/r8k/ - r8k

>>545

Nofap and shit like that is just a (((psyop))) to make men ashamed of their normal, healthy sexuality anyway. Don't fall for "semen retention" and other bullshit new-age pseudoscience deepity.

>>547

and only men; notice how nobody guilt-trips girls into not flicking their beans to porn or admonishes them for ENABLING MASS MALE GOONING?! is not the dealer the worse criminal!?

>>556

>>566

Women do care about me. Why? Because I understand and skillfully implement the following:

Women LIKE being beat, women LOVE being insulted and degraded, women CRAVE being treated like brainless fuckmeat or at best child-level intelligence and emotional discipline, women DEMAND being chained and caged as a man's private property in his personal dungeon full of other sexually excited pound-town puppets – because that's apparently alpha manly as all get out. If she says she doesn't, she just hasn't found the right sadistic abuser yet. If she says she's lesbian or bi, she just hasn't been slapped around by the right Chad Thundercock / Tyrone Muddick yet.

In short: never listen to what a woman says, she has no idea what she's talking about and that's how she feels RIGHT NOW and five minutes later that could be different without her prior knowledge nor consent – she thinks consent is gay, too. What they SAY they want, and what they RESPOND TO SEXUALLY, are a galactic super-cluster apart.

Islam is right about women.

>>583

You're very dedicated to your caricature-of-roastiefoid act. Why not take your deliberately obtuse, intentional mischaracterizing/misinterpreting hallucinations of words that just aren't there (pancakes and waffles), "I'm not mad, YOU'RE mad!" theatrical performance to 4ailwoke, dikdok, thotch, or some other bigger pond to farm attention from and you may even get a gathering of femarxist simp paypigs while you're at it! But if you really are the stereotypical foidroast fujoshit… I am so sorry for you and hope you find the right Chad Thundercock and Tyrone Muddick to double-penetrate you so you stop feeling so lonely and miserable.

>ban from 4ailwoke

Stopped reading there. If you can't figure out how to evade a ban you are too tech illiterate to belong in places like these. Go to plebbitumblr or twattergaia or whichever is the proper quarantine for failed normgroids like yourself.

>>545

Ever notice how everyone jumps at the chance to shame gooners, coomers, and pornbrains … unless they're women? Ever notice that unproven goofy woo like No Nut November, No-Fap, No-Porn, and Semen Retention are ALWAYS used to denounce male heterosexuality, and ONLY MALE HETEROSEXUALITY – especially if it's "male gaze" (note also nobody cries sexism at "female gaze", rather it's lauded and applauded!) aimed at women of healthy weight and proportions?

But in any case, male and female, gay and straight and all the rest: don't you ever let anyone shame you for watching porn. It's no different from any other mindless fun activity, but this one is widely shamed ONLY because of strong abrahamist [spits] undertones throughout all English-speaking nations, no other reason than that.

All "studies" on "porn addiction" are feminist (unchecked mass anti-male bigotry) pseudo-science bunk. Every "test" they did (Replication Crisis In Studies by the way, look it up and learn how much your blind religious faith in scientism is as much a belief as thinking Santa Claus is real) could equally apply to eating sugar or playing basketball. Unchecked, wide-spread, anti-male heterophobia is nothing more than judeo-femarxist shaming of normal male sexuality and anti-sex, anti-life, abrahamist [spits], asinine absurdity which SHOULD HAVE BY NOW gone the way of other primitive superstition like "beating off = hairy palms" and electroshock conversion therapy.

It makes no scientific sense that sex would be good for you, but masturbation wouldn't; how would your body know the difference? Why would evolution bake-in such self-destruction when a man orgasms, the one sole means of producing offspring, which is the ENTIRE FUCKING POINT OF EVOLUTION, YOU DROOLING FARTING JACKASSES? That this is so easily and swiftly sliced apart by one stroke of Occam's Razor SHOULD be the height of common sense and deductive reasoning. But apparently everyone but myself has the atrophied brains of a toddler with down's syndrome, being so entirely incapable of exercising one shred of critical analysis. I must be the one sole modern era's giga-genius or something, not like that's was a hard win when my competition is you lot of brainletismal spasmoids. Trying to teach you people a god damn thing would be as fruitless as holding an open manual of quantum physics in front of a lobotomized donkey's face expecting it to eventually learn how to find something in Hilbert Space. You couldn't comprehend "Hilbert Space" even after web-searching its definition you mental lilliputian.

This article is great: In Defense Of Pornography

https://web.archive.org/web/20190503062015/http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/rantmode/porno