/qresearch/ -  Q Research

>>23978063 other bread

75 years if it’s the Covid records. Slash mRNA

Nb main thread locked..

Somtin I said?

23967485

Canada #86

British Police Will NOT Investigate Former Prince Andrew’s Alleged Use of Taxpayer-Funded Security Officer To Dig Dirt on His Accuser, Late Epstein Victim Virginia Giuffre

by Paul Serran Dec. 14, 2025

Randy Andy is still protected from prosecution.

Now that Former Prince Andrew lost all his royal titles and honors, you could be excused for believing that he was finally about to face real law enforcement consequences for his decades of alleged crimes.

But you’d be wrong.

The British establishment is still fiercely protective of Mr. Andrew Mountbatten Windsor.

Today (13), it arises that the Metropolitan Police of London will not launch an investigation into the reports saying Andrew asked a taxpayer-funded officer to help dig up dirt on the woman who accused him of sexual assault.

Sky News reported:

“The Mail on Sunday claimed in October that Andrew tried to get his personal protection officer to investigate Virginia Giuffre for a smear campaign in 2011.

He reportedly passed Ms. Giuffre’s date of birth and social security number to his taxpayer-funded bodyguard in 2011 and emailed the late Queen’s then-deputy press secretary telling him of his request.”

The two-tier policing in the UK has never been exposed so out in the open.

“The Met said the force first received allegations, including one of trafficking to central London in 2001, and Ms. Giuffre was interviewed as part of an assessment of the evidence.

But the force decided not to launch a full criminal investigation in 2016 after officers and prosecutors concluded other international authorities were best placed to act on the allegations, which primarily concerned events outside the UK.

That decision was reviewed in August 2019 and again in 2021 and 2022; in each instance, the position remained unchanged, and Ms. Giuffre and her legal representative were informed.”

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/12/british-police-will-not-investigate-former-prince-andrews/

NYK and MOL agree $72m payout in UK car carrier cartel case

Sam Chambers December 12, 2025

Two of Japan’s biggest shipping lines — Nippon Yusen Kaisha (NYK) and Mitsui OSK Lines (MOL) — have agreed to pay £54m ($72.25m) to settle the long-running UK collective action over the car carrier cartel, drawing a line under a saga that stretches back a quarter of a century.

The proposed settlement, announced in London on Thursday, will go before the UK’s Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) in mid-January. If approved, it takes total recoveries to £92.75m following earlier deals with Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (K Line), WWL/Eukor and CSAV.

The case, launched five years ago by consumer advocate Mark McLaren, targeted a price-fixing cartel that affected shipments of 17m new cars and vans imported into the UK between 2006 and 2015 for brands including Ford, Toyota, BMW, Renault, Mercedes-Benz, Nissan and Volkswagen. The action followed EU findings that the car-carrier majors had colluded for years on prices, capacity and customer allocation — behaviour stretching back into the late 1990s.

The settlement follows a nine-week trial against NYK and MOL earlier this year. McLaren said the outcome proves the value of the UK’s still-new opt-out regime in enabling consumers and businesses to recover losses they could not realistically pursue alone.

The vessel operators involved have faced regulatory scrutiny worldwide for more than a decade, but the UK class action has now brought the final commercial reckoning. If approved by the CAT on January 16, distribution of damages to millions of UK vehicle buyers and lessees will begin later in 2026 — closing the book on one of the shipping industry’s longest-running competition scandals.

https://splash247.com/nyk-and-mol-agree-72m-payout-in-uk-car-carrier-cartel-case/

Bananas Ahoy as Overboard Containers Wash Ashore

Published Dec 11, 2025 6:36 PM by The Maritime Executive

Five days after eight containers carrying bananas were washed overboard from the reefer ship Baltic Klipper in Southampton Water, bananas in the thousands are still washed up onto the beaches of the West Sussex coast in southern England. A total of 16 containers were lost overboard, with others transporting plantains and avocados.

It has turned into a bit of a bonus day for residents who have been finding the jetsam within the wreckage of the containers. With heavy seas and high winds, the containers were driven onto shore, and many were broken apart. As of Tuesday, 11 of the 16 containers had beached. HM Coastguard reports that a helicopter and an aircraft have been carrying out searches for the missing containers.

Police, customs authorities, and the Receiver of Wrecks have warned beachcombers not to eat the bananas or to take them home. But local people have interpreted prevailing Wrecks and Salvage law in a more free market fashion, and have helped themselves to the bananas, rather than see them going to waste.

Even after five days at sea, what were green and unripe bananas when washed overboard have now ripened despite the cold conditions. True to the spirit of journalistic inquiry, your correspondent can attest that seawater has not degraded the taste of the bananas, with the only threats to health posed by skin slippage and by eating too many of them.

Due to the stormy and windy weather in the Selsey area, bananas have been swept off the beach into coastal roads, making for slippery driving conditions in some areas.

Shipping in the port of Southampton, which was delayed on Saturday, December 6, has now resumed. The port was operating, however, with a single lane for shipping as the authorities worked to locate the containers. The P&O Cruises ship Iona held overnight at her berth in Southampton, has now reached Tenerife, the first stop on its somewhat curtailed cruise.

The Baltic Klipper was shifted into Portsmouth on Monday night. Pictures show additional toppled containers still aboard the ship.

Members of the British government have been calling for strong efforts to ensure the shipping company and its insurers will pay the costs of the cleanup. Seatrade, which operates the vessel, said its insurers are fully engaged in the process, and in the meantime, volunteers are scouring the beaches, aiding in the cleanup (and possibly taking a few bananas home as a reward).

https://maritime-executive.com/article/bananas-ahoy-as-overboard-containers-wash-ashore

Canada #86

British Teachers To "Spot Misogyny" In Boys And Target Them For Reeducation

by Tyler Durden Friday, Dec 19, 2025

For years UK officials turned a blind eye to rape gangs because it might look racist to crack down on foreigners. Now, suddenly, the real problem is young boys who are 'radicalized' into becoming misogynists. The only solution is of course Orwellian; and includes an agenda to reeducate British boys showing "signs of misogyny" (anti-wokeness).

According to the BBC, teachers will be given training to spot and "tackle" misogyny in the classroom, while high-risk pupils could be sent on behavior courses as part of the government's strategy to halve violence against women and girls (VAWG).

The goal is to 'prevent the radicalization of young men' by addressing misogyny early in order to prevent escalation into violence. Safeguarding minister Jess Phillips called violence against women and girls a "national emergency," adding that the government's goal is to be "so ambitious that we change culture."

"What definitely does not exist yet, [is] if teachers are seeing signs of sexually harmful behaviour or are worried about the attitude of pupils with regard to misogyny… teachers currently don't have anywhere specialist or targeted to send those pupils," Phillips told BBC Radio 4.

Under a new £20 million program over three years;

Teachers will receive special training to 'spot and challenge misogyny,' teach consent, address the dangers of sharing nude pics, identify positive role models, and challenge 'harmful myths' about women and relationships.

Schools will refer high-risk students to 'behavioral courses' to address prejudice against women and girls.

The new measures will be incorporated into the Department for Education's statutory guidance on relationships, sex and health education, and specifies that pupils "should be equipped to recognise misogyny" along with its links to violence against women and girls.

The program arrives at the height of left-wing hysteria in the UK over popular opposition to mass third-world immigration and online censorship. The focus is largely on white native born British men, who have apparently been designated public enemy number one despite numerous mass murder events and sexual assaults perpetrated across Europe by third-world migrants, or the children of third world migrants.

Though there are already general classes in schools which include all students, the new program is designed to train teachers to single out "problem boys" for special attention. It is highly unlikely that progressive teachers will single out minority students.

The BBC cites data from a charity called "Reducing the Risk", claiming that nearly 40% of teenagers in relationships are victims of abuse. The charity's website does not give direct sources for this number, but it is likely taken from the December 2025 Youth Endowment Fund (YEF) report.

The report's conclusions are misleading, however, as the 40% stat is largely tied to perceived psychological abuse, including such terrible crimes as "looking at a partner's phone without their permission" and "saying something critical about their appearance." Upon deeper investigation, the report notes that only 4% of teens in Britain suffer from actual physical or sexual abuse in relationships, and the criteria for this is also broad.

Reeducation projects launched along with the release of a Netflix series called "Adolescence" about a young white British boy who murders a female classmate. The crime is largely blamed on the rise of online misogyny and "manosphere" influencers like Andrew Tate. Keep in mind, only one murder suspect in the UK has ever been identified as consuming masculinity content before a murder occurred, and it did not inspire the actual crime.

The majority of government and NGO funded public information ads depicting mistreatment of women feature white men, not minorities.

It is clear that the British government intends to ignore third world ideologies such as Islam which are openly hostile to women Instead, they hope to place the blame of misogyny on masculinity in general as a means to purge boys of any conservative ideals and thus, keep them under control.

So now, like racism, children in the UK will be programmed to believe they're guilty of another 'original sin,' while rape gangs from foreign lands continue to abuse young British girls - something the government conspired to cover up. On the bright side, Piers Morgan enjoys their cuisine.

More:

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/uk-tackle-national-emergency-over-misogyny-behavioral-courses-children

Brazil Gets HMS Bulwark for a Bargain Price

HMS Bulwark has been sold to Brazil while reports indicate her withdrawn sister may follow

Published Dec 19, 2025 4:24 PM by The Maritime Executive

The Royal Navy has sold the Albion Class amphibious assault ship HMS Bulwark (L15) to the Brazilian Navy for a reported $26 million, as it was completing a nearly $100 million midlife upgrade project. News of the sale made the British tabloids this week, which questioned the expenditure to refurbish the ships if they were being sold, while also highlighting the loss of the two amphibious assault ships in the Royal Navy.

Rumors of the pending sale had begun in the spring as the government wrestled with its budget for the Royal Navy and military expenditures. By September, Brazil was reporting that it had signed the purchase of HMS Bulwark, and it was reported to be negotiating for a sister ship, HMS Albion. Negotiations to sell the second Albion Class ship to Brazil have apparently stalled, but HMS Albion (L14) has already been withdrawn from service by the Royal Navy.

The media reports indicate that the Royal Navy has spent a total of $275 million on upgrades to the two Albion Class ships since 2010.

HMS Bulwark was launched in 2004 and was capable of landing a fully-equipped Royal Marines commando unit with main battle tanks, using eight landing craft launched from its internal dock and Chinook helicopters. The vessel is 176 meters (577 feet) long, displaces 18,500 tons, and has a capacity for up to 710 military personnel.

Once Bulwark’s refurbishment is completed in Plymouth, the Marinha do Brasil will rename her as NDM Oiapoque. Brazilian personnel were already traveling to the UK for training on the vessel and Marina do Brasil reported the crew would participate in simulations and joint exercises, focusing on the full operational capability of the vessel. HMS Bulwark is expected to be commissioned and transferred to Brazil next year, when it will become part of the Brazilian Navy. She will be used primarily in operations in the Blue Amazon region, where the versatility of the ship will be useful for a wide variety of both military and humanitarian aid operations supporting the civil community.

British Ministry of Defence planners indicated that the role performed by the two Albion Class ships would be carried out instead by Bay Class landing ships of the Royal Fleet Auxiliary. These are smaller vessels manned by civilians and built to civilian standards. All three Royal Fleet Auxiliary Bay Class ships, namely RFA Lyme Bay (L3007), RFA Mounts Bay (L3008), and RFA Cardigan Bay (L3009), are currently inactive for manpower or budgetary reasons.

https://maritime-executive.com/article/brazil-gets-hms-bulwark-for-a-bargain-price

Canada #86

Trump Suspends $40BN Tech Deal With UK Over Free Speech Crackdown

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news Saturday, Dec 20, 2025

The Trump administration has delivered a major blow to UK-US relations by suspending a massive $40 billion Tech Prosperity Deal, citing Britain’s aggressive censorship regime as a direct threat to American tech giants and their ability to operate freely.

This move underscores Trump’s zero-tolerance stance on foreign policies that undermine US interests, especially when they involve stifling free speech and handing advantages to global competitors like China.

The White House paused the tech prosperity deal amid concerns the UK government’s draconian Online Safety Act, which regulates online speech, will stifle American artificial intelligence companies, the Telegraph reports.

The law allows the British government to levy large fines on tech giants it deems have facilitated ‘hate speech’.

After the rise of artificial intelligence, companies like OpenAI or xAI can face huge fines – harming their growth and giving China an edge in the AI race.

On Tuesday, it was revealed that the £31bn agreement has been suspended as the White House seeks to improve terms on a wider UK-US trade deal agreed in May.

On Dec 3, Liz Kendall, the Technology Secretary, said the government planned to impose new restrictions on chatbots to ensure AI companies do not benefit from loopholes in the law.

“The perception is that Britain is way out there on attempting to police what is said online, and it’s caused real concern”, a source with knowledge of the decision to suspend the deal stated.

“Americans went into this deal thinking Britain were going to back off regulating American tech firms but realised it was going to restrict the speech of American chatbots,” the source added.

The deal, announced in September during Trump’s state visit to the UK, included pledges of £22bn from Microsoft and £5bn from Google to create an AI growth zone in north-east England, potentially generating £30bn in economic value and 5,000 jobs.

Leftist UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer hailed it as “a generational stepchange in our relationship with the US,” while Trump described it as a path to “dominate” in AI and lead the technological revolution “side by side.”

Beyond censorship, Washington has raised issues with the UK’s digital services tax on US tech firms and food safety rules blocking certain agricultural exports, framing the pause as part of hard-nosed negotiations to eliminate trade barriers.

A British government source downplayed the suspension as “the usual bit of hardball negotiations by the Americans,” adding that US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick “is a tough guy. We understand that the Americans negotiate incredibly hard but we’ll stand our ground. They want what’s best for their country, we want what’s best for ours.”

Another source labeled it “part of the shape of the negotiations” with Washington.

This latest escalation highlights the ongoing free speech crisis in the UK, where authorities have ramped up arrests for online expression. As we reported earlier, the latest insane case has seen a man jailed for 18 months over two anti-immigration tweets viewed just 33 times combined—a stark example of the regime’s overreach.

The broader pattern is alarming: nearly 10,000 arrests in 2024 alone for “grossly offensive” social media posts, equating to 30 per day, while violent crimes like knife attacks and burglaries are sidelined.

More:

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/trump-suspends-40bn-tech-deal-uk-over-free-speech-crackdown

General Research #29259

Labour's 'stop the boats' promise in tatters as more than 41,000 migrants have arrived in Britain on small boats in 2025

By Matt Strudwick 21 December 2025

The number of migrants arriving in Britain on small boats this year has surpassed 41,000, casting further doubt on Labour's promise to 'smash the gangs'.

The latest Home Office figures showed some 803 people made the dangerous journey across the English Channel in 13 dinghies from northern France, starting overnight on Friday and into Saturday.

The total number of Channel crossings for 2025 now stands at 41,455 people. The annual record stands at 45,755, recorded at the end of 2022.

Saturday's crossings are the largest number of people to have made the journey since October 8, when 1,075 crossed in a day.

It also appeared to be a record number of crossings for a day in December in seven years, when compared with data stretching back to 2018.

It is not, however, the largest total across the month of December compared with previous years.

December is traditionally one of the quietest months for Channel crossings, with a combination of low temperatures, poor visibility, less daylight and stormy weather making the journey particularly difficult.

The most arrivals recorded in the month of December is 3,254, in 2024. Some 2,163 people have arrived across the month so far this year.

On Saturday morning, a Border Force vessel could be seen bringing people thought to be migrants into Dover after an incident in the Channel.

This followed a busy night, in which a large number of boats were witnessed leaving the shores of France.

A video emerged yesterday of French police throwing tear gas at migrants as they tried to launch a small boat in the town of Grand-Fort-Philippe, near Calais.

Fisherman Matthew Coker said earlier this month it was 'farcical' to claim Labour was getting on top of the problem. The lull in crossings in November, he said, was simply due to a prolonged period of strong winds and waves in the Channel this month.

'I've only had three [fishing] trips in the last 28 days – and they were quite rough,' he said.

'There has been no weather at all where a migrant boat would have managed to cross in the last 28 days. When the weather has allowed, there's been massive numbers [of migrants crossing].

'It's just as well we didn't have a fine end of the year, like we did last year, otherwise they would have been in real trouble with their numbers.'

The Government, meanwhile, continues efforts to grasp the so-called 'upstream' causes of the migration crisis, including through work with neighbouring countries.

Just this week, Germany passed a new law which could see people smugglers face up to 10 years in prison for trying to bring migrants to the UK.

The law change, which will come into force before the end of the year, aims to give more powers to law enforcement and prosecutors, and boost information sharing between the UK and Germany.

Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper said: 'This major change in German law is the result of our close partnership working to tackle illegal migration and organised immigration crime.

'We will continue to ramp up our international co-operation to strengthen our own border security.'

France has meanwhile recently indicated it plans to halt small boats at sea before they pick people up heading for the UK.

A Home Office spokesman said: 'The number of small boat crossings are shameful and the British people deserve better.

'This Government is taking action. We have removed almost 50,000 people who were here illegally, and our historic deal with the French means those who arrive on small boats are now being sent back.

'The Home Secretary has announced the most sweeping reforms to tackle illegal migration in decades, removing the incentives that bring illegal migrants to the UK and scaling up the return of those with no right to be here.'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15403581/small-boat-crossing-figure-labour-promise.html

"We have removed almost 50,000 people who were here illegally" From where?, sent where? (other than Scotland)

Canada #86

Irony Alert: Google Suddenly Champions Free Speech As UK Crushes Online Expression

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news Monday, Dec 22, 2025

In a stunning reversal, Google has slammed the UK for threatening to stifle free speech through its aggressive online regulations. This from the company infamous for its own censorship crusades against conservative voices and inconvenient truths. If even Google is raising the alarm, you know the situation in Britain has hit rock bottom.

The move signals a broader culture shift in Big Tech, where woke agendas are crumbling under pressure from free speech advocates. It’s no coincidence this comes after Elon Musk turned Twitter into X, a platform where ideas flow without the heavy hand of ideological gatekeepers.

Google, which has demonetized, shadow-banned, and outright censored content that doesn’t align with leftist narratives, now positions itself as a defender of open discourse, accusing Britain of threatening to stifle free speech in an escalation of US opposition to online safety rules.

The Telegraph notes that Google has specifically accused Britain of a crackdown on the free flow of information through its ‘Online Safety Act’ and related regulations.

Key points from Google’s stance include concerns over the Act’s broad scope, which they argue could suppress open discourse by forcing platforms to over-censor content to avoid massive fines (up to 10% of global revenue).

Google has also previously criticized the funding mechanism for the crackdown, stating in a response to Ofcom: “The use of the worldwide revenue approach … risks stifling UK growth, and consequently affecting the quality and variety of services offered to UK users, by potentially driving services with low UK revenue out of the UK, or stopping companies from launching services in the UK.”

This ties into broader fears that the rules prioritize “safety” at the expense of fundamental rights, potentially leading to tech exodus or reduced innovation.

No additional direct quotes from Google appear in the public snippets, but the article frames their opposition as part of mounting transatlantic tensions, with Google contacted for comment on the matter. If you have access to the full piece, there might be more nuance.

Remember when Google scrubbed its calendar of DEI dates like Pride and Black History Month? That was a clear sign the winds were changing. As we covered earlier, it’s evidence of a culture shift away from forced diversity mandates.

But Google’s pivot isn’t happening in a vacuum. Credit goes to Elon Musk, who bought Twitter and rebranded it as X, transforming it into a bastion for free speech. Under Musk, X has resisted government overreach, allowing voices from all sides to thrive without fear of arbitrary takedowns. This has forced competitors like Google to rethink their own stifling policies, lest they lose users to platforms that actually value liberty.

The UK’s descent into speech suppression has been rapid and alarming.

In the latest crazy case, a UK man was jailed for 18 months over two tweets that were viewed just 33 times—insanity that highlights how far the state has gone in punishing thought crimes.

These cases build on a pattern of overreach, where British authorities prioritize “safety” over fundamental rights, echoing globalist efforts to control narratives on immigration, politics, and more.

President Trump’s allies have repeatedly criticised Britain’s pioneering legislative attempt to curb abuse and other harms online. Vice President JD Vance has warned the UK was following a “dark path” on free expression while Elon Musk’s X has urged that “free speech will suffer” under the rules.

Trump himself this week suspended a $40 billion tech deal with the UK over its free speech crackdown, a move that underscores America’s commitment to First Amendment principles, and a clear sign that Trump will not stay silent on Britain’s freedom crushing policies.

The President has also offered asylum to British citizens being treated as “thought criminals” in their own country.

If Google is now exposing this evisceration of free speech, it must be dire. This isn’t just a policy disagreement; it’s a wake-up call that the tide is turning against censorship regimes worldwide.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/irony-alert-google-suddenly-champions-free-speech-uk-crushes-online-expression

https://rumble.com/v73d6v4-bosi-briefs-unpacking-the-plan-trumps-executive-orders-gitmo-tribunals.html The Plan

https://rumble.com/v73cbwa-australias-constitutional-crisis-and-the-global-shift-from-cabal-to-white-h.html Bondi, Oz Gov Gen could be Starmer's sister. >must be someting similar in English Constitution, which birthed US & OZ

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2025-National-Security-Strategy.pdf

https://www.cia.gov/library/abbottabad-compound/4A/4A92FD2FB4DAE3F773DB0B7742CF0F65_Coleman.-.CONSPIRATORS.HIERARCHY.-.THE.STORY.OF.THE.COMMITTEE.OF.300.R.pdf

Canada #86

Greta Thunberg Arrested Under The UK's Terrorism Act

by Tyler Durden Wednesday, Dec 24, 2025

Climate activist Greta Thunberg has once again found herself in police custody after joining a demonstration outside the London offices of Aspen Insurance.

This British firm is a subsidiary of Elbit Systems, an Israeli defense contractor.

Authorities arrested Thunberg under the UK Terrorism Act for displaying a sign in support of Palestine Action, a group the British government has classified as a terrorist organization.

The arrest marks the latest chapter in Thunberg's evolution from teenage climate crusader to an adult pro-Palestinian advocate.

According to the BBC, Thunberg, “was detained in the City of London after attending the scene of the early-morning demonstration on Fenchurch Street.”

In a video shared by the group, she could be seen holding a sign reading "I support the Palestine Action prisoners" and "I oppose genocide".

City of London Police said a 22-year-old woman was arrested for displaying a placard in support of a proscribed organisation, in this case Palestine Action, contrary to Section 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000.

The force said officers were called to the area at about 07:00 GMT after hammers and red paint were used to damage a building.

A man and a woman were also arrested on suspicion of criminal damage after they "glued themselves nearby", police said. Specialist officers worked to release them before taking them into custody.

Video footage circulating online captured the moment officers confronted Thunberg as she sat cross-legged on the sidewalk holding the offending sign. Thunberg refused to stand when instructed, and the officer then confiscated the sign.

Thunburg has consistently labeled Israel an "apartheid state" and characterized its war against Hamas as "genocide," rhetoric that has placed her squarely within the more radical wing of the pro-Palestinian protest movement.

The UK government placed Palestine Action on its list of banned terrorist organizations in July.

The classification followed an incident at RAF Brize Norton, where activists reportedly damaged two military aircraft during an anti-Israel protest.

Home Secretary Yvette Cooper defended the move before Parliament, citing the group's pattern of targeting defense industry sites and allegations of threatening behavior.

Official data reveals that of 1,886 terrorism-related arrests in the UK in the year ending September 2025, a staggering 1,630 were linked to support for the Palestinian Action, representing an 86% share of all terrorism arrests during that period. This was a huge shift from previous years when such arrests typically involved other forms of extremism.

The figures show a 660% surge in total terrorism arrests compared to last year, almost entirely driven by Palestine Action-related cases.

Most arrests occurred in the three months following the July ban, with 1,706 arrests recorded between July and September alone. However, only 17% of these arrests resulted in charges, a sharp decline from the 47% charge rate for terrorism-related arrests in 2024.

Thunberg's involvement in the Palestinian cause stretches back several months and includes previous confrontations with Israeli authorities. She has been detained and deported by Israel twice after attempting to enter Gaza as part of her pro-Palestinian activities.

The night before her arrest at Aspen Insurance, Thunberg joined demonstrators who blocked Piccadilly Circus during a separate protest, according to video shared on social media.

Because Palestine Action has been designated a terrorist organization under the Terrorism Act 2000, any form of support for the organization is a criminal offense that could carry prison sentences of up to 14 years. That includes membership in the group or public expressions of support.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/greta-thunberg-arrested-under-uks-terrorism-act

Canada #86

King Charles Goes Full Woke: Parrots ‘Diversity Is Our Strength’ in Christmas Speech While UK Suffers from Migrant Mayhem

by Cassandra MacDonald Dec. 27, 2025

King Charles III used his annual Christmas broadcast to push the tired liberal trope that “diversity” is somehow Britain’s strength, even as the UK grapples with skyrocketing crime, cultural clashes, and anti-mass migration riots.

During the speech from Buckingham Palace on December 25, the King Charles stated, “In this, with the great diversity of our communities, we can find the strength to ensure that right triumphs over wrong.”

The King tied it to values like compassion and reconciliation, praising how people of different faiths share a “longing for peace,” a nice sentiment, perhaps, but one that ignores reality.

“As I meet people of different faiths, I find it enormously encouraging to hear how much we have in common; a shared longing for peace and a deep respect for all life. If we can find time in our journey through life to think on these virtues we can all make the future more hopeful,” Charles said.

Charles invoked the Christmas story of journeys and hope, noting the Holy Family’s homelessness and the Wise Men’s pilgrimage. He even quoted poet T.S. Eliot on finding a “still point” amid chaos.

However, critics are slamming the address as out-of-touch, especially after a year of violent unrest in cities like Leeds and Manchester, where tensions over unchecked immigration boiled over into violent clashes with police.

People were quick to slam the comment on social media, with several posting the alarming diversity arrest rates in Britain.

An X account called “Wall Street Mav” wrote, “Of course, he never has to live with the diversity behind his security and walls. He lives in a bubble. He does not represent Britain and refuses to defend the English.”

Another user with the handle “The British Patriot” wrote, “This man has betrayed the Christian faith, turned his back on the crown, and actively goes against the interests of the British people.”

They added, “The monarchy died with our late queen Elizabeth II.”

The UK is dealing with record migrant crossings, grooming gang scandals, and economic strain from housing thousands of asylum seekers.

Diversity is whose strength, exactly?

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/12/king-charles-goes-full-woke-parrots-diversity-is/

Canada #86

British Teacher Branded A Terrorist Threat For Showing Trump Videos In US Politics Class

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news Sunday, Dec 28, 2025

In a chilling display of ideological censorship, a veteran teacher in Britain has been referred to the government’s Prevent counter-terrorism program simply for showing videos of President Trump to his A-level students during a lesson on U.S. politics.

The incident unfolded at Henley College in Oxfordshire, where the teacher—a qualified educator since the mid-1990s and —introduced clips from Trump’s inauguration and campaign to illustrate the recent U.S. election.

Just days after Trump’s victory, two students complained, claiming the material was “biased” and left them “emotionally disturbed,” with one even alleging nightmares. The college swiftly escalated the matter to the Local Authority Designated Officer (LADO), who prioritized a Prevent referral, warning that the teacher’s views “could be perceived as radical,” potentially amounting to a hate crime or radicalisation.

The teacher, speaking out against this farce, described the ordeal as “completely jarring. It’s dystopian, like something from a George Orwell novel.”

He added, “It was just terrifying; just mind-boggling. We were discussing the US election, Trump had just won and I showed a couple of videos from the Trump campaign. Next thing, I was accused of bias. One of the students said they were emotionally disturbed and claimed to have had nightmares.”

Firmly rejecting the extremist label, the teacher, a self described “mainstream Republican,” stated “I am not an extremist,” and accused the college of “complete Left-wing bias,” noting, “They don’t tolerate anything about Donald Trump.”

The college’s official communication hammered the point, alleging the teacher had “shown your students videos of Donald Trump, his campaign, propaganda and other videos which are unrelated to what is being taught.”

Meanwhile, the LADO’s report escalated the hysteria: “There is concern that this behaviour could cause harm to a child, there could be a criminal offence from the views which could constitute a hate crime and it’s possible that his promoting of views could be radicalisation.”

In the end, the teacher settled for a modest £2,000 payoff and resigned from his role, effectively driven out for daring to present balanced political discourse.

This case exposes a grotesque reality in British education. How is it that showing footage of the duly elected U.S. President in a class explicitly about American politics gets you flagged as a potential terrorist?

There is also a horrible double standard where schools freely indoctrinate kids with outright fabrications, such as pushing “non-fiction” books claiming Black people built Stonehenge, and were integral in other historical developments, part of a “decolonizing” push that insists Britain was “a black country for more than 7,000 years before white people came.”

The hypocrisy deepens with radical gender ideology flooding classrooms. Trans lobbyists from Stonewall are demanding over 300 schools scrap terms like “boys and girls,” opting for neutral language, gender-neutral bathrooms, and identical uniforms—all under the guise of “inclusion.” Schools paying into Stonewall’s scheme must embed LGBTQ+ propaganda across the curriculum, ignoring government guidance against promoting “gender identity ideology.”

This teacher-shaming fits into a broader, sinister trend: the UK government’s push to teach children how to “spot extremist content and misinformation” in schools, embedding “critical thinking” that suspiciously aligns with establishment narratives.

Under the Labour government, kids are being indoctrinated to analyse articles and websites and weed out “putrid conspiracy theories,” grooming the next generation to police thought.

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has warned: “If the parameters that are set are to say to every kid, if you read a post that questions net zero and global warming, it will be extreme content, and a lie, if you read a post that even dares to question levels of immigration, legal or illegal into Britain, that that’s extremist, then you start to set a narrative for a future generation that is fundamentally undemocratic.” He labeled Prime Minister Keir Starmer the “biggest threat to free speech” in British history.

The Free Speech Union charges that child safeguarding is being twisted to muzzle “unfashionable opinions,” especially those leaning right. In an era where globalist agendas prioritise control over truth, this episode serves as a stark warning. If discussing a world leader like Trump lands you in the crosshairs of counter-terror watchdogs, what’s next for parents, educators, or anyone challenging the narrative?

True freedom demands we dismantle this censorship machine before it silences us all—starting with reclaiming our schools for honest, unbiased education.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/british-teacher-branded-terrorist-threat-showing-trump-videos-us-politics-class

Canada #87

The EU imposes a €3 fee per package: more control, more revenue, and more bureaucracy at the consumer's expense

Rafa Gómez-Santos Martín 30 December 2025

The European Union has decided to impose a flat fee of 3 euros on small packages sent within the block, a measure that will come into force next year and will directly affect millions of consumers and small businesses. Under the pretext of strengthening tax collection and ensuring resources for Member States, Brussels is taking yet another step in its policy of growing control over trade and the daily lives of citizens.

According to European legislation, the measure aims to curb the boom in low-value online commerce, especially frequent purchases of inexpensive products. However, in practice, the fee punishes everyday consumption, makes basic goods more expensive, and reinforces the European bureaucratic apparatus, which needs to justify its constant expansion with new sources of revenue.

The fee will apply to shipments whose value does not exceed a threshold set by each country, affecting both domestic and imported products. Brussels insists that the goal is to ensure “tax fairness,” but the outcome is clear: every package will be registered, monitored, and taxed, expanding state oversight and the administrative burden on citizens and businesses.

The impact will be immediate on European households. Families accustomed to buying affordable products will have to absorb an additional cost for each shipment, forcing them to rethink their budgets in a context of inflation, high taxes, and declining purchasing power. This measure does not protect consumers: it penalizes them.

Small and medium-sized enterprises are also harmed. For many of them, e-commerce is a lifeline in the face of tax pressure and competition from large platforms. The new fee forces them to raise prices or absorb losses, while the EU leaves its costly institutional and administrative structure untouched.

From Brussels, officials claim the objective is not to hinder digital commerce, but to sustain public systems. However, the reality is that every new tax serves to feed an oversized bureaucracy, disconnected from the real needs of citizens and increasingly intrusive.

Economic analysts warn that the measure could slow the growth of online commerce and reduce economic activity. Even so, European lawmakers defend the initiative as a way to “maintain control” over the economy. In other words, to collect more and monitor more, even if that means less economic freedom.

Implementing the fee will require cooperation between customs authorities and logistics companies, with systems to register and track every shipment. This not only increases operational costs, but also normalizes permanent surveillance, turning every purchase into an act overseen by the state apparatus.

https://gatewayhispanic.com/2025/12/european-union-will-impose-e3-fee-small-packages/

Post Office Scandal: secret Fujitsu contract revealed. How many heads will roll? How many legal eagles read the contract and didn't reveal the content?

>>24061344

Previous Scotland Breads contain quite a bit on that:

Q Research Scotland #10: Humza In Hot Water Edition

Final Horizon Post Office Scandal Bun Part Two

>>21117854 Post Office Scandal - George Thomson (video)

>>21144495 Post Office Scandal: Cringe moment ex-boss tries to defend only working '1 & half days a week' (video)

>>21144513 Post Office Scandal: Ex-boss gives many reasons why he hasn't said sorry to subPostmasters (video)

>>21144536 Post Office Horizon Inquiry Jason Beer & Tim Parker PART ONE (video)

>>21144543 Post Office Horizon Inquiry Graham Ward & Jason Beer CRINGE (video)

>>21144556 Post Office Horizon Inquiry Tim Parker & Jason Beer PART 2 & 3 (video)

>>21167883 Post Office Horizon Inquiry Tim Parker & Jason Beer PART 4 (video)

>>21227672 Post Office Inquiry: Fujitsu analyst confronted with email branding subPostmaster a 'nasty chap' (video)

>>21227766, >>21227793 Post Office Horizon Inquiry Lisa Allen & Emma Price (Parts 1&2 video)

>>21227823 Post Office Scandal - Gareth Jenkins (video)

>>21238857 'A Complete Travesty!' Sir Ed Davey Grilled At Horizon Post Office Inquiry (video)

>>21238896 Post Office Inquiry: former Postal affairs minister challenged over failure to listen to victims (video)

>>21243476 Post Office Inquiry: Ed Davey: 'I Was Unaware Of Post Office Prosecutions Against Sub-Postmasters' (video)

>>21243538 Paula Vennells lied to me, says Sir Ed Davey during Post Office Inquiry (video)

>>21243582 Ed Davey confronted at Post Office Inquiry over refusal to meet with Alan Bates (video)

>>21243630 Post Office Inquiry: Jo Swinson says Paula Vennells led her to believe Postmasters were stealing (video)

>>21251595 Post Office Inquiry:Jo Swinson says Paula Vennells spoke with 'moral authority of an ordained vicar' (video)

>>21251849 "He NEVER Listened!" Ed Davey Apologises To Alan Bates For Refusal To Meet

>>21254661, >>21256321 Post Office Horizon Inquiry David McDonnell & Jason Beer (Parts 1&2, video)

>>21259647 Horizon Inquiry: Former minister says she was not warned about unsafe witness (video)

>>21259729 Post Office Scandal - can't remember, don't care (video)

>>21277961 'Give 'Em Tesco Flowers' Post Office IT Horizon Scandal. Baroness Neville-Rolfe - 23 July 2024 (video)

>>21278009 Ex-minister tells Post Office inquiry she was repeatedly 'misled' by officials (video)

>>21278111 Post Office Inquiry hear evidence from Baroness Neville-Rolfe (video)

>>21287426 Post Office Inquiry: former PPS Margot James gives evidence (video)

>>21293844 Post Office Inquiry: Sir Vince Cable accepts department's 'clear policy failure' in Horizon Scandal (video)

>>21293953 Post Office Scandal: Vince Cable admits "failure" (video)

>>21297457 Ex-Lib Dem leader grilled over knowledge of Horizon Scandal in Post Office inquiry (video)

>>21299432 Post Office IT Horizon Scandal. Gareth Jenkins - 25 June 2024

>>21330701 Post Office Horizon Inquiry Roderick Williams & Mr Beer Part 1 of 8 (video)

https://youtu.be/pVgxjOHwbJQ

1MINT AGO,Supreme Court Rules Against Keir Starmer’s Secret EU Deal, Raising Serious Brexit Concerns

UK crisis dog

461 subscribers

4,079 views Jan 1, 2026 UNITED KINGDOM

1MINT AGO,Supreme Court Rules Against Keir Starmer’s Secret EU Deal, Raising Serious Brexit Concerns

In a landmark ruling that has sent shockwaves through Westminster and Brussels, the Supreme Court has struck down a secret UK–EU agreement, declaring it unlawful and unconstitutional. The court found that the deal was negotiated behind closed doors, without parliamentary approval or public knowledge, and would have transferred significant regulatory, financial, and judicial powers back to the European Union. Judges ruled that the agreement breached core democratic principles, undermined parliamentary sovereignty, and attempted to bind future governments without consent. The decision has triggered a political firestorm, raised serious questions about government transparency and accountability, and reignited the national debate over Brexit, sovereignty, and the rule of law. This judgment marks a defining moment in Britain’s constitutional history, reaffirming that no government can bypass democracy when shaping the country’s future.

#SupremeCourt

#UKPolitics

#Brexit

#ParliamentarySovereignty

#RuleOfLaw

#Westminster

#EURelations

#PoliticalScandal

#Democracy

#ConstitutionalCrisis

#BritishPolitics

#Accountability

>>24062928

Please please please tell me you have other sauce to confirm that

>>24062187

Thx, fren. Hadn't realised Scots don't post on UK board. Will check in future.

>>24065298

It's all shiny anon

WWG1WGA

You might find some goodies in these:

Archived Scotland posts

https://8kun.top/qnotables/res/39180.html

Canada #87

UK Goes Full Cradle-To-Grave With 'Sinister' Plan For Newborn Baby Digital IDs

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news Sunday, Jan 04, 2026

The UK government’s digital ID push is escalating into outright dystopia, with ministers privately floating the idea of assigning digital identities to newborns right alongside their health records.

This “sinister” expansion, revealed by the Daily Mail, exposes Labour’s true agenda: a lifelong tracking system masquerading as a tool to curb illegal immigration.

The move is being slammed as a blatant power grab, with many warning it has nothing to do with border control and everything to do with eroding freedoms from birth.

?NEWBORN BABIES TO BE GIVEN DIGITAL I.D

Ministers in the Labour Government have now let slip their latest proposal

This must be stopped

Nobody wants this pic.twitter.com/dZfkwgZi4K

— Basil the Great (@BasilTheGreat) January 1, 2026

The proposal emerged in secretive Cabinet Office meetings led by minister Josh Simons, who cited Estonia’s model where infants get unique numbers at birth registration for accessing public services.

Simons even suggested digital IDs could help teenagers log into social media, tying into global crackdowns like Australia’s under-16 ban on apps such as TikTok.

Announced by Prime Minister Keir Starmer in September as a way to verify job candidates’ right to work, the scheme is slated for rollout by 2028-29 at a staggering £1.8 billion cost. But the government has stonewalled on details, fueling suspicions of mission creep.

Shadow Cabinet Office minister Mike Wood blasted the idea: “Labour said their plan for mandatory digital ID was about tackling illegal immigration. But now we hear they are secretly considering forcing it on newborns. What do babies have to do with stopping the boats? This would be a deeply sinister overreach by Labour – and all without any proper national debate.”

Former Tory Cabinet minister Sir David Davis echoed the outrage, calling it “creeping state surveillance.” He added: “The idea that we should allocate children ID at birth is frankly an affront to centuries of British history, and is being put out by stupid ministers who really don’t understand the technology they are playing with. They think they are being clever and modern, but a large number of people will be outraged by this. It will end up being hated by a lot of people.”

Davis accused Starmer of peddling the policy on a “bogus premise” before quietly ballooning it without parliamentary input, labeling it a “constitutional disgrace delivered in a disgraceful manner.”

Liberal Democrat spokesman Lisa Smart warned: “Reports that ministers may be considering dragging newborn babies into their already over-reaching digital ID scheme would be a frightening development.”

Attendees at the meetings, sworn to secrecy, described jaws dropping when the newborn ID concept was raised. One source told the Daily Mail: “The disturbing prospect of digital IDs for newborn babies shows this has nothing to do with right-to-work checks, immigration or giving people choices. It’s a cradle-to-grave digital file being dishonestly forced on every single Briton. This is a shocking, underhand way to massively expand a controversial policy our country has always rejected.”

This development builds on Starmer’s broader biometric tracking rollout, the “Brit Card” system—tied to the UK One Login platform—promises to block “illegal” migrants from jobs but ignores the flood of legal asylum seekers and offers endless tools for government overreach.

With net migration hitting around 500,000 annually and only a fraction deemed “illegal,” the ID won’t stem the tide but could easily punish dissenters by revoking access to work or services. It’s a classic globalist bait-and-switch: exploit public frustration over open borders to impose surveillance that targets natives.

A government spokesman claimed: “The only mandatory area of the programme will be for digital right-to-work checks. Only people starting a new job will need to use the scheme.” But a Whitehall source admitted it’s all “hypothetical,” with a public consultation pending—hardly reassuring given the secretive plotting.

This is the death of privacy, starting at the cradle. Brits must reject this authoritarian slide before every citizen is fully reduced to a tracked data point in a vast surveillance state.

More:

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/uk-goes-full-cradle-grave-sinister-plan-newborn-baby-digital-ids

Canada #87

British Citizens Head to France and Slash Illegal Migrants’ Rubber Boats To Prevent Them From Crossing the Channel – So French Police Move To Arrest THEM, Not the Illegals

by Paul Serran Jan. 3, 2026

…So, what has started to happen is that desperate British citizens have started going to the French beaches and are attacking the migrant boats, slashing the rubber dinghies to try and keep the invasion from worsening.

At this juncture, the ‘brave’ French authorities have decided to arrest… the British nationals!

Several activists are now accused of slashing the rubber boats.

Daily Mail reported:

“The French interior minister, Laurent Nunez, has warned that any Brits interfering with the crossings could be arrested for possible obstruction and aggravated violence, according to local reports.

He has supposedly stepped-up efforts to stop such incidents following a number of vigilante-style actions by members of the Raise the Colours movement.”

The militants are forced to take matters into their own hands because Starmer and Macron are a complete joke.

“Videos posted on social media in recent months show members, including co-founder Ryan Bridge, racing across the sand searching for migrants and supposedly sabotaging small boats that had been bound for the UK.

But in a bid to stop any further actions, Nunez has now ‘requested that members of these groups be identified, apprehended if they act, and that measures to obstruct them be considered’, a source close to the minister told La Voix Du Nord.”

More:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/01/british-citizens-head-france-slash-illegal-migrants-rubber/

Holy shit, UK anons, this bread is almost a Year Old.

Canada #87

EU's Carbon Border Tax Goes Live And Trade Partners Are Not Amused

Authored by Irina Slav via OilPrice.com Tuesday, Jan 06, 2026

* The EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism launched on January 1 aims to level the playing field for European steel, cement, and power producers by taxing the carbon content of imports from countries with weaker emissions rules.

* China has threatened retaliation, calling CBAM unfair and discriminatory.

* While CBAM may protect EU industry, it risks higher prices for consumers and escalating trade disputes with major exporters

On Thursday, January 1st, the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism entered into effect with the goal of improving the competitiveness of European goods manufacturers against non-EU companies operating in laxer emissions reduction frameworks.

China was the first to threaten retaliation.

It won’t be the last.

The carbon border adjustment mechanism, or CBAM for short, was devised to remedy the unintended effects of the world’s most stringent emission-reduction standards for the industrial sphere, namely, sky-high costs that make the end product uncompetitive. This became especially painful for European makers of things such as steel and cement, where the biggest competitor is China—which does not have anything resembling the emission reduction requirements of the EU, so its steel and cement are very cheap, and buyers prefer them.

In other words, in order to boost the competitiveness of European steel and cement manufacturers—and electricity generators, too—the European Union made sure that cheaper imported steel, cement, and electricity are not that cheap anymore. China and India are unhappy about—and there are things they can do that will not help the competitiveness of European businesses.

As soon as the CBAM entered into effect, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a statement, in which it called the legislation “unfair” and “discriminatory”, Bloomberg reported.

“We will resolutely take all necessary measures to respond to any unfair trade restrictions,” the ministry said in its statement.

“CBAM is quite unpopular among major exporters to the EU, but it has already proven to be quite effective in pushing reticent countries towards building or expanding carbon pricing efforts,” one consultant specializing in carbon permit markets, told the Financial Times.

“So it’s a major policy shift for the EU to protect its own industry, while at the same time leveraging the carbon pricing idea to third countries.”

China, in fact, has its own carbon market, has had it since 2021, and it is the biggest carbon market in terms of the volumes of carbon emissions covered by it. With China, it’s not about selling the idea of carbon markets to third countries; it is about competitiveness. And China is not pleased that its competitiveness will be compromised.

In simple terms, the carbon border adjustment mechanism puts a price on the carbon dioxide emissions generated during the production of a good such as cement or steel. The price is based on calculations of the emissions from the respective industries in countries that export to the European Union. The mechanism puts a so-called default emission value for the production of a certain good, and also emission benchmarks, to be used in tandem in a way that is as of yet unclear, but some say it is, in fact, benefiting China.

Politico reported the concerns at the end of last year, citing industrial executives as saying the default values for emissions for certain countries that export to the EU were set too low to be real, including some steel production in China that, according to these estimates, turned out to be lower-emission than steel production in the EU.

“Inconsistencies in the figures of default values and benchmarks would dilute the incentive for cleaner production processes and allow high-emission imports to enter the EU market with insufficient carbon costs,” an industry representative told Politico.

“This could result in a CBAM that is not only significantly less effective but most likely counterproductive.”

Meanwhile, Indian steel imports are about to dry up because Indian steel producers appear not to have been included in the “inconsistencies”. India is the world’s second-largest steel producer after China and exports as much as 66% of its output to the European Union.

This is about to drop sharply next year because India’s steel manufacturing is done in blast furnaces fueled with coal, which is incompatible with the European Union’s emission reduction plans. The Reuters report notes steel mills could switch to electric arc furnaces, which have a lower emissions footprint, but such a switch would take time and money.

“Most of the companies are yet figuring out a way to deal with CBAM,” one analyst told Reuters. “In the near term, it is expected to slow down India's exports to EU,” Ravi Sodah, from Elara Capital, also said.

So, two of the world’s largest exporters of industrial goods, and major suppliers to the European Union specifically, are planning to respond to the CBAM by, at least in one case, curbing exports.

This would sure clear up the market for European producers, but it will not be welcome news to consumers of those goods, who would be footing the bill for what is essentially market intervention on the part of the European Union, and a protectionist market intervention, at that.

The United States is not going to be happy about it, either, and it will soon make its unhappiness known.

https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/eus-carbon-border-tax-goes-live-and-trade-partners-are-not-amused

Anon doesn't know if anyone here knows of Alex Krainer or his posts.

This is a recent post I want to share. The short version is that Alex K has many skills but the point of this post is his knowledge of history and how politicians manipulate their citizens into wars and is concerned the same broad-based process is underway now.

I expect most here already now this but Alex starts with multiple individuals using the same words claiming RF wants to attack Europe and seems genuinely concerned that European citizens will be fooled by the same old lies and methods. Fair warning he is not a fan of the "British Empire" and it's history and described some of it in detail. For anyone not that interested in history details just note the way and by whom the wars are created and citizens manipulated. MSM fear porn supported by politicians.

He is trying to find a way to warn ppl in Europe about the lies and media manipulation and that is why I share this. I hope it helps.

>>24083769

UK and France to send troops to Ukraine if peace deal agreed

Jaroslav Lukiv and Wyre Davies,Kyiv 6 January 2026

The UK and France have signed a declaration of intent on deploying troops in Ukraine if a peace deal is made with Russia, UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has announced.

After talks with Ukraine's allies in Paris, he said the UK and France would "establish military hubs across Ukraine" to deter future invasion, while French President Emmanuel Macron later said thousands of troops may be deployed.

Allies also largely agreed robust security guarantees for Ukraine and proposed that the US would take the lead in monitoring a truce. But the key issue of territory is still being discussed.

Russia has repeatedly warned that any foreign troops in Ukraine would be a "legitimate target".

Moscow has not yet commented on the announcements made in the French capital.

Russian President Vladimir Putin launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, and Moscow currently controls about 20% of Ukrainian territory.

Heads of state and top officials from the "Coalition of the Willing" took part in Tuesday's talks in Paris.

Speaking at a joint press conference after the meeting, Starmer said: "We signed a declaration of intent on the deployment of forces to Ukraine in the event of a peace deal.

"This is a vital part of our commitment to stand with Ukraine for the long-term.

"It paves the way for the legal framework under which British, French, and partner forces could operate on Ukrainian soil, securing Ukraine's skies and seas, and regenerating Ukraine's armed forces for the future."

The UK prime minister added London would participate in any US-led verification of a potential ceasefire.

Top US negotiator Steve Witkoff said "durable security guarantees and robust prosperity commitments are essential to a lasting peace" in Ukraine - referring to a key demand made by Kyiv.

Witkoff said the allies "largely finished" their work on agreeing security protocols "so that people of Ukraine know that when this [war] ends, it ends forever".

Jared Kushner, US President Donald Trump's special envoy and son-in-law, said that after a deal Ukrainians needed to know that "real backstops" were in place to ensure war would "not happen again".

Meanwhile, President Macron said Ukraine's allies had made "considerable progress" at the talks.

He said "robust" security guarantees for Kyiv had been agreed in the event of a potential ceasefire.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said a "huge step forward" had been made in Paris, but added that he would only consider efforts to be "enough" if they resulted in the end of the war.

What Ukraine calls security "guarantees" and what American officials have described as security "protocols" may leave some wiggle room for Trump in the event of coming to Kyiv's defence after a future Russian attack - but there is no doubt Zelensky feels he and his European allies have secured an important concession from Washington.

We heard few, if any, new details about where a future ceasefire line would be drawn and what territory, currently occupied by Russian forces, Ukraine would agree to surrender.

That prospect is still something many Ukrainians would find hard to swallow, especially as Russia continues to strike against cities and critical infrastructure across Ukraine on a daily basis.

But as the snows fall and bitter winds sweep in from the east, Zelensky knows the only alternative to a ceasefire and subsequent peace deal, is another costly, attritional winter of warfare with the inevitable loss of life that will hit Ukraine far harder than Russia.

Ukraine's president clearly hopes that guarantees of American monitoring, a multinational force on Ukrainian soil and more weapons support for his armed forces, will convince a sometimes-sceptical population that he is right to sue for peace, bolstered by a growing international coalition.

But, in concluding the Paris press conference, Zelensky acknowledged Tuesday's "milestone" did not necessarily guarantee peace. Real progress still needs Russian support, and Moscow has been notably silent in recent days about diplomatic efforts to end the war.

Putin is known to oppose the prospect of a European-led international force in any disputed areas and will be reluctant to halt his troops', albeit slow, advance if Moscow's war objectives have not been realised.

More:

www.bbc.com/news/articles/c17zee20qpzo

>>24080867

Shills took over, most of them have now gone.

"Appalling": Debanking Explodes To Record High In Britain

by Tyler Durden Friday, Jan 09, 2026

An estimated 453,230 accounts were shut down in the United Kingdom in the last year, a stunning figure that has drawn outrage from the country’s leading conservative lawmaker.

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage called the shocking figure “appalling” and slammed European rules that he believes "makes it cheaper for banks to close accounts over unusual transactions.” Farage, who was elected to the British Parliament in 2024 and leads the conservative populist Reform Party, is no stranger to debanking, having had his accounts closed by Coutts in 2023.

So what’s the banks' excuse? “Financial crime reasons,” they said, according to documents obtained by The Telegraph under Freedom of Information rules.

The Telegraph reports:

It comes ahead of the introduction of new rules which will force lenders to give customers longer before they close accounts – at least 90 days’ notice – as well as offer clearer explanations of why they shut the accounts.

But the requirements will only apply to accounts opened after April 28 this year and will be subject to exemptions to allow banks to comply with financial crime rules.Financial institutions are allowed to close accounts for commercial reasons, and if they suspect criminal activity. There is no legal right to a bank account in the UK, unlike in countries such as France and Belgium.

Banks have faced criticism over their failure to explain to customers exactly why accounts have been closed. This is often blamed on anti-money laundering and other financial crime rules which lenders must follow.

Nonetheless, British officials defend closing the accounts, claiming they were shut down after a thorough review.

“Banks must comply with strict legal and regulatory requirements in terms of verifying customers and preventing financial crime. As a result, a small proportion of accounts are closed, but only after extensive review and investigation,” a UK government spokesperson told The Telegraph.

“Fighting financial crime is one of our priorities. Fraud makes up over 40 pc of crime in the UK, robbing people of their hard-earned money,” An FCA spokesman said in a separate statement.

“It’s important banks and building societies play their part, including closing accounts they have suspicions about. Only a tiny fraction of accounts are closed – and we expect firms to act proportionately and treat customers fairly.”

While British officials don't appear to see the problem with the surging number of closed bank accounts, critics across the pond in the United States see the escalating situation as a cautionary tale.

Adam Smith Institute’s Maxwell Marlow told The Telegraph: "The scourge of debanking continues to blight the British public and significantly impacts the Square Mile."“Our finance system thrives through freedom – it is why we were the centre of global capitalism for so long, and we became rich from it. If we choose to reject these principles by ignoring this issue, our liberties and prosperity will be punished collectively,” Marlow added.

Across the pond - in August, President Donald Trump took a series of actions to thwart "debanking,” which was pervasive during the Biden administration, signing an executive order aimed at preventing financial institutions from denying services based on customers' political or religious beliefs.

The order, titled "Guaranteeing Fair Banking for All Americans," directs federal regulators to scrutinize banks for past or present policies that may have encouraged discriminatory practices and to impose remedies such as fines or consent decrees where violations are found.

The order also requires the removal of "reputational risk" considerations from supervisory guidance, which the administration argues have been used to pressure banks into restricting access for certain lawful industries or individuals.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/appalling-debanking-explodes-record-high

You guys still have internet?

Canada #87

UAE Cuts State Funding for Students Studying in UK Over Fears of Islamist Radicalization on British Campuses

by Robert Semonsen Jan. 9, 2026

The United Arab Emirates has withdrawn state funding from British universities, citing concerns about the risk of Islamist radicalization on UK campuses—a step that sharply contrasts with the approach taken by many globalist-controlled governments across the Western world.

According to officials familiar with the decision, Abu Dhabi has concluded that the UK’s academic environment poses unacceptable ideological risks to Emirati students.

The move affects government scholarships, a key pathway that has historically sent thousands of Emirati students to elite institutions abroad. British universities, once a top destination, have now been excluded from an official list of approved foreign schools eligible for UAE funding.

When British officials sought clarification, they were told that the omission wasn’t a mistake. The UAE’s message was crystal clear: UK university campuses are no longer considered safe and are increasingly regarded as potential hubs for Islamist radicalization.

Vice President JD Vance commented on the decision after reading about it on X, writing: “Absolutely insane headline. Some of our best Muslim allies in the Gulf think the Islamist indoctrination in certain parts of the west is too dangerous.”

At the heart of the dispute is the British government’s longstanding refusal to ban the Muslim Brotherhood, a radical Islamist movement outlawed across much of the Middle East. Emirati leaders, for years, have warned that the group operates openly in Britain under the cover of academic freedom and civil society protections.

From the perspective of the UAE, Britain—and much of Western Europe’s—distinction between “nonviolent extremism” and outright terrorism is dangerously naive. The government views ideological incubation as the first step toward political Islam gaining institutional power, and universities are seen as prime terrain for that influence.

Recent data reinforces those fears. Figures released by the British government have revealed a sharp rise in university students flagged for potential Islamist radicalization, nearly doubling year over year. While the numbers are small relative to total enrollment, the trend has alarmed foreign governments watching closely.

The UAE’s policy shift comes amid a broader regional crackdown on political Islam, which has often taken radical forms since the Arab Spring. Under President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed, the country has pursued an aggressive strategy to neutralize Islamist movements both domestically and abroad, viewing them as existential threats.

The decision carries real consequences. Emirati students attending unapproved institutions run the risk of earning degrees that will not be officially recognized at home, dramatically reducing their value in government or professional sectors.

The impact can be seen in visa statistics, with the number of Emirati students studying in the UK having collapsed over the past three years, falling by more than half since 2022. Federal funding for new students had already been scaled back considerably well before the policy was formalized.

British officials, for their part, have leaned on the usual, tired, globalist talking points. They emphasize academic freedom, campus diversity, and safeguards against extremism. Those reassurances, however, appear to have failed to sway a Gulf state that measures realworld outcomes, not mere rhetoric.

Additionally, the divide exposes a deeper, more significant philosophical rift. While Western elites continue to frame radical Islamist ideology as a marginal issue, governments that are closer to its consequences see it as a long-term civilizational problem—one spreading steathily through institutions that educate future leaders.

More:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/01/uae-cuts-state-funding-students-studying-uk-fears/

Canada #87

UK Government Video Game Teaches Teens Questioning Mass Immigration Could Make Them Terror Suspects

by Robert Semonsen Jan. 10, 2026

Britain’s globalist—and increasingly authoritarian—state has found a new way to ‘fight extremism’: teach teenagers that asking the ‘wrong questions’ about mass immigration could make them terrorists.

According to newly surfaced materials, a government-funded video game now warns schoolchildren that doubting the positive effects of unrelenting mass migration will land them in the crosshairs of counter-terrorism authorities.

The program, called Pathways, is marketed as an “educational” interactive experience for students aged 11 to 18. In practice, however, it functions as a digital loyalty test, funded in part by the Home Office’s Prevent program, Britain’s controversial anti-extremism scheme.

The game goes something like this. Players are placed in the role of a white teenage character named Charlie, newly enrolled in college and navigating modern Britain’s ideological minefield. Every decision—what videos to watch, what opinions to express, even whether to research immigration statistics—is tracked by an in-game extremism meter.

The premise is simple and utterly unmistakable: curiosity is dangerous, skepticism is suspect, and deviation from approved liberal-globalist, views carries severe consequences. Choose the wrong dialogue option, and Charlie is flagged for “extreme right-wing ideology,” a category that now appears to include asking basic questions about national identity.

Even the character’s gender is carefully flattened. Regardless of whether players select a male or female avatar, Charlie is referred to exclusively as “they,” a telling detail in a game obsessed with left-liberal ideological conformity.

Early scenarios in the game set the tone. Charlie struggles academically and is outperformed by an Afro-British classmate, after which players are nudged toward ‘correct’ emotional responses while being warned against drawing conclusions about immigration or competition.

At several points, the game introduces online posts claiming the government prioritizes migrants over British veterans for housing. Players are encouraged to scroll past these claims silently. Engaging, questioning, or researching them triggers ominous warnings.

Attempting to “learn more” is portrayed as especially risky. The game depicts Charlie being overwhelmed by statistics, reports, and protest information. Instead of being framed as civic engagement, the game clearly suggests it’s a slippery slope into ideological contamination.

Eventually, Charlie encounters an invitation to join a group called “Action for Britain,” or to attend a protest opposing the erosion of British values. Accepting leads to near-arrest scenarios and stern lessons about how such gatherings are really about ‘racism,’ not patriotism.

Lose the game, and the consequences are enlightening. Charlie is referred by a teacher to Prevent, where counseling and workshops are imposed to correct “ideological thoughts,” as if dissent were some kind of cognitive malfunction.

This initiative did not emerge in a vacuum. Local councils in East Yorkshire developed Pathways amid rising tensions over migrant housing, particularly after protests erupted near hotels used to accommodate asylum seekers.

One of the more uncomfortable realities is that these areas have already been the focus of repeated Prevent interventions—interventions that failed to stop real violence. In one high-profile case, a murderer had reportedly been referred to Prevent multiple times prior to committing his crimes.

The statistics make the government’s priorities difficult to ignore. Official Home Office figures show that nearly 20 percent of Prevent referrals now concern so-called right-wing extremism, compared to just 13 percent involving Islamist cases.

This imbalance persists despite MI5 itself admitting that Islamist threats account for roughly three-quarters of its counter-terror workload. Apparently, teenage boys googling migration statistics now rank alongside actual terror networks.

The organization behind the game, Shout Out UK, insists it offers “impartial media literacy.” Its leadership claims the goal is to equip students with lifelong tools to protect themselves from harmful ideas—an assurance delivered with all the warmth of a compliance seminar.

Government spokesmen, for their part, defend the program as a success, boasting of thousands diverted from violent ideologies. They simultaneously insist they are “furious” about illegal migration, even as their policies suggest the real threat lies in discussing it.

To critics, of which there are no doubt many, Pathways represents something far more troubling than a clumsy, out-of-touch educational tool cooked up by global liberals. It is a glimpse into a Britain where the state no longer trusts its own citizens—especially its youth—to think freely without supervision.

The game’s message is brutally clear. In modern Britain, the line between civic concern and criminal suspicion is thin, and asking the wrong questions may be all it takes to cross it.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/01/uk-government-video-game-teaches-teens-questioning-mass/

General Research #29376

UK Seeks to Partner with Australia and Canada in Censorship Plot Against Elon Musk’s X: Report

The British government has reportedly reached out to fellow leftist-run Anglo-sphere nations Australia and Canada in an attempt to wage a coordinated campaign to potentially ban Elon Musk’s X social media platform.

Earlier this week, UK Prime Minsiter Sir Keir Starmer said that “all options” were on the table, including a potential ban of X in Britain, over users being able to have the platform’s Grok artificial intelligence generate “deepfake” nude images of women and children.

The recently enacted Online Safety Act — passed by the previous “Conservative” government — empowers broadcasting regulator Ofcom to impose fines of up to 10 per cent of a social media firm’s global revenue, and allows for bans in extreme cases.

Yet, apparently reticent to draw the ire of President Donald Trump alone, Downing Street reportedly held talks in recent days with Canberra and Ottawa to craft a joint response to the tech platform, The Telegraph reported.

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, who is pushing for more censorship rules in his own country following the Islamist mass shooting at Bondi Beach last month, said, “The fact that this tool was used so that people were using its image creation function through Grok is, I think, just completely abhorrent. It, once again, is an example of social media not showing social responsibility. Australians and indeed, global citizens deserve better.”

Toronto MP Evan Solomon, the Minister of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation in Mark Caney’s government, denied on Sunday that Canada is considering a ban on X.

For his part, Elon Musk, who has long been critical of the increasingly censorious climate in Britain, accused Starmer’s government of acting “fascist” and suggested that they were merely looking for “any excuse for censorship” of X.

Censorship has become increasingly prevalent in Britain. Despite its long tradition of freedom of speech, the country is arresting around 30 people every day for comments made on social media, or over 12,000 per year. Such offences can include the sharing of “grossly offensive” messages or spreading content of “indecent, obscene or menacing character”.

The banning of X would remove a major headache for the struggling Labour government, which has come under consistent pressure personally from Musk, on issues such as freedom of speech, immigration, and the predominantly Pakistani Muslim child rape gangs and the failures of police and government to protect mostly young white working-class girls.

However, such an action taken against one of President Trump’s key allies and a major American business could risk further angering the White House, which has made fighting censorship in Europe a key foreign policy plank.

Indeed, just last month, the Trump administration sanctioned multiple Europeans, including two Britons, for their involvement in the international censorship industry.

This included Imran Ahmed, the head of the Centre for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), an organisation with close ties to Prime Minsiter Starmer’s chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney. The administration has sought to deport Ahmed from the United States for his group’s efforts to censor American conservative outlets, including Breitbart News.

While the CCDH has close ties to the Labour government, the White House has yet to sign off on sanctions against any British government official.

This may change if X is banned, however, with Republican Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna vowing to introduce legislation to sanction Prime Minister Starmer and the UK as a whole should the platform be banned in the UK.

“There are always technical bugs during the early phases of new technology, especially AI, and those issues are typically addressed quickly. X treats these matters seriously and acts promptly. Let’s be clear: this is not about technical compliance. This is a political war against Elon Musk and free speech—nothing more,” she said.

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2026/01/11/uk-seeks-to-partner-with-australia-and-canada-in-censorship-plot-against-elon-musks-x-report/

Scotland #13

Asylum seekers at Cameron Barracks to get free mental health support while locals must wait months

The 'bespoke' healthcare package on offer for up to 300 undocumented male migrants will include mental health support – but locals have to wait five months or fork out to go private

Ben Borland 12 Jan 2026

Asylum seekers housed at Cameron Barracks in Inverness would be given access to free mental health counselling as part of plans drawn up by the UK Government.

The revelation was described as a "massive slap in the face" to local people in the Highland capital, who must wait around five months before starting regular sessions on the NHS. Alternatively, one hour of private therapy costs between £40 to £100.

The Home Office says it has yet to make a "final decision" on whether it will use the barracks to house up to 300 men who have entered the UK illegally, mainly on small boats across the English Channel.

It has already caused huge anger in Inverness, even before details of the "bespoke" healthcare package were revealed. Reform UK spokesman Thomas Kerr said: "The Cameron Barracks is simply the wrong location for a facility like this. Local people are rightly angry. To now learn that taxpayers will also be paying for mental health support for people who have come to this country illegally is a massive slap in the face."

The use of the barracks – along with another military base in East Sussex – was announced in October last year and is a key plank of the bid to shut down controversial asylum hotels.

The Home Office has a statutory duty to provide healthcare to asylum seekers, sparking fears the city's overstretched public services would be put under even more strain. But Highland councillors have been told that by having trained therapists on site, it would mean "minimise the impact" on the NHS.

A briefing note sent to councillors before the migrants' arrival says: "Primary healthcare will be available on site, including mental health support. Funding for these services will be provided by the Home Office to minimise impact on local GP surgeries and NHS resources."

Isabelle MacKenzie, a Scottish Conservative councillor who represents the ward where the barracks is located, accused the Home Office of giving "preferential treatment" to asylum seekers. "It's almost like they're getting a bespoke service," she told the Sunday Times. "They're getting a roof over their head. They're getting fed and watered. They're getting their basic necessities and any medical needs are being catered for."

Edward Mountain, a Scottish Conservative MSP for the Highlands and Islands region, said it was "galling when many of those living in Inverness and the Highlands are finding it increasingly hard to access mental health services in their community".

Asylum seekers had originally been expected to arrive last month, but this was delayed due to refurbishment work required to make the facility fit for purpose. It had most recently been used as transitional accommodation for the Afghan Resettlement Programme.

The Ministry of Defence has offered the barracks – formerly the base of the Queen's Own Cameron Highlanders – to the Home Office for 12 months. After that, the barracks will return to the MoD as part of its training estate.

https://www.scottishdailyexpress.co.uk/news/scottish-news/asylum-seekers-cameron-barracks-free-36539486

Canada #87

‘I Didn’t Know About Epstein’s Crimes Because I’m Gay’: Disgraced Former British Ambassador to the US, Lord Peter Mandelson Uses the ‘Gay Card’ To Try To Evade Responsibility

by Paul Serran Jan. 11, 2026

Mandelson thinks we are all gullible simpletons.

Disgraced former British Ambassador to the US, Lord Mandelson, has claimed to have been ‘kept in the dark’ about Jeffrey Epstein’s sex crimes ‘because he was gay’.

The Telegraph reported:

“The peer was sacked as ambassador to the United States last year after it emerged [that] he had urged the financier to fight for early release from prison.

Lord Mandelson claimed that, because of his sexuality, he was ‘kept separate from what [Epstein] was doing in the sexual side of his life’.”

He described Epstein as his ‘best pal’, but argues he was kept ‘at the edge of this man’s life’.

“In his first interview since losing his job, Lord Mandelson refused to apologize to Epstein’s victims for writing to him after his conviction for sex offences, claiming he was not culpable for any of Epstein’s criminal activity.”

Even a Labour Cabinet minister was led to say he had been guilty of ‘deep naivety’.

BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg carried water for him, and asked whether he was never offered sexual favors by Epstein ‘because he was gay’.

“He replied: “Possibly, some people will think that because I’m a gay man, I was unsensitized, or I wasn’t attuned to what was going on. […] I don’t really accept [any guilt]. I think the issue is that because I was a gay man in his circle, I was kept separate from what he was doing in the sexual side of his life. […] I mean, he in a sense had three buckets of people in his life, the business and the financial, the political and the academic, and then what he was doing with young women.”

More:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/01/i-didnt-know-about-epsteins-crimes-because-im/

Canada #87

Globalist World Health Organization Says Boozy Europe Is Making Alcohol Cheaper, and Putting Lives at Risk – So, Their Solution Is: TAXES!

by Paul Serran Jan. 14, 2026

The old – and drunk – continent.

Europe has a drinking habit – or is it a problem?

Those of us well informed by the independent media are not inclined to listen to the World Health Organization’s advice any longer – if we ever did.

The WHO campaigners are out in force saying Europe’s hard drinking habits ‘are putting lives at risk’.

The crux of the UN agency’ ‘warning’ is that, instead of ‘making alcohol harder to afford’, what many European governments are doing is allowing a lowering of the prices.

Politico reported:

“Beer has become more affordable in 11 EU countries since 2022, and less affordable in six, the WHO report revealed Tuesday. There was a similar but even more dramatic trend for spirits, which became more affordable in 17 EU countries and less affordable in two. And for wine, 14 EU countries do not tax it at all, including big producers Italy and Spain, the report found.”

Oh, no – beer is cheaper! It must be the end of the world.

So, the detestable Tedros Ghebreyesus has the nerve to share his ‘brilliant idea’: TAXES.

Whatever ous views on tobacco, alcohol and sugary drinks, taxation is never the solution, and health policy must be instituted at national level, with each country freely exercizing its sovereignty.

After discussing the health hazards of alcohol consumption, the WHO solution is a ‘masterpiece’ in Globalist thinking.

“The WHO said governments should target alcohol consumption to protect people from its ill effects. Increasing the cost of booze through taxes is one of the most effective measures governments can take, the WHO said. Yet, some EU countries have minimal or no taxes on certain types of alcohol.”

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/01/globalist-world-health-organization-says-boozy-europe-is/

Canada #87

UK Bans Dutch Commentator For Criticizing Starmer While Welcoming Illegal Migrant Hordes

Authored by Steve Watson via modernity.news Thursday, Jan 15, 2026

Under Keir Starmer’s Labour government, the UK has become a dystopian nightmare where criticizing the Prime Minister gets you banned from entry. Meanwhile, boatloads of illegal migrants wash across the Channel daily, rewarded with hotel stays and taxpayer-funded perks.

Dutch commentator Eva Vlaardingerbroek learned this the hard way when her travel authorization was revoked just days after calling out Starmer’s hypocrisy on immigration and free speech.

This blatant act of political censorship highlights Labour’s twisted priorities: protect the establishment narrative at all costs, even as unchecked migration erodes British sovereignty and burdens citizens.

Vlaardingerbroek, a 29-year-old Dutch lawyer, political commentator, and activist, has built a reputation for her outspoken criticism of mass immigration, globalism, and threats to Western culture. Formerly affiliated with the Netherlands’ Forum for Democracy party, she advocates for “remigration” policies to preserve national identity and has amassed a large following on social media for her unfiltered takes on Europe’s migration crisis. As such, her views have made her a target for leftist regimes eager to silence dissent.

The UK government informed Eva “Your presence in the UK is not considered to be conducive to the public good.”

The post she referenced slammed Starmer directly: “Keir Starmer wants to crack down on X under the pretense of “women’s safety”, whilst he’s the one allowing the ongoing rape and killing of British girls by migrant rape gangs. Evil, despicable man.”

Meanwhile Starmer recently announced that one of his top priorities was getting an anti-white Egyptian extremist to the UK and was “delighted” to “welcome”‘” him:

Despite el-Fattah’s vile history – including posts like “fucking hate white people … a blight on the earth they are” and calls for “random shooting of white males” – Starmer celebrated his return to the UK.

As Vlaardingerbroek’s ban made headlines, recent reports confirm the UK’s borders remain a sieve. In the first week of January 2026 alone, dozens braved sub-zero temperatures to cross the Channel in small boats, adding to the over 41,000 arrivals in 2025 – the second-highest year on record. These migrants are often housed in hotels at taxpayer expense, with costs soaring to £8 million per day, while British families struggle.

More:

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/uk-bans-dutch-commentator-criticizing-starmer-while-welcoming-illegal-migrant-hordes

https://youtu.be/B-vTLpJDj4o

Grooming Gang Abducted Sikh Girl: 200 Sikhs Rescue Abducted Girl In London | India Today News

India Today

10.9m subscribers

262,704 views Premiered on 14 Jan 2026 #AnishaMathur #IndiaToday #London

On this Special Report, Anisha Mathur and Pranay Upadhyay discuss a horrific grooming gang incident in London's Hounslow area. A 15-year-old Sikh girl was allegedly abducted, stalked, and abused by a gang of six Pakistani-origin men. The situation escalated when approximately 200 members of the Sikh community took matters into their own hands to rescue the child from a flat after claiming police inaction. Anisha Mathur notes that the girl was 'stalked, trapped and raped and on camera' while community members confronted the accused. The programme highlights the outrage within the Sikh community over the recurring nature of such crimes in the UK and the perceived silence of certain political representatives. Activists at the scene expressed frustration, stating they have gone to the 'police many, many times and nothing is being done about this.' The report features dramatic footage of the rescue and the community's stand against exploitation and forced conversion.

#AnishaMathur #IndiaToday #London #itwebvideos #Hounslow #SikhCommunity #GroomingGang #UKCrime #JusticeForSikhGirl #LondonNews #SikhsUnited #CommunityRescue #HounslowGrooming #UKPolice #EndGrooming #SikhOutreach

>>24127930

>>24127650

>>24127650

Go for it

RESCUE innocent girls!

Canada #87

‘U-Turn’ Starmer Ditches Horrible Policies – Failing PM Abandons Mandatory Digital ID, Ending Jury Trial for Minor Offenses, Under-16 Social Media Ban and Attack on Pubs

by Paul Serran Jan. 15, 2026

The ability to change one’s mind is a sign of intelligence – but to be always flip-flopping on issues is lame.

Britons are asking themselves: can the failing Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, hold on to ANY policies?

Labour MPs are bracing for more chaotic U-turns today, and now, even Cabinet ministers are making fun of his ‘inability to stick to policies’.

But here’s the kicker: since so many of his leftist government’s policies are so bad, some wavering ends up being a net positive for the country.

After Starmer abandoned a mandatory Digital ID, more U-turns are expected on ‘curbing jury trials, under-16 social media ban and business rates assault on hospitality’.

Daily Mail reported:

“The embattled PM has cemented his reputation for flip-flopping with two more major concessions in 2026, just a fortnight into the New Year.

Having spent months extolling the virtues of digital ID cards for curbing illegal immigration, Sir Keir bowed to a backlash yesterday by confirming they will be entirely voluntary.”

A bailout package is being developed for a myriad of pubs facing collapse after Labour’s ‘Budget from hell’ hiked their business rates.

Rebellious Labour MPs are pushing on multiple other fronts.

“The government is facing massive resistance to proposals for curbing rights to jury trials, with campaigners warning ministers they will only look stupid if they continue to defend the measure publicly.

Asked if he was sure that the plans would be implemented given the government’s 13 major U-turns, Health Secretary Wes Streeting told BBC Radio 4’s Today program: ‘Yes… As sure as any of us can be’.”

Keir told a British newspaper that he did not favor a under-16 social media ban – and then, of course there are the pubs, hotels and restaurants.

“Speculation has been growing that the Chancellor will have to extend promised business rates relief for pubs to the wider hospitality sector – something that could heap more strain on the government’s finances.”

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/01/u-turn-starmer-ditches-horrible-policies-failing-pm/

https://youtu.be/FWxsToTWz4g

Meet The Health Ambassador For Wales!

Parliament Watch and British Stand

78,450 views Jan 20, 2026

Ayaan Hirsi Ali explains why Somalis are committing so much fraud. Basically, it looks as though cultures based on clan, tribe, kinship group, possibly caste, are not able to adapt to Western culture or create successful, cohesive societies in their home countries. A light bulb moment for this anon, but goodness knows what the solution might be when societies are constructed completely differently.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15388607/MP-second-jobs-analysis-gifts-search-tool.html

How much does YOUR MP earn from second jobs and gifts? Search tool reveals exactly how much they have declared - and who from…

RHODRI MORGAN

25 January 2026

The extraordinary amount of money MPs earn from second jobs and gifts can today be laid bare by the Daily Mail's eye-opening new search tool.

According to Parliament's latest Register of Members' Financial Interests, MPs have declared almost £5.5million from employment stretching back to 2022.

That sum is on top of their starting salaries of £93,904.

Ex-prime minister Rishi Sunak topped the earnings table at £1.29m, ahead of Nigel Farage – a regular GB News presenter and maker of personalised Cameo video messages – who pocketed £973,000.

It means the pair accounted for 41 per cent of the total tranche from second jobs.

MPs also declared £2.8m in freebies in the latest register. Among the gifts doled out tickets to watch Premier League football, Lady Gaga and Ed Sheeran.

Members also enjoyed £1.29m worth of accomodation, expenses and travel abroad, registered as 'visits outside the UK'.

Examples include Mr Farage's £5,000 seat at the Helping a Hero Gala Dinner in Texas and Sir John Whittingdale's £1,200 admission to Qatar Goodwood Festival 2025 and the accompanying Regency Ball.

Under the House of Commons' own rules, MPs must flag any payments received within 28 days of receipt.

Repeatedly failing to do so can, in extreme cases, lead to them being ousted as an MP, although late registers of interests are relatively common and do not typically progress through disciplinary processes.

Our analysis comes after Mr Farage this week apologised for breaching the rules 17 times.

Presenting on GB News and making Cameos were among the £384,000 payments the Reform leader failed to declare. He blamed the 'honest and genuine error' on the sheer number of well-paid second jobs he has.

Labour said that Mr Farage 'isn't on the side of working people – he's just lining his pockets when he should be standing up for his constituents'.

Yet Sir Keir Starmer himself was rebuked by Parliament's standards commissioner for breaching the same rules in 2022. Among the eight interests he failed to log on time were an £18,450 advance from publisher HarperCollins for a book he was writing and football tickets.

There has been renewed scrutiny of MPs' second jobs following the Owen Paterson lobbying scandal in late 2021.

At the height of the row, Sir Keir – then leader of the opposition – touted a total ban on MPs having second jobs with 'very limited exceptions'. He then softened his stance to focus on paid advisory and consultancy roles.

Labour politicians took home an extra £467,323 through second jobs, on top of their base salaries.

Those designated as Labour/Co-operative took just over £16,000.

Yuan Yang, member for Earley and Woodley, came out as Labour's top earner. The former Financial Times journalist, elected in the most recent election, accrued just shy of £75,000 in 2025 – the majority of which came through advances on a book launch.

The Conservatives, meanwhile, racked up £3.6m through second jobs, Lib Dems took £139,436.

Across just three members, Reform took just over £1m.

Rishi Sunak ranked as the top Tory with speaking engagements across a bevy of international conglomerates, including hedge funds Bain and Makena Capital.

At the end of last year, the former Prime Minister announced he had taken on advisory roles with tech monoliths Microsoft and Anthropic AI, both of which could net him hundreds of thousands of pounds per year.

>>24182499

……………………………………………………………………………….continued………………………………………………………………………………

Like second jobs, accepting gifts as a Westminster peer has long been a controversial topic.

Labour's first months in power were dominated by the 'freebies' row, when Sir Keir – nicknamed 'free gear Keir' – and other top ministers faced intense scrutiny over gifts they received.

In the wake of the scandal, the PM was forced to pay back £6,000 worth of gifts and hospitality, including Taylor Swift tickets.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves also vowed to no longer accept free tickets after she was criticised for taking a family member to see Sabrina Carpenter without paying.

Sir Keir, Ms Reeves and then-deputy PM Angela Rayner also pledged to no longer accept free clothing, after it was revealed donors were funding their wardrobes.

Tom Brake, chief executive of the political reform group, Unlock Democracy, told the Daily Mail: 'An MP's loyalty to their voters must never be in doubt.

'But when MPs take on multiple side gigs or accept lucrative freebies, even when it's within the rules, it raises all sorts of questions - of influence and special treatment - and erodes public trust.

'It's time to draw the line: no freebies above nominal value, and a cap on outside earnings of half an MP's salary.'

Charlie Maynard, Liberal Democrat MP for Witney, racked up just over £935,000 on pro bono legal fees, according to the latest register.

Every penny came in the form of waived legal fees for Mr Maynard to represent the government and the public in court against embattled utility provider, Thames Water over the later-approved investor bailout.

In a rare run of proceedings, Mr Maynard was given irregular permission to represent the interest of the public as investors battled for a government bailout for the firm's £17bn debt pile.

The firm, which provides water and waste management to 16m people, even unsuccessfully tried to get Mr Maynard to cover its legal fees of up to £1,400 per hour.

Mr Maynard, who was only elected in July 2024, was ordered to apologise to the house after failing to disclose the legal bill costs by the 28-day deadline in March last year.

They were noted by City of London law firm Marriott Harrison, barristers William Day and Rabin Kok, las well as legal scholar Riz Mokal.

More than £50,000 worth of freebies given to MPs were football hospitality tickets – including for Sir Keir and his beloved Arsenal.

At the tail end of last year, Parliament's sleaze watchdog suggested MPs should stop taking freebies in order to restore trust with voters.

Daniel Greenberg, the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, urged politicians to 'constantly benchmark' their actions against how they will be viewed by the public.

After nearly three years in his role investigating sleaze rows, Mr Greenberg warned that voters' trust in MPs remains a 'serious problem'.