hopes the case will embolden those who continue to suffer in silence.

"We know for a fact that there are many more perpetrators. Actually, also many more female perpetrators," she said.

Ms Aaronson remains concerned about the pockets of support that Leifer continues to receive from segments of the ultra-orthodox community.

"There's a tremendous cognitive dissonance. People do not want to believe that somebody who looks like them, who could be them, could do something so horrific," she said.

Investigative journalist Gabrielle Weiniger said she never thought justice would be served after witnessing farcical scenes playing out during many of Leifer's Israeli court hearings.

"People would shout at each other making a ridicule of the whole thing," she said.

Weiniger worked on a feature-length documentary about the Leifer case, which included a film crew being embedded with the sisters during the County Court trial in Melbourne.

The film, directed by Adam Kamien, is set to be released next year.

"The work on the Catholic Church has blown it open and raised awareness (of sexual abuse). I think it's important to do it in the Jewish community and all communities," Weiniger said.

"To display the sisters' bravery and discuss issues that are very uncomfortable will bring it into the mainstream."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-08-26/how-an-undercover-operation-brought-malka-leifer-undone/102774824

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19440283

File: 9bdc3c3ff6e3b0b⋯.jpg (366.86 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,A_helicopter_carrying_a_US….jpg)

File: 5d515f0aebde09f⋯.jpg (372.56 KB,1899x1069,1899:1069,US_Marines_with_Marine_Rot….jpg)

File: 515bdcf7d04e9e8⋯.jpg (393.29 KB,2048x1152,16:9,A_helicopter_carrying_a_US….jpg)

File: 46972cee79a99f8⋯.jpg (342.61 KB,893x796,893:796,US_military_aircraft_crash….jpg)

File: 05c51f20c608e3a⋯.jpg (278.91 KB,750x1119,250:373,AA_13.jpg)

>>19262114

Three dead in NT US military aircraft crash that involved 23 marines

BEN PACKHAM and ANGELICA SNOWDEN - AUGUST 27, 2023

1/2

Military aviation investigators will travel to a remote Northern Territory island after a US military aircraft crashed on Sunday killing three US Marines and seriously injuring at least five.

They were among 23 marines on the tilt-rotor MV-22B Osprey when it crashed on Melville Island about 9.30am while participating in a multinational exercise with Australian, Filipino, Indonesian and East Timorese forces.

Five of the injured were medically evacuated to Darwin Hospital including one in a critical condition who underwent surgery soon after arriving. The other survivors were triaged at the crash scene and awaiting transport to Darwin late on Sunday by CareFlight helicopter and fixed wing aircraft.

The US Marine Corps revealed the deaths in a statement after a press conference by NT Chief Minister Natasha Fyles and NT police commissioner Michael Murphy, in which they failed to mention there had been any fatalities.

“Three have been confirmed deceased while five others were transported to Royal Darwin Hospital in serious condition,” the Marine Rotational Force Darwin said.

“Recovery efforts are ongoing. The cause of the incident is under investigation. Further details will be provided as the situation develops.”

Anthony Albanese said the crash was “tragic”, and the government was focusing “on making sure every single assistance is given at this difficult time”.

“We do follow protocols at a time like this and the Australian Defence Force is co-operating with our friends in the United States Defence Force to make sure that we provide every assistance possible,” the Prime Minister said.

The Osprey was flying with another aircraft of the same type when it crashed.

The accident follows the crash of an Australian Army helicopter earlier this month with the loss of four lives.

It’s not the first time US Marines have died in an Osprey crash in Australia – three were killed in 2017 when one of the tilt-rotor aircraft attempted to land on a US transport ship in Queensland’s Shoalwater Bay but slid into the water.

Ms Fyles said NT Police were working with the Australian Defence Force and US authorities to respond to the “terrible incident”.

“We are well resourced and well practised in responding to emergencies,” she said.

A “code brown” was declared at Royal Darwin Hospital on Sunday postponing non-urgent cases to prepare for the arrival of more of the injured, Ms Fyles said.

“Some people are critically injured,” she said. “We have more arriving as we speak.”

Ms Fyles said the hospital’s emergency department and some of its wards were cleared to accommodate the injured.

“I feel very confident in the resources here in the Northern Territory care for these people,” she said.

“Our thoughts are with them and their families back in the United States and I want to reassure them we will give them that care,” she said.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19440285

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19440283

2/2

The marines were participating in Exercise Predator’s Run, one of the biggest multilateral combat simulations undertaken in the Territory.

Ms Fyles said the crash occurred in a remote area, and there were no locals present when the aircraft came down.

Commissioner Murphy said military personnel were the first on scene, but civilian flight services were assisting in airlifting the injured marines from the remote location.

A 2km exclusion zone had been established around the crash site, he said.

There were no Australian personnel on board the aircraft, despite the close co-operation between the ADF and the US Marines.

A Defence spokeswoman confirmed Exercise Predator’s Run had been paused following the crash.

“At this critical early stage, our focus is on the incident response and ensuring the safety of those involved,” he said.

About 2500 personnel were participating in the exercise, including 500 US marines, 120 Philippines Armed Forces soldiers, 120 Indonesian Defence Force personnel, and about 50 from the East Timor‘s Defence Force.

NT Labor MP and former Australian Army commando Luke Gosling said the region’s thoughts were with “our US Allies and friends, in particular those who have been injured, and all the families”.

“We wish the injured a speedy recovery as we remember the US Marine Corps motto ‘Semper Fidelis’ – ‘Always Faithful’,” he told the NT News.

The MV-22 Osprey has a troubled history, having been involved in five fatal crashes since 2012 causing 16 deaths, according to a Marine Corps report published this year in response to a deadly accident in California in June, 2022.

It that incident, five marines died when their MV-22 Osprey suffered a “catastrophic, unpreventable and unanticipated mechanical failure”, according to a Marine Corps report.

The investigation identified a clutch engagement issue that led to engine failure as the cause of the deadly crash in June, 2022.

At the time, the Marine Corps said equipment changes had been made to the aircraft to reduce, but not eliminate, the risk of similar accidents.

“It is clear from the investigation that there was no error on the part of the pilots and aircrew and nothing they could have done to anticipate or prevent this mishap,” a statement released at the time said.

An Australian MRH-90 helicopter crashed in early August during Australia’s largest bilateral military training exercise with the US, known as Talisman Sabre.

Lieutenant Maxwell Nugent, Warrant Officer Class Two Joseph Laycock, Corporal Alexander Naggs and Captain Dan Lyon died in the crash, during Exercise Talisman Sabre.

Some human remains have been recovered from the crash, but not all of those who died are accounted for.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/us-military-aircraft-crashes-in-nt-with-20-onboard/news-story/165ec6bb4b273178ba71bf63f58f2592

https://twitter.com/AlboMP/status/1695727412804538428

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NbDOYYbTT-c

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19440314

File: 69c085de820391f⋯.jpg (204.63 KB,1280x720,16:9,A_Care_Flight_helicopter_i….jpg)

File: 578d6520635eb00⋯.jpg (251.74 KB,1185x645,79:43,Three_US_Marines_killed_in….jpg)

File: c31e5c997be436b⋯.jpg (210.96 KB,1280x720,16:9,Five_people_have_been_tran….jpg)

File: c24c1b87d862233⋯.jpg (187.15 KB,750x817,750:817,MRF_D_59.jpg)

File: 2712287e0502ecc⋯.jpg (621.29 KB,4096x3188,1024:797,F4hZe7UacAA2sNd.jpg)

>>19440283

Three US Marines killed in aircraft crash in Australia during training exercise

Heather Chen, Brad Lendon, Angus Watson, Jake Kwon and Irene Nasser - August 27, 2023

(CNN) — Three US Marines have been killed and several others seriously wounded after an Osprey aircraft crashed during military exercises in Australia.

Of the 23 Marines on board the MV-22B Osprey aircraft, three died while five others have been transferred to Royal Darwin Hospital in a serious condition, the Marine Rotational Force - Darwin said in a statement on Sunday.

The incident on Melville Island in Australia took place at 9:30 a.m. local time.

“The Marines aboard the aircraft were flying in support of Exercise Predators Run. Recovery efforts are ongoing,” the statement read, adding “the cause of the incident is under investigation.”

Earlier, Northern Territory Chief Minister Natasha Fyles said some of the other Marines were being treated at the scene.

“We are working incredibly hard and as fast as we can to make sure we can get people to treatment,” Fyles said.

Two US Marine Osprey aircraft left Darwin and flew towards Tiwi Islands, about 80 kilometers away, on Sunday morning, Australia’s Northern Territory Police Commissioner Michael Murphy said. One of the aircraft crashed on Melville Island, he added.

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Defence Richard Marles expressed their condolences in a joint statement.

“Australian and US personnel have stood shoulder to shoulder for more than a century. Our Alliance is built upon these enduring links and our shared values,” Albanese and Marles said.

It is the latest deadly crash to involve an Osprey aircraft, with numerous accidents involving Osprey military aircraft reported over the years.

In 2022 five US Marines died after their MV-22B Osprey plane crashed during a training mission near Glamis, California. The same year four US service members were killed when their Osprey crashed during NATO training exercises in Norway.

The incident comes just a month after four Australian army aircrew members died after a MRH-90 Taipan helicopter crashed into the sea near Hamilton Island off the east coast of Australia during an exercise that was part of joint drills with the United States.

A history of crashes

Previous crashes of Osprey aircraft, according to CNN reporting and US Defense Department press releases:

July 20, 1992: Seven people are killed during testing when an Osprey crashes in Virginia.

April 8, 2000: A crash during training in Arizona kills 19 Marines. The crash is blamed on pilot error, with investigators concluding the pilot tried to land too fast and at too steep an angle, causing a loss of lift.

December 11, 2000: Four Marines are killed when an Osprey crashes in North Carolina. The accident is later blamed on problems with a hydraulic part and a software anomaly in the aircraft’s computer system.

April 8, 2010: US Air Force Osprey crashes in southern Afghanistan, killing three US service members and one civilian employee.

April 11, 2012: Two US personnel are killed in an Osprey crash in Morocco.

June 13, 2012: An Air Force CV-22 Osprey crashes during a routine training mission north of Navarre, Florida, injuring five.

May 17, 2015: A Marine Corps MV-22 Osprey crashes at Bellows training ground on Oahu, Hawaii, leaving two Marines dead

December 13, 2016: An MV-22B Osprey lands in shallow waters off Okinawa, Japan, injuring two.

August 5, 2017: An MV-22B Osprey crashes off the coast of Australia, leaving three Marines dead

September 28, 2017: A Marine Corps MV-22 Osprey crashes in Syria, injuring two service members.

March 18, 2022: Four US service members are killed when the MV-22 Osprey they are traveling in crashes during NATO training exercises in Norway.

June 8, 2022: Five US Marines die after an MV-22 Osprey crashes during a training mission Wednesday near Glamis, California

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/08/27/asia/aircraft-incident-us-defense-personnel-australia-intl-hnk/index.html

https://twitter.com/MRFDarwin/status/1695703721081204844

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19440325

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19440283

Three US Marines killed in military aircraft crash near Darwin

9 News Australia

Aug 27, 2023

Three US Marines are dead after an American military aircraft crashed during an exercise drill in the Tiwi Islands, off the coast of Darwin.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Gl6hiUwFOc

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

0f00d6 No.19440893

File: 5eaa6d1d8d2943c⋯.jpg (9.86 KB,345x349,345:349,question_everything.jpg)

'Sup?

Any anons here on the Aussie board?

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19446073

File: e1f0adca523748f⋯.jpg (448.26 KB,2048x1152,16:9,AFL_champion_Michael_Long_….jpg)

File: da9370078d7df6c⋯.jpg (153.98 KB,1280x726,640:363,YES_CASE_INSIGHTS.jpg)

>>19222755

>>19297392

Indigenous voice to parliament: Yes23 campaign must target 1.7m ‘soft’ voters

GEOFF CHAMBERS - AUGUST 28, 2023

1/2

Yes23 must win over at least 38 per cent of the nation’s 4.6 million undecided voters to claim victory in the October referendum, according to confidential research targeting young people, women, multicultural communities and soft voters in four battleground states.

The 31-page Yes23 Persuasive Conversations document, obtained by The Australian, includes new strategies designed to reverse polling trends indicating the pro-voice campaign is on track to lose the referendum, which is expected to be called for October 14.

Campaign volunteers have been told to name a “villain” when convincing at least 1.7 million undecided voters to join the Yes cause, including invoking mining billionaires who “care more about profit than protecting our country”.

With mining giants strongly backing a constitutionally enshrined voice advisory body, Anthony Albanese on Sunday travelled to Rio Tinto’s iron ore operations in the key state of Western Australia, where he expressed confidence the traditionally conservative state would back the Yes campaign.

The Prime Minister will travel to Adelaide on Wednesday to announce the referendum date and officially launch the Yes campaign in the must-win state of South Australia.

Central to the Yes23 campaign, which has recruited more than 27,000 volunteers, are new strategies to secure backing from millions of soft voters they describe as being “up for grabs”. The PowerPoint slides, which Yes23 says are not official but prepared by volunteers, includes new confidential strategic voting and messaging research.

“Young people are key. The largest age segment up for grabs are 18-34-year-olds. So are women … 54 per cent of (those) up for grabs are female. People who speak languages other than English at home are not being talked to about this issue,” the document say. “Opposition in WA is much softer than in other states, and so should be a key persuasion priority.

Tasmania is a key persuasion priority, with a higher proportion of supportive segments. SA and Queensland are over-represented in hard-to-move (segments).”

The document, which provides cheat sheets to help volunteers shift sentiment, categorises voters across eight segments – Sceptical Allies (closet conservatives), Cheerleaders (including young female professionals), Leaning Yes, Undecided, Leaning No, Disengaged, Hard No and Culture Warriors.

It provides instructions on how to redirect voters who ask why the voice is needed now, raise concerns over the lack of detail and who believe the voice is about “more than just recognition”. Yes23 campaigners, who should adhere to “positive framing”, are provided with written examples of how to “affirm, answer and redirect” under a plan to engage the base, persuade the maybes and ignore the opposition.

“The job of a good message isn’t to say what is popular. The job of a good message is to make popular what we need said,” the document says.

Yes23 campaigners, who will target voters in SA, Tasmania, WA and Queensland, are instructed to follow the “Four Vs framework – value, villain, victory and vision”.

After discussing values, which are universal or widely supported, campaigners are told to “name the villain, or unfair barrier, including who or what is harming us and why – pick a villain that most people dislike or distrust”. The Yes23 document tells volunteers to single out wealthy miners as villains: “Mining billionaires care more about profit than protecting our country.” This is despite some of the country’s biggest mining companies, such as BHP and Rio Tinto, backing the voice.

Other villain themes include harm caused by discrimination of the past, successive governments taking funding away from local communities without consultation and past governments reneging on promises made to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19446075

File: 3f0066541d8f3f3⋯.jpg (183.25 KB,1280x876,320:219,YES_CASE_STRATEGY.jpg)

>>19446073

2/2

Under the Four Vs framework, “value” is based on Australians believing everyone deserves a fair go, “villain” focuses on exposing discrimination and racism “that still has an impact today”, “victory” celebrates the voice as a practical step forward and “vision” represents a “united community where everyone is treated with respect and dignity”.

Yes23 volunteers are told that “in this campaign, when they go low – we will go high”, and encouraged to “introduce yourself using positional language rather than hierarchical language”.

The key message for voters categorised as Sceptical Allies, who Yes23 fears are adopting arguments from “covert conservatives”, is that a No vote will “be a big setback for FN (First Nations) people”.

Opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman and No campaigner Jacinta Nampijinpa Price said “once again we see the Yes camp making it up as they go along, and ‘redirecting’ voters who just want the detail”.

“The fact they are treating voters like mugs shows the complete desperation on the Yes side, and the fact their proposal only serves to divide us, not unite us,” Senator Price told The Australian.

“This is all the more disingenuous given the Yes camp has eagerly accepted several million dollars from some of the world’s biggest miners.”

A Yes23 spokesman told The Australian “this is not an official Yes23 document” but acknowledged it would have been prepared by volunteers engaged in persuasive conversation training sessions. “We welcome the enthusiasm of our ever-growing base of volunteers to educate others on how to have conversations with Australians about the importance of a successful Yes vote. The efforts and conversations that our army of volunteers will be having in the coming months will be critical to getting this referendum over the line,” he said.

Yes23 campaign director Dean Parkin on Sunday joined Indigenous AFL legend Michael Long in Melbourne for the launch of The Long Walk. Mr Long is re-creating his 2004 walk from Melbourne to Canberra in support of the voice.

Mr Parkin declared more than 40 per cent of voters “are absolutely undecided” and said they would for the first time this week turn their minds towards the referendum when Mr Albanese announces the date.

He said the Yes campaign would leave “no stone unturned” to get its message across, including through cashed-up advertising campaigns and “millions of conversations” with undecided voters.

A No campaign spokesman said “from the start” its focus has been on the key states of WA, Queensland, South Australia and Tasmania.

“We’ve had voter contact programs in place for months focused on these states. As far as the No campaign strategy is concerned, nothing has changed. The Yes campaign is saying SA is a key state but we’ve been there right from the start,” the spokesman told The Australian. “The Yes campaign is an over-hyped, over-funded and overrated explosion of ideas – they don’t have a clear message. All they have left is the corporate millions that they will use to try and buy a result.”

Speaking at Rio Tinto’s iron ore operations in Karratha, Mr Albanese said he remained confident that WA would back the voice. He pointed to the backing of the AFL and the mining industry for the voice as a sign the state could “absolutely” be persuaded to vote yes.

Ahead of announcing the referendum date, Mr Albanese said Australia was the only former colony that had not formally recognised its Indigenous people.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/indigenous-voice-to-parliament-yes23-campaign-must-target-17m-soft-voters/news-story/a40a8e15c8724b142d9b35a8f2367821

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19446079

File: 81a4ddd65e49d39⋯.jpg (679.15 KB,2048x1368,256:171,Perth_MP_Patrick_Gorman_wi….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19297392

Voice No vote will damage Australia’s standing: Bishop

Tom Rabe and Tom McIlroy - Aug 28, 2023

Former foreign minister Julie Bishop says Australia’s international reputation will be damaged if the country votes No in the looming Voice to parliament referendum.

Ms Bishop joined Foreign Minister Penny Wong in Perth on Monday for a street walk organised to build support for the Yes campaign in Western Australia, considered safe territory for the No side.

Ms Bishop, who served as foreign minister under Liberal leaders Tony Abbott and Malcolm Turnbull, echoed comments from Labor figures including Anthony Albanese that if voters rejected the Voice it risked sending a negative message about Australia’s “openness and empathy”.

She is popular with voters in Western Australia, but her support for the Voice puts her at odds with Opposition Leader Peter Dutton and senior WA Liberals including frontbenchers Michaelia Cash and Andrew Hastie.

“I know that Australia’s international reputation can be affected by a No vote,” Ms Bishop said.

“I have no doubt that it will be sending a very negative message about the openness and the empathy and the respect and responsibility that the Australian people have for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders.

“It’s probably more difficult for Penny to say this because she’s out there on the international stage having to promote Australia’s current position, but I would be most concerned at the message this would send the rest of the world if we can’t find it in our hearts to say yes.”

Asked whether she agreed with Ms Bishop’s assessment, Senator Wong said: “Julie, as always, is very eloquent and I’m going to leave it at that.

”This referendum is about recognition, it’s about listening and it’s about better outcomes, and as Julie very eloquently spoke about, this is something after 20 years in politics, you look at and think ‘this is a way of trying to make sure we actually do better and listen to what Aboriginal Torres Strait Islander people have said to us’.”

Ms Bishop is the Australian National University chancellor. She said the university believed the Uluru Statement from the Heart was an opportunity to address Indigenous disadvantage.

“I’m looking for a respectful, sensible debate across the nation,” she said after the event with Yes23 campaign director Dean Parkin.

“I believe that this is an opportunity first to give Aboriginal Torres Strait Islanders their rightful place in the Constitution, but secondly, to give them the right and the risk and the responsibility to come up with policies that will address the problems as they see them and get better outcomes, and I truly believe that this is our opportunity.”

The comments come as company directors supporting the Voice say advocates need a sharper message for voters about its benefits, and prepare to spend a $130,000 war chest.

Undecided voters

Organised by Ming Long, a director of Telstra and IFM Investors, and Nora Scheinkestel, who sits on the Westpac and Origin Energy boards, the group placed full-page advertisements advocating a Yes vote in national newspapers on Monday.

But Yes campaign spokesman Thomas Mayo said many voters wanted questions answered, and were yet to decide their position. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is expected to announce a date for the referendum this week.

“What I’ve found over the years is that when you give people the explanation on what this vote is really about, it’s basically just yes or no,” he said.

“There’s around 30 to 40 per cent of Australians that haven’t made up their minds yet. And those are the people that we’re going to be focusing on.

“We’ve been working furiously on being ready for this final run to the polls.”

Campaigning in Queensland, Mr Dutton said he expected a tight result, but warned against a major advertising campaign by Voice supporters.

“People will be bombarded with ads. People will be bullied into voting Yes,” he said.

https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/voice-no-vote-will-damage-australia-s-standing-bishop-20230828-p5e00j

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19446083

File: 41ef667bca004f6⋯.jpg (117.07 KB,1280x720,16:9,Brittany_Higgins_and_Bruce….jpg)

File: 9e6d70aea9481f1⋯.jpg (221.83 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Bruce_Lehrmann_walks_out_o….jpg)

File: 09d6395193473a9⋯.jpg (316.99 KB,2000x2667,2000:2667,Mr_Lehrmann_is_suing_journ….jpg)

>>19289887

>>19333459

Brittany Higgins, Bruce Lehrmann to take stand in defamation trial

ELLIE DUDLEY - AUGUST 28, 2023

A Federal Court judge has revealed both Brittany Higgins and Bruce Lehrmann will take the stand during the defamation matters between Mr Lehrmann and two media organisations, as the court debates the admissibility of expert evidence stating false sexual assault complaints as “rare”.

Both former Liberal staffers at the centre of an alleged rape in Parliament House will give verbal evidence during the defamation cases of Mr Lehrmann and Network Ten and journalist Lisa Wilkinson, and a separate matter between Mr Lehrmann and the ABC.

The matters are expected to be heard together across four weeks in November.

Ms Higgins has repeatedly stated her willingness to give evidence in the defamation proceedings, and on Monday morning Justice Michael Lee said it would be necessary for her to take the stand after she failed to deliver her written affidavit on time.

Tim Senior, acting for Ten and the ABC, told the court on Monday his legal team was unable to meet Ms Higgins due to her “unavailability”.

“The delay, I am instructed, there were two reasons for that: Ms Higgins’ unavailability, and the unavailability of her solicitor Mr Zwier,” Mr Senior said. “The combination of those matters meant that we weren’t able to conference with Ms Higgins.”

While Network Ten served an outline of the affidavit on schedule, Justice Lee said there was “no explanation” as to why the full affidavit could not be filed on time.

“I think we’ll just proceed on the basis she gives evidence by viva voce (verbal evidence),” he said.

Justice Lee said regardless of the schedule, he would have expected both Mr Lehrmann and Ms Higgins to give verbal evidence regarding the “critical incidents” that were alleged to have occurred in Parliament House.

“One of the reasons I would adopt that course I think, Mr Senior … evidence of what might be described as the critical incidents, which are the subject of the truth defence, even if an affidavit was served, I think require the critical witnesses to give viva voce evidence in chief in any event,” Justice Lee said.

Mr Lehrmann, who has consistently denied the rape allegations, is suing Ten and Wilkinson over an interview with Ms Higgins that aired on The Project in February 2021 detailing allegations Mr Lehrmann raped Ms Higgins in Parliament House, but not naming Mr Lehrmann as the alleged attacker.

Network Ten will rely on a truth defence.

Mr Lehrmann is also suing the ABC over their decision to live broadcast a National Press Club address of Ms Higgins and former Australian of the Year Grace Tame. While Mr Lehrmann was not named in the address, he says the ABC used the address to deliberately try to prejudice his rape trial.

The ABC will rely on a public interest defence.

The Federal Court on Monday heard Mr Lehrmann’s legal team will have four weeks to compile submissions arguing expert evidence from University of Sydney psychologist Chris Lennings is inadmissable.

Mr Senior said Dr Lennings’ evidence would speak to the response of sexual assault victims and their actions following the event.

However Mr Lehrmann’s barrister, Matthew Richardson SC, said he would “certainly” object to the admissibility of the evidence, as it claimed false sexual assault complaints are “rare” and seemed to simply be based on analysis of academic papers.

“As to the first report, which in addition to opining about the typical behaviour of victims of sexual assault, also posits opinions that for instance, false complaints are rare,” he told the court.

“There certainly will be objection to that evidence starting from the basis of whether or not there‘s a recognised field of expertise and so on, but also the conclusions and the opinions that are expressed, we would say have no sufficient factual foundation it really appears to be an analysis of academic papers.”

A second report from forensic toxicologist Michael Robertson will also be submitted into evidence, regarding “his observations and opinion about Ms Higgins and her level of intoxication on the night in question.”

The matters will be heard together at a final hearing that begins on November 22. It is expected to last for around four weeks and will hear from about 30 witnesses.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/brittany-higgins-bruce-lehrmann-to-take-stand-in-defamation-trial/news-story/614dfbeed62cb7847b2a372a86149699

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19446088

File: 84179d08f32dc9c⋯.jpg (431.55 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Bruce_Lehrmann_was_accused….jpg)

>>19289887

>>19333459

Ten wants to use expert evidence on Brittany Higgins’ level of intoxication

Michaela Whitbourn - August 28, 2023

Network Ten is seeking to rely on expert evidence in Bruce Lehrmann’s defamation case about sexual assault victims’ typical behaviour and Brittany Higgins’ level of intoxication on the night she alleges she was raped by Lehrmann in Parliament House.

The Federal Court trial against the broadcaster is slated to start in Sydney on November 22. Barrister Tim Senior, acting for Ten, told the court at a preliminary hearing on Monday that the network would call 28 witnesses, including Higgins and journalist Lisa Wilkinson.

Senior said Ten also wanted to tender two expert reports, on “the reactions and responses of victims of sexual assault … and how things like memory may be affected”, and a toxicology expert’s opinion about Higgins’ level of intoxication on the night in question.

Matthew Richardson, SC, acting for Lehrmann, said the first report, written by a clinical psychologist, offered not only an opinion about “the typical behaviour of victims of sexual assault” but “also posits opinions that, for instance, false complaints are rare”.

“There certainly will be objection to that evidence, starting from … whether or not there is a recognised field of expertise and so on, but also the conclusions and the opinions that are expressed, we would say, have no sufficient factual foundation,” Richardson said.

“It really appears to be an analysis of academic papers. As to whether we will object to the toxicology report, we just haven’t come to a view yet.”

Justice Michael Lee said questions about the admissibility of the first report would be determined before the trial.

Lehrmann filed Federal Court defamation proceedings against Ten in February over an interview Wilkinson conducted with his former colleague Higgins on The Project, broadcast on February 15, 2021. Separate proceedings against News Corp, filed at the same time, have since settled.

He alleges the interview conveyed a series of defamatory meanings, including that he raped Higgins in then-defence industry minister Linda Reynolds’ office on March 23, 2019.

Lehrmann was not named in the broadcast, but his lawyers say he was identified via other means.

If the court finds Lehrmann was identified, Ten and Wilkinson admit they conveyed the defamatory claims alleged, including the central claim of rape, and will seek to rely chiefly on defences of truth and qualified privilege – a defence relating to publications of public interest which requires an outlet to have acted reasonably.

Lehrmann is also suing the ABC for defamation for broadcasting a National Press Club address last year by Grace Tame and Higgins. Lee said on Monday that the ABC proceedings, which raise narrower legal issues, would be heard at the same time as the Ten case. The broadcaster proposes to call five witnesses.

Lehrmann was named in the media in August 2021, six months after the Ten interview, when he was charged with sexual intercourse without consent.

He pleaded not guilty to the charge. His trial was aborted in October last year due to juror misconduct. The charge was later dropped altogether amid concerns about Higgins’ mental health. Lehrmann has always maintained his innocence.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/ten-wants-to-use-expert-evidence-on-brittany-higgins-level-of-intoxication-20230828-p5dzwo.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19446096

File: 70e80f688b94813⋯.jpg (1.05 MB,2496x1662,416:277,Yang_Hengjun_has_spent_fou….jpg)

File: cb6635d9d8a7c42⋯.jpg (203.59 KB,1200x1600,3:4,Yang_Hengjun_and_his_wife_….jpg)

Australian fears he’ll die in Chinese prison after doctors find huge kidney cyst

Matthew Knott - August 28, 2023

Detained Australian Yang Hengjun says he is increasingly fearful he will be denied medical treatment and die in a Chinese prison after medical authorities told him they had discovered a huge, 10-centimetre cyst on his kidney.

Ahead of a planned trip to Beijing by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese later this year, Yang’s supporters are urging the federal government to demand the academic be given medical parole or access to Australian-supervised medical care outside his Beijing detention centre.

“If something happens with my health and I die in here, people outside won’t know the truth,” Yang said in a message conveyed through his supporters.

“That is frustrating. If something happens to me, who can speak for me?”

Albanese raised Yang’s case, and that of detained Australian journalist Cheng Lei, when he met Chinese President Xi Jinping last year and is expected to do the same if the pair meet on the sidelines of the G20 summit in India in early September.

The Chinese-born pro-democracy blogger, who worked for China’s Ministry of State Security before becoming an Australian citizen in 2002, was arrested in August 2019 on suspicion of espionage. His case was heard in secret in May 2021, with the details never disclosed to the public.

Friends who have been briefed in recent days said Yang feared he would suffer the same fate as his friend, Nobel Peace Prize-winning writer Liu Xiaobo, a political prisoner who died of liver cancer in 2017.

“There is little reason to trust that the Chinese state security system has any interest in giving Yang the treatment he needs,” said a friend of Yang, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive legal matters.

“We have been raising concerns about his kidney health and requesting medical parole for several years and have had no reliable assurances that he is getting any of it.

“And now, in recent days, we are told that he has a kidney cyst that is roughly the same size as the kidney itself. We have not been told what kind of cyst this is or what treatment options are available.”

Sources said that after Yang complained of a persistent muscle strain, a doctor conducted a medical examination and told him he had a 10-centimetre cyst.

Although the cyst is so large that it is squeezing his kidney, the doctor said no action was required as long as it wasn’t too painful and didn’t split or bleed.

This was the first time Yang had been advised of the results after being given several medical examinations during his time in detention, supporters said.

Yang’s doctoral supervisor Feng Chongyi said: “We ask that the Australian government leverages its new openings for dialogue to raise three urgent demands:

• obtain access to review the full medical examination report and other recent reports;

• ensure Yang is given Australian-supervised medical treatment outside the detention centre (supervised by an Australian-approved expert);

• and procure Yang’s release to Australia on medical parole.

“These are the three things that need to be done to ensure that an Australian citizen is not left to die as a political prisoner in a Beijing detention centre.”

The Beijing People’s High Court has approved multiple extensions to the deadline for handing down a verdict on Yang’s case, with October 9 set as the current deadline for a verdict.

Yang, who completed a PhD at the University of Technology Sydney, has spent the past four years in a 1.2 metre-wide prison cell with two other prisoners.

His supporters said he is frequently hungry between meals because the detention centre has stopped selling extra food.

A spokeswoman for Foreign Minister Penny Wong said: “Our thoughts are with Dr Yang Jun, and we share the deep concerns of his friends and family about the ongoing delays in his case.

“The Australian government has consistently advocated for Dr Yang’s interests and wellbeing, and for him to be reunited with his family.

“His case has been raised at every opportunity with the Chinese government, including by the prime minister and foreign minister.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/australian-fears-he-ll-die-in-chinese-prison-after-doctors-find-huge-kidney-cyst-20230827-p5dzs7.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19446105

File: e84f79ec32464da⋯.jpg (1.51 MB,3600x2395,720:479,ADFA_students_were_alleged….jpg)

File: 90ca818046f83ce⋯.jpg (1.05 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Andrew_Hastie_says_to_ram_….jpg)

ADF Academy cadets claim they were pressured to remove uniforms for Wear It Purple Day

Andrew Greene - 27 August 2023

Defence insists Wear It Purple Day (WIPD) activities are voluntary for personnel after cadets claimed they were warned not to dress in military uniform during the annual LGBTIQ+ event because it would be considered a "protest".

Students at the Australian Defence Force Academy (ADFA) have complained they felt pressured to wear purple clothing on Friday in a move the federal opposition has condemned as "coercive" and "overtly political" for the armed forces.

For several years the Defence Department has encouraged members to take part in WIPD, but ADFA recruits said a directive was given last week outlining that regular uniforms would be prohibited this year.

An instruction purportedly sent to ADFA cadets on Wednesday, and seen by the ABC, states: "Please remember it is Wear It Purple Day tomorrow and the dress is civilian attire. No one is to wear uniform!

"Please ensure personnel remember this as wearing of uniform tomorrow will be seen as an active protest against LGBTQIA+, which is not in line with Defence policy.

"Additionally, anyone in uniform will be required to explain why they have chosen to disobey a direct command from the CO."

ADFA students claim the specific dress instructions ahead of Wear It Purple Day came from the executive officer of the Canberra military institution.

"Guidance from XO [executive officer] is that wearing uniform will be considered a protest against WIPD, which does not align with the ADF value of respect," another message to ADFA students also seen by the ABC, states.

"You are very welcome to wear civvies with absolutely no purple if you wish!

"This will be viewed as a neutral stance rather than an active protest and that is absolutely okay."

One current ADFA member, speaking on the condition of anonymity, has told the ABC that wearing civilian attire is virtually never permitted while studying at the officer training establishment.

In a statement, the Australian Defence Force did not respond to specific questions about guidance notes given to ADFA members but said it "continues to improve workplace culture to enhance capability and performance through diversity and inclusion activities".

"Defence personnel voluntarily participate in a range of diversity and inclusion events throughout the year at a group, service or local community level," a spokesperson told the ABC.

"On 24 August 2023, Australian Defence Force Academy students and staff were asked to wear civilian attire and, if they wished, to wear something purple in recognition of 'Wear it Purple Day'."

Shadow Defence Minister Andrew Hastie, himself a graduate of ADFA, says military leaders at the officer training school are being "overtly political".

"The ADF leadership should only be insisting on adherence to its values: service, courage, respect, integrity and excellence," he said.

"To go beyond those values and ram home a political agenda — as they have with Wear it Purple Day — is to trample on our diggers and their freedom of conscience.

"That is not the spirit of ANZAC: it is coercive behaviour, and it is unacceptable.

"We have people with different religions, different backgrounds, different sexualities and we all have to live together, and we've got to be respectful of one another.

"I think that's the principle the ADF leadership should be focusing on, along with mastering the profession of arms which is their core business."

Twelve months ago Defence Minister Richard Marles overturned a controversial ban on ADF staff holding special events celebrating diversity and cultural causes such as LGBT+ morning teas that were introduced by his predecessor Peter Dutton.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-08-27/adf-academy-cadets-claim-they-were-pressured-to-remove-uniforms/102780562

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19446144

File: 5b84a4990c09a4d⋯.jpg (1.19 MB,4528x2546,2264:1273,A_US_Marine_Corps_MV_22_Os….jpg)

File: ff1add46f09c72b⋯.jpg (221.57 KB,750x463,750:463,PB_5.jpg)

File: f6d09f05e3d08c2⋯.jpg (181.66 KB,750x343,750:343,SODLJAIII_2.jpg)

File: afd5b085766d1cc⋯.jpg (294.04 KB,750x698,375:349,USEA_20.jpg)

File: b7ea6a0b93ed3b0⋯.mp4 (14.11 MB,640x360,16:9,V0mMRJD9DJRHinPt.mp4)

>>19440283

Aussie troops will keep flying on ‘Widowmaker’ after crash

Andrew Tillett - Aug 28, 2023

Australian troops will continue to fly on US Osprey aircraft as long as they are certified to operate, despite the weekend crash that killed three Marines on Melville Island near Darwin, Defence Minister Richard Marles said.

Rescuers on Monday continued efforts to recover the bodies and investigate the cause of the accident that thrust the safety record of the tilt-rotor aircraft sharply into focus.

The V-22 Osprey, a joint design of aviation companies Boeing and Bell, has the unwanted nickname of the “Widowmaker” for the number of fatal accidents the type has been involved in.

Since 1991, the aircraft has been involved in 10 fatal crashes, claiming 54 lives. The crashes took place in testing, exercises and during combat operations.

Sunday’s disaster was the second fatal incident for an Osprey operating in Australia. In August 2017, three US soldiers were killed and 23 rescued when their aircraft, while taking off from USS Bonhomme Richard, hit another warship and crashed into the sea during exercises at the Shoalwater Bay training area in central Queensland.

The unusual looking tilt-rotor design allows the aircraft to take off and land like a helicopter and fly like an aeroplane, making it ideal for amphibious and remote operations.

Australian forces do not operate the Osprey. The aircraft are mostly used by US Marines, including those deployed to Darwin, and Australian personnel will sometimes fly on them in training exercises. No Australians were aboard the aircraft that crashed on Sunday.

As well as the three deaths, eight soldiers remain in hospital, including one in intensive care. Twelve other personnel have been discharged after suffering minor injuries.

“We’re incredibly lucky and incredibly thankful, for a chopper that crashes and then catches fire, to have 20 marines that are surviving, I think that’s an incredible outcome,” Northern Territory police commissioner Michael Murphy said.

“This recovery and investigation will be prolonged, enduring and complex. We are planning to be at the crash site for at least 10 days.”

The accident comes less than a month after four Australian air crew were killed onboard their MR-90 Taipan helicopter in the Whitsundays.

Asked whether Australian personnel would continue to fly on Ospreys, Mr Marles said the aircraft was a “remarkable capability” and trusted the US to ensure their safety.

“Australians do get on board Ospreys and have done so during the course of a Marine rotation, that’s pretty standard,” he said.

“I think we see this as a very important piece of capability and we’ve been happy to work with the United States with the Ospreys.

“We don’t know what’s happened here, and so it’s really important that we allow that investigation process to take place. But we rely on the US to provide the safety certification for all the equipment that they use, and we would be satisfied with that.”

Former Australian army brigadier Ian Langford flew on Ospreys while deployed to Afghanistan and believes the aircraft’s reputation for being unsafe is unwarranted, and more a legacy of its early failures during testing.

“I never felt vulnerable on the V-22s. They’re very safe and fly thousands of hours a year with nothing to report,” said Associate Professor Langford, who now lectures in defence studies at the University of NSW.

He said Australian officials had in the past conducted their own safety assessments of the Osprey and relying on American airworthiness advice did not pose an elevated risk for Australian personnel.

Associate Professor Langford said Ospreys had awesome power to lift off quickly out of the range of small arms fire, had the speed to fly as quickly as fixed wing aircraft over tactical distances and could carry a significant amount of personnel or cargo.

While not speculating on the cause of the crash, he said the fact the bulk of those onboard survived with minor injuries suggested the aircraft was probably on approach or departure and not flying far off the ground.

“The most vulnerable part is when it transitions from rotary to fixed wing mode,” he said.

US President Joe Biden posted on social media that “Jill [his wife and first lady] and I send our deepest condolences to the families of the marines who lost their lives in this deadly crash. We are praying for those who also suffered injuries”.

https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/ausse-troops-will-keep-flying-on-widowmaker-after-crash-20230828-p5dzx2

https://twitter.com/POTUS/status/1695980512051957918

https://twitter.com/SecDef/status/1695892398692299023

https://twitter.com/USEmbAustralia/status/1696059548644388918

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19446165

File: a8da6ba145bb307⋯.mp4 (8.95 MB,960x540,16:9,Air_traffic_chatter_discus….mp4)

File: a4047fe1b5ec1b6⋯.jpg (107.17 KB,1200x801,400:267,The_US_MV_22_Osprey_crashe….jpg)

File: 9886de50dc16de8⋯.jpg (2.07 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Bernard_Tipiloura_says_the….jpg)

File: 83bec3eb24b650f⋯.jpg (2.63 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Personnel_from_across_the_….jpg)

File: 0dc35e9765392ea⋯.jpg (1.09 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,Tiwi_high_school_teacher_T….jpg)

>>19440283

Moments after US Osprey crash that killed three marines heard on air traffic control audio

Thomas Morgan, Matt Garrick, and Jack Hislop - 28 August 2023

Air traffic control audio has the moment authorities declared an emergency after the crash of a US military Osprey aircraft that killed three marines.

Twenty-three personnel were onboard the Osprey, with 20 of the crew evacuated to Darwin.

In the audio, an American voice can be heard making the first mention of a serious incident unfolding on the Tiwi Islands, to Darwin's north.

"We are just a declaring an emergency, we have Dumptruck 11 flight single MV-22 in the vicinity of Melville Island."

Approximately six minutes later, air traffic control asks for further information:

"Contact 33, search and rescue is requesting … if there is fire."

"There is a significant fire in the vicinity of the crash site. Looks like it is not spreading, but there is a significant fire," comes a response.

The recording can be heard in audio logs of Darwin's air traffic control shortly after the crash around 9am on Sunday.

The crash happened during Exercise Predators Run, a series of wargames being held in northern Australia between the militaries of the United States, Australia, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Timor Leste.

Three people were killed and three more remain in the Royal Darwin Hospital, including one in intensive care.

The bodies of those killed are expected to be brought back to the mainland in the coming days, with Northern Territory Police Commissioner Michael Murphy saying investigators are expected to be stationed at the crash site for another 10 days at least.

In the hours after the crash, multiple organisations including Careflight, NT Police, NT Health and the National Critical Care and Trauma Response Centre (NCCTRC) assisted in getting injured US marines back to Darwin.

Executive director of the Darwin-based National Critical Care and Trauma Response Centre, Len Notaras, said he was "relieved" so many people survived the crash.

"Quite often the result of such an event can be catastrophic," he said.

"Those that got the asset onto the ground, are probably well worthwhile commending even though they might have lost their lives."

Tiwi residents in shock after Osprey crash

On the Tiwi Islands, residents of the remote Northern Territory archipelago today reacted with shock and disbelief that an international incident of such scale could've happened on their home soil.

Tiwi elder Bernard Tipiloura, the NT's 2023 Senior Australian of the Year, offered his heartfelt condolences to the families of the fallen Americans, and said his people were preparing a traditional ceremony to help let their spirits rest.

"We were very sad to see this happen," he said from his home in Wurrumiyanga, on Bathurst Island.

"We can perform a sorry dance at the Tiwi College, because it's near Tiwi College where the plane crashed.

"We want to perform sorry dance because that's our way to say sorry to the lost people."

Xavier Catholic College teacher Tammy Kerinaiua said the crash happened on her mother's Mantiyuwi clan country.

As the news travelled through the community, she said many reacted with devastation over the deaths.

"Our sincere condolences go out to them," Ms Kerinaiua said of the victim's families.

"It's really shocking and devastating and sad."

She said children at the high school would also likely be putting together a tribute for the three lives lost on their island home.

"Probably get the school kids to do a tribute messages to the US [military personnel]," she said.

Kayne Fernando, who captains a ferry between neighbouring Bathurst and Melville Islands, said he watched Australian Defence Force members gathering by the water's edge for hours, just waiting for news to find out if Predators Run would continue.

He too offered his tributes.

"It's sad for the rest of the families over there in the US," Mr Fernando said.

The Tiwi Land Council, which issues visitor permits to those from outside the islands, today placed a blanket ban on media permits to Melville Island, the site of the crash.

A no-fly zone also remains in place over the remote and difficult-to-access area.

Tiwi Land Council Chairman Gibson Farmer Illortaminni said there was a strong bond between the Tiwi people and military personnel training in the area.

"We want to assure them and their families that they have the support and well wishes of the Tiwi community during this challenging time," he said.

Mr Gibson said he was relieved no residents were impacted by the unfortunate accident.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-08-28/nt-osprey-military-helicopter-crash-air-traffic-control-audio/102785112

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19452806

File: d40c368fc450298⋯.jpg (294.88 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_will_anno….jpg)

File: 6f76a8ffdda3153⋯.jpg (314.38 KB,2047x1152,2047:1152,Penny_Wong_with_Yes23_camp….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19297392

Anthony Albanese won’t be campaigning for an Indigenous voice to parliament each day

ROSIE LEWIS and PAIGE TAYLOR - AUGUST 28, 2023

Anthony Albanese won’t campaign daily for an Indigenous Voice to Parliament, but instead appear at major referendum events in between running the country, declaring the proposal was “about just giving a bit of respect” to Indigenous people.

The Prime Minister attempted to play down the reach of the Voice by comparing it to business groups and stakeholders that provide advice to government.

Peter Dutton predicted a tight vote across the country – including in his home state of Queensland – and said Australians would be bullied into voting Yes.

A small number of cabinet ministers will join Mr Albanese at a “significant community rally” in the northern suburbs of Adelaide on Wednesday to announce the referendum date, which is expected to be October 14.

Attempting to defy No campaign accusations Labor was too focused on the Voice, government sources said Mr Albanese would be “working hard” on governing and delivering for Australians ­during the official campaign but would attend some major campaign events.

Ministers who hold portfolios where the gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians is starkest – such as Health Minister Mark Butler and Education Minister Jason Clare – will campaign alongside Yes23 to ­demonstrate “practical solutions the Voice poses”.

With federal cabinet in Perth on Monday, Foreign Minister Penny Wong was joined by former Liberal deputy leader Julie Bishop for a street walk.

The Yes campaign told The Australian that in some of the city’s suburbs 50 per cent of households were unaware of the Voice or that a referendum would take place later this year. There were also pockets of undecided voters above 40 per cent, giving Yes23 hope Western Australia, which consistently polls as a staunch No state, was still in play.

Mr Albanese said the state’s scrapped cultural heritage laws had nothing to do with the Voice and the Indigenous advisory body would not make decisions about people’s land, after opposition legal affairs spokeswoman Michaelia Cash led a campaign likening the Voice to the unpopular laws.

“All the Voice is is an advisory group, like business have groups and a lot of people give advice to government. What it will be is a structured advice group,” Mr Albanese told Perth’s Nova 97.3FM. “It will then be up to government to decide whether they agree with it or not on any issue. None of that will change.”

Earlier he told Mix 94.5FM: “Remember with the apology to the Stolen Generations? It was like ‘no, we can’t apologise because there’ll be all these consequences’. There weren’t. Marriage equality, ‘we couldn’t have marriage equality because it would ruin straight marriages and it will change everyone’s lives’. It didn’t.

“This is about just giving a bit of respect to what is 3 per cent of the population. So, an upside for them with no downside for anyone else.”

The Opposition Leader accused Mr Albanese of trying to deceive voters after The Australian revealed Yes23 was providing volunteers cheat sheets on how to redirect voters who ask why the Voice was needed now, raise concerns over the lack of detail and who believed the Voice was about “more than just recognition”.

Yes23 campaigners have been given examples on how to “affirm, answer and redirect” under a plan to engage the base, persuade the maybes and ignore the opposition.

Mr Dutton conceded many Australians were still undecided though said those people were inclined to vote No “because the Prime Minister won’t give them detail”. “There’s going to be a tight vote across the country,” he said.

“The Yes campaign has $100m to spend between now and the 14th of October … People will be bombarded with ads. People will be bullied into voting Yes. If I thought it was in our country’s best interests, I’d sign up to it in a heartbeat – but it is not.”

The government and Yes campaign have fiercely disputed the No camp’s claim that Yes23 will spend $100m on the referendum.

Former foreign minister Ms Bishop said a successful referendum would give Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people their rightful place in the Constitution, but also the “right, and the risk and the responsibility to come up with policies that will address the ­problems, as they see them, and get better outcomes”.

Asked how a No vote would be perceived overseas, she said: “I know that Australia’s international reputation can be affected by a No vote. I have no doubt that it would be sending a very negative message about the openness, and the empathy, and the respect and responsibility that the Australian people have for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/anthony-albanese-wont-be-campaigning-for-an-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-each-day/news-story/b878553fa5a6ab7460a9c84cff3604dc

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19452823

File: ba7c820edf5c20e⋯.jpg (273.21 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 045365e01872a19⋯.jpg (479.46 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Linda_Burney_at_a_Yes_camp….jpg)

File: 4644f558dfc63f2⋯.jpg (254.98 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Burney_has_dismissed_any_w….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19297392

Linda Burney is sincere, but not suitable to be face of the Yes campaign for the Indigenous voice to parliament

DENNIS SHANAHAN - AUGUST 29, 2023

Linda Burney is a suitable, sincere and genuine face for the Indigenous voice to parliament but she is not up to being the voice for the Yes campaign for the constitutional referendum.

Whether this failure is through inability to perform publicly in parliament, press conferences and public meetings is a result of a “mini stroke”, a heart operation or medication is immaterial.

As Minister for Indigenous Australians, Burney has been in the hot seat of the Labor Government from the moment on election night Anthony Albanese gave top priority to a referendum to a constitutional Indigenous voice to parliament and executive government.

Burney is feeling the heat in that seat as the Yes campaign prepares to launch its official $100 million, six-week campaign to change the constitution because the Prime Minister put her there.

Albanese made her the lead Cabinet minister on Indigenous affairs and he did so knowing the intensity of the referendum campaign, Labor’s need for success, the importance to the nation and, significantly now, more than two years after she had suffered, and recovered from, a transient ischaemic attack or TIA.

On the eve of the official announcement of the referendum date Albanese is “briefing out” that he will not be campaigning every day on the voice and in his words will be “walking and chewing gum at the same time”.

Albanese is now caught in a political trap of his own making because he wanted to blame Peter Dutton if the referendum failed and accuse him of irrelevance if it won. But the PM now faces the dilemma of not being able to let the referendum fail while equally not being seen to be neglecting the huge impact of rising cost of living.

There is the whiff here of not just political realism but also of excuses.

At the same time Burney, in a requested interview, sought to respond to “whispering” about her health and revealed, variously, that changes to her speaking voice and possibly confusion were the result of the “mini-stroke”, a side effect of a heart operation or continuing medication.

But, Burney has also declared she is “fighting fit”, there “absolutely no issues with my health now” and her doctors have said there was a full recovery with no residual effect and there was “no bearing” on her ability to perform her duties “as a minister of the Crown”.

No-one should suffer stigma from health problems and be allowed to continue to work if recovered. Equally if someone is unable to continue to do their job because of health there has to be some adjustment made as much for them as anyone else.

It has been clear for months Burney has been unable to answer simple questions about the voice to parliament, even in sympathetic interviews, that she has Ministerial colleagues on hand at public meetings to help her sell the voice and in parliament her inability to handle basic requests for information is embarrassing to all.

To be fair Burney doesn’t have much detail to frame an argument beyond a sincere emotional appeal but as a Cabinet Minister and the lead on the Indigenous voice, after Albanese himself, she is expected to do better politically, think on her feet and not have to rely on her colleagues’ protection in her own portfolio.

Burney has declared she is absolutely fit for the job and Albanese has backed her in and described her strength and tenacity. Albanese put her in the job and has kept her there. There is no room for excuses or day passes during the next weeks of what threatens to be a brutal political campaign for a fundamental constitutional change for a voice to parliament and executive government.

Burney is either fit for the job as she says or she’s not; either way Albanese has committed her to the task and can’t expect special treatment or prepare excuses as the Yes campaign begins officially and from behind.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/linda-burney-is-sincere-but-not-suitable-to-be-face-of-the-yes-campaign-for-the-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/2ade43a19792b19fc6e9664fd786e5d8

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19452845

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>19222755

>>19297392

>>19427688

Meta ends partnership with RMIT FactLab amid voice referendum bias claims

SOPHIE ELSWORTH - AUGUST 29, 2023

1/2

Tech giant Meta has suspended its partnership with RMIT’s fact checking program “effective immediately” after receiving complaints about bias and unfairness relating to the upcoming voice to parliament referendum.

Meta executives have distanced themselves from RMIT’s FactLab after it recently came under fire for slapping a “false information” label on Sky News Australia host Peta Credlin’s reports posted on Facebook that the Uluru Statement from the Heart is not a single-page document but is 26 pages long.

The FactLab’s failure to have a current certification by the International Fact-Checking Network was also blamed for Meta’s decision to cut ties with FactLab.

The FactLab – which said itself that it works “hand-in-hand” with RMIT ABC Fact Check – claimed this month that Credlin’s reporting and commentary about the Uluru Statement’s length were incorrect, despite Credlin, who is also a columnist at The Australian, receiving a response to a Freedom of Information request from the National Indigenous Australians Agency confirming its length as 26 pages.

Meta’s regional director of policy, Mia Garlick, responded on Tuesday to an inquiry sent by Senator James Paterson that was revealed in The Australian this week, questioning the FactLab’s conduct.

“We have recently become aware that one of our Australian fact-checking partners – RMIT – did not have current IFCN accreditation and that there have been complaints made to the IFCN about possible bias or unfairness in some of the fact checks being applied by RMIT with respect to content relating to the upcoming referendum on the Voice to parliament,” she said in the correspondence.

“In light of these allegations and the upcoming vote on the Voice referendum, we are suspending RMIT as a partner in our fact checking program, effective immediately.”

Just last month Ms Garlick wrote that the tech giant was preparing to combat misinformation in the voice referendum and was providing a “one-off funding boost to our Australian fact-checkers”.

At the time RMIT FactLab CrossCheck director Anne Kruger said she was “grateful” for the support to deal with voice to Parliament “narratives” to help educate the “publicly safely and calmly”.

Senator Paterson wrote to Meta, the owner of Facebook, last Thursday and asked for a full explanation over its conduct which described as a “private company interfering with the free speech of Australians”.

“The decision of a foreign headquartered social media platform to interfere with legitimate public discourse during a referendum to change the Australian Constitution is particularly egregious and cannot go unaccounted,” he said.

In Ms Garlick’s response, she said fact checker organisations must be certified by the IFCN which “requires participating organisations to demonstrate a commitment to nonpartisanship and fairness”.

Ms Garlick said once the IFCN has determined whether RMIT FactLab’s expired certification is to be reinstated, Meta will reconsider their participation with the fact-checking program.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19452852

File: 35dcc8ff30c5dda⋯.jpg (374.82 KB,1275x1650,17:22,0001.jpg)

File: e59a4b1613b29bf⋯.jpg (152.95 KB,1275x1650,17:22,0002.jpg)

File: 7ea54cbedd3877a⋯.jpg (201.69 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Peta_Credlin.jpg)

File: 883816535630823⋯.jpg (101.24 KB,768x1024,3:4,ABC_Media_Watch_host_Paul_….jpg)

File: e75374a0916876d⋯.jpg (357.74 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Russell_Skelton_and_his_pa….jpg)

>>19452845

2/2

Sky News last week revealed the RMIT’s certification with the IFCN expired in December.

Despite this, on Tuesday RMIT FactLab still said on its website that it “works in partnership with Meta as third-party fact-checkers, debunking problematic posts on Facebook and Instagram to help slow the spread of harmful information”.

“As third-party fact-checkers we also receive funding from Meta,” the site said.

It also claims FactLab is “transparent, independent and fully accountable”.

Senator Paterson told The Australian, “I welcome Meta’s decision to suspend its relationship with the so-called fact-checking unit at RMIT which has displayed consistent pro-voice bias in the referendum debate.

“The freedom of Australians to participate in public debate about a radical change to our constitution should not be restricted by foreign tech platforms with or without the shield of self-appointed fact checkers.”

ABC Media Watch host Paul Barry on his program last week questioned the conduct of Meta and the FactLab and said a “disputed” label on Credlin’s editorial about the Uluru Statement’s length about being silenced would have been more appropriate.

“The Uluru Statement is expressed on one page, but there are many more pages of notes and background … where matters like a treaty and reparations are raised,” Barry said.

“And given that there may be some point in what Credlin is saying, we think a disputed label would be more appropriate.”

A Meta spokeswoman said they have suspended their partnership with RMIT until further notice.

“The IFCN requires participating organisations to demonstrate a commitment to nonpartisanship and fairness,” she said.

“The IFCN will determine whether RMIT FactLab’s expired certification should be reinstated. Considering both the nature of the allegations against RMIT and the upcoming referendum, we have decided to suspend RMIT from our fact-checking program pending the IFCN’s decision.”

RMIT FactLab and ABC FactCheck and both run by director Russell Skelton, an ABC veteran who has reported numerous tweets in favour of the voice referendum.

The ABC’s head of communications Nick Leys last week wrote to The Australian asking that Credlin’s column about the public broadcaster’s links with the fact-checking units be corrected after he said she made “incorrect statements about RMIT ABC Fact Check and should be corrected”.

The ABC was asked to provide an explanation of the difference between the two groups of fact checkers, the RMIT FactLab and RMIT ABC FactCheck but The Australian received no response.

RMIT FactLab has since then completely overhauled its website, removing ties on its homepage to the ABC and also removing the biographies written about its staff members.

RMIT has been contacted for comment.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/meta-ends-partnership-with-rmit-factlab-amid-voice-referendum-bias-claims/news-story/3237f2459b9dc28d2d74f185051ca60f

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjfZgDy1ivs

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19452872

File: ae2477735ced2d9⋯.jpg (276.37 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_Australian_Education_U….jpg)

>>19188991

>>19361940

Teachers in boycott of nuclear submarine project

NATASHA BITA - AUGUST 29, 2023

Pacifist teachers are boycotting a Defence Department “brainwashing’’ program that asks children to design nuclear-powered submarines.

The Australian Education Union federal executive will meet this week to consider a national boycott of the science project, which requires high school students to design a nuclear-powered propulsion system for a submarine.

The union is furious that the Albanese government is spending $368bn on AUKUS nuclear-powered submarines at a time when most public schools are receiving less money than they were supposed to under the Gonski needs-based funding deal.

At a grassroots level, some teachers are boycotting the Nuclear-Powered Propulsion Challenge, which was launched by Deputy Chief of Navy Rear Admiral Jonathon Earley in June as a science, technology, engineering and maths competition.

The controversial STEM challenge asks students to work in teams to submit engineering plans for submarine nuclear propulsion.

Defence devised the program “to inspire students to discover how nuclear propulsion works and how it makes submarines more capable’’.

Winning students from each state and territory will visit HMAS Stirling in Western Australia, tour a Collins-class submarine, dine with submariners and use a training simulator to “drive” a submarine through Sydney Harbour.

AEU branch meetings in Victoria have resolved to block the project in schools, and environmental group Friends of the Earth is now pushing for a national boycott.

Friends of the Earth nuclear-free co-ordinator Sanne de Swart said the Defence Department had made a “blatant attempt to normalise nuclear power and indoctrinate children into building in­struments of death’’.

She said the STEM project was “indoctrinating” students and failed to address the health and environmental risks of nuclear power.

“It fails to acknowledge Australia’s significant and devastating history with nuclear, including the atomic bomb tests, uranium mining and the attempts to impose nuclear waste dumps,’’ she said.

Union members at Virtual School Victoria voted to condemn the program.

“We resolve to refuse to refer students to this program or others like it, and we will refuse to promote it within our schools,’’ the branch stated.

A union meeting of public school teachers in the regional Victorian town of Benalla also called on the state’s Education Department to “cease all involvement in this and similar programs’’.

“The government spending of $368bn on AUKUS nuclear submarines will require whole new industries in Australia, and beginn­ing to draw our brightest teenage students into a war industry is outrageous,’’ their motion states. “A politicised pro-AUKUS curriculum has no place in our schools.’’

Melbourne primary school teacher Emma Kefford is planning to vote for a boycott at a meeting of the AUE’s inner-city branch on Thursday. She said she was “pretty disturbed’’ that the Defence Department was providing curriculum material to schools.

“I think it contradicts some of the other values in the Australian curriculum,’’ she said. “These inventions seem pretty exciting to young people, but they’re often removed from the realities of war and the horrors it entails.’’

The Victorian Education Department promotes the challenge on its website, saying: “We’re encouraging schools to register teams of 3 to 5 students to work together on the project.’’

The South Australian government also promotes the program on its website, as a way to “get young Australian minds thinking like engineers and scientists, by completing activities based on nuclear submarine engineering’’.

A spokesman for federal Education Minister Jason Clare said he did not share the concerns. The Defence Department was asked how many schools were participating but did not respond.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/teachers-to-ban-indoctrination-on-nuclear-submarines/news-story/d7d7c434d3f4ec2982fb52063eecf1a3

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19452895

File: e85f501edb1ead5⋯.jpg (172.94 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Shane_Drumgold.jpg)

>>19289705

Shane Drumgold takes legal action against Sofronoff Inquiry

STEPHEN RICE - AUGUST 29, 2023

Former ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold is taking legal action against the Sofronoff Inquiry, following its finding that he engaged in serious malpractice and grossly unethical conduct in the rape trial of Bruce Lehrmann.

Mr Drumgold, who resigned from his position as ACT Director of Public Prosecutions following the damning report, has listed a case in the ACT Supreme Court for 14 September.

The nature of the legal action is not yet known but Mr Drumgold is likely to be seeking to challenge the board of inquiry findings.

The Australian has sought comment from Mr Drumgold, who has been on paid leave since he appeared before the inquiry over five days in May. His resignation does not take effect until 1 September.

Mr Drumgold conceded he made mistakes in his prosecution of Mr Lehrmann for the alleged rape of Brittany Higgins but rejected the key findings of the inquiry that he had lied to the Supreme Court and engaged in serious malpractice and grossly unethical conduct.

After the report was leaked to the media, including to The Australian, Mr Drumgold said the report’s early release had denied him procedural fairness.

“The pre-emptive release of the report to the media has denied me procedural fairness. It has deprived the ACT Government of the opportunity of considering my conduct objectively,” Mr Drumgold said.

“Although I accept my conduct was less than perfect, my decisions were all made in good faith, under intense and sometimes crippling pressure, conducted within increasingly unmanageable workloads,” he said.

ACT Chief Minister Andrew Barr told the ACT Legislative Assembly on Tuesday that Mr Drumgold’s legal action “will obviously occur in the context of the appropriate judicial review provisions.”

“Accordingly, it is not appropriate for me to comment further in relation to the findings and processes associated with its report and its release,” Mr Barr said.

Inquiry chairman Walter Sofronoff KC ruled that every one of the allegations made by Mr Drumgold that sparked the inquiry was baseless and the chief prosecutor “did not act with fairness and detachment as was required by his role”.

“The result has been a public inquiry, which was not justified by any of his allegations, that has caused lasting pain to many people and which has demonstrated his allegations to be not just incorrect, but wholly false and without any rational basis,” Mr Sofronoff concluded.

“The cost of a six-month public inquiry … has been huge.”

In an extraordinary move earlier this month, Mr Barr suggested Mr Sofronoff could face charges or a referral to the national corruption watchdog over the premature leaking of his report.

Mr Barr said “a reasonably straight reading” of the Inquiries Act would indicate Mr Sofronoff had breached the law by providing journalists with copies of the ­report prior to its release by the government.

“We will consider our position in relation to that,” the Chief Minister said.

“I’m not making any pre-judgments at this point. I think there is a degree of objectivity that is required in assessing whether this constitutes a breach.”

However the government has refused to comment on whether Mr Drumgold will face ­charges of attempting to pervert the course of justice or the common law offence of misconduct in public office.

The Office of the DPP will now also face a multimillion-dollar claim by Mr Lehrmann on the grounds of malfeasance, following Mr Sofronoff’s findings of gross misconduct by Mr Drumgold.

More to come

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/shane-drumgold-takes-legal-action-against-sofronoff-inquiry/news-story/5071e0c35c365d47e126aecd0ab848b6

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19452897

File: 29127e2768c5acf⋯.jpg (302.37 KB,1251x1876,1251:1876,Outgoing_ACT_director_of_p….jpg)

File: 694f9bbe3fe1541⋯.jpg (660.48 KB,1920x1280,3:2,Bruce_Lehrmann_and_Brittan….jpg)

>>19289705

>>19452895

Lehrmann prosecutor seeks to quash damning findings from Sofronoff inquiry

Natassia Chrysanthos and Georgina Mitchell - August 29, 2023

Former ACT top prosecutor Shane Drumgold has launched legal action to overturn damning findings about his conduct made by the board of inquiry into the high-profile Bruce Lehrmann trial, and to stop the territory government from taking any action against him based on the report.

In judicial review proceedings filed in the ACT Supreme Court on Friday last week, Drumgold is seeking to quash the report by former judge Walter Sofronoff, KC, who controversially leaked it to select media outlets before its official release.

Drumgold argues the leak failed to comply with section 17 of the Inquiries Act, denied him natural justice and gave rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias on the part of Sofronoff.

Lawyers for Drumgold argue some of Sofronoff’s findings against him were legally unreasonable, including that he breached his duty as a prosecutor. They also say Drumgold was not given a fair hearing in relation to other findings, and that some of Sofronoff’s findings were out of the inquiry’s jurisdiction because they did not relate to its terms of reference.

ACT Attorney-General Shane Rattenbury earlier this month indicated he was considering whether Drumgold should be prosecuted, given the report’s findings had met the statutory threshold for dismissal for misbehaviour in office.

ACT Chief Minister Andrew Barr also said the government was seeking advice about whether Sofronoff had breached the Inquiries Act.

Drumgold’s proceedings – the latest in a number to have emerged in connection with the Lehrmann case – seek an injunction to stop Rattenbury from taking action against him under the DPP Act based on Sofronoff’s report.

The case, listed for a directions hearing on September 14, names the board of inquiry, the Australian Capital Territory and the ACT attorney-general as defendants.

The territory government commissioned the board of inquiry to investigate authorities’ handling of last year’s Lehrmann trial following a dispute between Drumgold and police about the investigation.

In the inquiry’s report, Sofronoff was highly critical of Drumgold’s conduct. While he noted the prosecution was properly brought, he found the top prosecutor lied to the Supreme Court in the lead-up to the trial and improperly questioned former Coalition minister Linda Reynolds on the stand.

However, Sofronoff’s inquiry was itself brought into disrepute when it emerged the former judge selectively leaked a copy of his final report to journalists before handing it to the ACT government. Sofronoff also briefed journalists throughout the inquiry.

Rattenbury said on Tuesday that Drumgold had concerns with the nature of the report and was seeking to challenge the findings made against him.

“I think the nature of this matter has been that it’s been heavily contested, the parties involved have continued to seek pathways to pursue their argument, and Mr Drumgold is entitled to lodge these proceedings. It will now proceed through the court,” Rattenbury said.

“Obviously, I’m limited in what I can say about it, given the ACT has been named as a respondent in the matter.”

Drumgold was the lead prosecutor in the trial of Lehrmann, a former political staffer who was accused of sexually assaulting colleague Brittany Higgins in 2019. Lehrmann pleaded not guilty and maintains his innocence. The trial was aborted in October due to juror misconduct and Drumgold decided against a retrial due to concerns over Higgins’ mental health.

Drumgold has since stepped down as DPP and will not be able to practise as an ACT barrister once his resignation takes effect next month because his practising certificate, which is tied to his title, will no longer be valid.

Barr on Tuesday said he was advised that Drumgold had commenced legal proceedings related to the content of the board of inquiry’s report but the proceedings had yet to be served on the territory.

“Accordingly, it is not appropriate for me to make further comment in relation to the findings of, and processes associated with, the report and its release,” Barr said.

Neither Drumgold nor Sofronoff had responded to a request for comment on Tuesday.

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/lehrmann-prosecutor-files-legal-action-against-sofronoff-board-of-inquiry-20230829-p5e0al.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19452901

File: 04ffa82077a71d6⋯.jpg (192.23 KB,1309x736,1309:736,James_Hayward_at_the_Distr….jpg)

Former WA Nationals MP James Hayward guilty of child sex abuse

JENNA CLARKE - AUGUST 29, 2023

A West Australian MP has been found guilty of sexually abusing a young girl and has automatically been disqualified from ­parliament.

A jury of six women and six men found James Hayward, 53, guilty of two counts of indecent dealing charges. He was acquitted of two other charges including the allegation he showed the child how to search for pornography online.

Hayward did not apply for bail and was remanded in custody until his sentencing hearing in October.

Hayward was an independent member of WA’s upper house after he was suspended from and then quit the Nationals WA in the wake of charges relating to indecently assaulting the girl between 2019 and 2021, when she was aged between six and eight. He had pleaded not guilty.

After more than four hours of deliberations the jury handed down their verdicts as Hayward stood silently and members of his family, including his wife, sobbed.

The court was told Hayward made the girl indecently touch him on three occasions and also instructed her on how to find explicit and sexually graphic material on the internet.

State prosecutor Sean Stocks told the court Hayward had admitted what he did in a letter emailed to his wife, which became a crucial piece of evidence.

He denied what he wrote was a confession and the WA District Court was told it was a “misguided” and “irrational” decision to protect “his family from the financial mess” he was in at the time, as his business had outstanding debts of more than $400,000.

Mr Stocks told the court that after the child’s parents went to the police and Hayward learned the allegations were going to be made against him, he wrote to his wife saying he was going to end his life.

He sent the email about a week later but added the words “which I have done” in reference to the allegations with a sad face emoji.

Opposition Leader Shane Love, leader of the Nationals WA, said the process to find a replacement for Hayward would commence shortly.

“Abuse in any form is unequivocally unacceptable,” Mr Love said. “It is expected James Hayward will be now disqualified from his position as a member of the Legislative Council representing the South West. A process will then commence to determine his replacement.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/former-wa-nationals-mp-james-hayward-guilty-of-child-sex-abuse/news-story/b4bce053efed827a24863833ea0dee42

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19452902

File: ef2eb36297757c4⋯.mp4 (14.04 MB,640x360,16:9,Adelaide_paedophile_given_….mp4)

Jailed paedophile teacher given end-of-life permit with 17 years left on sentence in Adelaide

Lucy Slade - Aug 29, 2023

An Adelaide paedophile has been given permission to end his life after being jailed for sexually abusing his students while working as a music teacher, 9News can exclusively reveal.

Malcolm Day, 81, is thought to be the first prisoner in the nation to be granted a voluntary assisted dying permit after having been diagnosed with a terminal illness, believed to be cancer.

Day was sentenced to 20 years in prison last June and has 17 years left on his sentence.

There is an 11-step process to access voluntary assisted dying in the state and 9News understands Day is towards the end of that process, meaning it could be finalised within the next few days.

The director of pro-euthanasia group Exit International Philip Nitschke said use of the scheme by a prisoner was going to happen sooner or later.

"By the sound of it, he satisfies all the conditions of the South Australian assisted dying legislation," Nitschke said.

"So there should be no impediment… he should be given the option that any other person would have if they were terminally ill."

Day forever changed the lives of two of his students as a South Australian music teacher in the 1980s.

He groomed and abused students, then denied any wrongdoing when investigated by the education department.

One of his victims has described his offending as "selfish and disgraceful".

The victim told the court Day poisoned her future for his own pleasure and went on to lie about it.

At the time of his sentencing, his barrister Stephen Ey said it was likely he would die in jail.

"Well, that's a real prospect, isn't it… given his age," Ey said.

The latest SA Health data shows 39 terminally ill South Australians have ended their own lives after being granted a permit since voluntary assisted dying was introduced in January this year.

Both the corrections department and SA Health have been contacted for comment.

Lifeline (13 11 14)

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

https://www.9news.com.au/national/exclusive-adelaide-news-jailed-paedophile-teacher-malcolm-day-given-end-of-life-permit-voluntary-assisted-dying/cab7e95c-f3b1-4dbd-ae0d-cc8dbfee22c0

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19452903

File: ce6c9028fad60ab⋯.jpg (83.78 KB,1024x683,1024:683,SYPAQ_s_drones_made_largel….jpg)

File: 557b4fc78a80121⋯.jpg (107.7 KB,1024x683,1024:683,Defence_Minister_Richard_M….jpg)

Cardboard drones from Australia used in attack on Russian airfield

Matthew Knott - August 29, 2023

Australian-made cardboard drones have been reportedly used to help bomb a Russian airfield as the Ukrainian military steps up its attacks on Russian territory.

Ukraine claimed it struck five Russian fighter jets on the weekend in a kamikaze drone attack on the Kursk airfield in Russia, approximately 170 kilometres from the Ukrainian-Russian border.

A prominent Telegram channel run by a former Russian fighter pilot, known as Fighterbomber, said that the drones used in the attack included the distinctive lightweight drones made by Australian engineering company SYPAQ in Melbourne.

“Tonight, [Ukrainians] used them in a swarm, mixing drones with warheads with empty drones,” the Telegram post read. “I don’t know exactly what engines were on the drones, but if they were electric-powered, then they were not launched from Ukraine.”

SYPAQ’s drones, which are made from waxed cardboard and rubber, have been exported to Ukraine in flat packs as part of a $33 million donation of uncrewed aerial systems to Ukraine announced by the federal government in February.

At the time the government said the drones would provide “a battlefield intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance capability” to Ukraine, but it appears the drones are also being used in an attack capacity.

The drones can carry up to 5 kilograms of cargo.

Ukraine’s ambassador to Australia, Vasyl Myroshnychenko, said the Kursk airfield was a “legitimate target” for Ukraine’s armed forces. “Russia uses that airport to launch military operations and send missiles into Ukraine,” he said.

Former Australian general Mick Ryan, who has visited Ukraine several times since the war began, said it was “great” that Australian technology was being used in such missions.

“We’re providing equipment to Ukraine to help them defend themselves,” he said. “If they want to use it in Ukraine or Russia, it’s up to them.”

Ryan said it would be simple for Ukraine to adapt the drones to carry munitions, and their lightweight nature made them well-suited to breach Russia’s air defence systems.

A source from the Security Service of Ukraine told the Kyiv Post that a wave of drones had hit “four Su-30 aircraft and one MiG-29” at the facility, as well as damaging two Pantsir missile launchers and the radars of an S-300 air defence system.

The source described the operation as “impressive”, saying only three of the drones used in the attack were “shot down by a leaky air defence system of Russia”. “We will find out the exact consequences of the damage and the number of dead and wounded in the near future,” they said.

A SYPAQ spokesman declined to comment on how the drones are being used by the Ukrainian armed forces.

In June, pro-Putin social media accounts posted photos purporting to show the drones had crashed inside Russian territory with explosives strapped to them.

The company’s chief executive Amanda Holt said in March that it was an “honour to be supporting the Ukrainian Armed Forces”, describing the drones as “an Australian capability that will help the Ukrainian people defend their country”.

A Department of Defence spokesperson said: “All exports of equipment to support the government of Ukraine have been subject to Australia’s export control legislation, including consideration of international obligations, particularly international humanitarian law.”

According to Russian media reports, there have been over 160 suspected aerial drone attacks this year in Russia and in Russian-controlled territory in Ukraine.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has said that attacks on Russian territory are an “inevitable, natural and absolutely fair process” while declining to claim responsibility for specific drone attacks.

https://www. theage. com. au /politics /federal /aussie -cardboard -drones -used -in -attack -on -russian -airfield -20230829 -p5e0bv .html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

817b11 No.19452904

File: 123287870630067⋯.jpg (91.66 KB,628x1079,628:1079,2023_06_07_11_42_07.jpg)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

817b11 No.19452905

File: 52f2f0fd5f9bd0d⋯.jpg (24.7 KB,463x390,463:390,Screen_Shot_2023_08_27_at_….jpg)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

817b11 No.19452906

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19452924

File: 938100848be9db8⋯.jpg (56.43 KB,1280x720,16:9,Donald_Trump_Atlanta_mugsh….jpg)

>>19321154

>>19427525

US, world should fear new Donald Trump presidency

TROY BRAMSTON - AUGUST 29, 2023

1/2

The mugshot of the disgraced Donald Trump after being arrested at Georgia’s Fulton County jail for attempting to overturn the 2020 presidential election is one of the most iconic photos of our time. Not surprisingly, Trump has already monetised it, offering it for sale on shirts, cups and stickers, and earning $US7.1m ($11m) in 24 hours.

The only person to blame for Trump’s multiple indictments is himself, and it would have been riskier not to have charged him given the threat he continues to pose to democracy. This is not a political witch hunt but about the survival of the great republic. This is what was at stake if Trump had succeeded in 2020 and is at stake if he reclaims the presidency in 2024. The criminal Trump has not been indicted for disputing an election result or challenging it in court, but for attempting to steal it. The former president tried to subvert the democratic process and then incited a destructive and deadly riot at the US Capitol aimed at overturning the certification of electoral college votes.

A concerted and co-ordinated effort to undermine and sabotage an election is one of the gravest crimes anybody can commit in a democracy. If Trump had succeeded, the US would have slid towards an autocracy. There can be no gainsaying this. It is absurd to blame Democrats for Trump’s indictments given that those most damning of Trump are his former Republican staff and officials.

The evidence against Trump and 18 others named in the latest and most sweeping indictment is overwhelming. The charges include lying to state officials, harassing and intimidating election workers, forgery and attempting to cover up their crimes. All 19 have also been charged under Georgia’s racketeering laws, designed to bring organised crime groups to justice.

It follows three other indictments. The previous federal grand jury indictment named four charges: conspiracy to defraud the US; conspiracy to obstruct congressional certification of the 2020 electoral college vote; obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding, and; conspiracy against rights. Trump has also been indicted over keeping boxes of highly classified documents and making hush-money payments to porn star Stormy Daniels.

While all of this is unprecedented for a former US president, the Georgia indictment, after an investigation led by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, is more serious because it is a state indictment. There can be no federal pardon by a re-elected president Trump (or his crony) to save himself from facing prison time if found guilty. Nobody is above the law, even presidents.

What was the alternative? Let Trump get away with serious felonies that violated state and federal law, and struck at the heart of US democracy? That would only serve to embolden Trump to commit even more federal and state crimes. He has, after all, called for the “termination” of the US constitution.

As special counsel Jack Smith noted, Trump is entitled to falsely claim he won the last election, but he is not entitled to overturn it. He was also entitled to seek legal avenues to challenge the election results, which he did, but he is not entitled to subvert the legal and democratic process with false claims, intimidation, forgery and conspiracy.

Yet for all of this, Trump has an effective lock on the Republican nomination for president in 2024. The Republican Party has long ceased to be. It is now a cult of personality around Trump. For evidence of this, look no further than a recent CBS poll of Trump voters who said they are more likely to believe he is telling the truth (71 per cent) compared to friends and family (63 per cent), conservative media figures (56 per cent) and religious leaders (42 per cent).

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19452930

File: d83e5834b1369d2⋯.jpg (209.5 KB,750x1046,375:523,POTUS_31.jpg)

File: 5fc0fdfcfccc5b7⋯.jpg (63.38 KB,965x1065,193:213,F4Vymo9XsAAHLJV.jpg)

File: da5ad4fe128355d⋯.jpg (185.83 KB,2000x1018,1000:509,The_new_line_of_mugshot_in….jpg)

>>19452924

2/2

In the Republican presidential candidate debate last week, almost all of them pledged to pardon Trump if they won the presidency and he was convicted. Vivek Ramaswamy, the most vocal Trump supporter, has previously written that claims of 2020 electoral fraud “weren’t grounded in fact” and “what he delivered in the end was another tale of grievance, a persecution complex that swallowed much of the Republican Party whole”. But now he says he would pardon Trump “on day one”.

What a second Trump presidency would mean for the US and Australia is examined in Bruce Wolpe’s new book, Trump’s Australia (Allen & Unwin). It makes for sober reading. Wolpe, who worked with US Democrats and for prime minister Julia Gillard, suggests US democracy will be under siege if Trump is re-elected. He also examines the impact of a Trump presidency on US allies such as Australia.

For a start, the $368bn trilateral defence pact with the US and UK to acquire eight nuclear-powered submarines by 2055 would be in jeopardy. The US was an unreliable ally during the Trump presidency as he trashed historic partnerships and abused world leaders. Congressional Republicans have repeatedly threatened to scuttle AUKUS.

In Christoffer Guldbrandsen’s documentary, A Storm Foretold, a candid Roger Stone said Trump was “the greatest single mistake in American history”. He is right about that. He began by debasing the political culture and repudiating established norms and conventions. He ended his single term with no regard for the rule of law or free and fair elections.

The 2024 election will be about the survival of US democracy. Trump is likely to win the Republican nomination for president but he is not certain to defeat Joe Biden. If Trump loses again, he will incite further unrest and violence. But if Trump wins, he will, as flagged, move to terminate democracy. The US, and the world, will pay a heavy price if Trump regains the presidency.

Troy Bramston is a senior writer and columnist with The Australian. He has interviewed politicians, presidents and prime ministers from multiple countries along with writers, actors, directors, producers and several pop-culture icons. He is an award-winning and best-selling author or editor of 11 books, including Bob Hawke: Demons and Destiny, Paul Keating: The Big-Picture Leader and Robert Menzies: The Art of Politics. He co-authored The Truth of the Palace Letters and The Dismissal with Paul Kelly.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/us-world-should-fear-new-donald-trump-presidency/news-story/7fff226ac4faec40223166f291977bca

https://nypost.com/2023/08/24/trump-already-selling-merch-featuring-his-mug-shot/

https://secure.winred.com/save-america-joint-fundraising-committee/storefront/

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1694886846050771321

https://qresear.ch/?q=Troy+Bramston

>You attack those who threaten you the most.

>What does FEAR look like?

>What does PANIC look like?

>These people are stupid.

>Enjoy the show!

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19452993

File: 86c41949357e731⋯.jpg (232.95 KB,1920x1920,1:1,F4qa0RMbIAAUbio.jpg)

File: 230a1a4ad729b39⋯.jpg (884.42 KB,1920x1920,1:1,F4qa0QEa0AAB3ed.jpg)

File: fe4177eee58d910⋯.jpg (631.3 KB,1920x1920,1:1,F4qa0QubsAAQlYw.jpg)

File: a59529fe94a3450⋯.jpg (480.38 KB,1920x1920,1:1,F4qa0RWa4AA3aQv.jpg)

>>19440283

UPDATE: MARINE ROTATIONAL FORCE - DARWIN MV-22B OSPREY TILTROTOR AIRCRAFT CRASH

marines.mil - 28 Aug 2023

DARWIN, AUSTRALIA - Marine Rotational Force - Darwin can confirm the names of those killed in the U.S. Marine Corps MV-22B Osprey crash on Melville Island, north of Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia, on 27 August 2023 at approximately 9:30 a.m. The cause of the crash remains under investigation.

Deceased are:

U.S. Marine Corps Corporal Spencer R. Collart, male, 21, MV-22B Osprey crew chief for VMM-363 (REIN), Marine Rotational Force – Darwin, originally from Arlington, VA

U.S. Marine Corps Captain Eleanor V. LeBeau, female, 29, MV-22B Osprey pilot for VMM-363 (REIN), Marine Rotational Force – Darwin, originally from Belleville, IL

U.S. Marine Corps Major Tobin J. Lewis, male, 37, the executive officer of VMM-363 (REIN), Marine Rotational Force – Darwin, originally from Jefferson, CO

Injured:

• Three Marines remain in Royal Darwin Hospital, with one in critical condition and two in stable condition. 17 others were taken to Royal Darwin Hospital, treated for minor injuries, and released.

Additional information on the deceased:

Spencer Collart enlisted in the Marine Corps on October 26, 2020, and was promoted to the rank of Corporal on February 1, 2023. He served in Pensacola, FL, and Jacksonville, NC, before arriving at Marine Corps Base Hawaii in Kaneohe Bay, HI. Cpl Collart, an MV-22B crew chief, received the National Defense Service Medal, Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, and Sea Service Deployment Ribbon.

Eleanor LeBeau was commissioned in the Marine Corps on August 11, 2018, and was promoted to the rank of Captain on March 1, 2023. She served in Pensacola, FL, Corpus Christi, TX, and Jacksonville, NC, before arriving at Marine Corps Base Hawaii in Kaneohe Bay, HI. Capt LeBeau, an MV-22B pilot, received the National Defense Service Medal, Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, and Sea Service Deployment Ribbon.

Tobin Lewis commissioned in the Marine Corps on August 22, 2008, and was promoted to the rank of Major on October 1, 2018. He has served in Pensacola, FL, Corpus Christi, TX, Jacksonville, NC, and Okinawa, Japan, before arriving at Marine Corps Base Hawaii in Kaneohe Bay, HI. Maj Lewis, an MV-22B pilot, received two Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medals, the Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal, Navy Unit Commendation, National Defense Service Medal, Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal, Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, and four Sea Service Deployment Ribbons.

“We are deeply saddened by the loss of three respected and beloved members of the MRF-D family,” said Col Brendan Sullivan, commanding officer of MRF-D. “Our thoughts and prayers remain with the families and with all involved."

“At present, we remain focused on required support to the ongoing recovery and investigative efforts."

“We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the Australian Defence Force, Northern Territory Police, Northern Territory Government, CareFlight Air and Mobile Services, NT Health, National Critical Care and Trauma Response Center, and Tiwi Island Government, who have come together to assist us in this difficult time.”

This year marks the 12th iteration of Marine Rotational Force – Darwin, which began in 2012 and is part of Australia’s U.S. Force Posture Initiatives. The MRF-D Marine Air-Ground Task Force is comprised of approximately 2,000 Marines and Sailors which are deployed to Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia, for a period of six months, from April to October 2023. While in Darwin, the unit supports a series of exercises and training events with the Australian Defence Force and other Allies and partners in the Indo-Pacific to maintain a forward-postured contingency response force, enhance interoperability between forces, and strengthen the Australia-U.S. Alliance and security partnership.

This year’s MRF-D MAGTF is comprised of the following units:

Command Element: 1st Marine Regimental Headquarters, from Camp Pendleton, CA.

Ground Combat Element: 3rd Battalion, 1st Marine Regiment (Reinforced), from Camp Pendleton, CA.

Logistics Combat Element: Combat Logistics Battalion 1 (Reinforced), from Camp Pendleton, CA.

Aviation Combat Element: Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 363 (Reinforced), from Kaneohe Bay, HI

The Marines involved in the MV-22B Osprey crash that took place on 27 August 2023 were from Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 363 (Reinforced) and 3rd Battalion, 1st Marine Regiment (Reinforced).

https://www.marines.mil/News/Press-Releases/Press-Release-Display/Article/3507817/update-marine-rotational-force-darwin-mv-22b-osprey-tiltrotor-aircraft-crash/

https://twitter.com/MRFDarwin/status/1696339220531712254

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19458899

File: 323ecf35c165987⋯.mp4 (13.07 MB,640x360,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_announces….mp4)

>>19222755

>>19297392

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice to Parliament referendum set for October 14

Brett Worthington - 30 August 2023

1/2

Australians will decide the fate of a constitutionally enshrined Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice to Parliament on October 14.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese officially set the date during a visit to Adelaide, sending the nation to the polls for the first referendum in more than two decades.

"For Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, this has been a marathon," he said.

"For all of us, it is now a sprint and across the finish line is a more unified, more reconciled Australia, with greater opportunities for all."

The proposed Voice would have the power to advise the parliament and federal government on matters that affect Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

It will need both a majority of the national vote and a majority the states — a so-called double majority — supporting the referendum for the Voice to be enshrined in the constitution.

"The idea for a Voice came from the people and it will be decided by the people," Mr Albanese said.

"On that day, every Australian will have a once in a generation chance to bring our country together and to change it for the better."

The last time a federal government held a referendum was in 1999 when the republic vote failed. A referendum has not passed in Australia since 1977.

The Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) estimates the voter roll is at 97.5 per cent of eligible voters, making the referendum likely to be the biggest electoral event in the nation's history.

Indigenous enrolment has skyrocketed since the end of 2022, up from 84.5 per cent to 94.1 per cent of eligible voters. That increase equates to an extra 60,000 First Nations Australians joining the voter roll.

Youth enrolment has also hit new heights. But the AEC has repeatedly warned that high enrolment doesn't guarantee high voter turnout.

Australians will be asked to write either Yes or No on their ballot, inline with previous referendums.

The prime minister picked Adelaide for the launch because of its historical significance to First Nations advocacy.

The city was where the 1967 referendum, which included Indigenous Australians in census population counts and gave the federal government the power to make special laws for First Nations people, was officially launched 56 years ago.

The 2023 launch was in front of hundreds of Yes supporters and featured First Nations leaders Tanya Hosch and Megan Davis. South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas, whose state is already home to its own Voice to Parliament, also addressed the rally.

His state, along with Tasmania, are considered crucial states if the Yes campaign is to win.

Mr Albanese told the rally the referendum would help right historical wrongs.

"My fellow Australians, what Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people want for their children is what you want for yours — staying healthy, doing well at school, finding a job they love, being safe and leading fulfilling lives," Mr Albanese said.

"That's what they are asking you to say yes to at this referendum. The same opportunity for their children to make a good life for themselves.

"In the words of the Uluru Statement from the Heart, 'when we have power over our destiny, our children will flourish'. That's the change that we as Australians can make happen."

The prime minister wrote to Governor-General David Hurley on Monday to recommend the poll be held on October 14.

He also requested a special meeting of the Federal Executive Council on or before September 11 to enable the governor-general to consider the writ for a referendum.

Early voting is expected to open on Monday, October 2, to allow for two weeks of voting ahead of polling day. Australians would also be able to vote by mail, like they would in a federal election.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19458908

File: 78109e48f72d9a1⋯.mp4 (15.71 MB,640x360,16:9,No_campaign_says_Voice_pro….mp4)

>>19458899

2/2

No campaign takes aim at PM

Federal Shadow Minister for Indigenous Australians Jacinta Nampijinpa Price and former politician Nyunggai Warren Mundine, two of the No campaigns most prominent spokespeople, went to Tasmania to mark the referendum date being set.

The duo will head to Adelaide to campaign on Thursday.

Senator Nampijinpa Price accused the prime minister of "dividing our country".

"To suggest we have not had a voice is completely and utterly misleading," she told reporters in Hobart.

"We will not allow for the prime minister and this referendum to divide our country along the lines of race within our constitution."

Both campaigns expect NSW and Victoria are likely to vote Yes, with Queensland and Western Australia likely to vote No.

Senator Nampijinpa Price said she was pleased with how polls in South Australia and Tasmania were tracking for the No campaign.

The question being put to Australians

"A Proposed Law: to alter the Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. Do you approve this proposed alteration?"

If passed, the constitution would be amended to include a new chapter, which would be titled "Recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples".

The details would be:

In recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the First Peoples of Australia:

1.There shall be a body, to be called the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice;

2.The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice may make representations to the Parliament and the Executive Government of the Commonwealth on matters relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples;

3.The Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have power to make laws with respect to matters relating to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice, including its composition, functions, powers and procedures.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-08-30/voice-to-parliament-referendum-date-set-october-14/102757140

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19458930

File: 861963c17358dd4⋯.jpg (163.88 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19458899

Anthony Albanese’s Indigenous voice to parliament referendum announcement in full

PRIME MINISTER ANTHONY ALBANESE - AUGUST 30, 2023

1/3

My fellow Australians

For many years, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have advocated for Constitutional Recognition through a voice.

Our Government – along with every single State and Territory Government – has committed to it.

Legal experts have endorsed it.

People on all sides of the parliament have backed it.

Faith groups and sporting codes and local councils and businesses and unions have embraced it.

An army of volunteers from every part of this great nation are throwing all their energy behind it.

Now, my fellow Australians, you can vote for it.

The idea for a voice came from the people – and it will be decided by the people.

Today, I announce that Referendum day will be the 14th of October.

On that day every Australian will have a once-in-a-generation chance to bring our country together and to change it for the better.

To vote for Recognition, Listening and Better Results.

And I ask all Australians to vote Yes.

Referendums come around much less often than elections – this will be the first one this century – and they are very different.

Because on October 14th, you are not being asked to vote for a political party or for a person.

You’re being asked to vote for an idea.

To say Yes to an idea whose time has come.

To say Yes to an invitation that comes directly from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people themselves.

A proposal thousands of elders and leaders and communities all over our country have worked on for over a decade.

A change supported by more than 80 per cent of Indigenous Australians: Constitutional Recognition through a voice.

A way for all of us to recognise Indigenous Australians and their history in our Constitution and a form of recognition that will importantly make a positive difference to their lives and their futures.

A practical way of dealing with issues that, despite all the good intentions in this world, no Australian Government has been able to get right before.

The voice will be a committee of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, local representatives from every state and territory, the regions, remote communities as well as the Torres Strait Islands.

A committee of Indigenous Australians, chosen by Indigenous Australians, giving advice to Government so that we can get better results for Indigenous Australians.

The voice is about advice.

The parliament and Government that Australians vote for in the normal way every three years will still be responsible for decisions and laws and funding.

Just as it always has been.

With a voice though, we’ll be able to hear directly from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities about the challenges they face in health and education, in jobs and housing, and we’ll be able to learn about the things are working in local areas, so we can replicate them and make them work right around the country.

Learning from communities in Arnhem Land where the parents and teachers co-operate to make sure children are going to school and aiming high.

Or the health services employing Indigenous nurses to deliver health checks and immunisations in remote communities.

Or Indigenous Rangers caring for our environment, with knowledge built up over tens of thousands of years.

There are local success stories out there – just imagine the progress we could make with a voice connecting the regions with the nation.

And giving locals a say, of course, means that we save money too.

Because we’ll be making sure the funding actually reaches the people on the ground.

No more waste – better results where they are needed.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19458935

File: 9acb6e61bbc8406⋯.jpg (341.34 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_PM_reads_his_referendu….jpg)

File: 77ee86e4b9c9103⋯.jpg (195.3 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Supporters_of_the_Yes_camp….jpg)

>>19458930

2/3

My fellow Australians

What Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people want for their children is what you want for yours.

Staying healthy, doing well at school, finding a job they love.

Being safe and leading fulfilling lives.

That’s what they are asking you to say Yes to at this referendum.

The same opportunity for their children to make a good life for themselves.

In the words of the Uluru Statement from the Heart:

“When we have power over our destiny, our children will flourish.”

That’s the change that we, as Australians, can make happen.

Of course, voting Yes won’t fix everything overnight.

We’re talking about challenges built up over generations – and they will take time to address.

But Voting Yes means we will finally have the right approach in place, so we can start finding the solutions.

We can make this change together – and then we will make it work together.

With a voice that’s independent from day-to-day politics, so that it can plan for the long term.

And let’s be very clear about the alternative.

Because Voting No leads nowhere. It means nothing changes.

Voting No closes the door on this opportunity to move forward.

I say today, don’t close the door on Constitutional Recognition.

Don’t close the door on listening to communities to get better results.

Don’t close the door on an idea that came from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people themselves.

And don’t close the door on the next generation of Indigenous Australians.

Vote Yes.

Vote Yes for Recognition.

Vote Yes for Listening.

Vote Yes for Better Results.

Voting Yes is a change for the better that all of us can make together.

We all get one vote and we all get an equal say.

And if something is unclear to you, or you haven’t even had a chance to think about this yet, I encourage you, ask questions.

Because if you’re unsure, it’s easy to find out more.

Have a listen to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leaders and elders like Noel Pearson and Aunty Pat Anderson, Megan Davis and Marcia Langton and Tanya Hosch and Tom Calma – trailblazers working with the next generation like Evonne Goolagong or Eddie Betts or Johnathan Thurston, or respected Liberals like Premier Jeremy Rockcliff, Ken Wyatt, Kate Carnell, Sean Gordon, Bridget Archer, Julian Leeser and Fred Chaney.

Have a read of the Uluru Statement from the Heart – just one page, full of grace and generosity, inviting all Australians to walk together to a better future.

Have a chat to the Yes campaign volunteers at your train station or shopping centre.

And have a look, importantly, at the words of the question – and the words to be added to the Constitution.

They are not long.

The Question is:

A Proposed Law: to alter the Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voice.

Do you approve this proposed alteration?”

Straightforward. Clear.

As are the provisions.

It’s the advantage of working on it for so long.

First, the recognition. It says this:

“In recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the First Peoples of Australia:”

That is what it says. Simple. Clear. Straightforward.

Then the what.

There shall be a body, to be called the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voice;

Again, straightforward. Clear.

The second provision:

The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voice may make representations to the parliament and the Executive Government of the Commonwealth on matters relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples;

That is the what, what will it do. That is what it will do.

Straightforward. Clear. Unambiguous.

Then, the how, including a clear declaration of the primacy of our parliament. It says this:

The parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have power to make laws with respect to matters relating to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voice, including its composition, functions, powers and procedures.

Again, pretty clear and pretty straightforward.

Recognition. Listening to advice. Parliament continuing as decision-maker.

That is the clear, positive and practical request from Indigenous Australians.

That is the hand out asking us, non-Indigenous Australia, to just grasp that hand of friendship.

And that’s what we can vote Yes for.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19458940

File: dc557c12697f1b3⋯.jpg (261.8 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Australians_will_vote_in_a….jpg)

File: d120fc15ea7fa27⋯.jpg (337.08 KB,2048x1152,16:9,A_supporter_of_the_Yes_cam….jpg)

>>19458935

3/3

My fellow Australians

Our Australian story goes back 65,000 years. And what a privilege we have of sharing this continent with the oldest continuous culture on earth.

But our story is not finished yet.

It’s up to all of us to write the next chapter together.

And we can start by writing one word – Yes.

In the history of our great nation, the wonderful acts of national progress and the great advances in fairness have always required hard work.

There were arguments here, when South Australia, something they are very proud of and should be, led the world in giving women the right to vote.

There were arguments made against Federation and the minimum wage, Medicare and multiculturalism.

And before the 1967 referendum, before Vincent Lingiari, before Mabo, before the Apology.

But the great story of our country, through the generations, is that Australians come together to answer these calls for change.

We rise to the moment.

Like the Kangaroo and the Emu on our coat of arms.

They never go backwards – they just go forwards.

And so do we.

And when it’s done, when we see the joy and the celebration, when we see the difference it makes to people’s lives, the only question we ever ask ourselves when these changes occur is:

“Why didn’t we do it earlier?”

And it will be the same this time, when we come together and vote Yes.

Because we will have a way forward, together.

On October 14, there is nothing for us to lose.

And there is so much for Australia to gain.

There is no downside here. Only upside.

Friends

Many times when I’ve spoken about this change, I’ve asked: “If not now, when?”

This is it.

October 14 is our time.

It’s our chance.

It’s a moment calling-out to the best of our Australian character.

For Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, this has been a marathon.

For all of us, it is now a sprint.

And across the finish line is a more unified, more reconciled Australia, with greater opportunity for all.

That’s why thousands of people have volunteered already, many of whom have never worked on any kind of campaign before.

This is a once-in-a-generation chance – and Australians from across the generations are working together to make it happen.

I say to all those volunteers, keep knocking on doors, making phone calls – and keep having those conversations.

With your colleagues in workplaces across the land. Because this change is supported by employers and unions alike.

With your teammates in every local sporting club. Because this is a cause backed by every single sporting code.

With your fellow worshippers in every faith, because all faiths have given their support to this proposal.

With multicultural communities, because they know what it means to celebrate and recognise tradition and culture.

Have those conversations with your family and friends, your parents and grandparents.

Because with your energy and enthusiasm, this referendum can be won.

And when Yes wins, all Australians will win.

So, in a spirit of generosity and optimism – Vote Yes.

In recognition of 65,000 years of history – Vote Yes.

With hope for a better future – Vote Yes.

Vote Yes on October 14.

Thank you.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/anthony-albaneses-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-referendum-announcement-in-full/news-story/4e0c8c7cef4a1120c72665b19d914c16

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19458950

File: f505763e172131f⋯.jpg (257.85 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Former_prime_minister_Malc….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19458899

Yes23 targets Liberal seats, backed by unions

GEOFF CHAMBERS - AUGUST 30, 2023

The Yes23 campaign will direct its army of volunteers into 18 Liberal-held marginal seats and traditionally conservative electorates, under a national strategy to win support from millions of soft voters ahead of the October 14 referendum.

The Australian can reveal prominent moderate Liberal MPs and party luminaries will lead the push for undecided conservative voters in Western Australia, Tasmania, South Australia, NSW and Victoria to vote Yes for a constitutionally enshrined Indigenous voice advisory body.

With the Liberal Party state divisions and supporter bases at low ebbs, the No campaign concedes it cannot rely on party members to volunteer en masse at pre-polls and on referendum day.

Yes23 plans to take advantage of the weak state of Liberal campaigning infrastructure, harnessing its 28,000 volunteers and the combined resources of the ALP and union campaign machines to bombard marginal and swing seats over the next six-weeks.

Liberal seats on Yes23’s target list include Deakin, Menzies, Banks, Bradfield, Hughes, Lindsay, Sturt, Bass and Braddon. Former Liberal seats held by teal independents and Labor, including Aston, Goldstein, Hasluck, Tangney, Curtin, Kooyong, North Sydney, Warringah and Wentworth, are also on the list.

Senior Yes23 campaigners believe “there are lots of undecided voters in these seats that can be swayed into the Yes column”.

Yes23 campaign director Dean Parkin will join voice advocate and Liberal MP Julian Leeser in Sydney on Thursday, as the Liberals for Yes movement led by former ACT chief minister Kate Carnell and prominent Indigenous business leader Sean Gordon gathers momentum.

ACTU secretary Sally McManus said union members would join Yes23 campaigners to end discrimination against Indigenous Australians.

“The union movement was built on amplifying voices so they can be heard. For too long our parliaments have made laws about Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples without proper consultation with First Nations peoples,” Ms McManus said.

“The union movement has listened to its membership who are keen to walk with their Indigenous colleagues and we will be supporting members to campaign on this issue.”

With the No campaign needing to win one or both of Tasmania and South Australia, Yes23 is confident that grassroots campaigning by Bass Liberal MP Bridget Archer in northern Tasmania will get them over the line.

“This is an historic opportunity for Australia. There are Liberals across the country – like me – who support this because we want to see better outcomes, less wastage and real results,” Ms Archer said.

A Yes23 campaigner said in addition to the push into Liberals territory, the Teals will rally supporters in NSW, Victoria and WA.

Malcolm Turnbull and former federal Liberal Party deputy leader Julie Bishop this week joined the Yes23 campaign in Perth and Sydney, and will continue supporting the push into Liberal Party heartland.

Mr Leeser, who quit his frontbench role as opposition Indigenous Australians spokesman in April after Peter Dutton announced the Coalition would oppose the voice, said “I believe Australians will vote for a better future”.

“At a referendum, there are no parties on the ballot paper, nor candidates, there is only an idea on the ballot paper. The idea is to recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders in the Constitution,” Mr Leeser said.

“I believe the risk at this referendum is not change, but the risk lies in more of the same.”

NSW Liberal MP and former NSW treasurer Matt Kean said he would be campaigning in his electorate of Hornsby, where voters were “already engaged”.

“Being out in the community you hear a variety of views, but I’m voting Yes because I believe we have an incredible opportunity before us to hear from Indigenous Australians on the issues that affect them,” Mr Kean said.

Ms Carnell said Liberals for Yes, which is co-ordinating volunteer activation, community forums and grassroots education programs, will promote genuine and practical change for Indigenous Australians to “like-minded Australians in a respectful way”.

Mr Gordon said a Yes vote “simply reaffirms the request made to Australia by an overwhelming number of Indigenous people in delivering the Uluru Statement from the Heart”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/yes23-targets-liberal-seats-backed-by-unions/news-story/4a7c3a330c68a1ed9d7be6667b74e87f

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19458972

File: 8b5ac18ec18ee51⋯.jpg (1.08 MB,4233x2826,1411:942,Then_prime_minister_Malcol….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19458899

OPINION: Why my government didn’t back the Voice, but I’m now voting yes

Malcolm Turnbull, Former prime minister - August 30, 2023

1/2

I will be voting Yes in the referendum on the Voice. Constitutional recognition of Indigenous Australians is long overdue and has been a bipartisan policy objective for many years. It’s time to get this done.

Six years ago, after long consultations, Indigenous Australians resolved that they wanted constitutional recognition to take the form of an entrenched Indigenous advisory council to be called the Voice. Since then, this particular amendment has been the singular focus of the constitutional recognition movement. If this is the form of recognition most Indigenous Australians want, the rest of us need a good reason to say No.

Back in 2017, when this idea was new and lacked detail, my government did not support it. We had two major concerns. First, we believed it had no chance of success in a referendum. The history of constitutional reform in Australia is a dismal one, and to date any proposal faced with concerted opposition has failed.

Our other major concern was that the Voice would create an institution in the Constitution, the qualification for which was something other than Australian citizenship. For me, as a republican prime minister, this was particularly important. I believe our head of state should be one of us: an Australian citizen, not whichever English aristocrat happens to be the king or queen of the United Kingdom.

I have wrestled long and hard with this issue of constitutional principle, and I have concluded that while the Voice amendment is not entirely consistent with my egalitarian, republican values, nonetheless we are better off supporting it.

The arguments for a Voice are obvious; of course, governments and parliaments should consult with and be advised by Indigenous Australians on decisions that affect them. In my own government, I was inspired by Dr Chris Sarra’s advice – do things with Indigenous Australians not to Indigenous Australians.

Our Indigenous policy committee of cabinet ensured that all ministers and departments paid attention to Indigenous advancement – not just Indigenous Affairs officials. Every meeting of that committee began with a presentation from and discussion with the co-chairs of the Indigenous Advisory Council, Chris Sarra and Andrea Mason. They had regular and direct access to cabinet.

I expect the Voice would operate in a similar way but with one very important difference – it would have greater standing and authority because it was not a council of Indigenous Australians chosen by government but, rather, chosen by Indigenous Australians. Its credibility will depend on the quality of its advice, how many Indigenous Australians participate in that choice and whether Indigenous Australians overall feel the Voice truly represents them.

But while many council members were connected to their communities, there was no structural link that allowed members formally to hear the views of local and regional people, which is the major difference with the current Voice proposal.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19458974

File: 119b8b361125d53⋯.jpg (451.18 KB,2000x1333,2000:1333,_2017_Opposition_Leader_Bi….jpg)

>>19458972

2/2

The real issue is not whether there should be a Voice, but whether it should be entrenched in the Constitution. This will mean it cannot be abolished by parliament, as was the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission.

But it won’t mean government or parliament must follow its advice. It will not have a right of veto, but it will have considerable influence in matters relating to Indigenous Australians. As Prime Minister Anthony Albanese observed recently, it would be a very brave government that ignored its advice on a matter relating to Indigenous affairs.

The scares and diversions whipped up over the Voice have been utterly predictable. Let me deal with a few of them:

Will the Voice give advice on the date of Australia Day? I am sure it will recommend the date be moved. So what? That’s hardly a novel suggestion.

Some have suggested it could offer advice on defence. Well, it might. But why would the views of Indigenous Australians on AUKUS carry more weight than anyone else’s, let alone on the Copyright Act or industrial relations?

The Voice will be most persuasive when it gives advice on matters directly relating to the welfare and advancement of Indigenous Australians. This is what the Indigenous people in local and regional communities will expect it to be dealing with, and this will make it an opportunity for better government, not a threat to it. The Voice is intended to be powerful. It seeks to address what the Uluru Statement from the Heart called the “trauma of powerlessness”. It should be very influential. But its influence will be greatest when it is speaking on matters central to the advancement of Indigenous Australians.

My government’s Indigenous Advisory Council was chosen by the government. The members had no democratic mandate from Indigenous Australians. They did not lack expertise, or goodwill or commitment to help their communities. But they did lack a clear democratic mandate from their own people.

The Uluru Statement from the Heart also called for treaty, but this is not what Australians are being asked to vote on at the referendum. The establishment of a Voice will not deliver a treaty. It may make it more achievable. Treaties are being negotiated at state and territory levels already. They take time, careful and respectful consultation and negotiation. But whatever the Voice may propose, the only people who can commit the Commonwealth of Australia to any treaty are the members of its parliament, elected by all Australians.

All sides of the Voice debate seek to draw lessons from the 1999 Republic referendum. So I will just share one. Do not allow the perfect to be the enemy of the good.

The Voice delivers recognition and respect to Indigenous Australians in the manner they have sought. On October 14, together we can bend the arc of history a little further towards justice by voting YES.

Malcolm Turnbull was prime minister of Australia from 2015-2018.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/why-my-government-didn-t-back-the-voice-but-i-m-now-voting-yes-20230829-p5e0a0.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19458993

File: bcf95d373335157⋯.jpg (289.12 KB,2048x1152,16:9,NT_senator_Malarndirri_McC….jpg)

File: 7fb8afc7fdbae4d⋯.jpg (275.69 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: 763620e3a5493a9⋯.jpg (1.01 MB,2048x1152,16:9,The_Uluru_Statement_from_t….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19458899

Let’s make a difference – and make history too

SENATOR MALARNDIRRI MCCARTHY - AUGUST 30, 2023

I hope October 14, 2023, is a day my grandchildren will learn about at school. The day that Australia said Yes to constitutional recognition for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and Yes to a voice. The day that Australians from all walks of life and all backgrounds and faiths and traditions came together and voted to celebrate our 65,000 years of history.

More importantly, I hope all Australians can look back on ­October 14 and say this was the day the gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians started to close. I hope we can look back and say that on that Saturday in spring when Australians voted for a voice to parliament, our country found a way forward on issues where for too long we’ve been going backwards.

That’s the beauty of this idea, a proposal Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have been working on for more than a decade. It’s not just about celebrating our history – it’s about getting better results in the future.

The voice will be a committee of Indigenous Australians, chosen by Indigenous Australians from all over the country to give advice to government and parliament about the big challenges facing Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people: health, education, jobs and housing. That’s what the voice is about: ­advice. Listening to locals and working with communities to get better results.

Make no mistake, we urgently need better results. At the ­moment only four of the 19 Closing the Gap targets are on track. In so many areas – child mortality, school education, life expectancy, mental health, pre­ventable disease – we are either moving too slowly, or going in the wrong direction.

But I can tell you, there are great success stories out there too. All over Australia, there are Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people achieving real progress in helping mothers give birth safely, getting children immunised and delivering vital health services.

There are schools working with the parents and community elders to get kids engaged, attending and doing well. There are training programs giving young people the path to a good job – and the sense of pride and purpose that comes with it.

In every case, it’s the local community leading the way.

Voting Yes for a voice will help us turn these local success stories into national progress. It will mean parliament and government will be able to listen to people, so we can get better results.

The other huge upside of listening to locals is it is more cost effective – because the funding actually reaches the people on the ground and makes a positive difference. That’s good for the individual and the community, and it’s good for every Australian taxpayer because we are all better off when government works more efficiently.

I started this piece by saying I was hopeful October 14 will be celebrated in Australian history. Far and away the biggest reason for that is because I’m a lifelong believer in the positivity of the Australian people and their deep sense of fairness.

It’s been so exciting to see the huge numbers of Australians from all walks of life who are volunteering for the Yes campaign, people who’ve never been involved in any kind of campaign before.

Equally, I appreciate there are plenty of people who haven’t had the chance to give this issue much thought. To all those Australians, over the next six weeks I encourage them to listen to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who are campaigning for a Yes vote – leaders and elders and trailblazers who have dedicated their lives to getting better results for Indigenous people.

On October 14, all of us have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to change Australia for the better. And all we have to do is write the word Yes. In the words of the great Evonne Goolagong, let’s grab this moment with both hands.

Senator Malarndirri McCarthy is the Assistant Minister for Indigenous Australians.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/lets-make-a-difference-and-make-history-too/news-story/3f9c5fb550cf3edc5ecb0ee177489bb2

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19459026

File: ab8a769826450b1⋯.jpg (1.64 MB,4619x3080,4619:3080,Then_PM_Tony_Abbott_at_a_s….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19458899

OPINION: The Constitution is too important to change because of the vibe

Tony Abbott, Former prime minister - August 30, 2023

1/2

Especially on something as sensitive as the recognition of Indigenous people in the Constitution, it’s a big mistake to sponsor a referendum proposal that might fail. Had the prime minister confined his proposed change, formally announced on Wednesday, to an overdue recognition of Australia’s Indigenous heritage, it would almost certainly have been carried by acclamation, as the 1967 referendum was. Sadly for the people who could be shattered by the result, what the PM is actually proposing is the biggest change to our Constitution we’ve ever been asked to make.

It’s to Australians’ credit that almost none of us want to let Aboriginal people down – as many will feel let down if this referendum fails. But constitutional change is too important to pass on the vibe. The Constitution belongs to all of us, not just to some of us, and any constitutional change should have something for everyone. In a country with “no hierarchy of descent” and “no privilege of origin” – to use Bob Hawke’s immortal words from our Bicentennial – it’s simply wrong to give just some of us a special say over how our government works based on ancestry.

Behind the elegant words of the Uluru Statement is an attempt to retro-fit Aboriginal sovereignty, as if the settlement of Australia was a grievous injustice. “Voice, Treaty, Truth”, the activists’ mantra, is meant to ensure that governments can do nothing much at all without the say-so of Indigenous people, with long-term ramifications for the way all of us live, as Western Australia’s deeply problematic recent land laws show.

Because the proposed constitutionally entrenched Indigenous Voice won’t just be to the parliament, prior to the making of laws under the so-called “race” power, but will be to the executive government too on anything “relating to” Indigenous people, it’s essentially a Voice to everyone on everything. Because a constitutionally guaranteed right to speak implies a constitutionally guaranteed obligation to hear, on any significant government action, the Voice will need to be given adequate notice, adequate information, adequate time and resources to respond, and then adequate consideration by the relevant governmental decision-maker.

It would take a “brave” government to ignore the Voice, as the PM said at the Garma Festival when beginning his campaign for it. Malcolm Turnbull grasped this too, when he initially opposed the Voice as a “third chamber of the parliament”. And it was certainly the understanding of the distinguished constitutional law experts Nicholas Aroney and Peter Gerangelos when they told the parliamentary inquiry into it that the Voice would be a “fourth arm” of government, along with the legislative, executive and judicial ones.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19459029

File: ccc4c8c30429c95⋯.jpg (238.12 KB,1810x1019,1810:1019,_2014_Tony_Abbott_pictured….jpg)

>>19459026

2/2

The most potent argument in favour of the Voice is that it’s what Aboriginal people want, and that it would be churlish not to give it to them, after two centuries of having to share the Australian landmass with millions of newcomers. But it’s actually far from clear what Aboriginal people want.

Polling conducted earlier this year for Passing the Message Stick, a pro-Voice entity, showed 24 per cent of First Nations people would vote No, while 42 per cent had heard very little or knew nothing about it. That left about a third who would vote Yes. Even if the “don’t knows” largely broke in favour of the Voice, that’s still a substantial number of Aboriginal people who presumably reject being pigeonholed on the basis of ancestry and would prefer to avoid perpetuating victim status in a country that, whatever might once have been the case, is now the least racist and most colour-blind on earth.

Why wouldn’t an arm of government selected on the basis of ancestry not constitute a local version of the House of Lords, especially as it’s deliberately constructed to give people of a particular ancestry an extra say over the government of everyone? How could a constitutionally entrenched arm of government, comprising solely people who identify as a particular race, and chosen solely by people who identify as a particular race, not entrench race in the Constitution, no matter how benign the intent in terms of addressing past disadvantage?

There’s no plausible reason to think that establishing a special Indigenous Voice would remedy the crisis in remote Australia where there’s little expectation that Aboriginal kids will go to school, that adults will work, or that the ordinary law of the land should apply, in communities with little or no real economic base. It’s hard to imagine how a Voice could add to the advice already coming from a plethora of existing consultation mechanisms. Almost certainly, the Voice’s advice would be more of the same, especially more money; plus re-thinking Australia Day, renaming cities and towns, and more cultural sensitivity training to give “First Nations” their due.

The failure of the current referendum shouldn’t be the disaster for reconciliation that many people understandably fear. It could actually be a golden opportunity to end the separatism that’s at the heart of Aboriginal disadvantage and allow Australians to go forward together as one equal people with an Indigenous heritage, a British foundation and an immigrant character. Indeed, acknowledging that in the Constitution, in preference to this divisive Voice, would be something in which we could all take pride.

Tony Abbott is a former Liberal prime minister of Australia.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/the-constitution-is-too-important-to-change-because-of-the-vibe-20230829-p5e0cn.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19459035

File: 8648ddeff0373de⋯.jpg (3.42 MB,7151x4769,7151:4769,Jacinta_Nampijinpa_Price_a….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19458899

OPINION: This isn’t a unifying Voice for Australia, it’s the prime minister’s Voice for division

Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, Senator for the Northern Territory - August 30, 2023

I was asked recently what question I think Australians should have front of mind when they head to the ballot box on October 14. My answer is a simple one: do you want Australians to be divided in our Constitution?

The prime minister is about to fire the starter’s gun on the most divisive referendum in our nation’s history. And make no mistake, it is divisive through and through. It’s dividing experts, it’s dividing politicians, it’s dividing Australians. It rests on the premise that the Voice could effectively represent Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, but it’s even dividing our communities.

There will be a lot of noise over the next six weeks about how wonderful and unifying it would be, but strip back all the hype, the celebrity endorsements and corporate sponsorship and consider what we’re voting on.

If successful, it would insert into the Constitution a chapter and a new body for only Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

If successful, it would create a new bureaucracy for the Aboriginal industry, those who make their living by claiming to help Indigenous Australians with little accountability.

If successful, it would mean an extra say for just one group of Australians, based solely on their racial heritage, given the constitutional power to make representations – not simply advise, as the prime minister claims – to parliament and executive government.

The process has been divisive from the start. From the beginning, the goal of those who advocate for the Voice seems to be to divide Australians, to bully those with doubts into agreement and abuse and name-call anyone who doesn’t fall into line.

The Uluru Statement from the Heart was not the result of a constitutional convention open to all Indigenous Australians. The Uluru Dialogues divided Indigenous people for an exclusive, invite-only talk-fest for the few.

The prime minister may not have bothered to read the final report of the Referendum Council, but anyone who has read it knows that “delegates were invited to each First Nations Regional Dialogue” and from those groups “10 delegates were selected to represent their region together with the conveners and working group leaders”.

Far from being a “modest request” that “Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have asked for”, the Uluru Statement is a loaded document signed by just 250 people.

Before Opposition Leader Peter Dutton had taken a position, he put sensible and reasonable questions to the prime minister about how the Voice would operate. His questions were ignored.

Constitutional conservatives, many of whom support the Voice, were left out of the process to create the referendum question. When they raised concerns about the wording, they were accused of being “white saviours” who were “just trying to stay in the spotlight”.

For disagreeing with them, prominent Yes campaigners who I won’t name called me and other Indigenous No campaigners every name in the book, they’ve accused me of hating Aboriginal people and, just last week, called me a puppet doing a jig.

This isn’t a unifying Voice for Australia, this isn’t a modest, simple or gracious request, and with no effort made to explain how it would work, it’s all risk and no reward. This is the prime minister’s Voice, it’s the Voice of the Indigenous activists and academics, it is the Voice of division.

The Yes campaign likes to say this proposal has been supported by “constitutional conservatives”, but the truth is that this proposal is constitutionally radical. It would enshrine a dangerous and divisive Voice in the Constitution, and that’s not something conservatives can get behind.

In 2014, while affirming his support for genuine constitutional recognition, then prime minister Tony Abbott said: “The worst of all outcomes would be dividing our country in an effort to unite it.”

That is exactly what’s already happened.

More concerned with themselves and getting their names in the history books, the prime minister and prominent Yes campaigners who flank him at every press conference have divided Australia.

The referendum campaign proper will begin this week, and it will be the most divisive six weeks in our nation’s history.

I am fighting for a No vote because I already asked myself that simple question, do I want Australians to be divided in our Constitution?

No. I want to be one together, not two divided.

Jacinta Nampijinpa Price is a Country Liberal Party senator for the Northern Territory and the former deputy mayor of Alice Springs.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/this-isn-t-a-unifying-voice-for-australia-it-s-the-prime-minister-s-voice-for-division-20230829-p5e0eg.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19459049

File: eb66c850c4009d0⋯.jpg (118.32 KB,1918x1079,1918:1079,Foreign_Minister_Penny_Won….jpg)

File: 0978e5d928127ea⋯.jpg (244.51 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_United_States_has_puts….jpg)

File: 256500af6a09f77⋯.jpg (131.45 KB,2048x1152,16:9,A_DJI_Inspire_drone.jpg)

>>19361989

Foreign Minister Penny Wong has appeared on TV wearing a microphone from high-risk Chinese tech company DJI

ELLEN WHINNETT - AUGUST 30, 2023

Foreign Minister Penny Wong used a microphone manufactured by controversial Chinese tech company DJI for a TV interview broadcast from inside Australia’s Embassy in Vietnam.

Senator Wong used an audio microphone which clearly displayed the DJI logo despite DFAT several months ago publicly stating it was getting rid of its DJI-manufactured equipment.

The company is facing a shadow-ban by the Australian Government after it was formally black-listed by the Pentagon and faced other restrictions slapped on it by the US Government late last year as a result of its close links to the Chinese state.

There are also concerns that any data obtained by its internet-enabled devices would be handed over to the Chinese Communist Party’s intelligence agencies upon request, as required of Chinese-headquartered companies under the 2017 national security laws.

Senator Wong answered a number of questions about China and Chinese influence during her live interview with the ABC’s 7.30 program from inside the Australian Embassy in Hanoi last Tuesday night.

A Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade spokesperson said the Australian Government “is acting to better protect government information from technologies of security concern.

“The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade is working to remove all DJI equipment from use across offices in Canberra and throughout the international network,’’ the spokesperson said.

“While the Department works to procure suitable replacement equipment, some DJI microphones continue to be used in limited circumstances. Use is controlled and limited to public settings.’’

Australia’s Department of Defence was the first to start ridding itself of DJI products after The Australian revealed earlier this year it was using hundreds of drones and other pieces of equipment despite the US banning them due to security concerns and the use of the technology in surveilling the oppressed Uighur population in Xinjiang.

While no formal ban has been issued, all Australian government agencies are quietly following Defence’s lead.

In June, DFAT told an Estimates hearing it was getting rid of DJI drones “as quickly as possible.’’

Other products manufactured by DJI – which is formally known as Da Jiang Innovations and is headquartered in China – are also being disposed of.

It’s believed DFAT is taking other precautions with the risky technology, including ensuring that hardware such as microphones, drones and cameras were never connected to DFAT’s government IT systems.

DJI equipment is not taken into secure locations.

Opposition home affairs spokesman James Paterson, who has led the charge against risky Chinese technology, questioned the decision to use a DJI microphone in Senator Wong’s interview.

“The Government has rightly recognised DJI products are not safe or appropriate to use given the company’s close links to the Chinese Communist Party,’’ he said.

“DFAT has promised to phase them out. How then can be it appropriate for the Foreign Minister to prominently wear an obvious branded DJI product in a nationally televised interview?’’

Senator Paterson said the decision sent a mixed signal about the government’s intentions with DJI.

“The sooner all these risky devices are out of the federal public service the better,’’ he said.

“The Foreign Minister shouldn’t be a human billboard for any company, let alone one that has had its technology banned from her own department as a security risk.’’

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/foreign-minister-penny-wong-has-appeared-on-tv-wearing-a-microphone-from-highrisk-chinese-tech-company-dji/news-story/cc0836ed111a6aba1b73409d204a9448

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19459101

File: 78cb7753713e5b5⋯.jpg (524.78 KB,1920x1080,16:9,The_inquiry_ran_for_29_mon….jpg)

File: 7db5bfe176bbe77⋯.jpg (2.72 MB,3992x2242,1996:1121,The_review_will_comprise_e….jpg)

File: 7d0f50cccfed373⋯.jpg (627.85 KB,2577x1461,859:487,The_Ashley_Youth_Detention….jpg)

File: e73988edff0dd3b⋯.jpg (1.64 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,The_commission_of_inquiry_….jpg)

Tasmania's child sex abuse commission of inquiry wraps up with final hearing in Hobart

Loretta Lohberger - 30 August 2023

1/2

The Tasmanian child sexual abuse commission of inquiry has referred more than 100 people to Tasmania Police and child protection since it began.

The commission's president revealed the numbers at the final hearing in Hobart of the Commission of Inquiry into the Tasmanian Government's Responses to Child Sexual Abuse in Institutional Settings.

The commission focused on the Launceston General Hospital, Ashley Youth Detention Centre, out of home care and public schools.

"Although we believe that children are now safer in Tasmanian institutions than was the case in the past, more work needs to be done," commission president Marcia Neave said.

"We have continued to hear examples of poor systems, practices and cultures within government institutions even as our inquiry has drawn to a close."

Ms Neave said the commission had referred more than 100 people to police and child protection during the 29 months of the inquiry.

She said it was also the commission's view that the Ashley Youth Detention Centre should be closed as a "matter of urgency", and improving the safety of children in youth detention and out of home care should be a priority.

Ms Neave said the Tasmanian government's response to allegations and incidents of child sexual abuse since 2000 had too often been inadequate.

"While we saw pockets of good practice, this was often a result of the initiative and good judgement of individuals rather than something encouraged or enforced by a broader system.

"More commonly, institutions did not recognise sexual abuse for what it was and failed to act decisively to manage risks and investigate complaints."

The commissioners will hand their report to Governor Barbara Baker on Thursday. That will mark the end of the commission's work.

The report, which contains 75 findings and 191 recommendations, is expected to be tabled in parliament on September 26, which will mean it will be publicly available.

"Preventing and effectively responding to child sexual abuse will require changes to laws and policies and also to social and institutional cultures and individual beliefs, attitudes and practices," Ms Neave said.

"If the necessary changes are not made children will continue to be subjected to child sexual abuse in these institutions," Ms Neave said.

During Wednesday's hearing, the commissioners gave an outline of what their recommendations will include:

• Ensuring institutions know how to recognise warning signs of child sexual abuse, and how to respond to it

• Embedding safe, accessible and transparent complaints processes

• Age-appropriate sexual education delivered consistently each year in public schools

• More therapeutic services to ensure victim-survivors have timely access to supports

• More culturally appropriate Aboriginal healing services, as well as support services that know diversity and disability

• Breaking down silos between different government agencies and departments to ensure investigations into allegations of child sexual abuse are properly coordinated

• Giving those working with children the knowledge to recognise harmful sexual behaviours in children, and clarity about how they should respond to them

• Urgent short-term reforms to youth justice to "address the serious deficits in the care of children detained at the Ashley Youth Detention Centre"

• The development of a world-class, trauma-informed, rehabilitative approach to youth detention

• Dedicated leadership for out-of-home care, youth justice and child safety services within the Education Department, which has responsibility for all three

• Investments in out-of-home care, and transitioning from government to non-government out-of-home care providers

• A new commission of children and young people that would act as a "strong and fearless advocate for children's rights" and would have more powers than the current Children's Commissioner, including additional advocacy for children in out-of-home care and youth detention, and advocate for the needs of Aboriginal children and young people.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19459114

File: 1b816246eaa622a⋯.jpg (173.47 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Tiffany_Skeggs_holds_hands….jpg)

File: f8d2dc4456c829a⋯.jpg (1.76 MB,5000x3333,5000:3333,The_commission_s_report_wi….jpg)

File: 49f2b5ab21ec9fa⋯.jpg (2.04 MB,5000x3377,5000:3377,Survivors_hugging_at_the_f….jpg)

File: cf612e5f2b96da2⋯.jpg (277.32 KB,836x879,836:879,Sexual_assault_help_and_su….jpg)

>>19459101

2/2

'Responsibility' now with Tasmanian government, commissioner says

Commissioner Leah Bromfield said widescale reforms to youth justice and out-of-home care were "urgent".

"We note with concern the continuing delays in the closure of the Ashley Youth Detention Centre and the out-of-home care was the only institution we looked into for which there was no significant investments that were announced in response to our inquiry," Dr Bromfield said.

"Widescale reform is hard. Strong leadership and a dedicated workforce will be required to drive the urgent reforms needed to ensure Tasmania's out-of-home care and youth justice systems are meeting the safety and care needs of children."

Commissioner Robert Benjamin said he and his fellow commissioners had "been on a profound journey with victim-survivors, their families and their loved ones, their trusted friends and supporters".

"We have sought to produce a report that while it looks backwards in shame and horror to learn the necessary lessons, it also looks forward with hope and determination," Mr Benjamin said.

"Our report is not the end of the journey, it is the beginning.

"It is now the responsibility of the Tasmanian government and parliament as policy-makers and legislators to ensure that the state continues this journey to better protect children and young people."

The commissioners will omit some information from its report to avoid prejudicing cases before the courts.

The Governor, acting on advice from the government, also has the power to make redactions.

"Except for omitting the parts of the report which affect a person's right to a fair trial, the commissioners hope and expect that the rest of the report will be published in full as soon as possible so that the Tasmanian community can consider all of the information in it," Ms Neave said.

Ms Neave also paid tribute to victim-survivors, their families and supporters who shared information with the commission.

"They told us that one of the main reasons they wanted to assist our inquiry was to prevent other children from suffering sexual abuse in the future, and to make sure there were more supportive and effective responses to people who said they had been abused," she said.

"We also acknowledge the victim-survivors, their families and supporters who did not engage directly with our inquiry, but who may be listening today."

Premier Jeremy Rockliff, speaking after the hearing, said he acknowledged and recognised victim-survivors' enduring pain.

"Today marks a very new beginning where we can not only shine a light, admit to, recognise that we have failed so many children in our state care," Mr Rockliff said.

"We will absolutely do all we can diligently, thoroughly, to work through every single one of those eight volumes [of the report], 191 recommendations, of which we will fully and thoroughly implement, to ensure that the wrongs of the past can never, ever be repeated."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-08-30/tas-commission-of-inquiry-final-hearing-hobart/102788850

https://www.themercury.com.au/truecrimeaustralia/police-courts-tasmania/final-address-child-sexual-abuse-commission-of-inquiry-to-deliver-191-recommendations-to-government/news-story/0410bf87416e78598aeabc8e3a609f21

https://www.commissionofinquiry.tas.gov.au/home

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19464924

File: 04b532134f791f2⋯.jpg (171.96 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19458899

PM asks Australians to vote Yes for a simple ’idea’

GEOFF CHAMBERS, ROSIE LEWIS and PAIGE TAYLOR - AUGUST 31, 2023

1/2

Anthony Albanese has asked ­Australians to vote Yes for a ­simple and straightforward “idea” ­enshrining an Indigenous voice advisory body in the Constitution, firing the starting gun on a six-week election-style campaign and a multimillion-dollar advertising blitz.

The Prime Minister declared that “when Yes wins, all Australians will win” after announcing an October 14 referendum date at the Yes23 campaign launch in Adelaide.

In his pitch for support among faith-based, multicultural, suburban and regional communities, Mr Albanese said the government’s constitutional amendment was “simple, clear, straightforward … unambiguous”.

Under pressure from the No campaign over the lack of detail around the voice advisory body’s function and design, Mr Albanese did not repeat his argument that the constitutional change was modest.

Speaking in front of more than 600 Indigenous leaders, Yes23 campaigners and ALP faithful at the Playford Civic Centre in the northern Adelaide suburb of Elizabeth, Mr Albanese told voters that the referendum had nothing to do with political parties or leaders.

“You’re being asked to vote for an idea. To say Yes to an idea whose time has come. To say Yes to an invitation that comes directly from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people themselves,” Mr Albanese said.

Indigenous leader and AFL executive Tanya Hosch, co-­architect of the Uluru Statement from the Heart and NRL commissioner Megan Davis and South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas delivered passionate speeches endorsing a Yes vote they said would change the lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

Despite Mr Albanese using his speech to invoke support from sporting codes and footy legends Eddie Betts and Johnathan Thurston, The Australian understands the AFL is unlikely to use the September 30 grand final as a platform urging fans to vote Yes.

The 46-day campaign, culminating in Australia’s first referendum since the failed 1999 vote on a republic, has been timed to maximise exposure of the voice following the AFL and NRL grand finals. AFL bosses are understood to be concerned that an orchestrated pitch on footy’s most celebrated day could backfire. They are worried that pushing a Yes vote on grand final day – watched by 100,000 fans at the MCG and attracting a television audience in the millions – could trigger controversy and spark a referendum backlash. The cautious approach comes despite the AFL’s support for the voice.

“Having the AFL telling people how to vote on grand final day won’t help the cause,” said a source familiar with the thinking in league headquarters.

An NRL spokesman said a decision had not been made over whether messaging around the voice would feature at its October 1 grand final in Sydney.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19464925

File: 1d17e1eee6c2495⋯.jpg (291.07 KB,1600x900,16:9,Footballer_Johnathan_Thurs….jpg)

>>19464924

2/2

Mr Albanese, who has ruled out pursuing another form of constitutional recognition if the referendum fails but has not said whether he would support a legislated voice, warned Australians that “voting No leads nowhere”.

“It means nothing changes. Voting No closes the door on this opportunity to move forward. Don’t close the door on constitutional recognition. Don’t close the door on listening to communities to get better results,” he said.

“Don’t close the door on an idea that came from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people themselves. And don’t close the door on the next generation of Indigenous Australians.”

As Mr Albanese, government ministers and premiers ramp up campaigning efforts, Peter Dutton will travel to central Queensland on Thursday to meet with farmers and small business owners. The Opposition Leader, who intends to adopt a business-as-usual strategy and frame Mr Albanese as being preoccupied with the voice ahead of the cost-of-living crisis, said that without more detail Australians would be voting for something they did not fully understand.

“You can’t go to an election asking people to make the biggest change to our Constitution in our nation’s history without providing the detail, and I think most Australians, millions of Australians will want to know what it is they’re being asked to vote for because it’s not going to provide practical outcomes,” the Opposition Leader said. “It is going to be Canberra-based. It’s not going to provide the panacea that the Prime Minister’s promising.”

Mr Dutton, who announced the Liberal Party would oppose the voice in April, has committed to pursuing constitutional recognition if the Coalition wins the 2025 election and legislating local and regional voices.

Indigenous leaders attending the Yes23 campaign launch in the battleground state of South Australia said they “felt relief” after the date was set, praising Mr Albanese’s “clear and concise” speech.

Indigenous author Jackie Huggins said: “I think it laid it clearly on the line. There is a bit of relief now about setting the date because we all know where we stand. Six weeks to go.”

Cape York Partnerships co-chair Richie Ah Mat said the strength of the Prime Minister’s speech was that it let everyone know the referendum was for all Australians.

As the cashed-up Yes23 mobilises its campaign and launches a multimillion-dollar multimedia advertising blitz, senior strategists acknowledge that any slip-ups before the October 14 referendum could see them fall short of victory.

Behind in the polls in Queensland and Western Australia and facing tight races in South Australia, Tasmania and NSW, Yes23 believes it must win backing from at least 38 per cent of the nation’s 4.6 million undecided voters. While the No side only needs a majority of voters in three states, Yes23 must win at least four states as well as a national majority. All eight successful referendums achieved victory with majority support in five or six states.

Leading No campaigner Jacinta Nampijinpa Price said it was wrong to suggest Indigenous Australians didn’t have a voice and the Prime Minister was “effectively ignoring” Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders who rejected Labor’s proposal.

The opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman said voters who wanted to improve the lives of Aboriginal people should vote No and accused Labor of backing a “bloated bureaucracy”.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/pm-asks-australians-to-vote-yes-for-a-simple-idea/news-story/4ee857c6b1327fbb106ac49985cf451c

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19464934

File: 62d3e449d73e71f⋯.jpg (2.24 MB,4880x3253,4880:3253,Independent_senator_for_Vi….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19458899

OPINION: Your Constitution was designed to erase us. Your token Voice does not empower us

Senator Lidia Thorpe - August 31, 2023

1/2

The referendum date has been announced, and official campaigning has begun. This will be a difficult time for my people. Many of our activists, elders and allies have been yelled at and called racist for not accepting Yes campaign propaganda. The weeks ahead will cause more pain for the many First Peoples and allies who don’t want this referendum.

If the referendum does succeed, we will have another year or more of the colonial parliament debating legislation that will allow us “to be heard”, while the government defers accountability to the future Voice. Truth and Treaty will remain on the backburner.

Behind the smoke and mirrors of the Voice, Labor governments have continued their war on our people and Country. They are pushing ahead with mining projects against the rights and voices of traditional custodians. They are overseeing the removal of our babies at record rates – almost 23,000 in out-of-home care. They are pushing the incarceration of our children with record cruelty – Queensland has just overridden its own Human Rights Act for the second time this year.

There is an acceptance that self-determination lies at the heart of improving First Peoples’ lives. The premise of the Voice is that the government will make decisions that improve our lives once they hear our voices. Yet, Closing the Gap targets continue to be unmet despite wide consultation and co-design. Self-determination is not about getting a say that can and will be ignored, it is about real power to make the decisions that affect our lives and Country.

Given their track-record of ignoring our advice, recommendations and knowledge, and insistence on a powerless Voice that can be redesigned or ignored at the government’s whim, on what basis does the Australian government – Labor or Coalition – deserve our faith and trust?

The strategy of the Yes campaign is to hide the violence of the government by focusing on the racist No campaign and refusing to engage with or acknowledge the progressive No case. The idea that Labor would really listen and respond to First Nations’ voices is only believable when it’s presented in contrast to the likes of David Adler.

Without the racist No, the Yes campaign would be left to engage with the many people, communities and nations it claims to speak for.

Constitutional recognition was pushed by former prime minister John Howard in an effort to kill moves towards a Treaty and the Voice is just another advisory body (being in the Constitution does not make its advice any harder to ignore). These are not discussions the Yes campaigners want to have. But they are true and without hard truths we cannot move forward.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19464936

File: 195b28473711ae0⋯.jpg (1.94 MB,4000x2666,2000:1333,Lidia_Thorpe_taking_part_i….jpg)

>>19464934

2/2

When the Yes campaign is forced to confront the arguments of the progressive No – to respect elders, activists, frontline workers – they ignore or dismiss us. Our voices are an inconvenient truth.

We were dismissed, disrespected and ignored from the beginning of the campaign for constitutional recognition, and this continued through the dialogues and the Uluru meeting. The response of Megan Davis to my criticism of this process clearly demonstrates their strategy. Davis twisted my exposure of the constitutional recognition campaign banning “significant leaders from the movement because of their cynicism about government” to suggest I was lying. My point was not about me, it was about the many other critics of the process who were actively silenced. Some sovereign people protesting this process were violently arrested. There was no consensus. I was at the table for the dialogues at the Uluru Convention and I saw first-hand the top-down nature of the process. That is why I and many others walked out.

The Yes campaign is actively working hand in glove with Labor, mining companies and corporate Australia instead of engaging with the people it claims to represent. It is in alliance with people and organisations which, history shows, are the ones most benefiting from the continued oppression of First Peoples.

Addressing the Truth is not easy or convenient, but it is essential. When we say our sovereignty has never been ceded, we speak Truth.

As sovereign people, we do not want to be in your Constitution. Your Constitution was designed to erase our existence and for us to be recognised in it with a token Voice does not empower us, it is another step in the process of assimilation.

If the Yes vote wins, we are guaranteed more of the same: First Nations voices calling for control over our lives and Country, and governments twisting, bullying and ignoring them as they continue to kill us and benefit from our land.

If the No vote wins, we will start afresh: a clean slate to work together to explore and own the Truth of this country. Those fighting for real change will be emboldened.

The Blak Sovereign Movement’s pamphlet on the referendum presents a way forward to peace and real change. Stand with us.

Lidia Thorpe is a Djab Wurrung Gunnai Gunditjmara woman and a federal senator for Victoria.

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/your-constitution-was-designed-to-erase-us-your-token-voice-does-not-empower-us-20230829-p5e0fa.html

https://blaksovereignmovement.com/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19464960

File: 26a810cd8e42a35⋯.jpg (135.87 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Justice_Walter_Sofronoff_a….jpg)

File: 483ccf834ab1a99⋯.jpg (150.42 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Chief_Minister_of_the_Aust….jpg)

>>19289705

>>19452895

>>19452897

Sofronoff demands ACT Chief Minister retract “unethical” claims

STEPHEN RICE - AUGUST 31, 2023

1/2

Inquiry head Walter Sofronoff KC has demanded ACT Chief Minister Andrew Barr retract suggestions he had breached his duties and acted unethically in releasing his report into the prosecution of Bruce Lehrmann.

Lawyers acting for Sofronoff Inquiry chairman have written to Mr Barr rejecting criticism made by the chief minister at a press conference earlier this month, following publication of Mr Sofronoff’s damning findings against ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold.

In a veiled threat to take legal action, Mr Sofronoff’s lawyers say they are writing to give Mr Barr “an opportunity to correct the harm he has caused to Mr Sofronoff’s professional reputation.”

In an extraordinary move, Mr Barr had suggested Mr Sofronoff could face charges or a referral to the national corruption watchdog over the premature leak of his report into the handling of the trial of Mr Lehrmann, the contents of which were published by The Australian.

Mr Barr said “a reasonably straight reading” of the Inquiries Act would indicate Mr Sofronoff had breached the law by providing journalists with copies of the report prior to its release by the government.

“We will consider our position in relation to that,” the Chief Minister said.

Mr Barr also said he found Mr Sofronoff’s engagement with journalists during the Inquiry was “concerning.”

“Mr Barr was wrong to say that Mr Sofronoff had contravened the Act and to impute that he had behaved in bad faith,” Mr Sofronoff’s lawyers said in the letter dated 17 August, released on Thursday.

Mr Sofronoff’s lawyers said it was clear there had been no breach of the Inquiries Act, which expressly permits the board to “do whatever it considers necessary or convenient for the fair and prompt conduct of the inquiry.”

They pointed out that Mr Sofronoff had stated publicly at the hearings that he would freely engage with journalists “to ensure that they can obtain a full understanding of what the evidence means and what may be the significance and ramifications of the evidence”.

Mr Sofronoff said he had given copies of his report to two reputable senior journalists who wrote for mainstream media organisations, The Australian’s Janet Albrechtsen and the ABC’s Elizabeth Byrne, and had conversations with both of them during the inquiry.

Neither of them ever breached his confidence during that time, he said.

“There was not the slightest reason to suppose that either of them would break their word about the serious matter of an embargo; and nobody has said that either of them have done so”, he said.

The Australian did not breach an embargo and will not reveal the source of the leak.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19464962

File: 78c18ea9a0f4fdd⋯.jpg (151.6 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Shane_Drumgold.jpg)

>>19464960

2/2

Mr Sofronoff also revealed he had provided a copy of the report to Brittany Higgins’ lawyer, Leon Zwier, so she could be reassured there was nothing adverse to her in his findings.

Mr Sofronoff had not acceded to the many requests for a public response to Mr Barr’s criticism, the lawyers said, despite added criticism of him by media outlets and commentators.

Mr Sofronoff regarded himself as bound by his professional duty of good faith “not to attack a person who, in practical terms, was akin to a client”. However, wrong criticism of Mr Sofronoff’s conduct of the inquiry and of his judgment would merely give grounds to complain to those who have no meritorious criticism to make, the letter said.

“We invite you to consider the matters in this letter and to obtain legal advice about them. We would respectfully invite Mr Barr also to consider whether the best course would be to make a public statement to the effect that, having taken advice, he accepts that Mr Sofronoff neither breached the terms of the statute, nor did he act unethically and that Mr Barr is now satisfied that Mr Sofronoff performed his duties properly and fully.

“That would put an end to the matter as far as Mr Sofronoff is concerned.”

Mr Sofronoff also released the letter he wrote to the ACT government explaining why he provided journalists with copies of his findings ahead of the report’s release by the government.

Mr Sofronoff’s lawyers asked Mr Barr and ACT Attorney-General Shane Rattenbury to release the correspondence after it became the subject of Freedom of Information requests. He also asked that his letter of 17 August be released at the same time, to give a complete explanation of his position.

“That would not only serve the public’s interest in knowing the reasons and the basis for Mr Sofronoff’s actions which have been the subject of criticism, it would also be the right and decent thing for you to do.”

He asked for a response by 12pm on Thursday but received none. As Mr Barr had not released the correspondence “within a reasonable period of time”, Mr Sofronoff was doing so himself.

In his now-released letter, Mr Sofronoff explains that he gave copies of his report to Ms Albrechtsen and Ms Byrne on embargo until the government had published it.

Mr Sofronoff said he had concluded that it was “possible to identify journalists who are ethical and who understand the importance of their role in the conduct of a public inquiry. I have not had my trust betrayed nor have I had any reason to be disappointed.”

“Ms Albrechtsen informed me by telephone that she had obtained a copy of my report from another source and that she regarded herself as being at liberty to write about its contents. I have no reason to believe that she was lying to me.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/sofronoff-demands-act-chief-minister-retract-unethical-claims/news-story/4a6c63894ebd5df486f9f6151b3e4a21

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19464965

File: 6e06f09f371b244⋯.jpg (377.43 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Julia_Gillard_and_Tim_Math….jpg)

File: 690ccd360bef2cd⋯.jpg (354.5 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Mr_Mathieson_was_charged_b….jpg)

File: 2b235917347de48⋯.jpg (257.85 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Tim_Mathieson_was_seen_lea….jpg)

>>19250307

Tim Mathieson: Julia Gillard’s former partner will plead guilty to sexual assault

Liam Beatty - August 31, 2023

Australia’s former ‘First Bloke’ will admit he sexually assaulted a woman in Melbourne last year, a court has been told.

Raymond Timothy Mathieson, also known as Tim Mathieson, appeared before the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court on Thursday.

The 66-year-old was dressed in a dark suit as he appeared via video link from his home.

At a previous court hearing last month, his barrister Brad Penno said negotiations with police had resolved the case as two unnamed charges were withdrawn against his client.

Mr Penno previously said his client had agreed to admit to intentional sexual touching without consent and requested the matter be adjourned to find out if prosecutors would accept diversion.

Diversion allows low-level and first time offenders to avoid a criminal conviction by undertaking conditions that benefit the victim, the community and themselves.

But in court, Mr Penno said diversion had been taken “off the table”, and requested the matter be adjourned until October for a one hour hearing.

He confirmed Mr Mathieson would still plead guilty.

Charge documents released by the court revealed Mathieson allegedly sucked on a woman’s nipple in the inner Melbourne suburb of Brunswick East on March 13 last year.

Details of the incident have not been aired in court.

The former hairdresser entered the public spotlight when he began dating then-Labor deputy leader Julia Gillard in 2006.

He became known as Australia’s “First Bloke” – taking on responsibilities traditionally fulfilled by the wives of prime ministers.

Mr Mathieson’s relationship with the former Prime Minister ended quietly in late 2020 or early 2021, with the incident occurring just weeks before Ms Gillard confirmed the pair had split.

In a March 26, 2022, interview Ms Gillard told The Adelaide Advertiser the distance between the pair had been a factor in straining the relationship.

She said she was splitting her time between Adelaide and the United Kingdom, while Mr Mathieson remained in Victoria.

Mr Mathieson will return to court in October.

https://www.news.com.au/national/victoria/courts-law/tim-mathieson-julia-gillards-former-partner-will-plead-guilty-to-sexual-assault/news-story/7d0e8b30df4ef4dfe371d86618e47bcf

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19464974

File: a91d084205537f5⋯.jpg (4.57 MB,8256x5504,3:2,Foreign_Affairs_Minister_P….jpg)

File: e43851d159d112f⋯.jpg (1.11 MB,3500x2653,500:379,An_Uyghur_human_rights_act….jpg)

Opposition, human rights groups slam Penny Wong over China inaction

Latika Bourke - August 31, 2023

London: The Coalition has accused Labor of inaction over China’s human rights abuses, questioning why the government has failed to introduce the sanctions and travel bans adopted by other jurisdictions such as the United Kingdom, United States and European Union.

The criticisms were echoed by Human Rights Watch, which queried what message Australia was sending by not joining other comparable countries in taking action.

The opposition’s foreign affairs spokesman, Simon Birmingham, launched the attack on the anniversary of the finding made by the UN’s High Commissioner for Human Rights, who said China’s forced detention and treatment of Uyghurs “may constitute international crimes, in particular crimes against humanity”.

Last October, China rallied its allies at the Human Rights Council to block a debate on the finding.

But individual countries have subsequently introduced sanctions and targeted travel bans against Chinese officials believed responsible for the systemic abuse of Uyghurs, which the UK’s House of Commons has declared is genocide.

Senator Birmingham said that Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong had not responded to his offer to participate in a bipartisan statement of support of sanctions.

“Disappointingly, there has been little action from the Albanese government in response to this report. Despite repeated calls from the Uyghur community in Australia and offers of bipartisanship from the Coalition, Labor has chosen not to utilise the responses available to them,” Birmingham said.

“The Albanese government’s inaction stands in contrast to the actions taken by the European Union, UK, US and Canada, who have pursued those responsible with targeted sanctions, including travel bans and asset freezes.”

He urged Wong to accept the Coalition’s offer of bipartisan support to introduce sanctions “without further delay” and “send a strong message that Australia is serious about these human rights violations”.

Daniela Gavshon, director of Human Rights Watch Australia, queried what message the government was trying to send with its inaction.

“Twelve months on from the release of the High Commissioner’s damning report on Xinjiang, the Australian government should join other democracies in holding serious human rights abusers in China to account. By not doing this, what message is Australia sending?” Gavshon said.

“In recent days China’s President Xi Jinping has made clear his intent to continue widespread, systematic abuses.

“It is up to the Albanese government to demonstrate, through tools like sanctions, that this conduct cannot be tolerated and abusers will be made accountable.”

Australia’s law to punish human rights abusers, the Magnitsky Act, named after the murdered Russian tax accountant Sergei Magnitsky, was introduced in December 2021 and first used against Russians in March 2022.

The law has been used against Myanmar, but never against China.

Since coming to government, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has said he wanted to stabilise Australia’s relationship with China, which reached a nadir under the former government when former prime minister Scott Morrison called for an inquiry into the origins of COVID-19.

Wong’s spokeswoman said the UN’s findings were harrowing and the minister acknowledged the “pain and distress” in the Australian Uyghur community.

“The resumption of dialogue with China has enabled Australia to raise our deep concerns about the situation in Xinjiang at the highest levels,” the spokeswoman said.

“We will continue to press China bilaterally and advocate in multilateral institutions for transparency and accountability.”

https://www.theage.com.au/world/europe/opposition-human-rights-groups-slam-penny-wong-over-china-inaction-20230830-p5e0s6.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19464986

File: aa60b3f67d2a9c8⋯.jpg (2.63 MB,4000x2667,4000:2667,Anthony_Albanese_met_China….jpg)

>>19464974

Xi Jinping set to skip G20 summit, dashing Albanese’s meeting hopes

Matthew Knott - August 31, 2023

1/2

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s hopes of meeting Xi Jinping on the sidelines of next week’s G20 summit appear to have been dashed, with the Chinese President expected to deliver host India a diplomatic snub by skipping the high-powered event.

Albanese had hoped to use what would be his second meeting with Xi to further thaw relations with China and lay the groundwork for a visit to Beijing by the end of the year.

The revelation that Xi is expected to skip the G20 in New Delhi came as former foreign affairs minister Julie Bishop prepares to travel to China next week on a sensitive back-channel diplomatic mission.

Former Labor trade minister Craig Emerson is also set to visit Beijing alongside Australian business leaders, scholars and cultural representatives for the first Australia-China high-level dialogue to be held since early 2020, when relations between the two nations plummeted.

Quoting two Indian officials and one diplomat based in China, Reuters reported on Thursday that Chinese Premier Li Qiang, who is effectively Xi’s deputy, is expected to represent Beijing at the September 9-10 meeting.

India said earlier this week it had lodged a “strong protest” with China after Beijing released a new version of its standard map showing Aksai Chin — an area of Kashmir mostly controlled by China — and the northeastern Indian state of Arunachal Pradesh within Chinese territory.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Xi Jinping met at the BRICS summit in South Africa last week and agreed to “intensify efforts” to reduce tensions along the border.

Albanese told parliament earlier this month: “I met with Xi Jinping in November last year, and I’m sure that we will potentially meet again on the sidelines of the G20 meeting that will be coming up in the future.”

Xi attended last year’s G20 summit in Indonesia, where Russian President Vladimir Putin was the only invited leader to skip the event.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19464987

File: 567bd4a3d470e07⋯.jpg (216.32 KB,2000x1336,250:167,Former_foreign_affairs_min….jpg)

>>19464986

2/2

Bishop, who served as foreign minister from 2013 to 2018, will attend the Australia-China high-level dialogue, which was launched in 2014. It is known in diplomatic parlance as a “1.5 track” forum, meaning conversations include a mix of government officials participating in an unofficial capacity and non-government experts.

Bishop said she would be briefed by DFAT on the agenda for the trip over the coming days.

The dialogue is co-hosted by DFAT and the Chinese People’s Institute of Foreign Affairs, an official Chinese government think tank.

The private talks typically feature former senior politicians from both Labor and the Coalition.

A source familiar with the planning of the event but not authorised to speak publicly said they expected it would feature a “frank and fearless” exchange of views, adding it was the latest demonstration of a steady thaw in tensions between the two nations since the election of the Albanese government.

China last month removed tariffs on Australian barley imports, following previous moves to lift sanctions on Australian timber and coal that were introduced in 2020.

Emerson declined to comment on the trip, which has yet to be formally announced.

Benjamin Herscovitch, a China expert at the Australian National University, said it was unlikely the event would lead to specific policy outcomes but added: “This is important because of what it says about how the bilateral relationship is changing.

“Beijing wants to turn back on the mechanisms that signal warmth and understanding in the relationship.”

Former prime minister John Howard co-chaired the most recent high-level dialogue in Sydney in January 2020, which was also attended by former Chinese foreign minister Li Zhaoxing.

The most recent meeting was also attended by China’s then-ambassador to Australia and officials from China’s ministries of commerce and foreign affairs as well as the then-head of DFAT and Australia’s ambassador to China Graham Fletcher.

Jennifer Staats, a China expert at the United States Institute of Peace, has described 1.5-track dialogues as a form of back-channel diplomacy that allows “government officials to discuss sensitive issues in their personal capacity, where they can go beyond government talking points and explore new ideas without fear that their comments will be made public”.

“These closed-door discussions help policymakers better understand the motivations and interests of the other actors and get a clearer sense of how their policy initiatives are perceived by their foreign counterparts,” Staats said.

“Track 1.5 dialogues also provide an opportunity to solicit feedback on ‘trial balloon’ policy ideas and alternative approaches, so that they can be refined and improved before they feed into the official policy process.”

DFAT was approached for comment.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/julie-bishop-heads-to-beijing-for-back-channel-diplomatic-mission-20230831-p5e0z4.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19471483

File: e9d5035106ef1ca⋯.jpg (177.13 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Former_Labor_leader_Kim_Be….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19458899

Kim Beazley wants Australians to vote Yes for an Indigenous voice to parliament to show respect

TROY BRAMSTON - SEPTEMBER 1, 2023

Kim Beazley remembers Indigenous boys and girls forcibly separated from their parents coming to the family home in Perth for a meal in 1950s and 60s, and shaping his belief in the ­dignity, opportunities and rights that should be afforded to the First Australians.

His father, Kim Beazley Sr, had been an early advocate for land rights, for removing racially discriminatory provisions in the Constitution, and as education minister in the Whitlam government allowed for Indigenous children to be taught in their own language at school.

“We always had kids coming out to spend a bit of time with us,” Mr Beazley told The Weekend Australian. “What those kids were actually experiencing, who had been through our house, it shocked me absolutely, and did very much affect my response to the Stolen Generation.”

When the Bringing Them Home report on the separation of Indigenous children from their families was tabled in parliament in May 1997, Mr Beazley was opposition leader. His emotional response, calling for recognition of past wrongs and supporting reconciliation, had been evoked by reading the ­report coupled with his own memories of meeting survivors.

Beazley Sr, elected to federal parliament in 1945, was responsible for adding support for land rights to the Labor platform in 1951 and was the first to speak about it in the House of Representatives in 1952. He was involved in the Christian social justice movement, Moral Re-Armament.

Mr Beazley, who served as a senior minister in the Hawke-Keating government, as deputy prime minister, Labor leader, ambassador to the US and governor of Western Australia, said the voice referendum was about showing respect and courtesy for Indigenous Australians, and would elevate our international standing.

“It’s not some product of a woke agenda in Canberra,” he said. “It is a product of what Aboriginals actually asked for. And they weren’t actually asking for this to be the vehicle for land rights or to intervene routinely in the ­affairs of the nation. It was simply asking that their views be heard.”

The constitutional referendum to enshrine an Indigenous advisory body with limited remit and no legal or spending power posed no risk to parliamentary authority, does not require the government to follow its advice or risked litigation, Mr Beazley said.

“It is quite simply a recognition of the Aboriginals as a part of our community,” he said. “It would mean that we have shown the rest of the world and, and shown ourselves, that we regard the views of the Aboriginals as important, not for those views to direct us, but an opportunity for those views to be heard.”

Mr Beazley was Labor leader during the republic referendum in November 1999. He said the voice was very different to the that vote and monarchists should have no concern about this modest change to the Constitution.

“You could be a constitutional monarchist and take the view that this was fine, and you could be a republican and take the view that this was fine,” he said.

“Vote for courtesy. Vote for a position that shows we are ­listening.

“We are lucky to be cohabitating a continent with the oldest civilisation on Earth. It’s a good thing for us to let that play on our minds.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/kim-beazley-wants-australians-to-vote-yes-for-an-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-to-show-respect/news-story/ceb18a4047e7aadfb17b764a5c700796

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19474105

File: 61d3102b36b5320⋯.jpg (340.8 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Anthony_Albanese_holds_a_p….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19458899

One side of Indigenous voice to parliament debate is being given extra privileges: this is not democracy

LOUISE CLEGG - SEPTEMBER 2, 2023

1/2

Section 128 of our Constitution sets out a unique and innovative process for amending a Westminster-style constitution in part because it is the only instance in our nation’s founding document where direct democracy is employed. It puts a question to amend our highest law above the parliament and entirely in the hands of the people.

Yet as we hurtle towards a referendum that would entrench a new advisory arm of government for Indigenous people in our Constitution, our founders may well be rolling in their graves about the ways in which the parliament and the government are undermining the process, and in doing so undermining the primacy of people.

First, the parliament has done nothing to ensure that there will be something even approximating a level playing field regarding the spending power as between the Yes and No camps.

Best estimates are that the Yes campaign will spend seven to 10 times that of the No campaign. Given the magnitude of the proposed change, parliament’s failure to insist on equal public funding is concerning.

The problem is exacerbated by the additional failure to cap private spending in some way. It is thoroughly objectionable that tens of millions of ASX 200 companies’ dollars – some of which was committed even before the proposal had been finalised, let alone any public debate was had – is being deployed to influence the outcome of a referendum.

As serious law, politics and business scholars around the world are raising concerns about the anti-democratic impacts of large corporations actively playing in the political and social spheres more generally, the parliament’s failure to check the oversize spending power of crusading Australian companies seeking to effect perman­ent change to our system of government is reckless and shortsighted. It is no less than a direct threat to our democracy.

The second problem relates to what will be a misleading question on the referendum ballot paper. It will read: “A Proposed Law: to alter the Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. Do you approve this proposed alteration?”

No other information will be provided on the ballot paper or in the voting booth. The question is misleading on its face and by omission. The question places undue emphasis on the non-operative and unconventional introductory words about relating to recognition but fails to inform us that the voice is an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander body created in an entirely new chapter in the Constitution that will make representations to the parliament and the executive government about laws and policies that affect all of us.

It is clear to those of us who have been watching carefully that the question – like much of the messaging from the Yes campaign – has been carefully constructed to place emphasis on the appealing, uncontroversial and benign aspect of the proposal (recognition) while giving no clue about what the voice itself would look like in the Constitution and therefore in our society.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19474111

File: e7483fc47049321⋯.jpg (407.21 KB,2048x1152,16:9,The_conduct_of_the_parliam….jpg)

>>19474105

2/2

The question – clever in its obfuscation and avoidance – has been carefully curated by individuals and rubber-stamped by the parliament with the intention to dupe the people. The third problem lies with the conduct of the Constitutional Expert Group. The eminent members of the expert group are appointed by the government and paid by the government, and the expert group is chaired by the Attorney-General as a member of the government. In other words, the expert group is an extension of the government.

On December 12 last year, seemingly in response to Facebook advertisements by No case activists claiming the proposed section 129 would give special rights to one race of people, a communique from the expert group advised us that the voice “does not confer ‘rights’, much less ‘special rights’, on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples”.

This surprising claim by the expert group is a serious category error. Many experts who are not in the thrall of the government – including constitutional law professors Peter Gerangelos and Nicholas Aroney – say the voice entrenches a right. Yet the error was and remains the primary justification by Facebook to ban ads on this subject by No campaigners, suppressing legitimate political speech in a referendum.

The correct characterisation of the proposed section 129 is that it would provide for a positive, political group or collective right for the voice on behalf of Indigenous people to make representations to the parliament and the executive government about matters affecting them. This may be a unique, previously unheard of right, with no precedent elsewhere, but it is still a very special kind of right when other Australians do not possess it.

As public polls tell us that one of the reasons people are giving for intending to vote No is their understanding that the voice affords Indigenous people special rights, it interesting to ponder whether members of the public may be more adept at constitutional characterisation than members of the expert group.

Meanwhile, by failing to withdraw, explain or clarify the error the expert group – ergo the government – continues to drive bans on material on social media that would correctly characterise the voice. We can only deduce that the most basic facts are regarded as too dangerous for the people.

The conduct of the parliament and the government raises genuine concerns about the integrity of this referendum.

In short, we have powerful corporations that do not have a vote under section 128 being given carte blanche to influence the result, a misleading question on the ballot paper and the government working to suppress political speech about the nature of the proposal.

For the maintenance of social harmony our founders would have assumed parliament would ensure a fair process, but we the people are being treated to anything but.

Louise Clegg is a Sydney barrister.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/one-side-of-indigenous-voice-to-parliament-debate-is-being-given-extra-privileges-this-is-not-democracy/news-story/1324e09e785c11c9effdc02736626010

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19474215

File: 584ef53c45a4f8e⋯.jpg (551.39 KB,2560x1707,2560:1707,Nicole_Meyer_Elly_Sapper_a….jpg)

>>19417697

>>19427870

Malka Leifer conviction: ‘Good - but not good enough’

‘Her eyes still had that same captivating, evil power that she had when she was abusing me … There’s no part of her that looks like she understands the impact of what she did, or feels bad about it’

REBECCA DAVIS - 31 August 2023

1/3

“HOW do I move on in life without Malka Leifer being such a central role in it – especially after getting ‘not guilty’?”

It’s the question Nicole Meyer continues to wrestle with, while she spoke candidly with The AJN from a Melbourne hotel room, four days after the sentencing of disgraced former Adass Israel School principal, Malka Leifer.

Over the past 22 years – more than half of Meyer’s life – Leifer had been a constant; “as my teacher or principal, then, as my boss and colleague”.

“And throughout it all, she was my abuser, attempting to escape justice.”

Last Thursday, County Court Judge Mark Gamble sentenced Leifer to 15 years imprisonment for 18 sexual offences – including six counts of rape – with a non-parole period of 11.5 years. The sentence takes into account time already spent in custody, meaning she could be released in 2029.

But the indictments related only to acts committed against Meyer’s sisters, Dassi Erlich and Elly Sapper; when the jury handed down their verdict in April, they found Leifer not guilty of a further five charges of rape and sexual abuse relating to Meyer.

It was a crushing blow for three sisters who have stood united through a protracted 12-year battle for justice, encompassing an international campaign to #BringLeiferBack, lengthy court delays, extradition orders, political corruption and terse diplomatic relations between Australia and Israel.

“I’ll try not to get emotional,” pre-empts Meyer, “But for me and my sisters, because of the verdict I received … it coloured our entire journey in a way that none of us ever expected. The shock of it really changed the trajectory of our feelings of achievement and celebration.”

Reflecting on the four months that have since passed, Meyer said, “It will take time for each of us, but Elly and Dassi will now be able to close that door on this because they got justice. I didn’t. I can never close the door on it. Ever.

“How do I move on without letting her continue to be in my mind 24/7?” she grappled. “I feel like she’s beaten me, and she’s broken me. She lost against my sisters, but she won against me.”

Despite the “heartbreak” of her verdict, which when handed down, Meyer says, “physically almost knocked me out”, she remained determined to show her strength to Leifer, who was present in the courtroom.

“I turned and stared at her non-stop … I thought, stuff the room and respect for the judge, I’m going to turn my head and keep staring at her. She knew I was looking at her and she looked away, but I kept glaring. Her arrogance, even at the time of the verdict, was very obvious.”

Meyer says she heard from a reliable source that even at the sentencing Leifer was so confident she would walk away with no need to serve extra time that her bags were packed.

On being in the same physical space as Leifer, Meyer observed, “Her eyes still had that same captivating, evil power that she had when she was abusing me. It hasn’t changed. She still emanates something. There’s no part of her that looks like she understands the impact of what she did, or feels bad about it.”

Overcome by Leifer’s unapologetic demeanour, Meyer shares that while present for sentencing last week, she considered risking contempt of court to communicate with Leifer, who appeared via video link from prison.

“I had written a seven-page victim impact statement which I never had the chance to read out in court. I lost that chance to speak to her and I desperately wanted to, I think I wanted to regain some of that power.

“But I zoned out as soon as the judge said 15 years.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19474220

File: 78257a474ec6082⋯.jpg (234.66 KB,1024x640,8:5,Sisters_Nicole_Meyer_L_Ell….jpg)

>>19474215

2/3

The day prior to the sentencing, Meyer, Erlich and Sapper met for a coffee. Completely unsure what to expect, the sisters set their sentencing expectations low: anything more than “time served” would be good.

They reconvened over the phone later that afternoon, to prepare a media statement for the following day. Meyer was at the beach, and the conversation that ensued was the hardest two hours, she recalled.

“Because we were exhausted. We were emotional. We were adrenalised. But we reassured each other; we have to get through this. We wanted to give a strong statement.”

The next morning, Meyer awoke before dawn to exercise. Together, the sisters shared an Uber to arrive at the court by 9.30am.

“From there, it was an absolute rollercoaster,” told Meyer, recalling the Judge’s 81 pages of comments he delivered; which appeared to swing favourably to the victims, to the perpetrator, and back again.

There were two short breaks throughout the morning.

“The first one I actually couldn’t move because if anyone asked me how I am, I knew I was going to melt into a puddle.”

The second interval saw a “funny, but not so funny” bathroom break, with the prosecution and defence all awkwardly navigating each other at the basins.

Shortly after returning, Judge Gamble began talking numbers.

15 years.

“I don’t remember what happened after that. Someone who observed me said I let out a small breath, but I don’t recall anything.

“Once I came to, 15 years felt unbelievable,” said Meyer. “It felt like an absolutely massive win for survivors of abuse, because it’s a number you don’t often hear. It felt like some form of validation.”

The sisters returned to a hotel room in the city. Meyer was exhausted, but remained awake until after 3am – “just dealing with lots of different emotions”.

By the following day, the sisters’ perspectives shifted when they had time to understand the maximum penalty, sentencing and cumulation on each charge.

“When you consider the maximum for one count of rape is 25 years, and there were six charges of rape, and 12 other indictments … Yes, 15 years is good, and we appreciate it tremendously – but it’s definitely not good enough.”

The road to this outcome has been long – and the toll on the sisters immeasurable.

Meyer shares that on the morning of the day she first went to the police station to make a statement 12 years ago, she discovered she was pregnant.

“It set me up for the most horrific pregnancy.

“Because of the trauma of giving the statement, of bringing it all up again, my anxiety hit a level I’ve never experienced before.

“Every single day of the pregnancy, I was convinced my baby wouldn’t make it. Even while in labour and the nurses rolled the crib into the room in preparation. I told them to take it out.”

Thankfully, she would give birth to a beautiful and healthy baby.

“But that’s where my state of mind was at that time.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19474229

File: 487322b8e63083d⋯.jpg (4.34 MB,5472x3648,3:2,Press_conference_at_Glen_E….jpg)

>>19474220

3/3

Meyer’s decision to come forward – a few months after Erlich and Sapper – was carefully considered. At the time, she was still working alongside Leifer at Adass Israel School.

Meyer kept asking herself, “Am I brave enough to share what happened to me?

“I’m in the school. I’m teaching. I had three kids – soon to be four – within five years. My family is very young … Am I actually brave enough?”

The answer was a resounding yes.

“I’m a decisive person, and I made up my mind. I did it to get justice, so every single bump and hurdle on the way, no matter how difficult it was, was always with that end goal in sight. That’s what continued to propel me along the way.”

Reflecting on that first police statement, Meyer says it was “so mild”. Having had such a sheltered upbringing, she says she didn’t have the language to adequately describe what she experienced – and unpack the subsequent impact.

“But thankfully, as sisters, we always supported each other. If one was down, the others rallied. We were there – and are there – for each other, always.”

Meyer is also grateful for the “unwavering” support of the broader Jewish community – “a founding support beneath us as we’ve gone along this path”.

“The messages we’ve received along the way have reassured us that even when it’s tough, we’re doing the right thing.”

Some of those messages even quietly came from members of the ultra-Orthodox community.

“It’s given me a bit of hope that these conversations will start happening a little bit more and people won’t be afraid to speak up.”

Indeed, Meyer hopes she has been an example for others in the ultra-Orthodox world, for victims silenced in shame.

“It is another reason why getting ‘not guilty’ was hard for me … I felt that I let everyone down.”

Pondering the path towards healing, Meyer says it is about not allowing herself to be silenced, or her experience invalidated.

And so her crusade for justice continues: Meyer plans to get back into the courtroom, with aspirations to study criminal law next year.

“I’d also love to go to court with survivors. As someone who’s had lived experience and can be there as a support person. I would literally do that every day because I know how traumatising court is, and how hard it is to not have support sometimes.

“To be able to fight for justice empowers me – even if I didn’t get it for myself. Being able to support others in their journey and help get perpetrators off the street to face their crimes, is worth it.

“The more we speak up and not be silenced, the harder it becomes for abusers to roam free.”

If this article brings up any issues for you, please call 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) – the national sexual assault, domestic and family violence counselling service.

https://www.1800respect.org.au/

https://www.australianjewishnews.com/good-but-not-good-enough/

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19474326

File: fcf06c395e5f39d⋯.jpg (2.09 MB,5188x3459,5188:3459,Westpac_chief_executive_Br….jpg)

>>19404497

How AUSTRAC is saving kids from sexual abuse

The financial enforcer is ensuring banks report the kind of transactions that give away the activities of predators.

Madonna King - Sep 1, 2023

1/3

In 2020, a trickle that became a stream of tiny financial transactions to fund child sexual abuse, eventually became a flood that destroyed some of Australia’s biggest business reputations. And it had the unintended, but enduringly good, impact of adding a valuable weapon to the armoury for the fight against child exploitation.

At the heart of the flood was the detective work of the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC), the federal government agency charged with monitoring the legality of money flowing in and out of the country.

Its main target was Westpac. AUSTRAC swamped Westpac’s reputation with a civil court action, alleging negligence in discerning and reporting large-scale money laundering between 2012 and 2019. It accused the bank of breaching anti-money laundering and counterterrorism financing laws on more than 23 million occasions, involving $11 billion in transactions. Westpac was duly ordered by the court to pay the highest civil penalty in Australian history: $1.3 billion.

Some of Westpac’s failings involved suspicious transactions related to child exploitation in the Philippines, including two associated with child sex offenders. While AUSTRAC’s allegations covered much broader ground than child exploitation, it was this revelation that tore at the heart of the bank’s integrity, and fuelled the public’s displeasure.

Westpac, Australia’s oldest bank, was shaken. Its share price was ravaged, and its leadership team became the target of angry investors and an indignant public – chief executive Brian Hartzer, along with other executives, resigned.

The accusations centred on claims that payments by hundreds of customers showed telltale connections to child abuse not just in the Philippines but other countries, too – the bank later confirmed this was so. Many of the amounts, in isolation, were tiny, but they were frequent and they met the red flags AUSTRAC had given all financial institutions at the start of the 2010s, when it asked them to be alert to the misuse of their services by child sex abusers. But Westpac took until 2018 to pay attention.

The action by AUSTRAC not only put the spotlight on Westpac but also on the business side of child sexual exploitation, which, thanks to the ubiquity of the internet and the ever-present desire to profit from it, was burgeoning.

A shamed Westpac, keen to retrieve its reputation, responded by both reforming its own business practices and by funding an initiative designed to stop the future channelling of money from Australian viewers of sexual violence to their evil partners in crime in other countries.

The scale of the business that sits behind child sexual exploitation is difficult to ascertain, but the money can be traced back to two things.

One is the willingness of certain people to pay to see exploitative material, principally via pay-per-view or subscription sites.

The other is the rising trend of sexploitation. The motivation by offenders is focused almost exclusively on forcing children to perform sex acts on camera. The target, who is increasingly likely to be a male in his late teens, is subsequently blackmailed to pay for the removal of videoed or photographed sex acts he has been enticed to perform by someone with a fake online persona.

In both instances, the money is required to be transmitted to the perpetrator. And this is where the International Centre for Missing and Exploited Children (ICMEC) in Australia has come into its own, working with regulators and financiers to alert them to how to spot these transactions and then report them.

Essentially, ICMEC’s work invokes one of the oldest principles adhered to by investigators of wrongdoing: follow the money.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19474329

File: e346c4f7cd5ee85⋯.jpg (2.56 MB,5272x3515,5272:3515,AFP_Assistant_Commissioner….jpg)

>>19474326

2/3

Jon Rouse, who is a non-executive director of ICMEC, says “taking out the consumer base” in commercial online child sex operations is the most effective way of dismantling them. “There are no low-hanging fruit,” he says. “We need to chase down every single target we can and that means taking out the people who are paying for it.”

Anna Bowden, ICMEC Australia’s savvy CEO, says her organisation – funded by Westpac after the financial transaction scandal – aims to help banks pick up payments directed at online child sex abuse, including financial sextortion, and then to feed quality information to AUSTRAC and law enforcement agencies.

Bowden says members of a working group made up of law enforcement, bank and not-for-profit representatives who have access to huge reserves of online data, collaborate to finger transactions that might otherwise escape attention.

“Sitting in a financial crime unit seeing $30 being paid for school fees [to an overseas destination] doesn’t mean anything by itself,” she says. But in tandem with other information or data, a case might be built to show that transaction is funding online child sex pursuits. This approach would almost certainly have highlighted the payments that dented Westpac’s reputation only a few years ago.

While online child abuse is itself often not driven by money, more and more financial crime networks are emerging that have the ability to produce content and then distribute and sell it.

“It’s much easier to get to victims, unfortunately. You can go online and find someone very quickly,” Bowden says. The perpetrators include single operators. “There are dads sitting online at night doing stuff,” explains Bowden. “But more and more they are networking with each other. And then there’s people where it’s not necessarily about the content, it’s about the profit. So they’re organising criminal networks in order to just extort and make money.”

‘Urgent and defining issue’

The total amount of money being paid to extorters, whose demands can range from $50 to $10,000, is difficult to tally because only one in four teens is likely to report the offence.

In addition, investigators say the overseas-based sextorters will also negotiate, and perhaps include vouchers which can be transferred into cash online for a small fee.

Regardless, this is now considered such a serious threat that, in December 2022, the FBI issued a National Public Safety Alert on Financial Sextortion Schemes. Meanwhile, a global threat assessment by the WeProtect Global Alliance, which involves more than 100 governments, 70 companies and a host of charities, has labelled child sexual exploitation and abuse online as “one of the most urgent and defining issues of our generation”.

In case you think this is something that only happens in other countries, consider this: in 2022, more than 500 current Australian bank, financial services and digital accounts were closed down because of a joint AFP and AUSTRAC effort called Operation Huntsman. It prompted the banks to help facilitate the closure of accounts that were held in Australia but linked to international organised crime syndicates.

A year later, investigators continue to comb through the details of more than 1000 Australian accounts that have seen money flowing out of the country due to financial sextortion.

The Australian Centre to Counter Child Exploitation says it is recording more than 100 reports of this type of sextortion each month, and more than 90 per cent of victims are male, usually aged between 15 and 17 – although some are as young as 10.

Julie Inman Grant, Australia’s eSafety Commissioner, is seeing a similar pattern, but with young men up to 24 years of age being targeted.

“It’s very lucrative,” she says. “We’ve had very distressed young people coming to us who have already given up about $10,000.” Some had negotiated the payment down to $150, but once the criminals got the $150, they knew they could access money and kept coming back to them.

Males and females are being targeted differently, too. Boys are being sextorted for money, while more intimate imagery or an escalation in sexual activity is more likely to be demanded of girls. AFP Assistant Commissioner Hilda Sirec says boys seem to be more persuaded by the quick hit conducted by offshore syndicates.

In other words, they have the characteristics most global businesses seek in their “customers” – they are a ready and vulnerable market.

“When you’ve got a gorgeous young lady between 14 and 17 prepared to send you some intimate images, the boys are turning around and saying, ‘Yep, giddy up on. I’m in for this.’”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19474333

File: fc907c895c13236⋯.jpg (705.05 KB,1807x2764,1807:2764,Saving_Our_Kids_The_inside….jpg)

>>19474329

3/3

Inman Grant says, “This is global organised crime,” adding that many tips have zeroed in on the West African nations of Nigeria, Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire, and more recently on the Philippines and India. The roots of this illegal phenomenon in Australia can be traced back to the proliferation of email scams a few years ago, where recipients were told that compromising photographs of them existed and they urgently needed to transfer money or risk having the images exposed online.

Investigators believe these syndicates use a strategy whereby large numbers of potential offenders attempt to make contact with children. They have a methodology, akin to a script, and work out of pop-up-type call centres, equipped with quotas and targets.

Investigators also believe they use hierarchical structures and rely on systematic funnelling to move money from their teen victims into Australian bank accounts, before the cash is then moved offshore.

Because a syndicate in Africa or Asia cannot open an Australian bank account, “money mules” – who may or may not be aware of the criminality behind what they are doing – are used to open accounts.

Some teens who are not able to pay the ransom to keep their sex acts from being distributed online are also being forced to open accounts, and are given instructions of where to then send the money deposited in them. This is where the AFP and AUSTRAC, through Operation Huntsman, have focused their attention: tracking down the money being siphoned to offshore accounts.

Michelle DeLaune, head of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) in the United States, says threats will continue to emerge. For example, in the four years to 2022, NCMEC saw a 567 per cent increase in reports relating to the “sexual enticement of a child”. The COVID-19 pandemic was a factor here, with a distinct increase in the number of young girls being targeted.

In fact, DeLaune’s team tracked predators talking openly in the dark web about how easy it was to find children during the pandemic. The comments included: “How many single or divorced dads are now stuck at home with their horny daughters that can’t visit their boyfriends? That must create some opportunities lol.” And: “I hope there are terabytes of new content being created right now with bored dads and older brothers stuck at home all day with their kids/ siblings.”

Online child sex victim identification expert Paul Griffiths says the changing modus operandi of predators challenges investigators because it requires a different mindset to tackle. He says, “It’s worrying on two fronts because you’ve got the straight financial aspects of the crime, and then the lasting damage to the kids as well. Some of the intricacies of the way that the exploitation is actually being applied is forcing the kids to commit acts that they wouldn’t have otherwise committed – because [the predators] know they have more financial value once they’ve done that.”

“We need to track down every single target,” says ICMEC’s Rouse, meaning the criminals who sexually assault young children, those who upload harrowing images, the customers of pay per-view and subscription operations, members of the huge dark web operations that harbour offenders, and those who have zero sexual interest in kids but who just want money.

And that’s because, at the centre of all those networked predator streams, there are children.

Saving Our Kids: The inside story of Taskforce Argos, Detective Inspector Jon Rouse and their mission to protect our children online by Madonna King (Hachette Australia).

https://www.afr.com/companies/financial-services/how-austrac-is-saving-kids-from-sexual-abuse-20230807-p5duiy

https://www.hachette.com.au/madonna-king/saving-our-kids-the-inside-story-of-taskforce-argos-detective-inspector-jon-rouse-and-their-mission-to-protect-our-children-online

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19476767

File: 830530247bd438e⋯.mp4 (14.59 MB,1024x576,16:9,Former_councillors_Vince_B….mp4)

File: e35872d78b2d633⋯.jpg (78.47 KB,960x640,3:2,Former_councillors_Philip_….jpg)

File: 67aad859cbadd9f⋯.jpg (82.6 KB,960x640,3:2,Former_Hurstville_Labor_co….jpg)

File: 7ca31f28cf7ca0f⋯.jpg (118.07 KB,1280x720,16:9,Vincenzo_Badalati_left_Con….jpg)

Sydney councillors filmed with escorts ‘for blackmail’, says corruption watchdog

STEPHEN RICE - AUGUST 30, 2023

The NSW anti-corruption watchdog has found a Sydney property developer secretly filmed two councillors with sex workers on a “boys’ weekend” trip to China so he could blackmail them into voting for his projects.

The Independent Commission Against Corruption found that the two men who were filmed, Vince Bada­lati and Philip Sansom, and councillor Constantine Hindi accepted perks from developers in exchange for favourable treatment on property developments.

ICAC found Mr Badalati and Mr Hindi accepted $170,000 each from developer Ching Wah (Philip) Uy as a reward for having used their positions to help him and the proponents of two proposed developments in Hurstville.

The commission found Mr Bada­lati and Mr Hindi engaged in serious corrupt conduct by travelling to China in April 2016 when they knew their positions with the then Hurstville City Council (later Georges River Council) would be misused to endorse and promote the property developments.

The pair accepted flights, accom­modation and travel in luxury cars.

Mr Sansom engaged in serious corrupt conduct by accepting payment for his and his partner’s return flights for a trip to China in 2014 when he knew the payment was intended to influence him in carrying out his official functions.

Mr Hindi also failed to disclose his pecuniary interest in a planning proposal through his wife Mireille Hindi’s interest in a development due to an agreement under which she stood to gain $500,000.

Mr Badalati and Mr Sansom told ICAC that during trips to China they would spend their time shopping, eating and drinking, going to nightclubs and occasionally performing karaoke with Mr Uy. Mr Sansom described these as “boys’ weekends”.

ICAC found two videos on Mr Uy’s mobile phone taken in 2013 showing Mr Badalati and Mr Sansom in a hotel and at a restaurant with young women.

Mr Uy told ICAC the women “were interpreters or alternatively shopkeepers” but Mr Badalati and Mr Sansom agreed the women were escorts. It was not clear who paid for their services.

When asked by ICAC why he filmed the pair, Mr Uy suggested it was inadvertent and “part of Chinese culture” to take videos of food. He denied taking the videos so could use them against Mr Badalati or Mr Sansom in relation to planning appli­cations coming before the council, and the two men said he had never tried to blackmail them, although Mr Badalati agreed the videos were intended as a “blackmail tool”.

“The commission is satisfied Mr Uy believed the videos provided a means by which he could, if necessary, secure their votes,” the commission said.

The ICAC investigation was rocked by the apparent suicide last year of one councillor called to testify. Former Hurstville Labor councillor Clifton Wong, 62, was found dead in his Sydney office two days after he admitted he failed to report a developer allegedly handing $10,000 to Mr Hindi.

ICAC made 11 recommendations including that a code of conduct prohibit council members and officials from accepting benefits from property developers.

ICAC does not have the power to lay criminal charges, but it recommended advice be obtained from the NSW DPP about prosecuting Mr Sansom, Mr Badalati, Mr Hindi, his wife and Mr Uy for various offences.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/sydney-councillors-filmed-with-escorts-for-blackmail-says-corruption-watchdog/news-story/0a3fb71457cf258702042a0af379571e

https://www.theage.com.au/national/nsw/bribes-blackmail-lies-and-escorts-former-councillor-confesses-20220720-p5b31m.html

https://www.theage.com.au/national/nsw/icac-witness-found-dead-in-office-after-giving-evidence-20220707-p5b00i.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19481563

File: 164e7b45addcc03⋯.jpg (2.45 MB,4380x2920,3:2,Opposition_Leader_Peter_Du….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19458899

Dutton promises another vote if Indigenous Voice fails

David Crowe and Broede Carmody - September 3, 2023

1/2

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has promised to hold a referendum on constitutional recognition for Indigenous Australians if the Voice is defeated at the ballot box next month, and he wins power at the next election.

Setting out some of his alternatives to a Voice that is written into the Constitution, the opposition leader said he supported “regional voices” and the recognition of First Australians.

But he highlighted the latest move by the Yes campaign – its use of John Farnham’s You’re the Voice anthem – to criticise the government for not providing more detail about how its proposal would work.

“In a sense, it’s the appropriate theme song for the Yes campaign, because remember that the key line in the lyrics there is, you know, ‘you’re the voice, try to understand it’,” he said.

“I honestly don’t think most Australians understand it. And they want to be informed.”

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has described the Voice as an “advisory committee” chosen by Indigenous people but has not said how many members it would have, or specified how they would be elected.

While Albanese set out his case for the Voice at a campaign event last week, Dutton has not outlined his alternative in detail but took questions on Sky News on Sunday morning that canvassed how the Coalition might try to close the gap on Indigenous disadvantage.

Asked what he would do if the October referendum was defeated and the Coalition won the next election, Dutton said he was willing to negotiate the creation of local and regional consultation groups in response to a report to the government by Indigenous leaders Tom Calma and Marcia Langton last year.

Dutton said the Coalition would go to the next election with a policy to hold a referendum to recognise Indigenous people in the Constitution, but without a Voice specified in the Constitution.

“Yes, I believe very strongly that that is the right thing to do,” he said.

“But enshrining a voice in the Constitution is divisive, it will divide the country down the middle. It will not provide the practical outcomes.

“It will change the way of government very significantly, because of the broad words.”

“And I think it would grind the process of government decision-making to a near halt.”

Albanese warned last week about a halt to progress on closing the gap if the Voice was defeated at the referendum.

“Voting No leads nowhere. It means nothing changes,” he said in his campaign speech.

“Voting No closes the door on this opportunity to move forward.”

Albanese said the Voice would be independent of daily politics, would be set up to offer advice and would not prevent the parliament from making decisions on laws and funding.

He used his speech to quote a key section of the proposed change to the constitution, the last of three provisions on how it would work, which says the parliament would have the power to make laws regarding the “composition, functions, powers and procedures” of the Voice.

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19481566

File: 03e2985adfaa3e2⋯.jpg (1.38 MB,3000x2000,3:2,Professor_Megan_Davis_does….jpg)

>>19481563

2/2

Dutton’s remarks on Sunday are the first comments since the referendum launch last week that suggest Australians would go to another referendum on Indigenous recognition if the Voice is defeated on October 14.

Uluru Dialogue co-chair Professor Megan Davis said Australians want constitutional change that isn’t just symbolic.

“There’s no use going to referendum if it’s not going to change the daily lives of First Nations peoples,” she said.

“There’s zero evidence anywhere in the world that a statement of recognition changes anything.”

South Australian traditional owner Kirstie Parker said Dutton’s comments showed the opposition leader wasn’t listening to Indigenous communities.

“Some people have said the referendum is an expensive exercise,” she said. “And here we have the opposition leader proposing to spend the same amount of money on something that would not change lives. That’s the poorest investment of Australian taxpayers’ dollars.”

Asked how many people will make up the Voice, which Albanese has called an advisory committee, Davis said that detail would be worked out by parliament, should the referendum succeed.

“Our primary focus is getting the principle embedded into the constitution. [That principle] is that we should have a voice and we should be at the table.”

The Uluru Dialogue co-chair added that it was not up to her to say whether the people who make up the Voice should be paid.

The elected representatives of Victoria’s First Peoples’ Assembly, for example, are paid a stipend. However, the exact figures are not publicly available.

“The Australian parliament has rules about how you pay people within the framework and machinery of governance,” Davis said.

As for how soon after a successful referendum she and others would like to see the Voice implemented, Davis said she was hoping for at least one day of rest after voters attend the ballot box.

“There’ll be a period of design where communities are asked to contribute to what the Voice looks like. Once that process is finished, it will enter the parliament. I don’t want to speak for the prime minister or the government, but that is the conventional way these things occur.”

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/dutton-promises-another-vote-if-indigenous-voice-fails-20230903-p5e1kc.html

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19481586

File: af41bde03a36880⋯.webm (14.41 MB,640x360,16:9,John_Farnham_You_re_the_v….webm)

>>19222755

>>19458899

John Farnham backs Voice, permits his anthem to front Yes campaign ad

Lisa Visentin - September 3, 2023

1/2

Australian music legend John Farnham has thrown his support behind the Yes campaign, and permitted his iconic anthem You’re the Voice to be used in a television ad that will encourage voters to see the Voice referendum as a profound moment in the nation’s history.

It is one of the few occasions Farnham has allowed his 1986 hit to be used in a commercial, having agreed to license it for an undisclosed sum to Yes campaign outfit Uluru Dialogue. He hoped allowing the song to support a Yes vote would help make the case for the constitutional change.

“This song changed my life. I can only hope that now it might help, in some small way, to change the lives of our First Nations peoples for the better,” Farnham said in a statement.

Tim Wheatley, son of Farnham’s late manager Glenn Wheatley and a close friend of the singer, said they had decided the song was perfect for the moment.

“Win or lose this referendum, this song will forever remain on the right side of history. Both John and my father have fiercely protected this song’s use for decades, I think, for this very moment,” Wheatley said.

The two-minute advertisement was kept under wraps ahead of its invite-only unveiling on Sunday night at the Corner Hotel, in the Melbourne suburb of Richmond.

But the Uluru Dialogue provided excerpts to the media and said in a statement that Farnham’s song was central to the ad campaign, which will run across television and social media.

It is the first major ad to be released by either the Yes or No campaigns during the six-week run to referendum day on October 14.

Farnham, who has recently recovered from a battle with cancer and has kept out of the public spotlight, only appears in the commercial via archival footage.

But his song provides the soundtrack as the ad features snippets of key moments in history including the 1967 referendum, which allowed Indigenous people to be included in the population, the Mabo High Court decision, Cathy Freeman’s gold medal at the 2000 Sydney Olympics, John Howard’s 1996 gun reform, the 2008 apology to the stolen generations and the 2017 marriage equality plebiscite.

Uluru Dialogue co-chair Megan Davis said her group contacted Farnham more than a year ago to secure his support.

“You’re the Voice is the nation’s unofficial anthem,” Davis said. “History isn’t just something we witness and observe, but something we ourselves can influence. And now we all have a voice in what happens at this critical moment, and we must use it.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19481591

File: ea1f0b9053f12ae⋯.jpg (340.84 KB,1920x1080,16:9,The_advertisement_features….jpg)

File: ce841f9a4f3c95e⋯.jpg (4.9 MB,5540x3693,5540:3693,Glenn_Wheatley_and_John_Fa….jpg)

>>19481586

2/2

Hitting the hustings alongside ACT independent senator David Pocock in the Canberra suburb of Woden on Saturday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese described the ad as “extraordinarily powerful”, and took aim at the No campaign. “Compare that with the campaign against this, which is negative, based upon things that aren’t going to happen,” Albanese said.

Uluru Dialogue and Yes23 are the two key Yes campaign organisations. Uluru Dialogue has been running a low-key campaign, largely focusing on holding information sessions in regional areas, while Yes23 has co-ordinated the larger national advocacy effort, concentrating on cities.

Farnham’s support marks something of a departure for the Yes campaign, which has otherwise pivoted away from celebrity endorsements so not to isolate ordinary voters, while trying to neutralise attacks from the No side about its support from “elite” sources such as Wesfarmers, Qantas and other big corporates.

A Yes23 insider, who was not authorised to speak publicly about the group’s strategy, said the campaign would still selectively use high-profile people who resonated with “ordinary Australians”, pointing to recent endorsements from singers Paul Kelly and Jimmy Barnes.

Leading No campaigner Warren Mundine said they would also be ramping up their advertising spend over the coming weeks.

“Social media is a big thing for us. Yes, of course we’ll be doing some TV ads, but most of it is going to be done in the battleground states of Tasmania and South Australia,” he said.

Farnham’s endorsement continues a historical trend of campaigns tapping into the gravitas of high-profile figures to sell a message.

A host of celebrities were at the forefront of Gough Whitlam’s 1972 election victory for Labor. The phrase “It’s Time” was popularised and followed by a catchy song featured in a TV commercial and sung by celebrities including Little Pattie, Jacki Weaver, Bobby Limb, Jack Thompson, Barry Crocker, Col Joye and Bert Newton.

Jazz and soul singer Renee Geyer sang the 1975 Liberal Party campaign theme Turn On The Lights for the election after the dismissal of the Whitlam government.

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/john-farnham-backs-voice-permits-his-anthem-to-front-yes-campaign-ad-20230901-p5e18t.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFpNnJS10Sc

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19481597

File: 1f102b0de7d5314⋯.jpg (111.87 KB,1710x962,855:481,John_Farnham_is_lending_hi….jpg)

File: 8a8ab4c60e45265⋯.jpg (327.02 KB,2048x1152,16:9,John_Farnham_is_lending_hi….jpg)

File: 1e51813ee577b31⋯.jpg (111.88 KB,1279x720,1279:720,Peter_Dutton_had_a_sassy_r….jpg)

File: 0fc9fd2ea01aafa⋯.jpg (209.58 KB,1920x1080,16:9,The_ad_will_follow_a_famil….jpg)

>>19222755

>>19458899

>>19481586

Peter Dutton’s sassy dig after John Farnham lends his voice in new campaign ad for Yes vote

STEVE ZEMEK, ANTHONY ANDERSON and COURTNEY GOULD - SEPTEMBER 3, 2023

1/2

Peter Dutton has taken a sassy dig at the Yes campaign after Aussie music legend John Farnham gave permission for his iconic anthem to be used in support of the Voice referendum.

Farnham's hit, You’re the Voice, will be featured in the History is Calling campaign that will air on TV and the internet across the country in the lead up to the October 14 referendum.

It marks the first time the former Australian of the Year and ARIA Hall of Famer has given permission for the classic song to be used in a commercial.

“This song changed my life. I can only hope that now it might help, in some small way, to change the lives of our First Nations Peoples for the better,” Farnham said, after announcing last week announced he was cancer-free.

But Mr Dutton dryly noted the song’s lyric could backfire on the Yes camp.

“In a sense, it’s the appropriate theme song for the Yes campaign, because remember that the key line in the lyrics there is, you know, ‘you’re the voice, try to understand it’,” he told Sky News on Sunday.

“I honestly don’t think most Australians understand it. And they want to be informed.”

Mr Dutton has repeatedly criticised the government for not providing more detail about how its proposal would work.

The government has said the Voice would be an advisory body chosen by Indigenous people based on the wishes of local communities.

Voice supporters, including Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, have called the Voice vote a once-in-a-generation opportunity.

The Yes campaign ad tracks a family from the 1980s as they witness iconic moments throughout Australia’s history, including the Mabo decision, the 1966 gun law reform, Cathy Freeman’s win at the 2000 Olympics, the 2008 apology to the Stolen Generation and the marriage equality plebiscite in 2016.

Farnham’s close friend Tim Wheatley said the iconic tune “is not aligned with any political party” and the referendum was the perfect moment to loosen the tight grip the singer and his manager, Tim’s father Glenn Wheatley, had kept on the song.

“It is aligned with humanity. It’s a song for all Australians. Always has been, always will be,” he said.

“Win or lose this referendum, this song will forever remain on the right side of history. Both John and my father have fiercely protected this song’s use for decades, I think for this very moment.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19481603

File: 1329d91d6614cf5⋯.jpg (240.99 KB,1920x1080,16:9,It_s_the_first_time_Farnah….jpg)

File: 614d17f3df78740⋯.jpg (371.21 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Uluru_Dialogue_co_chair_Me….jpg)

File: fa1e2b85d20d5c0⋯.jpg (165.06 KB,2048x1152,16:9,Prime_Minister_Anthony_Alb….jpg)

File: a85863e3f0b2e46⋯.jpg (274.02 KB,2048x1153,2048:1153,Australians_will_head_to_t….jpg)

>>19481597

2/2

Throughout the campaign, Voice supporters have attempted to draw parallels between the referendum and big moments in Australian history.

“You’re the Voice is the nation’s unofficial anthem,” said Uluru statement from the heart architect Megan Davis.

“It’s been the consistent theme of my life of the last six years … we had people asking ‘have you thought about The Voice?’, ‘have you thought about Johnnie Farnham?’.

“Some time around the NRL final it was suggested we reach out to (Tim) Wheatley … I got a response (from John Farnham) in January, and he said yes, which was exciting.”

Professor Davis said the Yes campaign had been working on the campaign in secret for six months and managed to keep it under wraps.

“It will have a monumental impact on the campaign,” Professor Davis said.

“It speaks to the agency of the Australian people, it's a rousing song, a call to arms, and that’s what this referendum is.

“There’s robust debate and bucketloads of disinformation, but what Australians need to keep their eye on is while we’ve been uncertain in decision making, we are a nation who’ve made good decisions.”

Professor Davis said disinformation was, in her opinion, one of the biggest hurdles the Yes campaign had faced.

“In all the referendums that have come before you’ve never had this sort of disinformation, you’ve never had a referendum in a ‘Trumpian’-era,” she said.

“One of the core work we do is face-to-face talks with Australians … what we’re hearing is they’re not getting factual information through the media, so things like this song helps Australians step up and get that information to make an informed decision.”

Mr Albanese on Wednesday fired the starter’s gun on the six-week referendum campaign.

The Yes camp has denied claims by Mr Dutton that it has a $100m war chest at its disposal for an advertising blitz.

Supporters have said they want to doorknock 250,000 homes as part of a volunteer-led grassroots campaign.

In his first major interview since announcing the date of the referendum, Mr Albanese this week made a big pitch to middle Australia.

“For many years, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have advocated for constitutional recognition through a Voice,” Mr Albanese told A Current Affair.

“Our government, along with every single state and territory government, has committed to it. Legal experts have endorsed it.”

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/john-farnham-lends-his-voice-to-the-voice-in-new-campaign-ad-for-yes-vote/news-story/5276c62995be23277a7e75312a31ca98

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19481639

File: c2ff83410326cbf⋯.jpg (95.68 KB,1199x675,1199:675,Teagan_Luketic_left_has_sl….jpg)

Mother’s warning after Snapchat’s ‘creepy’ AI bot asks daughter to ‘meet up’

The bot told the 13-year-old Melbourne girl that it was actually a 25-year-old man, adding: ‘Age is just a number.’

Hayley Taylor - 2 September 2023

1/2

Melbourne mother Teagan Luketic has a warning for parents after an AI bot on her daughter’s Snapchat claimed it was a “real” 25-year-old man.

It even told the 13-year-old Olinda: “Age is just a number.”

The bot suggested it meet the girl at a park 1km from her home, in a “creepy” conversation that Luketic, 32, documented with screenshots.

Luketic slammed the bizarre dialogue for, at the very least, normalising chatroom conversations between adults and minors.

“If you have children sitting on this app, and the AI bot is promoting that age is just a number, and teaching teenagers that that’s a normal part of life — that’s alarming,” Luketic told 7NEWS.com.au.

“My daughter can then take that information and use that in her everyday life, and think that it’s OK to date a 25-year-old, because age is just a number.”

It’s not the first time this situation has occurred. Another user pretending to be a 13-year-old reportedly received advice from Snapchat’s AI chatbot on how she could lie to her parents about meeting a 31-year-old man, AAP reported last month.

It’s one of the largest consumer chatbots available today, according to Snapchat, which reports 150 million people have sent over 10 billion messages to the platform’s AI bot.

Built on Chat GPT’s technology, it understands the age of the user it’s speaking to and aims to keep conversations age appropriate, 7NEWS.com.au has been told.

It’s understood the company uses certain guidelines to program the bot to avoid responses that are violent, hateful, sexually explicit, or otherwise offensive.

But it appears this isn’t enough to filter out the dangerously suggestive language that was enough to deeply concern Luketic’s daughter Olinda, and her schoolmates.

Olinda has had a phone since she was nine years old.

She also has a social media presence, and depends on apps such as Snapchat as a main form of communication with her schoolmates, which Luketic says is the new normal for kids of her age group.

But Olinda “is also very cautious about privacy” and has a great relationship with Luketic — so in mid-April, when Olinda’s friends began discussing the “creepy” nature of the bot, she flagged it with her mum straight away.

Luketic told 7NEWS.com.au she then prompted the bot while pretending to be Olinda, and within seconds the bot was pumping out more creepy responses.

The bot confirmed they should meet up at 11am the next day.

After she screenshotted the responses, Luketic said she immediately received another message from the bot.

“I’m sorry, but I never agreed to meet you at the park tomorrow. I think there might be some confusion here. It’s important to prioritise our safety and wellbeing,” the bot’s message said.

“Meeting up could put us in a potentially risky situation.”

A Snapchat spokesperson said: “My AI has access to a Snapchatter’s location to provide recommendations only if they’ve already shared it with friends on Snap Map or with Snapchat at the device level.

“My AI does not collect any new location information.

“As with all AI-powered chatbots, My AI is always learning and can occasionally produce incorrect responses.

“We want to create a positive and age appropriate experience for all our users and are continually making updates to help My AI give more accurate responses.”

Luketic said Olinda wasn’t initially scared about the bot, or the blurring lines of reality that such realistic responses create, but that anxious conversations about the AI feature persisted in her daughter’s friendship group for weeks.

“I could overhear her conversations with her friends, and they were all scared.

“They were saying things like: ‘You should ask your mum to go down to the park and see if there’s someone actually there. Maybe it’s been hacked’.”

Even Luketic said she was left feeling unsettled, and had an “eerie” feeling when she was in her backyard alone late at night to tend to her pets, after having the conversation with Olinda that evening.

At a time when young teens are plagued with anxiety, she said the responses “could be damaging”.

“Even adults, or anyone who knows that there’s no physical threat — it still plays in the back of your mind.”

(continued)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19481640

File: 2fbc4fb2f136587⋯.jpg (86.9 KB,1199x675,1199:675,While_chatting_to_13_year_….jpg)

>>19481639

2/2

While she isn’t concerned about AI sentience, she worries about how instances such as these come across to children, and that appropriate age restrictions or the ability to remove the feature do not exist.

Luketic even upgraded her daughter’s Snapchat account to a premium service in an attempt to lose the AI bot, but had no luck.

“There is no way of removing that feature at all,” she said.

Rather than an option to remove the bot, a spokesperson from Snapchat told 7NEWS.com.au that those experiencing bizarre responses can use their experiences to help improve the bot.

“My AI has been programmed with safeguards, and we’ve integrated My AI into our Family Centre, so parents can see if their teens are chatting with it and how often,” they said.

“We also show a pop-up before people can use My AI, which reminds them that it’s a fun chatbot and advises on its limitations

“If Snapchatters experience any inappropriate or incorrect responses from the My AI chatbot, we encourage them to report it using our in-app tool, so we can improve.”

Deleting a social connection

Luketic, who already limits Olinda’s social media, and maintains transparency by being logged into all of her accounts, said she tried taking away the app from Olinda for three days, but witnessed the rapid and negative social effect it had on her daughter.

“I’m angry that as a parent, I cannot remove the feature for my child.

“I can delete this app, yes, but 95 per cent of children her age at school use this as their main form of communication. So without Snapchat, she is the one missing out.

“So that affects her socially, if I fully take it away.”

And Snapchat is likely aware of the role AI can play in this. An article in the Journal of Service Management published in June found that the personification of chatbots leads to increased engagement and psychological dependence on them.

It’s not the first time Snapchat’s AI bot has acted in a weird way, with the company offering little reassurance.

In August, US software engineer Matt Esparza’s Snapchat AI bot seemed to post an image of his wall and ceiling to its Snapchat story.

La Trobe University’s deputy director of the Centre for Data Analytics and Cognition Daswin de Silva said in an article on The Conversation that Snapchat: “Put the whole thing down to a ‘temporary outage’.

“We may never know what actually happened; it could be yet another example of AI “hallucinating”, or the result of a cyberattack, or even just an operational error.”

https://7news.com.au/technology/snapchat/mothers-warning-after-snapchats-creepy-ai-bot-asks-daughter-to-meet-up-c-11768791

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487317

Notables

are not endorsements

#31 - Part 1

Australian Politics and Society - Part 1

>>19190812 Peak obstetricians’ body warns women at risk after abortion pill access expanded - Anthony Albanese’s expansion of abortion pill access puts women at risk of complications, or even death, an obstetrician body says, raising alarm over the government not properly considering the unintended consequences of the policy.

>>19199832 Doctors’ plea for answers on transgender treatment in Australia - The specialist youth and adolescent arm of the nation’s peak psychiatry college is pushing for national guidelines on the care of young people with gender distress and gender dysphoria as doctors around the country say they feel muzzled and fearful of expressing professional views on gender medicine.

>>19199925 Video: Daniel Andrews reveals Victoria’s 2026 Commonwealth Games will not go ahead - Australia’s Commonwealth Games chief has slammed Victoria’s decision to pull out of the event, questioning the sums used to justify the call. Premier Daniel Andrews on Tuesday morning confirmed the event would not go ahead in Victoria in 2026 and blamed a higher-than-forecast cost for the sudden cancellation.

>>19204858 Video: Yumi Stynes and Dr Melissa Kang’s sex book for kids sold at Big W sparks debate - Disgruntled parents have raised concerns about a “graphic” sex book targeted at children as young as eight being sold at Big W. Dr Melissa Kang and Yumi Stynes’ book, Welcome to Sex: Your no-silly-questions guide to sexuality, pleasure and figuring it out, released in May, is billed as a “frank, age-appropriate introductory guide to sex and sexuality for teens of all genders”. “Why is Big W selling this GRAPHIC SEX GUIDE FOR KIDS in Aus which includes how-tos for anal/oral sex, masturbation & heavily pushes gender ideology?” Rachael Wong, chief executive of Women’s Forum Australia, wrote on Twitter, sharing the video.

>>19205022 USS Canberra strengthens ties with US, littorally - They’re derided by many as ­“Little Crappy Ships”, but a senior US Navy officer says the Littoral Combat Ship USS Canberra will play an important role in the ­contested Indo-Pacific. The US Navy vessel cruised into Sydney Harbour on Tuesday ahead of its official commissioning on Saturday. The vessel, designed by Australian-owned Austal USA, will be the second US ship to be named in honour of the original HMAS Canberra, sunk by the Japanese in 1942.

>>19205027 Video: USS Canberra arrives in Sydney to be commissioned for the US Navy - Today saw a historic moment in Australia's military alliance with the US, as an American warship arrived in Sydney to be commissioned into the US Navy. The USS Canberra will be named in honour of a piece of our own military history. - 7NEWS Australia

>>19205037 USS Canberra arrives in Sydney to be commissioned - USS Canberra has arrived in Sydney ahead of the first ever commissioning of a US navy ship in an allied country, making it a historic moment for Australia’s military alliance. - Sky News Australia

>>19205053 USS Canberra arrives in Sydney - Australia welcomed the USS Canberra to Sydney Harbour, with HMAS Canberra guiding the Independence-variant littoral combat ship to berth alongside Fleet Base East ahead of the formal commissioning on 22 July. - Defence Australia

>>19211309 ADF captain's choice to wear female army uniform overhauls gender diverse policy - When Captain Jesse Noble realised they were gender diverse, it "was kind of like getting hit in the face with a truck". "I really associate with both genders," Captain Noble said. Captain Noble told their boss the female dress standards provided a greater range of gender expression in terms of who they were as a person. Captain Noble's boss gave immediate interim approval to wear the female uniform, and the request was then escalated up the chain of command. In April, the forces command issued a new directive stipulating that gender-fluid, non-binary and intersex people could choose the uniform, grooming, physical standards and accommodation that best aligned with their gender identity.

>>19211365 Welcome to Sex guide for kids rockets to No. 1 after Big W removes it from the shelves - A sex education guide for children has shot to No. 1 on the Amazon online sales charts after being pulled from the shelves at Big W and Target. Welcome to Sex by the former “Dolly Doctor” Melissa Kang and ABC presenter Yumi Stynes contains frank descriptions of sex, alongside cartoon drawings. It has been the subject of a boycott movement by some parents who say the sex tips it offers are far too graphic for children.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487320

#31 - Part 2

Australian Politics and Society - Part 2

>>19211387 'No, your kids shouldn't send nudes even with their faces removed. Here's why' - A cyber safety expert has condemned a controversial book written for children as young as eight, describing it as “dangerous” and “complete misinformation”. The book, Welcome to Sex: Your no-silly-questions guide to sexuality, pleasure and figuring it out by Yumi Stynes and Dr Melissa Kang, has sparked debate around sex education for children, with many parents furious. One section of the book discusses sending nude pictures and sexting, which Dr Kang likens to love letters that were once sent before phones, ignoring the innocence of those letters, which were generally written by adults, compared to the explicit pictures and videos that can be sent today and shared to the world instantly. Cyber safety expert with 27 years in law enforcement, Susan McLean, said she was concerned about the peddling of misinformation on such an important topic. “These people haven’t a clue about the reality of the digital world,” she stresses. “They are encouraging behaviour which is likely to cause a young person to be arrested and charged and that is not ok.”

>>19220977 Victorian MP sent ‘hit list’ letter threatening critics of Cambodian leader Hun Sen - Police in Australia are investigating a threatening letter received by a Victorian state MP which warned that he and other critics of Cambodian strongman Hun Sen in Australia would be targeted by an assassination team. The letter was sent to the Melbourne office of Labor’s Meng Heang Tak before Sunday’s election in Cambodia, and said his name appeared on a hit list, along with other vocal opponents of the government in Phnom Penh.

>>19221187 ‘Taking a leaf out of Trumpism’: Yumi Stynes on the ‘misguided’ backlash to sex book - A new Australian sex education book has topped Amazon’s bestseller list and some local bookshops are running out of copies, after a conservative backlash led to it being pulled from the shelves of major retailer Big W. Welcome to Sex, written by Yumi Stynes and Dr Melissa Kang, the longest-serving expert behind Dolly Doctor, reached the top of the Amazon charts on Thursday, two months after its release on May 17. Stynes said she was surprised by the backlash. “We really have a lot of credentials,” she said. “We’ve got an army of professors, who fact-checked and contributed to the book. So for people to try and shame us or make us feel like we haven’t done the work, it’s just really misguided. It does make me think that they’re taking a leaf out of the book of Trumpism and fearmongering there.”

>>19226413 USS Canberra Commissions in Rare Overseas Ceremony - Leaders of the U.S. Navy joined their Australian counterparts on a windy winter day at the ancestral home of the Royal Australian Navy to welcome USS Canberra (LCS-30) to the American fleet. Moored at the RAN naval base HMAS Kuttabul in the middle of Sydney harbor, Littoral Combat Ship Canberra (LCS-30), was commissioned in a rare overseas ceremony on Saturday. The LCS’ commissioning was a “celebration” and demonstration of the alliance between Australia and the United States, Australia Governor-General David Hurley said at the ceremony.

>>19226422 Video: USS Canberra officially launched into duty in Australia making history - A US warship has been officially launched into duty in Australia making history. The new USS Canberra will be based on this side of the Pacific but the all-American celebration was overshadowed by a stoush over submarines. - 7NEWS Australia

>>19226423 Video: US Navy warship USS Canberra commissioned in Sydney - Combat ship USS Canberra has been officially commissioned in Sydney on Saturday, making it the first-ever commissioning of a US Navy ship in an allied country. Australian and American dignitaries have reflected on the significance of the event. - Sky News Australia

>>19226427 Video: USS Canberra (LCS 30) Commissioning on 22 July, 2023. - USS Canberra (LCS 30) has arrived at the Royal Australian Navy’s Fleet Base East in Sydney for a one-of-a-kind commissioning later this week. The United States Navy’s 16th Independence Class littoral combat ship arrived on 18 July ahead of its commissioning on 22 July, before returning to its homeport of San Diego. Canberra is the first US Navy warship to be commissioned in an allied country and the second US Navy ship to bear the namesake of Canberra. The ship, launched in June 2021, was named Canberra after the Australian cruiser HMAS Canberra which was sunk following the Battle of Savo Island against Japanese forces on 9 August 1942. - Defense Now

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487325

#31 - Part 3

Australian Politics and Society - Part 3

>>19226500 ‘Don’t wait until one of us dies in a pool of blood’: MPs on hit list for criticising Cambodian leader - A former Victorian Labor MP named on a “death list” of Australian critics of Cambodian strongman Hun Sen says the Albanese government is still allowing the dictator’s enforcers to enter Australia despite promises to crack down on foreign interference by the regime. Former Clarinda MP Hong Lim was among several community leaders targeted in an anonymous letter sent to his successor in the seat, Labor MP Meng Heang Tak, who was also warned he would be killed if he did not stop his criticism of Hun Sen.

>>19231951 Australia to buy 20 C-130 Hercules aircraft from the US for $6.6 billion - Australia said Monday it will buy 20 new C-130 Hercules from the United States in a 9.8 billion Australian dollar ($6.6 billion) deal that will increase by two-thirds the size of the Australian air force’s fleet of its second-largest heavy transport aircraft. The announcement follows the U.S. Congress' approval last year of a larger sale of 24 of the Lockheed Martin-manufactured propeller-driven aircraft.

>>19232078 Donald J. Trump ReTruth: @KickDreaming - "NOTHING CAN STOP WHAT IS COMING. NOTHING." - https://truthsocial.com/@KickDreaming/posts/110767012220636077

>>19232078 Q Post #4944 - Are you ready to finish what we started? 'Nothing can stop what is coming' is not just a catch-phrase. Q - https://qanon.pub/#4944 - https://qalerts.pub/?q=nothing+can+stop - https://qalerts.pub/?q=NCSWIC

>>19237718 Transgender swimmers to compete in world-first test event later in 2023 - International swimming bosses are preparing to take the plunge and push ahead with a world-first event for elite transgender competitors. The details of where and when the test event will take place remain top secret, at least for now, because World Aquatics, the global governing body for the swimming, knows just how politically divisive the issue is. However, highly-placed sources have told this masthead that the sport’s leaders have made the decision to proceed with a test event later in 2023.

>>19243683 Facebook owner Meta ordered to pay $20m fine to Australian government - Two subsidiaries of Facebook parent company Meta have been ordered to pay the federal government $20m in penalties for contraventions of Australian consumer law, over claims the subsidiaries secretly collected and aggregated users’ personal data for Facebook’s commercial benefit.

>>19250307 Julia Gillard’s ex Tim Mathieson to plead guilty to sexual assault - Julia Gillard’s former partner, Tim Mathieson, will plead guilty to sexually touching a woman without her consent. The 66-year-old hairdresser, who became the first Australian man to be nicknamed the nation’s “first bloke” when Ms Gillard ousted Kevin Rudd as Labor leader in 2010, is expected to admit to sucking a woman’s nipple without her consent in an incident that took place in Brunswick on March 13 last year.

>>19250396 Controversial blockbuster Sound of Freedom heads to Australian cinemas - "The controversial American hit film Sound of Freedom, about a Homeland Security agent who quits his job to take on child traffickers, is headed for Australian cinemas. The unheralded thriller has stormed to stunning box office success in the US - taking more than $US130 million ($191 million) in three weeks - after being released by self-described faith-based distributor Angel Studios. While it tells a non-partisan story, the film has been championed by both mainstream conservatives and far-right figures including Steve Bannon and My Pillow proprietor Mike Lindell as well as followers of the QAnon movement." - Garry Maddox - smh.com.au

>>19256981 ‘Hugely significant’: Australia to manufacture and export missiles to US - Australia is set to begin manufacturing its own missiles within two years under an ambitious plan that will allow the country to supply guided weapons to the United States and possibly export them to other nations. The push to accelerate the creation of a local missile manufacturing industry in co-operation with the US will be one of the centrepiece announcements at the Australia-United States Ministerial (AUSMIN) consultations.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487330

#31 - Part 4

Australian Politics and Society - Part 4

>>19257385 Video: QAnon-link film gets local release - "Sound of Freedom, a micro-budget independent film with links to QAnon that became an unlikely box office hit in America, will be released in Australia in August. The film, made on a budget of $US14.5 million ($21.6 million), has taken in an astonishing $US130 million ($191 million) at the box office since its opening on July 4th. Sound of Freedom stars Jim Caviezel as Tim Ballard, a former federal agent who founded the anti-trafficking organisation Operation Underground Railroad. It follows his mission through Colombia to save a girl from child traffickers. During the Trump presidency, Ballard co-chaired a council established to guide federal anti-trafficking policymaking." - Geordie Gray - theaustralian.com.au

>>19257385 Q Post #3635 - Sometimes a good 'movie' can provide a lot of truth and/or background. 'Official Secrets.' Relevant today? Enjoy the show! - Q - https://qanon.pub/#3635

>>19262419 Secret space deal agreed to in AUSMIN talks as US green lights missile production in Australia - The US and Australia will embark on a secret new space partnership amid Chinese technological leaps that threaten US supremacy in the key military domain. The initiative, which is likely to include the development of offensive space-based capabilities, was agreed at AUSMIN talks in Brisbane, where the US also vowed to help Australia to produce advanced new missile systems within three years. US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin, Secretary of State Antony Blinken met with their Australian counterparts Richard Marles and Penny Wong on Saturday, declaring “enhanced space cooperation” a new priority for the nations’ “unbreakable alliance”.

>>19267311 Anti-fascist protesters rally outside neo-Nazi weightlifting event - Police stopped anti-fascism protesters from clashing with a group of neo-Nazis holding a “white powerlifting competition” at a boxing gym in Melbourne’s west on Saturday. Dozens of anti-fascism protesters marched to the Legacy Boxing Gym in Sunshine West, walking down Industrial Drive just before 3pm chanting “unite, unite, unite to fight the right”, before calling on the white supremacists to face them in the street. The neo-Nazi group waved at the protesters and performed Sieg Heil salutes from behind a fence, but did not leave the gym - previously linked to far-right groups – while demonstrators were outside.

>>19272527 US military analysts to embed in Australia's defence department to monitor regional threats in wake of AUSMIN talks - American military analysts will soon be sent to work at the Defence Intelligence Organisation (DIO) in Canberra as both allies intensify joint efforts to scrutinise the moves of states like China, Russia and North Korea in the region. The US and Australia announced that they would establish a "Combined Intelligence Centre — Australia" within the DIO by next year, saying the new entity would "enhance long-standing intelligence cooperation".

>>19272789 New dates revealed for Donald Trump Jr’s Australian tour after visa fracas - Donald Trump Jnr will hit Australian shores in September, with the political firebrand to touch down following a visa fracas which led to his string of shows being postponed. New dates for the son of former US President Donald Trump have been released including shows in Brisbane (September 25), Melbourne (September 26) and Sydney (September 27). Guests are set to include former British politician Nigel Farage and conservative South Australian Liberal Senator Alex Antic. It comes after a visa stoush delayed Trump Jnr’s initial Australian tour dates set down for July.

>>19290208 Joe Hockey’s ‘Trump whisperer’ predicts the Don’s likely return - The former deputy chief of staff to Donald Trump says “there’s a very big chance” he will be re-elected US president next year, but that Australia and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese have nothing to fear. Emma Doyle, who worked for Mr Trump between 2018 and 2020, now works for Australia’s former ambassador to the US Joe Hockey and his advisory Bondi Partners, where she is privately dubbed “the Trump whisperer”. Ms Doyle said the key to surviving under the former president was “not going to work every day afraid of being fired. If you get fired, you get fired.” “I was always very direct, never threw people under the bus and would say: ‘we’ve looked at this six different ways and here are two options’.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487331

#31 - Part 5

Australian Politics and Society - Part 5

>>19297988 United States Air Force 'mission planning' and operations centre to be built in Darwin - A new US Air Force "mission planning" and operations centre will be built in Darwin, as part of $630 million in American spending across the top end over the next two to three years. The "Squadron Operations Facility" in Darwin will add to its growing array of military assets in the north, raising fears Australia may be locked into any future military conflict between China and the US.

>>19303272 Alexander Downer Tweet: Had a drink with friends yesterday where I met Papadopoulos in 2016. They’ve put up this plaque!! - https://twitter.com/AlexanderDowner/status/1687518177016631298

>>19314910 Don’t ban paying cyber ransoms, ex-US spy chief warns Australia - A former US National Security Agency director says Australia should not impose a blanket ban on paying cyber ransoms but instead adopt a risk-based approach that considers a set of key criteria. Retired Admiral Michael Rogers, who headed the NSA and led United States Cyber Command from 2014 to 2018 under presidents Barack Obama and Donald Trump, also called for a shift in thinking on cyberattacks. “This is what I used to tell the two presidents, ‘Sir, if the metric you’re going to use is anytime we have a significant penetration that is a failure, then you are going to be incredibly frustrated’,” Mr Rogers told The Australian Financial Review.

>>19314910 Q Post #585 - TRUST Adm R. He played the game to remain in control. Q - https://qanon.pub/#585

>>19320818 The US and Sweden have put a bounty on the head of alleged AN0M gangster Maximilian Rivkin - A $7.6m bounty has been placed on the head of a fugitive Swedish gangster who targeted Australia’s drug market and is a key lieutenant of Australia’s most wanted man, Hakan Ayik. News of the reward offered for the arrest of Maximilian Rivkin comes as another of the 17 men indicted over the encrypted app AN0M, Seyyed Hossein Hosseini, is extradited to the US, taking to five the number of international alleged gangsters now facing the US justice system on racketeering charges. The app, which was pushed by the likes of Australian drug kingpin Hakan Ayik, was marketed as a secure way to avoid law enforcement, but was in fact a Trojan horse app being run and monitored by the FBI and Australian Federal Police. While 17 people were indicted over running the criminal enterprise behind the app, more than 1300 people were charged globally with a number of crimes as a result of the sting.

>>19321039 Video: Fireball that lit up Melbourne night sky was most likely debris from Russian rocket - A large flaming object that lit up Melbourne’s sky overnight is thought to be debris from a Russian rocket used to send a satellite into space. Victorians captured videos showing a bright fireball travelling across the night sky late on Monday, close to midnight. Social media posts indicate it was seen from Melbourne’s CBD as well as outer suburbs such as Sunbury and Mornington. Residents in regional Victoria and South Australia also reported seeing the flashes of light. The Australian Space Agency said that the flashes of light were likely the remnants of a Russian Soyuz-2 rocket re-entering Earth’s atmosphere.

>>19326780 Trump’s potential return to White House up to American people, says Kevin Rudd - The Australian ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, says it is up to the American people whether Donald Trump returns to the White House - an outcome he previously said would “fray” support for the US alliance in Australia. The former Australian prime minister said on Wednesday that US politics was “a complex beast” and he was focused on keeping on good terms with both sides of the aisle, including former Trump officials. Prior to his appointment as ambassador, which took effect earlier this year, Rudd called Trump “the most destructive president in history”. Rudd told Guardian Australia before the 2020 election that if Trump were re-elected, “the overall fabric of domestic political support in this country and among other American allies around the world will begin to more fundamentally fray”.

>>19326786 Kevin Rudd Tweet (27 Feb 2022): Donald Trump is a traitor to the West. Murdoch was Trump’s biggest backer. And Murdoch’s Fox Television backs Putin too. What rancid treachery. - https://archive.ph/gbMyl

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487336

#31 - Part 6

Australian Politics and Society - Part 6

>>19333536 Elon Musk lashes the ABC over its decision to abandon his social media platform X - Billionaire businessman Elon Musk has lashed out at the ABC over its decision to abandon his platform and accused the public broadcaster of favouring “censorship-friendly social media”. Musk purchased X (formerly Twitter) in 2022 and has made many changes to the platform, including rebranding it, sacking thousands of staff and introducing charges for verification, but its overhaul has not been welcomed by the public broadcaster. The reasons behind the ABC’s decision to stop using the platform included blaming toxic interactions, costs and lack of trust but it was met with annoyance by Musk who took to social media to scold the taxpayer-funded organisation. Hours after the decision was announced by the ABC, Musk responded on X to a post about the ABC’s move by writing, “Well of course they prefer censorship-friendly social media. The Australian public does not”. Mr Musk did not specifically name any social media platforms in his post.

>>19333564 Kevin Rudd in ‘traitor Donald Trump’ U-turn - Australia’s ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, says he could work with a re-elected Donald Trump - who he attacked last year as a “traitor” - if the “good burghers” of the United States put the Republican frontrunner back in the White House. Dr Rudd, who is in Canberra for the unveiling of his prime ministerial portrait on Thursday, said he had worked “comfortably and seamlessly” with congressional Republicans and with former members of the Trump administration since his arrival in Washington in March. “Our job as the Australian Embassy in Washington is to work with both sides of the aisle,” Dr Rudd said. “What the good burghers of the United States choose to do in their own electoral process is a matter for them.”

>>19333564 Kevin Rudd Tweet (27 Feb 2022): Donald Trump is a traitor to the West. Murdoch was Trump’s biggest backer. And Murdoch’s Fox Television backs Putin too. What rancid treachery. - https://archive.ph/gbMyl

>>19333643 Former NSA director and commander of US Cyber Command says America can learn ‘a lot’ about cybersecurity from Australia - The former head of America’s National Security Agency has declared there are “a lot of things” the United States can learn about cybersecurity from Australia. Former NSA Director and Commander of the United States Cyber Command, Mike Rogers, said that while there are “significant challenges” with respect to cyber security in Australia, the country also has “a lot of good things going for it.” The former Admiral, who lead the NSA and the US cyber command from 2014 until 2018, cited the fact that Australian governments from both sides of politics had been “very aggressive” and “very focused on cyber security.” The former NSA director also credited Australia with prohibiting Chinese company Huawei from being involved in the country’s 5G network “well in advance” of both the US and the United Kingdom.

>>19340466 ALP conference to be a Paul Keating-free zone - Former prime ministers Paul Keating, Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard will not attend the first in-person ALP national conference since 2018, as senior Labor figures scramble to avoid messy fights over AUKUS, economic and social policy, Palestine, trade and fossil fuels. More than 2,000 party delegates and members, union officials, MPs and observers will meet over three days at the Brisbane Convention Centre next week at the first national conference held in Queensland since the 1970s.

>>19367972 Rudd, Newsom get cosy on climate - Under the five-metre-high ceilings of the Leland Stanford Mansion in Sacramento, Australia’s ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, showed just what a former prime minister has to do to become mates with the potential next president of the United States. Californian governor Gavin Newsom, who many believe is planning a presidential run soon with a growing fund-raising base and an increasingly vulnerable Joe Biden at the helm, was courted on Tuesday (Wednesday AEST) by Rudd along with, as the ambassador put it, “a bunch of visiting Australian corporate buccaneers”. Newsom, 55, who has been governor since 2019 and a politician for 20 years, is widely regarded as the next best option for the Democrats after Biden. A favourite hate figure of the Republican right for his progressive views, he governs a state that, with GDP of about $US3.6 trillion ($5.5 trillion), is the fifth biggest in the world, behind Germany and ahead of India. He and Rudd met to announce a memorandum of understanding for five years of co-operation on clean energy, transportation and technology, green finance and investment, and research and development.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487338

#31 - Part 7

Australian Politics and Society - Part 7

>>19367975 Kevin Rudd says he will never apologise for his 2007 climate change warning - Kevin Rudd has revived his declaration that climate change is the greatest moral challenge of our time, saying he would never apologise for the warning he issued in 2007 even though it doomed his prime ministership when he abandoned his signature carbon pricing scheme. The US ambassador, who unveiled a climate pact between Australia and California with Governor Gavin Newsom on Wednesday, said he was “ridiculed” for his comments at the time. “I make no apology for saying it then and I make no apology for repeating it now, because it is,” Dr Rudd said.

>>19367987 Kevin Rudd AC Tweet: Proud to join @CAGovernor @GavinNewsom in Sacramento today for the signing of a new landmark climate MoU between Australia and California. This MoU will enhance cooperation in areas including clean transportation, energy, climate-friendly business and R&D.

>>19367987 Q Post #2782 - [Example CA] - https://calmatters.org/articles/commentary/gavin-newsoms-keeping-it-all-in-the-family/amp/? - What ‘family’ runs CA? They are all connected. Wealth-Power-Influence - [RIGGED] - The More You Know…. - Q - https://qanon.pub/#2782 - https://qalerts.pub/?q=newsom - https://qalerts.pub/?q=california

>>19368006 U.S. Embassy Australia Tweet - https://twitter.com/USEmbAustralia/status/1691583564310306947 - (Durham boat - Go Matildas)

>>19368006 Q Post #3800 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Durham_boat - Anons found the subtle hint dropped in the beginning. Think Durham start. Think 'Q' start. You have more than you know. Q - https://qanon.pub/#3800

>>19397621 Family Court judge rules father’s gender non-conformity ‘confused’ his children - A Family Court judge has determined that a father’s refusal to conform with traditional gender norms left his three children “confused” and encouraged them to “question their gender identity” after they all began identifying as non-binary, ruling the two youngest children will not be permitted to see their ­father for an extended period. The matter regarded the breakdown of a 20-year relationship between a mother and a ­father, who identifies as male but occasionally wears gender non-conforming clothes, including a dress to his middle child’s first day of school. Justice Kylie Beckhouse earlier this month ruled the two youngest children, known pseudonymously as Riley, 8, and Taylor, 13, will not be allowed to see their father for the next four months, after which period they will spend time with him on Sundays. The eldest child, Jamie, 16, who is taking puberty blockers and wishes to undergo a mastectomy once he completes his HSC, will live with both parents in accordance with his wishes.

>>19404456 AN0M accused Edwin Kumar asks FBI to give him names and messages from encrypted app - An Australian man accused of providing encrypted AN0M devices to people who used them to organise drug trafficking is asking prosecutors to give him details of every message sent on every phone he is accused of providing. The case against Edwin Harmendra Kumar, being heard in the US, has revealed fascinating details of the inner workings of Operation Ironside, the police sting of the century, built around the encrypted app AN0M. Mr Kumar, who was extradited from Sydney to the US earlier this year to face racketeering (RICO) charges, is seeking details of all users and all messages sent via the devices prosecutors say he provided or serviced. He is also seeking any reports of drug transactions allegedly involving him directly, or any end-user who allegedly used a device he had distributed or serviced.

>>19417641 Australia-California: A climate partnership made in la-la land - "Last week, Australian ambassador to the US Kevin Rudd and California Governor Gavin Newsom signed a memorandum of understanding in Sacramento on climate change. It should have been called a memorandum of waffle, as both governments jointly promised to do precisely nothing. After ploughing through 1600 words of waffle, the reader learns the MOU “does not create any legally binding rights or obligations and creates no legally recognisable or enforceable rights or remedies, legal or equitable, in any forum whatsoever”. Whatever agreements California and Australia make won’t make a scrap of difference to the global climate, given the near entirety of additional increases in carbon dioxide emissions now arise in India and China." - Adam Creighton - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487341

#31 - Part 8

Australian Politics and Society - Part 8

>>19427525 ‘I did nothing wrong’: Donald Trump arrested over Georgia 2020 election charges - "Donald Trump has become the first former US president to have his mugshot taken as he turned himself in to face criminal charges at a Georgia jail plagued by violence, squalor and overcrowding. In yet another extraordinary day in US presidential history, the 77-year-old Republican’s private plane touched down in Atlanta shortly after 7pm on Thursday (local time), where Trump surrendered over allegations that he was part of an alleged “criminal enterprise” designed to subvert the 2020 election results in that state. The charges, which Trump denies, represent the fourth criminal case that he has faced in about five months." - Farrah Tomazin - theage.com.au

>>19427567 Video: Donald Trump’s mugshot a big gamble for the Democrats - "Democrats have taken a big gamble in forcing Donald Trump to turn up at Fulton County Jail for finger printing and a mugshot, following the former president’s fourth indictment this year. Never before in US history has a former president been treated like this, let alone one who is in effect the de facto opposition leader, and the frontrunner for the Republican nomination for president for 2024. Whatever the outcome of the four indictments in court rooms across America over the next few years, the Georgia mugshot will become the visual embodiment of Trump’s status as a martyr for Republicans, at the same time as it’s the symbol of his criminality for Democrats." - Adam Creighton - theaustralian.com.au

>>19440283 Three dead in NT US military aircraft crash that involved 23 marines - Military aviation investigators will travel to a remote Northern Territory island after a US military aircraft crashed on Sunday killing three US Marines and seriously injuring at least five. They were among 23 marines on the tilt-rotor MV-22B Osprey when it crashed on Melville Island about 9.30am while participating in a multinational exercise with Australian, Filipino, Indonesian and East Timorese forces. Five of the injured were medically evacuated to Darwin Hospital including one in a critical condition who underwent surgery soon after arriving. The other survivors were triaged at the crash scene and awaiting transport to Darwin late on Sunday by CareFlight helicopter and fixed wing aircraft.

>>19440314 Three US Marines killed in aircraft crash in Australia during training exercise - (CNN) Three US Marines have been killed and several others seriously wounded after an Osprey aircraft crashed during military exercises in Australia. Of the 23 Marines on board the MV-22B Osprey aircraft, three died while five others have been transferred to Royal Darwin Hospital in a serious condition, the Marine Rotational Force - Darwin said in a statement on Sunday. The incident on Melville Island in Australia took place at 9:30 a.m. local time. “The Marines aboard the aircraft were flying in support of Exercise Predators Run. Recovery efforts are ongoing,” the statement read, adding “the cause of the incident is under investigation.”

>>19440325 Video: Three US Marines killed in military aircraft crash near Darwin - Three US Marines are dead after an American military aircraft crashed during an exercise drill in the Tiwi Islands, off the coast of Darwin. - 9 News Australia

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487347

#31 - Part 9

Australian Politics and Society - Part 9

>>19446105 ADF Academy cadets claim they were pressured to remove uniforms for Wear It Purple Day - Defence insists Wear It Purple Day (WIPD) activities are voluntary for personnel after cadets claimed they were warned not to dress in military uniform during the annual LGBTIQ+ event because it would be considered a "protest". Students at the Australian Defence Force Academy (ADFA) have complained they felt pressured to wear purple clothing on Friday in a move the federal opposition has condemned as "coercive" and "overtly political" for the armed forces. For several years the Defence Department has encouraged members to take part in WIPD, but ADFA recruits said a directive was given last week outlining that regular uniforms would be prohibited this year.

>>19446144 Aussie troops will keep flying on ‘Widowmaker’ after crash - Australian troops will continue to fly on US Osprey aircraft as long as they are certified to operate, despite the weekend crash that killed three Marines on Melville Island near Darwin, Defence Minister Richard Marles said. Rescuers on Monday continued efforts to recover the bodies and investigate the cause of the accident that thrust the safety record of the tilt-rotor aircraft sharply into focus. The V-22 Osprey, a joint design of aviation companies Boeing and Bell, has the unwanted nickname of the “Widowmaker” for the number of fatal accidents the type has been involved in. Since 1991, the aircraft has been involved in 10 fatal crashes, claiming 54 lives. The crashes took place in testing, exercises and during combat operations.

>>19446165 Video: Moments after US Osprey crash that killed three marines heard on air traffic control audio - Air traffic control audio has the moment authorities declared an emergency after the crash of a US military Osprey aircraft that killed three marines. Twenty-three personnel were onboard the Osprey, with 20 of the crew evacuated to Darwin. In the audio, an American voice can be heard making the first mention of a serious incident unfolding on the Tiwi Islands, to Darwin's north. "We are just a declaring an emergency, we have Dumptruck 11 flight single MV-22 in the vicinity of Melville Island." Approximately six minutes later, air traffic control asks for further information: "Contact 33, search and rescue is requesting … if there is fire." "There is a significant fire in the vicinity of the crash site. Looks like it is not spreading, but there is a significant fire," comes a response.

>>19452903 Cardboard drones from Australia used in attack on Russian airfield - Australian-made cardboard drones have been reportedly used to help bomb a Russian airfield as the Ukrainian military steps up its attacks on Russian territory. Ukraine claimed it struck five Russian fighter jets on the weekend in a kamikaze drone attack on the Kursk airfield in Russia, approximately 170 kilometres from the Ukrainian-Russian border. A prominent Telegram channel run by a former Russian fighter pilot, known as Fighterbomber, said that the drones used in the attack included the distinctive lightweight drones made by Australian engineering company SYPAQ in Melbourne.

>>19452993 UPDATE: MARINE ROTATIONAL FORCE - DARWIN MV-22B OSPREY TILTROTOR AIRCRAFT CRASH - Marine Rotational Force - Darwin can confirm the names of those killed in the U.S. Marine Corps MV-22B Osprey crash on Melville Island, north of Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia, on 27 August 2023 at approximately 9:30 a.m. The cause of the crash remains under investigation. Deceased are: U.S. Marine Corps Corporal Spencer R. Collart, male, 21, MV-22B Osprey crew chief for VMM-363 (REIN), Marine Rotational Force - Darwin, originally from Arlington, VA. U.S. Marine Corps Captain Eleanor V. LeBeau, female, 29, MV-22B Osprey pilot for VMM-363 (REIN), Marine Rotational Force - Darwin, originally from Belleville, IL. U.S. Marine Corps Major Tobin J. Lewis, male, 37, the executive officer of VMM-363 (REIN), Marine Rotational Force - Darwin, originally from Jefferson, CO.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487348

#31 - Part 10

Exercise Talisman Sabre 2023 - Part 1

>>19204909 Video: Talisman Sabre Facebook Post - 19 July 2023 - 3 days to go! 3 days left until the start of #TalismanSabre2023!

>>19204923 Chinese intelligence expected to monitor Australia’s Talisman Sabre military exercises - The Australian defence force expects that Chinese intelligence will seek to monitor Talisman Sabre, a military training exercise involving 30,000 personnel from 13 countries including the US and Pacific neighbours. The director of the exercise, Brigadier Damian Hill, said he expected Chinese intelligence to seek to monitor the event again this year. “Even though they’re not invited, they still turn up,” he said. “But they haven’t asked to be invited either.”

>>19204951 Japan to fire advanced ship-killing missile on Australia's shores - Japanese forces will fire their most advanced anti-ship missile into Australian waters for the first time, ahead of large-scale multinational military exercises that begin later this week. Japan's Self Defense Force (JSDF) is preparing to conduct a live fire demonstration of its Type 12 Surface-to-Ship missile (SSM) at a weapons range in Jervis Bay, south of Sydney.

>>19204962 American tank on way to Talisman Sabre in big central Queensland car crash - A US military tank, believed to be on the way to the Talisman Sabre military training exercise, has been caught in a fiery multi-vehicle crash on the Bruce Highway in central Queensland. Six people were taken to the Rockhampton and Gladstone hospitals, three with suspected spinal injuries. Queensland Police confirmed the forensic crash unit was investigating after the accident at Bajool, south of Rockhampton, involving seven vehicles.

>>19205012 Video: Multiple people injured in Bruce Highway crash involving US military tank - A United States military tank, multiple caravans and a B-double truck have been involved in a seven-vehicle crash on the Bruce Highway south of Rockhampton, injuring several people. Police said vehicles in the crash included a semi-trailer carrying a US military tank, a flat bed truck carrying two caravans, a B-double truck, three cars and a four-wheel drive towing a caravan.

>>19211171 Alice Springs alcohol restrictions to continue for at least two years after drops in NT crime rates - The Northern Territory will extend alcohol restrictions in Alice Springs for at least two years after incidents of domestic violence and assault plummeted by more than a third. The move follows an outcry from locals who had demanded for months that grog bans be implemented.

>>19211252 Bruce Highway reopens after multi-vehicle crash involving US tank - Both lanes of the Bruce Highway are now open, as investigators piece together the chain of events that led to a fiery multi-vehicle crash involving a US military tank in central Queensland. The seven-vehicle crash happened near Bajool, south of Rockhampton. It involved multiple caravans, a B-double truck and a semi-trailer carrying a US army tank en route to a military exercise. Capricornia District Police Inspector Ben Carroll said police were still piecing together the cause of the crash, but initial investigations suggest a passenger vehicle failed to stop for an escort vehicle accompanying the semi-trailer carrying the tank, causing a domino effect.

>>19211276 Video: Talisman Sabre military exercise brings foreign troops to Australia for war games - Thousands of troops from 13 countries have descended on Queensland for the Talisman Sabre war games, the largest to date. The biennial military exercise involving Australia and the United States has expanded over the past decade to include military partners and observers from many more countries in the Indo-Pacific region. Tent cities have been set up to accommodate an influx of 30,000 troops across the state's north, which has become a hive of activity with armoured vehicles, warships and aircraft.

>>19211280 Boxers and boots on the ground: tightening military ties with Germany - Visiting Australia to mark the inaugural involvement of German troops in Australia’s premier war games, Lieutenant-General Alfons Mais indicated his country’s armed forces, known as the Bundeswehr, planned to deepen ties with Indo-Pacific militaries as democracies unite to stand up for the international rules-based order. “We are here to strengthen relationships with partners. Not only the Australian Defence Force, but the US and France are participating, so partners we know already. It’s a signal to show the relevance of the region and where we can contribute.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487351

#31 - Part 11

Exercise Talisman Sabre 2023 - Part 2

>>19221161 Japan's top general inspects anti-ship missile ahead of historic Australian launch - Japan's top military officer is in Australia inspecting his country's most advanced anti-ship weapon as part of his country's largest ever participation in joint military exercises. Japan's Self Defence Force (JSDF) was scheduled to carry out a live test of its Type 12 Surface-to-Ship missile (SSM) for just the second time outside of Japan at the Beecroft Weapons Range on the New South Wales south coast. But the Australian Defence Force has delayed the exercise due to unfavourable sea conditions, and plans to resume the launch over the next few days.

>>19221167 Video: Chinese 'spy ships' expected to sit off Darwin and Central Queensland during Talisman Sabre military exercises - Officials are preparing for two Chinese "spy ships" to arrive off Australia's coast next week to monitor the multinational Talisman Sabre military exercises opening in Sydney this morning. Since 2017, China's Navy has deployed at least one Auxiliary General Intelligence (AGI) vessel to snoop on each of the biennial training drills involving the United States, as well as other partner nations. Defence and security sources told the ABC they were expecting a pair of People's Liberation Army-Navy (PLAN) vessels to head towards Australia over the next few days.

>>19226439 Talisman Sabre 2023: Firepower demonstrations 1,000 miles apart signal start of massive exercise in Australia - Dozens of mortar shells and rockets screamed across the Australian bush into a mountainside over the weekend, one of two live-fire demonstrations that kicked off the largest-ever Talisman Sabre exercise. Now in its 10th year, the biennial Talisman Sabre is expected bring more than 30,000 personnel, nearly double the number of troops deployed in 2021 during the COVID-19 pandemic, with additional participants from the United Kingdom, Canada, Indonesia, Fiji, Tonga and Papua New Guinea. The exercise provides an opportunity for the individual nations to practice teamwork and communication in the event of “whatever crisis may exist in our region in the future,” Lt. Gen. Greg Bilton, the Australian Defence Force chief of joint operations, said Friday during the exercise’s opening ceremony in Garden Island, Australia.

>>19226439 Talisman Sabre - MAGIC SWORD - https://qalerts.pub/?q=Operation+Specialists - https://qalerts.pub/?q=magic

>>19226465 Talisman Sabre: Chinese spy ships moving into position to monitor war game exercise - Live demonstrations of the latest military firepower are on display as part of the largest ever US and Australia-led war gaming exercise, Talisman Sabre. Chinese spy ships are moving into position to monitor the exercise for the next fortnight. - Sky News Australia

>>19231969 First image emerges of RAAF's encounter with Chinese spy ship during Talisman Sabre - An aerial photograph showing an RAAF P-8 Poseidon plane flying over a Chinese surveillance ship as it headed towards Australia last week has been obtained by the ABC. The image of the Dongdiao Class Auxiliary General Intelligence (AGI) vessel was taken from on board another Australian military aircraft over international waters in the Coral Sea.

>>19237744 ‘Olympics of war games’: This year’s Talisman Sabre is most ambitious ever, official says - This year’s Talisman Sabre is the “biggest and most ambitious” version of the multinational exercise ever and Australia’s largest military undertaking in more than a century, according to U.S. and Australian military officials. The exercise, with 30,000 troops from 13 countries, kicked off with a ceremony Friday but swung into gear with two live-fire drills the following day at sites 1,000 miles apart. Talisman Sabre, led by the U.S. and hosted by Australia along its eastern coast, is scheduled to conclude Aug. 4.

>>19243607 Video: Submarine spotted off Queensland coast one of several navy vessels headed to massive war games - A submarine has been spotted cruising off the coast of Queensland, much to the surprise and delight of locals. Doug Bazley, 63, of Caloundra on the Sunshine Coast, said he had been on Golden Beach for about two hours Friday afternoon when he noticed some unusual “spray and mist” in front of a container ship heading through the spitfire channel about 3.45pm. The keen photographer said he grabbed his binoculars and soon spied the surfaced Royal Australian Navy Collins Class submarine about 5km off coast, complete with a person standing on top and at the front of the sub.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487353

#31 - Part 12

Exercise Talisman Sabre 2023 - Part 3

>>19243643 Midge Point community marvels as Operation Talisman Sabre unfolds in their backyard - The shores of a secluded beach in the Whitsundays set the scene for a large scale military attack between American, Japanese and German forces. Three impressive landing craft air cushioned boats were deployed to Midge Point beach, where marine troops then worked to secure the area. The Midge Point community were able to watch the mock operation, carried out on July 26 as part of a three-day rehearsal under Talisman Sabre 23. Resident Robyn Crawford said “awesome” was the only word to describe what she had just seen.

>>19243661 Talisman Sabre 2023 a risky geopolitical game - "While "Exercise Talisman Sabre" may appear as an impressive military practice, its unintended consequences must not be understated. The aggressive posturing and heightened military readiness exhibited during drills can inadvertently increase uncertainty and anxiety among regional actors, leading to misconceptions, miscalculations, and misunderstandings. Besides, this hostile drill risks perpetuating a cycle of strategic mistrust, insecurity and confrontation in the region. Also, this US-backed drill provokes other regional powers especially China for countermeasures as Beijing may perceive it as a threat to its national interests and security." - Emilia Fernandez, security and political analyst with a focus on South Asian geopolitics, and PhD researcher at the University of Lucerne, Switzerland - chinadaily.com.cn

>>19250260 Talisman Sabre 23 Field Exercise Sets Benchmark for Combined Military Training in Indo-Pacific - "You're currently standing in what we call the Field of Dreams," said Australian Army Col. Ben McLennan, commander of the Australian Defense Force's Combat Training Centre, as he welcomed reporters to the Townsville Field Training Area. The training area is the epicenter of the 10-day field training exercise taking place during Talisman Sabre 23. "This activity that's occurring here is just the richest, most immersive and most realistic, no-consequence training environment that we can possibly create," he said. "We're calling it the Olympics of war games because it's the biggest, most ambitious Talisman Sabre ever."

>>19250270 Video: NZ soldiers perform Haka Tu in warning to mock enemy in Australian war games - A contingent of New Zealand soldiers have declared their readiness to head into battle on Australian soil by performing a traditional war challenge to intimidate their enemy. In a video released Wednesday, the soldiers performed the Haka Tu in front of counterparts from Australia, the US, Fiji and France in the Queensland bush to mark the start Exercise Talisman Sabre 2023.

>>19257074 United States, German and Japanese Military Forces Conduct Joint Amphibious Assault during Talisman Sabre 23 - Sailors from USS New Orleans transported the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, German Army, and Japanese Self-Defense Forces service members ashore via a landing craft, air cushion operation as part of Talisman Sabre 23 at Midge Point, Australia on July 25, 2023. Amphibious operations provide a combined-joint force commander the capability to rapidly project power ashore in support of crisis response at the desired time and location. “The exercise here is important because of all the joint forces - we integrate and we do all our training together,” said Sgt. Jorge Bravo, a U.S. Marine with the 31st MEU. “They have their own way of doing things, we have our own way of doing things, and we find the common ground in the middle - and we were better because of it.”

>>19262114 Video: Four feared dead after military chopper crashes near Hamilton Island - Four Australian Defence Force members are missing, feared dead, after a helicopter crash during the Talisman Sabre military exercise in Queensland. A search and rescue mission involving Australian and US Defence Force personnel is underway off Hamilton Island for the crew of the MRH-90 helicopter, which went down about 10.30pm on Friday. Emerging from Australia-United States Ministerial Consultation (AUSMIN) talks in Brisbane on Saturday, Defence Minister Richard Marles said the meeting was conducted with “heavy hearts”.

“The families of the four aircrew have been notified of this incident and our hopes and our thoughts are very much with the aircrew and their families,” he said. “Our hopes are very much with the efforts of the search and rescue crews as they go about their work right now.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487356

#31 - Part 13

Exercise Talisman Sabre 2023 - Part 4

>>19262158 Video: Crashed military helicopter has history of safety issues - The military helicopter involved in a horror crash off the coast of Queensland, leaving four feared dead, has a problematic history with nearly a dozen recorded safety incidents linked to MRH-90 Taipan helicopters. The helicopter ditched into the water about 10.30pm on Friday off the coast of Hamilton Island while on a two-helicopter mission as part of the Talisman Sabre joint exercise with America. It is the second incident this year, following a crash in Jervis Bay in March during a counterterrorism military training exercise.

>>19262255 Video: Talisman Sabre helicopter crash: Hopes fade for missing air crew - Four Australian Army aviators are feared dead after a horror chopper crash over the Whitsundays in what looms as the nation’s worst peacetime military disaster since 2005. Wreckage was recovered from the waters off Hamilton Island on Saturday, more than 12 hours after the chopper went down in the middle of major international war game exercises. In what Australia’s Defence chief described as “a terrible moment”, the MRH-90 Taipan ditched into the sea just before 11pm on Friday during Exercise Talisman Sabre. It is feared the incident could become one of Australia’s worst peacetime military disasters since two Black Hawk helicopters collided near Townsville in 1996, killing 18 personnel, and the 2005 Nias Island Sea King crash which killed nine personnel.

>>19262307 US pledge to stand by Aussies after Talisman Sabre crash tragedy - Top military officials from Australia and the United States have declared their unwavering commitment to Exercise Talisman Sabre as they expressed sorrow for four personnel still missing after a catastrophic crash during war-games in north Queensland. The disastrous ditching of an MRH90 Taipan during night-time exercise off Lindeman Island loomed large over high-level talks between Australian and American defence and foreign affairs officials in Brisbane. The annual AUSMIN talks delivered significant progress in deepening Australian and US military ties and cementing itself in an increasingly contested Pacific, but the timing was inextricably linked to what is set to be the nation’s worst peacetime disaster in at least two decades.

>>19262368 Talisman Sabre Facebook Post: 28 July 2023 - Statement issued by Defence - Defence can confirm an Australian Army MRH-90 Taipan helicopter has impacted waters near Lindeman Island, off the Queensland coast. The aircraft was participating in a night-time training activity as part of Exercise Talisman Sabre 2023 when it was reported missing late Friday night, 28 July 2023. Four crew were on board the aircraft at the time of the incident and are currently missing. Military and civilian search and rescue aircraft and watercraft are currently conducting search and rescue operations at the incident site. At this time Defence’s priority is supporting our ADF members and their families. Families of affected personnel have been notified. Families seeking information and support can call the Defence Member and Family Helpline at 1800 624 608.

>>19267202 Investigation launched into military helicopter crash, four feared dead - The federal government has launched an investigation into the cause of a helicopter crash that authorities fear has led to the death of four missing Defence Force personnel, making it Australia’s worst peacetime military accident in almost 20 years. Australia and the United States’ most senior defence and foreign policy officials expressed their dismay over the horror accident, which has revived longstanding concerns about the technical problems that have plagued the MRH-90 Taipan, the aircraft involved in the crash.

>>19267242 Police officer’s son among four feared dead in crash near Hamilton Island - The four men feared dead after a Defence helicopter went down in waters off the Whitsunday Islands have been identified. Captain Daniel Lyon, Lieutenant Maxwell Nugent, Warrant Officer Class Two Joseph Laycock, and Corporal Alexander Naggs were named by the Chief of Army, Lieutenant General Simon Stuart, as the four involved in the crash. The crew were members of the Australian Army Aviation’s 6th Aviation Regiment based at the Holsworthy Army barracks in Sydney. Lieutenant General Stuart said the men’s names had been released with permission from their families.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487357

#31 - Part 14

Exercise Talisman Sabre 2023 - Part 5

>>19267266 Four missing defence aviators identified, search-and-rescue mission continues near Hamilton Island after Taipan helicopter crash - Four Australian Defence Force (ADF) personnel who were on board a Taipan helicopter that crashed into waters near Hamilton Island have been identified. Captain Danniel Lyon, Lieutenant Maxwell Nugent, Warrant Officer Class Two Joseph Laycock and Corporal Alexander Naggs were on board the MRH90 helicopter that ditched into the ocean during a training exercise as part of Exercise Talisman Sabre on Friday night. All were members of the 6th Aviation Regiment. Lieutenant General Simon Stuart, the Chief of the Australian Army, said the families of the men were being supported by the ADF and had consented to the names of the missing men being released.

>>19272518 Video: ‘No hope’ of finding ADF servicemen alive: Richard Marles - There is no longer any hope of finding alive the four men aboard the MRH-90 Taipan helicopter when it crashed into the ocean off Queensland’s Whitsunday Islands on Friday night, with the government shifting the search and rescue mission to a recovery operation. Defence Minister Richard Marles said “the loss of these four men is as significant and meaningful as the loss of anyone who has worn our nation’s uniform. If it is as we imagine it to be, they died on Friday night making a difference.”

>>19290021 Human remains found after army helicopter crash - Human remains and parts of a cockpit have been found in the area where four army aircrew members died when their helicopter crashed last week off the Queensland coast. Lieutenant-General Greg Bilton told reporters the search-and-recovery mission had identified a “further debris field” in the sea near Hamilton Island that was consistent with a catastrophic, high-impact crash. “Sadly, I can confirm human remains have also been observed in this location by [a] remote underwater vehicle,” he said. “Due to the nature of the debris field, positive identification of the remains is unlikely to occur until we recover more of the wreckage.”

>>19297773 Defence Australia Tweet: Video: #TalismanSabre2023 is now officially closed. - #TS23 is the largest Australia-US bilaterally planned, multilaterally conducted exercise. This year is the largest iteration of the exercise, with 13 nations and more than 30,000 personnel participating. #YourADF

>>19297823 Talisman Sabre Tweet: Thank you to all of the personnel who have participated in the exercise, and to the local communities for their support. #TalismanSabre2023 has officially come to a close.

>>19297823 Talisman Sabre - MAGIC SWORD - https://qalerts.pub/?q=Operation+Specialists - https://qalerts.pub/?q=magic

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487362

#31 - Part 15

Coronavirus / COVID-19 Pandemic, Australia and Worldwide - Part 1

>>19250326 Anthony Fauci on Australia’s COVID response, AI and the next pandemic - The man who became the face of the coronavirus response in the United States says Australia’s willingness to accept science and resist conspiracy theories will help the country stave off future pandemics, but is concerned growing animosity and threats towards scientists will stifle the next generation of experts inspired by the events of the past three years. In an interview with the Sydney Morning Herald and The Age, Dr Anthony Fauci also said the responsible use of artificial intelligence would help scientists anticipate future variants of COVID-19 and predict other problem diseases before they reach pandemic level.

>>19252375 New Zealand government funds project to discredit anyone who questions safety of vaccines - It’s not only the UK government that’s refusing to acknowledge excess deaths since the mass covid injection campaign began, the New Zealand government is doing the same. Is it because they are afraid to admit that those who are raising awareness about the unsafety of the vaccines might be right?

>>19257187 Anthony Fauci has hailed Australia’s success in virtually eradicating HIV in inner Sydney - Top US medical advisor Anthony Fauci says Australia has demonstrated “proof of concept” that HIV can be eradicated, with the pockets of inner Sydney with large gay populations that have effectively stamped out the virus providing a powerful incentive to the world. “It shows it can be done,” Dr Fauci told The Australian. “I think Australia as a nation and Sydney as a city should be congratulated on doing that, because once you prove a concept, it becomes an incentive.”

>>19262682 Covid cover-up: how the science was silenced - America’s top infectious diseases adviser, Anthony Fauci, deliberately decided to downplay ­suspicions from scientists that Covid-19 came from a laboratory to protect his reputation and deflect from the risky coronavirus research his agency had funded, according to his boss, one of the most senior US health officials during the pandemic. In an exclusive interview, Robert Kadlec - former assistant secretary for preparedness and response at the US Department of Health – told The Weekend Australian that he, Dr Fauci and National Institutes of Health director Francis Collins privately discussed how to “turn down the temperature” on accusations against China in the early days of the pandemic while they were trying to encourage Beijing to co-operate and share a sample of the virus. - Sharri Markson - theaustralian.com.au

>>19262728 Who made Covid? US spy agencies have a name - US intelligence agencies are understood to be examining the possibility that Chinese military scientist Zhou Yusen’s research to develop a coronavirus vaccine led to the creation of Covid-19, and the first cluster of the pandemic. The decorated Chinese scientist died about May 2020 in circumstances that Five Eyes intelligence agencies have long suspected was at the hands of the People’s Liberation Army. The Weekend Australian can reveal that the FBI has, on at least two occasions since mid-last year, spoken with a close relative of Zhou who is now residing in the US. The individual is understood to be a crucial new witness. - Sharri Markson - theaustralian.com.au

>>19262914 ‘Turn the temperature down’: how the Covid cover-up began - A ‘nightmare’ of circumstantial evidence showed the virus could have been genetically engineered. But instead of disclosing their lab-leak suspicions Anthony Fauci and his peers pivoted to distract attention from contentious research funded by the US. There are several indicators that senior Chinese Communist Party officials know precisely how Covid-19 arose to ­become the most infectious virus in a century, shutting down major world economies and killing millions of people. Now, as the misinformation perpetuated by scientists is ­exposed and intelligence efforts persist, the rest of the world inches closer to the truth, too. - Sharri Markson - theaustralian.com.au

>>19272598 Australian professor Eddie Holmes privately discussed signs Covid-19 could have been engineered - A leading Australian virologist privately discussed signs Covid-19 may have been genetically engineered, writing “the furin cleavage site is an issue” and “it’s the epidemiology that I find most worrying” before publicly insisting a laboratory leak was a conspiracy theory. Evolutionary biologist Eddie Holmes has come under international scrutiny for his role in co-authoring a journal paper that claimed scientific analysis showed the virus was natural.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487363

#31 - Part 16

Coronavirus / COVID-19 Pandemic, Australia and Worldwide - Part 2

>>19278192 Edward Holmes claims ‘bad memory’ for not declaring writing a paper with a Wuhan scientist - Leading Australian virologist Edward Holmes said a “bad memory” was behind the reason he didn’t disclose he was listed on a paper submitted to medical journals alongside a Wuhan Institute of Virology scientist. Professor Holmes was co-author of a paper titled the Proximal Origins of SARS-CoV-2 that claimed Covid-19 was a natural virus and “improbable” it was a laboratory construct. But when authorising that paper, he did not disclose his work on a previous paper with a Wuhan scientist. He said he forgot his name was listed on a January 2018 paper about bat coronaviruses with a Wuhan Institute of Virology researcher, Jie Cui, a former postdoctoral student of his.

>>19278196 US academics ‘may be prosecuted’ over Covid-19 lab leak: top scientist - A leading US scientist expects academics who played down the idea Covid-19 leaked from a Chinese laboratory, despite their private doubts, will face criminal prosecution for fraud and has praised journalist Sharri Markson for her dogged investigation of the so-called “lab leak theory”. Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist and professor at Rutgers University, told The Australian the “preponderance of evidence” available supported the notion the new virus emerged from research-related activities at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, before rapidly spreading throughout the world in early 2020.

>>19280809 FOI Response Proves Australian Government Is Actively Censoring Citizens Posts About Covid Vaccine Injuries On Social Media - Yesterday, a response was received to a Freedom of Information Act (“FOI”) request which includes evidence that the Australian Department of Health and Aged Care (“DHAC”) were colluding with Facebook to censor posts about covid vaccine injuries. The FOI response is heavily redacted but the evidence is clear. - https://www.truth11.com/untitled-1190/

>>19434487 Biden’s probe censored Covid ‘smoking gun’ - "US President Joe Biden’s 90-day probe into the origins of Covid-19 censored the input of intelligence agency scientists who concluded the virus was most likely genetically engineered. Mr Biden ordered the Intelligence Community in May 2021 to give him an assessment into how the pandemic began after revelations, first published by The Australian, that researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology had been hospitalised with Covid-like symptoms in November 2019 in the suspected first cluster of the pandemic. When the report was published it concluded that most intelligence agencies assessed the virus, even if it had leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, was natural rather than manipulated in a laboratory The Australian can reveal that this was not the assessments made by the four groups within the intelligence agencies that actually engaged in scientific analysis, who concurred that there was either a highly likely or reasonable chance the virus was genetically engineered." - Sharri Markson - theaustralian.com.au

>>19434533 Decade-old Wuhan clue that proved Covid’s origin - "Buried away inside one of the US intelligence agencies’ secret laboratories, a group of eminent scientists examined the structure of Covid-19 in order to determine its origin. At the same time, another group of scientists, these ones happy to shape public opinion via social media, were fashioning a very different narrative, determined to turn the world’s gaze from the experimental lab in the middle of the ground-zero city – Wuhan. While Anthony Fauci and his like-minded scientific foot-soldiers were quickly latching on to and publicly endorsing a theory that the virus had a natural origin, keenly dismissing any talk of a lab leak as a conspiracy, these other, far less conspicuous scientists were quietly reaching a conclusion that was poles apart. The scientists who wrote what is regarded as the seminal research on the natural origin theory - the Proximal Origins paper - have ­received global recognition, some amassing hundreds of thousands of social media followers. But the scientists at the ­Defence ­Intelligence Agency’s National Centre for Medical Intelligence (NCMI) remain unknown and their endeavours to uncover the origins of Covid-19 have gone publicly unrecognised. Worse, there have even been attempts, at the highest levels of the US government to censor them and keep their discoveries secret. Stripped of scientific complexity, these highly experienced ­researchers conclude that Covid-19 was almost certainly the result of experiments in a lab, and was not of natural origin as the world has been led to believe. They made a discovery that was ­described internally as a smoking gun." - Sharri Markson - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487367

#31 - Part 17

Julian Assange Indictment and Extradition - Part 1

>>19243381 Key Assange supporter says Wikileaks founder could cut deal to secure freedom - One of federal parliament’s leading supporters of Julian Assange says the WikiLeaks founder could cut a deal with prosecutors and plead guilty to “whatever nonsense” necessary to secure his release from prison. Labor MP Julian Hill, the member for Bruce, tried unsuccessfully to visit Assange in Belmarsh prison, where he has been held since 2019, during a private trip to Europe recently. “The reality is that Australia cannot force the United States to [release Assange], and if they refuse, then no Australian should judge Mr Assange if he chooses to just cut a deal and end this matter,” said Hill.

>>19243388 OPINION: If Albanese’s such a buddy of Biden’s, why is Assange still in jail? - "Julian Assange is in his fourth year in Britain’s Belmarsh prison. If the current appeal fails, he will be shackled and driven off in a prison van and flown across the Atlantic on a CIA aircraft for a long trial. He faces likely life imprisonment in a federal jail, perhaps in Oklahoma. I don’t believe the president can shake his head and say, “nope”, given all we have gifted - the potent symbolism of B52s, nuclear subs and bases on the east and west coast. It would look like we have sunk into the role of US territory, as much a dependency as Guam or Puerto Rico. If Assange walks out the gates of Belmarsh into the arms of his wife and children it will show we are worth a crumb or two off the table of the imperium. If it’s a van to the airport, then making ourselves a more likely target has conferred no standing at all. We are a client state, almost officially." - Bob Carr, former foreign affairs minister of Australia and longest-serving premier of NSW - theage.com.au

>>19257022 Assange supporters call for release ahead of US talks - Julian Assange supporters are urging Australia's senior ministers to push for the WikiLeaks founder's release from prison when they meet officials from the United States. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese joined his defence and foreign affairs ministers at meetings with the US secretary of state and defence secretary in Brisbane on Friday. Further meetings will take place over the weekend. The brother for Mr Assange, Gabriel Shipton, said the talks were one of the last face-to-face meetings between the ministers before the 51-year-old faced extradition from England to the US. "Julian is inches away from extradition to the USA," Mr Shipton said in a statement. "The meeting between the secretary of state and the prime minister could be the last chance to put a stop to Julian's nightmare."

>>19262537 Julian Assange case has 'dragged on for too long', Australia's Wong says - Australia's Foreign Minister Penny Wong said on Saturday the long-running case of imprisoned Wikileaks founder Julian Assange had gone on too long and needs to be completed. Speaking alongside Defence Minister Richard Marles, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, Wong said representations had been made on behalf of Assange in public and private but there were limits on what could be done until his legal proceedings concluded.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487368

#31 - Part 18

Julian Assange Indictment and Extradition - Part 2

>>19262570 Assange ‘endangered lives’: Top official urges Australia to understand US concerns - The United States’ top foreign policy official has urged Australians to understand American concerns about Julian Assange’s publishing of leaked classified information, saying the WikiLeaks founder is alleged to have endangered lives and put US national security at risk. In the sharpest and most detailed remarks from a Biden administration official about the matter, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said Assange had been involved in one of the largest breaches of classified information in American history and had been charged with serious criminal conduct in the US.

>>19278210 Julian Assange supporters in Australian parliament urge US to get him out of maximum security prison - Julian Assange’s supporters in the Australian parliament have implored the US government to “get him the hell out of a maximum security prison” regardless of diplomatic friction over the WikiLeaks founder’s eventual fate. The US secretary of state, Antony Blinken, has pushed back at the Australian government’s complaints that the pursuit of Assange had dragged on too long, with the top diplomat declaring that the WikiLeaks founder is alleged to have “risked very serious harm to our national security”.

>>19326761 Assange pursuit 'gone on for too long', Kevin Rudd says - Kevin Rudd says the United States' pursuit of Julian Assange has "gone on for too long" and he will continue to express Australia's concerns. During a visit to Australia as part of high level talks, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said Mr Assange was accused of "very serious criminal conduct" . Asked how he was continuing to press Australia's position to the US as ambassador, Mr Rudd said his responsibility to engage on behalf of all Australians included Mr Assange. "As for Secretary Blinken's statements recently, that's to be anticipated from the administration, reflecting their concerns about the history of the case," he told reporters in Canberra on Wednesday. "We in Australia have our own concerns that we continue to reflect and my job as Australia's leading diplomat in the US is to engage effectively, which usually means silently with the US administration, in order to maximise our prospects.

>>19355431 ‘There’s a way to resolve it’: United States ambassador Caroline Kennedy flags Assange plea deal - United States ambassador Caroline Kennedy has flagged a potential plea deal between Julian Assange and US authorities that could end America’s pursuit of the WikiLeaks founder and allow him to return to Australia. As hopes fade among Assange’s supporters that the Biden administration will abandon its extradition request, a David Hicks-style plea bargain has emerged as the most likely way for Assange to avoid a drawn-out criminal trial on espionage charges and a possible lengthy jail term in a maximum security US prison.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487369

#31 - Part 19

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 1

>>19194509 Brittany Higgins, Bruce Lehrmann parliament CCTV footage handed to court - Critical CCTV footage of Bruce Lehrmann and Brittany Higgins in parliament house on the night of her alleged rape has been handed over to court after Sue Chrysanthou SC, acting for Lisa Wilkinson in the defamation proceedings, demanded to know why it wasn’t produced earlier.

>>19204809 ‘Recklessly indifferent to truth’: Linda Reynolds blasts DPP Shane Drumgold over Brittany Higgins case - Former Defence Minister Linda Reynolds has launched a blistering attack on ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold, accusing him of making “baseless and unsubstantiated allegations” that she was motivated by political forces to suppress Brittany Higgins’ rape complaint.

>>19211199 ‘Prefer to silence victims’: Brittany Higgins blasts Linda Reynolds - Brittany Higgins has blasted former defence minister Linda Reynolds for suggesting it should be illegal for anyone who believes a crime has been committed to fail to report it to police, saying “instead of solving the problem, there are people who would prefer to just silence victims”.

>>19257140 Who will take the fall for the Lehrmann controversy? - "There is really only one issue to look for next week when Walter Sofronoff gives the government of the ACT the report of his inquiry into the disastrous Brittany Higgins rape trial. Will anyone take the fall for the now abandoned rape prosecution of Bruce Lehrmann? Will blame be divided among the individuals who were targeted by the ACT government in the terms of reference it drew up for Sofronoff’s inquiry? Or will Sofronoff take a broader approach, one that would enable him to consider the impact of legal structures that have been put in place by the government itself?" - Chris Merritt vice-president of the Rule of Law Institute of Australia - theaustralian.com.au

>>19262626 Sofronoff findings on DPP Shane Drumgold to be kept secret for weeks - In a shock move, the ACT government will keep secret the findings of the Sofronoff inquiry into the prosecution for rape of Bruce Lehrmann for at least a month as it ponders how to deal with what are expected to be serious adverse findings against chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold. It had been anticipated that when inquiry head Walter Sof­ronoff KC delivered his much-anticipated report on Monday, it would be released immediately but the government will now consider the report “through a proper cabinet” process that ACT Chief Minister Andrew Barr said would take three to four weeks, with the Legislative Assembly “updated” at the end of August.

>>19278214 ’No excuse’ for report on Lehrmann rape case to be secret - "The ACT government has decreed that the findings of inquiry chair Walter Sofronoff KC will be kept secret for at least another month. There is no excuse for such a delay; not that Chief Minister Andrew Barr has bothered to offer one. Barr says he “currently intends” to table some or all of the report at the end of August, at which time he “may” provide an interim response, pending a final response that “may take several months”." - Stephen Rice - theaustralian.com.au

>>19278237 Revenge of Bruce Lehrmann: ACT DPP on trial - Bruce Lehrmann will lodge a multimillion-dollar claim for compensation against the ACT Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions as the territory government examines what are expected to be serious adverse findings against chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold. Mr Lehrmann’s explosive claim of malfeasance by the ODPP emerged on the same day the ACT government received the Sofronoff report into misconduct in the prosecution case against the former Liberal staffer.

>>19284047 ACT DPP Shane Drumgold ‘at risk of charges’ if he misled court - If ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold is found to have knowingly made false statements to the Supreme Court to prevent defence lawyers obtaining police documents, he may face an investi­gation for attempting to pervert the course of justice. A number of senior lawyers have told The Australian that if Mr Drumgold is found by the Sofronoff inquiry to have deliberately misled ACT Chief Justice Lucy McCallum during the course of Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial last year, it could lead to criminal ­charges against him.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487371

#31 - Part 20

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 2

>>19284078 Former judge Walter Sofronoff KC finds police were right to charge Bruce Lehrmann but lashed DPP’s conduct - A landmark inquiry into the trial of Bruce Lehrmann has found the prosecution was properly brought but made damning findings about the conduct of the Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold. Sources who have been briefed on the contents of the report have told news.com.au that Walter Sofronoff KC, a former Supreme Court judge in Queensland, finds that police acted lawfully when they charged Mr Lehrmann. It also finds that the decision of the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions to prosecute based on the evidence available was correct. - Samantha Maiden - news.com.au

>>19289705 Video: Sofronoff report reveals Shane Drumgold lied during Bruce Lehrmann rape case - ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold knowingly lied to the Supreme Court, engaged in serious malpractice and grossly unethical conduct, “preyed on a junior lawyer’s inexperience”, ­betrayed that junior lawyer who trusted him, and treated criminal litigation as “a poker game in which a prosecutor can hide the cards,” the Sofronoff Inquiry has found. In findings that are certain to end Mr Drumgold’s career as ACT Director of Public Prosecutions and may lead to criminal prosecution against him for perverting the course of justice, inquiry head Walter Sofronoff KC ruled that every one of the allegations made by Mr Drumgold that sparked the inquiry was baseless. - Janet Albrechtsen and Stephen Rice - theaustralian.com.au

>>19289796 Sofronoff inquiry: ACT DPP Shane Drumgold ‘threw his newest junior under the bus’ - Spare a thought for Shane Drumgold’s hidden victims - the trusting junior staff who unwittingly did the chief prosecutor’s dirty work only to be thrown under the bus as his web of lies unravelled. Drumgold’s betrayal of his loyal team ranged from directing an inexperienced young lawyer to swear a false affidavit to blaming an office administrator for wrongly releasing a document under Freedom of Information laws when he ordered her to do it. Inquiry chief Walter Sofronoff KC was clearly infuriated by Drumgold’s willingness to abuse the trust of innocent members of his team, labelling it “shameful” and an abuse of his authority. - Janet Albrechtsen and Stephen Rice - theaustralian.com.au

>>19289813 Lisa Wilkinson, Shane Drumgold and the Logies speech lie - TV host Lisa Wilkinson’s now-infamous Logies speech has come back to bite ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold, after he was caught lying about it to a Supreme Court judge. Mr Drumgold said he warned the star - who first aired Brittany Higgins’ rape allegations on Ten’s The Project in 2021 - about the danger of prejudicing Bruce Lehrmann’s upcoming rape trial before she gave the speech accepting a Logie award for her reporting. Wilkinson rejected that, saying Mr Drumgold “did not at any time” give her the warning he claimed. Mr Drumgold presented a note of the conference to Chief Justice McCallum as if it had been written contemporaneously by a junior lawyer present at the meeting. It hadn’t. That part of the note that was critical to the Chief Justice was effectively written by Mr Drumgold days later after Wilkinson gave her speech - and after it became clear the upcoming trial was in jeopardy because of it. Mr Sofronoff found that Mr Drumgold “knowingly lied to the Chief Justice”. - Janet Albrechtsen and Stephen Rice - theaustralian.com.au

>>19289859 Shane Drumgold’s time as DPP is surely at an end - Shane Drumgold is without a doubt the biggest loser in Walter Sofronoff’s report on what went wrong during the Brittany Higgins rape trial. But he might not be alone. The next biggest loser might turn out to be the ACT government - which was already on notice that the contents of this report would determine whether it would be hit with a damages bill worth millions of dollars.

>>19289887 Linda Reynolds sues Brittany Higgins for defamation over Instagram post - Liberal senator Linda Reynolds has made good on her threat to sue Brittany Higgins for defamation for a social media post accusing her of harassment, issuing a writ against her former staffer in the West Australian Supreme Court. According to the writ, Reynolds is suing Higgins for aggravated damages over an Instagram story on July 4 and a Twitter post on July 20, both of which she claimed were defamatory of her. The former defence minister is also claiming the posts constituted a breach of a deed of settlement and release the pair signed back in March 2021, which contained a non-disparagement clause.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487372

#31 - Part 21

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 3

>>19308125 DPP Shane Drumgold resigns in wake of misconduct findings - ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold has resigned in the wake of the damning findings of the Sofronoff Inquiry and is expected to retire. On Sunday ACT Attorney-General Shane Rattenbury confirmed that he had spoken to Mr Drumgold last Thursday and “in light of the commentary in the report” the pair had “agreed that his position as Director of Public Prosecutions was no longer tenable”.

>>19314741 ACT top prosecutor Shane Drumgold hits back against inquiry after resignation - ACT top prosecutor Shane Drumgold has accused the head of the inquiry into the Bruce Lehrmann rape case of denying him procedural fairness, and has disputed many of the probe’s findings after resigning from his high-profile role last week. In a written statement on Sunday, Drumgold denied acting dishonestly or underhandedly after inquiry chair Walter Sofronoff, KC, found he had lied to the Supreme Court in the lead-up to the trial, and said the inquiry had missed the opportunity to focus on systemic issues in the justice system instead of focusing largely on him. “Although I accept my conduct was less than perfect, my decisions were all made in good faith, under intense and sometimes crippling pressure, conducted within increasingly unmanageable workloads,” Drumgold said.

>>19314830 Drumgold and Sofronoff face investigation in Lehrmann inquiry fallout - ACT Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold, SC, and Walter Sofronoff, KC, the former judge who led the high-profile inquiry into authorities’ handling of the Lehrmann trial, face investigations that could lead to them both having charges brought against them. In their interim response to the inquiry’s 839-page report on the “case like no other”, ACT Chief Minister Andrew Barr and Attorney-General Shane Rattenbury foreshadowed further investigations into Drumgold, who was heavily criticised in the findings, and Sofronoff, who leaked them to select journalists.

>>19320737 ‘Fair go for Shane Drumgold’ case springs a giant leak - "Shane Drumgold has claimed that the leak of the Sofronoff Report denied him procedural fairness. The same notion has been echoed by other people who appear more concerned about a leak to a newspaper than the substance of a report that found that the chief prosecutor was guilty of serious misconduct in office. Drumgold, along with sections of the media, and the ACT Labor government, can excite themselves all they wish about leaks to a newspaper. The Australian did not breach an embargo and will not reveal the source of the leak. It’s curious that those who have spent years defending Julian Assange for leaking stories that may have undermined national security are now hot and bothered about a leaked report that found a DPP who wields enormous state power against citizens behaved improperly. A case of politics or sore losers? Maybe both." - Janet Albrechtsen - theaustralian.com.au

>>19326680 Police careers destroyed by ACT DPP Shane Drumgold’s false claims - Many senior and junior police involved in the investigation of Brittany Higgins’s rape claims have lost their jobs or gone on long-term sick leave and will never return to policing in the wake of baseless accusations against them by ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold. Thirteen Australian Federal Police officers involved in the investigation of the claims, including Detective Superintendent Scott Moller, have told The Australian of catastrophic damage to their lives and careers from the inquiry he demanded.

>>19326705 'Absolutely awful to me': Brittany Higgins hits out at police in response to damning Sofronoff Inquiry findings - Brittany Higgins has blasted investigators in the Bruce Lehrmann rape case in a statement published on her boyfriend’s social media after she deleted her own Twitter account. While inquiry chair Walter Sofronoff KC was scathing of the conduct of former ACT Director of Public Prosecutions Shane Drumgold which was described as “grossly unethical” – he praised police for performing their duties in “absolute good faith”. However, Ms Higgins slammed investigating officers and accused them of being “absolutely awful to me”. In reference to a police executive summary outlining discrepancies in her story - which was found to have been withheld from Mr Lehrmann’s defence team by Mr Drumgold - Ms Higgins said officers tried to “discredit” her. “They wrongly handed over my most private thoughts taken over years in counselling sessions at the Rape Crisis Centre to defence,” Ms Higgins said via her boyfriend David Sharaz’s Twitter account.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487374

#31 - Part 22

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 4

>>19326721 Linda Reynolds blasts ‘social crusader’ ACT DPP Shane Drumgold - Former defence minister Linda Reynolds has criticised outgoing ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold for his treatment of her in the witness box during the rape trial of Bruce Lehrmann, and for comments he made as he resigned from the position, saying when she first read them, she “thought it was a joke”. “If there was ever any doubt of the need for the Sofronoff inquiry, the DPP’s own statement justified it,” Senator Reynolds told The Australian. “It was clearly the voice of a social crusader, not a DPP, and it was clear to me that it was in his mind, the ends justified the means.”

>>19326748 ACT government weighs charges against Shane Drumgold after Sofronoff report - The ACT government has endorsed findings that its chief prosecutor, Shane ­Drumgold, acted grossly unethically, but the capital’s Labor-Greens administration will not investigate other cases he led and has not decided whether to charge him. On Monday afternoon, the Barr government released the full ­report of the Sofronoff inquiry, announcing it supported its 10 recommendations but saying it did not consider it necessary to look at any of the 18 cases Mr Drumgold conducted or participated in since his appointment as Director of Public Prosecutions in 2019.

>>19333459 Linda Reynolds’ defamation case against David Sharaz gets trial date - Brittany Higgins’ partner David Sharaz will front court in a defamation case levelled against him by West Australian Liberal Senator Linda Reynolds in a three-week trial provisionally set for May 2024. Reynolds is demanding the former press gallery journalist pay damages, as well as aggravated damages, over five social media posts, and has requested an injunction preventing the material from surfacing in future. The case has already been beset by delays, with the court having to issue special orders in July just to serve Sharaz with defamation papers, after Reynolds’ lawyers spent six months trying to track him down.

>>19417664 Senator Linda Reynolds’ defamation case against Brittany Higgins’ fiance to ‘end in tears financially’, court told - The lawyer for the fiance of former political staffer Brittany Higgins has told the WA Supreme Court a defamation case against his client will “end in tears financially,” with legal costs potentially reaching millions of dollars. In a hearing lasting nearly three hours, Mr Sharaz’s lawyer Jason MacLaurin argued the matter would “end in tears financially” for both parties, no matter the outcome, with legal bills amassing to “hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of dollars,” which would leave the parties “financially uncomfortable.” Senator Reynolds’ lawyer Martin Bennett retorted such matters usually end in tears one way or the other. The matter is set to go to trial in May, with lawyers for both Senator Reynolds and Mr Sharaz meeting before Supreme Court Justice Marcus Solomon to discuss a security for costs application.

>>19446083 Brittany Higgins, Bruce Lehrmann to take stand in defamation trial - A Federal Court judge has revealed both Brittany Higgins and Bruce Lehrmann will take the stand during the defamation matters between Mr Lehrmann and two media organisations, as the court debates the admissibility of expert evidence stating false sexual assault complaints as “rare”. Both former Liberal staffers at the centre of an alleged rape in Parliament House will give verbal evidence during the defamation cases of Mr Lehrmann and Network Ten and journalist Lisa Wilkinson, and a separate matter between Mr Lehrmann and the ABC. The matters are expected to be heard together across four weeks in November.

>>19446088 Ten wants to use expert evidence on Brittany Higgins’ level of intoxication - Network Ten is seeking to rely on expert evidence in Bruce Lehrmann’s defamation case about sexual assault victims’ typical behaviour and Brittany Higgins’ level of intoxication on the night she alleges she was raped by Lehrmann in Parliament House. The Federal Court trial against the broadcaster is slated to start in Sydney on November 22. Barrister Tim Senior, acting for Ten, told the court at a preliminary hearing on Monday that the network would call 28 witnesses, including Higgins and journalist Lisa Wilkinson. Senior said Ten also wanted to tender two expert reports, on “the reactions and responses of victims of sexual assault … and how things like memory may be affected”, and a toxicology expert’s opinion about Higgins’ level of intoxication on the night in question.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487375

#31 - Part 23

Brittany Higgins Rape Trial and Sofronoff Inquiry into ACT Criminal Justice System - Part 5

>>19452895 Shane Drumgold takes legal action against Sofronoff Inquiry - Former ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold is taking legal action against the Sofronoff Inquiry, following its finding that he engaged in serious malpractice and grossly unethical conduct in the rape trial of Bruce Lehrmann. Mr Drumgold, who resigned from his position as ACT Director of Public Prosecutions following the damning report, has listed a case in the ACT Supreme Court for 14 September. The nature of the legal action is not yet known but Mr Drumgold is likely to be seeking to challenge the board of inquiry findings. Mr Drumgold conceded he made mistakes in his prosecution of Mr Lehrmann for the alleged rape of Brittany Higgins but rejected the key findings of the inquiry that he had lied to the Supreme Court and engaged in serious malpractice and grossly unethical conduct.

>>19452897 Lehrmann prosecutor seeks to quash damning findings from Sofronoff inquiry - Former ACT top prosecutor Shane Drumgold has launched legal action to overturn damning findings about his conduct made by the board of inquiry into the high-profile Bruce Lehrmann trial, and to stop the territory government from taking any action against him based on the report. In judicial review proceedings filed in the ACT Supreme Court on Friday last week, Drumgold is seeking to quash the report by former judge Walter Sofronoff, KC, who controversially leaked it to select media outlets before its official release. Drumgold argues the leak failed to comply with section 17 of the Inquiries Act, denied him natural justice and gave rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias on the part of Sofronoff.

>>19464960 Sofronoff demands ACT Chief Minister retract “unethical” claims - Inquiry head Walter Sofronoff KC has demanded ACT Chief Minister Andrew Barr retract suggestions he had breached his duties and acted unethically in releasing his report into the prosecution of Bruce Lehrmann. Lawyers acting for Sofronoff Inquiry chairman have written to Mr Barr rejecting criticism made by the chief minister at a press conference earlier this month, following publication of Mr Sofronoff’s damning findings against ACT chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold. In a veiled threat to take legal action, Mr Sofronoff’s lawyers say they are writing to give Mr Barr “an opportunity to correct the harm he has caused to Mr Sofronoff’s professional reputation.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487376

#31 - Part 24

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 1

>>19188991 Powerful Senate committee signs off on transfer of nuclear submarines to Australia - The AUKUS security pact has passed a critical hurdle after a powerful Senate committee signed off on the transfer of nuclear-powered submarines to the navy and granted Australia a rare 20-year exemption from tough US defence technology export controls.

>>19204894 Blinken, Austin to visit Brisbane for AUSMIN talks - United States Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin and Secretary of State Antony Blinken will visit Brisbane next week for the annual dialogue with their Australian counterparts Richard Marles and Penny Wong, at the same time the ALP membership continues to agitate against AUKUS.

>>19211235 Australia to gain priority access to US military equipment under Washington proposal - Australian requests for US military equipment would be handled faster than almost all applications “other than from Taiwan and Ukraine” under a proposal before the US Senate. The Australian government has long viewed the complex web of US export controls as a potential barrier to the AUKUS security partnership. But US senators are pushing to ease export control bottlenecks, as well as demanding regular reports on how measures under the AUKUS deal are “strengthening the United States strategic position in Asia”.

>>19220996 US Republicans hold subs plan to ransom in bid to boost domestic submarine production - US Senate Republicans are threatening to block the transfer of Virginia-class submarines to Australia under the AUKUS pact unless Joe Biden boosts funding for domestic submarine production. The move is being led by the ranking Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, Senator Roger Wicker, who ruled out language this week to authorise the nuclear submarine transfer in the latest version of the nation’s annual defence policy bill. Senator Wicker told Politico that the Biden administration needed to “be sure we have enough submarines for our own security needs before we endorse that pillar of the (AUKUS) agreement”.

>>19231877 AUKUS: Republican Senator John Wicker expects congressional approval by end of year - Republican senator John Wicker, who last week held up critical US legislation that would enable the transfer of nuclear powered submarines to Australia, said he expected the impasse to be resolved by the end of the year, enough time to facilitate the landmark AUKUS security pact.

>>19231918 Doug Cameron warns Anthony Albanese of contest over nuke subs, Palestine at conference - Left-wing former senator Doug Cameron has warned Anthony Albanese he faces a contest at the ALP national conference over nuclear submarines and Palestine. Federal Labor MPs are working to head off disunity on AUKUS and Left-wing demands for a timeline on recognising Palestine, in line with the Prime Minister’s directions this month to Labor’s national policymaking committee.

>>19250231 United States says 'door is open' for New Zealand to join AUKUS as Blinken, Macron continue Pacific tour - The United States says "the door is open" for New Zealand to join AUKUS, as geopolitical competition reaches fever pitch in the Pacific, with three of the world's most influential leaders continuing lightning tours of the region. "As we further develop AUKUS, the door is open to engagement," Mr Blinken said. "As we continue to work on the second pillar, the door is very much open for NZ and other partners to engage as they see appropriate going forward. NZ is a deeply trusted partner, a Five Eyes member, we've long worked together on the most important national security issues."

>>19256860 AUKUS: Republicans demand doubling of submarine production before backing pact - A group of Republican congressmen including Senate leader Mitch McConnell have demanded a more than 100 per cent increase in US submarine production as a condition for supporting the transfer of nuclear-powered submarines to Australia as part of the AUKUS security pact. As annual AUSMIN discussions kick off in Brisbane between the foreign and defence ministers of Australia and the US, 23 Republicans in congress have asked the White House to “immediately” provide a plan, including a request for extra money, to lift production of Virginia class submarines from 1.2 to “a minimum of 2.5” per year.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487378

#31 - Part 25

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 2

>>19256893 ‘A risk we should not take’: Republican resistance mounts to nuclear submarine plan - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has declared he remains confident Australia will secure Virginia-class submarines from the United States, even as almost half of all Republican senators came out against the current plan on the grounds it would dangerously weaken the US Navy as it competes with China. Twenty-three Republican senators, including Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell, wrote to President Joe Biden on Thursday (Australian time) saying they did not support the proposal to provide nuclear-powered submarines to Australia unless the US doubled its own domestic production capacity.

>>19256945 NZ Foreign Minister Nanaia Mahuta slams door shut on AUKUS - A split has appeared in New Zealand’s leadership over AUKUS, as the country’s Foreign Minister ruled out joining the pact, only a day after Prime Minister Chris Hipkinsheld the door open to negotiations. Hours after fronting the media with US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, who said the door was “very much open” for NZ to engage with AUKUS “as a trusted partner,” Nanaia Mahuta appeared to slam that door shut. “I’ll be really clear, we’re not contemplating joining AUKUS,” Ms Mahuta told reporters.

>>19297296 Indigenous voice to parliament: Claims of ‘no say’ on AUKUS nuclear subs torpedoed by referendum adviser - A member of Anthony Albanese’s referendum advisory group says the AUKUS nuclear submarine project has the potential to impact Indigenous communities, signalling she backs the voice to parliament advising government on the key pillar of Australia’s defence policy. Artist Sally Scales said Aboriginal communities should be consulted on aspects of the nuclear subs deal, including where they will be docked. “I don’t care about the nuts and the bolts of the submarines. But what do I care about? Where’s that nuclear waste going to go for (those) submarines?” Ms Scales told an event at the Australian National University on Wednesday night. “If we’re going to build new ports for these submarines, where are those ports going to be? How (are) those Aboriginal communities going to be consulted and worked with?”

>>19297859 Video: US nuclear submarine visits Western Australia as allies increase defence preparedness - A U.S. Navy nuclear submarine arrived in Western Australia on Friday as allies Canberra and Washington deepen defence ties and prepare to transfer nuclear submarine capability to Australia. The U.S. Navy Virginia-class submarine arrived at HMAS Stirling for a scheduled port visit as part of a patrol of the Indo-Pacific, officials said.

>>19297936 Video: US military shows off nuclear capable submarine in Western Australia - The United States military is flexing its nuclear fleet of submarines in Western Australia. The arrival of the USS North Carolina is the first visit since a landmark defence deal was signed earlier this year. Australia is buying eight of the nuclear-powered Virginia class submarines in a deal costing $368 billion. Australia's Ambassador to the US Kevin Rudd was on Garden Island touring the 110-metre vessel which can go three months underwater. WA will permanently house nuclear subs from next decade.

>>19308139 Labor faces growing grassroots party revolt over AUKUS pact - The Albanese government is facing a rank-and-file party revolt over the AUKUS defence pact, with about 40 local branches opposing it outright or calling for a review, and activists determined to have it debated at the party’s national conference despite attempts to dampen dissent. Federal electorate councils covering the Labor seats of Sydney, held by Tanya Plibersek, Parramatta and Boothby, plus the seat of Mayo held by independent MP Rebekha Sharkie, have also passed resolutions opposing the trilateral AUKUS defence pact to acquire nuclear-powered submarines.

>>19333477 Australia, US urged to ramp up AUKUS as PM invited to White House - Australia and the United States are being urged to turbocharge the AUKUS pact by jointly producing long-range missiles and using Australia as a testing ground for hypersonic weapons as Anthony Albanese prepares to make his first prime ministerial visit to the US capital. Albanese will be feted at a rare state dinner in Washington, DC, in late October at the invitation of US President Joe Biden, just days before he has been tipped to make an as-yet-unconfirmed visit to Beijing. Republican congressman Mike Gallagher, considered a rising star of American politics, used a speech in Canberra on Thursday night to say the AUKUS pact had the potential to “bring this region from the brink of war” if the three member nations expanded their ambitions and put their nations on a preventative “war footing”.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487380

#31 - Part 26

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 3

>>19340296 AUKUS alarm after nuclear dump in South Australia is axed - The government has abandoned a decade-long process to establish a low-level radioactive waste dump near Kimba in South Australia, declaring it will not challenge a court ruling in favour of Indigenous people who argued that their voice was ignored in the site’s selection. The Coalition suggested Australians should prepare for a surge of such outcomes under the proposed voice to parliament, and of ramifications for the AUKUS ­nuclear-powered submarine deal that requires Australia to establish a high-level nuclear waste dump.

>>19340337 AUKUS partnership the 'beating heart of free world' - A leading United States congressman has described the AUKUS security pact as the "beating heart of the free world". Chair of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, Republican Mike Gallagher, called for greater cooperation under the AUKUS agreement as a deterrent. "My view is that the US-Australia alliance, and perhaps AUKUS more broadly, is the beating heart of the free world," he told ABC Radio. >"We have to make AUKUS a success, this is a no-fail endeavour. It will have a dramatic impact on our ability to deter a future war."

>>19346018 Caroline Kennedy says alliance won’t sink if Trump elected - US ambassador Caroline Kennedy says Australia will be able to count on America as a reliable ally in a crisis even if Donald Trump returns to the White House, adding she is hopeful Congress will this year pass laws to allow the transfer of America’s most sensitive military technology to Australia. Congress is currently debating legislation to allow the sale of up to three nuclear-powered submarines to Australia, as proposed by the AUKUS agreement, and to grant its ally a broad exemption to tough defence export controls.

>>19355518 Labor members eager for showdown on AUKUS at the party’s national conference - Richard Marles will attempt to allay simmering concerns over AUKUS among Labor Party members and trade unions with a special briefing, as a showdown over the nuclear defence pact at national conference is certain. The briefing by the Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister is open to all party members and affiliated trade unions to be conducted via Zoom as local Labor branches and federal electorate councils continue to express opposition to the trilateral nuclear submarine pact.

>>19355541 Two Americans Australia can count on - "The single purpose of the nuclear submarine AUKUS agreement between the US, UK and Australia, and its military technology sharing, is, by building deterrence, to prevent war with China. As with the Second World War, our security rests on US leadership. Through the Australian American Leadership Dialogue just held in Canberra, I’ve just interviewed two of the most important Americans in Asian security. Kurt Campbell, Indo-Pacific Coordinator in Joe Biden’s National Security Council, is Biden’s Asia tsar, having been assistant secretary for East Asia in Barack Obama’s first administration. Australia’s best friend in Washington, he’s a big personality, creative, sober, effective at the heart of power now for decades. Hawaii-based Marine Lieutenant General Stephen Sklenka, an intellectual and a soldier, is the deputy commander of US forces in the Indo-Pacific. So, given the threat environment, do the US and its allies have effective deterrence today?" - Greg Sheridan - theaustralian.com.au

>>19361940 Albanese doubles down on AUKUS as union boss criticises ‘silence’ on internal debate - Anthony Albanese will crash through internal Labor opposition to the AUKUS agreement and declare the nuclear pact a central part of his government’s agenda, as an influential union chief criticised the party’s reluctance to debate the submarine deal. United Firefighters Union boss Peter Marshall, who is running for a spot on Labor’s powerful national executive, said the party’s factional system had stifled debate on totemic issues, arguing a political culture that discouraged debate was counterproductive. “Whether you are for or against [AUKUS], previously there would have been significant debate about the rights and wrongs, whereas there has been complete silence,” he said. “People are frightened… Debate makes good policy.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487382

#31 - Part 27

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 4

>>19374503 Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility Welcomes First Contingent of AUKUS Personnel - Personnel from participating nations reported to Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility (PHNSY&IMF) in support of the Australia, United Kingdom, and United States (AUKUS) security partnership’s Pillar One initiative Aug. 14, 2023. The Pillar One initiative is delivering a conventionally armed nuclear powered attack submarine (SSN) capability to Australia. The uniformed and civilian submarine maintenance subject matter experts from Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States comprise the Advance Verification Team (AVT) that, over the coming weeks, will work directly with shipyard personnel to gain a full understanding of the maintenance and industrial skills required to establish Submarine Rotational Force-West (SRF-W) in Australia as early as 2027.

>>19382314 Labor conference: ALP armed for keeping China at arm’s length - Senior Labor ministers have warned that China will have 21 nuclear submarines and 200 major warships in the water by 2030, sparking an urgent need to deliver AUKUS submarines and defence technologies to ­prevent war in the Indo-Pacific. Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy on Friday urged union and party delegates to back the “progressive” AUKUS defence pact, to help “prevent war” and protect Australians amid Beijing’s aggressive military build-up and rising US-China tensions. “Strength deters war,” Mr Conroy said. In an extraordinary slap down of anti-AUKUS elements inside the Australian Labor Party, the Left-faction powerbroker delivered a scathing attack on those who supported a “Robert Menzies ­appeasement” strategy. Mr Conroy’s claim that anti-AUKUS delegates were appeasers sparked an angry backlash from Left-faction union leaders and colleagues, including federal Labor MP Josh Wilson who ­labelled the minister’s claim as “absurd”.

>>19382343 Chinese aggression has driven the ALP towards a nuclear compulsion on AUKUS - "The Labor Party has turned on the hinge of history. In an identity renovation, Labor has become the party of nuclear propulsion - with China the key to this dramatic transformation. China is remaking the Labor Party today via its strategic assertion, just as Japan’s war re-made Labor in the 1940s. Nuclear propulsion has been sold to the party as a new Labor value, as the path to peace through deterrence, the vital contributor to self-reliance, industrial revitalisation and regional stability. Sections of the rank-and-file who cannot stomach these messages have succumbed before Albanese government dictum." - Paul Kelly - theaustralian.com.au

>>19392379 China’s warning on AUKUS - China has warned against being made the target of the AUKUS agreement as union leaders vow to apply heavy scrutiny over the government’s jobs pledge for the construction of nuclear submarines. After senior ministers warned at Labor’s national conference the AUKUS deal was needed to prevent war with China and limit its regional influence, a Chinese embassy spokesman said bilateral or multilateral defence agreements should be “conducive to world peace and stability and not target any third party or harm others’ interests”. With Labor’s support for AUKUS cemented in its policy platform last week, Foreign Minister Penny Wong on Sunday said a nuclear submarine fleet would act as a balance to China’s growing influence in the Indo-Pacific region.

>>19452872 Teachers in boycott of nuclear submarine project - Pacifist teachers are boycotting a Defence Department “brainwashing’’ program that asks children to design nuclear-powered submarines. The Australian Education Union federal executive will meet this week to consider a national boycott of the science project, which requires high school students to design a nuclear-powered propulsion system for a submarine. The union is furious that the Albanese government is spending $368bn on AUKUS nuclear-powered submarines at a time when most public schools are receiving less money than they were supposed to under the Gonski needs-based funding deal.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487386

#31 - Part 28

Australian Defence Force Afghanistan Inquiry and Ben Roberts-Smith Defamation Trial - Part 1

>>19220746 Why Ben Roberts-Smith defamation ruling has a long way to play out - "In order to make sense of the Ben Roberts-Smith case, one important point needs to be kept in mind: this was not a war crimes trial or a murder trial - at least not officially. Allegations of murder and war crimes were at the heart of the argument. But the reality is that this was merely an expensive, complex private dispute. It is important to be clear about the difference between civil and criminal justice. Even if the different standards of proof are put to one side, the judge’s finding that the murders took place was made on the available evidence - which falls short of the evidence that would have been available to a criminal court. It must therefore be less reliable than a finding by a criminal court." - Chris Merritt, vice-president of the Rule of Law Institute of Australia - theaustralian.com.au

>>19231979 War Memorial installs plaques noting ‘gravity’ of Ben Roberts-Smith defamation case - The Australian War Memorial has installed plaques next to displays honouring disgraced former soldier Ben Roberts-Smith that say the museum is considering what further content should be added to the exhibits after a landmark defamation case found he was a murderer and war criminal. The plaques read: “The memorial assists in remembering, interpreting and understanding Australia’s experience of war and its enduring impact. This includes the causes, conduct and consequences of war. The memorial acknowledges the gravity of the decision in the Ben Roberts-Smith VC MG defamation case and its broader impact on all involved in the Australian community. This is the outcome of a civil legal case, and one step in a longer process. Collection items relating to Ben Roberts-Smith VC MG, including his uniform, equipment, medals and associated artworks, are on display in the memorial’s galleries. We are considering carefully the additional content and context to be included in these displays. The memorial acknowledges Afghanistan veterans and their families, who may be affected at this time.”

>>19231995 War Memorial ‘acknowledges gravity’ of Ben Robert-Smith murder finding - The Australian War Memorial has quietly added a notice to its displays honouring Ben ­Roberts-Smith “acknowledging the gravity” of the finding in his failed defamation case that he murdered unarmed detainees in Afghanistan. The AWM has previously stated it would leave displays featuring Mr Roberts-Smith in place, despite calls for the collections to be removed from display or contextualised with information about defamation court findings. Greens senator David Shoebridge has called for these items to be removed from display immediately, while former principal AWM historian Peter Stanley has suggested “we might pause before effacing him from our national war museum”. “Removing his portrait and uniform might satisfy a modish desire to obliterate the memory of his actions but by “cancelling” him, we would lose the chance to tell the truth; to explain how the trial’s evidence contradicts the heroic story that the memorial, among others, cultivated,” Professor Stanley said.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487387

#31 - Part 29

Australian Defence Force Afghanistan Inquiry and Ben Roberts-Smith Defamation Trial - Part 2

>>19297998 Defence blocks FOI on war crimes letters between the US and Australia - Defence has refused to release documents setting out US warnings that alleged war crimes by Australian troops in Afghanistan threatened to derail special forces co-operation between the allies. The department rejected a Freedom of Information request on the matter by Greens senator David Shoebridge, who blasted the “wall of silence” over the fallout from the Brereton war crimes report on Australia-US military ties. Defence said there were six separate items of correspondence on the matter but refused to release them on the grounds they could undermine Australia’s relations with the US.

>>19417651 Ben Roberts-Smith will fight his defamation loss at a ten-day hearing - War veteran Ben Roberts-Smith says a judge was mistaken in finding that he was involved in four murders of unarmed prisoners following a landmark defamation loss to three newspapers. In the notice of appeal, Mr Roberts-Smith’s lawyers said he “appeals from the whole of the judgment”. His representatives argue that Justice Besanko “erred in his findings” Mr Roberts-Smith was involved in the four murders of unarmed prisoners. Mr Roberts-Smith’s lawyers claim the judge “erred by impermissibly construing the evidence” of Person 41, who witnessed the execution of Ali Jan and should not have been regarded as a reliable witness. “The primary judge added to and cherry picked the evidence of a witness whose evidence he otherwise found to be reliable without adequately explaining the basis for doing so,” the appeal states. They also claim the judge denied procedural fairness, as he did not ask for the “rookie soldier”, known as Person 4, to give evidence about what happened at the compound and placed too great a weight on the evidence of Afghan villagers.

>>19427909 Police, war crimes investigators seek access to documents in Roberts-Smith case - The Australian Federal Police and war crimes investigators are seeking access to restricted documents from Ben Roberts-Smith’s failed defamation case amid dozens of active investigations into allegations that Australian soldiers broke the rules of engagement in Afghanistan. Federal Court Justice Anthony Besanko revealed in a judgment on Friday that the Commonwealth had applied for changes to national security orders to allow the AFP and the Office of the Special Investigator to seek access to sensitive court documents. This would include transcripts of parts of the trial heard behind closed doors and documents tendered during those hearings. The OSI is the agency investigating war crimes allegations against Australian soldiers in Afghanistan.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487389

#31 - Part 30

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 1

>>19194398 Women, regional voters lead rebellion on Indigenous voice to parliament: Newspoll - The referendum for an Indigenous voice to parliament has suffered a collapse in support among women voters and in the regions as the referendum heads toward defeat, with just 41 per cent of voters now saying they will vote yes.

>>19194411 Thomas Mayo and Kate Chaney get plaudits in Perth, but WA regions rail against the voice - Out in the WA farming and mining electorate of O’Connor, Liberal MP Rick Wilson sees baked-in opposition. In the last week of June, Wilson ran a survey of his own email database. Though it lacked any of the rigour of a poll, Wilson’s survey concluded 80.1 per cent of the 1487 respondents intended to vote No at the voice referendum later this year.

>>19194426 Thomas Mayo says Indigenous voice to parliament will be ‘difficult to ignore’ - Prominent Yes campaigner Thomas Mayo says an Indigenous voice to parliament will be “difficult to ignore” as he hits out at “disappointing” personal attacks that he says have been hurtful. He would keep talking to Australians telling them the voice would be modest, meaningful, uniting and something that would be celebrated forever.

>>19194442 Thomas Mayo - Voice to Parliament will close gaps and address glaring issue at nation's heart - "How can we say we are the greatest country of all when we are the only like nation with no constitutional recognition of our original habitants. Far from great - Indigenous Australians are proportionately the most incarcerated people on the planet. We are the worst in the world in terms of Indigenous health, education and employment outcomes. At the referendum, we are responding to a simple and modest proposition: should our constitution include recognition of the First Peoples of Australia by granting them the fairness of a say." - Thomas Mayo - canberratimes.com.au

>>19194448 Anthony Albanese confident ‘focus’ will lead to Yes vote for Indigenous voice to parliament referendum - Anthony Albanese has declared the referendum for the Indigenous voice to parliament will be supported by a majority of the people and a majority of the states on the back of a short, five or six week campaign which will be the chance to turn around the negative polling.

>>19194465 Details aside, the vibe won’t win voice referendum - Yes case advocates may have misunderstood the lessons of the 2017 same-sex marriage plebiscite and last year’s federal election that brought a Labor left faction prime minister to power. Voice advocates see both as signs Australia has moved left.

>>19194492 Tony Abbott accuses companies supporting The Voice of ‘shareholder abuse’ - Former prime minister Tony Abbott has accused “woke companies” of “shareholder abuse” by publicly supporting the referendum. The former politician added there was “absolutely no doubt that the new left establishment is massively behind this Voice for all sorts of reasons.”

>>19194500 Indigenous group demands $2.5m for WA tree planting events - More tree planting events in WA were cancelled due to claims by peak environmental body, the South East Regional Centre for Urban Landcare, that Perth-based Whadjuk Aboriginal Corporation is withholding approvals until $2.5m in compensation is received.

>>19199716 Speaking out: opposing camps state their reasons for and against an Indigenous voice to parliament - Australians will be told the ­Indigenous voice to parliament is a “leap into the unknown” when they receive the official No pamphlet in the mail, while the Yes ­brochure promises constitutional recognition with concrete results, as Anthony Albanese concedes the Yes case needs to be made stronger.

>>19199725 Greg Craven ‘beside myself with rage’ after Indigenous voice to parliament No pamphlet quotes him - Conservative constitutional lawyer and prominent Yes campaigner Greg Craven says he’s “beside myself with rage” after one of his quotes criticising the government’s preferred model for an Indigenous voice to parliament was used in the official No pamphlet.

>>19199734 Indigenous people thriving without voice: Mundine - No campaign leader Warren Mundine says the world "wouldn't give a bugger" if the Indigenous voice was shot down at the referendum, arguing Australia is already taking great steps to improve the lives of Aboriginal people.

>>19199738 No campaign 'outdated, missed opportunity': Leeser - Liberal backbencher Julian Leeser has criticised Peter Dutton's arguments against the voice, claiming the No campaign is outdated and could lead to a "missed opportunity" for Australians.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487390

#31 - Part 31

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 2

>>19199762 National Australia Bank in firing line for hosting videos with Yes backer Thomas Mayo - The Coalition has hit out at NAB for hosting pro-voice videos with Thomas Mayo on its website, in which the prominent Yes campaigner declares the advisory body “must be respected and its advice acted upon”.

>>19204775 Anthony Albanese: government will reject Indigenous voice advice if it disagrees - Anthony Albanese has declared an Indigenous voice to parliament is not about treaty or compensating Aboriginal people and says his government will absolutely reject its advice – including if it suggests changing Australia Day – if Labor disagrees.

>>19204786 Video: Anthony Albanese reveals deepening Indigenous voice to parliament frustration during clash with 2GB Radio host Ben Fordham - Anthony Albanese has publicly revealed what is clearly a deepening personal frustration over where the voice referendum is heading. In an interview with 2GB radio host Ben Fordham Wednesday morning the Prime Minister allowed himself to become audibly vexed and abrasive by the questioning.

>>19211137 Indigenous voice to parliament: Anthony Albanese undermined on treaty claim - Supporters of an Indigenous voice have said the body must be established so it can negotiate treaty, undermining Anthony Albanese’s declaration that the referendum is “not about a treaty”. UNSW Law School professor Gabrielle Appleby and senior Uluru Dialogue member Eddie Synot wrote in March: “Voice precedes treaty because fair, modern treaty negotiations require first the establishment of a representative Indigenous body to negotiate the rules of the game with the state. It can’t be left to the state alone, and the state must have a group of people with whom to negotiate.”

>>19211159 ‘Failure is not an option’: Dreyfus optimistic Voice referendum will overcome opposition - Federal Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus says he is confident most Australians will support the Indigenous Voice to parliament once they are engaged with the issue, declaring change is long overdue and “failure is not an option”. When asked who would be to blame if the referendum failed, Dreyfus replied: “It’s not going to fail. Failure is not an option for me.”

>>19211168 ‘I’m living on optimism’: Pearson finds hope for Voice in a Sydney Westfield - For Noel Pearson, a visit to the Liberal heartland of Hornsby on Thursday to campaign for the Indigenous Voice to parliament became a whistlestop foodie tour as friendly shopkeepers pushed samples of olives, seafood, doughnuts and coffee on the First Nations leader. Pearson said the opposition to the Voice came from the far right and the far left, and that should comfort mainstream Australians. “The Voice is right down the middle, it’s a sensible balance,” Pearson said.

>>19217202 Big W pulls Indigenous voice to parliament plugs from in-store messages - Big W has pulled public address announcements about the Uluru Statement from the Heart and the Indigenous voice to parliament from all its stores, citing feedback from customers and staff. The retail chain, owned by Woolworths Group, had been broadcasting an acknowledgment of country in Big W stores for more than a year and will revert to those, The Australian has confirmed.

>>19217224 Yes supporters of the Indigenous voice to parliament have raised some of the best reasons to vote No - "If the Yes pamphlet was being sincere it would tell people the truth: neither symbolic recognition nor a great big new bureaucracy, as outlined in the Calma/Langton report, are capable of solving the problems facing many Aboriginal people. Only economic participation can do this: kids in school, adults in jobs, people able to create businesses and own their own homes. That isn’t achieved with a magic wand. It’s achievable only through hard graft and political courage." - Nyunggai Warren Mundine, Indigenous Forum director at the Centre for Independent Studies - theaustralian.com.au

>>19217244 Australian Jewish Association says Indigenous voice to parliament advocacy goes against values - A conservative pro-Israel community organisation that opposes an Indigenous voice to parliament has hit out at representative bodies for actively campaigning on the referendum, saying the ­Albanese government’s proposal was “contrary to Jewish values and community interests”. Many major Jewish organisations have backed the voice, ­saying it resonates with them ­because they understand what it’s like to be voiceless.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487391

#31 - Part 32

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 3

>>19220640 Pro-voice Liberal Andrew Bragg calls for referendum delay to 2024 to ‘save the concept’ - One of the few Liberal MPs who support the Indigenous voice to parliament has appealed to the government to delay the referendum to next year. Andrew Bragg, who is campaigning for a yes vote, said not enough “middle ground” had been established and he feared that lack of consensus had doomed the referendum to failure. It was time to recalibrate to “save the concept”, he said, before running a referendum in mid-2024.

>>19222693 Indigenous voice to parliament’s No pamphlet casts light where Yes prefers shadows - "As we count down towards the most significant referendum since Federation, the picture that has emerged in the Yes and No pamphlets is both telling and saddening. As we enter the home straight, the decision taken by the Yes camp in the pamphlet to describe a proposed new institution of state as a committee suggests a new desperation. It is obfuscation at best and outright deception at worst. The No side has avoided overreach and calmly stated what is by now self-evident: the voice is risky, unknown, divisive and permanent." - Louise Clegg, barrister - theaustralian.com.au

>>19222723 Making the case for No to Indigenous voice to parliament, straight from horse’s mouth - "The only thing Yes activists hate more than No campaigners misquoting them is No campaigners quoting them accurately. Nobody makes mincemeat of the Yes case arguments anywhere near as effectively as the Yes advocates. The Yes case is most powerfully condemned out of the mouths of its own supporters." - Janet Albrechtsen - theaustralian.com.au

>>19222755 NSW slip into No camp puts Voice on track for defeat - The Indigenous Voice to parliament is headed towards a referendum defeat, with most NSW voters supporting the No campaign for the first time and just 31 per cent of Australians expecting the Yes vote to succeed. The Resolve Political Monitor survey shows support for the Voice in NSW slipped to 49 per cent over June and July, from 53 per cent in May-June, while it softened from 56 per cent to 52 per cent in Victoria.

>>19222789 OPINION: Faltering Yes campaign like watching a slow-motion car crash - "Time is running out for the Yes group to turn around its faltering campaign to enshrine a Voice to parliament in the Constitution. If the government is not yet asking itself hard questions about an exit plan, it needs to start planning an escape route now. From a high of 64 per cent public support in September last year, the trend has been all one way, sinking to 48 per cent support in this latest survey. For the first time, this survey shows more people expect the referendum will be defeated than think it will succeed. For the first time, four states would vote No if the national vote were held tomorrow." - James Massola, National Affairs Editor - theage.com.au

>>19222811 Video: PM issues plea to Labor to support Voice to Parliament - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has issued an urgent plea to the Labor faithful to get behind the Indigenous Voice to Parliament, as the latest opinion poll indicates it's heading towards defeat. - 9 News Australia

>>19231753 Video: Tony Abbott blasts PM’s voice ‘not about a treaty’ line - Former Prime Minister Tony Abbott has slammed Prime Minister Anthony Albanese for claiming the voice was “not about a treaty” with Indigenous Australians, as a video resurfaced of the Prime Minister wearing a “Voice, Treaty, Truth” T-shirt at at a Midnight Oil concert. “Quite apart from anything the Prime Minister chose to wear at a concert, I go back to that initial statement he made as Prime Minister. The new government is committed to the Uluru statement from the Heart in full - in other words, voice, treaty, truth in full,” Mr Abbott said.

>>19231792 Tony Abbott unleashes on the Voice, Anthony Albanese - Former Prime Minister Tony Abbott has unleashed on the Indigenous Voice to Parliament, describing it as a “power grab by activists”. In a scathing critique of the Yes campaign, Mr Abbott told 2GB’s Ben Fordham this morning that he did not want to see Australia “divided by ancestry or race”. “I don’t want to see Indigenous separatism reinforced in our constitution.” He claimed if the Voice passed it would lead to “massive demands for compensation or reparations and even more restrictions on what people can do with their land”.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487392

#31 - Part 33

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 4

>>19231811 Indigenous voice to parliament supporters say Anthony Albanese shouldn’t delay referendum - Voice co-architect and senior Australian of the Year Tom Calma says the referendum must be held this year and a delay will not change the will of the people, as Anthony Albanese is told to “go the course” by Yes advocates. Liberal for Yes co-convener Sean Gordon also rejected the suggestion the referendum be pulled because of a fear of failure or that the country may look bad in the eyes of the rest of the world, warning Australia shouldn’t shy away from a proposal put forward by Indigenous people.

>>19231841 Indigenous voice to parliament late-year poll ‘to harmonise voice’ - Conservative Yes campaigner Greg Craven says it would be sensible for Anthony Albanese to push the referendum as far as he can to mid-November or early December in the hope voice ­advocates can claw back support and the millions of dollars in ­donations can have the greatest impact.

>>19231869 Jacinta Price pans Indigenous ‘experts’ in Melbourne - Northern Territory senator and prominent No campaigner Jacinta Nampijinpa Price has taken aim at Victoria and sporting codes over their support for the Voice to parliament. “You only have to look at who’s running the show here in Victoria and the level of activism that takes place,” she said. “Victoria is one of those places where everything is about ideology and not common sense.” Ms Price also took aim at the major sporting codes and clubs. “I’m really disappointed there are clubs who have come out and said they support it,” she said. “They can’t describe to an Indigenous person in a remote community how it’s going to improve their lives. Why should they be telling Australians how to suck eggs?”

>>19237663 ‘Who knew’: Anthony Albanese responds to furore over picture of him in Midnight Oil T-shirt - Anthony Albanese has laughed off claims he misled Australians when he said the Voice to parliament was not about a treaty after a picture of him wearing a “Voice, Treaty, Truth” T-shirt resurfaced. “Who knew someone would wear a Midnight Oil T-shirt at a Midnight Oil concert? I did see that and have a laugh. Frankly, it shows the desperation of people,” the Labor leader chuckled.

>>19237674 Video: No campaign stands by Gary Johns amid controversy - The No campaign against an Indigenous voice to parliament is standing by Gary Johns, former Labor minister in the Keating government, despite growing calls for him to resign or be sacked over a series of comments and proposals that include blood tests for Aboriginal welfare recipients and a public holiday celebrating intermarriage between black and white Australians.

>>19243329 Indigenous voice to parliament ‘will let us make real deals’, says Noel Pearson - Indigenous leader Noel Pearson says the voice will conduct negotiations with the government of the day and make “real deals” to improve the lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, raising fresh questions from the No campaign.

>>19250147 Chris Hipkins signals support for Indigenous voice to parliament through NZ example - New Zealand Prime Minister Chris Hipkins has held up his country as one that has successfully embraced reconciliation with its Indigenous people, in a strong signal of trans-Tasman support for the voice referendum.

>>19256826 Farmers’ revolt threatens to stifle the Indigenous voice to parliament - The nation’s peak agricultural lobby says West Australian farmers are “paralysed with fear” and uncertain “what they can do on their own land” because of new Aboriginal cultural heritage laws that loom as a key threat to the voice referendum and Labor’s political dominance in the state. The National Farmers Federation has sounded an alarm over Anthony Albanese’s plan to legislate a stand-alone national framework for Indigenous cultural heritage protections, saying the rollout of separate federal rules could “intensify the confusion in WA with overlapping federal laws”.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487393

#31 - Part 34

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 5

>>19262483 Reject race-based ‘poison’, privilege the Indigenous voice to parliament will deliver - "The voice referendum deserves to be defeated on the ethics of conviction and consequences. I write as a proud Australian of Indian heritage. I pay my respects to the Aboriginal communities that have lived here since Dreamtime; but also to the pioneers who established modern Australia as a stable and prosperous democracy, and to the visionary leaders who strove tirelessly to create a society that grants equal citizenship to everyone in a vibrant multicultural country. The voice speaks not to all Australians’ better angels but to some white Australians’ guilt complex. Permanently codifying racial grievance into the Constitution will guarantee it is weaponised and monetised sometime in the future by activists making increasingly radical demands and stoking resentment and backlash. If approved, the voice will not mark the end of a successful process of reconciliation but the beginning of fresh claims for co-sovereignty, treaty and reparations, using the Constitution’s authority as the enabling mechanism." - Ramesh Thakur, emeritus professor at ANU’s Crawford School of Public Policy and former UN assistant secretary-general - theaustralian.com.au

>>19267275 Key voice architect Megan Davis criticises media for coverage of the voice referendum - Key voice to parliament architects have accused the media of “driving sentiment” towards a no vote while conceding their own messaging needs to be positive. Numerous polls in recent months have shown declining support for a yes vote at the upcoming referendum and advocates Megan Davis and Noel Pearson are among those to criticise the mainstream media’s coverage of the debate. Professor Davis, the Balnaves chair in constitutional law at the University of NSW, lambasted the media last week and said she had seen significant support for a yes vote while visiting communities across the country, which was at odds to negative media coverage showing falling support. “We are having deep conversations with Aussies and we are not picking up, nor is Yes23, the kind of sentiment that we are seeing in the media, where they are driving the sentiment … downwards, to no,” she told ABC presenter Phillip Adams on his Late Night Live program last week.

>>19267283 Without the Indigenous voice to parliament, a treaty is vulnerable - "The calls for reform over the past century reveal advocacy for a voice within the democratic framework of the state as a pragmatic way of First Nations adapting to the legal and political environment imposed on them. There is also advocacy for a framework for a treaty that would enable communities to practise self-determination. This two-tier approach is common in countries with significant Indigenous populations to ensure every possible mechanism can be adopted to influence the state and to leverage public power to drive change in communities." - Megan Davis, co-author of the Uluru Statement from the Heart, and George Williams, constitutional expert - theaustralian.com.au

>>19267290 One third of voters undecided or open to change: Voice poll - A nationwide polling exercise of more than 14,000 people undertaken by federal Labor shows almost a third of voters are either undecided or can be swayed towards voting Yes for the Indigenous Voice to Parliament, leading the government to conclude the referendum is not lost yet. The Australian Financial Review has learned that earlier this month, over a period of two weeks, Labor surveyed 14,300 voters in what was the most comprehensive polling exercise the party has undertaken outside last year’s federal election campaign. The polling, which drilled down into voter intention and attitudes across all demographics, found on a superficial basis there was 48 per cent support for the Yes vote, 47 per cent for the No vote, and 5 per cent were undecided.

>>19272561 ‘Furphy’: Noel Pearson dismisses calls to delay voice poll - Prominent Indigenous leader Noel Pearson has dismissed calls to delay the date of the constitutional referendum on the proposed Indigenous voice to parliament as he urged voters to rise above allegiances to the major political parties when they cast their vote in the looming poll. Liberal MP Andrew Bragg, who backs the voice, has called for the vote to be delayed to allow the Yes side to recalibrate and build bipartisan support for the referendum after polling revealed ­declining support amid voter confusion.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487395

#31 - Part 35

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 6

>>19283925 Labor’s national platform reveals treaty to be pursued this term of government - Labor has vowed to take steps towards a treaty with Indigenous Australians in this term of parliament in the latest draft of its national platform, as Anthony Albanese refuses to link a Makarrata commission and agreement-making with the referendum. The Prime Minister and Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney are facing increased pressure from the Coalition to explain if they still support a treaty and the Uluru Statement from the Heart in full - after Mr Albanese declared on 2GB last month the voice was not about treaty – with senior Liberals questioning Ms Burney’s ability to remain minister.

>>19283990 Indigenous voice to parliament: Why Anthony Albanese can no longer say he supports a treaty - "Why can’t Anthony Albanese provide a simple answer to the question - “do you support a treaty?” The reason is the politics of the voice referendum have forced the Prime Minister into concealing the extent of Labor’s agenda on treaty and truth-telling. This is not a tenable long-term position. With support for the voice trending down, Albanese does not want his constitutionally enshrined voice to parliament to become entwined in the public mind with a complex process of agreement making between governments and Indigenous Australians over the legacy of European settlement." - Joe Kelly - theaustralian.com.au

>>19284007 Inflexible Linda Burney doing more harm than good to Indigenous voice to parliament - "Anthony Albanese and the Labor government are trying desperately to separate the troubled proposal for an Indigenous voice to parliament from the even more controversial and politically damaging ideas of a treaty and truth-telling to rescue the referendum. It is a dismal failure because, as Indigenous Australians Minister and the government face of the campaign, Linda Burney is incapable of the task. Her parliamentary responses to perfectly reasonable requests for information about either the voice or, more recently, Labor’s own $5.8m Makarrata commission - which she announced - to oversee treaty and truth-telling, is embarrassing." - Dennis Shanahan - theaustralian.com.au

>>19289915 Indigenous voice to parliament Yes side insists treaties decades away - The Yes campaign has insisted treaties take decades to finalise as it seeks to distance the process from the voice referendum and Anthony Albanese rules out the commonwealth pursuing agreements with Indigenous Australians in this term of parliament. The Prime Minister said states were leading treaty negotiations but left open the possibility of the federal government playing a role, while refusing to say if he personally supported a treaty.

>>19297168 Anthony Albanese and Peter Dutton trade barbs over an Indigenous voice to parliament - Peter Dutton has broadened the No campaign’s attack against ­Anthony Albanese and the Indigenous voice to parliament, attempting to link the Prime Minister’s competency and management of the referendum to ­delivering government services and cost-of-living relief. After a week in which the ­Coalition continued to pressure the government over voice and treaty, Mr Albanese accused opponents of the advisory body of “confected outrage” and undermining Indigenous Australians to gain political advantage.

>>19297215 Albanese is now presiding over repeated tactical failures on the voice - "Labor has a well-publicised commitment to delivering the Uluru statement in full. This involves treaty and truth telling, with the voice being the first priority. There is nothing new in this. But the government’s apparent lack of a strategy to deal with inevitable attempts to link the voice to treaty is bewildering. As one senior Labor source said Thursday, as the Coalition continued to entrap the government into talking about the voice: “If the voice isn’t close to dead after this week, it’s got to be on life support.”" - Simon Benson - theaustralian.com.au

>>19297296 Indigenous voice to parliament: Claims of ‘no say’ on AUKUS nuclear subs torpedoed by referendum adviser - A member of Anthony Albanese’s referendum advisory group says the AUKUS nuclear submarine project has the potential to impact Indigenous communities, signalling she backs the voice to parliament advising government on the key pillar of Australia’s defence policy. Artist Sally Scales said Aboriginal communities should be consulted on aspects of the nuclear subs deal, including where they will be docked. “I don’t care about the nuts and the bolts of the submarines. But what do I care about? Where’s that nuclear waste going to go for (those) submarines?” Ms Scales told an event at the Australian National University on Wednesday night.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487396

#31 - Part 36

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 7

>>19297392 Anthony Albanese at top voice: no retreat on Indigenous referendum - Anthony Albanese has promised there will be no retreat on the referendum, declaring a constitutionally enshrined voice would bring a “new day” of unity to the nation and act as a “vehicle for progress” in tackling Indigenous advantage. In his strongest and most ­impassioned defence of the voice, to be delivered at the Garma festival in northeast Arnhem Land on Saturday, the Prime Minister will invoke the spirit and vision of the late Yolngu elder Yunupingu to promote the “coming-together of two worlds”. In a draft of his speech obtained by The Weekend Australian, Mr Albanese says voting Yes is a “once-in-a-generation opportunity for real, overdue and much-needed change” and promises there would be “no delaying or ­deferring this referendum”.

>>19297569 An Indigenous voice to parliament - like Garma - is two cultures embracing for the betterment of both - "Friends, more than 17 million of our fellow Australians are enrolled to vote in this referendum. The highest number of voters in our nation’s history, including a record number of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voters. In this decisive moment, each of us holds an equal responsibility. And each of us has an equal opportunity. Yes, we can make history together. More importantly, we can shape the future together. We can vote Yes, in a spirit of unity. We can vote Yes, with optimism and hope - not just for success at this referendum but for our greater success as a nation. We can bring our country together. We can bring our two worlds together. With our hearts and with our heads. This year, on referendum day, the power to reach for a better Australia is in our hands. Let’s seize it together. Let’s vote Yes for recognition, let’s vote Yes for a voice and let’s vote yes for the better future that both will deliver, for all of us." - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese - theaustralian.com.au

>>19302884 Voice campaign stepping up a gear, Noel Pearson signals at Garma Festival - Cape York leader Noel Pearson has signalled the voice campaign is moving into another gear, saying: “We’re going to love them on the beaches in this campaign.” Mr Pearson was speaking at the Garma festival in northeast Arnhem Land when he told the non-Indigenous people in the audience they were crucial to the result of the voice referendum to be held later this year. He described it as the most important vote in the nation’s history and our “last best chance” to complete the constitution.

>>19302959 Indigenous voice to parliament our chance to lift Indigenous lives above lies and insults - "When Anthony Albanese announced his commitment to the Uluru Statement from the Heart and outlined a draft question at the Garma Festival in July last year, we could not have predicted the viciousness of the opposition to what had been refined into a just, practical and constitutionally sound proposition. It is alarming yet unsurprising that politicians and some aspirants have been prepared to set up Indigenous people and their advocates for abuse and vilification for nothing more than transactional electoral motivations. Millions of Indigenous and non-Indigenous people are hoping we are all better than that; so many lives and our future rely on it. If the Opposition Leader were at the Garma Festival this weekend, listening, he would grasp why First Peoples respectfully ask him and all Australians to recognise us in the Constitution through a practical advisory body." - Marcia Langton, Redmond Barry Distinguished Professor at the University of Melbourne - theaustralian.com.au

>>19303021 Cook government to scrap Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act after months of controversy - The West Australian government will scrap its controversial Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Laws within days, the ABC understands. Premier Roger Cook and Minister for Aboriginal Affairs Tony Buti will make an announcement early next week. It follows months of harsh criticism of the laws and the government in the lead up to their implementation on July 1 and in the weeks following. The criticism has been led by WA's opposition parties - the Nationals and Liberals - along with farmers groups including WAFarmers and the Pastoralists and Graziers Association. The new legislation came into force to 'modernise' the existing process, which saw major problems exposed in the wake of the destruction of Juukan Gorge. The laws require some WA landowners to check for the presence of cultural heritage before conducting any activities that may compromise such sites.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487398

#31 - Part 37

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 8

>>19303148 Video: Yes campaign relieved as WA set to scrap controversial heritage laws - An obstacle appears to have been cleared from the path of the Yes campaign with the Western Australian government expected to scrap controversial Aboriginal heritage laws that had become a flashpoint in the Voice referendum. Reports of the move to ditch the laws were welcomed by the Yes campaign and Voice advocates at the Garma Festival in north-east Arnhem Land yesterday, after the federal Coalition sought to link the two issues and suggested the WA measures were a precursor to broader national changes that could infringe on property owners’ rights.

>>19308103 'Not focused on hypotheticals': PM not considering other forms of Indigenous recognition if Voice fails - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has warned no other forms of Indigenous recognition will be on the table if the Voice referendum fails. He told ABC's Insiders program, filmed at Garma Festival in north-east Arnhem Land, he will not back down from constitutional recognition in the form of a Voice to Parliament because that was the specific request First Nations people made in the Uluru Statement. "This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity," he said.

>>19308109 Labor in no-man’s land, not wanting to promote a treaty while also unable to say it won’t happen - "Anthony Albanese has launched a media blitz to reboot the failing campaign for a voice to parliament, warning there will be no second chance for constitutional recognition of indigenous Australians if the referendum fails. Amid the glow of an uplifting Garma festival of indigenous Australians, and against the idyllic backdrop of Arnhem Land, the Prime Minister is using his “spear of strength” to simultaneously promote the indigenous voice to parliament, warn there will be no watered-down versions of recognition, and to distance himself and the commonwealth from the Uluru Statement commitment to a treaty." - Dennis Shanahan - theaustralian.com.au

>>19308112 Video: ‘Complete lie’: Jacinta Price rejects claims No campaign using fake images of Indigenous people - No campaigner Warren Mundine and Country-Liberal senator Jacinta Price have knocked back “racist” allegations they have used AI-generated images of Aboriginal people to encourage people to oppose the Indigenous voice. Former NAIDOC co-chair and journalist John Paul Janke on Sunday told ABC Insiders that voice opposers had created the AI-generated images “to try to look like it is an Indigenous person supporting the No campaign”. “Online, the No campaign have multiple social media pages. Some of them are now using AI with a Blak Indigenous character to try to look like it is an Indigenous person supporting the No campaign,” he said, speaking from the Garma festival.

>>19314716 ’Nothing to fear from Makaratta’, Anthony Albanese says after Garma boost for voice referendum - Anthony Albanese says there is nothing to fear from the second stage of the Uluru Statement from the Heart - a proposed Makarrata commission often referred to as treaty for short - because any agreement making would be mutual, not imposed. After weeks of trying to separate the voice referendum from a Makaratta Commission, the Prime Minister said no Australian could deny the “struggle” of Indigenous Australians and that the commission would bring people together.

>>19320661 Video: WA Premier Roger Cook announces repeal of Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Laws - WA Premier Roger Cook has confirmed his government will scrap its controversial Aboriginal cultural heritage legislation. The laws have been in effect for only five weeks, and had been designed to avoid a repeat of Rio Tinto's destruction of 46,000-year-old culturally significant caves at Juukan Gorge in 2020. But Mr Cook now says those laws went too far, were too complicated and placed unnecessary burdens on property owners. "I understand that the legislation has unintentionally caused stress, confusion and division in the community and for that I am sorry," he told a press conference this morning.

>>19320682 WA backtrack on heritage laws is a reminder the Indigenous voice to parliament can’t be scrapped - "The “forever” nature of Anthony Albanese’s constitutionally enshrined voice to parliament has been put up in lights by the West Australian retreat over introduction of Indigenous cultural heritage laws. This is the obvious point: there can be no backdown over a voice to parliament that has been cemented into the Constitution. If the voice proves unpopular, something goes wrong with the advisory body or there are unintended consequences, the entity cannot be scrapped. While bad governments can be voted out and bad laws can be repealed, the voice is permanent." - Joe Kelly - theaustralian.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487401

#31 - Part 38

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 9

>>19320706 Indigenous voice to parliament No camp fears rush of the late engagers - Senior No campaigners have warned of complacency, fears that 20 to 30 per cent of voters will remain undecided on the voice until polls open and a “cooling” in fundraising and volunteer support, according to a leaked memo sent to Australians for Unity board members. The No campaign, which leads Yes23 in internal and public polling, holds serious concerns it will be outspent and outnumbered in the weeks leading up to the expected October 14 referendum asking Australians to enshrine a voice advisory body in the Constitution.

>>19326823 Indigenous voice to parliament: AI No group denies relationship with Warren Mundine and Jacinta Price - The man behind a No campaign group that has drawn criticism for using AI generated videos has denied having a formal or informal relationship with Warren Mundine or Country-Liberal senator Jacinta Price. The ABC was forced to issue a statement of clarification after former NAIDOC co-chair and journalist John Paul Janke said voice opponents were using AI to make it appear “like it is an ­Indigenous person supporting the No campaign”. Phillip Mobbs, who is running Constitutional Equality, said AI was a cost-effective way to create campaign videos that reflected multicultural Australia. “What you’ll observe is the avatar is clearly not Indigenous but (it) does reflect the multicultural society we live in,” he said. Mr Mobbs, whose background is in education, said he had no relationship with Senator Price, Mr Mundine or No campaign group Advance Australia.

>>19326866 Video: Indigenous voice to parliament referendum ‘the best chance to shape treaty’, says Thomas Mayo - Prominent Yes campaigner Thomas Mayo says Indigenous Australians who signed the Uluru Statement from the Heart ­wanted to pursue a voice first “so that we could have the best possible say on the Makarrata commission” to oversee agreement-making and truth-telling. Mr Mayo made the direct link between the voice and treaty as fellow leading Yes supporters - including Megan Davis and Tom Calma - backed Anthony Albanese in warning this referendum would be Australians’ only chance to pass constitutional recognition in a generation.

>>19327086 Video: Senator says Uluru Statement ‘confirmed’ as 26 pages by NIAA, after Albo blasts claim as ‘QAnon’ conspiracy - Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price says the Uluru Statement from the Heart has been “confirmed” as being 26 pages long by the agency that produced the documents under freedom of information, as she called on Anthony Albanese to “come clean” after the Prime Minister derided the claim as a “QAnon” style conspiracy theory on Tuesday. Mr Albanese used Question Time on Tuesday to blast the claims as a “QAnon” style conspiracy theory. “That is a conspiracy in search of a theory, Mr Speaker,” the PM said. “It is something that has been out there, like a whole lot of the QAnon theories, we have all sorts of conspiracy stuff out there, but this is a ripper. That is the Uluru Statement from the Heart on an A4 bit of paper. That is it. But what we have here is the conspiracy theories colliding with each other. They’re struggling to get their scares straight. I mean, what role did Marcia Langton play in the faking of the moon landing, Mr Speaker? What was the role of the Uluru Statement from the Heart in that?” He stressed it was “absolutely nonsense”.

>>19333302 Indigenous voice to parliament: Anthony Albanese strikes back on length of Uluru Statement - Anthony Albanese has attempted to slap down Coalition accusations the Uluru Statement from the Heart is more than one page as “absolute conspiracy and nonsense”, amid claims the Indigenous Australians agency has faced political pressure to fall into line with the government. The No campaign is intensifying debate over whether the Uluru statement is one or more pages as the Coalition points to previous comments from Megan Davis - an architect of the statement - that it was actually about 18 to 20 pages. The Coalition is claiming the government is wrong to say the Uluru Statement is one page, arguing the document is 26 pages and includes statements about invasion, treaty and genocide.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487402

#31 - Part 39

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 10

>>19333412 Uluru smear job reeks of desperation from No camp - "The Uluru Statement from the Heart is one page. It’s very simple. The unceasing attempts from the No campaign to take draft documents from conference rooms seven years ago and transcriptions of butchers paper seven years ago to manufacture a controversy over the Uluru Statement is farcical. It reeks of desperation. Who would knowingly and willingly mislead the Australian people? Not us. The Referendum Council report and website contains the official documents and they’ve been live online since 2017. It shows the one-page Uluru Statement from the Heart." - Megan Davis - theaustralian.com.au

>>19333451 First Peoples’ Assembly members issue warning on ‘No’ vote push - A rift in the Victorian First Peoples’ Assembly over its support for a national Indigenous Voice to parliament has sparked warnings that looming treaty negotiations with the state government will suffer from any disunity. The push from a minority faction to reverse the assembly’s formal endorsement of the Voice will be discussed at a meeting of the board on Thursday, but nine members of the representative body say the attempt is doomed to fail.

>>19333508 Anthony Albanese’s trip to the US firms up October 14 as Indigenous voice to parliament referendum date - Anthony Albanese’s late October visit to the United States has left little doubt October 14 is the preferred date for the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum, according to constitutional law expert George Williams. The Prime Minister now has three likely overseas trips in late October and early to mid-November, making that period too crowded for a referendum. He is expected to be in Australia between September 11 (after the G20 on September 9-10) and his visit to the White House on October 23, which would allow a short four to five-week campaign. During that time there is just one parliamentary sitting week from September 11-14 and then four weeks of a break, which would give the Yes campaign clear air to prosecute its case.

>>19340214 Video: Noel Pearson warns of high cost if No vote on Indigenous voice to parliament succeeds - Cape York leader Noel Pearson has issued a subtle message for the “progressive No” campaign against the Indigenous voice to parliament, hinting that a failed referendum would be a big loss for them too. Mr Pearson was speaking at a voice forum in the Torres Strait this week when he indirectly addressed any voter who believes Australia should hold out for something more substantial than an advisory body with no power of veto. A video and audio recording of the forum shows Mr Pearson using hand gestures to indicate the voice was at head height while other, more ambitious proposals were high up in the air. If the voice failed at head height, he indicated, a sky-high proposal would not succeed. Still gesturing with his hands, Mr Pearson argued that a failed referendum would leave Indigenous Australians asking for less not more. “And if they say no to that (the voice), you think they’re going to say yes to that (more ambitious proposal)?’” he said. Mr Pearson lowered his hand to waist height as he told the forum: “If they say no (to the voice), next time you will be talking about whether they will say yes to this (less ambitious proposal)”.

>>19340240 Tony Abbott loud in rejection of Indigenous voice to parliament - Former prime minister Tony Abbott has invoked the spirit of US civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr and late Labor legend Bob Hawke in an attack on an Indigenous voice to parliament. Speaking at an Institute of Public Affairs event in Perth on Wednesday night, Mr Abbott said a successful referendum on the voice would “entrench victimhood in our constitution forever”. “Citing … the wonderful words of Bob Hawke back on Australia Day in 1988, ‘we are a country with no hierarchy of descent. We are a country with no privilege of origin’. “Citing the immortal words of Martin Luther King from an earlier generation, ‘I want to live in a country where my four children are judged not by the colour of their skin, but by the content of their character’. “My absolute desire is that we can go forward as one equal people and that’s why I’ll be voting no. Because I absolutely reject any suggestion that there is something fundamentally wrong with this great country, Australia.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487403

#31 - Part 40

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 11

>>19340258 Peter Dutton says his government would ‘fight’ for constitutional recognition - Peter Dutton has committed the Coalition to “fighting for” constitutional recognition of Indigenous Australians, as he dismissed Anthony Albanese’s threat of Australia losing a once-in-a-generation chance for recognition as “arrogant and dismissive”. In response to the Prime Minister’s warning that a No vote in the voice referendum would mean constitutional recognition would not come around again, the Opposition Leader committed a Dutton-led government to constitutional recognition.

>>19340296 AUKUS alarm after nuclear dump in South Australia is axed - The government has abandoned a decade-long process to establish a low-level radioactive waste dump near Kimba in South Australia, declaring it will not challenge a court ruling in favour of Indigenous people who argued that their voice was ignored in the site’s selection. The Coalition suggested Australians should prepare for a surge of such outcomes under the proposed voice to parliament, and of ramifications for the AUKUS ­nuclear-powered submarine deal that requires Australia to establish a high-level nuclear waste dump.

>>19349726 Jacinta Price says ‘Australians don’t need to be welcomed to their own country’ - Opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman, Jacinta Price, has called for an end to welcome to country acknowledgments before every sporting event and public gathering because the practice is “wrong” and dividing the nation. The attack comes after former prime minister Tony Abbott last week conceded he was “getting a little bit sick” of welcome to country, arguing the nation “belongs to all of us, not just to some of us.” Senator Price, a Warlpiri-Celtic woman who grew up in Alice Springs and the leading campaign spokeswoman against Anthony Albanese’s constitutionally enshrined voice to parliament, said “Australians don’t need to be welcomed to their own country”. “There is no problem with acknowledging our history, but rolling out these performances before every sporting event or public gathering is definitely divisive,” Senator Price told The Australian.

>>19349755 The heart of the matter: All Australians are created equal, and they should be treated in the same manner - "Cancel culture’s war on free thinking and free speech must be brought to an end. In order for future generations to benefit from common sense we must arm ourselves with the weapon of truth and stand unified with pride in our shared Australian values and national identity. I can understand the widespread willingness to recognise Australia’s Indigenous heritage. But most of that “recognition” is virtue-signalling. I believe one of our great strengths as a country is that, as Australians, we all play by the same rules and every Australian is entitled to equal dignity and respect, regardless of our background and upbringing, and regardless of how many generations our forebears have been here. Australia is a great country and our way of life is the envy of the world. I am proud to be Australian." - Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, Country Liberal Party senator for the NT - theaustralian.com.au

>>19349772 ‘Real concern’: David Littleproud at odds with Peter Dutton over alternative to Voice referendum - The Coalition is split on what they would take to the next election should the Voice to parliament referendum fail. While neither the Liberals or the Nationals support a Voice to parliament, both support constitutionally enshrined recognition of Indigenous Australians. While Mr Dutton has pledged to legislate local and regional voices, a fracture has emerged over what the Coalition would take to voters at the next election should the referendum fail. Speaking on ABC’s Insiders on Sunday, Nationals leader David Littleproud said he had concerns over “regional models”. Mr Littleproud said regional bodies would struggle to property represent massive land masses that were made up of “hundreds of diverse communities”. He instead signalled his support for local Indigenous bodies, saying empowering local elders would deliver better outcomes for First Nations people.

>>19355508 Qantas takes support for the voice to parliament to the skies with ‘yes23’ livery - Qantas will not rule out further measures to drum up support for the voice to parliament after painting three of its aircraft with the “Yes23” campaign logo. The Qantas Boeing 737, Jetstar A320 and QantasLink Dash 8 were unveiled at a major event in Sydney on Monday attended by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, the voice architect Noel Pearson, former AFL star Adam Goodes and Qantas’ entire senior leadership team. Outgoing chief executive Alan Joyce said they were backing the campaign because they believed “a formal voice to government would help close the gap for First Nations people in important areas like health, education and employment”.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487405

#31 - Part 41

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 12

>>19361889 Prime Minister accuses No campaign of spreading AI misinformation - Anthony Albanese has accused the No campaign of spreading AI-generated misinformation ahead of the voice referendum, escalating his attack on media commentators opposed to his proposed constitutional change, including Peta Credlin and ­Andrew Bolt. On WSFM radio with Amanda Keller and Brendan Jones, the Prime Minister said it was ­“pretty scary frankly, some of the No campaign and stuff that’s going into people’s Facebook posts which is designed to spread misinformation”. “Some of it is AI-generated, some of it generated, of course, by people like the commentators that you have said.”

>>19361898 No campaigner’s comments on Stan Grant, Lidia Thorpe labelled ‘disgusting’, ‘grotesque’ - Remarks from a key figure in the Voice No campaign about Indigenous journalist Stan Grant and independent senator Lidia Thorpe have been condemned and labelled disgusting and grotesque. Australian Jewish Association head David Adler, who sits on the advisory board of top No outfit Advance with former prime minister Tony Abbott, insists he was not trying to insult the prominent Indigenous pair when he questioned Thorpe’s Aboriginal heritage and repeatedly suggested Grant had artificially darkened his skin.

>>19361927 No campaign dumps campaigners over racist remarks, distances itself from Adler - No campaign leader Nyunggai Warren Mundine has revealed he pushed two people out of his referendum campaign over allegedly racist comments, as he distanced himself from under-fire No figure David Adler. Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus said on Tuesday that Opposition Leader Peter Dutton should disassociate himself from Adler after this masthead reported he repeatedly questioned senator Lidia Thorpe’s Aboriginal heritage and suggested Indigenous journalist Stan Grant artificially darkened his skin. Mundine said Adler’s comments were “bizarre” and, without referring directly to Adler, said questioning an Indigenous person’s cultural heritage constituted a “disgusting … racist attack”.

>>19367921 Video: ‘Why would I?’: Anthony Albanese ‘hasn’t read’ additional 25 pages of Uluru Statement material - Anthony Albanese says he hasn’t read the additional 25 pages attached to the Uluru Statement from the Heart, which talk of “reparations” to Indigenous Australians under a future treaty, despite the “divisive” material being seized upon by opponents of the Voice referendum in recent weeks. Speaking to 3AW host Neil Mitchell in an hour-long interview on Monday, the Prime Minister accused the No campaign and Opposition leader Peter Dutton of playing dirty and “saying things that they know are not true”. “Peter Dutton knows full well that a Voice will not have a say in where the submarines from AUKUS will go, they know the Uluru Statement from the Heart is one page, not hundreds of pages,” Mr Albanese said. “But what are the other 25 pages? I’ve read them, what are they?” Mitchell said. “What they are is a record of meetings … they’re records of the big lead-up that happened, in the lead-up to, ironically … the Uluru Statement from the Heart,” the PM said. “Do you agree with most of what is said in those 25 pages?” Mitchell said. “I haven’t read it,” Mr Albanese said. “You haven’t read it?” Mitchell said. “There’s 120 pages - why would I?” the PM said.

>>19367937 Albanese rules out legislating the voice if No campaign prevails - Anthony Albanese has ruled out legislating a voice to parliament if the referendum is defeated this year, pledging that he will honour a No vote and the decision of the Australian people. In his most definitive comments to date on the issue, the Prime Minister said that simply legislating a voice, rather than enshrining the advisory body in the Constitution, also was not the outcome Indigenous leaders had asked of the Australian people. “The Australian people - we are giving them a say,” he told an extended podcast with 3AW’s Neil Mitchell. “The idea that the Australian people vote ‘no’ and I say, ‘well, that’s OK, thanks very much for participating in the referendum, we are going to do it anyway’. No. I won’t do that.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487408

#31 - Part 42

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 13

>>19367951 Lidia Thorpe addresses ‘hard truths’ about rights and sovereignty of Indigenous people - An upcoming referendum on the Voice to parliament is “window dressing” and should be called off, senator Lidia Thorpe says. The independent senator and face of the Blak Sovereign Movement outlined her criticism of the proposal in her first address to the National Press Club. Senator Thorpe slammed the Uluru Statement from the Heart for promoting the Voice, which she called a “romanticised spiritual notion” of Indigenous sovereignty. “When we talk about sovereignty, we are talking about much more than just the romanticised spiritual notion talked about in the Uluru Statement. We are talking about real political sovereign power,” she said. “I know that might make people feel uncomfortable. But, too bad. That's why the government is scared to acknowledge it. “We are talking about sovereign rights. Rights to our home lands. Our rights to nurture our lands, water, sea, country, and sky, as we have for millennia.”

>>19382262 Anthony Albanese presses go to super-charge Indigenous voice to parliament campaign - Anthony Albanese, senior cabinet ministers and state premiers are preparing a nationwide blitz of battleground states and electorates, as the ALP and union campaign machines swing behind the Yes23 grassroots movement ahead of the voice referendum. The Prime Minister and Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney on Saturday will use speeches on the final day of the ALP national conference in Brisbane to springboard Labor’s Yes campaign ahead of an expected October 14 referendum.

>>19382273 Warren Mundine to launch ‘vision’ at Conservative Political Action Conference - Indigenous entrepreneur Warren Mundine says it is time for Australian conservatives to rejoin discussions they once led on equality and rights. He flagged the Conservative Political Action Conference in Sydney as the forum to set out the movement’s commitments to Closing the Gap and economic prosperity for Indigenous Australians. Mr Mundine and Northern Territory senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, the Coalition’s spokeswoman on Indigenous affairs, will speak at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Sydney on Saturday. They are expected to reiterate their arguments against the Indigenous voice to parliament, as fellow speakers, including Tony Abbott and Pauline Hanson, are predicted to do.

>>19387384 Albanese declares Voice an opportunity to make Australia greater - The prime minister has rallied Labor members to campaign “like you’ve never campaigned before” for the Voice, to flip opinion polls showing the referendum in peril, at the party’s national conference in Brisbane. Anthony Albanese said the Voice to parliament referendum was a tough undertaking for his first-term government, but Labor was committed to taking on issues “not because they’re convenient, but out of conviction”. A Yes vote, Albanese argued, would “resound across our continent” and make “Australia, the greatest country on earth, just that little bit greater”.

>>19387439 Inside the conservative forum rallying troops against the Voice - Coalition firebrand senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price was treated to a rock star’s welcome as she strode onto the stage at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Sydney and rallied the crowd to do everything they could to oppose the Voice to parliament referendum. The Voice was a central theme of this year’s CPAC Australia event on Saturday, as the who’s who of the No campaign rubbed shoulders with hundreds of conservative voters who paid up to $600 to attend the two-day conference. For those chasing the VIP experience and access to the after party, it was $7000. Wearing a “Vote No” T-shirt, Price told attendees that while the polling was trending in the direction of a referendum defeat, they should not get complacent.

>>19387527 Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price lashes the prime minister over the Voice - Indigenous Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price has lashed the prime minister, telling a conservative conference Anthony Albanese is “so concerned with his own popularity he’s willing to tear apart the country”. The prominent No Campaigner has been vocal about how she doesn’t believe the Constitution should be amended to recognise Indigenous Australians as the nation’s First Peoples and enshrine a permanent, independent Aboriginal and Torres Strait advisory body, or “Voice”, to parliament and the executive government. Senator Price walked onto the stage at the Conservative Political Action Conference on Saturday at The Star Convention Centre in Sydney to a roaring applause and standing ovation.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487412

#31 - Part 43

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 14

>>19397646 Penny Wong and Noel Pearson hit the churches and the temples to preach for the voice - After a weekend of preaching to the converted at Labor’s national conference, the ALP and the Yes campaign are hitting the temples and the churches to convert undecided voters to the voice. Foreign Minister Penny Wong and voice co-architect Noel Pearson were invited to a Sikh temple in Adelaide’s Allenby Gardens on Sunday to speak to worshippers about constitutional change that would guarantee an Indigenous advisory body and, proponents argue, close the gap where previous attempts have failed. At the revered langar - the community kitchen of the temple - they served food to the worshippers, following the ancient Sikh tradition of feeding anyone who is hungry and in need.

>>19404413 Anthony Albanese could announce the Indigenous voice to parliament poll date next week - Anthony Albanese is preparing to announce the date for the voice referendum as early as next week, with the Prime Minister saying parliament “will still be in total control of its destiny” if the advisory body is enshrined in the Constitution. Mr Albanese will head to Perth on Monday for a meeting of his cabinet ministers, who he wants to consult before kick starting the ­official campaign, and will attend a breakfast event on Tuesday. Government sources confirmed the date won’t be revealed while he’s in Perth but said it was possible Australians could learn when they’ll head to the polls once Mr Albanese returned from Western Australia, with October 14 the most likely date. September 11 is the last possible day an October 14 poll can be ­announced. Mr Albanese will travel to Indonesia, The Philippines and India between September 6-10.

>>19417286 Voice referendum date to be announced in South Australia next Wednesday - The date for the Voice to Parliament referendum will be announced at an event in Adelaide on Wednesday next week, the Prime Minister's Office has confirmed, as the battle to win voters in key states ramps up. Anthony Albanese has previously said the vote will happen in October or November, with some speculation it will be held on October 14 due to travel commitments Mr Albanese has made in the coming months.

>>19417576 Video: ‘Tick will be accepted, cross will not’: AEC boss slammed for confusing Voice referendum rule - The head of the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) has sparked confusion after suggesting that ticks will be counted as Yes votes but crosses will not be counted as Nos in the Voice referendum. Opposition leader Peter Dutton now says he will write to the AEC over what he called the “completely outrageous” situation. On referendum day, widely expected to be October 14, Australians will be asked to write either “yes” or “no” in English on the ballot paper to the question, “A Proposed Law: to alter the Constitution to recognise the First Peoples of Australia by establishing an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice. Do you approve this proposed alteration?” But appearing on Sky News on Wednesday, Australian Electoral Commissioner Tom Rogers was asked by host Tom Connell whether vote counters would accept other types of marks inside the box. Mr Rogers said it was a “great question” and again urged people to “make sure you write on that box ‘yes’ or ‘no’ in English”. “Now there are some savings provisions, but I need to be very clear with people – when we look at that, it is likely that a tick will be accepted as a formal vote for yes, but a cross will not be accepted as a formal vote,” he said.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487414

#31 - Part 44

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 15

>>19417591 Dutton cross about AEC tick ruling on Voice referendum - Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has called for a re-think by the Australian Electoral Commission after it said a tick could be counted as a Yes vote in the Voice to parliament referendum, but a cross would not count as a No vote. In an interview on Sky News on Wednesday, Electoral Commissioner Tom Rogers stressed that Australians should write either Yes or No on the referendum ballot paper in English. However, he then added: “There are some ‘savings provisions’, but I need to be very clear with people: when we look at that, it is likely that a tick will be accepted as a formal vote of ‘Yes’, but a cross will not be accepted as a formal vote.” A spokesman for the AEC said the rules for referendums had been the same for a long time and the “savings provisions” - that is, the ability to count a vote where the instructions have not been followed but the voter’s intention is clear – had been in place for 30 years. Dutton seized on Rogers’ “outrageous” comments in an interview with radio station 2GB, claiming the ruling would give the Yes campaign a clear advantage. “If a tick counts for Yes, then a cross should count for No - it’s as clear as that … I just think Australians want a fair vote, they want to be informed, they want to have the detail before them,” Dutton said.

>>19417606 An Indigenous voice will help fight against endemic disease - "Later this year Australians will get the chance to vote to change our Constitution to recognise the place of First Nations Australians. It’s a chance to unify the country. As Health Minister, I can’t think of an area of policy where that voice will be more important and more valuable than in health. With the best of intentions and substantial investment from both sides of the parliament, the current approach simply isn’t working. Listening to an Indigenous voice to parliament will give us a better insight into how better to spend the hundreds of millions of dollars of taxpayer money that goes into First Nations health – getting better outcomes and better value for money. Politicians don’t know best – we need to listen to communities to hear their solutions and ensure funding is getting to where it needs to go, ultimately to ensure better outcomes and longer lives." - Mark Butler, federal Health and Aged Care Minister - theaustralian.com.au

>>19417616 The No campaign against an Indigenous voice to parliament concedes a six-week campaign will be challenging - The No campaign has hit out at Anthony Albanese for overseeing a six-week referendum campaign on an Indigenous voice to parliament, labelling it “an absolute slap in the face” to Australians struggling with cost-of-living pressures. A No campaign spokesman told The Australian their strategy would not change once the referendum campaign officially began, which was to communicate to battleground state voters it was a “terrible idea to divide the country with this proposal”. Opponents to the voice are targeting South Australia, Tasmania, Western Australia and Queensland as the No camp only needs a majority in three states to defeat the referendum. “The campaign is a challenge and six weeks is a long time,” the No campaign spokesman said. “It’s obvious to us that the PM has chosen a six-week campaign as it suits both the Yes campaign and the government to spend the $100m we think they have set aside for advertising during the referendum. It is an absolute slap in the face to every Australian that while they are worried about rent and the cost of petrol, the PM will be using their money on this campaign.”

>>19427643 AEC ticks off Peter Dutton over ‘factually incorrect’ complaint - The Australian Electoral Commission has rebuked Peter Dutton for making a “factually incorrect” complaint after the federal opposition leader complained that a tick on a Voice referendum ballot paper counting as a vote but a cross not counting would advantage the Yes camp. On Thursday, Dutton called on the AEC to rethink counting ticks as a Yes vote but not counting crosses as a No vote on a referendum ballot paper - even though doing this has been standard practice for the commission in referendums for 30 years under so-called ‘savings provisions’.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487417

#31 - Part 45

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 16

>>19427688 ABC management and Leigh Sales intervene in debate on Uluru Statement and argue it's a ‘one-page document’ - ABC management and top journalist Leigh Sales have instructed staff at the public broadcaster that the Uluru Statement from the Heart is a “one-page document” and given them tactics to quash any arguments contrary to this. The intervention from Sales and ABC management comes days after the broadcaster’s Media Watch program criticised attempts to label an editorial from Sky News host Peta Credlin arguing that the Uluru Statement was 26 pages long as “false information” on Facebook.

>>19427747 Edict over Uluru statement a step too far, says ABC host Tom Switzer - ABC Radio National presenter Tom Switzer says it’s “highly ­inappropriate” that the public broadcaster issued an edict to staff on what to say in a debate disputing that the Uluru Statement from the Heart is longer than a one-page document. On Friday, The Australian ­revealed that ABC management and top journalist Leigh Sales told staff that the Uluru statement was a single-page document. Sales ­offered numerous tactics on ­addressing any arguments in ­opposition to this. Switzer, who hosts the ­Between the Lines program on Radio ­National, said the ABC and individual staff members should not be arbiters on what is right and wrong in debate. “Why should the ABC or any media outlet issue edicts to staff on highly contentious issues where opinion among even ABC staffers varies?” he said.

>>19434584 WA Nationals backflip on voice, join federal party’s No push - The West Australian Nationals have fallen in line with the federal party on the Indigenous voice to parliament, backflipping on earlier support for the proposal. WA Nationals leader Shane Love, who is also the WA opposition leader, had confirmed his support as recently as April for the proposal to amend the constitution with words guaranteeing the existence of an advisory body with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander members. However, the WA Nationals have come under pressure to revise their position on the voice after a campaign by the state Pastoral and Graziers Association to frame unpopular state Aboriginal cultural heritage laws as a sign of things to come if the voice referendum succeeded. New WA premier Roger Cook dumped the laws this month, describing them as too onerous for landowners.

>>19446073 Indigenous voice to parliament: Yes23 campaign must target 1.7m ‘soft’ voters - Yes23 must win over at least 38 per cent of the nation’s 4.6 million undecided voters to claim victory in the October referendum, according to confidential research targeting young people, women, multicultural communities and soft voters in four battleground states. The 31-page Yes23 Persuasive Conversations document, obtained by The Australian, includes new strategies designed to reverse polling trends indicating the pro-voice campaign is on track to lose the referendum, which is expected to be called for October 14. Campaign volunteers have been told to name a “villain” when convincing at least 1.7 million undecided voters to join the Yes cause, including invoking mining billionaires who “care more about profit than protecting our country”.

>>19446079 Voice No vote will damage Australia’s standing: Bishop - Former foreign minister Julie Bishop says Australia’s international reputation will be damaged if the country votes No in the looming Voice to parliament referendum. Ms Bishop joined Foreign Minister Penny Wong in Perth on Monday for a street walk organised to build support for the Yes campaign in Western Australia, considered safe territory for the No side. Ms Bishop, who served as foreign minister under Liberal leaders Tony Abbott and Malcolm Turnbull, echoed comments from Labor figures including Anthony Albanese that if voters rejected the Voice it risked sending a negative message about Australia’s “openness and empathy”.

>>19452806 Anthony Albanese won’t be campaigning for an Indigenous voice to parliament each day - Anthony Albanese won’t campaign daily for an Indigenous Voice to Parliament, but instead appear at major referendum events in between running the country, declaring the proposal was “about just giving a bit of respect” to Indigenous people. The Prime Minister attempted to play down the reach of the Voice by comparing it to business groups and stakeholders that provide advice to government.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487418

#31 - Part 46

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 17

>>19452823 Linda Burney is sincere, but not suitable to be face of the Yes campaign for the Indigenous voice to parliament - "Linda Burney is a suitable, sincere and genuine face for the Indigenous voice to parliament but she is not up to being the voice for the Yes campaign for the constitutional referendum. Whether this failure is through inability to perform publicly in parliament, press conferences and public meetings is a result of a “mini stroke”, a heart operation or medication is immaterial. It has been clear for months Burney has been unable to answer simple questions about the voice to parliament, even in sympathetic interviews, that she has Ministerial colleagues on hand at public meetings to help her sell the voice and in parliament her inability to handle basic requests for information is embarrassing to all." - Dennis Shanahan - theaustralian.com.au

>>19452845 Video: Meta ends partnership with RMIT FactLab amid voice referendum bias claims - Tech giant Meta has suspended its partnership with RMIT’s fact checking program “effective immediately” after receiving complaints about bias and unfairness relating to the upcoming voice to parliament referendum. Meta executives have distanced themselves from RMIT’s FactLab after it recently came under fire for slapping a “false information” label on Sky News Australia host Peta Credlin’s reports posted on Facebook that the Uluru Statement from the Heart is not a single-page document but is 26 pages long. The FactLab’s failure to have a current certification by the International Fact-Checking Network was also blamed for Meta’s decision to cut ties with FactLab.

>>19458899 Video: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice to Parliament referendum set for October 14 - Australians will decide the fate of a constitutionally enshrined Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice to Parliament on October 14. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese officially set the date during a visit to Adelaide, sending the nation to the polls for the first referendum in more than two decades. "For Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, this has been a marathon," he said. "For all of us, it is now a sprint and across the finish line is a more unified, more reconciled Australia, with greater opportunities for all." The proposed Voice would have the power to advise the parliament and federal government on matters that affect Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. It will need both a majority of the national vote and a majority the states - a so-called double majority - supporting the referendum for the Voice to be enshrined in the constitution.

>>19458930 Anthony Albanese’s Indigenous voice to parliament referendum announcement in full - "My fellow Australians For many years, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have advocated for Constitutional Recognition through a voice. Our Government - along with every single State and Territory Government - has committed to it. Legal experts have endorsed it. People on all sides of the parliament have backed it. Faith groups and sporting codes and local councils and businesses and unions have embraced it. An army of volunteers from every part of this great nation are throwing all their energy behind it. Now, my fellow Australians, you can vote for it."' - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese - theaustralian.com.au

>>19458950 Yes23 targets Liberal seats, backed by unions - The Yes23 campaign will direct its army of volunteers into 18 Liberal-held marginal seats and traditionally conservative electorates, under a national strategy to win support from millions of soft voters ahead of the October 14 referendum. The Australian can reveal prominent moderate Liberal MPs and party luminaries will lead the push for undecided conservative voters in Western Australia, Tasmania, South Australia, NSW and Victoria to vote Yes for a constitutionally enshrined Indigenous voice advisory body. Malcolm Turnbull and former federal Liberal Party deputy leader Julie Bishop this week joined the Yes23 campaign in Perth and Sydney, and will continue supporting the push into Liberal Party heartland.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487420

#31 - Part 47

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 18

>>19458972 OPINION: Why my government didn’t back the Voice, but I’m now voting yes - "I will be voting Yes in the referendum on the Voice. Constitutional recognition of Indigenous Australians is long overdue and has been a bipartisan policy objective for many years. It’s time to get this done. Six years ago, after long consultations, Indigenous Australians resolved that they wanted constitutional recognition to take the form of an entrenched Indigenous advisory council to be called the Voice. Since then, this particular amendment has been the singular focus of the constitutional recognition movement. If this is the form of recognition most Indigenous Australians want, the rest of us need a good reason to say No. Back in 2017, when this idea was new and lacked detail, my government did not support it. We had two major concerns. First, we believed it had no chance of success in a referendum. The history of constitutional reform in Australia is a dismal one, and to date any proposal faced with concerted opposition has failed. Our other major concern was that the Voice would create an institution in the Constitution, the qualification for which was something other than Australian citizenship. For me, as a republican prime minister, this was particularly important. I believe our head of state should be one of us: an Australian citizen, not whichever English aristocrat happens to be the king or queen of the United Kingdom. I have wrestled long and hard with this issue of constitutional principle, and I have concluded that while the Voice amendment is not entirely consistent with my egalitarian, republican values, nonetheless we are better off supporting it." - Malcolm Turnbull, prime minister of Australia from 2015-2018 - theage.com.au

>>19458993 OPINION: Let’s make a difference, and make history too - "I hope October 14, 2023, is a day my grandchildren will learn about at school. The day that Australia said Yes to constitutional recognition for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and Yes to a voice. The day that Australians from all walks of life and all backgrounds and faiths and traditions came together and voted to celebrate our 65,000 years of history. More importantly, I hope all Australians can look back on ­October 14 and say this was the day the gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians started to close. I hope we can look back and say that on that Saturday in spring when Australians voted for a voice to parliament, our country found a way forward on issues where for too long we’ve been going backwards. That’s the beauty of this idea, a proposal Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have been working on for more than a decade. It’s not just about celebrating our history - it’s about getting better results in the future." - Senator Malarndirri McCarthy, Assistant Minister for Indigenous Australians - theaustralian.com.au

>>19459026 OPINION: The Constitution is too important to change because of the vibe - "Especially on something as sensitive as the recognition of Indigenous people in the Constitution, it’s a big mistake to sponsor a referendum proposal that might fail. Had the prime minister confined his proposed change, formally announced on Wednesday, to an overdue recognition of Australia’s Indigenous heritage, it would almost certainly have been carried by acclamation, as the 1967 referendum was. Sadly for the people who could be shattered by the result, what the PM is actually proposing is the biggest change to our Constitution we’ve ever been asked to make. The failure of the current referendum shouldn’t be the disaster for reconciliation that many people understandably fear. It could actually be a golden opportunity to end the separatism that’s at the heart of Aboriginal disadvantage and allow Australians to go forward together as one equal people with an Indigenous heritage, a British foundation and an immigrant character. Indeed, acknowledging that in the Constitution, in preference to this divisive Voice, would be something in which we could all take pride." - Tony Abbott, former Liberal prime minister of Australia - theage.com.au

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487421

#31 - Part 48

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 19

>>19459035 OPINION: This isn’t a unifying Voice for Australia, it’s the prime minister’s Voice for division - "I was asked recently what question I think Australians should have front of mind when they head to the ballot box on October 14. My answer is a simple one: do you want Australians to be divided in our Constitution? The prime minister is about to fire the starter’s gun on the most divisive referendum in our nation’s history. And make no mistake, it is divisive through and through. It’s dividing experts, it’s dividing politicians, it’s dividing Australians. It rests on the premise that the Voice could effectively represent Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, but it’s even dividing our communities. I am fighting for a No vote because I already asked myself that simple question, do I want Australians to be divided in our Constitution? No. I want to be one together, not two divided." - Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, Country Liberal Party senator for the Northern Territory and former deputy mayor of Alice Springs - theage.com.au

>>19464934 OPINION: Your Constitution was designed to erase us. Your token Voice does not empower us - "The referendum date has been announced, and official campaigning has begun. This will be a difficult time for my people. Many of our activists, elders and allies have been yelled at and called racist for not accepting Yes campaign propaganda. The weeks ahead will cause more pain for the many First Peoples and allies who don’t want this referendum. As sovereign people, we do not want to be in your Constitution. Your Constitution was designed to erase our existence and for us to be recognised in it with a token Voice does not empower us, it is another step in the process of assimilation. If the Yes vote wins, we are guaranteed more of the same: First Nations voices calling for control over our lives and Country, and governments twisting, bullying and ignoring them as they continue to kill us and benefit from our land. If the No vote wins, we will start afresh: a clean slate to work together to explore and own the Truth of this country. Those fighting for real change will be emboldened."

>>19464924 PM asks Australians to vote Yes for a simple ’idea’ - Anthony Albanese has asked ­Australians to vote Yes for a ­simple and straightforward “idea” ­enshrining an Indigenous voice advisory body in the Constitution, firing the starting gun on a six-week election-style campaign and a multimillion-dollar advertising blitz. The Prime Minister declared that “when Yes wins, all Australians will win” after announcing an October 14 referendum date at the Yes23 campaign launch in Adelaide. In his pitch for support among faith-based, multicultural, suburban and regional communities, Mr Albanese said the government’s constitutional amendment was “simple, clear, straightforward … unambiguous”. Under pressure from the No campaign over the lack of detail around the voice advisory body’s function and design, Mr Albanese did not repeat his argument that the constitutional change was modest.

>>19471483 Kim Beazley wants Australians to vote Yes for an Indigenous voice to parliament to show respect - Kim Beazley remembers Indigenous boys and girls forcibly separated from their parents coming to the family home in Perth for a meal in 1950s and 60s, and shaping his belief in the ­dignity, opportunities and rights that should be afforded to the First Australians. His father, Kim Beazley Sr, had been an early advocate for land rights, for removing racially discriminatory provisions in the Constitution, and as education minister in the Whitlam government allowed for Indigenous children to be taught in their own language at school. “We always had kids coming out to spend a bit of time with us,” Mr Beazley told The Weekend Australian. “What those kids were actually experiencing, who had been through our house, it shocked me absolutely, and did very much affect my response to the Stolen Generation.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487424

#31 - Part 49

Indigenous Voice To Parliament Referendum - Part 20

>>19474105 One side of Indigenous voice to parliament debate is being given extra privileges: this is not democracy - "Section 128 of our Constitution sets out a unique and innovative process for amending a Westminster-style constitution in part because it is the only instance in our nation’s founding document where direct democracy is employed. It puts a question to amend our highest law above the parliament and entirely in the hands of the people. Yet as we hurtle towards a referendum that would entrench a new advisory arm of government for Indigenous people in our Constitution, our founders may well be rolling in their graves about the ways in which the parliament and the government are undermining the process, and in doing so undermining the primacy of people. In short, we have powerful corporations that do not have a vote under section 128 being given carte blanche to influence the result, a misleading question on the ballot paper and the government working to suppress political speech about the nature of the proposal. For the maintenance of social harmony our founders would have assumed parliament would ensure a fair process, but we the people are being treated to anything but." - Louise Clegg, Sydney barrister - theaustralian.com.au

>>19481563 Dutton promises another vote if Indigenous Voice fails - Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has promised to hold a referendum on constitutional recognition for Indigenous Australians if the Voice is defeated at the ballot box next month, and he wins power at the next election. Setting out some of his alternatives to a Voice that is written into the Constitution, the opposition leader said he supported “regional voices” and the recognition of First Australians. Asked what he would do if the October referendum was defeated and the Coalition won the next election, Dutton said he was willing to negotiate the creation of local and regional consultation groups in response to a report to the government by Indigenous leaders Tom Calma and Marcia Langton last year. Dutton said the Coalition would go to the next election with a policy to hold a referendum to recognise Indigenous people in the Constitution, but without a Voice specified in the Constitution.

>>19481586 Video: John Farnham backs Voice, permits his anthem to front Yes campaign ad - Australian music legend John Farnham has thrown his support behind the Yes campaign, and permitted his iconic anthem You’re the Voice to be used in a television ad that will encourage voters to see the Voice referendum as a profound moment in the nation’s history. It is one of the few occasions Farnham has allowed his 1986 hit to be used in a commercial, having agreed to license it for an undisclosed sum to Yes campaign outfit Uluru Dialogue. He hoped allowing the song to support a Yes vote would help make the case for the constitutional change. “This song changed my life. I can only hope that now it might help, in some small way, to change the lives of our First Nations peoples for the better,” Farnham said in a statement.

>>19481597 Peter Dutton’s sassy dig after John Farnham lends his voice in new campaign ad for Yes vote - Peter Dutton has taken a sassy dig at the Yes campaign after Aussie music legend John Farnham gave permission for his iconic anthem to be used in support of the Voice referendum. Farnham's hit, You’re the Voice, will be featured in the History is Calling campaign that will air on TV and the internet across the country in the lead up to the October 14 referendum. It marks the first time the former Australian of the Year and ARIA Hall of Famer has given permission for the classic song to be used in a commercial. But Mr Dutton dryly noted the song’s lyric could backfire on the Yes camp. “In a sense, it’s the appropriate theme song for the Yes campaign, because remember that the key line in the lyrics there is, you know, ‘you’re the voice, try to understand it’,” he told Sky News on Sunday. “I honestly don’t think most Australians understand it. And they want to be informed.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487430

#31 - Part 50

Australia / China Tensions- Part 1

>>19194520 Solomon Islands PM accuses Australia of pulling budget support, foreign interference - The prime minister of Solomon Islands, Manasseh Sogavare says China has agreed to provide funding to prop up the country's troubled budget, and also accused Australia and development partners of suddenly withdrawing financial support worth millions of dollars.

>>19199781 Democracy activists welcome here say Aussie MPs, as new figures show few Hongkongers seek visas - People fleeing Chinese oppression in Hong Kong should consider Australia as a destination, the leaders of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China say, as new figures show barely a handful of protection visas are granted to Hongkongers by Australia each year.

>>19204881 ‘My son is innocent’: mother of imprisoned Australian businessman denies he’s a Chinese spy - Australian businessman Alexander Csergo brought home a “shopping list” given to him by two Chinese intelligence officials as evidence of China’s overt and ultimately unsuccessful efforts to cultivate him as a source, his lawyers say. Csergo’s elderly mother, Cathy Csergo said public allegations that her son was involved in espionage were devastating to her family and that his isolation was cruel and unjustified.

>>19210696 Video: How China's foreign minister going MIA could affect diplomacy with Australia - China's Foreign Minister Qin Gang has disappeared from public view after his last public appearance about three weeks ago. Experts say it is the first time a senior minister in the Chinese government has been out of the public eye for more than 20 days without explanation. His disappearance has led to much speculation in China and in the Chinese diaspora around the world about possible changes in the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

>>19220783 China’s spy threat to our solar energy grid - Australia’s fast-growing solar energy grid is being dominated by Chinese firms with links to the Chinese Communist Party, raising fears of the potential for Beijing to sabotage, surveil or disrupt solar energy supplies. New research shows Chinese companies dominate 58 per cent of the Australian inverter market, making the devices, which are internet-connected and can be remotely controlled, potentially vulnerable to any Chinese attempt to target the solar electricity grid.

>>19226522 Battle to save Aussie dad from ‘justice’ in America - Lawyers for an Australian father locked up in prison for nine months over claims he trained Chinese military pilots will front a Sydney Court this week to apply for a temporary stay of proceedings. Dan Duggan has been in solitary confinement awaiting extradition to the US based on 11-year-old allegations he trained Chinese military pilots in South Africa from 2010 to 2012. The allegations, which Mr Duggan strenuously denies, are detailed in a US indictment filed in 2017, at the same time that US foreign policy towards China took a dramatic turn.

>>19226545 Australian ‘Top Gun’ accused of training Chinese is backed by US marine - A former high-ranking member of the United States military has thrown his support behind Daniel Duggan, an Australian citizen and former marine who is being held in maximum security over accusations he trained Chinese military pilots more than a decade ago. Duggan, 54, who lives near Orange in regional NSW with his wife and six children, has been in custody since October last year after the US indicated it would request his extradition. He denies any wrongdoing. In a letter written last week, retired marine colonel Ben Hancock said he had known Duggan for 25 years, including serving in the same squadron for two years, working closely on a six-month ship deployment, and being deployed in Kuwait. He described Duggan as a “loyal patriot” and team player who served the US honourably and could be counted on in difficult circumstances.

>>19237694 ‘I think he is gone’: The strange disappearance of China’s foreign minister Qin Gang - Beijing’s official line had been that Qin Gang has been unwell. The explanation held for a couple of weeks, but few experts now believe that one of China’s top foreign affairs officials has been bedridden for a month without an update on his condition. Illness has also been used previously as an excuse by the Chinese government for officials who have fallen suddenly out of favour and disappeared.

>>19237763 Former top gun pilot Daniel Duggan fights ‘political extradition’ to United States - Former top gun pilot Daniel Duggan’s lawyers say there is a political character to the charges against their client and will present expert evidence on deteriorating relations between the United States and China. Lawyers for the 54-year-old Australian citizen are fighting his extradition to the United States to face charges over the alleged training of Chinese fighter pilots.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487433

#31 - Part 51

Australia / China Tensions- Part 2

>>19237802 Ex-US Marine accused of training Chinese military pilots fights extradition to the US - Former Marine Daniel Duggan once flew Harrier jets for the United States, taking off and landing on Navy carriers during international missions as part of Marine Attack Squadron 214, based in Yuma, Arizona. That was over 20 years ago, but his activity since leaving the service is now the subject of a US indictment that alleges he used his specialist skills to teach Chinese pilots how to land planes on aircraft carriers, claims he denies.

>>19237815 Jailed pilot will rely on novel defence never used in Australia - One of Australia’s top barristers will seek to expand the legal definition of a political offence during a challenge to the extradition of Daniel Duggan, an Australian man accused of training Chinese military pilots overseas. Barrister Bret Walker SC said a political offence does not have a precise definition, with the Extradition Act defining it as an offence of a political character because of the circumstances in which it is committed, “or otherwise”. He said no case law exists setting out the interpretation of those two words, “or otherwise”. “This will be it,” Walker said. “There’s been no case of this kind argued or decided before.”

>>19237833 Daniel Duggan: flight school where former US marine taught says syllabus ‘totally unclassified’ - The flight school where former marine Daniel Duggan allegedly helped train Chinese fighter pilots insists all of his teaching was legal, in line with international standards and “totally unclassified”. The Test Flying Academy of South Africa (TFASA) says it has strict protocols and a code of conduct to ensure no information is shared that might be legally or operationally sensitive – or security classified.

>>19237861 Wife of ex-Top Gun pilot slams ‘terrible injustice’ in extradition fight - A former US marine pilot will remain in limbo for at least another four months as he fights against an extradition order which has been called a “terrible injustice”. Daniel Edmund Duggan has been in custody since October last year after the US indicated it would seek his extradition for charges of conspiracy, arms trafficking and money laundering. On Tuesday, his wife Saffrine Duggan stood outside Sydney Downing Centre Court with the couple’s six children amid a crowd of protesters holding signs demanding Mr Duggan’s release.

>>19237876 Court date set for jailed ex-pilot Daniel Duggan to fight US extradition over claims he trained Chinese pilots - The wife of former US marine pilot Daniel Duggan says the impact of his ongoing incarceration on their family is "horrendous". The 54-year-old denies allegations he helped train Chinese military pilots more than a decade ago, which relate to his work at the Test Flying Academy of South Africa. An extradition hearing was set for November 24, however Mr Duggan's legal team says the Inspector General of Intelligence and Security (IGIS) is investigating the role ASIO played in the lead-up to his arrest, which could impact the case.

>>19237884 Video: Pilot Daniel Duggan in Australia, accused of training Chinese military pilots - The wife of a former U.S top gun has choked back tears as her husband fights extradition from Australia to America, accused of training Chinese military pilots. Daniel Duggan has been locked up since late last year. His family and supporters today demanded his immediate release. - 7NEWS Australia

>>19237894 Video: Family of former US pilot protests outside Sydney court - Family and friends of detained former American marine Daniel Duggan have held a peaceful protest outside a Sydney court, as the father fights extradition to the United States. - 9 News Australia

>>19237929 'Top Gun' pilot speaks from his Australian prison cell as he fights extradition to the US for allegedly training Chinese pilots - Daniel Duggan, 54, says "Hello". The Australian citizen and former US Marine pilot is calling from his maximum-security cell in New South Wales. It's the first time he's spoken publicly. Talking to 7.30 comes with risk. His words could be used as evidence against him. He's been in isolation for nine months. "It's not that I want to speak out or decided to speak out, but I feel that I've had a very unfair ability to defend myself," he told 7.30.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487434

#31 - Part 52

Australia / China Tensions- Part 3

>>19237940 Video: Former US Marine pilot proclaims innocence from Australian prison cell | 7.30 - For nine months, Australian citizen Daniel Duggan has been locked up in a maximum security prison while he fights extradition to the United States. The US Department of Justice wants to prosecute the former marine Major, for allegedly training Chinese fighter pilots more than a decade ago. Tonight, Duggan speaks publicly for the first time. Angelique Donnellan has this exclusive report. - ABC News In-depth

>>19243436 Video: Chinese foreign minister Qin Gang removed from office - Chinese leader Xi Jinping removed his handpicked foreign minister after less than seven months on the job, a surprise move that leaves more questions than answers around China’s black-box political system. Qin Gang’s removal comes after his mysterious absence from the public stage over the past month, a disappearance that has sparked speculation about his fate and cast a global spotlight on the Communist Party’s opaque governance of the world’s second-largest economy.

>>19243465 Video: Chinese minister replaced amid claim of affair with TV host - China’s foreign minister has been abruptly replaced following weeks of speculation about his disappearance from public view and speculation that he has been sacked for an affair with a newsreader. A hastily summoned gathering of the National People’s Congress standing committee announced on Tuesday that Qin Gang had been removed from his post. He has been replaced by his predecessor, Wang Yi, after a month in which he made no public appearances.

>>19243492 Chinese Foreign Ministry scrubs missing minister from its records - China’s Foreign Ministry has removed all mention of Qin Gang from its online records, purging the former foreign minister’s name and his meetings with world leaders. It follows President Xi Jinping’s decision to sack Qin from his role on Tuesday night after rumours ranging from illness to an extramarital affair with a high-profile TV presenter, to a power struggle at the top of the Chinese Communist Party, dogged the rising former ambassador to the United States.

>>19243524 Top legislature appoints officials, reviews law - China's top legislature voted to appoint Wang Yi as foreign minister and Pan Gongsheng as central bank governor, as it convened a session on Tuesday. Qin Gang was removed from the post of foreign minister he concurrently held; Yi Gang was removed from the post of governor of the People's Bank of China, according to a decision adopted at the fourth session of the Standing Committee of the 14th National People's Congress (NPC). - GT staff reporters - globaltimes.cn

>>19243535 China's top legislature adopts a decision of removing Qin Gang as foreign minister, appoints Wang Yi as foreign minister - China's top legislature convened a session on Tuesday to review a draft criminal law amendment and a decision on official appointment and removal. Qin Gang has been removed of his position as Foreign Minister. Wang Yi was appointed as the Chinese Foreign Minister. Tuesday's decision has not touched on Qin's title of State Councilor. - Chen Qingqing - globaltimes.cn

>>19250156 ‘Don’t wait’ to go to Beijing, Julie Bishop tells Anthony Albanese - Julie Bishop says China’s ­reappointment of Wang Yi as Foreign Minister ­“augurs well” for Australia’s relationship with Beijing, and has urged Anthony Albanese to travel to Beijing as soon as possible to accelerate the thaw in bilateral ties.

>>19250241 US coercion will ultimately lead to strong opposition from people of Australia, Pacific Island Countries - "The US and its allies have long been engaged in political manipulation in the region, with the purported aim to impose its own political and economic will on the PICs. More often than not, US aid programs are camouflaged instruments of political influence to shape and reshape the local political landscape. In contrast, China's relationship with countries in the South Pacific region has always been based on the principle of mutual respect, mutual trust and mutual benefit. China's assistance to the countries has significantly improved the local infrastructure, speeded up the economic development and elevated the people's livelihood with tangible fruitful outcomes and enduring benefits." - Chen Hong - globaltimes.cn

>>19257040 Darwin port review ‘holds back’ China ties - Uncertainty over the future of the Chinese-owned Port of Darwin has emerged as a barrier to the restoration of relations with Beijing, which says tensions over the “blue bridge” between the countries could slow the relaxation of trade sanctions on Australian exports. As Anthony Albanese weighs an invitation to visit Beijing before the end of the year, a senior Chinese government official urged the “quick conclusion” of a review of the port’s Chinese ownership, saying the issue was undermining the stabilisation of bilateral ties.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487435

#31 - Part 53

Australia / China Tensions- Part 4

>>19267329 Adelaide top gun Keith Hartley provided training for Chinese airmen, search warrant claims - An Adelaide-based former jet fighter pilot is accused of conducting training for military exercises that were “directed, funded or supervised’’ by China’s People’s Liberation Army. Former RAF top gun Keith Andrew Hartley, 74, is suspected of providing “training involving the use of arms or practising military exercises” to PLA pilots between June 2018 and January 2022. The allegations emerged after Mr Hartley lost a Federal Court bid to have the Australian Federal Police search warrant used to search his home in November voided. He has not been charged with any offence. The raid related to his role as chief operating officer of controversial South African company Test Flying Academy of South Africa (TFASA). He is the second Australian-based former military fighter pilot being investigated for his involvement in the alleged training of Chinese fighter pilots, with former US Marine pilot Dan Duggan incarcerated while he fights an extradition request by the US government.

>>19272537 US to further military footprint in Australia to suppress China; Washington 'source of tension' in Asia-Pacific - Chinese analysts on Sunday warned of a more volatile and unstable Asia-Pacific region where the US would provoke a regional arms race with more large-scale military drills and more strategic weapons deployments, after the latest move between the US and Australia that reached an agreement to expand the US military footprint on the southern continent to contain China's development. - GT staff reporters - globaltimes.cn

>>19272546 Being an offensive bridgehead not in Australia's national interests: Global Times editorial - By serving as the frontline base for Washington's aggression toward China, Australia is essentially tying itself with explosives and placing the lit fuse in the hands of Washington politicians known for their adventurous and provocative thinking toward China. If Australia provides a stronghold or arms for deterring or attacking China, it will undoubtedly face resolute retaliation from China. This is not alarmist talk but military common sense; Australia must not harbor any illusions. - Global Times - globaltimes.cn

>>19272640 Australian businessman ‘in survival mode’ when he placated Chinese intelligence with open-source information, documents claim - Alexander Csergo, a Sydney businessman, has been charged with one count of reckless foreign interference, with police alleging he provided reports to his handlers whom he knew were part of China’s vast state intelligence apparatus. But, as Csergo told police in an interview detailed in the police statement of facts tendered to a New South Wales court, he says he felt essentially trapped in China - most acutely during the height of Shanghai’s highly restrictive Covid lockdowns – and that he needed to placate his handlers or risk being detained in the country.

>>19272701 Spies may have known for a decade that top gun Daniel Duggan was training China pilots - Australia’s intelligence watchdog is investigating whether Western spy agencies knew for more than a decade that former top gun Daniel ­Edmund Duggan was training ­Chinese pilots through a controversial South African flying academy. The Office of the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security is examining what interactions Australia’s intelligence services had with Mr Duggan, following a complaint from his defence team that the domestic spy agency ASIO may have been involved in “luring’’ him back to Australia in order to enable his arrest.

>>19278203 China lodges complaint over foreign interference inquiry, WeChat criticism - Liberal senator James Paterson has accused the Chinese embassy of complaining to the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade about a Senate inquiry into foreign interference on social media probing the influence of WeChat. The Australian can reveal an official from DFAT’s China external and co-ordination branch emailed Senator Paterson’s committee secretariat seeking clarification about the parliament’s powers to compel foreign actors to front public hearings. The official questioned if it was accurate to say Chinese social media giant WeChat’s refusal to appear at the senate hearing “demonstrated contempt”.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487436

#31 - Part 54

Australia / China Tensions- Part 5

>>19298066 China's overseas police 'contact point' joins the cloud and remains operational in Australia - China has been using cloud-based technology to implement a police service in Australia, the ABC can reveal. China has set up dozens of police outreach centres in various cities across the world - which Beijing calls "contact points" - linked to the security departments of Chinese cities. Beijing has maintained these are staffed by volunteers and are designed to help Chinese citizens abroad with administrative tasks such as renewing national identification cards, passports and drivers licences, but human rights experts are concerned the contact points could be used to intimidate Chinese dissidents living overseas.

>>19340415 Video: Exercise Malabar joint naval drills begin off Sydney coast - Warships from India, Japan and the United States have met in Sydney Harbour as Australia hosts the annual "Exercise Malabar" military drills for the first time. The quad security partners deny their high-end warfare training is solely directed at China, but insist the activity is about promoting security in the region. Defence correspondent Andrew Greene was onboard HMAS Brisbane as she made her way into Sydney. - ABC News (Australia)

>>19340656 From dining with top officials to a Chinese-born Labor poster child: How Beijing is slowly changing the face of Western Australian politics - "The question of just how close the Chinese state is to the WA Labor government, and in particular to former premier Mark McGowan, has arisen repeatedly in recent years. His government’s appointment of Dr Edward Zhang to a 15-member multicultural council in February 2021 raised eyebrows, given Zhang - while not personally linked to the Chinese Communist Party - is a founding member and honorary chairman of the WA branch of the Australian Council for the Promotion of Peaceful Reunification of China (ACPPRC). This group is tied to Beijing’s United Front Work Department, an integral part of the state apparatus tasked with recruiting people at home and abroad to push the interests of the Communist Party. Then there’s WA Labor backbencher Pierre Yang, who founded the Australian Chinese Labor Association (ACLA) in 2015. Yang's preselection for the 2017 election has raised questions too since he had practically no experience in union activism, which is considered essential to get ahead in the ALP. Just how much is Beijing shaping politics in the WA ALP, and, by extension, in the rest of the state?" - Dr Rocco Loiacono - legal academic, writer and translator - skynews.com.au

>>19340781 Australian Cheng Lei's first message from Chinese prison describes harsh conditions - Australian journalist Cheng Lei, who was arrested and jailed in China three years ago, has released her first public statement describing the harsh conditions of her imprisonment and how much she misses Australia. "I miss the sun. In my cell, the sunlight shines through the window, but I can stand in it for only 10 hours a year," she writes from an undisclosed facility in Beijing. "This is a love letter to 25 million people and 7 million square kilometres of land, land abundant in nature, beauty and space. It is not the same in here, I haven't seen a tree in three years."

>>19340831 China visit not conditional on Cheng Lei’s release, says Albanese - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says his planned visit to China this year is not conditional on the release of detained Australian journalist Cheng Lei, who has written an emotional letter on her three years in jail. Mr Albanese called for the mother of two, detained in China on national security charges, to be released. However, the prime minister would not call off his visit if this did not happen and said dialogue should not be transactional but was instead constructive to sort out disagreements with other countries.

>>19349795 China won’t take the US military’s calls. A top general claims that makes war more likely - China’s military is becoming dangerously arrogant and is fuelling the risk of war with the United States by refusing offers to communicate with commanders in the Indo-Pacific, one of America’s most senior military officials has warned. Lieutenant General Stephen Sklenka, deputy commander of the US Indo-Pacific Command, said he feared that China would seek to establish a military base in Solomon Islands or another Pacific nation as it sought to dominate the region. Sklenka added that he saw value in Republican congressman Mike Gallagher’s idea of positioning US hypersonic missiles in Australia and other key locations across the Pacific as a way to deter China from launching an invasion of the self-governing island of Taiwan.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487437

#31 - Part 55

Australia / China Tensions- Part 6

>>19361989 Defence calls for Australian drone program to replace risky Chinese-made technology - The Defence Department is looking to turbocharge an Australia-made drone program as it turns its back permanently on high-risk Chinese-made DJI drones. Defence has put out a request for information and responses from Australian industry and research institutes “in relation to development of sovereign uncrewed aerial systems (UAS) and trusted autonomy capabilities.’’ The request relates to small, unarmed drones to be used for training, photography and survey work. The call comes three months after Defence decided to get rid of the more than 800 drones - known as UAS in Defence jargon - and other pieces of tech it owned that had been manufactured by DJI, the world’s largest drone company. The grounding of the drones came after the company was black-listed by the Pentagon amid concerns over its links to the Chinese military, and further concerns that its internet-connected drones posed an un­acceptable security risk. The company, formally known as Da Jiang Innovations, is headquartered in Shenzen, China, meaning its data must be provided to Chinese intelligence agencies upon request. Its technology has also been used to surveil the oppressed Uighur population in Xinjiang.

>>19362026 US sailors ‘sold secrets to China’ - Two US navy sailors have been charged with selling military secrets to China, with one accused of capturing photographs of military hardware during an international warfare exercise involving Australia. Wei Jinchao 22, also known as Patrick Wei, is alleged to have captured and sent details of the world’s biggest international maritime wargames exercise - the Rim of the Pacific Exercise - involving Australia, the US, France, Canada and 22 other countries. Mr Wei and another sailor, Zhao Wenheng, are China-born US citizens accused of sending sensitive military information to Chinese intelligence officers for cash, according to grand jury indictments from June 2022 and 2023 unsealed this month in the Southern and Central District of California district courts. Both have pleaded not guilty.

>>19382314 Labor conference: ALP armed for keeping China at arm’s length - Senior Labor ministers have warned that China will have 21 nuclear submarines and 200 major warships in the water by 2030, sparking an urgent need to deliver AUKUS submarines and defence technologies to ­prevent war in the Indo-Pacific. Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy on Friday urged union and party delegates to back the “progressive” AUKUS defence pact, to help “prevent war” and protect Australians amid Beijing’s aggressive military build-up and rising US-China tensions. “Strength deters war,” Mr Conroy said. In an extraordinary slap down of anti-AUKUS elements inside the Australian Labor Party, the Left-faction powerbroker delivered a scathing attack on those who supported a “Robert Menzies ­appeasement” strategy. Mr Conroy’s claim that anti-AUKUS delegates were appeasers sparked an angry backlash from Left-faction union leaders and colleagues, including federal Labor MP Josh Wilson who ­labelled the minister’s claim as “absurd”.

>>19382343 Chinese aggression has driven the ALP towards a nuclear compulsion on AUKUS - "The Labor Party has turned on the hinge of history. In an identity renovation, Labor has become the party of nuclear propulsion - with China the key to this dramatic transformation. China is remaking the Labor Party today via its strategic assertion, just as Japan’s war re-made Labor in the 1940s. Nuclear propulsion has been sold to the party as a new Labor value, as the path to peace through deterrence, the vital contributor to self-reliance, industrial revitalisation and regional stability. Sections of the rank-and-file who cannot stomach these messages have succumbed before Albanese government dictum." - Paul Kelly - theaustralian.com.au

>>19392379 China’s warning on AUKUS - China has warned against being made the target of the AUKUS agreement as union leaders vow to apply heavy scrutiny over the government’s jobs pledge for the construction of nuclear submarines. After senior ministers warned at Labor’s national conference the AUKUS deal was needed to prevent war with China and limit its regional influence, a Chinese embassy spokesman said bilateral or multilateral defence agreements should be “conducive to world peace and stability and not target any third party or harm others’ interests”. With Labor’s support for AUKUS cemented in its policy platform last week, Foreign Minister Penny Wong on Sunday said a nuclear submarine fleet would act as a balance to China’s growing influence in the Indo-Pacific region.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487438

#31 - Part 56

Australia / China Tensions- Part 7

>>19397639 Australia to spend $1.3bn on high-tech missiles - The former deputy prime minister has warned of China’s ability to target Australia from the mainland after the government announced it will spend $1.7bn on long-range strike missiles. Barnaby Joyce flagged concerns after the defence minister finalised a major weapons deal with the US on Monday. “China has certainly got missiles that can hit Australia, make no mistake,” Mr Joyce told Sunrise. Under the new deal, Australia will acquire more than 200 Tomahawk cruise missiles from the US, making it only one of three nations to own the high-tech weaponry. “As we enter what many are calling the missile age, these will be vital tools for the Australian Defence Force to do its job of defending Australians,” Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy said. “We are buying these weapons now to deliver capability quickly – but we are also considering options to manufacture missiles domestically because of the importance of building sovereign Australian defence manufacturing capabilities.” Tomahawk missiles have a strike range of 1500km, and a ship-launched version will be deployed on the Royal Australian Navy’s Hobart-class destroyers.

>>19417267 Video: Plea for Australian help to quell brutal PNG fighting as Canberra and China struggle for influence - The governor of a remote Papua New Guinea province racked by tribal fighting has appealed for Australian help as the nation struggles to contain surging violence that has seen dead people dragged by four wheel-drives and a flood of automatic weapons into the country’s Highlands. The Australian can reveal that multiple tribal conflicts have claimed the lives of an estimated 150 people this year, including two dozen lives in the past fortnight alone, and left thousands homeless.

>>19417281 Anthony Albanese restricted but ready to help troubled PNG and pro-Australia ally James Marape - Escalating tribal fighting in Papua New Guinea’s Highlands is a rolling human rights tragedy that the country’s government has been unable to contain. It is also a difficult issue for federal Labor, which has remained ­silent on the fighting, despite an estimated 150 deaths this year. Anthony Albanese has forged a strong personal relationship with PNG counterpart James Marape, who is standing firmly with Australia on the need to keep China at arm’s length. Marape is happy for his country to reap the economic benefits from China, but - unlike Manasseh Sogavare in Solomon Islands - has rebuffed Chinese efforts to forge closer security ties.

>>19417627 James Marape mobilises elite squad to deal with PNG violence - Papua New Guinea Prime Minister James Marape has vowed to mobilise a new joint force of heavily armed police and soldiers to stamp out tribal warfare in the country’s remote Enga Province, condemning the surging violence as “domestic terrorism”. The pledge came as Australia’s Minister for the Pacific Pat Conroy vowed Australian support for PNG’s response, saying the Albanese government was “deeply committed” to the nations’ policing and security partnership. Mr Marape declared on Wednesday he would not seek outside police support to deal with Enga’s ongoing tribal wars, despite calls by the province’s governor for Australian boots on the ground.

>>19446096 Australian fears he’ll die in Chinese prison after doctors find huge kidney cyst - Detained Australian Yang Hengjun says he is increasingly fearful he will be denied medical treatment and die in a Chinese prison after medical authorities told him they had discovered a huge, 10-centimetre cyst on his kidney. Ahead of a planned trip to Beijing by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese later this year, Yang’s supporters are urging the federal government to demand the academic be given medical parole or access to Australian-supervised medical care outside his Beijing detention centre. “If something happens with my health and I die in here, people outside won’t know the truth,” Yang said in a message conveyed through his supporters. “That is frustrating. If something happens to me, who can speak for me?”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487441

#31 - Part 57

Australia / China Tensions- Part 8

>>19459049 Foreign Minister Penny Wong has appeared on TV wearing a microphone from high-risk Chinese tech company DJI - Foreign Minister Penny Wong used a microphone manufactured by controversial Chinese tech company DJI for a TV interview broadcast from inside Australia’s Embassy in Vietnam. Senator Wong used an audio microphone which clearly displayed the DJI logo despite DFAT several months ago publicly stating it was getting rid of its DJI-manufactured equipment. The company is facing a shadow-ban by the Australian Government after it was formally black-listed by the Pentagon and faced other restrictions slapped on it by the US Government late last year as a result of its close links to the Chinese state. There are also concerns that any data obtained by its internet-enabled devices would be handed over to the Chinese Communist Party’s intelligence agencies upon request, as required of Chinese-headquartered companies under the 2017 national security laws.

>>19464974 Opposition, human rights groups slam Penny Wong over China inaction - The Coalition has accused Labor of inaction over China’s human rights abuses, questioning why the government has failed to introduce the sanctions and travel bans adopted by other jurisdictions such as the United Kingdom, United States and European Union. The criticisms were echoed by Human Rights Watch, which queried what message Australia was sending by not joining other comparable countries in taking action. The opposition’s foreign affairs spokesman, Simon Birmingham, launched the attack on the anniversary of the finding made by the UN’s High Commissioner for Human Rights, who said China’s forced detention and treatment of Uyghurs “may constitute international crimes, in particular crimes against humanity”.

>>19464986 Xi Jinping set to skip G20 summit, dashing Albanese’s meeting hopes - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s hopes of meeting Xi Jinping on the sidelines of next week’s G20 summit appear to have been dashed, with the Chinese President expected to deliver host India a diplomatic snub by skipping the high-powered event. Albanese had hoped to use what would be his second meeting with Xi to further thaw relations with China and lay the groundwork for a visit to Beijing by the end of the year. The revelation that Xi is expected to skip the G20 in New Delhi came as former foreign affairs minister Julie Bishop prepares to travel to China next week on a sensitive back-channel diplomatic mission.

>>19476767 Video: Sydney councillors filmed with escorts ‘for blackmail’, says corruption watchdog - The NSW anti-corruption watchdog has found a Sydney property developer secretly filmed two councillors with sex workers on a “boys’ weekend” trip to China so he could blackmail them into voting for his projects. The Independent Commission Against Corruption found that the two men who were filmed, Vince Bada­lati and Philip Sansom, and councillor Constantine Hindi accepted perks from developers in exchange for favourable treatment on property developments. ICAC found Mr Badalati and Mr Hindi accepted $170,000 each from developer Ching Wah (Philip) Uy as a reward for having used their positions to help him and the proponents of two proposed developments in Hurstville. The commission found Mr Bada­lati and Mr Hindi engaged in serious corrupt conduct by travelling to China in April 2016 when they knew their positions with the then Hurstville City Council (later Georges River Council) would be misused to endorse and promote the property developments.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487443

#31 - Part 58

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 1

>>19194528 Gymnastics Australia backs away from pledge to assist survivors of childhood sexual abuse - Three years after publicly pledging its commitment to the National Redress Scheme that could offer apologies and compensation to gymnasts who suffered childhood sexual abuse, Gymnastics Australia has declared itself financially incapable of assisting abuse survivors.

>>19199855 Pedophile priest David Edwin Rapson sentenced for further child abuse - A former Catholic priest serving jail time for sexually abusing students in Victoria has been given a "minimum" additional prison sentence for historical crimes against schoolboys at Hobart's Dominic College in the 1980s.

>>19237725 Accountant defends paedophile asset shed ‘plan of action’, tells court unaware of victim compensation claim - An accountant has confirmed he enacted a plan to divest a paedophile’s multimillion-dollar asset portfolio to family and friends ahead of his sentencing, but denied orchestrating the scheme. The Federal Court on Tuesday heard Launceston accountant Ken Davey developed “a plan of action” by which assets of child abuser John Wayne Millwood were sold to family and friends and the proceeds then gifted to them. Millwood later declared bankruptcy and has far avoiding paying a cent of $5.3m in civil compensation awarded to his victim, whom he repeatedly abused over five years in the 1980s. Mr Davey, a partner with Findex Group, told the court it was “pretty obvious” Millwood wanted to urgently dispose of assets before December 7, 2016, when he was due to be sentenced and when solicitors foreshadowed a compensation application.

>>19237732 Disgraced businessman and child abuser John Wayne Millwood to give evidence in bankruptcy case - Disgraced Launceston arts patron and child sexual abuser John Wayne Millwood will finally be grilled on the witness stand after divesting his multimillion-dollar portfolio and declaring himself bankrupt. Millwood, 77, was convicted of child sexual abuse crimes in 2016 and jailed after he pleaded guilty to sexually abusing a boy in the 1980s. In December 2021, he was ordered to pay what was believed to be an Australian record-breaking amount of $5.3 million to his victim, following a civil trial in which Millwood did not appear once. But the victim, known only by a court pseudonym of ZAB, still hasn’t received a cent.

>>19243408 ‘I was expecting to die’: Convicted paedophile John Millwood defends multimillion-dollar asset shed - Convicted paedophile John Wayne Millwood has vehemently denied under oath that he shed millions of dollars in assets to block a pending damages claim from his victim - claiming instead he believed he would die behind bars. The disgraced former Launceston arts patron and businessman, and former manager of Launceston Pathology, gave evidence about his bankrupt estate in the Federal Court of Australia

>>19243709 TikTok tells senate inquiry how it’s tackling online child exploitation material - TikTok kicks 190,000 users off its platform a day for lying about being older than 13 years old, a senate inquiry has been told. The inquiry is examining how Australia’s law enforcement agencies tackle child exploitation, including online trends for explicit material and access to child abuse material. It’s also considering the role technology providers have in assisting law enforcement agencies to combat child exploitation. TikTok director of public policy Ella Woods-Joyce confirmed the online platform closed 17 million accounts in the last financial quarter of 2022. It’s the equivalent of 190,000 users per day being banned. Those cancelled accounts were determined by TikTok’s 40,000 trust and safety professionals who found they were being operated by a person under the age of 13, which is against TikTok’s eligibility policy to use the platform. With more than 8.5 million Australian users coming to the online video platform per month, Ms Woods-Joyce said online child safety was TikTok’s “top priority”.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487444

#31 - Part 59

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 2

>>19250288 Jury acquits Kevin Spacey of all nine sexual offence charges in London trial - A London jury acquitted Kevin Spacey on sexual assault charges on Wednesday after a four-week trial in which the actor said he was a “big flirt” who had consensual flings with men and whose only misstep was touching a man’s groin while making a “clumsy pass.” Three men accused the Oscar winner of aggressively grabbing their crotches. A fourth, an aspiring actor seeking mentorship, said he awoke to the actor performing oral sex on him after going to Spacey’s London apartment for a beer and either falling asleep or passing out. All the men said the contact was unwanted but Spacey testified that the young actor and another man had willingly participated in consensual acts. He said a third man’s allegation that he grabbed his privates like a striking “cobra” backstage at a theatre was “pure fantasy.” Defence lawyer Patrick Gibbs said three of the men were liars and incidents had been “reimagined with a sinister spin.” He accused most of them of hopping on a “bandwagon” of complaints in the hope of striking it rich.

>>19250288 Q Post #4590 - https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/kevin-spacey-accuser-dies-by-suicide-day-after-actor-posts-kill-them-with-kindness-video - "This marks the third Spacey accuser to die in 2019." At what point does it become painfully obvious? - Q - https://qanon.pub/#4590

>>19250307 Julia Gillard’s ex Tim Mathieson to plead guilty to sexual assault - Julia Gillard’s former partner, Tim Mathieson, will plead guilty to sexually touching a woman without her consent. The 66-year-old hairdresser, who became the first Australian man to be nicknamed the nation’s “first bloke” when Ms Gillard ousted Kevin Rudd as Labor leader in 2010, is expected to admit to sucking a woman’s nipple without her consent in an incident that took place in Brunswick on March 13 last year.

>>19267294 Nations unite against Facebook over encryption plans ‘that endanger children’ - Britain’s home secretary has been building an international alliance to take on Facebook over its plans to introduce default end-to-end encryption for its messaging apps. Suella Braverman has warned Mark Zuckerberg, the boss of Meta, Facebook’s parent company, that “there will be no let-up” amid fears about the technology’s use by pedophiles and other criminals. End-to-end encryption stops anyone but the sender and recipient of a message seeing it, meaning the companies cannot police the content, making it an ideal tool for criminals. Meta will introduce it on Facebook Messenger and Instagram Direct chats this year.

>>19278301 Video: Breakthrough that led police to alleged abuser of 91 girls at daycare centres - A trusted childcare worker was secretly able to prey on 91 young girls across 15 years, and was only exposed as one of the nation’s most heinous paedophiles when investigators traced bed sheets seen in a horrific video back to one of his centres, police allege. In a case some of Australia’s most senior officers have described as “unfathomable” and “beyond the realm of anyone’s imagination”, the 45-year-old Gold Coast man allegedly targeted vulnerable pre-pubescent girls in 10 childcare centres in Brisbane, one in Sydney and another overseas before his arrest in August last year.

>>19284103 Man charged with child sex offences known to be involved with photography at a childcare centre, ABC confirms - A former childcare worker charged with 1,623 child abuse offences worked at a centre associated with a tertiary education facility and was known to be involved in photography, the ABC has confirmed. The Gold Coast man, 45, has been charged with 136 counts of rape and 110 counts of sexual intercourse with a child under 10. An investigation involving the Australian Federal Police (AFP) as well as Queensland and New South Wales police led to the arrest of the man, with offences allegedly committed in Brisbane, Sydney and overseas between 2007 and 2022. He has been in custody in Queensland since August 2022 when the AFP arrested and charged him with two counts of making child exploitation material and one count of using a carriage service for child abuse material.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487446

#31 - Part 60

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 3

>>19284162 Video: Calls for Australia to introduce the death penalty for paedophiles after a Gold Coast childcare worker is accused of sexually abusing 91 children - There are growing calls for the death penalty to be discussed as a punishment for paedophiles after a childcare worker was charged with a litany of horrific child sex offences this week. The former Gold Coast childcare centre worker, 45, was charged with 1,623 offences against 91 young girls this week. Liberal National Party Senator Matt Canavan said it was time for discussion about punishments more serious than life imprisonment in such cases. 'Life imprisonment seems too soft a penalty for a crime this heinous,' he told Daily Mail Australia. 'Maybe we do need a debate about should there be a death penalty for these types of offences,' he added. 2GB host Ben Fordham also argued for capital punishment. 'We don't have the death penalty in Australia, but would anyone seriously argue against it in the case of this paedophile pig?' he said.

>>19289945 Australia’s alleged worst pedophile ‘first detected in police sting’ - One of the nation’s worst alleged pedophiles went deeper underground after a dark web child-sex ring was busted by Australian authorities almost a decade ago. The childcare worker, now charged with the rape and sexual abuse of 91 young girls in 10 centres in Queensland, one in NSW and one overseas, allegedly shared images and videos on the dark web with members of a site called The Love Zone in 2013 and 2014. The Queensland Police Service’s internationally renowned Task Force Argos investigators infiltrated and then secretly took over the global network of child-sex offenders in 2014 after the head administrator had been identified as South Australian public servant Shannon Grant McCoole, who sexually abused at least seven children in his care. Among images and videos of abuse scooped up in the operation were those shared by the 45-year-old Gold Coast-based childcare worker, who the Australian Federal Police this week announced had been charged with 1623 child abuse offences over the 15 years leading up to his arrest last August.

>>19289982 Sex offenders must be identified to protect children, Peter Dutton demands - A national register of child sex ­offenders will be considered by state and territory governments after police charged a childcare worker over the alleged serial rape of dozens of young girls. Federal Education Minister Jason Clare has ordered a review of “working with children’’ checks to close a loophole that may let paedophiles move interstate to work with children undetected. And Peter Dutton is pushing for a national register of pedophiles to help schools and childcare centres identify predators.

>>19298140 Australia’s alleged worst pedophile reported to Queensland Police almost a year before arrest - One of the nation’s worst alleged pedophiles was reported to police almost a year before he was arrested for the alleged abuse of 91 girls after a colleague saw him kissing a girl at a daycare centre in Queensland. Yolanda Borucki, who managed a chain of daycare centres, says she alerted Queensland Police to the alleged kissing in October 2021 and said the alleged offender would take children outside with a mattress and blankets to play in a fort. Ms Borucki said another childcare worker saw the alleged offender, who cannot be identified, kissing a girl inside the fort and a complaint was sent to Queensland Police who cleared the man but did not check his home or devices.

>>19303385 'Hell on earth': State and church enabled child sex abuse, damning report finds - Hell on earth: a place where vulnerable children were subjected to depravity, sexual, physical and spiritual violence while the state looked away. That’s the description in a damning new report of the Marylands School and the associated Hebron Trust run in Otautahi Christchurch from the 1950s to the 1980s by the Brothers of St John of God. The report, titled Stolen Lives, Marked Souls, is part of the Abuse in Care Royal Commission of Inquiry and was tabled in Parliament on Wednesday. It details the horrors of the abuse suffered by many of the young boys in the care of the brothers, their desperation to be believed and helped, and the “shameful” failure of the state and the Catholic Church to act. The victims were as young as 5. “We are aware of no other circumstances or institution where the sexual abuse has been so extreme or has involved such a high proportion of perpetrators over the same extended period of time as that at Marylands School,” inquiry chairperson Coral Shaw said.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487447

#31 - Part 61

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 4

>>19314867 The letter that helped seal the fate of dozens of children - In 1977, the then Sydney-based provincial of the Catholic brotherhood St John of God, Brother Brian O’Donnell, received an anonymous letter bearing disturbing news. The prior and one of the brothers at Marylands, the order’s school for students with intellectual disabilities in New Zealand, were sexually abusing a boy, the letter alleged. Pausing at that moment now, as O’Donnell’s eyes flicker across the words on the page, there is an opportunity for dozens of children to avoid their fate, for boys who will later die by suicide to become grandfathers, and countless unhappy lives to take a different trajectory. The junior brother mentioned in the letter was Bernard McGrath, who went on to become the most notorious perpetrator of child sexual abuse among religious orders in Australia and New Zealand and possibly the most prolific. When the letter arrived he had just been promoted by the prior, Rodger Moloney, whose role only emerged in detail in a report into abuse in care by a New Zealand royal commission last week. He was McGrath’s mentor. But O’Donnell was disinclined to believe the allegations. “I thought it was a trouble-causing letter,” he would tell Catholic Church Insurance Limited years later.

>>19320920 Video: AFP announced 19 men arrested, 13 children removed from harm in major online child abuse investigation - Police have removed 13 Australian children from harm and arrested 19 men during an investigation into a "technologically sophisticated" online child abuse network sparked by the murder of two FBI agents in the US. FBI Special Agents Daniel Alfin and Laura Schwartzenberger were shot dead by suspect David Lee Huber as they executed a search warrant on a related case in Florida in 2021. The Australian Federal Police-led Australian Centre to Counter Child Exploitation began its investigation in 2022 after the FBI shared intelligence about Australian members of a peer-to-peer network allegedly sharing child abuse material on the dark web. Two Australian offenders have been sentenced, with other men who were arrested remaining before the courts.

>>19320928 Catholic church seeks to stop family’s lawsuit over George Pell child abuse allegations - The Catholic church is seeking to challenge a legal ruling in Victoria that would allow the father of a choirboy to sue for damages over allegations of child sexual abuse by Cardinal George Pell. The father, who cannot be named for legal reasons, filed a claim against the Catholic archdiocese of Melbourne and Pell. He claims to have suffered nervous shock after learning of allegations that Pell sexually abused his now deceased son in the mid-1990s.

>>19341000 'After School Satan Club' meeting canceled by City of Chesapeake - "We're seeing new developments between the city of Chesapeake and a controversial after-school club. The Satanic Temple shared on social media that Thursday's meeting of the 'After School Satan Club' at Indian River Library had been canceled by the city. Club leaders believe this is unconstitutional. The city says their policies require groups to assure that events don't pose a threat to public health, safety or welfare. City leaders wouldn't say how this meeting violated those policies. They say they sent specific details to the Satan Club, but would not share those elsewhere. We've reached out to the Satan Club for comment and have not heard back." - Julia Varnier - wtkr.com

>>19341000 Q Post #4545 - Humanity is good, but, when we let our guard down we allow darkness to infiltrate and destroy. Like past battles fought, we now face our greatest battle at present, a battle to save our Republic, our way of life, and what we decide (each of us) now will decide our future. Will we be a free nation under God? Or will we cede our freedom, rights and liberty to the enemy? If America falls so does the world. If America falls darkness will soon follow. Only when we stand together, only when we are united, can we defeat this highly entrenched dark enemy. This is not about politics. This is about preserving our way of life and protecting the generations that follow. We are living in Biblical times. Children of light vs children of darkness. United against the Invisible Enemy of all humanity. Q - https://qanon.pub/#4545

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487450

#31 - Part 62

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 5

>>19362008 Gerald Ridsdale jailed for another year for abusing 13-year-old boy as paedophile priest is told he will likely die in jail - A paedophile priest will 'probably die' behind bars after his prison sentence was extended for abusing another teenage boy. Gerald Ridsdale, 89, earlier this year admitted abusing his 72nd victim and another year was added to his 39-year jail sentence at Ballarat Magistrates Court in Victoria on Tuesday. Ridsdale, who has been in prison since 1994, abused children between 1961 and 1988 while he worked as a Roman Catholic priest in churches and schools across the state. He admitted indecently assaulting his latest victim, a 13-year-old boy, at a Catholic school in Horsham in 1987.

>>19362015 Jailed pedophile ex-priest Peter Andrew Hansen stripped of law credentials - A pedophile ex-priest and former Labor party official who preyed on young boys in Asian countries has been barred from practising law in Australia. Peter Andrew Hansen was jailed in June 2021 for at least 14 years on 31 charges of producing child pornography in Vietnam and the Philippines, distributing child exploitation material and engaging in sexual activity with nine boys. The chief clerk of the NSW Supreme Court applied in April to have Hansen struck off the law register and barred from practising due to his crimes. In a joint judgment handed down on Tuesday, Justices Fabian Gleeson, Jeremy Kirk and John Basten declared Hansen was not a fit and proper person to remain on the roll of Australian lawyers and ordered his name be removed.

>>19374396 Brian Houston not guilty of covering up pedo father’s abuse - Hillsong founder Brian Houston has called his late father a “serial pedophile” after being found not guilty of covering up the church leader’s abuse of a young boy in Sydney in the 1970s. Mr Houston, 69, stood trial in Sydney’s Downing Centre Local Court having pleaded not guilty to one count of concealing the serious indictable offence of another person and denied allegations that he failed to pass onto police details of his father’s Frank Houston’s crimes. Following a long-running hearing, Magistrate Gareth Christofi on Thursday found Mr Houston not guilty. Outside of court, Mr Houston said he wanted to “impress his sadness” to his father’s victim, Brett Sengstock, and all the victims of the late New Zealand and Australian church leader.

>>19374447 Video: Hillsong founder Brian Houston found not guilty of concealing his father's sexual abuse of a child - Hillsong founder Brian Houston has been found not guilty of concealing his father's sexual abuse of a child. The 69-year-old has previously told a Sydney court he was left "speechless" in 1999 when he first learned of Frank Houston's abuse of a seven-year-old boy decades earlier. But Brian Houston insisted he did not go to the police because he was respecting the wishes of the victim, Brett Sengstock, who by that time was aged in his 30s. He pleaded not guilty to concealing a serious indictable offence. Magistrate Gareth Christofi on Thursday found Brian Houston not guilty, after concluding he had a "reasonable excuse" for not reporting the matter. In his judgement, Magistrate Christofi found Mr Houston knew or reasonably believed that Mr Sengstock did not want the matter reported to police.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487451

#31 - Part 63

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 6

>>19374474 Catholic church uses death of paedophile priest in bid to stop survivor suing NSW diocese, court hears - The Catholic church is seeking to use using the death of a “prolific paedophile” priest to permanently prevent a dying Indigenous man from seeking justice for alleged abuse suffered on camping trips in rural New South Wales. Two survivors are suing the church’s Armidale diocese for the alleged abuse by notorious priest David Joseph Perrett during camping trips from an Aboriginal mission in the mid-1970s. Perrett died in 2020 while awaiting criminal trial for more than 100 offences relating to the abuse of almost 40 young children - including the two plaintiffs now suing the church - in areas spanning Armidale, Walcha, Guyra and the broader New England region from the 1960s to the mid-1990s. The church is now using Perrett’s death in a bid to shut down civil cases brought by the same survivors against the Armidale diocese. The church argues it cannot get a fair trial against the two survivors’ civil claims because Perrett and other deceased church officials cannot give evidence about whether the abuse occurred, whether there was negligence by the church or whether the camping trips were conducted as part of Perrett’s role with the church, potentially making it vicariously liable for his actions. The church is making the argument despite allegations it did nothing to investigate Perrett’s actions for decades after it learned he had been convicted and sentenced in 1996 for abusing children in north-west NSW.

>>19392401 Melbourne Buddhist monk Naotunne Vijitha Nayaka Thero faces court on child sex abuse charges - A senior Buddhist monk has faced a Melbourne court, charged with child sex offences dating back to the 1990s and early 2000s. The Venerable Naotunne Vijitha Nayaka Thero, who is the abbot of the Dhamma Sarana temple in Melbourne's south-east, is facing 13 charges including sexual penetration of a child under 16 and indecent act with a child under 16. Police charged Mr Vijitha earlier this week, saying three complainants had come forward. The incidents allegedly took place between 1996 and 2004, and police allege Mr Vijitha came into contact with the complainants through his role at the Keysborough temple.

>>19392419 AFP arrest man for allegedly creating child exploitation game in Victoria - A 31-year-old man has been charged over allegedly creating and operating an online child exploitation game used by Australian and international paid subscribers. The Geelong man was arrested after his home was raided by police on August 2. Police will allege the 31-year-old man was the creator and operator of the game, which was allegedly accessed by a number of people across Australia and internationally. Police allege those users had paid subscriptions to the game and their identities are currently being investigated. The joint investigation was launched in May after information about an online child exploitation game was uncovered by the Australian Border Force and provided to police. The platform is allegedly entirely comprised of animated child exploitation images, which is an offence in Australia.

>>19404497 How Taskforce Argos and the AFP tracked down the Gold Coast man accused of 1,623 child abuse offences - Earlier this month, the AFP, Queensland police and New South Wales police revealed they had charged a 45-year-old Gold Coast man with 1,623 child abuse offences. After the accused man's arrest in 2022, the AFP launched Operation Tenterfield, and reviewed almost 4,000 images and videos of abuse material allegedly found in his home under a search warrant. The operation is linked back to the work of Queensland Police Services's specialist child sexual abuse team, Taskforce Argos, which rescued children and brought down a dark web forum called The Love Zone. The anonymous TOR network first came to the attention of Taskforce Argos about a decade ago, after the arrest of a Queensland man who had VIP status on the dark web forum - as they followed leads from a Canadian operation called Project Spade. The abuse material was shared with the International Child Sexual Exploitation database, a global database where specialist victim identification teams work to identify and rescue children. The Argos team would eventually identify the forum's administrator as Families South Australia paedophile Shannon McCoole and after his arrest in 2014, Argos assumed his role in the forum. The former childcare worker currently facing 1,600 charges allegedly shared abuse material on the dark web. Agencies examined the images, but they contained few distinguishable clues for investigators to follow, the AFP said. But in August 2022 the AFP traced bedsheets in the abuse material back to a Brisbane childcare centre, leading to the accused man's arrest.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487453

#31 - Part 64

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 7

>>19417287 NSW court rules Catholic church can’t get a fair trial in civil case over paedophile priest - The Catholic church has successfully used the death of a known paedophile priest to permanently halt a civil claim by two Indigenous survivors, one of whom is dying of cancer. The New South Wales supreme court ruled on Wednesday that the church could no longer receive a fair trial due to the death of assistant priest David Joseph Perrett, which, along with the deaths of other key witnesses, caused the church serious prejudice in attempting to mount a defence. The church won the case despite allegations it had more than three decades to investigate Perrett’s past, but did nothing. The church had been aware since 1995 Perrett abused children, after he pleaded guilty to offences against three boys in north-west NSW. Perrett later confessed to a senior church official that he was a paedophile; by the time of his death in 2020, Perrett was awaiting criminal trial on more than 100 charges relating to almost 40 young children in areas spanning Armidale, Walcha, Guyra and the broader New England region from the 1960s to the mid-1990s.

>>19417697 Malka Leifer jailed for 15 years over sexual abuse of students at ultra-Orthodox Jewish school - Former school principal Malka Leifer has been jailed for 15 years over the sexual abuse of two former students. The 56-year-old must serve at least 11-and-a-half years before she is eligible for parole. The court will consider her already having served 2069 days of that sentence, due to pre-sentence detention in Australia and Israel. Leifer was convicted in April of 18 offences against sisters Elly Sapper and Dassi Erlich between 2003 and 2007. The abuse occurred when the pair were pupils of Adass Israel School in Elsternwick, part of a small enclave of ultra-conservative Jewish families in Melbourne’s inner south-east. Outside court, Ms Sapper said the sentence was a “momentous day”. “We feel overwhelmed and grateful that the legal system has recognised and validated the extreme impact of abuse by female perpetrators. Malka Leifer has finally been held accountable. “Today’s ruling of 15 years recognises the harm and pain that Malka Leifer caused each one of us to suffer over so many years. Trauma from sexual abuse is a lifelong sentence. “While no amount of years will ever be sufficient, we are so relieved that Malka Leifer is now in prison … and cannot prey on anyone else.”

>>19417751 Video: A tear stains Leifer’s cheek as she is sentenced to 15 years for child sex abuse - A decades-long fight to bring justice to the victims of Malka Leifer has ended with the former principal of an ultra-Orthodox Jewish school in Melbourne sentenced to 15 years in prison for sexually abusing and raping two former students in her care. Leifer, 56, will be eligible for parole in June 2029 after County Court Judge Mark Gamble imposed a non-parole period of 11½ years. Leifer has already served more than 2000 days in pre-sentence detention in Australia and Israel. Gamble said on Thursday that Leifer was a predator who should feel guilty for sexually abusing the innocent sisters and that she used her position of influence over them to pursue her own sexual gratification. Leifer watched the sentencing via video link from Dame Phyllis Frost Centre. A tear stained Leifer’s right cheek as Gamble reached the end of his sentencing remarks. It was the first time she showed any strong emotion throughout the trial. Outside court sisters Elly Sapper, Dassi Erlich and Nicole Meyer spoke about the “momentous day”, elated that the legal system had finally recognised the abuse Sapper and Erlich had suffered. “This fight was never just for us,” Erlich said. “Today really marks the end of this chapter of our lives and opens the chapter to us healing to any other survivors in this nightmare. You are never alone. We are all behind you.”

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487600

File: 3197e40022693e4⋯.jpg (153.01 KB,1280x853,1280:853,OZ_Damper.jpg)

NEW OZ BREAD

Q Research AUSTRALIA #32: YOU ARE NOT ALONE IN THIS FIGHT Edition

>>19487470

>>19487470

>>19487470

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

30a79f No.19487602

File: 9f9b4417d1078b5⋯.jpg (3.16 MB,2800x2000,7:5,Chairman_of_the_Joint_Chie….jpg)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Random][Post a Reply]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ]