/niggwretchedness/ - Nigger Community Wretchedness

Page 2 👉 CUNT ➡

Peasants are not intellectual, they are not principled.

What peasants do is find a leader and identify him as a father figure who is defending their interests and then do whatever he says.

If Trump said it was time to start rounding up Jews, putting them in camps and gassing them, MAGA would be just as enthusiastic about that as they are about arresting people for criticizing these same Jews. There are not philosophical principles here. MAGA people don’t like perverts, they don’t like being told what to do, they don’t like being poor. All of the rest of it is extremely flexible if not outright arbitrary.

But if this is true, then democracy is completely ridiculous, right? And no one such as Caitlin Johnstone wants to admit that human nature makes democracy a completely unworkable system, and would rather just complain about how people need to become fully actualized individuals.

The reality is, in order to have a moral and principled society, you need an aristocracy that is bound by honor based in religious doctrine to guide the peasantry.

For the record, I think the original American idea of only allowing males who own land to vote was more or less workable. But when you have universal suffrage, and literally allow women to vote, along with negroes and immigrants, you are just going to get an utterly debauched orgy of grotesque moronism, a paradise for nonsense and cartoonish corruption.

If Caitlin Johnstone and every other one of these people constantly complaining about hypocrisy are so concerned about the integrity of a principled order of society, they need to start calling for an end to democracy. Right now, this is like living in a swamp and becoming outraged that you are being swarmed with insects, and condemning the insects as immoral for violating the non-aggression principle.

If Johnstone was talking about people like Ben Shapiro and Barry Weiss (and a whole list of other “Jewish conservatives”) who did their whole bit about free speech for years and now all of a sudden are calling for Andrew Tate to be crucified in front of the castle in the Magic Kingdom because Florida doesn’t tolerate people asking questions about Jewish power, then okay. Those people can be criticized. I think it’s pointless, because anyone who thought Ben Shapiro would support the First Amendment right to criticize Jews is retarded. But he is a public figure who frames himself as an intellectual who will “debate anyone on facts and logic” who takes positions which are not based on facts and do not make logical sense.

But attacking the peasants for going along with whatever the media says is so ridiculous that it is beyond ridicule. Caitlin, when conservatives were demanding the right to say retard and tranny, did you imagine that if Donald Trump said it was illegal to criticize the Jews, they would take a principled stance against that? Are you surprised by this development? I seriously doubt you are, so if you could have predicted it years ago, then how can you now be outraged by it?

2nd Article

(What is the Core of the Power Struggle Between Russia and the United States??)

But he’s married and I think has kids. Hosting the show, he was really having problems monologuing, but I think he was mostly nervous and relying on a teleprompter. I don’t think he’s ever hosted a video show solo like that, so I won’t judge, but the shows were a bit dull.

I listened to most of the shows he did. He made a comment on Friday I wanted to comment on. Talking about the conflict between Russia and America, he noted that Russia’s media propaganda is all about how they are defending traditional Christian values against the satanic West, while America’s propaganda is all about how they are protecting democracy (which is basically a codeword for “satanism” at this point, though Lee didn’t mention that). His analysis is that both of these narratives are just propaganda, and this is actually just a power struggle between two large states. This is sort of too obvious and literal to be actually useful analysis. It’s like claiming that a gunfight is really about bullets flying in different directions propelled by the rapid expansion of gases generated when the gunpowder inside the cartridge is ignited by the primer. The actual question of interest when analyzing a gunfight is why the two parties involved are firing guns at one another, not the ballistics.

When we consider why the US and Russia are involved in this struggle, the propaganda of the two states is basically the straightforward explanation. There is nuance, because Russia is not really an ideal Christian state (though I think it is trying to be one, putting the standard amount of Russian effort into the project), and US-style democracy is not actually “freedom” but rather the opposite. But the basic narrative that this is a conflict rooted in differences in first principles is fundamentally true, and should be obvious.

Many or most former communist states, including former Russian states, have been fully or partially integrated into the Western system. None of those countries were anywhere near as powerful as Russia, but Russia spent the first decade and a half following the fall of communism making overtures to the West, pushing for collaborative ties, and they were successful in this endeavor with their energy relationship with Europe. But the US was intent on dominating Russia. But what does this domination entail? It is entirely about bullying Russia into accepting “Western democracy values,” which would mean abandoning the traditional values that Russia is striving to maintain.

When the United States claims that democracy countries do not have wars with each other, this is true. The reason is that the democracy ideology is fundamentally international and multicultural, and it is always dominated by the United States through the cultural manipulation that the US is so good at. If you allow democracy, that means you allow the Western media establishment (which they cartoonishly label a “free press”), which causes the population to adopt the American value system of materialism, consumerism, atheism, and the destruction of the family through normalization of decadent and deviant sexual norms. Meanwhile, the electoral system of democracy ensures that the power structure, controlled by the United States, can never actually be challenged. Even if you follow the rules the rules can be changed arbitrarily, as Romania’s Calin Georgescu recently discovered when he, as the election frontrunner, was banned from standing in the presidential election. If you are a democracy, you are under a full lockdown by the internationalist system that operates out of the United States, so there can’t be conflict.

Just so, Russia’s own mass media propaganda is absolutely correct that the United States is trying to force these values on Russia. Through the National Endowment for Democracy, USAID, a plethora of Soros-backed NGOs, the entire social media apparatus, and many other outlets, the US was actively spreading anti-Christian values in Russia, before these organizations were all banned by the Kremlin following the outbreak of the war.

So, while the propaganda might be an oversimplification, as all mass propaganda necessarily is, this is a pedantic argument. Defining it as a power struggle between states is technically true, but means nothing. The important issue is why the power struggle exists, and if Russia was a Western-style democracy, there would be no power struggle.

Journalist Lee Fang was a guest host for Glenn Greenwald’s System Update show on Rumble last week. Glenn needs to go on many vacations, I’m sure to, you know, experience cultures and so on. I’m sure that’s his main priority on all these vacations he’s constantly on.

Lee is one of the last real journalists. At least at the Intercept he was doing work that was really beyond what most all journalists are doing. He’s fine on podcasts, although he’s got that Chinese autism-like thing that 90% of Chinamen have. He’s not gay, by the way. With dapper East Asians it’s sometimes a bit ambiguous, especially when they’ve got his sort of interior design sense.

An important note is that the Russian elite do not have more wealth or power because the Russian state is resisting the Western system. Although Putin personally would have a problem if Western democracy were to triumph in Russia, the rich of Russia would end up with more money and not have to give up any power. When Romania went in on democracy, Nicolae Ceaușescu did not do well, but the elite made out like bandits, as the Western democracy system allowed for much more aggressive looting than the former communist system did. It was the political elite of Romania that sold Ceaușescu down the river, as they had made deals with the West that would allow them to privatize state assets.

One could claim that it is overly romantic to portray Vladimir Putin as a crusader fighting in defense of historical Christendom against the Western hordes of satanic perverts, but even the most cynical analysis would have to frame Putin as fighting for a personal legacy as a great man of history, and that legacy of greatness can only be based on the defense of traditional Russian identity. (No one is going to remember Mikhail Gorbachev or Boris Yeltsin as great men of history.) Therefore, the romantic and cynical interpretations of the personal motivations of Putin and his inner circle mean the same thing, and therefore any pontification of his personal motivations is a pointless distraction.

America is a satanic entity entirely controlled by Jews who hate Jesus Christ and all human normalcy. As Saint Paul said, the Jews are the enemies of all mankind. That is the core of the struggle between America and its enemies, and therefore, the simplistic narratives of the media apparatuses of both America and Russia reach a fundamental truth that Mearsheimerian power theory completely fails to address.

NEXT ARTICLE

Jewish Princess Scarlett Johansson Calls for an End to Robots After Being in an AI Meme

A viral video shows Jewish celebrities wearing anti-Kanye T-shirts. However, the video was created using AI without permission from the celebrities.

Scarlett Johansson has spoken out about the deepfake video in a statement to PEOPLE.

She can destroy a T-Rex like it’s some crying man whose life she ruined, but can she bring down the monster of antisemitism and the robots that promote it?

I actually support the US having ridiculous restrictions on AI development. China is already the leader in the field by a lot; just let Jews cripple their empire even further by limiting technological development for the purpose of social engineering.

CNN:

Scarlett Johansson is condemning antisemitism and calling for legislation to protect the public from artificial intelligence after a deepfake video of her and other celebrities, created with the technology, widely circulated on social media this week.

The AI video showed an image of Johansson in a T-shirt emblazoned with a hand and middle finger extended, a Jewish star and Kanye West’s name. Though fake, the video implied she and others were responding to West’s most recent antisemitic remarks and a swastika shirt he was selling on his Yeezy website, before it was pulled down by Shopify.

“It has been brought to my attention by family members and friends, that an AI-generated video featuring my likeness, in response to an antisemitic view, has been circulating online and gaining traction,” Johansson said in a statement obtained by CNN. “I am a Jewish woman who has no tolerance for antisemitism or hate speech of any kind. But I also firmly believe that the potential for hate speech multiplied by AI is a far greater threat than any one person who takes accountability for it. We must call out the misuse of AI, no matter its messaging, or we risk losing a hold on reality.”

Johansson’s statement continued, “I have unfortunately been a very public victim of AI, but the truth is that the threat of AI affects each and every one of us. There is a 1000 foot wave coming regarding AI that several progressive countries, not including the United States, have responded to in a responsible manner. It is terrifying that the US government is paralyzed when it comes to passing legislation that protects all of its citizens against the imminent dangers of AI.”

The fake video also included AI-generated imagery of Adam Levine, Mila Kunis, Lenny Kravitz, Mark Zuckerberg, Sacha Baron Cohen, Ben Stiller, Natalie Portman, David Schwimmer and others, set to “Hava Nagila,” a Jewish folk song that is typically played at celebratory cultural events.

[farmers-very-worried-as-pesticide-companies-push-law-blocking-litigation-against-them]

farmers want access to the courts in case the pesticides cause health problems.

They’ve known for many decades that these pesticides cause cancer, not just in the farmers that have to deal with them directly, but in the people who eat the produce.

The government doesn’t care about your health.

They say they do when they are trying to ban you from smoking or trying to force you to take experimental gene therapies, but they do not care about your health. They will give you cancer on purpose. They will give themselves cancer if it means they can make a few bucks off donations from these chemical manufacturers.

The Guardian:

Pesticide company efforts to push through laws that could block litigation against them is igniting battles in several US farm states and pitting some farm groups against each other.

Laws have been introduced in at least eight states so far and drafts are circulating in more than 20 states, backed by a deluge of advertising supporting the measures.

The fight is particularly fierce now in Iowa, where opponents call the pesticide-backed proposed law the “Cancer Gag Act”, due to high levels of cancer in Iowa that many fear are linked to the state’s large agricultural use of pesticides. Iowa has the second-highest rate of new cancer cases in the United States and the fastest growing rate.

The bill would bar people from suing pesticide manufacturers for failing to warn them of health risks, as long as the product labels are approved by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Organizers against the Iowa bill are planning a rally at the state capitol today after the state senate voted last week to advance the measure.

Opponents say the legislation will rob farmers and others who use pesticides from holding companies accountable in court if their pesticide products cause disease or injury.

“We’re very worried. Our farmers feel that if they have injuries or illnesses due to their use of a pesticide they should have access to the courts,” said Aaron Lehman, an Iowa corn and soybean farmer who is president of the Iowa Farmers Union. “We just don’t think the playing field should be tilted.”

2nd Page of article

actions in the states come alongside a simultaneous push for changes in federal law that would in effect shield companies from lawsuits brought by people claiming they developed cancers or other diseases due to their use of pesticides.

Bayer, the Germany-based owner of the former Monsanto Co, is the chief architect of the strategy, designed as a means to beat back thousands of lawsuits filed by farmers and others who blame their use of Monsanto’s Roundup herbicides for causing them to develop cancer.

The litigation has so far cost Bayer billions of dollars in settlements and jury verdicts favoring plaintiffs, and more cases are pending. The company says the pursuit of the legislative changes is necessary to protect its “important investments” and to ensure farmers don’t lose access to Roundup.

Hopefully RFK can get involved in this.

He’s the only man in America that can do that job.

There have been some settlements recently that indicated there could be some changes.

But there are never really any changes, are there?

Companies pay out some tiny fraction of their profits to a few of the people whose lives they’ve destroyed, and it just keeps on going.

5th Article

Denmark Makes Epic Troll Joke About Buying California

Yeah, just buy it! You get a lot of free junkies, not to mention millions of Indian geniuses who are dominating the AI field with the top AI product ChatGPT, which is the best on the market and very efficient.

This is a hilarious troll from the Danes and I was keking so hard I vomited up my daily dose of red pills and had to go to my safe space and realized it was time to take the L.

But also… wouldn’t it be a great idea to sell California, and all the people in it?

RT:

A crowdfunding group in Denmark has proposed that their country acquire the US state of California for $1 trillion and a lifetime supply of Danish pastries. The satirical idea of purchasing the territory comes after US President Donald Trump reiterated his interest in buying Greenland.

Trump has repeatedly floated the idea of acquiring Greenland – an autonomous territory of Denmark – citing the island’s significant strategic and economic value for the US. Both Danish and Greenlandic officials have vehemently rejected the idea. Trump, however, has suggested that he would be prepared to use military and economic force to obtain the territory. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio also stressed last month that purchasing Greenland is a serious goal and “not a joke.”

In response to Trump’s continued interest in the island, the ‘Denmarkification’ group has outlined its own proposal to the US president, offering to take California off his hands and throw in a lifetime supply of Danish pastries to “sweeten the deal.” The group pointed out that Trump has already described the state as “the most ruined” in the US.

The proposal is presented as a crowdfunded effort, with the group estimating that each Danish citizen would only need to “skip a few lattes” and contribute approximately 200,000 kroner ($27,675). The group humorously suggested that the acquisition would bring Danish cultural values, including “hygge” (comfort), bike lanes and Smorrebrod sandwiches to California. The group also said it plans to rename Disneyland to Hans Christian Andersenland, writing “Mickey Mouse in a Viking helmet? Yes please.”

2nd Page of article

Seriously though, it's for sale.

That joke could have been funnier if you would have tried even harder.

Quick, without looking it up, name one story by Hans Christian Andersen, the most famous Dane ever.

It’s absurd that Denmark would go around bragging about that, while America has all of the most epic figures in history. Maybe we’ll rename “Greenland” as “Bo Jacksonville.”

Eskimos playing two different professional sports at the same time? Yes please.

The only cool thing I’ve ever seen an Eskimo do was club a baby seal, but that still makes them 10X cooler than the most famous ever Dane, Hans Christian Literally Who.

The Danish prime minster is a husky stable wench who was milking a goat in a shed when she decided to run for office to take a stand against gay rights restrictions in Chechnya and because she wanted to force people to use paper straws.

Denmark was like “well, with Hans Whatshisface having recently died during a tragic goat-milking accident, you’re the most interesting person in our country, so you win the election by unanimous decision.”

Then the official Denmark government Twitter account literally posted: “Denmark takes a big W as husky woman vows more windmills and to conquer Russia and China.”

I hope Trump takes this deal and sells them California and then the Danes turn it into a slave colony and it ends up like that John Carpenter movie “Ghosts of Mars.”

Next page CUNT 👉 👉

Wait, did Natasha Henstridge have sex with Ice Cube in that movie?

I can’t imagine John Carpenter is that bluepilled, but that poster makes it look like they’re a couple, no? I don’t remember the movie that well, I just remember there was a slave colony in California run by the Danish and they were like torturing people using medieval devices and then making jokes about free pastries because Denmark has existed for thousands of years and the only thing they invented was a pastry.

Remember at the Oscars when Denzel Washington slapped Eddie Murphy because he said “yo man, Ice Cube, man, he like the Denmark of rappers-turned-actor”?

One time someone called me “the Denmark of internet jokesters” and I vomited up my red pills and had to go to my safe space and take the L.

6th Article for mid march

-"trump offers asylum to white south africans being hunted like animals by oppressed black overlords"

BLACKS JUST STEAL LAND FROM WHITES

oppressed blacks of South Africa, who have long suffered microaggressions, have a brutal stranglehold on the nation and use their unchecked power to destroy whites.

It’s nice of Trump to offer them a way out. It’s also politically useful, as he can meet the existing quotas for refugees with white people, rather than swamping us in even more human garbage from the third world.

RT:

Prominent Afrikaner (white South African) organizations, including AfriForum and the Solidarity Movement, have rejected an offer from US President Donald Trump to resettle in America as refugees, reaffirming their commitment to remain in South Africa.

The proposal was part of an executive order signed on Friday, which also suspended US financial assistance to the country over concerns about land expropriation policies and South Africa’s legal action against Israel at the International Court of Justice.

”We don’t want to move elsewhere, and we are not going to ask our children now to move to another country. We have interests of future generations and to make sure our culture is passed down to future generations; that cannot be done abroad,” Kallie Kriel, the CEO of AfriForum, said at a media briefing in the capital, Pretoria.

Flip Buys, the chairman of the Solidarity Movement, echoed this sentiment, stressing that while Afrikaners may disagree with the ruling African National Congress (ANC), they remain dedicated to their homeland and see no need to become refugees.

The South African government has criticized the US executive order, calling it misleading and based on misinformation. Officials say Afrikaners remain among the country’s most economically privileged groups and dismissed the claim that they face state-endorsed discrimination.

It’s funny how whites who are being systematically murdered while their land is being seized from them don’t want to be refugees, while people from Central and South America seek “refuge” from being poor.

If it wasn’t pure hated for the color of the skin to say so, I would have to ask if it’s not possible that maybe brown people have always been judged by the content of their character, and that content tends to be of a very low quality.

7th article

(UK DEMANDS APPLE GIVE THEM FULL BACKDOOR TO ALL IPHONES (GLOBALLY) SO THEY CAN KEEP THEIR IMMIGRANTS FROM KILLING EVERYONE)

story is that the US doesn’t want backdoors on iPhones because everyone in the government is using iPhones, and if they put backdoors in them, the Russians and the Chinese – and anyone else who wants them – will have access.

The NSA has some kind of way to hack iPhones, which they presumably get from Israeli companies that develop this software (that was in WikiLeaks), but what the UK is asking for – just an open door that will allow them to spy on all the phones at the same time – is something different and much more extreme.

RT:

The UK government has issued a “technical capability notice” to Apple, compelling the tech giant to create a backdoor to its encrypted iCloud service, the Washington Post reported on Friday. The move would enable UK law enforcement and security agencies to access encrypted data stored by Apple users worldwide, according to the newspaper.

The UK’s Investigatory Powers Act (IPA), referred to by critics as the “Snoopers’ Charter,” grants authorities the power to mandate that tech companies permit access to users’ data for investigative purposes. It also makes it a criminal offense to reveal that the government has made such a demand. The recent notice requires Apple to provide a means for decrypting user data. It is currently protected by end-to-end encryption, ensuring that only users can access their information.

Creating such backdoors could weaken overall security and set a dangerous precedent, according to Daniel Castro, vice-president of the US-based Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. In a statement on Friday, he has described the UK’s move as an “unjustified over-reach that threatens the security and privacy of individuals and businesses around the world.”

…

UK security officials argue that encryption can hinder efforts to combat crime and terrorism. “Maintaining proportionate, lawful access to such communications in the face of ever-more prevalent encryption is sometimes our only means of detecting and understanding these threats,” Ken McCallum, head of the UK’s domestic intelligence agency MI5, stated last October. He believes that “privacy and exceptional lawful access can coexist if absolutist positions are avoided.”