80e470 No.50955 [Last 50 Posts]
/qresearch/ Australia
Re-Posts of notables
____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109224
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23252468 (290934ZJUN25) Notable: Talisman Sabre Tweets: - We have reached the end of the Australian component of EXTS25 as activities now move to Papua New Guinea. This is the first time that a component of Exercise Talisman Sabre has been hosted outside of Australia and will conclude with a closing ceremony on 4 August. We thank all those who have participated to date and supported Talisman Sabre 25 and we look forward to seeing you all at Talisman Sabre 27. #ts25 #talismansabre #talismansabre25 #YourADF #StrongerTogether
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Talisman Sabre 2025 is coming from 13 July - 04 August 2025
Asia Pacific Defence Reporter - 23/04/2025
Australia will host the largest ever Exercise Talisman Sabre from 13 July to 4 August 2025 with over 30,000 military personnel from 19 nations set to participate in activities across Australia, and for the first time, in Papua New Guinea. Now in its 11th iteration, Talisman Sabre is the largest bilateral combined training activity between the Australian Defence Force and the United States military, reflecting the closeness of our Alliance.
Participating partner nations in Talisman Sabre 2025 also include Canada, Fiji, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, the Republic of Korea, Singapore, Thailand, Tonga, and the United Kingdom. Brunei, Malaysia and Vietnam will also attend as observers.
Talisman Sabre 2025 will focus on multi-domain warfighting. Key activities will include amphibious and airborne lodgements, firepower demonstrations, and combat across land, air, sea, space and cyber domains. The logistics for preparing, staging, integrating and moving forces to and around Australia are the most complex ever undertaken for a Talisman Sabre. The activities are scheduled to take place right across the nation, including Queensland, Western Australia, the Northern Territory, New South Wales and on Christmas Island.
For the first time ever, Papua New Guinea will also host an activity, highlighting the growing capabilities and interoperability with Pacific partners as Papua New Guinea marks its 50th Anniversary of Independence.
Chief of Joint Operations, Vice Admiral Justin Jones, said: “Talisman Sabre demonstrates our enduring Alliance with the United States, through deepening cooperation in training and force integration. It is a key opportunity to work with our partners from across the region and around the globe, demonstrating our combined capability to achieve large-scale operational outcomes together. As well as welcoming the largest ever contingent of partner nations, Australia is also excited to be holding part of this year’s exercise in Papua New Guinea. This is an important demonstration of the deepening integration between Australia and Papua New Guinea’s Defence Forces.”
Talisman Sabre Exercise Director, Brigadier Damian Hill, said: “This year’s exercise will demonstrate our ability to receive large volumes of personnel and equipment into Australia from across the Indo-Pacific, to stage, integrate and move them forward into the large exercise area. Considerable planning has gone into a safe and productive exercise for all participants. Talisman Sabre 2025 will be held across a range of Defence and non-Defence training areas throughout northern Australia. I thank the traditional owners, landowners, state authorities, and key community stakeholders who have helped us develop a safe and productive exercise for all participating nations.”
https://asiapacificdefencereporter.com/australia-hosting-exercise-talisman-sabre/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DBVBgSPCLPc
https://www.defence.gov.au/defence-activities/exercises/talisman-sabre
https://qresear.ch/?q=Talisman+Sabre
>Talisman Sabre
MAGIC SWORD
https://qalerts.pub/?q=Operation+Specialists
https://qalerts.pub/?q=magic
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109225
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23252471 (290942ZJUN25) Notable: Q Post #2064 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G02wKufX3nw - Played by 'Operation Specialists' [pre-event] last night. Q - https://qanon.pub/#2064
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
Q Post #2064
Sep 2 2018 15:18:24 (EST)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G02wKufX3nw
Played by 'Operation Specialists' [pre-event] last night.
Q
https://qanon.pub/#2064
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109226
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23252473 (290944ZJUN25) Notable: Video: Magic Sword - In The Face Of Evil - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G02wKufX3nw - Jan 8, 2015
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109225
Magic Sword - In The Face Of Evil
Magic Sword
Jan 8, 2015
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G02wKufX3nw
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109227
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23252476 (290950ZJUN25) Notable: Q Post #2065 - >why did I get extreme goosebumps while listening to this?? - https://qanon.pub/#2065
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109225
>>109226
Q Post #2065
Sep 2 2018 15:24:57 (EST)
>why did I get extreme goosebumps while listening to this??
https://qanon.pub/#2065
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109228
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23252491 (291001ZJUN25) Notable: Video: Wissam Haddad escalates violent rhetoric on eve of hate speech verdict – Jewish leaders are bracing for a Federal Court decision on whether Sydney cleric Wissam Haddad breached section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act. Haddad, long accused of promoting extremist views, described Jews as “vile” and “treacherous” in sermons at his Bankstown centre and has since escalated his rhetoric online, invoking swords against Jews and Christians. The case, brought by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, seeks injunctions to stop future vilification. It comes as NSW crossbenchers move to repeal hate speech laws linked to the discredited Dural caravan plot.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73626 (pb)
Wissam Haddad escalates violent rhetoric on eve of hate speech verdict
STEPHEN RICE - 29 June 2025
1/2
Jewish community leaders are waiting nervously to find out whether hate preacher Wissam Haddad will be allowed to continue his anti-Semitic attacks, with the Federal Court to deliver a landmark ruling in the vilification case against the radical cleric amid moves by NSW crossbenchers to repeal new hate speech and protest laws.
On Tuesday, judge Angus Stewart will hand down his verdict on whether Mr Haddad breached section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act in sermons asserting that Jews were “vile” and “treacherous” people.
Mr Haddad or speakers at his Bankstown-based Al Madina Dawah Centre in southwest Sydney have called Jewish people “descendants of pigs and monkeys”, recited parables about their killing, and said people should “spit” on Israel so its citizens “would drown”.
In his defence to the claim brought by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, Mr Haddad has claimed he was referring to or reciting Islamic scripture in sermons he made in the wake of the October 7, 2023, Hamas terrorist attacks.
Mr Haddad has escalated his violent rhetoric as the decision approaches, invoking the Koran in a sermon posted to social media about swords being raised against “Ahl al-Kitab” (the People of the Book, primarily Jews and Christians) “until they pay the Jizya” (a tax paid by non-Muslims living under Islamic rule in return for protection).
“As for the words of the messenger … when he said ‘I was sent with the sword’, it means that Allah sent him as a caller to Tawhid (the oneness and uniqueness of Allah) with a sword, after inviting the people to be a witness to Allah with evidence that whoever does not respond to the invitation of this Tawhid, through the Koran and its evidences is therefore called to Islam with the sword”, Mr Haddad said.
The post suggests he is deliberately using the violent imagery as a provocation.
“We are on the topic of swords, and the topic angers the Kuffar (disbelievers) … and in fact, angering them is a type of Ibadah (worship; acts done to seek the pleasure of Allah)”, Mr Haddad says in the video.
An earlier video featuring images of an Arabic sword, in which Mr Haddad warned that “we are not going to come unarmed”, was condemned by Jewish community members as an incitement to young radicals to commit violence.
In an early hearing, Justice Stewart said “upon quick reading” the case against Mr Haddad was “damning”, and pushed back on an argument that certain sermons were protected by section 18D of the Racial Discrimination Act that provides exemptions for public interest rhetoric, given it runs counter to his own judgment in the successful case of Greens deputy leader Mehreen Faruqi against One Nation’s leader, Pauline Hanson.
If Justice Stewart decides in favour of Mr Haddad, many in the Jewish community fear the case could unleash a storm of anti-Semitic rhetoric from radical clerics, at a moment when hate speech laws are being attacked in the NSW parliament as the product of a “fake” terror plot.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109229
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23256427 (300856ZJUN25) Notable: Beijing’s argument against increasing defence spending and China threat – China’s ambassador to Australia, Xiao Qian, has urged Anthony Albanese not to raise military spending, warning it would burden the economy and undermine growth, while dismissing fears over Beijing’s military build-up. His intervention comes as Penny Wong heads to Washington for Quad talks and Albanese prepares for a visit to Beijing. Defence Minister Richard Marles has warned of China’s aggressive actions, while US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said Beijing is preparing for war. Canberra maintains defence and social spending are not mutually exclusive, though critics argue strategic priorities remain underfunded.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73555 (pb)
>>73560 (pb)
>>73421 (pb)
Beijing’s argument against increasing defence spending and China threat
GEOFF CHAMBERS and NOAH YIM - 30 June 2025
1/2
Xi Jinping’s top diplomat in Australia has warned Anthony Albanese that increasing military spending will impose a “heavy fiscal burden” on his budget and undermine economic development, in an attack on Donald Trump’s push for Canberra to ramp up defence spending and help counter Chinese aggression.
Ahead of the Prime Minister’s expected visit to Beijing next month and Penny Wong travelling to Washington this week for a Quad foreign ministers meeting, Chinese ambassador to Australia Xiao Qian rejected domestic fears about China’s massive armed forces build-up and threat to regional security.
Writing in The Australian, Mr Xiao claimed China and Australia were “friends, not foes”, Beijing’s military build-up was “normal” and “just 1.5 per cent of GDP” was being spent on the People’s Liberation Army.
As Mr Albanese pledges to fund necessary ADF capabilities presented to him but resists US calls to increase defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, Mr Xiao urged against lifting military expenditure on the grounds of economic peril. “Dramatically increasing military spending places a heavy fiscal burden on the countries involved, undermining their efforts to boost economies and improve livelihoods, and further straining a global economy already struggling with weak recovery,” he wrote.
“Some countries are ailing yet demand their ‘allies and partners’ foot the bill for medicine, which seems to be an almost laughable notion. Whether to spend on arms purchases, handouts to the ‘hegemon’, or pooling funds for its sake, or to heed their own people’s calls for economic development, is now a difficult choice for these ‘allies and partners’.”
Mr Xiao’s intervention weeks before Mr Albanese meets with the Chinese President is a dramatic escalation in Beijing’s efforts to fight back against US officials calling on allies including Australia to spend more on defence.
The ambassador’s claims that Australia must choose between defence spending and social services comes just days after Spain’s Prime Minister, Pedro Sanchez, stared down tariff threats from Mr Trump. The Spanish leader said last week he would not sign up to NATO’s 5 per cent defence spending pledge to protect his country’s “welfare state”.
Speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore this month, Defence Minister Richard Marles warned that China was engaged in the largest military build-up since World War II without providing “any strategic reassurance”.
There have been multiple incidents where Australian Defence Force personnel have been put in danger by the PLA, which recently dispatched a spy ship to southern Australia and authorised Chinese warships to circumnavigate the country and conduct live fire exercises in the Tasman Sea ahead of the May 3 election.
In addition to cyber warfare and espionage operations targeting Australia, Chinese naval vessels and aircraft have targeted Australian navy and air force personnel conducting joint exercises with the US and regional allies.
Amid a 30-day Pentagon review into the AUKUS nuclear submarine agreement and pressure from the White House for the Albanese government to lift military spending, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth told the Shangri-La Dialogue that China was preparing for war.
Mr Hegseth said it was clear Beijing, which has made huge investments in nuclear weapons, hypersonics and amphibious assault capabilities, was preparing to “potentially use military force to alter the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific” and that Mr Xi could order an invasion of Taiwan by 2027.
Without naming the US, Mr Xiao accused some countries of hyping up the “so-called ‘China threat” narrative” at the Shangri-La Dialogue, G7 and NATO summits, while “inciting” Australia to follow their lead on defence spending.
“By playing up international and regional tensions and slandering China’s normal military build-up, these countries are merely seeking nothing but excuses to drastically grow their military spending, even arbitrarily reaching beyond its geographical scope and mandate,” he wrote.
“Behind the so-called ‘China threat’ lies certain countries’ desire to maintain their hegemony. They are trapped in their own inertia, fear fair competition, and even cannot tolerate other countries from making progress.
“To this end, they seek to stifle the development and advancement of countries like China, so that they can continue plundering the world through hegemony while funnelling benefits to their backers.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109230
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23256450 (300908ZJUN25) Notable: OPINION: Don’t fall for NATO’s hyped-up rhetoric on defence spending – “Recently, some countries hyped up the so-called China threat narrative on occasions such as the Shangri-La Dialogue, G7 summit and NATO summit, proclaiming to significantly increase defence expenditures, and even incited Australia to follow suit. Such rhetoric and actions are steeped in Cold War mentality, blatantly creating division, fuelling a global arms race as well as threatening world peace and stability, which warrants our high vigilance. China and Australia are friends, not foes. This should never have been in question. China has been always developing bilateral friendship and co-operation with the utmost sincerity and patience, and we hope Australia will work with us in the same direction.” – Xiao Qian, China’s ambassador to Australia – The Australian
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109229
OPINION: Don’t fall for NATO’s hyped-up rhetoric on defence spending
XIAO QIAN - 30 June 2025
1/2
Recently, some countries hyped up the so-called China threat narrative on occasions such as the Shangri-La Dialogue, G7 summit and NATO summit, proclaiming to significantly increase defence expenditures, and even incited Australia to follow suit.
Such rhetoric and actions are steeped in Cold War mentality, blatantly creating division, fuelling a global arms race as well as threatening world peace and stability, which warrants our high vigilance.
By playing up international and regional tensions and slandering China’s normal military build-up, these countries are merely seeking nothing but excuses to drastically grow their military spending, even arbitrarily reaching beyond its geographical scope and mandate.
NATO countries already account for 55 per cent of the world’s total military spending in 2024.
Yet they are still required to raise defence investment to 5 per cent of GDP to build a “more lethal NATO”.
Behind the so-called China threat lies certain countries’ desire to maintain their hegemony. They are trapped in their own inertia, fear fair competition and even cannot tolerate other countries from making progress.
To this end, they seek to stifle the development and advancement of countries such as China, so they can continue plundering the world through hegemony while funnelling benefits to their backers. This runs counter to fairness, justice and the prevailing trend of global development.
Healthy competition is the only path towards world progress and civilisation advancement, a consensus long held by the international community.
Dramatically increasing military spending places a heavy fiscal burden on the countries involved, undermining their efforts to boost economies and improve livelihoods, and further straining a global economy already struggling with weak recovery. Some countries are ailing yet demand their allies and partners foot the bill for medicine, which seems to be an almost laughable notion.
Whether to spend on arms purchases, handouts to the hegemon, or pooling funds for its sake, or to heed their own people’s calls for economic development, is now a difficult choice for these allies and partners.
To be frank, this is not the first time China has been labelled and targeted. In recent years a handful of countries have rallied so-called allies and partners to repeatedly smear China, peddling narratives such as the “China collapse”, “China threat” and even “Peak China”, while imposing economic suppression and technological blockades. Yet the only tangible outcome of their painstaking efforts to undermine international rules and order has been global economic stagnation, slower technological innovation and heightened regional instability.
Facing these smears and containment, China’s economy has demonstrated remarkable resilience and the living standards of the Chinese people have continued to rise. China has always been a steadfast supporter, defender and promoter of world peace. More than 600 years ago, Zheng He’s seven voyages to the Western Seas carried only silk, porcelain, trade and friendship.
Shortly after the founding of the People’s Republic of China, it put forward the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence.
Across the past 70-plus years, China has never initiated a war or occupied an inch of a foreign land. It is the only country that has incorporated peaceful development in its constitution and the only country among the nuclear-weapon states to pledge no first use of nuclear weapons.
China unwaveringly adheres to a defensive national defence policy, with military spending accounting for just 1.5 per cent of its GDP. It is far below the global average and paling in comparison to certain hegemons or their allies and partners.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109231
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23256464 (300915ZJUN25) Notable: Anthony Albanese riled by questions on China envoy’s op-ed – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said his government would commit whatever funding was necessary for defence after China’s ambassador to Australia, Xiao Qian, urged restraint in an op-ed arguing the “China threat” narrative was fuelling an arms race. Albanese rejected suggestions he was aligning with Beijing, telling reporters: “The Chinese ambassador speaks for China … my job is to speak for Australia.” The dispute comes amid US pressure for Canberra to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP and rising concerns over China’s rapid nuclear and conventional military expansion.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109229
>>109230
Anthony Albanese riled by questions on China envoy’s op-ed
JOSEPH OLBRYCHT-PALMER - 30 June 2025
1/2
Anthony Albanese says his government will pump as much cash as is needed into Australia’s defence after China’s ambassador wrote an op-ed urging Canberra to restrain from spending more.
In his piece published on Monday, Xiao Qian said China and Australia were “not foes” despite being embroiled in a regional rivalry and Beijing rapidly building up conventional and nuclear military capabilities.
It came as the Prime Minister faces domestic and international calls to boost the defence budget, with the US warning of a potentially “imminent” threat from China in the Indo Pacific.
But Mr Albanese has resisted, making Australia an outlier in the West – a position highlighted by NATO’s decision last week to dramatically hike military spending to 5 per cent of GDP.
Fronting media on Monday, Mr Albanese did not align with Xi Jinping’s envoy either.
“The Chinese ambassador speaks for China,” Mr Albanese told reporters.
“My job is to speak for Australia.
“And it’s in Australia’s national interest for us to invest in our capability and to invest in our relationships, and we’re doing just that.”
Asked by a reporter for The Australian if Mr Xiao’s comments constituted “meddling”, a visibly riled Mr Albanese said: “I don’t know, your newspaper published the op-ed.”
He added that people were free to “make comments”.
“That’s up to them,” Mr Albanese said.
“What my job is to do is speak for Australia, and that’s what I do.”
‘Not foes’
Mr Albanese and his senior minister have stuck firm to deciding what capability Australia needs and then funding it, rather than committing to a set percentage of GDP like most other countries and some previous Australian governments.
Mr Xiao used his op-ed in The Australian to urge Canberra to stay the course and continue resisting spending more on defence.
“Recently, some countries hyped up the so-called China threat narrative on occasions such as the Shangri-La Dialogue, G7 summit and NATO summit, proclaiming to significantly increase defence expenditures, and even incited Australia to follow suit,” he wrote.
“Such rhetoric and actions are steeped in Cold War mentality, blatantly creating division, fuelling a global arms race as well as threatening world peace and stability, which warrants our high vigilance.
“By playing up international and regional tensions and slandering China’s normal military build-up, these countries are merely seeking nothing but excuses to drastically grow their military spending, even arbitrarily reaching beyond its geographical scope and mandate.”
He accused “certain countries” of trying to contain China because they “fear fair competition” and “cannot tolerate other countries from making progress”.
Mr Xiao’s piece came as Foreign Minister Penny Wong heads to Washington for a second meeting with her Quad counterparts within six months.
The Quad, made up of Australia, India, Japan and the US, is a partnership broadly seen as a check on China’s economic and military might.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109232
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23256474 (300923ZJUN25) Notable: COMMENTARY: It’s time to get real about our China problem, PM – “Labor’s obfuscation on China and its refusal to publicly accept the need for a serious boost to defence spending are not helping Albanese secure an all-important first meeting with Donald Trump. Instead of seeing Albanese cement ties with Australia’s closest ally, Australians will watch him cosying up to Xi Jinping and sidestepping more questions on the Chinese threat. It’s time for the Prime Minister to talk clearly about the security threats the nation faces and have an honest conversation with the public about what this means for the defence budget.” – Ben Packham – The Australian
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73634 (pb)
>>109229
>>109230
COMMENTARY: It’s time to get real about our China problem, PM
BEN PACKHAM - 30 June 2025
When will Anthony Albanese be upfront with the Australian people on the security threat posed by China?
He was happy to dog whistle about Donald Trump for votes in the election campaign but refuses to speak clearly about Beijing’s strategic intentions and what they mean for Australia.
The last time the government made a serious case about the China threat was at the 2023 ALP national conference, when Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy spoke starkly about Beijing’s massive military build-up to smash criticism of AUKUS by the party’s hard left.
Two years later, that speech has curiously disappeared from the internet and the government is once again pretending there’s nothing to see here.
Albanese passed up another opportunity on Monday morning to be real with the Australian people on China in the wake of an opinion piece published in this newspaper by Beijing’s top diplomat in Canberra lecturing the government on defence spending.
Ambassador Xiao Qian, whose country is turning out submarines, warships and missiles at a frightening rate, had the gall to warn Australia that lifting defence spending to the 5 per cent agreed by NATO countries would cause tensions internationally and undermine living standards at home.
If anything, this should focus the government’s mind more clearly on the urgent need to rethink its defence budget. But the Prime Minister was having none of it.
Journalist: “We’ve seen the Chinese ambassador to Australia make comments about defence spending … this morning. What can you tell the Australian people about the military threat posed by China, and do you remain concerned about the military build-up that China is undertaking?”
Prime Minister: “The Chinese ambassador speaks for China. My job is to speak for Australia, and it’s in Australia’s national interest for us to invest in our capability and to invest in our relationships, and we’re doing just that.”
It’s no wonder the US is having second thoughts about handing over three of its Virginia-class submarines to Australia, as evidenced by its snap 30-day review of the AUKUS pact.
As the man behind the review, Elbridge Colby, warned last year: “It would be crazy for the United States to give away its single most important asset for a conflict with China over Taiwan.”
In the absence of any signal to the contrary, the US has every right to feel concerned that those submarines, if given to Australia, will sit on the sidelines in any war with China.
Labor’s obfuscation on China and its refusal to publicly accept the need for a serious boost to defence spending are not helping Albanese secure an all-important first meeting with Donald Trump.
There is no sign the government is preparing to shift its position on either issue, which will make for an uncomfortable audience with the US President if and when the Prime Minister makes it to the White House.
Penny Wong will no doubt do her diplomatic best to reassure the US that Australia remains a rock-solid ally when she meets her American counterpart, Marco Rubio, in Washington DC this week.
The problem is, she is the author of the government’s cautious language on China and an opponent of much of the Trump administration’s foreign policy agenda.
Expect more ambiguity from the government in coming weeks when Albanese travels to Beijing.
As revealed by The Australian, the Prime Minister is unlikely to get a meeting with Trump before the visit, around the middle of July.
Instead of seeing Albanese cement ties with Australia’s closest ally, Australians will watch him cosying up to Xi Jinping and sidestepping more questions on the Chinese threat.
It’s time for the Prime Minister to talk clearly about the security threats the nation faces and have an honest conversation with the public about what this means for the defence budget.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/its-time-to-get-real-about-our-china-problem-pm/news-story/dd609d97930d6d673c6abb2068bb70a6
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109233
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23256499 (300958ZJUN25) Notable: Kevin Rudd says US, Donald Trump have chance to build stable Middle East – Australia’s ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, praised Donald Trump’s intervention in the Israel-Iran conflict, giving him “full marks” for brokering a ceasefire and suggesting it could open a path to a two-state solution for Palestine. Speaking at the Aspen Ideals Festival, Rudd said degrading Iran’s nuclear program met Israeli security interests and created “an opportunity to secure the future” if Netanyahu could be persuaded. He added Trump’s pressure on NATO allies had succeeded, while cautioning China remained focused on Taiwan and prepared to use force if necessary.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73662 (pb)
>>>/qresearch/23218742 (pb)
Kevin Rudd says US, Donald Trump have chance to build stable Middle East
JOE KELLY - 30 June 2025
1/2
Kevin Rudd has given Donald Trump “full marks” on his intervention in the Israel-Iran conflict, while voicing hopes that the US President might now persuade Benjamin Netanyahu to accept a two-state solution with Palestine.
Australia’s ambassador to the US also said the recent decision of NATO members to lift defence spending was the result of a “cocktail of factors” – including the threat to Europe posed by Russia and Mr Trump’s ongoing insistence that America’s partners contribute more to their own security.
“To give President Trump his dues, he has always said that he does not accept that proposition that any US allies should be freeloading on the United States,” Dr Rudd said.
Pressed on the 30-day Pentagon review on the future of the AUKUS agreement, Dr Rudd said the Australian government was “completely relaxed about that … because it is what administration do when they are newly elected for programs which they have inherited from previous administrations”.
He also suggested there was a chance for Mr Trump to reach a grand bargain with Chinese leader Xi Jinping across a range of areas, including trade, investment, technology restrictions, national security issues – including cyber and space – as well as narcotics and fentanyl.
Asked whether Mr Trump deserved the Noble peace prize for his Middle East diplomacy, Dr Rudd did not rule out the possibility. He responded by saying that – given his own past experience as a junior diplomat in Scandinavia – he was aware that “the Nobel committee in Oslo … fiercely guards its independence”.
“But in being fiercely independent and having, through their own country, been party to the Oslo process ... which for the first time brought Palestinians and Israelis around the table way back when – 20 years ago – I’m sure our Norwegian friends will be very mindful of a real outcome,” he said.
Dr Rudd made sure to qualify his remarks at the Aspen Ideals Festival in Colorado, saying that he was a “China guy” by background and that the Middle East was “not my patch”. He said his remarks on the Middle East were those a “rank amateur” and did not represent “the official views of the Australian government”.
Speaking in conversation with Politico’s Jonathan Martin, Dr Rudd said that “we all want the ceasefire to hold. And, frankly, full marks to the President for having the chutzpah to put it on the line.”
He said Mr Trump was able to achieve a “ceasefire between the two most unlikely states to agree to a ceasefire”.
Dr Rudd said Mr Trump had finally brought the “Iranians to the negotiating table in terms of accepting a set of arrangements with the US and the rest of the international community on what is left ... of the Iranian nuclear weapons program”.
He was also optimistic about the outlook for Gaza and the West Bank, saying that Mr Trump’s actions would help “move the debate and the dial in the direction of a sustainable two-state solution”.
In addition, the fact that the Iranian nuclear program had now been degraded met a core Israeli national security interest. Dr Rudd said this would “therefore hopefully provide an opening for the United States and the rest of the international community to cause Israel to conclude that a two-state outcome is the best for Israel, best for the Palestinian people, best for the US, best for US allies, including my own country, and best for the rest of the world because there does need to be a Palestinian homeland”.
“If President Trump can push in this direction to get the Israeli government, notwithstanding Bibi Netanyahu’s reservations, across that line and, assuming there is a reform program within the Palestinian Authority, which has been notoriously badly administered, then I think there is an opportunity to secure the future,” he said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109234
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23256501 (301000ZJUN25) Notable: Penny Wong to meet Quad counterparts in Washington – Foreign Minister Penny Wong will meet her Quad counterparts in Washington this week, calling the talks vital to confronting Indo-Pacific challenges. “This will be the second Quad Foreign Ministers’ Meeting within six months, reflecting the importance of our partnership,” she said, stressing the US is Australia’s “closest ally and principal strategic partner.” The summit comes amid tariffs on Australian exports, a Pentagon review of AUKUS, and US pressure to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP. US officials have warned of an “imminent” threat from China, including possible action against Taiwan by 2027.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109229
Penny Wong to meet Quad counterparts in Washington
JOSEPH OLBRYCHT-PALMER - 30 June 2025
Australia’s chief diplomat will meet her Quad counterparts in Washington this week as the Trump administration looks to ramp up pressure on China.
The Quad, made up of Australia, India, Japan and the US, is a partnership broadly seen as a check on China’s economic and military might.
Foreign Minister Penny Wong said the upcoming dialogue reflected the challenges facing the Indo Pacific.
“This will be the second Quad Foreign Ministers’ Meeting within six months, reflecting the importance of our partnership and the strategic circumstances confronting our region and the world,” she said in a statement.
“I look forward to engaging with my Quad counterparts as we strengthen cooperation to ensure a peaceful, stable and prosperous Indo-Pacific.”
Senator Wong also said she would “meet separately with each of my counterparts … to progress bilateral cooperation”.
The meeting comes as pressure mounts on the Albanese government to bolster Australia’s alliance with the US.
Nearly six months have passed since Donald Trump’s inauguration and Anthony Albanese is yet to secure an in-person meeting with the US President.
Australian producers have been slugged with tariffs on most exports to the US, including duties of up to 50 per cent on steel and aluminium, and doubts loom large about the Trump administration’s commitment to AUKUS after it launched a snap review of the defence pact.
The Albanese government has also refused to budge after Washington’s call to hike defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP amid alarm over China’s military build-up.
In her statement, Senator Wong stressed the US “is our closest ally and principal strategic partner”.
“Our alliance contributes to the peace, prosperity and stability of our countries and the region we share,” she said.
“We will continue to work together to further our important economic and security partnership and advance our mutual interests.”
Former US president Joe Biden was last year caught on a hot mic telling his fellow Quad leaders that China was “testing” them, giving a rare glimpse into the candid nature of talks between some of the region’s key players.
“We believe (Chinese President) Xi Jinping is looking to focus on domestic economic challenges and minimise the turbulence in China’s diplomatic relationships, and he’s also looking to buy himself some diplomatic space, in my view, to aggressively pursue China’s interest,” Mr Biden said.
“China continues to behave aggressively, testing us all across the region, and it’s true in the South China Sea, the East China Sea, South China, South Asia and the Taiwan Straits.
“It’s true across the scope of our relationship, including on economic and technology issues.”
Mr Biden’s bluntness was a stark contrast of how leaders of all Quad countries have tried to frame the strategic four-way dialogue, often deflecting suggestions that it exists to counter China.
The hawkish approach to Beijing has been adopted by the Trump administration, with US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth earlier this month warning of an “imminent” threat to the Indo Pacific.
Mr Hegseth said China could invade Taiwan as early as 2027.
Such a move would deal a major blow to global supply of semiconductors – crucial components in modern tech – and massively disrupt vital trade routes.
“Let me be clear, any attempt by Communist China to conquer Taiwan by force would result in devastating consequences for the Indo-Pacific and the world,” Mr Hegseth said.
“There’s no reason to sugarcoat it. The threat China poses is real and it could be imminent.
“We hope not but certainly could be.”
Meeting with Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles on the sidelines of the conference, he directly asked Australia to boost the defence budget to 3.5 per cent of GDP.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/penny-wong-to-meet-quad-counterparts-in-washington/news-story/3a8d91e4f5d9181b953bcb3a3182f1db
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109235
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23260756 (010932ZJUL25) Notable: Australia’s friends in Congress urge Albanese to prioritise Trump visit – Senior US lawmakers Republican Michael McCaul and Democrat Joe Courtney have called on Anthony Albanese to prioritise a White House meeting, stressing Donald Trump values personal diplomacy and that such a gesture would reinforce AUKUS. The pair, who co-chair the Friends of Australia Caucus, warned the pact could be tested by a Pentagon review and pressure for Australia to lift defence spending. McCaul said “the president is transactional,” suggesting Canberra commit a higher share of GDP to defence, while Courtney insisted spending levels remain Australia’s choice. Albanese is working towards a September visit after months of tariffs and alliance strain. (105 words)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73634 (pb)
>>73662 (pb)
>>>/qresearch/23234931 (pb)
Australia’s friends in Congress urge Albanese to prioritise Trump visit
Jessica Gardner - Jun 30, 2025
1/2
Washington | Two senior US lawmakers backing the AUKUS nuclear defence pact have issued a bipartisan plea for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to prioritise a White House visit and forge the personal relationships needed to keep the agreement intact and ease broader strains on the alliance.
Republican Michael McCaul and Democrat Joe Courtney, in the US House of Representatives, said President Donald Trump valued one-on-one interactions, and his approach to diplomacy was heavily influenced by his past as a dealmaker.
“For [Albanese] to come to the White House would be a great gesture on the prime minister’s part, that I think would go over very well,” McCaul said in an interview. “That would be very sound advice for him to do that.”
The president’s tariff blitz challenged the friendship between the United States and Australia who, as a close ally and free trade agreement partner, had hoped for a carve-out. In June, military ties were shaken when it emerged that Elbridge Colby, the US defence under-secretary for policy, would review the AUKUS agreement. The review will weigh up whether Australia is spending enough on defence capabilities and the alliance poses any risk to American military efforts.
Colby has long held a view that the US should prioritise bolstering its own military power against the rising threat of Chinese aggression in the Pacific over the AUKUS alliance.
McCaul, a Texan who is worried about China, and Courtney, whose Connecticut district is home to shipyards, are leading the fight for AUKUS on Capitol Hill as co-chairs of the Friends of Australia Caucus. Last week, they wrote to Colby and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth seeking assurances that shipbuilders would be able to ramp up their production in time to deliver submarines to Australia in 2032 without undermining the US Navy’s fleet.
With Trump’s focus on deals and personal relationships, Courtney said Albanese should argue that Australian companies are heavily investing in American shipyards – set to hit $US3 billion ($4.6 billion) – and that the government does not expect any special deal on the three, four or five US-made Virginia-class nuclear submarines it is buying from 2032.
“This really takes it out of the sort of America First criticism of security agreements … where President Trump felt that other countries weren’t pulling their own weight,” he said. “It’s a case that is very unique that the prime minister can articulate. [Albanese] is a very personable and socially savvy person, kind of like [UK Prime Minister] Keir Starmer, who does seem to have succeeded with the personal interaction. [A visit] would be great.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109236
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23260808 (010949ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Identity of alleged childcare paedophile revealed as 1200 children urged to undergo STI tests – Melbourne childcare worker Joshua Dale Brown, 26, has been charged with more than 70 offences including child rape, with police alleging he abused eight children aged between five months and two years at a Point Cook centre. Authorities have urged about 1200 children to undergo precautionary STI testing after Brown, who tested positive for gonorrhea, was revealed to have worked at 20 centres since 2017. Premier Jacinta Allan said she was “sickened” by the allegations. Brown remains in custody ahead of a September court hearing as investigations widen.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Identity of alleged childcare paedophile revealed as 1200 children urged to undergo STI tests
Cassandra Morgan - July 1, 2025
1/2
The identity of a Melbourne childcare worker charged with more than 70 offences, including child rape, has been revealed, as authorities say 1200 children should get tested for infectious diseases.
The Health Department is recommending that the children undergo testing after childcare worker Joshua Dale Brown, a 26-year-old from Point Cook, was charged over the alleged abuse of eight children.
His eight alleged victims, who were aged between five months and two years old, attended Creative Garden Early Learning Centre in Point Cook between April 2022 and January 2023, police said.
The families of the eight have been notified, and since Brown’s arrest on May 12, sexual crimes squad detectives have led a significant investigation into Brown, police said.
Brown worked at 20 childcare centres between January 2017 and May this year, including in Melbourne’s west and north-west, Bundoora in the north-east and Geelong. Detectives are investigating an allegation that Brown committed more offences at another childcare centre in Essendon, police said.
“This matter is being investigated as a priority,” Victoria Police said.
A police source, speaking on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorised to speak publicly, told this masthead that Brown had tested positive for gonorrhea.
The Health Department contacted about 2600 families, parents, children and carers of children following the allegations, and recommended about 1200 children undergo testing for infectious diseases, Chief Health Officer Christian McGrath said on Tuesday.
“Families and the wider community can be reassured that the infections that the children were potentially exposed to can be treated with antibiotics, and there’s no broader public health risk to the community,” McGrath said.
“A dedicated advice and support hotline has been set up to provide families with health and screening information, as well as linking them to specialist supports, including mental health and wellbeing services.”
By midday on Tuesday, parents were reporting long delays on hold for the Health Department’s hotline. One parent of a child at the Point Cook centre said he waited more than 1½ hours.
Not all children who attended the childcare centres where Brown worked would need to be tested, McGrath said.
The department was co-ordinating with laboratories around Melbourne to ensure the testing was done as quickly as possible, the chief health officer said.
Brown was not known to police before officers raided his home and later charged him, police Crime Command Acting Commander Janet Stevenson said on Tuesday.
He had a valid Working with Children Check, which has since been cancelled. He was co-operative with police, and working as a childcare worker at the time of his arrest, Stevenson said.
“He may have held other roles throughout his employment, though,” she said.
The police investigation was “proactive” and happened after officers allegedly discovered Brown had child abuse material. Police then had to track down the alleged victims.
“We didn’t have a victim for quite some time,” Stevenson said.
Premier Jacinta Allan became emotional as she said she was sickened by the allegations of abuse.
“They are shocking and distressing, and my heart just breaks for the families who are living every parent’s worst nightmare,” Allan said.
The early childhood regulator would immediately start an investigation into the conduct of the early education providers where the alleged offender worked, Allan said.
A mother who went to collect her son from the Creative Garden Early Learning Centre at Point Cook on Tuesday morning said she was horrified to receive the letter.
“I was so mad, I was so angry,” she told reporters.
She saw the alleged abuser at the centre multiple times, always with a smile on his face and coloured hair, she said.
The mother was concerned about what could have gone on with her son at the centre, without her knowing.
“It’s just the thought as a parent that will haunt me forever,” she said.
A mother named Liz, who declined to give her last name, said she just wanted a photo of the offender so she could show it to her daughter to gauge her reaction. As of 2pm she was still waiting on the Health Department for more information.
A third parent said he was considering pulling his child out of the Point Cook centre, that he was furious and that he thought the working with children check system was a farce. He said he had heard about the allegations on the news, which is what made him go to the centre to pick up his child.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109237
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23260836 (011003ZJUL25) Notable: Penny Wong in Washington for key talks amid US alliance concerns – Foreign Minister Penny Wong has arrived in Washington for a Quad meeting with her counterparts from the US, India and Japan, calling it a chance to support a “peaceful, stable and prosperous Indo-Pacific.” The visit comes as Australia faces tariffs on exports to the US, a Pentagon review of AUKUS, and continued pressure to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP. Wong reaffirmed the US is Australia’s “closest ally and principal strategic partner.” The Trump administration has taken a hard line on Beijing, with Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth warning of an “imminent” threat.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109234
Penny Wong in Washington for key talks amid US alliance concerns
JOSEPH OLBRYCHT-PALMER - 1 July 2025
Australia’s chief diplomat has touched down in Washington for a key meeting with her Quad counterparts as the Trump administration looks to ramp up pressure on China.
The Quad, made up of Australia, India, Japan and the US, is a partnership broadly seen as a check on China’s economic and military might.
“Fantastic to arrive in Washington DC ahead of the Quad Foreign Ministers’ Meeting,” Foreign Minister Penny Wong posted on social media, along with a photo of her and Australian ambassador Kevin Rudd.
“Thank you (State Secretary Marco Rubio) for hosting our second meeting in six months.
“Looking forward to discussing how we continue to support a peaceful, stable and prosperous Indo-Pacific.”
The meeting comes as pressure mounts on the Albanese government to bolster Australia’s alliance with the US.
Six months have passed since Donald Trump’s inauguration and Anthony Albanese is yet to secure an in-person meeting with the US President.
Australian producers have been slugged with tariffs on most exports to the US, including duties of up to 50 per cent on steel and aluminium, and doubts loom large about the Trump administration’s commitment to AUKUS after it launched a snap review of the defence pact.
The Albanese government has also refused to budge after Washington’s call to hike defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP amid alarm over China’s military build-up.
Unless the Prime Minister books a Washington trip, his next most-likely opportunity to meet Mr Trump is at the Quad leaders summit tipped for September.
In a statement announcing the trip on Sunday, Senator Wong said the US “is our closest ally and principal strategic partner”.
“Our alliance contributes to the peace, prosperity and stability of our countries and the region we share,” she said.
“We will continue to work together to further our important economic and security partnership and advance our mutual interests.”
Former US president Joe Biden was last year caught on a hot mic telling his fellow Quad leaders that China was “testing” them, giving a rare glimpse into the candid nature of talks between some of the region’s key players.
“We believe (Chinese President) Xi Jinping is looking to focus on domestic economic challenges and minimise the turbulence in China’s diplomatic relationships, and he’s also looking to buy himself some diplomatic space, in my view, to aggressively pursue China’s interest,” Mr Biden said.
“China continues to behave aggressively, testing us all across the region, and it’s true in the South China Sea, the East China Sea, South China, South Asia and the Taiwan Straits.
“It’s true across the scope of our relationship, including on economic and technology issues.”
Mr Biden’s bluntness was a stark contrast to how other Quad leaders have tried to frame the strategic four-way dialogue, often deflecting suggestions that it exists to counter China.
The hawkish approach to Beijing has been adopted by the Trump administration, with US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth earlier this month warning of an “imminent” threat to the Indo Pacific.
Mr Hegseth said China could invade Taiwan as early as 2027.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/penny-wong-in-washington-for-key-talks-amid-us-alliance-concerns/news-story/7260a410c8b4d33d724966ba0045b090
https://x.com/SenatorWong/status/1939857983992955142
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109238
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23265063 (020959ZJUL25) Notable: Arrested childcare worker accused of contaminating food with bodily fluids as authorities unveil crackdown – Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan has announced a childcare crackdown after new allegations that Joshua Dale Brown, 26, added bodily fluids to food at a Point Cook centre. Brown, already charged with more than 70 offences including child rape, allegedly abused eight children and worked at 20 centres since 2017, prompting STI testing for over 1200 children. From September 26, centres must ban smartphones or face fines of up to $50,000, alongside a new statewide register of childcare workers. Authorities admitted existing safety checks had failed, with national reforms now under review.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109236
Arrested childcare worker accused of contaminating food with bodily fluids as authorities unveil crackdown
Cassandra Morgan and Rachel Eddie - July 2, 2025
1/2
Victorian authorities have announced a crackdown on the childcare industry, as horrifying new details emerge about the alleged abuse by a Melbourne childcare worker.
One of the charges against Joshua Dale Brown is that he recklessly contaminated goods to cause alarm or anxiety, which relates to allegations he added bodily fluids to children’s food.
The 26-year-old is accused of abusing eight young children at a Point Cook centre between April 2022 and January 2023. His work at 20 facilities over his eight-year career has sparked the testing of more than 1200 children for sexually transmitted infections.
The Victorian Health Department has recommended the testing out of “an abundance of caution”.
“There’s not no risk, which is why we are making this recommendation,” Chief Health Officer Dr Christian McGrath said on Wednesday.
Ingesting bodily fluids is generally considered low risk in transmitting STIs, however cuts or sores in the gums, mouth or throat are a risk factor, so authorities are proceeding with utmost precaution.
McGrath said “several hundred” families had already been referred for testing based on a case-by-case risk assessment.
It comes as Premier Jacinta Allan on Wednesday unveiled a suite of measures including fines of up to $50,000 if childcare centres do not ban their workers from carrying smartphones, as officials scramble to bolster the “failing” system.
A ban on smartphones will be enforced from September 26. If a provider does not sign up to the ban, they will have conditions added to their licence. Breaches will attract fines of up to $50,000.
Phone bans are already part of a national framework used within early childhood education and care, but providers must choose to enforce the ban.
“To avoid delay, we’ll be putting all Victorian childcare centres on notice. They will be required to adopt this ban on personal devices,” Allan told reporters on Wednesday.
The state government will also commission an urgent review into childcare safety. A leader for the review will be appointed by the end of the week.
“This will be a short, sharp piece of work that will focus on the immediate actions that we can take, based on that body of work that is going on across Commonwealth and state and territory jurisdictions, but also, too, looking at what further can be done with a sense of urgency,” Allan said.
Victoria will start building a statewide register of childcare workers, which is also being considered at a national level.
“I appreciate there is a substantial amount of work that is already under way across the Commonwealth and state and territory governments to strengthen the safety in the sector here in Victoria, [but] I won’t wait,” Allan said. “Families cannot wait.”
Earlier on Wednesday, federal Education Minister Jason Clare revealed he put child safety on the agenda last Friday during a meeting with his state-based colleagues, after he was briefed on the Melbourne childcare worker charged with more than 70 sex offences against children in his care.
The families of the eight alleged victims were informed last week, but parents of other children were not told until Tuesday this week.
“I was informed about this just over a week ago by the Victorian government. It’s the reason I put this on the agenda for education ministers when we met last Friday,” Clare told ABC Radio National on Wednesday.
“I’m certain that the Victorian government took the steps that they needed to take with police and with the relevant authorities, to make sure that when they advised parents and did so as soon as they possibly could, they were in a position to provide the necessary advice and support for parents.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109239
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23265073 (021005ZJUL25) Notable: Sex abuse investigation nets second man known to alleged childcare rapist – A second man, Michael Simon Wilson, 36, has been charged with 45 child sex offences, including rape and possession of child abuse material, following the same investigation that led to the arrest of former childcare worker Joshua Dale Brown. Police say Wilson and Brown are known to each other, though their exact connection is unclear. Wilson’s charges involve separate victims and are not linked to childcare centres. He will face court in September on the same day as Brown, who is accused of abusing eight children at a Point Cook centre.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109236
>>109238
Sex abuse investigation nets second man known to alleged childcare rapist
Carla Jaeger - July 2, 2025
Warning: Graphic and distressing content
A second man has been charged with dozens of sex crimes against children, including rape, as part of a major investigation that also uncovered the separate abuse allegations at a Melbourne childcare centre.
The accusations against Michael Simon Wilson, which have not been publicly revealed before, are not related to any childcare facilities and involve different alleged victims to those identified in the case against former childcare worker Joshua Dale Brown.
Wilson and Brown are known to each other – although their exact connection is unclear – and both were charged as a result of information obtained by detectives from the sex crimes squad that led to a police raid on Brown’s house and his arrest in mid-May.
Court records show Wilson, 36, from Hoppers Crossing, is due to appear in court in September on the same day as Brown to face 45 charges, including rape and possession of child abuse material.
Police confirmed some of the charges related to the alleged sexual assault of a teenage boy in Coburg in April and the subsequent investigation.
Wilson has previously been charged with assault, possession of a controlled weapon and property damage, and served a noncustodial sentence with mandated men’s behaviour change therapy.
He lived alone but had been active on dating websites, on which he spoke of recently leaving a long-term relationship.
He had helped run an amateur hobby club until abruptly leaving two months ago, fellow members said.
One former colleague from Wilson’s time working in waste management in Melbourne described him as “a bit strange”, but “alright”.
Wilson’s phone was off, and his immediate family did not answer calls from this masthead.
Victoria Police and the state government announced on Tuesday that Brown, 26, had been charged with 70 counts related to abuse he allegedly perpetrated against eight child victims, some as young as five months, at the Creative Garden Early Learning Centre in Point Cook between April 2022 and January 2023.
Brown has worked at 20 childcare centres since starting in the industry in 2017, and more than 1200 children are being tested for sexually transmitted diseases amid allegations that Brown could have exposed them to STIs.
Detectives are also probing Brown’s time as an educator at Essendon Papilio Childcare Centre, where he had worked from February until just before his arrest on May 12.
When police raided his house in May, the 26-year-old had no criminal record and held a valid working with children check.
No other childcare workers are suspected of being involved in the alleged abuse and police have said they did not believe abuse took place at all the centres where Brown worked. So far, identified victims are between five months and two years old.
The discovery of child abuse material allegedly in Brown’s possession has mobilised a police and Health Department response over the past few weeks as officials raced to identify victims, inform affected families and launch a large child-testing regimen.
One of the charges against Brown is that he recklessly contaminated goods to cause alarm or anxiety – relating to allegations he added bodily fluids to children’s food.
On Tuesday, Victoria Police took the rare step of naming Brown to ensure parents were informed about the situation, but have said they cannot comment further on the Wilson case.
The Victorian government has ordered the early childhood regulator to investigate the conduct of the childcare operators for which Brown worked.
https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/second-man-charged-with-child-rape-in-wider-abuse-investigation-20250702-p5mbwr.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9KFdoPUcRY
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109240
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23265081 (021012ZJUL25) Notable: ‘Vehicle for action’: Marco Rubio pushes for stronger critical mineral supply chain ahead of Quad meeting – US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has urged the Quad to move beyond “ideas and concepts” and become a “vehicle for action,” highlighting secure critical mineral supply chains as a priority. Meeting with counterparts Penny Wong, Takeshi Iwaya and Subrahmanyan Jaishankar in Washington, Rubio said concrete steps were needed to address shared economic and security challenges. Wong stressed the partnership’s importance against “escalating competition,” while Iwaya and Jaishankar underscored the Indo-Pacific’s role as a global growth engine and the need to uphold a rules-based order.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109234
‘Vehicle for action’: Marco Rubio pushes for stronger critical mineral supply chain ahead of Quad meeting
JOE KELLY - 2 July 2025
1/2
Marco Rubio has sketched out his ambition to transform the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue into a “vehicle for action” rather than a forum for discussing “ideas and concepts” ahead of a meeting with his counterparts from India, Japan and Australia.
Penny Wong has flown into Washington to attend the Quad Foreign Ministers’ Meeting with the US Secretary of State, Japanese Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya and Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyan Jaishankar.
Senator Wong has arrived at a key moment in the alliance relationship with America, with Mr Rubio’s call for action at the Quad coming shortly after a request from Washington for Australia to lift its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP and amid a snap 30-day review of the AUKUS agreement.
Mr Rubio said that he was reminded by his Quad counterparts that, in January, within an hour of being sworn in as Secretary of State, he had his first meeting with them. He said that India, Japan and Australia were “very important strategic partners and allies” and singled out the need to develop secure supply chains for critical minerals as top priority.
“We are honoured to host them today in this very important partnership that has developed over the years and that I think has really taken wing in the last few months,” Mr Rubio said in the State Department. “Together we have a lot of shared priorities, a lot of things we care about in the world.”
“I think there are many global problems but also problems that we face in our respective countries that can be solved by us co-operating together,” he said. “One of the challenges with something new like this is turning meetings and gatherings where we talk about ideas and concepts into a vehicle for action.”
He said that taking “concrete actions” was the “next step in this great partnership.” Mr Rubio said steps should be taken “in co-ordination with one another … for the benefit of our respective countries.”
He said co-ordinated action between Quad members would benefit other nations across the globe, saying it was not just about security but also economic development. “In fact, later today we will be hosting here in this building a number of companies … representing all four of our countries,” Mr Rubio said. “There are many topics that we can work on, focus on.”
A key issue which Mr Rubio said he was personally focused on was “diversifying the global supply chain of critical minerals. Not just access to the raw material. But also access to the ability to process and refine it into usable material.”
“Having a diverse and reliable global supply chain … is just one example of many that we can focus on,” he said. “That’s the hope for this partnership. That’s why it’s so important to host you here today.”
“It’s also important that in this forum – to turn it into one where we begin to focus on specific issues that we want to work together on and begin to deliver action on these issues,” he said. “And today’s the next step in that process.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109241
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23265089 (021020ZJUL25) Notable: Trump administration expresses regrets for ditching Albanese meeting – Penny Wong says the Trump administration expressed regret over cancelling Anthony Albanese’s planned G7 meeting with Donald Trump, after the president left to address the Israel-Iran conflict. In Washington, Wong met US Secretary of State Marco Rubio for 45 minutes, where he affirmed AUKUS’s importance and did not repeat earlier demands for Australia to raise defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP. Wong said they discussed “the positive benefits of AUKUS” and cooperation on critical minerals. She dismissed claims Kevin Rudd was a barrier to a Trump meeting, which is yet to be rescheduled.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73662 (pb)
>>109234
Trump administration expresses regrets for ditching Albanese meeting
Jake Evans and Brad Ryan - 2 July 2025
Foreign Minister Penny Wong says the Trump administration has expressed its regrets to her for missing a meeting with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on the sidelines of the G7.
The senator also said the US secretary of state had recognised the "importance" of the AUKUS agreement to both nations during their 45-minute meeting — and that a demand made last month for Australia to lift its defence spending was not repeated.
Mr Albanese is yet to meet face-to-face with United States President Donald Trump eight months since his election win, and has faced criticism from the Coalition for not pushing harder to meet with him earlier.
The pair were due to meet in Canada last week at the G7 leaders' summit, but Mr Trump left abruptly as the conflict between Israel and Iran flared.
Senator Wong, who is in the United States for a "Quad" meeting between the US, Australia, India and Japan, said she used talks with US Foreign Secretary Marco Rubio to discuss a future meeting between Mr Albanese and Mr Trump.
"He expressed his regret for the fact that the meeting had to be rescheduled," she told Channel Nine.
"I obviously said we completely understood; I think the world understood the president had a fair bit to do, given what was occurring in the Middle East."
The foreign minister rejected suggestions that Australia's ambassador to the United States, Kevin Rudd, who Mr Trump once labelled "not the brightest bulb", was a hurdle to the pair meeting.
Senator Wong said Mr Rubio did not raise Mr Rudd with her.
Defence demands, AUKUS review and tariffs weigh on talks
The meeting comes as Australia navigates several issues that threaten to cause trouble domestically.
The US has openly demanded Australia lift its defence spending as soon as possible to 3.5 per cent of its GDP — about a $40 billion annual lift on current spending.
Senator Wong said Mr Rubio did not raise Australia's defence budget with her.
Australia's major defence partnership with the United Kingdom and the US is also under review by the Trump administration, which is concerned the country may not be able to deliver on its deal to provide Australia with nuclear-powered submarines.
Senator Wong said she and Mr Rubio discussed deepening cooperation across the alliance, "including through AUKUS".
"We had a good discussion about the work we do together, we had a good discussion about AUKUS, and a good discussion about the positive benefits of AUKUS to [Australia, the US and the UK]," Senator Wong said.
"We both understand the importance to both our countries and to the United Kingdom."
Earlier this year, before the announcement of a US review into AUKUS led by sceptic Elbridge Colby, Mr Rubio said AUKUS had the "very strong support" of the Trump administration.
Meanwhile, the conversation of tariffs on foreign imports to the US looms large over trade discussions, and while the government believes the 50 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminium are unlikely to have a major impact, punishing tariffs on China could hurt Australia if Chinese demand for Australian goods falls as a consequence.
The senator said the Quad had also discussed strengthening cooperation on developing critical minerals supply chains, a "strategic vulnerability" that Senator Wong said Australia could do more to develop.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-02/trump-administration-regrets-ditching-albanese-meeting/105484286
https://x.com/SecRubio/status/1940193345575559461
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109242
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23265100 (021040ZJUL25) Notable: Federal Court orders series of Islamic preacher Wissam Haddad's lectures be removed from social media – The Federal Court has ruled that lectures by Sydney preacher Wissam Haddad, delivered at Bankstown’s Al Madina Dawah Centre, contained “fundamentally racist and antisemitic” material and must be removed from social media. Justice Angus Stewart found the speeches breached the Racial Discrimination Act by portraying Jews as “wicked,” “vile,” and “descendants of apes and pigs,” rejecting Haddad’s defence that they drew only on scripture. The judge said the imputations were “devastatingly offensive,” with serious effects on Jewish Australians. Haddad must also post corrective notices for 30 days, with costs likely awarded to the ECAJ.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109228
Federal Court orders series of Islamic preacher Wissam Haddad's lectures be removed from social media
Jamie McKinnell - 1 July 2025
1/2
A series of lectures delivered by an Islamic preacher at a Sydney prayer centre must be removed from social media under orders from a Federal Court judge who found they contained "fundamentally racist and antisemitic" material.
Wissam Haddad, who is also known as Abu Ousayd, gave the speeches at Bankstown's Al Madina Dawah Centre in November 2023.
In the Federal Court, the Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ) alleged he contravened the Racial Discrimination Act, including by portraying Jewish people as "wicked", "scheming", "vile", "mischievous" and "descendants of apes and pigs".
Mr Haddad's lawyers argued the speeches were derived in substance from religious texts including the Koran, were delivered only to a Muslim audience in private and did not refer to Australian Jewish people.
Justice Angus Stewart today found the speeches contravened the Racial Discrimination Act and rejected Mr Haddad's defences.
The court found the series of lectures conveyed "disparaging imputations" about Jewish people, based on race or ethnic origin, that were reasonably likely to offend, insult, humiliate and intimidate Jews in Australia.
"The imputations include age-old tropes against Jewish people that are fundamentally racist and antisemitic; they make perverse generalisations against Jewish people as a group," the judge said in a summary of his decision.
Effects on Jewish Australians 'profound and serious'
In his full judgment, Justice Stewart said the established imputations — or meanings — were "devastatingly offensive and insulting".
He said Jewish people in Australia would have experienced the comments to be harassing and intimidating, "all the more so" because they were made at a time of "heightened vulnerability and fragility".
"That is because of their profound offensiveness and the long history of persecution of Jews associated with the use of such rhetoric," Justice Stewart said.
"Those effects on Jews in Australia would be profound and serious."
The court found passages in an interview and sermon by Mr Haddad contained critical and disparaging things about the actions of the Israel Defense Forces in Gaza and about Zionists.
However, the judge found the "ordinary, reasonable listener" would not understand those things to be about Jewish people in general.
"That person would understand that not all Jews are Zionists and that disparagement of Zionism constitutes disparagement of a philosophy or ideology and not a race or ethnic group," Justice Stewart said.
"Also, political criticism of Israel, however inflammatory or adversarial, is not by its nature criticism of Jews in general or based on Jewish racial or ethnic identity.
"The conclusion that it is not antisemitic to criticise Israel is the corollary of the conclusion that to blame Jews for the actions of Israel is antisemitic; the one flows from the other."
Justice Stewart said he was satisfied Mr Haddad and the centre should be ordered to publish corrective notices on their social media accounts for 30 days, but will hear the parties further on the terms.
He said the ECAJ's case had been "overwhelmingly successful" and there was no reason why Mr Haddad should not have to pay costs.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109243
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23265108 (021047ZJUL25) Notable: Clinton, Gillard to headline Women UNLIMITED Leadership Summit – Hillary Clinton and Julia Gillard will headline the Women UNLIMITED Leadership Summit, set for 29 September–1 October across six Australian capital cities. Billed as the largest women-in-leadership event of its kind, the summit will feature Clinton speaking in person in Sydney and Canberra on navigating global challenges, while Gillard will appear via hologram to share lessons from her leadership journey. The program covers impact, resilience, diversity, women’s health in the workplace, and career acceleration, with contributions from figures including journalist Leigh Sales. Organisers say the event will fuel momentum toward more inclusive, purpose-driven leadership.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Clinton, Gillard to headline Women UNLIMITED Leadership Summit
insidestategovernment.com.au - 02/07/2025
Former U.S Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton and Australia’s first female Prime Minister, Julia Gillard AC, are set to headline the Women UNLIMITED Leadership Summit, scheduled for 29 September – 1 October.
The event, to be held across seven venues in six Australian capital cities, is poised to be the largest women in leadership event of its kind in Australia.
Organisers say the summit’s content is deeply curated to ignite new thinking, energise purpose-driven leadership and fuel collective momentum towards a more inclusive and empowered future.
The agenda features a powerful line-up of public servants, changemakers, and thought leaders who will share actionable leadership strategies.
Key Themes and In-depth Discussions:
The Women UNLIMITED Leadership Summit offers a deep dive into critical leadership areas, providing indispensable insights for today’s public sector and beyond.
• Leading with Impact and Navigating Complexity: Attendees will gain direct advice from global powerhouses. Former U.S Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton will be joining the summit in person in Sydney and Canberra, with her session also being livestreamed to other locations. She will share lessons on leading with impact when stakes are highest and effectively managing diverse personalities and evolving global challenges. Julia Gillard AC, Australia’s first and only woman Prime Minister, will reflect on her leadership journey and offer her vision for sustained progress and leading with strength in uncertain times via groundbreaking hologram technology. Journalist Leigh Sales AM will contribute insights on success, strength, and resilience, drawn from her extensive experience interviewing world leaders and powerful
figures.
• Diversity, Inclusion & Allyship: Delve into the profound impact of bias in the workplace, uncovering unconscious biases that leaders might overlook, and providing practical methods to lead with allyship to foster safer, more inclusive teams. Sessions are also dedicated to neuro-inclusive leadership, focusing on how neurodivergent traits can enhance leadership skills, creativity and problem-solving and how to build workplace cultures that celebrate and leverage diverse neurological perspectives.
• Authentic Leadership & Resilience: Participants will explore the power of bringing their whole selves to leadership, understanding how authenticity contributes to high performance and psychological safety and the creation of open and honest workplace cultures. The agenda also includes sessions on adapting to challenges and building personal and team resilience, with speakers sharing their experiences of reframing failure and overcoming challenges.
• Critical Topics Affecting Women in the Workplace: A crucial element of the summit is its direct engagement with women’s health and safety issues in leadership. Panel discussions will address the often-unspoken impact of women’s health conditions, caring responsibilities, mental health stigma, menopause, endometriosis and fertility on career progression and confidence. These discussions aim to equip leaders with practical steps to foster psychologically safe and health-aware workplace cultures.
• Career Acceleration & Practical Application: The summit emphasises real-world learning, featuring practical examples and case studies from some of the most senior and accomplished women in the Public Sector. Interactive sessions such as ‘Networking UNLIMITED’ provide structured opportunities for attendees to build valuable connections and engage in conversations about their leadership journeys, setting goals and receiving peer feedback. Furthermore, attendees gain access to two exclusive post-summit online seminars, which form part of a three-month learning journey. These sessions, focused on ‘Presenting with Power for Women in Leadership’ and ‘Building Trusted & High-Performing Teams’, are designed to enhance summit takeaways and provide practical tools for professional development beyond the event itself.
The summit will run from 29-30 September 2025 in Canberra at the National Convention Centre, with concurrent summits taking place from 30 September – 1 October 2025 in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide, and Perth.
https://www.insidestategovernment.com.au/clinton-gillard-to-headline-women-unlimited-leadership-summit/
https://womenunlimited.co/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109244
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23265116 (021054ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Kanye West officially banned from entering Australia – Rapper Kanye West, legally known as Ye, has been banned from entering Australia after releasing a song titled Heil Hitler. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke confirmed his tourist visa had been cancelled, saying officials determined Australia “doesn’t need” imported Nazism or anti-Semitism. West, who is married to Australian-born Bianca Censori, had previously praised Adolf Hitler in media appearances and faced repeated calls for a ban from Jewish community leaders. Burke said freedom of speech did not extend to foreign visitors promoting hatred. The decision prevents West accompanying Censori on visits to her Melbourne family.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Kanye West officially banned from entering Australia
The controversial musician, who is married to an Australian, has officially been banned from entering the country.
Samantha Maiden - July 2, 2025
Kanye West has officially been banned from Australia, and his tourist visa has been cancelled in the wake of an anti-Semitic song that referenced Adolf Hitler.
The bombshell decision means that he will be prohibited from entering the country with his Australian-born wife Bianca Censori, who grew up in Melbourne.
She was most recently in the country over the summer, but her husband remained in Japan at the time amid reported marital tensions.
News.com.au understands from government sources that the decision was made recently and communicated to Mr West, who has legally changed his name to Ye.
He had sought and obtained a tourist visa that could remain valid for up to 12 months, but it has now been cancelled.
Ye is the ex-husband of Kim Kardashian. He shares four children with his ex-wife, Kim Kardashian: North, Saint, Chicago, and Psalm.
Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke revealed his decision to cancel his visa on Wednesday afternoon, confirming it was cancelled after he released a song called Heil Hitler in May.
“He’s been coming to Australia for a long time and he’s made a lot of offensive comments,” Mr Burke said.
“But my officials looked at it again once he released the Heil Hitler song and he no longer has a valid visa in Australia.”
“It wasn’t a visa for the purpose of concerts. It was a lower level and the officials still looked at the law and said “you’re going to have a song and promote that sort of Nazism?”, we don’t need that in Australia.”
Asked on ABCTV if a ban on his visa was “sustainable” given his worldwide fame, Mr Burke said Australia would not tolerate anti-Semitism.
“I think that what’s not sustainable is to import hatred,’’ he said. “Some people say, oh, don’t you believe in freedom of speech and for Australian citizens, yeah, you’ve got full freedom of speech but we have enough problems in this country already without deliberately importing bigotry.”
Australia has repeatedly warned it may consider cancelling Mr West’s visa over his history of anti-Semitic rhetoric.
Originally, it followed Mr West’s decision to praise Adolf Hitler during an interview with far-right conspiracy theorist Alex Jones.
“I like Hitler,” West told Jones, later adding he saw “good things about Hitler”.
“I love Jewish people, but I also love Nazis.”
At the time, Labor frontbencher Jason Clare said to describe such comments as awful “would be an understatement”.
“I don’t know if he’s applied for a visa yet — but Google it, you will see that he seems like he’s a pretty big fan of a person who killed 6 million Jewish people last century,” Mr Clare told Channel 9.
“People like that who’ve applied for visas to get into Australia in the past have been rejected.
“I expect that if he does apply, he would have to go through the same process and answer the same questions that they did.”
The Australian Jewish Association has previously written to the government to demand that Mr West, who is legally known by the name of “Ye”, be banned from entering the country.
“He has become a lightning rod for extremists, for anti-Semites, for neo-Nazis as well, and he inspires a lot of young people — he has a massive following,” the association’s president, David Adler, said.
“He has a very strong record vilifying a segment of the community, namely, the Jewish community, he uses terms like going ‘DEFCON 3’ on the Jewish people.
“He’s used all sorts of anti-Semitic tropes — so yes, we think that’s a significant risk, and because of him being such a prominent and inspirational figure to youth, we think it is a risk in Australian society.”
https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/kanye-west-officially-banned-from-entering-australia/news-story/188c56101fcad5dd579540f232e43915
https://x.com/ausvstheagenda/status/1940300324998455766
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109245
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23269673 (030921ZJUL25) Notable: Accused paedophile Joshua Brown’s work history widens as evidence shows him at centre months earlier – The timeline of alleged offender Joshua Dale Brown’s childcare employment has widened after parents and records revealed he worked at Essendon Papilio Early Learning months earlier than authorities advised. Families were initially told Brown started in February, but evidence shows him at the centre in December and possibly as early as August. Similar discrepancies emerged at another facility in Footscray. Brown, 26, is in custody facing 70 charges, including child rape, while police investigate further offending. Authorities now expect many more families may need notification, with Affinity Education reviewing its records.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109236
>>109238
Accused paedophile Joshua Brown’s work history widens as evidence shows him at centre months earlier
Noel Towell - July 3, 2025
The work history of accused Melbourne paedophile Joshua Dale Brown has widened after errors emerged with the childcare worker’s employment dates supplied to families and the public.
Health authorities are expected to update official notifications of the dates Brown worked at certain centres on Thursday.
Parents at Essendon Papilio Early Learning in Melbourne’s north were scrambling for answers earlier this week after authorities advised them that Brown began working at the centre on February 17 and remained there until just days before his arrest on child sex abuse charges in May.
But this masthead has obtained evidence of Brown working at the daycare on December 13, more than two months before the date officially advised, and parents have said they recalled the alleged offender caring for children at Papilio as early as August.
The date discrepancy means that families whose children had contact with the 26-year-old before February 17 fell outside the time frame for official notification.
The exposure of Brown’s alleged offending prompted health authorities to notify 2600 families and call for the testing of 1200 children, and forced the state government to rush out a major overhaul of safety protocols for Victoria’s daycare centres.
But the fresh information means that many more families may now have to be notified that their children may have come into contact with Brown.
Doubts have also emerged over the supplied information on Brown’s time at D.O.T.S Occupational Therapy for Children in Footscray, where officials said he worked from March 1 to April 30 last year.
D.O.T.S director Hannah Dunn told this masthead: “This ex-employee was employed at D.O.T.S. from March 18 to April 24, 2024.”
Brown remains in custody facing 70 charges, including sexually penetrating a child under 12, attempting to sexually penetrate a child under 12, and producing child abuse material. Police are investigating allegations of further offending at the Essendon centre while he worked there.
Sources close to the information chain but not authorised to speak publicly said Brown’s work history was supplied by Papilio’s operator, national childcare giant Affinity Education, to Victoria Police early in their investigation. The government used these dates in its notification process and public communications.
The original dates supplied by Affinity were taken from a payroll database, but after other employee databases were searched for more information on Brown, an updated timeline has been sent to authorities.
A spokesperson for the company said it was still going through its records for material that might assist investigators.
“Given the serious nature of the matter, we are currently reviewing our records in detail to ensure completeness,” the spokesperson said.
“Affinity Education continues to co-operate fully with authorities and remains focused on the safety and wellbeing of the children and families in our care.”
A police spokesperson said online information would be updated as fresh details became available.
“As part of the ongoing investigation, information has been compiled from a number of sources and records in relation to Brown’s employment history,” the spokesperson said.
That information, including dates and locations, was released on Tuesday based on what was known at that time.
https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/accused-paedophile-joshua-brown-s-work-history-widens-as-photos-show-him-at-centre-months-earlier-20250703-p5mcac.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109246
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23269684 (030927ZJUL25) Notable: First photo of alleged child rapist Michael Simon Wilson revealed – The identity of Michael Simon Wilson, 36, has been publicly revealed after he was charged with child rape and bestiality offences in April. Wilson is reportedly known to Joshua Dale Brown, the Melbourne childcare worker accused of abusing eight children, though his alleged crimes involve separate victims and no childcare centres. Police allege Wilson raped a teenage boy in Hoppers Crossing. Both men are due in court on September 15. The cases have triggered urgent childcare reforms, with Premier Jacinta Allan and Education Minister Jason Clare pledging tougher checks, phone bans, and safety reviews.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109236
>>109239
First photo of alleged child rapist Michael Simon Wilson revealed
Duncan Evans - July 3, 2025
The full identity of an alleged child rapist, linked to a Victorian childcare worker charged with child sexual abuse, has been revealed.
Michael Simon Wilson, 36, was charged with child rape and bestiality offences in April, with a first image released of the man on Thursday.
The publication of Mr Wilson’s charges followed confirmation of charges against childcare worker Joshua Brown on Tuesday.
Victorian Police charged Mr Brown with 70 offences after he allegedly abused eight children at a Point Cook childcare centre in Melbourne.
It is alleged some children were as young as five months.
A widespread investigation has now been launched, with Victoria’s chief health officer saying 1200 children have been recommended to undergo infectious diseases testing as a precaution.
He is also accused of using his bodily fluids to tamper with food, news.com.au reported.
Mr Wilson and Mr Brown are reportedly known to each other, though the nature of the relationship is unclear.
Mr Wilson’s alleged offences are not believed to involve childcare centres or any of Mr Brown’s alleged victims.
Police allege he raped a teenage boy in Hoppers Crossing in April.
On Thursday, the Herald Sun reported it was the investigation into Mr Wilson’s alleged offending that led them to Mr Brown.
Mr Brown was arrested on May 12 and is due to appear at Melbourne Magistrates Court on September 15.
Mr Wilson will appear at Melbourne Magistrates Court on the same day.
The charges have sparked urgent calls for reform in the childcare sector, with Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan promising immediate action.
The state government will immediately begin building a register for childcare workers, she said, and will bring forward a policy to ban personal devices in centres.
“To avoid delay, we’ll be putting all Victorian childcare centres on notice,” she said.
“They will be required to adopt this ban on personal devices, effective from September 26.
“Childcare centres who don’t comply with this ban will have this placed on them as a condition of licence and may face fines of up to $50,000.
The premier will also commission an “urgent review” into childcare safety, with more details expected at the end of the week.
The review will examine the possibility of installing CCTV cameras in centres and the deploying a “four eyes” principle, meaning children should not be left alone with a single adult.
It will also review whether the five-year working with children check time frame should be shortened.
Federal Education Minister Jason Clare said on Wednesday the problem of predators in childcare settings was “serious” and required “serious action”.
“It’s one of the reasons why I put this on the top of the agenda when education ministers met last week,” he said.
“Let me be clear – when education ministers met to discuss child safety last week, we didn’t discuss this case, but we discussed – what are the next steps that we need to take as a nation to make sure that our kids are safe in early education and care?”
The federal government has already banned personal mobile phones in centres and changed rules around mandatory reporting from seven days to 24 hours following complaints about sexual or physical abuse.
Mr Clare promised further reforms, including cutting off funding for centres that fail to meet minimum standards.
He also flagged changes to background checks for workers.
“It’s taken too long to do the work necessary to make sure that our Working with Children Check system is up to scratch,” he said.
“I’ve spoken a number of times with the Attorney-General, Michelle Rowland, the new Attorney-General, and I think I can safely speak on her behalf – she agrees, and is determined to take the action necessary here to make sure that our working with children checks across the nation are up to scratch.
“That’ll be something that will be discussed by Attorneys-General when they meet next month.”
He cautioned that a working with children check was not a “silver bullet”.
“In too many examples, a perpetrator is eventually caught and arrested and sentenced, there’s somebody that got a Working with Children Check because they had no prior criminal record,” he said.
“And so it’s only one of the things that we need to focus on here if we’re serious about making sure that we keep our kids safe.”
https://www.news.com.au/national/victoria/courts-law/first-photo-of-alleged-child-rapist-michael-simon-wilson-revealed/news-story/47ba798e0c91e521b13ea6f027e7fab3
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109247
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23269714 (030945ZJUL25) Notable: Elon Musk’s X wins ‘free speech’ fight against eSafety Commissioner – The Administrative Review Tribunal has overturned an order by eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman-Grant requiring Elon Musk’s X to remove a post insulting trans activist Teddy Cook. Deputy president Damien O’Donovan ruled the post did not meet the legal threshold for adult cyber-abuse, saying intent to cause serious harm was not proven. X’s lawyer Justin Quill called it “a win for free speech in Australia,” accusing the commissioner of overreach. eSafety said it welcomed the ruling’s guidance but would continue tackling online harms. The case comes as the government prepares to introduce a social media ban for under-16s.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Elon Musk’s X wins ‘free speech’ fight against eSafety Commissioner
Alexander Darling and Erin Pearson - July 1, 2025
1/2
Lawyers for social media platform X have declared a judgment that found in X’s favour against the eSafety Commissioner “a win for free speech in Australia”.
On Tuesday, the Administrative Review Tribunal struck out an order by Australia’s eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman-Grant, which demanded that Elon Musk’s X remove a post that insulted a transgender Australian man.
The order was made in March 2024 and relates to an X post about trans rights activist Teddy Cook.
Chris Elston, known on X as Billboard Chris, misgendered and insulted Cook, equated transgender identity with mental illness, and linked to an article suggesting Cook was “too smutty” for intergovernmental work.
At the time, X complied with an order from Inman-Grant to hide the post from Australian users, but later lodged an appeal against the removal notice.
In his ruling, the tribunal’s deputy president Damien O’Donovan said he was not satisfied that the post met “the statutory definition of cyber-abuse material targeted at an Australian adult”.
In Australia, if online content is serious enough and the service or platform does not help the person affected, the eSafety Commissioner can direct the platform to remove it.
The statutory definition is that the offensive content in question must target a specific Australian adult (over 18 years old) and be both intended to cause serious harm, and menacing, harassing or offensive in all the circumstances.
“The more focused question is whether I can be satisfied that the necessary intention to cause serious harm to the subject of the post has been established,” he wrote in his ruling.
“Based on the evidence before me, I am not satisfied that it has. Consequently, the decision of the eSafety Commissioner to issue a removal notice is set aside.”
X was represented in court by Justin Quill, partner at major law firm Thomson Geer.
“This is a win for free speech in Australia,” Quill said in a statement on Tuesday night.
“It seems clear this is another example of the eSafety Commissioner overreaching in her role and making politically motivated decisions to moderate what she considers Australians should and shouldn’t read and hear from the outside world.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109248
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23269730 (030954ZJUL25) Notable: Chinese bases ‘not welcome’ in Pacific, says Fiji PM Sitiveni Rabuka – Fiji’s Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka told the National Press Club that Beijing should not be allowed to establish military bases in the Pacific, declaring: “Who would welcome them? Not Fiji.” Visiting Australia with senior ministers, he backed Labor’s plan to recruit Pacific Islanders into the ADF, saying Fijians could fill the force’s 5000 vacancies. Rabuka called for a treaty with Australia to elevate ties beyond “political whims” and endorsed cooperation on development and security. He also praised Xi Jinping’s domestic achievements while warning against coercion in the Pacific. Rabuka will observe Fiji’s participation in Talisman Sabre.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109229
Chinese bases ‘not welcome’ in Pacific, says Fiji PM Sitiveni Rabuka
BEN PACKHAM - 3 July 2025
1/2
Fiji’s Prime Minister, Sitiveni Rabuka, has called on fellow Pacific leaders to resist Chinese efforts to establish a military base in the region as he backed Labor’s push to recruit Fijians to the Australian Defence Force and flagged a new bilateral treaty with Australia.
Amid surging efforts by China to expand its security footprint in the Pacific, the former coup leader said Beijing should not be allowed to secure a military outpost in the region.
“Who would welcome them? Not Fiji,” he told the National Press Club in Canberra on Wednesday. Mr Rabuka – one of the region’s most senior leaders – threw his support behind the Albanese government’s plan to recruit Pacific Islanders into the ADF, which is short more than 5000 personnel.
He said Fijians, more than 1500 of whom were serving in the British Army, could fill “the whole lot”.
“I would like to see it happen,” Mr Rabuka said.
Declaring the region’s outlook “more uncertain than at any time since Fiji’s independence in 1970”, Mr Rabuka said it was time to step up his country’s “Vuvale” (family) partnership with Australia to “an agreement or treaty”.
He said a bilateral treaty, which was being strongly backed by the Albanese government, would help address “neglected areas of development” while placing the countries’ relationship above politics.
“It will not be subject to the political whims of the winning parties in the various elections because there will be national treaties between sovereign states,” Mr Rabuka said.
The former military strongman, who has long been concerned about China’s growing influence in the Pacific, laid out a plan for a Pacific “ocean of peace” based on unity and co-operation among the region’s states.
In a veiled swipe at Beijing, he said Fiji expected “those from outside to respect our approaches and participate with us”. He said this meant respecting the “Pacific way”, refraining from “coercion” and respecting the environment.
“Right now, we are having to cope with a China that is big, really big, and has gotten powerful, and would probably like to spread its influence to the Pacific,” he said. “The Pacific leaders in all the recent discussions have tried to go for policies that are friendly to all and enemy to none. It is a fairly tough call to steer. But is it possible? We need to hold hands. We need to encourage each other to be able to maintain that view.”
At the same time, he acknowledged China’s President Xi Jinping was a “great leader” for his country, lifting standards and economic development for his people.
Mr Rabuka’s comments follow Beijing’s failed push for a region-wide security pact, its controversial 2022 security agreement with Solomon Islands and its repeated attempts to do a similar deal with Papua New Guinea.
The Fijian Prime Minister is in Australia for a six-day visit with his defence, security and immigration ministers. He and Anthony Albanese will watch the country’s Flying Fijians rugby union team go up against the Wallabies on Sunday.
Mr Rabuka also will visit a company of Fijian soldiers taking part in Australia’s biggest military exercise, Talisman Sabre – his country’s biggest contingent yet to join the biennial war games.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109249
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23269751 (031006ZJUL25) Notable: ‘No effective treatment’: man dies after first case of rare bat virus confirmed – A man in his 50s from northern NSW has died after contracting Australian bat lyssavirus, marking the first confirmed case in the state and only the fourth nationally since 1996. NSW Health said he was bitten by a bat several months ago and later hospitalised in critical condition. Authorities warned there is “no effective treatment” once symptoms begin, which progress rapidly to paralysis and death. In 2024, 118 people required medical assessment after bat bites or scratches. Officials urged the public to avoid handling bats and to seek urgent treatment if bitten.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
‘No effective treatment’: man dies after first case of rare bat virus confirmed
HOLLY TRUELOVE - 3 July 2025
A northern NSW man has died after being bitten by a bat, in the first confirmed case of Australian bat lyssavirus in NSW.
The man, in his 50s, was bitten by a bat several months ago and had been in a critical condition in hospital, but on Thursday NSW Health confirmed he had died.
“We express our sincere condolences to the man’s family and friends for their tragic loss,” NSW Health said in a statement.
Health authorities have urged people to stay away from bats, warning that there is “no effective treatment” for the rare virus – a close relative to the rabies virus.
The virus is transmitted from infected bat saliva to humans through a bat bite or scratch.
NSW Health Director in Health Protection Keira Glasgow described the case as “very tragic” and said further investigations were under way to understand if other factors contributed to the man’s illness.
“This is the first confirmed case of the virus in NSW, and the fourth case in Australia,” Ms Glasgow said.
“It is incredibly rare for the virus to transmit to humans, but once symptoms of lyssavirus start … sadly there is no effective treatment.”
Only three cases of human infection with bat lyssavirus (ABLV) have been recorded since the virus was first identified in 1996, according to NSW Health. All three cases were in Queensland and all died as a result of ABLV infection after bites or scratches by bats.
The early symptoms are flu-like, including headache, fever and fatigue. The illness progresses rapidly to paralysis, delirium, convulsions and death, usually within a week or two.
NSW Health said 118 people required medical assessment after being bitten or scratched by bats in 2024.
Anyone bitten or scratched by a bat should seek urgent medical assessment.
Ms Glasgow said people should wash the wound for 15 minutes and apply an antiseptic with antivirus action, before they are treated with rabies immunoglobulin and a rabies vaccine.
Australian bat lyssavirus can be found in species of flying foxes, fruit bats and insect-eating microbats.
Authorities are advising people who see a distressed, injured or trapped bat to contact WIRES (Wildlife Information, Rescue and Education Service - 1300 094 737) or a local wildlife rescue group.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/health/medical/no-effective-treatment-man-in-critical-condition-as-first-case-of-rare-bat-virus-confirmed/news-story/30cb3c5ecf056a0252d0dd9a1c1ddba9
https://www.wires.org.au/
https://www.wires.org.au/report-a-rescue
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109250
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23278899 (050618ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Crisafulli’s bid to bring Trump - and the Quad - to Queensland – Premier David Crisafulli has launched a push for Brisbane to host the Quad summit, arguing Queensland’s G20 experience and Olympic trajectory make it ideal. Speaking at an AmCham lunch, he said a smaller-scale gathering with Donald Trump, Narendra Modi and Shigeru Ishiba would deliver defence and investment opportunities, vowing to press the case in India and Japan. While he highlighted Brisbane firm Ferra Engineering’s F-35 parts production, protesters outside condemned Australia’s deepening military ties with the US and complicity in Gaza, warning of secretive deals and militarisation.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73662
>>109234
Crisafulli’s bid to bring Trump - and the Quad - to Queensland
Cameron Atfield - July 4, 2025
Premier David Crisafulli has made an audacious bid to get US President Donald Trump to Queensland as he pushes the state’s claims to host the Quad leaders’ summit.
The Quad - Australia, the United States, Japan and India - has a stated goal of defending a free and open Indo-Pacific, but is widely seen as an attempt to contain China’s influence in the region.
With India hosting this year’s summit, the earliest Australia could host would be 2026.
The premier used an American Independence Day event in Brisbane to announce Queensland’s candidature if, as he expected, Australia was confirmed host.
Crisafulli told the American Chamber of Commerce in Australia (AmCham) lunch he had been persistent in his lobbying of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, citing Brisbane’s experience of hosting the G20 leaders’ summit in 2014.
“It was amazing to see the world leaders here, but I’m not certain that Queensland quite got the buzz and the recognition, because it was so big,” he said.
“It was Obama and Putin and was just awe-inspiring, the amount of horsepower and personnel and the security detail, but sort of it blended a little bit into where it was.”
Crisafulli said that would not be the case with the Quad – even with Trump, it would be of a much smaller scale.
“Based on where things are at the moment geopolitically, who those partners are, where it will be, the fact that we’re about to become an Olympic city, the journey point where we are as a state, I think we can own it,” he said.
“The defence lens and the defence opportunities that come with that, and the investment opportunities, it would be a really big win for us and it’s something I’m really pinning our hopes on.
“I’m going to keep fighting pretty hard for it.”
Crisafulli said he would lead his first overseas delegation as premier within the next month to both India and Japan, during which Quad hosting rights would be “top of the agenda”.
Comment was sought from both Albanese and Foreign Minister Penny Wong.
While the American Chamber of Commerce (AmCham) celebrated July 4 inside the Brisbane Sofitel ballroom, a small band of protesters outside demonstrated against Australia’s military cooperation with Trump’s United States, including through AUKUS, and the ongoing war in Gaza.
Annette Brownlie, the chair of Independent and Peaceful Australia, was among the demonstrators.
“We’re very concerned about what sort of deals our premier might be doing with the American Chamber of Commerce,” she said.
“We don’t know what sort of contracts, etc, they will sign. We are deeply enmeshed in the American military industry – the F-35 fighter jets, parts of those fighter jets are made here in Brisbane.
“It implicates us and makes us complicit for the genocide that’s happening in Gaza and in Palestine.”
Ferra Engineering, based at Tingalpa in Brisbane’s east, manufactures components for the US’s F-35 Joint Strike Fighters and Crisafulli appeared to single it out while on stage.
“That’s one company employing 100 people doing one small element in the backblocks of Queensland,” he said.
“Now that’s a massive opportunity, and what we can do is make sure that we allow the private sector to do their job and invest in those partnerships that get people to look here [for investment].”
Along with Trump, Albanese would host his counterparts from India (Narendra Modi) and Japan (Shigeru Ishiba) at the security summit.
https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/politics/queensland/crisafulli-s-bid-to-bring-trump-and-the-quad-to-queensland-20250703-p5mc7x.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwvDtyr3XN0
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109251
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23278918 (050627ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Restaurant stormed and synagogue targeted in night of antisemitic attacks in Melbourne – A Melbourne synagogue was set on fire while 20 people, including children, were inside for Shabbat dinner, and Israeli restaurant Miznon was stormed by masked people shouting offensive chants, including “death to the IDF”. Firefighters quickly contained the synagogue blaze, captured on CCTV, but police are still searching for the arsonist. Premier Jacinta Allan, Lord Mayor Nicholas Reece and Jewish leaders condemned the attacks as cowardly, racist and dangerous. The Executive Council of Australian Jewry warned antisemitism is worsening, demanding perpetrators face the full force of the law.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Restaurant stormed and synagogue targeted in night of antisemitic attacks in Melbourne
Chip Le Grand - July 5, 2025
1/2
A Melbourne synagogue has been hit by an arson attack and an Israeli restaurant stormed by a violent group, some wearing the Palestinian keffiyeh, in a night of antisemitic attacks that have left Jewish people fearing for their safety.
Police have released an image of a man they wish to speak to in relation to the arson attack on the East Melbourne Synagogue on Friday night.
The man pictured is described as Caucasian, believed to be in his 30s, with a beard and long hair. He was last seen wearing a dark blue or black jumper, black pants, and a black beanie.
The arson attack on the synagogue was carried out while about 20 people, including children, were having a Shabbat dinner inside the place of worship.
Also on Friday night, a group of about 20 masked people entered Israeli restaurant Miznon and shouted offensive chants, scuffling with staff and knocking over tables to the alarm of patrons, before police arrived and arrested one man.
Vision from the incident shows diners screaming in fear inside the Hardware Lane restaurant, which is part-owned by an Israeli entrepreneur who has been promoting a controversial aid group in Gaza.
Premier Jacinta Allan has condemned the synagogue attack – now under investigation by Victoria Police – as disgraceful and cowardly.
“This is disgraceful behaviour by a pack of cowards,” Allan said on Saturday morning, as Jewish Australians woke to news of the attack. “That this happened on Shabbat makes it all the more abhorrent.
“Antisemitism has no place in Victoria and I stand with the Jewish community in their fight against hate, violence and fear.”
Jewish Community Council of Victoria president Phillip Zajac told this masthead that a lone arsonist used fuel to torch the front doors of the East Melbourne Synagogue in Albert Street about 8pm.
Firefighters responded quickly and contained the fire, which caused only superficial damage to the bluestone building and heavy timber doors. The attack was captured on CCTV.
Zajac said on Friday night that the perpetrator needed to be identified and prosecuted.
“I don’t know what the government can do but there have to be consequences for people who do things like this,” he said. “Lighting a place of worship [on fire] is just dreadful...
“A place of worship has got nothing to do with the Middle East dispute. This has really gotten to me. I don’t know what to say.”
Melbourne Lord Mayor Nicholas Reece attended the synagogue on Friday night after he learnt of the attack. He described the synagogue fire and targeting of Jewish businesses in the city as despicable and racist.
“The criminal attacks on Jewish businesses in the CBD and the East Melbourne Synagogue are shocking and should be condemned in the strongest possible terms,” he said. “I am angry and dismayed that once again our community is confronted with the despicable and racist actions of a few people.
“My thoughts are with the Jewish community, who are hurting deeply after these vile attacks. Everyone deserves the right to enjoy the most basic human acts, like practising your faith or enjoying a meal, without being attacked or vilified.”
Police confirmed about 20 people walked to the restaurant on Hardware Lane on Friday night and began shouting offensive chants, including “death to the IDF”.
“A 28-year-old person from Footscray was arrested for hindering police and has been released on summons,” police said in a statement issued just after midnight.
The “death to the IDF” chant was also heard in Melbourne’s Bourke Street Mall during last Sunday’s regular anti-Israel protest, and shouted from the Glastonbury stage in the UK by band Bob Vylan in its controversial performance.
The attack follows the firebombing in December that gutted the Adass Israel Synagogue in Ripponlea. No charges have been laid in that attack despite Victorian and federal police launching a joint taskforce investigation into the suspected terror attack.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109252
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23278968 (050647ZJUL25) Notable: PM wants ‘full force of the law’ as Sussan Ley, Josh Frydenberg slam ‘hate’ in Melbourne anti-Jewish attacks – Anthony Albanese condemned Friday night’s synagogue arson and violent protest at Israeli restaurant Miznon, vowing anti-Semites “must face the full force of the law.” Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke called the attacks “evil,” while Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said, “This is not protest. This is hate.” Former treasurer Josh Frydenberg labelled it a “hate crime,” and opposition spokesman Julian Leeser called it “a very sad day for Australia.” Israel’s Deputy Foreign Minister Sharren Haskel branded the incidents “terrorism” and accused Canberra of weakness against rising antisemitism.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
PM wants ‘full force of the law’ as Sussan Ley, Josh Frydenberg slam ‘hate’ in Melbourne anti-Jewish attacks
RICHARD FERGUSON - 5 July 2025
1/2
Anthony Albanese has called on anti-Semites who terrorised Melbourne’s Jewish community on Friday night to face the “full force of the law”.
The Prime Minister has talked to Victorian police minister Anthony Carbines and been briefed by both ASIO and the federal police on Friday’s incidents.
The Prime Minister has made his first comments after a man tried to set the East Melbourne synagogue on fire while 20 people were inside having a Shabbat dinner, while in a separate incident, customers and staff a CBD restaurant were left screaming as rioters tried to break in while chanting “death to the IDF.”
Mr Albanese said in a statement that the Commonwealth would do everything it could to help the Victorian state government and Victoria police to find justice.
“Anti-Semitism has no place in Australia,” Mr Albanese said.
“Those responsible for these shocking acts must face the full force of the law and my government will provide all necessary support toward this effort.”
Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke has called the attacks “abhorrent” and “evil”.
Opposition Leader Sussan Ley also condemned the attacks, describing them as ‘horrifying’.
“This is not protest,” she wrote on social media platform X. “This is hate. And it has no place in Australia.” Other leaders including former Liberal treasurer Josh Frydenberg called for more action and protection against rising anti-Semitism.
Israel, meanwhile, weighed in, branding the firebombing attack on thesynagogue and a targeted protest at the restaurant as acts of “terrorism”, and accused Australia of failing to confront the surge of violent anti-Semitism.
Deputy Foreign Minister Sharren Haskel said the attacks were not only assaults on the Jewish and Israeli communities, but a threat to Australia’s democratic values.
“The horrifying attacks overnight on a synagogue and an Israeli business in Melbourne are yet another reminder of how far racist, antisemitic hate crimes have spread in the heart of Australia,” Ms Haskel said in a statement to The Australian.
“Targeting Jewish houses of worship and an Israeli restaurant is terrorism, aimed at intimidating an entire community simply because of their religion and identity. These attacks are not just assaults on Jews or Israelis – they are assaults on Australian values of tolerance, diversity, and freedom.”
Ms Haskel said the Australian government had failed to implement “real consequences” for individuals and groups spreading anti-Semitic hate and inciting violence, warning the “weakness” would only embolden extremists.
“Let me be clear: these attacks are happening because, for too long, there have been no real consequences for those spreading hate and inciting violence. Weakness and silence only embolden the extremists,” she said.
In a terrifying night for Melbourne’s Jewish community, police say a man entered the grounds of the East Melbourne Hebrew Congregation on Albert St about 8pm and poured flammable liquid over the front door before setting it alight then fleeing on foot.
Friday’s arson comes months after the Adass Israel Synagogue at Ripponlea was firebombed.
Counter-terrorism police in June executed raids across Melbourne’s northern suburbs as part of its months-long probe into the potential terrorist attack.
Police are yet to determine the motivation for the attack on East Melbourne Hebrew Congregation synagogue but confirmed arson chemists and detectives are reviewing CCTV footage and investigating the possibility of a hate crime.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109253
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23279036 (050729ZJUL25) Notable: Attempted synagogue firebombing no act of terror, say police – Victoria Police confirmed three anti-Semitic incidents in Melbourne, including an arson attack on East Melbourne Hebrew Congregation, but stopped short of declaring terrorism. Commander Zorka Dunstan said 20 worshippers escaped unharmed, while CCTV shows the suspect carrying a duffle bag before lighting the doors. Hours earlier, 20 protesters stormed Israeli-owned restaurant Miznon chanting “death to the IDF,” damaging property before police intervened. A third incident saw cars torched and spray-painted in Greensborough. All cases are under Counter-terrorism Command review, with police calling the crimes “abhorrent” but currently treating them as serious criminal acts.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109252
Attempted synagogue firebombing no act of terror, say police
MOHAMMAD ALFARES and LYDIA LYNCH - 5 July 2025
1/2
Victoria Police have revealed a third anti-Semitic incident occurred in Melbourne on Saturday, as they stopped short of declaring the attempted firebombing of a synagogue a terrorist attack – despite confirming it was a targeted act that endangered 20 worshippers.
Addressing the media after releasing CCTV images of the suspected arsonist, Commander Zorka Dunstan said investigators were now examining three separate incidents, all under the scrutiny of the Counter-terrorism Command and local detectives.
The first, and most serious, was the deliberate arson attack on the East Melbourne Hebrew Congregation, where an unknown man allegedly poured a flammable liquid over the front doors and set them alight around 8.05pm Friday.
Twenty people inside the synagogue for a Shabbat dinner were forced to evacuate through a rear exit. No injuries were reported, but police confirmed the building’s entrance was significantly damaged.
“I’d like to make it very clear that we do recognise that these crimes are disgusting and abhorrent, but at this stage we are not declaring this a terrorist incident,” Commander Dunstan said.
“In the course of our investigation we will examine the intent and ideology of the person involved to determine if this is in fact terrorism. At the moment we are categorising it as a serious criminal incident and responding accordingly.”
The second incident occurred in Melbourne’s CBD, when a splinter group of pro-Palestinian protesters from a broader “No Police at Protest” rally stormed Miznon, an Israeli-owned restaurant on Hardware Lane, and disrupted diners.
Police arrived quickly and moved the demonstrators on. A 28-year-old Footscray man was arrested for hindering police and later released on summons.
A third, previously unreported incident occurred at 4.30am Saturday at a Greensborough business on Para Road, where three cars were set alight and spray-painted with graffiti. One vehicle was destroyed; the others were damaged.
“That business has been subject to some pro-Palestinian activity in the past, and that’s why we’ve made that connection at this time,” Commander Dunstan said.
“In saying that, we haven’t made a full connection. We’re just continuing to investigate, and we thought we’d just bring it to your attention at this time.
All three incidents are being reviewed for potential links by detectives and counterterrorism authorities.
Suspect image released
An image of the attempted synagogue firebombing suspect, captured just before 8pm on Friday night, shows a man walking past the synagogue’s front gate holding what appears to be a dark duffle bag.
“The man depicted is perceived as being Caucasian in appearance, is believed to be aged in his 30s with a beard and long hair,” police said in a statement.
“He is pictured wearing a dark blue or black jumper, black pants and a black beanie.”
Twenty people were inside having a Shabbat dinner on Friday at the time of the attack, while in a separate incident a group of keffiyeh-wearing protesters stormed a Jewish-owned restaurant in the CBD.
“Everyone inside self-evacuated through the rear of the building and there have been no reports of injuries,” Victoria Police said in a statement.
“Firefighters attended and extinguished the fire which was contained to the front entrance.
“Police are still working to establish the exact circumstances surrounding the fire including the motivation behind the incident. An arson chemist will be attending the scene and police are currently canvassing for CCTV footage.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109254
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23279053 (050754ZJUL25) Notable: ‘Kindy cops’ sent in to police childcare as top operator installs CCTV cameras – The federal government will introduce laws allowing “kindy cops” to carry out unannounced inspections after a Melbourne childcare worker was charged with sexually abusing eight babies and toddlers, forcing 1200 children to undergo STI tests. Education Minister Jason Clare vowed to cut funding to centres prioritising profit over safety, calling delays in reform “too bloody long.” Goodstart Early Learning, Australia’s largest chain, is rolling out CCTV across 653 centres, while Early Childhood Australia warned staff shortages encourage corner-cutting. Clare dismissed calls to ban men from childcare, stressing systemic safeguards, not gender bans, are required.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109236
>>109238
‘Kindy cops’ sent in to police childcare as top operator installs CCTV cameras
NATASHA BITA - July 03, 2025
1/2
Commonwealth “kindy cops’’ will carry out snap inspections of childcare centres, as the nation’s biggest childcare chain installs CCTV cameras across hundreds of daycare centres.
New powers of entry for fraud officers to conduct unannounced spot checks of daycare centres will be part of childcare safety legislation to be introduced to federal parliament within weeks.
Federal Education Minister Jason Clare said it was “sickening and serious’’ that 1200 young children had to be tested for STDs this week after a Melbourne childcare worker was charged with allegedly sexually abusing eight babies and toddlers in his care. He said governments had taken “too bloody long’’ to fix child-safety risks in daycare centres and announced new laws to punish centres that “put profit over quality and put child safety at risk’’.
“The big weapon that the federal government has to wield here is the funding that we provide to childcare centres,’’ Mr Clare said.
“It equates to about 70 per cent of the funding that runs a centre, and if they’re not keeping our kids safe then we need to cut off their funding.’’
The change means fraud teams will no longer require a warrant, or be accompanied by Australian Federal Police, to check if centres are fraudulently claiming to care for “ghost” children to pocket taxpayer subsidies.
The legislation will give the federal Education Department the power to cut childcare subsidies to centres with “egregious and continued breaches’’ of child safety and quality rules.
Childcare operators that persistently fail to meet minimum standards for childcare will be banned from opening centres.
Mr Clare said federal, state and territory governments must bring in a national register of childcare workers, and “fix’’ working-with-children checks to provide live notifications of criminal convictions. “That’s work that’s being led by attorneys-general, but it needs to be sped up,’’ he told the Seven Network.
“It’s a complicated system but people aren’t interested in bloody excuses, they’re interested in action. The implementation of those reforms has taken too bloody long, and they need to be accelerated.’’
Mr Clare hosed down suggestions that men be banned from working in childcare, noting that women had also abused and neglected children in daycare.
Australia’s largest childcare chain, not-for-profit Goodstart Early Learning, has revealed it is installing CCTV cameras across all 653 centres to “enhance safety and security, with strict privacy controls in place’’.
“CCTV has a role to play but it will never be a replacement for active supervision of every child by professional educators,’’ Goodstart said in a statement.
“Governments will have to consider how they fund a national program to support the rollout of CCTV in early learning centres as the costs are extremely high, in terms of installation costs, secure storage of data and ongoing monitoring or review.’’
Goodstart banned mobile phones from its centres in March this year, well ahead of national ban to start in September.
The company also employs more staff than the mandated ratio of one carer for every four babies in nursery rooms. “Our educators are also expected to work closely together to ensure they are in line of sight or in hearing of each other,’’ Goodstart said.
It said staff were not allowed to be alone with a child “if there is no professional reason for doing so’’, and they should avoid taking children to offices or staffrooms out of the sight of colleagues.
Staff do not put posters over windows that hinder line of sight.
Goodstart said: “We are very supportive of the proposed introduction of a national working-with-children check, improved reporting and information sharing between government agencies and increased funding for regulators.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109255
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23279069 (050810ZJUL25) Notable: Queensland review into responses to child sexual abuse hears past complaints against Ashley Paul Griffith may not have been shared between agencies – A review into system responses to child sexual abuse has heard that reputation concerns, defamation fears, and unclear processes may have deterred agencies from raising concerns about convicted paedophile Ashley Paul Griffith, who abused children over two decades. The Child Death Review Board found “more than one complaint” was made to employers, regulators and police, but not always progressed or shared. Griffith retained a Blue Card until his 2022 arrest. The review warned the system gave a “false sense of security” and urged reforms before 2026.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109236
Queensland review into responses to child sexual abuse hears past complaints against Ashley Paul Griffith may not have been shared between agencies
Kate McKenna - 1 Jul 2025
1/2
Defamation fears and a focus on an organisation's "reputation" may act as a deterrent to raising concerns about childcare staff, a Queensland review into child sexual abuse responses has heard.
Paedophile Ashley Paul Griffith is appealing his life sentence after last year pleading guilty to abusing dozens of children over almost 20 years at childcare centres in Brisbane and in Italy.
The Child Death Review Board (CDRB) is currently reviewing system responses to child sexual abuse in Queensland — using Griffith's offending as a case study.
The latest progress report, published late last week, detailed what the review has heard so far, including that the early childhood education and care workforce is large and highly casualised, and pressures may impact the quality of recruitment processes, including the "robustness" of referee checks.
"[In addition] the prioritisation of an organisation's reputation, a fear of defamation and legal risks to organisations and individuals may act as a deterrent to raising or sharing concerns about a person, particularly where complaints have not been substantiated," the progress report said.
"Unclear information sharing processes and a fear of privacy breaches may also create an environment where early indicators of potential harm are minimised. This impacts the system's capacity to detect child sexual abuse, including by identifying patterns over time and across services."
Initial findings show 'more than one complaint' made against Griffith
Queensland police have previously said Griffith was subject to two reports about his behaviour in the two years leading up to his arrest, however there was "insufficient evidence to take action" at the time.
An internal inquiry found police investigated the claims appropriately.
The progress report said initial findings from the CDRB review show “more than one complaint” was made about Griffith to his employers, the Early Childhood Regulatory Authority and QPS.
"Of these complaints, the available information suggests they were not always progressed, and information was not shared between agencies," the report said.
"Prior complaints made to QPS did not proceed to prosecution. This meant that up until the offender's arrest in 2022, there were no pending investigations, charges or convictions against him, and he met all requirements to obtain and maintain a Blue Card."
Queensland's working with children check — the Blue Card screening process — looks for a charge or conviction for any offence in Australia, child protection prohibition orders, and domestic violence information.
The CDRB review has heard a "lack of understanding" of the limitations of the Blue Card system "may result in a false sense of security" in organisations where workers hold the card.
"The Blue Card system is not designed to collect information on early indicators of harm or to identify patterns over time and across organisations, particularly where complaints about a person have been investigated and found to be unsubstantiated due to a lack of evidence," the progress report said.
"The implementation of a reportable conduct scheme in Queensland, which will commence in 2026, will improve the collation and sharing of this type of information."
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109256
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23279531 (051335ZJUL25) Notable: University of Pennsylvania to revoke transgender swimmer’s records and apologise to female swimmers – The University of Pennsylvania will revoke Lia Thomas’s swimming records and titles and issue apology letters to female athletes, under a resolution with the US Education Department. The deal comes after the Trump administration froze $US175m in Penn research funds while investigating whether allowing Thomas, a transgender woman, to compete in female categories breached Title IX, the federal law banning sex-based discrimination in education. Education Secretary Linda McMahon called it “the Trump effect in action.” Penn said it complied with NCAA rules at the time. NCAA now restricts women’s teams to those assigned female at birth.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73621 (pb)
University of Pennsylvania to revoke transgender swimmer’s records and apologise to female swimmers
SARA RANDAZZO - July 02, 2025
The University of Pennsylvania will revoke winning records of a transgender swimmer who competed for the school several years ago and issue apologies to affected female swimmers under a resolution announced Tuesday by the Education Department.
The resolution is the latest in the Trump administration’s ongoing campaign to remake higher education. President Trump’s ire against universities has so far focused on accusations of tolerating antisemitism and criticisms of policies related to diversity, equity and inclusion. Education Secretary Linda McMahon called Tuesday’s agreement (local time) an example of “the Trump effect in action.”
The administration had frozen $US175m ($266m) in federal research funds to the Ivy League university earlier this year while investigating whether Penn violated Title IX by allowing swimmer Lia Thomas to compete on the women’s team. While the resolution doesn’t mention any financial aspects, an Education Department spokeswoman said Tuesday the funds would be restored.
Thomas came out as transgender in the summer of 2019 after previously swimming on the men’s team and underwent hormone therapy during a cancelled Covid pandemic season. Thomas became the first openly transgender athlete to win an NCAA Division I championship after winning the 500-yard (457m) freestyle in 2022. Thomas holds three all-time school records in freestyle events and one relay record.
Penn agreed to remove any records, titles or recognitions “misappropriated by male athletes allowed to compete in female categories,” the Education Department said. The resolution also includes sending personalised apology letters to affected female swimmers, adopting “biology-based definitions” for the words “male” and “female” and issuing public statements.
Thomas is the only transgender athlete to have participated in women’s competitive athletics at Penn.
The university noted Tuesday that it complied with NCAA rules at the time Thomas competed and never set its own regulations around transgender athletes. NCAA in February announced new guidelines, following an executive order by Trump, that limit women’s athletic teams to those assigned female at birth.
“Our commitment to ensuring a respectful and welcoming environment for all of our students is unwavering,” Penn President J Larry Jameson said Tuesday. “At the same time, we must comply with federal requirements.”
In February, three former Penn swimmers sued the school and the organisers of an Ivy League championship for allowing Thomas to compete, arguing it made the competition unfair.
Paula Scanlan, a former Penn swimmer not involved in the lawsuit, heralded the agreement in the Education Department announcement. “Today marks a momentous step in repairing the past mistreatment of female athletes, and forging a future where sex discrimination plays no role in limiting girls’ potential,” Scanlan said.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/us-politics/penn-to-revoke-transgender-swimmers-records-and-apologise-to-female-swimmers/news-story/8b4271d7a62bf2f1f6890c34f235be75
https://qresear.ch/?q=Lia+Thomas
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109257
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23279579 (051347ZJUL25) Notable: PNG woman Rosa Yakapus endured days of public torture. No one came to save her – Rosa Yakapus, in PNG’s Hela Province, was accused of sorcery in her estranged husband’s death and endured three days of brutal, public torture. Stripped naked, tied to a pole, and burned, she was assaulted with hot sticks and knives before being shot and thrown into a river. Villagers repeatedly called police, but officers lacked vehicles, fuel, and backup to intervene. Critics argue billions in Australian aid secure energy projects while women remain unprotected. Shared videos underline escalating sorcery-accusation violence and community paralysis. “The world is watching PNG. We need to do something,” said Sergeant Alice Arigo, urging cars, fuel, rations, and urgent arrests soon.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73607 (pb)
PNG woman Rosa Yakapus endured days of public torture. No one came to save her
AMANDA HODGE - 5 July 2025
1/2
On Tuesday this week, Papua New Guineans received a government phone alert that a new Australian-trained, counterterrorist unit – the latest beneficiary of hundreds of millions in funding – was being deployed with “shoot to kill” orders to address soaring tribal violence.
A day earlier, in Ugu village in PNG’s impoverished Hela Province, Rosa Yakapus, stripped naked and tied to a pole with her legs spread wide and a fire burning beneath her, was enduring a third day of extreme and very public torture over a sorcery allegation.
Her estranged husband, a man she had supported through teacher’s college only for him to marry another woman after his career took flight, had died of a suspected heart attack and his relatives had accused her of using witchcraft to kill him.
Graphic videos of Rosa’s ordeal circulating before her death and in the days since, including her assault with hot sticks and knives, have raised questions about the police response to such an extreme and public crime.
The Weekend Australian has been told a local community police officer at a Margarima police station, less then 40 minutes drive away from Ugu village, had fielded calls from several villagers alerting them to the ongoing torture. They hoped police could come and save her.
But no one rescued Rosa Yakapus.
The Margarima local community police officer was on his own with no car.
He called Sergeant Alice Arigo, the committed, lone family and gender violence officer in a region now riven with such crimes, who this week has been personally caring for two sorcery-related violence victims for lack of a local safe house.
She too had no car – after it was “requisitioned” by another station – and needed backup which took time to organise, time that Rosa Yakapus did not have.
Hela Province police commander Michael Heli, a two-hour drive away, was only 10 days into the job and still finding his feet when he too learned of Rosa’s ordeal. He ordered a car to be sent to Margarima but by the time it happened it was too late.
In a province where huge police and military resources are dedicated to protecting Chevron and Santos oil and LNG projects, there were apparently no resources available for a woman whose impending murder had been all-but broadcast through viral video.
Australia has sunk well over a billion dollars into building up PNG’s defence and police forces in the past decade, $637 million this year alone in development assistance, and another $600 million to support a Port Moresby-based National Rugby League team – all in the interests of geostrategic security.
Yet there were no vehicles, no fuel, no manpower to save Rosa, none either for at least two other women in her district killed weeks earlier in horrifically similar circumstances, nor for countless PNG women every year who face beatings, torture and sorcery-accusation related mob killings.
Australian money, it seems, has done little to improve their security.
In Rosa’s final hours another video shows her still naked, signs of torture on her body.
It is dark and she is blindfolded. Her head is hanging down and she is surrounded by a mob of men, some laughing, many taking video.
“Did you remove his heart?” one village leader is heard to ask.
In earlier videos she has protested her innocence but this time she weakly confesses.
She did take his heart, she says, but she can put it back and revive him if only they will allow her to go free.
It is a feeble and ultimately futile last effort to save her own life.
On Tuesday evening, after 72 hours of enduring the most extreme, humiliating and sexual-related violence – much of it reportedly committed in front of her five children – her death is recorded in one final video.
Rosa cowers weakly at the very edge of a bridge while a village mob looks on. A single gunshot rings out and her body falls into the river below.
“It took three days and nobody tried to stop it,” says Hela province Bishop Reverend Steven Bai who has called for all those responsible to surrender. “Even the police didn’t come on time. The problem was manpower and logistics.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109258
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23279623 (051356ZJUL25) Notable: Opinion: Torture, burning, murder: just the tip of the iceberg in PNG - “The case of a young woman tortured in front of a group of men before being murdered in Papua New Guinea, which Amanda Hodge describes in her article, is significant not because it’s unusual but because it is all too common. Many, many more cases go unrecorded in any way. Bodies are silently buried, or disposed of in rivers, or thrown down pit toilets. Survivors flee their communities and become refugees, constantly looking over their shoulder, worried about what will happen when their new neighbours learn about their history. Most government officials in PNG now accept that this happens on a regular basis and at scale. I have been working in the space of what is now called sorcery accusation related violence in Papua New Guinea since 2013. This has been difficult work, but we have started to see some positive developments. Most government officials in PNG now accept that this happens on a regular basis and at scale. PNG has also passed a holistic national action plan to address sorcery accusation related violence, ... And yet, the violence and the cases continue. The national action plan has been desperately underfunded. The response is overwhelmingly reactive rather than preventive.” - Miranda Forsyth, Director of the International Network Against Witchcraft Accusations and Ritual Attacks - The Australian.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73607 (pb)
>>109257
Torture, burning, murder: just the tip of the iceberg in PNG
MIRANDA FORSYTH - 5 July 2025
In my work as Director of the International Network Against Witchcraft Accusations and Ritual Attacks I am regularly sent images of the most shocking and gruesome violence to women, related to witchcraft accusations.
The case of a young woman tortured in front of a group of men before being murdered in Papua New Guinea, which Amanda Hodge describes in her article, is significant not because it’s unusual but because it is all too common.
I am told about such cases on a depressingly regular basis, sometimes with, and sometimes without, video footage or photographs. Most cases involve an element of public torture and collective violence. Most are triggered by a death or sickness.
But frequent as these cases are, they are just the tip of the iceberg. Many, many more cases go unrecorded in any way. Bodies are silently buried, or disposed of in rivers, or thrown down pit toilets. Survivors flee their communities and become refugees, constantly looking over their shoulder, worried about what will happen when their new neighbours learn about their history. The fact that an entire community often supports these kinds of attacks and the consequent fear of repercussions, means that cases are seldom reported to police, and even more infrequently result in a prosecution.
I have been working in the space of what is now called sorcery accusation related violence in Papua New Guinea since 2013. Over this time, I have sought to reveal and map the extreme human rights abuses associated with accusations of sorcery.
In one detailed mapping exercise, I recorded 1039 accusation incidents involving 1553 accused persons in four out of the 23 provinces (less than 2 million people) in PNG, over a four-year period. In total, 318 people, either died or survived serious harm during this period, just over half of whom were women.
This has been difficult work, but we have started to see some positive developments. Most government officials in PNG now accept that this happens on a regular basis and at scale.
PNG has also passed a holistic national action plan to address sorcery accusation related violence, and there are many activists and donor programs working in the area. Many use WhatsApp or other social media to network with local leaders and sympathetic police officers and each other.
And yet, the violence and the cases continue. Many police officers are apathetic, overwhelmed or on the side of the community. The national action plan has been desperately underfunded. The response is overwhelmingly reactive rather than preventive.
Through my work on sorcery accusation related violence in PNG I came to know about individuals and organisations around the world working on similar problems.
In 2021 the UN Human Rights Council passed the Resolution on the Elimination of Harmful practices related to Accusations of Witchcraft and Ritual Attacks which documented more than 20,000 cases of harmful practices related to witchcraft accusations in more than 60 countries over a 10 year period, between 2009 and 2019.
The resolution formally recognised at an international level the scale of the problem for the first time and highlighted the urgent need for governments across the world to take action.
But it is just the start of the journey, rather than the end.
Miranda Forsyth is the Director of the International Network Against Witchcraft Accusations and Ritual Attacks.
This article is an edited version of a speech she gave at the exhibition ‘Witch Hunts in the 21st Century: A Human Rights Catastrophe’, which can be seen at the Moot Court Foyer, ANU Law School until Tuesday July 8.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/torture-burning-murder-just-the-tip-of-the-iceberg-in-png/news-story/7216208714ded4b496b23306820c5f3f
https://www.anu.edu.au/events/witch-hunts-in-the-21st-century-a-human-rights-catastrophe-photography-exhibition-launch
https://researchportalplus.anu.edu.au/en/persons/miranda-forsyth
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109259
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23283156 (060823ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Anthony Albanese to champion 'Australian independence' within US alliance – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will deliver a speech honouring John Curtin, invoking his wartime leadership to argue Australia must assert sovereignty within its US alliance. He will stress Curtin is remembered for “speaking for Australia” and resisting US-UK pressure to divert troops to Burma. The speech comes amid Trump’s tariffs, AUKUS uncertainty and defence spending demands. Historian James Curran called it Albanese’s most significant speech, saying it highlights that “being in a close alliance does not mean you cannot stand up for Australian self-respect and self-regard,” a signal to both Washington and Australians.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73662 (pb)
>>109234
Anthony Albanese to champion 'Australian independence' within US alliance
Stephen Dziedzic - 4 Jul 2025
Anthony Albanese will use a speech lionising Labor prime minister John Curtin to champion Australian independence within the US alliance, saying the legendary wartime leader is remembered "not just because he looked to America" but because he "spoke for Australia".
The speech comes at a delicate moment in Australia's key strategic relationship. The federal government is grappling with an unpredictable White House, along with uncertainties over the administration's tariffs, the AUKUS pact, and the US's trajectory under President Donald Trump.
On Saturday night the prime minister will deliver a speech at the John Curtin Research Centre marking the 80th anniversary of the former prime minister, who is often called the "father" of the Australia-US alliance.
Successive Labor prime ministers have claimed the alliance as a signature achievement for ALP foreign policy, and have lavished praise on Curtin for turning to America in the wake of the United Kingdom's catastrophic defeat in Singapore in 1942.
While Mr Albanese will praise the alliance as a "pillar" of Australian foreign policy and the nation's "most important defence and security partnership" he will also say that it was "product" of Curtin's leadership and "not the extent of it".
"Curtin's famous statement that Australia 'looked to America' was much more than the idea of trading one strategic guarantor for another, or swapping an alliance with the old world for one with the new," he is expected to say.
"It was a recognition that Australia's fate would be decided in our region."
The prime minister will also say that Curtin recognised that Australia realised that its security "could not be outsourced to London, or trusted to vague assurances from Britain".
"We needed an Australian foreign policy anchored in strategic reality, not bound by tradition," he will say.
"So we remember Curtin not just because he looked to America. We honour him because he spoke for Australia."
Mr Albanese will also praise Curtin for withstanding pressure from both Roosevelt and Churchill to send Australian troops returning from the Middle East to Burma, rather than back home to defend Australia.
He will say that if the US and UK got their way, "hundreds if not thousands of Australians would have been killed, or taken prisoner" as Japanese forces took Burma, and John Curtin's assertion of sovereignty prevented "a disaster every bit as crushing to national morale as the fall of Singapore".
The prime minister will also seek to frame his government as the inheritor of Curtin's economic agenda, comparing the government's moves to bolster manufacturing to Curtin's wartime industrial program.
While the Albanese government has doubled down on the AUKUS pact and its ambitious plan to develop nuclear powered submarines with the United States, it has also expressed deep frustration over the Trump administration's so-called Liberation Day tariffs, pushed back against Washington's demand that Australia radically increase defence spending, and fretted privately about the impact of the massive cuts to US aid programs.
And while Mr Albanese has had three phone calls with Mr Trump, he is yet to have a face-to-face meeting with the president since the US leader departed the G7 in Canada early ahead of American strikes on Iran.
'Easily the most significant' speech
James Curran from the University of Sydney told the ABC the speech was "easily the most significant" one Mr Albanese had delivered in office.
"It's significant not just for the way in which Albanese invokes the Curtin legend, but the time in which he is doing it — when Australia is again under significant pressure from a great power to adopt policy courses not necessarily in Australia's interests," he said.
"He says Curtin's wartime leadership was fundamentally about the defence of Australian sovereignty, that it was about safeguarding Australia's security in the Pacific, and that Curtin, like other Australia leaders before him, was all too aware that great powers can play fast and loose with Australian interests. That it was simply not an option to rely on assurances from London or Washington as the basis for making Australian policy."
Professor Curran said Mr Albanese was using the Curtin story to send a signal to both Washington and to Australians that "being in a close alliance does not mean you cannot stand up for Australian self-respect and self-regard".
"[Also] that leadership is as much about tending to the domestic hearth and what we have built here as it is in safeguarding the continent's security," he said.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-04/anthony-albanese-champions-australian-independence-/105497350
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3ZBRY_IA4s
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109260
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23283166 (060832ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Why Albanese’s ‘Australian way’ speech will concern Washington – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese used the John Curtin Oration to outline an “Australian way” foreign policy, stressing Canberra will pursue sovereign interests even when diverging from Washington. He drew on Curtin’s defiance of Churchill and Roosevelt in WWII, framing the US alliance as “a pillar” but “not the extent” of policy, while promoting regional engagement, multilateralism and the rules-based order. Critics in Washington viewed the speech negatively, with Hudson Institute’s John Lee warning it lacked matching defence spending and risked leaving Australia “more isolated and vulnerable,” while Arthur Sinodinos urged careful diplomacy to prevent misinterpretation.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109259
Why Albanese’s ‘Australian way’ speech will concern Washington
JOE KELLY - 6 July 2025
1/2
Anthony Albanese has given a speech that will heighten fears of a growing strategic and political disconnect between Australia and Washington.
The Prime Minister used the John Curtin Oration in Sydney on Saturday night to set out what he has dubbed the “Australian way” under Labor.
This is partly a response to the “America First” agenda being championed by Donald Trump, with Albanese issuing a reminder that Labor will pursue Australian sovereign interests – even where they diverge from those of Washington.
Drawing on Curtin’s wartime experience in resisting pressure from Winston Churchill and Franklin D. Roosevelt to divert Australian troops to Burma following the fall of Singapore, Albanese made clear the US alliance was “not the extent” of Australia’s defence and foreign policy.
“Our alliance with the US ought to be remembered as a product of Curtin’s leadership in defence and foreign policy, not the extent of it,” he said. “Curtin’s famous statement that Australia ‘looked to America’ was much more than the idea of trading one strategic guarantor for another … It was a recognition that Australia’s fate would be decided in our region.”
This will be seen as a rhetorical assertion of greater Australian independence on the world stage at a time of growing differences and strain in Canberra’s relations with Washington under Trump.
The address will have been closely watched in Washington, with insiders already suggesting it is being viewed negatively. They say Albanese is not taking the obvious step to embrace greater independence by lifting defence spending above current levels.
Setting out the pillars of his “Australian way”, Albanese made clear this approach included strong support for a robust multilateralism, adherence to the rules-based order, support for small and middle powers and a rejection of “great power peace” as the basis for stability in the Indo-Pacific.
While this sends a message to Beijing, it will also reverberate discordantly in Washington. The risk is Albanese will be seen as leaning into the differences between Labor and the Trump administration to win a domestic political dividend.
These differences extend beyond the realm of foreign affairs, with Albanese framing Australia as a “social laboratory” and ‘workers’ paradise” in having created a fair minimum wage, age pension and affordable health care.
After the US pharmaceutical lobby took aim at Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, Albanese sent another message to Washington. “We’ve made it clear that under our Labor government, the PBS is not up for negotiation,” he said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109261
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23283172 (060837ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Anthony Albanese pays tribute to ‘father’ of Australia-US alliance – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese delivered the John Curtin Oration in Sydney, marking 80 years since Curtin’s death, to praise the wartime leader as founder of the Australia-US alliance while highlighting Australia’s sovereign independence. He said Curtin’s defiance of Churchill and Roosevelt, who wanted troops sent to Burma, saved “hundreds if not thousands” of lives and showed Australia’s fate must be decided in its own region. Albanese called the alliance a “pillar” but “not the extent” of policy, stressing middle-power rights, Pacific leadership, and stabilising ties with China, amid Trump’s push for 3.5% GDP defence spending.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109259
>>109260
Anthony Albanese pays tribute to ‘father’ of Australia-US alliance
LYDIA LYNCH - 5 July 2025
Anthony Albanese has trumpeted Australia’s independence in its relationship with the United States in a speech paying tribute to the wartime leadership of John Curtin.
Amid growing concern about his relationship with Donald Trump, the looming tariff deadline and doubts about the future of the AUKUS submarine deal, Mr Albanese praised Curtin for giving Australia “the confidence and determination to think and act for ourselves”.
In his speech in Sydney on Saturday night, to mark 80 years since the death of the former Labor prime minister, Mr Albanese honoured Curtin as the founder of the Australia-US alliance.
“A pillar of our foreign policy. Our most important defence and security partnership and a relationship that commands bipartisan support, respect and affection in both our nations,” he said.
“Yet our alliance with the US ought to be remembered as a product of Curtin’s leadership in defence and foreign policy, not the extent of it.”
As WWII spread into the Pacific, Curtin recognised that Australia’s security could not be “outsourced to London” and foreign policy had to be “anchored in strategic reality, not bound by tradition”.
Mr Albanese praised Curtin’s decision to push back on Winston Churchill and Franklin Roosevelt’s demands to deploy troops to Burma, now Myanmar, which would have resulted in the death or capture of “hundreds if not thousands of Australians”.
“Curtin’s famous statement that Australia ‘looked to America’ was much more than the idea of trading one strategic guarantor for another, or swapping an alliance with the old world for one with the new.
“It was a recognition that Australia’s fate would be decided in our region. It followed the decision Curtin had made in 1941 that Australia would issue its own declaration of war with Japan.
“Speaking for ourselves, as a sovereign nation.”
Ahead of an extended trip to China this month where he will have his fourth meeting with President Xi Jinping, Mr Albanese also championed “the rights and the role of middle powers and smaller nations”.
He said Labor was rebuilding Australia’s standing as a leader in the Pacific and “patiently and deliberately working to stabilise our relationship with China”.
The Prime Minister’s speech comes amid growing calls for him to do more to strengthen his relationship with the Trump administration, which is demanding Australia lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP.
Mr Albanese has had three phone calls with Mr Trump, but the pair have never met in person, with the President cancelling their talks at the G7 summit in Canada last month to deal with the Israel-Iran conflict.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/anthony-albanese-pays-tribute-to-father-of-australiaus-alliance/news-story/f8d00102f3ddf391184d5bf217f78bc2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=angnhO-jOSI
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109262
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23283192 (060900ZJUL25) Notable: Albanese urged to reassure Trump after Curtin speech – Anthony Albanese’s John Curtin Research Centre address, praising independence in foreign policy, has sparked warnings it could be misread in Washington while AUKUS is under review. Former ambassador Arthur Sinodinos urged a diplomatic “charm offensive” to reassure the Trump administration the alliance remains strong, while Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said the speech’s timing risked weakening ties. Ex-Home Affairs chief Mike Pezzullo argued Albanese overlooked Curtin’s pre-war push for defence preparedness and self-reliance, while analyst Michael Shoebridge criticised the speech as ill-timed before Albanese’s fourth meeting with Xi Jinping, noting Albanese has yet to meet Trump face-to-face.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73662 (pb)
>>109259
>>109260
Albanese urged to reassure Trump after Curtin speech
GREG BROWN and JOE KELLY - 6 July 2025
1/2
Former ambassador to the US Arthur Sinodinos has urged the Albanese government to assure the Trump administration it is not going its own way on foreign policy, amid concerns a weekend speech by Anthony Albanese will be viewed negatively in Washington as AUKUS is being reviewed.
Mr Sinodinos called for a diplomatic charm offensive after the Prime Minister hailed John Curtin for pursuing an independent foreign policy that was “not bound by tradition”.
Mr Albanese’s speech, at the John Curtin Research Centre on Saturday, identified the former prime minister’s role in establishing Australia’s alliance with the US during World War II.
While he called the alliance a “pillar of our foreign policy” and “our most important defence and security partnership”, Mr Albanese also declared it was “not the extent” of Curtin’s foreign policy agenda.
“Because Curtin’s famous statement that Australia ‘looked to America’ was much more than the idea of trading one strategic guarantor for another. Or swapping an alliance with the old world for one with the new,” Mr Albanese said in the speech.
“It was a recognition that Australia’s fate would be decided in our region.”
Mr Albanese will travel to China at the end of the week and is expected to have his fourth meeting with Xi Jinping before securing one with Donald Trump.
While Mr Sinodinos defended the content of the speech, he said the context of the relationship with the Trump administration – including the review of AUKUS and a failure to secure a leader-to-leader meeting – made a “careful explanation” necessary.
“Given the context of Australia-US relations at present, the speech will need careful explanation to our American friends to avoid a misconception that was hyped that the speech would be a declaration of independence from the US,” Mr Sinodinos said.
“The speech is about Australia taking foreign policy decisions in its own interest including turning to the US in World War II, and frames that pivot in terms of our security interest in the region.
“The speech makes clear that the alliance has bipartisan support in Australia.”
Sussan Ley questioned the timing of Mr Albanese’s speech on Saturday night, arguing the relationship with Washington “remains as much in our national interest today as it did during John Curtin’s prime ministership”.
“Many Australians will wonder whether this speech at this time was in our national interest, given so many things crucial to Australia’s future are currently being considered by the US administration,” the Opposition Leader said.
“At a time of global uncertainty, growing conflict and a growing list of issues in the Australia-United States relationship, now is a time to build our influence in Washington, not diminish it.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109263
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23283256 (060956ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Man charged after alleged arson attack on Melbourne synagogue – Angelo Loras, 34, from NSW, has been charged with reckless conduct endangering life, criminal damage by fire and weapon possession after the East Melbourne Hebrew Congregation’s doors were allegedly set alight, forcing 20 people to flee. Police are probing intent and ideology to determine terrorism links. On the same night, protesters chanting “death to the IDF” attacked Israeli restaurant Miznon, cars were torched in Greensborough, and antisemitic graffiti appeared in Elsternwick. Anthony Albanese condemned the synagogue arson as “cowardly.” Benjamin Netanyahu called the incidents “reprehensible anti-Semitic attacks” and urged Australia to “take all action” against those responsible.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109252
>>109253
Man charged after alleged arson attack on Melbourne synagogue
Allanah Sciberras and Callum Godde - 6 July 2025
1/2
The identity of a man accused of firebombing a synagogue has been revealed, as a series of alleged anti-Semitic attacks at several other locations draws international attention.
Angelo Loras, 34, from Toongabbie in NSW, was arrested in Melbourne's CBD on Saturday night, about 24 hours after the front doors of the East Melbourne Hebrew Congregation were allegedly set alight, forcing 20 people to flee.
He has been charged multiple offences including reckless conduct endangering life, criminal damage by fire and possession of a controlled weapon.
The 34-year-old appeared in Melbourne Magistrates' Court on Sunday, where the court was told it was his first time in custody.
He was remanded until a hearing on July 22.
Detectives will investigate the accused man's intent and ideology to determine if the incident was an act of terrorism.
Police are also investigating another alleged act of anti-Semitism on the same night, when protesters who splintered from a larger demonstration allegedly smashed a window, flipped tables, threw chairs and chanted "death to the IDF" outside Israeli restaurant Miznon.
Hours later, offenders spray-painted three cars and a wall outside a Greensborough business in Melbourne's northeast before setting fire to the vehicles, destroying one and damaging two.
Police have revealed they are investigating a fourth incident where offenders used stencils to spray paint offensive images on pillars at a busy intersection and a number of walls in Elsternwick.
It came as hundreds gathered for a pro-Palestine rally in Melbourne on Sunday.
Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu has condemned "reprehensible anti-Semitic attacks" on both the Melbourne synagogue and restaurant.
He urged the federal government to "take all action" against those responsible.
None of the incidents have been declared terrorism-related but the force is increasing patrols around the synagogue and in the city's southeast.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109264
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23283300 (061014ZJUL25) Notable: Protesters continue anti-IDF chant at Melbourne rally following antisemitic attacks – At a Melbourne rally on Sunday, children led chants of “Death to the IDF” just 48 hours after an arson attack on East Melbourne Synagogue forced 20 worshippers to flee. Organisers condemned the synagogue attack, but police continue to probe links between Miznon restaurant agitators and known violent protest groups. Angelo Loras, 34, was charged with the synagogue arson and remanded until July 22. State Opposition Leader Brad Battin demanded stronger police powers, while Jewish MP David Southwick accused Premier Jacinta Allan’s government of delaying promised protections, leaving Victoria’s Jewish community “under siege.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109252
>>109263
Protesters continue anti-IDF chant at Melbourne rally following antisemitic attacks
Kieran Rooney - July 6, 2025
1/2
Pro-Palestinian advocates including children chanted “Death to the IDF” at a demonstration in Melbourne less than 48 hours after an antisemitic attack on a Melbourne synagogue.
The chants came after a number of leaders of the pro-Palestinian protest condemned the attempted firebombing of an East Melbourne synagogue on Friday while children and families were inside.
Despite a rally organiser’s condemnation of the attack during the protest, two pre-teen Melbourne sisters, who had previously made moving remarks about the suffering of children their age in Gaza, then led chants of “Death, death to the IDF [Israel Defence Forces]” and “Death, death to the IOF [Israeli Occupying Force]“.
On the same night as Friday’s synagogue attack, a group of 20 people stormed Israeli restaurant Miznon in the CBD, upturning tables, distressing diners and chanting “Death to the IDF”.
Police are also investigating a third incident, on Saturday morning, in which three cars were set on fire and the wall of a business in Melbourne’s north-east was spray-painted with graffiti.
The protest and the chants came after political leaders hit out at the protests which came two days after Friday night’s incidents.
On Sunday, counterterrorism detectives charged Sydney man Angelo Loras over the alleged arson attack at the synagogue, while police continue to investigate the incident at Miznon. The 34-year-old appeared in Melbourne Magistrates’ Court on Sunday and was remanded until July 22. The court heard it was the accused’s first time custody.
Police said they were still trying to determine whether to classify the alleged arson as an act of terror. They continue to investigate the instigators of the antisemitic incident at Miznon on Friday night.
A police source, who cannot be identified speaking about operational matters, said at least one of those who invaded the restaurant was part of a group known to counter-terrorism police for sometimes organising left-wing protests that turned violent.
Victoria Police declined to comment on the identity of the person or the nature of the groups involved.
At the protest on Sunday, an organiser who did not wish to be identified opened the event by condemning the attack on the synagogue where 20 worshippers were gathered for a meal on the weekly Jewish holy day of Shabbat, on Friday night.
She later told this masthead: “We’ve always stood against antisemitism; attacks on synagogues, worshipping and praying. That’s not what we stand for, and we condemn the attacks.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109265
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23283343 (061041ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Reviving the Warrior Spirit: Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth on Service, Sacrifice & Strength - “This We Will Defend.” Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth delivers a powerful message on service, sacrifice, and the revival of the American warrior spirit under President Trump. - The White House
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73555 (pb)
>>73582 (pb)
>>109229
Reviving the Warrior Spirit: Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth on Service, Sacrifice & Strength
The White House
Jul 6, 2025
“This We Will Defend.”
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth delivers a powerful message on service, sacrifice, and the revival of the American warrior spirit under President Trump.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=38hwtrnR66k
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109266
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23288285 (070927ZJUL25) Notable: The Australia-first words that Sussan Ley says could diminish US relationship – Anthony Albanese used the John Curtin Research Centre oration to highlight Australia’s foreign policy independence, praising Curtin’s decision to prioritise national defence over US and UK demands during WWII. Albanese framed the alliance as “a product of Curtin’s leadership, not the extent of it,” under the banner of “progressive patriotism.” Opposition Leader Sussan Ley sharply criticised the timing, warning that with the Trump administration reviewing AUKUS and tariffs, Australia should “build our influence in Washington, not diminish it.” Ley argued many Australians would question whether such a speech was in the national interest given critical US decisions looming.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109259
>>109260
The Australia-first words that Sussan Ley says could diminish US relationship
Paul Sakkal - July 6, 2025
Opposition Leader Sussan Ley has questioned the wisdom of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s decision to emphasise Australia’s foreign policy independence while the Trump administration reviews the future of the AUKUS defence pact.
On the eve of his meeting in China with President Xi Jinping next week, Albanese used the 80th anniversary of the death of Labor’s wartime prime minister John Curtin to talk up Curtin’s Australia-first instincts.
“John Curtin is rightly honoured as the founder of Australia’s alliance with the United States. A pillar of our foreign policy … that commands bipartisan support, respect and affection,” Albanese said at the John Curtin Research Centre’s annual oration in Sydney on Saturday.
“Yet our alliance with the US ought to be remembered as a product of Curtin’s leadership in defence and foreign policy, not the extent of it.
“As Paul Keating put it in his John Curtin Memorial Lecture: ‘Curtin began us thinking in our own terms’.
“So we remember Curtin not just because he looked to America. We honour him because he spoke for Australia.”
Curtin is feted for shifting Australia’s primary allegiance from London to Washington, but Albanese hailed Curtin’s decision to stand up to both powers by bringing troops back to defend Australia, rather than sending them to Burma. In putting Australia first, Albanese said Curtin avoided a “disaster”.
Albanese placed his reflections on Curtin under the banner of “progressive patriotism”, a phrase he has used repeatedly since first mentioning it in this masthead’s Inside Politics podcast in May.
But with Albanese now unable to secure a face-to-face meeting with US President Donald Trump, even as the AUKUS defence pact is being reviewed by the Pentagon and Australia is lobbying for exemptions to US tariffs, Sussan Ley argued it was the wrong time to inch away from the US.
“At a time of global uncertainty, growing conflict and a growing list of issues in the Australia-United States relationship, now is a time to build our influence in Washington, not diminish it,” she said in a statement.
“Many Australians will wonder whether this speech at this time was in our national interest, given so many things crucial to Australia’s future are currently being considered by the US administration.”
The AUKUS defence pact is a trilateral agreement with the United States and United Kingdom that will allow Australia to acquire nuclear submarine capabilities.
James Laurenceson, director of the Australia-China Relations Institute at the University of Technology Sydney, said that since John Howard it was unusual for Australian prime ministers to speak positively about a more independent foreign policy not tied solely to US interests.
“It’s not entirely inconsistent with where Albanese has been headed,” Laurenceson said, pointing to remarks from Trade Minister Don Farrell about growing trade with China following Trump’s tariffs.
Laurenceson said Albanese would be confident that the Australian public was comfortable with his coming meeting with Xi occurring before a face-to-face with Trump, pointing to polling showing Trump’s unpopularity in Australia. Coalition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan said on Sky News on Sunday that “it is embarrassing” Albanese had not yet met Trump.
Sydney University international affairs historian James Curran said there was a contradiction in putting a spotlight on sovereignty at a time when Australia was tying itself more firmly into US military framework through the AUKUS submarine pact.
He said Albanese’s speech was significant because it came at a time when the US was pressuring allies to boost defence spending and contain a rising power in China.
“While it’s not a new strategic doctrine, it is saying that there are times when Australia has to determine its own destiny,” Curran said.
“After the best part of two decades, in which the culture of the alliance has been awash in the sentimental claptrap of ‘100 years of mateship’, it’s not necessarily a bad thing for the loose cannons in the Trump administration – who are perhaps getting used to allies capitulating – to hear an Australian PM saying that, from time to time, Australia needs to express itself differently.”
During the election campaign, Albanese and his ministers used Trump’s haphazard approach to discredit the Peter Dutton-led Coalition, whose policy agenda and style had similarities with the US president’s.
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/the-australia-first-words-that-sussan-ley-says-are-a-threat-to-the-us-relationship-20250706-p5mcve.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109267
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23288298 (070941ZJUL25) Notable: Washington will not be impressed by Anthony Albanese’s Curtin call … but Beijing will lap it up – “Anthony Albanese’s John Curtin oration was ‘astonishingly ahistorical’ and dangerously misleading. By misrepresenting Curtin’s legacy to suggest a lesson of distance from the US, Albanese risks weakening the alliance while flattering Beijing. Curtin placed Australian troops under US command and sought deeper imperial defence links, yet Albanese cherry-picks one dispute with Churchill as proof of independence. With defence spending stagnant, Albanese’s rhetoric is hollow and irresponsible, and this silly speech will do nothing to convince Washington there is a serious government in Canberra.” – Greg Sheridan, The Australian
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109259
>>109260
Washington will not be impressed by Anthony Albanese’s Curtin call ... but Beijing will lap it up
GREG SHERIDAN - 6 July 2025
1/2
Is Anthony Albanese actually trying, intentionally, for reasons best known to himself, to diminish, if not undermine, the US-Australia alliance?
How else to explain his bizarre “look away from America” speech about John Curtin, and the lesson for contemporary Australia to keep its distance from the US?
What byzantine thought processes in the PM’s office produced this astonishingly ahistorical, if not slightly dotty, speech about Curtin, misinterpreting the wartime leader – who placed all Australian troops under the command of US General Douglas MacArthur, who wanted to make Australia “a second Britannia in the Antipodes”, who in his own words feared “the teeming millions of coloured races” to Australia’s north and who therefore argued for re-establishing imperial defence centred on Britain once the war ended – into a modern identity politics kumbaya Asianist?
Of course, it’s not the misrepresentation of Curtin’s historical record in this speech that is so perplexing. It’s the dangerous rhetorical and political purposes to which Albanese seeks to put this misinterpretation that is worrying. Who on earth is Albanese messaging in this speech? Because it implies greater Australian strategic distance from the US, it will be welcomed in Beijing. But the Prime Minister is surely overdoing things here. There’s already been enough sucking up to Beijing to ensure a favourable reception in his forthcoming extended trip to China.
What does the speech say to Washington? That Australia knows better than the Americans? Surely that’s the implication of the tired, tedious, droolingly unspecific tacit call for greater independence within the alliance. Greater independence and self-reliance would obviously require a vastly increased defence budget. What price logic in this speech?
It’s worth noting that as the PM prepares for his fourth meeting with Xi Jinping but apparently won’t go to Washington to meet Donald Trump, he’s now making strategic speeches more welcome in Beijing than in Washington.
Back to Curtin. In the 1930s, a decade of comprehensive bipartisan defence failure by Australia, which led to the nation being wholly unprepared for World War II, Curtin at least notionally supported defence self-reliance.
Albanese would say he promotes Australian defence self-reliance, too, and also supports the US alliance. But here’s the most basic of the countless contradictions. You cannot do defence self-reliance while failing to produce a formidable Australian Defence Force. And you can’t have a formidable ADF with our current pathetic defence budget.
Defence expenditure was 2 per cent of GDP when Albanese came to office in 2022, it’s 2.05 per cent of GDP now. The dollar increase in the defence budget is a result mainly of inflation and population growth. The real increase in defence spending is minuscule.
The Albanese government has embarked on a program to acquire nuclear submarines, which eats up vast amounts of money without substantially increasing defence spending. As a result, we are weaker militarily now than when Albanese was elected. That’s not independence or self-reliance, it’s national irresponsibility of the kind Curtin fought against. Washington has noticed that Albanese is not remotely funding even the capabilities identified as urgent in his government’s own Defence Strategic Review.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109268
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23288313 (070952ZJUL25) Notable: Victorian government announces new police taskforce in wake of 'sickening' antisemitic attacks – The Victorian government has launched an Anti-Hate Taskforce after antisemitic attacks across Melbourne, including an arson attack on the East Melbourne Hebrew Congregation that forced 20 worshippers to flee. Premier Jacinta Allan condemned the “sickening crime” and pledged stronger police powers, saying the taskforce would “look at the bigger picture” of hate across Victoria. A 34-year-old Sydney man has been charged. Other incidents included protesters storming Israeli restaurant Miznon, cars torched in Greensborough, and antisemitic graffiti near a Holocaust museum. Anthony Albanese called the attacks “completely unacceptable.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109252
>>109263
Victorian government announces new police taskforce in wake of 'sickening' antisemitic attacks
abc.net.au - 7 July 2025
The Victorian government has announced a new Anti-Hate Taskforce following a spate of antisemitic attacks in Melbourne over the weekend.
Premier Jacinta Allan said the taskforce would work to crack down on antisemitism after a synagogue in Melbourne's east was set on fire on Friday.
Twenty people were forced to flee the East Melbourne Hebrew Congregation after a man allegedly poured flammable liquid on the front door and set it on fire during a Shabbat meal.
A 34-year-old man from Sydney has been charged over the incident, briefly appearing in Melbourne Magistrates Court on Sunday.
He has been remanded in custody until later this month.
Ms Allan thanked Victoria Police for its swift actions over what she described as a "sickening crime".
"Places of worship like this synagogue are a part of our fabric as a society," she said.
"We will protect them with everything we've got."
Visiting the synagogue in East Melbourne on Monday morning, the premier said she spoke with the Jewish congregation about the "horrific, hateful experience".
"If you consider just as the fire came to the front door here of this shul, but it was stopped - so too must we put a stop to hate, put a stop to antisemitism," she said.
"Which is why alongside pledging my support and my government's support … we spoke about the future. How hate needs to stop, how the Anti-Hate Taskforce will be convened.
"I will continue to stand with the strong, proud Jewish community here in Victoria every single day."
She said a new Anti-Hate Taskforce between governments and police would "look at the bigger picture across our city and state" and vowed to increase police powers to enforce tougher protest laws rolled out earlier this year.
The taskforce is expected to hold its first meeting this week.
Weekend of incidents
Shortly after the attack on the synagogue, about 20 protesters interrupted diners at an Israeli-owned restaurant in the CBD.
In a statement posted to social media, the group behind a No Police at Protests movement said it targeted the restaurant because it was part-owned by Israeli businessman Shahar Segal.
Mr Segal is a spokesman for the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), an Israeli and US-backed organisation that has been criticised for how it distributes aid in Gaza.
But the group denied that incident was linked to the attack at the synagogue.
"Pro-Palestinian activists have never attacked places of worship, and we condemn such attacks," the statement read.
On Saturday afternoon, police revealed a business in Greensborough was also targeted.
"It's understood that unknown offenders attended a business on Para Road and set fire to three cars," Acting Commander Zorka Dunstan said.
"They also used spray paint on the cars and a building wall. One of the cars was destroyed, the other two were moderately damaged."
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has condemned the weekend incidents.
"It is completely unacceptable the attack that occurred at a restaurant in Melbourne, and also the attack on a business in the outer suburbs of Melbourne," Mr Albanese said on Saturday night.
"The fact that people were having a peaceful dinner and were disrupted by this act of violence could have had catastrophic consequences."
On Sunday afternoon, police said they were also investigating antisemitic graffiti near a Holocaust museum in Elsternwick in Melbourne's south-east.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-07/victoria-government-taskforce-antisemitism-police/105501252
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109269
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23288326 (071000ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Pacific Islands vital in power struggle against China – Australia is intensifying efforts to counter China’s growing influence in the Pacific, turning to rugby and cultural ties as soft-power tools. Fijian Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka joined Anthony Albanese in Newcastle, where they awarded the Vuvale Bowl at a Wallabies match, underscoring what Albanese called the “Pacific family.” China has poured billions into regional infrastructure, while US aid cuts under Donald Trump have weakened Western influence. Rabuka said Fiji was “managing” but hoped for improvement within three years. Deputy Nationals Leader Kevin Hogan stressed China remained both a vital trading partner and a strategic concern. Sport, trust and cooperation are seen as central to securing regional alliances.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109248
Pacific Islands vital in power struggle against China
Sarah Swain - Jul 6, 2025
They are neighbours, friends and in many cases family, but now the Pacific Islands are being seen as vital in the struggle for power in our region.
With China's influence growing, Australia is pushing back, turning Wallabies into ambassadors.
Fijian Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka was the guest of honour in Newcastle as part of a charm offensive aimed at a pivotal player in the Pacific power struggle.
With China investing billions into infrastructure projects across the Pacific Islands, Australia and our allies – unable to compete financially –have turned to sport as part of a bigger-picture approach. Fijian workers on a specialty Pacific visa class were in the stands.
"We provide a lot of support for rugby in the Pacific – it's an important way of connecting up with a lot of young people," Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said.
"That essentially is about family. We are all part of the Pacific family - we have an important responsibility."
Rugby union is the code of choice for Fiji, with the new NRL team vital for Papua New Guinea, our nearest neighbour.
The contest for hearts and minds in the Pacific has been made harder with the Trump administration cuts to American financial aid in the region.
"We are managing, and in three years hopefully things will change," Rabuka said.
Deputy Nationals leader Kevin Hogan said "Obviously China are an important trading partner for us".
"We have issues with China - we have things we need to talk about their leadership as well," he told Sky's Agenda.
The prime ministers jointly presented the Vuvale bowl to the winning Wallabies today.
Trust and cooperation in uncertain times is a much bigger prize.
https://www.9news.com.au/national/pacific-island-relations-fiji-prime-minister-australia/af8486d6-8f16-428e-b440-1c2ebc558801
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XJTfvbY9Ng
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109270
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23288425 (071042ZJUL25) Notable: Eight PNG men arrested over murder of ‘sorcery’ accused – Eight men in Papua New Guinea have been arrested for the torture and murder of Rosa Yakapus, accused of sorcery after her estranged husband’s suspected heart attack. Yakapus was stripped, tied to a pole over fire, tortured with hot implements and finally shot dead at a bridge, her body falling into a river. Police said suspects surrendered after community leaders intervened and face life sentences for torture, murder and illegal confinement. Prime Minister James Marape called the crime a “national shame”, while NGOs and Education Minister Lucas Dawa Dekena warned sorcery-violence is escalating and threatens PNG’s social fabric.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73607 (pb)
>>109257
>>109258
Eight PNG men arrested over murder of ‘sorcery’ accused
STAFF WRITERS - 7 July 2025
Eight Papua New Guinean men have been arrested for the torture and murder of a young woman over a sorcery allegation, with the country’s Prime Minister condemning the horror act as a “national shame”.
The arrests were made after community leaders reportedly intervened and helped detain the men, who had subjected Rosa Yakapus to three days of extreme torture before shooting her dead in the impoverished Hela district.
The Australian reported at the weekend that Ms Yakapus was stripped naked and beaten before being tied to a pole over a fire, after her estranged husband died of a suspected heart attack and his relatives accused her of using witchcraft to kill him.
She was then taken to a bridge where, surrounded by laughing men, she was shot – with her body falling into the river below.
Villagers had alerted a local community police officer at a Margarima police station, less than 40 minutes’ drive from Ms Yakapus’s Ugu village, but without a car he couldn’t reach her in time.
Police Chief Superintendent Michael Welly said after the arrests the murder was “condemned by leaders at all levels as both criminal and barbaric”. He said local leaders had liaised with police to facilitate the “voluntary surrender” of the suspects, including the man who had shot Ms Yakapus dead.
Chief Superintendent Welly said more suspects had been identified and would also be detained. They faced charges of torture, murder and illegal confinement, and could be jailed for life if found guilty, he said.
Prime Minister James Marape welcomed the arrests, saying PNG had been embarrassed internationally by recurring incidents of sorcery accusation-related violence (SARV) and murders.
“This is not who we are. We are a Christian country. We are a country with laws,” he said. “This cannot continue. We must end this once and for all.”
James Komengi, one of a few NGO, church and police workers battling the violence in PNG’s Highlands, said he hoped there would now be a momentum towards preventing the brutality instead of reacting to it.
Mr Komengi, who had told The Australian he feared SARV would become normalised if the government didn’t address it, said: “My hope is that we take advantage of this momentum against perpetrators here to promote a change in the narratives for development towards taking a preventive approach instead of being reactive.”
PNG Education Minister Lucas Dawa Dekena said he feared the sharing of the videos of Ms Yakapus’s suffering highlighted the potential for normalisation of such violence.
“These are not just isolated incidents, they are a direct assault on the fabric of our society,” he said. “Such horrific acts have no place in Papua New Guinea.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/eight-png-men-arrested-over-murder-of-sorcery-accused/news-story/0148af5bc0f7ec764f31940e33eb1464
https://www.postcourier.com.pg/leaders-condemn-animalistic-behaviour-in-hela-killing/
https://www.postcourier.com.pg/lae-front-and-back-page/
https://www.postcourier.com.pg/sorcery-a-national-shame-must-end/
https://www.postcourier.com.pg/death-bed-accusation-leads-to-murder/
https://www.postcourier.com.pg/k50000-reward-offered-for-hela-murder-suspects1/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109271
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23288479 (071102ZJUL25) Notable: Q Post #4207 - The Armor of God - Finally, be strong in the Lord and in his mighty power. Put on the full armor of God, so that you can take your stand against the devil’s schemes. For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms. Therefore put on the full armor of God, so that when the day of evil comes, you may be able to stand your ground, and after you have done everything, to stand. Stand firm then, with the belt of truth buckled around your waist, with the breastplate of righteousness in place, and with your feet fitted with the readiness that comes from the gospel of peace. In addition to all this, take up the shield of faith, with which you can extinguish all the flaming arrows of the evil one. Take the helmet of salvation and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God. And pray in the Spirit on all occasions with all kinds of prayers and requests. With this in mind, be alert and always keep on praying for all the Lord’s people. Q - https://qanon.pub/#4207
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73607 (pb)
>>109257
>>109258
>>109270
Eight suspects over sorcery torture and shooting in police custody
MIRIAM ZARRIGA - JULY 6, 2025
Police Commander Chief Superintendent Michael Welly said: “A woman in Magarima, Hela Province, tortured and murdered over accusations of Sorcery was condemned by leaders at all levels as both criminal and barbaric, prompting the immediate launch of a police-led manhunt supported by provincial and community leadership.”
Hela Governor Philip Undialu, Minister for Bougainville Affairs and Magarima MP, Manasseh Makiba, visited Magarima and formally launched the operation to pursue and apprehend the suspects. They appealed for community cooperation and the peaceful surrender of those involved.
By Saturday, PPC Welly said, “Local leaders, Magarima District CEO, and police teams engaged communities and facilitated voluntary surrenders.”
“Police units deployed from Tari conducted coordinated arrests on Sunday.”
Eight (8) suspects were taken into custody, including the individual who allegedly pulled the trigger,” PPC Welly confirmed.
All arrested persons have been transported to Tari Police Station for formal processing.
He confirmed additional suspects have been positively identified.
“Some individuals are believed to be from Biango Village, Kandep District, Enga Province, requiring cross-border cooperation with Enga police.”
Sorcery-related killings are fully prosecutable under PNG’s Criminal Code. The Sorcery Act was repealed in 2013, making it clear that sorcery accusations do not justify violence.
Offenders are subject to charges including murder, torture, and unlawful confinement, with potential penalties of life imprisonment, PPC Welly added.
“The success of this operation underscores the importance of proactive leadership and strong community-police collaboration. Hela Province continues to demonstrate that justice is achievable when leaders work on the ground with law enforcement.”
“The direct involvement of Governor Undialu and Minister Makiba, coupled with decisive police action, sends a strong message: sorcery-related violence will not be tolerated in Hela Province.”
https://www.postcourier.com.pg/eight-suspects-over-sorcery-torture-and-shooting-in-police-custody/
https://www.postcourier.com.pg/k50000-reward-offered-for-hela-murder-suspects1/
—
Q Post #4207
May 11 2020 12:05:59 (EST)
The Armor of God
Finally, be strong in the Lord and in his mighty power. Put on the full armor of God, so that you can take your stand against the devil’s schemes. For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms. Therefore put on the full armor of God, so that when the day of evil comes, you may be able to stand your ground, and after you have done everything, to stand. Stand firm then, with the belt of truth buckled around your waist, with the breastplate of righteousness in place, and with your feet fitted with the readiness that comes from the gospel of peace. In addition to all this, take up the shield of faith, with which you can extinguish all the flaming arrows of the evil one. Take the helmet of salvation and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God.
And pray in the Spirit on all occasions with all kinds of prayers and requests. With this in mind, be alert and always keep on praying for all the Lord’s people.
Q
https://qanon.pub/#4207
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109272
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23293950 (080956ZJUL25) Notable: Anthony Albanese to launch plan to tackle anti-Semitism ‘in days’ – Anthony Albanese will unveil a new anti-Semitism strategy with special envoy Jillian Segal after synagogue and restaurant attacks in Melbourne. Albanese labelled anti-Semitism a “scourge” and pledged stronger protections for Jewish schools, synagogues and organisations. Segal’s plan, informed by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry’s 15-point blueprint, is expected to focus on violent slogans, education reforms and visa rules. Alex Ryvchin, co-chief executive of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, said recent events showed “a violent ideology that not only chants ‘death to Zionists’ but threatens police, elected officials and public safety … the intifada is being globalised.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109252
>>109268
Anthony Albanese to launch plan to tackle anti-Semitism ‘in days’
RICHARD FERGUSON - 8 July 2025
1/2
A new strategy to combat hate will be unveiled by Anthony Albanese and his special envoy on anti-Semitism after a resurgence of attacks on the Jewish community over the weekend.
Jewish leader Jillian Segal is working on a comprehensive set of proposals for Labor to consider, following the alleged attempted firebombing of a synagogue and the trashing of an Israeli restaurant in Melbourne.
The Prime Minister on Tuesday said he was committed to working with Ms Segal to end the “scourge” of anti-Semitism, but dismissed Sussan Ley’s call for an emergency national cabinet to discuss the hate-crime crisis.
“Jillian Segal has been doing a terrific job, and over the coming days we’ll have more to say. But, of course, we have responded substantially with increased security for synagogues, for Jewish schools, for community organisations,” Mr Albanese said in Hobart.
“We’ll continue to engage constructively with the community to make sure that they get the support that they need. Anti-Semitism is a scourge. It has no place in Australia. And what we saw in Melbourne with the attacks that occurred are reprehensible, deserve condemnation and the gentleman concerned at the synagogue has been arrested and he should face the full force of the law.”
The Australian understands Ms Segal’s plan will incorporate elements of an Executive Council of Australian Jewry blueprint on combating anti-Semitism, which was released in February.
Sources close to the process believe the Segal proposal will not adopt all 15 points of the ECAJ plan, which includes a clampdown on violent anti-Israel slogans at protests, a new strategy to stamp out bigotry in classrooms, and a tightening of visa rules to keep anti-Semites out of Australia.
But ECAJ co-chief executive Alex Ryvchin on Tuesday said he was pleased Mr Albanese was working closely with Ms Segal to “implement the policy responses the community has called for”.
“The events in Melbourne have, yet again, shown that we are confronted with a violent ideology that not only chants ‘death to Zionists’ but threatens the police, elected officials and public safety,” Mr Ryvchin told The Australian.
“They want to turn our CBDs into no-go zones and to pit groups of Australians against each other. They have infiltrated campuses, schools, cultural institutions. The intifada is being globalised exactly as promised.
“We await the government’s announcement on how it intends to restore public order and drive anti-Semitism back to the dark peripheries of society.”
Mr Albanese on Tuesday appeared to oppose the suggestion of a cross-jurisdictional taskforce on anti-Semitism when asked about merging state and federal police efforts.
“We have a task force and what we do is take on security issues, we take advice from security agencies,” he said. “That’s precisely what we have done.”
He nonetheless said that he had been receptive to requests by Jewish leaders about stemming rising anti-Semitism.
“I spoke with Jewish community leaders on Saturday,” he said. “Every time there has been a request, it has been met, expeditiously, and that has occurred.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109273
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23293962 (081002ZJUL25) Notable: Three charged over altercation at Israeli-owned restaurant Miznon in Melbourne CBD – Three people have been charged after protesters stormed Israeli-owned restaurant Miznon in Melbourne on Friday night, hurling chairs and damaging a glass door. Police allege the accused — a 50-year-old man, a 48-year-old woman and a 28-year-old woman — left a Swanston Street protest before targeting the venue. The incident occurred the same night as a synagogue arson attack and car fires in Greensborough, though police say no links are established. Miznon, partly owned by Gaza Humanitarian Foundation spokesman Shahar Segal, said it “welcomes people of all backgrounds” and condemned the violence.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109252
>>109263
Three charged over altercation at Israeli-owned restaurant Miznon in Melbourne CBD
abc.net.au - 8 July 2025
Three people have been charged with assault, riotous behaviour and criminal damage after a group of protesters converged on an Israeli-owned restaurant in Melbourne's CBD on Friday night.
The group was a part of a larger cohort which had gathered on Swanston Street to protest the need for police presence at public demonstrations.
Police said about 20 people left that group about 8:15pm and went to the Miznon restaurant in Hardware Lane where patrons were having dinner.
Police allege several people in the group were involved in an altercation, where chairs were thrown and a glass door was damaged.
Three people — a 50-year-old man from Richmond, a 48-year-old woman from Footscray and a 28-year-old woman from Essendon have been charged with assault, affray, riotous behaviour and criminal damage.
The incident occurred on the same night as a string of antisemitic incidents.
On Friday night the door of a synagogue in East Melbourne was set alight while 20 congregants were inside.
Angelo Loras, 34, has been charged over that incident.
A business in the north-eastern suburb of Greensborough also had three cars torched about 4:30am the next day.
Police said on Monday no links between any of the incidents had been identified.
Miznon restaurant says venue welcomes people of all backgrounds
In a statement posted to social media, the group behind a No Police at Protests movement said it targeted the restaurant because it was part-owned by Israeli businessman Shahar Segal.
Mr Segal is a spokesperson for the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, an Israeli and US-backed organisation that has been criticised for how it distributes aid in Gaza.
But the group denied that incident was linked to the attack at the synagogue.
"Pro-Palestinian activists have never attacked places of worship, and we condemn such attacks," the statement read.
A statement released by Miznon on Tuesday said the events on Friday had had a "profound impact" on staff.
"We are a restaurant, a place of hospitality, of warmth and welcome. Our greatest joy is to feed people from every background and viewpoint and to see the joy on people's faces as they enjoy our food and each other's company. That is our purpose and our objective," the statement read.
"All our staff and customers are coming from different background and cultures. We respect everyone's right to their own nationality and religion. We ask for the same.
"All we wish to do moving forward, is to keep feeding anyone who comes through our doors with love, attention and care while supplying a safe working space for our employees."
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-08/three-charged-melbourne-israeli-restaurant-miznon/105507930
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/7/8/three-charged-after-protest-at-israeli-owned-restaurant-in-australia
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109274
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23293966 (081009ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Deadline looms for Trump's liberation day tariffs - Australian products bound for America may be stuck with tariffs. This comes after the Albanese government has indicated it would not offer extra incentives to the Trump administration. - 9 News Australia
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73550 (pb)
>>73596 (pb)
Deadline looms for Trump's liberation day tariffs
9 News Australia
Jul 7, 2025
Australian products bound for America may be stuck with tariffs. This comes after the Albanese government has indicated it would not offer extra incentives to the Trump administration.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4QRL0ha4CA
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109275
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23293989 (081021ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Benjamin Netanyahu nominates Trump for Nobel Peace Prize – Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has nominated US President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, citing his “bold leadership” in brokering the Abraham Accords and pursuing peace in the Middle East. Netanyahu said Trump’s leadership showed “dialogue, not extremism,” while warning a Palestinian state would be “a platform to destroy Israel.” Trump, fresh from ordering strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, confirmed Iran had requested talks. Netanyahu set three red lines for a ceasefire with Hamas: its destruction, exile of its leaders, and disarmament. Washington, Qatar and Egypt are brokering a 60-day ceasefire deal.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/23224390 (pb)
>>>/qresearch/23224392 (pb)
Benjamin Netanyahu nominates Trump for Nobel Peace Prize
JOE KELLY - 8 July 2025
1/2
Benjamin Netanyahu has nominated Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize because of his efforts in reshaping the Middle East, but warned a Palestinian state would only serve as a “platform to destroy Israel” amid ongoing ceasefire talks with Hamas.
The Israeli Prime Minister strengthened his case with the administration for the Jewish state to retain control over security in Gaza as part of any long-term political settlement, but was optimistic that a broader peace in the region could be achieved.
Mr Trump also said that he was pursuing talks with Iran after ordering a US-led bombing strike on three of the rogue nation’s nuclear enrichment sites last month, declaring that “they’ve requested a meeting and I’m going to go to a meeting.”
“If we can put something down on paper that would be fine, that would be good. I think they’ve gained a lot of respect for us.”
Mr Netanyahu presented the US President with the letter he sent to the Nobel prize committee in a gesture aimed at projecting deep friendship and common cause with America. The letter praised Mr Trump for his “steadfast and exceptional dedication to promoting peace, security, and stability around the world.”
“President Trump’s vision and bold leadership promoted innovative diplomacy defined not by conflict and extremism but by co-operation, dialogue, and shared prosperity,” Mr Netanyahu said in the letter, dated July 1.
“Foremost among these achievements was President Trump’s pivotal role in facilitating the Abraham Accords. These groundbreaking agreements established formal diplomatic relations between Israel and several Arab nations – including the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Morocco.”
Sitting across from Mr Trump, Mr Netanyahu said he wanted to “express the appreciation and admiration, not only of all Israelis, but of the Jewish people and many, many admirers around the world for your leadership.’
“The President has already realised great opportunities. He forged the Abraham Accords. He’s forging peace as we speak in one country and one region after the other,” he said. “So, I want to present to you Mr President the letter I sent to the Nobel prize Committee. It’s nominating you for the peace prize which is well deserved and you should get it.”
Both leaders, who were accompanied by their top advisers for an official dinner in the White House Blue Room, framed the 12-day war between Israel and Iran as a key victory which had changed the strategic outlook for the region.
“They (Iran) took a big drubbing I think when we hit the three sites really,” Mr Trump said. “That was the very beginning of the end.”
A meeting with Iran is expected within the next week or so, with the US President suggesting that further details would be announced on Tuesday local time.
Pressed on whether be still believed in a two state solution in the Middle East, Mr Trump threw the “age old” question to Mr Netanyahu who said that he believed Palestinians should have “all the powers to govern themselves, but none of the powers to threaten us.”
“And that means that certain powers like overall security will always remain in our hands. Now that is a fact. And no-one in Israel will agree to anything else because we don’t commit suicide. We want life,” he said. “We cherish life for ourselves, for our neighbours. I think we can work out a peace for us and the entire Middle East with President Trump’s leadership. And by working together I think we can establish a very, very broad peace that will include all our neighbours.”
He said that Hamas had failed to build a future for the people of Gaza but had instead “built down into bunkers, into terror tunnels after which they massacred our people, raped our women, beheaded our men, invaded our cities and our towns and out kibbutzim.”
“So people aren’t likely to say ‘let’s just give them another state’ – it will be a platform to destroy Israel. We’ll work out a peace with our Palestinian neighbours, those who don’t want to destroy us. And we’ll work out a peace in which our security, the sovereign power of security always remains in our hands.”
“Now people will say ‘it’s not a complete state, it’s not a state’ … We don’t care. You know, we vowed never again,” he said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109276
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23294002 (081028ZJUL25) Notable: Albanese rebuffs China on two key requests ahead of visit – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has rejected Beijing’s push to add artificial intelligence to the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement and ruled out easing foreign investment restrictions, ahead of his six-day trip to China. Albanese will meet President Xi Jinping, Premier Li Qiang and Zhao Leji, Chairman of the National People’s Congress and China’s third-highest ranking leader. Treasurer Jim Chalmers confirmed no relaxation of investment scrutiny, citing national security. Business leaders including Andrew Forrest and Shemara Wikramanayake will attend a CEO Roundtable, with Forrest urging green iron–steel cooperation as a “profound” bilateral opportunity.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73560 (pb)
>>109229
>>109232
Anthony Albanese confirms meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping during China trip
Anthony Albanese is set to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping, where he is expected to discuss key issues including trade and tourism.
Jessica Wang - July 8, 2025
Anthony Albanese has stressed the importance of Australia’s $325bn trade relationship with China ahead of his six day visit to Shanghai, Beijing and Chengdu, with the Prime Minister to meet with Chinese Communist Party President Xi Jingping and other senior officials.
The centrepiece of the trip will be the Australia-China Annual Leaders’ Meeting in Beijing which he will attend alongside Chinese Premier Li Qiang, and where he will also meet Mr Xi and Chairman of the National People’s Congress, Zhao Leji – the third highest ranking person of the CCP.
Discussions will be focused on global and regional issues, plus bilateral co-operation on areas including trade and tourism. China accounts for nearly 26 per cent of Australia’s total goods and service trade.
China will also raise desires to open the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement to include AI, healthcare, green energy and the digital economy.
Mr Albanese, who has faced criticism for failing to secure a meeting with US President Donald Trump before his face-to-face with Mr Xi, has defended the trip, saying he intended to “continue to co-operate with China where we can” and “disagree where we must, and engage in our national interest”.
“Trade is now flowing freely, to the benefit of both countries and to people and businesses on both sides,” Mr Albanese said.
“We will continue to patiently and deliberately work towards a stable relationship with China, with dialogue at its core.
“I will raise issues that are important to Australians and the region including my government’s enduring commitment to pursuing Australia’s national interest.”
A 14-person business delegation will also accompany Mr Albanese at a Australia–China CEO Roundtable, which will be hosted by the Business Council of Australia and include leaders from industries representing banking, resources, tertiary education and food.
This includes ANZ International’s managing director Simon Ireland, BHP Australia president Geraldine Slattery, Fortescue Metals Group executive chairman Andrew Forrest, Rio Tinto chief executive Kellie Parker, SunRice chief executive Paul Serra and UNSW Vice-Chancellor and president Attila Brungs.
BCA chief executive Bran Black said Australia’s relationship with China was a “partnership that matters deeply to our nation’s success”.
“With one in four Australian jobs trade dependent, it’s imperative that our businesses are part of the solution in identifying further opportunities with both new and existing partners,” he said.
“The Australia-China CEO Roundtable is a crucial forum for building an even stronger relationship with our largest economic partner, particularly in the resources, energy and services sectors.”
Mr Albanese is also set to meet with business, tourism and sport leaders when he visits Shanghai and Chendgu, the latter which is home to the giant panda research base, which is where Adelaide Zoo acquired two new giant pandas, Xing Qiu and Yi Lan, in late 2024.
This will be Mr Albanese’s second visit to China.
https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/anthony-albanese-confirms-meeting-with-chinese-president-xi-jinping-during-china-trip/news-story/e1419c003ef467c451528b5333767bbe
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109277
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23294037 (081051ZJUL25) Notable: OPINION: China is open to free trade in AI with Australia – “China-Australia relations have stabilised and improved, achieving a comprehensive turnaround. At the 10th anniversary of the implementation of ChAFTA, we are willing to review the agreement with a more open attitude and higher standard, further consolidate co-operation in traditional areas such as agriculture and mining, and actively explore new growth areas in emerging fields like artificial intelligence, healthcare, green energy, and the digital economy. China is willing to work with Australia to build consensus on international and regional issues, jointly safeguard regional peace and stability, uphold international rules and order, advocate for free trade.” – Xiao Qian, ambassador of the People’s Republic of China to Australia - AFR
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109276
>>109230
Opinion: China is open to free trade in AI with Australia
On the 10th anniversary of free trade deal, China is willing to review the agreement and actively explore new growth areas in emerging fields.
Xiao Qian, Ambassador to Australia - Jul 7, 2025
1/2
Over the past three years, through the joint efforts of both sides, China-Australia relations have stabilised and improved, achieving a comprehensive turnaround.
President Xi Jinping and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese have met on three occasions. Premier Li Qiang and Prime Minister Albanese have exchanged successful visits. Mechanisms for dialogue and exchange across various sectors have been resumed, mutual understanding enhanced, and practical co-operation between the two nations expanded. Facts have proven that the healthy and stable development of China-Australia relations serves the interests of both countries and enjoys the firm support of the two peoples.
Not long ago, the Australian Labor government was re-elected and sworn into office, ushering in the second decade of the China-Australia Comprehensive Strategic Partnership and another important epoch of development.
At present, both China and Australia are faced with new economic development tasks. China is committed to advancing high-quality development, while Australia is devoted to enhancing productivity. We look forward to further strengthening co-operation between the two sides so as to bring more benefits to both countries and peoples.
First, strengthening high-level guidance and consolidating institutional dialogue and exchanges. Since the establishment of diplomatic ties, China-Australia relations have demonstrated resilience and vitality, weathering ups and downs, with the key lying in the strategic guidance of the leaders of the two countries.
China has always viewed Australia and China-Australia relations from a strategic and long-term perspective, committed to advancing bilateral ties beyond stabilisation and towards progress.
China is willing to work with Australia to maintain the momentum of high-level engagement, make the most of such primary intergovernmental dialogue mechanisms as the China-Australia Leaders’ Annual Meeting, the Foreign and Strategic Dialogue, the Strategic Economic Dialogue, the Joint Ministerial Economic Commission, as well as the Ministerial Dialogue on Climate Change, continuously enhance communication, deepen mutual trust, build consensus, and promote co-operation.
Second, expanding practical co-operation across all fields. China and Australia are natural partners with complementary economic strengths. Over the past decade since the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement (ChAFTA) came into effect, it has served as an important engine in boosting bilateral economic and trade co-operation.
China has been Australia’s largest trading partner, largest export destination and the largest source of imports for 16 consecutive years. With a population of more than 1.4 billion, including more than 400 million middle-income earners, China provides a vast and stable consumption market for Australian minerals, wine, beef, lobster and other products.
At the 10th anniversary of the implementation of ChAFTA, we are willing to review the agreement with a more open attitude and higher standard, further consolidate co-operation in traditional areas such as agriculture and mining, and actively explore new growth areas in emerging fields like artificial intelligence, healthcare, green energy, and the digital economy, elevating practical co-operation to new heights.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109278
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23299361 (090930ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Copper, pharma tariffs are coming as Trump hardens trade stance – US President Donald Trump has ruled out further extensions to negotiate new trade deals beyond August 1, warning countries to accept bilateral agreements or face steep tariffs. The White House announced 50 per cent tariffs on copper imports, sending prices to record highs, while Trump flagged pharmaceutical tariffs could reach 200 per cent after a short grace period. China, which reached a temporary framework in June, has until August 12 to finalise a permanent deal. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said tariffs have already raised $100bn in 2025 and could reach $300bn by year’s end.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109274
Copper, pharma tariffs are coming as Trump hardens trade stance
ANITA HAMILTON - 9 July 2025
1/2
US President Donald Trump has hardened his stance on trade deals, saying there would be no more extensions past a new August 1 deadline, as the administration said it would continue to announce country-specific tariff rates.
Mr Trump said during a cabinet meeting on Tuesday (local time) that he would continue issuing letters to the leaders of other countries announcing US tariff rates on their products effective August 1 unless they arranged a specific deal by then.
In addition, the White House said it would set 50 per cent tariffs on copper imports on Wednesday (AEST), an announcement that sent the commodity’s price to a record, though it did not clarify when they would take effect.
And tariffs on imported pharmaceutical products would kick in after a grace period giving companies time to adjust their supply chains, Mr Trump said.
It was part of a swirl of trade announcements in the past few days as the Trump administration hurtles toward a self-imposed deadline for so-called reciprocal tariff rates to kick in after a 90-day pause. That deadline is Wednesday (local time).
In a post on his Truth Social platform on Wednesday (AEST), Mr Trump said: “We will be releasing a minimum of 7 Countries having to do with trade, tomorrow morning, with an additional number of Countries being released in the afternoon.”
Mr Trump has taken to settling the tariff question himself, favouring a unilateral approach and announcing his decisions by letter and posts on social media.
“The deals are mostly my deal to them,” Mr Trump said. “We’re picking a number that’s low and fair.”
It follows the example Mr Trump set on Monday, when he released 14 letters addressed to the leaders of countries scattered mostly across Asia and Europe. The letters set US tariff rates on imports from those countries at between 25 per cent and 40 per cent.
Mr Trump said during Tuesday’s cabinet meeting that he considers the letters to be deals.
The US will be sending a letter to the EU this week. “We’re probably two days off from sending them a letter, ” he said.
It is emblematic of Mr Trump’s approach to trade, which has been to threaten high levies to draw countries to the bilateral negotiating table, then to pause those levies while deals are being worked out, then to draw a new line in the sand.
Just a few trade deals have been announced since Mr Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariff announcement on April 2, which he then paused a few days later, including deals with the UK and Vietnam. A current deal with China is temporary and expires in August, slightly after the deadline now applied to other countries.
Mr Trump now says there will not be any more extensions to negotiate new deals after August 1.
Mr Trump’s tariff letters on Monday, which were nearly identical to each other, also explained that goods shipped through third countries to avoid tariffs would still face the same levies, and that the rates would go up if countries retaliated.
The current tariffs have brought in $100bn so far this year, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said during Tuesday’s cabinet meeting. He added that tariff revenue could rise to $300bn by the end of 2025.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109279
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23299395 (090942ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Donald Trump flags tariffs of 200pc on pharmaceuticals, 50pc on copper – US President Donald Trump has warned pharmaceutical imports could face a 200 per cent tariff, with drug makers given up to 18 months to shift production to America. The move threatens Australia’s $2.2bn export industry, with $1.4bn worth bound for the US last year, more than 40 per cent of total pharmaceutical exports. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said a final decision would follow an inquiry due this month. Trump also announced copper would face a 50 per cent tariff by early August. Australia exported $55m of copper to the US last year, less than 1 per cent of its $6.7bn global sales.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109274
>>109278
Donald Trump flags tariffs of 200pc on pharmaceuticals, 50pc on copper
Brad Ryan - 9 July 2025
Donald Trump has flagged a possible 200 per cent tariff on pharmaceuticals - one of Australia's biggest exports to the US - but says manufacturers will be given time to move to America to dodge the tax.
The US president also said copper was likely to be hit with a 50 per cent tariff.
To date, pharmaceuticals and copper have both been exempt from the US's ever-evolving tariffs regime, pending two separate investigations by the Department of Commerce.
But Mr Trump has long railed against American dependence on foreign producers of the products, given the lifesaving nature of many imported medicines and copper's importance to the industrial sector and technological innovation.
Speaking to the media before a cabinet meeting, Mr Trump said pharmaceutical producers would get a grace period to move production to the US.
"We're going to give [drug manufacturers] about a year, a year and a half to come in, and after that, they're going to be tariffed," he said.
"They're going to be tariffed at a very, very high rate, like 200 per cent. We'll give them a certain period of time to get their act together."
A $2b industry
Pharmaceutical tariffs could be particularly punishing for Australia.
Last year, Australia exported $US1.4 billion ($2.2 billion) in pharmaceutical products to the US, according to the UN's Comtrade database.
That was more than 40 per cent of its total pharmaceutical export value of $US3.2 billion ($4.9 billion).
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick later suggested a final decision on pharmaceutical tariffs had not been made.
His department's investigation into pharmaceutical imports would be completed at the end of the month, he said.
"And so the president will then set his policies," Mr Lutnick told business network CNBC. "And I'm going to let him wait to decide how he's going to do it.
"He said, if you don't build in America, they're going to be a high rate. But he may consider that if you're building in America, to give you the time to build … and then the tariff will be much higher."
America's pharmaceutical industry has long been frustrated with Australia's Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, which forces drug companies to negotiate prices with the Australian government rather than individual buyers.
It is designed to keep prices down by giving purchasing power to the government. Pharmaceutical industry leaders in the US have lobbied the Trump administration to impose retaliatory tariffs on Australia.
Copper tariff due within weeks
Copper is also a significant export product for Australia, but sales to the US last year were valued at just $US36 million ($55 million) — less than 1 per cent of Australia's total copper exports, which were valued at $US4.4 billion ($6.7 billion).
"Today, we're doing copper," Mr Trump said after speaking through some of his past tariff announcements. "I believe the tariff on copper, we're going to make it 50 per cent."
Of all the US's trading partners, Chile will feel the effects of the tariff most. It supplies the majority of the US's copper imports.
Mr Lutnick said the copper tariff would probably take effect at the end of July or start of August. Aluminium and steel are already subject to 50 per cent tariffs.
The announcements come a day after Mr Trump released letters he had sent to foreign leaders, which outlined new country-specific tariffs to take effect on August 1.
Australia, however, is not expecting an increase in the 10 per cent tariff already imposed on its exports.
On Monday, the Productivity Commission released modelling that projected Australia could enjoy a small economic benefit from Mr Trump's tariffs.
But the commission also warned that an escalating global trade war would be "very bad for Australia".
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-09/donald-trump-tariffs-copper-pharmaceutical-imports/105509914
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109280
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23299419 (090957ZJUL25) Notable: PBS ‘not on the table’ in battle for pharmaceutical tariff exemption, despite lobbying – Donald Trump’s threat of tariffs up to 200 per cent on pharmaceuticals has raised fears for Australia’s $18bn Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS), which subsidises 930 medicines. The US pharmaceutical lobby has urged Trump to leverage trade talks, calling PBS pricing “damaging” and restrictive. Treasurer Jim Chalmers insisted the PBS was “not on the table”. Trump’s May 12 “Most Favoured Nation” executive order would bar US buyers from paying more than the lowest global price, pressuring drug firms to lift prices abroad or risk exclusion, a move that could deter them from selling in Australia.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109274
>>109278
PBS ‘not on the table’ in battle for pharmaceutical tariff exemption, despite lobbying
The threat of global 200 per cent tariffs on pharmaceutical products presents a challenge to Australia’s drug subsidy scheme after foreign lobbyists pushed for it to be leveraged in trade negotiations.
JAMES DOWLING - 9 July 2025
1/2
US President Donald Trump has threatened to expand his sweeping global trade war by pushing tariffs on pharmaceutical products as high as 200 per cent, raising fears for the future of Australia’s cheap medicines.
The tariff threats follow aggressive lobbying by the US pharmaceutical industry explicitly targeting Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme – with pharmaceutical giants hoping to “leverage ongoing trade negotiations” against the PBS.
Treasurer Jim Chalmers reassured the nation on Wednesday that the PBS was “not on the table” in any bilateral negotiations with the US but markets are nervous and uncertainty is rife.
Tariffs threatened
Mr Trump floated the potential tariff to reporters at a cabinet meeting on Tuesday amid broader discussion of his nation-specific global tariffs, setting a zero-exemption August 1 deadline ahead of the reintroduction of his “Liberation Day” tariffs on July 9.
“We will be announcing something very soon on pharmaceuticals,” he said.
There would be a grace period of up to 1½ years to give companies time to adjust their supply chains, he said, but once instituted the tariff rate could range as high as 200 per cent. It would drastically shift the balance of trade with Australia’s largest pharmaceutical importer, meaning Australia and local companies would find little appetite for their products, while patients remained reliant on American imports.
Lobbyists attack PBS
Australia has been targeted aggressively by the US pharmaceutical lobby since the appointment of the Trump administration over accusations that the PBS has undervalued US products and stymied innovation.
The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) group urged Mr Trump to pull the PBS into tariff negotiations and drive up Australian pharmaceutical prices in the process.
PhRMA said in a January submission to the US trade review that US companies were the “constant target of compulsory licensing and other harmful practices” by Australia and the PBS.
“Biopharmaceutical innovators in the US face a wide array of damaging government pricing policies abroad,” it wrote.
PhRMA’s submission placed Australia and four other jurisdictions, including the EU, on a “watch list” for the Trump administration to consider; a further 19 countries, including Canada, were placed on a “priority watch list”.
“Australia undervalues new innovative medicines by setting prices based on older inferior medicines and generics, and through use of low and outdated monetary thresholds per year of life gained from clinically proven treatments,” PhRMA said more recently.
“In addition, government assessments often restrict access to a small subset of the patient population for which the regulator determines the product to be safe and effective and additionally create considerable patient access delays through unnecessary data requirements and other administrative hurdles.”
Given the relatively small market Australia presents to global pharmaceutical corporations, the competitiveness of negotiations with the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee – which evaluates and negotiates which drugs should be on the PBS – has been a point of constant friction.
The Australian pharmaceutical industry
The US makes up about 40 per cent of Australia’s pharmaceutical export share, more than double our next largest customer, New Zealand. Australia is a far bigger pharmaceutical importer than exporter and takes about 20 per cent of its drugs from the US.
A shock to prices bilaterally could up-end deals forged under the PBS and drive up prices for vulnerable patients accessing new treatments outside of the subsidised system.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109281
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23299427 (091009ZJUL25) Notable: Top brass in danger as ADF faces overhaul – Defence Minister Richard Marles is preparing sweeping reforms that could cut up to 25 star-ranked ADF officers and 20–40 senior Defence executives amid budget blowouts, delivery delays and Trump administration demands for 3.5 per cent of GDP defence spending. Plans include merging procurement and weapons agencies into a new armaments directorate, with cuts achieved via attrition and severance. Critics say top leadership, including Defence secretary Greg Moriarty, has failed to deliver results. With ships out of service, Collins submarines ageing, and personnel shortages of 5000, analysts warn of a “paper ADF.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73555 (pb)
>>109229
Top brass in danger as ADF faces overhaul
BEN PACKHAM - 8 July 2025
1/2
Dozens of senior ADF officers and Defence public servants are facing the chop as Richard Marles prepares to roll out sweeping reforms amid ongoing tension over budget blowouts and delays in getting new weapons and equipment into service.
Up to 25 star-ranked Australian Defence Force commanders could be forced out in the “everything’s on the table” overhaul, while 20 to 40 senior public service positions could be cut.
The government is also considering the creation of a new armaments directorate that would roll together the department’s vast and underperforming Capability Acquisition and Sustainment Group with its Guided Weapons and Explosive Ordnance Enterprise, and the Naval Shipbuilding and Sustainment Group.
Mr Marles, the Defence Minister, flagged the reforms last month, saying the department needed to be “fit for purpose”.
The overhaul comes as the Defence budget is stretched to the limit by the AUKUS submarine program and new frigate projects, sparking warnings of a hollowed-out force with scarce munitions and a shortage of critical capabilities, including missile defence systems and long-range weapons.
At the same time, the government is refusing to lift defence spending from 2 per cent of GDP to the 3.5 percent demanded by the Trump administration.
Mr Marles’ office declined to provide details of his reform plan when approached by The Australian, while a senior government source said the extent of the personnel cuts was yet to be finalised.
The reduction in senior officers and department executives is likely to be achieved through attrition and severance packages.
The ADF is one of the most top-heavy militaries in the world, with one study revealing Australian star-ranked officers are responsible for 11 times fewer personnel than their US counterparts. Multiple sources said internal discussions on the reforms warned star-ranked officer numbers could be slashed by 10 per cent, while even deeper cuts were being considered for the department’s senior executives.
They said the changes were aimed at sharpening the accountability of senior decision-makers and getting people with the right skills into the right roles.
Mr Marles has become increasingly frustrated with his department over its ability to deliver on the government’s plans to transform the ADF into a modern force capable of projecting power over long distances.
The tensions were underscored by a recent Auditor-General’s report that revealed Defence failed for nearly 2½ years to provide formal updates to Mr Marles on the readiness of the army, air force and navy.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109282
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23299470 (091030ZJUL25) Notable: Giggle v Tickle: Courtroom sequel in clash over women-only spaces – Sall Grover, founder of the Giggle for Girls app, has appealed a Federal Court ruling that she unlawfully discriminated against transgender woman Roxanne Tickle by excluding her from the women-only platform. Justice Robert Bromwich had found Grover indirectly discriminated against Tickle, awarding $10,000 in damages. Grover’s appeal argues the app qualifies as a lawful “special measure” under the Sex Discrimination Act to redress disadvantages faced by biological women. The case, set for August, has drawn interventions from the Sex Discrimination Commissioner and the Lesbian Action Group, underscoring its national significance.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73621 (pb)
>>>/qresearch/23212894 (pb)
Giggle v Tickle: Courtroom sequel in clash over women-only spaces
STEPHEN RICE - July 08, 2025
1/2
A ruling that a transgender woman was discriminated against when rejected from a female-only networking app is set to be challenged on the grounds that the judge failed to consider that the platform was designed to overcome the real disadvantages faced by biological women.
Sall Grover, creator of the Giggle for Girls app, has lodged an appeal seeking to overturn last year’s Federal Court ruling that she unlawfully discriminated against Roxanne Tickle, a biological male who identifies as a woman, by barring her from the app.
The finding by judge Robert Bromwich that “sex is changeable” and non-binary caused some shockwaves around the country, with some legal experts arguing it would make it impossible to exclude men from any female spaces if they claimed to be women.
Ms Tickle, who underwent gender-affirming surgery in 2019, was accepted into the app in February 2021 after an analysis of a “selfie” by Giggle’s third-party artificial intelligence tool, but was later blocked when Ms Grover surveyed the image herself.
Justice Bromwich found that Ms Grover had indirectly, but not directly, discriminated against Ms Tickle when she removed her from the app because she did not look sufficiently female, and ordered her to pay Ms Tickle $10,000, as well as her legal costs.
Ms Grover’s appeal will be heard over four days in August in the Full Court of the Federal Court, before justices Melissa Perry, Geoffrey Kennett and Wendy Abraham.
In a reflection of the extraordinary legal significance of the case, the court has granted leave to both the Sex Discrimination Commissioner and the Lesbian Action Group to intervene in the appeal.
Each side has recruited heavyweight legal teams, with Ms Grover represented by Sydney silk Noel Hutley, while Victorian Bar Council member Georgina Costello is likely to appear for Ms Tickle.
While much of Ms Tickle’s legal work has been done pro bono, Ms Grover has had to fund her own case through her Giggle crowd-funding website.
Ms Grover’s appeal team will claim that Justice Bromwich failed to consider the broader context of the Sex Discrimination Act, arguing that the app’s female-only policy was a special measure intended to address the unique disadvantages faced by women in digital spaces, and thus should not be considered discriminatory.
Ms Grover said her own experience of sexual abuse and trauma recovery underscored for her the importance of female-only support environments and led directly to the app’s creation.
“These are not abstract concerns,” she says in her appeal submission, obtained by The Australian. “They represent real, lived disadvantage occasioned by female biological or physiological differences.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109283
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23299504 (091052ZJUL25) Notable: USS America and other foreign battle ships head to town ahead of Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025 – The USS America, one of the US Navy’s largest amphibious assault ships, has arrived in Queensland ahead of Talisman Sabre 2025, the region’s largest multinational training exercise. More than 30,000 personnel from 23 nations will take part across Australia and Papua New Guinea. The vessel, carrying F-35B fighters, Ospreys and 3000 Marines, is joined by other ships including HMAS Farncomb and South Korea’s ROKS Marado and Wang Geon. This will be the 11th Talisman Sabre, marking its evolution from a bilateral drill into the southern hemisphere’s biggest war games.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73659 (pb)
>>109224
USS America and other foreign battle ships head to town ahead of Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025
One of the US Navy’s largest amphibious assault ships has been spotted off the coast of Queensland on Wednesday afternoon, ahead of the start of the Exercise Talisman Sabre.
Jodie Munro O'Brien - July 9, 2025
1/2
One of the US Navy’s largest amphibious assault ships has been spotted off the coast of Queensland during what is likely its final visit to Australia.
The USS America has been carrying out training drills off the coast of Shoalwater Bay, outside of Rockhampton in Central Queensland for the past week, ahead of the start of Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025 on Sunday.
Sunshine Coast based photographer Doug Bazley of Bluey’s Photography, spotted the flagship of the US Seventh Fleet’s America Strike Group off the coast of Caloundra just after midday Wednesday on its way into Brisbane.
“It’s always exciting to see the Navy, whether it be American or Australian,” he said.
“It’s always a thrill to see an aircraft carrier, you could see all the choppers and aircraft on board.
“Everybody is always so excited to see them come past, it’s a spectacle because they’re so close here at Caloundra.
“We don’t see them often, so it always gets people out on the balcony or footpath snapping at them.”
More than 30,000 military personnel from a record 23 countries – including observer nations – are expected to take part in TS25 which is scheduled to be held throughout Queensland, parts of Australia and – for the first time – in Papua New Guinea, from July 13 to August 4.
It is the third time in six years the USS America, which carries fighter jets and tiltrotor aircraft such as MV22-Ospreys, has visited Queensland for Talisman Sabre.
The crew of about 3000 US sailors and Marines, from the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, were not permitted to leave the ship during its first visit to the Sunshine State in 2021 due to the then-ongoing Covid-19 pandemic restrictions.
The 257m-long landing helicopter assault (LHA 6)-class vessel, is designed to accommodate the F-35B Lightning II Joint Strike Fighters – or stealth multirole combat jets – as well as a combination of rescue, combat and support helicopters including MV22 Ospreys, CH-53E Super Stallions, AH-1Z Super Cobra and UH-1Y Venom aircraft.
A detachment from the Marine Fighter Attack Squadron (VMFA) 242 is also on board.
The USS America, along with the USS Rushmore and USS Sand Diego, stopped into Sydney for a port visit in June.
The lead ship of the Seventh Fleet’s Amphibious Ready Group has been operating mostly off the coast of Queensland since leaving Sydney.
Based in Sasebo, Japan since 2019, the USS America is scheduled to return to the US, to Naval Base San Diego in California.
Its replacement in Japan, the USS Tripoli, arrived in Sasebo in late June.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109284
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23299531 (091107ZJUL25) Notable: Talisman Sabre Tweet: (Video) Countdown is on! Less than one week ‘til Talisman Sabre 2025 - #TS25 #TalismanSabre2025 #YourADF
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
Talisman Sabre Tweet
Countdown is on!
Less than one week ‘til Talisman Sabre 2025.
#TS25 #TalismanSabre2025 #YourADF
https://x.com/TalismanSabre/status/1942746555762565306
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109285
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23304704 (101055ZJUL25) Notable: Trump serves Australia $3bn dose of bad medicine – Donald Trump’s threat of 200% tariffs on pharmaceuticals has triggered alarm in Canberra and business circles, with Barclays estimating a $2.8bn hit to Australia’s economy. Treasurer Jim Chalmers insisted the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) “is not on the table” for trade talks, calling it “a fundamental part of healthcare in Australia.” But CSL chairman Brian McNamee urged the Albanese government to make the PBS more efficient and allow innovative American drugs into Australia faster, saying the nation benefits as much from US innovation in medicines as it does from the protection the nation gets from the Pentagon’s defence spending in the Indo-Pacific.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109274
>>109278
>>109280
Trump serves Australia $3bn dose of bad medicine
MATTHEW CRANSTON - 9 July 2025
1/2
Donald Trump’s move to ramp up tariffs on medicines and copper has sparked alarm among government and business leaders, amid fears the US President’s latest trade war will smash the local drug industry, stripping nearly $3bn from the economy.
But the chairman of the country’s biggest drugs manufacturer says the White House’s concerns over the nation’s Pharmaceuticals Benefits Scheme are not unreasonable and the Albanese government has room to negotiate with Mr Trump.
Mr Trump warned on Wednesday (AEST) there would be no more extensions on tariffs past a new August 1 deadline as he unveiled a 50 per cent hit on copper imports and threatened a 200 per cent duty on pharmaceuticals after a grace period of a year to 18 months.
Reserve Bank deputy governor Andrew Hauser said staff at the central bank were watching Mr Trump’s tariff manoeuvres like “hawks” and that the effects on Australia could be profound.
“How worried are we about it? We are very, very focused on it. The level of uncertainty is clearly elevated and the implications … for a global trading economy like Australia, of these fundamental changes, are very profound,” he told a conference in Sydney.
Mr Trump’s proposed tariff on pharmaceuticals is estimated by analysts at investment bank Barclays to likely cost Australia $2.8bn through both direct impacts on economic activity, exports to the US and via intermediate goods exports to countries that use them in production of drugs also hit by the tariffs.
“We’re going to give (drug manufacturers) about a year, a year and a half, to come in, and after that they’re going to be tariffed,” Mr Trump said in the Oval Office.
“They’re going to be tariffed at a very, very high rate, like 200 per cent. We’ll give them a certain period of time to get their act together.”
Jim Chalmers expressed alarm, saying the government was urgently seeking further details from the US. “These are obviously very concerning developments,” the Treasurer said.
He said Australia’s pharmaceutical sector was “much more exposed” to the US market, but reiterated the government would not sacrifice the nation’s PBS to do a deal with the Trump administration. “We see the PBS as a fundamental part of healthcare in Australia. We’re not willing to compromise the PBS,” Dr Chalmers said.
But CSL chairman Brian McNamee urged the Albanese government to make the PBS more efficient and allow innovative American drugs into Australia faster, saying the nation benefits as much from US innovation in medicines as it does from the protection the nation gets from the Pentagon’s defence spending in the Indo-Pacific.
“I don’t think America’s demand is an unreasonable demand. I don’t think the US is trying to tear the PBS down,” Mr McNamee said.
“Americans have allowed their companies to maximise drug innovation and sell to other countries. Other countries benefit from that and are using the free-rider system. I think this is the same as defence.
“I think Australia could accelerate the system for approvals and the mechanism for pricing of innovative new drugs, but it does come at a cost. You need to make a contribution.”
The US is Australia’s biggest pharmaceutical export market, accounting for 38 per cent of total Australian pharmaceutical exports. Blood products make up about 90 per cent of the trade.
Australia’s pharmaceutical exports to the US were valued at $2.06bn in 2024, accounting for 9 per cent of the nation’s total goods sold into the American market.
US lobbyists at the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) have urged Mr Trump to “leverage ongoing trade negotiations” as a tool for reworking the PBS and raising Australian drug prices.
Medicines Australia chief executive Liz de Somer — representing Australia’s pharmaceutical producers — opposed the institution of tariffs and any threat by the Trump administration to the PBS.
An untested executive order by Mr Trump, dubbed the “Most Favoured Nation” order, also leaves open the threat that international producers could hike up Australian prices or pull their products. Under the proposal, the US would refuse to accept medicine prices higher than those overseas, forcing companies to either give Americans their best rate or bring foreign prices in line.
“We don’t want to overreact to the announcement, but being very clear, the industry in Australia opposes tariffs being applied to pharmaceutical manufacturing,” Ms de Somer said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109286
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23304723 (101111ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Plan to tackle antisemitism: Funding threats for unis, school curriculum changes in bid to change ‘dangerous trajectory’ – Jillian Segal, Australia’s first special envoy on antisemitism, has delivered a landmark plan proposing mandatory Holocaust education, adoption of the International Holocaust Remembrance Association’s definition of antisemitism, stricter oversight of universities and media, and potential funding cuts to institutions, charities or cultural events that fail to act. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese released the report with Segal, pledging swift but balanced implementation and urging bipartisanship. Mainstream Jewish groups welcomed the blueprint, while civil liberties advocates, Palestinian activists and the Jewish Council of Australia warned it risks undermining free speech.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109252
>>109272
Plan to tackle antisemitism: Funding threats for unis, school curriculum changes in bid to change ‘dangerous trajectory’
Olivia Ireland and Jessica McSweeney - July 10, 2025
1/2
Universities will be rated on how they have cracked down on anti-Jewish hate, social media sites forced to combat racist trolls and teaching the Holocaust mandated in the national school curriculum under a sweeping blueprint put forward by the country’s first special envoy on antisemitism.
Funding would be stripped from educational institutions, cultural events and charities that fail to address antisemitism if the government agrees to enact the full plan delivered by Jillian Segal to address a series of antisemitic incidents, including arson attacks.
The recommendations would embed a controversial definition of antisemitism in Australian institutions and pose a challenge for the Albanese government, which has promised to protect Jewish Australians while safeguarding free speech.
Segal said antisemitism had become ingrained in academic and cultural institutions and flourished on social media. “We need to resolve this urgently,” Segal said in her report. “We are on a dangerous trajectory where young people raised on a diet of disinformation and misinformation about Jews today risk becoming fully fledged antisemites tomorrow.”
The report, released by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese alongside Segal on Thursday, sparked mixed reactions: praise from mainstream Jewish groups, and concern from legal figures and Palestinian activists who cautioned it could undermine democratic freedoms.
Segal told this masthead that she would be a realist about changes to her recommendations but echoed calls from Albanese for the country to discuss it in good faith.
“The plan has to evolve, it’s ambitious,” Segal said. “This, unfortunately, is no silver bullet, and it needs support rather than people reacting that it’s bad and dangerous.”
Albanese said the government had already implemented some of Segal’s recommendations, would move quickly on others and consider the rest. But he did not specify which recommendations were in which category.
“I don’t want this to be partisan,” Albanese said. “I want everyone to say: ‘yep, might not agree with absolutely everything in here, but it’s something we can work with’.”
The opposition welcomed Segal’s plan and said the government should implement it. “Fighting the tidal wave of antisemitism cannot be left to the envoy alone,” shadow attorney-general Julian Leeser said. “It needs the prime minister’s commitment, not just to hear the envoy’s advocacy, but to action her policies.”
Segal’s report was created in response to a wave of antisemitic incidents in the last year, the latest an alleged arson attack at a Melbourne synagogue last week, similar to a firebombing of a childcare centre daubed with anti-Jewish graffiti in Sydney’s east in January.
It contains calls for more security but focuses on the educational and cultural spheres. Some Jewish students have said they felt unsafe around protest encampments at universities that sprang up after the October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks on Israel and the subsequent bombardment of the Gaza Strip. Attendees have felt similar fears at festivals with pro-Palestinian speakers.
The report says people with antisemitic views should be barred from Australia, and charities that promote antisemitism should be denied the ability to receive tax-deductible gifts.
It also has a recommendation to put Holocaust and antisemitism education in the national school curriculum, and another for the envoy to monitor media organisations “to encourage accurate, fair and responsible reporting.”
It further states the media should be pushed to meet editorial standards, commitment to impartiality and balance, and “to avoid accepting false or distorted narratives”.
Cultural institutions, police, judges and public servants would be educated about antisemitism, and the envoy would push to establish agreed guidelines for festivals and arts organisations to respond to incidents.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109287
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23304735 (101135ZJUL25) Notable: Gaza woman living in Sydney detained in pre-dawn raid following ASIO security risk ruling – A 61-year-old grandmother from Gaza, Maha Almassri, was detained in a pre-dawn raid on her Bankstown home after the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation issued an adverse assessment declaring her a security risk. Her bridging visa was cancelled under the Migration Act’s character test, with the decision signed by Assistant Immigration Minister Julian Hill. Ms Almassri was taken to Villawood Immigration Detention Centre, prompting a rally outside Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke’s office. Family members denied she posed any threat, while the government cited national security and refused further comment.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109264
Gaza woman living in Sydney detained in pre-dawn raid following ASIO security risk ruling
A rally has sprung up at Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke’s office after the alleged detention of a woman from Gaza living in Sydney.
A 61-year-old grandmother from Gaza has been detained following a pre-dawn raid on her Bankstown home after she was deemed a security risk by ASIO.
Maha Almassri, 61, was taken to Villawood Immigration Detention Centre on Thursday, with a Department of Home Affairs letter seen by The Daily Telegraph stating her bridging visa was cancelled on Wednesday as she had failed the visa’s “character test”.
The document states the department was “provided with an Adverse Security Assessment” by the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO), which said the agency “assessed Ms Almassri to be directly or indirectly a risk to security”.
The document said “taking into account the above information”, Ms Almassri “does not pass the character test” – a claim fiercely denied by her family, who launched a snap rally outside Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke’s office where other protesters chanted “death, death to the IDF”.
The same day, the Albanese government’s envoy to combat anti-Semitism released an overarching plan to deal with the issue, including the potential to screen visa applicants for anti-Semitic views and work to ensure the Migration Act “effectively facilitates visa refusals or cancellations for anti-Semitic conduct and rhetoric”.
The reasons for Ms Almassri’s detention are not known and there is no suggestion that she holds anti-Semitic views.
A crowd of about 50 protesters, including Ms Almassri’s daughter Albatoul and four year-old granddaughter Laila, gathered outside Mr Burke’s Punchbowl office hours after the raid with keffiyehs and Palestinian flags, pledging to camp outside until the 61-year-old was freed.
Albatoul, who looked sombre during the protest, said her mother had arrived in Australia in February 2024, after visiting relatives in Saudi Arabia and being denied re-entry to Gaza.
Ms Almassri’s brother-in-law Soliman Almassri said “no explanation” had been given for her detention, that she was “sick” and “traumatised” after a family member was killed and her Gaza home destroyed in the conflict there.
“She’s an old lady, there’s no reason … what threat to security are they talking about,” Mr Almassri said.
Police watched on as community members chanted “Tony Burke, you can’t hide, you’re supporting genocide”, and “Anti-Zionism is not anti-Semitism”.
There’s no suggestion of wrongdoing by family members or supporters who attended the rally.
A spokesman for Mr Burke said, “The government will not be commenting on this cancellation”.
“Any information in the public domain is being supplied by the individual and is not necessarily consistent with the information supplied by our intelligence and security agencies,” he said.
“The Australian government doesn’t stop investigating new information about a visa-holder just because they are onshore.
“Our security checks never stop and this cancellation is proof the system is working.
“There is nothing more important to this government than the safety of the Australian community.”
The documents state the visa cancellation was “personally” decided by Assistant Immigration Minister Julian Hill, who was contacted for comment.
It’s understood the decision to revoke the visa could be judicially reviewed through the federal or high courts.
https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/gaza-woman-living-in-sydney-detained-in-predawn-raid/news-story/1ec533132bde633052bf59a46d26e5c0
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109288
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23304741 (101146ZJUL25) Notable: Foreign minister promises Asian nations Australia will remain a 'reliable' partner with open markets – Foreign Minister Penny Wong told ASEAN leaders in Kuala Lumpur that Australia would remain a dependable partner with open markets, contrasting Canberra’s approach with the Trump administration’s aid cuts and tariff threats. Wong highlighted Australia’s efforts to fill funding gaps left by Washington and urged support for global rules against coercion. She warned China was pursuing a military build-up and strategic dominance in the South China Sea, stressing the need for a regional balance of power where “no country dominates and no country is dominated.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109234
Foreign minister promises Asian nations Australia will remain a 'reliable' partner with open markets
Stephen Dziedzic - 10 July 2025
Foreign Minister Penny Wong has promised South-East Asian nations that Australia will be a "reliable" partner with open markets, as the region grapples with the Trump administration's aid cuts and tariff threats.
Senator Wong also criticised China's aggressive behaviour in the South China Sea and its military build-up, warning the Association of South-East Asian Nations (ASEAN) that Beijing is intent on changing the balance of power in Asia.
Foreign ministers from the ten-member ASEAN have gathered in Kuala Lumpur for an annual meeting, along with top officials from other countries, including US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.
The Trump administration has threatened to hit multiple ASEAN countries with heavy tariffs if they don't strike new deals with the US, and anxieties over the economic fallout from the US president's trade agenda look set to dominate many of the discussions.
Senator Wong used a major speech at the conference to urge ASEAN nations to stand up for global rules and against coercion, while burnishing Australia's credentials as a "reliable partner on whom you can count".
The foreign minister did not directly criticise either Mr Trump's trade agenda or his massive cuts to USAID, but said Australia had moved quickly to fill some "unexpected funding gaps" in development in South-East Asia.
"We believe as partners and neighbours that we have a responsibility to contribute to a more equitable future for our region, and it's a responsibility that our government will not abandon," she said.
"And Australia's response to others reducing their funding has been to pivot and re-prioritise, ensuring we respond to the most acute needs."
Senator Wong said while the Trump administration envisaged a "different role" for America in the world, the US's presence in the region remained "critical" to stability.
She did not take aim at Mr Trump's protectionist agenda and trade threats, but drew an implicit contrast with the US by lauding Australia's move to dismantle tariff barriers in the 80s.
"Australia opened our economy to the region and the world long ago … I can assure you today that this will not change," she said.
She also sharply criticised China's massive military build-up and aggressive conduct in the South China Sea, saying Beijing was intent on shifting the balance of power in its favour.
"China continues to assert its strategic influence and project its military power further into our region," she said.
"And we have seen the worrying pace of China's nuclear and conventional military build-up, without the transparency that the region expects.
"We are realistic about China's objectives in changing the regional balance of power — and it is clear in China's public political discourse."
She also stressed that neither the US nor countries across the region sought military confrontation with China, reiterating her call for "a balance of power" in the region, "where no country dominates and no country is dominated".
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-10/foreign-minister-penny-wong-asean-comments/105518328
https://x.com/SenatorWong/status/1943169815235182864
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109289
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23309418 (110954ZJUL25) Notable: Bitter Family Battle:What really happened to Virginia Giuffre?- She took on Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew, then died by suicide in April. For the first time, her family share diary entries, private messages and photos that reveal her secret battle with her husband. - On March 30 Virginia Giuffre shared a photo on her Instagram page, showing her bruised and bloodied after a car crash outside her home in Australia. “They’ve given me four days to live,” she wrote of her prognosis. “I’m ready to go.” To the outside world, it appeared to be the latest in a series of tragedies to befall Virginia, who had accused Jeffrey Epstein of sexually trafficking her to his high-profile friends, including Prince Andrew. But her family understood the post for what it was: a desperate and final plea for help. Three weeks later, on April 25, Virginia took her own life, alone on a ranch in remote scrubland north of Perth, aged 41. Virginia’s family said little in the months that followed, even as media speculation and conspiracy theories swirled - that she had made up the crash, that her death had been ordered by influential people trying to silence her. Now, her relatives have decided to speak out in their first interview, to honour what they say were her last wishes. “Her death was a terrible ending to this story, but there is a big part of it she never got to tell,” Amanda Roberts, the wife of Virginia’s younger brother, Sky Roberts, told The Times. That story is one of abuse by those, like Epstein, who trafficked and exploited her. But it is also a story about a bitter battle with the person closest to her: her husband of 22 years and father of her three children, Robert Giuffre.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73395 (pb)
What really happened to Virginia Giuffre?
She took on Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew, then died by suicide in April. For the first time, her family share diary entries, private messages and photos that reveal her secret battle with her husband
Josie Ensor, The Times - July 1 2025
1/5
On March 30 Virginia Giuffre shared a photo on her Instagram page, showing her bruised and bloodied after a car crash outside her home in Australia.
“They’ve given me four days to live,” she wrote of her prognosis. “I’m ready to go.”
To the outside world, it appeared to be the latest in a series of tragedies to befall Virginia, who had accused Jeffrey Epstein of sexually trafficking her to his high-profile friends, including Prince Andrew.
But her family understood the post for what it was: a desperate and final plea for help.
Three weeks later, on April 25, Virginia took her own life, alone on a ranch in remote scrubland north of Perth, aged 41.
Virginia’s family said little in the months that followed, even as media speculation and conspiracy theories swirled — that she had made up the crash, that her death had been ordered by influential people trying to silence her. Now, her relatives have decided to speak out in their first interview, to honour what they say were her last wishes.
“Her death was a terrible ending to this story, but there is a big part of it she never got to tell,” Amanda Roberts, the wife of Virginia’s younger brother, Sky Roberts, told The Times.
That story is one of abuse by those, like Epstein, who trafficked and exploited her. But it is also a story about a bitter battle with the person closest to her: her husband of 22 years and father of her three children, Robert Giuffre.
Amanda, using a nickname for Virginia, said: “Jenna may have fought battles with some of the most powerful men in the world, like Epstein and Prince Andrew, but what people didn’t understand was that [in her final days] the hardest battle of her life was at home.”
For the first time, Virginia’s family is sharing a diary she kept from the beginning of this year, in which she shares her memories of her marriage as it was breaking down, as well as photos, text messages and legal filings, in which she alleges that Robert was violent, abusive and “emotionally and physically controlling”.
Virginia claimed in her diary that her husband’s behaviour worsened as she became the face of the campaign to bring Epstein and others to justice. “The stronger I became, the scarier he became,” she wrote, accusing him of trying to stop her from “advocating for the victims of trafficking” and, in the final months, allegedly preventing her from seeing her children.
“What you have to know about Jenna is she was never afraid of any of these people,” Sky said. “She was ready to move on with her life, but she wanted that life to be with her kids.”
When contacted for comment, Robert’s attorney said that “the passing of the wife of Robert Giuffre and mother of their children is tragic”. But his counsel was unable to comment on specific allegations of abuse due to live proceedings in the Western Australia courts.
Meeting Robert
Born Virginia Lee Roberts, she experienced abuse at a young age when a family friend molested her aged seven.
She was spotted one day by Epstein’s girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell while working a summer job, aged 15, at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach.
Virginia described how she was “passed around like a platter of fruit” among the Epstein and Maxwell’s friends until she managed to escape, aged 19.
An aspiring masseuse, she had been sent by Epstein to Thailand for a course at the International Training Massage School. It was there, in 2002, that she met Robert, a 26-year-old mixed martial arts (MMA) instructor from Australia.
Instead of returning to Epstein in New York, as she had promised, she ran away with Robert and they were married ten days later.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109290
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23309419 (110956ZJUL25) Notable: Bitter Family Battle:What really happened to Virginia Giuffre?- She took on Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew, then died by suicide in April. For the first time, her family share diary entries, private messages and photos that reveal her secret battle with her husband. - On March 30 Virginia Giuffre shared a photo on her Instagram page, showing her bruised and bloodied after a car crash outside her home in Australia. “They’ve given me four days to live,” she wrote of her prognosis. “I’m ready to go.” To the outside world, it appeared to be the latest in a series of tragedies to befall Virginia, who had accused Jeffrey Epstein of sexually trafficking her to his high-profile friends, including Prince Andrew. But her family understood the post for what it was: a desperate and final plea for help. Three weeks later, on April 25, Virginia took her own life, alone on a ranch in remote scrubland north of Perth, aged 41. Virginia’s family said little in the months that followed, even as media speculation and conspiracy theories swirled - that she had made up the crash, that her death had been ordered by influential people trying to silence her. Now, her relatives have decided to speak out in their first interview, to honour what they say were her last wishes. “Her death was a terrible ending to this story, but there is a big part of it she never got to tell,” Amanda Roberts, the wife of Virginia’s younger brother, Sky Roberts, told The Times. That story is one of abuse by those, like Epstein, who trafficked and exploited her. But it is also a story about a bitter battle with the person closest to her: her husband of 22 years and father of her three children, Robert Giuffre.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109289
2/5
‘On the surface everything looked okay’
The couple welcomed their first child, Christian, in 2006. Noah arrived in spring the following year.
Virginia stayed at home to raise the children. Robert had odd jobs in construction. For years she was afraid to talk about her time with Epstein, even with her own family — until he was convicted for the sex trafficking of a minor in Florida in 2008.
One year later, Virginia sued Epstein — identifying herself only as Jane Doe 102 — accusing the financier of trafficking her between his homes in Palm Beach, New York and the US Virgin Islands.
She decided to waive her anonymity after the birth of her daughter Emily the following year and gave interviews about exactly what went on, turning what had been a local story into international news. Dini von Mueffling, Virginia’s public representative, told The Times: “Holding Emily as a newborn, she said to herself, ‘I need to do better for my daughter and for all the women out there who can’t fight’.”
The earliest alleged incident of domestic violence dates to that time. There is no record of a complaint by Virginia at the time.
In a text Virginia sent to von Mueffling in April this year, she alleged that:
Even when I had Emily in my arms as a baby, Rob was coming down off a 3-day bender and punched me in the face which dropped me to the floor and continuously kicking me in the stomach.
The couple spent those early years between Cairns — the northeast tip of Australia where Robert had grown up — and Colorado in the US, near Sky, 36, and Virginia’s half-brother, Danny Wilson, 46.
They stayed for a month in 2013 with Danny and his wife, Lanette. Danny claimed Robert was “volatile” and “erratic” during that visit, alleging Robert would start drinking on their porch each morning before they went to work. “Anything would set him off,” Danny alleged.
Sky and Amanda said they had always thought of Robert as “controlling” and short-tempered, but Virginia had not mentioned any physical abuse at the time. If she was ever having a bad day, she would say, “Oh, you know Robbie”, Sky said. When pressed about what exactly she meant, Virginia never offered anything more.
Two years later, Robert was arrested in Colorado for an alleged assault on Virginia that the couple kept private. The Times has seen a police record filed in Fremont County on June 3, 2015, against Robert, labelled with the case type “domestic violence”.
The criminal docket is sealed, but according to a civil lawsuit Virginia filed against Maxwell that same year, the couple “became involved in an argument over the welfare of the family dog … [Virginia] alleges she was assaulted by her husband as witnessed by at least one of their children”. According to the filing, Robert pleaded guilty to domestic violence and was placed on probation.
Public v private fight
In 2017 the family moved from the US back to Cairns, where they remained for three years before relocating to Perth. Virginia alleged in her journal, written this year, that Robert stopped working that year and had taken to drinking most days “from 8am to sometime in the pm”.
She claimed in her diary that he was drinking, and alleged that he had become violent when “consumed by jealousy”.
At the same time, Virginia’s lawyers filed another suit in Florida, claiming that Epstein had trafficked her to Prince Andrew.
She accused Epstein and Maxwell of forcing her to have sex with Andrew on at least three occasions in the early 2000s. He denied the allegations.
In November 2019, Andrew gave an interview to the BBC’s Emily Maitlis about his relationship to Epstein that was widely considered a PR disaster. What had been tabloid fodder mutated into a full-blown scandal, forcing the duke to step down from public duties.
Virginia, a 35-year-old sex-trafficking victim from Loxahatchee — a down-at-heel town in Florida which her brothers describe as “a place no one has heard of” — had toppled the Queen of England’s favourite son. Her family said she had always been “incredibly proud of herself” for that.
“When people told her ‘no’, or people told her they wouldn’t believe her, or that she was crazy, she would say ‘Watch me’,” Amanda said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109291
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23309420 (110957ZJUL25) Notable: Bitter Family Battle:What really happened to Virginia Giuffre?- She took on Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew, then died by suicide in April. For the first time, her family share diary entries, private messages and photos that reveal her secret battle with her husband. - On March 30 Virginia Giuffre shared a photo on her Instagram page, showing her bruised and bloodied after a car crash outside her home in Australia. “They’ve given me four days to live,” she wrote of her prognosis. “I’m ready to go.” To the outside world, it appeared to be the latest in a series of tragedies to befall Virginia, who had accused Jeffrey Epstein of sexually trafficking her to his high-profile friends, including Prince Andrew. But her family understood the post for what it was: a desperate and final plea for help. Three weeks later, on April 25, Virginia took her own life, alone on a ranch in remote scrubland north of Perth, aged 41. Virginia’s family said little in the months that followed, even as media speculation and conspiracy theories swirled - that she had made up the crash, that her death had been ordered by influential people trying to silence her. Now, her relatives have decided to speak out in their first interview, to honour what they say were her last wishes. “Her death was a terrible ending to this story, but there is a big part of it she never got to tell,” Amanda Roberts, the wife of Virginia’s younger brother, Sky Roberts, told The Times. That story is one of abuse by those, like Epstein, who trafficked and exploited her. But it is also a story about a bitter battle with the person closest to her: her husband of 22 years and father of her three children, Robert Giuffre.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109290
3/5
Back in Australia, meanwhile, Virginia claimed in her diary kept in her last months that her husband grew uncomfortable with the publicity her case was attracting.
“During this time, the world was getting to know Virginia,” Amanda said during a family trip to New York last month.
“She’s going public, filing lawsuits and I guess she sort of had to put on a face. She had become a spokesperson against sex trafficking and she was able to build that fight for all the other victims, but she wasn’t able to do that battle and the one at home at the same time.”
She was awarded millions of dollars over the years from settlement funds and civil lawsuits against Maxwell, the Epstein estate, Prince Andrew and the bank JP Morgan over its handling of Epstein’s finances. She received $10 million from the duke in 2022, and Queen Elizabeth is believed to have donated £2 million ($2.7 million) to Speak Out, Act, Reclaim (Soar), a charity Virginia had set up to campaign for survivors of sexual abuse.
Virginia alleged in her recent diary that Robert was no longer working and was “gambling away” their money “carelessly”.
The incident
Virginia’s family said she first broached the subject of divorce with Robert in August 2023. “We talked so many times about her leaving. She talked to us for years about being unhappy in their relationship,” Lanette said. “She told me, ‘I don’t love him any more’.”
The couple remained legally married but became estranged in 2024, living in separate houses. Virginia lived at the ranch in a town called Neergabby with her full-time carer, Cheryl, whom she had hired to help after suffering a debilitating back injury. Robert remained at the “marital home” in Ocean Reef 30 miles away.
Everything changed after an incident on January 9 this year, which Virginia and Robert have characterised very differently.
They had reunited at a rental house along the western Australian coast for their daughter Emily’s 15th birthday.
Over a FaceTime call the next day, Virginia told Sky and Amanda her account of the incident. According to Sky, Robert went into Virginia’s room and asked her for sex. When she told him no, Robert allegedly “started to call her names and got aggressive”. Sky said Virginia claimed he “punched her over and over”.
Sky claims said the incident aggravated existing injuries to her sternum and spine, which she had undergone extensive surgery to treat in 2023.
Sky shared a text Virginia sent her mother on January 10:
Fri, Jan10 at 5:55 AM
Mommy, pls call me when you're awake. Rob did it again, I'm in the hospital and I need your voice to help me calm down.
Fri, Jan10 at 10:21 AM
Trying to call please call me back when you can please love you honey love mom
In the days after the alleged assault, while Virginia was recovering at Royal Perth Hospital, she and Cheryl took photos of her injuries. They appear to show Virginia with a black eye and her face and chest bruised.
Both sides reported the incident to police in Western Australia. An investigator from the family violence investigation squad in Perth confirmed they had looked into the claims and that they had not charged either with any crime.
Robert filed a restraining order application against Virginia at the magistrates’ court while she was in hospital.
According to his account, he and Virginia had been talking and “the conversation led to an argument and then she started physically assaulting me with headbutts, punching and spitting. I was trying to protect myself by covering my face and as soon as I had the chance to flee I did.”
He alleged that she caused herself the injuries and that she was, and had been, mentally unstable.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109292
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23309423 (110959ZJUL25) Notable: Bitter Family Battle:What really happened to Virginia Giuffre?- She took on Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew, then died by suicide in April. For the first time, her family share diary entries, private messages and photos that reveal her secret battle with her husband. - On March 30 Virginia Giuffre shared a photo on her Instagram page, showing her bruised and bloodied after a car crash outside her home in Australia. “They’ve given me four days to live,” she wrote of her prognosis. “I’m ready to go.” To the outside world, it appeared to be the latest in a series of tragedies to befall Virginia, who had accused Jeffrey Epstein of sexually trafficking her to his high-profile friends, including Prince Andrew. But her family understood the post for what it was: a desperate and final plea for help. Three weeks later, on April 25, Virginia took her own life, alone on a ranch in remote scrubland north of Perth, aged 41. Virginia’s family said little in the months that followed, even as media speculation and conspiracy theories swirled - that she had made up the crash, that her death had been ordered by influential people trying to silence her. Now, her relatives have decided to speak out in their first interview, to honour what they say were her last wishes. “Her death was a terrible ending to this story, but there is a big part of it she never got to tell,” Amanda Roberts, the wife of Virginia’s younger brother, Sky Roberts, told The Times. That story is one of abuse by those, like Epstein, who trafficked and exploited her. But it is also a story about a bitter battle with the person closest to her: her husband of 22 years and father of her three children, Robert Giuffre.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109291
4/5
In handwritten notes in the affidavit, he claimed that he was left with “scratches and bruising to head” and that he was “fearful my spouse will once again come assault and harass myself and my kids”.
He filed for temporary custody of their younger children — Noah, who was months away from turning 18, and Emily — which he was granted. Virginia was prohibited from seeing or contacting them for six months, in a decision that came as a shock to her and her family in the US.
During her FaceTime call with Sky, Virginia “opened up” about her alleged abuse, which she claimed had been taking place for some time.
“She’d gone through rough patches growing up and she would always protect me from all that stuff,” Sky said. “She played that protector role later in life too, but at this point it was beyond that.”
‘Mommy still loves you’
That night at the rental house was the last time Virginia saw her children.
Over the next two months, she tried to reach out to Emily. “She had sent Emily a link to a song they liked,” Sky said. She changed the names of the family’s shared Netflix and Amazon accounts to “Mommy still loves you” and “Mommy is here”, Sky said, in the hope the children would see the messages.
The family said they saw Virginia’s cryptic Instagram post on March 30 as “a way to reach her children” and “a desperate plea for help”.
The post was met with questions about Virginia’s reliability, whether she did — as she claimed — have four days to live, and whether the crash had even happened. “I reviewed the damage to [Virginia’s] car just because I’m an insurance adjuster myself and I was curious. It was very much damaged,” said Sky, who travelled to Australia to be with Virginia, concerned about her wellbeing:
“There are a very small number of people that know the overall scope of what happened,” Sky said. “You have people coming out, including my own dad, saying somebody did this to her. It’s insulting to me.”
The final days
“I've never seen my sister as physically broken down as she was then,” Sky said of the final three weeks they spent together. “She was really struggling, emotionally and physically. She could face a lot of things, but the idea of not seeing her children broke her.”
Despite that, Sky said he and Virginia had had “such a good day” the day before she took her life. “We had lunch and after that we tried on cowboy hats and went to a thrift store. We were just being silly, you know — she could be very silly.”
That night they went to bed and everything seemed normal, Sky said. The next day, he went to check on her. Hearing the sound of what he described as “meditation music” through her bedroom door, he decided to give her some space and left the house.
He called Cheryl to check she was with his sister, but she informed him that Virginia had told her to take the day off as it was Anzac Day, a national day of remembrance in Australia.
“We have always had this interconnected, twinsie thing and I just felt something was wrong,” Sky said, sobbing. He said he drove back to the house at about 8pm and knocked on her door. When Virginia did not answer, Sky tried to open it but found it locked.
He broke the door down and found her unconscious. He attempted resuscitation for 45 minutes before paramedics arrived and declared her dead. Her brother did not wish to go into detail on the manner of her death.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109293
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23309425 (111000ZJUL25) Notable: Bitter Family Battle:What really happened to Virginia Giuffre?- She took on Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew, then died by suicide in April. For the first time, her family share diary entries, private messages and photos that reveal her secret battle with her husband. - On March 30 Virginia Giuffre shared a photo on her Instagram page, showing her bruised and bloodied after a car crash outside her home in Australia. “They’ve given me four days to live,” she wrote of her prognosis. “I’m ready to go.” To the outside world, it appeared to be the latest in a series of tragedies to befall Virginia, who had accused Jeffrey Epstein of sexually trafficking her to his high-profile friends, including Prince Andrew. But her family understood the post for what it was: a desperate and final plea for help. Three weeks later, on April 25, Virginia took her own life, alone on a ranch in remote scrubland north of Perth, aged 41. Virginia’s family said little in the months that followed, even as media speculation and conspiracy theories swirled - that she had made up the crash, that her death had been ordered by influential people trying to silence her. Now, her relatives have decided to speak out in their first interview, to honour what they say were her last wishes. “Her death was a terrible ending to this story, but there is a big part of it she never got to tell,” Amanda Roberts, the wife of Virginia’s younger brother, Sky Roberts, told The Times. That story is one of abuse by those, like Epstein, who trafficked and exploited her. But it is also a story about a bitter battle with the person closest to her: her husband of 22 years and father of her three children, Robert Giuffre.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109292
5/5
Von Mueffling, who was keen to dispel any conspiracy theories that there may have been foul play, said: “She confided in me [in the weeks before her death] that she had planned to commit suicide, down to the method.” Von Mueffling counselled her against it and urged the brothers to go and be with her in Perth. “She was very clear that the pain was just too deep, she just couldn’t take it any more. It wasn’t a dramatic conversation, it was very matter of fact.”
Sky does not know why his sister picked that day, though Amanda believes she felt safe knowing her brother — one of the few men she ever really trusted — was there.
“It was a lot of things,” he said. “It was about to be Noah’s 18th birthday. That was very important to her and she knew she wouldn’t be there for that. They were her life.”
Because he remained her next of kin, Virginia’s body was released to Robert, who held a small private service for her in Perth. Her family said they were not invited.
In the months since, Amanda and Sky have taken up Virginia’s mantel with the charity Soar, campaigning across the US to help pass legislation to help protect the victims of abuse.
The pair and Danny got matching tattoos to remember their sister, or “Sissy”.
“I didn’t want this to end this way,” Sky said. “I didn’t want to have this big battle openly.
“But as a culture we are so quick to dismiss women experiencing violence, and we’ve got to stop doing that.”
https://www.thetimes.com/us/news-today/article/what-happened-virginia-giuffre-husband-family-epstein-zr2cxwrlh
https://archive.vn/TAJYH
https://www.instagram.com/virginiarobertsrising11/p/DH0vvDKzDvu/
https://x.com/Josiensor/status/1940392315388088416
https://x.com/JayShams/status/1940096033494647156
—
Q Post #4923
Oct 21 2020 20:55:05 (EST)
https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1319071346282778624
Dearest Virginia -
We stand with you.
Now and always.
Find peace through prayer.
Never give up the good fight.
God bless you.
Q
https://qanon.pub/#4923
https://qanon.pub/#4568
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109294
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314308 (120823ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Donald Trump nominates Sydney-born influencer Nick Adams as US ambassador to Malaysia – Sydney-born former Liberal councillor Nick Adams, once suspended for verbally abusing a journalist, has been nominated by US President Donald Trump as ambassador to Malaysia. Adams, 40, migrated to America and rebranded as a MAGA-aligned influencer, founding a conservative youth group and self-styling as an “alpha male” and Hooters enthusiast. Trump praised him as “an incredible patriot.” Adams’s bombastic persona and lack of diplomatic experience have raised concerns, with analysts warning his appointment could damage already strained US–Malaysia relations. The role requires Senate confirmation. Adams called the nomination “the honour of a lifetime,” citing his “unending love affair” with the United States.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Donald Trump nominates Sydney-born influencer Nick Adams as US ambassador to Malaysia
Brad Ryan and Phoebe Hosier - 11 July 2025
A Sydney councillor-turned-MAGA-influencer, who faced suspension from the Liberal Party after swearing at a TV journalist, has won Donald Trump's nomination to become US ambassador to Malaysia.
Nick Adams made headlines as a young deputy mayor on Sydney's Ashfield council with a proposal to eradicate the area's pigeons to prevent the spread of bird flu.
The party decided to suspend him after he was filmed verbally abusing a Channel Ten reporter covering his repeated absences from council meetings in 2009.
Mr Adams reportedly later said he quit before he was suspended.
More than 15 years later, now aged 40, he is an American citizen and MAGA commentator, self-branded as a Hooters-loving "alpha male" and "cultural thought leader".
Mr Trump described him as "an incredible patriot and very successful entrepreneur" who had "made it his life's mission to extol the virtues of American greatness".
After moving to the US, Mr Adams set up the Foundation for Liberty and American Greatness, a non-profit dedicated to instilling conservative values in children.
He advocates "patriotic boycotts" to punish the promotion of progressive values, with targets including Disney, Nike, the NBA, "feminist M&Ms" and "woke jezebel" Taylor Swift.
His X feed — where earnest passion can be difficult to distinguish from tongue-in-cheek trolling — is stacked with praise for Mr Trump, who Mr Adams describes as his favourite person.
Other posts list his "girlfriend material" preferences, including "does not interrupt me, ever" and "understands and supports my alpha male way of life".
Multiple tweets mention his love of diner chain Hooters, sometimes referred to as a "breastaurant" because of its shameless practice of hiring busty waitresses and dressing them in snug shirts and short shorts.
In a post on Substack after his nomination, Mr Adams wrote:
"Much of my adult life has been a story of giving back to the United States, the country I loved, the country that welcomed me first as a visitor, then as an entrepreneur, then as a citizen, and today, as an ambassador.
"…Throughout my adult life, I have written books detailing my unending love affair with the United States, her Constitution, flag, people, and history.
"Now, the greatest president of all time, Donald J Trump, has bestowed upon me the honour of a lifetime."
Mr Adams was elected as a Liberal councillor in Ashfield in 2004, aged 19, and became deputy mayor the following year.
After media reports highlighted his numerous absences from council meetings, he was filmed verbally abusing Channel Ten journalist Brett Mason in 2009.
The party decided to suspend him for six months. Then-state director Mark Neeham said his actions fell "well below the standard expected of Liberal Party-endorsed councillors", according to a report in local newspaper City Hub.
Mr Adams, a media and communications graduate from the University of Sydney, also ran his own PR agency.
In 2010, he was featured on the ABC's Media Watch program for his involvement in a publicity stunt where models were apparently paid to pose as protesters calling for Halloween to become a public holiday.
Mr Adams's appointment to the ambassador role requires confirmation by the US Senate.
'Probably will not go down well'
The US and Malaysia have strained relations, in part due to America's support for Israel's war on Gaza, Mr Trump's tariffs and Malaysia's tightening ties with China.
"So the entire relationship is in a pretty negative state before we get to the question of who's the ambassador," said Joshua Kurlantzick, a South-East Asia expert at the Council on Foreign Relations.
He said appointing an ambassador with so little experience would be seen as a "slap in the face to Malaysia", and Mr Adams's "bombastic" nature might not be a good fit for the region's style of diplomacy.
"South-East Asian states, with the exception of the Philippines maybe, prefer to work out diplomatic matters … in as quiet and subtle a way as possible," he said.
"It's potentially a problematic appointment. It shows that Trump doesn't value the foreign service … it probably will not go down well in Malaysia."
Mr Adams won the praise of the president during his first term.
In 2017, Mr Trump tweeted an endorsement of Mr Adams's book about his struggles migrating to the US, and later appointed him to the Woodrow Wilson Center think tank.
The ABC has attempted to contact Mr Adams for comment.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-11/donald-trump-nick-adams-malaysia-ambassador/105519888
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhMqcAOYo9U
https://x.com/NickAdamsinUSA/status/1943268508630184088
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114831088465448187
https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/837633820417482754
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109295
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314324 (120837ZJUL25) Notable: Video: The remarkable rise of an Australian deputy mayor to a plum Trump job – US President Donald Trump has nominated Sydney-born Nick Adams, a self-styled “Alpha Male” and conservative pundit, as ambassador to Malaysia, praising his “love of, and devotion to, our Great Country.” Adams, 40, became Australia’s youngest deputy mayor in Ashfield before resigning from the Liberal Party in 2009 after abusing a journalist. He later moved to the US, joined the conservative speaking circuit and built a profile on Fox News as an outspoken Trump supporter. Naturalised in 2021, Adams wrote several books extolling “American greatness” and became a Trump campaign surrogate. Critics note his lack of diplomatic experience and history of Islamophobic remarks.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109294
The remarkable rise of an Australian deputy mayor to a plum Trump job
Josefine Ganko - July 11, 2025
US President Donald Trump has heaped praise on Sydney-born self-described “Alpha Male” Nick Adams, lauding his “love of, and devotion to, our Great Country” as he confirmed his appointment as US ambassador to Malaysia.
The appointment caps the remarkable rise of the University of Sydney graduate who, at 21, became the youngest deputy mayor in Australian history, before moving to the US, where he rose to prominence as a conservative commentator, author and one of Trump’s most loyal and outspoken supporters.
After the ambassadorial appointment was sent to the Senate for confirmation on Wednesday, Trump personally announced his nomination in a post to Truth Social, writing that Adams was an “incredible patriot” and “very successful entrepreneur”.
“Nick graduated from the University of Sydney and, since then, has made it his life’s mission to extol the Virtues of American Greatness. Congratulations Nick!” the post read.
Adams’ effusive support of Trump on X, and in his regular appearances on Fox News shows, drew the president’s attention, with his ascendance making him the latest conservative pundit without relevant experience to be given a role in the Trump administration.
The New York Times has reported that Adams has a history of making Islamophobic remarks, including denigrating Trump’s rivals as supporters of Islam and speaking out against purported efforts to “teach Islam in schools”. Malaysia is a Muslim-majority country.
Born Nicholas Adamopoulos in Sydney in 1984, Adams has written that he battled a neuroblastoma in his childhood, undergoing extensive cancer treatment. In his books, he describes his father as the “ultimate alpha male”, recounting how he never said “I love you” and crediting him with pushing his son to achieve greatness.
He attended Trinity Grammar School, in Sydney’s inner west, before gaining a bachelor of media and communications from the University of Sydney.
Adams’ first foray into politics came when he was elected to Ashfield Council in 2004 on the Liberal Party ticket, before being appointed Australia’s youngest deputy mayor the following year.
His five years on the council were marked by outlandish stories, like his campaign to stop the removal of a portrait of the Queen from the council’s chambers, and a proposal to cull all the pigeons in Ashfield to prevent the spread of avian flu.
“Ashfield should be inhospitable to pigeons,” he said at a council meeting.
“I’m not an expert. I’m not an accountant. I’m certainly not a pest controller. Don’t ask me about procedure. What I would like to see is no pigeons in our area.”
He was censured by his fellow councillors in 2006 for spending thousands of dollars of council funds on personal phone calls and Cabcharges, the Inner West Weekly reported. Adams later repaid the council more than $4000.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109296
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314345 (120851ZJUL25) Notable: Anthony Albanese takes strong stand on anti-Semitism ‘but attacks must stop’ – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese backed envoy Jillian Segal’s anti-Semitism plan, vowing to strip funding from universities, festivals and institutions that fail to act, train border officials to screen anti-Semites, and enforce a nationwide definition of anti-Jewish hate. Albanese declared anti-Semitism “an evil scourge,” condemning recent violence while maintaining criticism of Israel’s actions in Gaza. Jewish leaders, including Israel’s ambassador Amir Maimon, Alex Ryvchin of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry and Alon Cassuto of the Zionist Federation of Australia, praised the plan but demanded swift implementation. Opposition spokesman Julian Leeser warned Albanese would be judged on results, not rhetoric, while legal and community groups urged full adoption.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109286
Anthony Albanese takes strong stand on anti-Semitism ‘but attacks must stop’
RICHARD FERGUSON - July 10, 2025
1/2
Jewish leaders are warning Anthony Albanese that his landmark plan to fight anti-Semitism will be judged on how fast he can implement it and how hard he can crush anti-Jewish bigotry, as they declare the Prime Minister and Labor have finally shown “they get it”.
The Prime Minister’s hand-picked envoy on anti-Semitism, Jillian Segal, was flanked by Mr Albanese and Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke on Thursday as she unveiled a strategy that promises to bring universities, arts bodies, and public broadcasters into line if they allow anti-Jewish hate to continue to foment.
The Segal plan would strip funding from universities and arts festivals that fail to stop anti-Semitism, train border force officials how to screen anti-Semites trying to enter Australia, and implement a nationwide definition of anti-Jewish hate in all level of governments and public institutions.
Australia’s highest-profile vice-chancellor, University of Canberra chief and ex-Labor leader Bill Shorten, warned his sector that it could not hide behind “academic freedom” and must work with Ms Segal in her plan to fight anti-Semitism on campuses.
Ms Segal will also work with the ABC and SBS to make sure they are taking social cohesion into account and make sure judges, prosecutors and police are trained to deal with anti-Semitic hate crimes.
Israel’s ambassador to Australia, Amir Maimon, was among Jewish leaders in Australia who lauded Thursday’s plan as the most significant step yet into solving a crisis that has seen Jewish Australians targeted on campus, in synagogues, and even in childcare centres since the October 7 massacres and the outbreak of the Israel-Hamas war in late 2023.
In his strongest comments since the crisis broke out, Mr Albanese said he would not stand by and let Jewish Australians be vilified and abused under the guise of pro-Palestinian activism.
“Anti-Semitism is an evil scourge,” the Prime Minister said in Sydney. “There is no place in Australia for anti-Semitism. The kind of hatred and violence that we’ve seen on our streets recently is despicable, and it won’t be tolerated. And I want those responsible to face the full force of the law.”
Mr Albanese made it clear he would not walk away from his government’s strong criticisms of the Israeli government’s actions in its war against Gaza terror group Hamas but said the pro-Palestine movement’s targeting of individual Jews was “delusional” and “destructive”.
“Where the line has been crossed is in blaming and identifying people because they happen to be Jewish.” he said. “If you have a view about the directions of the Netanyahu government, or any other government for that matter … I saw on the ABC the other night, a woman who participated in the trashing and violence that occurred at the restaurant in Melbourne.
“Justifying that, justifying it. There is no justification for that whatsoever. And what’s more, the idea that somehow the cause of justice for Palestinians is advanced by behaviour like that is not only delusional, it is destructive.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109297
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314377 (120914ZJUL25) Notable: Protect our spaces from transgender women, lesbian group tells court – The Lesbian Action Group has joined Giggle app founder Sall Grover’s Federal Court appeal against a ruling that she unlawfully discriminated against transgender woman Roxanne Tickle. The group argues biological women are entitled to female-only spaces under the Sex Discrimination Act, warning lesbians are pressured to accept sex with trans women and risk social isolation if they refuse. Their submission cites dangers to schools, shelters and privacy if biological men are legally recognised as women. Sex Discrimination Commissioner Anna Cody and the Australian Human Rights Commission support Ms Tickle’s case.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109282
Protect our spaces from transgender women, lesbian group tells court
STEPHEN RICE - July 11, 2025
1/2
Female-only spaces for biological women must be protected by law, in part because lesbians are now regularly being pressured to have sex with trans women and face social isolation if they don’t comply, according to a lesbian group that will appear in the Federal Court in support of Giggle app founder Sall Grover.
In a rare move, the court has granted the Melbourne-based Lesbian Action Group “intervener” status in Ms Grover’s appeal against the ruling last year that she unlawfully discriminated against transgender woman Roxanne Tickle by rejecting her from the networking app because she was a biological man.
The Lesbian Action Group argues that biological women have a right under the Sex Discrimination Act to their own safe spaces, stating in a submission obtained by The Australian that “it is now commonplace for lesbians to be pressured into having sex with transwomen, and to face risk of social isolation if they do not agree with that very concept.”
The intervention pits the long-established lesbian group not just against Tickle but against Sex Discrimination Commissioner Anna Cody who has also been granted amicus curiae (friend of the court) status in the case.
The commissioner says she is simply “seeking to assist the court by providing submissions about the meaning, scope and validity of relevant provisions of the Sex Discrimination Act and that she “has not made submissions about whether Ms Tickle was in fact discriminated against”.
However, the commissioner’s position largely mirrored Ms Tickle’s submissions in the case last year that sex is “changeable” and non-binary, and Dr Cody publicly welcomed judge Robert Bromwich’s decision in favour of Ms Tickle.
“We are pleased this case has recognised that every individual, regardless of their gender identity, deserves equal and fair treatment under the law,” Dr Cody said after the ruling.
The Australian Human Rights Commission estimates it will have spent about $35,000 briefing barristers to represent the Sex Discrimination Commissioner by the end of the current appeal.
The Lesbian Action Group was granted amicus status because it has an interest in the outcome of the case after seeking an exemption from the Sex Discrimination Act in 2023 to hold regular “lesbians born female only” social events.
“We have witnessed the demise of our culture and lesbian space since the early 1990s … in part because of the rise of mainstream LGBTIQ+ and also because of diversity and inclusion laws which currently make it illegal for lesbians to hold public female-only functions without applying for an exemption with the Human Rights Commission,” the group said.
The AHRC rejected the exemption, finding that although it would be legal for the Lesbian Action Group to ban men and heterosexual women, it could not discriminate against transgender lesbian women.
The group lost an appeal in the Administrative Appeals Tribunal but a challenge in the Federal Court has been stayed pending the outcome of the Giggle v Tickle appeal.
The group argues in its submission that undermining the sex-based protections of the Sex Discrimination Act “denies autonomy, dignity and safety” to lesbians.
There are “dangers in a male capable, or giving the appearance of being capable, of procreation being classified by the law as a female, despite the best intentions of gender ideology”, says the submission, prepared by Melbourne barristers Leigh Howard and Megan Blake.
“It is the lived experience of lesbians to be confronted by autogynephilic men (those who become sexually aroused by the idea of themselves as women) seeking lesbian attention, as a means of generating sexual gratification for themselves.
“It is now commonplace for lesbians to be pressured into having sex with transwomen, and to face risk of social isolation if they do not agree with that very concept. This is unacceptable.
“The appeal must proceed on the basis that the Giggle app is intended to be used by women (members of the female sex) to the exclusion of Ms Tickle (a member of the male sex).
“Construing the Sex Discrimination Act in this way properly accommodates the needs of members of the female sex, and does not diminish any protection afforded to Ms Tickle and the broader transgender community by the act.
“This community, like members of the female sex, can establish their own special measures.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109298
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314404 (120932ZJUL25) Notable: No joke: trans woman wants $40k because female-only app founder giggled at caricature – Transgender woman Roxanne Tickle is seeking at least $40,000 from Giggle app founder Sall Grover, arguing a brief laugh at a caricature during last year’s Federal Court hearing compounded discrimination. Justice Robert Bromwich had already awarded Tickle $10,000, finding Grover’s response “offensive and belittling.” In a cross-appeal, Tickle argues the sum was “manifestly inadequate” and seeks aggravated damages over public comments and misgendering. Grover, who is appealing the ruling, said her laugh was an involuntary reaction. The Federal Court will hear both the appeal and cross-appeal in August.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109282
>>109297
No joke: trans woman wants $40k because female-only app founder giggled at caricature
STEPHEN RICE - July 09, 2025
1/2
Transgender woman Roxanne Tickle wants Giggle app founder Sall Grover to pay her at least $40,000 because the female-only platform creator laughed in court when shown a caricature of Tickle during cross-examination in a sex discrimination hearing last year.
Grover and her Giggle platform are appealing a Federal Court ruling last year that they indirectly discriminated against Ms Tickle when they rejected her from the app because she did not appear to be female.
Tickle is also appealing parts of that decision, arguing judge Robert Bromwich should have found she was the victim of direct, rather than indirect, discrimination.
Justice Bromwich awarded Tickle $10,000, in part because Grover had briefly laughed in court at “an offensive caricature” of Tickle that she had been asked to look at during cross-examination, a moment the judge found “offensive and belittling”.
“Her explanation, that it was funny in the context of the courtroom, was obviously disingenuous,” he said.
Grover told The Australian: “It was just this moment of such ridiculousness that I was in this high stakes, incredibly stressful time, when you’re sitting in the witness box in Federal Court and they turn to a cartoon meme, and I just burst out laughing.
“It wouldn’t have even been three seconds, it was just a complete involuntary human response to something and the judge said that that caused Tickle harm. It’s just ridiculous.”
Justice Bromwich declined to award aggravated damages over the incident because he accepted that Grover was “expressing a genuine, if (as I accept) hurtful belief that Ms Tickle is a man”.
In a cross-appeal submission obtained by The Australian, Tickle claims the $10,000 general damages award was “manifestly inadequate” and she should be awarded at least $30,000 in general damages, and at least $10,000 in aggravated damages.
Tickle says the hurt caused was more than “slight” and came on top of “disparaging and hurtful comments by Ms Grover in public forums about transgender women”.
Tickle claims she should have been awarded aggravated damages because Grover “engaged in a sustained attack on Ms Tickle’s integrity and gender identity, infused with innuendo that Ms Tickle, and indeed transgender women more generally, pose a threat or danger to cisgender women”.
Tickle also complains about “the constant and continual misgendering of Ms Tickle by Ms Grover and Giggle throughout the earlier proceedings” as well as Grover’s “campaign” based on gender identity.
Grover’s refusal to provide Tickle with access to the app “because she did not appear to be a cisgender woman” was direct and unlawful discrimination under the Sex Discrimination Act, Tickle’s submission argues.
According to the submission prepared by silk Georgina Costello, the trial judge wrongly concluded that to find discrimination by reason of a person’s gender identity, the discriminator must first be aware of the person’s gender identity.
The legislation’s deliberately broad definition of “gender identity” was intended to confer broad protection from discrimination, the submission argues, so it didn’t matter whether Grover was aware that Tickle identified as a woman.
In any event, the submission argues, Grover and Giggle clearly had a policy of excluding both men and transgender women from the Giggle App.
Their exclusion of Tickle from the app, followed by a refusal to re-admit, “demonstrated a pattern of delegitimising Ms Tickle’s gender identity”.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109299
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314434 (120956ZJUL25) Notable: Video: ‘Enormous value’: UK’s top AUKUS envoy insists the pact delivers for the US – Sir Stephen Lovegrove, the UK’s special envoy on AUKUS, said Australia’s “massive” contributions to the submarine pact provide “enormous value” to Washington despite the Trump administration’s snap review. He told ABC’s 7.30 that US defence agencies strongly backed AUKUS, with Australia funding the American submarine industrial base and developing a maintenance hub in Western Australia to keep more Virginia-class boats at sea. While noting “schedule is king,” Lovegrove said he was confident the UK would boost production capacity and all three nations remained committed to meeting 2027 milestones.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73634 (pb)
'Enormous value': UK's top AUKUS envoy insists the pact delivers for the US
Stephen Dziedzic - 9 Jul 2025
1/2
The United Kingdom's top AUKUS envoy has backed Australia's "massive" contributions to the defence technology pact, saying the agreement delivers "enormous value" to the US and its two military allies.
The US Department of Defense caught Australia by surprise in May when it kickstarted an internal snap review of AUKUS, saying it wanted to ensure it was aligned with Donald Trump's "America First" agenda.
Former top British civil servant Sir Stephen Lovegrove — who conducted the UK's own review of the AUKUS pact before being appointed as Prime Minister Keir Starmer's special envoy — is visiting Australia for talks with senior officials and top brass.
He told ABC's 7.30 program that he was "not worried" about the Trump administration's review, because AUKUS enjoyed "huge" support in Washington DC, and delivered major benefits to the US.
"The US Navy is right behind it; I speak to them a lot. The State Department is very much behind it [and] many players in the Defence Department are completely engaged in AUKUS and everything it brings to the US," he said.
"So I'm pretty comfortable that we'll end up with the right answer for the US, Australia and the UK — this is a critical, critical program."
The senior Trump administration official conducting the AUKUS review, Elbridge Colby, has warned the US will only be able to sell Virginia Class submarines to Australia under AUKUS if it succeeds in lifting its own pace of production to at least two boats a year.
Australia is already pouring billions of dollars into the US submarine industrial base under AUKUS, but Sir Lovegrove said Australia's promise to develop a submarine maintenance hub in Western Australia would also make it easier for US Navy to keep more boats in the water.
"Clearly one of the things that they're going to be looking at is whether or not they're building [the Virginia Class submarines] fast enough, but one of the other crucial things they're going to be looking at is the massive contribution that Australia is making by allowing Western Australia to be used as a maintenance and sustainment hub," he said.
"And that will mean that there are many more Virginias which are capable of being put to sea. So this is a real win-win for all of the nations."
Under AUKUS both US and UK submarines will begin to rotate through the HMAS Stirling naval base from as early as 2027, and the federal government has promised to plough more than $120 million into transforming the nearby Henderson shipyard into a precinct which can service nuclear-powered submarines.
But earlier this week the former US Navy Secretary Richard Spencer warned that Australia needed to move more quickly to upgrade both HMAS Stirling and the Henderson shipyard, to ensure they were ready by 2027.
"We need to start moving dirt, putting the infrastructure in, because 2027 is going to be here within the blink of an eye," he told The Nightly.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109300
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314507 (121042ZJUL25) Notable: If we go to war, submarines come too: How US could demand AUKUS changes – Australia faces pressure from a Trump administration review led by undersecretary of defence Elbridge Colby, who may demand Canberra pay more for submarines and guarantee their use in a conflict over Taiwan. Sources say Colby questions selling Virginia-class subs while US production lags, and wants assurances Australia’s boats would fight under US command. The review has divided Washington, with the State Department and Congress backing AUKUS while Pentagon sceptics push for tougher terms. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, soon to meet Xi Jinping, risks political fallout as debates continue.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
If we go to war, submarines come too: How US could demand AUKUS changes
Paul Sakkal and Michael Koziol - July 10, 2025
1/2
Australia is facing the prospect of a Trump administration review demanding it pay more for submarines under the $368 billion AUKUS pact and guarantee the boats support the US in a conflict over Taiwan.
Sources familiar with the review by Trump’s undersecretary of defence, Elbridge Colby, believe he intends to urge major changes to the program before Australia can get the nuclear submarines it has been promised.
The review puts Anthony Albanese in a politically difficult position as the prime minister prepares to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping during a six-day trip to China next week.
But the Trump administration is not united behind Colby’s thinking, according to former aides, with foreign policy a major sticking point in the Republican Party.
The review from Colby, who works for the Pentagon and is sceptical of selling US submarines to Australia, blindsided Marco Rubio’s State Department when it was revealed in press reports last month. The State Department sent its diplomats a message: “We are not aware of a review of the AUKUS agreement.”
Interviews with three Australian sources with direct knowledge of the AUKUS review and American defence experts who worked on the submarine project believe the probe will recommend amending rather than scrapping the deal brokered by former leaders Joe Biden, Scott Morrison and Boris Johnson.
Two Australian officials said one option for Colby was to seek more money for the US submarine industry, which Australia is already contributing $4.7 billion towards.
Two other Australian sources, one in the political establishment and one in defence who have both spoken to Colby, said Colby believed Australia should give a public declaration or private guarantee that US-made nuclear submarines would be used in a possible conflict with China.
Colby is on record as saying the US is not building enough Virginia-class subs for its own needs, even before selling Australia a minimum of three from 2030.
It is not clear if Colby’s boss, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, or the broader White House support those ideas. The administration is split between isolationists, old school Republican globalists, and those who see China as the biggest threat, of which Colby is one.
The Pentagon last week moved to pause weapons deliveries to Ukraine at Colby’s urging, but Trump reversed the move just days later. Foreign policy chaos in the White House has made it difficult for Australian officials to gauge how much impact the undersecretary’s review will have.
One senior Australian official said Colby’s scepticism about selling submarines was not widespread.
“People are mistaking Colby as being the only driver of opinion in the US,” the source said, on condition of anonymity. “He’s an important voice, but not the only voice. There are multiple views about AUKUS within the US administration.”
Jennifer Hendrixson White, a former US official who was the lead negotiator for the AUKUS legislation in the Senate, also indicated Rubio’s department was caught off guard by Colby’s review, and said the State Department and Congress supported AUKUS.
She said leasing rather than selling the submarine was a subject of intense debate when the legislation was passed.
“It’s reasonable to expect the new team will want to put their mark on the agreement, but I don’t expect they will jettison it entirely,” White said. “With this team, there’s always a desire to increase leverage and ‘get a better deal’.
“If I was in London or Canberra, I would count on increased defence spending being one of the things the Administration is looking for. They have made similar requests across the board with other allies and partners.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109301
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314548 (121110ZJUL25) Notable: No missiles … but Defence can fire off a cookbook for ‘harmony’ – Defence’s Guided Weapons and Explosive Ordnance Group, tasked with building a $20bn missile industry, has produced a $1800 “Taste of Harmony” cookbook instead, featuring recipes from staff and commander Air Marshal Leon Phillips. Senior officers ordered the book buried amid frustration over slow progress on missile production and looming job cuts. Defence Minister Richard Marles is planning a major departmental shake-up as costs blow out under AUKUS. Opposition figures ridiculed the cookbook, saying taxpayers expect missiles, not menus, while industry sources warned the project had failed to deliver.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109281
No missiles … but Defence can fire off a cookbook for ‘harmony’
BEN PACKHAM - July 09, 2025
1/2
They say an army marches on its stomach and so too does Defence’s Guided Weapons and Explosive Ordnance Group, which has produced a “Taste of Harmony” cookbook with taxpayers’ funds.
The group, headed by Air Marshal Leon Phillips, has its work cut out establishing a $20bn-plus domestic missile manufacturing industry – a goal that remains a distant one.
But Phillips believes the “incredible power” of food will help his team get the job done, authorising an $1800 print run of the recipe book to celebrate Harmony Week earlier this year.
“In line with this year’s theme of ‘Everyone Belongs’, this book serves as a reminder that every member of GWEO group is valued as we work together towards our shared purpose,” he says in the book’s foreword.
“I encourage each of you to continue to embrace our shared values and create an environment where everyone truly belongs.”
The group’s staff contributed their favourite recipes, including a Chinese-inspired “Mystery meat stir fry”, and a “Loaded potato soup”.
Phillips, a keen amateur gourmet, shares his recipe for Spaghetti ai gamberi, urging his subordinates to “pair this meal with great company and a lovely dry riesling”.
But not everyone shares his passion for food-led team building, with orders coming down for the book to be buried amid high-level concerns over the GWEO group’s progress.
The Australian obtained a copy of the culinary compendium as Defence’s most senior officers braced for news of looming job cuts, with dozens of commanders and senior public service executives set to face the chop.
Defence Minister Richard Marles has ordered sweeping reforms to his department, warning “everything is on the table” amid tensions over budget blowouts and delays in getting new weapons and equipment into service.
The Australian revealed this week that up to 25 star-ranked Australian Defence Force officers could be drummed out, while 20 to 40 public service executive positions could be cut.
It’s understood senior commanders will be briefed on the changes in coming days. There was speculation in military circles this week that Defence could waive a requirement preventing former officers from taking consulting jobs for 12 months after entering civilian life.
The GWEO group faces being rolled into a new armaments directorate with the department’s vast and underperforming Capability Acquisition and Sustainment Group and its Naval Shipbuilding and Sustainment Group.
The bureaucratic shake-up would leave Phillips fighting for his job, while CASG head Chris Deeble could also be vulnerable.
Mr Marles said in April 2023 he was “confident” Australia could begin producing guided missiles within two years, but there has been little progress on the GWEO initiative.
One well-placed industry source said: “I’d be cautious about any cooking times suggested in the cookbook given the amount of time it’s taking for the missile plan to come to a boil.
“They just haven’t done anything. They’re meant to be delivering a whole lot of locally-made missiles to increase our stocks for times of war and that just hasn’t progressed beyond orders for foreign missiles that are already in our catalogue.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109302
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314590 (121139ZJUL25) Notable: ‘Central base of operations’: Australia-US alliance carved into the landscape – Facilities like Western Australia’s Harold E Holt station and Pine Gap in the Northern Territory highlight Australia’s critical role in US war planning, relaying messages to submarines and providing early warning of nuclear attack. New AUKUS radar and submarine hubs, as well as US bomber and Marine rotations, reinforce Australia’s position as what US congressman Michael McCaul called “the central base of operations” against China. Defence Minister Richard Marles stresses these joint sites operate with “full knowledge and concurrence,” but analysts warn their importance makes them prime targets in any conflict.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109299
‘Central base of operations’: Australia-US alliance carved into the landscape
BEN PACKHAM - July 11, 2025
1/3
Etched into the ancient red sands of Western Australia’s Northwest Cape is a network of dirt roads that, seen from above, carve a mysterious network of geometric shapes into the landscape.
For most Australians, clinging to the continent’s east and southwest coasts, the Harold E Holt Naval Communications Station is out of sight and out of mind.
Towering radio masts rise from its central point and each corner of its two hexagonal ring roads, broadcasting very-low frequency signals to Australian and US submarines, including nuclear-armed American “boomers”.
As Australians recoil from Donald Trump, Anthony Albanese has pointedly asserted Australia’s independence in its relationship with the US, praising wartime leader John Curtin in a speech last Saturday for giving the nation the confidence “to think and act for ourselves”.
But the reality is that Australia’s security is so tightly wound up with the US’s strategic posture that the two would be almost impossible to disentangle.
The isolated Harold E Holt station, pictured in a stunning aerial photograph taken last September, is just one example of the array of facilities on Australian soil that would play a critical role in a US war with China.
It’s possible, though Australians will never know, the station’s transmitters relayed messages to the Ohio-class submarine that launched 30 Tomahawk missiles on Iranian nuclear sites last month.
Nearly 1700km southeast as the crow flies is another more well-known national security installation, Pine Gap. It’s been ingrained in the national consciousness, inspiring sporadic protests and one of Midnight Oil’s most famous songs – Power and the Passion. (“Flat chat, Pine Gap, in every home a Big Mac. And no one goes outback, that’s that.”)
Few know, however, that this joint Australian-US facility 18km south of Alice Springs gives the US 20-30 minutes advance warning time of a Russian or Chinese nuclear attack.
That’s long enough for whoever is in the White House to launch a devastating counterstrike. It’s this guarantee of mutually assured destruction that, theoretically, keeps America’s enemies from pressing the button, and gives credibility to the US’s extended nuclear umbrella that protects its allies, including Australia.
Top secret files leaked by former NSA officer Edward Snowden confirmed Pine Gap, codenamed “RAINFALL”, also “plays a significant role in supporting both intelligence activities and military operations”, feeding in signals intelligence to the US’s ECHELON surveillance program.
Its capabilities include the geolocation of individuals from their mobile phone signals, allowing them to be assassinated by drone strikes.
These sites and a handful of others are the physical manifestations of the Australia-US alliance. Together with new “force posture initiates” allowing the US military to operate from Australian soil, they are critical to America’s war plans. They are what Defence Minister Richard Marles was talking about when he pointed to the contribution Australia’s geography would make to any conflict between the US and China.
“Our continent is more relevant to great power contest now than it’s ever been before,” he told The Australian’s Defending Australia summit in June.
“That is as much of a question in the here and now as is the building up of our defence capability.”
Marles is right. But he is tiptoeing around just how strategically important Australia has become to its closest ally.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109303
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314599 (121143ZJUL25) Notable: Penny Wong issues warning on Chinese threat as Anthony Albanese prepares to fly to Beijing – Foreign Minister Penny Wong has warned that China’s nuclear and military build-up was accelerating “without the transparency that the region expects.” Senator Wong, in Malaysia for meetings with Southeast Asian counterparts, said: “What we seek is a balance of power, where no country dominates and no country is dominated.” Her remarks set the stage for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s six-day China visit, where he will meet Xi Jinping while resisting US pressure to double defence spending. Taiwan’s envoy Douglas Hsu urged stronger ties with Canberra and support for Taipei’s CPTPP bid.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109276
>>109288
Penny Wong issues warning on Chinese threat as Anthony Albanese prepares to fly to Beijing
BEN PACKHAM - July 10, 2025
1/2
Foreign Minister Penny Wong has expressed alarm over Beijing’s strategic ambitions and surging military capabilities, two days before Anthony Albanese departs for a six-day visit to China that will be closely watched in Washington for any signs of Australian kowtowing.
Speaking in Malaysia, Senator Wong said Australia didn’t agree with all of Donald Trump’s policies, but strongly supported an ongoing US presence in the Indo-Pacific as a vital counterweight to China’s efforts to shift the regional balance of power in its favour.
“China continues to assert its strategic influence and project its military power further into our region,” Senator Wong told the Institute for Strategic and International Studies.
“And we have seen the worrying pace of China’s nuclear and conventional military build-up, without the transparency that the region expects.”
The sharp assessment comes as Taiwan’s envoy to Australia, Douglas Hsu, warns China is intensifying military and “grey zone” threats against the self-governed territory, prompting Taipei to step up its preparations for a potential invasion.
Writing in The Australian, Mr Hsu urges the Albanese government to help bring Taiwan further into the international system by ramping up bilateral ties and supporting its bid to join one of the world’s biggest trading blocs.
He says the territory is “perfectly positioned to meet the high standards” of the 12-nation Comprehensive and Progressive Trans Pacific Partnership, which Australia is chairing this year. Beijing is also pushing to join the CPTPP, while vehemently opposing Taiwan’s application, and is expected to ramp up lobbying of the Prime Minister over the issue during his visit from Saturday.
Mr Albanese will have his fourth meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping during the trip but has been unable to secure his first face-to-face with the US President amid a snap Pentagon review of the AUKUS submarine pact and his government’s refusal to agree to the Trump administration’s demands for a near doubling of the defence budget.
The Prime Minister pushed back against the White House in a speech last Saturday, lauding wartime Labor prime minister John Curtin for refusing to outsource foreign policy and giving Australians the confidence to speak “for ourselves, as a sovereign state”. He reportedly sharpened his remarks in a subsequent question-and-answer session, saying he was a supporter of AUKUS, “but that doesn’t mean that we are subservient to any other country”.
Senator Wong, in Malaysia for meetings with Southeast Asian counterparts, sought to set the tone for Mr Albanese’s China visit, urging Beijing to “wield its strength in a way that contributes to its security and economic resilience”. She said Australia was realistic about China’s intention to assert its influence as a major regional power, while urging it not to provoke a clash with the US. “None of us, including the United States, seeks military confrontation with China – in the South China Sea, the East China Sea or across the Taiwan Strait,” Senator Wong said.
“What we seek is a balance of power, where no country dominates and no country is dominated.”
She said Australia’s realistic assessment of China’s place in the region was behind the government’s efforts to stabilise the Australia-China relationship, and strengthen its partnerships with the rest of the region.
Her speech follows a warning by Treasurer Jim Chalmers that Australia will continue to rebuff Chinese calls for the weakening of foreign investment rules barring its companies from taking stakes in critical infrastructure, energy, data and minerals ventures.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109304
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314635 (121215ZJUL25) Notable: COMMENTARY: Strengthening ties with Taiwan need not upset Beijing – “Under Xi Jinping’s rule, the past 13 years have seen a dramatic transformation in China’s strategic posture and military ambitions. Xi’s China has militarised the South China Sea in defiance of international law. It has weaponised trade and levied punitive sanctions on Taiwan’s agricultural products, as well as Australian wine, beef, barley and coal. I ask the Prime Minister to reflect on what is unfolding across the Taiwan Strait: 23 million patriotic Taiwanese are rehearsing for a full-scale invasion, with drills designed to gauge how fast they can pivot from weekday routine to wartime survival. Taiwan stands ready to deepen our partnership with Australia. With global trade policy uncertainty at a 50-year high, Taiwan offers collaboration and innovation anchored in an open, rules-based trading order where no country shall coerce or dominate another.” – Douglas Hsu, Taiwan’s chief representative in Australia - The Australian
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109276
>>109288
>>109303
COMMENTARY: Strengthening ties with Taiwan need not upset Beijing
Douglas Hsu - July 11, 2025
1/2
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will touch down in China on Saturday for a historic seven-day visit. While dialogue and mutually beneficial co-operation are important, Australians know successful engagement requires an understanding that China’s political system prioritises state power over all else. Under Xi Jinping’s rule, the past 13 years have seen a dramatic transformation in China’s strategic posture and military ambitions.
Xi’s China has militarised the South China Sea in defiance of international law. It has imposed its will on Hong Kong, undercutting its long-agreed autonomy. It has weaponised trade and levied punitive trade sanctions on Taiwan’s agricultural products, as well as Australian wine, beef, barley and coal. China has become more openly aggressive in the Taiwan Strait, increasing both the frequency and intensity of its military threats and grey-zone activities. These actions continue: last Monday China unilaterally activated a west-to-east flight path, challenging Taiwan’s situation awareness and betraying a decade-long commitment to consult on such moves. This has further heightened regional tensions.
Engaging with the Australian public through the lens of China always seems to me to do a disservice to the important story my country of Taiwan is writing. Taiwan is a world-class maritime trading power with a sophisticated economy and cutting-edge tech sector. The island has an exemplary track record of meeting international trade obligations. It’s perfectly positioned to meet the high standards required by agreements such as the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans Pacific Partnership, or CPTPP.
During his post-election visit to Indonesia, the Prime Minister offered support for Jakarta’s CPTPP application. This is welcomed because “trade liberalisation serves the collective good”, as former DFAT secretary Peter Varghese has written for the Lowy Institute. Geopolitics, not economic and trade merit, appears to be determining the queue, given Taiwan’s CPTPP application was lodged in September 2021. It’s time to put prosperity over politics and move Taiwan’s CPTPP application forward. As CPTPP chair this year, Australia has the chance to focus on real economic opportunity, which helps fulfil the potential of this gold-standard agreement.
Taiwan’s true muscle is witnessed daily in our humming semiconductor fabs, which produce 90 per cent of the world’s most advanced chips, essential for a huge range of applications that power our daily life and fuel our ambitions. Few realise these facilities will soon consume more than 12 per cent of Taiwan’s electricity – largely from gas-fired power plants fuelled by Australian LNG – underlining the critical energy relationship between our economies.
Taiwan is a natural partner for the Albanese government’s economic agenda. Our semiconductor expertise can play a substantial role in supporting the Future Made in Australia vision, from critical minerals processing to advanced manufacturing. Our AI leadership spans chip design to responsible development frameworks. While others seek to dominate, Taiwan partners.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109305
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314662 (121238ZJUL25) Notable: ‘Stable ties’ with Beijing as Chinese spy ships head our way – Defence officials expect Chinese surveillance vessels to monitor Talisman Sabre 2025 as Anthony Albanese embarks on a five-day visit to China, including meetings with Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang. Albanese said he would raise “the full range of issues,” from Taiwan and South China Sea navigation to the detention of Yang Hengjun, insisting “We co-operate where we can and we disagree where we must.” Penny Wong warned of a “permanent state of competition” with Beijing, while Michaelia Cash urged Albanese to reinforce support for the US presence.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109276
>>109303
‘Stable ties’ with Beijing as Chinese spy ships head our way
BEN PACKHAM - July 11, 2025
1/2
Defence officials are bracing for the arrival of Chinese spy ships off Australia’s coast in coming days as Anthony Albanese prepares to press the flesh with the country’s President, Xi Jinping, during a record five-day trip taking in Shanghai, Beijing and panda capital Chengdu.
The Prime Minister, who departs for China on Saturday, will use the visit to highlight his government’s efforts to stabilise ties with the nation’s biggest trading partner, while sidestepping difficult questions on Beijing’s strategic intentions.
The trip coincides with the start of Australia’s largest military exercise, Talisman Sabre, which is expected to be watched at a distance by multiple Chinese surveillance ships after it gets under way on Sunday.
A Defence spokeswoman told The Australian: “It would not be unusual or unexpected for China to monitor Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025, as it has during previous iterations of this exercise. Defence monitors all traffic in our maritime approaches.”
The biennial war games will bring together military personnel and equipment from 19 nations for land, air, sea, space and cyber exercises, offering a rich intelligence-gathering opportunity for Beijing, which has sent spy ships to lurk off Queensland for the past three Talisman Sabres.
Mr Albanese, who is yet to meet Donald Trump in person, will have his fourth meeting with Mr Xi during the trip, as well as annual talks with Chinese Premier Li Qiang, and a sit-down with National People’s Congress chairman Zhao Leji.
The visit is the longest by an Australian prime minister to China in living memory and comes amid tensions between Australia and the US over the Prime Minister’s refusal to lift defence spending and the Pentagon’s snap review of the AUKUS submarine program.
It comes just over six months after Beijing lifted the last of its $20bn worth of punitive trade bans on Australian exporters. Australia’s biggest companies are keen to leverage the improvement in relations, with Mr Albanese to be accompanied by a delegation of CEOs led by the Business Council of Australia.
China will attempt to drive a further wedge between Australia and its closest ally during the trip by urging closer trade co-operation to counter Mr Trump’s tariff chaos. It is expected to renew its calls for Australia to back its bid to join the 12-nation trans-Pacific trade deal, seek the relaxation of Australia’s foreign investment rules, and urge co-operation on artificial intelligence. All are red lines for Canberra.
Beijing is also likely to pressure Mr Albanese to abandon his pledge to force Chinese-owned company Landbridge to relinquish its lease over the Port of Darwin, amid government silence on the issue since the election.
Mr Albanese said he would raise the “full range of issues” in the nations’ bilateral relationship in his closed-door talks with China’s leaders. These will include a call for the release of detained Australian writer Yang Hengjun, and for Beijing to maintain the status quo on Taiwan and allow freedom of navigation in the South China Sea.
“We co-operate where we can and we disagree where we must, and we’re able to have those honest conversations about some of the disagreements that are there,” Mr Albanese said on Friday.
“Australia and China have different political systems. We have, therefore, different values that are reflected in those political systems. But we have got to be able to have that engagement directly and that is what we will be doing.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109306
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314682 (121250ZJUL25) Notable: Anthony Albanese lands in China, while Australian Defence officials brace for arrival of spy ships – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has landed in Shanghai for a record five-day visit, calling it “wonderful” to return to Australia’s largest trading partner. He will meet Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang, promote a new tourism deal, and attend panda diplomacy events in Chengdu. The trip highlights economic ties worth $312bn annually, with Albanese noting “one in four of Australia’s jobs depends on our exports.” Meanwhile, Defence expects Chinese spy ships to shadow Talisman Sabre 2025, a three-week exercise involving 19 nations and over 30,000 personnel.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109276
>>109303
Anthony Albanese lands in China, while Australian Defence officials brace for arrival of spy ships
BEN PACKHAM - 12 July 2025
Anthony Albanese will look to lure thousands more cashed-up Chinese tourists to Australia as he begins his record five-day charm offensive in Shanghai on Sunday.
Arriving in China’s financial capital just before 8pm AEST Saturday, the Prime Minister declared it was “wonderful” to be back in the country that supports millions of Australian jobs as the nation’s biggest trading partner.
The first full day of his visit will be spent spruiking Australia’s tourism drawcards and launching a reworked marketing campaign amid a slower than expected rebound in visitor arrivals from China.
Mr Albanese said it was a “great honour” to represent Australia during the trip, which will include high-level talks with Xi Jinping and Chinese Premier Li Qiang in Beijing, and a visit to panda breeding capital Chengdu.
The meeting with President Xi will be Mr Albanese’s fourth, underscoring his failure so far to secure a first face-to-face meeting with US President Donald Trump.
The visit comes as Defence officials in Australia brace for the arrival of one or more Chinese spy ships off Australia’s coast in coming days to monitor the nation’s biggest military exercise, Talisman Sabre.
The three-week long exercise opens Sunday and will involve 19 nations, including the US and Japan, and more than 30,000 personnel.
In China, Mr Albanese will oversee a new deal between Tourism Australia and Trip.com, before holding a media event with the Shanghai Port Football Club, coached by former Socceroo Kevin Muscat.
A revamped version of the 2022 “Come and Say G’Day” campaign, starring a toy kangaroo called Ruby voiced by actor Rose Byrne, will also be released, featuring popular Chinese actor Yu Shi.
The latest Bureau of Statistics data showed short term visitor arrivals in Australia at 8.5 per cent below 2019 levels, with the market out of China among the slowest to return. In the 12 months to April, New Zealand accounted for 19 per cent of all visitor arrivals followed by China at 12 per cent and the UK at 9 per cent.
While trailing New Zealand on arrivals, China outpaces all other markets on spend, which was valued at $9.2bn a year
The Prime Minister, who is accompanied by a major business delegation, said the trip “speaks to the importance of the economic relationship between Australia and China”.
“We know that one in four of Australia’s jobs depends on our exports, and China is our major trading partner, with exports to China being worth more in value than the next four countries combined,” he said on the tarmac after his RAAF jet touched down.
“This week, we will have important meetings about tourism, about decarbonisation of steel, about the full range of issues.”
Mr Albanese is likely to sidestep questions about strategic tensions between Australia and China during the trip, which Foreign Minister Penny Wong highlighted last week warning China’s massive military build-up was destabilising the region.
She urged Beijing not to provoke a clash with the US, which has warned Beijing is preparing to invade Taiwan.
A Defence spokeswoman told The Australian on Friday: “It would not be unusual or unexpected for China to monitor Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025, as it has during previous iterations of this exercise. Defence monitors all traffic in our maritime approaches.”
The presence of Chinese warships off Australia’s coast will revive memories of the heavily-armed flotilla of Chinese warships that conducted a surprise live-fire drill in the Tasman Sea in February before circumnavigating the country in an unprecedented show of force.
ANU international law expert Don Rothwell said given that experience, “the government may feel the need to conduct a more robust response to the presence of the PLAN offshore Australia’s coast”.
Mr Albanese was met at the airport by Australia’s Ambassador to China Scott Dewar, China’s Ambassador to Australia Xiao Qian, and received a bouquet of flowers from two young children.
The visit is the longest by an Australian prime minister to China in living memory and comes amid tensions between Australia and the US over the Prime Minister’s refusal to lift defence spending and the Pentagon’s snap review of the AUKUS submarine program.
China is far and away Australia’s largest trading partner, with total two-way goods and services trade valued at $312bn in 2024 – more than Australia’s next three trading partners combined.
The trip comes just over six months after Beijing lifted the last of its $20bn worth of punitive trade bans on Australian exporters.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/anthony-albanese-lands-in-china-while-australian-defence-officials-brace-for-arrival-of-spy-ships/news-story/c6bac717094b6919d77bfc8b5defd43f
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109307
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314703 (121302ZJUL25) Notable: In the hills of Australia, Pacific allies are training to fight Beijing – Japanese and Australian artillery crews joined US Marines in a live-fire drill near Townsville during Southern Jackaroo, underscoring deepening military integration aimed at deterring China. About 3000 troops took part, the largest since the exercise began in 2013. The training comes as Beijing expands naval and air activity across the region, prompting allies to boost readiness. Southern Jackaroo precedes Talisman Sabre 2025, involving 19 nations and 30,000 personnel. Analysts say Australia, Japan and the US are sharpening collective deterrence. Commanders stressed integration is improving each year, overcoming differences in language and procedure.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
In the hills of Australia, Pacific allies are training to fight Beijing
MIKE CHERNEY, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL - 12 July 2025
1/2
In the rugged hills outside the Queensland coastal city of Townsville, Japanese and Australian artillery crews fired in tandem on a distant target. They were assisted by US Marines, who were embedded with the Australian gun teams.
The live-fire drill was the culmination of Southern Jackaroo, an expanding annual exercise in the Australian bush in which the three nations’ forces practise working together as allies.
Although top officers didn’t call out any foe by name, troops taking part said it was clear that they were training to fight China.
As Beijing’s military steadily expands its forays in the Pacific, US allies in the region are realising they could easily be drawn into a conflict with China. They are responding by bolstering their forces and increasing joint drills to ensure they can work together seamlessly.
A primary goal of the combined displays of force is to complicate Beijing’s planning and convince the Chinese leadership that it would be too risky to use military force to assert territorial claims.
Australia and Japan, both of which have security pacts with the US, have emerged as essential US partners in the Pacific. If a war were to erupt, Washington would want Tokyo to sign off on the US using its Japanese bases to confront China and for Australia to send aircraft, ships and troops to Japan to help the fight, some defence analysts say.
“If there’s any argument to be made for a collective approach to deterrence in the region, it’s these three countries,” said Jeffrey Hornung, the Japan lead at Rand, a think tank.
On Friday, the US, Japan and Australia further bolstered their co-operation with a new naval logistics agreement that covers activities such as refuelling and reloading missile systems, which could be vital to improving their defences.
Australia is also gearing up to host the three-week Talisman Sabre exercise opening Sunday. The exercise will involve 19 nations, including the US and Japan, and more than 30,000 personnel.
Multinational manoeuvres are the new normal as the US and its allies prepare for a possible confrontation with China over Taiwan, the self-governing democratic island that Beijing claims as its territory.
China has spent years building up its military – it now has the world’s largest navy – and is using that extra heft to expand its influence, including in areas beyond the “first island chain,” which includes Japan, Taiwan and the Philippines.
China sent an aircraft carrier group to waters east of Iwo Jima, a remote Japanese island, for the first time in June, prompting alerts from Tokyo. In another foray this year, China conducted naval drills near Australia.
At the same time, Beijing has continued to send its armed forces into the waters and airspace around Taiwan. It has expanded its operations in the disputed South China Sea near the Philippines and is increasing its activities in the Yellow Sea, a strategic area between mainland China and the Korean Peninsula.
“The Chinese are stretching their legs,” said Kelly Magsamen, who was chief of staff to US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin in the Biden administration.
“Their military modernisation has been at a pace that is pretty astounding. And then once you create a military, you start using your military, and you start pushing further and farther afield.”
Beijing has accused the US and its allies of spreading false accusations about the threat from China, and it has denounced the drills as provocations that disrupt peace and stability.
Training is picking up all over the region. In one recent exercise, US tilt-rotor Osprey aircraft carried Marines and Philippine troops to beaches and a nearby airfield where they practised repelling an adversary. In another, F-35 jet fighters from the US, Japan and Australia trained together for the first time in Guam, a US island territory with an expanding military role.
About 3000 troops took part in this year’s Southern Jackaroo, the most since the exercise started in 2013.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109308
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314748 (121328ZJUL25) Notable: Meet the Japanese marines getting ready to storm Australian beaches – Japan’s amphibious rapid deployment brigade (ARDB), created in 2018 amid tensions with China, has grown to 3000 troops and will deploy 450 marines, two destroyers and a tank landing ship for Talisman Sabre 2025. Commanding officer Maj Gen Toshikatsu Musha said working with Australian and US forces would “strengthen our mutual understanding and also strengthen interoperability.” Analysts said training now reflects “actual contingencies” such as Taiwan or the Korean Peninsula, with the ARDB focused on defending Japan’s Senkaku Islands, which China also claims. For the unit’s soldiers, Australia offers tougher seas and live-fire training.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109307
Meet the Japanese marines getting ready to storm Australian beaches
David King - July 11, 2025
1/2
They are the Japanese army’s newest fighting force – a crack group of highly trained marines whose sole purpose is to storm one of the country’s 10,000 islands and repel any invader.
For the next three weeks, they’re going to call Australia home as they prepare to land on a remote Queensland beach with US and local forces in a simulation of what they could face in a potential conflict.
The amphibious rapid deployment brigade (ARDB) was created just seven years ago as tensions mounted between Japan and China over disputed islands in the East China Sea. Since then, the brigade has grown from one regiment to three – 3000 troops in total.
This masthead was given exclusive access to the brigade’s base at Camp Ainoura, at Sasebo on the southern Japanese island of Kyushu, before the mission to Australia for Talisman Sabre, the massive international military exercise about to get under way in Sydney on Sunday.
Japan’s contingent of 1500 military personnel is its largest deployment to the exercise so far and will include 450 Japanese marines as well as two navy destroyers, a tank landing ship and amphibious vehicles.
Commanding officer major general Toshikatsu Musha said the chance to test his troops with Australian and US forces was extremely valuable, and he was looking forward to more challenging conditions than the calm waters around their training base.
“The higher the waves we have, the better training we can have. So it’s very beneficial to us,” he said.
“Another benefit is we can work with the US Marine Corp and the Australian soldiers, so we can strengthen our mutual understanding and also strengthen interoperability.”
Talisman Sabre involves 30,000 personnel from 19 countries, plus three observer nations, with war games stretching from Jervis Bay in NSW to the Northern Territory and for the first time this year, Papua New Guinea. Giant warships have already started to arrive in Australia’s northern waters.
It is also the largest combined training activity between the Australian Defence Force and the United States military, which the ADF says reflects “the closeness of our alliance”.
Japan, Australia and the US are quickly stepping up their military co-operation in a strategic push against China and the exercises will be the first step in delivering a commitment from the countries’ defence ministers to work together on amphibious warfare.
Simulated beach landings near Rockhampton will involve the 31st US Marines as well as the Japanese units amid concerns in all three countries about China’s military build-up and deepening ties between North Korea and Russia.
China has sent spy ships to monitor the Talisman Sabre exercise regularly since 2017 with a keen interest in how the Japanese navy works with US and Australian forces. Defence Minister Richard Marles said he fully expects China to monitor the operation again in 2025.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109309
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314818 (121350ZJUL25) Notable: 9th Brigade, US Coast Guard join forces in 30,000 strong Talisman Sabre multi-domain warfighting – More than 30,000 personnel from 19 nations will join Talisman Sabre 2025, with one of the most striking contributions a 1400-strong task group made up mostly of reservists. Australia’s 9th Brigade and the US Coast Guard — which shipped six vessels to Darwin — will patrol communities, waterways and critical infrastructure. 9th Brigade commander Brigadier Tim Orders said reservists bring “real empathy with communities,” while US Cmdr Faith Gamboa called the deployment “a big thing for the US government.” It marks the first time a US Coast Guard Port Security unit has operated in the Indian Ocean.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
9th Brigade, US Coast Guard join forces in 30,000 strong Talisman Sabre multi-domain warfighting
Harry Brill - July 10, 2025
While the size and scale of military’s Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025 will captivate the masses, it is the contribution of a single task group that is shaping up to be the most intriguing addition to the mammoth Top End war games exercise.
Starting this weekend, more than 30,000 military personnel from across 19 nations will take to the bush, air and sea to wargame, hitting Territorians with another year of exercise deja vu.
However, at a time when a retention crisis continues to plague the ADF and heated debate surrounds the ‘younger’ generation’s’ desire to enlist, this year’s iteration comes with a positive turnout.
A 1400-strong task group, made up almost entirely of reservists, will take part in the month-long multi-domain warfighting and have been assigned the role of patrolling communities, waterways and critical infrastructure across the Top End.
The task group is made up of both Australian personnel and reservists from the US Coast Guard, who have shipped half-a-dozen vessels to Darwin especially for July.
Despite not being full-time, ‘chocos’ - as they’re colloquially referred to across the ADF - have a lot to offer operationally, according to 9th Brigade commander Brigadier Tim Orders.
“They have real empathy with (local) communities and bring a lot in terms of how we are able to connect and operate,” he said.
Brigadier Orders’ comments are backed by history, as it was ‘chocos’ who did the heavy lifting during the Kokoda Track campaign of 1942 - a series of battles waged in the jungle of Papua New Guinea.
Currently, the ADF’s reserve numbers remain relatively healthy at approximately 32,500.
However, the ADF have sought to expand that number and refine its quality, after a 2024 strategic review tabled 14 detailed recommendations.
One of the submissions was to extend the active commitment period of former permanent ADF personnel from five to 10 years, allowing military commanders to call-on a larger pool of troops in the event of an emergency.
It was also recommended the ADF raise an extra 1000 troops by 2030.
Australia is not the only nation putting more stock into their reserves.
This month, Commander Faith Gamboa of the US Coast Guard will lead a team - of which about 90 per cent are reservists - who hail from Clearwater, Florida.
“This is the first time a Port Security unit has ever been to Darwin, ever been to the Indian Ocean,” she said.
“So this is a big thing for the US government.”
While it is rare for the US Coast Guard to partake in a large, international military exercise, Commander Gamboa said she saw potential to test her troops in the waters of Darwin Harbour and beyond.
“(Our capability is) we can detect, defend and deter any kind of malign threat that’s in the intercoastal waterways or surrounding waters, as well as port spaces (and) critical infrastructure” she said.
“We have both a waterside security portion as well as a shore-side security portion, providing a layer defence in the port area.”
Exercise Talisman Sabre will run from 13 July to 4 August.
https://www.ntnews.com.au/news/9th-brigade-us-coast-guard-join-forces-in-30000-strong-talisman-sabre-multidomain-warfighting/news-story/5f9dedd96f5986e396e95603ad79c520
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109310
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314896 (121417ZJUL25) Notable: Marine Rotational Force - Darwin Tweet: (Video) Talisman Sabre locked in - press [play] now. Talisman Sabre is the largest bilateral military exercise between Australia and the United States advancing a free and open Indo-Pacific by strengthening relationships and interoperability among key allies and partners.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
U.S. Marines launch Exercise Talisman Sabre 25 in Australia’s north
Capt. John Fischer - 07.11.2025
DARWIN, Australia — U.S. Marines with the Marine Rotational Force – Darwin (MRF-D) 25.3 Marine Air-Ground Task Force (MAGTF) are taking part in Exercise Talisman Sabre 25, Australia’s largest bilateral military exercise, to enhance interoperability and strengthen ties with the Australian Defence Force and U.S. Army joint forces across the Northern Territory (NT) this month.
During the exercise, which runs from July 13 to August 4, MRF-D MAGTF Marines and Sailors will execute complex operations alongside the Australian Army’s 1st Division. The training includes airfield seizures at Timber Creek, Cloncurry, and Bootu airfields; establishment of expeditionary advanced bases (EABs) and sustainment hubs; joint and combined live-fire evolutions; and continuous airspace control of the NT through MRF-D MAGTF Marines with Marine Air Control Group 38.
“Our Marines are seizing simulated key maritime terrain and enabling freedom of maneuver for allied forces,” said Col. Jason C. Armas, commanding officer of the MRF-D 25.3 MAGTF. “This exercise is Force Design 2030, in action, right now.”
Highlights include a bilateral artillery live-fire between Kilo Battery, 3rd Battalion, 11th Marine Regiment, MRF-D 25.3, and Australia’s 8th/12th Regiment at Mount Bundey Training Area, MV-22 Osprey-supported air assault operations to secure airfields deep inland, and a historic mobile command and control node enabling continuous low signature deconfliction of fires and forces in the NT battlespace. Marines are also operating the Tactical Aviation Ground Refueling System (TAGRS) to rapidly refuel joint and combined aircraft, showcasing advanced expeditionary refueling capabilities. MRF-D’s defensive cyber capabilities will also integrate with Australian and New Zealand partners to identify simulated threats during the exercise.
Exercise Talisman Sabre is designed to improve combat readiness and strengthen the long-standing alliance between the United States and Australia. More than 35,000 personnel from 19 nations are participating this year, with the U.S. Marines playing a critical role in maneuver, fires integration, logistics support, and combined command and control.
“Everything we do is predicated on trust with our allies and partners,” said Armas. That’s how we train and that’s how we really uphold security and stability in the Asia-Pacific,” Armas said.
MRF-D has been deploying to Australia annually for more than a decade as part of the U.S. Force Posture Initiatives, enhancing regional security cooperation, crisis response capability, and combined operational proficiency.
For imagery and updates from Talisman Sabre, visit:
https://www.dvidshub.net/feature/TalismanSabre25
https://www.dvidshub.net/news/542510/us-marines-launch-exercise-talisman-sabre-25-australias-north
—
Marine Rotational Force - Darwin Tweet
Talisman Sabre locked in — press [play] now.
Talisman Sabre is the largest bilateral military exercise between Australia and the United States advancing a free and open Indo-Pacific by strengthening relationships and interoperability among key allies and partners.
https://x.com/MRFDarwin/status/1943662313866952818
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109311
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314941 (121431ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Talisman Sabre underway in Queensland - Talisman Sabre is underway in Brisbane as armed forces from several allied countries have arrived in Australia. Three US Navy ships have docked in Brisbane for routine maintenance, to resupply, and to give the more than 2,000 marines on board some rest and recovery ahead of the planned military drills. This year marks the 20th anniversary of Talisman Sabre and will have its largest participation so far, with more than 30,000 military personnel from 19 countries. The international training exercise will involve a month-long series of war games and live fire operations, aimed at strengthening allied military ties and improving interoperability. Events will be held in and around military bases in NSW, north and central Queensland, and Darwin, as well as in Papua New Guinea, hosted by their defence force. Talisman Sabre will begin next week following a ceremony at Sydney Harbour. - Sky News Australia
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109283
Talisman Sabre underway in Queensland
Sky News Australia
Jul 12, 2025
Talisman Sabre is underway in Brisbane as armed forces from several allied countries have arrived in Australia.
Three US Navy ships have docked in Brisbane for routine maintenance, to resupply, and to give the more than 2,000 marines on board some rest and recovery ahead of the planned military drills.
This year marks the 20th anniversary of Talisman Sabre and will have its largest participation so far, with more than 30,000 military personnel from 19 countries.
The international training exercise will involve a month-long series of war games and live fire operations, aimed at strengthening allied military ties and improving interoperability.
Events will be held in and around military bases in NSW, north and central Queensland, and Darwin, as well as in Papua New Guinea, hosted by their defence force.
Talisman Sabre will begin next week following a ceremony at Sydney Harbour.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ML6Q36ngF58
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109312
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23314955 (121434ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Sydney Harbour will star in a military spectacle for Exercise Talisman Sabre - Sydney Harbour will star in a military spectacle for the beginning of Exercise Talisman Sabre, the biggest wargames Australia has ever hosted. - 7NEWS Australia
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
Sydney Harbour will star in a military spectacle for Exercise Talisman Sabre
7NEWS Australia
Jul 11, 2025
Sydney Harbour will star in a military spectacle for the beginning of Exercise Talisman Sabre, the biggest wargames Australia has ever hosted.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0li1Cp6aLg
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109313
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23318879 (130856ZJUL25) Notable: PM and fiancee step out in Shanghai to kick off soccer diplomacy – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and fiancée Jodie Haydon walked The Bund with Socceroos great Kevin Muscat, now coach of Shanghai Port FC, in a bid to appeal to Xi Jinping’s love of football and strengthen personal ties ahead of formal talks. Albanese was gifted a team jersey and hailed “ambassadors” like Muscat as people-to-people links. The visit begins with tourism deals and a new “Come and Say G’Day” campaign, even as Penny Wong raised concerns with Beijing over a Chinese flotilla that conducted a live-fire drill around Australia earlier this year.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109303
>>109306
PM and fiancee step out in Shanghai to kick off soccer diplomacy
Paul Sakkal - July 12, 2025
1/2
Shanghai, China: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and his fiancee Jodie Haydon spent the morning walking The Bund with Socceroos great Kevin Muscat, using soccer as a form of diplomacy with China.
In a bid to appeal to Chinese President Xi Jinping’s love for the world game, Albanese met with Muscat, who coaches Shanghai Port FC – a club that has been flooded with funding after Xi put forward an ambitious plan to conquer world football.
The diplomatic move to engage with Muscat before formal talks between Albanese and Xi signals Australia’s aim of strengthening the personal relationship between the two leaders to ease geopolitical tensions.
Albanese was presented with a Shanghai Port FC soccer shirt during an event with the club’s Australian coach, Muscat, at Shanghai’s famous Bund thoroughfare.
“We have a parliamentary football team [and] we’re not very good,” Albanese said, holding the jersey with the number 10 and his name on the back. “I’ll be able to wear that around Australia proudly.”
Muscat and Australians doing business in China were examples, the prime minister said, of healthy people-to-people links between the two nations.
“I’ve just been chatting about Kevin, about the fact that they are ambassadors as well,” Albanese said alongside the Huangpu river, talking up Muscat’s chances of winning another trophy with Shanghai.
Muscat replied: “That’s the idea.”
Wearing a hat bearing the logo of his own football team, the South Sydney Rabbitohs, Albanese said Australia’s trade with China was worth as much as the next four nations combined.
“That says something about how important this relationship is,” he said.
From 1994 to 2006, Muscat played as a defender for the Socceroos. He won 46 caps and scored 10 goals in that time.
In 2023, the soccer champion became the coach of Shanghai Port, and the club has since won the 2024 Chinese Super League season and the 2024 Chinese FA Cup.
Beyond soccer diplomacy, Australia complained on Friday to China about a live-fire exercise in February that disrupted flights between Sydney and New Zealand, only a day before Albanese touched down in Shanghai.
Foreign Minister Penny Wong raised Australia’s concerns about the heavily armed flotilla that circumnavigated Australia earlier this year in a meeting with Chinese counterpart Wang Yi on the sidelines of a regional meeting in Malaysia on Friday, the government confirmed.
Her expression of disapproval at the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), a day after she warned of China’s rapid military build-up, serves as a reminder of the points of difference with Australia’s largest trading partner, even after years of calmer relations under Labor.
The emergence of a Chinese flotilla sailing around Australia’s east coast in February sparked concern in Canberra about the lack of notice of live-firing, despite the voyage being conducted in accordance with international law.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109314
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23318889 (130904ZJUL25) Notable: China to take more active part in promoting comprehensive strategic partnership with Australia – "Over the past three years, China-Australia relations have stabilized, turned around and achieved positive results, said Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi on Friday. It proves that as long as the two countries uphold a correct positioning of their partnership, bilateral relations can develop steadily and continue to yield results. For her part, Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong said that dialogue and cooperation between Australia and China in trade, tourism and other fields have continued to make progress, and personnel exchanges have become increasingly active. Wong said Australia supports the central role of ASEAN and is committed to maintaining regional peace and stability." – Xinhua
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109303
>>109306
>>109313
China to take more active part in promoting comprehensive strategic partnership with Australia: FM
Xinhua - 2025-07-12
KUALA LUMPUR, July 12 (Xinhua) - China is ready to promote the comprehensive strategic partnership with Australia through a more proactive approach, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said here on Friday.
China is willing to work with Australia to prepare for the next stage of high-level exchanges, maintain the momentum of improvement in bilateral ties and properly manage their differences, Wang said.
Wang made the remarks during a meeting with Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong in the Malaysian capital on the sidelines of the ASEAN Foreign Ministers' Meeting and related meetings.
Over the past three years, China-Australia relations have stabilized, turned around and achieved positive results, said Wang, also a member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China Central Committee.
It proves that as long as the two countries uphold a correct positioning of their partnership, bilateral relations can develop steadily and continue to yield results, Wang said.
The Chinese foreign minister noted that Australia's rational and pragmatic policy toward China serves the interests of both countries and aligns with the trend of the times.
For her part, Wong said that Australia is committed to developing a positive and pragmatic relationship with China.
Both sides are making every effort to prepare for high-level exchanges and look forward to achieving positive outcomes, she said, adding that dialogue and cooperation between Australia and China in trade, tourism and other fields have continued to make progress, and personnel exchanges have become increasingly active.
Wong noted that Australia remains firmly committed to the one-China policy and does not support "Taiwan independence."
Australia is willing to engage in candid communication and deepen cooperation with China to promote the sustained and positive development of bilateral relations, she said.
Wong said that Australia supports the central role of ASEAN and is committed to maintaining regional peace and stability.
The two sides also exchanged views on issues including the South China Sea and the Ukraine crisis.
https://english.news.cn/20250712/da547c54ed3b4cd8893f1fe7b1f85af7/c.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109315
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23318896 (130915ZJUL25) Notable: Albanese bats away questions about Taiwan and US defence demands on first day of China visit – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, on the first full day of his China trip, dismissed pressure from the Trump administration after Elbridge Colby, leading a review of AUKUS, urged allies to say what role they’d play in a US-China war over Taiwan. Albanese insisted Australia opposed “any unilateral action” and wanted “no change in the status quo.” Acting Defence Minister Pat Conroy said only the elected government could commit Australia to war. Albanese also launched a tourism campaign in Shanghai and praised China’s economic development.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109303
>>109306
Albanese bats away questions about Taiwan and US defence demands on first day of China visit
Stephen Dziedzic and Tom Crowley - 13 July 2025
The prime minister has been forced to bat away fresh defence demands from the Trump administration on the first full day of his visit to China, insisting that Australia supports "the status quo" in regards to Taiwan.
The Financial Times reported on Saturday that senior defence official Elbridge Colby — who is leading the Trump administration's review of the AUKUS pact — was pressing both Australia and Japan to say what role they would play if the US and China went to war over Taiwan.
Mr Elbridge took to social media after the piece was published to say that Mr Trump was focused on restoring US strength, including "by urging allies to step up their defense spending and other efforts related to our collective defense".
"Of course, some among our allies might not welcome frank conversations. But many, now led by NATO after the historic Hague Summit, are seeing the urgent need to step up and are doing so," he said.
The story came at an awkward moment for Anthony Albanese, who fielded several questions on Mr Colby's comments during his visit to the commercial metropolis of Shanghai.
Mr Albanese told reporters Australia did not support "any unilateral action" on Taiwan and that its spending on both defence and aid was "about advancing peace and security in our region".
"We have a clear position and we have been consistent about that … We don't want any change in the status quo."
A separate US government source told the ABC that the US — which maintains its own policy of strategic ambiguity when it comes to the defence of Taiwan — was having a "broader conversation" with allies like Australia.
They also said Australia had rejected overtures from US officials who suggested Australia should give specific assurances to the Trump administration about how they'd deploy Virginia-class submarines acquired through the AUKUS pact in the event of the US going to war.
Asked whether the US was entitled to seek assurance about an Australian response to a war over Taiwan, given its own position of strategic ambiguity, Mr Albanese did not answer directly but said the question answered itself.
Earlier, acting Defence Minister Pat Conroy told the ABC's Insiders on Sunday Australia did not "engage in hypotheticals" and would make its own decisions in response to any conflict.
"The sole power to commit Australia to war, or to allow our territory to be used for a conflict, is the elected government of the day," he said.
"Sovereignty will always be prioritised and that will continue to be our position."
Tourism focus of first leg
Mr Albanese has tried to use the first leg of his visit to highlight the human links between Australia and China, going for a walk down Shanghai's famous waterfront with ex-Socceroo Kevin Muscat, who is the manager for high-profile local soccer club Shanghai Port FC.
After that, he launched a new "chapter" of a major Australian tourism campaign designed to coax more Chinese visitors back to Australia, who have returned to Australia more slowly than expected in the wake of COVID-19 travel bans.
He also met Shanghai Party Chairman Chen Jining, where he praised China's rapid economic development.
"The development we can see across the river is symbolic of the extraordinary development that China has seen in recent decades, lifting literally hundreds of millions out of poverty," he said.
Mr Albanese told the chair that Australia wanted to engage in "frank and constructive dialogue" to promote "stability" in the region.
"We deal with each other in a calm and consistent manner, and we want to continue to pursue our national interests," he said.
"And it's in our interests to have good relations with China."
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-13/albanese-taiwan-us-defence-demands-china-visit/105526626
https://x.com/USDPColby/status/1944045317227151579
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109316
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23318907 (130927ZJUL25) Notable: US demands to know what allies would do in event of war over Taiwan – The Pentagon is pressing Australia and Japan to clarify their roles in a possible US-China war over Taiwan, a move that has unsettled both allies. Elbridge Colby, under-secretary of defence for policy, has urged commitments despite Washington’s own “strategic ambiguity.” A US official said the aim was “to intensify and accelerate efforts to strengthen deterrence,” insisting “we do not seek war.” Japan called the request “difficult to answer” and Australia declined comment. Observers said it was unrealistic for the US to demand clarity when President Trump has not committed to Taiwan’s defence.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109303
>>109306
>>109315
US demands to know what allies would do in event of war over Taiwan
Trump administration says it is trying to prevent war but raises eyebrows by calling for commitments from Australia and Japan
Demetri Sevastopulo - 12 July 2025
1/2
The Pentagon is pressing Japan and Australia to make clear what role they would play if the US and China went to war over Taiwan, in an effort that has frustrated the two most important American allies in the Indo-Pacific.
Elbridge Colby, under-secretary of defence for policy, has been pushing the issue in meetings with Japanese and Australian defence officials in recent months, said five people familiar with the discussions.
The push is his latest effort to convince US allies in the Indo-Pacific to enhance deterrence and prepare for a potential war over Taiwan.
After publication, Colby wrote on X that the Pentagon was implementing President Donald Trump’s agenda of “restoring deterrence and achieving peace through strength”. He said that included “urging allies to step up their defence spending and other efforts related to our collective defence”.
A US defence official said the “animating theme” of the discussions with allies was “to intensify and accelerate efforts to strengthen deterrence in a balanced, equitable way”.
The US official added: “We do not seek war. Nor do we seek to dominate China itself. What we are doing is ensuring the United States and its allies have the military strength to underwrite diplomacy and guarantee peace.”
The talks include efforts to persuade allies to raise defence spending amid rising concern about China’s threat to Taiwan. But the request for commitments related to a war over the island is a new demand from the US.
“Concrete operational planning and exercises that have direct application to a Taiwan contingency are moving forward with Japan and Australia,” said one person. “But this request caught Tokyo and Canberra by surprise because the US itself does not give a blank cheque guarantee to Taiwan.”
The US has long had a policy of “strategic ambiguity” under which it does not say if it would defend the island. Former president Joe Biden on four occasions deviated from that, saying the US would intervene. But Donald Trump has echoed other presidents in refusing to say what he would do.
Zack Cooper, an Asia expert at the American Enterprise Institute, said: “It is very difficult to get allies to provide specifics about what they would do in a Taiwan conflict when they don’t know either the scenario’s context or America’s own response.”
“President Trump has not committed to defend Taiwan, so it is unrealistic for the US to insist on clear commitments from others.”
The push has been aimed at Japanese and Australian defence officials, and not higher levels. A second person said there was a “collective raising of eyebrows” from representatives in Japan, Australia and other US allies.
Japan’s defence ministry said it was “difficult to answer the hypothetical question of a ‘Taiwan emergency’.” It said any response would “be implemented on an individual and specific basis in accordance with the constitution, international law, and domestic laws and regulations”.
The Australian embassy in the US did not comment.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109317
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23318920 (130938ZJUL25) Notable: Video: US review of AUKUS incomplete as cost of defence boost revealed – Acting Defence Minister Pat Conroy said the Trump administration’s review of AUKUS, led by Elbridge Colby, has missed its 30-day deadline but expressed confidence it would back the pact. He acknowledged pressure on Australia to raise defence spending, with budget office figures showing a jump to 3.5% of GDP could cost $287b over a decade. Conroy said aid and diplomacy also bolster security, insisting “sovereignty will always be prioritised” and that only the elected government can commit Australia to war, amid reports the US sought assurances on how Australia would respond in a Taiwan conflict.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109306
>>109315
US review of AUKUS incomplete as cost of defence boost revealed
Tom Crowley - 13 July 2025
The Trump administration's review of the AUKUS partnership is unfinished as its slated deadline arrives, according to Australia's acting defence minister.
Patrick Conroy told the ABC's Insiders the Australian government was "engaging at the most senior levels" and was optimistic the US review would endorse the military pact.
"I'm confident it will support AUKUS just as our review of AUKUS [and] the UK review found," he said.
"There's been lots of speculation about what the timeframe is of the review … My last information is that the review has not been completed yet."
The review, led by senior Pentagon official Elbridge Colby whose public statements about AUKUS have been mixed, was slated to be finished within 30 days, a timeframe reached this weekend which coincides with Anthony Albanese's visit to China.
Bracing for pressure on defence spending
Despite the statements of confidence, the government is bracing for the likelihood that the Trump administration will press harder on Australia to lift its defence spending, as it did with European partners.
The ABC can reveal new figures laying out the colossal budget impact of agreeing to such a request.
During the election campaign, the Parliamentary Budget Office estimated the short-term boost to defence spending needed to achieve 3 per cent of GDP by 2035, as was Coalition policy, would cost $20.6 billion over the first five years and $156.4 billion over a decade.
Those figures, prepared in consultation with Treasury and Defence, can be extended to suggest the even larger cost of a 3.5 per cent spend of $45.2 billion over five years or $287.1 billion over a decade.
The government currently intends to increase defence spending to 2.3 per cent of GDP by 2035.
To get to 3.5 per cent instead, the extra funding alone would triple Australia's entire foreign aid budget by the year 2029-30.
Mr Conroy told the ABC the government would seek to emphasise that its aid and diplomatic spending, especially in the Pacific region, was also contributing to security.
"We're making the point to everyone that both [defence and aid spending] are incredibly important," he said.
"We're investing in our relationships in the region, as well as our military capability and we are increasing our defence budget significantly, $57 billion above the previous trajectory," he said.
"We've made it clear that if a case is made for more capability, we'll increase more. We're not going to pluck a figure out of the air and work out how to spend it. That's what the Coalition took to the election."
Mr Conroy, who is acting for Richard Marles in the defence portfolio but whose regular portfolio is defence industry, said Australia was also trying to get more value for money from defence procurement processes.
"It's a challenging area for every country around the world [and] it was problematic under the last government … We've made significant reforms to how we do defence procurement," he said.
"It is important that taxpayers have confidence that every single dollar goes to improving capability of the Australian Defence Force as well as supporting the 100,000 Australians who work in that industry."
'Sovereignty' central amid reports of Taiwan request
Mr Conroy said Australia would not "engage in hypotheticals" after a report in the Financial Times that Mr Colby was also pressing both Australia and Japan to give assurances about how they would respond in the event of a war with China over Taiwan.
In a social media post following that report, Mr Colby did not address Taiwan directly but said the Pentagon had "made abundantly and consistently clear" it wanted allies to "step up their defense spending and other efforts related to our collective defense.
"This has been a hallmark of President Trump's strategy in Asia as in Europe where it has already been tremendously successful," he said, describing the pressure on NATO allies to spend more as a "formula" for other regions.
"Of course, some among our allies might not welcome frank conversations. But many... are seeing the urgent need to step up and are doing so."
Mr Conroy told the ABC Australia would make its own decisions about any conflict.
"The sole power to commit Australia to war or to allow our territory to be used for a conflict is the elected government of the day," he said.
"Sovereignty will always be prioritised and that will continue to be our position."
Officials have also emphasised Australia's strategic focus on deterrence and opposition to the use of force.
"We are being very clear that we want a balanced region where no-one is dominated and no-one dominates," he said.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-13/us-review-of-aukus-incomplete-defence-cost/105526330
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GjYuW19XOww
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109318
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23318940 (130952ZJUL25) Notable: US wants to know how Australia would use subs if America goes to war – The Pentagon has confirmed it is seeking undertakings from Australia on how AUKUS nuclear-powered submarines would be deployed “across different scenarios,” while also pressing for “substantial increases” in defence spending. US Undersecretary of Defence Elbridge Colby said allies must “step up” commitments, including on Taiwan, as part of Donald Trump’s “peace through strength” agenda. Acting Defence Minister Pat Conroy stressed sovereignty, saying Australia “doesn’t discuss hypotheticals” and that only the government of the day can commit forces. The review of AUKUS also examines command structure, US shipbuilding capacity and asset posture.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109306
>>109315
US wants to know how Australia would use subs if America goes to war
Michael Koziol - July 13, 2025
1/2
Washington: The Pentagon has confirmed it is asking Australia for undertakings on how its AUKUS submarines would be used in the event of US military conflicts, and for “substantial increases” in defence spending as part of its review of the $368 billion agreement.
A senior US defence official, who requested anonymity to speak freely, said the Trump administration wanted a clear idea of how Australia would deploy the nuclear-powered boats in the event of a contingency, though this was much broader than conflict with China over Taiwan.
“There’s a conversation about command structure, about alignment of assets. We would want, in any scenario, a clear sense of what we can expect from Australia,” he said in an interview.
“There seems to be a hyper-emphasis on Taiwan in public reporting. But this is broader than any one particular contingency. It is about how we can reasonably expect these kinds of critical assets to be allocated across different scenarios.”
This masthead can also reveal that the Pentagon’s AUKUS review focuses on four areas: command structure, the US’s capacity to produce the boats, posture (positioning) of the assets and Australian defence spending.
Meanwhile, US Undersecretary of Defence Elbridge Colby, who is heading the review, publicly confirmed reports that the US wanted its allies such as Australia and Japan to “step up” and make commitments about how they would act in the event of a conflict.
Colby said the Pentagon was implementing US President Donald Trump’s commonsense agenda of restoring deterrence and achieving peace through strength.
“That includes by urging allies to step up their defence spending and other efforts related to our collective defence,” he said, noting it also applied in both Europe and Asia.
“Of course, some among our allies might not welcome frank conversations. But many, now led by NATO after the historic Hague summit, are seeing the urgent need to step up and are doing so. President Trump has shown the approach and the formula – and we will not be deterred from advancing his agenda.”
Colby was responding to a report in the Financial Times, published on Saturday US time, that said he had been pressing the issue in meetings with Australia and Japan, citing five sources familiar with the discussions.
This masthead revealed on Thursday that Colby believed Australia should give a public declaration or private guarantee that the US-made nuclear-powered submarines would be used in a possible conflict with China.
Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy said on Sunday that Australia prioritised its sovereignty and “we don’t discuss hypotheticals”.
“The decision to commit Australian troops to a conflict will be made by the government of the day, not in advance, but by the government of the day,” he told ABC’s Insiders program.
Under the AUKUS agreement, Australia would buy several Virginia-class nuclear submarines from the US and then develop its own fleet with the United Kingdom. The Trump administration is reviewing the deal, brokered by former leaders Joe Biden, Scott Morrison and Boris Johnson, to determine whether it puts “America First”.
The senior US defence official said the review was being done “in good faith” and the Pentagon “would like to make this thing work as best we can, consistent with President Trump’s agenda”.
He pushed back against the characterisation of Colby, in both Australia and the US, as an AUKUS sceptic. Colby was “in many ways a moderate on AUKUS” who was “trying to do this thing in a prudential manner”.
And he warned: “There are folks that are very powerful and very important stakeholders who have very serious concerns privately [about AUKUS].”
The official also confirmed the question of Australian defence spending was tied up in the AUKUS discussions, though he declined to say if the Pentagon sought a further injection of money into the US submarine industrial base. Australia is already contributing $4.7 billion.
“Substantial increases in Australian defence spending, I think, are quite warranted,” the official said. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has already told Australian Defence Minister Richard Marles the US wants Australia to increase its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, from a little over 2 per cent.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109319
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23318962 (131007ZJUL25) Notable: Video: LIVE | Talisman Sabre 2025 Kicks Off: US, Australia Lead Massive War Games - The opening ceremony of Talisman Sabre 2025 marked the start of the largest-ever iteration of the Australia-U.S. joint military exercise, now including 19 participating nations. The multinational war games are designed to strengthen interoperability, readiness, and regional security cooperation across land, sea, air, and cyber domains. Held in Queensland, Australia, the opening event featured military leaders and defense personnel from across the Indo-Pacific, delivering statements on the strategic importance of allied unity and rapid response capability in a shifting global security landscape. A joint press conference followed the ceremonial events, with remarks from representatives of the Australian Defence Force, the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, and high-ranking officials from countries including Japan, South Korea, France, the U.K., Indonesia, and more. The exercise spans several weeks and includes amphibious landings, live-fire drills, cyber-defense simulations, and complex combat operations, underscoring growing defense ties among democratic allies in the Indo-Pacific. - APT
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
LIVE | Talisman Sabre 2025 Kicks Off: US, Australia Lead Massive War Games
APT
Jul 13, 2025'
The opening ceremony of Talisman Sabre 2025 marked the start of the largest-ever iteration of the Australia-U.S. joint military exercise, now including 19 participating nations. The multinational war games are designed to strengthen interoperability, readiness, and regional security cooperation across land, sea, air, and cyber domains.
Held in Queensland, Australia, the opening event featured military leaders and defense personnel from across the Indo-Pacific, delivering statements on the strategic importance of allied unity and rapid response capability in a shifting global security landscape.
A joint press conference followed the ceremonial events, with remarks from representatives of the Australian Defence Force, the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, and high-ranking officials from countries including Japan, South Korea, France, the U.K., Indonesia, and more.
The exercise spans several weeks and includes amphibious landings, live-fire drills, cyber-defense simulations, and complex combat operations, underscoring growing defense ties among democratic allies in the Indo-Pacific.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qO9f_ws2Dyo
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109320
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23318968 (131012ZJUL25) Notable: Talisman Sabre Tweets: - We have reached the end of the Australian component of EXTS25 as activities now move to Papua New Guinea. This is the first time that a component of Exercise Talisman Sabre has been hosted outside of Australia and will conclude with a closing ceremony on 4 August. We thank all those who have participated to date and supported Talisman Sabre 25 and we look forward to seeing you all at Talisman Sabre 27. #ts25 #talismansabre #talismansabre25 #YourADF #StrongerTogether
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109225
>>109226
>>109227
Talisman Sabre 2025: Australia is prepared for Chinese spies off our coast
7NEWS Australia
Jul 13, 2025
Australia is prepared for Chinese spies off our coast as troops take part in the biggest military exercises on home soil.
Allies from around the world have been deployed for Talisman Sabre and military rivals are watching on.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Hyhg9cetCw
>Talisman Sabre
MAGIC SWORD
https://qalerts.pub/?q=Operation+Specialists
https://qalerts.pub/?q=magic
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109321
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23323820 (140909ZJUL25) Notable: Albanese walks trade-security tightrope before Xi meeting – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese vowed to return the Port of Darwin to Australian hands despite Chinese displeasure, saying “we want the port to go into Australian ownership.” Speaking in Shanghai ahead of his Beijing talks with Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang, Albanese promoted Australia as a free-trade nation while stressing peace in the Indo-Pacific underpins economic ties. Mining magnate Andrew “Twiggy” Forrest warned that “security becomes a distraction” to $312bn in annual trade. Albanese, joined by executives from Rio Tinto, BHP and Fortescue, also promoted “green steel” cooperation while declining to reveal planned security or rights discussions with Xi.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109306
>>109315
Albanese walks trade-security tightrope before Xi meeting
Paul Sakkal - July 14, 2025
Shanghai: Australia will not back down on its decision to take the Port of Darwin out of Chinese hands as mining magnate Andrew “Twiggy” Forrest warns that an overemphasis on security risks is hurting the $312 billion in annual trade between the two nations.
As Albanese prepares for a grand welcome at his meeting with Xi Jinping in Beijing on Tuesday, the final day of his two-day stop in Shanghai was centred on Australia’s financial ties with its biggest trading partner.
The Prime Minister spruiked Australia as a stable, open trading nation against a backdrop of US President Donald Trump’s stop-start trade wars.
“I think that Australia’s support for free and fair trade does provide potential opportunities for Australia in this region as well, not just with China, but with ASEAN nations,” Albanese said, without naming the president.
Trade will be central to Albanese’s talks with Xi and Chinese Premier Li Qiang – who famously referred to Albanese as a “handsome boy” in 2023 – on Tuesday. But disagreements are likely to make the agenda, including China’s frustration with Australia’s decision to force a Chinese firm to end its lease over the Port of Darwin due to security concerns.
Albanese said his government would not be deterred when asked if he believed China might retaliate against the move because Chinese-owned firm Landbridge has leased the asset since 2015.
“The answer to that is no,” the prime minister said at a press conference in Shanghai’s Peninsula Hotel.
“We had a very clear position that we want the port to go into Australian ownership. We’ve been very clear about it … and we will go through that process.”
Albanese said he was solely focused on his trip to China when asked if he was closer to securing a meeting with Trump, noting that previous Liberal prime ministers Tony Abbott and Malcolm Fraser had met with Chinese leaders before seeing their US counterparts.
Albanese suggested the Australian media had lost perspective in its coverage of his not having met with Trump.
The port dispute, which has received significant negative attention in Chinese state media, reflects the depth of worry in Australia’s intelligence community about China having control of critical infrastructure. Putting the port back in Australian hands would be achieved by encouraging Landbridge to sell the asset or to force its divestment, a move that would trigger further Chinese displeasure.
Albanese declined to reveal what security or human rights he would discuss with Xi. He trumpeted his record of securing freedom for detained Australians when asked about Chinese-Australian pro-democracy activist Yang Hengjun, who is in prison after being given a suspended death sentence on murky espionage offences.
Billions in iron ore revenue for Australia’s strained budget would be safeguarded by stripping the use of coal out of the production of steel, Albanese said while flanked by the heads of the country’s largest miners. Before his press conference, the prime minister convened a roundtable with Chinese and Australian resources executives on so-called green steel.
Fortescue mining billionaire Forrest, a long-time advocate of closer links with China, said worries about national security clouded the business relationship between the two nations.
“Yes, security becomes a distraction,” Forrest said.
“We have people [in China] that want a peaceful, long-term relationship with Australia. Across Australia, we have people who want a peaceful, long-term relationship with China. The prime minister has brought us into the realm of that peaceful, long-term relationship.”
Forrest’s remarks came a day after the US made clear it wanted to know how Australia would act in a potential war with China over Taiwan.
Albanese said maintaining peace in the Indo-Pacific, which he said on Sunday was the purpose of the AUKUS submarine pact, would create the conditions for stronger economic ties.
“The economic relationship is obviously based upon a stable and secure region. We’ve seen the disruption that occurs when there is conflict in the world. That’s why we need to make sure that we do everything we can to promote peace and security in the region,” Albanese said.
https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/albanese-walks-trade-security-tightrope-before-xi-meeting-20250714-p5mepo.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109322
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23323852 (140935ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Masked figure claims responsibility for anti-Israel firebombing, threatens weapons workers – A masked figure in a video claimed responsibility for the July 5 firebombing of weapons manufacturer Lovitt Technologies in Greensborough, Victoria, and threatened further violence against its workers. Police said the four-minute video, filmed before a Palestinian flag, is being reviewed by the Victorian Joint Counter Terrorism Team. The man used voice-altering software, warned employees he had their addresses, and demonstrated how to firebomb cars. Victoria’s Police Minister Anthony Carbines condemned the threats as incitement to violence, while Jewish leaders likened the group to “an al-Qa’ida terror cell.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109253
>>109268
Masked figure claims responsibility for anti-Israel firebombing, threatens weapons workers
RYAN BOURKE - 14 July 2025
A video circulating online shows a masked figure taking responsibility for the firebombing of a Victorian-owned weapons manufacturer, and threatening to target its workers with further violence.
Victoria Police has launched an investigation into the July 5 incident.
“Investigators are aware of a video which has been circulating where a group has claimed responsibility for the incident,” a police spokesperson said.
“This video is being reviewed as part of the ongoing investigation … Police are urging anyone with information about the Greensborough incident and those involved to come forward.”
In the four-minute video that began circulating on Sunday night, a black-clad man wearing a balaclava in front of a Palestinian flag uses voice-altering software to tell viewers “This is an anonymous communique by the cell that torched three cars at Lovitt Technologies”.
The figure then threatens further “consequences” if the company continues to manufacture weapons, and instructs viewers how to conduct firebombings of their own, adding that workers should “consider this as a warning”.
After explaining the company’s link to the manufacturing of Israeli weapons, the figure warned workers at the company they have had “years to contemplate the consequences of your actions”.
“We will decide your fate as you have decided the fate of millions … for the past few months we have been watching you, we have your addresses.
“All of the information we have about you will be distributed to our underground networks.”
The video then shows the figure demonstrating how to firebomb a car using paper bags and fire starters.
“Place one bag under the front and one under the back tyre … be mindful of fingerprints and DNA.”
The alarming threat comes after five hooded offenders were captured on CCTV entering Lovitt Technologies Australia on Para Rd, Greensborough just before 4am on Saturday, July 5. Police allege the offenders then set fire to three vehicles and used spray paint to write various slogans on the cars and on a building wall.
The attack remains under investigation by the Victorian Joint Counter Terrorism Team, which includes personnel from Victoria Police, the Australian Federal Police and the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation.
The video was posted to X by the Australian Jewish Association at roughly 10.30pm on Sunday.
AJA chief Robert Gregory said: “It was sent to us by a concerned member of the Jewish community who came across it on a social media page of anti-Israel activists.”
A search of Instagram revealed several accounts with anti-Israel posts began sharing the video around 7pm, although the original source of the video remains unknown.
Acting Premier Jaclyn Symes said she had only “just been briefed” about the video when asked about it on Monday afternoon.
“I’ll have a look when I get back in the car, I’m sure it’s been referred to the Police.
“When it comes to acting on hate and inappropriate conduct in this state we are a government that has acted,” she added.
Asked if he considered the video an incitement to violence, Police Minister Anthony Carbines said, “Those matters stand condemned, should be called out, should be referred to Victoria Police.
Mr Carbines added the government’s new anti-vilification laws would “give police the tools they need to hold offenders to account who think they can incite violence, threaten people, scare people, and vilify people”.
“They’ll meet the full force of the law.”
Speaking to The Australian, Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Alex Ryvchin said: “Seeing a group resembling an al-Qa’ida terror cell openly pledging to carry out criminal acts is chilling and disturbing.”
“Today it is a business they oppose and tomorrow it will be individuals, politicians, journalists or religious institutions they deem impure,” Mr Ryvchin said.
“We expect this incident to be investigated and for those responsible to be met with the law. If we fail to confront this threat we risk becoming a nation of competing violent extremists and not a society under the rule of law.”
Lovitt Technologies has been contacted for comment.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/masked-figure-claims-responsibility-for-antiisrael-firebombing-threatens-weapons-workers/news-story/fb14d553b704871dc02ecbb669fdebc6
https://www.theage.com.au/national/anonymous-group-claims-responsibility-for-attack-on-israel-linked-military-parts-maker-20250714-p5meth.html
https://x.com/AustralianJA/status/1944371884612567466
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109323
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23328908 (151221ZJUL25) Notable: AUKUS sceptic Turnbull discussed pact’s defects with Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby – Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull has held extensive talks with US Undersecretary of Defence Elbridge Colby about AUKUS, with both men voicing doubts over Australia’s ability to fund the pact and America’s capacity to supply Virginia-class submarines. Colby reposted a 2024 Turnbull article warning of a looming submarine gap, noting the US could not “prudently reduce” its most vital assets. Turnbull has since warned AUKUS would “considerably” reduce Australian sovereignty, arguing allies must “do more to defend themselves” and protect “sovereign autonomy.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73633 (pb)
>>73441 (pb)
>>73609 (pb)
>>109316
AUKUS sceptic Turnbull discussed pact’s defects with Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby
JOE KELLY - 15 July 2025
1/2
Malcolm Turnbull held substantial conversations with Elbridge Colby about the AUKUS agreement – including its defects and challenges – before the Pentagon policy chief was charged with leading a vital review into the future of the security partnership.
The engagement between the former prime minister and Mr Colby predates the confirmation of Mr Colby in March as the US Undersecretary of Defence for Policy, where he serves as the key intellectual force behind the Pentagon’s application of Donald Trump’s “America First” agenda in the world – including the Indo-Pacific.
Mr Turnbull has been a sustained critic of AUKUS, arguing that the deal will not work for Australia, and he shares with Mr Colby a range of concerns and criticisms about the agreement.
The Australian can reveal the former prime minister has engaged with Mr Colby for more than three years on a range of issues including the trilateral security partnership between Australia, the US and the UK under which Canberra is hoping to acquire three Virginia-class submarines from America.
The two men know each other well and in March 2024 an opinion piece written by Mr Turnbull – warning that Australia faced the prospect of having no submarine capability for a decade because of the AUKUS deal – was reposted by Mr Colby.
Responding to the article, Mr Colby said “America cannot prudently reduce the number of its most important asset for a Western Pacific fight, precisely in the period when such a war seems increasingly plausible”.
Discussions between the two men in recent years are understood to have canvassed a range of topics about which Mr Turnbull has spoken in recent weeks – including the need for Australia to reclaim greater sovereignty and independence in world affairs by standing more firmly on its own two feet.
The US is becoming increasingly concerned that Australian defence spending – at about 2 per cent of GDP – is insufficient to fund the AUKUS agreement for the purchase of Virginia-class submarines without hollowing out other defence capabilities needed for Australia to contribute effectively to stability in the Indo-Pacific.
Another key concern held by both men relates to the US production rate for Virginia-class submarines falling behind what is required for Washington to meet both its own needs and those of Australia.
This is critical because, under the enabling AUKUS legislation, the US President cannot authorise the sale of submarines to Australia unless he can certify to congress that it will not degrade the capabilities of the US Navy.
Delivering the Jeff Bleich Centre Distinguished Lecture in late June, Mr Turnbull sketched out these points in detail.
And he mentioned Mr Colby by name.
“These are really the best, the most important assets in their fleet … Their current rate of production is, according to the navy, (running at an) average of 1.1 a year. It’s been between 1.1 and 1.2 for quite a while, it needs to be well over two to be able to meet the US Navy’s needs and our needs,” Mr Turnbull said.
“This is the point that has been of great concern to many people in Washington, including the Under Secretary for Defence, ‘Bridge’ Colby, who is undertaking a review of AUKUS at the moment.
“He has simply made the point, ‘if these are the most valuable assets in our navy … if we are already short of them and if we are producing half as many of them as we need to replace retirements, how can we possibly transfer any of these vital assets to another country, no matter how friendly and fond we may be of that nation?’”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109324
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23328949 (151232ZJUL25) Notable: Elbridge Colby’s three key challenges for Australia – US defence policy chief Elbridge Colby is pressing Australia on three fronts: whether AUKUS still aligns with Donald Trump’s priorities, if Canberra will pre-commit US-supplied submarines to a Taiwan conflict despite America’s own “strategic ambiguity,” and lifting defence spending. Colby warned that “Taiwan’s fall would be a disaster for American interests” and has tied his review of AUKUS to questions over submarine use. Posting online, he said “central to President Trump’s commonsense, America First message is that our alliances have to be fair and equitable for them to be sustainable.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109315
>>109318
>>109316
Elbridge Colby’s three key challenges for Australia
JOE KELLY - 15 July 2025
1/2
Elbridge Colby is issuing a challenge to the direction of Australian strategic policy, from defence spending levels and the future of the AUKUS agreement to the prospect of Australian involvement in a potential US conflict against China in the Taiwan Strait.
The US defence policy chief is swiftly emerging as one of the most important figures in the Trump administration and the intellectual engine behind the application of the “America First” agenda to US defence policy – including in the Indo-Pacific.
This makes the US Undersecretary of Defence for Policy one of the central people for Australia to engage with as Canberra navigates the relationship with the administration at a time of global uncertainty and turbulence.
But it may not be an easy road ahead. One of Colby’s key goals is to ensure more equal burden sharing when it comes to the management of America’s key alliance partnerships – and there are three key issues where he is presenting challenges.
The first is on AUKUS. As the leader of the Pentagon’s comprehensive review of the security partnership, Colby is examining whether the agreement still aligns with the priorities being championed by the US President.
While the review was not launched with the aim of killing off the agreement, there is an expectation there will be “tough” conversations. The prospect of modifications being proposed is clearly on the table.
There will be extensive engagement with both Australia and the UK over the future of AUKUS, but it would be wrong to assume that only champions of the agreement will be granted an audience with the Pentagon’s policy chief.
Colby will be listening to the full contest of ideas – and this means hearing the case presented by sceptics of the AUKUS agreement.
Nothing should be taken for granted.
The second challenge for Australia posed by Colby is his focus on how Canberra approaches China and, more specifically, whether it is willing to pre-commit US-supplied submarines to a potential American conflict with China over Taiwan.
It is true that Colby has asked this question of Australian officials, but this imposes an unreasonable demand on Canberra that, if accepted, would compromise sovereign Australian decision-making.
Even the US maintains a policy of strategic ambiguity in respect of Taiwan, and Donald Trump himself has made clear he will “never say” what course of action he would take.
Unless Washington drops this approach for a hard and fast security guarantee to Taiwan, no credible Australian government could provide an answer one way or the other.
This point has been reflected to the administration. Yet it is worth noting Colby’s statements to his confirmation hearing in March that one of his top priorities is preparing the US to mount a successful operation in defence of Taiwan if required.
“Taiwan’s fall would be a disaster for American interests,” he said. “It is vital for us to focus and enable our own forces for an effective and reasonable defence of Taiwan.
“We have to have the military capabilities in Asia or relevant to Asia to be able to conduct a local defence of Taiwan at a cost and level of risk that the American people are prepared to tolerate.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109325
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23328979 (151242ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Thorny issues broached as Albanese, Xi go head-to-head – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese raised concerns with Chinese President Xi Jinping over February’s live-fire drills off Australia’s coast, securing a commitment that Beijing would provide more notice in future. He also pressed China on Taiwan, reaffirming “no unilateral change to the status quo,” and raised the case of detained writer Yang Hengjun, though without expectation of progress. Mr Xi hailed the “recovered” relationship, calling for “equal treatment” and “mutually beneficial co-operation.” Tuesday’s meetings with Xi, Premier Li Qiang and Communist Party Chairman Zhao Leji formed the centrepiece of Albanese’s six-day China tour.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109306
>>109315
>>109321
Thorny issues broached as Albanese, Xi go head-to-head
Jacob Shteyman and Dominic Giannini - July 15 2025
Anthony Albanese has used a meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping to raise concerns over China's lack of notice before it conducted military drills off the Australian coast.
The live firing exercise in international waters near Australia in February, which forced the diversion of commercial flights, was among topics on the agenda during talks between the two leaders in Beijing.
Speaking after Tuesday's meeting, Mr Albanese said he had secured a commitment for China to better inform Australia on military drills in the region.
The prime minister noted the drills being in international waters didn't contravene international law "but that we were concerned about the notice and the way that it happened, including the live fire exercises".
Australia's position on there being no unilateral change to the status quo over Taiwan was also conveyed to the president, he said.
"We want peace and security in the region, that is in the interests of both Australia and China," Mr Albanese replied when asked whether he had raised China's unprecedented military build up.
Mr Xi didn't raise reports the United States had asked Australia to commit to teaming up during a potential conflict with China over Taiwan, nor Labor's commitment to terminate a Chinese company's lease of the Port of Darwin, Mr Albanese added.
The prime minister also raised the detention of Australian writer Yang Hengjun but said he didn't expect immediate progress on the case.
Dr Yang was given a suspended death sentence in China on secretive national security charges that Australia rejects.
"I raised the case, you wouldn't expect there to be an immediate outcome and that is not the way things work," Mr Albanese told reporters.
In his opening remarks ahead of the meeting, Mr Xi hailed improved relations with Australia.
The president was all smiles as he greeted his Australian guest in the East Hall - one of the many ornate chambers in the Great Hall of the People.
"The most important thing we can learn from this is that a commitment to equal treatment, to seeking common ground while sharing differences, pursuing mutually beneficial co-operation, for our countries and peoples," he said.
China's president pointed to past meetings as "in-depth discussions on the strategic overarching issues critical to the direction of China-Australia relations"
"With joint efforts from both sides the China-Australia relationship has recovered from the setback and turned around," Mr Xi said.
Tuesday's bilateral meetings with President Xi, Premier Li Qiang and Communist Party Chairman Zhao Leji - the three highest-ranking members of China's ruling committee - mark the centrepiece of Mr Albanese's six-day tour of the Middle Kingdom.
With China and Australia's comprehensive strategic partnership entering its second decade, Mr Xi said he was ready to push the relationship further to reap greater benefits for both peoples.
The meeting comes as the Chinese-Australian free trade agreement passes its 10th anniversary.
Co-operation between the two nations has increased following a falling out during the COVID-19 pandemic.
An article by a Chinese state media influencer suggested Beijing could restrict Australian imports as retaliation, risking financial blowback for Australian companies.
It comes as Chinese security officials tried to stop Australian journalists, who were travelling with the prime minister's delegation, from leaving a tourist attraction in Beijing after filming in the area.
The group of reporters had permission to film at the location, but were stopped by security officials and were told to hand over footage before police arrived.
The journalists were able to leave the site with the footage, despite being followed by security.
https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/9016725/thorny-issues-broached-as-albanese-xi-go-head-to-head/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oO-GWpQ19ek
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109326
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23328999 (151248ZJUL25) Notable: Australian concerns over live fire drill brushed aside in Xi meeting – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese raised February’s live-fire drills off Australia’s coast with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing, stressing concern over “the notice and the ways that it happened.” Mr Xi replied that China conducted exercises “just as Australia engages in exercises.” Albanese also pressed the case of detained Australian writer Yang Hengjun, though he said outcomes would take “patient, calibrated advocacy.” Xi hailed a turnaround in ties after a “setback,” while Albanese emphasised trade and stability. The Chinese Foreign Ministry called for both nations to uphold multilateralism, free trade and international law.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109325
Australian concerns over live fire drill brushed aside in Xi meeting
Tom Crowley - 15 July 2025
President Xi Jinping appears to have brushed aside Australia's concerns about the lack of notice given by China ahead of a Chinese military exercise off the Australian coastline earlier this year.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese told reporters his meeting with the Chinese leader, held in Beijing on Tuesday, was "constructive" and that he had raised the live fire drill in a manner consistent with his previous public statements.
He said Mr Xi had reiterated China's right to perform exercises.
"I said what I said at the time, which is that it was within international law, there was no breach of international law by China in that, but that we were concerned about the notice and the ways that it happened, including the live fire exercises," he said.
"In response, of course … President Xi Jinping said that China engaged in exercises just as Australia engages in exercises."
Mr Albanese said he also raised the case of Australian man Yang Hengjun, who is detained in a Chinese prison on spying charges he has long denied and whose health is ailing.
"I raised the case. You wouldn't expect there to be an immediate outcome, and that is not the way things work. The way it works is by that patient, calibrated advocacy, what Australians do, what my government does," he said.
The PM said the ownership of the Port of Darwin was not raised. Asked whether Donald Trump or US trade tariffs had been discussed, he said both leaders had asserted the importance of international trade.
A statement from the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs said Mr Xi told Mr Albanese the two countries should "work together to uphold fairness and justice, support multilateralism and free trade, defend the UN-centred international system and the international order based on international law".
The statement suggested Mr Albanese had expressed support for China's bid to host the APEC summit in 2026 and that the PM had said Australia was "ready to work with China" to support multilateralism and the UN and "jointly safeguard free trade and WTO rules – contributing to greater global stability and predictability".
Earlier on Tuesday, the pair made public remarks in Beijing's Great Hall of the People prior to a closed-door meeting and a lunch attended by Mr Albanese's fiancee, Jodie Haydon, and China's First Lady, Peng Liyuan.
In his remarks, Mr Xi welcomed an improvement in relations between the two countries since what he called "the setback", an apparent reference to the cooling of bilateral ties during the Morrison government.
"The China–Australia relationship has [risen] from the setback and turned around, bringing tangible benefits to the Chinese and Australian peoples," he said.
"No matter how the international landscape may evolve, we should uphold this overall direction unswervingly."
In his own remarks, Mr Albanese emphasised economic ties and said it was important to have "direct discussions on the issues that matter to us, and to the stability and prosperity of our region."
"Australia values our relationship with China and will continue to approach it in a calm and consistent manner, guided by our national interest, which we regard very much as the relationship being positive," he said.
The meeting came on the third full day of the PM's six-day trip to the country, his second as prime minister, which began in Shanghai.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-15/albanese-xi-meeting-live-fire-drills-beijing/105535036
https://x.com/AlboMP/status/1944980617680048634
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109327
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23329028 (151300ZJUL25) Notable: Xi tells Albanese that China’s ships will conduct exercises wherever they want in international waters – In Beijing, President Xi Jinping told Prime Minister Anthony Albanese that Chinese naval forces would conduct drills “just as Australia engages in exercises,” brushing aside concerns over February’s live-fire operations around Australia. Albanese urged Xi to maintain the status quo on Taiwan and raised the case of detained writer Yang Hengjun. Despite Beijing’s anger at Labor’s pledge to strip Chinese company Landbridge of its lease over Darwin Port, Xi did not raise the issue, instead hailing improved ties and “mutually beneficial co-operation.” Albanese also met Premier Li Qiang and National People’s Congress chairman Zhao Leji, while Business Council of Australia chief Bran Black led 14 major company CEOs in Beijing talks.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109325
>>109326
Xi tells Albanese that China’s ship will conduct exercises wherever they want in international waters
BEN PACKHAM and WILL GLASGOW - 15 July 2025
1/2
Xi Jinping has told Anthony Albanese his naval forces will conduct exercises wherever they want in international waters as the Prime Minister called for more notice of PLA-Navy drills near Australia and urged the Chinese President not to invade Taiwan.
Hosting Mr Albanese in Beijing’s Great Hall of the People on Tuesday, China’s supreme leader lauded the improvements in the countries’ bilateral ties under Labor, calling for the Australian leader to “unswervingly” maintain the positive momentum in the relationship “no matter how the international landscape may evolve”.
Mr Xi warmly welcomed Mr Albanese to the capital for their fourth meeting amid glowing state media coverage, with one of the Chinese Communist Party’s most influential mouthpieces saying his visit sent a message “to the wider world” amid Donald Trump’s tariff chaos.
The Prime Minister and his fiance, Jodie Haydon, were treated to a rare lunchtime banquet by Mr Xi, as well as a full military honour guard. A second feast followed in the evening with China’s No.2 leader, Premier Li Qiang.
Speaking after his meeting with the President, Mr Albanese revealed he had agreed to a review of the China-Australia free-trade agreement, amid Chinese calls for the deal to be expanded to allow closer co-operation on artificial intelligence and technology, which Australia has ruled out.
Mr Albanese said he raised February’s surprised live-fire drills by Chinese warships in the Tasman Sea which went on to circumnavigate Australia in an unprecedented show of force, while conceding the vessels had operated within their legal rights.
“I said what I said at the time, which was that it was within international law … but that we were concerned about the notice and the way that it happened, including the live-fire exercises,” he said.
“In response, of course, President Xi said that China engaged in exercises just as Australia engages in exercises.”
His comments came as Defence officials declined to say if they were tracking Chinese spy ships heading towards Queensland’s coast to monitor Australia’s biggest military exercise, Talisman Sabre, after earlier saying their arrival was expected soon.
Amid US calls for Australia to declare whether it would support its ally in a war with China over Taiwan, Mr Albanese urged Mr Xi to maintain the status quo on the self-governed territory, which the Chinese leader has ordered his forces to be prepared to seize by 2027. Asked whether he regarded China as a threat, he said: “We have strategic competition in the region, but we continue to engage in order to support peace and security in the region and stability in the region.”
At the opening of their meeting, Mr Xi said he and his guest had “reached many common understandings” during their past three meetings.
Speaking just over six months after China lifted the last of its $20bn in punitive trade bans on Australian exporters, Mr Xi said the countries could avoid further diplomatic tensions by “seeking common ground while sharing differences and pursuing mutually beneficial co-operation”.
“No matter how the international landscape may evolve, we should approach this overall direction unswervingly,” he said in a veiled reference to the global instability caused by Mr Trump – who Mr Albanese is yet to meet face-to-face. The Prime Minister said he and his Chinese counterpart did not speak directly about the US, and that Mr Trump’s trade policies had not changed how Australia approached its relationship with China.
“Our relationship with China is very separate from that. China is our major trading partner. The destination for more than one in four of our export dollars comes here. The trade with the United States is important, but it’s less than 5 per cent,” he said. Mr Albanese, who also had meetings with Premier Li and National People’s Congress chairman Zhao Leji, called on Mr Xi to release jailed Australian writer Yang Hengjun, who is serving a suspended death sentence on espionage charges.
He was not expecting any swift change in his status after six years of detention. “You wouldn’t expect there to be an immediate outcome. That’s not the way these things work. The way it works is by that patient, calibrated advocacy. That is what Australians do,” he said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109328
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23329049 (151306ZJUL25) Notable: Video: HIMARS rocket platform fired in Talisman Sabre wargame exercise – The biennial Talisman Sabre war games opened in Central Queensland with Australia’s first live-fire of the US-made High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS). Brigadier Nick Wilson called it “a remarkable day,” marking the Army’s entry into long-range, multi-domain strike capability. About 35,000 personnel from 19 countries, including the US, UK, Japan, Canada, France and Germany, are taking part, with Vietnam and Malaysia attending as observers. Wilson said the drills demonstrate that “we are stronger together,” as the exercise expands beyond Australia’s borders for the first time into the Torres Strait and Papua New Guinea.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109320
HIMARS rocket platform fired in Talisman Sabre wargame exercise
9News Staff - Jul 14, 2025
The largest and most sophisticated wargame exercise on Australian soil is under way in Central Queensland.
Exercise Talisman Sabre is a showcase of the most advanced weaponry from 19 countries, including Australia, the US, the UK, Canada, France, Japan and Germany, and involves about 35,000 personnel.
Vietnam and Malaysia are attending as observers.
The exercise's opening act was the High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems or HIMARS, a light multiple rocket launcher.
"Today was the first time the Australian Army has live-fired our long-range multi-domain platforms being the HIMARS, so it is a remarkable day," Brigadier Nick Wilson said.
The goal of the exercise is to strengthen relationships between allies and partners and to promote a peaceful and prosperous Indo-Pacific.
"We are stronger together and in partnering with both our regional and partner nations, we provide like minds in the application of our fire power," Wilson said.
The operation is usually conducted on Australian territory but for the first time will be extended across the Torres Strait and into Papua New Guinea.
https://www.9news.com.au/national/talisman-sabre-queensland-multiple-rocket-launcher-tested-in-wargame-exercise-news/73667e21-838e-40e1-a32f-bd41fa53229d
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ax0llt3v9KY
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109329
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23329060 (151310ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Talisman Sabre 2025: Largest-ever joint military exercise underway in Central Queensland - A massive field hospital, capable of treating dozens of people, is up and running in central Queensland. It's part of the largest ever joint military exercise currently underway. - 9 News Australia
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109320
Talisman Sabre 2025: Largest-ever joint military exercise underway in Central Queensland
9 News Australia
Jul 15, 2025
A massive field hospital, capable of treating dozens of people, is up and running in central Queensland. It's part of the largest ever joint military exercise currently underway.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjShHfP1gZ0
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109330
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23329076 (151316ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Australia hosts military drills with US and other nations, likely to draw Chinese surveillance – The largest-ever Talisman Sabre exercises are under way, involving 35,000 troops from 19 nations, with Malaysia and Vietnam attending as observers. Australia live-fired its newly acquired HIMARS rocket system for the first time at Shoalwater Bay in Queensland. Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy said Chinese surveillance ships had monitored every exercise since 2017 and were again expected: “It’d be very unusual for them not to observe it.” Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, in China for talks with Xi Jinping, said the issue would not be raised, calling such monitoring “nothing unusual.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109320
>>109315
Australia hosts military drills with US and other nations, likely to draw Chinese surveillance
ROD MCGUIRK - July 15, 2025
MELBOURNE, Australia (AP) - The largest-ever war-fighting drills in Australia, Exercise Talisman Sabre, are underway and expected to attract the attention of Chinese spy ships.
Australia launched missiles from its M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System, known as HIMARS, on Monday during live-fire exercises at the Shoalwater Bay Training Area, a 4,500 square kilometer (1,700 square mile) Outback expanse in Queensland state. The HIMARS launchers were recently bought from the United States.
“Today was the first time the Australian Army has live-fired our long-range, multi-domain platforms being the HIMARS, so it is a remarkable day,” Brig. Nick Wilson told reporters.
Talisman Sabre began in 2005 as a biennial joint exercise between the United States and Australia.
This year, more than 35,000 military personnel from 19 nations, including Canada, Fiji, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, South Korea, Singapore, Thailand, Tonga, and the United Kingdom, will take part over three weeks, Australia’s defense department said.
Malaysia and Vietnam are also attending as observers.
The exercise will also take place in Papua New Guinea, Australia’s nearest neighbor. It is the first time Talisman Sabre activities have been held outside Australia.
Chinese surveillance ships have monitored naval exercises off the Australian coast during the last four Talisman Sabre exercises and were expected to surveil the current exercise, Defense Industry Minister Pat Conroy said.
“The Chinese military have observed these exercises since 2017. It’d be very unusual for them not to observe it,” Conroy said.
“We’ll adjust accordingly. We’ll obviously observe their activities and monitor their presence around Australia, but we’ll also adjust how we conduct those exercises,” Conroy added.
Conroy said the Chinese were not yet shadowing ships as of Sunday.
The exercise officially started on Sunday with a ceremony in Sydney attended by Deputy Commanding General of U.S. Army Pacific Lt. Gen. J.B. Vowell and Australia’s Chief of Joint Operations Vice-Adm. Justin Jones.
The exercise, showcasing Australia’s defense alliance with the United States, started a day after Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese began a six-day visit to China, where he is expected to hold his fourth face-to-face meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing on Tuesday.
Albanese said Chinese surveillance of Talisman Sabre would not be an issue raised with Xi.
“That would be nothing unusual. That has happened in the past and I’ll continue to assert Australia’s national interest, as I do,” Albanese told reporters in Shanghai Monday.
Albanese also noted that while he had visited the United States as prime minister five times, he had only been to China twice.
The Australian leader has been criticized at home for failing to secure a face-to-face meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump.
“I look forward to a constructive engagement with President Trump. We have had three constructive phone conversations,” Albanese said.
https://apnews.com/article/australia-talisman-sabre-miltary-exercise-e236e5ed9173bc766c2ed73441b3efda
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-yv5ePUYc0
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109331
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23329122 (151327ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Talisman Sabre 2025: The largest military exercise in Australian history - The Australian Defence Forces and 19 other nations are conducting the largest military exercise ever staged in Australian waters, known as Talisman Sabre 2025. The exercise involves 40,000 troops and showcases Australia's newly acquired High Mars rocket launchers with a 500-kilometre range of fire. - 7NEWS Australia
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109320
>>109315
Talisman Sabre 2025: The largest military exercise in Australian history
7NEWS Australia
Jul 14, 2025
The Australian Defence Forces and 19 other nations are conducting the largest military exercise ever staged in Australian waters, known as Talisman Sabre 2025. The exercise involves 40,000 troops and showcases Australia's newly acquired High Mars rocket launchers with a 500-kilometre range of fire.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thV9X7W8x0I
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109332
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23329161 (151341ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Talisman Sabre 2025: As PM charms China, Australia hosts 19-nation war games with eyes on Beijing – As Anthony Albanese met Chinese leaders in Beijing, Australia launched its largest-ever Talisman Sabre, with 40,000 troops from 19 nations openly training with China “firmly pointed out” as the adversary. Vice Admiral Justin Jones said it was “19 friends, allies and partners wanting to operate together … for peace, stability, a free and open Indo-Pacific.” New capabilities on display included HIMARS rocket systems and the “Ghost Shark” submersible drone. Officials acknowledged that Australia’s forces on their own are dwarfed by China’s. Yet combined, the 19 participating nations match Beijing’s manpower and surpass its assets. Lt Gen Joel Vowell called the exercise “a deterrent mechanism” and reaffirmed the US–Australia alliance as “ironclad.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109320
>>109315
Talisman Sabre 2025: As PM charms China, Australia hosts 19-nation war games with eyes on Beijing
As Anthony Albanese courts Beijing, 40,000 troops prepare for war, with China front and centre in Australia’s biggest military exercise yet.
Chris Reason - 15 July 2025
1/2
The timing was as extraordinary as it was unfortunate.
The very week Prime Minister Anthony Albanese chose to go charm China, Australia’s armed forces begin training to go to war with them.
It’s quite the diary clash; his appointments secretary might need to reconsider their position.
Exercise Talisman Sabre. It’s locked in around the same time every two years and has been since 2005. And this year was the biggest, most ambitious, and significant iteration of them all: 19 nations, 40,000 troops, all coming together to focus on just one increasingly troubling adversary: China.
There was a time Talisman would rattle that sabre at a so-called “unknown adversary” and the assembled press and generals would wink and nod their heads, knowing that was code for the People’s Republic. Like fine China itself, identification was always handled with care.
Not anymore.
The fingers of 19 nations are firmly pointed at the neighbourhood rogue; happy to point China out.
There’s almost an urgency about it now.
At the Talisman Sabre opening ceremony, held on the expansive landing deck of the Australian giant HMAS Adelaide on Sunday, the ADF Chief of Joint Operations Vice Admiral Justin Jones, had no hesitancy or inhibitions in putting China’s name firmly on the table.
When asked what message the coalition of Talisman partners was sending in the three-week exercise, it was all about China.
“Well, I will leave it to China to interpret what 19 friends, allies and partners wanting to operate together in the region means to them,” he said.
“But for me, it’s nations that are in search of a common aspiration for peace, stability, a free and open Indo-Pacific and adherence to international law.”
Vice Admiral Jones was also happy to openly discuss the expected arrival of China’s spy ships.
“I fully expect that the People’s Republic of China will want to come and observe the activities that occur as part of Exercise Talisman Sabre,” he said.
“They’ve made a habit of those over preceding iterations of the exercise.”
Adding cryptically: “And we have measures in place to cater for that.”
But he also revealed that if they were on the way, they’re late.
“There is no sign yet,” he said.
It could be that the PLA Navy leadership held back any orders to dispatch their ships while Mr Albanese was still their official visitor this week. A gesture of goodwill, perhaps.
But they won’t want to leave it much longer; there’s a lot to spy on.
Exercise Director Brigadier Damien Hill, who’s been planning the event for the last 700 days, says he’s counted a total of 79 defence “innovations” about to be unveiled at Talisman. Two of which the organisers were happy to discuss publicly.
The first is Australia’s newly-acquired HIMARS highly mobile rocket launch system — the so-called “shoot and scoot” weapon. It can fire rockets at a range of up to 500km. Even out to sea — almost as far as the Chinese ships conducting live fire exercises off the coast in February.
The ADF has bought 42 units. And it’s excited. These were the first items displayed in a breathtaking live fire exercise at Shoalwater Bay on the opening day of the exercise yesterday.
The second breakthrough acquisition: the ADF’s new submersible drones. I asked the US Deputy Commanding General, Lt Gen Joel Vowell, if we’d see any used in TS25. In fact, I’d walked straight past one as we boarded the Adelaide. And he confirmed, it will be used.
The boldly-named “Ghost Shark” was jointly developed and funded between Defence and Anduril Australia. They are a naval warfare game changer — able to be used for long-range stealth operations at a depth of 6000m and gather intelligence, or deliver strike capabilities.
World-leading Aussi-tech — on-budget, ahead of schedule. They are one of the rare success stories of ADF procurement. Expect to see a proliferation of them in the years to come.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109333
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23333070 (160912ZJUL25) Notable: Lunch invitation leaves Albanese in a delicate position in rapidly changing global order – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was honoured with a rare lunch with Xi Jinping in Beijing’s Great Hall, the first such gesture since Malcolm Turnbull in 2016. Xi lauded improved ties, saying relations had “risen from the setbacks and turned around,” while Albanese raised concerns over February’s Chinese live-fire drills near Australia and the detention of writer Yang Hengjun. China Daily praised Albanese’s “clearer judgment” than predecessor Scott Morrison, framing his six-night visit as a success. The visit coincided with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and Indian External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar also being in Beijing.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109325
>>109326
>>109327
Lunch invitation leaves Albanese in a delicate position in rapidly changing global order
WILL GLASGOW - 15 July 2024
1/2
Xi Jinping has clearly decided Anthony Albanese is a world leader worth his time.
That is going to make some people in Australia very happy – and it is going to make another group in Australia, and in Washington, more than a little worried.
After their official meeting on Tuesday, the Chinese leader cleared his diary to have lunch with the visiting Australian Prime Minister. The PM’s fiancee Jodie Haydon was also invited for lunch (although Xi’s wife Peng Liyuan was not along).
It was the first time an Australian leader had eaten with Xi since Malcolm Turnbull did during a trip to China in 2016.
“I thank very much President Xi for the bilateral meeting and also (for) hosting a banquet lunch there in the Great Hall of the People, which is an honour which is bestowed on Australia,” the PM said at a press conference in Beijing after the meal.
It is an increasingly rare experience for visiting leaders to get so much time in the Chairman of Everything’s diary.
“Xi receives lots of guests but doesn’t invite many to lunch,” Richard McGregor, senior fellow at the Lowy Institute and Australia’s top expert on elite Chinese politics, told The Australian.
“He clearly sees value in investing in Albanese personally, especially as he would have been advised that he might be in charge of Australia for some years to come.”
After his election win, Albanese could be PM for the rest of Donald Trump’s second term in the White House. It is a period ripe with opportunity for Beijing.
No one should confuse Albanese’s lunch invitation, or dinner banquet he and a gaggle of Australian business leaders had with Premier Li Qiang on Tuesday night, for an end of Australia’s difficulties with China.
Xi made that crystal clear in the almost hour-long, pre-lunch meeting when the PM raised concerns about the lack of warning before the PLA Navy’s live-fire drills in the Tasman Sea earlier this year.
”President Xi said China engages in exercise just as Australia engages in exercises,” the PM told reporters.
In other words: get used to it.
It is an assertive message being taken increasingly seriously around the region – no where more so than in Taiwan.
Indeed as the PM attended his Beijing meetings, Taiwan held its annual Han Kuang military drills. Some of this week’s drills are taking place in Taipei, as President William Lai’s government tries to prepare the Taiwanese public for the realities of what would follow a feared Chinese attack.
China’s security state also did its bit to puncture the friendly bubble. On Tuesday morning, a posse of plainclothes security officers surrounded visiting Australian journalists who were filming by the Drum Tower, one of Beijing’s most beautiful Imperial-era structures. The visitors were told to delete all of their recordings – a routine encounter for international media based in China.
“China has a different system,” the PM said, euphemistically, when asked about the incident.
China’s Leninist system had made clear in a Tuesday editorial in one of its most influential state mastheads it was determined for the PM’s “notably long” six-night trip to be a success. It is revelling in the PM’s focus on economic ties and mostly upbeat rhetoric about Australia’s biggest trading partner.
In a tone-setting editorial, Beijing’s most authoritative English language organ, the China Daily, praised Albanese for his “clearer judgment and understanding of China” than his Coalition predecessor Scott Morrison.
“Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s ongoing visit to China is not only of significance for the bilateral and trade relations between the two countries, it also sends a message amid the changing global trade landscape,” the China Daily declared, grandly.
It noted the trip was taking place “against the backdrop of rising tensions between the United States and many countries because of the US administration’s recent threat to levy higher tariffs on them”.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109334
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23333078 (160920ZJUL25) Notable: Anthony Albanese ducks ‘free Yang Hengjun’ criticism – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese confirmed he raised the case of detained Australian writer Yang Hengjun with Xi Jinping but rejected claims his government’s approach is “too soft,” saying it would be “inappropriate and insensitive” to respond to family criticism. He said “patient, calibrated advocacy” was the only way to secure progress and pointed to past successes in securing the release of other Australians. Yang, arrested in 2019 and sentenced last year to a suspended death penalty on espionage charges, has endured harsh treatment in prison. His friend and PhD supervisor Feng Chongyi has condemned Labor’s stance as weak.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109325
>>109326
>>109327
Anthony Albanese ducks ‘free Yang Hengjun’ criticism
RHIANNON DOWN - 15 July 2025
Anthony Albanese has refused to respond to criticism from supporters of an Australian writer detained in China, Yang Hengjun, that Labor’s approach has been too weak, declaring it would be “inappropriate and insensitive” to weigh in.
The Prime Minister said he raised Dr Yang’s incarceration on espionage charges with Chinese President Xi Jinping when the two leaders sat down for a face-to-face meeting on Tuesday.
Speaking in Beijing just hours after the closed-doors meeting, Mr Albanese defended his government’s approach to securing Dr Yang’s release through diplomatic channels.
Amid mounting pressure to push for Dr Yang’s release after his six years in a Chinese prison, Mr Albanese said he would not respond to criticism from the democracy advocate’s supporters that the government’s approach had been too soft.
“I am certainly not going to comment on what the family of someone who is detained here or anywhere else …. that would be entirely inappropriate and insensitive,” Mr Albanese said.
“I understand the pressures that are on people when a loved one has been incarcerated. “What we will do, though, is put forward our views in a diplomatic way in order to try to maximise an outcome.”
Mr Albanese said it could not be expected that there would be an immediate outcome after he raised Dr Yang’s incarceration with Mr Xi, and his government would continue to progress his case through “patient, calibrated advocacy”.
“You wouldn’t expect there to be an immediate outcome, and that is not the way these things work,” Mr Albanese said.
“The way it works is by that patient, calibrated advocacy … that is what Australians do, what my government does. And I point to the record of my government when it comes to these issues.”
Mr Albanese defended his government’s track record on securing the release of Australians detained overseas, vowing to continue to pursue resolution in Dr Yang’s case.
“I point towards the outcomes where Australians here, in China, in Myanmar, in Vietnam, in Indonesia, the US and the UK have all received outcomes that, at the least, could be called satisfactory, because of my government’s advocacy,” he said. “We will continue to do that to achieve outcomes, and that is what our objective is.” Dr Yang was handed a suspended death sentence by a Beijing court last year, after he was sentenced for espionage charges in a secretive closed-door trial.
The sentence could be commuted to life in prison after two years of good behaviour.
His friend and PhD supervisor Feng Chongyi has repeatedly criticised the Australian government’s approach towards securing his release as being “soft”.
Dr Yang’s ordeal has continued despite the Albanese government’s progress in stabilising its relationship with Beijing, with the thawing of relations having no impact on his detention so far.
Following his arrest at Guangzhou airport by Chinese security agents in January 2019, Dr Yang has endured enforced sleep deprivation, erratic medication and being strapped to a “tiger chair”, which was used to restrain him during interrogation sessions.
Dr Yang was accused of handing secret information to Taiwan’s security officials when he was based in Hong Kong. Dr Yang has maintained his innocence.
Before migrating to Australia in 2000, Dr Yang worked for China’s Ministry of State Security.
He has published a series of spy novels and completed a PhD at UTS.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/anthony-albanese-ducks-free-yang-hengjung-criticism/news-story/dacea2b4743fafbaccd66cda7f0b3f5d
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109335
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23333091 (160926ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Anthony Albanese follows in the footsteps of Gough Whitlam in China tour – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has marked his China trip with a homage to Gough Whitlam, touring the Great Wall with fiancée Jodie Haydon, echoing Whitlam’s landmark 1971 visit that preceded Australia’s recognition of Beijing. Albanese praised Whitlam’s “courage” while Beijing’s state-run China Daily lauded Albanese for showing “clearer judgment” than Scott Morrison. At a press conference, Albanese insisted he acted only in the national interest, not party politics. His six-night stay continues in Chengdu, with stops at Cochlear’s factory and the panda breeding centre.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109325
>>109326
>>109327
Anthony Albanese follows in the footsteps of Gough Whitlam in China tour
WILL GLASGOW - 16 July 2025
1/2
After his big day in the Great Hall with Xi Jinping, Anthony Albanese spent most of Wednesday leading a Gough Whitlam tribute mission.
The Chinese government was delighted to assist. A huge section of the Badaling section of the Great Wall – about 80km northwest of Beijing and normally heaving with tourists – was closed off for the Australian Prime Minister, his fiancee Jodie Haydon and the travelling media, diplomatic and security entourage.
As opposition leader, Whitlam, one of the Labor PM’s political heroes, had visited this same chunk of Ming dynasty-era Great Wall back in 1971, the year before he won government, severed official relations with Taipei and switched recognition to Beijing.
“There is no question that Gough Whitlam made the right decision in 1971 and that Australia has benefited from that,” Albanese said on Wednesday. “It’s certainly understood in China that that was an early decision. And it was a decision that took courage.”
Labor Party history presents Whitlam as a visionary global leader, but you need to be pretty parochial to think recognising Beijing in 1972 was “early”.
By then, more than 60 countries had done so.
The flurry of recognition in the late 1960s and throughout the ’70s had a lot more to do with Mao Zedong reorienting China’s foreign policy after Beijing’s rupture with Moscow than the long-sightedness, or otherwise, of other world leaders at the time.
Washington, which did not officially recognise the People’s Republic until 1979, did not rush its formal recognition because it did not want Taiwan and its population to come under the rule of the Communist Party. (Whitlam, as one of his China advisers, Ross Terrill, has recorded, had no such qualms.)
The Chinese government is more than happy to endorse the ”Whitlam as visionary” Labor version of Australia’s history with the PRC.
The PM has lent into the legend. In Shanghai, he gave a speech to the Australian business community in the Peace Hotel where, he told his audience, Whitlam spent his 55th birthday on his brazen trip as an opposition leader, pursuing recognition of Beijing despite the then Australian government’s reservations.
On his first trip to China as PM in November 2023, Albanese included a visit to Beijing’s Temple of Heaven to recreate a photo from Whitlam’s 1971 trip.
China’s ambassador Xiao Qian could not have looked happier as he watched that day of politically loaded sightseeing.
China claims not to interfere in Australian domestic politics. Yet it is hard to square that with much of what its spokespeople and official mouthpieces say.
In a tone-setting editorial before Albanese’s more than two hours with Xi, the government-controlled China Daily repeated Beijing’s line that all the problems in the relationship were the fault of the Coalition. “Albanese’s visit shows that the Australian side has a clearer judgment and understanding of China than it had under the previous Scott Morrison government,” the influential masthead purred.
Up until 2020, it was former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull who China blamed for all the “twists and turns” in the bilateral relationship.
At Wednesday’s press conference on the Great Wall, I asked Albanese if he was worried about the Australia-China relationship being politicised?
“My job is to be Prime Minister of Australia – to represent the Australian government. That’s the capacity I am here in,” he said.
”I continue to do so to the best of my ability each and every day. Each and every day, I don’t think about any interests of a political party.
“What I do is I think about the national interest and I continue to do that each and every day.
“And I would encourage everyone in the parliament to do the same, including those commenting on international relations,” he said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109336
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23333103 (160938ZJUL25) Notable: Chinese premier Li Qiang presses Albanese over treatment of Chinese firms amid Darwin angst – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese rejected Premier Li Qiang’s call for a “fair, open and non-discriminatory” environment for Chinese investors after Li raised concerns over Australia’s strict foreign investment rules and the treatment of firms like Darwin Port leaseholder Landbridge. Albanese insisted all bids are assessed “case-by-case” in the national interest and defended AUKUS as vital to counter China’s build-up. Chinese state media flagged Darwin and security ties with the US as points of tension, though neither Xi nor Li raised them directly. The leaders also agreed to resume the China–Australia Strategic Economic Dialogue later this year.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109325
>>109326
>>109335
Chinese premier Li Qiang presses Albanese over treatment of Chinese firms amid Darwin angst
WILL GLASGOW - 16 July 2025
1/2
Anthony Albanese has rejected a Chinese push for his government to weaken rules blocking the country’s investors from key economic sectors, as a Beijing mouthpiece warned Labor against stripping the Port of Darwin lease from Chinese-owned company Landbridge.
On the fourth day of his landmark trip to China, the Prime Minister said his government wanted to secure peace and stability through “positive engagement” with Beijing, but defended its plan to acquire nuclear-powered submarines through the $358bn AUKUS program.
After a marathon day of meetings with Chinese President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang on Tuesday, Mr Albanese travelled to the Great Wall of China, paying homage to his Labor hero Gough Whitlam, who visited the same Badaling section of the wall as opposition leader in 1971.
The excursion, with fiancee Jodie Haydon, followed pointed remarks by Mr Li late on Tuesday in which he raised concerns about Australia’s treatment of Chinese firms, which are routinely barred by the Foreign Investment Review Board from taking stakes in critical infrastructure and other sensitive sectors.
“We hope that the Australian side can provide a fair, open and non-discriminatory business environment for Chinese enterprises in Australia,” Mr Li said during his meeting with Mr Albanese in the Great Hall of the People.
At a later business roundtable, which included senior Chinese business figures with direct experience of Australia’s strict foreign investment regime, the Premier pressed the point again.
“We hope that the Australian side will treat Chinese enterprises visiting Australia fairly and properly solve the problems encountered by enterprises in market access, investment review, and other aspects,” Mr Li said.
Mr Albanese, who has used his second China visit as Prime Minister to talk up the strength of bilateral trade ties, pushed back on the critique, saying China wasn’t being singled out. “We have a case-by-case issue when it comes to foreign investment (which) is viewed not on the basis of any one country, but on the basis of an objective assessment of our national interest,” he said.
While the US maintains a policy of “peace through strength”, Mr Albanese said his five-day visit to China underscored his principle that working more closely with potential rivals was a key to maintaining good relations.
“It’s important that we build stability and security in our world, and part of that has to have positive engagement. That’s what I’m doing here,” he said.
However, he said Australia still needed the deterrent of nuclear submarines through the AUKUS program, which is aimed squarely at countering China’s massive military build-up in the Indo-Pacific.
“We need a defence force, and we make no apologies for investing in our capability to give Australia the defence and security assets that we need,” Mr Albanese said.
The official Chinese readout of the Prime Minister’s meeting with Mr Xi on Tuesday said he had assured his counterpart that Australia adhered to the “one-China” policy and did not support “Taiwan independence”. But Mr Albanese said he had simply restated longstanding Australian policy.
“We support the status quo,” he said. “By definition, we don’t support any unilateral action on Taiwan. That’s been our position for a long period of time. Nothing is different.”
The Prime Minister flew from Beijing to the capital of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, on Wednesday afternoon, where he will visit China’s largest panda breeding facility, attend a medical technology lunch, and tour Australian bionic ear company Cochlear’s local manufacturing operation.
Australia is the world’s second-largest producer of medtech patents, while China is one of Cochlear’s top five global markets.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109337
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23333122 (160949ZJUL25) Notable: COMMENTARY: China’s embrace of Anthony Albanese aimed at Trump, wider world – “Australia is back in China’s good books, and Beijing wants the world to know it. Anthony Albanese is being held up by Xi Jinping as a model Western leader, playing a bit part in China’s global effort to be seen as a reasonable alternative to Donald Trump. The country’s state-run newspapers carried front-page pictures … extolling the ‘turnaround’ in bilateral relations. The tabloid Global Times said the Australia-China relationship was poised to soar into the ‘stratosphere’. Meanwhile, on page three of the China Daily, there was a photo of Xi extending a hand to Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov … The accompanying story says the pair discussed how to ‘promote a more just and equitable order’. Behold, the two faces of China.” – Ben Packham, The Australian
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109325
>>109326
>>109335
COMMENTARY: China’s embrace of Anthony Albanese aimed at Trump, wider world
BEN PACKHAM - 16 July 2025
Australia is back in China’s good books, and Beijing wants the world to know it.
Anthony Albanese is being held up by Xi Jinping as a model Western leader, playing a bit part in China’s global effort to be seen as a reasonable alternative to Donald Trump.
The country’s state-run newspapers carried front-page pictures on Wednesday of a beaming Albanese meeting President Xi in the Great Hall of the People, and stories extolling the “turnaround” in bilateral relations.
According to the China Daily, Xi told Albanese the improvement in relations proved “adhering to the principles of treating each other as equals, seeking common ground while shelving differences, and engaging in mutually beneficial co-operation” would serve the interests of both countries and their people.
The subtext? “Australia shows us respect, unlike the US. If countries want to get along with China and reap the economic rewards, behave like Albanese.”
The tabloid Global Times said the Australia-China relationship was poised to soar into the “stratosphere”.
But its take wasn’t all positive, sounding a note of warning in its lead editorial over Albanese’s pledge to strip Chinese-owned company Landbridge of its lease over the strategically located Port of Darwin.
“At present, there are specific issues between China and Australia that need to be discussed, such as the lease of Darwin Port and the expansion of the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement,” it said.
“There are also practical obstacles, especially the tendencies towards ‘pan-politicisation’ and ‘pan-securitisation’, as well as interference from third parties.”
China’s No.2, Premier Li Qiang, also fired a shot across the bow in a speech to Australian and Chinese business leaders on Wednesday night, warning Beijing expected a non-discriminatory business environment for its companies.
“I trust that Australia will also treat Chinese enterprises fairly and also properly resolve issues in terms of market access and investment review,” he said.
Li laid out the rewards on offer if Australia toed the line, saying the Chinese could consume more “lobsters, wine and tuna” than the country’s exporters could sell.
“About 80 per cent of the trade surpluses of Australia come from its trade with China,” he said. “Such trade has surged in recent years, and this has proved that continued sound development of China-Australia trade co-operation can best serve the common interests of both countries.”
For his part, Albanese is glossing over the irritants in the relationship, hailing the trip as a success, and proof of his “patient and calibrated approach” to stabilising bilateral ties.
And to those who question the wisdom of getting too close to the communist dictatorship that held Australia’s economy to ransom just a few years ago and is turning out warships and submarines at a rate of knots?
“Dialogue builds understanding,” Albanese said, restating his guiding foreign policy principle that is at once blindingly obvious while completely obscuring the complexity of the relationship.
As is always the case with Chinese diplomacy, there were outcomes to report.
In the official leader-level talks with Li on Tuesday, the PM agreed to a review of the countries’ 2014 free trade deal.
This is formality, activating an inbuilt mechanism in the deal a decade after it was signed. But for Beijing, in the current circumstances, it’s a clear win, opening the way for it to raise a range of curly issues in upcoming consultations.
In a more minor success for the Chinese side, Australia agreed to allow the import of Chinese jujubes, also known as red dates. The sweet, slightly tangy fruit is apparently packed with vitamin C, potassium and anti-oxidants – a further symbol in Beijing’s telling of Australia’s appetite for all things China.
Albanese and Li also declared apples from mainland Australia would now be allowed into China under new biosecurity protocols, reannouncing an agreement revealed several months ago.
Meanwhile, on page three of the China Daily, there was a photo of Xi extending a hand to Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, whom he met before he sat down with Albanese on Tuesday.
The accompanying story says the pair discussed how to “promote a more just and equitable order”.
Behold, the two faces of China.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/chinas-embrace-of-anthony-albanese-aimed-at-trump-wider-world/news-story/300a1b3212a01ed94e665e150c5db429
https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202507/16/WS6876e4c6a31000e9a573c36a.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109338
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23333139 (160956ZJUL25) Notable: Looking forward to seeing China-Australia relations cruise steadily in the ‘stratosphere’: Global Times editorial – “Chinese President Xi Jinping met with Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese … bringing tangible benefits to the people of both countries. As the China-Australia comprehensive strategic partnership enters its second decade, this meeting has set the tone for steady progress in bilateral ties while keeping external disruptions at bay. … Of course, compared with the ‘minefields’ status described by the Global Times editorial three years ago, today’s China-Australia relationship is like a plane flying in the ‘stratosphere’ after passing through the storm zone, and the most turbulent and bumpy period has passed.” – Global Times
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109325
>>109335
>>109337
Looking forward to seeing China-Australia relations cruise steadily in the ‘stratosphere’: Global Times editorial
Global Times - Jul 15, 2025
1/2
Chinese President Xi Jinping met with Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Tuesday morning, during the latter's official visit to China. This marks the fourth meeting between the two leaders in three years. President Xi said that with the joint efforts of both sides, China-Australia relations have emerged from their low point and achieved a turnaround in recent years, bringing tangible benefits to the people of both countries. As the China-Australia comprehensive strategic partnership enters its second decade, this meeting has set the tone for steady progress in bilateral ties while keeping external disruptions at bay.
This visit marks Albanese's first trip to China since his re-election, and China is the country where he has spent the longest time during an overseas visit in this term. His seven-day itinerary spans Shanghai, Beijing, and Chengdu, accompanied by a delegation that includes senior executives from major Australian companies. In recent years, as China-Australia relations have continued to improve, the Australian government's understanding of its relationship with China has also deepened. During the meeting on Tuesday, Albanese said that Australia values its relations with China, adheres to the one-China policy and Australia has never sought to decouple from the Chinese economy. He has demonstrated a pragmatic and rational approach to China policy. An Australian scholar described the current state of China-Australia relations this way - Both sides recognize their differences, but agree that those differences should not define the relationship. Such wisdom in "seeking harmony without uniformity" is especially enlightening at a time when unilateralism and protectionism are on the rise.
Australia is currently facing tariff pressure from Washington, but the outlook for the development of China-Australia economic and trade relations remains very clear. Since 2009, China has been Australia's largest trading partner, top import source, and biggest export market for 16 consecutive years. One in four Australian jobs depends on trade, and approximately 25 percent of the country's exports go to China. In addition, China has long been Australia's largest source of international students and overseas tourists, with more than one million Chinese tourists visiting Australia each year.
According to a recent report released by the China-Australia Chamber of Commerce, over 70 percent of surveyed Australian businesses operating in China said that improvements in bilateral relations have had a positive impact on their long-term strategies in the Chinese market.
The turnaround in China-Australia relations reflects the genuine expectations of both peoples. It also demonstrates that China and Australia are opportunities for each other's development - and highlights the strong appeal of China's vast market, the resilience of its economic growth, and the certainty of its continued commitment to opening-up.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109339
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23333155 (161001ZJUL25) Notable: Queensland to fast track $1.23bn graphite mine in order to break China’s dominance – Queensland will fast track a $1.23bn Graphinex project to mine and process graphite for Australia’s first battery anode hub, seeking to cut dependence on China, which dominates 98% of global supply. The Croydon mine and Townsville plant, backed by Japan’s Idemitsu and Indonesia’s Baramulti, are set for construction in 2027, creating more than 230 jobs. Graphinex’s Art Malone stressed graphite’s role in EV batteries, noting “6kg of lithium and 52kg of graphite” are needed per unit, making outside supply critical.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109325
Queensland to fast track $1.23bn graphite mine in order to break China’s dominance
GLEN NORRIS - 16 July 2025
Queensland will fast track a $1.23bn graphite mine to service the nation’s first battery anode hub as Australia moves to reduce China’s dominance of the critical battery mineral.
The project will involve privately held Graphinex developing a greenfield graphite mine at Croydon in northwest Queensland, as well as a processing plant in Townsville. The project will create 100 jobs during construction and 133 at peak operational capacity.
The project, which has been declared a co-ordinated project by the Queensland government, aims to build sovereign capability in battery manufacturing as surging global demand for natural graphite is forecast to rise 140 per cent by 2030.
Graphite provides the negative charge in lithium batteries and is the largest material in electric vehicles by weight, making it crucial for the clean-energy transition.
China dominates 98 per cent of graphite anode production, and companies such as Graphinex are expected to become increasingly important as an alternative supply – especially for the US and Europe. The facility has been backed by capital secured through a trade mission to North America led by Queensland’s Natural Resources and Mines Minister Dale Last earlier this year, and the Crisafulli government playing “matchmaker” to secure the investment.
Major investors include Japan energy giant Idemitsu and Indonesian resources company Baramulti. Subject to approvals, construction is anticipated to begin in 2027, and operations to begin about 18 months later.
Graphinex managing director Art Malone said the co-ordinated project declaration would reduce development timelines by at least 12 month. It would allow the state’s Co-ordinator-General to facilitate environmental approvals from the Queensland and federal governments, and involve stakeholder and community consultation processes.
“Approvals are the hardest thing to come by in any mining project and having the Co-ordinator-General stand behind you and stand behind the project means a lot,” he said. “It means a lot shorter time frames in a co-ordinated approach.”
Mr Malone said the international supply of graphite had been hampered due to export restrictions imposed by China over the past couple of years.
“To put the need for supply in perspective, in every electric vehicle lithium battery there’s 6kg of lithium and 52kg of graphite,” he said. “China processes 98 per cent of the world’s graphite so Japan, South Korea, the US and Europe are really looking for outside supply, and that’s become critical for us.
“We’re getting original equipment manufacturers and car manufacturers reaching out direct to try to move away from China supply because they put in place export restrictions two years ago. So it’s been really difficult to get the material out and Australia at the moment doesn’t produce any graphite.”
Mr Malone said the company had a “completely unique deposit” in one of the richest graphite reserves in the world.
“Our deposits are hard-rock volcanic,” he said. “Typically, every other graphite in the world is sedimentary and soft. Ours is a different style and style is important because it results in ultra-high performance and also batteries that last longer.”
Mr Last said the region had a reported 25 million tonnes of graphite – the third-largest deposit in the world.
“This is an exciting milestone that positions Queensland as a leader in graphite mining and processing,” Mr Last said.
“Investors are looking at jurisdictions that offer certainty, clarity and low sovereign risk.
“We’ve made it our mission to connect international investors with Queensland innovation, backed by the work of the resources cabinet committee to streamline approvals and get more projects like this off the ground.”
The Queensland government committed $5.1m in last month’s state budget to enhance mineral exploration and identify new opportunities across the state.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/renewable-energy-economy/queensland-to-fast-track-123bn-graphite-mine-in-order-to-break-chinas-dominance/news-story/1717d8055dd24922396249563dc19115
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109340
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23333159 (161007ZJUL25) Notable: Any AUKUS pledges ‘won’t be worth paper they’re written on’: Turnbull – Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull said Australia cannot guarantee its AUKUS submarines would defend US interests, calling any such pledge meaningless as no government can bind its successor. He confirmed past conversations with Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby, who is pressing allies to clarify submarine use in a Taiwan conflict. Turnbull warned the US isn’t producing enough Virginia-class subs to meet its own needs, let alone AUKUS. PM Anthony Albanese declined to give assurances, maintaining strategic ambiguity, while Turnbull accused AUKUS supporters of “groupthink” and excessive deference to Washington.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109316
>>109318
>>109323
Any AUKUS pledges ‘won’t be worth paper they’re written on’: Turnbull
Michael Koziol - July 16, 2025
Washington: Australia cannot give the US a guarantee it would use AUKUS submarines to defend American interests in any conflict with China, and any such assurances “would not be worth the paper they’re (not) written on”, former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull says.
Confirming his past conversations with US defence official Elbridge Colby, who is leading a Pentagon review of the AUKUS deal, Turnbull said it was impossible for Australia to promise nuclear-powered submarines for a hypothetical contingency.
“No Australian government can commit any of its defence assets in advance to some future conflict. And the American government wouldn’t do that,” he said in an interview.
“In any event, even if one government were to make a commitment of that kind, it couldn’t bind a successor government. And circumstances change. In this area, you really cannot deal in hypotheticals.”
Last week, this masthead revealed Colby was seeking a public declaration or private guarantee from Australia that it would use the US-made submarines it buys under AUKUS in a possible future conflict with China.
Later, the Pentagon confirmed a Financial Times story that said Colby wanted Australia and Japan to clarify the role they would play in a conflict over Taiwan. A senior US defence official said a key issue in the AUKUS review was the submarine “command structure” in the event of war.
Turnbull is a vocal AUKUS critic who, as prime minister, championed a submarine deal with France, which was canned in favour of AUKUS.
On Tuesday, The Australian reported Turnbull held substantial conversations with Colby about the AUKUS agreement and its defects.
Confirming those interactions, Turnbull said: “I have not spoken to Bridge Colby since he became undersecretary [for defence]. But I’ve spoken to him many times beforehand, and I know him and respect him.
“I don’t say anything privately that I don’t say publicly. My views on this are well known … my argument is we have to become more patriotic and more focused on Australian sovereignty and Australian independence.”
Turnbull said the nuclear-powered Virginia-class submarines were the most valued asset of the US Navy and noted the US was not currently building enough of them. The current production rate is about 1.2 boats a year, which needs to increase to 2.3 to satisfy US domestic needs and AUKUS obligations.
“In those circumstances, as Bridge [Colby] has said publicly, how can you responsibly part with them?” Turnbull said. “If you part with them, even to your best friend, you can’t be sure they would be available in the event of a conflict.”
Turnbull said he did not know if Colby was seeking such assurances, “but those assurances cannot be given”. “Even if they were given, they’re not worth the paper they’re (not) written on,” he said.
Speaking from China this week, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese declined to give an explicit public assurance that Australia’s nuclear submarines would help the US in a future conflict, suggesting that he valued the longstanding doctrine of strategic ambiguity – a policy of giving no public declarations about military plans.
The AUKUS agreement, brokered under former leaders Joe Biden and Scott Morrison, has bipartisan support in Australia despite its prominent detractors, including Turnbull and former Labor prime minister Paul Keating.
Coalition assistant defence spokesman Phil Thompson, an army veteran, said on Tuesday that Turnbull should stop “throwing grenades from the sidelines”, accusing him of trying to undermine AUKUS. Turnbull has regularly criticised the deal, including at the National Press Club and in a lecture last month at the Jeff Bleich Centre.
But Turnbull said AUKUS boosters exhibited groupthink.
“I get criticised for simply acknowledging reality. It is not a crime in Australia not to drink the Kool-Aid in Canberra,” he said.
“A lot of the people who talk about national security in this country need to become more patriotic.
“They have a misconception of what Australia’s national security is about. They seem to think our national security is simply a function of being more and more deferential to the US.”
The Pentagon has pushed back against suggestions it is solely focused on the contingency of a war with China over Taiwan. A US defence official, granted anonymity to speak freely, said the Pentagon’s concerns were wider than that.
“It is about how we can reasonably expect these kinds of critical assets [the submarines] to be allocated across different scenarios,” he said.
https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/any-aukus-pledges-won-t-be-worth-paper-they-re-written-on-turnbull-20250716-p5mfcp.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109341
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23338415 (170959ZJUL25) Notable: Charges laid but orchestrators behind synagogue attack remain a mystery – Investigators say the December 2024 firebombing of Melbourne’s Adass Israel synagogue, declared a likely terrorist incident, has “hit a wall” due to encryption and disposable street gangs concealing those who ordered it. A 20-year-old man has been charged only over the theft of the blue VW Golf used in the attack, but no terrorism charges have been laid. The Joint Counter Terrorism Taskforce (JCTT) maintains it was politically motivated, with $31m pledged for rebuilding and security. Officials believe multiple offenders remain at large, shielded by encrypted networks linking Melbourne’s wider arson-for-hire underworld.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
Charges laid but orchestrators behind synagogue attack remain a mystery
Chris Vedelago - July 17, 2025
1/2
The investigation into the terror attack on the Adass Israel synagogue has stalled, as the person or group who ordered the firebombing concealed their involvement by using encryption technology and untraceable thugs for hire.
Only one arrest linked to the attack has been made, but no terrorism charges have been laid since the firebombing in Ripponlea on December 6, 2024. Underworld and police sources have described how criminals used sophisticated encryption to protect themselves.
A police source familiar with the joint counterterrorism taskforce (JCTT) investigation but not authorised to speak publicly about its operations said the investigation had “hit a wall” and it remained unclear who ordered the attack or why.
The investigation had been able to identify only low-level suspects allegedly responsible for setting the fire, who were suspected violent criminals and street gang members for hire with no known political or ideological affiliations.
Anyone arrested would probably face only arson charges because there was not enough evidence to substantiate terrorism charges, the source said.
On Wednesday, a 20-year-old Williamstown man was charged over his alleged role in the theft of a blue VW Golf, which was allegedly used by those involved in the arson attack and in other serious crimes across Victoria.
The man faces charges including theft of a motor vehicle and failing to comply with an order to provide access to applications on his mobile telephone.
Victoria Police and the Australian Federal Police said in a statement to this masthead that the joint counterterrorism taskforce had “previously stated last year’s arson was likely a politically motivated attack”.
“This remains the position of the JCTT, who continue to investigate the fire at the Adass Israel synagogue as a terrorist attack.”
The synagogue building remains closed more than seven months after the attack. The federal and state governments have pledged more than $31 million towards rebuilding the synagogue and improving its security.
On December 6, 2024, three hooded and masked men in an allegedly stolen blue Volkswagen Golf drove to the synagogue on Glen Eira Avenue about 4.10am. After using an axe to smash open the front door, they poured petrol from jerry cans and then set it alight. One of the men, in a white face mask, filmed the attack on his mobile phone.
There were two members of the congregation inside the synagogue when the fire was lit, but both escaped the blaze, which was universally regarded as an antisemitic attack and condemned by Premier Jacinta Allan and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.
Three days later, the firebombing was declared a “likely a terrorist incident” by a federal and state law enforcement committee, meaning it was assigned to the joint counterterrorism taskforce, which can access sweeping detention, search and surveillance powers, and seek assistance from spies at the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation.
A major break in the case appeared to come in May when the taskforce revealed the car used in the firebombing of Adass Israel had been tracked to a series of other crimes, including a drive-by shooting in Bundoora on the same night and the firebombing of Lux Nightclub in Chapel Street, South Yarra, a fortnight before.
A second source, who was familiar with the taskforce investigation but not authorised to speak publicly, said the car had been identified fairly soon after the Adass Israel attack but the decision was made to track the vehicle in the hope of identifying the person or group ultimately responsible.
Several media outlets also withheld reporting the information to avoid compromising the investigation.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109342
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23338446 (171010ZJUL25) Notable: Jason Clare flags ‘months’ until anti-Semitism response – Education Minister Jason Clare says the government will wait for reports on Islamophobia and wider racism before acting on Jillian Segal’s nearly 50 recommendations to combat anti-Semitism, including stripping funding from universities that fail to act. Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief Alex Ryvchin said the Jewish community cannot wait, warning the crisis has lasted “more than 21 months and counting.” Labor MP Ed Husic urged against “heavy-handed” measures, cautioning young Australians’ reactions to the Middle East should not be assumed to lead to anti-Semitism. Clare backed Husic’s call for careful consideration.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109286
Jason Clare flags ‘months’ until anti-Semitism response
NOAH YIM and RHIANNON DOWN - 16 July 2025
The nation’s Jewish community has told Labor it cannot wait any longer to implement a landmark plan to stop the wave of anti-Semitic hate, after Education Minister Jason Clare said he would not move till seeing a similar report on stamping out Islamophobia.
Nearly a week after Anthony Albanese personally unveiled the plan to stop anti-Semitism, Mr Clare declared that he will wait for the Special Envoy on Islamophobia to hand down his own report next month before he commits to any recommendations to punish universities that fail to stop anti-Semitism on campus. .
Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Alex Ryvchin said Jewish Australians wanted to see swift action on anti-Semitism, regardless of any other reports that may be delivered on other issues. “Regardless of what reports on other issues may be presented in coming months, we expect progress in the implementation of Ms Segal’s plan,” he said.
“Ms Segal is the government’s expert adviser on addressing the specific problem of anti-Semitism and, after deep consultation, she has produced a clear and practical road map for ending a crisis of more than 21 months and counting. This is something that cannot wait.”
The Segal plan contained almost 50 recommendations, including stripping universities and arts festivals of public funding if they failed to stop anti-Semitism, training migration officials to screen for extremists, and implementing a nationwide definition of anti-Jewish hate for all levels of governments and public institutions.
Mr Clare said he wanted to see reports being prepared by Islamophobia envoy Aftab Malik and the Race Discrimination Commissioner before the government considers “those recommendations to their final conclusion”.
“We expect to see that report from the Special Envoy on Islamophobia next month,” he said.
“We’ll get the report from the Race Discrimination Commissioner later this year. But I do think I need to look at all of those reports that might make different recommendations here.”
The concerns come as Labor MP Ed Husic cautioned against being “heavy-handed” and rushing to adopt Ms Segal’s recommendations without careful consideration of the consequences. “Let’s take the time to think it through. A lot of thought has been put into it,” he said.
“Whatever we can do to bring people together without necessarily having to use sticks and threats of funding, et cetera.
“I would be very careful, I would much prefer us finding ways to bring people together rather than being heavy-handed in response. I would make that point for this report and whatever the Special Envoy for Islamophobia brings up.
“We should always be focusing on what brings us together.”
Mr Husic, who was pushed to the backbench because of post-election factional infighting, also raised concerns about the suggestion that young people were “at risk of becoming fully fledged anti-Semites due to misinformation”.
“Younger Australians, like most Australians, are genuinely moved by what they’re seeing in the Middle East, and it shouldn’t necessarily be assumed or a conclusion drawn that will lead to anti-Semitism,” he said.
Mr Clare backed Mr Husic’s comments, saying he takes his “counsel and advice all the time”.
“This is something that we’re going to give careful consideration to … having a look at racism in all its ugly forms across our universities and across our community,” Mr Clare said.
Mr Ryvchin said Mr Husic was entitled to his own opinion but not “his own facts”, pointing to research showing that anti-Semitism was becoming “more entrenched among young people”.
“This is unsurprising given that generation has grown up almost completely relying on digital platforms as the source of news and information,” he said.
On the same day as Ms Segal’s report was handed down last week, Mr Malik revealed he had consulted more than 100 Muslim leaders and representatives to inform his own plan to tackle anti-Muslim sentiment, to be handed down next month.
“The proposed measures adopt a whole-of-government approach, recognising that tackling Islamophobia requires co-ordinated effort across many sectors and all levels of society,” Mr Malik said at the time.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/jason-clare-flags-months-until-antisemitism-response/news-story/51deb69376f6bb6d06ad348b555c23b9
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109343
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23338461 (171017ZJUL25) Notable: Hate preacher can’t ‘bury’ court-ordered corrective social media posts – The Federal Court has ordered Wissam Haddad, also known as Abu Ousayd, to post pinned corrective notices on his social media admitting unlawful racial vilification of Jews, rejecting his attempt to avoid “advertising” them. Justice Angus Stewart ruled Haddad breached section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act and granted the Executive Council of Australian Jewry a muzzle order to prevent future discrimination. ECAJ’s Peter Wertheim welcomed the decision as essential to counteracting harm, warning Haddad could face contempt if he breaches the order.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109228
>>109242
Hate preacher can’t ‘bury’ court-ordered corrective social media posts
STEPHEN RICE - 17 July 2025
Hate preacher Wissam Haddad has been stymied in a bid to “bury” a series of corrective notices he is required to post on all his social media pages admitting he broke the law in a series of lectures and sermons that asserted Jews were “vile” and “treacherous” people.
Judge Angus Stewart ruled in the Federal Court this month that Mr Haddad had breached section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, upholding a complaint that the speeches were the “racist project” of a self-proclaimed “masjid (mosque) shock jock” indiscriminately targeting those of Jewish faith and ethnicity.
Justice Stewart granted an application by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ) for a muzzle order on Mr Haddad that would find him in contempt of court should he racially discriminate against Jewish Australians in future.
The judge ordered the speeches be removed from social media but reserved judgment on the specific form of corrective notices that Mr Haddad and his Al Madina Dawah Centre would be required to post on their social media platforms, acknowledging he engaged in “unlawful behaviour based on racial hatred”.
Mr Haddad, who is also known as Abu Ousayd, had tried to escape the full impact of the orders, arguing that he should not be required to “pin” the corrective notices at the top of his social media pages because it would force him to “essentially advertise and promote” them.
But in a judgment released on Thursday Justice Stewart accepted expert evidence that such posts could quickly disappear from view, being overtaken by subsequent posts if not “pinned” on Instagram or made a “feature” on Facebook.
Justice Stewart found this was not onerous or unduly burdensome and that the educative purpose of the publication “contemplates some degree of promotion”.
“In short, the ‘pinning’ and ‘featuring’ of the posts will prevent them from disappearing from view in a short period of time, and it will prevent them from being deliberately buried by way of successive further posts,” Justice Stewart said.
“I do not regard it as disproportionate to the nature and extent of the wrong committed to require redress of that nature.”
ECAJ co-chief executive Peter Wertheim welcomed the decision, telling The Australian: “We see this as an essential part of counteracting the harm that was caused by their online promotion and reproduction of Haddad’s anti-Semitic speeches.”
Mr Haddad or speakers at the Al Madina Dawah Centre in southwest Sydney have called Jewish people “descendants of pigs and monkeys”, recited parables about their killing, and said people should “spit” on Israel so its citizens “would drown”.
Justice Stewart ordered Mr Haddad not to facilitate “words, sounds or images (being) communicated otherwise than in private, which attribute characteristics to Jewish people on the basis of their group membership and which convey any of the disparaging imputations identified as being conveyed by the lectures”.
Mr Haddad appeared defiant in the wake of the ruling, his lawyer declaring outside the court that “he maintains that he has the right to quote religious scripture, as all parties do, the court has found he has that right”.
Mr Wertheim said he would call Mr Haddad back to court for potential contempt should he breach the court orders against him, saying the outcome “vindicated” months of community action against anti-Semitism.
“Common decency should dictate that free speech and freedom of religion do not include the right to racially vilify other people. Common decency should tell us that that is where to draw the line,” Mr Wertheim said.
He argued the verdict indicated current federal criminal anti-vilification laws were insufficient.
“The original proposals for prosecution were never tested. Those prosecutions were never brought,” he said.
“So we don’t know whether stronger laws are needed, but if the authorities believe that those laws were not sufficient to prosecute in a case like this, or in the case of the Opera House steps and the chanting of ‘F the Jews’ and much worse, then clearly the laws are in need of reform.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/hate-preacher-cant-bury-courtordered-corrective-social-media-posts/news-story/02f04deeb0c52adaf0907f638e2fe126
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109344
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23338506 (171034ZJUL25) Notable: Whitlam, Nixon, Albanese: PM uses Great Wall to place himself in history – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese marked his China trip with a symbolic stop at the Great Wall, drawing parallels with Gough Whitlam’s 1971 decision to open relations with Beijing ahead of US President Richard Nixon. “At the time, that was a controversial decision to recognise the People’s Republic of China,” he said, adding, “We are literally standing on history.” Acknowledging China had not democratised as hoped in Whitlam’s era, Albanese stressed his method: “We don’t shout with a megaphone,” contrasting with Scott Morrison’s confrontational style.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109325
>>109335
>>109337
Whitlam, Nixon, Albanese: PM uses Great Wall to place himself in history
Paul Sakkal - July 16, 2025
In case the symbolism wasn’t obvious, the prime minister spelled it out.
Standing on the Great Wall on a muggy Wednesday morning, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese placed himself in the long arc of Australia’s history of managing relations with China.
Labor icon Gough Whitlam, as opposition leader, went ahead of the United States in 1971 to open relations with China. He was followed by US President Richard Nixon’s establishment of engagement with China.
“At the time, that was a controversial decision to recognise the People’s Republic of China,” Albanese said, adding that it was also the correct one.
“I have the sense of history following in the footsteps of ... Gough Whitlam.
“We are literally standing on history.”
The prime minister referenced the US leadership of the time that Whitlam had risked upsetting.
Now, as then, Albanese faces pressure from Australia’s closest military and cultural partner, the US, to stick firmly by its side as he adds economic and diplomatic layers to the era of stabilisation with China which Labor kicked off in 2022.
China has failed to democratise in the way many in the West had hoped in Whitlam’s time. Albanese admitted he was dealing with a different beast, but said the best way to manage differences was to build as much trust as realistically possible.
“We don’t shout with a megaphone,” he remarked, referring to his predecessor Scott Morrison’s confrontational diplomatic style that drew China’s ire.
If chumminess is the name of the game, China knew which buttons to press when Albanese came to town.
The pub rock-loving PM was treated to Chinese covers of Powderfinger, Paul Kelly and Midnight Oil at dinner in Beijing’s Great Hall on Tuesday.
Power and the Passion was the Oils’ song played, according to Albanese. The lyrics from the activist band’s hit are pro-Whitlam and make jabs at “Uncle Sam” and the Pine Gap intelligence facility – all made in the context of paranoia around the US role in Whitlam’s 1975 dismissal.
Albanese and Xi were splashed on page one of the China Daily, a state media publication. Russia’s foreign minister, who met Xi on the same day as the PM, was relegated to page three despite Russia’s “no limits” relationship with China.
“They did the full kit and caboodle,” Albanese said. “And so, it was a splendid occasion.”
It’s hard to see how China’s wooing of Albanese makes ambassador Kevin Rudd’s job easier in Washington as he works to preserve the AUKUS pact in talks with the China hawks in the Trump administration.
The Great Wall, usually jammed with tourists, was cleared for Albanese’s visit. Freeways across Shanghai and Beijing were closed off for the prime minister’s motorcades, with Australian flags lining the streets.
After a short press conference – decked in his Rabbitohs cap and tennis shoes – Albanese went for a walk up the wall with a tour guide and fiancee Jodie Haydon.
Once the money shot was in view, he took off his Ray-Bans, asked the guide and translator to move aside, shooed reporters and assorted hangers-on out of the way, cleared the path ahead of him for what he clearly expects will become an iconic photo in the same stretch of the wall as Whitlam.
Even while feeling the weight of history, Albanese had his nuptials on his mind after photographers captured the scenic shot.
“Anyone here a celebrant?” he asked with a smirk.
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/whitlam-nixon-albanese-pm-uses-great-wall-to-place-himself-in-history-20250716-p5mfd4.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109345
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23338525 (171039ZJUL25) Notable: Albanese says Taiwan ‘status quo’ remains after questions on Chinese media report – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese dismissed Chinese state media claims that he opposed Taiwan’s independence, clarifying: “What we do is continue to support a one-China policy. We support the status quo. By definition. We don’t support any unilateral action on Taiwan.” He said Australia’s stance meant Taiwan should not declare independence unilaterally and China should not seize the island without talks. Albanese also stood firm on Labor’s plan to end Landbridge’s Darwin Port lease, while Chinese Premier Li Qiang urged fairer treatment for Chinese investment.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109325
>>109335
>>109337
Albanese says Taiwan ‘status quo’ remains after questions on Chinese media report
Paul Sakkal - July 16, 2025
1/2
Beijing: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has played down claims he declared Australia’s opposition to Taiwanese independence in a meeting with President Xi Jinping as the Chinese government dials up pressure over Labor’s decision to take back the Port of Darwin.
After Premier Li Qiang said the country expected its companies to be treated fairly when they invested overseas, a state media outlet made clear Beijing’s anger at Canberra’s commitment in April to have the port sold by its owner, Chinese company Landbridge, over national security concerns.
“At present, there are specific issues between China and Australia that need to be discussed, such as the lease of Darwin Port and the expansion of the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement,” the Global Times wrote in an editorial on Wednesday.
But it hailed a major improvement in relations between Australia and China that Albanese basked in on Wednesday as he spoke to reporters from the historic Great Wall.
“I have the sense of history following in the footsteps of the Labor prime minister Gough Whitlam, who was the first prime minister to visit here in 1973,” he said. “We are literally standing on history.”
Albanese said the port issue – Landbridge has repeatedly said the port is not for sale – had not come up in his meetings with Chinese leaders, but the government would stay consistent on the issue. “My position hasn’t changed over a long period of time,” he said.
China Daily, another state media publication, had earlier claimed Albanese told Xi on Tuesday that Australia did not support Taiwanese independence. “[Albanese] assured Xi that Australia adheres to the one-China policy and does not support ‘Taiwan independence’,” the outlet reported.
Albanese said after the meeting on Tuesday he had conveyed to Xi that Australia supported Taiwan’s current position. The island is a self-governing democratic island of more than 23 million people that maintains informal diplomatic-style ties to Australia. China considers Taiwan to be part of the country’s territory.
“You’re trying to quote a Chinese readout that I haven’t seen,” Albanese said at a press conference on Wednesday in response to a question about his reported position. “What we do is continue to support a one-China policy. We support the status quo. By definition. We don’t support any unilateral action on Taiwan.”
The status quo, in Australia’s view, is that Taiwan should not declare independence unilaterally and China should not retake the island without negotiations.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109346
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23338548 (171046ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Bamboo-zled: Albanese embraces China’s panda diplomacy – On the final day of his China visit, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese toured Chengdu’s panda research base with fiancée Jodie Haydon, calling the pandas housed at Adelaide Zoo “a great sign of friendship between China and Australia.” The Chengdu facility manages China’s panda loans, a long-running tool of “panda diplomacy.” Analysts note the practice has grown “more hard-headed,” with pandas leased rather than gifted, extending Beijing’s influence. Adelaide Zoo pays about $780,000 annually, while cubs born abroad must be returned to China by age four, ensuring pandas remain a symbol of Chinese ownership and soft power.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109325
>>109335
>>109337
Bamboo-zled: Albanese embraces China’s panda diplomacy
BEN PACKHAM - 17 July 2025
Sixteen-year-old giant panda Da Mao chewed lazily on a succulent bamboo shoot as Anthony Albanese, Jodie Haydon and their motley retinue gawked at him through the glass at Chengdu’s sprawling panda park.
On the final day of his record-length visit to China, the Prime Minister cast aside concerns he could be labelled a “panda hugger”, opting to soak up China’s famous “panda diplomacy”.
“They’ve been like this for thousands of years!” he marvelled as he toured the Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding.
The facility is the largest of its kind in China, co-ordinating the country’s panda loans to its favoured partner nations, including Australia.
Last year, Adelaide Zoo received two new pandas, Xing Qiu and Yi Lan, in recognition of the stabilisation of the Australia-China relationship under Labor.
Albanese and Heydon stopped by to visit one of the pandas they replaced, Fu Ni, who was enjoying her retirement in one of the centre’s outside enclosures.
“Our Adelaide Zoo pandas are a great sign of friendship between China and Australia,” the PM gushed.
China has been using its pandas as a soft diplomacy tool since the 1950s. But the practice has a hard edge.
Da Mao and another panda, Er Shun, were returned from Canada in 2020, before their 10-year contract was up, due to a slowing of bamboo shipments from China.
Beijing blamed the Covid-19 pandemic, but the pandas’ return came amid a breakdown in relations between the countries over Ottawa’s arrest of Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou, and China’s retaliatory detention of the “Two Michaels” – Michael Spavor and Michael Kovrig.
Lowy Institute North Asia fellow Richard McGregor said Beijing’s panda diplomacy had become “more hard-headed” in recent years.
“They are rarely gifted anymore,” he said.
“Instead they are leased or lent, which means their diplomatic weight has a longer shelf life.”
Adelaide Zoo’s pandas cost about $780,000 a year to keep, or about $15,000 a week, according to federal budget papers.
While pandas are famously uninterested in sex, at least in captivity, any born in overseas zoos are deemed to be Chinese and, under the terms set by Beijing, must be returned to their home country by the age of four.
The US received its first two pandas from China in 1972, after Richard Nixon’s first trip to China, symbolising the “opening up” of the country to the world.
“Symbolism is a central part of Chinese culture and diplomacy,” Georgetown University animal diplomacy expert Barbara Bodine said in a 2024 article on the subject.
“They are often referred to as a ‘seal’, agreed to once China turns a corner with a country, be it in diplomatic, trade or security matters.
“This was especially important during the early phases of China’s opening up when countries were interested in certainty amid this new phase of Chinese communism.
“Pandas really did make a difference, but primarily as a symbolic tool.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/bamboozled-albanese-embraces-chinas-panda-diplomacy/news-story/22960b80c87ce8a592c5d72e3910fd48
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbiPmEVbVr4
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109347
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23338565 (171053ZJUL25) Notable: John Bolton says the fate of AUKUS should be resolved before Albanese meets Trump – Former US national security adviser John Bolton warned Anthony Albanese against seeking a White House meeting with Donald Trump before the Pentagon’s AUKUS review is finalised, saying the deal could be derailed. Bolton said Elbridge Colby’s request for an Australian commitment on Taiwan carried “huge diplomatic consequences” and should be handled at leader level. He urged Australia to secure clarity on AUKUS before pursuing a meeting, citing Trump’s record of abandoning agreements. Bolton also called for higher defence spending by both nations and questioned Trump’s resolve to defend Taiwan.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73662 (pb)
>>109299
>>109316
>>109318
John Bolton says the fate of AUKUS should be resolved before Albanese meets Trump
JOE KELLY - 17 July 2025
1/2
Former US national security adviser John Bolton says a meeting between Anthony Albanese and Donald Trump before the future of the AUKUS review is resolved could backfire and even endanger the deal.
Mr Bolton, who served as NSA in the first Trump administration from 2018-19, said he thought it was possible the US could back out of or place new conditions on the AUKUS agreement.
Speaking to The Australian, he suggested a breakdown in the presidential decision-making process had also empowered the Pentagon’s policy chief, Elbridge Colby, who is leading the AUKUS review.
However, Mr Bolton said it was hard to say how seriously its findings would be taken.
Mr Bolton said it was unlikely the Australian Prime Minister’s visit to China and fourth meeting with Xi Jinping would have seriously registered with the US President, questioning Mr Trump’s own focus on the strategic threat posed by Beijing.
He saw no obvious benefit for Mr Albanese in rushing off to Washington to obtain an Oval Office meeting with Mr Trump, pushing back on arguments that forging a personal relationship at the leader-to-leader level would assist Australia’s case when it came to AUKUS.
“Who knows what he’ll say?” Mr Bolton said. “Ask Volodymyr Zelensky how that can go. Or Cyril Ramaphosa from South Africa. You really want to do that?”
“It’s a signal of how damaging Trump’s presidency can be to the United States – when foreign leaders have to think to themselves, do I really want to go to the White House and take a risk? Xi Jinping hasn’t done that.
“You can bet that the Chinese are not going to ask for a meeting until they know 110 per cent that it’s going to go according to script.”
However, Mr Bolton said the request from Mr Colby for an Australian precommitment of support for Taiwan in the event of a US conflict with China clearly had “huge diplomatic consequences”.
“Did anybody in the State Department hear about this? Was it cleared by the Secretary of State?” he said.
“Was it cleared through the National Security Council process? I bet you an American dollar right now the answer to that is ‘No’.”
Mr Bolton said this was a more appropriate conversation to have at the leader-to-leader level, and a possible reason for Mr Albanese to travel to Washington and “have a conversation in private (with Mr Trump); just the two of us about this – not some guy at the Pentagon”.
The question of when to meet with the US President presented Mr Albanese with “a difficult decision to make”.
A leading critic of Mr Trump, Mr Bolton argued there was a compelling case for Australia to lift its defence spending but also said the US should increase its own defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP.
“I think it is a matter of national security concern for Australia – its defence spending should go up,” he said. “I mean, the Solomon Islands are a lot closer to you all than they are to us.
“And we all share the problem of the of the Pacific island states and China’s efforts to increase its influence across the Pacific.”
Mr Bolton argued that the imposition of US tariffs was creating “enormous problems for the United States all around the world, particularly with its friends and allies” and should be seen as the worst economic decision in nearly a century.
He said there was also a precedent for Mr Trump in trying to dishonour agreements with Australia, pointing to the US President’s 2017 conversation with then-prime minister Malcolm Turnbull where he tried to abandon the refugee resettlement deal struck with Barack Obama.
Mr Bolton said Australia should instead come to a better understanding of the Pentagon review and do enough behind the scenes work to ensure a favourable outcome for the AUKUS agreement before a face-to-face meeting was arranged between Mr Albanese and Mr Trump.
“If I were in the Australian Prime Minister’s shoes, I would say AUKUS is the highest priority and I want to get that resolved the right way,” he said. “Clear up the ambiguity here and proceed with the program.
“And if we can do that without a face-to-face meeting, I’d prefer to do it. And then, once that’s resolved favourably, then go and ask for a meeting.
“Because, as Malcolm Turnbull found out, when he called up in the first term to ask for implementation of a refugee resettlement deal that had been made with Obama, Trump could say, ‘well, that’s not my deal. I didn’t make that deal. I’m not going to go through with that deal’.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109348
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23347832 (190735ZJUL25) Notable: Great haul of China visit: PM spruiks ‘tangible outcomes’ – Anthony Albanese defended his six-night China trip against Coalition claims it was “indulgent,” insisting visits to the Great Wall and Chengdu’s panda park projected “respect” to over a billion Chinese and advanced Australia’s interests. He cited talks on steel decarbonisation with major iron ore producers, promotion of medtech firms such as Cochlear, and cultural initiatives like the Australian Open wildcard tournament in Chengdu. While China praised warmer ties, critics noted pressure over Darwin Port and PLA drills. Albanese said disagreements remain but dialogue strengthens cooperation.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109325
>>109335
>>109337
Great haul of China visit: PM spruiks ‘tangible outcomes’
BEN PACKHAM - July 17, 2025
1/2
Anthony Albanese has lashed Coalition claims his lengthy China trip was “indulgent”, saying he had demonstrated Australia’s “respect” to more than a billion Chinese people, while positioning his government to work through differences with Beijing.
On the final day of his record six-night visit, the Prime Minister said he had advanced Australia’s economic interests and strengthened ties with China’s top leaders, developing a “warm and friendly” relationship with Xi Jinping.
But as he prepared to fly home to Australia, Mr Albanese declined to say whether he trusted the Chinese President, declaring instead that Mr Xi was yet to break any commitments he had made to him.
Mr Albanese’s comments followed Coalition criticism on Thursday over his China itinerary, which included an excursion to the Great Wall of China to retrace Labor hero Gough Whitlam’s steps in 1971, and a picture opportunity at a panda breeding centre with fiancee Jodie Haydon.
Opposition finance spokesman James Paterson said it was hard to identify any “tangible outcomes” from the six-day trip, and that high-level visits were not for “personal enjoyment”.
“Frankly, I have to say that some of this is starting to look a little bit indulgent,” Senator Paterson said on Sky News.
“I mean, the appropriate time to do a nostalgic history tour of Labor Party mythology is after you retire, in your own time, at your own expense, not on the taxpayer dime.”
Mr Albanese hit back, arguing the visits to the popular tourist attractions had furthered Australia’s standing among everyday Chinese people.
“Those pictures go to 27 million people, potentially, in Australia. They go to over a billion people in China. And those billion people represent people who are increasingly rising up the income ladder and are potential tourists and therefore job creators in Australia,” he said.
“The Great Wall of China symbolises the extraordinary history and culture here in China, and showing a bit of respect to people never cost anything. But you know what it does? It gives you a reward.”
Mr Albanese rattled off what he said were the outcomes of the visit, including talks on steel decarbonisation between Chinese steelmakers and the heads of Australia’s top iron ore producers, and the promotion of Australian medical technology companies such as world-leading hearing aid manufacturer Cochlear.
The Prime Minister – who is yet to have a first meeting with US President Donald Trump – denied he had been “cosying up” to China while allowing the Australia-US relationship to languish.
“What we’ve had is constructive engagement. We have continued to be able to put forward Australia’s position,” he said.
“Will there be a circumstance when there is no disagreements? No, because we have different political systems, we have different cultures, we have different values.
“What I’d like to see is to be able to talk about those issues regularly, get as much agreement as possible, but (also) understanding of where our nations are coming from. Out of understanding can come greater co-operation.”
Mr Albanese has talked up the strength of the Australia-China economic relationship during the trip, which included lengthy meetings with President Xi and China’s No.2 leader, Premier Li Qiang, in Beijing, as well as stops in Shanghai and Chengdu for business-focused events.
Beijing was also upbeat, despite concerns over Australian investment rules and Labor’s vow to reclaim the Port of Darwin from a Chinese company, with Mr Xi saying China wanted “to push the bilateral relationship further”.
One of Australia’s foremost China experts, Swinburne Emeritus Professor John Fitzgerald, said the Chinese side would not be satisfied with the countries’ newly “stabilised” relationship, and would continue to push Australia for concessions.
“If all it takes to have a good relationship with Xi’s China is to smile, exchange compliments, and talk business, then PM Albanese is on to a good thing,” he said.
“Xi clearly expects more than that. He is likely to be disappointed.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109349
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23347855 (190744ZJUL25) Notable: Australian investment in China stalls despite thawing of relationship – Australian direct investment in China has plunged 90% since 2019, standing at just $1.6bn in 2024, while Chinese investment in Australia also declined to $36.5bn. Anthony Albanese acknowledged the fall, blaming Covid and Morrison-era tensions, and called for “more direct investment here.” Visiting Cochlear’s $110m Chengdu plant, he praised its impact: “The idea that an Australian invention gives someone … who’s never heard the voice of their mum or dad … it’s amazing.” Yet security risks and coercion concerns continue to deter firms, with Crown, ANZ, and others scaling back.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109325
>>109335
>>109337
Australian investment in China stalls despite thawing of relationship
WILL GLASGOW - July 17, 2025
1/2
Australia’s direct investment in China has more than halved since Anthony Albanese was first elected in 2022, as companies remain concerned about heightened business risks and the Chinese economic growth rate has slowed.
The entire stock of Australian direct investment in China was only $1.6bn at the end of 2024, according to Australian Bureau of Statistics data.
Last year, Australian direct investment in China fell by more than 25 per cent from $2.1bn, according to the ABS. It has fallen every year since 2019, shrinking by almost 90 per cent from a peak of $15.5bn.
Chinese firms have also reduced their stock of direct investment in Australia every year since 2019, when China’s total stock peaked at $47.7bn. By the end of 2024 that had fallen 24 per cent to $36.5bn.
Even at that level, China has more than 20 times the direct investment in Australia compared to Australian direct investment in China.
The Prime Minister on Thursday said he wanted to see more direct investment into China when asked about the decline by The Australian.
Speaking at a press conference in Chengdu on the final full day of his six-night trip to China, the PM said there were both global and bilateral reasons for the fall since 2019.
“Covid had an impact on global economic investment, but also there were the specific issues during that term of the Morrison government,” Mr Albanese said.
“I want to see more direct investment here. It’s something that I’ve raised.”
Direct foreign investment requires high levels of trust because it entwines companies and their staff in the destination country and its legal system.
Despite the huge imbalance in investment levels, China’s government continues to complain about Australia’s foreign investment regimen, which it claims unfairly targets Chinese firms.
Premier Li Qiang on Tuesday repeated Beijing’s longstanding complaints in a meeting with the Prime Minister and senior Australian business figures.
“We hope that the Australian side will treat Chinese enterprises visiting Australia fairly and properly solve the problems encountered by enterprises in market access, investment review and other aspects,” Mr Li said.
On Thursday afternoon, the Prime Minister visited one of the rare investments by an Australian company in China in the past five years at listed hearing aid firm Cochlear’s factory in Chengdu.
He said it was a “great example” of the benefits of Australian investment to China.
“The idea that an Australian invention gives someone who has never heard the voice of their mum or dad, brother, sister – never heard the sound of airconditioning, the sound of the river, of birds tweeting. It’s amazing,” Mr Albanese said.
“We should be so proud of what we’re doing,” he said.
The Cochlear plant cost about $110m – almost a tenth of the total stock of direct Australian investment in China – and began production during the pandemic.
Sources at the world-leading company’s Chinese operation have told The Australian its operations were not affected by Beijing’s coercion campaign against the Morrison government.
The Sydney-headquartered company does not manufacture its most advanced products in China, a country with a long history of forced technology transfer.
Cochlear employs about 100 staff in China, a fraction of its total of more than 4000 staff, most of whom are based in Australia. But even at that modest level, it is one of Australia’s biggest employers in China.
Cochlear’s factory in Chengdu sits over the road from the headquarters of lithium producer Tianqi, which has invested more than $3bn in facilities in Western Australia.
In recent years, Tianqi has complained about its inability to increase its investment in Australia’s lithium sector, arguing that its expertise could help develop the critical minerals sector.
Mr Albanese did not visit Tianqi’s offices during his trip to Chengdu, the first by an Australian prime minister since Bob Hawke in 1986.
A senior representative from Tianqi attended the Australia-China business dialogue on Tuesday in Beijing’s Great Hall, where Mr Li and senior Chinese business figures raised concerns about Australia’s treatment of investment from China.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109350
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23347937 (190824ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Albanese hits back at claims of ‘indulgent’ China trip, saying it will reap rewards – Wrapping up his six-night China tour in Chengdu, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese rejected Coalition criticism of panda visits and Great Wall photo-ops, saying “showing a little bit of respect to people never cost anything. But you know what it does? It gives you a reward.” He cited progress in green steel, tourism and medtech ties, while declining to say he “trusted” Xi Jinping, noting instead that “nothing that he has said to me has he not fulfilled.” Opposition MPs said the trip lacked outcomes on Darwin Port, detainees, and PLA drills.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109325
>>109335
>>109337
Albanese hits back at claims of ‘indulgent’ China trip, saying it will reap rewards
Paul Sakkal - July 17, 2025
1/2
Australia will reap economic rewards from showing respect for China, the prime minister has declared, shrugging off barbs from the Coalition that stops he made on his week-long trip to visit soccer coaches, historical landmarks and a tennis centre were self-indulgent.
Rounding out his trip on Thursday afternoon in the western Chinese city of Chengdu, Anthony Albanese said that images of him admiring pandas and walking the Great Wall were signs of reverence for China’s history that worked as marketing to the country’s massive consumer base.
“Showing a little bit of respect to people never cost anything. But you know what it does? It gives you a reward,” Albanese said.
But the limits of Labor’s stabilisation of the relationship with China were on show on Thursday, with Albanese facing Coalition criticism that the trip had not delivered tangible benefits, such as a guarantee Australia would get more notice of Chinese military exercises in nearby waters.
Asked if he trusted President Xi Jinping following Tuesday’s talks and banquet in Beijing’s Great Hall, Albanese chose not to use the word “trust”. “Nothing that he has said to me has he not fulfilled,” Albanese said.
Chinese navy ships circumnavigated Australia in February and used live ammunition in drills in the Tasman Sea, which is permitted under international law but disrupted flights that had been given little notice of the exercises.
Trade between Australia and China has recovered since the Communist Party imposed strikes on beef, barley, lobsters and other commodities after the Morrison government criticised its assertive foreign police and handling of the coronavirus pandemic.
Figures from consultancy KPMG and the University of Sydney show Chinese investment in Australia increased from $US613 million in 2023 to $US862 million in 2024, well down on the peaks of the 2010s when it was regularly above $US10 billion.
Australian Bureau of Statistics numbers show total Australian capital invested in China has fallen from $70 billion in 2021 to $58 billion this year.
Trumpeting his more than two hours of talks with Xi, Albanese flagged more two-way investment after years of falling Australian inflows into China, along with new tie-ups in green steel and tourism.
But as Albanese prepared to conclude his trip, political focus will shift swiftly from Australia’s place in the world to domestic affairs, with parliament to sit next week for the first time since the May election.
As the government spotlighted its focus on trade and tourism ties with China this week, it faced questions about how it was handling its relationship with the erratic Trump administration, which will likely be a theme of parliament next week alongside Labor’s election promises on university fee cuts and free childcare.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109351
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23347968 (190844ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Australian PM says dialogue with China matters for Australian economy, regional security – "Dialogue with China matters. For jobs, our economy and the security of our region," visiting Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said in a post on X platform on Friday. "One in four Australian jobs depends upon our trade and the most important trading partner is China. We have worked very hard to stabilize the relationship that brought benefits with over $20 billion of trade resuming." The goal of Albanese's visit to China can be summarized as seeking progress while maintaining stability, as he aims to advance the stability and development of China-Australia relations through dialogue, Chen Hong, director of the Asia Pacific Studies Centre at East China Normal University, told the Global Times on Friday. "Given the current turbulence and uncertainty in the international situation, both China and Australia, along with other regional countries, hope to work together to pursue predictability and stability," Chen added. " – Chen Qingqing, Global Times
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109325
>>109335
>>109337
Australian PM says dialogue with China matters for Australian economy, regional security
Chen Qingqing - Jul 18, 2025
"Dialogue with China matters. For jobs, our economy and the security of our region," visiting Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said in a post on X platform on Friday.
"One in four Australian jobs depends upon our trade and the most important trading partner is China. We have worked very hard to stabilize the relationship that brought benefits with over $20 billion of trade resuming. We signed agreements for further two way trade and in addition to that, we agreed on the promotion of two way tourism as well," Albanese said in a video attached with the post.
Albanese's China trip, which began Saturday and ends on Friday, is extraordinarily long compared with Australian state visits over the past decade and marks a normalization of bilateral relations that plumbed new depths under the previous Australian government's nine-year reign, AP reported on Thursday.
According to an official statement published on Australian government website on Friday, Albanese's visit was an opportunity to continue advancing Australia's security and economic interests. Wise management of this relationship is crucial for Australia's future prosperity and for the security of our nation and the stability of our region.
"Australia's approach to our relationship with China remains patient, calibrated and deliberate. Dialogue is central to a stable and constructive relationship," the statement said.
During Albanese's visit, China and Australia signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) on the implementation and review of China-Australia Free Trade Agreement on Tuesday, according to the Chinese Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM), Xinhua reported.
As 2025 marks the 10th anniversary of the agreement, the two countries will maintain close cooperation, continue high-quality implementation of the agreement, and jointly conduct a review to identify areas for further improvement or expansion, the MOFCOM said.
The goal of Albanese's visit to China can be summarized as seeking progress while maintaining stability, as he aims to advance the stability and development of China-Australia relations through dialogue, Chen Hong, director of the Asia Pacific Studies Centre at East China Normal University, told the Global Times on Friday.
"Given the current turbulence and uncertainty in the international situation, both China and Australia, along with other regional countries, hope to work together to pursue predictability and stability," Chen added.
Albanese paid an official visit to China from July 12 to 18, traveling to Shanghai and Beijing, with Chengdu being the final leg of his trip.
Bloomberg said Albanese's six-day visit to China was a diplomatic reset that marks the full restoration of trade ties after years of friction. While the trip was framed around economics, the stakes were far broader, as tensions simmer over Taiwan question, defense, and Australia's balancing act between its biggest trading partner and its key security ally, the US, according to the US media outlet.
The future of China-Australia relations will be on a positive trajectory. However, what Australia needs to do is to eliminate external interference, particularly from third parties and domestic right-wing forces, in order to work with China to ensure that the bilateral relationship remains stable and sustainable, Chen noted. "Only with stability can long-term progress be achieved, and stability is the foundation for realizing ambitious goals."
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202507/1338655.shtml
https://x.com/AlboMP/status/1945985579076002142
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109352
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23347997 (190858ZJUL25) Notable: ‘Beware of bully Xi Jinping’s strategy of flattery’, says Scott Morrison – Former prime minister Scott Morrison warned that Beijing was now seeking to “isolate us from the US charming and flattering us,” after previously trying to “isolate us from the US by bullying us.” He argued “China’s plan is to dominate, control the price, block out rivals … exactly what China has done on critical minerals and rare earths for 20 years.” Prime Minister Anthony Albanese insisted his six-day trip produced “constructive engagement,” saying a “stable and constructive relationship with China is in Australia’s national interest,” while critics questioned whether tangible gains were delivered.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109335
>>109337
>>109351
‘Beware of bully Xi Jinping’s strategy of flattery’, says Scott Morrison
SARAH ISON and GREG SHERIDAN - 18 July 2025
1/2
Scott Morrison says China is “charming and flattering” Anthony Albanese in an attempt to isolate Australia from the US, arguing a change in approach from Beijing since lifting its trade sanctions did not alter its underlying motives to “block out rivals”.
As a former George W. Bush adviser warns of growing divisiveness between the US and Australia, fuelling Coalition demands the Prime Minister urgently prioritise is relationship in Washington, foreign affairs experts observed Mr Albanese was becoming increasingly “confident about warming up ties with China without paying any domestic political price”.
However, as the prime minister who weathered the worst of Beijing’s trade sanctions in recent times, Mr Morrison issued a stark warning over Xi Jinping’s change of tack since Labor took power.
“China’s plan back then was to isolate us from the US by bullying us,” Mr Morrison told The Australian. “Their plan now is to isolate us from the US charming and flattering us.”
The comments from the former Coalition leader came as he reflected on the series of strict trade sanctions on products including beef, wine and barley that were enforced by China in 2020, after Australia became one of the first countries to openly demand an independent inquiry into the origins of Covid-19.
Despite the last of those sanctions being removed in 2024, Mr Morrison said it was clear Beijing was still seeking to exert its trade dominance over other countries.
“China’s plan is to dominate, control the price, block out rivals,” he said. “China massively subsidises production to block out competitors and this gives them their dominant position. This is exactly what China has done on critical minerals and rare earths for 20 years.”
While refusing to say explicitly whether or not he trusted the Chinese President, Mr Albanese reiterated that he and Mr Xi shared mutual respect and that his trip across China had resulted in “constructive engagement” between the two parties.
The Prime Minister compared this to circumstances under the Coalition government, which hadn’t managed “a phone conversation between a single minister in Australia and our major trading partner”.
“This visit marks another important step in the Australia-China relationship. A stable and constructive relationship with China is in Australia’s national interest,” Mr Albanese said on Friday ahead of returning to Australia at the end of his six-day China visit. “Strengthening our security and economic interests with our largest trading partner will boost Australian jobs and support Australian businesses. I used my engagements in China to advocate for Australia’s interests including on trade, consular, human rights and regional and global issues.”
Mr Albanese denied he had been “cosying up” to China, during what was his second official visit to the country, while allowing the Australia-US relationship to languish.
But former Defence Department analyst and critic of the AUKUS agreement Hugh White said while the Labor leader had clearly wanted to “avoid the appearance of going too far with China” in his first term, that sentiment had changed.
“He has moved on from that. I believe this is a significant visit because it shows Albanese far more confident about warming up ties with China without paying any domestic political price,” Professor White told The Australian’s Inquirer.
The comments come amid ongoing Coalition criticism of Mr Albanese’s trip, which opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan on Friday called a “working holiday” that had not achieved any tangible outcomes.
Despite declaring it was clear that China “got what it wanted” from the Prime Minister’s visit, Professor White said he didn’t believe what the CCP had wanted “has been to Australia’s disadvantage”.
He did note, however, that China’s “fundamental ambition” was to push the US out of Asia and take its place. “No matter how we manage this day-to-day diplomatic tension and how successfully we manage it, the fundamental conflict remains the same,” he said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109353
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23348101 (191006ZJUL25) Notable: AUKUS port purchases alarm: fears of Chinese Communist Party links – Companies tied to Shanghai businessman Wang Yongxin, president of the Shanghai Xinyang Chamber of Commerce, have purchased properties near Port Kembla and Newcastle, both shortlisted as potential AUKUS submarine bases. The chamber hosts CCP-related events and has links to the United Front, though Wang’s family denies any connection, calling the acquisitions “purely a commercial investment.” Experts Peter Jennings and Clive Hamilton warned of serious security risks, with Jennings saying “China’s No.1 intelligence target in Australia will be anything to do with AUKUS and nuclear submarines.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109316
>>109336
AUKUS port purchases alarm: fears of Chinese Communist Party links
JACK QUAIL - July 17, 2025
1/2
Companies controlled by the family of a Shanghai businessman with connections to the Chinese Communist Party’s foreign influence arm have purchased two commercial properties located within port precincts earmarked for AUKUS submarine bases.
As Beijing ramps up pressure on Canberra to stop the Port of Darwin from being prised from Chinese hands, The Australian can reveal that Chinese businessman Wang Yongxin, president of the Shanghai Xinyang Chamber of Commerce, is tied to property deals at the Kembla and Newcastle ports.
The chamber has links to China’s Communist Party and hosts party-related events, according to its WeChat channel, raising the spectre it is linked to the United Front – the Communist Party’s organisational effort to turn opinion at home and abroad in Beijing’s favour.
Both the Kembla and Newcastle ports were shortlisted by the Defence Department in 2023 for a future east coast submarine base that would serve as the home port for Royal Australian Navy nuclear-powered submarines and support allied visits from the UK and the US.
It is unclear whether the two acquisitions were subject to approval processes by the Foreign Investment Review Board, with the Treasury Department not responding to questions about the matter sent in early July.
Mr Wang’s son and director of the company that purchased the Port Kembla site, Wang Zhongdong, said the acquisitions were “commercial investments” in green energy and emphatically denied any link to China’s United Front Work Department.
At nearly 220,000sq m, the Port Kembla site – formerly home to a copper smelter – was acquired by Port Kembla Group in January and is located adjacent to the port.
As director, Wang Zhongdong’s address is listed at a luxury apartment in the Crown Residences at Sydney’s Barangaroo Tower One, according to ASIC records. Transfer documents value the property at more than $10.5m.
Port Kembla Group also lists businessman Jian Chen as a director, while Binggang Jiang, secretary-general of the Australia-China Environmental Protection Association, holds a 15 per cent stake. Wang Yongxin also serves as president of that association.
In addition, Mr Wang is connected to a 70,000sq m property in Newcastle, owned by Ausdragon Holdings Pty Ltd, which is located less than 500m from the port and was purchased late last year.
On the day the company was incorporated, Mr Wang was listed as its director, before he immediately transferred ownership to his daughter, Wang Rui, who remains the sole director. While serving as director, Mr Wang was registered to the Barangaroo apartment, and he retains directorship of a separate company, Newport International Investments Pty Ltd, at that same address.
Peter Jennings, a former executive director of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, said the port acquisitions were of “serious concern” and called on Canberra to scrap the deal if United Front links were confirmed. “China’s No.1 intelligence target in Australia will be anything to do with AUKUS and nuclear submarines,” he said.
“We’ve had lots of experience of having to … fight them away from the Osborne precinct in South Australia.”
Mr Jennings said he would be “appalled” if the FIRB had greenlit the acquisitions. “This is how China operates and yet we just seem to be in this naive space where you know property purchases or businesses being purchased by Chinese companies are thought to be just commerce – those deals drive back to the interests and priorities of the Chinese Communist Party,” he said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109354
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23348117 (191017ZJUL25) Notable: Gaza woman living in Sydney released from detention after ASIO security risk ruling – Palestinian grandmother Maha Almassri, 61, dubbed “Gaza Gran,” was released from Villawood detention a week after ASIO deemed her a security risk and her bridging visa was cancelled. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke’s office declined to explain, citing national security, while noting no previous adverse assessments had led to visas being reinstated. Opposition spokesman Andrew Hastie called the handling “shambolic,” demanding answers on how she could be freed. Her family denies she failed the “character test” and supporters protested outside Burke’s office.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109287
Gaza woman living in Sydney released from detention after ASIO security risk ruling
Protests broke out at Tony Burke’s office last week when Maha Almassri, 61, was detained – now she’s been set free.
Lachlan Leeming and Thomas Sargeant - July 18, 2025
The Opposition has accused the Albanese Government of the “shambolic” handling of a Palestinian grandmother released from immigration detention a week after being deemed a security risk by ASIO.
It’s understood ‘Gaza Gran’ Maha Almassri, 61, was released from Villawood Immigration Detention Centre on Thursday.
Her release came a week after The Telegraph revealed Ms Almassri was taken into detention following a 5am raid on a Bankstown home, with a Department of Home Affairs letter seen by this publication stating her bridging visa was cancelled as she had failed the visa’s “character test”, a claim she denies.
The document states the department was “provided with an Adverse Security Assessment” by the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO), which said the agency “assessed Ms Almassri to be directly or indirectly a risk to security”.
Ms Almassri’s current visa status is unclear, as is whether she remains in home or any other form of community detention.
Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke’s office said the government “will not be commenting on this cancellation”, but did say previous subjects of adverse security assessments had not had their visas reinstated.
“For people in Australia who have been given an adverse security assessment, none of them have been given visas and they remain in detention in accordance with the Migration Act,” a spokesman said.
Coalition Home Affairs spokesman Andrew Hastie questioned how she had been let out of immigration detention following ASIO’s assessment.
“The Government’s handling of this process has been shambolic from start to finish,” he said.
“How is it that this individual posed such a security risk the Minister cancelled their visa, and yet a week later they are free in the Australian community?
“Australians deserve answers. This is the same Labor Government that issued thousands of tourist visas to people from Gaza … before the proper security checks were undertaken, and with no plan for what to do once they arrived in Australia.
“It is little wonder Australians have lost confidence in Labor’s ability to manage immigration and national security.”
The document seen following Ms Almassri’s detention last week included that she “does not pass the character test” – a claim fiercely denied by her family, who alongside supporters launched a snap rally outside Mr Burke’s office last Thursday.
The reasons for Ms Almassri’s detention are not known.
The spokesman for Mr Burke added “any information in the public domain is being supplied by the individual or her family and is not necessarily consistent with the information held by our intelligence and security agencies”.
“The Australian government doesn’t stop investigating new information about a visa holder just because they are onshore. There is nothing more important to this Government than the safety of the Australian community,” he said.
Alison Battisson, a lawyer acting for Ms Almassri, was contacted for comment.
https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/gaza-woman-living-in-sydney-released-from-detention-after-asio-security-risk-ruling/news-story/3fc6f01e49943ffa2f339163c4ecdca4
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109355
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23348169 (191048ZJUL25) Notable: Trump threatens to sue Murdoch over Wall Street Journal report alleging 50th birthday letter to Epstein – US President Donald Trump denied a Wall Street Journal report that he wrote a sexually suggestive letter to Jeffrey Epstein, calling it “a FAKE letter, supposedly to Epstein … These are not my words, not the way I talk. Also, I don’t draw pictures.” He said he warned Rupert Murdoch and editor Emma Tucker, but “they are going with a false, malicious, and defamatory story anyway.” Trump vowed to sue and asked Attorney-General Pam Bondi to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts, declaring: “This SCAM … should end, right now!”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109289
Trump threatens to sue Murdoch over Wall Street Journal report alleging 50th birthday letter to Epstein
abc.net.au - 18 July 2025
1/2
US President Donald Trump says he plans to sue media mogul Rupert Murdoch and News Corp over a report in The Wall Street Journal that claims he wrote a sexually suggestive birthday letter to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
In a post to his Truth Social platform on Thursday, Mr Trump denied the story and condemned the Murdoch-owned newspaper's reporting of what he called "a FAKE letter, supposedly to Epstein".
The paper reported that Epstein had been gifted a leather-bound book of "bawdy" letters from associates for his 50th birthday in 2003, including a letter bearing Mr Trump's name alongside a drawing of a naked woman.
"The Wall Street Journal printed a FAKE letter, supposedly to Epstein. These are not my words, not the way I talk. Also, I don't draw pictures," the president said in his Truth Social post.
"I told Rupert Murdoch it was a Scam, that he shouldn't print this Fake Story. But he did, and now I'm going to sue his ass off, and that of his third rate newspaper."
Shortly after his first post on the issue, Mr Trump said he had asked Attorney-General Pam Bondi to produce any and all "pertinent" grand jury testimony related to the Epstein case, a move that would fall well short of what has been demanded by even his own supporters.
"Based on the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein, I have asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval," he wrote.
"This SCAM, perpetuated by the Democrats, should end, right now!"
Shortly after Mr Trump's statement, Ms Bondi said on X that the Justice Department was ready to ask the court on Friday, local time, to unseal the grand jury transcripts.
"President Trump - we are ready to move the court tomorrow to unseal the grand jury transcripts," she wrote.
Epstein, a financier and convicted sex offender, died in prison in 2019.
Report alleges Trump wrote of 'wonderful secret' in birthday letter
Mr Trump wrote on Truth Social that the White House had warned Mr Murdoch about the validity of the letter, but that the newspaper had gone ahead with the story anyway.
"Mr. Murdoch stated that he would take care of it but, obviously, did not have the power to do so," the statement said.
"The Editor of The Wall Street Journal, Emma Tucker, was told directly by Karoline Leavitt, and by President Trump, that the letter was a FAKE, but Emma Tucker didn't want to hear that. Instead, they are going with a false, malicious, and defamatory story anyway."
The letter was reportedly collected by Epstein's partner, disgraced British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, as part of a birthday album for Epstein years before the wealthy financier was first arrested in 2006 and subsequently had a falling-out with Mr Trump.
The letter, which bears Mr Trump's name, includes text framed by the outline of what appears to be a hand-drawn naked woman and ends with, "Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret," according to the newspaper.
The outlet described the contents of the letter, but did not publish a photo showing it entirely.
The ABC has contacted News Corp for further comment.
Maxwell was arrested in 2020 and convicted a year later on charges that she helped Epstein lure girls to be sexually abused.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109356
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23348173 (191051ZJUL25) Notable: Jeffrey Epstein’s Friends Sent Him Bawdy Letters for a 50th Birthday Album. One Was From Donald Trump. - The leather-bound book was compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell. The president says the letter ‘is a fake thing.’ - Khadeeja Safdar and Joe Palazzolo - July 17, 2025 - The Wall Street Journal
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109355
2/2
Epstein client list sparks growing MAGA rift
The latest controversy comes amid a growing rift within the president's Make America Great Again (MAGA) Republican coalition over the Epstein files, and a reported "client list" the FBI says does not exist.
The FBI announced last week it would not release any further documents related to Epstein or his suicide in a New York jail cell.
On Thursday, Mr Trump labelled many of his supporters "stupid" and "weaklings" for believing what he describes as the "Jeffrey Epstein hoax".
In his Truth Social post, the US president compared claims of an Epstein client list to other high-profile sagas, including allegations Russia interfered in the 2016 election.
Mr Trump has previously pointed the blame at the Democrats for peddling the story.
"The Radical Left Democrats have hit pay dirt, again!"
Mr Trump knew Epstein socially in the 1990s and early 2000s.
During the 2021 trial of Epstein's associate Ghislaine Maxwell, the financier's long-time pilot, Lawrence Visoski, testified that Mr Trump flew on Epstein's private plane multiple times.
Mr Trump has denied ever being on the plane, and has not been accused of any wrongdoing.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-18/trump-moves-to-unseal-transcripts-from-epstein-case/105546530
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114871422727186590
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114871752316281496
—
Jeffrey Epstein’s Friends Sent Him Bawdy Letters for a 50th Birthday Album. One Was From Donald Trump.
The leather-bound book was compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell. The president says the letter ‘is a fake thing.’
Khadeeja Safdar and Joe Palazzolo - July 17, 2025
https://archive.is/20250719091533/https://www.wsj.com/politics/trump-jeffrey-epstein-birthday-letter-we-have-certain-things-in-common-f918d796
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109357
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23348211 (191113ZJUL25) Notable: Video: ‘I’m going to sue his ass off’: Trump turns on Murdoch over Epstein story – US President Donald Trump vowed to sue Rupert Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal after it reported he wrote Jeffrey Epstein a cryptic 2003 birthday letter “framed by the outline of a naked woman.” The Journal alleged Trump’s text read: “A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy Birthday – and may every day be another wonderful secret.” Trump called it a “FAKE letter” and accused Murdoch of a “Scam,” with Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt labelling it a smear. Amid MAGA rifts over Epstein, Trump reversed course and asked Attorney-General Pam Bondi to seek release of grand jury testimony.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109355
‘I’m going to sue his ass off’: Trump turns on Murdoch over Epstein story
Michael Koziol - July 18, 2025
Harrisburg: US President Donald Trump says he will sue the Murdoch-owned Wall Street Journal for a story claiming he wrote a cryptic letter – with an “outline of a naked woman” – to now-convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein for the late financier’s 50th birthday.
Meanwhile, as the furore over the Epstein saga grew, especially among MAGA supporters, Trump reversed course and asked his attorney-general to release more documents related to the case, pending court approval.
The Journal reported Trump had signed a letter in a leather-bound book organised by Epstein’s friend Ghislaine Maxwell in 2003, and that the book formed part of the files examined by the Justice Department during its sex-trafficking investigation of Epstein and Maxwell.
Trump’s letter was “framed by the outline of a naked woman”, the newspaper reported, including small arcs depicting her breasts. The text reportedly took the form of an imagined conversation between the two men.
Donald: “We have certain things in common, Jeffrey.”
Jeffrey: “Yes, we do, come to think of it.”
Donald: “Enigmas never age, have you noticed that?”
Jeffrey: “As a matter of fact, it was clear to me the last time I saw you.”
Donald: “A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy Birthday – and may every day be another wonderful secret.”
Trump and Epstein were friends in the 1990s and mixed in the same New York finance circles. But Trump has maintained their relationship deteriorated at some point in the following decade and at times has claimed he only “knew” Epstein and was “not a fan”.
Ahead of the Journal’s story being published, rumours swirled in Washington that the paper was about to publish a significant story about the president and Epstein, who died in prison in 2019 at the age of 66.
Trump denied he wrote the letter or drew the picture in the Epstein birthday book.
“The Wall Street Journal printed a FAKE letter, supposedly to Epstein,” he posted on Truth Social.
“These are not my words, not the way I talk. Also, I don’t draw pictures.
“I told Rupert Murdoch it was a Scam, that he shouldn’t print this Fake Story. But he did, and now I’m going to sue his ass off, and that of his third rate newspaper.”
The Australian-born Murdoch bought the storied business newspaper from the Bancroft family in 2007. It is part of the News Corp empire now run by his son Lachlan.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt released a statement accusing the Journal of a “hatchet job”, and doubling down on Trump’s denials of the document’s veracity.
“The WSJ refused to show us the letter and conceded they don’t even have it in their possession when we asked them to verify the alleged document they’re basing their ENTIRE fake story on,” she said.
“When has President Trump ever spoken like the conversation alleged in the fake WSJ story? That’s not at all how he speaks or writes.”
Leavitt accused the newspaper of knowingly publishing a smear against the president and said there was a “co-ordinated hoax” at play by the Democrats and the “fake news”.
The Wall Street Journal declined to comment.
The story comes at a critical time for Trump, amid ructions in his MAGA base over the Epstein affair and the administration’s refusal to release more documents related to the investigation.
A contingent of MAGA supporters believes Epstein did not kill himself in prison but was murdered as part of a “deep state” ploy to cover up his crimes and protect members of the liberal elite.
The FBI and Department of Justice say there is no further credible information to provide, no evidence Epstein met foul play, and no evidence he kept a “client list”.
This week, Trump tried to draw a line under the saga and attacked his own supporters for buying into “bullshit” he said was spread by the Democrats to damage him.
But on Thursday night (Washington time) he changed course and said he had asked for more documents to be released.
“Based on the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein, I have asked Attorney-General Pam Bondi to produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval,” he posted on Truth Social.
“This SCAM, perpetuated by the Democrats, should end, right now!”
Bondi said she was ready to request that a court unseal the relevant documents as soon as Friday (Saturday AEST).
http://archive.today/msEoz
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTIZ0C4IkMY
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109358
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23348233 (191129ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Trump taunts Murdoch as he files $15 billion lawsuit over Epstein story – US President Donald Trump has launched a $15.3 billion defamation suit in Miami against Rupert Murdoch, News Corp chief executive Robert Thomson, and The Wall Street Journal over a story alleging he wrote a cryptic, sexually suggestive letter to Jeffrey Epstein. Trump denounced it as a “FAKE letter” and pledged to “sue his ass off.” His lawyers said the report was fabricated to smear him. The Justice Department also asked a court to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts. The Journal’s publisher, Dow Jones, said it would “vigorously defend” its reporting.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109355
>>109357
Trump taunts Murdoch as he files $15 billion lawsuit over Epstein story
Michael Koziol - July 19, 2025
1/2
Washington: US President Donald Trump has filed a defamation lawsuit against Rupert Murdoch and The Wall Street Journal, making good on his threat to sue over a story reporting that he signed a letter to Jeffrey Epstein for the disgraced financier’s 50th birthday.
The lawsuit was filed in a federal court in Miami less than 24 hours after the story was published last week. The filing – which names Murdoch, News Corp, chief executive Robert Thomson and the two reporters as defendants – says Trump is seeking $US10 billion ($15.3 billion) in damages, punitive damages, court costs and other relief.
“This historic legal action is being brought against the so-called authors of this defamation, the now fully disgraced WSJ, as well as its corporate owners and affiliates, with Rupert Murdoch and Robert Thomson (whatever his role is!) at the top of the list,” Trump posted on Truth Social.
The Australian-born Thomson is the long-serving chief executive of News Corp, based in New York. He was previously the editor-in-chief of Dow Jones, the News Corp subsidiary that publishes the Journal, and once worked at The Sydney Morning Herald, among other papers.
On Thursday (Friday AEST), the Journal reported Trump was among several Epstein associates who contributed a letter to a leather-bound book for the financier’s 50th birthday in 2003, organised by Epstein’s friend Ghislaine Maxwell.
The letter, which took the form of a cryptic, imagined conversation between the two men, was reportedly typed within a drawing of a naked woman, with two small arcs depicting her breasts. The exchange concluded: “Happy Birthday – and may every day be another wonderful secret.”
Trump denied writing the letter and claimed to have never drawn a picture in his life, though evidence quickly emerged disproving that claim. The Journal reported that Trump’s signature appeared below the woman’s waist, “mimicking pubic hair”.
The complaint filed in court alleged the defendants failed to attach the letter and drawing, failed to prove that Trump authored or signed such a letter, and failed to explain how the purported letter was obtained. In its story, the Journal did not claim to possess the documents, but said it had “reviewed” the letter.
“Defendants concocted this story to malign President Trump’s character and integrity and deceptively portray him in a false light,” Trump’s lawyers claimed in the complaint.
They also alleged the timing of the publication was malicious. Trump has been mired in controversy for two weeks regarding the administration’s refusal to release more documents related to the Epstein investigation.
Many of his core MAGA supporters are demanding the files be made public, alleging there is a “deep state” conspiracy to cover up Epstein’s high-profile acquaintances.
On Friday (Saturday AEST), the Trump administration asked a federal court to unseal grand jury transcripts related to the case amid pressure from Democrats and Republicans for more information to be made public.
“Transparency to the American public is of the utmost importance to this administration,” the Justice Department said in the filing, adding that “given the public interest” in the investigations into Epstein, the transcripts should be released.
It’s unclear if the courts will grant the administration’s request or whether the request will satisfy critics, including some of Trump’s own allies. Grand jury deliberations are typically kept secret. The judges could also take time to make a decision.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109359
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23348306 (191158ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Family of US pilot imprisoned in NSW pleads for his release after 1000 days – Former US Marine pilot and Australian citizen Daniel Duggan has spent 1000 days in Bathurst maximum security prison while awaiting extradition to the US on charges of illegally training Chinese pilots in South Africa between 2010 and 2012, which he denies. His wife Saffrine appealed to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Attorney-General Michelle Rowland: “Surely that can’t stand in a free, sovereign Australia… enough is enough.” Duggan’s legal team, which previously filed an 89-page submission, will challenge the extradition in the Federal Court next month.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Family of US pilot imprisoned in NSW pleads for his release after 1000 days
Emily Bennett - Jul 18, 2025
The family of imprisoned former US Marine Corps pilot and Australian citizen Daniel Duggan has made a fresh plea for his release 1000 days after he was locked up.
The 55-year-old is being held in a maximum security prison in Bathurst, NSW while awaiting extradition to the US.
Duggan was arrested in Australia in October 2022 on US orders, accused of breaching arms trafficking laws by providing military training to Chinese pilots in South Africa between 2010 and 2012.
He was allegedly paid $100,000 for his services.
Duggan has repeatedly denied the accusations.
His wife Saffrine Duggan has called on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and the Attorney-General Michelle Rowland to release her husband.
"Today my husband and Aussie citizen Dan Duggan has now been locked up in maximum security for 1000 days, with no Australian charges, awaiting extradition to the United States," she said in a statement.
"Surely that can't stand in a free, sovereign Australia.
"Please Prime Minister and Attorney General, enough is enough. You need to help your fellow Aussies."
Saffrine also thanked the thousands of Australians who continue to have hope by showing their support.
Duggan's legal team sent a comprehensive 89-page submission to the former Attorney-General in August last year, however he approved Duggan's extradition in December.
The legal team intends to fight the extradition in the Federal Court, with a date set in August.
https://www.9news.com.au/national/family-of-imprisoned-pilot-daniel-duggan-makes-plea-for-his-release/f8580418-9276-41cc-be22-f47cbe14e848
https://qresear.ch/?q=Daniel+Duggan
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109360
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23348316 (191202ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Family plead for alleged China pilot trainer's freedom – Former US Marine and Australian citizen Daniel Duggan has spent 1000 days in maximum security, facing extradition to the US on charges he unlawfully trained Chinese pilots in South Africa between 2010–12. Duggan denies wrongdoing, saying intelligence agencies knew of his work. His wife Saffrine called the case “politically motivated” and pleaded with Anthony Albanese and Attorney-General Michelle Rowland: “Surely Dan, me and our six kids have been failed by our government.” Despite repeated appeals, the government says it will not intervene while the Federal Court review of his extradition proceeds.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109359
Family plead for alleged China pilot trainer's freedom
Alex Mitchell - July 18 2025
Australia won't intervene to stop the extradition of an ex-US marine locked up for 1000 days on allegations he unlawfully helped China.
Daniel Duggan faces up to 60 years in prison for allegedly training Chinese military personnel in South Africa after leaving the US Marine Corps.
The father of six is fighting his extradition to the United States in the Federal Court after former attorney-general Mark Dreyfus ticked it off in December.
Charges and an indictment were first filed in a sealed court case in 2017 under the first Donald Trump administration, before Duggan was arrested and detained in 2022.
His family, led by wife Saffrine Duggan, continues to plead with the government to intervene in his case.
She used the 1000-day milestone to beg Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Attorney-General Michelle Rowland for his release before he is sent to America.
But the plea will fall on deaf ears, with Australia to keep Duggan in extradition custody until his judicial review process is complete.
"As the matter is currently before the court, it would not be appropriate to comment further," a spokesman for Ms Rowland said.
Ms Duggan called the charges "politically motivated" and said they do not stack up.
"Surely that can't stand in free Australia. Surely Dan, me and our six kids have been failed by our government," she said.
"We often hear our prime minister advocating for Australians locked up by a foreign government.
"Why won't our own government advocate for us?"
Ms Duggan has written to Ms Rowland asking her to examine the facts of the case "and learn what we already know".
"Dan and my family should not be in this situation.
"Australia should be a place of strength, of freedom, independence and justice," she said.
Duggan was arrested in Australia in October 2022 after being accused of breaching US arms-trafficking laws by providing military training to Chinese pilots in South Africa between 2010 and 2012.
He had worked part-time as a flying instructor during the relevant period.
In a letter from prison, Duggan said he believed his activities were not illegal and the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation and the US Naval Central Intelligence Service knew of his work.
He claimed ASIO agents brought up being able to meet Chinese generals and the topic of intelligence in a 2012 interview, leading him to believe they were trying to recruit him as a spy.
ASIO said it was unable to comment because the matter was before the court.
https://www.theleader.com.au/story/9019131/family-plead-for-alleged-china-pilot-trainers-freedom/
https://x.com/FreeDanDuggan/status/1946311514316755377
https://www.facebook.com/freedanduggan
https://www.change.org/p/support-dan-duggan-s-family-in-their-fight-to-overturn-extradition-decision
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109361
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23348545 (191331ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Counting begins as polls close in Tasmania for the election 'no one wanted – Tasmanians voted in their second election in 15 months after Liberal Premier Jeremy Rockliff called a snap poll following a no-confidence motion. Rockliff, in office since 2022, said he was “confident” he had put his “best foot forward,” while Labor leader Dean Winter urged voters to choose “a fresh start.” The campaign was dominated by debt concerns and a divisive plan for a Hobart AFL stadium, with Greens and independents opposing the project. Early signs suggest the crossbench may grow, threatening the Liberals’ hold on government.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73639 (pb)
Counting begins as polls close in Tasmania for the election 'no one wanted'
Yashee Sharma - Jul 19, 2025
The polls have closed in Tasmania for the second election in just 15 months, as voters were forced to decide between a premier with no support behind him and an opposition hoping to offer a fresh start.
Electoral officials are beginning to count votes across the island state's five electorates.
Liberal Premier Jeremy Rockliff, who has held the position since 2022, made the case for more time in the top job, saying he is "confident" he put his best foot forward.
"I don't believe we could've done much more," he said.
Labor Opposition Leader Dean Winter is banking on the stunning Liberal wipeout across Tasmania in May's Federal Election.
"We've given Tasmanians a choice, and a choice for a fresh start," he said.
But the proposal to build an AFL stadium in Hobart for the state's incoming team in 2028 may throw a wrench in today's election.
Tasmania is already struggling with its budget and health system, meaning voters may prefer to vote for the Greens and independents who want the money for the stadium spent elsewhere.
Electoral officials are counting voters for the 35 seats across the state.
At last year's election, the Liberals won 14 seats, Labor won 10, the Greens won five, the Jacqui Lambie Network won three, and independents also won three.
All indications suggest the crossbench may grow.
What triggered the election?
The election was called last month after Winter tabled a no-confidence motion in parliament, arguing that rising debt, delayed ferries and a previous plan to privatise state assets made Rockliff's leadership untenable.
The Liberals' state budget in May revealed that debt was forecast to reach almost $11 billion by the end of the decade.
The motion was passed and, instead of resigning, Rockliff decided to take the state through their second election in 15 months.
"Another election is not what I wanted, and I know that it's not what Tasmanians wanted," he said in June.
"But it was forced upon us by the leader of the Opposition."
Governor Barbara Baker granted the dissolution of parliament to hold another election because she believed there was "no real possibility that an alternative government can be formed", but acknowledged the "public interest in avoiding the cost of another election and the prevailing public mood against holding an election".
Tasmania has been in political turmoil after having a total of four elections in seven years.
Rockliff called an early election last year in the hope of regaining majority rule in parliament after two of his MPs quit the Liberal Party and defected to the crossbench.
He suffered a 12 per cent swing at the polls, but won more seats than Labor, creating a hung parliament.
He later reached a deal with three MPs from the Jacqui Lambie Network to form government.
Then-Labor leader Rebecca White conceded defeat and resigned following her third straight loss at the polls, allowing Winter to successfully contest the role.
There are concerns the turbulence will derail Tasmania's incoming AFL team, which is due to join the league in 2028.
One thing is for sure - Rockliff and Winter have a lot to prove at this election.
The Liberals have held Tasmania since 2014, but the vote of no confidence means that Labor may have a fighting chance.
https://www.9news.com.au/national/tasmania-election-2025-date-candidates-everything-to-know-explained/1f569dfd-2fc2-4460-a766-2bf809e731eb
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtGkqXrALdk
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109362
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23351189 (200033ZJUL25) Notable: Boost to Liberals, swing against Labor as voters punish ALP in Tasmanian poll – Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff claimed a “re-endorsement” as the Liberals secured 39 per cent of the primary vote, a 3.3 per cent boost, but still short of a majority. Labor suffered a 2.9 per cent swing against it, facing its worst result in state history at 25.8 per cent, with leader Dean Winter urging a “new approach to politics” in a likely hung parliament. The $945m Hobart AFL stadium dominated the campaign, splitting voters and boosting independents and Greens, who may now hold the balance of power.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109361
Boost to Liberals, swing against Labor as voters punish ALP in Tasmanian poll
Daniella White - July 19, 2025
1/2
Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff will seek to re-form government with an increased primary vote as Labor stares down the barrel of its worst result in the state’s history in an election dominated by a divisive debate over a new AFL stadium.
But a 3.3 per cent boost to the Liberal Party’s vote will likely not be enough for the party to lead a majority, and it remains possible for Labor to form a minority government.
With 39 per cent of the primary vote, the Liberal Party is set to fall short of forming a government in its own right and may be forced to negotiate with a largely left-leaning crossbench.
Rockliff said the result was a re-endorsement of the Liberal government and urged Tasmanian MPs to “respect the will of the people”, in a veiled reference to the dysfunctional Parliament which saw him lose a no-confidence vote brought on by Labor that led to the election.
Speaking in the election tally room in Hobart just after 9.30pm, after walking out to jubilant cheers of “Rocky, Rocky”, Rockliff said he would visit the state’s governor, Barbara Baker, and ask her to recommission his government “so we can get on with the job for Tasmania”.
“A little over six weeks ago, the leader of the Opposition forced this unnecessary election on the Tasmanian people by moving a vote of no confidence,” Rockliff said.
“Well tonight, the people of Tasmania in return have said that they have no confidence in the Labor Party to form government.”
With counting continuing late on Saturday night, Labor faced a 2.9 per cent swing against it, in a sign voters have punished the party for triggering an early poll by bringing the no-confidence motion which the Greens and some independents supported.
ABC election analyst Casey Briggs said it amounted to the party’s worst vote in Tasmanian history at just 25.8 per cent of the primary vote as of 10pm.
Speaking at the tally room on Saturday night, Labor leader Dean Winter did not concede but also would not reveal whether he will seek to work with the Greens.
But he said whoever forms government will have to form a “new approach to politics in the state” and show a willingness to work together.
Winter noted the parliament would likely return a majority of progressive MPs.
“Tonight, the Tasmanian people have spoken, and they have delivered another hung parliament and, with it, a resounding message that they want their politicians to work together more collaboratively. They aren’t happy with politics as usual, and they want to see things done differently,” he said.
Saturday’s snap poll, the second in under two years, was called after Rockliff lost a no-confidence-motion brought on by Labor, which criticised his budget management and the bungled roll-out of Spirit of Tasmania ferries. Rockliff chose to call an election instead of resigning.
Labor has ruled out doing a deal with The Greens to form government, but has left the door open to accepting supply and confidence from the minor party.
The party is predicted to hold either nine or 10 seats in the new parliament, with the Liberals remaining on at least 14. Eighteen seats are needed for a majority.
Speaking just after 10pm on Saturday night, Tasmanian Greens leader Rosalie Woodruff said Winter needed to have a conversation about the possibility of forming government with the Greens, despite his previous refusals to do so.
“There are differences, but the Greens and Labor have a lot in common too. We are ready. We are ready to work collaboratively in the best interest of Tasmanians and, Dean, I hope you put them first this time too,” she said.
The early election has delayed a key vote around the proposed $945 million Macquarie Point Stadium in Hobart and brought fierce anti- and pro-stadium sentiment to the forefront of the campaign.
The stadium project – an AFL condition of a new Tasmanian team, The Devils – is backed by Labor and Liberals but opposed by the Greens and most independents.
For many, like Hobart resident Travis Price, the proposed stadium and the prospect of a Tasmanian AFL team have ignited a newfound interest in politics.
“The team and the stadium have probably been the first major thing that’s got me to actually follow along with the politicians and what’s important for the state,” Price said on Saturday at an election-day rally in support of the stadium.
He said he voted Liberal, seeing the party as the strongest advocates for the stadium’s completion.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109363
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23351612 (200218ZJUL25) Notable: Tasmanian state election leaves state in limbo as Rockliff, Labor fight to form government – Tasmania faces another hung parliament, with Liberal Premier Jeremy Rockliff claiming a mandate to govern after winning the most seats, while Labor leader Dean Winter pointed to a “progressive majority” and called for collaboration with the Greens and crossbench. Rockliff vowed to work “maturely and pragmatically” with independents despite strained ties, but securing 18 seats for confidence and supply remains uncertain. Winter ruled out another election, urging a “new approach” to politics. Greens leader Rosalie Woodruff invited Labor into a power-sharing alliance, signalling weeks of negotiations ahead.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109361
>>109362
Tasmanian state election leaves state in Limbo as Rockliff, Labor fight to form government
MATTHEW DENHOLM - 20 July 2025
Tasmania is in political limbo, with both major party leaders flagging they can form government after the election of another hung parliament.
Labor leader Dean Winter said Saturday’s snap election had essentially returned the same result as the 2024 poll and voters wanted a different approach.
With Greens leader Rosalie Woodruff earlier offering to “have a conversation” with Mr Winter about forming government with Labor and crossbenchers, it appears such an outcome is possible in the weeks ahead.
Mr Winter said the majority in the new parliament would be “progressive”. “It is incumbent upon all of us to respect the will of the people and to make this new parliament work in the best interests of Tasmania,” he said.
“Whoever forms the next government will need to develop a new approach to politics in this state, one where genuine collaboration and a willingness to work together, and an ability to put aside differences.”
With Labor suffering its worse result this century, he said voters wanted a “change of approach”. “The Liberals will have the most seats but it is uncertain as to how they will achieve a majority,” he said.
He would not “trade away” Labor policies or values, but suggested he was prepared to “collaborate” with the crossbench.
“If the Liberals are unable to form a government, another election is not an option,” he said. “Fundamentally, what Tasmanians have asked us to do is to collaborate on the big challenges that face our state.”
Earlier, Liberal Premier Jeremy Rockliff said he was “humbled” that his party had won the most seats and, while falling short of a majority, he would ask Governor Barbara Baker to recommission him.
To chants of “Rocky”, the Liberal leader – deposed in a no-confidence motion only weeks ago – told the Hobart tally room he would work in a “mature and pragmatic” way with balance of power crossbenchers.
He said Labor, which suffered a negative 3.4 per cent swing on the latest count, had been rejected by voters.
“A little over six weeks ago the leader of the opposition forced this unnecessary election on the Tasmanian people by moving a vote of no confidence,” Mr Rockliff said.
“Well, tonight, the people of Tasmania in return have said they have no confidence in the Labor Party to form government. And they have voted to re-endorse our Liberal government.”
With more than half the vote counted, it appeared the ruling Liberals would win 14-15 seats, Labor 10, the Greens 5, independents 4 and the Shooters, Fishers, Farmers 1-2.
Mr Rockliff faces a largely hostile crossbench and will struggle to secure sufficient pledges of confidence and supply to govern with surety.
It appears the SFF will secure one and possibly two seats, soaking up the vote displaced by the demise of the Jacqui Lambie Network, while the National Party appears to have failed in its bid to gain a toe hold in the state.
The independents expected to be elected include anti-salmon newcomer Peter George, in the southern seat of Franklin, and sitting MPs Kristie Johnston in Clark, Craig Garland in Braddon, and David O’Byrne, in Franklin.
To secure the 18 votes in the 35 seat Assembly to govern with confidence and supply, Mr Rockliff – who has a troubled relationship with the existing crossbench – will need to win over three or four MPs.
While Mr O’Byrne has previously provided confidence and supply to the Liberals, Ms Johnston, Mr Garland and Mr George are not thought likely to offer such deals.
Even with the one or two SFF MPs onside, that would leave the Liberals short of a guaranteed majority on confidence and supply, as well as the passage of legislation.
That would leave the government at the constant whim of the crossbench and having to horse-trade for each piece of legislation, potentially include budgets.
Greens leader Rosalie Woodruff, whose party has retained its five seats, urged Labor leader Dean Winter to “have the conversation” about forming a power-sharing alliance.
“Yes there are differences but the Greens and Labor have a lot in common, too,” Dr Woodruff said. “We are ready to work collaboratively in the interests of Tasmanians. Dean, I hope you put them first this time, too.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/jeremy-rockliff-claims-victory-in-tasmanian-election-expects-to-form-minority-liberal-government/news-story/12b60087324e5954af90c70f4af7f171
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109364
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23351668 (200238ZJUL25) Notable: Carrier USS George Washington Joins Talisman Sabre Drills off Australia – The USS George Washington Carrier Strike Group has joined Talisman Sabre 2025, the largest-ever iteration of the multilateral exercise involving 19 nations and 35,000 troops. Rear Admiral Eric Anduze said the drills rehearse “ally and partner integration” to increase interoperability and deterrence. Allied vessels include the UK’s HMS Prince of Wales, Australia’s HMAS Sydney, Canada’s HMCS Ville de Quebec, and Norway’s HNoMS Roald Amundsen. For the first time, F-35C fighters are participating. Brigadier Damian Hill said Australia’s vast geography tests partners’ ability to project force across the Indo-Pacific’s vast distances.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109320
>>109315
Carrier USS George Washington Joins Talisman Sabre Drills off Australia
GORDON ARTHUR - JULY 16, 2025
1/2
TOWNSVILLE, AUSTRALIA — The U.S. Navy’s George Washington Carrier Strike Group is joining in exercise Talisman Sabre, contributing thousands of sailors to the largest iteration of the multilateral exercise off the coast of Australia in the CSG’s first major international exercise since returning to Japan.
The U.S. is one of 19 nations and 35,000 troops engaging in Talisman Sabre 2025, which has been held every two years since 2005. This year’s event kicked off July 13 and will conclude July 27. The strike group includes the USS George Washington (CVN-73), the Arleigh Burke-class USS Shoup (DDG-86), the Ticonderoga-class cruiser USS Robert Smalls (CG-62), and Carrier Air Wing Five, according to Rear Admiral Eric Anduze, commander of Carrier Strike Group Five and Task Force 70, who spoke to USNI News from his flagship shortly after the exercise began.
“We participate in Talisman Sabre ‘25 in order to rehearse, join and combine operations with our Australian counterparts, demonstrate maneuverability of naval forces in a contested environment, and increase operability and lethality,” Anduze said.
The carrier strike group joins the exercise following scheduled maintenance and reintegration into the forward deployed naval forces.
The strike group’s role in the exercise is “no different” than its typical role, according to Anduze.
“We are a striking element of the U.S. Navy. We do ally and partner integration, we do deterrence, and we do that with the arm of Carrier Air Wing Five and our ships of escort,” Anduze said.
For reasons of operational and exercise security, Anduze declined to reveal the area where Carrier Strike Group Five is training during the exercise. However, USNI News understands the CSG was likely sailing in the Timor Sea north of Darwin at the time of the interview. The George Washington Carrier Strike Group is working with other navies, including Anduze’s British equivalent under the Talisman Sabre 2025 construct, he said. Despite the presence of allies, Anduze only commands U.S. Navy ships.
“There are, other than U.S. and Australian forces, other navies out here and we work on interoperability with tactics, communications, command and control. So we work on all those aspects of our combined force as we maneuver our forces to conduct warfare.”
These allies include the United Kingdom Carrier Strike Group headed by HMS Prince of Wales (R09) and its escorts, comprising the British destroyer HMS Dauntless (D33), frigate HMS Richmond (F239) and fleet oiler RFA Tidespring (A136), as well as the Australian destroyer HMAS Sydney (DDG42), the Canadian frigate HMCS Ville De Quebec (FFH332) and the Norwegian frigate HNoMS Roald Amundsen (F311).
The goal of the exercise, he rear admiral explained, is to rehearse interoperability across the allied navies.
“We rehearse our tactics and communications, how we operate and how Australia operates, how we communicate and how we integrate across multiple domains. All of these experiences increase interoperability and strengthen our alliance as a whole for the security and freedom of the Indo-Pacific,” Anduze said.
The U.S. conducts routine operations in the region to ensure freedom of navigation and a free and open Indo-Pacific.
“And we have to do it with allies and partners in order to be successful and have the most impact. So anytime we have the ability to share, coordinate and work together, it is a chance for our tactics to become more refined and for us to be able to come together quickly,” Anduze said.
Having sailed from the Philippines, departing Manila on July 7, it is presumed that Carrier Strike Group Five passed through the South China Sea, the majority of which China vehemently claims as its own. China’s navy routinely shadows or harasses foreign naval vessels, law enforcement craft and fishermen in the South China Sea, with the Philippines being meted out for harsh treatment.
Incidentally, July 12 marked the ninth anniversary of the Permanent Court of Arbitration’s findings that China’s “historic rights” and nine-dashed claims had no legal basis.
“It also found China had violated the Philippines’ sovereign rights under UNCLOS and that its vessels had unlawfully created risks of collision and danger. Unfortunately, nine years later, we continue to see instability and destabilizing conduct in the South China Sea,” the Australian government explained on the anniversary.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109365
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23351734 (200307ZJUL25) Notable: Aircraft Carriers USS George Washington, HMS Prince of Wales Team Up off Australia – USS George Washington and HMS Prince of Wales met in the Timor Sea for the first dual-carrier operations in Talisman Sabre history. The Royal Navy hailed the “powerful demonstration of naval power,” with Prince of Wales embarking 17 F-35Bs and George Washington deploying F-35Cs, marking the first F-35C participation in the exercise. Supporting vessels include USS Robert Smalls, USS Shoup, HMAS Sydney, HMS Dauntless, HMCS Ville de Québec, HNoMS Roald Amundsen, and RFA Tidespring. The UK group continues its Operation Highmast deployment, sailing to Japan after drills conclude July 27.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109320
>>109315
Aircraft Carriers USS George Washington, HMS Prince of Wales Team Up off Australia
DZIRHAN MAHADZIR - JULY 18, 2025
Aircraft carriers USS George Washington (CVN-73) and HMS Prince of Wales met Friday in the Timor Sea for operations as part of Talisman Sabre 2025.
“This powerful demonstration of naval power brings together advanced capabilities and carrier aviation, including HMS Prince of Wales’ air group of F-35B Lightning jets,” the Royal Navy said..
Friday’s operations mark the first time aircraft carriers from the U.S. and the U.K. have operated together as part of Talisman Sabre since the exercise began in 2005. Held every other year off the coast of Australia, the eleventh iteration of the multinational exercise began July 13 and will conclude July 27. The U.S. and the U.K. are among 19 countries and 35,000 troops participating in the exercise.
The dual carrier operations are also the George Washington CSG’s first major bilateral drill since returning to Japan. Meanwhile, the UKCSG’s participation in Talisman Sabre is part of its Operation Highmast deployment to the Mediterranean and Indo-Pacific.
The George Washington CSG consists of aircraft carrier George Washington with embarked Carrier Air Wing (CVW-5), cruiser USS Robert Smalls (CG-62), and destroyer USS Shoup (DDG-86). The UKCSG includes aircraft carrier HMS Prince of Wales (R09), destroyer HMS Dauntless (D33), Royal Australian Navy (RAN) destroyer HMAS Sydney (DDG-42), Royal Norwegian Navy frigate HNoMS Roald Amundsen (F311), Royal Canadian (RCN) frigate HMCS Ville de Québec (FFH 332) and fleet oiler RFA Tidespring (A136). Royal New Zealand Navy (RNZN) frigate HMNZS Te Kaha (F77), which was part of the UKCGS, has detached from the group but will remain off the coast of Australia to participate in Talisman Sabre as part of the New Zealand contingent for the drills.
Both CSGs are operating F-35 Lightning II fighters. George Washington’s embarked Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 147 “Argonauts” of CVW-5 operates F-35Cs. This is the first time the F-35C variant is participating in Talisman Sabre.
Prince of Wales is embarked with 17 F-35Bs from an original complement of 18 with one aircraft grounded in India at Thiruvananthapuram airport following a diversionary landing on June 14 due to bad weather.
The Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) land-based F-35As and U.S. Marine Corps F-35Bs of Marine Fighter Attack Squadron (VMFA) 242 “Bats” embarked on amphibious assault ship USS America (LHA-6) are also taking part in Talisman Sabre drills. Two VMFA-242 F-35Bs conducted landings, refueling and take-offs on July 8 on Prince of Wales in the run-up to the multilateral exercise.
The Royal Norwegian Air Force originally planned to send seven F-35As to Australia for Talisman Sabre but called it off due to a lack of available partner nation tankers to support the aircraft’s flight to Australia.
George Washington CGS is participating in the massive exercise following scheduled maintenance and reintegration into the forward deployed naval forces.
The UKCSG is expected to sail to Japan after Talisman Sabre, conducting drills with U.S. and Japanese forces along the way.
https://news.usni.org/2025/07/18/aircraft-carriers-uss-george-washington-hms-prince-of-wales-team-up-off-australia
https://x.com/RoyalNavy/status/1946194479393701931
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109366
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23351780 (200323ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Talisman Sabre 2025: The top end operation with 150 planes - South East Queensland is taking centre stage in this year's Exercise Talisman Sabre. - 9 News Australia
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109320
>>109315
Talisman Sabre 2025: The top end operation with 150 planes
9 News Australia
Jul 17, 2025
South East Queensland is taking centre stage in this year's Exercise Talisman Sabre.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jtqDCxRt4Jg
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109367
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23351790 (200329ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Talisman Sabre 2025: Australia's armed forces test readiness in major military exercise - Australia's armed forces are participating in a major military exercise called Talisman Sabre, involving over 150 aircraft from 19 countries. The exercise is designed to test the readiness and capabilities of the Australian defence forces in the face of an increasingly assertive China. - 7NEWS Australia
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109320
>>109315
Talisman Sabre 2025: Australia's armed forces test readiness in major military exercise
7NEWS Australia
Jul 17, 2025
Australia's armed forces are participating in a major military exercise called Talisman Sabre, involving over 150 aircraft from 19 countries. The exercise is designed to test the readiness and capabilities of the Australian defence forces in the face of an increasingly assertive China.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6IadKXmbVjk
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109368
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23352196 (200746ZJUL25) Notable: Australian Army helicopter damaged in 'hard landing' during Talisman Sabre exercise in the NT – An Australian Army Tiger helicopter was damaged after a “hard landing” near Timber Creek during Talisman Sabre, though the two crew escaped unharmed. The 1st Aviation Regiment has paused flying operations pending an independent Defence Flight Safety Bureau investigation, but other rotary support will continue. Defence thanked NT Emergency Services and the US for their assistance. The biennial war games involve 30,000 personnel from 19 nations. The incident comes two years after a fatal Taipan crash at the same exercise, which led to the helicopter fleet being permanently grounded.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109320
>>109315
Australian Army helicopter damaged in 'hard landing' during Talisman Sabre exercise in the NT
abc.net.au - 18 Jul 2025
An Australian Army helicopter has been damaged during a multinational defence exercise in the Northern Territory, while all crew members on board avoided injury.
A defence spokesperson said the Tiger helicopter experienced a "hard landing" on Wednesday evening while participating in Exercise Talisman Sabre near Timber Creek, about 300 kilometres south-west of Katherine.
"The two aircrew aboard were unharmed and able to exit the helicopter safely," they said.
The spokesperson said the 1st Aviation Regiment had "implemented a pause on unit flying operations" after the incident but "other rotary wing support to the exercise will continue".
They said the Defence Flight Safety Bureau had deployed a team to the Northern Territory to start an "independent aviation investigation of the incident".
"Defence thanks Northern Territory Emergency Services and the United States for their support during the response to the incident."
Exercise Talisman Sabre involves 30,000 military personnel from 19 nations and is the largest combined training activity between the Australian Defence Force (ADF) and United States military.
The biennial war games involve live firing and combat simulations across land, sea and air.
The ADF permanently grounded its fleet of Taipan helicopters after a fatal crash during the exercise two years ago which killed Captain Danniel Lyon, Lieutenant Maxwell Nugent, Warrant Officer Class 2 Joseph "Phillip" Laycock and Corporal Alexander Naggs.
A defence investigation into the crash later found evasive action taken by the pilot avoided more lives being lost.
An ADF spokesperson told the ABC earlier this month both Black Hawk and Chinook helicopters would be used by the army during this year's exercise.
Australian personnel were also expected to fly in three Taipans operated by New Zealand's Defence Force as part of the exercise when it formally commenced last weekend.
"The Australian Army will deploy rotary-wing capabilities from the Battlefield Aviation Program, including the CH-47F Chinook and UH-60M Black Hawks to support movement of troops and equipment across the battlefield," they said.
"Partner nations, including New Zealand, Singapore and the United States, will also deploy rotary-wing lift assets."
The ABC also confirmed the 1st Regiment's Tiger helicopters would provide armed reconnaissance support during the large-scale war drills.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-18/talisman-sabre-tiger-helicopter-incident-australian-army/105547892
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109369
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23352204 (200755ZJUL25) Notable: Tiger Helicopter goes down during 2025 Talisman Sabre operations – An Australian Army Tiger Armed Reconnaissance Helicopter sustained damage after a “hard landing” at Bradshaw Training Area, Timber Creek, on July 16, just hours before it was due to finish its role in Talisman Sabre. Defence confirmed the two crew were unharmed, though the incident was kept under wraps for almost 48 hours. An independent Defence Flight Safety Bureau investigation is underway, with the entire 1st Aviation Regiment grounded pending findings. The ADF plans to retire the troubled Tiger fleet later this year, replacing it with AH-64E Apache helicopters.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109320
>>109368
Tiger Helicopter goes down during 2025 Exercise Talisman Sabre operations
It has been revealed that the Army Tiger helicopter which went down in the NT outback was just hours away from wrapping up its contribution to Exercise Talisman Sabre. Meanwhile, defence are remaining tight-lipped around the situation.
Nathaniel Chambers and Harry Brill - July 20, 2025
The military helicopter which hard-landed in the NT outback was just hours away from finishing the exercise, defence say, with authorities remaining tight-lipped around incident.
On Saturday afternoon, the ADF confirmed a Tiger Armed Reconnaissance Helicopter (ARH) sustained damaged after it experienced a hard-landing at Bradshaw Training Area, near Timber Creek, on the evening of July 16.
No major injuries or casualties were sustained.
In response, an Aviation Safety Investigation Team deployed to the NT to examine the circumstances around the incident.
Meanwhile, the incident was kept under close wraps by defence media, who held off from announcing the incident for almost 48 hours.
As officials enter day three of their investigation, defence have now confirmed ARH support to Exercise Talisman Sabre was supposed to have concluded on the same day of the incident.
For 1st Aviation Regiment - the unit involved in the incident - the investigation has created inconvenience, with the entire unit barred from flying operations while the investigation unfolds.
Asked when the unit would be permitted to take to the skies again, defence declined to comment.
‘Independent investigation’ launched after Talisman Sabre chopper goes down
An Army Tiger helicopter has gone down during a training exercise in the Northern Territory as part of Exercise Talisman Sabre.
An Australian Defence Force spokesperson told this masthead a Tiger Armed Reconnaissance Helicopter (ARH) experienced a “hard landing” in the vicinity of the Bradshaw Training Area, at Timber Creek, on July 16.
There were no major injuries or casualties as a result of the incident, according to the spokesperson.
The two crew on-board were unharmed and were able to safely exit the aircraft.
The helicopter sustained damage during the hard landing.
The Director of the Defence Flight Safety Bureau has established an independent aviation safety investigation team to probe the incident.
“To enable to conduct of this investigation the 1st Aviation Regiment has implemented a pause on unit flying operations,” the statement read.
“Other rotary wing support to the exercise will continue.”
The Defence spokesperson thanked the Northern Territory Emergency Services and the United States for their support during the response to the incident.
“Defence is committed to ensuring the safety of military personnel during all exercise and training activities, including Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025,” they said.
The ADF has plans to retire the Tiger, which was brought into service in 2004.
Made in Europe, army aviators have raised concerns around the chopper’s performance, with technical deficiencies and maintenance issues a common criticism of the airframe.
Under army project LAND 4503, the Tiger is expected to be replaced in late 2025 by the world-renowned AH-64E Apache attack helicopter.
Exercise Talisman Sabre is a multinational operation that has been conducted between Australia and the United States biennially since 2005.
The 2025 iteration of the event started on July 13.
https://www.ntnews.com.au/news/tiger-helicopter-crashes-during-2025-exercise-talisman-sabre-operations/news-story/77a45eb47fc567b68ec8c16ea8688b7e
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109370
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23352220 (200813ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Talisman Sabre Exercise Includes New Space Domain - The Talisman Sabre Exercise is a lot bigger this year and for the first time there's a space operations team. That new space domain will also be opening up for new recruits. - 7NEWS Townsville
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109320
>>109315
Talisman Sabre Exercise Includes New Space Domain
7NEWS Townsville - 15 July 2025
The Talisman Sabre Exercise is a lot bigger this year and for the first time there's a space operations team.
That new space domain will also be opening up for new recruits.
https://www.facebook.com/7NEWSTownsville/videos/talisman-sabre-exercise-includes-new-space-domain/714029624939425/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109371
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23352234 (200828ZJUL25) Notable: ABF report disturbing rise in alleged importation of child-like sex dolls into Australia — Australian Border Force (ABF) reports a “disturbing rise” in attempts to import banned child-like sex dolls, with 47 seized nationwide in the past year and six arrests made in seven NSW raids since November. Offenders face fines up to $782,500 and 10 years’ jail. Recent Hunter Valley arrests include Trevor Richard Jones, 63, who pleaded guilty, and Paul Adams, 49, who also faces child abuse and bestiality charges. ABF Inspector Michael Mahony said, “Dolls that normalise child exploitation are far from a victimless crime and they have no place in the Australian community.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ABF report disturbing rise in alleged importation of child-like sex dolls into Australia
Dan Proudman - July 18, 2025
Authorities are seizing child-like sex dolls at the country’s border on an almost weekly basis in what is being described as a “disturbing rise” in importations of the banned sick playthings which can attract maximum fines of almost $800,000 and 10-year jail terms.
Australian Border Force officials have made six arrests during seven raids in NSW alone since November, including the charging of three Hunter men over their unrelated alleged attempts to bring the child-like sex dolls into their homes.
It follows 47 dolls being seized by ABF officials across Australia in air, sea and mail cargo during the financial year ending last month and has prompted a warning for others getting on websites to order the products to know of the consequences.
The offence of importing tier two goods, namely child-like sex dolls, in contravention of the Customs Act (1901) attracts maximum penalties of a $782,500 fine and a decade behind bars, or both.
Lake Macquarie man Trevor Richard Jones, 63, pleaded guilty in Newcastle Local Court on Wednesday to the Commonwealth charge of intentionally importing prohibited tier 2 goods without approval before his matter was adjourned to Toronto in August.
Jones was arrested during a raid of a Cooranbong property on November 11 last year, after ABF officers found a child-like sex doll in an air cargo consignment in October.
He was the first of three significant arrests across the Hunter, with ABF officers raids a property north of Scone on May 14 after allegedly finding a doll within an air cargo consignment declared as a “silicone doll” the previous month.
Paul Adams, 49, was charged with the importation count as well as a series of other charges including four counts of possessing child abuse data using a carriage service, and one count of possessing bestiality material.
Adams has not been required to enter any pleas and remains in custody on remand after not applying for bail.
And last month, 52-year-old Anthony Blakewell was arrested at a Whitebridge address following a raid on a northern NSW premises before being charged with importing a child-like sex doll.
Blakewell has also not been required to enter a plea and was granted conditional bail to reappear in court on August 6.
“The Australian Border Force (ABF) is cracking down on a disturbing rise in attempted importations of child-like sex dolls into New South Wales (NSW), with more than half a dozen warrants actioned since late 2024,” the ABF said in a statement.
ABF Insp Michael Mahony said backing the intelligence and officers that protect the most vulnerable members of our community would always be a top priority for the ABF.
“These are just a few examples of recent actions taken by the ABF in relation to child-like sex dolls. Dolls that normalise child exploitation are far from a victimless crime and they have no place in the Australian community,” Insp Mahony said.
“Our officers utilise intelligence-led screening and risk-based targeting to disrupt illicit goods like these child-like sex dolls from being imported into our country.”
“The ABF is resolute in its commitment to seize any and all forms of abhorrent child abuse material at the border and ensure those responsible are prosecuted.”
https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/newslocal/the-newcastle-news/abf-report-disturbing-rise-in-alleged-importation-of-childlike-sex-dolls-into-australia/news-story/ecccd723c851e93117d87d3214b23fb1
https://www.abf.gov.au/newsroom-subsite/Pages/Crackdown-on-child-like-sex-doll-imports-across-NSW-results-in-multiple-arrests.aspx
https://qresear.ch/?q=child-like+sex+doll
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109372
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23352250 (200838ZJUL25) Notable: Ex-Australian PM Morrison to testify before US House panel on China — Former Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison will appear before the U.S. House Select Committee on China on Wednesday at a hearing on countering Beijing’s “economic coercion against democracies.” Former U.S. ambassador to Japan Rahm Emanuel will also testify. Relations with China soured under Morrison after Australia banned Huawei from its 5G network and demanded a COVID-19 origins probe, prompting tariffs on wine, barley, beef and coal. Emanuel has described China’s “economic coercion” as its “most persistent and pernicious tool.” The hearing comes as current PM Anthony Albanese moves to stabilise ties with Beijing.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109335
>>109337
>>109352
Ex-Australian PM Morrison to testify before US House panel on China
David Shepardson - July 19, 2025
WASHINGTON, July 18 (Reuters) - Former Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison will testify at a U.S. House panel hearing on Wednesday about countering China's "economic coercion against democracies," the committee said on Friday.
Former U.S. ambassador to Japan Rahm Emanuel will also testify before the House Select Committee on China.
Relations with China, already rocky after Australia banned Huawei from its 5G broadband network in 2018, cooled further after Canberra called for an independent investigation into the origins of COVID-19.
China responded by imposing tariffs on Australian commodities, including wine and barley and limited imports of Australian beef, coal and grapes, moves described by the United States as "economic coercion."
Morrison was defeated in a bid for reelection in 2022.
Reuters reported this week Canberra is close to an agreement with Beijing that would allow Australian suppliers to ship five trial canola cargoes to China, sources familiar with the matter said, a move towards ending a years-long freeze in the trade. China imposed 100% tariffs on Canadian canola meal and oil this year amid strained diplomatic ties.
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese visited China this week, underscoring a warming of ties.
Emanuel, who told a Chicago news outlet last month he is considering a run for president in 2028, has been a harsh critic of China, saying last year Beijing constantly uses coercion and pressures other countries, including Japan and the Philippines.
"Economic coercion by China is their most persistent and pernicious tool in their toolbox," Emanuel said in a separate speech in 2023.
The Chinese Embassy in Washington did not immediately comment.
https://www.reuters.com/world/china/ex-australian-pm-morrison-testify-before-us-house-panel-china-2025-07-18/
https://www.congress.gov/event/119th-congress/house-event/118535
https://selectcommitteeontheccp.house.gov/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109373
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23352261 (200846ZJUL25) Notable: Rudd ‘confident’ on AUKUS review, rejects defence spending claims — Kevin Rudd, Australia’s ambassador to Washington, said he was “confident” issues raised by the Pentagon’s AUKUS review under Elbridge Colby would be resolved, citing his long relationship with Colby and the “mature relationship” between defence establishments. Rudd rejected claims Australia underspends on defence, arguing differences in methodology mean its real level is closer to 2.5 per cent of GDP. He stressed AUKUS was a “quarter of a trillion dollar exercise” benefiting both nations. Despite past criticisms of Donald Trump, Rudd said the alliance had proved resilient and would grow stronger under his presidency.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109316
>>109318
Rudd ‘confident’ on AUKUS review, rejects defence spending claims
Jessica Gardner - Jul 19, 2025
Washington | Kevin Rudd believes issues raised by the Pentagon’s review of the AUKUS submarine pact can be resolved, but refutes suggestions that Australia is not spending enough on defence.
The former prime minister and now United States ambassador, who is under intense scrutiny amid strains in the Australia-US alliance, said the relationship had proved resilient through 15 prime ministers and presidents and would grow stronger under President Donald Trump.
“For the better part of 100 years, every major war in the 20th century and into the 21st century, we’re the crazy guys in the foxholes next to you,” he said during a panel discussion at the Aspen Security Forum on Friday (Saturday AEST). “So I think history does speak for something.”
The decades-long alliance has been tested in Trump’s second term because of tariffs on Australian goods, demands for Canberra to lift defence spending and a probe that jeopardises a $368 billion plan for Australia to acquire nuclear-powered submarines.
The Pentagon review of AUKUS is being run by under secretary of defence for policy Elbridge Colby, a known sceptic of the arrangement. The review seeks to ensure the sale of US submarines to Australia as part of AUKUS does not diminish US military capacity.
Colby has reportedly put pressure on Australia as part of the review to say what role it would take in a war between the United States and China over Taiwan, while observers expect he will conclude that Canberra must lift its own defence spending as a prerequisite for AUKUS to continue.
‘I’m confident’
Rudd, a foreign policy specialist who was prime minister between 2007 and 2010 and in 2013, said he had a good relationship with Colby, who many refer to as ‘Bridge’.
“Bridge has been around my place a lot of times, and so we have known each other for a long period of time, and that’s why I’m confident, quite apart from the mature relationship within our two defence establishments ... that we’ll work our way through this stuff,” he said.
“We are confident that we’ll work our way through each and every one of the issues which he has raised in the context of this internal Defence Department review.”
The Trump administration has successfully persuaded European nations to lift their defence spending to 3.5 per cent of gross domestic product annually, but the Albanese government has so far rebuffed similar demands from US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth.
Australia spends about 2 per cent of GDP on defence, but Rudd said it had been spending at this level or above for a lot longer than other nations. As well, he added, Australia used a narrower definition of defence spending than the US, without going into detail.
“There’s this whole question, frankly, of methodology, of how you count defence expenditures and outlays,” he said. “And there’s an active debate about how, in fact, that would render Australia’s current defence numbers probably more in the vicinity of 2.5 [per cent] or north if the same methodology was deployed as is deployed in the United States.”
The United States spends about 3.4 per cent, which includes a portion of the spending on its National Intelligence Programme, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
Fierce China hawk
Further, Rudd said Australia had committed to significant long-term defence investments, especially through AUKUS, which brought other benefits to the US, such as maintenance facilities in Perth for American submarines.
“The AUKUS program… itself is a quarter of a trillion dollar exercise over the next 15 years,” he said. “We will continue to increase our allocations on defence, and the PM [Anthony Albanese] has been very clear about doing so consistent with our national interests.”
Another former prime minister, Malcolm Turnbull, said this week that he has had past conversations with Colby, raising his well-known criticisms of the AUKUS deal.
Colby is a fierce China hawk who has said that US military efforts should prioritise holding back Beijing’s ambitions to expand its authoritarian influence in the region, including a possible invasion of Taiwan.
But some foreign policy experts have raised concerns about Trump’s willingness to push back on China, amid elements in the Republican Party who want the US to scale back its participation in foreign conflicts.
Rudd, who has been critical of Trump in the past, said the administration’s support for the Quad alliance between the US, Australia, Japan and India showed it retained the clear view that Chinese power “has to be rolled back in multiple domains”.
https://www.afr.com/policy/foreign-affairs/rudd-confident-on-aukus-review-rejects-defence-spending-claims-20250719-p5mg4g
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109374
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23352309 (200910ZJUL25) Notable: Video: First tranche of Australian army tanks arrive in Ukraine — More than half of the 49 M1A1 Abrams tanks pledged by Australia are now with Ukraine’s armed forces, nine months after the Albanese government’s commitment. Defence Minister Richard Marles said the tanks would make a “significant contribution” to Ukraine’s fight against Russia, while Pat Conroy said they provided “more firepower and more mobility.” The $245m tanks, originally slated for retirement, faced US export delays before delivery. Their upkeep may cost $153m annually.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73521 (pb)
First tranche of Australian army tanks arrive in Ukraine
JACK QUAIL - July 18, 2025
More than half of the 49 Australian Army tanks pledged to Ukraine are now in the hands of its armed forces – nine months after the Albanese government first made the commitment.
Under the promise, announced in October 2024, Australia agreed to provide Ukraine with dozens of recently retired M1A1 Abrams tanks in response to a formal request from Kyiv, in a move aimed at bolstering the country’s fighting efforts against Russia’s ongoing invasion.
The Australian tanks – valued at $245m – were originally scheduled to be retired this year and replaced by next-generation M1A2 models.
Yet they are still in good condition and are widely regarded as more advanced than many of the tanks currently operated by Russia’s military.
The transfer marks the first tranche of armoured equipment delivered under the agreement, and follows a prolonged delivery process that was delayed by bureaucratic hurdles in the US.
Until recently, the tanks had remained in Australia due to extended delays by the US in approving their export.
In April, The Australian revealed that the vehicles were still on Australian soil, with the US State Department only seeking congressional sign-off for the transfer about three weeks prior.
In a statement announcing the transfer, Defence Minister Richard Marles said the federal government remained “steadfast” in its support for Ukraine.
Mr Marles said he had met with Australian Defence Force personnel who had helped deliver the first tranche of tanks.
“The M1A1 Abrams tanks will make a significant contribution to Ukraine’s ongoing fight against Russia’s illegal and immoral invasion,” he said.
That view was shared by Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy, who said the promised military hardware would provide Ukraine’s armed forces with “more firepower and more mobility”.
“They meet a direct request from the Ukrainian government and form part of Australia’s unwavering commitment to protect the global rules-based order,” he said.
Once completed, the tank transfer will bring Australia’s contribution to Ukraine since the start of the conflict to $1.5bn, while the ADF also continues to contribute to efforts to train Ukrainian military personnel.
Despite the pledged military support, neither Australia nor the US has committed to covering maintenance costs or providing ammunition for the tanks — potentially limiting Ukraine’s ability to deploy them effectively.
Sources have previously told The Australian it would cost about $US100m ($153.7m) a year to keep the tanks in working order on the battlefield.
The arrival of the first tranche of Australian Army tanks comes as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine stretches into its 41st month and efforts to broker a ceasefire between the two countries have stalled.
This week, US President Donald Trump, in conjunction with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, announced a major arms package to build up Ukraine’s defences.
With Russian President Vladimir Putin ramping up missile and drone bombardments of Ukraine in the hopes of ending a deadlocked conflict, Mr Trump also threatened on Monday (Tuesday AEST) to slap “very severe” tariffs on Moscow unless it agreed to a ceasefire within 50 days.
Mr Trump’s increasingly tough stance against the Kremlin comes amid ardent efforts by European leaders to convince him to bolster armaments for Kyiv and drag Mr Putin toward serious negotiations that would bring about an end to the conflict.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/first-tranche-of-australian-army-tanks-arrive-in-ukraine/news-story/4eb9fba53be4f9018fdf7626ab34f366
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109375
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23352316 (200915ZJUL25) Notable: Vasyl Myroshnychenko Tweet: The majority of the 49 M1A1 Abrams tanks, generously gifted by Australia, have now arrived in Ukraine. The final delivery is expected in the coming months. On behalf of the Government of Ukraine and every Ukrainian heart, I express our deepest and most sincere gratitude to Prime Minister @AlboMP and DPM @RichardMarlesMP This powerful gesture of solidarity is more than military support-it is a lifeline, a message that we are not alone in our darkest hour. As we continue to defend our land, our people, and our future from brutal Russian aggression, we are reminded that the fight for freedom, dignity, and justice is a shared one. Together, we stand for all those who believe in democracy, human rights, and the rule of law. Let this united stand serve as a warning to all who threaten peace: the free world will not be broken.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109374
Vasyl Myroshnychenko Tweet
Breaking News:
The majority of the 49 M1A1 Abrams tanks, generously gifted by Australia, have now arrived in Ukraine. The final delivery is expected in the coming months.
On behalf of the Government of Ukraine and every Ukrainian heart, I express our deepest and most sincere gratitude to Prime Minister @AlboMP and DPM @RichardMarlesMP This powerful gesture of solidarity is more than military support—it is a lifeline, a message that we are not alone in our darkest hour.
As we continue to defend our land, our people, and our future from brutal Russian aggression, we are reminded that the fight for freedom, dignity, and justice is a shared one. Together, we stand for all those who believe in democracy, human rights, and the rule of law.
Let this united stand serve as a warning to all who threaten peace: the free world will not be broken.
Access to photo and video gallery is here.
https://images.defence.gov.au/assets/S20251860
https://x.com/AmbVasyl/status/1946315441695301955
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109376
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23357327 (210938ZJUL25) Notable: Inspired by China, Anthony Albanese sets red lines for Donald Trump meeting — "I’m planning to have a defence policy that is in Australia’s national interest," Prime Minister Anthony Albanese stated as he outlined boundaries for future talks with US President Donald Trump. Reflecting on his recent trip to China, Albanese emphasized respect for both nations' interests, highlighting his opposition to US demands for pre-commitment on Taiwan support and increased defence spending. He also expressed confidence in AUKUS's alignment with Australia’s national interest. Albanese rejected criticism of his China trip, asserting that it was focused on learning from China’s urban planning and transport systems.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73662 (pb)
>>109335
>>109337
Inspired by China, Anthony Albanese sets red lines for Donald Trump meeting
BEN PACKHAM - 20 July 2025
Anthony Albanese has vowed to draw clear lines when he meets Donald Trump on the limits of the nations’ partnership, as he declared Australia could learn from China’s fast-rail network and centrally planned cities.
Returning to Canberra after a record six-night visit to China, the Prime Minister said he was now focused on securing a first meeting with the US President.
“That’s a priority, and that will happen,” he said in an interview aboard his RAAF jet, amid criticism he had allowed Australia’s ties with its closest ally to drift.
While in China, the Prime Minister hit back at opposition claims that his itinerary was “indulgent”, saying his decision to visit the Great Wall of China and a panda sanctuary in Chengdu were aimed at showing “respect” to Australia’s biggest trading.
Mr Albanese told The Australian he would demonstrate his respect for Mr Trump “by engaging in a clear, forward manner, saying what we can do, what we can’t do”.
“It’s the way that I engage and build relationships,” he said.
“We’re not about to abandon our Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme, for example.”
He defended his government’s approach to the US relationship, declaring “our relationship is a positive one”.
“It’s our most important alliance. Obviously, the current US administration has an ‘America First’ policy, as they call it,” Mr Albanese said.
“That has led to a different position on tariffs than what Australia does. So part of engaging is recognising that and dealing with it in our national interest, in the best way we can.”
As well as pushing back on US criticism of Australia’s PBS as part of Mr Trump’s tariff blitz, Mr Albanese has rejected Pentagon calls for Australia to pre-commit to supporting the US if it goes to war with China over Taiwan, and for Canberra to nearly double the nation’s defence budget.
Asked whether he was preparing to unveil a major defence spending package when he met with Mr Trump, Mr Albanese said: “I’m planning to have a defence policy that is in Australia’s national interest. Simple as that.
“That’s what we do – build on our capability.”
He was also dismissive of a review of AUKUS ordered by US Undersecretary of Defence for Policy Elbridge Colby, which some fear could force changes to the nations’ nuclear submarine pact.
“Look, AUKUS is in Australia’s national interest, and it’s in the interest of the US,” Mr Albanese said. He signalled the meeting with Mr Trump was likely to occur at a multilateral meeting, such as the upcoming Quad meeting in New Delhi, or the G20 in Johannesburg, rather than at the White House, where Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky and South Africa’s Cyril Ramaphosa found themselves on the receiving end of presidential tirades.
“There’ll be multiple meetings between now and the end of the year. Australia and the US are both members of a range of international gatherings,” he said.
On a high after his trip to China, the self-confessed “urban policy nerd” lauded that country’s centrally planned cities and rapid transport links.
Despite concerns Australia would never have the market to make fast-rail a reality, Mr Albanese said “I think … we certainly can do”.
“We have our High Speed Rail Authority,” he said.
“I want the first part of that to be to Newcastle. It’s a way of taking pressure off the capital cities as well on the east coast.”
Mr Albanese, who has pledged $500m so far for the Sydney to Newcastle route, said he wanted to see progress on policy during this term of government.
“The person who is overseeing that for the commonwealth (Tim Parker) is the person who oversaw the Sydney Metro.
“Sydney Metro has been a huge success.”
“Obviously, it’s a very long-term project. We’re looking to receive the business case and to go through that this term.”
Mr Albanese also enthused over China’s smart cities, including a new “five minute city” in Chengdu that “will have business, residential and everything, all in one spot”.
Opposition foreign affairs spokeswoman Michaelia Cash said the Prime Minister needed to prioritise securing a meeting with Mr Trump after his “extended visit” to China.
“Mr Albanese needs to focus his international attention on securing the AUKUS alliance and gaining exemptions from US tariffs,” she said.
“At a time of global uncertainty, growing conflict and a growing list of issues in the Australia-US relationship, now is a time to build our influence in Washington, not diminish it.
“The US-Australia alliance in 2025 needs to be stronger than ever, not put on the back burner, as Mr Albanese has done.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/inspired-by-china-anthony-albanese-sets-red-lines-for-donald-trump-meeting/news-story/1558d8b3c87bd964daf22172c64dba9c
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109377
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23357341 (210945ZJUL25) Notable: ‘An element of trust’: Inside Xi and Albanese’s warm, funny private lunch in Beijing – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese described his private banquet with Chinese President Xi Jinping as “very personal,” saying, “We got to know each other a lot more … there was humour. That shows an element of trust.” He called the “unusual” lunch a sign the relationship had moved “beyond stabilisation” towards deeper engagement. While defending his China visit against Coalition criticism, Albanese also confirmed support for Beijing’s hosting of APEC 2026 and said outcomes on green steel and agricultural trade would build on the six-day trip’s momentum.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109325
>>109335
>>109337
‘An element of trust’: Inside Xi and Albanese’s warm, funny private lunch in Beijing
Paul Sakkal - July 21, 2025
1/2
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has feted a rare intimate lunch with Chinese President Xi Jinping as a moment of “trust” in an ambitious new phase in relations, after years of Australia pursuing a more limited policy of stabilisation.
Revealing details of the event for the first time, the prime minister also used an interview to shift his gaze to the domestic agenda, with Labor to pursue pre-election pledges to wipe 20 per cent off student debt and enshrine penalty rates in law, and rush through new laws to boost childcare centre safety after shock allegations of child abuse in Melbourne and Sydney.
However, the prime minister said he would not seek to pass a contentious super tax hike in the first fortnight of parliamentary sessions of the 48th parliament.
Instead, Labor’s 17 new MPs will deliver their maiden speeches, led by Ali France and Sarah Witty, who respectively toppled former Coalition leader Peter Dutton and ex-Greens leader Adam Bandt.
Albanese demanded the Coalition get out of the way of his agenda after it described his week of high-level talks in China as “indulgent” and a “working holiday”.
In an interview on his flight back to Australia, the prime minister provided details about a private banquet that Xi organised after the pair’s formal bilateral talks. Until now, he had not spoken at length about the private meal, which analysts have said was a treat few foreign leaders were handed when they travelled to Beijing.
“He was very personal. It was a very personal discussion,” Albanese said of the lunch in Beijing’s Great Hall on Tuesday.
“We got to know each other a lot more; a lot more about our backgrounds, our upbringing, our views, a lot more about everything … There was humour.
“That shows an element of trust, as well, to open up in that way.”
Facing the challenge of balancing Australia’s relations between Beijing and Australia’s chief security partner in Washington, the Labor leader declined to use the word “trust” when pressed on his relationship with China’s autocratic leader in a press conference last week.
Former prime minister Scott Morrison warned in The Australian on Saturday that Xi was flattering Albanese to subtly coerce Labor into accepting China’s plans for hegemony in the Indo-Pacific.
Albanese said the “unusual” private lunch was significant, and he agreed “absolutely” with the proposition that Labor was edging beyond the more cautious era of stabilisation that came after years of feuding between China and Australia.
“We’re adding layers to it … How does further development in the relationship occur?”
Xi is not known for his warmth in bilateral meetings. Former prime minister Kevin Rudd told the ABC in 2021 that he did not hear a sidesplitting joke in his hours of talks with Xi. Former Trump administration secretary of state Mike Pompeo once described Xi as “dour”.
“Of the dozens of world leaders I met, he was among the most unpleasant,” Pompeo wrote in 2023.
In a sign of tighter ties with Beijing, Albanese said Australia was supporting China’s hosting of the APEC summit next year. It is expected that Australia will unveil additional outcomes from the China trip in coming months on top of those dealing with trade and tourism already announced.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109378
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23357378 (211010ZJUL25) Notable: Man arrested in Strathfield driving black ‘Chinese Police’ sedan with firearms, ammunition in boot – A 21-year-old man was arrested in Sydney’s inner west after police stopped a black sedan marked with “Chinese Police” insignia, including a bonnet with misspelt “POILCE.” Officers found 48 live rounds of ammunition in the boot, along with items allegedly used to impersonate police. The man produced a fake document claiming he was transporting Chinese consulate officials. A search of his Baulkham Hills home uncovered gel blasters, while his registered firearms were seized pending review. He faces multiple charges and is due before Burwood Local Court on July 22.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Man arrested in Strathfield driving black ‘Chinese Police’ sedan with firearms, ammunition in boot
Police in Sydney’s inner-west made a peculiar arrest on Friday after stopping a 21-year-old man armed to the teeth driving a black sedan.
Alex Blair - July 21, 2025
1/2
You don’t see this one every day.
Police in Sydney’s inner west made a peculiar arrest on Friday after stopping a 21-year-old man driving a black sedan in Strathfield.
Burwood Highway Patrol officers were conducting routine patrols at around 2:50pm on 18 July when they noticed a vehicle bearing “Chinese Police” markings.
On inspection of the vehicle, they found numerous “Chinese Police” insignia affixed to the passenger door panels and the bonnet.
The driver was charged after officers allegedly found firearms and ammunition in the boot.
Upon questioning, the man allegedly produced a fake document claiming the vehicle was being used to transport Chinese consulate officials.
During a search of the car, officers located a box containing 48 live rounds of ammunition in the trunk.
The man, who holds an active firearms licence, allegedly told police he believed it was “the best place to store his ammunition”.
Officers seized the ammunition along with other items suspected of being used to impersonate police.
They later gained access to the man’s Baulkham Hills residence, where they located two gel blaster firearms, which were also seized.
His registered firearms were taken pending a review of his firearms licence.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109379
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23357388 (211015ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Confusion as ‘Chinese police’ car spotted on street in Melbourne’s southeast - It’s understood Australia’s foreign interference taskforce is investigating the vehicle - 18 April 2023 - https://archive.vn/d8OqC#18714060
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109378
2/2
The man was charged with multiple offences, including use display emergency services organisation insignia, driving motor vehicle with unlawful police insignia and possession of an unauthorised prohibited firearm.
He was granted conditional bail and is due to appear at Burwood Local Court on Tuesday, 22 July 2025.
At a glance, the man’s black sedan looked to be legitimate, if not for the misspelt “POILCE” emblazoned on his bonnet.
https://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-act/crime/man-arrested-in-strathfield-driving-black-chinese-police-sedan-with-firearms-ammunition-in-boot/news-story/2bc91276bb9a2889e9fef731b68ea4b5
https://qresear.ch/?q=chinese+police+car
—
Confusion as ‘Chinese police’ car spotted on street in Melbourne’s southeast
It’s understood Australia’s foreign interference taskforce is investigating the vehicle.
Molly Magennis - 18 April 2023
https://archive.vn/d8OqC#18714060
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109380
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23357406 (211023ZJUL25) Notable: Swing against Labor won’t stop Dean Winter trying to form government with crossbench – Tasmania faces political deadlock after another hung parliament, with Jeremy Rockliff’s Liberals on 14–15 seats and Dean Winter’s Labor stuck on 10 with its worst primary vote in a century. Rockliff claims the first mandate to govern, but crossbenchers hold the balance of power. Winter argues Tasmanians want “collaboration” and is pitching a “progressive majority” despite pledging no deals with Greens. Constitutional experts say Governor Barbara Baker may demand written agreements before commissioning either side.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109361
>>109362
>>109363
Swing against Labor won’t stop Dean Winter trying to form government with crossbench
MATTHEW DENHOLM - 20 July 2025
1/2
Tasmanian Liberal Premier Jeremy Rockliff is fighting to prove he can rule in a nightmare parliament with a progressive crossbench, as Opposition Leader Dean Winter embarks on a mission to turn Labor’s worst primary vote in a century into a workable government.
Mr Rockliff will have the first shot at forming government after Saturday’s state election, having won at least 14 seats in the 35-seat Assembly – the same number as in the last, failed parliament.
Despite a swing to his Liberal Party in almost every region, the Premier appears stuck on a likely 17 votes – one short of the 18 required to govern with confidence and supply.
Mr Winter, with just 10 seats – also unchanged – and a primary vote of just 25.9 per cent is pitching a “progressive majority” government to three green-left independents and the Greens, which could deliver him the 18 votes required.
Where the crossbenchers land is far from certain, with none yet declaring support for one side or the other.
Mr Rockliff on Sunday said Mr Winter had “no mandate” to govern after the voter backlash and he would ask Governor Barbara Baker to commission him to form a government.
“Mr Winter … has no mandate to govern with the Greens because he said he would do no deals and Tasmanians would look on that very poorly,” Mr Rockliff said. “That to me is an integrity issue.
“But Mr Winter has said today that we should be given the first opportunity to govern and that’s exactly what I intend to do.
“I will get on with the job and I will be going to the Governor to seek a recommissioning of our government.”
He said that would wait until the vote count was finished, which the Tasmanian Electoral Commission advised would be after the distribution of preferences on July 29.
Mr Winter said he would stick to his pledge not to do a power-sharing “deal” with the Greens, but confirmed that he was talking to independents.
While acknowledging the Liberals would have the first opportunity to try to govern, he said he did not believe they could achieve the necessary 18 votes in the Assembly to guarantee supply and confidence.
“Tasmanians have voted for a change of approach and they want to see their politicians working better together,” he said. “And I accept that all of us need to change the way that we approach this.
“This is going to be about who can form a government that can last for four years. No one wants another early election, including myself and the Labor Party, so we’ve got to make this parliament work.”
Mr Winter has pitched power-sharing protocols and a “collaborative approach” to the independents but ruled out ditching any Labor policies in win their support, or that of the Greens, who have retained their five seats.
The Greens voted with three crossbenchers and Labor to express no confidence in Mr Rockliff in June and leader Rosalie Woodruff has expressed a willingness to work with Labor to form government.
On Sunday, she would not say whether the party would be willing to do so without Mr Winter providing any policy wins for the party.
“The first step is to have a conversation,” Dr Woodruff said. “Dean Winter hasn’t spoken to me. I’ll pick up the phone and have a conversation with him.”
Both Mr Rockliff and Mr Winter spoke to independents Peter George, Craig Garland, David O’Byrne and Kristie Johnston, while the Premier also spoke to likely Shooter, Fishers, Farmers MP Carlo Di Falco.
Liberal figures believe Mr Di Falco, who appears to have replaced former Jacqui Lambie Network MP in the largely rural seat of Lyons, is likely to support Mr Rockliff to govern.
However, Mr Garland, Mr George, Ms Johnston – all green-left leaning MPs – and Mr O’Byrne, a former Labor leader-turned-independent, are yet to declare their hands.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109381
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23357429 (211032ZJUL25) Notable: Childcare CCTV rollout risks becoming an ‘expensive mistake’ – Early Childhood Australia chief Samantha Page warned CCTV in centres would be “a very expensive mistake,” creating privacy risks and a false sense of security, calling instead for two staff to be present at all times. Goodstart Early Learning said cameras were “just one tool, and a minor one,” stressing active supervision by trained staff. Georgie Dent of parental advocacy organisation The Parenthood said “cameras don’t build trust – relationships do,” while Carolyn Smith of the United Workers Union warned of hacking risks. Minister Jess Walsh welcomed CCTV commitments but said clear policies would be required from September.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109236
>>109238
Childcare CCTV rollout risks becoming an ‘expensive mistake’
RACHEL BAXENDALE - 20 June 2025
The blanket rollout of CCTV in childcare centres will be an “expensive mistake”, creating a false sense of security and risking the misuse of footage by predators, key early childhood experts are warning.
Early Childhood Australia chief Samantha Page said she understood the appeal of CCTV in the wake of revelations a fortnight ago that accused pedophile Joshua Dale Brown had been charged with more than 70 offences allegedly committed in Melbourne childcare centres.
“CCTV is not the answer. It needs to be about people and pedagogy,” Ms Page said, calling for a minimum requirement for two staff members to be present with children at all times.
Her view has been supported by other early childhood experts, but comes as Early Childhood Education Minister Jess Walsh welcomed announcements from childcare providers G8 Education and Affinity – which employed Mr Brown – that they will install CCTV across their centres.
“What we’ve got is a whole load of providers that are either inexperienced or trying to cut costs, and running single educators during opening and closing and thin numbers over breaks. That’s when we see children at risk,” Ms Page said.
“We’ve seen the introduction of CCTV has been a very expensive mistake in the UK. It’s created all kinds of privacy issues about who’s viewing the footage, and we’ve seen tragedies in UK centres because people are relying on cameras rather than checking on children in person. I understand why (CCTV) sounds so appealing, but I just think it’s going to be a very expensive mistake.
“We can put that money into educators. That’s what will deliver on children’s safety.”
Australia’s largest not-for-profit childcare provider, Goodstart Early Learning, has been trialling CCTV in some of its centres since 2022, but the organisation said CCTV was “just one tool, and a minor one, in keeping children safe”.
“Active supervision by qualified and well-trained educators and teachers working in a centre, where children always remain visible, is the key to safeguarding children,” a Goodstart spokeswoman said. She said the cameras were installed with strict privacy controls in place, with vision encrypted and unable to be accessed within centres.
“CCTV has a role to play but governments will have to consider how they fund a national program to support the rollout of CCTV in early learning centres as the costs are extremely high, in terms of installation costs, secure storage of data, and ongoing monitoring and review,” she said.
Georgie Dent, chief executive of parental advocacy organisation The Parenthood, echoed Ms Page’s concerns. “Installing CCTV might offer a false sense of security but it won’t prevent harm,” she said.
“Cameras don’t build trust – relationships do. The most important safeguard for children in early learning settings isn’t surveillance – it’s well-trained, well-supported, properly paid educators and robust systems that promote safety and accountability.
“CCTV is passive. It records but it doesn’t protect children in real time. Every dollar spent on surveillance is a dollar we’re not spending on improving educator-child ratios, professional development or wages – investments that are proven to improve outcomes and safety for children.”
United Workers Union early education director Carolyn Smith said there were serious risks associated with footage falling into the wrong hands. “If banks and Qantas can be hacked, how do we make sure the local education and care centre is safe?” Ms Smith said.
Senator Walsh said she welcomed the commitments from some providers to install CCTV cameras in their centres. “CCTV can be an important tool as part of provider obligations to maintain a strong child safe culture in their services,” she said.
Regulatory changes coming in from September 1 will require childcare services to have clear policies and procedures on taking, use, storage and destruction of photos and videos of children.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/childcare-cctv-rollout-risks-becoming-an-expensive-mistake/news-story/41ad5a1ab70fa028552f3c6f0719aa0e
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109382
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23357456 (211044ZJUL25) Notable: Free speech no joke, says Giggle for Girls founder in appeal over transgender ‘Sweaty Balls’ laughter – Sall Grover, founder of the Giggle for Girls app, is appealing a Federal Court ruling that fined her $10,000 for laughing at satirical merchandise mocking transgender woman Roxanne Tickle. Grover’s lawyers argue her “momentary, reflexive laugh” at the “Sweaty Balls” candle, which caricatured Tickle’s comments on SBS Insight, was constitutionally protected political expression. They say penalising such courtroom reactions “chills political engagement and penalises dissent.” Grover maintains her app excluded Tickle based on “visual impression of maleness,” not gender identity. Appeals begin August 4.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109282
>>109298
Free speech no joke, says Giggle for Girls founder in appeal over transgender ‘Sweaty Balls’ laughter
STEPHEN RICE - July 20, 2025
1/2
When Giggle for Girls app founder Sall Grover burst out laughing in court at a caricature of transgender woman Roxanne Tickle, she couldn’t have imagined it would spark a constitutional battle over the limits of free speech.
That spontaneous laugh has turned the sex discrimination case about female-only spaces into an equally watershed test of whether a joke or insulting remark about trans gender people can be protected speech under law.
In a new submission responding to a cross-appeal filed by Tickle, Grover’s legal team argues that her “momentary, reflexive laugh” in response to political satire was protected by the implied freedom of political communication in the Constitution.
“If the freedom protects mockery, it protects response to mockery,” Grover’s lawyers claim in a submission lodged with the Federal Court late on Friday.
Even highly offensive statements and insults may constitute protected political expression, the submission argues, otherwise the effect would be “to chill political engagement and penalise dissent”.
Grover is appealing judge Robert Bromwich’s ruling in the Federal Court last year that she indirectly discriminated against Tickle by rejecting her from the female-only Giggle networking app because she looked like a man.
Tickle is also appealing parts of Justice Bromwich’s decision, arguing the judge should have found she was the victim of direct, rather than indirect, discrimination and that Grover should pay her at least $40,000 for the hurt caused.
Under cross-examination during the case, Grover was confronted with a piece of crowd-funding merchandise sold online – a scented candle taking a satirical jab at Tickle’s claim that she realised she was a woman because she “hated the smell of balls”.
The “Sweaty Balls” scented soy candle was on sale at $37.30, but her involuntary laugh cost Grover $10,000.
Justice Bromwich was not amused, awarding aggravated damages for her “offensive and belittling” outburst.
Grover rebuts Tickle’s claim that the $10,000 penalty was “manifestly inadequate”, arguing the damages award was “infected by legal error” and should never have been made.
The only basis for the award “was a brief and involuntary act of laughter” by Grover – reacting to a proposition put to her by Tickle’s counsel – that the judge found was not deliberate, malicious, or intended to cause harm, the submission says. The laughter was a “momentary, reflexive laugh” and a “spontaneous courtroom response”, and Tickle should not be allowed to increase “this already flawed reward”.
More importantly, Grover’s legal team argues, imposing liability “for expressive conduct during litigation” raises a potentially serious constitutional issue.
“The conduct in question occurred in court, during adversarial proceedings, in response to cross-examination in respect of political satire. The subject of that satire – a basis on which (Tickle) had publicly claimed to be a woman – is at the core of political discourse in this litigation.
“To penalise expressive response to that claim is to burden political communication.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109383
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23357461 (211052ZJUL25) Notable: Dutch defence chief warns Australia to increase military capability – Visiting for Talisman Sabre, Netherlands Chief of Defence General Onno Eichelsheim warned that China’s rise in the Indo-Pacific mirrors Russia’s threat to Europe, urging Australia to prepare: “If you prepare for war, you can avoid war.” The Netherlands has lifted defence spending to 3.5% of GDP under U.S. pressure, but Eichelsheim stressed “it’s not about the percentage, it’s about the capabilities.” He said Australia “inevitably” must increase capabilities, both for regional security and support to Europe. Defence Minister Richard Marles insisted Australia is funding targeted capabilities, not arbitrary spending benchmarks.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109316
>>109318
>>109224
>>109320
Dutch defence chief warns Australia to increase military capability
Tom Lowrey - 21 July 2025
The Netherlands' chief of defence has warned Australian leaders the country needs to counter China's military rise by increasing its own defence capability.
General Onno Eichelsheim, visiting Australia for the Talisman Sabre defence exercises, warned the threat posed by China to the Indo-Pacific is not unlike that Russia poses to Europe.
And he says "naivety" should not allow Australia and other countries to avoid preparing for the risk of conflict in future.
"You should look at the facts that are around you … if Russia tells us that they want to have more, more influence, than take that seriously," he said.
"And if you see in this case in this region, China building up, take it seriously and get ready for something that you hope will never happen.
"If you prepare for war, you can avoid war. And that's how we look at it."
The Netherlands recently agreed to lift its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of its GDP, alongside most other NATO countries.
The decision came in part due to pressure from the United States for NATO countries to provide more for their own security.
Australia has faced its own pressure from the United States to lift defence spending to the same level.
General Eichelsheim said 3.5 per cent of GDP would provide the Netherlands with the capability the country needs, given the security situation in Europe.
He said while the focus on GDP percentages was not important, there was no doubt Australia would need to do more.
"It's not about the percentage, it's about the capabilities," he said.
"But inevitably, I think Australia has to increase its capabilities as well, if you look at the region, and the build-up in this case of China.
"Also, if they need to help out Europe, which [Australia is] actually already doing — if you look at the war in Ukraine, and supporting us there."
Netherlands watching Russia's risk
In April General Eichelsheim issued an order to the country's 76,000 defence personnel, both uniformed and civilian.
The top-ranking Dutch military official warned they needed to increase their readiness and be ready for rapid deployment.
He said the message was sent for two reasons: that a ceasefire in the war in Ukraine might need to be protected, and that it might lead Russia to shift its attention elsewhere.
"We know that [Russia has] the ability, if there is a ceasefire, they can move within one or two years to other locations where they can threaten, for instance, the Baltic States," he said.
"So we need to be ready to defend that line as well. And that is not that much time, to be honest."
The Netherlands is one of 19 countries taking part in the Talisman Sabre defence exercises, which are jointly organised by Australia and the United States.
The Dutch defence personnel taking part are also joined by other European militaries like France, Germany and Norway.
Asked why the Netherlands is taking an interest in the region, and how he views the security situation in the Indo-Pacific, General Eichelsheim said he has real concerns.
"We worry about the amount of capabilities that China is building up," he said.
"Those are not capabilities that you only use for protecting yourself. There are also quite a lot of offensive capabilities in it.
"Leaving it only to the US versus China is also not a good idea — so we've increased our partnerships a lot with Japan, the Republic of Korea, Australia, New Zealand and also the Philippines."
Marles says capabilities are what counts
The Albanese government has pushed back on the United States' calls for significant increases in defence spending, arguing spending is already rising quickly.
The prime minister has argued Australia will set its own defence policy, and made the case that specific capabilities should be funded, rather than funding targets set and pursued.
Asked about whether pressure might come from other allies rapidly increasing defence spending as a share of GDP, Defence Minister Richard Marles said those countries can see what Australia is doing.
"We understand there is a process of international benchmarking, but ultimately every country, when it goes through its own processes about what kind of defence force it needs to build, does so based on assessing its own strategic need," he said.
"And that's exactly what we're doing and I think countries can see that we are engaging in that process, it's an ongoing process and a process which up until this point has yielded the biggest peacetime increase in Australia's defence spending."
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-21/dutch-defence-chief-warning-on-australian-military/105553010
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109384
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23357475 (211101ZJUL25) Notable: Talisman Sabre 2025: Marines rehearse remote airfield seizures during massive Indo-Pacific drills – U.S. Marines and Australian troops practiced seizing remote airstrips in the Outback as part of Talisman Sabre 2025, involving 35,000 personnel from 19 nations. Airstrips at Timber Creek, Nackeroo, and Cloncurry stood in for island bases in a future conflict, with Marines arriving by MV-22B Ospreys and KC-130Js. A Typhon system also fired an SM-6 missile from Bradshaw, the first live launch in the Western Pacific. Marines established command posts, refueling points, and air traffic control, encountering only “small sporadic fire teams” in the exercise scenario.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109320
Talisman Sabre 2025: Marines rehearse remote airfield seizures during massive Indo-Pacific drills
SETH ROBSON, STARS AND STRIPES - July 21, 2025
CLONCURRY, Australia - U.S. Marines and Australian soldiers pushed deep into the Outback in recent days to practice seizing remote airstrips, part of preparations for potential operations across the vast Indo-Pacific.
The training is part of Talisman Sabre, a biennial multinational exercise that began July 13 and runs through Aug. 4. More than 35,000 personnel from 19 nations are participating this year.
Since the exercise began, the Marines and Australian troops have captured airstrips at Timber Creek and Nackeroo in the Northern Territory, and at Cloncurry in Queensland, said Capt. Johnny Fischer, a spokesman for the 2,500-strong Marine Rotational Force-Darwin.
The airstrips are standing in for island facilities that the Marines could be tasked with seizing in a future contingency, Fischer told Stars and Stripes in Cloncurry on Sunday.
MV-22B Ospreys with Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 363, based in Hawaii, have flown Marines and Australian troops to their objectives. A recreational vehicle equipped with high-tech communications gear served as the command-and-control center during a 1,000-mile journey from Darwin to Cloncurry, Fischer said.
A five-vehicle convoy carrying 20 Marines, including cyber defenders, arrived near each airstrip ahead of the simulated raids.
The first runway seized was at Timber Creek, 376 miles south of Darwin. Troops then moved on to the Nackeroo airstrip at Bradshaw Field Training Area.
In May 2024, the Australian Defence Department announced the completion of upgrades at Nackeroo, including a runway extension and parking for aircraft, including Ospreys and C-17A Globemaster IIIs. The work is a major part of a $486 million package of upgrades to Northern Territory training areas and ranges, according to the department’s website.
Separately, the U.S. Army on July 15 struck a maritime target with an SM-6 missile launched from the Bradshaw area – marking the first live fire by a Typhon launch system in the Western Pacific. Marines helped ensure the surrounding airspace was clear, Fischer said.
On Friday, the Marines and Australians conducted another airborne raid to seize Cloncurry using Ospreys. Marine air traffic controllers took up positions beside the runway, and support personnel established a forward arming and refueling point, while additional Marines arrived Sunday on a KC-130J Super Hercules to assume control of the airport.
Australian troops then departed for Shoalwater Bay Training Area on Queensland’s east coast.
Flying deep into the Outback was a new experience for many Marines, said Capt. Kendall Weigand, a KC-130J pilot with Marine Aerial Refueler Transport Squadron 153, also based in Hawaii.
“It’s wide open, wild terrain that’s unique to Australia,” he told Stars and Stripes after landing at Cloncurry. “We dropped into a canyon and saw a herd of wild horses. We were hoping for kangaroos.”
The arriving Marines encountered minimal resistance in the exercise scenario, said their commander, 1st Lt. Max Burke of 2nd Platoon, Company E, 2nd Battalion, 1st Marine Regiment.
“Only small sporadic fire teams are what’s expected,” he said.
Maj. Jamie Frisby, commander of the Australian troops at the airport, recommended a local bakery to the newly arrived Marines.
“They’re bringing the pies to us,” he said.
https://www.stripes.com/theaters/asia_pacific/2025-07-21/marines-seize-airstrips-talisman-sabre-18504131.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109385
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23357490 (211116ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Talisman Sabre 2025: Providing coastal protection far from home – U.S. Coast Guard Security Unit 307 joined Talisman Sabre 2025 in Darwin, integrating with the 2nd Australian Division to protect vital infrastructure. After a Welcome to Country and training with Australian troops, the Coast Guard began layered port defence drills alongside the 12th/40th Battalion, Royal Tasmania Regiment. “To be able to work alongside the Aussies is invaluable learning for us,” said Lt. Nicholas Haas. Lt. Doug Shephard added, “There’s always something to learn.” The joint effort focuses on securing the Port of Darwin through combined sea and shore defence.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109320
>>109336
Talisman Sabre 2025: Providing coastal protection far from home
defence.gov.au - 21 JULY 2025
They may be a long way from their home base of Clearwater, Florida, but the United States Coast Guard personnel from Security Unit 307 are starting to feel like honorary Aussies.
After arriving at Larrakeyah Defence Precinct in Darwin for Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025, the US Coast Guard team were treated to a Welcome to Country and a smoking ceremony by Elders from the Larrakia Nation.
Soldiers from 8th Brigade also took the guardsmen and women through Australian Army EF88 Austeyr rifle training at Robertson Barracks.
And now the US Coast Guard personnel have been incorporated into the 2nd (Australian) Division task force in Darwin protecting vital infrastructure across the city.
US Coast Guard officer Lieutenant Nicholas Haas is relishing the opportunity to work side-by-side with Australian Army Reserve soldiers from 12th/40th Battalion, Royal Tasmania Regiment, at HMAS Coonawarra.
“To be able to work alongside the Aussies is invaluable learning for us,” Lieutenant Haas said.
“We get to learn to speak a little bit of Army, understand what capabilities they bring and how they can be best used in port defence.”
It’s not all one-way, though, and Australian Army officer Lieutenant Doug Shephard who is leading the 12th/40th Battalion’s direct-fire support platoon, is learning as much as he can, too.
“It’s always great being able to work with partners such as the US Coast Guard,” Lieutenant Shephard said.
“There’s always something to learn and inevitably, you see things we haven’t come across before, so every opportunity we get to exchange ideas and practices, we jump at it.”
The training undertaken by the two partner units is all part of the critical task of protecting northern Australia.
“Our tasking on Exercise Talisman Sabre is to provide security for the Port of Darwin,” Lieutenant Haas said.
“To achieve that we’re doing a layered point defence, where we have our small boats out on the water providing security and our shore-side element is in multiple positions should any craft get past the boats.
“It all revolves around area defence and key point protection so providing defence and security for military or civilian infrastructure, which is obviously critical for the northern part of this country.”
Exercise Talisman Sabre will run until August 4.
https://www.defence.gov.au/news-events/news/2025-07-21/providing-coastal-protection-far-from-home
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8mbAfC-DaA
>Talisman Sabre
MAGIC SWORD
https://qalerts.pub/?q=Operation+Specialists
https://qalerts.pub/?q=magic
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109386
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23361911 (220926ZJUL25) Notable: Australia, UK, France and other nations call for immediate end to war in Gaza – Twenty-eight countries, including Australia, the UK, France and Japan, signed a joint statement demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and the release of hostages. The statement, signed by Foreign Minister Penny Wong, condemned Israel’s “drip feeding of aid” and “inhumane killing” of Palestinians, noting more than 800 people have died near aid sites run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke called it Australia’s strongest language yet. Israel rejected the statement as “disconnected from reality”, blaming Hamas for prolonging the war. The US did not sign.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Australia, UK, France and other nations call for immediate end to war in Gaza
abc.net.au - 22 July 2025
1/2
Twenty-eight countries, including Australia, the UK and France, are demanding an immediate end to the war in Gaza and for Israel to lift aid restrictions.
The joint statement, signed by Foreign Minister Penny Wong, comes amid growing international concern over the number of deaths at aid sites in the enclave.
It criticises what it calls the "inhumane killing" of Palestinians and condemns the "drip feeding of aid".
The majority of people killed in recent weeks have been in the vicinity of Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) sites, which the United States and Israel backed to take over aid distribution in Gaza from a network led by the United Nations.
"We, the signatories listed below, come together with a simple, urgent message: the war in Gaza must end now," the foreign ministers of Britain, Australia, France, Italy, Japan, Canada, Denmark and other countries, and an EU commissioner, said in a joint statement.
"We are prepared to take further action to support an immediate ceasefire and a political pathway to security and peace for Israelis, Palestinians and the entire region," they added.
The statement also voices sharp condemnation of the Israeli government's aid delivery model.
"The suffering of civilians in Gaza has reached new depths. The Israeli government's aid delivery model is dangerous, fuels instability and deprives Gazans of human dignity," it said.
"We condemn the drip feeding of aid and the inhumane killing of civilians, including children, seeking to meet their most basic needs of water and food.
"It is horrifying that over 800 Palestinians have been killed while seeking aid. The Israeli Government's denial of essential humanitarian assistance to the civilian population is unacceptable.
"Israel must comply with its obligations under international humanitarian law."
On Tuesday, Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said the joint statement represented Australia's strongest comment yet since the beginning of the conflict in Gaza.
"We've seen too many images of children being killed, of horrific slaughter, of churches being bombed," he told the ABC.
"The images that we've seen have been pretty clear that so much of this is indefensible, and as that statement referred to, aid being drip-fed in.
"None of this changes the fact that the hostages need to be released, of course that needs to happen, but what we are watching on the other side of the world is indefensible.
"The hostages still need to be released, but the war needs to end."
The joint statement also includes a condemnation of Hamas's treatment of hostages held captive since the group's October 7, 2023, attack in Israel.
"We condemn their continued detention and call for their immediate and unconditional release," it said.
"A negotiated ceasefire offers the best hope of bringing them home and ending the agony of their families."
The statement was signed by EU Commissioner for Equality, Preparedness and Crisis Management Hadja Lahbib, Senator Wong and the foreign ministers of Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Greece, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the UK.
It said the countries "strongly oppose any steps towards territorial or demographic change in the Occupied Palestinian Territories".
It said that if the E1 settlement plan announced by Israel's Civil Administration was implemented, it would divide a Palestinian state in two.
This would mark a "flagrant breach of international law and critically undermine the two-state solution," the statement added.
The 28 countries went on to urge other members of the international community to "unite in a common effort to bring this terrible conflict to an end, through an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire".
"Further bloodshed serves no purpose," they said.
"We reaffirm our complete support to the efforts of the US, Qatar and Egypt to achieve this," they added.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109387
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23361918 (220932ZJUL25) Notable: Labor brands Israeli conduct in Gaza ‘indefensible’ after 28-nation statement – Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke declared Israel’s actions in Gaza “indefensible” after Australia joined 27 countries in condemning the “horrifying” killing of Palestinians and demanding an immediate ceasefire. The joint statement, signed by Penny Wong, criticised Israel’s “drip feeding” of aid and warned against forced removal of Palestinians. US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee called the statement “disgusting”, while Israel’s top diplomat in Australia, Amir Maimon, said it was “disconnected from reality”. The UN reported 875 deaths near aid sites since July 13.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109386
Labor brands Israeli conduct in Gaza ‘indefensible’ after 28-nation statement
BEN PACKHAM - 22 July 2025
One of the Albanese government’s most senior ministers has lashed Israel’s conduct in Gaza as “indefensible” after Australia joined with 27 other countries to condemn the “horrifying” killing of Palestinians and demand an immediate end to the war.
Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said the statement – branded “disgusting” by the US’s top diplomat in Israel – was Australia’s strongest since the war began, reflecting the scale of the humanitarian disaster in the territory.
“We’ve seen too many images of children being killed, of horrific slaughter, of churches being bombed,” Mr Burke told the ABC. “None of this changes the fact that the hostages need to be released, of course that needs to happen. But what we are watching on the other side of the world is indefensible. The hostages still need to be released, but the war needs to end.”
The statement, signed by Foreign Minister Penny Wong and backed by the UK, Japan, New Zealand, and a raft of European nations, said Israel’s “drip feeding” of aid into Gaza was dangerous and unacceptable, and warned its plan to remove Palestinians from the territory would breach international law. “The suffering of civilians in Gaza has reached new depths,” it said.
“We urge the parties and the international community to unite in a common effort to bring this terrible conflict to an end, through an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire. Further bloodshed serves no purpose.”
US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee blasted the statement on social media, saying Israel wasn't to blame for the conflict. “Disgusting! 25 nations (later 28) put pressure on Israel instead of savages of Hamas! Gaza suffers for 1 reason: Hamas rejects EVERY proposal. Blaming Israel is irrational,” he wrote on X.
Israel’s top diplomat in Australia, Amir Maimon, responded in a social media post: “Israel rejects the joint statement published by a group of countries, including Australia, as it is disconnected from reality and sends the wrong message to Hamas.”
The statement came as hundreds of protesters rallied outside Parliament House in Canberra, holding dolls shrouded in white cloth, representing babies killed in the Palestinian territory.
The UN said 875 people had been killed in Gaza since July 13 while trying to get food, including 674 in the vicinity of new Israeli-controlled aid hubs that have been widely criticised by the international community.
Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said while the Coalition wanted to “see aid reach those who deserve it”, it was Hamas’s responsibility to release its hostages and allow aid to reach civilians.
“There are still hostages in Gaza, there are still hostages hidden in tunnels, and a way to end the situation is for those hostages to be released by the terrorists Hamas who control so much of the activity there,” she said.
The Executive Council of Australian Jewry said Israel wanted an end to the war “but that can only happen with the release of the 50 hostages and assurances that Hamas will not retain effective control over Gaza”.
“There is immense suffering right now, which cannot be denied,” ECAJ president Daniel Aghion said. “The solution is the permanent removal of the terrorist force that started this war and their release of all hostages.
“Anything less would guarantee a return to war and further suffering… All sides need a ceasefire but we (must) ensure this is the last Israel-Hamas war.”
The Australia Palestine Advocacy Network said the statement was “dangerously insufficient and months too late”.
“The time for these statements has long passed. People are starving to death because Israel refuses to allow aid into the hellscape it created in Gaza. Families are being bombed and gunned down while trying to access water,” APAN president Nasser Mashni said.
“If Australia has even a shred of moral courage left, it must act now – with sanctions akin to the 1400 sanctions it imposed on Russia, with a two-way arms embargo, and with unequivocal support for international accountability for the genocidal rogue state of Israel through the International Criminal Court and International Court of Justice.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/labor-brands-israeli-conduct-in-gaza-indefensible-after-28-nation-statement/news-story/e9510eac1b34aadd310b3df429e793f4
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109388
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23361926 (220942ZJUL25) Notable: Pro-Palestine protesters disrupt opening of parliament – Seventeen activists were detained inside Parliament House after chanting “free, free Palestine” during Governor-General Sam Mostyn’s speech, while hundreds more rallied outside, some clashing with police. Greens deputy leader Mehreen Faruqi held a “Sanction Israel” sign and shouted at Anthony Albanese, while Bob Katter retorted “they started it” in reference to Hamas’s October 7 attacks. Demonstrators displayed images of dead children and staged mock funerals; one man stood on a police car before being ordered down. The protest followed Labor’s strongest rebuke of Israel yet, co-signing a 28-nation letter condemning civilian deaths and aid restrictions in Gaza.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109386
>>109387
Pro-Palestine protesters disrupt opening of parliament
Nick Newling and Brittany Busch - July 22, 2025
Pro-Palestine protesters were detained in Parliament House during a rally on Tuesday, while hundreds more massed on the lawns outside in a gathering that briefly grew so rowdy that one attendee stood on a police car.
Seventeen protesters were held in an antechamber off parliament’s Marble Hall for around an hour by police and building security as they shouted protest chants of “free, free Palestine” while Governor-General Sam Mostyn addressed the Senate.
Mehreen Faruqi held a sign in solidarity with the protesters during the entirety of Mostyn’s speech – “Gaza is starving. Words won’t feed them. Sanction Israel” – before the deputy Greens leader shouted at Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to “sanction Israel” as he left the chamber.
Albanese did not respond, but the member for Kennedy, Bob Katter, was heard calling out “they started it” – seemingly referring to the October 7 attacks from Hamas where the terror group killed more than 1200 people in Israel – as the chamber emptied.
An Australian Federal Police spokesman confirmed that officers detained a group of 17 people to confirm their identities and then removed them from Parliament House after they caused a disturbance on Tuesday afternoon.
“They will be issued formal banning notices at a later date,” the spokesman said. “At about 3pm, one woman was arrested outside Parliament House by protective service officers and she has been transported to the ACT watch house. She is expected to be charged with failing to obey the direction of a protective service officer.”
Before being detained, protesters inside the building were heard yelling at police to use gender-neutral language after being referred to as “ladies and gentlemen”, and shouted that “history will remember” those opposed to their cause before they were escorted out.
Outside, the AFP formed a border at the front of Parliament House, behind which protesters held up images of children killed in Israel’s Gaza offensive.
A man climbed onto the top of an AFP car, yelling, before officers ordered him down, while the public were barred from entering parliament.
Demonstrators had earlier lined the roads, holding bundles wrapped in funeral cloth to resemble dead children.
It was the second day of protests after activists were arrested on Monday for scaling a business in the industrial Canberra suburb of Hume, accusing the firm of contributing to weapons used in Israel.
Israel’s foreign ministry said on Tuesday that Hamas was to blame for the conflict. “Hamas is the sole party responsible for the continuation of the war and the suffering on both sides,” the ministry posted on X.
It argued the terror group was harming civilians who came to receive aid from the US and Israel-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation.
The protest in Canberra came after the government made its strongest condemnation yet of the Israeli government’s conduct in Gaza, signing a letter alongside 27 other countries on Tuesday morning. The joint statement condemned the “drip feeding of aid and the inhumane killing of civilians, including children”.
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/pro-palestine-protesters-disrupt-opening-of-parliament-20250722-p5mgyc.html
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/propalestine-protesters-gather-at-parliament-house-as-pollies-return/news-story/93127c95a31eb34b48c3127820f6b0e3
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109389
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23361932 (220946ZJUL25) Notable: Accused childcare pedophile Joshua Brown ‘may face more charges’: court – Prosecutors told Melbourne Magistrates’ Court they may lay further charges against former childcare worker Joshua Brown, already accused of 70 child sex offences against eight children aged between five months and two years. Brown, 26, allegedly offended while employed at Creative Garden Early Learning Centre, Point Cook, between April 2022 and January 2023, and worked at 24 centres statewide. Magistrate Donna Bakos granted prosecutors more time, adjourning the case to February 2026, and released charge sheets to the media. Linked accused Michael Wilson, facing rape and child abuse charges, also had his case delayed.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109236
>>109238
Accused childcare pedophile Joshua Brown ‘may face more charges’: court
LILY MCCAFFREY - 22 July 2025
Prosecutors have been granted more time to prepare their case against alleged pedophile Joshua Brown, with a court hearing there was the potential for further charges to be brought against the former childcare worker.
The Office of Public Prosecutions on Tuesday applied for an extension of time to compile its evidence and have the committal mention for Mr Brown - charged with 70 child sex offences - pushed back from September 15 this year to February 10 2026.
Magistrate Donna Bakos granted the application, which was unopposed by Mr Brown’s lawyer, Rishi Nathwani KC.
Mr Brown, 26, in custody since his arrest in May, was excused from appearing at Tuesday’s brief hearing in the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court.
Mr Nathwani flagged the possibility of detectives bringing further charges against Mr Brown, and said the lack of certainty meant that an application by media agencies to obtain the police charge sheets should be opposed.
Mr Nathwani argued it would be “premature” to release the charge sheets to media outlets on Tuesday “because the charges are in flux”.
“It would hinder the realisation of natural justice … at this stage,” he said.
However, Ms Bakos said she was not prepared to restrict access to the charge sheets and granted their release.
“They are the charges that are before the court,” Ms Bakos said.
Mr Brown was this month charged with 70 child sex offences allegedly committed against eight children aged between five months and two years.
Mr Brown – who worked at 24 childcare centres across the state – is alleged to have committed the offences at Creative Garden Early Learning Centre in Point Cook in Melbourne’s west between April 2022 and January 2023.
Among the 70 charges are sexual penetration of a child, attempted sexual penetration of a child, sexual assault of a child, sexual activity in presence of a child and the production of child abuse material for use through a carriage service.
The court on Tuesday also heard an application from the Office of Public Prosecutions to move the court date for Michael Simon Wilson, who has been linked to Mr Brown, from September 15 to November 15 2025.
Mr Wilson, 36, was charged in relation to an alleged sexual assault of a teenage boy on April 16 in Hoppers Crossing, in Melbourne’s south west.
Victoria Police previously confirmed detectives had charged Mr Wilson with a range of sexual offences in relation to the alleged assault, including rape, while the Magistrates Court previously said the nature of the charges included child abuse material, sex offences and bestiality.
The relationship between Mr Wilson - who is not a childcare worker - and Mr Brown remains unclear.
A police investigation is underway into Mr Brown, who authorities believe worked across 24 Victorian childcare centres and one children’s occupational therapy service between January 2017 and May this year.
Authorities recommended 2000 children be tested for infectious diseases in the wake of the allegations against Mr Brown.
The Office of Public Prosecutions will be required to serve a hand-up brief of its evidence against Mr Brown by 4 December 2025.
A hand-up brief of evidence against Mr Wilson is due by 4 October 2025.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/accused-childcare-paedophile-joshua-brown-may-face-more-charges-court/news-story/282898a3a53d5c85bb1ec43b001bc86c
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109390
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23361943 (220952ZJUL25) Notable: Rocket launch demonstration off Jervis Bay shows military might as part of Talisman Sabre – Japanese Self-Defense Forces fired two advanced Type 12 anti-ship missiles in Jervis Bay during Talisman Sabre 2025, their most sophisticated demonstration yet, with missiles striking simultaneously after being fired with different trajectories. Exercise director Brigadier Damian Hill said over 1,500 Japanese personnel are participating, reflecting deepened ties since Japan first joined as an observer in 2017. The three-week drills involve 19 nations and 40,000 personnel, expanding to Christmas Island for the first time. Australia also live-fired HIMARS rockets, showcasing rapid modernisation, while Chinese surveillance ships monitored the exercises.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109320
Rocket launch demonstration off Jervis Bay shows military might as part of Talisman Sabre
Romy Gilbert and Justin Huntsdale - 22 July 2025
Japanese forces have fired their most advanced anti-ship missiles off the coast of New South Wales for a second time as part of a military training exercise involving a record 19 countries.
Japan's Self-Defense Force (JSDF) first conducted a live fire demonstration of Type 12 surface-to-ship missile at a weapons range in Jervis Bay during exercise Talisman Sabre 2023.
This time around, they had more to show.
"Last time it was about proving we could fire the missile in the Southern Hemisphere just to ensure the range apparatus and the safety mechanisms," Talisman Sabre exercise director Brigadier Damian Hill said.
"The Japanese have [today] fired two sea-skimming missiles moving 10 to 15 miles as the crow flies, about 70 miles through different types of terrain.
"Both missiles fired with different trajectories and hit the target at the same time."
Brigadier Hill said the JSDF had brought a level of sophistication the defence force had not seen from the Japanese military before.
Observer countries become major players
Talisman Sabre is Australia's largest military exercise and is designed to show military strength and a commitment to peace and protection in the Indo–Pacific region.
It started as a bilateral partnership between the United States and has grown to involve 19 countries and more than 40,000 personnel.
For the first time this year, Papua New Guinea has joined.
Brigadier Hill said the Australian and Japanese forces had strengthened defence ties since their involvement with Talisman Sabre as an observer back in 2017.
"There are over 1,500 Japanese personnel here undertaking the live firing," he said.
"We now have a reciprocal access agreement, which enables us to train a lot more and in different types of environments."
Prepared for uncertain times
While Chinese surveillance ships have again monitored the activities of Talisman Sabre, Brigadier Hill said the exercise was not about sending a military warning to specific countries.
"This is about us working together and demonstrating our willingness to maintain peace and security in the Indo–Pacific," he said.
The 11th iteration of the three-week Talisman Sabre has been running across north-eastern parts of Australia, including for the first time at Christmas Island, and is expected to finish next week.
Brigadier Hill said the exercise involved training against potential threats on air, land and water as well as cyber and space.
He said, for the first time, Australia launched its own HIMARS (High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems) able to reach up to 400 kilometres.
This happened alongside the US and Singapore forces during training in Queensland last week.
"I think it's demonstrating our ability to modernise at speed," Brigadier Hill said.
"Our HIMARS arrived in Australia earlier this year and we've got proficient crews and capacities to live fire within months.
"I think that shows a little bit about how fast we're modernising."
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-22/rocket-launch-off-jervis-bay-talisman-sabre/105559398
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109391
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23367227 (230939ZJUL25) Notable: Scott Morrison to argue case for AUKUS before US Congress committee on China threats – Former Australian prime minister Scott Morrison will testify before the US House Select Committee on China as it urges Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to support the under-review AUKUS pact. The review, led by Elbridge Colby, has raised concerns over US shipbuilding capacity. Bipartisan committee leaders said China’s expanding naval reach underscores the pact’s importance. Morrison, who launched AUKUS in 2021, has argued Trump will back it and urged expansion into space security. Washington wants Australia to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, a demand resisted by Anthony Albanese.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73669 (pb)
>>109299
>>109372
Scott Morrison to argue case for AUKUS before US Congress committee on China threats
Brad Ryan - 23 July 2025
Former prime minister Scott Morrison is set to appear before a committee of the US Congress as its leaders lobby the White House to support the under-review AUKUS pact.
The select committee, which is examining threats posed by China, has written to US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to push him to back the trilateral pact as the Pentagon considers its future.
The pact with the US and the UK, under which Australia would procure nuclear-powered submarines, is being reviewed to ensure it meets "common sense, America First criteria", according to the White House.
The Pentagon official leading the review, Elbridge Colby, has in the past expressed scepticism about AUKUS amid concerns about America's consistent failures to meet its own shipbuilding targets.
In their letter, the select committee's Republican chairman, John Moolenaar, and its most senior Democrat, Raja Krishnamoorthi, wrote that China's "rapid expansion of its nuclear, conventional, cyber, and space capabilities pose a grave concern for the United States and our like-minded allies and partners".
"AUKUS has received strong bipartisan support from Congress for a reason," they wrote. "We are stronger together under the AUKUS framework."
They pointed to the Chinese navy's deployment of aircraft carriers into the western Pacific in June, and its live-fire exercises in the Tasman Sea in February as troubling examples of Beijing "project[ing] blue-water capabilities at increasing distances from its shores".
"This attempt to project power as far south as New Zealand's front door highlights the importance of AUKUS in cementing ties to longstanding allies like Australia, as well as advancing vital undersea capabilities that will be central to deterrence," they wrote.
Mr Morrison, who announced the AUKUS pact with then-leaders Joe Biden and Boris Johnson in 2021, has previously spoken directly to Donald Trump about AUKUS. In June, he told the ABC he had "never had concerns" about the US president's commitment to the pact.
"I mean, there's a review underway, and I think he'll take notice of what Bridge Colby says, and I think we need to engage with that and make the case again," he said.
He later wrote a Wall Street Journal op-ed describing the review as a chance to "refocus and recalibrate" and advocating for AUKUS's expansion to outer-space security. "It's time for AUKUS to grow, and Mr Trump is the right person for the job," he wrote.
The Australian government has also expressed confidence in the pact's future, framing the review as a standard process for an incoming government and rejecting suggestions a "plan B" is needed.
But American concerns about Australia's defence budget remain a possible sticking point.
Mr Hegseth has urged Australia to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, from its current level of about 2 per cent. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has pushed back, saying Australia will determine its own defence priorities.
The opposition has been pressuring Mr Albanese to prioritise a meeting with Mr Trump to press the case for AUKUS. Plans for a meeting in May fell through.
Multiple congressional committee chairs have also recently written to Mr Hegseth in support of AUKUS, pointing to its benefits for the US, including a $4.5 billion Australian investment in America's submarine-building capabilities.
The Australian government made an initial payment of almost $800 million earlier this year. In total, the submarine deal is expected to cost Australia up to $368 billion over several decades.
Mr Morrison is one of two witnesses set to appear at Wednesday's committee hearing, which is focused on strategies to counter China's "economic coercion against democracies". The other is former US ambassador to Japan, Rahm Emanuel.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-23/scott-morrison-to-promote-aukus-to-us-congress-committee/105561962
https://selectcommitteeontheccp.house.gov/media/press-releases/strength-through-alliances-moolenaar-krishnamoorthi-reaffirm-aukus-support-amid-aggressive-ccp-military-threats
https://selectcommitteeontheccp.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/selectcommitteeontheccp.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/aukus-letter-to-secretary-hegseth.pdf
https://www.congress.gov/event/119th-congress/house-event/118535
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109392
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23367236 (230952ZJUL25) Notable: Australia quietly pays US another $800 million for AUKUS despite review – Australia has quietly transferred another $800m to the United States for the AUKUS submarine deal, lifting its total contribution to $1.6bn, even as the Trump administration reviews the pact. The funding boosts US shipyard capacity to deliver Virginia-class submarines, with $2bn due by the end of 2025. Defence Minister Richard Marles said the payments follow a fixed schedule and reflect Canberra’s commitment to AUKUS. The unannounced transfer raised eyebrows, with speculation the US may seek further funds and press Australia to raise defence spending beyond 2 per cent of GDP.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109316
>>109318
Australia quietly pays US another $800 million for AUKUS despite review
Michael Koziol - July 23, 2025
Washington: Australia has quietly paid the United States another $800 million towards the AUKUS submarine deal, taking the total to $1.6 billion, despite the Trump administration placing the agreement under a review.
This masthead confirmed the second payment was made in the second quarter of this year, per the agreed schedule. By the end of 2025, Canberra will have paid $US2 billion, or just over $3 billion, to the American shipbuilding industry to boost submarine production.
A Defence Department spokesperson said Australia had been clear since March 2023 that it would make a “proportionate contribution” to the American industrial base under the AUKUS agreement.
“Australia’s contribution is about accelerating US production rates and maintenance to enable the delivery of Australia’s future Virginia-class submarines,” the spokesperson said.
“The payments are occurring in line with Australia’s commitment to contribute US$2 billion by the end of 2025, which underscores our commitment to the successful delivery of AUKUS Pillar I outcomes.”
The government was unfazed by the Pentagon’s review of the AUKUS agreement and said it was natural that a new US administration would want to examine the progress of key initiatives.
“All three countries are continuing to progress the AUKUS pathway at pace, ensuring it meets national and trilateral objectives,” the Defence spokesperson said.
While Australia’s first $800 million payment was announced with fanfare in February, when Defence Minister Richard Marles met his US counterpart, Pete Hegseth, in Washington, the second payment was not announced.
However, in February, officials told a Senate estimates hearing the payment would proceed as per an agreed schedule – before the end of the 2024-25 financial year – and that $2 billion would be paid by the end of 2025.
The exact date of the second $800 million payment – and whether it occurred with knowledge of the US review – is unclear. The government confirmed the payment was made during the second quarter of this year, between April and June, but did not respond to further questions to clarify the date.
The Pentagon publicly confirmed the existence of the AUKUS review on June 11, and Marles has said the Australian government was informed of the review “weeks” before then. The government was in caretaker mode from March 28 until the May 3 election.
After this year, the remaining $US1 billion will be paid in regular annual instalments adjusted for inflation over 10 years. The $US3 billion ($5 billion) contribution to US submarine building represents a fraction of the $268-$368 billion price tag of AUKUS over 30 years.
Asked about this masthead’s story on Wednesday afternoon, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the second payment was delivered according to the schedule.
“We have an agreement with the United States, as well as with the United Kingdom,” he told the ABC’s Afternoon Briefing.
“It’s about increasing their industrial capacity. But as part of that, we have Australians on the ground learning those skills, so that when it comes to the submarines being built here in Australia, we have those skills.
“It’s not extra, it’s a schedule that we have of a payment that we’re making. We support AUKUS, we have an agreement, it’s a treaty-level agreement.”
Bruce Wolpe, a senior fellow at the United States Studies Centre, said the payments made so far showed AUKUS was moving forward and nothing had changed despite the doubts that had erupted following the Pentagon’s review.
“There’s been no deviation on AUKUS from this government,” he said. “What this shows is a redoubling of the commitment. It’s in an orderly fashion.
“It’s kind of significant, though, that it has not been disclosed in a timely fashion ... everyone’s touchy about AUKUS and I guess they want to be more reticent than forthcoming.”
There is speculation the Pentagon review of AUKUS could ask for further contributions from Australia beyond the $US3 billion already pledged towards the US maritime industrial base. Hegseth has asked Australia to lift overall defence spending to 3.5 per cent of gross domestic product, from about 2 per cent – about an extra $40 billion a year.
The review is also considering whether the US can build enough submarines to fulfil its AUKUS commitments, and what undertakings Australia can give about how the boats will be used in the event of a conflict with China over Taiwan, or other contingencies.
https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/australia-quietly-pays-us-another-800-million-for-aukus-despite-review-20250723-p5mh8y.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109393
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23367241 (230959ZJUL25) Notable: All STD results negative in childcare screening so far, says Victorian minister – Victorian Deputy Premier Ben Carroll confirmed that all children tested for sexually transmitted diseases linked to accused childcare paedophile Joshua Dale Brown have so far returned negative results. Around 2,000 children are being screened after Brown, 26, was charged with more than 70 offences, including rape and producing child abuse material, allegedly committed at a Point Cook centre between 2022 and 2023. Carroll also defended current funding for the Commission for Children and Young People, despite reports of rising abuse complaints and warnings its oversight capacity is under strain.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109236
>>109238
All STD results negative in childcare screening so far, says Victorian minister
abc.net.au - 23 July 2025
All children tested so far for sexually transmitted diseases in relation to accused childcare paedophile Joshua Dale Brown have tested negative, the Victorian government says.
Deputy premier Ben Carroll provided an update on Wednesday morning on the testing exercise of about 2,000 children being undertaken as part of a police investigation into the alleged 26-year-old child abuser.
He said the latest advice came from his conversations with health authorities.
"From what we have advised, there is no child that has … tested [positive] for an STD."
"I think they've [hospital staff] tested just about everyone — but I can get that clarified — and all the tests have been negative."
Mr Brown is facing more than 70 charges, including rape of children, sexual activity in the presence of a child and contaminating food.
The charges, which were first made public on July 1, relate to eight children at Creative Garden Early Learning Centre in Point Cook between April 2022 and January 2023.
Out of caution, health authorities initially recommended STD screening for 1,200 children, taking in other centres where Brown has worked.
They then later recommended testing for another 800 children.
Mr Brown is expected to be hit with further criminal charges, following a brief court hearing on Tuesday during which his lawyer Rishi Nathwani KC said his client's charges were "in flux".
Charge sheets released by the Melbourne Magistrates' Court show Mr Brown faces 73 charges, including 28 of producing child abuse material, 24 of transmitting child abuse material, 13 of sexually touching a child under 16 and three of sexual penetration of a child under 12.
Carroll defends commission's funding levels
The deputy premier was also asked about funding for the Commission for Children and Young People, amid a sharp rise in the number of notifications about alleged abuse by workers or volunteers, including two complaints against Joshua Dale Brown.
Last week, the ABC revealed authorities were aware of investigations into Mr Brown's conduct in the two years before he was arrested for alleged child sexual abuse.
Mr Brown remained employed despite a finding he allegedly "aggressively" handled a child.
Mr Carroll defended the commission's current funding levels, despite reports to its Reportable Conduct Scheme being up 30 per cent in the year to 2023-24.
"Since about 2015, there's been about a 120 per cent increase in funding — around $14 million per year," he said.
"Having said that though, we can always do more. I know the role they play is critically important."
The commission's most recent annual report said its lack of funding meant it was forced to "significantly reduce" its oversight on a high number of investigations.
"With no additional funding for the scheme despite increased notifications, the commission has progressed a risk-based strategy to manage demand," the report said.
The state government is currently searching for a new commissioner to lead the organisation. The role was vacated in March, following the departure of Liana Buchanan.
"It needs to be filled with urgency," Mr Carroll said.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-23/std-testing-results-negative-melbourne-childcare-joshua-brown/105562872
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109394
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23367254 (231007ZJUL25) Notable: Police scour devices of man accused of East Melbourne Synagogue firebombing – Angelo Loras, 34, has been charged with arson, reckless conduct endangering life and criminal damage after allegedly firebombing the East Melbourne Synagogue on July 4 while 20 worshippers were inside. Police say he poured flammable liquid on the doors before setting them alight, causing $5000 damage. No injuries were reported. Two of Loras’ electronic devices are being examined to determine motive, which could escalate the case to a higher court if evidence is found. The incident is being investigated for potential terrorism links amid rising antisemitic acts in Melbourne.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109263
>>109268
Police scour devices of man accused of East Melbourne Synagogue firebombing
Melissa Cunningham - July 22, 2025
Police are examining the electronic devices of a man accused of firebombing a Melbourne synagogue as they continue to hunt for a motive for the alleged attack, which occurred when 20 people were inside the building.
Angelo Loras, 34, faced Melbourne Magistrates’ Court on Tuesday after being charged over the alleged firebombing at an East Melbourne synagogue on July 4.
Charge sheet documents released by the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court allege Loras set the front doors of the East Melbourne Synagogue on fire, causing an estimated $5000 in damage.
He has been charged with committing arson, as well as possessing a control weapon, reckless conduct endangering life and criminal damage by fire.
Loras did not apply for bail and entered no plea at Tuesday’s hearing.
Police allege Loras was seen walking through Parliament Gardens in the moments before the fire, entering the grounds of the synagogue on Albert Street about 8pm on July 4.
He then allegedly poured flammable liquid on the front door of the religious building and set it alight before fleeing.
The NSW man, who appeared via video link from prison wearing a white T-shirt and sporting a beard and long, dark hair, remained expressionless throughout the brief hearing.
Police prosecutor Anthony Albore told the court two electronic devices had been seized by investigators and were being examined in a bid to determine a motive behind the alleged attack.
“If there is evidence obtained from those devices, that may establish a motive to this particular crime,” he said.
He said if a motive was discovered by police, there was a chance the case could go to trial in a higher court.
Loras’ lawyer asked the court to adjourn the matter to later this year and sought a sentence indication if his client was to plead guilty to the charges.
A police statement released at the time of the fire earlier this month said detectives would “continue to examine the intent and ideology of the person charged to determine if the incident is, in fact, terrorism”.
About 20 people, including children, were taking part in Shabbat inside the historic Albert Street synagogue when flammable liquid was poured on the front doors of the building, and they were set alight.
The congregants were able to evacuate the building, and no injuries were reported.
The alleged arson attack was the second on a Jewish place of worship in Melbourne since December, when a fire destroyed the Adass Israel Synagogue in Ripponlea in the city’s inner south-east.
It is also one of several alleged acts of antisemitism across the city, including a protest incident at CBD Israeli restaurant, Miznon, on July 5.
The incident followed a larger protest about the war in the Middle East involving about 70 people on Swanston Street earlier the same evening.
It is alleged about 20 people splintered off and went to the Hardware Lane restaurant where police said chairs were thrown, and a glass door was damaged.
Loras will next face the court on September 12.
https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/police-scour-devices-of-man-accused-of-east-melbourne-synagogue-firebombing-20250722-p5mgzt.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109395
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23367272 (231015ZJUL25) Notable: Australia knows its China relations well, doesn’t need outsiders peddling anxiety – “Australia has a good grasp of its relationship with China and doesn't need outsiders peddling anxiety. Some Western politicians still believe that NATO's outdated playbook can work in the Asia-Pacific, even though the region has clearly moved on to a very different chapter. Here, people have long understood that conflict reflects the failure of diplomacy, while maintaining peace is the true sign of strength. Trying to fan the flames might stir up a little dust, but disrupting the region's deep-rooted aspirations for peace and prosperity? That's a much harder task.” – The Global Times
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109338
>>109224
>>109320
>>109383
Australia knows its China relations well, doesn’t need outsiders peddling anxiety
Global Times - Jul 22, 2025
Shortly after the Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese wrapped up a positive and productive visit to China, a Dutch general entered the public discourse, urging Australia to beware of China's military rise and to ramp up its defense spending. One can't help but wonder: Do some European officials truly believe they hold a remote control capable of steering the trajectory of Asia-Pacific affairs from halfway across the globe?
The Australian Broadcasting Corporation reported on Monday that General Onno Eichelsheim, the Netherlands' chief of defense, who was visiting Australia for the Talisman Sabre defense exercises, warned Australia about "the threat posed by China to the Indo-Pacific." "China is building up, take it seriously and get ready for something that you hope will never happen," he said, adding that "naivety" should not allow Australia and other countries to avoid preparing for the risk of conflict in the future.
What's puzzling is how a general, usually stationed more than 8,000 kilometers from China, managed to detect a "threat" so far away. While Europe grapples with crises on two fronts - the war in Ukraine and escalating tensions in the Middle East - this Dutch general has journeyed across continents to advise Australia on how to beef up military muscle against China. Funny how that works.
Some Western politicians seem quite skilled at turning a blind eye to the fact that the Asia-Pacific is currently one of the most stable and prosperous regions in the world - a status that didn't come easy. China as a major power has played a key role in maintaining this stability. The Asia-Pacific is also a major engine of the global economy, and at the heart of that engine lies China.
What's more, Australian Prime Minister Albanese recently wrapped up a visit to China, returning with a host of tangible cooperative achievements spanning trade, education, agriculture, tourism, and more. Chen Hong, director of Australian Studies Centre, East China Normal University, summed up this visit with three keywords in an interview with the Global Times: "stable," "new," and "progressive."
Chen said that "stable" refers to the overall steady state of China-Australia relations; "new" highlights the joint efforts to break new ground in emerging fields like the green economy and green iron; and "progressive" signifies a step forward on existing foundations. For instance, the visit's inclusion of diverse cities like Chengdu showcases Australia's intention to engage with China from a broader and more open perspective.
At a time like this, amplifying the "China threat" and stirring the pot in China-Australia relations feels ill-timed. Whether these remarks aim to signal loyalty to the US or NATO, or simply to grab attention for personal fame, they reveal a deeper issue: Some people just don't want to see stability in the Asia-Pacific, a positive thaw in China-Australia ties, or regional cooperation and peace.
But Australia has already spoken for itself. During his visit to China, Albanese stated that Australia values its relations with China; that China's development is vital to Australia; and that the relationship in China means jobs in Australia, it's as simple as that. On the military spending question, Australian Defense Minister Richard Marles made it clear that "ultimately every country, when it goes through its own processes about what kind of defense force it needs to build, does so based on assessing its own strategic need."
Australia has a good grasp of its relationship with China and doesn't need outsiders peddling anxiety. Some Western politicians still believe that NATO's outdated playbook can work in the Asia-Pacific, even though the region has clearly moved on to a very different chapter. Here, people have long understood that conflict reflects the failure of diplomacy, while maintaining peace is the true sign of strength. Trying to fan the flames might stir up a little dust, but disrupting the region's deep-rooted aspirations for peace and prosperity? That's a much harder task.
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202507/1338995.shtml
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109396
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23372968 (240958ZJUL25) Notable: Scott Morrison issues new Beijing warning after Andrew Forrest says suspicion of Xi Jinping’s China now a thing of the past – Scott Morrison and Andrew Forrest have clashed over China, with Morrison criticizing Forrest’s praise of Prime Minister Albanese's approach. Forrest claims that Albanese’s government has replaced suspicion with respect in Sino-Australian relations, particularly after the PM’s meeting with Xi Jinping. Morrison, however, warned that China still poses a significant strategic threat. Forrest emphasized China's commitment to green energy and iron, urging greater Australian support. Morrison cautioned against Beijing's charm offensive and its efforts to isolate Australia from its allies. Forrest remains hopeful about a respectful partnership, contrasting his stance with Morrison’s tougher position.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109337
>>109372
>>109391
Scott Morrison issues new Beijing warning after Andrew Forrest says suspicion of Xi Jinping’s China now a thing of the past
PAUL GARVEY and JOE KELLY - 24 July 2025
1/2
Scott Morrison and billionaire Andrew Forrest have engaged in a stunning war of words over China, with the former prime minister saying the Chinese Communist Party will be pleased with the Fortescue chairman’s attacks on his Liberal government’s handling of Beijing.
Dr Forrest writes in The Australian on Thursday that Anthony Albanese is showing the world that it no longer needs to be suspicious of Xi Jinping’s regime, and that Australia and China as friends can teach US President Donald Trump that “respect triumphs over fear.”
As well as effusively praising the Prime Minister and Labor over the China reset, Dr Forrest accused the Morrison government solely for the deterioration of relations with China during the Covid-19 pandemic.
“China has not just been a partner to me personally, but to the company I founded, Fortescue, and to Australia as a whole,” Dr Forrest writes.
“Three of Australia’s top five taxpayers are iron ore majors. Yet, for reasons that had little to do with facts and everything to do with politics, an Australian government chose to sow fear over fostering respect.
“Fast forward to last week and it’s remarkable how far our bilateral relationship has come in such a short space of time.
“When Anthony Albanese sat down with Xi Jinping, we saw something we haven’t seen for years: two leaders talking as equals, with mutual respect.”
Just before the former PM appeared before a US Congressional panel probing the CCP where he warned that Australians risked being “asleep” to the strategic threat from Beijing, Mr Morrison hit back at Dr Forrest.
“I’m sure Dr Forrest’s comments would have been well received by the CCP in Beijing,” he said on Capitol Hill on Thursday.
During Mr Albanese’s China visit, Mr Morrison warned that China was “charming and flattering” his successor in an effort to isolate Australia from the US.
Morrison issues China warning
Addressing the hearing, Mr Morrison warned that China’s objective was the “subordination of a rule of law based on universal human rights to one arbitrarily defined by the state and to draw an equivalence between their regimes and freedom-based societies”.
“This will not change. Nor can it be negotiated away,” he said. “Rather than opening up their society, during post-cold war globalisation the CCP used China’s newly granted access to global trade, capital markets and legitimacy in international forums to build the economic, diplomatic, technological and military capacity to one day challenge the global order in an attempt to make it more favourable to their regime security. That day is now.”
Mr Morrison said he was “pleased that our government provided the example of resistance and resilience” by standing firm against Beijing’s coercion “rather than acquiescence and appeasement”.
“Throughout this period, we moved to work with our allies and partners in the region to deepen our ties and strengthen our co-operation,” he said.
Mr Morrison also sounded the alarm on the recent change in tactics from Beijing.
“The PRC took advantage of the change in government following the 2022 federal election to effect a reset and adopt a different tactics,” he said.
“This included abandoning their economic and diplomatic bullying and coercion for more inductive engagement, laced with charm and flattery.
“That said, the PRC still continues to engage in intimidatory behaviour by their military against Australia when it suits them without remorse.”
Dr Forrest is effusive in his praise for Mr Albanese’s efforts to improve ties with the nation’s biggest trading partner amid tensions between the Trump administration and Beijing over tariffs and defence
He writes that Mr Albanese had shown the right way to build respect and ties with China, and understood that the relationship between Beijing and Canberra could not return to “old ways of suspicion and division”.
“It is time for Australia and China to show the world – particularly my friends in North America – what is possible when respect triumphs over fear, and when ambition for a world no longer reliant on fossil fuels triumphs over complacency,” he said.
“We must choose a clean, pollution free, peaceful world, where energy can no longer be weaponised. We owe it to the next century to get this right.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109397
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23372994 (241008ZJUL25) Notable: OPINION: We’ve vilified China as an ‘enemy’; Anthony Albanese is right to make friends – "Ever since I was at school, I have found that if you treat someone like an enemy for long enough, eventually they will become one. Human nature is such that if you box someone in, back them into a corner and paint them as a threat, sooner or later they will see themselves that way too. As I watched Australia’s relationship with China deteriorate to the terrible lows of five years ago, this was one of my greatest fears. China has not just been a partner to me personally, but to the company I founded, Fortescue, and to Australia as a whole. It is time for Australia and China to show the world what is possible when respect triumphs over fear." – Andrew Forrest, The Australian
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109321
>>109337
>>109396
OPINION: We’ve vilified China as an ‘enemy’; Anthony Albanese is right to make friends
ANDREW FORREST - 24 July 2025
1/2
Ever since I was at school, I have found that if you treat someone like an enemy for long enough, eventually they will become one.
Human nature is such that if you box someone in, back them into a corner and paint them as a threat, sooner or later they will see themselves that way too.
As I watched Australia’s relationship with China deteriorate to the terrible lows of five years ago, this was one of my greatest fears. Here was a country that I had been coming to for 36 years – a country where I have made lifelong friends, done business in good faith, and seen incredible economic transformation for both the benefit of Australia and China.
China has not just been a partner to me personally, but to the company I founded, Fortescue, and to Australia as a whole. Three of Australia’s top five taxpayers are iron ore majors. Yet, for reasons that had little to do with facts and everything to do with politics, an Australian government chose to sow fear over fostering respect.
Iron ore – a $138bn industry supporting more than 60,000 full-time jobs – was untouched, showing how deep the economic ties still run. But sectors such as wine, barley, beef and seafood were hit hard.
Fast forward to last week and it’s remarkable how far our bilateral relationship has come in such a short space of time. When Anthony Albanese sat down with Xi Jinping, we saw something we haven’t seen for years: two leaders talking as equals, with mutual respect.
The bond that helped transform China into the modern, dynamic, fast-moving place it is today, while delivering Australia an unparalleled economic windfall, was back. And it was wonderful to see. I congratulate the Prime Minister for his deliberate, rational and values-based leadership. He gets it – he understands China and how to build partnerships. Today that is more important than ever.
While the prosperity of modern Australia has been deeply tied to China’s remarkable growth, what comes next will matter even more. It is why the renewed trust that I witnessed matters.
The next chapter in the Australia-China relationship will define our shared futures for the next century. It was significant that one of the defining moments of the Prime Minister’s visit was one I had not experienced on the more than 50 occasions I have been to China: the leaders of our respective countries, the leaders of Australia’s largest iron ore miners, and the leaders of China’s biggest steelmakers, together in one room.
Most of those in that room for the steel decarbonisation roundtable – those with their heart truly set on building a future for Australia and China, together – could see what green iron and green steel could deliver.
They knew, like me, there wasn’t a snowflake’s chance in hell that China wouldn’t send its cities green and its skies blue, and that Australia was in the box seat to enable it to do so.
Those who didn’t have their hearts in it exposed themselves, and that’s OK. For more than two decades Fortescue has put its head above the parapet on issues we believe are critical to the future of our company and our country, and that will never change.
What is clear is that both the Australian and the Chinese governments are taking this very seriously. The establishment of a new Policy Dialogue on Steel Decarbonisation shows a welcome determination to take this forward.
This is not a pipe dream. As Ross Garnaut, an economic adviser to former prime minister Bob Hawke, told The Sydney Morning Herald, Albanese’s trip was “as important as Bob Hawke’s trip to China in 1984 that set up the iron ore trade – it’s the future of the Australian economy”.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109398
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23373015 (241025ZJUL25) Notable: China punished Australia's loyalty to America, Scott Morrison tells US Congress committee – Scott Morrison has appeared before a committee of the US Congress to implore America to "never become casual" about the economic threats posed by China and its willingness to weaponise trade. Pointing to China's "targeted and illegal trade bans and diplomatic estrangement" when he was prime minister, Morrison said Australia had been punished for its loyalty to the US and now had many lessons to offer. He emphasized the importance of strengthening US alliances to better ward off any threat from China, highlighting Australia's own response as a model for others.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109337
>>109396
China punished Australia's loyalty to America, Scott Morrison tells US Congress committee
Brad Ryan - 24 July 2025
1/2
Scott Morrison has appeared before a committee of the US Congress to implore America to "never become casual" about the economic threats posed by China and its willingness to weaponise trade.
Pointing to China's "targeted and illegal trade bans and diplomatic estrangement" when he was prime minister, Mr Morrison said Australia had been punished for its loyalty to the US and now had many lessons to offer the Americans.
And — without explicitly mentioning the up-ending of trade relationships caused by the Trump administration's tariffs program, or its AUKUS review — he argued for tighter ties between Australia, the US and like-minded democracies to better ward off any threat.
"Above all, I would highlight the need to never become casual about the potential threat and to remain vigilant," he told the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
"Strengthening and deepening the networks of US alliances and partners is critical to resilience and deterrence. This is as true in the economic sphere as it is in the security sphere."
Mr Morrison was invited to testify before the bipartisan committee, which was formed in 2023 to assess the CCP threat and "develop a plan of action to defend the American people".
Since its formation, it has been sounding alarms on America's economic dependence on China, particularly for mineral exports such as the rare earths widely used in modern technology.
"China can so much as flick a switch and cause major damage to the American economy," the committee's top Democrat, Raja Krishnamoorthi, said.
'Charm and flattery' from the CCP
Mr Morrison told the committee China changed tactics after Australia's 2022 election, when the Labor Party defeated the incumbent Coalition.
The CCP was now using "inductive engagement laced with charm and flattery" to try to manipulate Australia and isolate the US in the region.
He said diplomacy with China would never lead to effective solutions.
"We have to be clear-eyed about this and not pretend that somehow this is going to be resolved through discussion," Mr Morrison said.
The committee's other witness, former US ambassador to Japan Rahm Emanuel, said: "Australia's response to China's coercion is the best example to try to replicate going forward."
He argued America and its allies should form a new "anti-coercion coalition" with the "economic equivalent" of NATO's Article 5 clause, which states that an "attack on one is an attack on all".
But he warned America's current trade policies meant it risked motivating a similarly united retaliatory response from its partners.
While President Donald Trump's "reciprocal tariffs" remain on pause, he has this month written to scores of foreign leaders warning that punishing tariffs will be imposed soon.
Mr Emanuel pointed to action taken by the EU after China imposed trade restrictions on Lithuania over the Baltic state's Taiwan policy.
"The only time they've thought of deploying that unity now was with the United States because of how we're negotiating with the EU," he said.
"So it was designed with China in mind, but … now may be deployed with us."
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109399
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23373022 (241030ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Australians ‘going to sleep’ on China threat, Morrison tells US Congress – Scott Morrison has warned the US Congress that Australians are at risk of "going to sleep" on the security threat posed by China, citing polling from the Lowy Institute that shows Australians' shifting perception of China, with 50% seeing it as an economic partner and 47% as a security threat. He stressed that Western democracies must be willing to endure economic pain to stand up to Beijing. Morrison defended his government's stance against China's coercion and warned that discussions with Beijing were unlikely to change its objectives. He emphasized the need for vigilance and resilience in the face of China's influence.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109337
>>109398
Australians ‘going to sleep’ on China threat, Morrison tells US Congress
Michael Koziol - July 24, 2025
Washington: Former prime minister Scott Morrison has told the United States Congress that Australians are at risk of “going to sleep” on the security threat posed by China, and warned the US and its allies they must be prepared to wear economic pain to stand up to Beijing.
Appearing before a congressional hearing on the Chinese Communist Party, Morrison cited polling by the Lowy Institute that showed, in 2025, 50 per cent of Australians said China was “more of an economic partner to Australia”, whereas 47 per cent said it was “more of a security threat”.
That had changed significantly from 2021-22, a time of strained relations between Canberra and Beijing, when 63 per cent said China was more of a security threat and 33 per cent said it was more of an economic partner.
“That is an objective of the CCP – that Western democracies will go to sleep on the threat,” Morrison told the hearing.
“You need to build the internal resilience, and that means an appreciation of the potential threat. And that is somewhat in jeopardy in Australia.”
Later, he told reporters that Australians’ level of awareness of the security threat posed by China had clearly diminished significantly over the past three years.
Morrison, whose call for an inquiry into the origins of COVID-19 roiled Beijing, told US lawmakers that China had chosen to make an example of Australia as a key US ally – “to punish Australia as a warning to others”.
He said he was proud that his government had resisted this pressure “by standing firm, rather than acquiescence and appeasement”, and encouraged other leaders to do the same.
“There are many lessons from our experience,” Morrison said. “Above all, I would highlight the need to never become casual about the potential threat, and to remain vigilant.
“Discussion is fine, engagement is good, it’s better than the alternative. But if we think that is going to produce a change in the mindset in Beijing about what the objectives are, then we’re frankly kidding ourselves.”
Morrison gave the Albanese government no credit for improving relations, arguing instead that Beijing took advantage of the change in government in 2022 to reset its failing coercive tactics.
“This included abandoning their economic and diplomatic bullying for more inductive engagement, laced with charm and flattery,” he told the hearing.
Australia’s relations with China have thawed under Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Beijing has ended its trade bans. Albanese just returned from a six-day visit that included a meeting with President Xi Jinping.
Morrison told reporters that the relationship with China – Australia’s largest trading partner – deteriorated on his watch “because of the actions of China, not the actions of Australia”.
“You don’t thank someone for stopping punching you in the face,” he said.
The former prime minister warned lawmakers that standing up to the CCP came at an economic cost.
He said he was encouraged by letters he had received from Australian farmers hit by China’s trade bans – on products such as barley, beef and wine – who told him he was doing the right thing, despite the hurt.
“If you’re going to stand up here, you’ve got to be prepared to take a few hits in the process,” he said. “But you’re much more able to do that if you can take hits with your mates, and your mates have got to show up as well.”
It is rare for former government leaders to provide evidence to a congressional inquiry. Morrison said he was appearing in a personal capacity.
Since leaving office, he has joined defence advisory firm American Global Strategies as non-executive vice chairman, and he chairs the advisory board of Space Centre Australia.
https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/australians-going-to-sleep-on-china-threat-morrison-tells-us-congress-20250724-p5mhdd.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QutGLTXhNLU
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109400
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23373031 (241039ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Turn AUKUS shipyard into joint naval base with the US, Morrison urges – Scott Morrison has suggested that a planned AUKUS shipbuilding facility in Western Australia should become a joint base with the US to address the Trump administration's concerns about the submarine deal. The proposal would allow the upgraded facility at Henderson to host and repair both Australian and US submarines, providing the US direct access to the Indian Ocean. Morrison emphasized the importance of maintaining US capabilities and suggested that Australia's Henderson yard could play a significant role in enhancing US submarine production and maintenance. He also downplayed concerns about the Pentagon’s AUKUS review, asserting that operational planning was crucial.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109337
>>109398
Turn AUKUS shipyard into joint naval base with the US, Morrison urges
Michael Koziol - July 24, 2025
1/2
Washington: Scott Morrison says a planned AUKUS shipbuilding facility in Western Australia should become a joint base with the US to help address the Trump administration’s “legitimate issues” with the submarine deal he designed and announced as prime minister in 2021.
The controversial idea, with advocates in both Canberra and Washington, would allow the upgraded facility at Henderson, south of Perth, to host and repair American submarines, not just Australian ones, and give the US direct access to the Indian Ocean, a strategic asset.
As the Pentagon reviews the AUKUS agreement to see if it fits with President Donald Trump’s “America First” agenda, one of the key issues is whether the US can part with the three nuclear-powered submarines Australia is due to buy.
The slow rate of production is a problem, as is a severe maintenance backlog. Australia has paid $US1 billion (about $1. 6 billion) to the US maritime industrial base so far, with another $US1 billion due by year’s end.
Morrison - who now provides strategic advice for corporations, including defence industry clients - said the US appreciated and valued AUKUS, “but that doesn’t mean there aren’t issues”.
“The issues that [US defence undersecretary] Elbridge Colby has been raising, he’s been raising those for years, and they’re legitimate issues, and they go to the US’s capability to produce submarines,” he said.
“There are many ways you can get more subs out at sea, and it’s not just about how quickly you build them; it’s also how you maintain them. Australia, through Henderson, has a real opportunity to add to that.”
Asked if he meant maintaining US boats at the facility, he said yes. “That would significantly add to the capability of the US to do what it needs to do.”
Morrison made the remarks while speaking to reporters in Washington after appearing before a congressional committee on the Chinese Communist Party.
‘I know they value AUKUS’
Asked if he believed the Trump administration would go ahead with the deal, Morrison said: “I think they’ll complete their review. I know they value AUKUS ... There are many ways to address the issues that are being highlighted in this review, and it would be a mistake for us to think they’re not real issues.”
Australia must build the Henderson yard to service its own needs under AUKUS. Former home affairs secretary Mike Pezzullo has also advocated making it a joint base, arguing it could be “at least as significant” as the Pine Gap satellite surveillance station near Alice Springs.
“The US would have to pay for only labour and material costs for maintaining its own boats, taking advantage of Australia’s capital investment in Henderson for free,” he wrote in a piece for the Australian Strategic Policy Institute in May.
Pezzullo, who was removed by the Albanese government in 2023 over his attempts to influence the previous Coalition government, said Australia would have to blitz through planning and construction to have two dry docks ready by 2032. In return, it could lock in the three submarines by negotiating a treaty with Trump.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109401
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23383417 (260949ZJUL25) Notable: COMMENTARY: In a new cold war, Albanese and Forrest should choose their sides carefully – "Whether the Fortescue executive chairman believes China’s propaganda or simply mouths it, Andrew Forrest’s upbeat take on Beijing’s ‘beautiful evolution’ is, in truth, the entry price into the court of Xi Jinping. Forrest claims Anthony Albanese has overcome these mistakes because “he understands China and how to build partnerships”. Now, Australia and China must together teach 'friends in North America what is possible when respect triumphs over fear'.” Forrest fails to address any negative aspect of China’s behaviour towards Australia in the past few years… He appears to take no position on Beijing’s persecution of ethnic and religious minorities..." – Peter Jennings, The Australian
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109337
>>109396
>>109397
COMMENTARY: In a new cold war, Albanese and Forrest should choose their sides carefully
Whether the Fortescue executive chairman believes China’s propaganda or simply mouths it, Andrew Forrest’s upbeat take on Beijing’s ‘beautiful evolution’ is, in truth, the entry price into the court of Xi Jinping.
PETER JENNINGS - July 25, 2025
1/3
In a remarkable column in The Australian on Thursday, Fortescue executive chairman and founder Andrew Forrest claimed that past Australian governments had treated China as an enemy and “chose to sow fear over fostering respect”.
Forrest claims Anthony Albanese has overcome these mistakes because “he understands China and how to build partnerships”. Now, Australia and China must together teach “friends in North America what is possible when respect triumphs over fear”.
On Friday Australia signed a 50-year AUKUS agreement with our friends in the UK. This is a big step forward in practical defence cooperation, a far cry from Beijing’s banquets and panda theatre. Forrest is completely tone deaf to the geopolitical shifts which make China more of a risk than an opportunity.
Four concerns stand out to me in this astonishing misrepresentation of China’s intent and Australia’s behaviour during the past decade.
My first concern is that Forrest is never shy to talk up his own book. He and other “iron ore majors” are big taxpayers, he tells us – so we had better listen.
He has made “lifelong friends” and operated “in good faith” in China; he has witnessed the “beautiful evolution” of China’s modernisation.
What Forrest doesn’t mention is the extensive public funding his ventures have received from Australian state and federal governments to promote renewable energy projects, the Gladstone hydrogen plant and, perhaps less environmentally sound but a nice little earner anyway, diesel fuel subsidies.
It is expected that Fortescue will be a major beneficiary from the $1 billion that the Albanese government splurged last February to create a fund supporting the manufacture of green iron and its supply chains.
Forrest wants “governments willing to back ambition with policy certainty”. To be clear, it’s his ambition that must be backed and “policy certainty” means public support to achieve his private sector goals.
“We owe it to the next century to get this right.” That means a China that wants Fortescue products and an Australia that will help Forrest make “big bets on the future”.
It is a remarkable testimony to Forrest’s drive and personal confidence that he sees no gap between his personal interest and Australia’s national interest. Indeed, an Australian government not aligned to this aim is one that will “drift back into the old ways of suspicion and division”. He has seen the future. To echo Louis XIV: “The future, it is me.”
My second concern about Forrest’s article is the astonishing way in which it fails to address any negative aspect of China’s behaviour towards Australia in the past few years. In fact, the article says, “for reasons that had little to do with facts and everything to do with politics” previous Australian governments had damaged the relationship.
This mirrors the Chinese Communist Party’s longstanding line that any damage to the relationship is Australia’s fault.
In fact, Forrest’s opening line is “if you treat someone like an enemy for long enough, eventually they will become one”. This echoes the charge made by a Chinese embassy official in 2020 when handing to journalists the notorious 14-point “grievance list” about Australian bad behaviour: “China is angry. If you make China the enemy, China will be the enemy.”
This newspaper has reported on Forrest’s past reluctance to discuss uncomfortable aspects of Chinese behaviour. Despite leading a global campaign against modern slavery in July 2019, Forrest said he didn’t have enough information about China’s treatment of Uighurs to offer clear comment: “I’m not close enough to make an authoritative statement on any country but I can firmly say that every country has modern slavery.”
Forrest claims to have made more than 50 visits to China. None gave him an insight into the internationally recognised situation of the Uighurs. China is one of the worst abusers of modern slavery, including of people forced to make items imported into Australia.
In Australia, but not in China, the Fortescue executive chairman can write and say whatever he wants about “facts” without consequence.
He appears to take no position on Beijing’s persecution of ethnic and religious minorities; the suppression of political dissent and the arrest and disappearance of regime opponents; the use of propaganda and indoctrination to brainwash the population and surveillance technology to control them.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109402
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23383513 (261034ZJUL25) Notable: China diplomat grills mayor over AUKUS submarine location – A Chinese diplomat, Wang Yu, used a private meeting with Newcastle’s Lord Mayor Ross Kerridge to probe whether the city’s port could serve as a base for AUKUS nuclear submarines. Wang raised concerns that Australia’s strategic defence decisions could affect Chinese interests and urged Newcastle to maintain good relations with China. Despite this, Kerridge downplayed the discussion, stating the conversation was diplomatic and “routine.” He noted that Newcastle’s nuclear-free policy would make it unlikely to host a submarine base, and the decision would ultimately be made by higher levels of government.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109316
>>109318
China diplomat grills mayor over AUKUS submarine location
A top Chinese diplomat used a private meeting to grill Newcastle’s mayor about the future location of AUKUS nuclear submarines, raising serious security concerns. Now the Lord Mayor has spoken out.
Lachlan Leeming - July 24, 2025
1/2
A top Chinese diplomat has used a closed-doors meeting with a local mayor to probe for information about where AUKUS nuclear submarines will be docked, in a move the federal Opposition says should “ring alarm bells at the highest levels of government”.
Wang Yu, the Consul General of China in Sydney, also warned Newcastle City Lord Mayor Ross Kerridge that Australia shouldn’t use “relations with other countries to adversely affect China”, according to minutes of the intimate meeting, obtained by The Daily Telegraph.
The document shows the sit-down was requested by Mr Wang and held last Thursday in the council’s office, during Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s six-day visit to China.
Notes taken during the meeting reveal the Consul General’s (CG) probing for defence details, including whether submarines obtained under the AUKUS deal would be docked in Newcastle, which has the east coast’s largest port.
“CG explained that China is concerned that Chinese interests in Australia will be affected by strategic defence decisions,” the minutes read.
“For example, is Newcastle Port a potential base for AUKUS submarines?
“(The Lord Mayor) explained that we are a nuclear free city but we will not have the means to stop a decision of this nature taken by the state and/or federal governments.”
“China expects that Australia and Newcastle will have good relations with other countries and is also looking to build good relations but would not like us … to use our good relations with other countries to adversely affect China.”
The Lord Mayor of Newcastle has since spoken out, defending the meeting as routine and warning against “sensational comments” made by critics.
He also attached a photo of Chinese President Xi Jinping and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese shaking hands underneath his post, highlighting his call for diplomacy.
Mr Wang also asked about Newcastle’s Tibetan and Taiwanese communities, before telling the Lord Mayor China is “against any kind of support” for either country.
“The CG explained China’s position on official engagements with Taiwan and Tibet. China is against any kind of support for Taiwan or Tibet which includes engagements by local officials. China will not compromise on this issue,” the document states.
In response to questions from The Telegraph, the Consulate General of China in Sydney’s office did not answer why AUKUS was discussed, saying: “It is our responsibility to engage and exchange views with all institutions and local governments in NSW for bilateral relations”.
A spokesman for the Lord Mayor said the sit-down was a “meet and greet and to talk about Sister City relationships”.
“The China Consul General had never been to Newcastle before and wanted to introduce himself. The Consul General is new in the role. The Consul General met with other stakeholders in Newcastle,” he said.
He confirmed no advice was sought from the Department of Foreign Affairs or other government officials on the meeting, saying the Lord Mayor’s role “is to represent the Council at intergovernmental forums at regional, state and Commonwealth level”.
He said “no other discussion about AUKUS was entered into”.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109403
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23383565 (261057ZJUL25) Notable: Sub plot forces action: Canberra calls Beijing after secret submarine meeting with Newcastle mayor – The Australian government has raised concerns with Beijing following a secret meeting between Chinese Consul General Wang Yu and Newcastle Lord Mayor Ross Kerridge, where the diplomat asked about the potential location of AUKUS nuclear submarines. The conversation, revealed in meeting minutes, raised alarms, with opposition figures accusing the government of turning a blind eye to China's actions. The Australian government reiterated that national decisions on AUKUS would be made at the federal level, while local officials questioned the lack of transparency regarding the meeting's agenda.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109316
>>109402
Sub plot forces action: Canberra calls Beijing after secret submarine meeting with Newcastle mayor
A closed-door meeting between a Chinese diplomat and a NSW mayor has been noticed by the Australian government.
Lachlan Leeming - July 24, 2025
Comments made in a meeting between a top Chinese diplomat and a NSW mayor have been escalated to Beijing, after the diplomat asked questions about the future location of AUKUS nuclear submarines in a closed-door sit-down.
The Daily Telegraph understands the Australian Government has raised concerns over the comments with its Chinese counterparts, following last week’s meeting between China’s consul general in Sydney Wang Yu and Newcastle Lord Mayor Ross Kerridge.
Minutes of the meeting, obtained by The Daily Telegraph, revealed Mr Kerridge was asked if Newcastle’s port would be used to dock AUKUS submarines in the future.
The Opposition accused the government of “turning a blind eye to disturbing behaviour from China” after the sit-down was revealed.
“The Prime Minister must clarify whether he thinks this conduct aligns with what he describes as a respectful relationship between Australia and China,” Coalition home affairs spokesman Andrew Hastie said.
The Telegraph asked the offices of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong and Defence Minister Richard Marles whether they were aware of other similar approaches from Chinese diplomats to officials at local and state government levels.
A spokeswoman for assistant foreign Minister Matt Thistlewaite responded, saying “China has made no secret of its views about AUKUS”.
“Australia makes our decisions in our national interest – and it will be the Australian federal government that is responsible for our policies,” she said.
Newcastle’s deputy Lord Mayor Callum Pull on Thursday highlighted the Lord Mayor could know sensitive information, after meetings in the last year with Kongsberg Defence Australia, Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy and the Hunter Defence Task Force.
“I and other Councillors have questioned why we were not informed of, or invited to the meeting, and why the meeting occurred with apparently no agenda, stated intent or clear purpose,” Mr Pull said.
Mr Kerridge on Wednesday night posted a lengthy post on social media about the meeting, including a photo of Mr Albanese and Chinese president Xi Jinping shaking hands.
“He did explain that a submarine base in Newcastle would make China less interested in investing in the area,” Mr Kerridge wrote of the meeting with Mr Wang.
“It sounds very dramatic saying that these things were discussed, but I felt that these are topics that they have to introduce in order to state the Chinese government positions. I just politely noted his comments.”
Coalition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said “reports … officials from foreign governments are suggesting there would be economic retaliation against local councils over this decision are highly concerning and must be immediately investigated by the Minister for Defence”.
Strategic Analysis Australia director Michael Shoebridge said it was “startling to have a Chinese government official be so openly … focused on national security issues like where a submarine base will be in Australia, while the PM was on his extended friendship tour of China”.
“It shows the Chinese government can walk and chew gum – they can flatter our PM and business leaders … while pursuing Beijing security interests at exactly the same time,” he said.
“We need to understand both sides of China, and not just happy pandas and iron ore sales.”
Ms Wong and Mr Marles on Friday will meet with their British counterparts for a series of defence-focused meetings.
https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/sub-plot-forces-action-canberra-calls-beijing-after-secret-submarine-meeting-with-newcastle-mayor/news-story/735e45a19a9d35d9911ef1f07686ff28
https://www.facebook.com/drrosskerridge/posts/122168919884445318
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109404
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23383607 (261117ZJUL25) Notable: The warning sign about Chinese steel before Kew pool roof collapse – Lab testing revealed "inconsistencies" in the Chinese steel used to support the roof of the $73 million Kew Recreation Centre, which collapsed in October 2022, the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court has heard. The steel was found to have insufficient yield stress, tensile strength, and excessive aluminium. Procurement manager Richard Zhang told the court that concerns over the steel's quality were raised before the collapse, but he did not follow up on the issues due to time pressures. The Victorian Building Authority has charged ADCO Group following a two-year investigation into the collapse.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109325
>>109326
>>109337
The warning sign about Chinese steel before Kew pool roof collapse
Grant McArthur - July 23, 2025
Lab testing detected “inconsistencies” in the Chinese steel used to support the roof of a $73 million Melbourne public pool before it caved in during a construction collapse, a court has heard.
A court heard imported steel used by construction company ADCO to build the Kew Recreation Centre was found to have a range of issues, including insufficient yield stress, tensile strength and excessive aluminium.
The company’s procurement manager, responsible for sourcing the steel, told the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court that late changes to some aspects of the plans were also not resubmitted for approval as it would have caused a “big financial and time impact” for its client, the City of Boroondara.
The roof of the $73 million Kew Recreation Centre redevelopment on High Street caved in at 10pm on October 20, 2022, causing a deafening bang locals likened to an explosion.
Twisted metal members, which had been holding up the roof, fell from both sides.
The Victorian Building Authority (VBA) has filed 18 charges against ADCO Group and its director John Conroy following a two-year investigation into the major construction collapse.
After ADCO’s procurement manager Richard Zhang failed to provide a witness statement, the VBA applied to the court to conduct a compulsory examination of him.
Under cross-examination from VBA counsel Chris Carr, KC, on Wednesday, Zhang said senior external engineers had raised concerns about the accuracy of mill certificates for imported steel they had used on previous projects and, as a result, agreed the material for the Kew pool would need to be independently tested by Australian labs.
He said the testing was undertaken when the steel arrived in Australia after his role on the project had finished, though he was still included in email chains that raised concerns about the steel before the collapse.
“I have been copied into some emails, discussions, about the testing ADCO had an independent lab did, showing some inconsistencies of the steel,” Zhang said.
“That’s when we realised there could be some issues with the steel complying to the standards.
“I believe it was before the collapse.
“The message was quite clear. The message was ‘we found some inconsistencies that need to be questioned’.”
While he was sent lab results highlighting issues with the content and strength of the Chinese steel, Zhang said he did not look into the details because he was working full-time on another job and left it to ADCO senior project engineer Zlatan Radakovic to urgently follow up on the concerns.
Loading
Zhang told the court that he was invited to a meeting at the Kew site days after the collapse, though he claimed he was never interviewed by management about why he thought the roof had failed.
“I showed up and one of the senior site managers kind of comforted me to make sure I don’t have any psychological or mental issues,” he said.
“And the other part (of the meeting) was for management to explain to the team that we are working with WorkSafe and don’t spread rumours, don’t go around and tell people what you think, it doesn’t help because none of us is qualified to tell what was the reason.”
After Carr reminded Zhang of an email he sent to his managers five days after the collapse - which was titled ‘preliminary findings on shop drawings to GT1’ - Zhang said he had forgotten offering his opinion and providing information on what had gone wrong with the failed truss, called GT1.
Later, after being taken through a series of messages exchanged during the project, Zhang confirmed he received a call from the project’s engineer during the steel’s fabrication asking for a change to increase its gauge, which presented a “big financial and time impact” for the client.
“I remember it was a very brief call. We didn’t dive into the details, but he made it clear it’s required for engineering purposes. So if that point is clear to me, it would be a complete waste of time to argue with him,” Zhang said.
When asked if the team failed to resubmit the plans for approval due to time pressures on the Kew project, Zhang denied any additional approvals were required, though said they would have been ideal.
“We didn’t reissue the shop drawings because the shop drawings was approved,” Zhang said.
“If I had time I would definitely resubmit it, but I would maintain that the drawings was approved and the engineer never asked for resubmission.
“It’s a better practice, I agree with you, but it wouldn’t be a mistake.”
The hearing continues.
https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/the-warning-sign-about-chinese-steel-before-kew-pool-roof-collapse-20250723-p5mh9r.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109405
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23383645 (261141ZJUL25) Notable: Britain pledges 50-year AUKUS support in message to Trump – The UK government has committed to a 50-year treaty with Australia to strengthen the AUKUS defence pact, with a $41 billion investment to build new submarine fleets. The treaty is seen as a countermeasure to US President Donald Trump's doubts about AUKUS, with his administration conducting a review of the agreement. UK Defence Secretary John Healey emphasized that the treaty would enhance security in the Indo-Pacific and NATO, while also creating thousands of jobs in both the UK and Australia. The deal is a significant move in the face of US skepticism over the pact.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109316
>>109392
Britain pledges 50-year AUKUS support in message to Trump
David Crowe and Matthew Knott - July 25, 2025
1/2
London: The British government will sign a 50-year treaty with Australia to cement the AUKUS defence pact in a massive strategic and financial deal, backing the plan when it is under extraordinary pressure from US President Donald Trump and his advisers.
The treaty will include a $41 billion pledge to scale up industry in both countries to build new submarine fleets with a common design, amid fears that Trump will undercut AUKUS and leave Australia and the UK exposed.
But the deal will require a soaring investment from Australia to ramp up construction in the UK on the new design for nuclear-propelled submarines, after it made another $800 million payment to the US to support its shipbuilding.
The new treaty is a significant move from Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and his British counterpart Sir Keir Starmer because it counters the open questions in the Trump administration about whether AUKUS will work.
Albanese and Starmer have formed a personal friendship that helps deepen support for AUKUS in both governments at a crucial point when Trump advisers are reviewing the three-way defence pact struck in 2021.
The new treaty will be signed when UK Defence Secretary John Healey and UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy visit Australia from Friday for annual AUKMIN talks, just as a Royal Navy aircraft carrier visits Darwin during the Talisman Sabre defence exercise.
Defence Minister Richard Marles said the agreement was “as significant a treaty [as] has been signed between our two countries since Federation”.
Healey said: “It’s a treaty to build the most powerful, the most advanced attack submarines our two navies have ever had. It’s a treaty that strengthens NATO, as well as security in the Indo-Pacific. It’s a treaty that will … safeguard the security of our children and our children’s children to come.”
Marles said the three AUKUS nations were forging ahead with the partnership even as the Trump administration reviewed the pact.
“A new government undertaking a review is the most natural thing in the world,” he said. “We welcome the review which is being undertaken by the Trump administration.”
Trump’s approach to AUKUS is in doubt while the Pentagon conducts a review led by Department of Defence undersecretary Elbridge Colby, a critic of the agreement. There is no formal deadline for the review.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109406
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23383680 (261200ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Australia and UK announce new 50-year AUKUS deal amid US submarine review – Australia and the UK have announced a new 50-year AUKUS treaty, pledging to strengthen defence and industry ties despite US-led review concerns. The treaty, which includes a significant industrial plan to build new nuclear-powered submarines, was unveiled as both nations emphasised the importance of the Indo-Pacific and the geopolitical ties between Ukraine and China. UK Defence Secretary John Healey highlighted the indivisibility of security between the Euro-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific regions, while Australian Defence Minister Richard Marles downplayed concerns about the US review, calling it “the most natural thing in the world.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109316
>>109405
Australia and UK announce new 50-year AUKUS deal amid US submarine review
JAMES DOWLING and SARAH ISON - July 25, 2025
1/2
Australia and the UK have reached agreement on a 50-year AUKUS pledge sold as the greatest military leap since the establishment of the navy, despite the thunder clouds presented by a US-led review into the submarine deal.
Senior politicians of both nations on Friday also emphasised geostrategic ties between Indo-Pacific law and order and the conflict in Ukraine, at a key diplomatic meeting between Defence Minister Richard Marles, Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong, and their British counterparts.
The absence of delegates for the third AUKUS partner, the US, loomed large over the proceedings, with Australia under American pressure to raise defence spending after Anthony Albanese’s failure to score a face-to-face meeting with US President Donald Trump.
Mr Marles and Senator Wong, joined by UK Defence Secretary John Healey and Foreign Secretary David Lammy, on Friday announced the new 50-year AUKUS treaty to be signed on Saturday in Geelong.
It would “underpin … the biggest industrial endeavour that our nation has ever seen”, Mr Marles said on Friday.
“It will give rise to the biggest leap in military capability that our nation has had since, frankly, the establishment of the navy back in 1913,” he said from the lawn of Admiralty House.
“It is a profoundly important treaty that we will sign tomorrow. It forms part of a trilateral agreement that we have, and we are really confident about the progress of all three countries in bringing that to fruition.”
Both Mr Marles and Mr Healy were at pains to emphasise the treaty would be an action plan for delivering on the August 2024 AUKUS treaty signed in Washington, rather than a bilateral shift away from the US to shore up the agreement under the uncertainty of the Trump administration.
The meeting comes as part of the Australia-UK Ministerial Consultations, or AUKMIN, and is the second joint delegation since the election of the Starmer government in 2024.
The meeting follows Britain sending a Royal Navy aircraft carrier, the Prince of Wales, and its accompanying fleet to Darwin this week in what is the first such visit in nearly 30 years.
Operation High Mast was launched in April in a sign of Britain’s intention to ramp up its presence in the Indo-Pacific, as questions are raised over China’s intention to reunify Taiwan in coming years and tension between Beijing and the US continues.
It will be folded into the ongoing training exercise Operation Talisman Sabre, in which 3000 UK personnel will take part.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109407
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23383895 (261315ZJUL25) Notable: PM labels Gaza a 'humanitarian catastrophe' and reaffirms aspiration for Palestinian statehood – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has labelled the Gaza conflict a "humanitarian catastrophe" and reiterated Australia's commitment to a two-state solution. He condemned Israel’s actions, including denial of aid and civilian casualties, calling on Israel to comply with international law. While France plans to officially recognise Palestine, Albanese did not directly address this move but affirmed Australia's long-standing position on a Palestinian state. Foreign Minister Penny Wong stated that Australia would not follow France’s lead but would continue to push for a ceasefire and increased aid to Gaza.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109386
>>109387
>>109388
PM labels Gaza a 'humanitarian catastrophe' and reaffirms aspiration for Palestinian statehood
Tom Lowrey - 25 July 2025
1/2
The prime minister has labelled the conflict in Gaza a "humanitarian catastrophe", while reaffirming an existing commitment to a two-state solution.
France has announced it will formally recognise Palestine later this year, becoming the largest and most influential European nation to do so.
In some of his strongest language on the conflict yet, Anthony Albanese said the conflict has gone "beyond the world's worst fears".
"Gaza is in the grip of a humanitarian catastrophe. Israel's denial of aid and the killing of civilians, including children, seeking access to water and food, cannot be defended or ignored," he said.
"We call on Israel to comply immediately with its obligations under international law."
It follows Australia joining 27 other countries in a joint statement earlier this week demanding an immediate end to the war.
Israel labelled those joint calls "disconnected from reality", arguing the attention of those countries should be focused on the actions of Hamas.
Australia does not recognise a Palestinian state, instead referring officially to the West Bank and Gaza as the "Occupied Palestinian Territories", though it does have diplomatic ties with the Palestinian Authority.
Albanese pushed to follow France
The new comments from Mr Albanese do not refer directly to France's moves to recognise Palestine, but point to Australia's long-standing ambitions around recognition.
"Recognising the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinian people for a state of their own has long been a bipartisan position in Australia," he said.
"The reason a two-state solution remains the goal of the international community is because a just and lasting peace depends upon it.
"Australia is committed to a future where both the Israeli and Palestinian peoples can live in peace and safety, within secure and internationally recognised borders."
Former Labor minister and MP Ed Husic said the Australian government should follow France's lead and formally recognise Palestine.
Speaking on the ABC's Afternoon Briefing, Mr Husic said Australia had "the perfect opportunity" to do so.
"We should move to recognise Palestine now, standing alongside France, because there will be a number of countries that will do so," he said.
"The time is now for us to stand and step forward and say we will recognise the State of Palestine now."
Israel's ambassador to Australia, Amir Maimon, said pressure "must be placed where it belongs, on Hamas".
"To condemn Israel for defending itself is wrong," he said on X.
"It deflects attention from the real perpetrators of this horror: Hamas."
Last year, Foreign Minister Penny Wong indicated Australia was considering recognising a Palestinian state as part of a peace process, rather than at the endpoint.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109408
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23384004 (261334ZJUL25) Notable: Farmers have a beef with Anthony Albanese’s ‘move to woo Donald Trump – Australian beef producers have raised concerns over the Albanese government’s decision to loosen biosecurity restrictions on US beef imports, calling it "dangerous" and a potential risk to the $14bn industry. The decision allows beef sourced from Canada and Mexico, slaughtered in the US, into Australia, despite previous concerns over diseases like mad cow. Industry groups are demanding an independent review of the decision, questioning whether biosecurity and traceability measures are sufficient. Critics argue the decision is politically motivated, aimed at smoothing relations between Australia and the US ahead of Prime Minister Albanese's upcoming meeting with President Trump.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/23372922
Farmers have a beef with Anthony Albanese’s ‘move to woo Donald Trump’
MATTHEW DENHOLM - July 24, 2025
Australian beef producers fear the Albanese government’s decision to loosen biosecurity restrictions on US imports is “dangerous”, risking the introduction of “devastating” diseases such as mad cow.
Cattle Australia and peak state industry bodies are demanding an independent review of the decision, which means Australia will accept beef from the US sourced from Canada and Mexico but slaughtered in the US.
Some beef producers accused the government of placing their $14bn export industry at risk for the sake of facilitating a meeting between the Prime Minister and US President Donald Trump.
Other meat sectors, particularly pork, expressed concerns they might be next for relaxed biosecurity controls, unravelling a system that keeps safe Australia’s $82bn red meat and livestock trade.
“We fully support open trade, open access, minimal barriers, but if a biosecurity issue exists, then we need to know what the science-based review is,” Cattle Australia deputy chair Adam Coffey told The Australian.
Mr Coffey said the decision set a “dangerous precedent” and called on the government to release the detailed justification for the change – something Agriculture Minister Julie Collins said was “not what is done usually”.
The US has had beef access into Australia since 2019, but the announcement on Thursday removes a key impediment, allowing beef sourced from cattle born in Canada or Mexico and legally imported and slaughtered in the US.
Mr Coffey, a Queensland beef producer, said there was lack of information to judge whether biosecurity and traceability measures were sufficient and an independent inquiry was justified. A similar inquiry was held after the decision to allow Thai prawns to be imported into Australia, he said.
The industry was “disappointed” that it had little warning of the decision. “If this is the benchmark for industry consultation, then it’s going to be a wild ride for the next few years,” he said.
West Australian beef producer and WA Farmers livestock president Geoff Pearson said mad cow disease had been detected in Canadian and Mexican beef processed in the US in the past.
“It’s game over if that gets into our cattle herd and our products – it closes down a very valuable industry,” Mr Pearson told The Australian. “It would be catastrophic. Having to burn herds of livestock is not pretty. You are potentially threatening the Australian beef and meat industry with a breach of biosecurity or outbreak for a market that is not necessary and that Australia doesn’t need.
“(The US) doesn’t have a robust system like ours for traceability (of product). We need to see the science and see they’ve fixed their traceability systems and their processing compliance … which didn’t meet regulations.”
Mr Pearson, who runs 15,000 Angus beef cattle near Badgingarra, about 200km north of Perth, questioned the motivation and timing of the announcement.
“Is it around the political side of things, with our Prime Minister meeting with Trump very soon?” he said. “Is it to smooth over the relationship? That’s concerning.”
US Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins added to these suspicions by claiming the decision as “yet another example of the kind of market access the President negotiates to bring America into a new golden age”.
In March, Mr Trump erroneously claimed Australia “bans” US beef. “They’re wonderful people, and wonderful everything — but they ban American beef,” he said.
Ms Collins said the decision followed a “rigorous”, five-year assessment by departmental officials, including in the US.
“We are assured the supply chain and the traceability and the safety of any food coming into Australia is safe,” she said.
“This is a decision based on science.”
She said government had been “keeping the industry informed the entire way”.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/agribusiness/farmers-have-a-beef-with-pms-move-to-woo-trump/news-story/9861f6c09106c756ffb2a58cf5660e9a
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109409
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23384239 (261419ZJUL25) Notable: Australia opens market to US beef imports amid Trump celebration – US President Donald Trump has hailed Australia’s decision to reverse its beef import ban as a triumph for his trade agenda, claiming it proves US beef is the "safest and best in the world." The reversal will allow beef from cattle raised in Canada and Mexico and processed in the US into Australia. While the move was celebrated by the US and its agricultural bodies, Australian beef producers and the Nationals party have raised concerns over potential biosecurity risks, calling for an independent review of the decision. Treasurer Jim Chalmers defended the move, citing the scientific process behind the decision.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/23372922
>>109408
Australia opens market to US beef imports amid Trump celebration
Donald Trump has declared Australia’s beef ban reversal a triumph of his trade agenda, boasting that the deal proves the US has the ‘best’ beef in the world.
Vanessa Marsh - July 25, 2025
1/2
US President Donald Trump has celebrated Australia’s reversal of its beef import ban, claiming it as a victory for his trade agenda.
Posting on Truth Social, Mr Trump applauded the decision, while his trade chief credited the breakthrough as the “direct result” of the President’s push to confront “unfair trading practices.”
“After many years Australia has agreed to accept American Beef!” he said on his Truth Social platform.
“For a long time, and even though we are great friends, they actually banned our Beef.
“Now, we are going to sell so much to Australia because this is undeniable and irrefutable Proof that U.S. Beef is the Safest and Best in the entire World.
“The other Countries that refuse our magnificent Beef are ON NOTICE. All of our Nation’s Ranchers, who are some of the hardest working and most wonderful people, are smiling today, which means I am smiling too.”
Nationals leader David Littleproud said the Trump Administration’s victory lap over Labor’s decision to allow more US beef into Australia seemed to have “validated” his concern a deal was done before the biosecurity protocols were finalised.
Mr Littleproud said comments in the past 24 hours made by the US Administration were at odds with Labor’s claim that the move was predicated on biosecurity and science.
He added industry was also backing his calls for an independent review into the decision. “We need to know if Labor is sacrificing our high biosecurity standards just so Prime Minister Anthony Albanese can obtain a meeting with US President Donald Trump,” Mr Littleproud said.
“The Prime Minister should be using our strong relationship with the US and our AUKUS deal as a solid reason to obtain a much-needed meeting with President Trump.”
But Treasurer Jim Chalmers has rejected the Nationals’ characterisation of the beef import decision, saying the call to allow US products from cattle raised or born in Mexico or Canada had followed a “longstanding” process.
“It’s a scientific process that involves experts and scientists and it makes sure that our arrangements are up to scratch,” he said.
“I see that there’s a lot of commentary around this in the last day or two.
“I know that our political opponents want to play their usual low-rent politics over it but this is a long-standing scientific process.
“It’s coming to a conclusion and it’s all about making sure that we have the best arrangements based on the best scientific advice.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109410
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23384298 (261430ZJUL25) Notable: ‘This is very big’: Delighted Trump hails Australian beef deal for a second day – US President Donald Trump has continued to celebrate Australia's decision to lift restrictions on US beef imports, claiming it would be the "first time" American beef would be sold in Australia. Trump hailed the decision as proof that US beef is the "safest and best in the entire world." While Australia had not previously banned US beef, the new policy allows beef from cattle raised in Canada and Mexico to be imported via the US. Agriculture Minister Julie Collins and Trade Minister Don Farrell denied any connection between the decision and ongoing tariff negotiations with the US.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/23372922
>>109408
>>109409
‘This is very big’: Delighted Trump hails Australian beef deal for a second day
Benedict Brook - July 26, 2025
Donald Trump has again riffed about Australia’s decision to allow more US beef to come in to the country claiming on Friday it would be the “first time” American beef would be sold in Australia.
Seemingly out of the blue on Friday, and a full day after he declared victory due to Australia dropping its restrictions, Mr Trump was back on his TruthSocial platform talking about it again.
“Australia to take US BEEF for first time,” he wrote on Friday morning, US time.
“A very BIG market. I hope our GREAT FARMERS ARE HAPPY. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!”
Australia had not banned US beef. But on Thursday, agriculture minister Julie Collins confirmed Australia will remove the ban on American beef that came from cattle originating in Canada and Mexico after a decade-long review.
It was originally put in place to stop bovine spongiform encephalopathy, known as mad cow disease, from coming into Australia.
Since 2019, Australia has allowed imports of beef raised and slaughtered in the US. But it did not allow for the import into Australia via the US of beef raised in neighbouring countries.
Additional measures put in place by the US to track the origin of Canadian and Mexican beef are being cited as the reason Australia is now satisfied.
“For a long time, and even though we are great friends, they actually banned our Beef,” said Mr Trump on Thursday, US time.
Now, we are going to sell so much to Australia because this is undeniable and irrefutable Proof that US Beef is the Safest and Best in the entire World.”
The US imports billions of dollars of Australian beef each years which is leaner than American beef.
Decision based on ‘science’
The Albanese government has been quick to deny the timing has anything to do with drawn-out tariff talks with the US, reported NewsWire.
But removing restrictions was one of Washington’s key demands in tariff negotiations, with Mr Trump specifically accusing Australia of banning American beef during remarks on “liberation day” – the day the US imposed blanket tariffs on all foreign imports, including Australian products.
But both Ms Collins and Trade Minister Don Farrell have claimed it is simply a coincidence the beef review ended just weeks after the US President threatened a 200 per cent tariff on foreign-made pharmaceuticals.
“We haven’t made any compromise, and we certainly haven’t compromised Australia’s strict biosecurity laws,” Senator Farrell told reporters huddled in a Parliament House corridor on Thursday.
“This has been a process that’s been underway for the last 10 years.
“It’s now come to a completion, and it’s appropriate that we announce the results of that inquiry, but at no stage do we risk our terrific biosecurity standards for any trade arrangement.”
https://www.news.com.au/world/north-america/us-politics/this-is-very-big-delighted-trump-hails-australian-beef-deal-for-a-second-day/news-story/1a3a91363f10a1fffb0addcda1a9670b
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114914339003272307
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109411
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23386791 (270022ZJUL25) Notable: Trump’s Aussie ‘alpha male’ is falling flat in Malaysia – US President Donald Trump’s nomination of Nick Adams as ambassador to Malaysia has sparked protests, with the nominee’s past Islamophobic remarks and support for Israel drawing backlash. Adams, an Australian-born, naturalized US citizen, has a history of making controversial statements, including advocating for internment of Muslims and criticising Palestinian support. His nomination has raised concerns in Malaysia, particularly due to his stance on Palestine, a key issue for the country. Despite this, Malaysia’s government, seeking better trade relations with the US, may reluctantly accept Adams, though critics argue he is not the right choice.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109294
>>109295
Trump’s Aussie ‘alpha male’ is falling flat in Malaysia
Zach Hope - July 24, 2025
1/2
US President Donald Trump’s nomination of a right-wing provocateur with a history of making Islamophobic remarks as his man in Muslim-majority Malaysia has gone down, of course, like a lead balloon.
Protests in Kuala Lumpur against would-be ambassador Nick Adams kicked off last week and will probably return if he is waved through as expected in an upcoming Senate confirmation hearing.
Adams, an Australian-accented, naturalised American who self-identifies as an “alpha male” with “oozing masculine confidence” and “charisma”, fawned his way into the US president’s favour as a brash, conservative pundit and MAGAsphere influencer.
Braggadocio aside, the main reason Malaysians are upset at his nomination – to their country, of all places – is his hostility to the plight of Palestine, a cause close to the hearts of millions of Malaysians, and his history of making Islamophobic remarks, which includes denigrating Trump’s rivals as supporters of Islam and critiquing efforts to “teach Islam in schools”.
Then there is this anecdote Adams himself posted to X last year.
“I sat down for lunch today with a broker on a deal,” he wrote. “The waitress arrived wearing a Free Palestine pin. I demanded to speak with the owner. I had Leslie promptly fired, and then closed my deal.
“I won’t tolerate being served by those who support terror, I stand with Israel.”
While unverified, the anecdote shines a spotlight on how Adams sees himself and the situation in the Middle East, which could be problematic in Malaysia, where Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and other government types are often seen in scarves with the pattern of a keffiyeh in a show of Palestinian solidarity.
Will Adams treat the prime minister the same as “Leslie”?
The 40-year-old was barely known in his native Australia before being tapped by Trump this month. His claim to fame before packing up for the US was being Australia’s youngest ever deputy mayor (for Ashfield council in Sydney), a platform he used in the mid-noughties to spout wacky ideas that went nowhere, like culling pigeons to stop avian flu.
The Americans, however, put him on the telly and conservative speaking circuits, where he has relished owning woke lefties, worshipping Trump and espousing supposed old-school masculinity.
This, of course, caught Trump’s eye. The president returned the love by endorsing Adams’ books, including 2016’s Retaking America, in which the author declares, “We don’t want a president who has more sympathy for Muslims than Jews” and “there are many peaceful and law-abiding Muslims, but this does not make Islam a religion of peace”.
In one passage, written in the context of Islamic State’s brutality in the Middle East, Adams muses on the “culturally confident, passionate” leaders of Australia and America who locked up people of Japanese descent during World War II.
“There is significant evidence of disloyalty ... both on the individual and mosque level. Yet never once, anywhere, to my knowledge, has the internment of Muslims as a policy idea been floated,” he wrote.
“Let me be clear: I am not advocating for the current internment of Muslims in America, Australia or anywhere else. But I also do not believe it should never be considered, nor do I believe anyone should fear raising the concept.”
Here is another titbit from Retaking America: “I’m a Western civilisation guy. I have little cultural interest in Asia and Africa. Except for Israel, I have no great impulse to visit the Middle East.”
Perhaps he has since discovered an appreciation for Asian cultures.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109412
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23386936 (270058ZJUL25) Notable: Face age and ID checks? Using the internet in Australia is about to fundamentally change – New industry codes set to take effect in December will require Australians to undergo age checks on various online services, including search engines, social media, app stores, and AI chatbots. The codes, developed by the tech sector and the eSafety commissioner, aim to protect children from harmful content like pornography and self-harm material. While some welcome the changes, others warn of privacy concerns, with critics arguing that the regulations give tech companies more control over users' online activities. Non-compliant companies could face fines up to $49.5 million.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Face age and ID checks? Using the internet in Australia is about to fundamentally change
New codes developed by the tech sector and eSafety commissioner come into effect in December, with major ramifications for internet users
Josh Taylor - 20 Jul 2025
1/2
As the old adage goes, “On the internet, nobody knows you’re a dog”. But in Australia it might soon be the case that everything from search engines and social media sites, to app stores and AI chatbots will have to know your age.
The Albanese government trumpeted the passage of its legislation banning under 16s from social media – which will come into effect in December – but new industry codes developed by the tech sector and eSafety commissioner Julie Inman Grant under the Online Safety Act will probably have much larger ramifications for how Australians access the internet.
Measures to be deployed by online services could include looking at your account history, or using facial age assurance and bank card checks. Identity checks using IDs such as drivers licences to keep children under 16 off social media will also apply to logged-in accounts for search engines from December, under an industry code that came into force at the end of June.
The code will require search engines to have age assurance measures for all accounts, and where an account holder is determined to be aged under 18, the search engine would be required to switch on safe search features to filter out content such as pornography from search results.
Six more draft codes being considered by the eSafety commissioner would bring similar age assurance measures to a wide range of services Australians use every day, including app stores, AI chatbots and messaging apps.
Any service that hosts or facilitates access to content such as pornography, self-harm material, simulated gaming, or very violent material unsuitable for children will need to ensure children are not able to access that content.
In her National Press Club speech last month, Inman Grant flagged that the codes were needed to keep children safe at every level of the online world.
“It’s critical to ensure the layered safety approach which also places responsibility and accountability at critical chokepoints in the tech stack, including the app stores and at the device level, the physical gateways to the internet where kids sign-up and first declare their ages,” she said.
The eSafety commissioner announced the intention of the codes during the development process and when they were submitted, but recent media reporting has drawn renewed attention to these aspects of the codes.
Some people will welcome the changes. News this week that Elon Musk’s AI Grok now includes a pornographic chat while still being labelled suitable for ages 12+ on the Apple app store prompted child safety groups to call for Apple to review the app’s rating and implement child protection measures in the app store.
Apple and Google are already developing age checks at the device level that can also be used by apps to check the age of their users.
Founder of tech analysis company PivotNine, Justin Warren, says the codes would “implement sweeping changes to the regulation of communication between people in Australia”.
“It looks like a massive over-reaction after years of policy inaction to curtail the power of a handful of large foreign technology companies,” he says.
“That it hands even more power and control over Australians’ online lives to those same foreign tech companies is darkly hilarious.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109413
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23387071 (270125ZJUL25) Notable: Australia is quietly introducing 'unprecedented' age checks for search engines like Google – Australians will soon face mandatory age checks on major online services, including search engines, under new regulations set to take effect in December. The eSafety Commissioner has introduced industry codes requiring companies like Google and Microsoft to implement age-assurance technology for logged-in users. While aimed at protecting children from harmful content such as pornography, the changes have raised privacy concerns. The codes also mandate filtering out inappropriate content for users under 18. Non-compliance could result in fines up to $50 million. The regulations are expected to expand to more online sectors in the future.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109412
Australia is quietly introducing 'unprecedented' age checks for search engines like Google
Ange Lavoipierre - 11 Jul 2025
1/3
Australians will soon be subjected to mandatory age checks across the internet landscape, in what has been described as a huge and unprecedented change.
Search engines are next in line for the same controversial age-assurance technology behind the teen social media ban, and other parts of the internet are likely to follow suit.
At the end of June, Australia quietly introduced rules forcing companies such as Google and Microsoft to check the ages of logged-in users, in an effort to limit children's access to harmful content such as pornography.
But experts have warned the move could compromise Australians' privacy online and may not do much to protect young people.
"I have not seen anything like this anywhere else in the world," said Lisa Given, professor of Information Sciences from RMIT, who specialises in age-assurance technology.
"As people learn about the implications of this, we will likely see people stepping up and saying, 'Wait a minute, why wasn't I told that this was going to happen?'"
From December 27, Google — which dominates the Australian search market with a share of more than 90 per cent — and its rival, Microsoft, will have to use some form of age-assurance technology on users when they sign in, or face fines of almost $50 million per breach.
The search results for logged-in users under the age of 18 will be filtered for pornography, high-impact violence, material promoting eating disorders and a range of other content.
Despite the apparent magnitude of the shift, it has mostly gone unnoticed, in stark contrast to the political and media fanfare surrounding the teen social media ban, which will block under-16s from major platforms using similar technology.
As for why so few people have noticed, it may be because the changes took place away from the halls of parliament, in the relatively dry world of regulation.
They were contained in a new industry code — one of three registered by eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant in June.
All up, the regulator will register nine codes this year, governing the conduct of internet service companies in Australia.
The regulator's media release about the new codes made no mention of the new age-assurance requirements, although Ms Inman Grant briefly mentioned the matter in her recent address to the National Press Club.
"These provisions will serve as a bulwark and operate in lock step with the new social media age limits," she said.
"It's critical to ensure the layered safety approach … including on the app stores and at the device level — the physical gateways to the internet where kids sign up and first declare their ages."
Her comments hint at plans for age checks for even more sectors of the internet.
Experts are concerned that almost no-one seems to be aware of the shift.
"This one has kind of popped out, seemingly out of the blue," Professor Given said.
"It's not clear that there is a social licence for such important and nuanced changes," Digital Rights Watch chair Lizzie O'Shea said.
"We would argue that the public deserves more of a say in how to balance these important human rights issues."
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109414
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23387166 (270146ZJUL25) Notable: Opinion: Age verification is coming to search engines in Australia - with huge implications for privacy and inclusion – "The way we use the internet in Australia is changing. Soon, it won’t just be social media platforms asking to verify your age. Come December, age verification requirements will also extend to search engines - with significant ramifications. That means you may need to scan your face or do an identity check to use a search engine as a logged-in user. And it’s unlikely to stop there: the eSafety commissioner is considering rules for mandatory age checks across the entire internet landscape. These are not small decisions; they will impact everyone who uses the internet in Australia." – Samantha Floreani, The Guardian.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109412
>>109413
Opinion: Age verification is coming to search engines in Australia – with huge implications for privacy and inclusion
New rules will radically change the way we use the internet in Australia, and not just social media
Samantha Floreani - 23 Jul 2025
1/2
The way we use the internet in Australia is changing. Soon, it won’t just be social media platforms asking to verify your age. Come December, age verification requirements will also extend to search engines – with significant ramifications.
That means you may need to scan your face or do an identity check to use a search engine as a logged-in user. And it’s unlikely to stop there: the eSafety commissioner is considering rules for mandatory age checks across the entire internet landscape.
Whether or not you support the idea of age-gating the internet, this is a huge, unprecedented change. These are not small decisions; they will impact everyone who uses the internet in Australia – not just people under 16. There are implications for privacy, digital inclusion, access to information and online participation that go beyond the controversial teen social media ban. All of this warrants meaningful public debate.
If this is the first time you’re hearing about it, you’re not alone. Despite the significance of the changes, these latest rules are the result of industry codes, which differs to regular legislation. These codes don’t go through parliament. Instead, they’re developed by the tech industry and registered by the eSafety commissioner in a process called co-regulation. On one hand, this can be good: it can allow for more flexibility or technology-specific detail that is less appropriate in legislation. On the other: it creates risk of industry co-option, and by bypassing parliamentary process, can give an enormous amount of power to an unelected official (in this case, the eSafety commissioner).
Greens senator David Shoebridge has called the implications of age verification for search engines “staggering” and noted that “these proposals don’t have to go through an elected parliament and we can’t vote them down no matter how significant concerns are. That combined with lack of public input is a serious issue.”
The age verification policy development process has been littered with blunders that make a mockery of meaningful consultation and evidence-based policy development. It is particularly striking that these codes were drafted before the completion of the government’s $6.5m trial into the efficacy of age assurance. Later, the trial’s preliminary findings conceded the technology is not guaranteed to be effective, and noted “concerning evidence” that some technology providers were seeking to collect too much personal information.
While a government-commissioned survey on the teen social media ban found overwhelming support in theory, it also found most people have no idea what that means in practice, with many uncomfortable with the methods it might entail – such as biometric face scanning or handing over your credit card details. And while there was much fanfare around the social media ban, it’s not clear there is a social licence to extend this approach to search engines and beyond. It seems many people may be unpleasantly surprised.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109415
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23387225 (270210ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Google threatens to sue the Australian Government if YouTube is added to social media age ban – Tech giant Google is threatening to sue the Australian Government on "constitutional grounds" if YouTube is included in the social media ban for children aged 16 and below. In a letter to Communications Minister Anika Wells, Google outlined three legal options, including a potential High Court challenge. The company argued that the age limit would prevent young adults from engaging in political communication via YouTube. Google also rejected the eSafety Commissioner’s recommendation to include YouTube, claiming it was a "video streaming platform" rather than a "social media platform."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109412
>>109413
>>109414
Google threatens to sue the Australian Government if YouTube is added to social media age ban
Clare Armstrong - July 27, 2025
1/2
Tech giant Google is threatening to sue the Australian Government on “constitutional grounds” if YouTube is included in the social media ban for children aged 16 and below.
In a letter sent to Communications Minister Anika Wells on Thursday and obtained by this masthead, the company warned it was “considering its legal position” given the government was looking at “resiling” from its previous decision to exempt the platform.
YouTube is not currently captured by the age restriction due to take effect in December, but is being considered for inclusion following a recommendation from Australia’s eSafety Commissioner.
In a warning to the government, YouTube outlined three legal options open to it, including a potential High Court challenge arguing the ban would be an “impermissible fetter on the implied constitutional freedom of political communication”.
The company claimed the age limit would prevent young adults under the age of 16 from having an account and being able to “contribute to political communication by posting videos on YouTube and by making comments on those videos”.
In the letter, which was signed by YouTube Australia and New Zealand head of government affairs and public policy Rachel Lord, and Google Australia and New Zealand director of legal Shoshana Shields, the company also rejected the premise of the potential ban by arguing YouTube was a “video streaming platform” rather than a “social media platform” as defined in the legislation.
Thirdly, the company cast doubt on whether the late inclusion of YouTube would be an “appropriate” use of the minister’s power given the original legislation was passed last year on the “express understanding” the platform would be excluded.
“To the extent that the minister may be purporting to rely on the eSafety Commissioner’s advice as a basis for its change, we do not consider this can form a sufficient or proper basis for the change in position,” the letter said.
eSafety’s advice recommended no single platform or service, whether YouTube or others, be specifically excluded under the rules due to the fast-evolving nature of online platforms meaning their risk profile could quickly change.
But Google said it rejected the “robustness” of that advice, and argued nothing in it was “contrary” to the matters already considered by the government when the legislation was drafted and passed.
Under the current laws, social media platforms like TikTok, Snapchat, Instagram and Facebook are captured, but YouTube, Headspace, Kids Helpline and Google Classroom are not.
The letter said “regardless of its legal options” the company remained of the view there were “strong policy reasons” for its exclusion describing the issue as a “matter of grave concern to YouTube”.
It also claimed the ban would not protect children from harm as they would still be able to watch videos without an account, which would also expose them to more detrimental content as this would mean “targeted safety features that apply to the accounts of children and young adults will no longer apply”.
There has been a separate push for a distinction between the company’s main video platform and its “YouTube Shorts” component, which uses a different algorithm.
The company said if the government was considering going ahead with its inclusion it wanted “an opportunity to provide further submissions before any such decision is made”.
“If ultimately no exclusion is expressly provided, then YouTube contemplates having to engage with the options available to it,” the letter said.
The government declined to comment.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109416
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23388125 (270739ZJUL25) Notable: Trade minister admits gaffe over Trump-Albanese beef talks – Trade Minister Don Farrell admitted he was wrong to claim that US President Donald Trump had raised Australian beef import restrictions in phone conversations with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese before the decision to lift the ban. The opposition is calling for a Senate inquiry and independent scientific review of the move, suggesting it was politically motivated. Albanese denied discussing the issue with Trump, and Farrell later clarified his statement, saying he had confused Trump’s public remarks with a private conversation. The lifting of the restrictions follows a 10-year independent review, according to Albanese.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/23372922
>>109408
>>109409
Trade minister admits gaffe over Trump-Albanese beef talks
Matthew Knott - July 27, 2025
Trade Minister Don Farrell says he was wrong to claim that US President Donald Trump raised Australian restrictions on beef imports from North America in phone conversations with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese ahead of the decision to scrap the de facto ban.
The opposition is calling for both a Senate inquiry and an independent scientific review of the decision to end the restrictions, which they have suggested was made to help secure a trade deal with the Trump administration.
Asked about diplomatic discussions leading up to last week’s announcement, Farrell said on Sunday that: “Of course, the president of the United States has raised it with the prime minister”.
Pressed on when Trump and Albanese had discussed the issue, Farrell told Sky News: “I couldn’t tell you off the top of my head which of the discussions, but I’m aware that this issue was raised by the president of the United States, but that will not change the way in which we conduct and examine our biosecurity issues.”
Opposition foreign affairs spokeswoman Michaelia Cash leapt upon Farrell’s “extraordinary” comments, saying they had raised more questions about whether the process to ease restrictions on beef imports was purely science-based.
Albanese later told the ABC’s Insiders that he had not discussed the issue with Trump in any of their three phone conversations, refuting Farrell’s initial claim.
“I made a mistake,” Farrell told this masthead, adding that he had confused Trump’s remarks about Australian beef in the White House rose garden with a conversation between the two leaders.
Asked whether Trump had raised the issue with him, Albanese said: “No. Donald Trump, though, did raise it at the so-called Liberation Day, of course – he raised it publicly, so his views were well-known.”
Albanese insisted that “this wasn’t a political decision”, saying it was “absolutely” a coincidence that the Department of Agriculture decided to lift the restrictions after loud complaints from Trump.
“There has been an independent review, it took 10 years,” Albanese said, rejecting the opposition’s calls for an investigation into the move. “The decision has been made, and it was made independently at arm’s length of any political decision.”
Cash said: “It is even more imperative now that we need to ensure that the Australian Labor Party under Mr Albanese have not traded away our strict biosecurity standards, which all Australians understand need to be in place.”
Australia has allowed US beef into the country since 2019, but blocked meat from cattle that were born in Mexico and Canada before being slaughtered in America. This effectively meant that all beef from the continent was blocked, because US supply chains are highly integrated. No US beef has been imported since 2019.
The Trump administration has taken credit for the government’s move to lift the restrictions, hailing it as a major trade victory that would “make agriculture great again”.
“This is yet another example of the kind of market access the president negotiates to bring America into a new golden age of prosperity, with American agriculture leading the way,” US Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said last week.
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/trade-minister-admits-gaffe-over-trump-albanese-beef-talks-20250727-p5mi3k.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109417
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23388140 (270747ZJUL25) Notable: Senior Democrat Joe Courtney calls for Trump administration to open up on Elbridge Colby’s AUKUS probe – US Congressman Joe Courtney has called for greater transparency around the AUKUS submarines review, criticizing the US Department of Defence for providing limited information. Courtney expressed concern over the Pentagon’s lack of clarity, particularly regarding the scope and timeline of the review. Despite ongoing work under the assumption that AUKUS will continue, the review’s findings and status remain unclear. Courtney emphasized the need for clearer guidance on the review’s direction, calling the current process frustrating for those involved.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109316
>>109405
Senior Democrat Joe Courtney calls for Trump administration to open up on Elbridge Colby’s AUKUS probe
JOE KELLY - 27 July 2025
1/2
US congressman Joe Courtney says there should be greater clarity around the AUKUS submarines review, with another leading Democrat blasting the US Department of Defence for a lack of transparency and refusing to provide basic information and briefings when requested.
Mr Courtney, a Democrat from Connecticut and the co-chair of the Congressional Friends of Australia Caucus, said there was a “systemic issue” with the Pentagon and a “dearth of communication” in which information was only coming out in small “dribbles”.
He told The Australian the leadership of the US navy had briefed the Pentagon as part of the ongoing AUKUS review but again stressed he did not know “what the questions were that were asked or the answers that were given.”
The Albanese government has now made the second instalment of $800m dollars to the US under the AUKUS framework, bringing the total to $1.6bn, in the expectation that America will provide Australia with three Virginia-class submarines from the early 2030s.
Addressing the available information on the AUKUS review, Mr Courtney suggested confusing signals had been floated by the Pentagon. He said it was “really problematic” for work to be continuing on AUKUS by invested parties without more guidance on what was being examined.
Mr Courtney is the Democrats’ ranking member of the seapower and projection forces subcommittee of the House of Representatives armed services committee.
He said it was hard to know how seriously the review would be taken by President Donald Trump when it was finished, declaring that “the buck stops at the White House” and not with the Under Secretary of Defence for Policy, Elbridge Colby.
“We were told initially it was a 30-day review which obviously had people really sceptical that something that has been worked on for four years and had so much effort with the optimal pathway could get a fair analysis in 30 days,” he said. “I does seem like the Department (of Defence) pumped the brakes in terms of the framework.”
“It’s not clear why they did that or what is the new timeframe? I mean, in the meantime there’s still work going on … operating under the assumption that AUKUS is here to stay,” he said.
“So to have this happening with no sort of guidance about what’s the scope of this (review) in terms of people who are operating in good faith and relying on AUKUS being enduring is really problematic.”
“For me, it’s very frustrating and, for others, it’s just completely kind of a head scratcher trying to figure out what is the approach?”
It is not known what the time frame for the AUKUS review is; whether its findings will be released publicly either in full or in part; what parts of the AUKUS agreement are being examined; whether issues outside of AUKUS itself – such as Australia’s positioning on Taiwan – will factor into the review’s findings; whether it will make direct recommendations to the Trump administration or what status the review will have when completed.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109418
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23388165 (270801ZJUL25) Notable: Michaelia Cash backs plan to ditch welcome to country, Indigenous flags – Senator Michaelia Cash has publicly supported two motions from the Liberal Party of WA to remove Aboriginal welcome-to-country ceremonies and flags from official government events. Cash, along with conservative figures like Canning MP Andrew Hastie, advocates for a focus on unifying under the Australian flag. The motions, set to be debated at the WA Liberal Party's state council meeting, reflect a push from the party’s conservative faction, with opponents arguing that these Aboriginal symbols are divisive and tokenistic. The debate continues within the party, with tensions over its future direction.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Michaelia Cash backs plan to ditch welcome to country, Indigenous flags
PAUL GARVEY and MOHAMMAD ALFARES - July 24, 2025
1/2
The highest-ranking Liberal woman MP behind Sussan Ley is part of a party push to ditch welcome-to-country ceremonies and Aboriginal flags from official events, putting senator Michaelia Cash at odds with the Opposition Leader on Indigenous symbolism.
Senator Cash, from Western Australia and the opposition’s Senate leader, on Thursday was swift to back publicly two motions prepared for the Liberal Party of WA’s state council this Saturday which demand the Aboriginal welcome-to-country speeches be stripped of “official status” and only commonwealth and state flags appear at government events.
The push comes as Anthony Albanese uses vanquished Liberal leader Peter Dutton’s opposition to Indigenous symbolism to attack the depleted opposition as out of step with mainstream Australia.
Ms Ley has said she is “happy” to stand alongside Aboriginal flags and has given her support to acknowledgements of country in the right “time and place”, even congratulating Indigenous participants at the opening of parliament this week and making her own odes to elders. But Senator Cash said she supported the motions to take Indigenous symbolism out of public life, and welcomed them being debated at the WA Liberal Party council.
“It has been my long-held belief that there is one national flag and we should all unite under it,” Senator Cash said.
“Formal commonwealth recognition should only be given to flags representing official jurisdictions or government institutions. On the welcome-to-country issue my position is consistent with the motion.
The motions – especially with Senator Cash’s support – signal a push from conservative figures across both the parliamentary party and the lay party for the Liberals to focus on their base.
The Australian revealed this week that the state council would also consider a motion – endorsed by Canning MP Andrew Hastie – for the party to formally abandon net-zero climate targets.
All three motions are expected to pass at Saturday’s meeting.
Mr Dutton had pledged to stand in front of only the Australian flag at his press conferences and had described welcome-to-country and acknowledgment-of-country ceremonies as “overdone”.
Ms Ley began her first major speech as Opposition Leader with an acknowledgement of country, before stating that there was a time and a place for the declarations.
Speaking at the official opening of parliament earlier this week, Ms Ley delivered her own acknowledgment of country and said the welcome to country that preceded her should “set the tone as we re-commit ourselves to the taking of practical action to improve lives and expand opportunity for Indigenous Australians in every part of our great country”.
The welcome-to-country and flag motions are understood to have support from a large group of WA Liberal MPs.
Mr Hastie sells A3-sized ‘Together under one flag’ bin stickers through his website and has questioned the inclusion of welcome to country ceremonies at Anzac Day services.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109419
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23388179 (270808ZJUL25) Notable: Motion to ditch welcome-to-country ceremonies passes WA Liberal state council – A motion passed by the WA Liberal state council calls for the removal of Aboriginal welcome-to-country ceremonies and the exclusion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander flags from official proceedings. Senator Michaelia Cash publicly supported the motion, advocating for unity under the national flag. This position contrasts with Opposition Leader Sussan Ley, who has supported acknowledging country in the right context. A motion to abandon net-zero climate targets also passed, with conservative members expressing concerns over Australia’s energy security.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109418
Motion to ditch welcome-to-country ceremonies passes WA Liberal state council
MARCUS DE BLONK SMITH - July 26, 2025
A motion to scrap welcome-to-country ceremonies and freeze out the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander flags from official proceedings has passed the WA Liberal state council.
The motions demand Aboriginal welcome-to-country speeches be stripped of “official status” and only Commonwealth and state flags appear at government events.
Opposition Senate leader Michaelia Cash was quick to publicly back both motions this week.
Senator Cash said it had been a “long-held belief” of hers that Australians “unite” under one national flag.
“Formal Commonwealth recognition should only be given to flags representing official jurisdictions or government institutions,” she said.
The move puts Senator Cash at odds with Opposition Leader Sussan Ley who has said previously that she is “happy” to stand alongside Aboriginal flags and has backed acknowledgements of country in the right “time and place”.
A motion for the party to formally abandon net-zero climate targets also passed the WA Liberal state council on Saturday.
The move to dump net-zero climate targets was endorsed by Canning MP Andrew Hastie.
It comes as Sussan Ley faces a growing Coalition uprising to dump the party’s net-zero by 2050 policy.
Mr Hastie told The Australian this week that the motion reflected concerns among members over Australia’s energy security.
“It’s understandable and appropriate that our party members have their say on energy policy while it is under review by the federal party room,” he said.
The WA Liberal state council joins South Australia and the Northern Territory in backing a motion to ditch net-zero policy.
According to Liberal Party sources, the motions are the product of the party’s dominant conservative faction attempting “to flex a bit of muscle”.
Moderates within the party, sources say, wanted to avoid the motions.
“They don’t want to talk about those – no question,” the source said.
The welcome-to-country and flag motions were prepared by the party’s policy committee, which is chaired by former federal Liberal candidate Sherry Sufi.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/motion-to-ditch-welcometocountry-ceremonies-passes-wa-liberal-state-council/news-story/902c22920849ded2691ab41d28b24f57
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109420
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23388321 (270925ZJUL25) Notable: ‘We won’t make a decision as a gesture’: Albanese says no imminent move to recognise Palestine – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese rejected calls for Australia to immediately recognise Palestine, stating the decision would be made at the "appropriate time." He condemned Israel's restrictions on aid to Gaza as a breach of international law and morality but said Australia would only recognise Palestine once key conditions, such as the removal of Hamas from power, are met. Former foreign minister Bob Carr and other Labor figures urged quicker recognition, but Albanese emphasized that any recognition should be substantive, not symbolic.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109386
>>109387
>>109407
‘We won’t make a decision as a gesture’: Albanese says no imminent move to recognise Palestine
Matthew Knott - July 27, 2025
1/2
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has accused Israel of breaking international law by restricting the entry of aid into Gaza, while rebuffing calls within the party to quickly recognise Palestinian statehood.
The Israeli military has announced that airdrops of aid will begin in Gaza and humanitarian corridors will be established for United Nations convoys to deliver food after growing international condemnation over starvation in the beleaguered strip.
Albanese told the ABC’s Insiders program on Sunday morning that “quite clearly, it is a breach of international law to stop food being delivered, which was a decision that Israel made in March”.
Albanese added that, while he is not a lawyer, he considers Israeli restrictions on food and other supplies entering Gaza as a “breach of decency, humanity and morality”.
He said that the flood of images of suffering in Gaza - including a severely malnourished one-year-old boy – “just breaks your heart”.
“A one-year-old boy is not a Hamas fighter, and the [scale of] civilian casualties and death in Gaza is completely unacceptable, it’s completely indefensible,” he said.
Albanese said in a statement on Friday that the situation in Gaza “has gone beyond the world’s worst fears” and called on Israel to “comply immediately with its obligations under international law”.
Asked whether he would join French President Emmanuel Macron by recognising Palestine at the United Nations General Assembly in September, Albanese said: “No, we will make a decision at an appropriate time ... Is the time right now? Are we about to imminently do that? No, we are not.”
Albanese indicated that Australia would only recognise Palestine after key conditions, such as the removal of Hamas from power in Gaza, are met.
“We support two states, so some would argue, ‘Well, why don’t you just recognise the state?’” he asked.
“You need to recognise a Palestinian state as part of moving forward. How do you exclude Hamas from any involvement there? How do you ensure that a Palestinian state operates in an appropriate way that does not threaten the existence of Israel?”
He continued: “We won’t do any decision as a gesture. We will do it as a way forward if the circumstances are met.”
Albanese also noted that there had been no elections in Palestine for many years, presenting another hurdle to recognising a Palestinian state.
Former foreign minister Bob Carr, a strong supporter of Palestine, said it was “embarrassing” that Albanese appeared to want to move in unison with the United Kingdom rather than move swiftly to recognise Palestine.
“I can’t think of anything better we could do to improve our standing with crucial neighbours like Indonesia and Malaysia than take action on this issue,” he said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109421
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23388366 (270941ZJUL25) Notable: Inside Australia’s biggest war games, Exercise Talisman Sabre – Thousands of military personnel, including from the US Coast Guard, have converged on Darwin for the nation’s largest war games, Talisman Sabre 2025. This year’s exercise, involving Australian Defence Personnel and the US military, sees a bigger focus on “the enemy,” as concerns rise over threats to Australia. The training takes place in a fictitious country, “Belesia,” with both attack and defence teams. In this iteration, exercises stretch to Papua New Guinea and Christmas Island. The ADF continues to emphasize the peaceful nature of the training, despite China’s surveillance of the exercises.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109320
Inside Australia’s biggest war games, Exercise Talisman Sabre
Cloe Read - JULY 25, 2025
1/2
It’s a sweltering morning in the top end of Australia, where thousands of military personnel have swarmed Darwin’s coastline for the nation’s largest war games.
Members of the US Coast Guard bring reporters through Darwin’s turquoise waters off Larrakeyah Barracks on a fast ride through the security zone.
There’s chatter about the clear differences between how Australia and the US protect their coasts. Military vessels circle the water, a heavy presence as ordinary boaties cruise through.
Further along the coast, a group of soldiers has set up to practise firing. There, they wait for civilian watercraft to pass through, the boaties seemingly unperturbed by the military.
For many Darwin residents, the huge influx of armed forces to the region is not a surprise.
And many of the troops have been here before.
But some say this year’s Talisman Sabre, the 11th iteration of the training exercise comprising mainly Australian Defence Personnel and members of the US military, is different.
There’s a bigger focus on “the enemy”.
Questions swirl in the political bubble about potential threats to Australia.
Talisman Sabre kicked off as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese met with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing.
Albanese has vowed not to back down on security measures, such as taking back control of the Port of Darwin, controversially leased by Chinese firm Landbridge.
Uneasiness hangs in the air in Darwin as journalists ask defence commanders questions regarding China surveilling the war games.
The Chinese have routinely monitored military training from afar in recent years.
Royal Australian Air Force Commander Louise DesJardins tells a media pack that while the ADF keeps an eye on maritime approaches, “at the moment we’re not happy to discuss the surveillance”.
The ADF consistently pushes the message that the war games are not, in fact, targeted at any particular country, and are more for maintaining peace.
US Brigadier-General Shannon Smith, serving with one of Australia’s steadfast allies, points to the massive scope of the region and what he says are the complexities of international relationships.
“I’ve seen nothing but a consistent messaging from our administration and our national defence strategy that we’re committed to a rule-based order across the globe,” he says.
But reporters ask the troops if they feel prepared for war.
Many say they are.
They acknowledge what they’ve learned in previous exercises, sometimes serving on “attack” teams, other times in defence.
This stifling day in Darwin, Mark Hazlett, a captain in the Australian Army’s reserve 31st/42nd Battalion of the Royal Queensland Regiment, is serving in the “enemy” team.
For this exercise, both the attack and defence teams are operating in a fictitious country, “Belesia”.
Strategies employed are “open source, obviously derived from our knowledge of the operation procedures and tactics from world actors”, Hazlett says.
His personnel are tasked with testing the contingencies of the defence team, who represent Australia and its allies.
“That includes having a look at the vulnerabilities, and trying to exploit those as enemy combatants,” he says.
Soldiers get to practise detention, handling skills, vehicle checkpoints, and other tactics with personnel from the US, Britain and Canada. For the first time, the exercises have stretched to Papua New Guinea and Christmas Island.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109422
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23388424 (270957ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Australian Army's new Precision Strike Missile fired at NT's Mount Bundey during Exercise Talisman Sabre – The Australian Army has successfully test-fired its Precision Strike Missile (PrSM) for the first time at Mount Bundey Training Area in the Northern Territory. The missile, launched from High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS), reached its target 300 kilometres away in just over four minutes. Developed for the United States Army, the missile provides Australia with enhanced deterrence capabilities. Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy highlighted the importance of this advancement in strengthening the Indo-Pacific deterrence strategy. This launch took place during the joint military exercise Talisman Sabre 2025, which involves over 40,000 personnel.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109320
Australian Army's new Precision Strike Missile fired at NT's Mount Bundey during Exercise Talisman Sabre
Roxanne Fitzgerald - 27 July 2025
The Australian Army has test fired its newest long-range missile for the first time, launching the weapon from a remote army training base in the Northern Territory.
The Precision Strike Missile (PrSM), which can hit distant targets with minimal warning and high accuracy, was fired from the Mount Bundey Training Area, south-east of Darwin, on Friday.
It hit its target over 300 kilometres away in four minutes and three seconds, reaching speeds of roughly 4,050 kilometres per hour — more than three times the speed of sound.
Fired from US-made High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS), the PrSM can strike targets at distances of up to 500 kilometres with precision — a significant leap from the Australian Army's previous long-range strike range of just 30 kilometres.
At a press conference at Mount Bundey on Friday, Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy said the new weapon marked the day the "Australian Army enters the missile age".
"This is all about extending deterrence in the Indo-Pacific, all about signalling to any potential adversary that pain can be inflicted — all about deterring war through strength," he said.
Developed for the United States Army, the PrSM was sent to Australia last month as part of a $310 million deal with the US.
The deal locks in Australian access to munitions, technological advancements and the option for future domestic manufacturing and maintenance.
The missile launch was conducted as part of Exercise Talisman Sabre, a joint military exercise involving more than 40,000 military personnel from 19 nations, including the US.
This year marks the largest iteration of the exercise since it began in 2005 as a way to practice maritime operations, air combat and live-fire exercises with international partners.
On Friday, the Secretary of the United States Army, Dan Driscoll, was more forthright in his assessment of where the message of deterrence was aimed at.
"President Trump, [the United States Secretary of Defence] Pete Hegseth and the rest of the Pentagon team have been very clear that our pacing threat is China," he said.
"We are actively designing our army so that we are capable of responding to any threat from China."
While the US Army's chief of staff, General Randy George, did not respond directly to questions about an imminent threat, or whether there were enhanced capabilities in China, he said keeping up with technological advancements was "what keeps us up at night".
"What we are trying to do is to transform as rapidly as possible," he said.
Alex Miller, the US Army's chief technology officer, said the PrSM's high speed halved the amount of warning time given to a potential enemy.
He also said while the missile's explosion would not "level a city", its precision, driven by advanced navigation, was what made it lethal.
"When you think about having six to seven minutes rather than 15 to 20 minutes, that's a lot less time for [a target] to pack up and roll out if they learn that they are being shot at," he said.
In a statement from Mr Conroy's office, a spokesperson said future upgrades to the PrSM could include an extended strike range of over 1,000 kilometres, improved sensors and novel warheads.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-26/australia-army-tests-precision-strike-missile-in-mount-bundey-nt/105576916
https://x.com/TalismanSabre/status/1949273606065733863
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109423
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23388478 (271021ZJUL25) Notable: Defence chiefs meet in Darwin as allies wrap-up Talisman Sabre – As Exercise Talisman Sabre concludes its mainland component, Defence chiefs from 17 participating nations have met in Darwin to discuss the exercise’s outcomes. The largest Talisman Sabre since its inception in 2005, the exercise involved 43,000 military personnel, 32 ships, 297 aircraft, and 32 million kilograms of cargo moved across the country. Vice Admiral Justin Jones highlighted the objectives of the exercise, including the value of allies, testing Australia’s military posture, and rehearsing combined joint war fighting. Key participants included personnel from the United States, the UK, New Zealand, and Japan.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109320
Defence chiefs meet in Darwin as allies wrap-up Talisman Sabre
Allies have praised the benefits of Talisman Sabre as Defence chiefs prepare to meet in Darwin.
Camden Smith - July 26, 2025
With the mainland component of Exercise Talisman Sabre wrapping-up ahead of its conclusion in Papua New Guinea next week, Defence top brass have released details of the exercise that was one of the largest of its type in Australia.
Vice Admiral Justin Jones, Australian Defence Force chief of joint operations, said Defence command travelled to Darwin this weekend to participate in a Conclave featuring military top brass from the 17 participating nations, including Australia.
The largest Talisman Sabre since it was first held in 2005 Vice Admiral Jones said at its peak this month, 43,000 ADF and overseas military personnel were in Australia taking part.
Equipment included 32 ships, eight of which were amphibious, an aircraft carrier each from the UK and United States, 297 aircraft that flew 2000 sorites, and also moved 32 million kilograms of cargo around the country. As well, more than 16,000 military passengers were moved around the country.
Vice Admiral Jones said there had been six live fires, including Friday’s Precision Strike Missile (PrSM) launch from Mt Bundey military base to Bradshaw and before that, the US launching a mid-range capability Typhon missile from Bradshaw.
“Talisman Sabre is a tactical field training exercise by nature, but over an extraordinary geographic scale,” Vice Admiral Jones said.
“(It’s) 5300km from Christmas Island in the north-western approaches to Australia through the southern New South Wales coast, where we were doing firings with our Japanese colleagues.”
A “continental scale” activity, he said this year’s exercise had three main objectives.
“The first was the value of allies and partners and the messaging that comes with that,” he said.
“The second was to test our posture, and by that I mean force-flowing those people and assets into the country and around the country.
“Most importantly, combined joint war fighting rehearsal, and we’ve done exactly that across the northeast and north of Australia over the last two weeks.
“Those 19 participants are all like-minded, they’re friends, allies and partners who have a shared vision for our region, if not our world, for a peaceful, stable, prosperous region based on international law.
“It’s clear we live in unstable times, and our own National Defence Strategy made that very point about strategic competition in our region. I’ll leave it to others to judge what has brought 17 nations to Australia, but in my view it’s a willingness to operate with like-mindeds and the value that comes from that.”
Deputy Chief of Joint Operations, Major General Hugh McAslan said 440 New Zealand Defence Force personnel were participating including a frigate, an aviation detachment, a land combat element and pre-existing in-beds around Australia.
“When you look north out of Australia and when you look north out of New Zealand, you see two very different environments,” he said. “Both those environments are absolutely intertwined, into each country’s national interest
“We’re trading nations, we’re maritime nations and we require that rules based system to function for our prosperity. Those interests are pretty common, and that’s what we need for our prosperity for our two countries, but for our region.”
The Exercise Talisman Sabre Conclave involving the chiefs of joint operations or their equivalents from participating defence forces, begins in Darwin and concludes on Monday.
https://www.ntnews.com.au/business/nt-business/defence-chiefs-meet-in-darwin-as-allies-wrapup-talisman-sabre/news-story/3a6a6e78a96c4e391f5c47b8e0651156
https://x.com/hqjoc/status/1948968956917592493
https://x.com/hqjoc/status/1949268226241654871
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109424
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23388521 (271040ZJUL25) Notable: Talisman Sabre -Magic Sword- https://qalerts.pub/?q=Operation+Specialists - https://qalerts.pub/?q=magic''''
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109320
Information Operations:Talisman Sabre’s new advantage takes shape
Major Cameron Jamieson - 24 JULY 2025
Amid the backrooms of Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025, a significant first occurrence is highlighting the trust between the exercise partners.
Twelve partner nations have joined to create the first-ever Multinational Information Operations Centre (MIOC).
Created for the Talisman Sabre exercise series, the MIOC weaves together the complex relationships of national authorities needed to create a cohesive capability.
Information Operations (IO) within the Indo-Pacific area of operation uses information-related capabilities and activities that layer effects while protecting friendly forces and operations.
Ultimately, IO aims to gain a competitive edge by shaping the information environment and influencing perceptions and actions.
With over 80 personnel from 12 nations working in the MIOC, a key achievement has been the integration of the many national perspectives.
Canadian Army planning officer Major Kai Hesser said the MIOC demonstrated the determination of multiple nations to work together.
“This allows us to form a cohesive and unified perspective, and effectively plan information operations,” Major Hesser said.
“Within this one capability, we can address the opinions and concerns of our partners, and demonstrate to an international audience our strategic partnership and resolve.”
Through military manoeuvre and unique specialised capabilities, the MIOC has the ability to project and deliver their multinational effects across vast distances.
Integrated with agreed objectives, the MIOC can be proactive rather than reactive, enabling manoeuvrability in the information space, a domain that is in a constant state of evolution.
The origins of IO predates the introduction of the written word.
Inevitably, all military actions, whether implied or actual, have used information operations to deter military action or give the victor a winning advantage.
In the 21st century, IO uses a diverse range of activities, including cyber, space, operational security, signature management, and electronic magnetic operations to create desired effects.
It is a growth industry, with nations seeking to build their own capabilities as they understand the impacts of IO in contemporary conflicts and during peacetime military operations.
The MIOC’s US Army co-director, Lieutenant Colonel Katherine Redding, said a key feature of the MIOC had been the involvement of global partners, including European nations.
“This creation of the MIOC is a significant achievement, as it has demonstrated the trust that partner nations have to work in an environment that includes unique perspectives and ideas that can be turned into state-of-the-art capabilities and innovative approaches,” Lieutenant Colonel Redding said.
“This global partnership underlines the emerging interest with which IO is taken by professional militaries due the rapid evolution of technology.
“It also addresses the requirement to increase education across the force, so we can identify multinational solutions to persistent threats in the information environment.”
Lieutenant Colonel Redding said information operations were very complex to understand and grasp.
“Every country has their own definitions and understanding of the capability that must be fully coordinated so that it can be properly planned and integrated into all military operations,” she said.
“The movement of forces, their actions, inactions, and their capabilities all tell a story. It’s the MIOC’s responsibility to tell the story that brings all of these events together to create opportunities to project a unified narrative that properly communicates the interest of all the participating countries.”
Australian Army MIOC co-director, Lieutenant Colonel Peter Power, said the success of the MIOC could be found in the diversity of the nations involved.
“Every nation’s unique perspective is allowing us to better understand cultures, interests, and topics that resonate in the information environment,” Lieutenant Colonel Power said.
“The contribution of each nation demonstrates the strength of our partnerships and of our willingness to co-operate.
“We look forward to Exercise Talisman Sabre 27 and the opportunities it will provide.”
https://www.defence.gov.au/news-events/news/2025-07-24/talisman-sabres-new-advantage-takes-shape
>Talisman Sabre
MAGIC SWORD
https://qalerts.pub/?q=Operation+Specialists
https://qalerts.pub/?q=magic
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109425
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23392664 (280941ZJUL25) Notable: NSW premier resists calls for pro-Palestinian 'March for Humanity' on Sydney Harbour Bridge – NSW Premier Chris Minns has opposed a proposed pro-Palestinian march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge, citing concerns over public safety and potential chaos. The Palestine Action Group Sydney planned the march for August 3 to protest the "extraordinary situation" in Gaza, highlighting the impact of Israeli restrictions and humanitarian concerns. Minns argued that the bridge, a critical infrastructure, could not accommodate such a protest without causing significant disruption. The group has called for more time to plan and support the march, while the NSW opposition and police have suggested alternative protest routes.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109264
>>109388
NSW premier resists calls for pro-Palestinian 'March for Humanity' on Sydney Harbour Bridge
Digby Werthmuller - 28 July 2025
The NSW premier has opposed calls for a mass pro-Palestinian march across Sydney Harbour Bridge, saying he "cannot allow Sydney to descend into chaos".
Palestine Action Group Sydney proposed the march for Sunday, August 3, to address the "extraordinary situation" in Gaza.
It said it chose the bridge as "Australia's most iconic symbol" to send a "powerful message to the world".
"Thousands of aid trucks remain stranded at crossings outside Gaza, as Israel starves the Palestinian population," a spokesperson said.
More than 100 humanitarian agencies have warned the strip was facing mass starvation due to Israeli restrictions on essentials and aid.
Palestinian health authorities said 133 people had died from starvation in the last week, including 87 children.
Rallies in support of the Palestinian people have drawn thousands across the country since the Hamas terrorist attacks on Israel on October 7, 2023.
Israel has denied its actions have caused a starvation crisis, and instead blames Hamas for creating the situation.
'Nothing chaotic about people marching for peace'
Premier Chris Minns said the NSW government could not "support the protest of this scale and nature" on the bridge on a week's notice.
"The bridge is one of the most critical pieces of infrastructure in our city — used every day by thousands of people," he said.
"Unplanned disruption risks not only significant inconvenience, but real public safety concerns.
"We cannot allow Sydney to descend into chaos."
Palestine Action Group Sydney said there was "nothing chaotic about people marching for peace, to stop mass starvation".
"If the premier says we need more time to plan such an event, then would he agree to support the 'March for Humanity' a week later?
"We call on NSW authorities to work with us to plan this event and stand on the right side of history."
A spokesperson for the group added it had lodged a form with police for its intentions with the "March for Humanity".
NSW Police said it was aware of the proposed planned assembly and was "consulting relevant stakeholders".
Mr Minns added that the force "were in discussions with organisers about other routes they can take" and were "working to ensure community safety is upheld".
'Plenty' of alternatives, opposition leader says
Opposition Leader Mark Speakman acknowledged the situation was tragic but said the bridge "belongs to everyone".
"I can understand people have sincere and passionate views about what is happening in the Middle East, which whichever way you look at it, it is a tragedy," Mr Speakman said.
"The failure to release hostages is a tragedy, the initial terrorist attack is a tragedy … and what is happening to innocent people in Gaza is a tragedy."
But Mr Speakman said there were "plenty" of alternative ways to protest and "other venues where the protesters can march".
"Absolutely they should not be taking over the harbour bridge," he said.
NSW Greens MP Sue Higginson said on Monday the party endorsed the march and that it was "time for action".
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-28/nsw-pro-palestine-march-sydney-harbour-bridge/105582106
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109426
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23392689 (280953ZJUL25) Notable: Sydney Harbour Bridge protest showdown looms after Chris Minns’ intervention – Premier Chris Minns has opposed a planned pro-Palestinian march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge, citing public safety concerns and the potential for chaos. Palestine Action Group Sydney intends to hold the "March for Humanity" on August 3 to protest the suffering in Gaza. The Premier's opposition has sparked defiance from organizers, with spokesperson Josh Lees saying they would proceed with the march if negotiations fail. While some, including Greens MP Sue Higginson, support the protest, others, like Opposition Leader Mark Speakman, argue that alternative protest locations should be used.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109425
Sydney Harbour Bridge protest showdown looms after Chris Minns’ intervention
JAMES DOWLING - 28 July 2025
1/2
Pro-Palestine activists barred from marching across the Sydney Harbour Bridge by Premier Chris Minns plan to defy any orders should negotiations with the state government and NSW police fall through.
Mr Minns said on Monday that he would block and divert any planned protest on Sydney Harbour Bridge after the Palestine Action Group announced it had requested the state government divert traffic to allow the “March for Humanity” on Sunday, August 3, in protest against “the horrific suffering in Gaza”.
Mr Minns said the NSW government “cannot support a protest of this scale and nature taking place on the Sydney Harbour Bridge, especially with one week’s notice”.
“The bridge is one of the most critical pieces of infrastructure in our city – used every day by thousands of people,” he said.
“Unplanned disruption risks not only significant inconvenience, but real public safety concerns. We cannot allow Sydney to descend into chaos.
“NSW police are in discussions with organisers about other routes they can take and are working to ensure community safety is upheld.”
But Palestine Action Group spokesman Josh Lees told The Australian the march would seek to go ahead regardless, although he did not want to pre-empt negotiations with police.
“Thankfully, it’s not all up to the Premier to decide if the people of NSW can protest,” he said.
Asked if protesters would march if negotiations failed, he said: “Yes, but it’s premature to discuss that. We still haven’t heard from the police.”
Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chair Alex Ryvchin said the protest would be “sullying another Australian icon” and urged the state government to stand firm.
“These very sorts of protests brought such shame and disgrace to our city at the foot of one of our other iconic landmarks not so long ago,” Mr Ryvchin said. “These protesters disgraced our country at the Opera House and dealt a blow to Australian decency from which we’re still reeling. The Premier is right to stop them from sullying another Australian icon.
“The last thing we need is another spectacle like that.
“We’ve seen the tenor, the mood, the slogans of these protests become progressively more aggressive, more vitriolic, more hateful and more unlawful in many cases. So, with this plan to take place here on our Harbour Bridge, there’s every chance that things will escalate further.
“This is one of our most iconic landmarks. It’s the beating heart of our city. We don’t need it sullied with this extremism that’s been ripping our society apart.
“Australians are sick of the cost, the disruptions and the extremism that come from these protests. This is the time to enforce our laws and ensure our city is open to everyone.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109427
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23392708 (280959ZJUL25) Notable: Bill to criminalise AI child abuse apps to be introduced to parliament – Independent MP Kate Chaney will introduce a bill criminalising the use of AI tools designed to create child sexual abuse material. The bill responds to the urgent need for legislation, as current laws fail to address the use of AI in generating illegal material. The proposed bill creates offences for downloading or distributing such tools, with penalties of up to 15 years in prison. Ms Chaney argues that these tools allow for the on-demand creation of abuse material, making police work more challenging and increasing risks for children.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Bill to criminalise AI child abuse apps to be introduced to parliament
Jake Evans - 28 July 2025
1/2
A bill to criminalise the use of AI tools purpose-built to create child sexual abuse material is set to be introduced to parliament.
Independent MP Kate Chaney, who will introduce the bill, says the urgent issue cannot wait for the government's wider response to artificial intelligence.
While it is an offence to possess or share child abuse material, there is no criminal prohibition on downloading or distributing the wave of emerging AI generators designed to create the illegal material.
The tools are becoming easier to access online, with some of the most popular visited millions of times.
Their spread is diverting police resources and allowing material to be created offline, where it is harder to track.
A roundtable convened last week to address the issue recommended swift action to make the tools illegal, prompting Ms Chaney's bill.
"[This] clearly needs to be done urgently and I can't see why we need to wait to respond to this really significant and quite alarming issue," Ms Chaney said.
"I recognise the challenges of regulating AI — the technology is changing so fast it's hard to even come up with a workable definition of AI — but while we are working on that holistic approach, there are gaps in our existing legislation we can plug to address the highest-risk-use cases like this, so we can continue to build trust in AI."
Ms Chaney said she had met with Attorney-General Michelle Rowland's office, who she said recognised there was a gap in the law.
Tools enable 'on-demand, unlimited' abuse material, Chaney warns
The MP for Curtin's bill would create a new offence for using a carriage service to download, access, supply or facilitate technologies that are designed to create child abuse material.
A new offence for scraping or distributing data with the intention of training or creating those tools would also be created.
The offences would carry a maximum 15-year term of imprisonment.
A public defence would be available for law enforcement, intelligence agencies and others with express authorisation to be able to investigate child abuse cases.
"There are a few reasons we need this," Ms Chaney said.
"These tools enable the on-demand, unlimited creation of this type of material, which means perpetrators can train AI tools with images of a particular child, delete the offending material so they can't be detected, and then still be able to generate material with word prompts.
"It also makes police work more challenging. It is [getting] harder to identify real children who are victims.
"And every AI abuse image starts with photos of a real child, so a child is harmed somewhere in the process."
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109428
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23392738 (281005ZJUL25) Notable: Hong Kong police issue arrest warrants for foreign nationals including Australian citizen Feng Chongyi – Hong Kong police have issued arrest warrants for 19 foreign nationals, including Australian citizen Feng Chongyi, accusing them of national security crimes. The individuals, involved in pro-democracy activities, are part of what the police call a "subversive organisation" named Hong Kong Parliament. Feng, a vocal critic of China, dismissed the warrant as "ridiculous," stating it reflected the loss of Hong Kong's autonomy under Chinese rule. Australia has strongly condemned the warrants, with Foreign Minister Penny Wong reaffirming Australia's objections to Hong Kong's national security laws.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109321
>>109337
>>109397
Hong Kong police issue arrest warrants for foreign nationals including Australian citizen Feng Chongyi
Georgia Roberts and Gavin Coote - 26 Jul 2025
An Australian man has discovered he is wanted by Hong Kong authorities via messaging platform WhatsApp.
Feng Chongyi is among 19 foreign nationals who Hong Kong police have imposed bounties on, accusing them of national security crimes.
According to Hong Kong police, the activists, who also include UK citizens, worked for what the force called a "subversive organisation" named Hong Kong Parliament, a pro-democracy non-government group.
A reward of $HK200,000 ($38,000) each has been offered for 15 of the activists, while the four others were already wanted for $HK1 million ($194,038).
The 19 arrest warrants for the activists follow political unrest and ongoing, at times violent, protests in Hong Kong, which have quietened since Beijing imposed sweeping national security laws in 2020.
Dr Feng, who in 2017 was detained in China for a week and interrogated by authorities, described the arrest warrant as "ridiculous".
But he said he did "not take it as a big deal" because he did not plan to return to mainland China or Hong Kong.
"This action shows the world the brutality of the Chinese communist regime. It also reminds the world that Hong Kong has been completely controlled by China," he said.
"The autonomy is gone, basic liberties protected by law [are] gone, they've completely destroyed a beautiful city — it's so sad."
While Dr Feng is not originally from Hong Kong, he has been heavily involved in pro-democracy efforts, with local authorities citing his participation in a Hong Kong electoral organising committee as the reason for his arrest warrant.
In an annex by the Hong Kong Police Force, authorities accused him of "intent to overthrow the system of the People's Republic of China".
Dr Feng — a friend of imprisoned Australian writer Yang Hengjun, who is awaiting a death sentence in China — said he had joined the organising committee because he has many friends in Hong Kong who want democracy.
He said he was relieved Australia's extradition treaty with Hong Kong was currently suspended.
Australia strongly objects to arrest warrants
Condemnation of the arrest warrants has poured in from politicians.
Australian Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong took to social media platform X (formerly Twitter) to voice her strong objection to the warrants for pro-democracy Australian activists.
"Freedom of expression and assembly are essential to our democracy," Senator Wong said.
"We have consistently expressed our strong objections to China and Hong Kong on the broad and extraterritorial application of Hong Kong's national security legislation, and we will continue to do so"
Opposition spokesperson for foreign affairs, Michaelia Cash, said the Coalition had serious concerns about Hong Kong authorities' issuing of arrest warrants.
"We fundamentally believe in free speech. It is an essential element of our democracy," she said in a statement.
UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy, who is currently in Australia, said this sort of interference in UK affairs was "totally, totally unacceptable".
"We will stand up to it, as you would expect us to," he told a crowd in Sydney, during an address at the Lowy Institute on Saturday.
According to reporting by Agence France-Presse, the bounties announced by Hong Kong police are viewed as largely symbolic, as those affected live overseas in nations unlikely to extradite political activists to Hong Kong or China.
According to the Hong Kong Police Force's website, as of Friday, there were 34 people wanted by the agency for national security offences, including secession, subversion, or foreign collusion.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-26/australian-citizens-wanted-by-hong-kong-authorities-feng-chongyi/105576958
https://www.police.gov.hk/ppp_en/06_appeals_public/nsc/index.html
https://www.police.gov.hk/ppp_en/06_appeals_public/nsc/detail.html?id=20250002
https://x.com/SenatorWong/status/1948899044505649620
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109429
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23392743 (281008ZJUL25) Notable: HKSAR govt opposes smears of US, Canada and Australia against lawful enforcement actions on 19 individuals linked to subversive organization – "The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) on Sunday strongly opposed and disapproved of smears with distorted facts by government officials and politicians from countries like the US, Canada and Australia, as well as anti-China organizations, on HKSAR's lawful act to pursue wanted persons endangering national security absconding from Hong Kong... Absconders should not think they can evade criminal liability by absconding from Hong Kong. Ultimately, they will be liable for their acts constituting serious offences endangering national security and be punished by the law." – The Global Times.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109428
HKSAR govt opposes smears of US, Canada and Australia against lawful enforcement actions on 19 individuals linked to subversive organization
Global Times - Jul 27, 2025
The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) on Sunday strongly opposed and disapproved of smears with distorted facts by government officials and politicians from countries like the US, Canada and Australia, as well as anti-China organizations, on HKSAR's lawful act to pursue wanted persons endangering national security absconding from Hong Kong.
Not only did such foreign government officials and politicians, as well as anti-China organizations, turned a blind eye to illegal acts of criminals, but also deliberately smeared and spread irresponsible remarks, in an attempt to mislead the public, about the measures and actions taken by the HKSAR government in accordance with the law, read the statement released by the HKSAR government on Sunday.
The National Security Department of the Hong Kong Police Force issued wanted notices on Friday for 19 individuals involved in subversive organization "Hong Kong Parliament," including wanted fugitives Yuan Gongyi and Ho Leung-mau Victor for suspected of violating the national security law for Hong Kong.
The HKSAR government's Sunday statement was made in response to irresponsible remarks made by countries including the US, Canada and Australia, which attempted to smear the arrest warrant.
The statement said the Hong Kong Police Force has the responsibility to pursue, in accordance with the law, persons suspected of committing offences under the Hong Kong National Security Law (HKNSL) outside Hong Kong.
In the statement, the HKSAR government spokesman emphasized, "Absconders should not think they can evade criminal liability by absconding from Hong Kong. Ultimately, they will be liable for their acts constituting serious offences endangering national security and be punished by the law. No country or organization should harbor criminals nor try to exonerate these people with different excuses."
"The Constitution and the Basic Law steadfastly safeguard the rights and freedoms enjoyed by Hong Kong people. Any attempt by foreign countries or external forces to undermine Hong Kong's situation will only expose their own weakness and faulty arguments and be doomed to fail. The HKSAR Government will continue to unwaveringly discharge its duty in safeguarding national security," the spokesman said via statement.
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202507/1339389.shtml
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109430
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23392787 (281022ZJUL25) Notable: UK to China: Britain will be a strong military presence in the Indo-Pacific with our Australian allies – UK officials, including Foreign Secretary David Lammy and Defence Secretary John Healey, have committed Britain to upholding international laws in the Indo-Pacific, emphasizing defence cooperation with Australia. At Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025, the UK highlighted its military presence and support for the AUKUS partnership, sending its aircraft carrier to Australia for joint exercises. This move reinforces the UK’s pledge to support freedom, security, and prosperity in the region, despite growing concerns over Chinese aggression. Lammy and Healey stressed that these efforts are vital in countering global threats and maintaining peace.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109316
>>109405
>>109224
>>109320
UK to China: Britain will be a strong military presence in the Indo-Pacific with our Australian allies
GEOFF CHAMBERS and RICHARD FERGUSON - 27 July 2025
1/2
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s top security officials have declared Britain will always uphold “international laws that protect our way of life” in the Indo-Pacific, amid concerns over rising Chinese aggression and military expansion, as they elevate defence, AUKUS nuclear submarines and military technology as “bedrocks” of the relationship with Australia.
Joining more than 3000 British armed forces personnel on Sunday in the Northern Territory, where 35,000 troops from 19 countries are participating in Exercise Talisman Sabre, British Foreign Secretary David Lammy and Defence Secretary John Healey warned that “conflicts and aggressive autocracies” are on the rise.
The senior UK Labour ministers also committed Britain to “always stand as the closest of allies (with Australia)” to defend freedom, prosperity and the rules-based order.
In a move that will draw the ire of Beijing, Britain has sent one of its carrier groups to dock in Australia for the first time in decades, with the $6bn-plus aircraft carrier HMS Prince of Wales conducting exercises with Australian and US defence personnel and pilots.
As Exercise Talisman Sabre is closely monitored by Xi Jinping’s People’s Liberation Army, Mr Lammy and Mr Healey have written in The Australian that the largest ever Australia and US-led defence exercise ensured soldiers from different countries could “work together … in a massive display of military deterrence”.
Mr Lammy and Mr Healey, who were in Darwin with Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Defence Minister Richard Marles after holding formal AUKMIN talks in Sydney on Friday, wrote that “in today’s increasingly volatile world, with conflicts and aggressive autocracies on the rise, partnerships between like-minded democracies are vital for protecting our shared values and way of life”.
“The UK’s huge presence in this (Talisman Sabre) exercise was made possible by our carrier strike group visiting Darwin. A formidable formation of naval and air assets demonstrating the power of alliances – with warships from Canada, Norway, Spain and New Zealand. These exercises aren’t just symbolic. They strengthen regional stability and improve our forces’ ability to act together,” Mr Lammy and Mr Healey wrote.
“Our security co-operation doesn’t end there. We’re extending our naval personnel exchange program to include more personnel and more vessels. Our Five Eyes relationship keeps us safe through world-leading intelligence sharing. And we continue to jointly train Ukrainian armed forces, while UK personnel are set to serve aboard Australian Wedgetail aircraft that will monitor Ukrainian supply lines.
“From the battlefields of northern Europe to the frontlines of Korea and Afghanistan, our two nations have stood together when it mattered most. Today, we face a new era of threat, which demands a new era of Australian-British partnership.”
With the British government moving over the weekend to support the AUKUS pact for “50 years” despite a Trump administration review into the agreement, Mr Lammy and Mr Healey’s comments are the latest sign of a cooling attitude towards China across Europe.
Mr Healey on Sunday said the high volume of British trade going through the Pacific and his belief that the British military should be “NATO first, but not NATO only” were also key factors in Britain’s increasing focus on the region. “We secure peace through strength,” he said in Darwin.
Just a week after Anthony Albanese spent six days in China trying to grow ties with Mr Xi and promote more trade with China, Mr Marles in Darwin said the Talisman Sabre exercises showed there were not “multipolar” world orders, but one set of global rules.
“This is an exercise which is about – from an Australian national interest point of view – building Australian capability,” he said. “And we really appreciate the presence of the UK here. Obviously, the Prince of Wales being here.
“I guess what comes to mind, in a sense, is the words of (French) President (Emmanuel) Macron recently when he was speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue. And he said there’s not multiple world rules-based orders – there is one rules-based order. And it applies right round the world. And all of us are engaged in upholding the rules-based order. We live in a global community.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109431
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23392811 (281030ZJUL25) Notable: An old friendship is ready for new era of security threats – "In today’s increasingly volatile world, with conflicts and aggressive autocracies on the rise, partnerships between like-minded democracies are vital for protecting our shared values and way of life. Australia and the UK enjoy a strong and growing trade and investment relationship, worth close to $50bn annually. ... But it is defence that remains the bedrock of our relationship. Our AUKUS partnership with the United States is our most strategically significant defence agreement in generations, and last week we took decisive steps to fast-track delivery. ... These exercises aren’t just symbolic. They strengthen regional stability and improve our forces’ ability to act together." – David Lammy and John Healey, The Australian
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109405
>>109224
>>109320
>>109430
COMMENTARY: An old friendship is ready for new era of security threats
David Lammy and John Healey - 27 July 2025
As the Wallabies and Lions battle tooth and nail on the pitch, we are in Australia signing agreements that will make both nations more secure and prosperous.
In today’s increasingly volatile world, with conflicts and aggressive autocracies on the rise, partnerships between like-minded democracies are vital for protecting our shared values and way of life. Australia and the UK enjoy a strong and growing trade and investment relationship, worth close to $50bn annually.
We’re bringing the expertise gained from building London’s award-winning Elizabeth Line to Sydney’s Metro renewal.
We’ve agreed to deepen co-operation on industrial policy, global free trade, artificial intelligence and cyber security to further boost and protect our economies – our high-level meeting between foreign and defence ministers.
AUKMIN was first set up in 2006 when Tony Blair was prime minister and we were both ministers early in our careers. Since then, our relationship has gone from strength to strength.
But it is defence that remains the bedrock of our relationship. Our AUKUS partnership with the United States is our most strategically significant defence agreement in generations, and last week we took decisive steps to fast-track delivery.
We re-established the Defence Industry Dialogue to boost military technology development and strengthen procurement.
And most significantly, we’ve signed the Treaty of Geelong to bolster AUKUS and accelerate delivery of the SSN-AUKUS fleet of nuclear-powered, conventionally armed submarines.
SSN-AUKUS will be the largest, most advanced, most powerful attack submarines ever operated by either the Royal Australian Navy or Royal Navy. They will help us protect our vital trade routes and sovereign borders, and support thousands of jobs in Australia and the UK.
Just as it strengthens our collective security, our investment in AUKUS will be an engine for growth across our two nations. It is creating 10,000 jobs in Adelaide, 3000 in Perth, and thousands more in supply chains across the country.
While we’ve been strengthening our political and economic ties in recent days, our armed forces have been training side by side across Australia.
More than 3000 UK personnel are taking part in Exercise Talisman Sabre, the largest military exercise ever staged in Australia, with a total of 35,000 personnel from 19 nations sharpening their ability to work together, in a massive display of military deterrence.
The UK’s huge presence in this exercise was made possible by our Carrier Strike Group visiting Darwin. A formidable formation of naval and air assets demonstrating the power of alliances – with warships from Canada, Norway, Spain and New Zealand.
These exercises aren’t just symbolic. They strengthen regional stability and improve our forces’ ability to act together.
And our security co-operation doesn’t end there. We’re extending our naval personnel exchange program to include more personnel and more vessels. Our Five Eyes relationship keeps us safe through world-leading intelligence sharing. And we continue to jointly train the Ukrainian armed forces, while UK personnel are set to serve aboard Australian Wedgetail aircraft that will monitor Ukrainian supply lines.
From the battlefields of northern Europe to the frontlines of Korea and Afghanistan, our two nations have stood together when it mattered most. Today, we face a new era of threat, which demands a new era of Australian-British partnership.
Through AUKUS, through our Carrier Strike Group deployment and through strengthened military co-operation, our nations are leading efforts to maintain a free and open Indo-Pacific and uphold the international laws that protect our way of life.
Our alliance will deliver the “defence dividend” that sits alongside our strengthened security: creating high-skilled jobs and world-leading technologies, and reinvigorating our proud industrial base in both nations.
We will always remain fierce sporting competitors, and we will always stand as the closest of allies: defending our freedoms, our prosperity, and the rules-based international order that underpins both.
David Lammy is UK Foreign Secretary and John Healey is UK Defence Secretary.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/an-old-friendship-is-ready-for-new-era-of-security-threats/news-story/ff6f2a0a00b3041cb0c7386f18fc27f8
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109432
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23392847 (281040ZJUL25) Notable: Talisman Sabre Tweets: - We have reached the end of the Australian component of EXTS25 as activities now move to Papua New Guinea. This is the first time that a component of Exercise Talisman Sabre has been hosted outside of Australia and will conclude with a closing ceremony on 4 August. We thank all those who have participated to date and supported Talisman Sabre 25 and we look forward to seeing you all at Talisman Sabre 27. #ts25 #talismansabre #talismansabre25 #YourADF #StrongerTogether
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109320
Talisman Sabre Tweets
We have reached the end of the Australian component of EXTS25 as activities now move to Papua New Guinea.
This is the first time that a component of Exercise Talisman Sabre has been hosted outside of Australia and will conclude with a closing ceremony on 4 August.
https://x.com/TalismanSabre/status/1949420479930110206
—
We thank all those who have participated to date and supported Talisman Sabre 25 and we look forward to seeing you all at Talisman Sabre 27.
#ts25 #talismansabre #talismansabre25 #YourADF #StrongerTogether
https://x.com/TalismanSabre/status/1949420489656717648
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109433
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23392867 (281046ZJUL25) Notable: Video: ADF | Talisman Sabre 2025 - Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025 is being conducted across Australia from 13 July to 04 August. More than 40,000 military personnel from 19 nations will participate in Talisman Sabre 2025, primarily in Queensland but also in Western Australia, the Northern Territory, New South Wales, and for the first time, offshore activities will be conducted in Papua New Guinea. Talisman Sabre is the largest Australia-US bilaterally planned, multilaterally conducted exercise and a key opportunity to work with likeminded partners from across the region and around the world. Canada, France, Fiji, Germany, India, Indonesia, Japan, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Republic of Korea, Singapore, Thailand, Tonga the United Kingdom are all participating in Talisman Sabre 2025. Occurring every two years, Talisman Sabre reflects the closeness of our alliance and strength of our enduring military relationship with the United States and also our commitment to working with likeminded partners in the region. Now in its eleventh iteration, Talisman Sabre provides an opportunity to exercise our combined capabilities to conduct high-end, multi-domain warfare, to build and affirm our military-to-military ties and interoperability, and strengthen our strategic partnerships. - Defence Australia
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109320
>>109432
ADF | Talisman Sabre 2025
Defence Australia
Jul 28, 2025
Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025 is being conducted across Australia from 13 July to 04 August.
More than 40,000 military personnel from 19 nations will participate in Talisman Sabre 2025, primarily in Queensland but also in Western Australia, the Northern Territory, New South Wales, and for the first time, offshore activities will be conducted in Papua New Guinea.
Talisman Sabre is the largest Australia-US bilaterally planned, multilaterally conducted exercise and a key opportunity to work with likeminded partners from across the region and around the world.
Canada, France, Fiji, Germany, India, Indonesia, Japan, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Republic of Korea, Singapore, Thailand, Tonga the United Kingdom are all participating in Talisman Sabre 2025.
Occurring every two years, Talisman Sabre reflects the closeness of our alliance and strength of our enduring military relationship with the United States and also our commitment to working with likeminded partners in the region.
Now in its eleventh iteration, Talisman Sabre provides an opportunity to exercise our combined capabilities to conduct high-end, multi-domain warfare, to build and affirm our military-to-military ties and interoperability, and strengthen our strategic partnerships.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fEcnHy_IFQI
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109434
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23395092 (282041ZJUL25) Notable: An old friendship is ready for new era of security threats – "In today’s increasingly volatile world, with conflicts and aggressive autocracies on the rise, partnerships between like-minded democracies are vital for protecting our shared values and way of life. Australia and the UK enjoy a strong and growing trade and investment relationship, worth close to $50bn annually. ... But it is defence that remains the bedrock of our relationship. Our AUKUS partnership with the United States is our most strategically significant defence agreement in generations, and last week we took decisive steps to fast-track delivery. ... These exercises aren’t just symbolic. They strengthen regional stability and improve our forces’ ability to act together." – David Lammy and John Healey, The Australian
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109431
Australia, UK to Sign 50-Year Treaty for Nuclear Submarines
By Swati Pandey Bloomberg July 25, 2025
Jul 24, 2025 (Bloomberg) –Australia and the UK will sign a landmark 50-year defense treaty on Saturday to underpin the construction of nuclear-powered submarines, senior ministers said following high-level talks in Sydney.
Framed as the most consequential bilateral agreement since Australia’s Federation in 1901, the pact underscores deepening defense ties between the historic partners against a backdrop of mounting global geopolitical volatility.
Both sides stressed that the treaty doesn’t impact the Aukus security partnership between Australia, the UK and the US — currently under review by the Trump administration.
Instead, the bilateral agreement, which will be signed in Geelong near Melbourne, “will very much underpin the development of Aukus,” Australia’s Defense Minister Richard Marles told a press conference next to Sydney Harbor on Friday. “It is a profoundly important treaty that we will sign tomorrow.”
Friday’s meeting is part of the Australia-United Kingdom Ministerial Consultations (AUKMIN). Marles and Foreign Minister Penny Wong are hosting UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy and Defence Secretary John Healey.
The deal is expected to be worth up to £20 billion ($27 billion) to the UK in exports over the next 25 years, the UK’s Foreign Office said in a statement on Friday.
The Times of London reported that under the deal, the UK will build up to a dozen attack submarines with both the Royal Navy and the Australian Navy operating the SSN-Aukus. It said the agreement is part of an effort to persuade the US to stick with the Aukus accord.
More than 21,000 people will work on the conventionally armed, nuclear-powered Aukus submarine program in the UK at its peak, the Foreign Office said. “This historic Treaty confirms our AUKUS commitment for the next half century,” Healey was quoted in the statement as saying.
Under the Aukus agreement signed in 2021, the US and the UK agreed to collaborate on providing Australia with a fleet of nuclear-powered submarines to ramp up Canberra’s defense capabilities in the face of growing strategic competition with China in the Indo-Pacific.
Both sides said they welcomed the US review as a chance to renew the Trump administration’s commitment to Aukus.
“We’re really confident about the progress of the Aukus project and the progress in respect of all three countries,” Marles said.
Under the terms of Aukus, Washington is initially due to sell a fleet of Virginia-class submarines to Canberra, with the first vessels expected to arrive in the early 2030s. The UK and Australia will then collaborate on designing and building a new model of nuclear-powered submarines known as the SSN-Aukus, with the first expected to be ready in the early 2040s.
However, the Pentagon has launched a review of the pact as the Trump administration looks to shift more responsibility to allies and ensure the US’s supply of warships. The review is aimed at making sure that allies contribute more to collective security and that America’s defense industrial base can meet its domestic needs.
On Sunday, the Australian and British defense and foreign ministers will visit the northern city of Darwin to observe the deployment of a UK Carrier Strike Group as part of Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025.
https://gcaptain.com/australia-uk-to-sign-50-year-treaty-for-nuclear-submarines/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109435
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23397867 (290945ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Donald Trump drops another tariff bombshell that may hit Australia – US President Donald Trump has threatened to raise the baseline tariff rate on all US imports to “somewhere in the 15-20 per cent range,” ramping up pressure on the Albanese government to avoid even higher tariffs. Trade Minister Don Farrell reaffirmed Australia’s position, calling any tariffs unjustified and an act of economic self-harm. Health Minister Mark Butler pointed to volatility in US trade talks, particularly regarding pharmaceuticals. Trump confirmed he would soon notify countries of their new “world tariff” rate, which could impact Australian trade.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109274
>>109279
>>109280
Donald Trump drops another tariff bombshell that may hit Australia
NOAH YIM - 29 July 2025
US President Donald Trump has threatened to raise the baseline tariff rate on all US imports to “somewhere in the 15-20 per cent range”, dialling up pressure on the Albanese government to avoid being hit with even higher tariffs.
The government has pledged to stay the course in its diplomatic approach to tariffs.
“Our position is unchanged – any tariffs on Australian goods are unjustified and an act of economic self-harm,” a spokesman for Trade Minister Don Farrell said.
“We will continue to engage at all levels to advocate for the removal of all tariffs, in line with our free-trade agreement with the United States.”
Health Minister Mark Butler portrayed the latest threat as another update in volatile US trade talks, including in his own portfolio area, where the US has expressed grievances with the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.
“The nature of some of these trade positions from the US administration – I’ve found that the position in relation to pharmaceuticals has changed a lot over the last couple of weeks – the nature, the timing, the scale of tariffs that might be imposed not just on Australia but on pharmaceutical imports to the US from anywhere in the world,” Mr Butler told ABC Radio National.
“So we’re trying to make sure that we have a sense of what the US administration is planning but continuing nonetheless to prosecute Australia’s national interest and reinforce the importance of free trade between our two countries which we’ve enjoyed since the free-trade agreement for more than 20 years.”
Mr Trump in Scotland said the tariff rate would be “somewhere in the 15-20 per cent range”.
“Probably one of those two numbers,” the President said.
He said he would soon notify countries of their new “world tariff” rate.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/donald-trump-drops-another-tariff-bombshell-that-may-hit-australia/news-story/2c328377cf925acc5678bbb81bc74927
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VwIMaFTo99g
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109436
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23397881 (290953ZJUL25) Notable: Government scrambling for details after Trump threatens higher tariffs – Australian officials are scrambling to determine whether exports to the US will face tariffs of up to 20 per cent after US President Donald Trump's recent move to raise tariffs. Opposition leader Sussan Ley criticized Prime Minister Albanese for failing to secure a meeting with Trump, while Trade Minister Don Farrell reiterated Australia's stance against unjustified tariffs. Trump has hinted at a “world tariff” rate of 15-20 per cent but has not specified which countries will be affected. The Albanese government continues to engage with US counterparts, hoping to avoid an increase in tariffs before Trump’s August 1 deadline.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/23372922
>>109435
Government scrambling for details after Trump threatens higher tariffs
Natassia Chrysanthos - July 29, 2025
1/2
Australian officials are scrambling to identify whether exports to the United States will be hit with tariffs of up to 20 per cent after Donald Trump’s move to increase import taxes sparked renewed focus on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s inability to secure a meeting with the president.
Trump’s indication he would impose tariffs between 15 and 20 per cent within days increases the political pressure on Albanese, who is yet to secure a face-to-face meeting with Trump or an exemption to the current 10 per cent tariffs on Australian goods entering the US.
Opposition leader Sussan Ley accused Albanese of being a “bystander” to the situation on Tuesday, as senior members of the government either downplayed the risk of a tariff increase or insisted Australia was continuing to engage closely with US counterparts.
“The government seems to be shrugging its shoulders as if there is nothing they can do to address the tariff situation,” Ley said.
“It is not good enough that all these months after Donald Trump became president … the vital meeting between Anthony Albanese and the president has not taken place.”
Trump floated his desire for a single tariff rate for the “rest of the world” at a press conference in Scotland on Monday (UK time), having recently announced trade deals with major economies, including Japan and the European Union.
While Trump did not name Australia as one of the countries to incur the higher tariff range, he made it clear he would not negotiate individual deals with all the remaining countries.
Australian exports are subject to a 10 per cent “baseline” tariff under a White House decision earlier this year, separate to higher tariffs on steel and aluminium. The Albanese government is seeking to avoid higher tariffs, but there has been no sign the countries will reach a deal before Trump’s August 1 deadline.
“It’s a matter of wait and see,” a senior Australian official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. Asked whether the government was expecting a 10, 15 or 20 per cent tariff, the official said: “We haven’t had that level of engagement.”
A spokesman for Trade Minister Don Farrell said Australia maintained its position that any tariffs on Australian goods were unjustified, against the countries’ free trade agreement, and an act of economic self-harm for the US.
Coalition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan said the latest developments underscored the significance of Albanese’s failure to secure an in-person meeting with Trump.
“He needs to go over there and … argue Australia’s case, but also to stand up for free trade across the globe, because the importance of it for us as a trading nation,” he said on Sky News.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109437
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23397893 (291002ZJUL25) Notable: ‘Age, health’: Trump seeks urgent evidence from Murdoch in Epstein case – US President Donald Trump’s lawyers are seeking an urgent deposition from Rupert Murdoch in a defamation case related to Jeffrey Epstein, citing the media mogul’s age and health concerns. Trump is suing Murdoch, News Corp, and others over a 2003 birthday letter allegedly written by Trump for Epstein, which Trump denies. The lawsuit seeks $US10 billion in damages, with Trump’s legal team arguing that Murdoch’s involvement in editorial decisions and his recent health issues warrant expedited testimony. Murdoch, 94, resides over 100 miles from the court, raising concerns about his availability for trial.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109289
>>109355
>>109357
>>109358
‘Age, health’: Trump seeks urgent evidence from Murdoch in Epstein case
Michael Koziol - July 29, 2025
Washington: US President Donald Trump’s lawyers are seeking an urgent deposition from Rupert Murdoch in the president’s Jeffrey Epstein-related defamation case against News Corp due to the media mogul’s advanced age.
A motion filed in court notes Murdoch is 94, has suffered several health setbacks and lives more than 160 kilometres from the Florida court where the defamation suit has been lodged, making it likely he would be “unavailable for in-person testimony at trial”.
Murdoch should provide the deposition within 15 days, Trump’s lawyers argue.
Trump is suing Murdoch, News Corp, chief executive Robert Thomson and two reporters from The Wall Street Journal over a July 18 story that claimed he signed a birthday letter and drawing for Epstein’s 50th birthday in 2003. Trump denies writing the letter or drawing the picture.
Epstein pleaded guilty to procuring a minor for prostitution in a 2008 plea deal and died awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges in 2019. The president was friends with Epstein in the 1990s but says the two fell out in the 2000s, and denies any knowledge of Epstein’s crimes.
In the motion filed on Tuesday (AEST), Trump’s lawyers say the president spoke directly with Murdoch after being approached by one of the Journal’s reporters about the story before publication.
According to the filing, Trump told Murdoch the letter was “fake”, and Murdoch advised the president that “he would take care of it” – but the paper published the story.
The filing says Trump was left with the impression that Murdoch – who is now chairman emeritus of News Corp, but not an executive – would contact people at the newspaper.
Murdoch is “widely known for having a hands-on approach over editorial decisions related to News Corp’s periodicals”, it says.
It goes on to say that Murdoch’s direct involvement “further underscores [the] defendants’ actual malice and intent behind the decision to publish the false, defamatory, disparaging, and inflammatory statements about President Trump”.
The lawyers also note Murdoch’s age and reported health issues. They cite a story by the UK Telegraph that reported he collapsed during a breakfast with News UK chief executive Rebekah Brooks in London in 2023 – among other recent ailments.
“Murdoch’s age and health warrant conducting his deposition on an expedited basis,” the lawyers argue. “[He] recently turned 94 years old and has suffered, but thankfully overcome, multiple health issues throughout his life.
“Moreover, upon information and belief, Murdoch resides in New York, New York, which is well over 100 miles from this district. Thus, it is presumable, both because of his age and health and/or his distance from this court, that Murdoch will be unavailable for trial.”
Dow Jones, the News Corp subsidiary that publishes the Journal, was contacted for comment. The company has previously said it has full confidence in the rigour and accuracy of the story and will vigorously defend any lawsuit.
Trump is seeking $US10 billion ($15 billion) in damages, punitive damages, court costs and other relief for what his lawyers say was a “concocted” story aimed at maligning the president’s character and integrity.
The Journal reported Trump’s letter was written inside the outline of a naked woman, and appeared in a book that Epstein’s friend and accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell compiled for the disgraced financier’s 50th birthday. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence for conspiring with Epstein to sexually exploit and abuse girls.
The newspaper did not publish a photo of the book but said it had “reviewed” the letter in question. It later reported former president Bill Clinton and billionaire investor Leon Black also contributed to the book.
Trump is facing a significant backlash from his MAGA supporters and Republicans in Congress about his administration’s failure to release - as promised - more documents related to the investigation of Epstein.
https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/age-health-trump-seeks-urgent-evidence-from-murdoch-in-epstein-case-20250729-p5miig.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109438
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23397904 (291009ZJUL25) Notable: PM brands Israel’s denial of starvation reports in Gaza ‘beyond comprehension’ – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has condemned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s claim that there is no starvation in Gaza, calling it “beyond comprehension.” Albanese criticized Israel’s role in restricting media access and said claims of no starvation were part of Hamas’ propaganda. While Albanese continues to oppose Hamas’ control of Gaza, he indicated that the region could eventually be freed from their rule, paving the way for Palestinian state recognition. The remarks come amid ongoing conflict and international disputes over humanitarian conditions in Gaza.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109386
>>109407
>>109420
PM brands Israel’s denial of starvation reports in Gaza ‘beyond comprehension’
Paul Sakkal - July 29, 2025
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has signalled he believes Gaza will be freed from Hamas’ rule, paving the way for recognition of a Palestinian state, as he slammed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s claims that Gazans are not starving.
Asked by pro-Palestine backbencher Ed Husic on the timeline for Australia to recognise a Palestinian state in the Labor caucus on Tuesday, Albanese repeated his criticism of Hamas’ role in prolonging the conflict but implored Israel to end the violence.
“While there is a caveat on any information provided by Hamas, it is Israel that has prevented any journalists getting in,” Albanese said. “Those claims that there is no starvation are beyond comprehension.”
He was directly referring to remarks from deputy Israeli ambassador to Australia Amir Meron, who told journalists in a briefing on Monday that claims of starvation amounted to Hamas propaganda and relied on “false pictures” presenting a distorted view.
Albanese also made reference to similar remarks from Netanyahu, who said on Monday there was “no starvation in Gaza”, putting him at odds with aid agencies, the United Nations and contradicting widely shared images of malnourished children.
Loading
Husic lost his ministry after the election, freeing him to be more outspoken on the situation in Gaza. It is rare for MPs to ask challenging questions of the prime minister in Labor’s caucus meetings.
Albanese has emphasised in recent days that Australia would only recognise a state if certain conditions were met, including the removal of Hamas as a governing force from the strip it has ruled since 2007.
But responding to Husic, the prime minister quoted former South African president Nelson Mandela in saying that things can seem impossible until they are not. This was taken by some MPs, who spoke on condition of anonymity, that Albanese believed Gaza could be freed from Hamas’ control.
Albanese will miss a debate on the Palestinian statehood at Labor’s Victorian party conference on the weekend, when he will be at the Garma festival in the Northern Territory.
Loading
Left-wing groups are expected to put forward motions to immediately recognise a Palestinian state and to sanction Netanyahu at the conference. Labor has sanctioned ministers in Netanyahu’s government, but has not indicated it would go as far as punishing the prime minister himself.
Asked about Albanese’s comments in a press conference on Tuesday afternoon, Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said she was distressed by the images coming out of Gaza before calling for the return of the Israeli hostages.
“I’m pleased to see that aid is flowing further and better into Gaza, and I really encourage everyone who sees the situation for the reality it is, to remind others that Hamas’ control of the hostages could end the war tomorrow,” Ley said.
Albanese’s comments in the Labor caucus discussion came a day after Meron said that Israel did not recognise any famine or starvation in Gaza.
“This is a false campaign that is being [led] by Hamas, taking advantage of sick children in order to show a false claim and false presentation of hunger and starvation,” Meron said.
Netanyahu had earlier said it was a “bald-faced lie” that Israel was causing starvation. US President Donald Trump has since demanded Israel allow “every ounce of food” into the besieged strip and said there was “real starvation”.
“We can save a lot of people, I mean some of those kids. That’s real starvation; I see it and you can’t fake that. So we’re going to be even more involved,” Trump said during a visit to Britain this week.
https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/pm-brands-israel-s-denial-of-starvation-reports-in-gaza-beyond-comprehension-20250729-p5mimb.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109439
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23397960 (291047ZJUL25) Notable: NSW Police to block Sydney Harbour Bridge pro-Palestine protest – NSW Police have moved to block a pro-Palestine protest on the Sydney Harbour Bridge, citing public safety concerns. The Palestine Action Group had planned to march with 10,000 people to raise awareness of the hunger crisis in Gaza. Acting Deputy Commissioner Peter McKenna stated that the protest would create significant disruption and risk public safety. While negotiations for alternative routes are ongoing, the Palestine Action Group insisted the march will go ahead. Premier Chris Minns also raised concerns about insufficient notice given for the protest.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109425
>>109426
NSW Police to block Sydney Harbour Bridge pro-Palestine protest
Emily Bennett - Jul 29, 2025
NSW Police plan to block a march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge by pro-Palestine protesters, claiming the public gathering would put lives at risk.
As the hunger crisis in Gaza spirals, with aid agencies saying the new aid measures from are not enough to counter worsening starvation in the territory, organisers from the Palestine Action Group want to march across the landmark to raise awareness and encourage action.
An application has been lodged by the Palestine Action Group for 10,000 people to march across the bridge on Sunday.
NSW Police acting deputy commissioner Peter McKenna said police would not facilitate the protest but would be open to negotiation on alternative routes and times.
He said if the protest does go ahead on the Sydney Harbour Bridge, police would take the matter to the Supreme Court.
"We can not facilitate that public assembly this Sunday," NSW Police acting deputy commissioner Peter McKenna said.
"The main rationale behind that is public safety."
In 2000, 250,000 people marched across the bridge in support of reconciliation.
In 2023, Hollywood got the nod for filming Fall Guy with Ryan Gosling, and the same year for World Pride.
However McKenna said these events took months of planning and required significant resources.
"If I give the example of the Sydney Marathon, there's about 10 months of planning that goes into that, we don't just put a cone down in the middle of the road and blow a whistle and say 'yep, you're alright to cross'," he said.
"It is very significant to try and close that piece of critical infrastructure to the city, it is a main arterial between the north side and the city.
"It would have a major disruption and effect on thousands of motorists.
"There's emergency vehicles that will have to get across that bridge in emergencies if they need to."
This week, Premier Chris Minns told the protesters that they had not given enough notice.
Despite police moving to block the protest, the Palestine Action Group said the march will go ahead this Sunday.
"Hundreds are starving to death, and Gazan authorities warn that 40,000 babies are at imminent risk of death due to a lack of baby formula, as a result of Israel's blockade and deliberate starvation of the strip," the group said in a statement.
"The Palestine Action Group has been inundated with support for the march in a way that has never been seen in these past two years of genocide.
"The people of Australia, and NSW, have had enough of this atrocity and are determined to take a powerful stand to make it stop.
"We will see an immense and peaceful display of humanity against genocide this Sunday."
McKenna said police have worked with the group to facilitate more than 100 protests and organise alternative protest routes.
"I think we've given them a really fair go," he said.
"We understand there is some angst at the moment about what is going on overseas and are sympathetic to that.
"But the NSW Police decision has to be, first and foremost, about public and police safety."
https://www.9news.com.au/national/nsw-police-to-block-sydney-harbour-bridge-protest-on-sunday/7f443feb-d23f-47e6-8cd0-99320e962860
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUhn4ewnZgI
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109440
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23402161 (301008ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Overseas criminal suspects in synagogue firebombing – Police are investigating the involvement of overseas criminals, including exiled tobacco kingpin Kazem 'Kaz' Hamad, in the firebombing of the Adass Israel Synagogue in Ripponlea. Australian Federal Police are working with Five Eyes partners to explore links to criminals offshore. Authorities arrested a 21-year-old Werribee man in connection with the attack. The firebombing is believed to be politically motivated, but no terrorism-related arrests or charges have been made yet. Police seized electronic devices during searches, and further arrests are expected.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109263
>>109322
>>>/qresearch/23338410
Overseas criminal suspects in synagogue firebombing
Angus Delaney - July 30, 2025
1/2
Police are examining exiled tobacco kingpin Kazem ‘Kaz’ Hamad as part of its investigations into whether offshore criminals worked with Victorian associates to carry out the firebombing of the Adass Israel Synagogue.
The overseas investigations were confirmed after the Victorian Joint Counter-Terrorism Team (JCTT) on Wednesday arrested a Werribee man, 21, as part of an ongoing investigation into the firebombing in Ripponlea on December 6, 2024.
Australian Federal Police Deputy Commissioner Krissy Barrett said investigators were working with Australia’s Five Eyes security partners to ensure “our collective powers and capabilities are drawn upon”, but would not answer questions about which countries they believed the attack’s masterminds were based in.
“Our investigation is not limited to Australia. It involves exploring criminals offshore, and we suspect these criminals worked with criminal associates in Victoria to carry out the arson attack,” Barrett said.
Five Eyes is a multinational intelligence-sharing network which includes Australia, the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada and New Zealand.
Barrett also said authorities were investigating links to exiled tobacco kingpin Kazem ‘Kaz’ Hamad.
“That is a name that has come up in our investigation, and that remains one of our ongoing lines of inquiry,” she said.
Victoria Police allege the 21-year-old Werribee man was one of three individuals who broke into the Ripponlea synagogue and set the fire, but would not divulge if they believed he was involved in orchestrating the attack, or if he was a low-level criminal hired to carry it out.
“I don’t think it’s good to go into the specifics of the individual,” said Victoria Police Deputy Commissioner Wendy Steendam.
“What I want to make clear today is that this investigation remains ongoing, and we anticipate there will be further arrests.”
Authorities still believe the firebombing was politically motivated, but are yet to make any arrests or charges in relation to terrorism. Barrett said investigators would not rule out upgrading charges or laying new ones.
“No offences are off the table at the moment, and we have said from the outset that we’re investigating this as a politically motivated attack,” she said.
Investigators carried out search warrants at seven homes in Melbourne at Point Cook, Toorak, Airport West, Hadfield, Werribee, Weir Views and Coburg.
The man was arrested at the Weir Views property on Melbourne’s western fringe.
When police attended the house an AFP officer was attacked by an unrestrained dog. The officer is recovering in hospital.
“A police firearm was used to stop the attack, and the dog was later euthanised at a veterinary clinic,” Barrett said.
Various items, including phones and electronic devices, were seized during the searches and will be forensically examined, police said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109441
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23402220 (301023ZJUL25) Notable: Israel accuses Albanese of telling 'a lie' as a report warns famine is 'playing out' in Gaza – Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar has accused Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese of lying after he claimed Israel was withholding aid and causing starvation in Gaza. Sa'ar rejected the allegations, insisting Israel was not withholding aid. Meanwhile, the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) issued a warning that famine is "playing out" in Gaza, with malnutrition and hunger-related deaths rising. The IPC is urging immediate action, as Gaza’s food insecurity and starvation are rapidly accelerating. Famine thresholds have been reached, but Israel maintains that aid is being delivered.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109386
>>109407
>>109438
Israel accuses Albanese of telling 'a lie' as a report warns famine is 'playing out' in Gaza
Matthew Doran - 29 Jul 2025
1/2
Israel's foreign minister has accused Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese of telling "a lie" in accusing Israel of breaching international law in withholding aid from Palestinian civilians in Gaza.
The criticism came as a global hunger monitor issued an alert warning that famine is "playing out" in the Gaza Strip.
On Sunday, Mr Albanese levelled his strongest criticism of the Netanyahu government and the Israeli military, saying the scenes of starving children were "indefensible".
Speaking in Jerusalem today, Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar hit back at the prime minister and rejected the accusation..
"This is a lie, because we are not withholding any aid," he told the ABC.
"It's not only that it's not true, but the opposite is the truth."
Mr Sa'ar echoed the rhetoric of other members of the Israeli government, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, that starvation was not gripping Gaza.
The comments are in stark contrast to the scenes coming out of the strip, and warnings from humanitarian agencies and the United Nations of a crisis across the war-ravaged territory.
The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) issued an alert this evening warning that the "worst-case scenario of famine is currently playing out in the Gaza Strip".
"Mounting evidence shows that widespread starvation, malnutrition, and disease are driving a rise in hunger-related deaths," it said.
The IPC alert does not formally classify Gaza as being in famine. Such a classification can only be made through an analysis, which the IPC said it would now conduct "without delay".
The IPC is a global initiative that partners with 21 aid groups, international organisations, and UN agencies, and assesses the extent of hunger suffered by a population.
'Immediate action' needed, famine report says
War has raged in Gaza between Israel and Palestinian militants Hamas for the past 22 months.
Facing global condemnation over the humanitarian crisis, Israel said on Sunday it would halt military operations for 10 hours a day in parts of the Palestinian enclave and allow new aid corridors.
At the media event in Jerusalem, Mr Sa'ar insisted that there were no restrictions on aid entering the strip, even as Israel controls all of the borders heading into Gaza and imposed a total humanitarian blockade in March.
Those restrictions were partially eased a few weeks ago, and have been further relaxed since the weekend — but tight controls remain in place.
"There were more than 200 trucks that entered yesterday," Mr Sa'ar said.
"Inside Gaza, waiting to be distributed, we have almost 600 trucks in both the crossings: Kerem Shalom and Zikim.
"And, if we are speaking about the last two months, more than 5,000 trucks entered to Gaza Strip, and anyone who wants to do that can do that."
Mr Sa'ar also pointed to airdrops of aid, which began on Sunday.
"There is no route that we are not using," he said.
For an area to be classified as in famine, at least 20 per cent of people must be suffering extreme food shortages, with one in three children acutely malnourished and two people out of every 10,000 dying daily from starvation or malnutrition and disease.
"Immediate action must be taken to end the hostilities and allow unimpeded, large-scale, life-saving humanitarian response. This is the only path to stopping further deaths and catastrophic human suffering," the IPC alert said.
The latest data indicated that famine thresholds had been reached for food consumption in most of the war-torn Palestinian enclave — where some 2.1 million people remain — and for acute malnutrition in Gaza City, the alert said.
"Formal famine declarations always lag reality," David Miliband, head of the International Rescue Committee aid group, said in a statement ahead of the IPC alert.
"By the time that famine was declared in Somalia in 2011, 250,000 people — half of them children under 5 — had already died of hunger," he said.
"By the time famine is declared, it will already be too late."
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109442
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23402293 (301050ZJUL25) Notable: Albanese resists ‘moral momentum’ call to join UK plans for recognising Palestine – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has resisted British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s call to recognise Palestine, stating that recognition will only occur after progress towards peace is made. Despite pressure from Australian Labor MP Ed Husic and unions, Albanese reiterated that the government is focused on the two-state solution, not making statements for political gain. A recent statement from 14 nations, including Australia, shows willingness to consider Palestinian statehood, but stops short of endorsing the UK’s position. Meanwhile, opposition foreign affairs spokesperson Michaelia Cash emphasized that recognition should follow peace negotiations.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109386
>>109407
>>109420
Albanese resists ‘moral momentum’ call to join UK plans for recognising Palestine
Natassia Chrysanthos - July 30, 2025
1/2
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is resisting British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s call to recognise a Palestinian state unless Israel takes urgent steps towards peace, as rank-and-file Labor members and a former frontbencher urge Australia to add to “moral momentum”.
Australia issued a statement with 14 other countries on Wednesday saying it would consider Palestinian statehood as a step towards a two state-solution, and encouraged other nations to do the same, but stopped short of endorsing the United Kingdom’s major foreign policy shift.
Starmer overnight heightened pressure on Israel to commit to a ceasefire by declaring the UK would recognise a Palestinian state in September at the United Nations unless Israel agrees to a ceasefire, two-state solution and ends the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
The British prime minister said this was “the moment to act” following a declaration from French President Emmanuel Macron last week that France would recognise a Palestinian state at the UN – although the UK has placed a caveat on its plan in a bid to give Israel an incentive to act.
Labor MP Ed Husic, who has been vocal on the issue since losing his ministry after the election, said his caucus colleagues had “deep feeling” about Palestinian recognition and called for the Australian government to support the UK position.
He said the government’s position on recognising Palestine once conditions, such as ending Hamas’ rule of Gaza, was understandable.
“But moral momentum cannot be ignored, and that momentum is significant at the moment, and it requires of us a reconsideration of our approach,” Husic said.
Australian Council of Trade Unions president Michelle O’Neil echoed the backbencher. “I really welcome the comments that have been made by the prime minister and foreign minister about all these issues and the action that’s already been taken, but this is urgent,” she said.
But Albanese, who spoke with Starmer overnight, said Australia was not concerned by the timeframe for recognition.
“What we’re looking [at] is the circumstances where recognition will advance the objective of the creation of two states,” Albanese said at a press conference later on Wednesday morning.
“My entire political life, I’ve said I support two states, the right of Israel to exist within secure borders and the right of Palestinians to have their legitimate aspirations for their own state realised. That is my objective. Not making a statement, not winning a political point, but achieving that.”
Albanese pointed to a separate statement that Wong co-signed on Wednesday with allies including Canada, France and New Zealand, demanding a ceasefire and reiterating an “unwavering commitment to the vision of the two-state solution” while condemning Hamas’ October 7 attacks.
The nations said they had “already recognised, have expressed or express the willingness or the positive consideration of our countries to recognise the State of Palestine, as an essential step towards the two-state solution, and invite all countries that have not done so to join this call”.
They also said Gaza should be unified with the West Bank under the governance of the Palestinian Authority, an idea that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has strongly rejected.
It came on the same day that a United Nations working group, which included the Arab League, released a seven-page plan to end the war and progress towards a two-state solution that did not involve Hamas, which Australia will be asked to vote on in September.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109443
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23402320 (301105ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Donald Trump says Jeffrey Epstein 'stole' young women, including Virginia Giuffre, from Mar-a-Lago – US President Donald Trump has revealed he fell out with Jeffrey Epstein after the convicted sex offender "stole" young women, including Virginia Giuffre, from his Mar-a-Lago club. Trump recalled telling Epstein, "We don’t want you taking our people," referring to women hired at the Mar-a-Lago spa. Trump also confirmed that Giuffre, who later accused Epstein of sex trafficking, was one of the women taken. Meanwhile, Epstein's associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, seeks immunity before testifying before Congress regarding her role in Epstein’s crimes. Trump denied considering a presidential pardon for Maxwell.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109289
>>109355
>>109437
Donald Trump says Jeffrey Epstein 'stole' young women, including Virginia Giuffre, from Mar-a-Lago
abc.net.au - 30 July 2025
1/2
US President Donald Trump says he fell out with Jeffrey Epstein because the convicted sex offender "stole" young women, including Virginia Giuffre, from his Mar-a-Lago club.
His admission on Tuesday, local time, came as Epstein's long-time associate Ghislaine Maxwell sought immunity from future prosecution as a condition for testifying to a US congressional committee.
Speaking to reporters on Air Force One while flying home from Scotland, Mr Trump gave some of his most expansive public comments yet about his falling out with Epstein, the wealthy and well-connected financier who died in a New York jail in 2019 while awaiting trial for sex trafficking underage girls.
"People were taken out of the [Mar-a-Lago] spa, hired by him, in other words, gone," Mr Trump said.
"When I heard about it, I told him, I said, 'Listen, we don't want you taking our people.'
"And then, not too long after that, he did it again. And I said, 'Out of here.'"
Mr Trump also confirmed that one of the Mar-a-Lago spa attendants taken by Epstein was Ms Giuffre, the Australian who brought a civil case against Epstein's friend Prince Andrew, accusing him of sexually assaulting her when she was 17.
Ms Giuffre, who accused Epstein of using her as a sex slave, took her own life at her home in Australia in April.
"I think she worked at the spa," Mr Trump told reporters.
"I think that was one of the people. He stole her."
The White House has said previously Mr Trump threw Epstein out of his Mar-a-Lago club two decades ago "for being a creep", and US media have reported that they became estranged over a Florida real estate deal.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109444
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23402348 (301124ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Labor says Google 'sharks' won't scare it from banning YouTube for under 16s – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Communications Minister Anika Wells have vowed not to be intimidated by Google’s threat of legal action against the Australian government’s plan to restrict children under 16 from accessing YouTube. “We can’t control the ocean, but we can police the sharks,” Wells said, underlining the government’s commitment to safeguarding young Australians from online harm. The new laws, which will take effect in December, will cover platforms like TikTok and Instagram, despite legal pressure from Google. The eSafety Commission has supported the release of the rules.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109412
>>109413
>>109415
Labor says Google 'sharks' won't scare it from banning YouTube for under 16s
Maani Truu - 29 July 2025
1/2
The prime minister has vowed not to be intimidated by Google, as the tech giant threatens to sue over the government's decision to restrict children and teenagers from accessing YouTube.
Australians under the age of 16 will be barred from logging in to YouTube when the social media ban comes into force in December, after the government reversed its plan to grant the video-sharing site an exemption.
Rules of how the ban will operate are set to be presented to parliament on Wednesday, including details of the types of platforms that won't be captured, such as those primarily concerned with gaming, messaging, health and education.
It comes days after Google, the parent company of YouTube, threatened legal action if the government scrapped its previously flagged exemption on the basis of the platform's educational uses.
Communications Minister Anika Wells issued a blunt retort to the tech giant.
"We can't control the ocean, but we can police the sharks, and that is why we will not be intimidated by legal threats when this is a genuine fight for the wellbeing of Australian kids," Ms Wells said.
Flanked by parents whose children had died as a consequence of bullying on social media, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said he would also be promoting Australia's social media ban on the sidelines of the next major United Nations conference in New York in September.
"I know from the discussions I have had with other leaders that they are looking at this and they are considering what impact social media is having on young people in their respective nations, it is a common experience," he said.
"We don't do this easily. What we do, though, is respond to something that is needed here."
YouTube Kids is expected to be spared from the new laws because it does not allow users to communicate with others through the platform.
Unlike other popular social media sites, YouTube does not require users to have an account to access most features and young people will still be able to use the site in a logged-out state after the world-leading laws come into effect.
But including YouTube in the list of social media platforms covered by the ban — which already includes apps like TikTok and Instagram — means under 16s won't be able to access age-restricted content on the video-sharing site.
In a statement on Wednesday, the eSafety Commission welcomed the "important milestone" of the release of the rules, noting there would be no blanket exceptions for platforms.
The commissioner is tasked separately with determining what steps platforms will be expected to take to comply with the new laws.
"Following the release of the Age Assurance Technology Trial report, eSafety will publish these guidelines to support industry's compliance with the legislation," they said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109445
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23406871 (310950ZJUL25) Notable: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese waiting for right moment to recognise Palestinian state – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has indicated he will recognise a Palestinian state, but only when the timing aligns with achieving a peaceful resolution. "What we're looking at is the circumstances where recognition will advance the objective of the creation of two states," Albanese said. He emphasized that his goal has always been to support both Israel’s right to exist within secure borders and the legitimate aspirations of Palestinians for their own state. The Prime Minister also reaffirmed Australia’s support for a two-state solution while calling for a ceasefire and the exclusion of Hamas from Palestinian governance.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109386
>>109407
>>109420
>>109442
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese waiting for right moment to recognise Palestinian state
Jacob Greber - 31 July 2025
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is preparing the ground for an historic shift.
Australia will recognise a Palestinian state, it is only a matter of when and how.
7.30 understands Mr Albanese has been privately indicating to Labor colleagues that such a declaration can only be made once.
He is aiming for a time that best contributes to a peaceful resolution to the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians.
"What we're looking at is the circumstances where recognition will advance the objective of the creation of two states," Anthony Albanese said on Wednesday.
"My entire political life, I've said I support two states, the right of Israel to exist within secure borders and the right of Palestinians to have their legitimate aspirations for their own state realised. That's my objective."
Support for Palestinian statehood among the world's developed nations is growing.
British prime minister Keir Starmer said this week that the UK will recognise the state of Palestine by September unless Israel takes "substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza, agree to a ceasefire and commit to a long-term sustainable peace reviving the prospect of a two-state solution".
The UK move came less than a week after French president Emmanuel Macron pledged to formally recognise Palestinian statehood in September.
If both countries follow through, they would be the first G7 and UN Security Council members to adopt such recognition.
"This decision by France and the UK is significant," Malak Benslama-Dabdoub, a lecturer in Law at Royal Holloway University of London, wrote on The Conversation.
"It signals a departure from the western consensus, long shaped by the US and the EU, that any recognition of Palestinian statehood must be deferred until after final-status negotiations.
"The move also highlights growing frustration in parts of Europe with the ongoing violence in Gaza and the failure of peace talks over the past two decades."
'Significant step'
Foreign Minister Penny Wong on Wednesday signed a joint statement with 14 other countries — including France, Canada and New Zealand — expressing "our determination" to work on a "day after" plan for Gaza that guarantees its reconstruction and the exclusion of Hamas from "Palestinian governance".
The statement also highlighted promises by Palestinian Authority president Mahmoud Abbas that a future Palestinian state would be "demilitarised".
Mr Albanese spoke with Mr Starmer overnight and revealed there would be further conversations between the leaders "in the coming couple of days as well", reiterated that Hamas can play no role in a future Palestinian state.
He noted that the Palestinian Authority leader's pledge implies a future Palestinian state can have neither a conventional or "paramilitary" force.
"That's a very significant step forward," Mr Albanese said.
"What we will continue to do is to put forward a principled position consistent with our unwavering commitment to the vision of the two-state solution."
"In an immediate sense, we continue to call for a ceasefire. We continue to call for hostages to be released. We continue to say that Hamas can have no role in a future Palestinian state, and we continue to call for aid to be allowed to the people of Gaza."
Mr Albanese said "Israel needs to be able to be confident … that they're able to exist without a threat to their security."
Mr Albanese said Australians want the fighting and killing to stop, and they do not want "conflict brought here".
"My priority has been to try to navigate what is a very difficult situation.
"The young Jewish boy or girl going to the local school should not be harassed because of who they are. They are not responsible for what is going on in Gaza.
"And Arab Australians or Muslims are not responsible for what Hamas did."
Former Labor trade minister Craig Emerson told 7.30 that the "recognition of a Palestinian state has been a long and difficult journey for Labor".
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-30/anthony-albanese-waiting-for-right-moment-on-palestinian-state/105593298
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7w8QQ4cVuaA
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109446
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23406946 (311014ZJUL25) Notable: Trump says Palestinian recognition a threat to trade talks in warning to Australia – US President Donald Trump has warned that the recognition of Palestinian statehood could jeopardise trade negotiations, adding pressure on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. As Canada, France, and the UK advance plans to recognise Palestine, Albanese stated that Australia's position remains about "when, not if," but without rushing. Labor faces growing internal and external pressure to align with the global momentum for a two-state solution. Meanwhile, Trump warned that Canada's recognition would complicate trade talks, stating it would make a trade deal with Canada “very hard” .
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109407
>>109420
>>109442
>>109445
Trump says Palestinian recognition a threat to trade talks in warning to Australia
Natassia Chrysanthos - July 31, 2025
1/2
United States President Donald Trump has warned that Palestinian recognition could threaten trade talks, raising the stakes for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese as he tries to avoid higher tariffs while navigating a growing global push to advance a state of Palestine.
Labor ministers on Thursday welcomed international momentum for a two-state solution but insisted Australia would stick to its own timeline for recognition after Canada became the latest Western nation to declare it would support Palestinian statehood at a United Nations meeting in September.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announced on Thursday (AEST) that he planned to recognise Palestine, following France and the United Kingdom. But shortly after, he was rebuked by Trump, who warned Canada’s move “will make it very hard for us to make a trade deal with them” on his Truth Social platform.
It complicates the dynamic as Australia tries to negotiate a favourable trade outcome with the US after Trump threatened to raise baseline tariffs on imports to the US, while supporting the international community in pushing for a two-state solution.
Australian officials who spoke on condition of anonymity are bracing for a 15 per cent baseline tariff, up from the previous 10 per cent, when they are announced on August 1.
Foreign Minister Penny Wong on Thursday said recognising Palestinian statehood remained a question of “when, not if” for the government, and Albanese had a call with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer to discuss the situation overnight, a day after the United Kingdom’s major foreign policy shift.
“The leaders agreed on the importance of using the international momentum to secure a ceasefire, the release of all hostages and the acceleration of aid, as well as ensuring Hamas did not play a role in a future state,” an Australian government spokesperson said about the call.
But the Albanese government did not rush to set out its timeline alongside the other nations. “We are engaging with other friends and partners in the international community. Ultimately, this has to be something the great weight of the international community has to come together around,” Wong said on the ABC.
“I hope what happens in New York in September is we see the hostages released, we see the commitments from the Palestinian Authority and others in the region about the security of Israel, the demilitarisation of a Palestinian state, and a move on recognition.
“What we want out of it is something … which breaks the cycle of violence. That’s what we want.”
Labor has been under mounting pressure from rank-and-file members and parts of its caucus to join international counterparts and add to global momentum. Former frontbencher Ed Husic this week said there was “deep feeling” on the issue among his Labor colleagues, and argued there was a moral imperative for Australia to take immediate steps towards recognition.
At the same time, Albanese assured the Executive Council of Australian Jewry in parliament this week that recognition was not imminent. Co-chief executive Peter Wertheim said the prime minister had made two things clear.
“Firstly, Australia will make its own decision concerning the timing of recognition of a Palestinian state. Secondly, recognition must not simply be an empty gesture,” he said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109447
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23406966 (311027ZJUL25) Notable: Video: Adass Israel Synagogue arsonist identified as Giovanni Laulu in first court appearance – Giovanni Laulu, 21, has appeared in court charged with arson, recklessly endangering life, and vehicle theft following the firebombing of the Adass Israel Synagogue in Ripponlea in December 2024. Laulu, arrested during counter-terrorism raids across Melbourne, faces multiple charges related to the attack, which caused extensive damage to the $20 million synagogue. CCTV footage shows masked men entering the building with a red jerry can before setting the fire. Investigations continue, with Laulu remanded in custody. Authorities are also exploring possible links to overseas criminals.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109263
>>>/qresearch/23338410
>>109440
Adass Israel Synagogue arsonist identified as Giovanni Laulu in first court appearance
MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 31 July 2025
A 21-year-old man accused of being one of the attackers in the firebombing the Adass Israel Synagogue has faced court for the first time, following his arrest during a series of counter-terrorism raids across Melbourne.
Giovanni Laulu appeared in Melbourne Magistrates Court on Thursday morning, charged with arson, recklessly endangering life, and vehicle theft over the attack on the synagogue in Ripponlea in December.
Dressed in a long-sleeved black shirt and sporting a thin moustache and beard, Mr Laulu sat quietly in the dock, only speaking to confirm his identity.
He maintained eye contact with the magistrate and nodded in acknowledgment of directions. He did not apply for bail and was remanded in custody.
The court heard federal and state police were still preparing an extensive brief of evidence against Mr Laulu, with 11 mobile phones yet to be analysed.
Prosecutors requested – and were granted – 12 weeks to finalise their case, with Magistrate Brett Sonnett setting a deadline of October 23.
Mr Laulu was arrested on Wednesday morning during a high-stakes operation led by the Victorian Joint Counter Terrorism Team – a task force comprising Victoria Police, Australian Federal Police and ASIO – which executed a series of co-ordinated raids across Melbourne suburbs.
He is accused of being one of three people who set fire to the synagogue on December 6, 2024.
CCTV footage released this year shows masked men smashing their way into the $20m synagogue, with one carrying a red jerry can before flames engulfed the building.
The fire caused millions of dollars in damage to the synagogue and destroyed priceless religious artefacts, including centuries-old Torah scrolls.
Police allege the group arrived at the scene in a stolen blue Volkswagen Golf, previously described as a “communal crime car” allegedly used in a string of unrelated incidents – including a firebombing at South Yarra’s Lux Nightclub.
According to charge sheets released by the court, Mr Laulu allegedly stole the $40,000 vehicle the night before the synagogue attack, taking it from an address in Tarneit.
On Wednesday, AFP Deputy Commissioner Krissy Barrett confirmed police were examining potential links to overseas criminals.
She said an AFP officer was bitten by a dog during Mr Laulu’s arrest at a Werribee property.
A police firearm was discharged during the arrest and the dog was later euthanised at a veterinary clinic.
Investigations remain ongoing and authorities said they expected to make further arrests.
Another man allegedly involved in stealing the Volkswagen Golf was charged on July 16.
Mr Laulu is due to reappear via video link at Werribee Magistrates Court on August 6 for the state charges.
His federal charges will return to court on December 4 for a committal mention.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/adass-israel-synagogue-arsonist-identified-as-giovanni-laulu-in-first-court-appearance/news-story/e48f7c146666641475c926c94fe19c6d
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109448
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23406982 (311043ZJUL25) Notable: Australia clueless on Trump’s new tariffs – The Albanese government is bracing for potential tariff increases as US President Donald Trump nears his August 1 deadline for imposing higher tariffs on countries without trade deals with the US. Trump has flagged raising the baseline tariff from 10 per cent to as high as 15-20 per cent, potentially impacting Australian exports. The Australian government has yet to receive official notification and is monitoring Trump’s Truth Social account for updates. With no progress on trade negotiations, Australia risks losing its preferential tariff rate. In contrast, the UK has secured a reduced tariff rate after negotiations, further intensifying Australia's tariff concerns.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/23372922
>>109435
>>109436
>>109446
Australia clueless on Trump’s new tariffs
Andrew Tillett - Jul 31, 2025
The Albanese government is bracing for a potential tariff hit as officials closely monitor Donald Trump’s Truth Social media account in anticipation that it will give the first inkling from the US president about higher duties on Australian exports to America.
Trump’s latest “D-Day” in his trade war is August 1, his deadline for imposing higher tariffs on countries that have not managed to negotiate a trade deal with the US.
Trump this week flagged increasing the 10 per cent baseline rate – which captures a large proportion of Australia’s exports to the US – to 15 per cent or as high as 20 per cent.
“No news is good news, I hope,” said one government source, speaking on condition of anonymity, in respect to the silence from the White House on whether Australia was in the firing line.
A second government source, not authorised to speak publicly, said as of Thursday morning (AEST) it was unclear how details of any tariff increase would be conveyed to either Canberra or the Australian embassy in Washington.
Trump said has said over the past fortnight he intends to send out as many as 200 letters to countries outlining their tariff rate. About 150 will go to smaller countries that “don’t do that much business” with the US and they will be on the same rate.
US media outlet Politico reported on Thursday that Trump planned to sign a series of executive orders setting out new tariff rates.
Earlier in July, Trump sent off about two dozen letters to the leaders of larger trading partners outlining what their tariffs would be from August 1. Australia did not receive one.
Brushing aside diplomatic protocol, Trump published those letters on his Truth Social account, sharing the news with his 10.5 million followers at the same time.
Truth Social may again provide the first indication of tariff changes, according to the second government source.
Given Australia has been on the lowest tariff rate, the Albanese government has not moved with the same urgency as other countries to strike a trade deal with Trump.
But with the UK managing to reduce its tariff to 10 per cent through negotiations, Australia will lose its advantage if Trump increases the baseline rate to 15 or 20 per cent.
Albanese has offered the US preferential access to Australian critical minerals, an offer the White House has shown little interest in. And while the government denied a link to tariff talks, Trump claimed credit for last week’s announcement that Australia’s ban on beef had been lifted.
Trump used his social media account on Thursday to announce a deal had been struck with South Korea, which imposed a 15 per cent tariff on Korean goods and included promises of Seoul pouring $US350 billion ($540 billion) into investments of Trump’s choosing, and buying $US100 billion of US gas. He also announced he would whack Indian exports with a 25 per cent tariff.
Trump also tried to repudiate his TACO label – Trump Always Chickens Out – by vowing he would not further delay imposing reciprocal tariffs.
“THE AUGUST FIRST DEADLINE IS THE AUGUST FIRST DEADLINE — IT STANDS STRONG, AND WILL NOT BE EXTENDED. A BIG DAY FOR AMERICA!!!” Trump posted.
When Trump announced the first round of tariffs in April, the so-called “liberation day”, Trade Minister Don Farrell and officials had to watch the White House ceremony, as did millions of others around the world, to learn what rate Australian goods would be hit at.
Oversized posters listed each country’s tariff, with Australia copping the lowest rate of 10 per cent because of its trade surplus with the US.
Other countries where the US had a trade deficit were hit with much higher rates under Trump’s “reciprocal tariffs”. Amid a global market meltdown, Trump paused those tariff hikes for 90 days, and then delayed for another month until August.
Farrell’s office declined to comment ahead of Trump’s latest announcement. Comment was sought from Albanese.
https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/will-australia-be-hit-with-new-trump-tariffs-the-govt-has-no-idea-20250731-p5mj7f
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114942005076829557
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109449
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23406987 (311054ZJUL25) Notable: US delays AUKUS review as defence spending row drags on – The Trump administration has delayed the AUKUS review, initially set for completion in 30 days, now expected in the fall. Donald Trump’s defence policy chief, Elbridge Colby, cited the need for an empirical assessment aligning with Trump's America First approach. This delay coincides with ongoing tensions over Australia's defence spending, with Washington urging Australia to increase its spending to 3.5% of GDP amid China's military build-up. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese dismissed concerns over the delay, saying it was expected. Meanwhile, Australia and the UK signed a 50-year treaty to strengthen the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109316
>>109318
>>109405
US delays AUKUS review as defence spending row drags on
JOSEPH OLBRYCHT-PALMER - July 30, 2025
Anthony Albanese has denied the US is using its AUKUS review as “leverage” after the Trump administration delayed it by several months.
Donald Trump’s defence policy chief Elbridge Colby announced the delay on Wednesday morning (AEST) but did not give a firm date.
Instead, Mr Colby, an AUKUS sceptic, said the review would be completed “in the fall” – much longer than the initial 30 days.
It comes as the Albanese government resists Washington’s demand to hike defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP in response to China’s rapid military build-up.
Mr Colby’s office said the AUKUS review would “be an empirical and clear-eyed assessment of the initiative’s alignment with President Trump’s America First approach”.
“As part of this process, the (US Department of Defence) looks forward to continuing regular engagements on this important matter with other parts of the US government, the US Congress, our allies Australia and the United Kingdom and other key stakeholders,” his office said.
“The department anticipates completing the review in the fall.
“Its purpose will be to provide the President and his senior leadership team with a fact-based, rigorous assessment of the initiative.”
Speaking to reporters at Parliament House, the Prime Minister was asked if the delay was “a cause for concern”.
“No, it is not surprising that that would be the case and something that we expected something like that,” Mr Albanese said.
“We expected a review from an incoming government just like the Keir Starmer government did (in the UK).
“We expect that those things take longer than just 30 days.”
Asked if it was being used as “leverage”, he simply replied: “No.”
Last week, Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles and UK Secretary of State John Healey signed a 50-year agreement to strengthen ties around the AUKUS nuclear submarine agreement.
Mr Marles described it as a “significant a treaty as has been signed between our two countries since federation”.
“It will very much underpin the development of AUKUS, the building of submarines in Adelaide, and what will ultimately see Australia and the United Kingdom operate the same class of nuclear powered submarines in the future,” he said.
Mr Healey said the treaty would support “tens of thousands of skilled, high paid jobs in both our nations”.
“It’s a treaty to build the most powerful, the most advanced attack submarines our two navies have ever had,” he said.
“It’s a treaty that strengthens NATO as well as security in the Indo-Pacific. It’s a treaty that will outlast us as politicians, that will safeguard the security of our children and our children’s children to come.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/us-delays-aukus-review-as-defence-spending-row-drags-on/news-story/138ac87a0ea4f8e55fe7a84c7ed4b4b6
https://x.com/DOD_Policy/status/1950316812564123952
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109450
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23407027 (311123ZJUL25) Notable: David James: Sydney childcare worker unmasked as alleged paedophile – Former childcare worker and ex-probationary police officer David James has been publicly identified after a year-long court suppression order was lifted. James, accused of abusing 10 children, faces 13 charges including nine counts of aggravated use of a child to make child abuse material. Police allege he filmed boys aged five and six across multiple centres in Sydney’s northern suburbs between 2021 and 2024. Investigators have seized 142,000 files and notified 1200 families. James remains in custody, with prosecutors given 12 weeks to finalise their case.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109236
>>109238
>>109239
>>109246
David James: Sydney childcare worker unmasked as alleged paedophile
Perry Duffin and Sally Rawsthorne - July 31, 2025
1/2
A male childcare worker accused of abusing 10 children has been unmasked after the Herald successfully fought a year-long court order that prevented the public from knowing his name and former employment as a police officer.
The names of all the centres where alleged paedophile David James worked, almost 60 in total, can now be revealed.
James was initially charged with refusing to grant police access to his phone by the Australian Federal Police as part of a dark web investigation known as Operation Arctile in September last year. Investigators quickly found alleged evidence that he had filmed and photographed children in his care.
Police pored through 142,000 files and allegedly concluded some were child abuse material, Acting Commissioner Brett James said on Thursday.
David James was arrested a month later, and a non-publication order was made over his name to give police time to identify and contact his alleged victims.
He is facing 13 offences with nine counts of aggravated use of a child to make child abuse material, one count of using a child to make abuse material, two counts of possessing abuse material and one count of refusing officers access to his phone.
Court documents, seen by th e Herald last year, suggest James allegedly filmed “pre-pubescent boys”.
Police allege James recorded explicit photos of 10 children aged five to six at six centres “through his employment at out-of-school hours care (OSHC) facilities in the northern suburbs of Sydney between April 2021 and May 2024”.
The AFP on Thursday published a list of 58 centres where James worked.
“The AFP holds no evidence to suggest any alleged offending took place at these facilities,” an AFP statement reads.
Most allegations are too graphic to publish, but include claims the man filmed young boys as they used the bathroom at the daycare.
He also allegedly pleasured himself in a classroom in front of children.
On Thursday, the Herald contested the suppression order, arguing it was time to unmask James as the families of all his alleged victims had been notified.
James’ lawyers protested, but prosecutors and ultimately Deputy Chief Magistrate Michael Antrum agreed, lifting the order immediately.
James, aged in his 20s, worked at an Artarmon daycare and casually at after-school care centres in Sydney’s northern suburbs, including Lane Cove.
James was a failed NSW Police officer who never made it past his probationary period.
Speaking generally, Acting Commissioner Brett James said law enforcement were focused on bringing “paedophiles to justice”.
“What we find is people make, find, they share this type of material for their own personal gain but what they’re doing is preying on young, vulnerable people in our community,” he said.
“These individuals cross all industries, all parts of the communities.”
James was employed as a probationary constable from December 2021 to September 2022 and, after failing to complete his probation, continued in a civilian capacity until his resignation in May 2023.
He was ejected from the NSW Police Force because he was unable to perform to their standards. Police were never aware he was also working part-time in childcare at the time.
“During his employment, the man failed to seek the required approval to engage in secondary employment, and as such, police were unaware of his concurrent role in the childcare sector,” a NSW Police statement reads.
“We acknowledge the seriousness of the allegations and condemn any behaviour that places our community’s most vulnerable members at risk.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109451
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23407041 (311130ZJUL25) Notable: U.S. Embassy Australia Tweets: (Video) @FBIDirectorKash visited Sydney, Australia, to engage in high-level law enforcement meetings aimed at strengthening international partnerships and addressing shared security challenges. These discussions focus on combating transnational crime, cyber threats, and other global issues that require close collaboration with international allies. Building strong partnerships is vital to ensuring a safer and more secure future for all. - #uswithaus @FBI @AusFedPolice @ASIO @nswpolice @MarineCommand @scg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
FBI opens first office in New Zealand ‘to counter China and cybercrime’
Kash Patel says the office will strengthen protection of the Five Eyes nations and that the US and New Zealand would work on ‘important global issues’
Eva Corlett - 31 Jul 2025
The director of the FBI, Kash Patel, has opened the bureau’s first ever office in New Zealand, in what he said was an attempt to help counter China’s activities in the Indo-Pacific, crack down on issues including cybercrime, and strengthen protection of the Five Eyes nations.
Patel, who opened the office at the US embassy in Wellington on Thursday, called the event an “historic moment”.
“The announcement that we are opening up our law enforcement attache office here in Wellington shows the world that the FBI is actually prioritising a permanent presence across all Five Eyes countries,” Patel said in a video, supplied by the embassy.
“Here in New Zealand we had not had that until this historic moment, so we are truly humbled with the reception we have been given.”
Patel said the US and New Zealand would work together on “some of the most important global issues of our time”.
“Countering the CCP in the Indopacom [the US’s Indo-Pacific Command] area, countering the narcotics trade, working against cyber intrusion and ransomware operations and most importantly protecting our respective citizenry,” he said.
The FBI has stationed staff in Wellington since 2017, as a sub-office of the legal attaché office in Australia’s capital Canberra, Australia. The new office will have responsibility for partnerships in New Zealand, Antarctica, Samoa, Niue, Cook Islands, and Tonga.
Patel – a Donald Trump ally, who has made headlines in recent weeks over the Epstein controversy - is the most senior member of the US administration to visit New Zealand since the start of Trump’s second term in office.
During his visit, he met with senior government representatives, including the ministers and heads responsible for the country’s police, foreign affairs and spy agencies.
The minister responsible for New Zealand’s intelligence services, Judith Collins said she and Patel had “exchanged a range of insights” on areas such as trans-national organised crime, counter-terrorism, cybersecurity and espionage.
Police minister Mark Mitchell said Patel’s visit should “send a clear message to criminals” that they “cannot hide behind an international border”.
“New Zealand police are continually working with their overseas counterparts like the FBI to catch those engaged in illegal, harmful activities such as drug smuggling and online child exploitation, as well disrupting and preventing this offending from happening in the first place,” he said in a statement.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/31/fbi-opens-new-zealand-office
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109452
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23407051 (311134ZJUL25) Notable: U.S. Embassy Australia Tweets: (Video) @FBIDirectorKash visited Sydney, Australia, to engage in high-level law enforcement meetings aimed at strengthening international partnerships and addressing shared security challenges. These discussions focus on combating transnational crime, cyber threats, and other global issues that require close collaboration with international allies. Building strong partnerships is vital to ensuring a safer and more secure future for all. - #uswithaus @FBI @AusFedPolice @ASIO @nswpolice @MarineCommand @scg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109451
Home Affairs minister met with FBI director during secretive Australia visit
Stephen Dziedzic - 31 July 2025
FBI Director Kash Patel paid a quiet visit Australia this week, with Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke later confirming he dined with the law enforcement chief while he was Sydney.
Mr Patel, who is a loyalist of US President Donald Trump, stopped in Sydney earlier this week before travelling to New Zealand to announce the US would expand its FBI office in Wellington.
Neither Australia nor the United States publicly flagged the visit, but after he was approached by the ABC Mr Burke said he "enjoyed" his evening with Mr Patel.
"We share a commitment to keeping our people safe, and I'm optimistic about what we can achieve together in the interest of national security," he said.
A source confirmed the FBI chief met with other officials from the security community while in Sydney, but played-down the significance of the stop-off, suggesting Mr Patel's main focus was on his New Zealand visit.
Mr Patel wields significant power as the head of the US's law enforcement but he is also a controversial figure, in part because he's called some of those jailed for the January 6 assault on Capitol Hill "political prisoners".
Greens home affairs spokesperson David Shoebridge on Thursday called on the government to provide "more transparency" over the meeting.
"The minister, understandably, wanted his meeting with a defender of the January 6 rioters, kept secret," he said.
"Equally understandably, the Australian public has an interest in knowing who our minister for home affairs is meeting with, and why.
"Going forward the best way to avoid public concern about meeting with Trump appointees who defend the January 6 riots is not to meet them in the first place."
While opening the FBI's new permanent office in New Zealand, Mr Patel said he was looking forward to working closely with New Zealand to counter the Chinese Communist Party and other threats in the region.
New Zealand is a member of the Five Eyes intelligence-sharing alliance, alongside Australia, the United States, Britain and Canada.
"Some of the most important global issues of our times are the ones that New Zealand and America work on together," he said.
"The FBI cannot do it alone. The FBI, in my opinion, is the greatest law enforcement agency in the world, and our partners in the Five Eyes are our greatest partners around the world. But we need all of them ... to get after the fight and put the mission first."
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-31/fbi-director-kash-patel-australia-visit/105598408
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109453
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23415176 (020759ZAUG25) Notable: Video: FBI director says new office in New Zealand will counter China’s sway, provoking Beijing’s ire – FBI Director Kash Patel’s remarks in Wellington about the new office aiming to counter Chinese influence in the South Pacific have drawn criticism from Beijing and a dismissive response from New Zealand officials. Patel’s comments about tackling the Chinese Communist Party’s activities were quietly rejected by Foreign Minister Winston Peters and other New Zealand leaders, who emphasised the focus on tackling transnational crime. Beijing responded angrily, stating such efforts would not contribute to regional peace. Analysts suggest New Zealand seeks balance between relations with China and its Five Eyes commitments.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109451
>>109452
FBI director says a new office in New Zealand will counter China's sway, provoking Beijing's ire
CHARLOTTE GRAHAM-McLAY - August 1, 2025
1/2
FBI Director Kash Patel provoked diplomatic discomfort in New Zealand by suggesting the opening of a new office in the capital aims to counter China’s influence, drawing polite dismissals from Wellington and criticism from Beijing.
Patel was in Wellington on Thursday to open the FBI’s first standalone office in New Zealand and to meet senior officials. The arrangement aligns New Zealand with FBI missions in other Five Eyes intelligence-sharing nations, which also include the United States, Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom.
The Wellington office will provide a local mission for FBI staff who have operated with oversight from Canberra, Australia, since 2017.
In remarks made in a video published Thursday by the US embassy, Patel said the office would help counter Chinese Communist Party influence in the contested South Pacific Ocean.
New Zealand ministers who met Patel, the highest-ranking Trump Administration official to visit New Zealand, quietly dismissed his claims. A government statement Thursday emphasised joint efforts against crimes such as online child exploitation and drug smuggling, with no mention of China.
‘When we were talking, we never raised that issue,’ Foreign Minister Winston Peters said Thursday.
Judith Collins, minister for the security services, said the focus would be on transnational crime.
‘I don’t respond to other people’s media statements,’ she said when reporters said Patel had mentioned China, Radio New Zealand reported.
Trade Minister Todd McClay rejected a reporter’s suggestion Friday that Wellington had ‘celebrated’ the office opening.
‘Well, I don’t think it was celebrated on Thursday,’ he said. ‘I think there was an announcement and it was discussed.’
Beijing decries the FBI chief's comments
At a briefing Friday, Beijing’s foreign ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun criticised Patel’s remarks.
‘China believes that cooperation between countries should not target any third party,’ he said. ‘Seeking so-called absolute security through forming small groupings under the banner of countering China does not help keep the Asia-Pacific and the world at large peaceful and stable.’
New Zealand, the smallest Five Eyes partner, has faced continuing pressure to align with US stances on China, its largest trading partner, while carefully balancing relations with Beijing. Analysts said the FBI chief’s comments could vex those efforts, although New Zealand has faced such challenges before.
‘It’s in New Zealand’s interest to have more law enforcement activities to deal with our shared problems,’ said Jason Young, associate professor of international relations at Victoria University of Wellington. ‘It’s perhaps not in New Zealand’s interest to say we’re doing this to compete with China.’
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109454
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23415184 (020818ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Relief as Australia dodges higher Trump tariffs – Australia has successfully avoided an increase in US tariffs, remaining on the 10 per cent base rate as President Trump imposed higher tariffs on other nations. Trade Minister Don Farrell hailed the result as a win for Australia's "cool and calm" diplomacy. The Albanese government’s plan to recognise Palestinian statehood could yet result in tariff hikes for Australian exporters, after Mr Trump warned that Canada could be punished with higher rates for announcing it would recognise Palestine. Australia's exporters still face challenges, including sector-specific tariffs on steel and pharmaceuticals. While the government celebrates, the opposition argues Australia’s trade surplus with the US, not diplomatic efforts, is the reason for the favourable outcome.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/23372922
>>109435
>>109436
Relief as Australia dodges higher Trump tariffs
BEN PACKHAM and JOE KELLY - August 01, 2025
1/2
Anthony Albanese will go into his first meeting with Donald Trump a winner, with Australia dodging steeper US tariffs to remain on the President’s 10 per cent base rate as other industrialised nations were slapped with duties of at least 15 per cent.
The government claimed the result as vindication of its low-key diplomacy with the Trump administration, which saw the Prime Minister put a presidential meeting on the back burner for nearly seven months in favour of a “watch and wait” strategy.
But the Albanese government’s plan to recognise Palestinian statehood could yet result in tariff hikes for Australian exporters, after Mr Trump warned that Canada could be punished with higher rates for announcing it would recognise Palestine.
Mr Trump’s new executive order on tariffs, issued on Friday, AEST, confirmed Australian goods would continue to face the original “Liberation Day” base rate of 10 per cent, in an outcome Trade Minister Don Farrell lauded as a win for exporters.
“I think this is a vindication for the Albanese government and particularly the Prime Minister in the cool and calm way we have conducted diplomacy with the US,” Senator Farrell said.
“What this decision means in conjunction with all of the other changes to other countries is that Australian products are now more competitive in the American market. This means products like wine, beef, lamb, wheat, in a relative sense, are cheaper into the United States.”
It remains unclear when Mr Albanese will score his first meeting with Mr Trump, but the government is pointing to an array of upcoming summits where the leaders may brush shoulders, including a Quad leaders’ meeting in India and APEC in South Korea.
With tariffs out of the way, Australia’s defence spending and the future of AUKUS are likely to dominate discussions.
Many countries that engaged directly in negotiations with the Trump administration suffered worse tariff outcomes than Australia, including Japan (15 per cent), South Korea (15 per cent), Indonesia (19 per cent) and India (25 per cent). Canada was hit with a 35 per cent rate, up from a previously announced 25 per cent, after Mr Trump suggested Prime Minister Mark Carney’s decision to recognise Palestine would make it “very hard” to do a deal with the country. The White House blamed Canada’s failure to stop the flow of fentanyl into the US for the additional 10 per cent.
Australian steel, aluminium and copper producers will continue to face sector-specific tariffs of 50 per cent, while more than $2bn worth of Australian pharmaceutical exports a year could be hit with a threatened 200 per cent tariff next year.
Mr Trump on Thursday blamed “foreign freeloading nations” for the high drug prices faced by US consumers, in a shot across the bows to drug companies that supply discounted medicines under initiatives like Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.
Senator Farrell said he hoped the tariff reveal was “the end of the matter” and Australia would remain on the 10 per cent rate.
But said he had invited US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnik to Australia to try to negotiate an even better deal.
“We believe in free and fair trade and we will continue to put the argument to the United States that they should remove all tariffs on Australia,” he said.
Opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan seized on comments from an unnamed Trump administration official to argue the government had done little to achieve the outcome.
According to the official, countries were sorted into three groups: those with which the US had a trade surplus received 10 per cent tariffs; countries that reached deals or had modest trade deficits received 15 per cent; and higher rates were applied to countries with large trade deficits which did not strike deals.
“Australia was placed in the 10 per cent group because the US runs a trade surplus with us, not because of any effort from the Prime Minister,” Mr Hogan said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109455
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23415195 (020830ZAUG25) Notable: Albanese government claims vindication after dodging Trump tariff increase – Australia has avoided higher tariffs, with exports to the US remaining at a 10 per cent rate despite earlier threats of a rise to 15 or 20 per cent. Trade Minister Don Farrell called the outcome “a vindication for the Albanese government,” stating, “I haven’t seen any case where retaliatory tariffs result in a better position.” Opposition spokesman Kevin Hogan said Australia was placed in the 10 per cent group because of the US trade surplus, not diplomacy. Farrell highlighted that Australian products like beef and wine are now more competitive in the US market.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/23372922
>>109436
>>109454
Albanese government claims vindication after dodging Trump tariff increase
Michael Koziol - August 1, 2025
1/2
Washington/Canberra: President Donald Trump has delivered Australia the equal-lowest tariff rate of any country, with its exports to the US to continue to be hit with a 10 per cent impost, prompting the Albanese government to claim its approach had been vindicated.
Trade Minister Don Farrell vowed to continue talks until Australia is allowed to sell goods to the United States with no tariffs, as the opposition accused the government of avoiding increased tariffs on Friday through the economy’s structure rather than diplomacy.
After issuing earlier threats to hike the baseline levy to 15 or 20 per cent, Trump issued an executive order on Friday confirming new tariff rates for several trading partners following “deals” struck with their leaders, as well as revised tariffs for other countries.
Australia received the lowest rate, 10 per cent, when the so-called reciprocal tariffs were announced on April 2. Australia was not named among the changes on Friday (AEST), and a White House fact sheet confirmed any countries not on the new list would remain at 10 per cent, the same as the United Kingdom.
But some countries faced increases: Trump hiked the tariff on goods from New Zealand to 15 per cent.
White House officials indicated the administration was still open to compromise if countries removed trade barriers and came to Trump with a proposed deal. The tariffs are set to take effect in seven days.
Farrell, the trade minister, said Trump’s decision vindicated Australia’s “cool and calm” diplomatic approach to the negotiations.
“At no stage did we introduce tariffs on American goods,” Farrell said. “I haven’t seen any case or any example where the retaliatory imposition of tariffs has resulted in a country being in a better position.”
Farrell said he had invited US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick to Australia to negotiate further, with the government’s position being that true reciprocity would mean zero tariffs from Washington, given the existing free trade deal between the countries.
“The Americans export about double to us what we export to them,” Farrell said. “But we will continue the discussions until we get all of those tariffs removed.”
Opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan said Australia appeared to have been fortunate to be grouped into the group of countries that buy more goods from the US than they sell in return.
“Australia was placed in the 10 per cent group because the US runs a trade surplus with us, not because of any effort from the prime minister,” Hogan said.
Australia’s largest export industries to the US include beef and other meats, gold and pharmaceuticals.
Farrell said the decision would make many Australian products more competitive in the American market because rival goods from other nations faced higher trade penalties.
“This means products like wine, like beef, like lamb, like wheat, in a relative sense, are cheaper into the United States,” Farrell said. “And as a government, we will assist all of our exporters in ensuring that we take advantage of this situation and increase the volume of exports, not just to the United States, but to all of those other countries that we have diversified with.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109456
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23415214 (020907ZAUG25) Notable: Trump takes aim at ‘foreign freeloading nations’ over drug prices in new threat to PBS – US President Donald Trump has ordered pharmaceutical firms to extend “most favoured nation” pricing to Medicaid, warning companies to “negotiate harder with foreign freeloading nations” or face penalties. Letters sent to 17 drugmakers, including Pfizer, AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson, demanded overseas profits be repatriated to lower US drug costs. Trump, who pledged tariffs of up to 200 per cent on pharmaceutical imports, also signalled new baseline tariff hikes on key trading partners, leaving Australia uncertain about impacts on its Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109280
>>109455
Trump takes aim at ‘foreign freeloading nations’ over drug prices in new threat to PBS
Michael Koziol - August 1, 2025
1/2
Washington: US President Donald Trump has blamed “foreign freeloading nations” for the high drug prices faced by Americans and told pharmaceutical firms to negotiate harder with other countries, in a new threat to programs such as Australia’s Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.
Trump issued letters to the bosses of 17 drug firms on Thursday (Friday AEST) demanding they extend “most favoured nation” pricing to the US Medicaid scheme, and guarantee such pricing for new drugs. It means other comparable, high-income nations could not be offered cheaper prices than the US.
“Domestic MFN pricing will require you, and all manufacturers, to negotiate harder with foreign freeloading nations,” Trump wrote in the letters.
“US trade policy will endeavour to support this. However, increased revenues abroad must be repatriated to lower drug prices for American patients and taxpayers through an explicit agreement with the United States.”
The letters were sent to major drugmakers including Pfizer, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson, and published on Trump’s social media.
They did not mention Australia but referred to putting “an end to the free ride of American innovation by European and other developed nations”.
Under the PBS, Australians can buy life-saving drugs worth thousands of dollars for as little as $31.60 a script after the government negotiates with the drug company to secure a lower price based on buying in bulk.
Trump’s letter makes explicit instructions to drug firms to “negotiate harder” and return those extra profits to American patients and taxpayers.
“Other nations have been freeloading on US innovation for far too long; it is time they pay their fair share,” he wrote, giving firms until September 29 to commit to the goals.
If drugmakers refuse to step up, the administration will “deploy every tool in our arsenal” to end “abusive drug pricing practices”, he wrote.
It was not immediately clear how Trump’s instructions would intersect with the PBS more broadly. Treatment of pharmaceuticals is already managed under the US-Australia free trade agreement.
Trump has also pledged to impose 200 per cent tariffs on imports of pharmaceuticals, which would hit more than $2 billion a year in Australian drug products. The Australian government said in early July it was seeking more detail on the plan.
American drugmakers have long harboured other gripes against the PBS, including that it restricts market access for non-listed products, or undervalues innovative products.
An industry lobby group, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, identified the PBS on a list of “egregious and discriminatory” policies in a submission to the US Trade Representative this year, saying it threatened market competitiveness.
A spokesperson for Health Minister Mark Butler said the government would not negotiate over the future of the PBS.
“Our government is getting on with the job of delivering cheaper medicines for Australians,” they said. “The PBS is not up for negotiation.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109457
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23415263 (021008ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Harbour Bridge protest in limbo after police argue crowd crush threat – NSW Police has sought a Supreme Court prohibition order against Sunday’s pro-Palestine march across the Harbour Bridge, warning of “unprecedented” risks to public safety, including crowd crush and disruption to emergency access. The move followed a counter-protest threat by fringe pro-Israel group Never Again is Now, which was later withdrawn. Organisers say up to 100,000 protesters will attend, with activists arguing a sanctioned road closure would be safer. The protest has divided Premier Chris Minns’ party, with five Labor MPs joining crossbenchers in backing the march despite Minns’ opposition.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109425
>>109439
Harbour Bridge protest in limbo after police argue crowd crush threat
Jessica McSweeney - August 1, 2025
A decision on the fate of a pro-Palestine march across the Harbour Bridge will be made on Saturday after police argued it would bring too great a risk to public safety, in part because of threats of a counter-protest in the Sydney Harbour Tunnel which has since been cancelled.
NSW Police is seeking a prohibition order in the Supreme Court against a planned march across the bridge by the Palestine Action Group on Sunday.
A last-minute application to police by fringe pro-Israel group Never Again is Now was lodged on Friday, and threatened to block the tunnel in recognition of hostages held in tunnels by Hamas, NSW Police’s barrister Lachlan Gyles, SC, told the court.
The competing protests could lead to clashes and hostility, as well as risks to safety if the bridge needed to be closed, he argued. A police spokesperson confirmed that the counter-protest was withdrawn on Friday evening.
About 100 supporters tried to enter the packed court on Friday afternoon, which had to briefly pause as activists pushed in and sat on the floor.
The court heard up to 100,000 protesters could descend on the bridge on Sunday, which police argue cannot be accommodated safely in such a short time frame.
“This is really unprecedented … in terms of scale, level of risk, lack of time to prepare, and of course location, which is one of the main arteries in one of the largest cities in the world,” Gyles said.
Gyles argued if “there are violent scenes” or if ambulances were blocked from accessing patients, “the court has to be concerned about being seen to condone that”.
Activists say they are willing to delay this weekend’s march over the Harbour Bridge if police agree to support the protest.
The protesters plan to march from Lang Park near Wynyard to the US consulate in North Sydney at 1pm on Sunday.
“Fifty thousand people at Lang Park, whether authorised or unauthorised, has significant public safety risk, crowd crush. I’m personally concerned about that,” acting Assistant Police Commissioner Adam Johnson said under cross-examination.
Palestine Action Group protester Josh Lees, who earlier described the protest as “unstoppable”, told the court he believed that closing the appropriate roads and allowing people to protest on the bridge would in fact be safer.
He argued that the short amount of planning time was necessary because a protest needed to happen immediately to have maximum effect as the world grappled with images of starving children in Gaza. Lees said police had appropriate powers to adequately protect the public from risks of counterprotests.
The prohibition order would not ban the protest, but would revoke certain protections, including for blocking roads.
On behalf of the Palestinian Action Group, barrister Felicity Graham argued having crowds between 50,000 to 100,000 was a foregone conclusion for this Sunday, and being able to safely march on the roads without the threat of arrest would be a far safer outcome for the public.
“It would create a very fluid, dangerous and unstable situation if the court grants this application. It’s unclear exactly what would unfold, but it’s clear police wish to have powers to arrest people simply for being on a road,” she said.
Acting Deputy Commissioner Peter McKenna earlier told 2GB the protest was “stoppable” and accused protesters of communicating mixed messages about whether the protest would go ahead regardless of the court outcome.
The protest has revealed unrest within Premier Chris Minns’ party, with five Labor MPs joining the Greens and independent crossbenchers to sign a letter supporting the march, after Minns declared it should not go ahead.
Labor’s Sarah Kaine, Stephen Lawrence, Anthony D’Adam, Cameron Murphy and Lynda Voltz all pledged to join Sunday’s protest, along with independents Alex Greenwich, Jacqui Scruby and Libertarian John Ruddick.
The letter detailed “in strong terms our disapproval of the ongoing starvation of the Palestinian people” and called on the government to work with protest organisers to facilitate a safe march.
Kaine said she would march with her elderly parents and her children, who told her they intended to turn up regardless of the court outcome.
“This issue is too important to be postponed,” she said.
Minns previously said the protest would cause Sydney to descend into chaos.
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/nsw/police-say-harbour-bridge-protest-could-end-in-crowd-crush-20250731-p5mjdi.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14_HPxwIIyA
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109458
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23415265 (021010ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Sydney Harbour Bridge to close for 4 hours, as cops prepare for Sunday traffic chaos – The NSW Supreme Court has authorised a pro-Palestine “March for Humanity” across the Sydney Harbour Bridge, prompting police to warn of major disruption as the bridge shuts from 11.30am to 4pm Sunday. Justice Belinda Rigg ruled safety could be maintained, citing Palestine Action Group’s track record, while organiser Josh Lees called the march an “urgent necessity” amid Gaza’s crisis. Police warned of “serious safety concerns” but pledged a strong presence. The Executive Council of Australian Jewry condemned the ruling, calling it reckless and divisive.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109425
>>109439
>>109457
Sydney Harbour Bridge to close for 4 hours, as cops prepare for Sunday traffic chaos
STEPHEN RICE and HOLLY TRUELOVE - 2 August 2025
1/2
The Sydney Harbour Bridge will be closed to traffic for at least four hours on Sunday after pro-Palestine protesters were given permission to hold a “March for Humanity” in support of Gaza, following a ruling by the NSW Supreme Court handed down on Saturday morning.
Police have confirmed the bridge will close at around 11.30 Sunday morning and is expected to reopen at 4pm, but the march from the CBD to North Sydney could take much longer, amid estimates that 50,000 people may take part.
Transport for NSW warned Sydneysiders there would be “significant disruptions” to the Sydney road and transport network, with commuters urged to avoid non-essential travel. Trains will continue to run across the bridge but bus services will be severely impacted.
Acting Deputy Commissioner Peter McKenna said police would “have to scramble now, there’s no doubt about that.” He warned that although the march had been authorised by the court, police would not tolerate any breach of the law, including hate speech.
There would be a “significant” police presence throughout the city and police would “have no hesitation but to take action if protesters do not do the right thing”.
Police had opposed the march, in part because they say they have not been given enough time to prepare proper traffic and crowd management plans.
However Justice Belinda Rigg ruled the protest could go ahead on Sunday, saying the Palestine Action Group had “ensured that people’s safety was a priority” on previous protest days.
Justice Rigg said she accepted the evidence of PAG organiser Josh Lees that the timing of the march was “based on his view that ‘we are at a critical moment, on the issue of Palestinian rights not only due to the crisis in Gaza, itself, but also due to awareness of that crisis brought about by the horrific images, published in the media recently’.”
“Mr Lees’ evidence indicates that the timing and the lodging of this proposed march and its location is directly responsive to the dramatic increase in the known suffering of Gazan citizens over the last weeks.
“He states, ‘the March for Humanity is an urgent necessity demanded by the urgent situation in Gaza right now, where at least 147 people have died from starvation, and Gazan authorities warn 40,000 infants under the age of one are at imminent risk of death due to the lack of baby formula.”
Justice Rigg said Mr Lees had indicated “support in the Australian community has been growing” and that the march was “publicly endorsed by a great number of people and organisations including the council of civil liberties”.
“The public interest in freedom of expression at this time in the manner contemplated for the reasons advanced is very high,” she said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109459
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23415282 (021028ZAUG25) Notable: Albanese’s allies work to kill off anti-AUKUS push before Labor conference – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s allies in Labor’s Victorian Left are lobbying to soften or block a grassroots motion demanding Australia “withdraw” from AUKUS and denouncing US President Donald Trump as a “demagogue.” The push, led by Labor Against War, comes as the Pentagon reviews the $360 billion pact amid US concerns about submarine production. Powerbrokers aligned with Deputy PM Richard Marles are trying to avoid debate, while former foreign minister Bob Carr said the cost justifies scrutiny. A harsh motion could unsettle Washington about Labor’s commitment to AUKUS.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109316
>>109318
>>109405
Albanese’s allies work to kill off anti-AUKUS push before Labor conference
Paul Sakkal and Kieran Rooney - August 1, 2025
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s allies are scrambling to put a lid on an anti-AUKUS grassroots Labor move that threatens to complicate a US probe into the submarine pact.
The party’s Victorian Left faction, led by minister Andrew Giles and who back the prime minister, are lobbying behind the scenes to water down a motion submitted by the anti-US Labor Against War to Labor’s state conference on Saturday that slams US President Donald Trump and demands the government “withdraw” from AUKUS.
The push comes at a time when the Pentagon is reviewing the $360 billion nuclear deal and the US Navy is concerned the country is not building enough nuclear submarines to sell any to Australia in the 2030s without a dramatic increase in production.
Australian officials are emphasising to the US that AUKUS gives it a more powerful military position in the Indo-Pacific to persuade it to stay committed to the deal, but the push from rank-and-file Labor members highlights discomfort in the party about closer ties with the US military.
Powerbrokers loyal to Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles in the Victoria Right faction are trying to kill off debate on AUKUS entirely, according to sources in both factions who asked to remain anonymous because talks about the Left faction-dominated Victorian Labor conference were private.
“There is a general view in the membership that AUKUS is a crock of shit,” one senior party figure said, “but we’re all going along with it because it’s like a federal version of the Suburban Rail Loop that we can’t ditch.”
The loop is an expensive Victorian infrastructure project announced with little scrutiny. Since 2018, it has provoked fierce criticism from transport academics and Labor’s political opponents, but the state Labor government attributes its thumping election wins to the project.
Spokespeople for Giles and Marles declined to comment. Labor Against War, which does not have significant institutional backing in the party, was contacted for comment.
Former foreign minister Bob Carr, a frequent critic of the nuclear submarine pact signed by the Morrison government, said the Labor conference was entitled to debate it given “it is so colossally expensive that it’s crowding out other options for the defence of this continent”.
“It is going to leave us almost certainly without a sovereign submarine capacity as the Collins class boats are retired,” he said.
Carr previously served as the director of the Australia-China Relations Institute and holds more moderate views on the threat posed by China than Australian defence officials, as expressed in the landmark Defence Strategic Review. The only federal Labor member who has raised public concern about AUKUS is Fremantle MP Josh Wilson.
Marles said on July 26, at an AUKUS treaty signing with UK counterparts, that AUKUS will create 20,000 jobs in Australia and “deliver is the biggest leap in Australia’s military capability, really, since the formation of the navy back in 1913”.
Labor’s state conference is not as significant as the national version, which backed AUKUS after a bruising debate during the last parliamentary term. However, a sharply worded anti-AUKUS motion could cause US officials to question the governing party’s commitment to the pact.
The current motion states that Trump is a “demagogue” who is a “danger to peace and security”.
Conference motions do not bind governments.
A key point of contention in the AUKUS motion is whether to use a word such as “withdraw”. Discussions are under way about whether the wording can be toned down to cause less conflict, according to sources familiar with the negotiations.
“The question will come down to whether the AUKUS opponents are willing to adjust the language sufficiently to avoid embarrassing the government,” one source said.
Wording can be altered as late as Saturday morning when delegates from Labor’s Left will meet and decide on the final form of each motion before taking it to conference. Resolutions could also be merged or pulled up to this point.
Marles will be the most senior party figure at the event over the weekend because Albanese is at the Garma festival in the Northern Territory.
Duelling motions related to Israel and Gaza are also expected to be debated at the conference.
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/albanese-s-allies-work-to-kill-off-anti-aukus-push-before-labor-conference-20250731-p5mja3.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109460
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23415285 (021034ZAUG25) Notable: Victorian Labor conference heats up over Gaza, AUKUS – Victorian Labor delegates have voted to urge the Albanese government to immediately recognise a Palestinian state, impose sanctions on Israel, and suspend participation in AUKUS. The Gaza motion called for trade in arms with Israel to cease, while the AUKUS resolution demanded funding be halted and the pact removed from Labor’s platform. Labor Against War described AUKUS as “madness” under Donald Trump, but Premier Jacinta Allan insisted only government sets policy, reiterating support for AUKUS and the two-state solution. Defence Minister Richard Marles faced flag-waving protests inside the conference hall.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109316
>>109445
>>109459
Victorian Labor conference heats up over Gaza, AUKUS
RYAN BOURKE - 2 August 2025
The Victorian Labor Party has overwhelmingly voted for the Albanese government to immediately recognise a Palestinian state, step up sanctions against Israel and suspend its participation in AUKUS at its annual conference.
Despite support from delegates, Labor MPs have distanced themselves from the motions with Premier Jacinta Allan insisting only the government can determine its policies.
The first motion called for a federal parliamentary inquiry into the AUKUS submarine deal and for Australia to suspend participation and funding for the alliance pending its findings. It also called for the removal of AUKUS from the Labor policy platform.
Labor Against War Victorian convener Hamish McPherson told delegates that “AUKUS is a dangerous and doomed pact that can’t be fixed or tweaked,”
“It was a bad idea when it was conceived by Scott Morrison, Boris Johnson and Joe Biden, but with Donald Trump now in power … It is madness,” he added.
The motion passed overwhelmingly, while attempts by moderates to water it down were defeated.
The second motion called on the federal government to recognise Palestine immediately, to extend comprehensive sanctions against Benjamin Netanyahu’s cabinet, and to cease trade of all arms or military goods with Israel.
Motion mover Oliver Van Ingen told delegates the Albanese government needed to do so “to preserve any hope of Palestinians preventing further illegal territorial approaches”.
“The International Court of Justice has ruled that Australia has a positive duty to end complicity in Israel’s crimes,” he added.
Delegate Nick Dyrenfurth from Labor Friends of Israel failed to pass an amendment to the resolution calling for the government to pursue the exclusion of Hamas from a two-state solution and release all hostages.
“Until then peace is going to be very difficult if not impossible,” he said.
Mr Dyrenfurth was also unsuccessful in his attempt to amend a separate motion on equality to include a condemnation of anti-Semitism and described the failure of that amendment as “offensive, disingenuous, and a deliberate provocation to Jewish Laborites and Jewish Victorians”.
While motions at the conference can determine and influence the party’s official policies, the government is not bound to follow them.
Speaking after her address to the conference on Saturday morning, Premier Allan said it was important for the conference to enable “a contest of ideas”.
“But let’s be clear, it’s the government that sets government policy, and our policy is to support the Federal government’s position around a two-state solution”.
Ms Allan said her government was just as committed to AUKUS, adding that the defence industry was a vital part of the state’s economy, including her own electorate of Bendigo where Bushmaster armoured vehicles are manufactured.
“As someone who represents a community that has a very strong defence industry in Bendigo, I understand very keenly the importance of the defence industry to our economy, to supporting working people and families, to good jobs in regional and rural Victoria, but also across Melbourne as well,” she said.
The conference was also addressed by Defence Minister Richard Marles, with members of the Labor friends of Palestine group holding up Palestinian flags and playing videos of famished children while he spoke.
Protesters also gathered outside the Moonee Valley Racecourse where the conference was held, but were unable to make their way onto the premises, with security and police numbers boosted after last year’s attempted storming of the conference by activists.
It comes as pro-Palestine protesters prepare to shut down the CBD and King Street bridge as part of its weekly Sunday protest, a move that police have sought to prevent due to its status as a critical access point for emergency services.
Asked if she had a message for protesters planning on ignoring warnings from police, Ms Allan said, “Anyone intending to disrupt emergency services or everyday Victorians going about their Sunday safely will be dealt with swiftly by Victoria Police”.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/victorian-labor-conference-heats-up-over-gaza-aukus/news-story/f5a4a34ef96670a909078658a5462932
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109461
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23415297 (021040ZAUG25) Notable: CNO Nominee Caudle Says Sub Construction Pace Needs to Grow to Deliver on AUKUS Promise – US Navy chief nominee Adm. Daryl Caudle told Congress the industrial base must double attack submarine output to meet AUKUS commitments, with production needing to rise from 1.3 to 2.3 Virginia-class boats annually while also building Columbia-class submarines. Caudle praised Australian submariners but warned current capacity falls short of Trump administration goals, calling for “transformational improvement.” He backed outsourcing, shipyard reform, and allied maintenance partnerships to ease pressure. Caudle also highlighted amphibious fleet readiness problems, saying the Navy cannot sustain required Marine deployments.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109316
>>109318
>>109405
CNO Nominee Caudle Says Sub Construction Pace Needs to Grow to Deliver on AUKUS Promise
MALLORY SHELBOURNE - JULY 24, 2025
1/2
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. industrial base must double its attack submarine output for America to meet its obligations under the AUKUS agreement with Australia and the United Kingdom, the Navy’s nominee to lead the Navy told Congress Thursday.
Testifying before the Senate Armed Services Committee as part of his confirmation process to serve as the next chief of naval operations, Adm. Daryl Caudle praised Royal Australian Navy (RAN) submariners and said the current Pentagon-wide review of the AUKUS partnership is about U.S. industrial capacity.
“The question of Australia’s ability to conduct undersea warfare is not in question by me or by anyone,” Caudle told Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), who chairs the SASC seapower subcommittee. “But as you know, the delivery pace is not where it needs to be to make good on the Pillar 1 of the AUKUS agreement, which is currently under review by our Defense Department.”
As of last month, the Pentagon is reevaluating AUKUS, which would see the U.S. share its nuclear propulsion technology for the second time in history, to ensure it aligns with the Trump administration’s priorities, USNI News previously reported. Elbridge Colby, the under secretary of defense for policy, is leading the assessment of the pact that could see the U.S. sell up to five Virginia-class attack boats to the RAN as an interim solution while it helps Australia develop an indigenous capability to maintain and build nuclear-powered attack submarines.
To sell the Virginia boats to the Australians, Navy officials have said the U.S. industrial base must build 2.33 attack boats per year while also keeping pace constructing one Columbia-class nuclear ballistic missile submarine each year. The industrial base currently builds about 1.3 attack boats per year.
Caudle agreed with SASC Chairman Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) that the U.S. Navy and the defense industrial base must pursue pivotal changes so General Dynamics Electric Boat and HII’s Newport News Shipbuilding can construct double the attack submarines they’re currently building.
“We do have to understand whether or not the industrial base can produce the submarines required so that we can make good on the actual pact that we made with the U.K. and Australia, which is around 2.2., 2.3 Virginia-class submarines per year,” Caudle told senators. “That’s going to require a transformational improvement, not a 10 percent improvement, not a 20 percent, a 100 percent improvement.”
Caudle called for creativity, outsourcing work, and minimizing the attrition at the shipyards to increase that build rate. He told lawmakers that the biggest challenge the U.S. Navy currently faces in its quest to counter the Chinese military and manage worldwide threats is capacity across the service.
Caudle, a career submariner who is currently the commander of U.S. Fleet Forces, endorsed working with international partners to maintain and repair U.S. ships and said he would assess how other countries could help the U.S. with its capacity challenges.
“I don’t know how we do what we need to do without bringing international partners into the capacity problem that we have while we build up our capacity because we need ships today,” Caudle told Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.). “And so there are no magic beans to that. There’s nothing that’s just going to make that happen. So the solution space has got to open up, and I think part of that has to look at international partnerships to give us a little bit of a relief valve while we work on our own organic industrial capacity.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109462
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23415327 (021102ZAUG25) Notable: ‘Not woke stuff’: Trump administration bars US officials from Australia defence talks – The Trump administration has blocked Pentagon officials from travelling to Canberra for the US-Australia Indo-Pacific Deterrence Dialogue, citing concerns that think tank events conflict with its “America First” agenda. The cancellation halted confidential discussions on military integration, nuclear deterrence and China strategy, prompting warnings it undermines alliance ties. Australian experts called the move “disappointing” and “self-defeating,” while the US Studies Centre said Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth was fighting “internal culture wars.” Organisers hope to reschedule, but future exchanges remain in doubt under the Pentagon edict.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109316
>>109318
‘Not woke stuff’: Trump administration bars US officials from Australia defence talks
Matthew Knott - August 2, 2025
1/2
Confidential talks canvassing strategies to prevent a war with China and deepen the United States-Australia alliance have been scrapped after the Trump administration abruptly blocked senior defence officials from travelling to Canberra next week.
National security experts fear an array of exchanges between US and Australian counterparts will dry up following a sweeping Pentagon edict, announced this week, suspending all participation in think tank and research events because it suspects they do not align with Donald Trump’s “America First” agenda.
The edict comes as the US reviews the future of the AUKUS nuclear-powered submarine pact and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese prepares for a potential first meeting with Trump in September after months of no discussions between the pair.
US and Australian officials were planning to meet some of the nations’ top defence experts in Canberra on Monday and Tuesday next week for the fifth round of the US-Australia Indo-Pacific Deterrence Dialogue, but the event was suddenly called off on Wednesday when the American officials were told they were no longer allowed to travel to the event.
Around 40 American and Australian national security figures would have gathered to discuss issues such as military integration, nuclear deterrence and strategic interaction with China at the closed-door dialogue, which involved months of planning.
The so-called “1.5 track” event brings together current military leaders, government officials and diplomats with non-government researchers. Discussions are held under the Chatham House rule to foster frank discussions on sensitive and complex topics, with the participants’ identities kept secret.
This would have been the first time the dialogue has been held since Trump’s re-election.
Chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said in a statement: “In order to ensure the Department of Defence is not lending its name and credibility to organisations, forums, and events that run counter to the values of this administration, the Department’s Office of Public Affairs will be conducting a thorough vetting of every event where Defence officials are invited to participate.”
Rory Medcalf, head of the Australian National University’s National Security College, said the “cancellation of this dialogue is disappointing and counterproductive for alliance interests”.
“This would have been a valuable opportunity for the US administration to help Australians understand its strategy, and for us to help explain Australia’s security priorities,” he said.
“It is in the interests of both countries that such dialogues resume as soon as possible.”
Foreign policy sources, speaking on condition of anonymity, blasted the US move as “a shock”, “narrow-minded” and “self-defeating”.
“This is a war on expertise,” one foreign policy expert said. “These dialogues are not woke stuff, they are about hard strategy … This is the US shooting themselves in the foot.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109463
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23415344 (021116ZAUG25) Notable: ‘Low on the priority list’: Trump administration in no rush to appoint ambassador – US President Donald Trump has yet to nominate an ambassador to Canberra despite doing so for more than 50 countries, fuelling claims Australia ranks low on his agenda as tariff decisions and an AUKUS review loom. Analysts said the vacancy underscores limited engagement between Trump and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, who has not secured a meeting with the president. DFAT called the delay routine, but experts warned alliances under Trump hinge on personal ties. Canberra is currently represented by chargé d’affaires Erika Olsen.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109454
>>109294
‘Low on the priority list’: Trump administration in no rush to appoint ambassador
Matthew Knott - July 31, 2025
1/2
US President Donald Trump has shown no sign of appointing an ambassador to Canberra despite doing so for more than 50 other countries, fuelling accusations Australia is a low diplomatic priority as Trump weighs decisions on tariff rates and the future of the AUKUS defence pact.
The federal opposition has intensified its criticism of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese for not securing a meeting with Trump this week after the president said he planned to increase his baseline tariff rate from 10 per cent to as much as 20 per cent.
The Trump administration has announced ambassadorial nominees for at least 52 countries, including Malta, Tunisia, the Bahamas, Latvia, Namibia and New Zealand.
The US Senate has approved Trump’s nominees for ambassadors to China, Japan, Canada, Mexico, France, Israel, Britain, Ireland, Turkey and Panama, allowing those diplomats to take up their posts at embassies in their host countries.
Michael Green, chief executive of the University of Sydney’s United States Studies Centre, said that Canberra remained a “coveted posting” in Washington, with high-profile former members of Congress and Republican donors lobbying to be appointed to the position.
“Trump is making them work for it and is not rushing to decide,” said Green, who served as a senior official in George W. Bush’s administration.
Michael Shoebridge, who served as a senior defence policy official at the Australian embassy in Washington, said the lack of an ambassadorial appointment was part of a “disturbing pattern” of a lack of engagement between the Albanese government and Trump administration, including the lack of a leaders’ meeting.
“We are clearly low down their priority list,” said Shoebridge, a director at the Strategic Analysis Australia think tank.
He noted that Trump’s predecessor Joe Biden appointed a member of Democratic Party royalty, Caroline Kennedy, as US ambassador to emphasise the importance of the relationship, although that appointment took almost a year to announce.
Shoebridge said that personal relationships were more important than ever in the Trump era, given the president did not place the same importance on alliances and traditional policy processes as his predecessors.
“You can’t coast on past relationships and value. It’s all about: what have you done for me lately?” he said. “It’s up to Australia to make the case for why we matter in the relationship now, and we’re not doing that.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109464
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23415362 (021127ZAUG25) Notable: COMMENTARY: In national interest, China must be a key climate ally – "We can outlast warmongers like Putin … but we cannot outrun the far greater existential collapse of climate change. The United States is going backwards on climate, while China is accelerating the manufacture and deployment of renewable technologies at a speed the world desperately needs … Turning our backs on China’s decarbonisation would not just be self-defeating. It would be a missed opportunity … Peaceful, firm and respectful relationships with our neighbours is not a choice, but a necessity … Serious countries do not undermine their leader when they are representing the nation on the world stage. That’s not politics. That’s patriotism." – Andrew Forrest, The Australian
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109337
>>109397
>>109401
COMMENTARY: In national interest, China must be a key climate ally
ANDREW FORREST - July 29, 2025
1/2
I love my country to my core and will defend it at any cost. I grew up in the great Australian Outback and fell heavily for the land we call our own. I’ve been a builder and creator for as long as I can remember, which led to the creation of Fortescue – Australia’s largest and most successful business – and its beneficiary, Minderoo Foundation, a $9 billion philanthropy, one of the largest in the Asia-Pacific.
Every fibre of my being is committed to building our national wealth and protecting Australians from the greatest threat we face.
We can outlast warmongers like Putin on the battlefield, but we cannot outrun the far greater existential collapse of climate change.
I throw everything I have at heading off global climate change. Why? Because it’s accelerating and hurting every single Australian, especially the poorest.
Quick and shallow analysis might try to belittle that as a conflict of interest, but it’s anything but. It’s walking the talk. It’s the hard yards. It’s throwing everything you have into what you believe is critical for every Australian.
When I think of national interest – an esoteric term adopted by some as a veil to hide any manner of sins – I think differently. I think of the best interests of every single Australian child, woman and man, and how responsible economic growth can contribute to this, not against it.
The propagation of oil and gas is hurting every person on this planet.
The United States is going backwards on climate, while China is accelerating the manufacture and deployment of renewable technologies at a speed the world desperately needs. Almost 75 per cent of all solar and wind power projects being built globally are in China.In May, China installed 93 gigawatts of solar capacity – almost 100 solar panels every second. This is economic pragmatism, freeing China from the nation-draining costs of imported fossil fuel.
Turning our backs on China’s decarbonisation would not just be self-defeating. It would be a missed opportunity to be part of the massive economic growth and the most consequential industrial transformation of humanity.
Yet armchair warriors such as Peter Jennings say Australia should pull up the drawbridge with China – just at the very moment in time when global economic collaboration has never been more critical.
Peaceful, firm and respectful relationships with our neighbours is not a choice, but a necessity. Picking sides and choosing favourites isn’t selfless – it’s quite the opposite. We only have one side: Australia.
Those same armchair critics would do well to get on a plane to China. In the lobbies they will see businesspeople from all over the world – but mainly Americans.
For all the sabre rattling and the encouragement of a new Cold War, we forget that China is critical to global supply chains and critical to stopping climate change.
In fact, this opposition echoes those who opposed Nixon and Kissinger’s opening to China. Critics at the time warned it would “legitimise a communist regime” and empower a rival. In hindsight, it was a strategic masterstroke, weakening the Soviet Union and reshaping global diplomacy to favour freedom.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109465
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23415394 (021158ZAUG25) Notable: Inside the Australian port at the heart of China-US power struggle – One part of Darwin Harbour hosts the key naval base HMAS Coonawarra, where some of the world’s largest warships have docked, including, most recently, the UK’s HMS Prince of Wales. The other part, however, is occupied under a 99-year lease by Landbridge Group, a Chinese company whose billionaire owner, Ye Chang, has close ties to the ruling communist party. This split has raised concerns over military security as Indo-Pacific tensions rise. Analysts warn Chinese control curbs allied operations, despite reviews finding “no basis for security concerns.” The US has expanded its Marine Rotational Force in Darwin and used the harbour during Talisman Sabre 2025 drills, highlighting its strategic value in deterring conflict over Taiwan. Experts argue Australia must retake the port before crisis, warning legal powers to do so in wartime would be too late.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109325
>>109336
>>109385
>>109320
Inside the Australian port at the heart of China-US power struggle
Experts fear risk to key military facility from Beijing-linked billionaire’s company as Indo-Pacific threat levels rise
Allegra Mendelson - 30 July 2025
1/3
Down a sandy, dirt road on the outskirts of Darwin in Australia’s Northern Territory lies one of the US and Australia’s most important military assets – but there’s a catch.
Written in large letters high above the entrance are the words ‘Landbridge Darwin Port’ in Chinese.
One part of the harbour here – the largest in Australia’s largely uninhabited northern coast – hosts the key naval base HMAS Coonawarra, where some of the world’s largest warships have docked, including, most recently, the UK’s HMS Prince of Wales.
The other part, however, is occupied under a 99-year lease by Landbridge Group, a Chinese company whose billionaire owner, Ye Chang, has close ties to the ruling communist party.
The Australian government has been working behind the scenes to bring the port under domestic control amid growing fears of a war in the Indo-Pacific. It would be central to any future conflict between China and Taiwan.
And as one UK defence source told The Telegraph this week, threat levels in the Indo-Pacific are the “highest in the world”.
A Telegraph request to visit the commercial port was denied by the Chinese owners. When we approached the gates and asked to enter, we were turned away.
The ownership of the commercial port has been embroiled in controversy since the lease was signed in 2015.
Successive Australian governments have highlighted the risks of a Chinese company controlling such a strategically important military asset, and have vowed to bring it back under Australian control, but to little avail.
The presence of a Chinese company with prying eyes stationed so close to the naval base has meant the US and Australia have been concerned about expanding their military operations at Darwin. They don’t want to run the risk of classified intelligence or military assets – such as fighter jet parts - being handled by a Chinese-owned port operator.
For now, China, maintains the upper hand over the port through Landbridge. That, however, hasn’t stopped the US and its allies from building up their presence elsewhere in Darwin as part of a greater strategy to spread out and reinforce troops across the Indo-Pacific.
“Darwin is the front door for Australia and our military into the region,” Michael Shoebridge, a former Australian intelligence officer, said.
Location key to preventing war
Darwin’s strategic role in the Indo-Pacific has long been on display during Australia’s annual military exercises known as Talisman Sabre. This year, the drills were the largest yet, with tens of thousands of troops involved from 19 countries, including the US and the UK.
Vice Admiral Justin Jones, the chief of joint operations with the Australian Defence Force, said over the weekend that one of the objectives of the exercises was to “test our posture” by “force flowing all of those 42,000 people and assets into the country and out again”.
Darwin’s significance isn’t only hypothetical – building up capabilities in Darwin and elsewhere in the region could be key to preventing a war over Taiwan altogether. China, which claims sovereignty over Taiwan, has threatened to use force to “reunify the motherland”.
The government in Taipei strongly rejects Beijing’s claims, but persistent threats and increasing use of coercion by Xi Jinping, the Chinese president, have turned the Indo-Pacific into one of the world’s most highly anticipated flashpoints.
“A key part of the foreign policy… is to stop a potential Chinese invasion of Taiwan in the first place by deterring it and all the bases throughout the Pacific are a means of providing that deterrent effect,” said Neil James, the executive director of the watchdog organisation Australia Defence Association.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109466
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23419003 (030648ZAUG25) Notable: Revealed: Former Knox student allegedly made videos at childcare centres – Former Knox Grammar student and ex-NSW police employee David William James, 26, has been charged with producing child abuse material involving 10 boys aged five and six at six Sydney childcare centres. The Australian Federal Police said more than 1000 families have been contacted, with a hotline established after his identity was revealed in court. Investigators allege James filmed children in bathrooms and found material among 142,000 files seized from his devices. He remains in custody on 12 offences, while authorities confirm he held a valid Working With Children Check., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: David_James_in_a_photograph_published_on_social_media_in_2015.jpg, Acting_Assistant_Commissioner_Brett_James.jpg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109450
Revealed: Former Knox student allegedly made videos at childcare centres
JOANNA PANAGOPOULOS - August 01, 2025
1/2
A childcare worker who allegedly produced child abuse material of 10 children in his care across six different Sydney after-school centres has been identified as a former star Knox Grammar student.
Artarmon man David William James, 26, who was previously also employed by NSW Police, has been charged with filming boys aged between five and six to make child-abuse material videos.
It comes as parents are still reeling from allegations Victorian man Joshua Brown, who worked at 20 childcare centres across Melbourne, was charged with 70 child sex offences.
It is alleged Mr James stood behind the boys while they were at the urinal, and in other videos masturbated behind them, according to court documents seen by The Australian.
More than 1000 parents and carers from the six centres – a number of which are owned by Junior Adventures Group – where Mr James allegedly produced the material, were contacted last month.
But authorities have today notified the other 52 out-of-hours school services where Mr James worked between March 2018 and September 2024. The Australian Federal Police say they do not believe any alleged offending took place at those centres.
Authorities have also created a website listing every centre, which are largely based in Sydney’s north, and the dates he worked there.
According to his year 12 yearbook Mr James participated in many co-curricular activities at the school, including cadets, multiple choirs, dance, drama, Symphonic Wind Ensemble, and had received awards for multiple academic achievements.
He was also part of the old boys’ bag pipes band in the years after he graduated in 2017.
When contacted, Knox said “the AFP has assured us that we are not being investigated as part of the David James matter”.
The six childcare centres where the alleged offending took place included Willoughby Kids House, where he worked for one day, Helping Hands – St Ives Public School, Helping Hands – Lane Cove West, Pyrmont OSHC – City of Sydney, OSHClub – Barker College, and St Ives OSHC Centre – KIDZONE.
In a statement, Junior Adventure Centres, which runs three of the centres where the alleged abuse took place, said they were “also only just finding out details of alleged offences, with the Non-Publication Order (NPO) being lifted today”.
“We fully understand how distressing this matter is, and we share the immense upset and concern surrounding it. We have been co-operating with police and doing all that we can to assist them in their investigation. We are now contacting all our parents at the centres the AFP has listed,” the statement said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109467
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23419010 (030656ZAUG25) Notable: Equality Australia joins fight against female-only spaces – Equality Australia has applied to join Roxanne Tickle’s Federal Court appeal against Giggle app founder Sall Grover, backing claims female-only spaces are unlawful if they exclude trans women. The group’s intervention puts it alongside Sex Discrimination Commissioner Anna Cody and against the Lesbian Action Group, which argues sex is binary. Grover alleged the case is a planned “test” by activist Teddy Cook and said Equality Australia is opposing lesbians’ rights. The appeal, beginning August 4, will consider definitions of “sex” and whether Grover should pay Tickle damages., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Sall_Grover_left_and_Roxanne_Tickle_right.jpg, Social_media_post_by_Roxanne_Tickle_showing_Ms_Tickle_with_trans_activist_Teddy_Cook_in_2021.jpg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109282
>>109297
Equality Australia joins fight against female-only spaces
STEPHEN RICE - July 28, 2025
1/2
The powerful gay and trans rights advocacy group Equality Australia, which counts Governor-General Sam Mostyn as patron, is bidding to join transgender woman Roxanne Tickle in her court battle to establish that female-only spaces are unlawful if they exclude trans women.
Equality Australia has applied to the Federal Court for leave to appear next week in support of Ms Tickle’s case against Giggle app founder Sall Grover, who was found last year to have unlawfully rejected Ms Tickle from the female-only networking platform because she was a biological man.
In what is shaping to be the nation’s most consequential legal battle over trans and women’s rights, Equality Australia is challenging the proposition advanced by Ms Grover – and by the Lesbian Action Group – that sex is a binary biological reality.
The intervention by Equality Australia in Ms Grover’s appeal reveals the depth of division in the LGBTIQ+ community sparked by the landmark case. Equality Australia’s request to appear as intervener, or alternatively amicus curiae (friend of the court), is in direct response against submissions filed by the Lesbian Action Group.
The long-established lesbian group is now pitted against both Equality Australia and Sex Discrimination Commissioner Anna Cody, who has already been granted amicus curiae status in the case and whose position mirrors Ms Tickle’s.
Ms Grover told The Australian she believed the direct support from Equality Australia and its chair of Trans Equality, activist Teddy Cook, was designed from the start to create a strategic test case to establish that female-only spaces are unlawful, and in doing so to erode both women’s and LGB rights under the Sex Discrimination Act.
It appears Ms Tickle’s association with Mr Cook predates her action against Ms Grover and Giggle. Ms Tickle posted a picture of herself with Mr Cook – who was then a community health director with ACON – on social media on November 21, 2021, two weeks before lodging her first complaint against Ms Grover with the Human Rights Commission.
“That tells me it was legal activism, it was planned,” Ms Grover said. “One thing I know for sure is that before Tickle went on the app, he knew who I was, what my stance on female-only spaces (was), and then he went on the app – so I was his perfect sitting duck, I just didn’t know it.”
Mr Cook was the subject of the recent case in which Elon Musk’s X successfully appealed against a takedown order issued by eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant over a social media post last year by Canadian activist Chris Elston.
Mr Elston had slammed the proposed appointment of Mr Cook, a biological female, to a World Health Organisation panel on healthcare delivery. His tweet linked to a Daily Mail article that made reference to Mr Cook’s use of private social media accounts to post material relating to bestiality, public nudity, bondage parties and transgender orgies.
The eSafety order was set aside by the Administrative Review Tribunal, which ruled that although the post was offensive it was “consistent with views Mr Elston has expressed elsewhere in circumstances where the expression of the view had no malicious intent”.
Mr Cook referred questions from The Australian to Equality Australia.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109468
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23419015 (030704ZAUG25) Notable: Signal boss warns app will exit Australia if forced to hand over users’ encrypted messages – Signal president Meredith Whittaker said the messaging app would quit Australia rather than create a “backdoor” for authorities, warning it would “poison the body” of global communications by undermining encryption. She cited risks for journalists and dissidents if one jurisdiction weakens privacy, arguing “for many people, private communication is the difference between life and death.” ASIO chief Mike Burgess has pressed tech firms to unlock encrypted platforms, while Whittaker condemned governments and big tech for expanding surveillance and deploying “reckless” AI systems.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109412
>>109413
>>109444
>>>/qresearch/23402364
Signal boss warns app will exit Australia if forced to hand over users’ encrypted messages
JARED LYNCH - July 29, 2025
1/2
Signal president Meredith Whittaker is prepared to withdraw the privacy-focused messaging app from Australia — saying she hopes it doesn’t become a “gangrenous foot” by poisoning its entire platform by forcing it to hand over its users’ encrypted data to authorities.
Ms Whittaker says Signal would take the “drastic step” of leaving any market where a government compelled it to create a “backdoor” to access its data, saying it would create a vulnerability that hackers and authoritative regimes could exploit, undermining Signals’ “reason for existing”.
Pressure has been mounting on Signal and other secure messaging platforms. ASIO director general Mike Burgess has urged tech companies to unlock encrypted messages to assist terrorism and national security investigations, saying offshore extremists use such platforms to communicate.
But Ms Whittaker argues it is a slippery slope that threatens to erode fundamental human rights, highlighting the plight of another Burgess – Jessica Burgess of Nebraska in the US.
Ms Burgess was sentenced to two years’ jail in 2023 for helping her 17-year-old daughter have an illegal abortion. Facebook direct messages formed a key part of the prosecution’s evidence.
“She helped her daughter obtain and deal with the aftermath of abortion care … after the Supreme Court’s Dobbs ruling allowed Nebraska to criminalise access to reproductive care,” Ms Whittaker said.
“And why was she convicted? Because Meta turned over her Facebook DMs that were used as key evidence.”
In a wide-ranging interview with this masthead, Ms Whittaker warned of the encroachment of governments on the privacy of citizens, as well as big tech stockpiling personal data and their “reckless” use of artificial intelligence on mobile phones and laptops.
Signal, which operates as a not-for-profit and is funded largely by donations and grants, has surged in popularity this year after The Atlantic published details of a group chat in which US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth shared attack plans with a group that included key members of the Trump administration.
The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief was added to the chat, which revealed attack plans against the Iran-aligned Houthi rebel group, highlighting how much the app has become trusted among Washington’s elite.
It competes with Meta’s WhatsApp and Apple’s iMessage and holds its own with an annual budget of about $US50m. Its appeal is it collects virtually no user data and makes it difficult to discover others on Signal.
“You could come to my house, put a gun to my head, saying, ‘give me the data’. I could not give you the data. You would have to shoot because I don’t have it. I don’t have access to it,” Ms Whittaker said.
“Our commitment to end-to-end encryption, maintaining robust, technically guaranteed privacy for everyone who uses Signal never wavers. That’s the reason we exist.
“Our ability to make good on that commitment, for the people of Australia who depend on our services – often for very high stakes communication where there is real risk involved – does face threats from legislation.”
Ms Whittaker says such laws that would force Signal to create backdoor in its system to access users’ encrypted messages would undermine its privacy guarantees and force it to consider ‘taking a drastic move, like leaving the market’.
“Let’s hope Australia doesn’t become a gangrenous foot. Ultimately, we would hurt the people who rely on us if we leave a market – we don’t do that lightly. There are hundreds of thousands, millions, of people in Australia who rely on Signal.
“So we would only do that (leave) as a last resort. But again, we must do it because if you let the gangrene spread, you poison the body.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109469
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23419110 (030745ZAUG25) Notable: U.S. Embassy Australia Tweets: (Video) @FBIDirectorKash visited Sydney, Australia, to engage in high-level law enforcement meetings aimed at strengthening international partnerships and addressing shared security challenges. These discussions focus on combating transnational crime, cyber threats, and other global issues that require close collaboration with international allies. Building strong partnerships is vital to ensuring a safer and more secure future for all. - #uswithaus @FBI @AusFedPolice @ASIO @nswpolice @MarineCommand @scg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
‘Spying at unprecedented levels’: ASIO boss sounds alarm on espionage threat
Matthew Knott - July 31, 2025
1/2
The nation’s top spy boss has revealed espionage is costing Australia an estimated $12.5 billion a year as foreign operatives mount increasingly audacious attempts to pilfer highly sensitive defence and business secrets.
ASIO director-general Mike Burgess said the organisation had disrupted 24 major espionage and foreign interference operations in the past three years – more than the previous eight years combined. Yet more than 35,000 Australians have exposed themselves to danger by “recklessly” boasting on professional networking sites that they have access to sensitive information.
Burgess revealed that spies recently gained access to official Australian documents on free trade negotiations by recruiting someone with a security clearance, while others convinced a state bureaucrat to obtain the names and addresses of dissidents being targeted by a foreign regime.
Spies have also hacked into the computer network of a major Australian exporter to gain an advantage in negotiations, tried to place an agent in a media organisation by masquerading as a researcher and stolen tree branches from a horticultural facility to reverse-engineer Australian research.
“Nation states are spying at unprecedented levels, with unprecedented sophistication,” Burgess said while delivering the Hawke Oration in Adelaide on Thursday, a speech named in honour of the late Labor prime minister.
“ASIO is seeing more Australians targeted – more aggressively – than ever before.”
Burgess said that foreign spies were taking a “very unhealthy” interest in the AUKUS defence pact, describing Australia’s defence sector as “a top intelligence collection priority for foreign governments seeking to blunt our operational edge, gain insights into our operational readiness and tactics, and better understand our allies’ capabilities”.
“Targets include maritime and aviation-related military capabilities, but also innovations with both commercial and military applications,” he said.
“Foreign intelligence services are proactive, creative and opportunistic in their targeting of current and former defence employees: relentless cyber espionage, in-person targeting and technical collection.
“In recent years, for example, defence employees travelling overseas have been subjected to covert room searches, been approached at conferences by spies in disguise and given gifts containing surveillance devices.”
Burgess said that “a particularly aggressive and creative intelligence service” had created fake online job ads, advertising well-paid jobs for people with expertise in geopolitics or defence to try to gain access to sensitive information.
The spy boss called for a national “awakening” on the threat of espionage, saying he was alarmed that 35,000 Australians indicated on a professional networking site such as LinkedIn that they had access to sensitive and potentially classified information.
“Nearly two and a half thousand [Australians] publicly boast about having a security clearance and 1300 claim to work in the national security community,” he said.
“While these numbers have fallen since I first raised the alarm two years ago, this still makes my head spin ... I get that people need to market themselves, but telling social media you hold a security clearance or work on a highly classified project is more than naive; it’s recklessly inviting the attention of a foreign intelligence service.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109470
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23419114 (030748ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Spies hunt AUKUS secrets, deliver $12.5bn hit to economy – ASIO director-general Mike Burgess warned espionage is costing Australia $12.5 billion a year, with agents targeting AUKUS technologies amid “unprecedented” foreign spy activity. He said China, Russia, Iran and other states are seeking to compromise defence, trade and critical infrastructure, with examples including hacking networks, fake job ads, and a delegate stealing plant material to replicate decades of research. Burgess revealed 24 major espionage operations were disrupted in three years and vowed ASIO will help defend AUKUS to ensure it is “delivered without compromise.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109469
Spies hunt AUKUS secrets, deliver $12.5bn hit to economy
GEOFF CHAMBERS - July 31, 2025
1/2
Spy chief Mike Burgess has warned foreign agents are hunting AUKUS secrets amid “unprecedented” espionage activity that has delivered a one-year hit to the economy of more than $12.5bn.
In a major speech on Thursday night, Mr Burgess revealed details of previously undisclosed spy cases and released an inaugural “cost of espionage” report highlighting threats confronting governments, the private sector and high-value individuals targeted by nation states.
The report prepared by ASIO and the Australian Institute of Criminology, which was granted access to classified material and government departments, showed a conservative espionage cost to the economy of at least $12.5bn in 2023-24, with tens of billions of dollars in additional damage prevented by foiling spy plots.
As the US Defence Department conducts a review into the AUKUS nuclear submarine and military technologies pact, Mr Burgess used his Hawke Lecture in Adelaide to raise alarm over foreign intelligence services and agents seeking to potentially “compromise” the defence agreement.
In the speech, which outlines the industrial scale of foreign espionage and spy activity targeting Australians at home and abroad, the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation director-general said “you would be genuinely shocked by the number and names of countries trying to steal our secrets”.
“The obvious candidates are very active – I've previously named China, Russia and Iran – but many other countries are also targeting anyone and anything that could give them a strategic or tactical advantage, including sensitive but unclassified information,” Mr Burgess said.
Mr Burgess – who warned espionage activity had surged to “unprecedented levels” eclipsing the Cold War era – said “we are seeing foreign intelligence services taking a very unhealthy interest in AUKUS and its associated capabilities”.
“With AUKUS, we are not just defending our sovereign capability. We are also defending critical capability shared by and with our partners,” he said.
The Australian last year revealed the Australian Federal Police had established a new AUKUS Command and was working closely with the Department of Defence and Australian Submarine Agency to shield nuclear submarine secrets and protect key personnel, technology and submariners.
As current and former Australian Defence Force and department personnel are targeted by foreign intelligence services using a range of espionage tradecraft, Mr Burgess said spies should expect to be arrested if they attempt to “compromise AUKUS”.
“Foreign intelligence services already consider Australia a difficult operating environment and I am determined ASIO will continue to play its part to make it even less hospitable. We will help defend AUKUS to ensure it is delivered without compromise.”
“The commonwealth government is also well attuned to the espionage challenge – not just in Defence but more broadly. It fully backs ASIO as Australia's spy catcher.”
While violent extremism remains a top priority for ASIO after the national terrorism threat level was lifted last year to ‘probable’, which means a greater than 50 per cent chance of an onshore attack or terror plot, Mr Burgess said a “new iteration of great power competition is driving a relentless hunger for strategic advantage and an insatiable appetite for inside information”.
“Russia remains a persistent and aggressive espionage threat. Last year, two Russian-born Australian citizens were arrested and charged with an espionage-related offence.
“Separately, I can confirm in 2022 a number of undeclared Russian intelligence officers were removed from this country. The decision followed a lengthy ASIO investigation that found the Russians recruiting proxies and agents to obtain sensitive information, and employing sophisticated tradecraft to disguise their activities.
“But Russia is by no means the only country we have to deal with. Espionage can be small-scale and it can be industrial-scale. Spies can be opportunistic and spies can be patient, masquerading as diplomats, journalists, academics, business people and other professionals to conduct sophisticated, multi-year campaigns.”
Mr Burgess revealed ASIO had “detected and disrupted countless examples of all these things: 24 major espionage and foreign interference disruptions in the last three years alone – more than the previous eight years combined … and they are just the major disruptions; there have been many other cases”.
He said spies had recruited a security clearance holder who handed over official documents on free trade negotiations, foreign companies linked to intelligence services had sought to buy land near sensitive military sites, and revealed a state bureaucrat obtained names and addresses of designated “dissidents” from a database.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109471
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23419131 (030758ZAUG25) Notable: Spy agency cracking down on ‘reckless’ boasts by people with top-secret clearance – ASIO will ban top-secret clearance holders from posting about their status on social media after Mike Burgess warned 35,000 Australians had exposed themselves by boasting of access to sensitive information online. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said anyone breaching the rule would lose clearance, stressing espionage costs Australia $12.5 billion a year. He said spies target both government and commercial secrets and urged discretion. Burgess revealed ASIO disrupted 24 major operations in three years, including spies recruiting a clearance holder to hand over trade documents.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109469
>>109470
Spy agency cracking down on ‘reckless’ boasts by people with top-secret clearance
Brittany Busch - August 1, 2025
Top-secret security-clearance holders will be banned from posting about their position on social media in a move to protect the country from the $12.5 billion-a-year threat of espionage.
ASIO director-general Mike Burgess said on Thursday that more than 35,000 Australians had exposed the country to danger by “recklessly” implying on professional networking sites they had access to sensitive information, with almost 2500 people declaring they had a security clearance.
Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said on Friday that stricter conditions would be enforced to stamp out the practice after the government moved responsibility for the highest levels of clearance to ASIO from Burke’s department, which handles lower-level security passes.
“What ASIO is going to start doing with those top secret clearances is just make it a condition [to not post about it online],” he told ABC’s News Breakfast.
“And if you start putting it up on social media, then what you put up on social media will no longer be true because you won’t hold the clearance any more. If you’re going to have a top-secret clearance, you need to show that you’re worthy of it.”
Burke said the government had given similar advice to security-clearance holders after the issue was first raised by Burgess in 2023, resulting in an 85 per cent reduction in the number of people boasting of security clearances online.
He said Australians needed to be aware that spies wanted to steal both commercial and government secrets.
“It doesn’t all have to be defence and military. A lot of it could be commercial information,” he said. “It doesn’t mean you treat everybody with paranoia or anything like that, but you be discreet. And you work on the basis that if information’s confidential, it’s confidential for a reason.”
Analysis from the Australian Institute of Criminology and ASIO revealed by Burgess on Thursday estimated that foreign espionage cost the country $12.5 billion in 2023-2024.
Burke said he understood people’s desire to market themselves to potential employers, but he declared that foreign spies should not be able to identify targets simply by Googling.
Burgess said in his speech on Thursday night that ASIO had disrupted 24 major espionage and foreign interference operations in the past three years – more than in the previous eight years combined.
He revealed that spies had recently gained access to official Australian documents on free trade negotiations by recruiting someone with a security clearance, while others convinced a state bureaucrat to obtain the names and addresses of dissidents being targeted by a foreign regime.
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/spy-agency-cracking-down-on-reckless-boasts-by-people-with-top-secret-clearance-20250801-p5mjhh.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109472
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23419154 (030813ZAUG25) Notable: Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell transferred to lower-security prison facility – Ghislaine Maxwell has been moved from a Florida prison to a minimum-security camp in Texas, where Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes is also held. Her lawyer confirmed the transfer but gave no reason. The move followed a nine-hour interview with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, who granted conditional immunity as she answered questions on about 100 people linked to Jeffrey Epstein. Trump said he had not considered clemency, though Maxwell faces a congressional subpoena. Lawmakers agreed to delay questioning until the Supreme Court rules on her appeal.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73395 (pb)
>>109289
>>109443
Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell transferred to lower-security prison facility
C. RYAN BARBER AND SADIE GURMAN - August 02, 2025
1/2
Ghislaine Maxwell, the former associate of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, has been transferred from a federal prison in Florida to a lower-security facility in Texas to serve her 20-year sentence, her lawyer said Friday.
Maxwell met last week with the Justice Department’s second-ranking official, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, for a two-day interview in Tallahassee, Fla. Blanche, who previously worked as President Trump’s criminal-defence lawyer, questioned Maxwell as the administration confronted criticism from Trump supporters who have called for the release of all files related to Epstein.
A Bureau of Prisons official and Maxwell’s lawyer, David Markus, confirmed her transfer to a minimum-security prison camp in Bryan, Texas, from a low-security prison in Tallahassee, but declined to comment on the reason for the move.
Among other high-profile inmates at the Texas camp is Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes, who was sentenced in late 2022 to more than 11 years in prison after being found guilty of running a yearslong fraud scheme at her blood-testing company.
A Justice Department spokesman didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
Maxwell, a British socialite who once dated Epstein, was convicted in 2021 on sex trafficking and other offences for facilitating Epstein’s sexual abuse of underage teens.
She spoke with Blanche for roughly nine hours last week after receiving conditional immunity to discuss the case, a person familiar with the discussions said.
Blanche posted on social media that the Justice Department would share information about the interview “at the appropriate time”.
Maxwell’s lawyer estimated that she answered questions about roughly 100 people and said she “didn’t hold anything back”.
In the aftermath of the interview, Trump faced questions about whether he was considering commuting Maxwell’s sentence or granting her a pardon. “I’m allowed to do it, but it’s something I have not thought about,” Trump said.
House of Representatives lawmakers have subpoenaed Maxwell in hopes of questioning her. In the days before her transfer to the prison camp in Texas, Maxwell’s lawyer told lawmakers that she wouldn’t agree to answer their questions unless Congress met several conditions, including immunity, or Trump grants her clemency.
House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. James Comer (R., Ky.), who sent the subpoena, said in a letter to Maxwell’s lawyer on Friday that it didn’t intend to grant her immunity nor share written questions in advance. However, the committee would delay her deposition until the Supreme Court decides whether to hear her appeal of her conviction, the letter said.
Markus, Maxwell’s lawyer, said he appreciated the committee’s willingness to delay its questioning.
“We will continue to engage with Congress in good faith to find a way for Ms. Maxwell to share her information without compromising her constitutional rights,” he said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109473
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23419171 (030823ZAUG25) Notable: Virginia Giuffre’s family expresses shock over Trump saying Epstein ‘stole’ her – The family of Virginia Giuffre said it was “shocking” to hear President Trump claim Jeffrey Epstein had “stolen” her from Mar-a-Lago, urging that Ghislaine Maxwell remain in prison. Giuffre, who accused Prince Andrew and others of sexual abuse while trafficked by Epstein, died by suicide this year. The family demanded answers, saying “survivors deserve this.” Trump’s office said he was answering a reporter’s question and noted he expelled Epstein from his club. The comments came after Maxwell’s DOJ interview, where she reportedly answered questions on about 100 people.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73395 (pb)
>>109289
>>109443
>>109472
Virginia Giuffre’s family expresses shock over Trump saying Epstein ‘stole’ her
Mike Catalini - Jul 31, 2025
The family of Virginia Giuffre, who was among Jeffrey Epstein’s most well-known sex trafficking accusers, said that it was shocking to hear President Donald Trump say the disgraced financier “stole” Giuffre from him and urged that Epstein’s former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell remain in prison.
Giuffre, who had accused Britain’s Prince Andrew and other influential men of sexually exploiting her as a teenager trafficked by Epstein, has been a central figure in conspiracy theories tied to the case. She died by suicide this year.
Her family’s statement is the latest development involving Epstein, who took his own life in a New York jail in 2019 while facing federal sex trafficking charges, and the Republican president, who was his one-time friend. Trump denied prior knowledge of Epstein’s crimes and said he cut off their relationship years ago, but he still faces questions about the case.
Trump, responding to a reporter’s question on Tuesday, said that he got upset with Epstein over his poaching of workers and that Epstein had stolen Giuffre from his Palm Beach, Florida, club.
“It was shocking to hear President Trump invoke our sister and say that he was aware that Virginia had been ‘stolen’ from Mar-a-Lago,” the family’s statement said.
“We and the public are asking for answers; survivors deserve this,” it continued.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt noted the president was responding to a reporter’s question and didn’t bring up Giuffre himself.
“The fact remains that President Trump kicked Jeffrey Epstein out of his club for being a creep to his female employees,” she said.
The family’s statement comes shortly after the Justice Department interviewed Maxwell, who was convicted in 2021 on sex trafficking and other charges and is serving a 20-year sentence in Tallahassee, Florida. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche interviewed Maxwell in a Florida courthouse, though details about what she said haven’t become public.
Maxwell’s lawyers have said she testified truthfully and answered questions “about 100 different people.” They have said she’s willing to answer more questions from Congress if she is granted immunity from future prosecution for her testimony and if lawmakers agree to satisfy other conditions.
A message seeking comment about the Giuffre family’s statement was sent to Maxwell’s attorney Thursday.
A Trump administration official said the president is not considering clemency action for Maxwell.
Giuffre said she was approached by Maxwell in 2000 and eventually was hired by her as a masseuse for Epstein. But the couple effectively made her a sexual servant, she said, pressuring her into gratifying not only Epstein but his friends and associates.
Giuffre said she was flown around the world for appointments with men including Prince Andrew while she was 17 and 18 years old.
The men, including Andrew, denied it and assailed Giuffre’s credibility. She acknowledged changing some key details of her account.
The prince settled with Giuffre in 2022 for an undisclosed sum, agreeing to make a “substantial donation” to her survivors’ organization.
The American-born Giuffre lived in Australia for years and became an advocate for sex trafficking survivors after emerging as a central figure in Epstein’s prolonged downfall.
Her family’s statement said she endured death threats and financial ruin over her cooperation with authorities against Epstein and Maxwell.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/virginia-giuffres-family-expresses-shock-over-trump-saying-epstein-stole-her
https://www.facebook.com/newshour/posts/the-family-of-virginia-giuffre-released-a-statement-on-thursday-expressing-their/1216280250367219/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109474
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23419187 (030836ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Virginia Giuffre’s family says she would have wanted Epstein documents released – Virginia Giuffre’s relatives said she called for the release of Epstein-related documents before her death this year, with her sister-in-law Amanda Roberts recalling she “had been fighting that till her very last day.” The family criticised Trump for saying Epstein “stole” her from Mar-a-Lago, arguing she was “preyed upon … at President Trump’s property.” They condemned giving Ghislaine Maxwell a platform, saying she “deserves to rot in prison,” and warned immunity or clemency would betray survivors. Relatives demanded justice and answers about why the files remain sealed.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109289
>>109443
>>109472
>>109473
Virginia Giuffre’s family says she would have wanted Epstein documents released
Kaanita Iyer - AUG 1, 2025
1/2
The family of Virginia Giuffre — one of the women who accused Jeffrey Epstein of sex trafficking and who died by suicide earlier this year — said Thursday that she would have wanted documents related to the disgraced financier to be made public, as the Trump administration faces mounting pressure around the case.
Amanda Roberts, Giuffre’s sister-in-law, told CNN’s Kaitlan Collins on “The Source” that in one of their last conversations, Giuffre called for the release of the documents.
“She wanted the world to know what they’ve done to her and so many other survivors, and she had been fighting that till her very last day,” Roberts said.
Giuffre, a prominent Epstein accuser who also alleged that Britain’s Prince Andrew abused her when she was a teenager, died by suicide in April at the age of 41. In 2019, Epstein died awaiting trial on federal charges accusing him of sexually abusing underage girls. His death was ruled a suicide.
Prince Andrew repeatedly denied the claims.
President Donald Trump, who had decades-long ties to Epstein, said earlier this week that the sex offender poached young women from Mar-a-Lago, including Giuffre, who worked at Trump’s resort as a teenager.
“I think she worked at the spa,” Trump said of Giuffre. “I think that was one of the people, yeah. He stole her.”
Sky Roberts, Giuffre’s brother, on Thursday took issue with Trump’s use of the word “stole,” telling Collins, “She wasn’t stolen, she was preyed upon at his property, at President Trump’s property.”
“Stolen seems very impersonal, feels very much like an object, and these survivors are not objects,” Roberts said.
He added that Trump’s comments raise questions about “how much he knew during that time.”
The White House has said Trump barred Epstein from his Mar-a-Lago club “for being a creep.” Trump has not been accused of any wrongdoing in connection with Epstein.
Earlier Thursday, Giuffre’s family expressed shock and raised questions about Trump’s relationship with Epstein in a statement to CNN. Those comments were first reported by The Atlantic.
Sky Roberts on “The Source” also weighed in on a top Justice Department official meeting last week with Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s accomplice who has also offered to testify before Congress, but with major conditions, including immunity.
Giuffre “was preyed upon by Ghislaine Maxwell, as well as many other predators out there. But she was preyed upon at Mar-a-Lago and we were very shocked and very surprised that they were giving her a voice and giving her a platform to essentially, possibly make a deal,” Sky Roberts said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109475
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23419269 (030945ZAUG25) Notable: 100,000 march in Melbourne and Sydney to protest Israel’s bombardment of Gaza – More than 100,000 pro-Palestine demonstrators rallied on the Sydney Harbour Bridge and Melbourne’s King Street Bridge, demanding sanctions on Israel and condemning Gaza’s starvation. Protesters displayed images of malnourished children, chanting “free Palestine,” while organiser Mohammad Sharab urged calm, calling the movement “peaceful” and denouncing claims of extremism. Victoria Police deployed heavy riot units but confirmed no arrests. Activists including Samantha Ratnam and Basil El Ghattis said Labor faces pressure over military ties, while Premier Jacinta Allan and Opposition Leader Brad Battin warned of consequences for unlawful disruption.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109425
>>109457
>>109458
100,000 march in Melbourne and Sydney to protest Israel’s bombardment of Gaza
Charlotte Grieve and Ashleigh McMillan - August 3, 2025
1/2
More than 100,000 pro-Palestine protesters marched on the Sydney Harbour Bridge and Melbourne’s King Street Bridge on Sunday, rallying against Israel’s bombardment of Palestine and calling for sanctions.
Local protest organisers estimate 25,000 people gathered in Melbourne, marching through the CBD before their demonstration concluded at the King Street bridge, which was blocked by a heavy police presence.
Protesters held photos of emaciated children and placards reading “Israel is starving Gaza” and “Starving children is a war crime” as they marched down Swanston Street, Bourke Street and King Street towards the bridge.
Several protesters did not want to be interviewed, citing fear of backlash from their employers or distrust in mainstream media reporting.
Angela Hunter said she attends the protests every second weekend to call for greater political leadership.
“I just feel so disappointed with this government,” she said. “We could do so much more. I don’t believe when they say we can’t do anything about it. It’s not only about killing children, it’s about killing all human beings. It’s devastating.”
Three heavy riot squad vans were at the front of the police line on the King Street Bridge, with mounted and riot police and a row of police cars behind. Aerial footage showed as many as 100 police assembled to block the crowd. Police were also seen steering boats along the Yarra River.
As the crowd approached the police line, organiser Mohammad Sharab called on protesters to “prove to the world that this is not a movement that will clash with police” and told them to stay back or sit down.
“We are sitting here for Palestine … peacefully,” he said. “We need to calm down, show everybody who we are. We have women, children, vulnerable people. We are responsible people.
“They are holding their guns, their weapons, against people who are protesting peacefully. Shame on Victoria Police, shame.”
One woman wearing a keffiyeh approached the police line to say “keep our children safe” and another protester told the heavily armed officers the police blockade was a “waste of taxpayer dollars”.
Protest marshals formed a line to keep distance between the police and protesters, that gathered and chanted “free Palestine” and “not a target”.
“Thank you for blocking the bridge. You did our job for us!” one masked protester shouted at the police.
Standing on the bridge a few metres from the police line, Kevin Bracken said he had attended most protests and all had been peaceful.
“It’s right over the top, isn’t it?” he said. “It’s sending the message, who runs Victoria? They couldn’t stop it in NSW, but the politicians here are puppet masters. This is about what’s happening in Gaza. This is about starving children.”
After the larger protest dispersed about 3pm, a small spin-off group stopped traffic and started burning an Australian flag and spray-painting “abolish Australia” on Spencer Street.
When asked whether they represent the broader protest movement, one person in a grey hoodie and black mask shook her head and walked away.
“We’re just concerned citizens,” said another. “No group.”
They chanted “too many coppers not enough justice” and “free Palestine” before police arrived and the crowd of less than one dozen people dispersed.
Earlier in the day, former Greens candidate for Wills Samantha Ratnam addressed the crowd to roaring applause and clanging pots, a symbol of food shortages in Gaza. She said Labor was feeling pressure amid rising calls for Israeli sanctions and greater scrutiny on contracts for military parts.
“The more they minimise us ... the more and more they’re being overwhelmed [by the] community telling them they’re on the wrong side of history,” she said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109476
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23419310 (031005ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Julian Assange joins pro-Palestine march across Sydney Harbour Bridge before police stop rally citing safety fears – Tens of thousands marched in Sydney despite rain, with Julian Assange, Bob Carr, Ed Husic, Meyne Wyatt, Craig Foster and Mehreen Faruqi among attendees. Police texted the crowd to halt the rally over safety concerns, turning protesters back after estimating attendance at 100,000, though organisers claimed up to 300,000. Carr and Husic renewed calls for sanctions on Benjamin Netanyahu and recognition of Palestinian statehood, while Faruqi praised protesters for “defying Chris Minns.” Police and government figures had earlier warned of crowd crush and major disruption.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109457
>>109458
>>109475
Julian Assange joins pro-Palestine march across Sydney Harbour Bridge before police stop rally citing safety fears
Indigenous actor Meyne Wyatt and former Socceroo and Australian of the Year Craig Foster among tens of thousands of people protesting in wet weather
Guardian staff - 3 Aug 2025
1/2
Tens of thousands of pro-Palestine marchers, including Julian Assange, Bob Carr and Ed Husic, have marched across Sydney Harbour Bridge in the rain to protest against Israel’s conduct in Gaza and to speak out about the children starving there.
The world-famous landmark was closed to traffic at 11.30am on Sunday, with protesters gathering in Lang Park in the city centre in chilly weather before walking north to Bradfield Park across the bridge.
About 3pm, NSW police sent out a mass text message to phones throughout the city ordering the pro-Palestine march to stop due to safety concerns, with authorities turning protesters around at the north end.
“Message from NSW Police: In consultation with the organisers, the march needs to stop due to public safety and await further instructions,” the message read.
A police helicopter hovered overhead with instructions for the hordes of protesters to turn around and walk back towards the city.
A second text message read: “After consultation with the protest organisers, we are asking that everyone stops walking north. As soon as the march has stopped, we will look at turning everyone around back towards the city BUT it needs to be done in a controlled way in stages to keep everyone safe.”
Crowd estimates varied. A spokesperson for rally organiser Palestine Action Group said police had informed them 100,000 people were in attendance – but the spokesperson estimated the figure was closer to 300,000.
Earlier, the Indigenous actor Meyne Wyatt and the former Socceroo and Australian of the Year Craig Foster were among tens of thousands of people marching in the wet weather, while the Greens senator Mehreen Faruqi spoke passionately before the walk began.
Faruqi, who has been an outspoken critic of the federal government’s action in relation to Israel’s conduct in Gaza, commended protesters for “defying Chris Minns” after the New South Wales premier said: “We cannot allow Sydney to descend into chaos.”
“Thank you for defying Chris Minns,” she said. “This is a man who wants you to stay home and be silent in the face of a genocide.
“It was never about logistics. It was never about traffic. It was never about communications or anything else. It was always about stopping us and silencing us. It was always about protecting Israel and the Labor government from accountability.”
Police had rejected an application from organisers for them to facilitate the march, arguing there was not enough time to prepare a traffic management plan and warned of a potential crowd crush and huge disruptions.
But on Saturday the NSW supreme court ruled the march could go ahead.
On Sunday protesters turned out carrying pots and pans – to highlight the starvation in Gaza – while many carried Palestinian flags and signage along with their wet weather gear and umbrellas.
One protester that Guardian Australia spoke to, a British man called Dan, held a sign reading “Gay Jews 4 Gaza”.
“I grew up in a north London Jewish community, and I think there’s a widespread Zionism that exists within the Jewish community that is difficult to separate from religion,” he said, adding: “I think it’s important for people within the community to stand up and raise their voice against the state of Israel because they’re not representative of the Jewish community as a whole.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109477
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23423343 (040908ZAUG25) Notable: How ‘serial pest’ Josh Lees won the Battle of the Bridge - and closed it down – Activist Josh Lees, long branded a “professional protester,” secured a NSW Supreme Court ruling allowing the Harbour Bridge march, despite police warnings of gridlock, ambulance delays and violent clashes. Justice Belinda Rigg accepted Lees’ testimony that urgency over Gaza’s humanitarian crisis justified authorisation, citing his two decades of activism and community backing. The judgment noted 147 Gazans had died from starvation and 40,000 infants were at imminent risk. Lees, hailed by Red Flag as victorious over “forces of injustice,” left court waving the Palestinian flag.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109475
>>109476
How ‘serial pest’ Josh Lees won the Battle of the Bridge – and closed it down
STEPHEN RICE - August 03, 2025
The most powerful man in Sydney on Sunday leads his pro-Palestine supporters across the Harbour Bridge basking in the global spotlight – and revelling in a sweet victory handed to him by the NSW Supreme Court.
Josh Lees, the 43-year-old Trotskyist who now calls the tune in the harbour city, has captured the nation’s most iconic landmark and plans to use the moment well into the future.
Even for a man who has led more than 85 protests around Sydney since the Hamas terror attack on Israel in October 2023, it was a remarkable feat.
The keffiyeh-wearing Lees has led a string of causes in the last two decades, his exploits on behalf of refugees, LGBTQI rights and against capitalism all breathlessly recorded in the Red Flag, his Socialist Alternative news outlet.
On Saturday night the Red Flag was hailing Lees’ court win as a triumph in the “test of wills between the forces of injustice and imperialism”.
When NSW Premier Chris Minns recently called Lees a “professional protester” he meant it as an insult.
But for NSW Supreme Court judge Belinda Rigg it was more like a professional qualification – one that trumped the experience of the senior police and transport experts pleading with her to stop the madness.
Lees had expertise, she said, noting his leading role in the protests that have so far tied up nearly 20,000 police – even before Sunday’s march – at a cost now estimated at well over $10 million.
Yes, Justice Rigg agreed, the consequences of the march could include violent scenes, traffic gridlocks, ambulances not getting to where they need to go, “and other undesirable consequences”.
Yes, police and transport officials had expressed grave safety concerns “due to the absence of any evidence of detailed planning by the organisers and limited considerations given to identifying safety risks”.
But Lees had “compellingly” explained the reasons “why he believes there is an urgency for a response to the humanitarian situation in Gaza”, she said.
“Mr Lees’ experience and activism for two decades, and his knowledge of the current support voiced to PAG suggests the groundswell of support in the community for the March for Humanity is much greater than (a previous incident) in 2020”, she said.
Justice Rigg said she accepted Lees’ view that on the timing of the march that “we are at a critical moment, on the issue of Palestinian rights not only due to the crisis in Gaza, itself, but also due to awareness of that crisis brought about by the horrific images, published in the media recently”.
“Mr Lees regards it as highly desirable in the current circumstances that the public assembly is authorised so as to provide structure, support and safety to those who participate.”
“Mr Lees’ evidence indicates that the timing and the lodging of this proposed march and its location is directly responsive to the dramatic increase in the known suffering of Gazan citizens over the last weeks.
“He states, ‘the March for Humanity is an urgent necessity demanded by the urgent situation in Gaza right now, where at least 147 people have died from starvation, and Gazan authorities warn 40,000 infants under the age of one are at imminent risk of death due to the lack of baby formula.”
Rarely has a professional protester been treated with such deference in the Supreme Court.
Lees walked away from the court waving the Palestinian flag. And making it very clear: this was just the beginning.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/how-serial-pest-josh-lees-won-the-battle-of-the-bridge-and-closed-it-down/news-story/8b98637d13d0c0d46e2f37932f4f421a
https://www.socialistalternative.org.au/
https://redflag.org.au/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109478
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23423365 (040922ZAUG25) Notable: Sydney Harbour Bridge pro-Palestine protest marred by Ayatollah image and traffic chaos – An estimated 90,000 protesters, led by Julian Assange, marched across the Harbour Bridge in heavy rain, closing it for over five hours and causing major traffic disruption. The event was marred when a demonstrator displayed an image of Iran’s Ayatollah Ali Khamenei behind Assange and other high-profile figures. Police raised safety fears after crowding at the northern end but no major incident occurred. Justice Belinda Rigg authorised the march, citing Gaza’s worsening humanitarian crisis. Protesters and figures such as Bob Carr demanded recognition of Palestinian statehood.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109475
>>109476
>>109477
Sydney Harbour Bridge pro-Palestine protest marred by Ayatollah image and traffic chaos
STEPHEN RICE and JOANNA PANAGOPOULOS - 3 August 2025
1/2
In a procession drenched by pouring rain and occasionally marred by hateful images, an estimated 90,000 pro-Palestine protesters marched across Sydney Harbour Bridge on Sunday led by WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.
The bridge was closed for more than five hours, throwing Sydney traffic into chaos, as the largely well-behaved protesters made their way from the CBD to North Sydney under a sea of umbrellas, Palestinian flags and crude anti-Israel signs. However, the “March for Humanity” was marred by a protester who held aloft a picture of Iranian dictator Ayatollah Ali Khamenei behind Assange and other prominent figures.
The picture of Khamenei, standing with a rifle, was clearly visible behind Assange as he marched alongside Greens senator Mehreen Faruqi, republican activist Craig Foster and former journalist Mary Kostakidis.
Assange, who was joined by his wife Stella and their two children, greeted former NSW premier and foreign minister Bob Carr but did not speak to the media.
Other high-profile attendees at the march included writer Randa Abdel-Fattah, radio presenter Antoinette Lattouf, Sydney Lord Mayor Clover Moore and former sportsman Anthony Mundine.
Small pockets of protesters chanted “all Zionists are terrorists” and “From the river to the sea, Palestine is all you see”.
The bridge march coincided with a warning by terror group Hamas that it would not lay down its arms until an independent Palestinian state was established, a move that will make it tougher for the federal government to formally recognise Palestine this year.
Hamas vowed to continue its armed struggle until Israel agreed to the establishment of a Palestinian state with full sovereignty and Jerusalem as its capital.
The statement came as a video emerged of an emaciated Israeli hostage, Evyatar David, digging what he fears is his own grave in a tunnel under Gaza and declaring he had just “a few days to live”.
In the video, the young musician who was kidnapped from the Nova musical festival, is also seen crossing off dates on a calendar drawn on sheets of paper and detailing when he has eaten – and when he has been starved.
In Melbourne, heavily armed police clashed with anti-Israel activists during a volatile pro-Palestinian protest in the CBD on Sunday, with officers verbally harassed and traffic brought to a standstill.
Victoria Police established a blockade on the King Street Bridge early in the day, deploying more than 100 officers, including riot police and mounted units, in anticipation of the demonstration.
Protesters responded with fury, chanting “Shame on you Jacinta Allan” and “Free, free Palestine” in defiance of the Premier’s warning that anyone blocking the bridge would be “dealt with swiftly”.
By midday, thousands had descended on the city, confronting officers in a tense standoff before spilling through the streets and staging rolling disruptions throughout the afternoon.
It was the first time Victoria Police were forced to come out in a show of force since the toxic Land Forces protest last year.
Several agitators were swept away from the crowd by police as the protesters continued to march towards the King Street Bridge guarded by more than 100 officers from the Public Order Response team, including 15 on horseback.
In Sydney, as people gathered at midday in Lang Park, protesters stomped on a sign that pictured a bloody Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu next to the words “two killers”.
Stalls sold keffiyehs and Palestinian flags. Others held signs with Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu’s face on it with a Hitler moustache above the word “terrorist”.
Protesters remained spirited on the walk back across the bridge, some two to three hours later, continuing to chant and sing, but at one point were forced to stop in order to avoid a dangerous crowd crush at the northern end of the harbour bridge. One senior police officer said he had never seen a more perilous situation”.
“I was honestly worried that we were going to have a major incident with potential loss of life,” Acting Assistant Police Commissioner Adam Johnson said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109479
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23423380 (040932ZAUG25) Notable: Albanese seeks call with Netanyahu following Sydney, Melbourne protests – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is pursuing a phone call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu after 90,000 marched across the Harbour Bridge and 25,000 in Melbourne, pressing for recognition of Palestine. Albanese said he would use the call to advocate a two-state solution, while ruling out new sanctions beyond those already imposed. Ed Husic, Alison Byrnes and Tony Sheldon joined the protest, with Husic urging immediate recognition. Albanese praised the march as peaceful but said Australians “don’t want conflict brought here.” Critics warned of manipulation by extremist organisers.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109475
>>109476
>>109478
Albanese seeks call with Netanyahu following Sydney, Melbourne protests
Nick Newling - August 4, 2025
1/2
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is pursuing a phone call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu after 90,000 people marched across the Sydney Harbour Bridge calling for an end to the war in Gaza, as pressure builds within Labor for recognition of Palestinian statehood.
Albanese said on Monday he would use any phone call with Netanyahu to advocate for a two-state solution. Assistant Immigration Minister Matt Thistlethwaite had earlier confirmed that the call was being pursued, as Labor politicians backed the peaceful protest organised by the Palestine Action Group, with at least three members of the federal caucus in attendance.
Backbenchers Ed Husic, Alison Byrnes and Tony Sheldon marched with protesters on Sunday, putting further pressure on Albanese to recognise Palestine.
At a press conference on Monday, Albanese said he would continue to advocate for peace with Netanyahu.
“I have said to prime minister Netanyahu before, as I’ve said publicly for a long period of time that I’m a supporter of a two-state solution, and that there can’t be peace and security in the Middle East, without there being an advance on that two-state solution,” Albanese said.
The government has repeatedly said that recognition of a Palestinian state is a matter of timing. Allies in France, Canada and the United Kingdom have all laid the groundwork to recognise the state at the next United Nations General Assembly in September.
Albanese ruled out any further sanctions against Israeli figures, following those already placed on ministers Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich in June for inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank.
Speaking about the Harbour Bridge protest, Albanese said he was not surprised so many felt moved to march after seeing images of “people being deprived of food and water and essential services” in Gaza.
“In a democracy, it’s a good thing that people peacefully express their views, and yesterday’s march was peaceful and was an opportunity for people to express their concern about what is happening in Gaza,” Albanese said.
“Australians want people to stop killing each other. They want peace and security. But the second thing they want is they don’t want conflict brought here.”
Thistlethwaite earlier condemned any forms of antisemitism or pro-Iran sentiments at the protest, telling Sky News that people holding images of Iran’s supreme leader Ali Khamenei were wrong.
“A phone call [with Netanyahu] is being pursued. I don’t believe that people should have been displaying photos of the Ayatollah Khamenei. I think that’s provocative,” he said.
“As long as you do it peacefully and in accordance with the law, which is what occurred on the weekend, then every Australian has the right to protest.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109480
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23423492 (041044ZAUG25) Notable: U.S. Embassy Australia Tweets: (Video) @FBIDirectorKash visited Sydney, Australia, to engage in high-level law enforcement meetings aimed at strengthening international partnerships and addressing shared security challenges. These discussions focus on combating transnational crime, cyber threats, and other global issues that require close collaboration with international allies. Building strong partnerships is vital to ensuring a safer and more secure future for all. - #uswithaus @FBI @AusFedPolice @ASIO @nswpolice @MarineCommand @scg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
First woman appointed to lead Australian Federal Police as Reece Kershaw retires a year early
Olivia Ireland - August 4, 2025
Australian Federal Police Commissioner Reece Kershaw is retiring a year early to spend more time with his grandchildren, and will be replaced by the first woman to head the nation’s police force.
Deputy commissioner Krissy Barrett, who most recently oversaw the AFP’s national security portfolio, will replace Kershaw in October.
Kershaw’s early retirement comes after the police chief faced scrutiny over his handling of the Dural caravan plot in Sydney, which was first described as a terrorist act but was later revealed to be a fake plot by powerful crime figures to distract police and influence prosecutions.
The commissioner refused to answer questions at a hearing in February about whether he had briefed Prime Minister Anthony Albanese about the plot.
But in announcing Kershaw’s departure at a press conference in Canberra on Monday, Albanese and Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said he would leave his role on good terms with the government after his six-year tenure.
“Commissioner Kershaw has made an extraordinary contribution to public life, and we are deeply grateful for his service,” Albanese said. “[He] has been absolutely on call 24 hours a day, seven days a week with his commitment to his fellow Australians.”
Burke said Kershaw was retiring with his head held high to spend more time with family.
“Commissioner Kershaw asked to meet with me with no staff present and in the meeting, to my surprise … said that he had set October 3 as the date that he was intending to retire,” Burke said.
Kershaw said his time as commissioner has taken its toll on his family but that he was grateful for his time with the AFP.
“Being a grandfather has changed me dramatically, and I need to be there for my family,” he said.
“We sacrifice a lot, in particular our family, including my wife’s own career. She gave up her career to support me, so it is time for me to give back.”
Former attorney-general Mark Dreyfus extended Kershaw’s term in May last year for two years to October 2026, instead of the usual five-year extension.
Government sources confirmed the two-year extension was because the police commissioner was not committed to a full term, but there was a view that none of the assistant commissioners were ready for the role. Barrett had impressed people with her national security work since then, prompting Kershaw to bring forward his retirement.
Barrett was the first choice for Albanese and Burke after Kershaw told them of his resignation.
“[Barrett] is highly renowned for her leadership capability, and I’ve certainly seen that firsthand in the dealings that I’ve had with Ms Barrett, as well as the way that she has represented the AFP on matters before the National Security Committee,” Albanese said.
The first woman to lead the AFP, Barrett has almost 25 years of experience dealing with community policing, counter-terrorism, financial crime and organised crime.
Barrett said she would be committed to championing all staff in the force, as she had started her career in the AFP as an administrative assistant, and acknowledged how the police were constantly responding to an ever-changing environment.
Asked about her view of the pro-Palestine protest across the Sydney Harbour Bridge on Sunday and how she would approach social cohesion given conflicts around the world, she said the AFP would continue to work closely with state police forces.
“I did say I would have more to say on my priorities going forward, but absolutely [social cohesion] is right at the top of the list,” she said.
Barrett has been recognised for her distinguished service to the Solomon Islands and the Bali bombings investigation. She received a Police Overseas Service Medal in 2004 and an Operations Medal in 2005.
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/afp-commissioner-reece-kershaw-retires-a-year-early-20250804-p5mk79.html
https://qresear.ch/?q=Reece+Kershaw
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109481
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23423505 (041058ZAUG25) Notable: Trans women should have legal protections available to pregnant women, court told – Sex Discrimination Commissioner Anna Cody has argued in a Federal Court submission that protections for “pregnant or potentially pregnant women” under the Sex Discrimination Act should extend to trans women, claiming the 2013 repeal of the definition of “woman” confirms inclusivity. The case, brought by trans woman Roxanne Tickle against Giggle app founder Sall Grover, will test whether “sex” is binary or changeable under the Act. Judges will also consider whether Equality Australia can intervene, alongside the Lesbian Action Group, which defends female-only spaces for biological women.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109282
>>109297
>>109467
Trans women should have legal protections available to pregnant women, court told
STEPHEN RICE - 3 August 2025
Trans women should be able to access legal protections available to “pregnant or potentially pregnant women”, the Sex Discrimination Commissioner has claimed in an extraordinary submission lodged with the Federal Court.
The submission is part of a bid to establish that the word “woman” in the Sex Discrimination Act is intended to include trans women, a key argument in the claim by trans woman Roxanne Tickle that Giggle app founder Sall Grover unlawfully rejected her from the platform because she looked like a man.
Ms Grover’s appeal against the finding that she discriminated against Ms Tickle begins on Monday, in a Federal Court hearing that will be live-streamed on YouTube.
In a submission lodged with the court late last week, Sex Discrimination Commissioner Anna Cody says the act expressly gives protection to “women” against discrimination on the grounds of a woman’s “pregnancy or potential pregnancy” - which includes “a desire to become pregnant, or that the woman is perceived as being likely to become pregnant”.
The repeal in 2013 of the definition of “woman”, suggests that a trans woman should be able to access protections related to pregnancy, the Sex Discrimination Commissioner argues, “which in turn confirms that the word ‘woman’ is intended to include a trans woman.”
Dr Cody does not discuss in her submission the biological capacity for a trans woman to become pregnant.
The argument highlights the challenges facing the Full Court – judges Melissa Perry, Geoffrey Kennett and Wendy Abraham – in deciding whether, under the Sex Discrimination Act “sex” is binary and established at birth, or non-binary and changeable.
On Monday the judges must first decide whether to allow the powerful gay and trans lobby group Equality Australia, led by chief executive and ex-Labor staffer Anna Brown, to intervene in the case in support of Ms Tickle.
The judges have already granted intervener status to the Lesbian Action Group, which argues that undermining the sex-based protections of the Sex Discrimination Act “denies autonomy, dignity and safety” to lesbians.
Biological women have a right under the Sex Discrimination Act to their own safe spaces, the Melbourne-based LAG says, because “it is now commonplace for lesbians to be pressured into having sex with trans women”.
Dr Cody has also been granted amicus curiae (friend of the court) status, her position generally mirroring Ms Tickle’s.
Equality Australia is also seeking to intervene in the case to put the case that female-only spaces are unlawful if they exclude trans women.
On Monday the court may also decide whether to allow into evidence an SBS television show in which Ms Tickle described how she realised she was transgender at the age of 26 because she didn’t like the smell of the male changing rooms.
Ms Grover wants the Insight program admitted because it is the basis of her claim that she should not have to pay the $10,000 damages awarded against her by judge Robert Bromwich last year because she had laughed at a reference to it in cross examination.
Ms Grover says she shouldn’t have been penalised for that brief giggle when Ms Tickle’s counsel asked her to look at a piece of satirical merchandise – a scented candle featuring a caricature of Tickle and a speech bubble reading: “So, I realised I was a woman because I hate the smell of balls.”
The candle – which was not produced, sold nor endorsed by Grover – mocked Tickle’s suggestion on the Insight program “that the realisation of being a woman was due to an aversion to the smell of men’s locker rooms”.
Grover’s legal team now argues that her “momentary, reflexive laugh” in response to political satire was protected by the implied freedom of political communication in the Constitution.
“If the freedom protects mockery, it protects response to mockery,” Grover’s lawyers argue.
Tickle’s comments about changing room smells had been satirised “as emblematic of the subjectivity and reversibility of gender identity claims advanced by males seeking access to female-only spaces”, they say.
But in a submission to the court, Tickle’s lawyers rejected Grover’s constitutional argument and last week wrote to her saying their client did not consent to the SBS program being admitted, as “this new evidence was not available to the trial judge”.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/trans-women-should-have-legal-protections-available-to-pregnant-women-court-told/news-story/ae8101d7ef2490572eb8dd2a406148be
https://www.youtube.com/@FederalCourtAus
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109482
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23423528 (041115ZAUG25) Notable: AUKUS review focus on fixing subs ‘could favour Australia’ – The Pentagon’s review of the AUKUS submarine pact has expanded to include maintenance capacity, which former US Navy secretary Richard Spencer says could benefit Australia if it accelerates upgrades in Western Australia. Spencer, now Austal chairman, urged Canberra to “start walking and stop talking,” warning that delays risk leaving submarines idle. Upgrades at HMAS Stirling and Henderson shipyard are central, though funding remains modest. The review, led by US Under-Secretary of Defence Elbridge Colby, is due by November, with any final decision resting with President Donald Trump.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109316
>>109318
>>109400
AUKUS review focus on fixing subs ‘could favour Australia’
Jessica Gardner - Aug 3, 2025
1/2
Washington | The US Navy’s expanded focus on submarine maintenance rates as part of the Pentagon’s review of the AUKUS pact could prove positive for the Albanese government if it acts faster to upgrade facilities in Western Australia, according to a former navy chief.
Richard Spencer, who was secretary of the US Navy during President Donald Trump’s first term, said a better maintenance network would help alleviate Pentagon concerns about building enough nuclear-powered submarines to meet domestic demand before delivering second-hand vessels to Australia by 2032.
Australia has committed to investing $US3 billion ($4.6 billion) in US shipbuilding facilities to help lift current production rates from below 1.5 to 2.3 new Virginia-class submarines a year. But Spencer, who is also chairman of Australian shipbuilder Austal, said if it acted faster to upgrade a defence precinct in Perth, Australia could lend a hand with maintenance too.
“The [Australian] Defence Ministry has to start walking and stop talking,” he said. “They have to start doing things. I know they’re writing cheques for AUKUS, but writing cheques does not move dirt, does not put dry docks in that can accommodate Virginias.”
The navy has broadened its evaluation of the AUKUS accord beyond whether shipbuilders can deliver vessels to Australia from 2032, according to two industry sources with knowledge of the review process. Expanding and upgrading maintenance rates could be an additional factor in ensuring the American fleet is at full strength in the event of a war with China, they said.
Spencer applauded the review’s expanded focus and said that to avoid having “a conga line” of inactive submarines waiting months at a time for maintenance, the navy had to urgently upgrade its facilities.
“We had one ship that was out 18 months when I was there, which is just absolutely unheard of,” he said.
“The navy has yet to get their head around that. So there’s infrastructure, there’s process, there’s people. It involves every single aspect of the enterprise, but it is critical.”
Two facilities about 30 kilometres south of Perth will play a critical role in Australia’s AUKUS commitments. An estimated $8 billion will be spent on upgrading the HMAS Stirling base, on Garden Island, as the home port for the rotational force of US and UK submarines from as early as 2027.
This initiative, known as SRF-West, is designed to help Australia gain the skills and infrastructure to operate its own nuclear–powered submarine fleet.
Meanwhile, the Henderson shipyard on the mainland will be a major shipbuilding location and will manage the docking and maintenance of submarines. However, the Australian government has so far budgeted just $127 million over three years from 2024 for planning and feasibility studies.
Former prime minister Scott Morrison has said Henderson could be used to repair US submarines, not just Australian vessels.
“There are many ways you can get more subs out at sea, and it’s not just about how quickly you build them; it’s also how you maintain them,” he told reporters last month during a visit to Washington. “Australia, through Henderson, has a real opportunity to add to that.”
The $368 billion defence co-operation agreement between the US, Australia and the United Kingdom, aimed at containing Chinese expansionism in the Indo-Pacific, came under a cloud in June when it was revealed US Under-Secretary of Defence for Policy Elbridge Colby – an AUKUS sceptic – had initiated a review.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109483
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23423545 (041130ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Chinese woman charged with reckless foreign interference over Canberra Buddhist association spying – A Chinese-born Australian permanent resident has been charged with reckless foreign interference, accused of gathering information on Canberra’s Guan Yin Citta Buddhist association on behalf of China’s Public Security Bureau. The Australian Federal Police allege she engaged in covert and deceptive conduct, with items including electronic devices seized during raids. Assistant Commissioner Stephen Nutt said the case, the first involving a community group, poses a threat to “democracy, social cohesion, and national sovereignty.” The offence carries a maximum 15-year prison term.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109325
>>109378
>>109469
>>109480
Chinese woman charged with reckless foreign interference over Canberra Buddhist association spying
It is the first time the Australian Federal Police has charged someone with foreign interference involving a community group.
Demi Huang - 4 August 2025
A Chinese woman has been charged after police alleged she was sent to gather information from an Australian association.
The woman, who is also an Australian permanent resident, was arrested on Saturday after the Australian Federal Police (AFP) executed search warrants at homes in Canberra.
The investigation began in March after a tip-off from Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO).
During the searches, several items - including electronic devices - were seized.
Police allege the woman was tasked by China’s Public Security Bureau to covertly gather information about the Canberra branch of Guan Yin Citta, a Buddhist association.
She has been charged with reckless foreign interference and faced the ACT Magistrates Court on Monday.
The offence carries a maximum penalty of 15 years’ imprisonment.
This is the first time the AFP has charged someone with foreign interference involving a community group, rather than the political or academic sectors.
Assistant Commissioner Stephen Nutt said the woman’s conduct was covert, deceptive, and undisclosed to those being monitored.
“There was covert and deceptive conduct about collecting information on the Buddhist group, acting in concert or collaboration with a person from China’s Public Security Bureau,” he told reporters on Monday.
While it remains unclear how the information was intended to be used, Nutt described the case as a threat to democracy, social cohesion, and national sovereignty.
“Foreign interference is a serious crime that undermines democracy and social cohesion,” he said.
“Foreign interference activity may be used to influence a political or government process, influence the exercise of an Australian democratic or political right, support the intelligence objectives of a foreign principle, or prejudice national security.”
Nutt said the investigation is ongoing and further charges have not been ruled out, with police planning more arrests.
This is the third time a foreign interference offence has been laid in Australia since the Commonwealth introduced new laws in 2018.
A Victorian man was charged in November 2020, while a NSW man was charged in April 2023.
“As with other like-minded countries, Australia is not immune to foreign interference, and we should not expect that this arrest will prevent further attempts to target our diaspora communities,” Nutt said.
“At a time of permanent regional contest, offenders will attempt to spy on individuals, groups and institutions in Australia.
“That’s why the AFP and our partners will continue to educate the community about what foreign interference is, how communities can protect themselves, and importantly, encourage the public to contact authorities if they believe they are being targeted by those working for foreign entities.
ASIO Director-General Mike Burgess warned those targeting diaspora communities not to underestimate Australia’s national security agencies.
“Anyone who thinks it is acceptable to monitor, intimidate and potentially repatriate members of our diaspora communities should never underestimate our capabilities and resolve,” he said.
A factsheet on foreign interference is available in more than 40 languages on the AFP website.
It explains what foreign interference is, how it manifests, and what individuals can do if they believe they are being threatened or intimidated by foreign governments.
Members of the public who feel threatened should contact their local police on 131 444, or in an emergency or life-threatening situation, call triple-0 immediately.
Individuals or community groups who feel they are the target of foreign interference are encouraged to contact the National Security Hotline on 1800 123 400.
https://7news.com.au/news/chinese-woman-charged-with-reckless-foreign-interference-over-canberra-buddhist-association-spying-c-19575850
https://www.afp.gov.au/news-centre/media-release/chinese-national-charged-foreign-interference-offence-canberra
https://www.afp.gov.au/crimes/espionage-and-foreign-interference
https://www.afp.gov.au/sites/default/files/PDF/Factsheet-ForeignInterferenceintheCommunity.pdf
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109484
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23428058 (051026ZAUG25) Notable: PM speaks with Palestinian Authority amid mounting pressure to recognise statehood – Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has spoken with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, pledging support for aid access, a ceasefire, hostage releases and a two-state solution, while agreeing to meet him at the UN General Assembly in September. Australia committed $20m in new Gaza aid as pressure grows for recognition of Palestinian statehood, with Penny Wong suggesting coordination with allies ahead of the UN. Albanese also seeks a call with Benjamin Netanyahu, while UN figures show 1300 Palestinians have died trying to access food since late May.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109475
>>109478
>>109479
PM speaks with Palestinian Authority amid mounting pressure to recognise statehood
Yashee Sharma - Aug 5, 2025
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has had a rare phone call with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas overnight, promising to meet with him on the sidelines of a crucial global leaders meeting next month.
According to a readout of the call, Albanese discussed the immediate entry of aid into Gaza, a permanent ceasefire, the release of all hostages and a two-state solution.
Abbas thanked Albanese for his support, just hours after Australia committed another $20 million of humanitarian aid to Gaza.
The two leaders discussed "deepening cooperation" and have agreed to meet on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly in New York in September.
The United Kingdom, Canada and France have set the United Nations meeting as their stage to recognise Palestinian statehood if governance reforms are agreed upon.
Albanese is under pressure to confirm whether he will use the international momentum to recognise Palestinian statehood, with his government reiterating it is a matter of "when, not if".
When asked about Australia's unclear timeframe for recognition, Foreign Minister Penny Wong suggested the government was working behind the scenes towards the upcoming UN meeting.
"September, there will be a high-level leaders meeting at the UN. Between now and then, we will be working with other countries and coordinating with them," she told Today.
Albanese has stressed that Hamas could have no role in a future Palestinian state.
Hamas has said it would not disarm until the establishment of an "independent, full sovereign Palestinian state".
Albanese is also seeking a phone call with his Israeli counterpart, Benjamin Netanyahu.
Wong confirmed the talk has not happened yet.
"I'm sure if he does, the prime minister will put the view that he has put publicly, and the view of so many Australians, that Australia wants to see a ceasefire, Australia wants to see the hostages released... Australia wants aid to flow," she told Today.
Netanyahu is poised to urge a meeting of the national security cabinet to support the full "conquest" of Gaza, according to Israeli media reports.
Meanwhile, the World Health Organisation has said the number of starvation-related deaths spiked and malnutrition rates reached "alarming levels" in Gaza last month.
According to the UN, at least 1300 Palestinians have been killed while trying to reach food since May 27.
An estimated 100,000 to 300,000 Australians marched across the Sydney Harbour Bridge on Sunday to protest the worsening humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
The demonstration's organisers, Palestine Action Group, said the march called for an end to the war on Gaza and demanded the Australian government sanction Israel.
"We've sent an enormous message to the world," the group said.
https://www.9news.com.au/national/anthony-albanese-speaks-with-palestinian-authority-president-mahmoud-abbas/d9c0f43c-61cc-4c5f-9dec-e700986ae78a
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9QFOBLVDlI
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109485
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23428083 (051040ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Japan beats Germany to build Australia’s new frigate fleet – Japan’s Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has been selected to build Australia’s new 11-ship frigate fleet, with Defence Minister Richard Marles calling the upgraded Mogami “absolutely the best ship” over Germany’s MEKO-A200. The first three vessels, costing $10bn with infrastructure upgrades, will be built in Japan by 2034, with the remaining eight intended for Perth’s Henderson shipyard. The frigates will feature 32 vertical launch cells, stealth design and long-range missile capability. The deal, Japan’s largest defence export since WWII, symbolises deepening bilateral ties but poses export and sustainment risks.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109400
Japan beats Germany to build Australia’s new frigate fleet
BEN PACKHAM - 5 August 2025
1/2
The Albanese government is leaving open the option of building more general purpose frigates offshore after selecting Japan’s Mitsubishi Heavy Industries to deliver the new frontline warships in a decision that will shape the navy for a generation.
MHI’s upgraded Mogami was named the winner of the frigate contest on Tuesday, beating its German rival, the MEKO-A200, offered by ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems.
Defence Minister Richard Marles said the Japanese vessel was “absolutely the best ship” in the race, with a contract to be signed by early next year for an 11-vessel fleet that could ultimately cost $30bn or more.
The government has budgeted $10bn for the first three ships, together with infrastructure upgrades at Henderson and “long lead items” that need to be ordered well in advance.
But he refused to say what the per-ship cost of the program would be, arguing it would undermine the government’s bargaining position as it negotiated a final contract price with MHI.
MHI has pledged to deliver the first ship by 2029 and a third by 2034 from its Japanese production line, with a further eight due to be built at Perth’s Henderson shipbuilding precinct.
However, Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy said there was no guarantee that Henderson or the government’s new sovereign shipbuilder, Austal, would be ready to commence domestic production in time for ships four to six. “It’s up to Australian industry to prove that they can do this. We’re not giving a blank cheque, but I’m confident that they’ll rise to the challenge,” he said.
The Henderson yards need major upgrades to relocate non-defence tenants and undertake maintenance on visiting US and British nuclear submarines, while Austal has 26 landing craft to build for the army before it can focus on the frigates. West Australian Premier Roger Cook said it was “absolutely imperative … that those ships are built in Western Australia”.
“We’ll do what needs to be done,” he said. “That will happen because it’s not just about building the ships, it’s about building them in Australia and building … our sovereign defence capacity.”
Cabinet’s national security committee selected the Japanese ship at a meeting on Monday evening, with the bidders informed of the decision soon after.
The government said the Japanese ship was recommended by Defence on the key criteria of cost, capability and build schedule. “The Mogami-class frigate is the best frigate for Australia,” Mr Marles said.
“It is a next-generation vessel. It is stealthy. It has 32 vertical launch cells capable of launching long-range missiles. It has a highly capable radar, highly capable sonar. In that sense, it is generally a general-purpose frigate capable of engaging in air warfare and undersea warfare.”
The MEKO-A200 had only 16 vertical launch cells and, unlike the Mogami, could not be upgraded to fire long-range Tomahawk missiles, or advanced SM-2 and SM-6 air defence missiles, the government said.
Mr Marles said the choice also had strategic benefits. “There’s no other country in the world that is quite as aligned with Australia as Japan,” he said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109486
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23428097 (051050ZAUG25) Notable: Chinese woman accused of spying on Canberra Buddhist group on Beijing’s orders – A Chinese-born Australian permanent resident has been charged with reckless foreign interference after allegedly being directed by China’s Public Security Bureau to spy on the Guan Yin Citta Buddhist association in Canberra, which Beijing considers an “evil cult.” The woman, whose identity is suppressed, faced court on Monday after being arrested in AFP Operation Autumn Shield. Assistant Commissioner Stephen Nutt said further arrests are expected. It is the third charge under Australia’s 2018 foreign interference laws, with ASIO’s Mike Burgess calling the alleged conduct “an appalling assault on Australian values.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109325
>>109378
>>109469
>>109483
Chinese woman accused of spying on Canberra Buddhist group on Beijing’s orders
BEN PACKHAM and NOAH YIM - 5 August 2025
1/2
A Chinese woman was allegedly directed by Beijing’s security services to covertly collect information on a Canberra Buddhist group considered by the Chinese Communist Party to be part of an “evil cult”.
The woman, a permanent Australian resident who cannot be identified for legal reasons, faced Canberra Magistrates Court on Monday on one count of reckless foreign interference.
She is alleged to have been instructed by China’s Public Security Bureau to “covertly gather information” on Canberra’s Guan Yin Citta Buddhist association, based near the Australian National University.
Australian Federal Police Assistant Commissioner Stephen Nutt said more arrests were expected in relation to the case, after electronic devices were seized in search warrants on multiple Canberra addresses.
Guan Yin Citta has clandestine centres in mainland China, as well as associations in the US, Singapore, Malaysia and Taiwan.
China’s security services have reportedly sought to eradicate the movement, which was founded by Shanghai-born Sydney man Lu Junhong, who died in 2021 aged 62.
The woman, whose identity was suppressed by the court, was arrested on Saturday. If found guilty, she faces a maximum 15 years’ jail.
She was arrested as part of Operation Autumn Shield, launched in March after information from ASIO.
Guan Yi Citta’s Canberra headquarters is on the fourth floor of a worn-down office building opposite the Australian National University. A woman who answered the door at the association on Monday said she did not know anything about the arrest.
It is the third time a charge has been laid under the commonwealth’s 2018 foreign interference laws.
The first involves Vietnamese-Chinese community leader Di Sanh Duong, accused of courting former multicultural affairs minister Alan Tudge on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party.
The second involves Australian businessman Alexander Csergo, accused of compiling reports for China on Australian defence, economic and national security arrangements.
Mr Nutt said that in the latest case, police were focusing on the unlawful targeting of Australian community members.
“Foreign interference is a serious crime that undermines democracy and social cohesion. It is a crime carried out on behalf of a foreign principal that involves covert and deceptive conduct or threats of serious harm or menacing demands,” he said.
“Foreign interference activity may be used to influence a political or government process, influence the exercise of an Australian democratic or political right, support the intelligence objectives of a foreign principal or prejudice national security.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109487
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23428116 (051107ZAUG25) Notable: China, US could be excluded from Pacific Islands Forum amid pressure over Taiwan – Solomon Islands Prime Minister Jeremiah Manele is expected to propose restricting next month’s Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) leaders meeting in Honiara to members only, excluding Taiwan, China, the US and other partners. The move, presented as procedural, is seen as an attempt to defuse Beijing’s pressure to block Taiwan while avoiding a split among Pacific allies. Analysts said the plan would “de-escalate a geopolitically charged situation” but risk angering major partners. Australia and New Zealand are urging Solomon Islands not to exclude Taiwan.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73475 (pb)
>>73610 (pb)
>>>/qresearch/23239588 (pb)
China, US could be excluded from Pacific Islands Forum amid pressure over Taiwan
abc.net.au - 4 August 2025
Solomon Islands could try to defuse a potentially explosive stoush over Taiwan's participation in a key regional meeting next month by restricting the gathering to Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) members — effectively excluding China, the US and a host of other countries as well.
Solomon Islands Prime Minister Jeremiah Manele is under increasing pressure over whether his country will allow Taiwan's representatives to attend the Pacific Islands Forum leaders meeting in Honiara this September.
Taiwan has long attended the meeting as a "development partner" and has used that opportunity to meet with Pacific "allies" that extend its diplomatic recognition — although that band has now dwindled to just three nations.
But Beijing remains intent on doing everything it can to isolate Taiwan diplomatically, and has been pressing Solomon Islands to break with tradition and exclude Taiwan entirely, stirring anger among Taipei's remaining allies, and stoking frustration in Canberra and Wellington.
China responded furiously at last year's PIF leaders meeting in Tonga when Pacific leaders reaffirmed the status quo, and earlier this year, Solomon Islands refused to issue visas to Taiwanese officials who wanted to enter Honiara to help prepare for their delegation.
Now the ABC has been told Mr Manele is likely to propose to fellow Pacific leaders that the annual dialogue with PIF partners be deferred entirely, until after a broader review of regional diplomatic architecture is complete.
That review, which includes a proposal to establish a new "tiered" system for PIF dialogue partners, was meant to be finished in time for the leaders' meeting in September, but has been hit with delays.
By deferring the dialogue, Solomon Islands will effectively block not just China and Taiwan from sending delegations to Honiara, but a host of other countries as well, including from Asia, Europe and the Middle East.
While Mr Manele is likely to present the proposal as procedural, an Australian government source said it was "obvious" that Solomon Islands was also "looking for a solution to the Taiwan problem", which both Beijing and Taiwan's Pacific allies could live with.
Palau's President Surangel Whipps Jr has already warned that singling out and excluding Taiwan could risk a reprise of the "PIF split" that rocked the forum a few years ago.
Tuvalu's Climate Change Minister Maina Talia also took aim at China last week, saying Pacific nations that chose to recognise Taiwan also had the right to meet with their key partner at the leaders' meeting.
Anna Powles from Massey University said the compromise being put forward by Mr Manele would "de-escalate a geopolitically charged situation" but was also "evidence that geopolitics has coopted the Forum Leaders Meeting."
"If Beijing was not placing pressure on Solomon Islands, Prime Minister Manele would presumably be able to uphold the 1992 Honiara Communique [which affirms that Taiwan should be able to meet its allies on the margins of the PIF leaders meeting]," Dr Powles said.
One Pacific official told the ABC that while no final decision had been made — and that the PIF Secretariat would have to endorse the proposal — Mr Manele's compromise might be the "only solution" if Solomon Islands was determined not to let Taiwan's representatives into the country.
They also said Mr Manele and the PIF Secretariat would be able to point to a precedent: Fiji also excluded dialogue partners when they hosted the leaders meeting in 2022, saying Pacific nations needed to focus on healing rifts from the PIF split.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109488
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23428124 (051117ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Allies remember Pacific War 80 years on - With the enormous Ohio-class guided missile submarine in Brisbane, Sky News’ Investigations Reporter Jonathan Lea has taken a deeper look at the reason for its visit. War games brought it down under - now allies are beginning to mark the 80th anniversary of Victory in the Pacific. All as the government awaits news confirming Washington will still sell Australia at least three Virginia-class attack submarines needed for the navy. - Sky News Australia
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109224
>>109320
Allies remember Pacific War 80 years on
Sky News Australia
Aug 4, 2025
With the enormous Ohio-class guided missile submarine in Brisbane, Sky News’ Investigations Reporter Jonathan Lea has taken a deeper look at the reason for its visit.
War games brought it down under – now allies are beginning to mark the 80th anniversary of Victory in the Pacific.
All as the government awaits news confirming Washington will still sell Australia at least three Virginia-class attack submarines needed for the navy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLKC3E3vru0
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109489
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23428135 (051126ZAUG25) Notable: Brigadier Ben McLennan hails Talisman Sabre a huge success for Townsville and ADF – Brigadier Ben McLennan declared Talisman Sabre 2025 “exceeded expectations,” praising Townsville’s role and the Australian Defence Force’s ability to coordinate with 19 partner nations. The exercise showcased new platforms, including the M182 Abrams tank deployed for the first time. McLennan described it as “a bonanza for us” and thanked the region for its support. Exercise director Brigadier Damian Hill highlighted expanded geography, record participation, and activities in Papua New Guinea coinciding with its 50th independence anniversary. The exercise formally closes on August 4.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109320
>>109432
>>109424
Brigadier Ben McLennan hails Talisman Sabre a huge success for Townsville and ADF
Emily Devon - August 2, 2025
The world’s largest defence exercise that took place right here in North Queensland is over and it has been hailed a massive success.
Brigadier Ben McLennan said Talisman Sabre had “exceeded expectations” from all over.
“It exceeded the arms, the ADFs and our partners and allies in what we delivered, it’s the world’s largest exercise of its type without a doubt and we’re very proud that team Australia and army and the ADF are the ones who design and conduct it with our allies,” he said.
“It allows us to practice how we fight as an arm of formation, we only became an arm of formation in the last six months, in January this year.”
The Open Day held at Riverway also displayed new platforms that Brigadier McLennan said were used in the practice.
“I think we passed the exam at least, but it was great to be able to sit the exam through this activity,” he said.
He said third brigade’s amphibious department travelled up and down the east coast from the top of Hinchinbrook Shire to Rockhampton and Livingstone Shire.
Its armoured department was largely based in Charters Towers and Townsville.
“For us the key capability that we were able to roll out was the M182 Abrams tank, the best tank in the world,” he said.
“We’ve got 36 of them and were able to deploy them for the first time and it delivered in spades.
“This exercise was a bonanza for us, it was exciting for us.”
While the most significant exercise of the year is over, the Brigadier said the engineers were excited to have access to new platforms in which he referred to as “behemoth” sized.
“I’ve been waiting my whole career for these things to arrive,” he said.
“People were writing articles about these in the 90s. There’s no one that packs a punch greater than us.”
Brigadier McLennan said he wanted to thank the region for their support.
“We don’t take it for granted, we’re so appreciative.”
Brigadier and Talisman Sabre Exercise Director Damian Hill said everyone had almost returned home safely from the exercise, and said it had been “truly impressive to see”.
“I think it was the first time in many years we had an Australian Combat Division in the field,” he said.
He said it had spread between here in Townsville, NT and Central Queensland.
“I was asked to do three things – to expand geography, expand the number of countries, so there were 19 countries, and the last thing, to look at an activity overseas for Papua New Guinea.
“We asked if they were willing to host an activity and they were unbelievably accommodating, it just happened to coincide with the 50th anniversary of Independence for Papua New Guinea which I think is fantastic.”
He said Talisman Sabre was set to close properly on August 4.
https://www.townsvillebulletin.com.au/news/brigadier-ben-mclennan-hails-talisman-sabre-a-huge-success-for-townsville-and-adf/news-story/68385e5fd8f176a68c64c43e40ab2200
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109490
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23428147 (051133ZAUG25) Notable: Historic Talisman Sabre Exercise nears end with Personnel Recovery Drill – Talisman Sabre 2025 concludes on August 4 with its first-ever overseas component, featuring complex personnel recovery drills in Papua New Guinea. Forces from the PNG Defence Force, Australian Defence Force and US Armed Forces simulated a crashed aircraft response, deploying joint air, sea and land assets including a PNG Guardian-class Patrol Boat, a C27-J Spartan and the USS Miguel Keith. Exercise Director Brigadier Damian Hill said the trilateral drills strengthened regional ties, coinciding with PNG’s 50th independence anniversary and underscoring its growing defence interoperability.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109320
>>109432
>>109424
Historic Talisman Sabre Exercise nears end with Personnel Recovery Drill
POSTCOURIERONLINE - AUGUST 2, 2025
In a historic first for the major military training event, Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025 is wrapping up with complex training scenarios being conducted in Wewak and Lae, Papua New Guinea.
The exercise, which concludes on August 4, 2025, marks the first time components of the multinational exercise have been held outside of Australia.
The final activities include a joint personnel recovery exercise, where the Papua New Guinea Defence Force (PNGDF), Australian Defence Force (ADF), and US Armed Forces are simulating a response to a crashed aircraft. The training involves a Multi-National Tactical Operations Centre deploying a combined recovery team to the crash site to recover personnel.
As the scenario progresses, the mission will integrate a PNG Guardian-class Patrol Boat, a PNG Air Transport Wing PAC750 aircraft, an Australian C27-J Spartan, and the USS Miguel Keith with its embarked helicopters and mission support craft. This growing complexity highlights the strong integration and interoperability between the allied forces.
Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025 Director Brigadier Damian Hill emphasised the importance of the trilateral partnership. “To work together means to work as one combined force. We become stronger together and I am confident that this exercise has forged a stronger relationship between the three countries, including the Australian Defence Force, Papua New Guinea Defence Force and the United States Armed Forces,” he said.
He added, “This activity is designed to provide participants insight into a real-life scenario while working together to recover personnel.”
The complex training scenarios demonstrate the PNGDF’s growing capabilities and its increasing interoperability with Pacific partners, which is particularly significant as Papua New Guinea celebrates its 50th anniversary of independence.
Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025 will officially conclude with a closing ceremony in Lae on August 4.
https://www.postcourier.com.pg/historic-talisman-sabre-exercise-nears-end-with-personnel-recovery-drill/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109491
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23428160 (051139ZAUG25) Notable: Talisman Sabre ends in PNG with renewed calls for stronger defence ties – The 11th Talisman Sabre military exercise has concluded with Australia, the United States and Papua New Guinea emphasising unity in a tense Indo-Pacific. For the first time, drills were staged in Lae and Wewak, where joint forces carried out a complex search and rescue exercise. Vice Admiral Justin Jones said the exercise proved allies could “train together, plan together, and be ready” to defend shared security. With 19 nations participating and PNG marking its 50th Independence, calls have grown for deeper defence cooperation and future joint activities.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109320
>>109432
>>109424
Talisman Sabre ends in PNG with renewed calls for stronger defence ties
MARTHA LOUIS - AUGUST 4, 2025
The 11th Talisman Sabre military exercise wrapped up this week with a clear message: Australia, the United States, and Papua New Guinea are standing firmer together in an increasingly tense region.
This year marked the first time part of the exercise took place outside Australia. Lae and Wewak played host to key training activities, including a complex search and rescue drill involving troops from the three nations.
Vice Admiral Justin Jones, Chief of Joint Operations for the Australian Defence Force, said the past three weeks have highlighted the strength of working with trusted allies.
“Our greatest strength lies in our allies, partners, and like-minded friends,” he said. “Talisman Sabre proves we can train together, plan together, and be ready, if needed, to defend our shared security.”
Nineteen nations were involved, with Vietnam and Malaysia observing for the first time. The exercise, held across Australia and PNG, focused on preparing for high-end warfare, humanitarian work, and disaster response.
As the Indo-Pacific faces growing geopolitical pressure, questions remain about how Australia, the US, and PNG will deepen their cooperation. Local communities in Lae and Wewak have welcomed the visibility, but some have asked how they will benefit from future military visits.
Vice Admiral Jones said lessons learned from this year’s exercise will guide planning for the next round in 2025.
And with PNG’s 50th Independence celebrations coming up, the Australian Defence Force is also preparing to contribute, offering aircraft, naval vessels, and even an army band.
“It’s an honour to celebrate this milestone alongside the people of PNG,” Jones said.
For now, the troops return home, but plans for closer defence ties in the region are clearly underway.
https://www.postcourier.com.pg/talisman-sabre-ends-in-png-with-renewed-calls-for-stronger-defence-ties/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109492
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23428182 (051149ZAUG25) Notable: Talisman Sabre Tweets: (Video) The closing ceremony of Talisman Sabre 2025 was held in Lae, Papua New Guinea, today. The celebrations included a quarter guard by the PNGDF, and a fly-over by a PAC-750. Officials from PNG, Australia and the United States all spoke of the significance of PNG hosting Talisman Sabre activities this year - the first time a component of the exercise has been conducted outside of Australia – and the close defence ties between the three nations. This ceremony marks the conclusion of Talisman Sabre 2025.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109320
>>109432
>>109424
Talisman Sabre Tweets
1/2
The closing ceremony of Talisman Sabre 2025 was held in Lae, Papua New Guinea, today.
The celebrations included a quarter guard by the PNGDF, and a fly-over by a PAC-750.
https://x.com/TalismanSabre/status/1952297719956898098
—
Officials from PNG, Australia and the United States all spoke of the significance of PNG hosting Talisman Sabre activities this year – the first time a component of the exercise has been conducted outside of Australia – and the close defence ties between the three nations.
https://x.com/TalismanSabre/status/1952297728496558542
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109493
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23428186 (051151ZAUG25) Notable: Talisman Sabre Tweets: (Video) The closing ceremony of Talisman Sabre 2025 was held in Lae, Papua New Guinea, today. The celebrations included a quarter guard by the PNGDF, and a fly-over by a PAC-750. Officials from PNG, Australia and the United States all spoke of the significance of PNG hosting Talisman Sabre activities this year - the first time a component of the exercise has been conducted outside of Australia – and the close defence ties between the three nations. This ceremony marks the conclusion of Talisman Sabre 2025.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109492
2/2
This ceremony marks the conclusion of Talisman Sabre 2025.
📷 CPL Cameron Pegg
https://x.com/TalismanSabre/status/1952297737006760120
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109494
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23428192 (051157ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025 - From fighter jets and surveillance aircraft to heavy lifters and logistics teams, Air Force brought the full force of its capability to Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025. More than 5,500 flight hours - 2,000 sorties - Operations across five states and Papua New Guinea. Air Force worked side by side with 18 partner nations to train for high-end scenarios and test what it takes to operate as part of a joint and combined force. It takes an entire team - on the ground and in the air - to deliver Air Power. Talisman Sabre may be over for another year, however you’ll still see our people and equipment in the coming weeks in the sky and on the road as we make the trip home. - Royal Australian Air Force
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109320
>>109432
>>109424
Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025
Royal Australian Air Force
Jul 29, 2025
From fighter jets and surveillance aircraft to heavy lifters and logistics teams, Air Force brought the full force of its capability to Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025.
✈ More than 5,500 flight hours
🎯 2,000 sorties
🌏 Operations across five states and Papua New Guinea
Air Force worked side by side with 18 partner nations to train for high-end scenarios and test what it takes to operate as part of a joint and combined force.
It takes an entire team - on the ground and in the air - to deliver Air Power.
Talisman Sabre may be over for another year, however you’ll still see our people and equipment in the coming weeks in the sky and on the road as we make the trip home.
🎥 | SGT Kieren Whiteley
#TalismanSabre2025 #StrongerTogether #FriendsPartnersAllies
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qwz6Mt0lfF4
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109495
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23428208 (051210ZAUG25) Notable: Talisman Sabre -Magic Sword- https://qalerts.pub/?q=Operation+Specialists - https://qalerts.pub/?q=magic''''
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109320
>>109432
>>109424
Talisman Sabre Tweet
This year, Talisman Sabre hit some new milestones.
Hear from Vice Admiral Justin Jones, Australian Defence Chief of Joint Operations on the successes of Talisman Sabre 25 🏆
#TS25 #TalismanSabre25 #StrongerTogether #OurPeople
https://x.com/TalismanSabre/status/1952172758235770926
>Talisman Sabre
MAGIC SWORD
https://qalerts.pub/?q=Operation+Specialists
https://qalerts.pub/?q=magic
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109496
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23432165 (060941ZAUG25) Notable: Jeremy Rockliff reappointed as Tasmanian premier as Labor signals another no-confidence motion — Jeremy Rockliff has been recommissioned as Tasmania’s premier after the governor accepted his request to continue leading a minority Liberal government. Rockliff pledged to govern for a full four-year term, despite Labor leader Dean Winter announcing a no-confidence motion would be tabled when parliament returns on August 19. The governor cited the “convention of incumbency,” allowing Rockliff to test his support in parliament. The Liberals hold 14 seats, Labor 10, the Greens five, one Shooters, Fishers and Farmers MP, and five independents., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: The_Liberal_leader_Jeremy_Rockliff_has_been_reappointed_as_premier_of_Tasmania_by_the_governor_Barbara_Baker.jpg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109361
>>109362
>>109363
>>109380
Jeremy Rockliff reappointed as Tasmanian premier as Labor signals another no-confidence motion
Liberal insists he will govern for four years but authority to be tested within weeks when parliament returns
Luca Ittimani - 6 Aug 2025
Tasmania’s Liberal government has been recommissioned after weeks of political limbo after a snap election that failed to deliver either major party a majority.
The premier, Jeremy Rockliff, met with the governor, Barbara Baker, on Wednesday at Government House to formally ask for his minority government to remain.
Baker accepted the request after Rockliff told her he expected to gain the confidence of the lower house, the governor said.
Just hours after the premier was reappointed, the state’s Labor leader, Dean Winter, said a motion of no confidence would be tabled on the first day of the new parliament, either by Labor or a crossbencher.
“It is clear we need a parliament that will work together and Tasmania Labor stands ready to work with the crossbench to deliver Tasmanians a stable parliament and a stable government that can last four years,” Winter said.
“Tasmanians can be assured that any motion we move will not result in another election, it will result in either a Liberal government or a Labor government.”
Rockliff said on Wednesday he would serve as premier for a full four-year term.
“Through sensible communication, everyone working together, pragmatism, working together on policies, working together in the best interests of Tasmanians, this is a government and a parliament that will last the full term,” he told reporters after the governor confirmed his appointment.
“What we want to do, by evidenced of today, is get on with the job,”
He said he had taken “learnings” from the previous parliament which was cut short by a vote of no confidence.
“We want to build on the progress that was made in terms of how parliament works for the betterment of all members of parliament and, of course, that means the betterment of all Tasmanians. And move forward.”
In a statement, the governor explained why she appointed Rockliff despite his inability to demonstrate a majority backing in parliament.
“In a hung parliament, where no one clearly holds the confidence of the majority of the House of Assembly, the incumbent has the right to remain in office in order to test the numbers in the House of Assembly and for parliament to have the final say in who should be premier,” Baker said.
“I consider the convention of incumbency applies in the current circumstances.
“I shall reappoint the premier.
“It is better for confidence to be determined inside and not outside the parliament.”
Rockliff and his cabinet are set to be sworn in next week, before state parliament returns in a fortnight on 19 August.
The governor said the detailed reasons for her decision would be published on her website later on Wednesday.
On Tuesday, Rockliff said he had not secured supply and confidence agreements with key crossbenchers but thought it was “not necessary” in this instance.
The final makeup of Tasmania’s parliament is 14 Liberals, 10 Labor, five Greens, one Shooters, Fishers and Farmers MP and five independents.
The 19 July election was triggered after Rockliff lost a no-confidence motion, prompting the state’s second election in 16 months.
A key sticking point in forming government is the major parties’ backing of a new $1bn stadium in Hobart, which the Greens and some independents oppose.
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/aug/06/jeremy-rockliff-premier-tasmania
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109497
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23432173 (060947ZAUG25) Notable: Trump and Murdoch agree to pause in battle over Epstein article — Donald Trump and Rupert Murdoch have agreed to delay Murdoch’s deposition in the US president’s $15bn libel suit against The Wall Street Journal over a story linking him to Jeffrey Epstein. Court filings show the pause will remain until the Journal’s motion to dismiss is heard. Murdoch, 94, had faced pressure for an expedited appearance due to age and health but will only testify if dismissal fails. Trump alleges the Journal defamed him by publishing a 2003 “fake” letter and drawing, while News Corp vows to defend its reporting., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Donald_Trump_has_filed_legal_action_against_Rupert_Murdoch_and_News_Corporation_over_a_story_published_in_The_Wall_Street_Journal.jpg, Rupert_Murdoch_and_Donald_Trump_embrace_at_a_function_in_2017.jpg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109289
>>109355
>>109358
>>109437
Trump and Murdoch agree to pause in battle over Epstein article
Calum Jaspan - August 5, 2025
Rupert Murdoch and Donald Trump have agreed to pause the media mogul’s deposition in a libel lawsuit brought by the US president last month over a story published by The Wall Street Journal detailing Trump’s dealings with Jeffrey Epstein.
Court filings released on Tuesday said the two parties had reached an agreement to hold off on Murdoch’s court appearance until after The Wall Street Journal’s motion to dismiss the case had been heard.
Trump had initially sought Murdoch’s deposition to be expedited, citing the 94-year-old’s age and health, which some media outlets have labelled a stunt.
The parties had also agreed not to engage in discovery in the meantime, filings released by the Florida Court said.
The agreement was reached on Monday evening, according to US media outlet Politico. The likely outcome is that Murdoch, also facing a resumption of his own family legal battle in Nevada this year, will not appear in court for at least several months, and would only need to if the Journal’s motion to dismiss the case failed.
The filing also said Murdoch would appear in a mutually agreed location, in person, within 30 days, should the motion fail, and that he had agreed to provide “regularly scheduled updates to the Plaintiff [Trump] regarding his health”, including a mechanism for him to alert the president if there was a material change in his health.
Trump brought the $US10 billion ($15 billion) suit last month after The Wall Street Journal published a story reporting that he had signed a “bawdy” letter to Epstein, the disgraced Wall Street financier, for his 50th birthday, which included a drawing of a naked woman with his signature attached.
The president named Murdoch, News Corp chief executive Robert Thomson and the two reporters responsible for the article as defendants. The company intends to defend the reporting.
Trump has sued several other major media companies, including Disney-owned television network ABC and Paramount-owned CBS, ultimately settling both for a fraction of the costs he initially sought.
Trump has faced mounting pressure over his administration’s handling of the Epstein scandal and his links to the convicted paedophile, who died while in custody in 2019.
His initial response to the Journal story was that the drawing and letter was “fake”, claiming the publication of the alleged 2003 letter amounted to slander and violated libel laws.
The president and his team were reported to have gone to great lengths to kill the story, which the newspaper ultimately printed, and has stood by since its publication, later also reporting that Trump’s name appeared in the Epstein files.
Thomson will face investors on Wednesday morning, Australian time, as the company delivers its full-year financial results. News Corp’s other east coast newspaper, the New York Post, has announced its intentions to launch a Los Angeles based right-wing tabloid on Tuesday, The California Post.
https://www.theage.com.au/business/companies/trump-and-murdoch-agree-to-pause-in-battle-over-epstein-article-20250805-p5mklj.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109498
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23432218 (061013ZAUG25) Notable: ‘Let us see the audits’: Kmart faces legal battle over alleged links to Uyghur forced labour — Kmart is facing a Federal Court challenge from the Australian Uyghur Tangritagh Women’s Association, which is demanding disclosure of audits and documents on two Chinese textile factories linked to Uyghur forced labour. The group, represented by Maurice Blackburn and the Human Rights Law Centre, argues Kmart may have misled consumers by making unsubstantiated ethical sourcing claims. Kmart insists it has provided extensive details and monitors suppliers, but critics say it has withheld audit evidence. The case is the first of its kind in Australia., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Australian_Uyghurs_take_Kmart_to_court.mp4, Kmart_has_been_hit_with_a_legal_bid_to_provide_documents_on_how_it_has_dealt_with_two_suppliers_and_their_alleged_links_to_forced_labour_in_the_Uyghur_region.jpg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109325
>>109337
‘Let us see the audits’: Kmart faces legal battle over alleged links to Uyghur forced labour
Jessica Yun - August 5, 2025
1/2
Kmart has defended its ethical sourcing practices after being served with a court challenge to provide documents on how it has dealt with two clothing factories that have been linked to forced labour in Xinjiang, an autonomous territory in north-western China.
The Australian Uyghur Tangritagh Women’s Association (AUTWA) filed a Federal Court application on Monday seeking documentation from Kmart about what it knew of two clothing suppliers linked to the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, where the Chinese government has systematically persecuted the Uyghur population and other Turkic minorities.
Represented by law firms Maurice Blackburn and the Human Rights Law Centre, AUTWA is looking to determine whether Kmart followed its ethical sourcing procedures and monitored risks to mount a future legal case that would allege Kmart breached consumer law by making misleading and deceptive statements.
In a statement, a Kmart spokesperson said the retailing giant had been corresponding with AUTWA’s lawyers for more than 12 months and had provided “extensive details” of its ethical sourcing program that had been in place for 15 years.
“We invited the AUTWA to meet with us several times to help us understand their concerns,” said the Kmart spokesperson. “Suppliers in the Kmart ethical sourcing program are regularly monitored through activities including our site visits, audit programs and investigations if we receive any reports or complaints of concern.
“Where we learn of an alleged non-compliance with our code through an audit, site visit or complaint, or by a worker in a supplier’s factory, we take action to investigate and remediate the issue, working collaboratively with the supplier.
“When remediation isn’t possible due to the supplier’s refusal to do so, or repeated failures to make meaningful changes, we will exit the relationship.”
However, Maurice Blackburn principal lawyer Jennifer Kanis said the Australian retailer’s response during the 12 months of correspondence was “not satisfactory” because it had repeated public assertions about its ethical sourcing without providing any evidence.
“What do you do to make these ethical clothing, ethical sourcing claims?” Kanis said. “What do you actually do to back them up? What have you done in particular with these two factories?
“We’re saying, if you say you’re doing audits, and let us see the audits that you’ve done on these companies ... [Kmart has] not provided us with any of those documents. And so that’s why we’ve gone to court.”
Kmart’s spokesperson said it was the first Australian retailer to provide a list of factories it sourced from. The two contentious factories are Jiangsu Guotai Guosheng Co Ltd (Guotai) and Jiangsu Lianfa Textile Co Ltd (Lianfa), listed in Kmart’s 2025 and 2024 factory lists respectively.
Kanis pointed to three main sources, including a 2021 paper from Sheffield Hallam University, a March 2021 letter from a UN special rapporteur issued to Guotai, and a 2020 report by the Australian Strategic Policy Institute that implicated the two companies in using forced labourers in the Uyghur region subjected to serious human rights abuses, such as arbitrary arrests and detention, mass surveillance, religious persecution and more.
“We’re asking for any third-party audits, any audits, any reports of any non-compliance with their ethical sourcing code, any reports or documents saying that they may have suspended or terminated or taken any other remedial action against those producers, and then any information on factory visits or complaints,” said Kanis.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109499
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23432264 (061051ZAUG25) Notable: Sall Grover should pay big damages for ‘misgendering’ trans woman Roxanne Tickle in interviews, court told — Lawyers for Roxanne Tickle told the Federal Court that Giggle app founder Sall Grover should face “significant” aggravated damages for repeatedly referring to Tickle as a man in at least 50 media interviews. Tickle, who is appealing for damages of at least $40,000, argued Grover’s conduct went far beyond a single courtroom incident involving satirical merchandise. Counsel said Grover’s repeated “misgendering” was not bona fide under the Sex Discrimination Act. Grover’s lawyers countered that Tickle’s evidence of loss was “minimal.” J.K. Rowling publicly expressed support for Grover., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Sall_Grover_right_has_appealed_against_the_finding_she_discriminated_against_trans_woman_Roxanne_Tickle_left.jpg, Giggle_chief_executive_Sall_Grover.jpg, Supporters_of_Ms_Grover_outside_court.jpg, JKR_6.jpg, JKR_7.jpg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109282
>>109297
>>109467
>>109481
Sall Grover should pay big damages for ‘misgendering’ trans woman Roxanne Tickle in interviews, court told
STEPHEN RICE - 5 August 2025
1/2
Giggle app founder Sall Grover should have to pay hefty damages to trans woman Roxanne Tickle because she “misgendered her” in media interviews, Ms Tickle’s legal team has pleaded in a bombshell submission to the Federal Court.
In a submission which, if accepted, would have far-reaching implications for free speech, Ms Tickle’s lawyers argued that Ms Grover’s description of Ms Tickle as a man in at least 50 interviews should make her liable for “significant” aggravated damages.
Ms Grover is appealing a decision by judge Robert Bromwich that she indirectly discriminated against Ms Tickle by rejecting her from the Giggle for Girls female-only networking app because she appeared to be a man.
Justice Bromwich had awarded $10,000 damages because Ms Grover had laughed in court at a satirical piece of merchandise – a scented candle – which appeared to mock Ms Tickle.
Ms Tickle is also appealing parts of Justice Bromwich’s decision, asking for a finding of direct rather than indirect discrimination and that the damages be increased to at least $40,000. Ms Tickle had sought $200,000 in damages at the previous trial.
The Giggle v Tickle appeal has gained global attention, with author and prominent women’s rights activist J.K. Rowling expressing support for Ms Grover in an overnight post on social media platform X.
Rowling retweeted a post by Ms Grover of The Australian’s story revealing a submission by the Sex Discrimination Commissioner that trans women “should have legal protections available to pregnant or potentially women”.
Ms Grover had captioned the post: “This is how insane gender ideology is.”
Rowling also sent her support to Ms Grover.
“Good luck, Sall. May the best woman (haha) win x,” she wrote in a post on X.
On Tuesday, counsel for Ms Tickle, Briana Goding, said the $10,000 damages award was insufficient, in part because the beliefs Ms Grover held privately were also being made publicly and expressed in dozens of media interviews.
“There was evidence that Ms Grover had participated in some 50 interviews in relation to this case, and in each of those she used the male pronouns for Ms Tickle, and that on at least 10 occasions she referred to being scared or threatened or harassed by Ms Tickle,” Ms Goding said.
Ms Grover’s conduct “has at the very least been seriously aggravating and has caused Ms Tickle injured feelings”, Ms Goding said. “The aggravation and injured feelings have mounted up, blow by blow.”
Ms Goding said Justice Bromwich had found the satirical candle to be so offensive that he didn’t repeat the content in his written judgment.
“However, it’s our submission that His Honour ought to have gone beyond that single act of laughing in court and awarded aggravated damages for much broader conduct in the proceedings.
Those matters included the statement that Ms Tickle was a man, but should also include the fact that in her opening submissions Ms Grover and Giggle stated they “do not know, and cannot admit, whether the applicant is a natural person capable of being sued in the name of Roxanne Tickle”.
“This is not just a delegitimising of gender, but a delegitimising of humanity,” Ms Goding said.
“There’s further, the overall conduct of crowd funding for the case using the demeaning material, the promoting of others to purchase material from the Etsy store as well as the laughing in court,” Ms Goding said. Ms Grover has previously stated that she did not have any role in producing or selling the candle merchandise.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109500
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23432280 (061101ZAUG25) Notable: eSafety commissioner says YouTube 'turning blind eye' to child abuse — Australia’s eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant accused major tech companies of failing to prioritise child protection, saying YouTube and Apple could not even disclose how many reports of child sexual abuse material they received or how quickly they acted. A new report found “safety deficiencies” across platforms, including weak detection of live-streamed abuse and failure to use hash-matching on all services. The government last week included YouTube in its teenage social media ban. Inman Grant said companies were “turning a blind eye” to crimes on their platforms., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: eSafety_commissioner_Julie_Inman_Grant_says_large_technology_companies_are_failing_to_answer_basic_questions_about_how_they_are_handling_reports_of_child_abuse_material_on_their_platforms.jpg, 0001.jpg, 0002.jpg, 0003.jpg, 0004.jpg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109413
>>109415
>>109444
>>>/qresearch/23402364
eSafety commissioner says YouTube 'turning blind eye' to child abuse
Reuters / abc.net.au - 6 August 2025
Australia's internet watchdog has accused the world's biggest social media firms of still "turning a blind eye" to online child sex abuse material on their platforms, and said YouTube in particular had been unresponsive to its enquiries.
In a report released on Wednesday, the eSafety Commissioner said YouTube, along with Apple, failed to track the number of user reports it received of child sex abuse appearing on their platforms and also could not say how long it took them to respond to such reports.
The federal government decided last week to include YouTube in its world-first social media ban for teenagers, following the commissioner's advice to overturn its planned exemption for the Alphabet-owned Google's video-sharing site.
"When left to their own devices, these companies aren't prioritising the protection of children and are seemingly turning a blind eye to crimes occurring on their services," eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant said in a statement.
"No other consumer-facing industry would be given the licence to operate by enabling such heinous crimes against children on their premises, or services."
Google has said previously that abuse material has no place on its platforms and that it uses a range of industry-standard techniques to identify and remove such material.
Meta — owner of Facebook, Instagram and Threads, three of the biggest platforms with more than three billion users worldwide — has said it prohibits graphic videos.
The eSafety Commissioner, an office set up to protect internet users, has mandated Apple, Discord, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Skype, Snap and WhatsApp report on the measures they take to address child exploitation and abuse material in Australia.
The report on their responses so far found a "range of safety deficiencies on their services which increases the risk that child sexual exploitation and abuse material and activity appear on the services".
Safety gaps included failures to detect and prevent live-streaming of the material or block links to known child abuse material, as well as inadequate reporting mechanisms.
It said platforms were also not using hash-matching technology on all parts of their services to identify images of child sexual abuse by checking them against a database.
Google has maintained its anti-abuse measures include hash-matching technology and artificial intelligence.
The Australian regulator said some providers had not made improvements to address these safety gaps on their services despite it putting them on notice in previous years.
"In the case of Apple services and Google's YouTube, they didn't even answer our questions about how many user reports they received about child sexual abuse on their services or details of how many trust and safety personnel Apple and Google have on-staff," Ms Inman Grant said.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-08-06/esafety-commissioner-says-google-turning-blind-eye-child-abuse/105617742
https://www.esafety.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/tech-giants-are-still-making-minimal-efforts-to-tackle-the-growing-scourge-of-online-child-sexual-abuse
https://www.esafety.gov.au/industry/basic-online-safety-expectations/responses-to-transparency-notices
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109501
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23432296 (061112ZAUG25) Notable: Russia blames Australia war games as it dumps nuclear pact — Russia’s Foreign Ministry declared it no longer considers itself bound by a self-imposed ban on deploying short and intermediate-range nuclear missiles, citing “threats” from US and allied actions. Moscow singled out Washington’s deployment of Typhon launchers to the Philippines and the use of the system in Australia during Talisman Sabre 2025, which also featured the first overseas deployment of the Dark Eagle hypersonic system. The ministry accused the US and partners of ensuring a permanent presence of such weapons, prompting Russia to respond. Dmitry Medvedev warned opponents to “expect further steps.”, MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Dmitry_Medvedev_says_the_decision_is_the_result_of_NATO_s_anti_Russian_activities.jpg, Statement_by_the_Ministry_of_Foreign_Affairs_of_the_Russian_Federation_on_the_moratorium_on_the_deployment_of_ground_launched_intermediate_range_and_shorter_range_missiles.jpg, DM_1.jpg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109320
>>109432
>>109424
Russia blames Australia war games as it dumps nuclear pact
ANNE BARROWCLOUGH - August 05, 2025
Russia has announced it is to consider redeploying short and intermediate range nuclear missiles, claiming military actions by Australia, the US and other allies are putting its national security at risk.
In a statement on Tuesday (AEST), Russia’s Foreign Ministry said Moscow “no longer considers itself bound by the previously adopted self-imposed restrictions.”
”The conditions for maintaining a unilateral moratorium on the deployment of (nuclear) systems have ceased to exist,” the ministry declared.
The missiles are reportedly likely to deployed in Russia’s southwest, near the border with Ukraine and the country’s northeast border with the NATO countries of Norway and Finland, where it has already expanded its military infrastructure.
Vasily Kashi, the director of Russia’s Centre for Comprehensive European and International Studies at the Higher School of Economics told state news agency TASS: “It is obvious that most of (the missiles) should be deployed in the north-western direction, and the others in the southern area of the country’s European part.”
“Choosing not to deploy intermediate-and shorter-range ground-based ballistic and cruise missiles en masse has been very seriously limiting our capabilities,” Mr Kashi added.
The move comes after Donald Trump ordered the deployment of two nuclear submarines to “appropriate regions” in an escalation of what had been an online war of words with Mr Medvedev.
The nuclear sabre-rattling intensified as the US President set a deadline of the end of this week for Russia to take steps toward ending the Ukraine war or face unspecified new sanctions.
Mr Trump on Monday confirmed his special envoy Steve Witkoff would arrive in Moscow either Wednesday or Thursday before the Friday deadline.
In 2019, after Mr Trump withdrew the US from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty Moscow said it would not deploy missiles as long as Washington also refrained from doing so.
But in its statement, the ministry said it was withdrawing from the pact due to threats to its national security from Washington’s deployment of Typhon launchers carrying Tomahawk cruise missiles to the Philippines.
The ministry accused Australia and other allies of adding to its security risks by allowing the launchers to be deployed in their regions.
“The same system was used in Australia in July during live-fire exercises as part of the Talisman Sabre 2025 multilateral training,” the ministry said. “During those exercises, the US military carried out the first overseas deployment of the Dark Eagle intermediate-range hypersonic system, openly stating that this was done to ‘project power’ and emphasising the system’s rapid redeployment capability.
“The above actions by the United States and its allies go hand-in-hand with the official statements to ensure the long-term (in fact, permanent) presence of such US weapons in Europe and the Asia-Pacific.”
Accusing the US of “a clear anti-Russian focus,” the ministry said: “Since the situation is developing towards the actual deployment of US-made land-based medium and short-range missiles in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region … the conditions for maintaining a unilateral moratorium on the deployment of similar weapons have disappeared.”
Posting on social media after the foreign ministry’s statement, former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev said the decision “is the result of NATO countries’ anti-Russian policy”.
He added: “This is a new reality all our opponents will have to reckon with. Expect further steps.”
Mr Medvedev last week warned that US support for Ukraine risked sparking a war between Russia and the United States and made reference to Moscow’s “dead hand” automatic nuclear retaliation system.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov on Tuesday said officials were happy to meet with Mr Witkoff
“We are always glad to see Mr. Witkoff in Moscow,” he said. “We consider (talks with Witkoff) important, substantive and very useful.”
Mr Trump said on Sunday that Russia had proven to be “pretty good at avoiding sanctions.” “They’re wily characters,” he said.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/russia-withdraws-from-nuclear-pact-as-tensions-escalate/news-story/a9648887bd9fdb5e85e882d8678e3063
https://mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/news/2039749/
https://x.com/MedvedevRussiaE/status/1952452686802198557
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109502
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23432316 (061126ZAUG25) Notable: U.S. Embassy Australia Tweets: (Video) @FBIDirectorKash visited Sydney, Australia, to engage in high-level law enforcement meetings aimed at strengthening international partnerships and addressing shared security challenges. These discussions focus on combating transnational crime, cyber threats, and other global issues that require close collaboration with international allies. Building strong partnerships is vital to ensuring a safer and more secure future for all. - #uswithaus @FBI @AusFedPolice @ASIO @nswpolice @MarineCommand @scg, MISSING MEDIA/FILES: USEA_29.jpg, GWdvdRxUh9HavWu2.mp4
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109451
>>109452
>>109469
>>109480
U.S. Embassy Australia Tweets
@FBIDirectorKash visited Sydney, Australia, to engage in high-level law enforcement meetings aimed at strengthening international partnerships and addressing shared security challenges. #uswithaus @FBI @AusFedPolice @ASIO @nswpolice @MarineCommand @scg
https://x.com/USEmbAustralia/status/1952923199479718119
—
These discussions focus on combating transnational crime, cyber threats, and other global issues that require close collaboration with international allies. Building strong partnerships is vital to ensuring a safer and more secure future for all.
https://x.com/USEmbAustralia/status/1952923272254988481
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109503
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23435986 (071027ZAUG25) Notable: Australia could recognise Palestinian state within weeks, won’t wait for Trump — Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is weighing whether to announce recognition of a Palestinian state before September’s UN General Assembly, aligning with France, the UK and Canada. Albanese stressed Australia is a “sovereign government” and would not seek US President Donald Trump’s approval, despite his warnings recognition could reward Hamas. Any Australian move would depend on Hamas leaving Gaza and reforms within the Palestinian Authority. Albanese discussed the issue with Mahmoud Abbas this week, while critics warned recognition risks diverging from US and Israeli policy.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109475
>>109479
>>109484
Australia could recognise Palestinian state within weeks, won’t wait for Trump
Paul Sakkal - August 7, 2025
1/2
Australia is considering recognising a Palestinian state before a major United Nations summit in September, without seeking approval from US President Donald Trump.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has faced a barrage of questions about Australia recognising Palestinian statehood after France vowed to make the move in September. The UK and Canada followed France, attaching conditions to their decisions.
Sources familiar with discussions at the top of the government, not permitted to speak publicly, said the government could make an announcement this month about the position it would take at the September UN General Assembly, where Gaza and the future of a Palestinian state will be a key focus.
Labor ministers, including Treasurer Jim Chalmers and Foreign Minister Penny Wong, have said publicly that recognition was a matter of time, but the government has refused to set a date for the move and made it conditional on Israel’s security and Hamas ceding control of Gaza.
When asked on Thursday if he would clear any step to recognition with Trump before making it public, Albanese brushed off the need to act in line with the US, which is Israel and Australia’s top ally, saying he led a “sovereign government” that would make decisions in the national interest.
Trump has said that Canada’s move to recognise Palestine would reward Hamas and threaten the US’ trade talks with its northern neighbour, but later clarified it was “not a deal-breaker”.
Israel’s war cabinet is due to decide in the early hours of Friday morning (AEST) whether to escalate its campaign in Gaza by moving into the approximately 25 per cent of the battered strip still controlled by Hamas. Israel’s military chief reportedly believes the step is too risky.
Hamas still holds dozens of Israeli hostages, prolonging the conflict that began with its massacre of about 1200 people in Israel on October 7, 2023.
After weeks of images showing starvation in Gaza, France, the UK and Canada sped up plans to recognise Palestine ahead of the New York UN meeting.
Any Australian recognition of Palestine is contingent on Hamas’ removal from Gaza. Other conditions the government has raised include reforming the alternative governing force, the Palestinian Authority, to position it as a moderate ruler of Gaza that commits to leaving Israel in peace. The authority recently committed to holding elections to allow for generational renewal.
Albanese spoke to the authority’s head, Mahmoud Abbas, this week, where he raised the necessity for the governing force in the West Bank to modernise and seek peace. The prime minister has also been building the case for a two-state solution in calls with French President Emmanuel Macron and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer.
“The prime minister is genuinely working with world leaders on recognition and the broader issues to achieve something practical. The timing on recognition will flow from that,” one Labor MP said.
Albanese’s office was contacted for comment.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109504
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23436001 (071036ZAUG25) Notable: ‘A very big threat’: Australia defends PBS as Trump flags 250% tariffs on medicines — Health Minister Mark Butler has warned Donald Trump’s threat of tariffs of up to 250% on pharmaceuticals is “a very big threat” to $2 billion in Australian exports, particularly CSL’s blood and plasma products. Butler said the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) was “not up for negotiation” but confirmed he would act on a review to speed up new medicine approvals, long criticised by US firms. Trump said tariffs would rise to 250% within 18 months unless nations stopped “freeloading” off higher US drug prices., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: The_Trump_administration_has_complained_about_other_countries_offering_cheaper_medicines_than_the_US.jpg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109280
>>109455
>>109456
‘A very big threat’: Australia defends PBS as Trump flags 250% tariffs on medicines
Natassia Chrysanthos - August 7, 2025
1/2
Health Minister Mark Butler is planning to speed up medicine approvals as US President Donald Trump threatens to put tariffs of up to 250 per cent on pharmaceutical products, which could affect $2 billion worth of Australian exports.
Butler said Trump’s latest threat would not change the discount Australians received on medicines through the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, but revealed he would get advice within days about accelerating the approvals process for new drugs in Australia – a key issue that US pharmaceutical giants have raised with Trump.
Speeding up the timeframe for US medicines to land on pharmacy shelves could improve the Australian government’s standing with the Trump administration, although it does not deal with the White House’s bigger concern that Americans pay more for medicines than citizens of other countries.
Trump’s anger with what he called “foreign freeloading nations” prompted him to threaten tariffs of up to 250 per cent on drug imports this week.
Butler said it was a “a very big threat”. “It’s one we’re working very hard to engage with the Americans on,” Butler said on Thursday.
“The numbers are jumping around … They were 200 per cent a couple of weeks ago, and now they’re 250 per cent potentially. They are very, very big tariffs.
“We are making the case very strongly, but I’m not going to pretend that the US administration doesn’t appear to be pretty serious about this.”
Australia’s PBS – under which the government subsidises drugs and Australians can buy expensive medicines for a maximum price of $31.60, soon to become $25 – has been brought up repeatedly during Trump’s trade wars as US pharmaceutical companies push the president to punish countries that limit their market access.
The big drug companies say the PBS delivers a hit to their potential profits because they are forced to negotiate with the Australian government, which pushes them to offer the lowest possible price. They also say the PBS takes too long to go through its process of deciding to approve medicines and, in doing so, delays the arrival of their product on Australian pharmacy shelves.
Medicines Australia, the nation’s peak pharmaceutical industry group, also takes issue with the approvals process, claiming it takes an average 466 days for new drugs to become subsidised after being approved for use. In other countries, it says, this process can be done in 90 days.
Butler said he agreed that medicines should get into the Australian system more quickly, but blamed the complexity of policy reform for the delays in acting on the issue, which he first commissioned a review about in 2022. It delivered 50 recommendations in May 2024.
“I’m expecting a report this week or next week on ways in which we can implement a series of recommendations to make our medicines approval system quicker,” Butler told the ABC on Thursday.
“We’re living through this turbocharged period of discovery that’s bringing more and more new medicines. So, making sure we can assess them and approve them very quickly ... is something I’ve said is a real priority for us this term.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109505
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23436017 (071045ZAUG25) Notable: Leaked letters and closed-door talks with PM: Media bosses’ AI fight — Australia’s major media companies have joined authors, artists and musicians to oppose a Productivity Commission proposal to exempt AI firms from copyright laws, warning it would “legalise theft” of creative work. Nine’s Matt Stanton and other media chiefs have lobbied Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and ministers directly, pushing for regulation and commercial deals with AI firms. The Albanese government insists it has “no plans” to amend copyright laws, while Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said it was “not appropriate for big tech to steal” Australian content., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Michael_Miller_executive_chair_of_News_Corp_Australasia_left_with_Prime_Minister_and_Anthony_Albanese_and_Daily_Telegraph_editor_Ben_English_during_the_election_campaign_in_April.jpg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Leaked letters and closed-door talks with PM: Media bosses’ AI fight
Paul Sakkal - August 6, 2025
1/2
Australia’s media bosses are directly lobbying Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on the threat artificial intelligence poses to news outlets, uniting with authors, musicians and artists to slam a proposal to waive copyright laws for multibillion-dollar AI companies.
The prospect of large language models such as ChatGPT scraping articles, songs and art without paying creators burst into the spotlight on Wednesday after the government’s think tank, the Productivity Commission, proposed a copyright exemption for AI firms training their models.
A letter from Australia’s top media firms and creative bodies, sent to Attorney-General Michelle Rowland on July 11 and obtained by this masthead, vowed to fight any move to weaken copyright protections, opening a fresh battle between local media outlets and foreign technology companies.
Nine chief executive Matt Stanton took the media’s fears directly to Albanese in private talks last month, as Labor tries to balance its agenda to rein in digital behemoths against the spectre of retaliation from the Trump administration against countries that regulate US tech giants.
The media companies’ concern centres on the way companies such as Google are reconstituting information from publishers and presenting it as AI answers to search queries, which one study found resulted in up to 80 per cent fewer views of underlying articles.
Stanton argued weakening copyright protections to allow AI firms to legally obtain Australian data – which has already largely happened due to it being a legal grey area – would amount to legalising theft.
“They don’t care for permission, they ignore direct requests to stop and are now actively campaigning our politicians to make this theft a legal and acceptable practice,” Stanton told this masthead, which Nine owns.
“To even contemplate making this behaviour legal is beyond comprehension. Yet that is the risk presented to us if our investment in Australian journalists and local news reporting is rendered worthless because these generative AI platforms can simply take it.”
“If Australian journalism is swiped into submission it is our democracy, our identity as Australians and our own voice as a people that is at risk.”
A united front of news bosses met with Communications Minister Anika Wells and Assistant Treasurer Daniel Mulino on Tuesday. They included Stanton, News Corp chief Michael Miller, Seven West Media’s Jeff Howard, the ABC’s Hugh Marks, and Guardian Australia’s Lenore Taylor. Those outlets were all contacted for comment.
The group is also pushing Labor to get moving on its promised incentive scheme to charge tech giants such as Meta for Australian news shared on social media and search platforms.
The company, which owns Facebook and Instagram, has refused to pay media companies under existing legislation and suggested it would remove all news content if it was pushed by the government.
But multiple sources familiar with the talks, who requested anonymity because they were private, said the outlets were mulling a request for the government to intervene and help them strike commercial deals with AI firms. Such a move would only come after the conclusion of talks over the incentive scheme, the sources stressed.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109506
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23436029 (071053ZAUG25) Notable: Law ‘never intended boys to sleep in girls’ dormitories’, court told — The Federal Court has heard final submissions in Sall Grover’s appeal against a ruling that she indirectly discriminated against transgender woman Roxanne Tickle by rejecting her from the Giggle networking app. Counsel for the Lesbian Action Group argued parliament never intended biological men to enter female-only spaces such as shelters, schools, or lesbian events. Equality Australia countered that sex was non-binary and socially defined, while the Sex Discrimination Commissioner argued “woman” includes trans women. Grover’s lawyers warned expanded protections risk undermining safe spaces for both women and transgender women., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Transgender_woman_Roxanne_Tickle_left_and_Giggle_chief_executive_Sall_Grover_outside_the_Federal_Court_on_Wednesday.jpg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109499
Law ‘never intended boys to sleep in girls’ dormitories’, court told
STEPHEN RICE - August 06, 2025
1/2
Parliament could not have intended that biological boys would sleep in girls’ dormitories or that men would attend lesbian parties when it introduced changes to the Sex Discrimination Act, an appeal in the landmark case of Giggle v Tickle has been told.
The consequences of saying sex is non-binary and changeable “cannot be objectively sustained”, counsel for the Lesbian Action Group, Leigh Howard, told a Full Bench of the Federal Court on Wednesday.
The court heard final submissions in the appeal by Giggle app founder Sall Grover against a decision by judge Robert Bromwich that she indirectly discriminated against transgender woman Roxanne Tickle by rejecting her from the female-only Giggle networking app because she appeared to be a man.
The LAG has been granted intervener status in the case because of its special interest in creating female-only spaces.
It says the conclusion that a biological man who identifies as a woman is a “woman” under the Sex Discrimination Act has serious unintended consequences, including that charitable accommodation providers would have to admit biological men into domestic violence shelters and rape crisis centres and police body searches of women could be carried out by biological men.
“The legislature did not intend this,” Mr Howard told the court.
“It did not intend for biological boys to attend all-girls schools, or for biological boys to sleep in the girls’ dormitory, or for men to attend a lesbian party.”
Mr Howard addressed the complexity introduced into the case by the interpretations of sex and gender offered by Ms Tickle and two other parties granted intervener status in the case, the Sex Discrimination Commissioner and gay and trans lobby group Equality Australia.
“This is an act that touches upon all aspects of society … it needs to be interpreted by the nurse at St Vincent’s Hospital, the market stall operator at Paddy’s Markets, the Big Four bank on Market Street, and the institutional department in Canberra – it has to work for everyone,” Mr Howard said.
“It has to be read sensibly and logically, produce coherent results that are understandable and capable of application by everyone and also all stakeholders of differing sophistication.”
Mr Howard also raised what he referred to as “the female elephant in the room” – the For Women Scotland case in which the UK Supreme Court ruled in April this year that “the terms woman and sex in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex”. While acknowledging the different jurisdiction, Mr Howard suggested that, after analysing the balance of the act in that case, “you cannot in their situation lead to the conclusion that the legislature intended there to be a concept of anything but a biological woman under their legislation.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109507
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23444208 (091153ZAUG25) Notable: Video: ‘Cowards and goons’: Premier condemns neo-Nazi march through Melbourne CBD — Around 100 masked members of the far-right National Socialist Network, led by white supremacist Thomas Sewell, marched through Melbourne’s Bourke Street Mall before dispersing at Flagstaff Gardens. A 26-year-old man who confronted the group was assaulted and hospitalised. No arrests were made, with police citing a strong presence to maintain order. Premier Jacinta Allan denounced the protesters as “cowards” and “goons,” pledging new police powers to unmask participants. Opposition Leader Brad Battin said Victoria had become the “hate capital,” while the Anti-Defamation Commission called the rally a “war parade.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
‘Cowards and goons’: Premier condemns neo-Nazi march through Melbourne CBD
MARCUS DE BLONK SMITH - 9 August 2025
A group of neo-Nazi protesters who marched through the Melbourne CBD have been condemned by Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan as “cowards” and “goons”, as she vowed to introduce stronger powers for police.
About 100 people dressed in black face coverings from the National Socialist Network - a far-right neo-Nazi group - marched through the Bourke Street mall at 12.40am on Saturday.
As the group made its way along Bourke Street several police cars drove alongside the protesters.
In videos posted to social media, members of the protest group, led by white supremacist leader Thomas Sewell, can be seen waving the Australian and National Socialist Network flags and holding banners stating: “White man fight back”.
A 26-year-old man who confronted the group was allegedly assaulted and was taken to hospital with non-life threatening injuries.
According to police, the group walked to Flagstaff Gardens where they dispersed at about 1.25am.
A police spokesman said no arrests were made throughout the protest, and added that “police had a strong presence to maintain community safety and to prevent any breach of the peace”.
“Victoria Police respects the right to protest, however, there is absolutely no place for such anti-Semitic, racist or hate-based behaviour in our society and police will not tolerate such activity.”
Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan condemned the march in a statement, saying: “Nazis don’t belong in this country and they know it. That’s why they hide behind masks in the dark.”
She also thanked officers for maintaining “public order”, and said police needed “more powers, and we’re giving it to them”.
“Our criminal Anti-Vilification laws come into effect next month,” the premier said in a statement.
“We will introduce powers for police to unmask cowards at protests after that. We’re not afraid of these goons – but we won’t tolerate them either.”
In a post on social media, Opposition Leader Brad Battin described the march as “appalling”.
“This behaviour is unacceptable and does not align with the values of an inclusive, tolerant and multicultural state,” he said.
Mr Battin accused the government of being “afraid to take a stand” against anti-Semitic and racist protests and had “lost control of our streets”.
“Protesters are now travelling from interstate to join these hateful rallies. Under the Allan Labor government, Victoria has become the hate capital - a place where this behaviour is allowed to thrive.”
David Southwick, opposition spokesman for police and corrections, said that both the far-right and far-left were “taking advantage of a weak and ineffective government”.
He accused the Victorian government of failing “to confront rising violence and extremism” across the state.
Dr Dvir Abramovich, Chair of the Anti-Defamation Commission, described the march as a “war parade”.
“Yesterday, Melbourne witnessed a scene that should freeze the blood of every Australian: an army of neo-Nazis marching in formation through our streets,” he said.
Dr Abramovich, who led the national campaign that resulted in the banning of the Nazi swastika, salute and sale of Third Reich memorabilia, called on politicians to act.
“I call on the Prime Minister and parliament to outlaw every neo-Nazi and white-supremacist organisation operating in this country,” he said.
“These are not activists … (and) the law must recognise them for what they are – organised extremists.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/cowards-and-goons-premier-condemns-neonazi-march-through-melbourne-cbd/news-story/941c141c7f50866d3263035925896448
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZJW3pQtCcY
https://qresear.ch/?q=Thomas+Sewell
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109508
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23444222 (091204ZAUG25) Notable: Outrage as 100+ masked neo-Nazis march on streets of Melbourne, Bacchus Marsh — More than 100 masked members of the far-right National Socialist Network marched through Melbourne’s CBD early Saturday before gathering at Bacchus Marsh and later holding a “national conference” at a Ballan caravan park attended by nearly 250 people. Police, who accused the group of assaulting a 26-year-old man, made no arrests. Premier Jacinta Allan vowed new powers to unmask “goons,” while Opposition leaders branded Victoria the “hate state.” Neo-Nazi leaders Thomas Sewell and Nathan Bull attended the gathering, where the group discussed forming a federal political party.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109507
Outrage as 100+ masked neo-Nazis march on streets of Melbourne, Bacchus Marsh
Victorian Neo-Nazis are gearing up to register their own political party, holding talks at their “national conference” after hundreds of masked members marched through CBD as powerless police watched on.
Regan Hodge and Anna Shreeves - August 9, 2025
1/2
More than 100 neo-Nazis who marched through the city before holding a mass gathering at a caravan park were labelled as “gutless cowards” and “goons” from both sides of politics.
Police were virtually powerless as the crew of far-right neo-Nazis marched through the CBD in the early hours of Saturday morning.
Police vehicles were seen driving alongside members of the National Socialist Network (NSN) as they marched along Bourke St from 12.40am.
Police accused the neo-Nazis, who wore black clothing and face coverings, of assaulting a 26-year-old man who confronted the group in the city.
Members and supporters of the NSN later gathered at a football ground in Bacchus Marsh where a small group of counter-protesters met them about 10am on Saturday.
They shamed the far-right group through a series of banners and posters as about a dozen police officers stood by.
“Insecure men’s retreat 2025,” one banner read.
It is understood supporters of the NSN flew into Melbourne to attend Saturday afternoon’s “national conference” — later held at a caravan park in Ballan.
The neo-Nazis were driven from the Bacchus Marsh train station, which is opposite the football ground, to the caravan park on mini buses.
Nearly 250 members of the NSN were in attendance.
The Sunday Herald Sun can reveal that the group continued discussions on their hopes and plans to form a federal political party.
Just 1500 members are required to apply to the Australian Electoral Commission to form an official federal party, but that number has not yet been reached.
“We’re having a community, a family, an athletic event to celebrate our culture and identity as white Australians,”controversial white supremacist leader Thomas Sewell said on Saturday.
Members of the NSN have so far escaped any criminal charges over a protest on the steps of Parliament in December, in whichthey chanted “Jews must go”.
Victoria Police have referred charges under the state’s racial and religious vilification laws but the Herald Sun last week revealed the Office of Public Prosecutions (OPP) was still investigating.
Jewish Community Council of Victoria president Philip Zajac said the government “must act now” to stamp out the “hate and menace” on Victorian streets.
He labelled the group of neo-Nazis a “tiny fringe rejected by the overwhelming majority of Victorians”.
“They will not intimidate us,” he said.
“Parliament is sitting this week.
“Eight months after promising anti-masking and anti-hate symbol laws, the Government must act now.”
Premier Jacinta Allan said police would soon have the power to unmask the “goons” who hid their faces in the middle of the night.
“Nazis don’t belong in this country and they know it. That’s why they hide behind masks in the dark,” she said.
“I thank Police who maintained the public order. It’s clear they need more powers, and we’re giving it to them.
“Our criminal Anti-Vilification laws come into effect next month. We will introduce powers for police to unmask cowards at protests after that.
“We’re not afraid of these goons — but we won’t tolerate them either.”
Police will still have to seek approval from the OPP to lay charges under the anti-vilification laws, potentially delaying charges.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109509
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23444254 (091217ZAUG25) Notable: Economic, defence ties on the table as NZ hosts its ‘only ally’ - New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has called Australia his country’s “only ally” as he prepares to host Anthony Albanese for bilateral talks in Queenstown. The leaders will discuss strengthening economic integration, security ties, and Pacific defence cooperation amid growing Chinese assertiveness. New Zealand has doubled its defence budget, emphasising interoperability with Australia, while both governments remain aligned on Middle East issues, including recognition of a Palestinian state as “a matter of when, not if.” Tourism levies may emerge as a point of contention., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: New_Zealand_Prime_Minister_Christopher_Luxon_and_Anthony_Albanese_at_Parliament_House_in_Canberra_in_2024.jpg, New_Zealand_Prime_Minister_Christopher_Luxon_and_Anthony_Albanese_speak_to_reporters_at_Taramea_in_Queenstown_New_Zealand.jpg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Economic, defence ties on the table as NZ hosts its ‘only ally’
ANNE BARROWCLOUGH - 9 August 2025
1/2
New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has described Australia as New Zealand’s “only ally in a world of uncertainty”, as he prepares to host Anthony Albanese for bilateral talks this weekend.
The remarks illustrate New Zealand’s increasing determination to tighten ties with Australia, particularly in regards to security in the region, and the countries’ economic relations.
Both areas will be front and centre of talks between the two leaders when they meet in the mountain resort town of Queenstown, in the South Island.
Mr Albanese will arrive in Queenstown on Saturday for his second annual Leaders Meeting with Mr Luxon. The two men held their first Leaders Meeting in Canberra last year but they have met several times since, during which they have forged a warm relationship as they face increasing turbulence in their economic and strategic spheres.
After arriving late morning on Saturday, Mr Albanese will be met with a “powhiri” (traditional Maori greeting) before bilateral talks with Mr Luxon, followed by a roundtable with business leaders including Qantas CEO Vanessa Hudson.
Describing the relationship between the two countries as a “tremendous bedrock of certainty”, Mr Luxon told NZ media: “They are family, they are our only ally. In a world of incredible uncertainty there is a tremendous bedrock of certainty in the relationship between Australia and New Zealand.”
Mr Albanese echoed his words, saying: “As neighbours, friends and family, the bonds between our countries, our economies and our communities are unmatched.”
There has been a paradigm shift in the friendship between the nations’ leaders since the notoriously tense relationship between former NZ prime minister Jacinda Ardern and Australian counterpart Scott Morrison. Mr Albanese soothed those tensions with his removal of the controversial policy of deporting NZ criminals, and his 2023 decision to fast-track Australian citizenship visas for Kiwis.
But while both sides are intent on building on their Single Economic Market after previously committing to a Trans-Tasman Roadmap to 2035, one sticking point this weekend may be Wellington’s recent decision to start charging international tourists fees of up to $36 to enter its famous natural sites – which are free to locals.
This may be a point of debate between the two leaders, Democracy Project think tank analyst Geoffrey Miller said.
“New Zealand needs to be careful about shooting themselves in the foot with levies,” Mr Miller told The Australian. “Tourism hasn’t really recovered since Covid and we should be welcoming Australians and other foreigners, not adding taxes to their already expensive trip.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109510
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23444271 (091223ZAUG25) Notable: Anthony Albanese, Christopher Luxon united on Gaza, China for trans-Tasman talks - Anthony Albanese and Christopher Luxon presented a united front during bilateral talks in Queenstown, aligning on Gaza, China and trade. Both leaders reaffirmed that recognition of Palestinian statehood is a matter of “when, not if,” while condemning Israel’s planned occupation of Gaza City as worsening the humanitarian crisis. They also pledged closer defence and security cooperation amid China’s growing regional assertiveness, while maintaining engagement with Beijing despite differences. Trade linkages, Trump’s tariff agenda and deportation disputes were also on the agenda., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Anthony_Albanese_met_with_New_Zealand_Prime_Minister_Christopher_Luxon_for_the_two_countries_annual_talks_on_Saturday.jpg, Anthony_Albanese_and_Christopher_Luxon_held_a_joint_press_conference.jpg, China_conducted_live_fire_exercises_in_the_Tasman_Sea_which_separates_Australia_and_New_Zealand_earlier_this_year.jpg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109509
Anthony Albanese, Christopher Luxon united on Gaza, China for trans-Tasman talks
JACK QUAIL - 9 August 2025
Anthony Albanese and Christopher Luxon have presented a united front in response to the deepening conflict in Gaza and heightened Chinese assertiveness in the Pacific, hailing the trans-Tasman alliance as a source of stability in turbulent times.
During their annual bilateral talks in a wintry Queenstown on Saturday, discussions between the pair also focused on deepening trade linkages amid Donald Trump’s aggressive tariff agenda and the ongoing dispute between the countries over Australia’s deportation of New Zealand criminals.
Against a backdrop of snow-capped peaks, the Australian Prime Minister and his delegation were greeted in New Zealand with a traditional Māori ceremony known as “powhiri”, before he and Mr Luxon held formal leaders’ talks followed by a roundtable with business leaders from both nations.
The trans-Tasman meeting comes as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed on Friday that his country’s military would take full control of Gaza City, defying mounting international calls to end the conflict and moves by France, Britain and Canada to progress recognition of a Palestinian state.
Asked about the matter at a joint press conference following the leaders’ meeting, Mr Albanese gave few specifics about his discussions with Mr Luxon on the subject of statehood, but noted that his government would “continue to play a role” in steps to resolve the conflict.
Mr Luxon – who leads a centre-right coalition government – was similarly vague on the subject of Palestinian statehood and did not comment on the necessary prerequisites for New Zealand to move ahead with recognition when asked. He said, however, that Australians and New Zealanders were “horrified” by the humanitarian crisis unfolding in Gaza.
“Military action that we’ve seen is not the way to solve this problem. It requires diplomacy. It requires dialogue,” he told reporters.
Asked whether recognising Palestine could hinder trade talks with the United States — after the US President expressed doubts about securing a deal with Canada after it said it would move to officially acknowledge statehood — both leaders said it would not influence their support.
The positions of the Australian and New Zealand governments on Palestinian statehood are completely aligned — that it is not matter of if, but rather of when, recognition occurs.
Earlier on Saturday, Australia’s Foreign Minister Penny Wong and her New Zealand counterpart Winston Peters joined foreign ministers from Britain, Germany and Italy to warn the Netanyahu government against its planned occupation of Gaza.
“It will aggravate the catastrophic humanitarian situation, endanger the lives of the hostages, and further risk the mass displacement of civilians,” the joint statement read.
The annual bilateral talks also canvassed security and defence co-operation amid an increasingly assertive China, which sparked alarm in Canberra and Wellington by conducting live-fire exercises in the Tasman Sea in February and March.
While both Mr Albanese and Mr Luxon have met with Chinese President Xi Jinping in recent weeks, Beijing’s expanding footprint in the region remains a shared concern. New Zealand in June suspended aid to the Cook Islands after it signed a number of controversial security pacts with China earlier this year.
Both leaders affirmed they would “disagree where we must” with Beijing, with Mr Albanese citing China’s human rights record and non-democratic governance, while Mr Luxon emphasised the importance of maintaining ongoing engagement despite these differences.
“Good partners should be not afraid to actually talk about those things and do so in a way that we can manage those differences as a consequence of that,” he said.
The meeting was the fourth between Mr Albanese and Mr Luxon, however, the pair have known each other for more than a decade in their previous roles as transport minister and chief executive of Air New Zealand, respectively.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/anthony-albanese-christopher-luxon-united-on-gaza-china-for-transtasman-talks/news-story/d35dea9fa8a79513f2b73aaf71bf5247
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109511
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23444314 (091251ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Israeli security cabinet agrees to major escalation in Gaza - Israel has approved plans for its military to seize Gaza City as part of a broader ambition to take full control of the enclave, rejecting international calls for a ceasefire. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the goal was to defeat Hamas and later hand Gaza to Arab forces, not the Palestinian Authority. Foreign Minister Penny Wong said the move would “worsen the humanitarian catastrophe,” while Israel’s opposition leaders warned it risked the lives of remaining hostages. The war has already killed over 61,000 Palestinians, Gaza’s Health Ministry says.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109484
>>109503
Israeli security cabinet agrees to major escalation in Gaza
Matthew Knott and David Crowe - August 8, 2025
1/2
Israel will escalate the war in Gaza by seeking to take control of the devastated enclave’s most populated city under plans approved by the country’s security cabinet in a marathon meeting, shunning global calls for a ceasefire.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu outlined his ambitions to conquer the entirety of the Gaza Strip to defeat Hamas, a listed terror group in Australia, on Friday, but the stated plan centres on an initial military operation to take over Gaza City as the next step toward broader goals.
The security cabinet set out five principles after a contested vote and decided the Israel Defence Forces would pursue security control over the Gaza Strip before one day ensuring a new civil government take over the enclave.
“The [Israel Defence Forces] will prepare to take control of Gaza City while providing humanitarian aid to the civilian population outside the combat zones,” Netanyahu’s office said in a statement.
The plan, which has drawn heated criticism from Netanyahu’s main political opponents in Israel, could take months to come into effect.
Israeli media outlets have reported that the military takeover of Gaza City may not occur until after the second anniversary of the October 7 attacks, following the dispersal of civilians to other areas.
Foreign Minister Penny Wong said the Australian government opposed the plans.
“Australia calls on Israel to not go down this path, which will only worsen the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza,” she said.
“Permanent forced displacement is a violation of international law. With international partners, Australia maintains our call for a ceasefire, the return of hostages and aid to flow unimpeded.”
But opposition foreign affairs spokeswoman Michaelia Cash countered Wong’s statement and declared the operational tactics were a matter for the Israeli government.
“What disturbs me more than anything is that so many now – but in particular Penny Wong – skip over this important detail: this war could end tomorrow if Hamas released the hostages and laid down their arms,” Cash said.
Most of the 2 million Palestinians in Gaza are currently in areas outside direct control by Israel, with many in Gaza City – highlighting the risks to civilians in any military operation to take over the city. Israel says it controls 75 per cent of the Gaza Strip.
The Israeli cabinet canvassed several other options on the best way to conduct the war when it met in the early hours of Friday, AEST, but rejected them.
“A decisive majority of security cabinet ministers believed that the alternative plan ... would neither achieve the defeat of Hamas nor the return of the hostages,” the prime minister’s office said, acknowledging the divisions.
The first four principles agreed to end the war were the disarming of Hamas, the return of all hostages living and dead, the demilitarisation of the Gaza Strip and Israeli security control in the Gaza Strip.
The fifth principle was the establishment of an alternative civil administration over the territory that would be neither Hamas nor the Palestinian Authority.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has joined other leaders in speaking to Palestinian Authority president Mahmoud Abbas in recent weeks, highlighting a global push to make the governing body in the West Bank a key part of a two-state solution that would include Gaza.
Speaking before the security cabinet meeting, which ran for 10 hours through the night, Netanyahu had said Israel planned to take control over all of Gaza and eventually hand it off to Arab forces opposed to Hamas.
Israel’s top general, Eyal Zamir, reportedly warned that it would endanger the remaining 20 or so living hostages held by Hamas and further strain Israel’s army after nearly two years of war. Many families of hostages are also opposed, fearing further escalation will doom their loved ones.
Israel’s centrist opposition leader Yair Lapid blasted the security cabinet’s decision as “a disaster that will lead to many more disasters”.
“This is exactly what Hamas wanted: for Israel to be trapped in the field without a goal, without defining the picture of the day after, in a useless occupation that no one understands where it is leading,” he said on social media.
Yair Golan, the leader of the centre-left Democrats party, said the move was “a death sentence for the hostages” and would prove to be a “disaster for generations”.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109512
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23444355 (091309ZAUG25) Notable: Donald Trump’s Pentagon warns Anthony Albanese that he is not spending enough on defence and AUKUS — The Pentagon has warned Australia will struggle to defend itself or meet AUKUS obligations unless defence spending lifts to 3.5% of GDP, far above the current 2.04%. Officials said AUKUS was “an expensive thing” requiring greater investment, while noting allies needed clarity on commitments in potential conflicts with China. NATO countries recently pledged 5% of GDP on defence, partly by including infrastructure like roads and ports, while Anthony Albanese has resisted using such accounting methods to inflate Australia’s totals. Critics in Washington fear Australia lacks near-term deterrence., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Prime_Minister_Anthony_Albanese_The_Pentagon_is_warning_Australia_s_defence_budget_must_rise.jpg, US_President_Donald_Trump_has_been_pressuring_US_allies_including_Australia_to_radically_lift_their_defence_spending.jpg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109316
>>109318
>>109405
Donald Trump’s Pentagon warns Anthony Albanese that he is not spending enough on defence and AUKUS
JOE KELLY and GEOFF CHAMBERS - 9 August 2025
1/2
The Pentagon says Australia will be unable to adequately defend itself and deliver on its AUKUS commitments unless it massively lifts its defence budget, and argues 3.5 per cent of GDP is now the “new global standard”, in the Trump administration’s strongest warning yet to Anthony Albanese.
The warning sets up a collision with the Labor government, which has repeatedly rebuffed calls from Washington to lift its defence spending.
It also provides an insight into how seriously this issue is viewed by the US and the sorts of conclusions that may be drawn in the review of the landmark AUKUS pact being led by Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby.
The comments from the US Department of Defence come as the Prime Minister prepares for a gruelling schedule of international trips over the next three months, including a September visit to the UN General Assembly in New York, as he continues to pursue an in-person meeting with Donald Trump.
In a briefing provided to The Australian on Thursday local time, the Pentagon flagged its concerns that Australia would not be able to both modernise the ADF and achieve its objectives under the AUKUS framework with defence spending pegged to its current trajectory.
Under the AUKUS plan, Washington will transfer to Australia at least three Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarines from the 2030s – so long as the President is confident it will not degrade America’s own “undersea capabilities” and is consistent with US national security interests.
However, senior US defence figures appear increasingly concerned that a failure by Australia to spend more on defence could have a bearing on the nation’s ability to operate as an effective ally in deterring a more aggressive Beijing. “For Australia in particular, it is vitally important that they are able to raise defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP,” a US Defence official told The Australian.
“That will allow them to generate and field the kind of forces required not just to defend themselves but work together closely with us to maintain deterrence in the region.
“It is not an abstraction. This is a concrete objective. AUKUS is an expensive thing. Increasing defence spending is going to be vitally important for Australia to achieve its stated objectives under AUKUS while also modernising the rest of the ADF. At a certain point, it’s just maths. They need to spend more on defence.
“I think we can say with confidence that if Australia does not raise defence spending it is going to struggle to field the forces required to defend Australia but also to make good on its commitments to others.
“But we are hopeful that Australia will be able to lean in and make these decisions – 3.5 per cent of GDP on defence spending; that is the new global standard.”
Jim Chalmers’ most recent budget revealed Australian defence spending would rise to nearly $59bn, or 2.04 per cent of GDP, this financial year, but only 32 per cent of the money is going towards the acquisition of new weapons and equipment.
The outcome is in line with the government’s plan to lift defence spending by $50.3bn over the next decade, but the bulk of the increases are back-ended and don’t start kicking in before 2028-29.
US Studies Centre chief executive Michael Green told The Australian defence spending didn’t increase “until the second five year increment” and expected that, as part of the AUKUS review, “there’ll be discussions about (it)”.
Dr Green, who served on the staff of the National Security Council at the White House from 2001 to 2005, said the “question will likely come up: do we (Australia) have adequate deterrence in the near term. And I expect the US position will be, ‘not really’.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109513
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23444385 (091326ZAUG25) Notable: ‘Bad timing’: US-India tensions throw Albanese-Trump meeting into doubt - Australia’s plans for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to meet US President Donald Trump in India next month are in jeopardy after Trump doubled tariffs on Indian exports to 50 per cent, provoking anger in New Delhi. The Quad summit, intended as Albanese’s first in-person meeting with Trump, is now uncertain, raising doubts over the group’s future role countering China. Analysts warn Trump’s transactional approach undermines long-term US-India cooperation, with tensions over Russia ties, immigration, and trade priorities clouding prospects for the summit., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Indian_Prime_Minister_Narendra_Modi_Australian_Prime_Minister_Anthony_Albanese_and_US_President_Donald_Trump.jpg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73662 (pb)
>>109234
>>109241
>>109325
‘Bad timing’: US-India tensions throw Albanese-Trump meeting into doubt
Matthew Knott - August 7, 2025
1/2
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s plans to meet US President Donald Trump in India next month have been thrown into turmoil by the intensifying trade battle between Washington and New Delhi, raising doubts about the future of a four-nation grouping’s ability to counter China.
Trump announced on Thursday that he would double tariffs on Indian exports to the United States to 50 per cent, among the highest in the world, to punish the nation for buying oil from Russia, sparking an angry reaction from New Delhi.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been preparing to host the leaders of Australia, the US and Japan for a summit of the Quad grouping in early September, providing a platform for Albanese’s first in-person meeting with Trump.
The Quad leaders have met every year since 2021 as part of the high-profile partnership designed to showcase the ability of the nations to work together as a democratic counterweight to authoritarian China’s growing influence in the Indo-Pacific.
Beijing has loathed the Quad since its inception, blasting it as an “exclusive clique” and falsely characterising it as an “Asian NATO”, although the group is not underpinned by a treaty.
Ian Hall, an expert on Indian politics at Griffith University, said it was “a toss up” whether the September summit, which has not been formally confirmed, would go ahead given the rising hostility between Trump and Modi, who until recently revelled in a seemingly friendly relationship.
“The Quad is going to have to come up with a whole new agenda and to find a way to hold a summit in India. It’s very unclear if that will happen,” he said.
“For 25 years, the US has seen India’s rising prosperity and influence as being in its interests. That has just disappeared under ‘America first’ and that’s a big problem.”
Albanese tried to meet Trump to discuss issues including tariffs and AUKUS at a meeting of the G7 group of countries in June, but the president left early as conflict escalated in the Middle East.
If the Quad summit is shelved, Albanese’s next chance to meet Trump would be during a visit to the US for the United Nations General Assembly in New York in late September.
Beyond whether a summit can be arranged, Hall said there were profound questions about the purpose of the partnership now that Trump is pursuing a mercantilist, transactional foreign policy vision.
Issues the Quad focused on during Joe Biden’s presidency – such as green technology and health security – will be of little interest to Trump, Hall said.
“The question is: what on earth are they going to talk about?” he said. “I can’t see an agenda, to be honest.”
As well as the punishing tariffs, Hall said that US-India relations have been damaged by Trump’s harsh immigration policies and his efforts to deepen ties with Pakistan, a key strategic rival to India.
Lavina Lee, an expert in security studies at Macquarie University, said: “This is really bad timing for the Quad, and the summit may need to be postponed.”
She said: “Previous US administrations have been irritated by India’s ties with Russia and its protectionist economy, but put that aside for the bigger prize of securing India’s support in the geopolitical competition with China. In a prime example of disruption, Trump is showing he has different priorities.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109514
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23444410 (091334ZAUG25) Notable: Alleged Chinese spy ran business in heart of Canberra society - A Chinese-born Australian permanent resident accused of spying on the Guan Yin Citta Buddhist association for Beijing’s Public Security Bureau has been revealed as a businesswoman active in Canberra’s social circles. Court-ordered suppression prevents her identification, but her ventures may have brought her into proximity with politicians, staffers and journalists. Arrested under Operation Autumn Shield, she faces up to 15 years’ jail if convicted of reckless foreign interference. The case, one of the first to target a community group under 2018 laws, follows earlier prosecutions of Di Sanh Duong and Alexander Csergo., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: The_case_is_one_of_the_first_under_the_nation_s_current_foreign_interference_regime_where_an_alleged_spy_has_been_accused_of_targeting_a_community_group_rather_than_a_government_or_a_company.jpg, Australian_Federal_Police_Assistant_Commissioner_Stephen_Nutt.jpg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109483
>>109486
Alleged Chinese spy ran business in heart of Canberra society
NOAH YIM and RICHARD FERGUSON - August 07, 2025
A woman who is alleged to have spied on a Buddhist sect in Australia for Beijing’s security bureau is a business woman who has been operating in the heart of Canberra society.
The alleged spy has owned a number of businesses across NSW and the ACT, and was previously involved in a bankruptcy case.
The permanent Australian resident, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, faced Canberra Magistrates Court earlier this week on one count of reckless foreign interference.
She is alleged to have been instructed by China’s Public Security Bureau to “covertly gather information” on Canberra’s Guan Yin Citta Buddhist association, based near the Australian National University. But The Australian can now reveal that she has been involved in a popular Canberra business and potentially had access to many politicians, political staffers and journalists through her work.
Australian Federal Police Assistant Commissioner Stephen Nutt said more arrests were expected to be made in relation to the case, after electronic devices were seized in search warrants on multiple Canberra addresses.
The case is one of the first under the nation’s current foreign interference regime where an alleged spy has been accused of targeting a community group rather than a government or a company.
Guan Yin Citta has clandestine centres in mainland China, as well as associations in the US, Singapore, Malaysia and Taiwan.
China’s security services have reportedly sought to eradicate the movement, which was founded by Shanghai-born Sydney man Lu Junhong, who died in 2021 aged 62.
But revelations about the woman’s business will raise fears that she may have been in close proximity to MPs, bureaucrats and others having sensitive conversations.
The Australian can also reveal the woman moved to Australia as a teenager.
The woman, whose identity was suppressed by the court, was arrested on Saturday. If found guilty, she faces a maximum of 15 years in jail.
She was arrested as part of Operation Autumn Shield, which was launched in March after information from ASIO.
It is the third time a charge has been laid under the commonwealth’s 2018 foreign interference laws. The first involves Vietnamese-Chinese community leader Di Sanh Duong, accused of courting former multicultural affairs minister Alan Tudge on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party.
The second involves businessman Alexander Csergo, accused of compiling reports for China on Australian defence, economic and national security arrangements.
The Albanese government has refused to say whether it will raise with Beijing the woman’s case, after a court agreed to the defendant’s request to keep her identity secret.
While Foreign Minister Penny Wong has previously raised concerns over Chinese operatives seeking to exert influence abroad, The Australian understands no warning was given to the Chinese government before the Australian Federal Police made its allegations public on Monday.
When asked if she had spoken to Beijing counterparts about the revelations a Chinese national was being accused of covert information gathering, Senator Wong would not comment.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/alleged-chinese-spy-ran-business-in-heart-of-canberra-society/news-story/6ac15c4be2e5e70a8dbbb97e6d35b79f
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109515
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23444504 (091353ZAUG25) Notable: Virginia Giuffre's family says "it would be a travesty" if Ghislaine Maxwell gets a pardon – Virginia Giuffre’s family has condemned the idea that President Trump could pardon Ghislaine Maxwell, calling it “a travesty” and “a slap in the face” to survivors. Giuffre’s sister-in-law Amanda Roberts said survivors are saying “no to leniency. No to a pardon.” Her brother Sky Roberts insisted “the survivors… should have a platform.” Maxwell, serving 20 years for sex trafficking, has offered to testify before Congress if pardoned. Amanda Roberts said Maxwell “needs to be behind bars” and described her as an “active participant and a ringleader.”, MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Virginia_Giuffre_s_family_says_it_would_be_a_travesty_if_Ghislaine_Maxwell_gets_a_pardon.mp4
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109289
>>109472
>>109473
>>109474
Virginia Giuffre's family says "it would be a travesty" if Ghislaine Maxwell gets a pardon
Kelsie Hoffman - August 6, 2025
The family of Virginia Giuffre, who was a vocal accuser of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell, have been speaking publicly about Giuffre's legacy, Maxwell's request for clemency and the Epstein files.
Giuffre, who claimed Epstein and Maxwell began abusing her when she was 16 years old, died by suicide in April. Now, her sister-in-law Amanda Roberts is calling for transparency in the Epstein case and speaking out against the possibility that President Trump could grant Maxwell a pardon.
"People need to see the real truth and the humans that were actually affected by this … those are the testimonies that need to come to the forefront and come to light," she said in an interview Wednesday with "CBS Mornings" co-host Gayle King. "It would be a travesty, it makes me sick, it makes survivors sick, it's a slap in the face, the idea that she (Maxwell) could potentially get a pardon. Survivors are saying no, no to leniency. No to a pardon. Will you silence them again?"
Maxwell would be willing to testify before Congress about Epstein — whose death in jail in 2019 was ruled a suicide — if Mr. Trump pardoned her or commuted her sentence, according to a letter from her attorney that was recently obtained by CBS News. Mr. Trump said late last month that he hadn't thought about pardoning her, but that he was "allowed to do it."
"For me I think it's, why are we listening to a known perjurer?" said Giuffre's brother, Sky Roberts, referring to Maxwell. "I mean, I think if anybody needs to be heard it's the survivors. They should have a voice. They should have a platform to be able to stand on. I think we need to be listening to the other side of things, which is the survivors and their voices, help elevate those."
Maxwell was sentenced in 2022 to 20 years in prison for child sex trafficking and other crimes linked to Epstein. Giuffre's accusations were not part of the case that led to Maxwell's conviction, which Maxwell is currently appealing.
Giuffre told CBS News in 2020 that she believed Maxwell was the mastermind behind the pair's crimes.
"In conversations with Virginia, she really described Ghislaine as almost this puppet master, that she kind of was the brains behind recruiting the girls and really used her womanhood to build that trust and lure these girls in," Amanda Roberts said.
Maxwell "was an active participant in the abuse – the physical and destructive abuse," Amanda Roberts said. "She was an active participant and a ringleader in this."
Amanda Roberts said she feels that the survivors are being forgotten and added that she and Sky Roberts would be willing to speak with the Trump administration or law enforcement officials regarding the Epstein case.
"I think we would be the first ones to show up and give our sister's testimony and remind people why she (Maxwell) needs to be behind jails and the correct facility," she said.
Maxwell was recently transferred from a federal correctional facility in Florida to a facility in Texas. According to the Federal Bureau of Prisons, the facility in Bryan, Texas, is considered minimum security.
"The punishment should fit the crime and right now, where she currently is, does not fit the crime," Amanda Roberts said.
As for Giuffre, Sky Roberts wants her to be remembered for her powerful voice, saying, "she was also a mom. She was a sister. She was you know … a friend, a daughter and so I think … she would want survivors to still be able to build off that platform which is why we're coming forward because she can't speak for herself now."
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/virginia-giuffre-family-ghislaine-maxwell-pardon/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109516
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23448157 (100910ZAUG25) Notable: Video: ‘No tears for Virginia Giuffre’: Ghislaine Maxwell's brother brands Epstein accuser a 'monster' who 'ruined lives – Ghislaine Maxwell’s brother Ian has branded Virginia Giuffre a “monster” and said he shed “no tears” after her death, claiming she “ruined the lives” of his sister and Prince Andrew. Speaking to LBC’s Nick Ferrari, he maintained Maxwell’s innocence despite her 2022 conviction, accusing Giuffre of being a “consummate liar” and noting she was not called to testify at Maxwell’s trial. Ian Maxwell backed the release of the so-called Epstein files, arguing “transparency is the friend of my sister,” and said there was a “good chance” of her release on appeal.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109289
>>109472
>>109474
>>109515
'No tears for Virginia Giuffre’: Ghislaine Maxwell's brother brands Epstein accuser a 'monster' who 'ruined lives'
Henry Moore - 1 August 2025
The brother of convicted sex offender Ghislaine Maxwell has defended his sister, branding her primary accuser, Virginia Giuffre, a “monster” and saying he “shed no tears” after her death.
Speaking to LBC’s Nick Ferrari, Ian Maxwell claimed his sister was innocent, accusing Ms Giuffre of “ruining the lives” of both her and Prince Andrew.
Virginia Giuffre, perhaps the most high-profile victim of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse, died at her farm in Neergabby, Australia, earlier this year.
Mr Maxwell’s comments come as Donald Trump faces increasing pressure to release the so-called “Epstein files”, a list allegedly revealing who collaborated with infamous sex offender, and Ghislaine Maxwell’s long-term boyfriend, Jeffrey Epstein.
President Trump has so far resisted calls to release the files, but has hinted he could pardon Ms Maxwell if she aided in exposing others who helped Epstein.
Calling for the files to be released, Ian Maxwell said: “I believe that transparency is generally the right way to go, and I believe transparency is the friend of my sister.
“So I do think that to the extent some of these files or whatever they amount to can be released, that's a good thing.”
“My sister's been banged up for five years. It is very, very largely due to the actions, lies of this woman who has destroyed my sister's life and other lives with her lives, including that of Prince Andrew and other young women whom she recruited for Epstein. I shed no tear for Virginia Giuffre.”
Mr Maxwell maintains his sister is completely innocent, despite her being found guilty of luring women into Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring during their time together.
Hitting out at Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein’s primary accusers who passed away earlier this year, Mr Maxwell said: “I think I know who the monster is here. It certainly isn't my sister.
“Virginia Giuffre was a consummate liar from start to finish. And this is most conspicuously revealed when she had alleged that she had slept with Professor Alan Dershowitz, maintained it for many years and then had to withdraw and desist.
“That's the first major point and perhaps the second crucial point is that the law enforcement elected not to call Virginia Giuffre to the trial of my sister, the most voluble, perhaps best known of her accusers.
“And why was that? Because she would have been eviscerated by the defence. So that's My take on her.”
On the condition of his sister, he added: “Well, she's now completed five years of prison, two years of that pretrial in absolutely torturous circumstances.”
Opening up about his relationship with Epstein, Mr Maxwell said: “I thought he was a highly intelligent man. He had a sort of dark charisma about him.
“He was a very aggressive listener. You felt that he was taking things from you, taking information from you. I didn't warm to him, I have to say.
“He's not the kind of person I would have wanted to go for a drink with, if you see what I mean.
“But this was a relatively short time, maybe an hour or two, something like 25 years ago.”
Mr Maxwell added there is a “good chance” his sister could be released from prison in the wake of her upcoming appeal to the Supreme Court.
https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/exclusive/ghislaine-maxwell-brother-virginia-giuffre-epstein/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epLV5ptJLPA
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109517
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23448169 (100918ZAUG25) Notable: Jewish leaders demand Albanese makes sure Palestinian Authority accepts Israel before recognition – Jewish leaders have urged Anthony Albanese to ensure the Palestinian Authority recognises Israel as a Jewish state, ends support for terrorism and halts anti-Semitic indoctrination before Australia considers Palestinian statehood. Labor ministers outlined a path for recognition, with Penny Wong signing a joint call for the PA to play a “central role” and Tony Burke noting precedent for recognition despite terrorist control in parts of territory. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned European recognition efforts undermined ceasefire talks, while Jewish organisations in Australia questioned Mahmoud Abbas’s credibility., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Palestinian_Authority_President_Mahmoud_Abbas.jpg, US_Secretary_of_State_Marco_Rubio.jpg, Co_chief_executive_officer_of_the_Executive_Council_of_Australian_Jewry_Alex_Ryvchin.jpg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109484
>>109503
>>109511
Jewish leaders demand Albanese makes sure Palestinian Authority accepts Israel before recognition
RICHARD FERGUSON - 10 August 2025
1/2
Jewish leaders are demanding Anthony Albanese ensure the Palestinian Authority agrees to support a Jewish state in Israel, stop funding terrorism, and end the anti-Semitic indoctrination of schoolchildren before he recognises it as the official government of a new Arab state.
Labor ministers over the weekend laid out a path for the Prime Minister to recognise a Palestinian state led by West Bank chief Mahmoud Abbas, who will speak to the Prime Minister in New York next month.
Foreign Minister Penny Wong signed a joint statement with Britain, Italy, Germany and New Zealand calling for Israel to abandon plans to occupy Gaza City, the demilitarisation of Hamas, and for the PA to play a “central role” in a Palestinian state.
Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke suggested on Sunday Labor could go forward with Palestinian recognition even if Hamas are still in charge of the Gaza Strip, saying Australia has recognised governments before when parts of their lands were occupied by terrorists.
“There have frequently been countries where part of that nation has been occupied by a terrorist group and we haven’t ceased to recognise the country,” Mr Burke told Sky News.
“Both Syria and Iraq had long periods where parts of those countries were being occupied and realistically controlled by ISIS. It didn’t stop us from recognising and having diplomatic relations with those countries themselves. So, you know, there’s a fair bit of precedent on this.”
But there are concerns about Australia legitimising the Palestinian Authority as the alternative to Hamas, considering its decades-long opposition to the Jewish State’s existence.
And US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said the European movement to recognise Palestine at the United Nations – which Labor may yet follow – was directly responsible for the collapse earlier this month of White House-led ceasefire talks.
“Talks with Hamas fell apart on the day (French President Emanuel) Macron made the unilateral decision that he’s going to recognise the Palestinian state,” Mr Rubio told an American Catholic television station. “And then you have other people come forward. Other countries say, ‘well, if there is not a ceasefire by September, we’re going to recognise a Palestinian state’. If I’m Hamas, I’d basically conclude let’s not do a ceasefire, we can be rewarded, we can claim it as a victory.”
Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Alex Ryvchin has said Mr Albanese needs to lay out now how he would recognise Palestine, and tell the nation how he would ensure Mr Abbas would not continue to be a threat to Israel.
“We expect that in exchange for any recognition of an Arab Palestinian state, our government will demand that Mahmoud Abbas … declare his desire to live in peace alongside the Jewish state of Israel,” Mr Ryvchin said.
“Imposing a Palestinian state rather than supporting its creation through a peace process may be imminent, but it represents a massive break from nearly 80 years of Australian policy.”
Mr Abbas, 89, has led the PA since 2005, when he took over following the death of Yasser Arafat.
His 20-year rule has seen the PA lose control of Gaza to Hamas, accusations of corruption and repeated outbursts of division.
Mr Abbas has called Hamas “dogs” and demanded the release of hostages, but there are also questions about his long-term commitment to peace with Israel.
The PA only in February ended a “martyrs fund” that gave money to families of Palestinians who died as a result of violent incidents with Israelis.
Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council executive director Colin Rubenstein said “the corrupt Palestinian Authority dictatorship continues to promise reforms but repeatedly fails to deliver meaningful change or to genuinely confront terrorism”.
“That makes any premature recognition or legitimisation both misguided and counter-productive to advancing the negotiated two-state outcome,” he said.
Zionist Federation chief executive Alon Cassuto said the PA’s poor support among Palestinians would hamper its ability to be a partner in peace for Israelis.
“The last time they had a presence in Gaza, it ended in a violent civil war with Hamas, where PA officials were thrown off buildings and chased out,” he said. “This is not a strong foundation for success for a future Palestinian state.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/jewish-leaders-demand-albanese-makes-sure-palestinian-authority-accepts-israel-before-recognition/news-story/5eb048a574dfc39a362f7ce062be5f77
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109518
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23448206 (100941ZAUG25) Notable: Shattering the silence - Surviving Malka Leifer to stream internationally – A new documentary, Surviving Malka Leifer, follows the decades-long fight by sisters Dassi Erlich, Nicole Meyer and Elly Sapper to bring their abuser, Malka Leifer, to justice. Filmmaker Adam Kamien said the project was made foremost for the sisters, who feel the film honours their story. It traces their campaign to extradite Leifer, her 2023 conviction for multiple sexual offences, and the toll of years of court battles. The film, premiering at the Melbourne International Film Festival before streaming on Stan, also aims to break the culture of silence in closed communities., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Dassi_Erlich_Nicole_Meyer_and_Elly_Sapper_spent_years_trying_to_bring_their_abuser_Malka_Leifer_to_justice_A_new_film_documents_their_journey.jpg, Malka_Leifer_being_brought_to_a_Jerusalem_courtroom_in_2018.jpg, From_left_Nicole_Meyer_Elly_Sapper_and_Dassi_Erlich_leave_the_Victorian_County_Court_after_Malka_Leifer_was_sentenced_to_15_years_in_jail.jpg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Shattering the silence - Surviving Malka Leifer to stream internationally
Dassi Erlich, Nicole Meyer and Elly Sapper spent years trying to bring their abuser, Malka Leifer, to justice. A new film documents their journey. Jessica Abelsohn spoke to filmmaker Adam Kamien about Surviving Malka Leifer.
JESSICA ABELSOHN - 4 August 2025
1/2
For documentary filmmaker Adam Kamien, there was a very select audience he had in mind when filming Surviving Malka Leifer – Dassi Erlich, Nicole Meyer and Elly Sapper.
As long as these three women felt the film had done their story justice, public perception always came second. And, as Kamien told The AJN, they do indeed feel proud of the finished product.
As many readers would know, Erlich, Meyer and Sapper lifted the lid on abuse by Malka Leifer, the principal of the Adass Israel School in Melbourne. They bravely came forward, not only to pursue justice for themselves but also to speak to the issue more broadly – ensuring sexual abuse survivors know they are not alone and encouraging them to come forward if and when they feel comfortable.
The case against Malka Leifer was broken by this very masthead, when Kamien was employed as a journalist. He has followed the story from the very beginning.
“I just remember the newsroom being abuzz,” he recalled. “As a weekly paper, it can be hard to keep hold of a story by the time we go to press on a Wednesday. Often, these things have already made the rounds. But this was a story that we broke – Ashley [Brown] and Naomi [Levin] broke – and then all of a sudden, everyone wanted to talk to us. It was a big deal.”
Kamien told The AJN that despite getting his start in print journalism, he always wanted to be in film.
“I never really did the fireman, astronaut thing. I always wanted to be in the film industry,” he said, explaining that the skills in journalism and documentary filmmaking are transferable, so everything he learned while in print, he could use in his filmmaking career.
He went on to explain that the Malka Leifer case was particularly relevant and important to him.
Kamien covered a few of the child sexual abuse scandals while he worked for The AJN, including the Manny Waks allegations against Yeshiva Centre in Melbourne and the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. He explained that given his history with covering these kinds of cases, the Malka Leifer allegations always interested him. And, of course, his quest for justice.
“Social justice has always been important to me, and having seen Manny Waks go through what he went through, sort of speaking out very publicly, and all of the difficulties that came with that, the story of Dassi, Elly and Nicole really spoke to me, because, particularly in a closed community like Adass, speaking out comes with some pretty serious ramifications,” Kamien said. “They chose to do that. And not just for themselves, but to speak to the issue more broadly, and obviously to try to pursue justice themselves. It occurred to me that if they were willing to sacrifice that, then someone had to amplify that message.”
Kamien acknowledged that the women were doing a pretty good job themselves of amplifying the message, but he knew he could help by providing another level of exposure. Surviving Malka Leifer will have its premiere at the Melbourne International Film Festival before moving onto Stan for streaming, which Kamien said allows for a really wide audience.
While Kamien also recognised and appreciated the written information that has been produced about the Malka Leifer case, he said there’s another layer that can be added by using film.
“I think it’s a much more personal medium. And while I’ve been concerned with getting this story out there and amplifying that message as I said before, I think the other thing that documentary allows you to do, maybe better than you can in print or other mediums, is convey a sense of who a person is. And I really hope that people get that sense of who Dassi, Elly and Nicole are, because they’re not defined solely by this incredible thing that they did,” he said.
“And I hope people get to see them a little bit in the way that I’ve been able to … there’s obviously a lot of difficult subject matter. But to me, that’s one of the hopeful things in the film – it’s the people that they are, despite all of this, because of it, who knows? So I hope that resonates with people.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109519
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23448301 (101010ZAUG25) Notable: Torture and murder accused to be re-arrested – Papua New Guinea Police Commissioner David Manning has ordered the re-arrest of eight men accused of torturing and murdering a woman in Hela Province after their release by a court. He said police would exercise their authority to charge the suspects, stressing that evidence from video footage must be backed by witness statements for successful prosecution. Manning condemned villagers for hiding other suspects, warning that anyone obstructing investigations would be treated as co-offenders. He appealed to community leaders to support police, declaring the crime “absolutely disgusting” and depraved., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Manning_calls_on_community_to_stop_hiding_suspects.jpg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>>/qresearch/23448266
Torture and murder accused to be re-arrested
Manning calls on community to stop hiding suspects
POSTCOURIERONLINE - JULY 31, 2025
The Commissioner of Police, David Manning, has issued instructions that eight suspects accused of the torture and murder of a woman in Magarima district in Hela Province, be re-arrested and face prosecution.
The Commissioner’s directions follow a recent Court order, releasing the eight suspects from police custody.
“While I respect the court ruling that saw the men released, in this instance Police will exercise their authority at law to re-arrest and charge the accused responsible for this disgraceful offending.
“The eight arrested were held while they were being processed and charges being formalised.”
This is a complex case and despite video footage circulated on social media, witness statements and corroborative investigations must be conducted to ensure that arrests result in successful prosecutions.
Commissioner Manning said police were also facing opposition from the community of the victim who were hiding other suspects.
“This is an absolutely disgusting crime and now friends and fellow villagers are trying to hide the men who tortured and then murdered this woman,” Commissioner Manning said.
“This level of depravity sickens me. Anyone hiding these animals or obstructing police investigations will be subject to arrest.”
Commissioner Manning highlighted the challenges in investigating offences without the support of communities.
“It is sad to see the communities of Magarima district fail to support police investigations into this matter. I make a final call for the community leaders in the village where the victim came from to give up the additional suspects, provide statements, and support police investigations.
“The woman they tortured and killed was your daughter, and anyone who hides these animals will be treated as a co-offender, arrested, and face serious prison time.”
https://www.postcourier.com.pg/torture-and-murder-accused-to-be-re-arrested0/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109520
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23452518 (111024ZAUG25) Notable: Historic decision:Albanese to recognise Palestinian state at UN in September– (Video) Anthony Albanese has announced Australia will formally recognise a Palestinian state at next month’s UN General Assembly, aligning with Britain, France and Canada. He said recognition followed commitments from Mahmoud Abbas that Hamas would have no role, while condemning Israel’s actions in Gaza and settlement expansion. Israel’s ambassador Amir Maimon and Jewish leaders warned the move undermines security and peace talks, as Benjamin Netanyahu branded it “shameful.” Penny Wong confirmed she briefed US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, with Washington’s response likely to add strain to relations with Donald Trump’s administration.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109484
>>109503
>>109517
Albanese to recognise Palestinian state at UN in September
BEN PACKHAM - 11 August 2025
1/2
Australia will formally recognise a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly next month, in a landmark policy shift that will further test his government’s relationship with the Trump administration.
The Prime Minister announced the move after a cabinet meeting in Canberra, aligning Australia with Britain, France and Canada, which have made similar commitments in recent weeks.
“Australia will recognise the right of the Palestinian people to a state of their own, predicated on the committed amendments Australia has received from the Palestinian Authority,” Mr Albanese said.
“Our government has made it clear that there can be no role for the terrorists of Hamas in any future Palestinian state. This is one of the commitments Australia has sought and received from President (Mahmoud) Abbas and the Palestinian Authority.”
Israel’s top diplomat in Australia Amir Maimon immediately condemned the decision, saying it “undermines Israel’s security, derails hostage negotiations, and hands a victory to those who oppose coexistence”.
“Peace is built by ending terror, not rewarding it. By recognising a Palestinian state while Hamas continues to kill, kidnap, and reject peace, Australia undermines Israel’s security, derails hostage negotiations, and hands a victory to those who oppose coexistence,” Mr Maimon said in a statement.
The nation’s peak Jewish group also reacted furiously to the announcement, accusing Labor of bolstering Hamas’s position and abandoning decades of bipartisanship on Israel.
“It leaves Hamas armed and in control of territory, and in a position to regroup and rearm, thereby creating the conditions for the next war rather than a comprehensive peace,” Executive Council of Australian Jewry president Daniel Aghion said.
“Australia is now committed to recognising as a state an entity with no agreed borders, no single government in effective control of its territory, and no demonstrated capacity to live in peace with its neighbours.”
The announcement came after the Prime Minister told the ABC’s Insiders program a fortnight ago that his government didn’t want recognition to be a “gesture”.
He reassured the Jewish leaders in a private meeting days later that Australian recognition of Palestine was “not imminent”.
Speaking on Monday, Mr Albanese denied recognition of Palestine was a symbolic one.
“This is a practical contribution towards building momentum. This is not Australia acting alone,” Mr Albanese said.
He said the decision was made as part of a “co-ordinated global effort”, which he had discussed with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during a phone call last Thursday.
He said Israel was responsible for “the human catastrophe in Gaza”, and was placing a two-state solution at risk by its illegal settlements and threats to annex the occupied territories.
“A two-state solution is humanity’s best hope to break the cycle of violence in the Middle East and to bring an end to the conflict, suffering and starvation in Gaza,” Mr Albanese said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109521
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23452542 (111039ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Netanyahu lashes ‘shameful’ Australia over Palestinian state – Benjamin Netanyahu has denounced Australia’s plan to recognise Palestinian statehood as “shameful,” insisting it will not bring peace but “the next war.” At a press conference, the Israeli Prime Minister defended Israel’s expanded offensive in Gaza, revealing cabinet approval to dismantle Hamas strongholds beyond Gaza City into central refugee camps. He rejected accusations of genocide and starvation, saying if Israel intended such actions “it would have taken exactly one afternoon.” Netanyahu argued Hamas already used Gaza as a “terror state” and warned Palestinian statehood in the West Bank would allow radicals and Iran to exploit it.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109520
Netanyahu lashes ‘shameful’ Australia over Palestinian state
STAFF WRITERS & AP - 11 August 2025
1/2
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has lashed out at “shameful” Australia for preparing to recognise Palestinian statehood, as he defended a sweeping military offensive in Gaza.
Revealing plans to broaden the Israeli military’s Gaza plan to include dismantling Hamas in the Strip’s central refugee camps in addition to Gaza City, Mr Netanyahu told reporters: “Those who say that Israel has a right to defend itself are also saying, ‘But don’t exercise that right.’
“I think we’re actually applying force judiciously, and they know it. They know what they would do if right next to Melbourne, or right next to Sydney, you had this horrific attack. I think you would do at least what we’re doing … [although] maybe not as efficiently and as precisely as we’re doing it.”
Mr Netanyahu said Israel adamantly opposed an independent Palestine “for the simple reason that they know it won’t bring peace, it will bring war. To have European countries and Australia march into that rabbit hole … and buy this canard, it is disappointing. And I think it’s actually shameful.”
On Saturday, Australia joined the UK, France, Canada and other allies condemning Israel’s military action in Gaza and over the weekend Anthony Albanese and New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon jointly called for an immediate ceasefire in the enclave.
But Mr Netanyahu said Hamas had a de facto state in Gaza, which the militants used “to launch a war of terror against Israel,” and would do so again if it could.
Mr Netanyahu said Israel “has no choice but to finish the job and complete the defeat of Hamas,” as he revealed for the first time that his security cabinet last week instructed the dismantling of Hamas strongholds not only in Gaza City but also in the “central camps” of Muwasi.
The crowded camps had not been part of Israel's announcement on Friday of the offensive. It was not clear why, a; though Mr Netanyahu has faced criticism within his ruling coalition that targeting Gaza City was not enough.
Giving the Palestinians a state wouldn’t see them abandoning the “goal of destroying the Jewish state,” he said. “All you’re doing is you’re bringing the next war closer.”
“Again, Hamas had a state. It just brought the war closer. If you did the same thing in Judea and Samaria (Israel’s name for the West Bank), right above Tel Aviv, enveloping Jerusalem, some say cutting Jerusalem into two … you’re going to have the radicals again take it over, Iran take it over, and start a war from improved boundaries.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109522
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23452557 (111053ZAUG25) Notable: Australia will recognise a Palestinian state. But what does that actually mean? – Australia will join Britain, France and Canada in recognising a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly in September, a largely symbolic act that grants Palestine expanded diplomatic status but no immediate change on the ground. Palestine remains a non-member observer state with divided governance between the Palestinian Authority and Hamas, disputed borders and extensive Israeli settlements. Anthony Albanese said recognition followed commitments from Mahmoud Abbas to exclude Hamas and pursue elections. Experts stressed UN membership remains unlikely due to a probable US veto, though recognition strengthens Palestine’s claim to self-determination., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Prime_Minister_Anthony_Albanese_and_Foreign_Minister_Penny_Wong_announce_Australia_s_plan_to_recognise_a_State_of_Palestine.jpg, Pro_Palestine_protesters_outside_Parliament_House_in_Canberra_on_the_first_day_of_the_new_parliament_last_month.jpg, Gaza_and_the_West_Bank_form_modern_day_Palestine_officially_referred_to_by_the_Australian_government_as_the_Occupied_Palestinian_Territories.jpg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109520
>>109521
Australia will recognise a Palestinian state. But what does that actually mean?
Brittany Busch - August 11, 2025
1/2
Australia has become the latest in a string of nations to vow it will recognise a Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly in September.
A two-state solution in the Middle East has been debated for decades, but many countries have held back from recognising Palestine to avoid making a purely symbolic move and to encourage a lasting peace agreement with Israel.
However, international opinion has shifted rapidly in recent weeks amid reports of hunger in Gaza, an Israeli plan to send mass ground troops to more of the territory, and a breakdown in ceasefire talks to end the conflict that began with Hamas’ massacres in Israel on October 7, 2023.
France last month became the first of the G7 group of wealthy nations to declare it would recognise a Palestinian state, which led to several following suit, including the UK and Canada at the end of July. On Monday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced Australia would also follow suit.
But what does recognition actually look like? Would it make a practical difference? And what status does Palestine have right now?
What does Australian recognition of Palestinian statehood mean?
A Palestinian state would be considered equal to other nations in Australia’s eyes and would have expanded diplomatic representation. That means it would be able to have an embassy in Canberra and an ambassador, rather than a representative of a general delegation.
The move is largely symbolic because the proposed Palestinian state does not have settled borders, and Israel has forces in many parts of the West Bank and Gaza – the territories where Palestinians have long aimed to establish a state.
Statehood would be unlikely to have an immediate effect for people in Gaza or on Israel’s war with Hamas, but it could help influence conversations about the future of the Middle East.
Albanese said on Monday that a two-state solution was “humanity’s best hope to break the cycle of violence in the Middle East, and to bring an end to the conflict, suffering and starvation in Gaza”.
What is Palestine’s current status?
Gaza and the West Bank form modern-day Palestine, officially referred to by the Australian government as the Occupied Palestinian Territories. It has no unified government, standing army or settled borders.
Professor Ben Saul, chair of international law at the University of Sydney, said Palestine met most of the requirements to be legally considered a state, including having a permanent population and the ability to enter into international relations, but it did not have an effective, independent government. He said that because of its disputed status, other countries’ recognition carried more power in supporting Palestinians’ right to self-determination.
Almost 150 of the 193 UN member states recognise Palestine as a state, including many developing countries.
Militant group Hamas, designated a terrorist organisation by countries including Australia, has run the Gaza Strip for almost 20 years.
The Palestinian Authority, through which Australia officially engages with Palestine, has limited autonomy in the West Bank. The Oslo Accords in the 1990s gave the authority direct control of about 20 per cent of the territory.
There are numerous Israeli settlements across the West Bank, and these have been expanding. Israel retains control of security in much of the West Bank. According to the CIA, about 468,300 Israeli settlers lived in the West Bank in 2022. The agency estimated that as of 2021, 236,600 Israelis lived in East Jerusalem, which Israel annexed in 1980.
Australia and most countries officially oppose the settlements on the basis they are illegal under international law. Israel disputes the illegality of the settlements.
The Palestinian Authority, which was formed in the 1990s as a result of the Oslo Accords, is the territory’s representative at the UN, where it is a non-member observer state and has no vote in the 193-member General Assembly.
What will happen at the United Nations General Assembly session in September?
Australia has joined France, the UK, and Canada in saying it will separately recognise a Palestinian state and use the 80th session of the UN General Assembly, which opens September 9, as the stage for that move.
Professor Saul said the announcement at the UN was a political move rather than a legal one, but the choice of location was important.
“Recognition is just the political act. You could do it by press release … it’s just that doing it in a high-level, multilateral forum like [the UN] is absolutely designed to have a much greater impact politically,” he said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109523
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23456893 (120854ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Australia's Albanese says Netanyahu 'in denial' over suffering in Gaza – Anthony Albanese has accused Benjamin Netanyahu of being “in denial” about the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, citing a phone call in which the Israeli leader dismissed concerns over civilian suffering. The rebuke came a day after Albanese announced Australia will recognise a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly, aligning with France, Britain and Canada. He said Netanyahu’s refusal to heed allies contributed to the decision, which is conditional on the Palestinian Authority excluding Hamas. Opposition leader Sussan Ley warned the move risks straining ties with Washington, as public sentiment in Australia shifts.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109520
>>109521
Australia's Albanese says Netanyahu 'in denial' over suffering in Gaza
Alasdair Pal - August 12, 2025
SYDNEY, Aug 12 (Reuters) - Australia Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said on Tuesday his Israeli counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu was "in denial" about the humanitarian situation in Gaza, a day after announcing Australia would recognise a Palestinian state for the first time.
Australia will recognise a Palestinian state at next month's United Nations General Assembly, Albanese said on Monday, a move that adds to international pressure on Israel after similar announcements from France, Britain and Canada.
Albanese said on Tuesday the Netanyahu government's reluctance to listen to its allies contributed to Australia's decision to recognise a Palestinian state.
"He again reiterated to me what he has said publicly as well, which is to be in denial about the consequences that are occurring for innocent people," Albanese said in an interview with state broadcaster ABC, recounting a Thursday phone call with Netanyahu discussing the issue.
Australia's decision to recognise a Palestinian state is conditional on commitments received from the Palestinian Authority, including that Islamist militant group Hamas would have no involvement in any future state.
Right-leaning opposition leader Sussan Ley said the move, which breaks with long-held bipartisan policy over Israel and the Palestinian territories, risked jeopardising Australia's relationship with the United States.
SENTIMENT SHIFT
Albanese said as little as two weeks ago he would not be drawn on a timeline for recognition of a Palestinian state.
His incumbent centre-left Labor Party, which won an increased majority at a general election in May, has previously been wary of dividing public opinion in Australia, which has significant Jewish and Muslim minorities.
But the public mood has shifted sharply after Israel said it planned to take military control of Gaza, amid increasing reports of hunger and malnutrition amongst its people.
Tens of thousands of demonstrators marched across Sydney's Harbour Bridge this month calling for aid deliveries in Gaza as the humanitarian crisis worsened.
"This decision is driven by popular sentiment in Australia which has shifted in recent months, with a majority of Australians wanting to see an imminent end to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza," said Jessica Genauer, a senior lecturer in international relations at Flinders University.
Opposition leader Ley said the decision was "disrespectful" of key ally the United States, which opposes Palestinian statehood.
"We would never have taken this step because this is completely against what our principles are, which is that recognition, the two state solution, comes at the end of the peace process, not before," she said in an interview with radio station 2GB.
Neighbouring New Zealand has said it is still considering whether to recognise a Palestinian state, a decision that drew sharp criticism from former prime minister Helen Clark on Tuesday.
"This is a catastrophic situation, and here we are in New Zealand somehow arguing some fine point about whether we should recognise we need to be adding our voice to the need for this catastrophe to stop," she said in an interview with state broadcaster RNZ.
"This is not the New Zealand I've known."
https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/australias-albanese-says-netanyahu-in-denial-over-suffering-gaza-2025-08-12/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PXZZPlyO3o
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109524
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23456896 (120859ZAUG25) Notable: Coalition vows to revoke Australia's recognition of a Palestinian state – Opposition Leader Sussan Ley has pledged a future Coalition government would overturn Anthony Albanese’s decision to recognise a Palestinian state at the UN, insisting recognition should only follow a peace process. She accused Labor of disrespecting the US and warned recognition was premature while Hamas holds hostages. Albanese said Netanyahu’s “denial” of Gaza’s humanitarian toll influenced his stance, describing Australia’s move as part of a coordinated global push with France, the UK and Canada. Michaelia Cash questioned the feasibility of recognising an entity with no borders or unified government, calling it meaningless., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Sussan_Ley_has_vowed_to_reverse_Labor_s_plan_to_recognise_Palestinian_statehood.jpg, Anthony_Albanese_said_frustration_with_the_Israeli_government_had_contributed_to_his_decision_to_move_on_Palestinian_recognition.jpg, Israeli_Prime_Minister_Benjamin_Netanyahu_strongly_rebuked_Australia_s_plans_to_recognise_a_Palestinian_state.jpg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109520
>>109521
Coalition vows to revoke Australia's recognition of a Palestinian state
Maani Truu - 12 August 2025
The Coalition has vowed to revoke recognition of a Palestinian state if elected in three years, as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese strengthened his criticism of Israel's leader, labelling him "in denial" about the consequences of the war in Gaza.
Opposition Leader Sussan Ley made the pledge in a statement a day after Labor's much-anticipated announcement that Australia would recognise a Palestinian state at the upcoming United Nations meeting in September.
The statement also reiterated the opposition's position that Palestinian recognition should only come at the end of a "proper peace process".
"The Coalition would have never made this call and we do not agree with it," read the statement, which was released shortly after Ms Ley held a media conference where she did not confirm her party's position on whether recognition would be revoked.
Earlier on Tuesday the prime minister said frustration with the Israeli government had contributed to his government's decision to make the move to recognise Palestinian statehood after more than seven decades.
In a call with Mr Netanyahu on Thursday, during which Mr Albanese discussed Australia's plans to follow in the footsteps of France, the United Kingdom and Canada in recognising Palestinian statehood, he said his counterpart had made the same argument as a year earlier.
"That if we just have more military action in Gaza, somehow that will produce a different outcome," Mr Albanese said.
"He again reiterated to me what he has said publicly as well, which is to be in denial about the consequences that are occurring for innocent people."
The Israeli prime minister has been scathing of the handful of Western countries' pledges to recognise a Palestinian state. In comments made before Mr Albanese publicly revealed his plans, Mr Netanyahu name checked Australia, calling the move "shameful".
"To have European countries and Australia march into that rabbit hole, just like that, fall right into it and buy this canard is disappointing, and I think it's actually shameful," he said in a rare media conference for foreign press.
"It's not going to change our position. Again, we will not commit national suicide to get a good op-ed for two minutes."
Mr Albanese on Monday said Australia's position was developed as part of a "coordinated global effort" to build momentum towards a two-state solution.
Two weeks earlier, however, in the days after France became the first G7 nation to pledge to recognise a Palestinian state at the United Nations meeting in September, Mr Albanese said Australia would not be making a similar declaration "imminently".
Pressed on Tuesday about when that changed and a decision was made, Mr Albanese cited the announcements from other like-minded nations and commitments from the Palestinian Authority, as well as Mr Netanyahu's comments, which he said were in response to the conversation they had days earlier.
"I spoke with Prime Minister Netanyahu last week and indicated to him the direction that Australia was headed," he said.
"Prime Minister Netanyahu, before yesterday's statement … before our Cabinet met, made comments based upon the discussion I'd had with him."
Coalition questions feasibility of plan
The plan to recognise a Palestinian state in September marks a break in Australia's long-held bipartisan approach to the Middle East, with the Coalition firmly rejecting any move to recognise before the hostages taken by Hamas are released and a peace process is finalised.
Foreign affairs spokesperson Michaelia Cash on Tuesday slammed the decision, questioning whether it could even be done.
"What state is he recognising as a state? You don't actually recognise a new state until that state exists," she told the ABC.
"He's now committed Australia to recognising as a state an entity with no agreed borders, no single government in effective control of its territory. You've got to be honest … what does that even mean?"
In a separate interview, Ms Ley said the government's announcement disrespects the United States because "any peace that happens in this region will be brokered by the US" and "the prospects of a ceasefire are not good with this decision".
"The prime minister has so many questions to answer on this … and I don't know that he's actually addressing them at all," she said.
"He has said that recognition of Palestine is conditional, but he actually refuses to say what will happen if the conditions that he sets out for recognition are not met."
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-08-12/albanese-says-israel-prime-minister-in-denial/105640946
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109525
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23456903 (120915ZAUG25) Notable: Birkins, Rolex and $400,000 mystery item: police raid home of alleged Chinese spy – Federal police allege a Canberra woman spied on the Guan Yin Citta Buddhist Association for China’s Public Security Bureau, receiving more than $230,000 in payments since 2017. Court documents say she covertly gathered residential, financial and sentiment data, including photos and maps, under the direction of a handler in Jindong, China. A July 30 raid found Hermes handbags, a $24,000 Rolex receipt, $5,000 cash and a receipt for a mystery $400,000 item. Police say she later sought refuge at the Chinese consulate. Denied bail, she is accused of targeting a diaspora minority on Beijing’s behalf., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: A_woman_arrested_in_Canberra_accused_of_spying_was_taking_instructions_from_a_mysterious_security_official_police_allege.jpg, Photos_of_the_Canberra_temple_where_the_spying_is_alleged_to_have_taken_place_show_it_is_adorned_with_portraits_of_founder_Lu_Junhong.jpg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109483
>>109486
>>109514
Birkins, Rolex and $400,000 mystery item: police raid home of alleged Chinese spy
LIAM MENDES - August 11, 2025
1/2
A woman accused of spying on a Canberra Buddhist association was paid more than $200,000 by the Chinese government, and was taking instructions from a mysterious security official over encrypted messaging platform WeChat, federal police officers will allege.
Officers executing a search warrant on the woman’s home last month located hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of luxury goods, according to fresh court documents, including a Rolex watch receipt and large boxes of high-end handbags “that were too numerous to practicably count”.
Police also found a receipt for a mystery item costing $400,000.
The woman, who cannot be named due to a suppression order, is alleged to have been working as a “proxy” to covertly gather information for an official working for China’s security bureau about Canberra’s Guan Yin Citta Buddhist Association.
The Australian last week revealed the woman had been involved in a popular Canberra business and potentially had access to many politicians, political staffers and journalists through her work, which cannot be disclosed for legal reasons.
The Australian can now reveal that federal police believe other individuals were given tasks by the same Chinese Public Security Bureau official, and officers have seized a “significant” amount of material related to the alleged offences that needs to be translated into English.
Court documents show the woman travelled to China on “several occasions in the past several years” including to the region where her alleged security handler was employed. She is alleged to have received “taskings” from the handler attached to the Jindong Branch – 650km east of Wuhan – from June 2, 2022, to covertly collect information and infiltrate the association.
Police believe the woman, who first entered Australia on a higher education visa, secretly collected information about the Guan Yin Citta organisation, including details regarding the residential addresses of former leaders of the group and their national office locations.
She allegedly provided photos of the front doors of businesses, internal map data of locations and financial information about organisations and businesses, as well as gathering information about a radio station and its affiliations with the Buddhist group.
She also allegedly fed information about general sentiments relating to Taiwan and other factional struggles to the Chinese handler.
The documents show police believe she received more than $230,223 in payments from the People’s Republic of China since 2017, and maintains “strong links” to China – including having family living there and possessing an active Chinese passport.
The passport was seized during a police raid on July 30, during which time officers located: Hermes bags (believed to be Kelly or Birkin bags) one of which is understood to be worth about $30,000; about $5000 in $100 bills; and high-end watch receipts including one for a $24,000 Rolex.
The officers also located “large quantities of designer brands” including Burberry, Gucci and Louis Vuitton, and a receipt for a $400,000 item that has been redacted.
Police spoke with the woman while the search warrant was executed. According to the documents, she “answered freely around topics that were unrelated to her offending” but provided “no comment” responses when asked about her alleged crimes.
During the search, officers also located a Guan Yin Citta booklet.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109526
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23456934 (120952ZAUG25) Notable: No transition from gender reality, app boss Sall Grover tells court – Giggle for Girls founder Sall Grover told the Federal Court she does not accept that a person who has transitioned from male to female is a woman, after barristers for Roxanne Tickle argued she was discriminated against on gender identity grounds by being excluded from the app. Tickle, who underwent gender-affirming surgery in 2019 and is legally recognised as female, said Grover’s public misgendering was distressing and fuelled online hate. The case is the first Federal Court test of gender identity protections under the Sex Discrimination Act, with the Commissioner arguing sex is changeable., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Giggle_for_Girls_app_founder_Sall_Grover.jpg, Sall_Grover_right_leaving_court.jpg, Roxanne_Tickle.jpg, Sex_Discrimination_Commissioner_Dr_Anna_Cody_centre.jpg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109499
>>109506
No transition from gender reality, app boss Sall Grover tells court
JOANNA PANAGOPOULOS - April 10, 2024
The founder of a women's-only social media app says she does not accept that a person who transitions from male to female surgically, socially and legally is a woman, and removed her from the app as she does with “all males”.
The view, held by Giggle for Girls app founder and CEO Sall Grover was described in court on Wednesday by Roxanne Tickle’s legal team as being at the “heart” of the discrimination case.
Ms Tickle, who underwent gender-affirming surgery in 2019 and is now designated as female on her birth certificate, argues she was discriminated against on the grounds of gender identity by Giggle for Girls and Ms Grover when she was denied access to the app. Ms Tickle claims she was initially accepted into the app in February 2021 when she submitted a “selfie” through Giggle’s third-party artificial intelligence tool but was later blocked by Ms Grover.
Barrister Bridie Nolan, for Ms Grover, says the app was designed “for the purpose of achieving equality between men and women in public life by providing an online refuge”, and so does not amount to discrimination as it is a “special measure”.
But Georgina Costello KC, acting for Ms Tickle, said: “The critical issue in this case, your honour, is that the first and second respondents, Ms Grover and the company Giggle for Girls, have persisted in misgendering the applicant for years. That’s the heart of this case – that there’s been a discrimination on the basis of gender in excluding her from the app and persisting in misgendering her subsequently.”
It is the first time a case alleging gender identity discrimination has been heard by the Federal Court following changes to the Sex Discrimination Act in 2013, which made it unlawful to discriminate against a person on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity or intersex status.
Ms Costello asked Ms Grover in cross-examination whether “even where a person who was assigned male gender at birth has transitioned to being a woman” by having gender-affirming surgery, taking hormones to make them grow breasts, removing their facial hair, wearing female clothing and using female changing rooms, “you don’t accept that that person is a woman, do you?”
“No,” Ms Grover replied.
Ms Costello continued: “I suggest to you that in Australian society, the natural meaning of, the ordinary, contemporary meaning of woman, includes women whose gender is dated to be a woman on their birth certificate, having transitioned from man to woman?”
“I don’t agree,” Ms Grover replied.
Ms Costello also questioned Ms Grover about the alleged hurt caused to Ms Tickle through interviews and tweets referring to her as a man.
The court heard Ms Tickle said in an affidavit Ms Grover’s public statements about the case had been “distressing, demoralising, draining and hurtful” and claimed the “scale of online hate” towards her, as a result, was “enormous”.
Ms Grover agreed she would have done about 20 to 50 interviews about the case, most recently travelling to the UK for press, and that she frequently described Ms Tickle as a man, and as a “man wanting access to female spaces”.
Ms Grover also said she had told interviewers she was “harassed by the applicant” and “afraid of the applicant”.
Ms Costello put to her that it was “not kind” to refer to Ms Tickle as a man. “I don’t think it’s kind to expect a woman to see a man as a woman,” Ms Grover responded.
In her opening address on Tuesday, Ms Nolan argued “sex” is a biological and binary concept, while Ms Tickle’s legal team argued it is partly psychological and social.
On Wednesday afternoon, barrister Zelie Heger, on behalf of the Sex Discrimination Commissioner submitted that “sex” for the purpose of the Sexual Discrimination Act is “changeable” and “non-binary” and as a result not “only” biological.
The Commissioner is assisting the Court by providing submissions about the meaning, scope and validity of relevant provisions of the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth).
Ms Heger also said a person can be of the “female sex” as per the Act “if they are registered as such” and “had gender affirming surgery”.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/landmark-transgender-discrimination-case-gets-to-the-heart-of-the-issue/news-story/b22d1b53bf48a5db1686015c38d7306e
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109527
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23456939 (120959ZAUG25) Notable: Giggle app founder Sall Grover mulls move to US if female-only spaces found to be illegal – Giggle for Girls founder Sall Grover says she may move her business to the US if Australian courts rule her female-only platform unlawful, citing free speech protections under the First Amendment. Grover is appealing a Federal Court finding she discriminated against trans woman Roxanne Tickle, with Equality Australia expected to support Tickle in an appeal to the High Court if Grover wins. Grover criticised Australian institutions, drew parallels with cases overseas, and said her defence is crowdfunded. She remains confident section 7D of the Sex Discrimination Act protects female-only measures., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Giggle_app_founder_Sall_Grover_right_says_she_may_have_to_move_to_the_US_to_establish_her_business_even_if_the_Federal_Court_finds_in_her_favour_in_her_appeal_against_Roxanne_Tickle.jpg, Brazilian_feminist_Isabella_Cepa.jpg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109499
>>109506
>>109526
Giggle app founder Sall Grover mulls move to US if female-only spaces found to be illegal
STEPHEN RICE - August 11, 2025'
1/2
Giggle for Girls app founder Sall Grover may leave Australia to set up her business in the US if the Federal Court rules that her female-only networking platform is unlawful in her home country.
Ms Grover faces months before a decision in her appeal against a finding that she discriminated against trans woman Roxanne Tickle – and the high likelihood that, even if she wins, the case will be appealed to the High Court with backing from the Sex Discrimination Commissioner and powerful lobby group Equality Australia.
“At the forefront of my mind is leaving the country because if I can’t run a business for women here, why should I be here?” Ms Grover told The Australian.
“At least in the US we could get the app up and running – 100 per cent we could, because the other part of the case is free speech, and I wouldn’t mind living in a country with a First Amendment.”
The First Amendment to the US Constitution declares the government shall not make a law “abridging the freedom of speech”, while safeguarding other freedoms.
Ms Grover worked as a screenwriter in the US for a decade but left after experiencing sexual harassment. She says she wouldn’t go back to Los Angeles or New York but would go “somewhere much more rural”.
“A lot of Australian families are leaving, they’re moving to Bali and places like that, either people for financial reasons, or because of an infringement of rights,” she said. “If that’s the direction the country is going, if you’re going to push out hard working people or innovators or business owners, then what are you going to be left with - people on NDIS?”
Ms Grover expressed sympathy for Brazilian feminist Isabella Cepa, who was forced into exile after facing up to 25 years in prison for “misgendering” a powerful politician in her home country. The graphic designer has been granted refugee status in Europe, making her the first person to be given international protection from persecution for speaking against transgender ideology.
“It’s torture, what she’s gone through,” Ms Grover said. “This is how persecuted women are for not going along with gender ideology. It’s as if, in different countries, they’re choosing a woman to be an example to everybody else to get scared into silence and not challenge it.”
Responding to suggestions that Ms Cepa could be offered asylum in Australia, Ms Grover said: “My recommendation for anybody who is fleeing gender persecution would be to stay as far away from Australia as possible. You’ve probably got a better chance in Russia – that’s the sad reality. We’ve got beautiful beaches, but horrible institutions and weak politicians.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109528
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23460988 (130908ZAUG25) Notable: Albanese faces backlash after Hamas praises PM’s ‘courage’ on Palestinian recognition – Hamas has hailed Anthony Albanese’s decision to recognise a Palestinian state as “political courage,” claiming its October 7 attacks helped spur Western governments, including Australia, to shift positions. Senior Hamas figure Sheikh Hassan Yousef praised Australia’s move and rejected conditions that the group disarm or be excluded from elections. Albanese dismissed the claim, insisting Hamas opposes two states and that recognition is tied to Palestinian Authority commitments. Israeli officials, Jewish leaders and the Coalition accused Labor of emboldening terrorists, while critics within Labor warned Hamas would exploit recognition to legitimise its violent tactics., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: A_co_founder_of_terrorist_group_Hamas_Sheikh_Hassan_Yousef_right_has_welcomed_the_Albanese_government_s_decision_to_recognise_Palestine.jpg, GS_1.jpg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109520
>>109521
Albanese faces backlash after Hamas praises PM’s ‘courage’ on Palestinian recognition
Matthew Knott - August 13, 2025
1/2
Listed terrorist group Hamas has applauded the Albanese government’s decision to recognise Palestine, arguing the move by Australia and other Western governments has vindicated its shock October 7 attacks on Israel and commitment to armed resistance.
Rejecting Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s claim that Hamas would be “totally opposed” to the move to recognise Palestine as part of a global effort to progress a two-state solution, one of the militant organisation’s top officials praised the government for showing “political courage” and urged other nations to follow suit.
Sheikh Hassan Yousef, a co-founder of Hamas who has been arrested several times by Israel, made clear the group rejected the rival Palestinian Authority’s calls for it to demilitarise and be excluded from Palestinian elections, conditions Albanese cited when explaining the decision to recognise Palestinian statehood.
“We welcome Australia’s decision to recognise the state of Palestine, and consider it an important step towards achieving justice for our people and securing their legitimate rights,” Yousef, one of Hamas’ most senior officials in the occupied West Bank, said in a statement to this masthead.
“This position reflects political courage and a commitment to the values of justice and the right of peoples to self-determination.
“We call on all countries, especially those that believe in freedom and human dignity, to follow Australia’s example and translate their positions into practical steps to support the Palestinian people and end their suffering under occupation.”
The Israeli government and federal opposition have vehemently opposed the government’s move to recognise Palestine, saying it rewards Hamas’ terror tactics and would embolden the group to continue fighting in Gaza.
Albanese has rejected that argument, telling Channel Seven’s Sunrise on Tuesday: “Hamas will be totally opposed to this decision. Hamas don’t support two states, they support one state.”
Yousef’s statement is the first time that Hamas has commented on Australia’s decision to recognise Palestine at the United Nations General Assembly in September.
Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon S’ar responded to the comments on social media by using a love heart emoji to say that “Hamas loves Albanese”.
Opposition foreign affairs spokeswoman Michaelia Cash said that “Albanese should hang his head in shame” after being praised by Hamas.
“Mr Albanese has emboldened a terror group who murder civilians in cold blood and still hold 50 Israeli hostages in tunnels under Gaza,” she said.
“This is a sad day for our nation.”
Opposition leader Sussan Ley called for the government to rethink its decision, saying: “Now prime minister, if you’ve got a listed terrorist organisation cheering on your foreign policy, it might be time to admit that you got it wrong.”
Hamas fighters stormed into southern Israel on October 7, 2023, killing about 1200 people, including the massacre of young people at the Nova music festival and elderly residents and children living in kibbutzes near the Gaza border. It was the worst mass murder of Jews in a single day since the Holocaust.
Hamas, which has governed the Gaza Strip since 2007, also took around 250 people hostage, dozens of whom are believed to have died in captivity during the war in Gaza. The incursion sparked a ferocious military response from Israel that has extended for almost two years and killed over 60,000 Palestinians.
Australia listed Hamas, which has launched rocket attacks into Israel and carried out suicide bombings, as a terror organisation in 2022, joining the United States, United Kingdom and other countries.
Asked whether Hamas believed its commitment to violence had encouraged countries like Australia to recognise Palestine, Yousef said: “Yes, we believe that the escalation of armed resistance, including the operations carried out on October 7, has significantly contributed to highlighting the suffering of the Palestinian people and the injustice they face.
“These operations have drawn global attention to the Palestinian cause and compelled many countries and organisations to reconsider their positions, leading to greater support and recognition of Palestine as a state by some countries.
“Resistance has proven to be an effective means to break the siege and bring the Palestinian cause back to the international discussion table.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109529
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23460999 (130920ZAUG25) Notable: Albanese ‘detached from reality’ as Hamas praises recognition – Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Sharren Haskel, a former Australian citizen, has accused Anthony Albanese of being “detached from reality” after Hamas praised his decision to recognise Palestinian statehood. Haskel said recognition, tied by Albanese to commitments from Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas on reform and elections, would only empower Hamas, which polls suggest would win. She warned Australia had delivered a gift to terrorists and undermined security cooperation. The comments came as Australia joined 25 nations in condemning Israel for curbing aid to Gaza, while US Secretary of State Marco Rubio dismissed Western recognition moves as symbolic politics., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Israel_s_Deputy_Foreign_Minister_Sharren_Haskel_a_one_time_Australian_citizen_said_Albanese_s_decision_was_a_blow_from_a_country_Israel_regarded_as_a_friend_as_well_as_key_partner_on_security_cooperation.jpg, SH_1.jpg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109520
>>109521
Albanese ‘detached from reality’ as Hamas praises recognition
Andrew Tillett - Aug 13, 2025
1/2
A top Israeli minister has accused Anthony Albanese of being “detached from reality” about Palestine recognition as terror group Hamas praised the Prime Minister for showing “courage” around Palestinian statehood.
Israel’s Deputy Foreign Minister Sharren Haskel, a one-time Australian citizen, said Albanese’s decision was a blow from a country Israel regarded as a friend, as well as key partner on security cooperation.
Amid Israel’s ongoing rage over Australia’s decision, which Haskel warns will help supporters of Hamas win elections, the terror organisation released a statement welcoming the move.
“[We] consider it an important step towards achieving justice for our people and securing their legitimate rights,” Hamas co-founder Sheikh Hassan Yousef said in a statement to The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age.
“This position reflects political courage and a commitment to the values of justice and the right of peoples to self-determination.”
Hamas’ acclaim for Albanese is at odds with the prime minister’s insistence the terror group would be opposed to recognition and affirmation for the two-state-solution peace process because it was committed to Israel’s destruction.
Haskel maintained the recognition moves by Australia, France, Canada and the United Kingdom were motivated more by domestic political considerations, a view US Secretary of State Marco Rubio echoed overnight.
“It is very disappointing,” she said in an interview with The Australian Financial Review from Nigeria, where Haskel was discussing counter-terrorism cooperation with government officials.
“This is throwing away years of diplomatic relations. This was gifted to Hamas. One of the leaders of Hamas have said this recognition of a Palestinian was a ‘fruit’ of the Seventh of October [terrorist attack in 2023].
“Unfortunately Prime Minister Albanese and the government have helped Hamas harvest their reward for the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust.”
Haskel’s comments came as Australia joined 25 other Western countries including the UK and Japan as well as the European Union to issue fresh condemnation of Israel for curbing supplies of aid to wartorn Gaza.
The signatories pleaded with Israel to abandon new registration requirements that non-government organisations warn will force them to cease aid operations in Gaza and the West Bank.
“The humanitarian suffering in Gaza has reached unimaginable levels. Famine is unfolding before our eyes. Urgent action is needed now to halt and reverse starvation. Humanitarian space must be protected, and aid should never be politicised,” the joint statement said.
Israel’s embassy in Canberra responded to the statement by saying while it shared concerns over humanitarian suffering in Gaza, it was “deeply troubling” that mention of Israeli hostages was relegated to a single sentence towards the bottom of the statement.
“We have yet to hear to the Australian government speak with the same urgency about their humanitarian situation,” the embassy said.
Albanese announced on Monday Australia would recognise Palestinian statehood on the sidelines of the United Nations’ General Assembly meeting in New York in September, arguing Western moves to do so would help keep alive the two-state solution to create an independent Palestine and bring peace to the Middle East.
However, the Coalition has promised to revoke recognition when it next forms government, while pro-Palestinian supporters argue it is insufficient and tougher action needs to be taken against Israel, such as sanctions on a wider range of ministers.
Rubio, in a radio interview on Monday US time, derided the Western push to recognise Palestine as “largely meaningless”.
“It’s symbolic, and they’re doing it primarily for one reason, and that is their internal politics, their domestic politics,” said Rubio.
“In the UK, in France, in many parts of Europe and Ireland, for a long time their domestic politics have turned anti-Israel or whatever it may be, and they’re getting a lot of domestic pressure to do something.
“The truth of the matter is that the future of that region is not going to be decided by some UN resolution [or] … some press release by a prime minister or a president from some country … It’s going to be decided … when Palestinian areas are not governed by terrorist organisations. Because that’s truly what this comes down to, and that is the security of Israel.”
Rubio last week blamed France’s move to recognise Palestine for the collapse in ceasefire talks, saying it had encouraged Hamas to walk away from the negotiating table.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109530
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23461005 (130926ZAUG25) Notable: ‘Not married to one solution’: Trump won’t criticise Albanese’s Palestine state call – The White House has declined to criticise Australia’s decision to recognise a Palestinian state, with officials saying Donald Trump is “not married to any one solution” on the conflict. While reiterating he will not recognise Palestine himself, Trump’s team said he opposed rewarding Hamas but remained open-minded about paths to peace. It marked Washington’s first response since Canberra’s announcement, contrasting with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s dismissal of such moves as “symbolic” and politically driven. Anthony Albanese tied recognition to commitments from Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, including reform, elections and excluding Hamas.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109520
>>109521
‘Not married to one solution’: Trump won’t criticise Albanese’s Palestine state call
Michael Koziol - August 13, 2025
Washington: The White House has declined to criticise Australia’s announcement that it will recognise a Palestinian state, saying in its first comments on the decision that President Donald Trump was “not married to any one solution” on the Israel-Palestine conflict.
While Trump has mocked the significance of France recognising Palestine, and insinuated on Truth Social that Canada could impact trade talks if it made the same move, he has stayed silent since Canberra’s announcement.
The White House also rebuffed numerous requests for comment ahead of Australia’s decision, pointing only to Trump’s public remarks about other countries.
But on Tuesday (Wednesday AEST), when asked specifically about Australia’s move to recognise Palestine, a White House official told this masthead that while Trump was not going to recognise Palestine himself, he had an open mind on the issue.
“As the president stated, he would be rewarding Hamas if he recognises a Palestinian state, and he doesn’t think they should be rewarded. So he is not going to do that,” the official said.
“However, the president is not married to any one solution as it pertains to building a more peaceful region.”
The statement marks the first public comment from the White House since Australia broke with the US to recognise Palestine.
At the same time, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio continued to argue it was meaningless for other countries to recognise the territory as a sovereign state, and claimed governments were choosing to do so now due to domestic political considerations.
Asked by New York radio personality Sid Rosenberg about the move by Australia, Ireland and other countries, Rubio said: “It’s symbolic, and they’re doing it primarily for one reason, and that is their internal politics, their domestic politics.
“In the UK, in France, in many parts of Europe and Ireland, for a long time their domestic politics has turned anti-Israel or whatever it may be, and they’re getting a lot of domestic pressure to do something, but it’s largely meaningless.”
Rubio did not specifically mention Australia in his answer.
“The truth of the matter is that the future of that region is not going to be decided by some UN resolution. It’s not going to be decided by some press release by a prime minister or a president from some country,” Rubio said.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced on Monday that Australia would recognise Palestinian statehood at next month’s United Nations General Assembly meeting.
The move came after weeks of deliberations that included a conversation with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and a phone call with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, both last week.
Albanese said the decision was predicated on commitments from the Palestinian Authority that Hamas could play no role in a future Palestinian state, that it must recognise Israel’s right to exist, hold general elections and reform governance, education and international oversight.
The Israeli government lashed the decision, saying it was a reward for the terror group Hamas and that recognising Palestine was one of the fruits of the attack the group launched against Israel in October 2023.
Albanese on Tuesday accused Netanyahu of being in denial about the consequences of the conflict in Gaza, but vowed to continue relations despite the escalating disagreement.
The war began on October 7, 2023, when Hamas-led militants stormed into southern Israel, killing 1200 people and taking 251 hostages, according to Israeli figures. Israel’s offensive against Hamas in Gaza since then has killed more than 61,000 Palestinians, according to local health officials.
There are growing global concerns over Israel’s plan to intensify the war and take Gaza City – the territory’s biggest population centre – amid warnings about starvation, civilian casualties and lack of medical care.
https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/not-married-to-one-solution-trump-won-t-criticise-albanese-s-palestine-state-call-20250813-p5mmgw.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109531
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23461010 (130929ZAUG25) Notable: Marco Rubio slams Australia’s ‘meaningless’ Palestine move – US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has dismissed Australia’s decision to recognise a Palestinian state as “largely meaningless,” accusing Canberra and other Western governments of bowing to domestic anti-Israel sentiment. Rubio said recognition was symbolic and would not affect realities on the ground, stressing peace depends on removing terrorist groups from power in Palestinian areas. He reiterated that Israel’s war began after Hamas’s October 7 attacks and would continue while such groups govern. The rebuke highlights a widening rift, with Anthony Albanese unable to secure a meeting with Donald Trump or tariff relief amid tensions.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109520
>>109521
Marco Rubio slams Australia’s ‘meaningless’ Palestine move
Vanessa Marsh - August 13, 2025
America’s top diplomat has lashed Australia’s “meaningless” move to recognise Palestinian statehood, saying governments were bowing to domestic anti-Israel sentiment that would ultimately make no difference on the ground.
United States Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued the scathing rebuke of moves by Australia, France, Canada and the UK toward a two-state solution at the United Nations General Assembly next month.
“It’s largely meaningless,” Mr Rubio said.
“It’s symbolic, and they’re doing it primarily for one reason, and that is their internal politics, their domestic politics.”
Mr Rubio said the anti-Israel sentiment growing across the world, including in the UK and Europe, had put pressure on those governments to act.
“The truth of the matter is that the future of that region is not going to be decided by some UN resolution,” he said.
“It’s not going to be decided by some press release by a prime minister or a president from some country.
“It’s going to be decided on the ground. It’s going to be decided by: when will the day come when Palestinian areas are not governed by terrorist organisations? Because that’s truly what this comes down to, and that is the security of Israel.”
The United States has remained a staunch ally of Israel and refused to recognise a Palestinian state.
Prior to Australia’s announcement, US President Donald Trump last month voiced his “displeasure and disagreement” with similar moves by the UK and Canada.
Mr Trump described it as rewarding Hamas at a time when the terrorist group was hampering ceasefire efforts and continuing to hold hostages in Gaza.
Two days after Australia’s announcement, Mr Rubio said peace in the Middle East hinged on eliminating groups intent on the destruction of the Jewish state, reiterating the only reason there was a war in Gaza was because Israel was attacked on October 7.
“And as long as people govern these spaces who are going to attack Israel, you are not going to have peace,” he told WABC radio.
“That’s a fact. Whether people want to accept that or not, the sooner they accept it, the sooner we have a chance at peace there. It’s difficult and it ain’t easy, but that’s a fact. But all these statements are meaningless … they’re not going to change anything.”
Australia’s departure from its key ally in the US comes at a strained time in the relationship.
Mr Albanese has been unable to secure a face-to-face meeting with Mr Trump and attempts to secure a tariff exemption have been unsuccessful.
The pair could finally come face-to-face at next month’s UN meeting in New York.
https://www.couriermail.com.au/news/world/north-america/marco-rubio-slams-australias-meaningless-palestine-move/news-story/b538c401d9bb79baebef9c757f556947
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OuMkV4HL2c
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109532
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23461015 (130936ZAUG25) Notable: Brisbane hoping to play host to Quad leaders – Queensland Premier David Crisafulli is lobbying Japan’s Shigeru Ishiba and India’s Narendra Modi for Brisbane to host next year’s Quad Leaders’ Summit, arguing it would boost trade links and investment ahead of the 2032 Olympics. He has also pitched the idea to Anthony Albanese, who is said to be open to it. The push follows tensions with Indian and Japanese business under the previous Labor government. Crisafulli said hosting the Quad would showcase Queensland’s global role, while the next summit could mark Albanese’s first meeting with Donald Trump if New Delhi’s talks falter., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Queensland_Premier_David_Crisafulli_is_pushing_for_the_state_to_host_the_next_Quad_meeting_in_Brisbane.jpg, The_request_comes_amid_concerns_the_next_planned_meeting_in_New_Delhi_later_this_year_may_not_go_ahead_due_to_increasing_hostilities_between_Mr_Modi_and_US_President_Donald_Trump_over_America_s_tariff_policy.jpg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109234
>>109241
>>109513
Brisbane hoping to play host to Quad leaders
MACKENZIE SCOTT - 12 August 2025
Premier David Crisafulli is lobbying the leaders of Japan and India for Queensland to host the powerful diplomatic Quad Leaders’ Summit in Brisbane next year, in a move he says would revitalise the state’s international trade links and open the door to investment opportunities.
Mr Crisafulli has written to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba in a bid to secure Australia’s first meeting of the reformed Quad, framing the push as an attempt to rebuild relations with big business in both nations that were tested under the previous state Labor government.
The request comes amid concerns the next planned meeting in New Delhi later this year may not go ahead due to increasing hostilities between Mr Modi and US President Donald Trump over America’s tariff policy.
“Now is the time to get the Quad to Queensland,” Mr Crisafulli told The Australian, ahead of his first international trip as Queensland Premier to both nations this month.
“As we start the runway to the 2032 Games, Queensland has never been better placed to host the Quad Leaders’ Summit, with our strategic location, multilateral trade links, and world-class infrastructure.
The Premier has already made his pitch to Anthony Albanese to continue the pair’s “strong relationship” and “cannoli diplomacy” in a letter obtained by The Australian. It is understood Mr Albanese has told Queensland officials that he was open to the idea of the next Quad meeting being held in Brisbane, which is also holding the 2032 Olympics.
Indian business leaders accused Queensland Labor of politicising the treatment of Indian conglomerate Adani in 2017 over its then proposed coalmine. And the Japanese ambassador accused the Palaszczuk government in 2022 of insulting mining companies operating in the state with unheralded coal royalty hikes.
“Hosting The Quad Leaders’ Summit will demonstrate our commitment to revitalising Queensland’s international trade relationships, which we must rebuild following the disrespect of our trusted partners by the former Labor government,” Mr Crisafulli said.
“Unlocking investment opportunities with India, Japan and the US will build on our existing multi-billion-dollar trade in energy and resources, food and fibre, and education, which will deliver a better lifestyle through a stronger economy for all Queenslanders.”
The next Quad meeting, which could be held as early as September if it goes ahead, could mark the first time Mr Albanese will meet with Mr Trump. However, Mr Modi is believed to have avoided locking in a date after Mr Trump hosted Pakistan’s army chief in Washington and praised his counter-terrorism efforts as military action between the Asian neighbours continued to build.
Mr Crisafulli first revealed his push to host the Quad meeting at a joint Queensland Futures Institute and American Chamber of Commerce in Australia 4th of July event in Brisbane, declaring it would strengthen Queensland’s relationship with the US.
He said Brisbane did not get the expected “buzz” when it held the G20 summit in 2013, recalling that the location was overshadowed by the attendance of then US president Barack Obama and Russian leader Vladimir Putin.
Queensland hopes to bolster India relations, securing new direct flights to increase tourism and international student attraction.
The Premier’s letter to Mr Albanese was one of the first pieces of correspondence between the pair following the Prime Minister’s re-election in May, which he secured with a strong swing in suburban Brisbane.
The leaders, who both boast Italian heritage, signed a deal for $2.8bn in federal funding for state schools over cannoli in March.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/brisbane-hoping-to-play-host-to-quad-leaders/news-story/3bf73cfb17803bdb52373dadfd8477ae
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109533
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23461026 (130954ZAUG25) Notable: US congressman spruiks Australia relationship at future AUKUS shipyard – US congressmen Joe Courtney and Trent Kelly joined Assistant Defence Minister Peter Khalil at Adelaide’s Osborne Naval Shipyard, with Kelly praising the US-Australia alliance as “irreplaceable.” Khalil said AUKUS was “critical” for Australia’s defence, highlighting the deterrence value of Virginia-class submarines and future AUKUS boats. More than $1.5 billion has already been invested in the site, where five nuclear-powered submarines are planned if Washington proceeds. The visit came as Trump’s defence chief Elbridge Colby delayed a review of AUKUS, which Canberra supports despite resisting US pressure to lift defence spending to 3.5% of GDP., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Republican_congressman_Trent_Kelly_says_the_US_Australia_relationship_can_t_be_replicated_.jpg, Assistant_Defence_Minister_Peter_Khalil_says_AUKUS_is_an_investment_in_peace_.jpg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109316
>>109405
>>109512
US congressman spruiks Australia relationship at future AUKUS shipyard
JOSEPH OLBRYCHT-PALMER - 13 August 2025
AUKUS is “critical” to Australia’s defence, Assistant Defence Minister Peter Khalil has declared while spruiking it in Adelaide with visiting US congressmen.
US representatives Joe Courtney and Trent Kelly are in Australia for the Australian American Leadership Dialogue – an annual conference aimed at highlighting the deep ties between Canberra and Washington.
Both men are staunch supporters of the US-Australia alliance, including AUKUS, which the Trump administration is reviewing.
Speaking to media, Mr Kelly, a Republican like Donald Trump, said the bilateral relationship was like no other.
“Our relationship with our Australian partners is one that cannot be can’t be replicated,” he told reporters, standing alongside Mr Khalil and South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas.
“And so it’s important that we continue to grow as friends.
“I’ve seen that relationship over the last two or three years as AUKUS has matured, grow stronger and better.”
Mr Kelly was speaking from Osborne Naval Shipyard, where five nuclear-power AUKUS submarines will be built, assuming the US stays in the defence pact.
More than $1.5 billion in federal funds have already been pumped into preparing to build and maintain them.
Australia will also get at least three American-made Virginia-class submarines under the agreement.
Mr Khalil said the Albanese government welcomed the Trump administration’s review, declaring it “brings forward the issues that are actually important for us to discuss about how we can get the best out of this partnership”.
“The AUKUS partnership is something that is historic,” he said.
“It’s critical, it’s important.”
He went on to say the “advanced capability that we get out of the Virginia-class and the future AUKUS submarines is extremely important”.
“We’re talking about making sure that we have the ADF and the defence capability to deter and deny adversaries from impacting negatively our national interests, forcing others to come back to the negotiating table rather than using force,” Mr Khalil said.
“Investment in defence is about investment in peace.”
US President Donald Trump’s defence policy chief Elbridge Colby announced he was delaying the AUKUS review late last month and did not give a firm date for its completion.
Instead, Mr Colby, an AUKUS sceptic, said the review would be completed “in the fall” – much longer than the initial 30 days.
The delay comes as the Albanese government resists Washington’s demand to hike defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP in response to China’s rapid military build-up.
Announcing the delay, Mr Colby’s office said the AUKUS review would “be an empirical and clear-eyed assessment of the initiative’s alignment with President Trump’s America First approach”.
“As part of this process, the (US Department of Defence) looks forward to continuing regular engagements on this important matter with other parts of the US government, the US Congress, our allies Australia and the United Kingdom and other key stakeholders,” his office said.
“The department anticipates completing the review in the fall.
“Its purpose will be to provide the President and his senior leadership team with a fact-based, rigorous assessment of the initiative.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/breaking-news/us-congressman-spruiks-australia-relationship-at-future-aukus-shipyard/news-story/869ed642972a585544157efd6b475446
https://www.insidestategovernment.com.au/adelaide-hosts-australian-american-leadership-dialogue/
https://www.aald.org/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109534
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23461031 (131001ZAUG25) Notable: United States congressmen Joe Courtney and Trent Kelly visit Adelaide’s naval shipyard and back AUKUS – US congressmen Joe Courtney and Trent Kelly have endorsed the $368bn AUKUS nuclear-powered submarine program during a visit to Adelaide’s Osborne Naval Shipyard, despite the Trump administration’s ongoing review of the pact. Kelly said AUKUS had deepened an already strong alliance, while Courtney praised the “eye-watering investment” in Australia’s shipbuilding sector and noted university collaboration on submarine and unmanned vessel technology. Premier Peter Malinauskas highlighted South Australia’s growing defence role, as both congressmen urged greater technology transfer under AUKUS pillar two, saying all three partners would be “stronger and better together.”, MISSING MEDIA/FILES: Visiting_for_a_high_powered_forum_starting_in_Adelaide_on_Thursday_Republican_Trent_Kelly_and_Democrat_Joe_Courtney_expressed_major_confidence_about_the_AUKUS_pact_in_the_face_of_a_US_administration_review.jpg, Republican_congressman_Trent_Kelly_left_Premier_Peter_Malinauskas_Democratic_congressman_Joe_Courtney_and_Federal_Assistant_Minister_for_Defence_Peter_Khalil_right_tour_Osborne_Naval_Shipyard_in_Adelaide_s_northwest.jpg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109316
>>109405
>>109512
United States congressmen Joe Courtney and Trent Kelly visit Adelaide’s naval shipyard and back AUKUS
Two United State’s congressmen have toured Adelaide’s naval shipyard as the US President’s review of the military deal weighs its “America First” credentials.
Paul Starick - August 13, 2025
Key United States congressmen have strongly endorsed the $368bn AUKUS nuclear-powered submarine program during a tour of its Adelaide naval shipyard base.
Visiting for a high-powered forum starting in Adelaide on Thursday, Republican Trent Kelly and Democrat Joe Courtney expressed major confidence about the AUKUS pact in the face of a US administration review.
Mr Kelly, the House Seapower and Projection Forces subcommittee chairman, said AUKUS had further cemented a relationship between Australia and the US “that I didn’t think could get any better or stronger”.
Mr Courtney, a prominent AUKUS backer and the seapower subcommittee’s ranking member, praised the “eye-watering investment that’s going on in the shipbuilding sector here in Australia”.
The duo are in Adelaide for the Australian American Leadership Dialogue, which will cover topics including AUKUS, defence, critical minerals, energy, social media and health.
The US is reviewing AUKUS, which was inked and planned under the Biden administration, to examine its alignment with the President Donald Trump’s America First Agenda.
Premier Peter Malinauskas, who hosted the congressmen at Osborne Naval Shipyard on Wednesday morning, said South Australia’s role as the home of the AUKUS submarine program presented “a unique opportunity” to build upon existing relationships with the US “and to forge new ones”.
He said SA was “positioning itself as a security and technology partner of choice” in areas including artificial intelligence, electronic warfare, advanced cyber and quantum technologies.
Mr Courtney, whose Connecticut district includes a nuclear submarine yard at Groton, drew attention to collaboration between Connecticut and Adelaide universities on “cutting-edge work for the US Navy in terms of submarines and unmanned vessels … all kinds of stuff that we can’t really talk about that much publicly”.
“We’ve had undergraduate and graduate engineering students come to Adelaide, and the two faculties now have a very healthy back-and-forth dialogue,” he said.
“That’s exactly what, I think, is going to help us deal with the question of, really, a decades-long challenge in terms of, again, creating the trust and the speed with which AUKUS is dedicated to, in terms of achieving the goal of a free and open Pacific.”
Mr Kelly, whose Mississippi district includes the Pascagoula surface ship yard, urged more focus on technology transfer under AUKUS pillar two.
“I think we need to focus some more on pillar two, and make sure we take the opportunities that exist to build things and share things and make each of us greater,” he said.
“The thing I love about AUKUS the most is all three of our partners get stronger and better by doing that together. We are stronger than we are as individuals.”
Mr Kelly, and Mr Courtney in June were among bipartisan authors of a letter to US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, backing AUKUS and urging the sale of Virginia class submarines go ahead under the pact.
https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/united-states-congressmen-joe-courtney-and-trent-kelly-visit-adelaides-naval-shipyard-and-back-aukus/news-story/3f99fbcb58cec66ed41d3f347cde2be9
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109535
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23461047 (131016ZAUG25) Notable: ‘Join the club’: US congressman backs Australia in tensions with Trump – US congressman Joe Courtney has defended AUKUS and Australia’s role in the alliance, rejecting claims the transfer of Virginia-class submarines should be scrapped due to US industrial pressures. Touring Adelaide’s shipyard, he said Australia’s $1.6bn contribution to boost production showed commitment, and argued fears about submarine shortages were “totally inaccurate.” Courtney also backed Anthony Albanese’s objections to Trump’s tariffs, calling them unjustified given America’s trade surplus. He said tariffs could be Trump’s “Achilles heel” politically, but stressed bipartisan support for Australia in Congress would help sustain the alliance through current strains., MISSING MEDIA/FILES: US_Democrat_congressman_Joe_Courtney_right_with_Assistant_Defence_Minister_Peter_Khalil_Republican_congressman_Trent_Kelly_and_South_Australian_Premier_Peter_Malinauskas_at_Adelaide_s_shipyard_on_Wednesday.jpg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109316
>>109405
>>109512
‘Join the club’: US congressman backs Australia in tensions with Trump
Andrew Tillett - Aug 13, 2025
One of the US Congress’ strongest AUKUS supporters has warned Donald Trump there is no justification to tear up the plan to sell Australia second-hand nuclear-powered submarines, and rejected suggestions Canberra was not pulling its weight in the US alliance.
Congressman Joe Courtney said the visit to Adelaide this week by a delegation of US legislators including himself for the high-powered Australian American Leadership Dialogue was aimed at showing that Australia remained a valued partner, amid signs of friction between the Trump administration and Albanese government.
Albanese is yet to hold his first face-to-face meeting with Trump after the US president cancelled their planned talks in Canada in June. The White House has shunned Australia’s pleas to be exempted from Trump’s global tariffs, and Albanese is resisting US demands to further increase defence spending to 3.5 per cent of gross domestic product.
A review by senior Pentagon official Elbridge Colby has also cast doubt on the AUKUS pact and one of its key elements, the transfer of Virginia-class submarines to the Australian navy in the 2030s. Colby has previously questioned the wisdom of transferring submarines and weakening the US fleet when there is growing risk of a conflict over Taiwan, with concerns US shipyards will be unable to increase production to provide replacement boats.
But Courtney, a Democrat whose Connecticut district is home to one of America’s two main submarine yards, maintained such fears were overblown.
“Everybody in 2023, which is not that long ago, when the announcement was made, they understood all the challenges the submarine industrial base was going through,” he told The Australian Financial Review.
“The production cadence was thrown off for a number of reasons, the biggest of them being COVID.
“The notion that production and the strength of the industrial base is a problem in 2025 that should nix the sale of the submarines with the idea this was an unexpected risk that wasn’t understood in 2023 is just totally inaccurate.”
Courtney said the US navy had estimated an extra 6 million man-hours were required to ensure America had sufficient submarines, and investments in the shipyards and the industrial base to achieve that were beginning to ramp up and had reached a third of that goal. Australia has contributed $1.6 billion this year to the US to bump up production, with more money to come.
Courtney, who toured Adelaide’s shipyard on Wednesday with South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas, said majority-Australian-owned shipbuilder Austal’s yard in Alabama would play a crucial role.
“They’re about to hit full operations sometime in the middle of next year and that is going to get the whole system up closer to the 6 million number.
“Two Virginias were delivered last year, two are going to be delivered this year, two are going to be delivered next year.
“It is way premature for the decision to be made on the basis that the submarine inventory is insufficient.
“I have a hard time with this because I’m very close to what is going on, I watch it very closely and I just feel there is no justification for AUKUS to be sidelined because of industrial production.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109536
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470114 (160442ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Australia's commitment to recognise Palestine met with 'disappointment and disgust' by Trump administration – US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee said Australia’s decision to recognise a Palestinian state was met with “disappointment and some disgust” in the Trump administration, calling the timing “terrible” and a “gift” to Hamas. He warned it endangered hostages and could push Israel towards West Bank annexation. Penny Wong said she had notified Secretary of State Marco Rubio in advance, but Huckabee said Israel expected more. He defended Israel’s war conduct, while claiming Donald Trump had done “more than anyone else” to stop starvation by creating a Gaza aid foundation.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109520
>>109521
Australia's commitment to recognise Palestine met with 'disappointment and disgust' by Trump administration
Sarah Ferguson - 14 August 2025
The US ambassador to Israel says the Australian government's decision to recognise Palestine was met with disgust by senior members of the Trump administration.
Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee told 7.30 he discussed Australia's decision with US President Donald Trump.
"There's an enormous level of disappointment and some disgust," Ambassador Huckabee said.
"I don't know that the president used that word, [but] I would say that is a characterisation of a sentiment.
"I think it does express the emotional sentiment, a sense of, 'You've got to be kidding … why would they be doing this? And why would they be doing it now'?"
Ambassador Huckabee also said Australia's timing was "terrible".
"I think the timing has been very hurtful to any prospects of negotiating some settlement in Gaza with Hamas … this is a gift to them, and it's unfortunate," he said.
The ambassador continued his critique of the Albanese government's decision, saying it would have a direct impact on the remaining hostages of Hamas.
"For this to come at a time like this, further endangering them and endangering any hopes of some peaceful resolution of dealing with Hamas and getting them to lay down their arms," he said.
Australia followed similar commitments to recognise a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly in September, that were made by France, Canada and the UK.
"As Israel's closest partner, we would have expected that there would have been some heads up," he said.
On 7.30 this week, Foreign Minister Penny Wong said she had spoken to the US Secretary of State Marco Rubio about the government's intentions.
"As a matter of courtesy, I did want to give him advance notice of our announcement," Ms Wong said.
Annexation of the West Bank
Earlier in the week, Minister Wong warned there would be "no Palestine left" to recognise if the world did not act.
Asked about Senator Wong's comments, Mr Huckabee claimed Australia's decision could inadvertently push Israel towards annexation of the West Bank.
"What Australia and the other countries may have done inadvertently is push Israel to do exactly what they're afraid of," he said.
However, in July, the Israeli Knesset passed a non-binding motion calling for the annexation of the West Bank.
On Thursday, multiple outlets reported that Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich threatened an expansion of settlements outside Jerusalem.
"Those who try to recognise a Palestinian state will receive from us an answer on the ground … and ensure that by September the hypocritical leaders in Europe will have nothing to recognise," he said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109537
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470143 (160449ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Albanese plays down US ‘disgust’ over Palestine recognition – Anthony Albanese has sought to downplay US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee’s claim that Donald Trump and Marco Rubio reacted with “disgust” and “disappointment” at Australia’s recognition of a Palestinian state. The Prime Minister said Huckabee represented US interests in Israel, not Australia, and stressed his role was to act for Australians, many of whom were horrified by both Hamas’s October 7 massacre and Gaza’s humanitarian crisis. Albanese said recognition supports a two-state solution, following France, Canada and the UK. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said the stance distracts from genuine peace talks with Washington.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109520
>>109521
>>109536
Albanese plays down US ‘disgust’ over Palestine recognition
Nick Bonyhady - August 15, 2025
US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee says there is disgust and disappointment in the Trump administration at the Albanese government’s decision to recognise a Palestinian state, deepening the rift with Australia’s closest security partner.
Huckabee, a former Republican governor and major supporter of Israel, said he had spoken to President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and both men were unhappy with the decision Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced on Monday.
“There is an enormous level of disappointment, and some disgust,” Huckabee said on the ABC’s 7.30 on Thursday. Huckabee, who led numerous evangelical tour groups to Israel before his appointment as ambassador, did not confirm the exact words used by Rubio or Trump, saying he would not reveal private conversations.
“I think it does express, though, the emotional sentiment, a sense of ‘You’ve got to be kidding. Why would they be doing this? And why would they be doing it now?’”
The comments build pressure on Albanese, who has already faced a storm of criticism this week after Hamas officials praised Australia’s decision to recognise a State of Palestine at a United Nations meeting in September.
Australia’s relationship with the United States has suffered a series of knocks since Trump reclaimed the presidency, including the lack of a meeting between him and Albanese and tension over defence spending. But the Resolve Political Monitor conducted for this masthead shows most people do not blame Albanese for the lack of a meeting, and Australia has the lowest tariff rate available for exports to the US.
Albanese played down the ambassador’s comments, saying Huckabee represented the United States in Israel, not Australia. The prime minister told ABC radio on Friday that his role was to represent Australia’s interests.
“Australians have been disgusted by what they see on their TV every night,” Albanese said.
“They were disgusted by the terrorist actions of Hamas on October 7, the slaughter of innocent Israelis, the taking of hostages and the ongoing holding of those hostages have outraged Australians, but Australians have also seen the death of tens of thousands of people.
“When you have children starving, when you have children losing their lives, with families queuing for food and water, then that provokes, not surprisingly, a human reaction.”
More than 60,000 Palestinians have died from Israel’s assault on Gaza, according to the territory’s health ministry, which is linked to Hamas.
Israel has defended its war in Gaza as a necessary measure to root out the terror group that massacred or kidnapped about 1500 people in October 2023, and blamed Hamas for Gazans’ suffering.
Almost 80 years of conflict, Albanese said, had to end, and recognition for Palestine would help build momentum for a two-state solution.
The move follows similar plans announced by France, Canada and the United Kingdom.
The Trump administration has not appointed an ambassador to Australia, fuelling accusations that Australia is a low diplomatic priority for the White House.
On Thursday, Albanese warned the media about reporting Hamas propaganda after the office of one of the listed terror group’s co-founders issued a statement welcoming Australia’s decision to recognise Palestine. A Telegram post in the organisation’s name then disavowed the message.
“What that should be is a warning to the media of being very careful about the fact that Hamas will engage in propaganda because what is happening is the international community are united about isolating Hamas, about supporting a peaceful way forward,” Albanese said.
But two other senior Hamas officials confirmed the group welcomed recognition for Palestine by Australia.
Hamas media director Ismail Al-Thawabta, who is based in Gaza, told the ABC that Australia’s move to recognise a Palestinian state “reflects a growing global awareness of the necessity to end the injustice suffered by our people for decades”.
Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said Albanese’s position was a distraction from genuine progress towards peace via talks with the United States, which remains Israel’s most crucial ally.
“To see our prime minister stand up there and sound as if he has some sort of gotcha moment in response to the legitimate criticism that is coming at him from everywhere on this issue, by saying he’s found a statement from Hamas saying another statement by Hamas wasn’t correct ... is ridiculous,” Ley said on Sky on Thursday night.
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/albanese-dismisses-us-disgust-over-palestine-recognition-20250815-p5mn6k.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBsGzIfyHro
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109538
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470225 (160506ZAUG25) Notable: Video: PM’s Palestine decision ‘could blow up’ White House talks, former White House adviser says – Former US National Security Council official Michael Green warned Anthony Albanese’s recognition of a Palestinian state is “unexploded ordnance” that could detonate when he meets Donald Trump. The comments followed US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee’s claim the Trump administration felt “disappointment and some disgust” at Australia’s move, though Penny Wong insists she warned Marco Rubio in advance. Albanese dismissed Huckabee’s criticism, saying his duty was to represent Australia’s interests. Green said figures such as Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby on AUKUS and Huckabee on Gaza were “taking initiative,” making summit planning harder to predict.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109520
>>109521
>>109536
PM’s Palestine decision ‘could blow up’ White House talks, former White House adviser says
BEN PACKHAM - August 15, 2025
1/2
Anthony Albanese’s recognition of a Palestinian state is “unexploded ordnance” that could ignite when the Prime Minister meets Donald Trump, former White House National Security Council member Michael Green has warned.
The assessment came after the US’s top diplomat in Israel said President Trump and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio were furious at Australia’s upcoming policy shift on Palestine.
“There’s an enormous level of disappointment and some disgust,” US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee told the ABC’s 7.30 program.
“We don’t have to pretend that it’s OK, because in our view, it’s not OK.”
Mr Huckabee claimed the Albanese government had neglected to give the Trump administration a “heads-up” on the decision, contradicting Foreign Minister Penny Wong, who said she raised it with Mr Rubio before it was announced.
Dr Green, a former NSC director of Asian affairs, said Mr Huckabee’s comments reflected the views of sections of the Trump administration.
“Huckabee’s daughter was Trump’s first press secretary, so he would be reading the White House carefully and not freelancing, even if he took the initiative to do this on his own,” said Dr Green, who is now chief executive of the United States Studies Centre.
“I doubt Huckabee was asked to do this by State or NSC, but who knows whether somebody like (Vice-President) JD Vance told him to go for it. There is no clear process for these things.”
He said he did not believe the Trump administration as a whole was mobilising to punish Australia for the policy shift, “but there are clearly elements in the administration who are really angry about this and believe that they can go out and do this”.
“For the (Albanese-Trump) summit, it’s like unexploded ordnance. When they eventually meet, this is something that may or may not explode,” Dr Green said.
Mr Albanese brushed aside Mr Huckabee’s criticism.
“He is an ambassador … to another country. Not Australia, Israel. My job is to represent Australia’s interest,” he told ABC radio.
“We’re a sovereign nation. He’s entitled to put his views, but we’re also entitled to put our views, and we didn’t do it shyly.
“I saw the interview last night. He suggested that this came as a surprise. I spoke with (Israeli) Prime Minister (Benjamin) Netanyahu last Thursday night. I asked him, ‘What’s the end point here?’ And the end point is the same as the end point that he had put to me more than a year ago, which was to get rid of Hamas militarily. There was no political solution there.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109539
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470401 (160608ZAUG25) Notable: US politicians back AUKUS and bigger defence spend – Visiting US lawmakers voiced bipartisan support for AUKUS while urging Australia to lift defence spending and Donald Trump to visit Australia. Democrat senator Chris Coons praised Canberra’s diplomacy but said more investment in defence was needed given shipyard shortfalls and global threats. Congressman Michael Turner credited Trump’s pressure for NATO’s decision to raise spending to 5 per cent of GDP and suggested allies, including Australia, may follow. Delegation leader Joe Courtney warned past comments by Pentagon official Elbridge Colby on AUKUS were troubling but remained confident submarine transfers would proceed. Both Coons and Turner urged an Albanese–Trump meeting.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109316
>>109512
>>109534
US politicians back AUKUS and bigger defence spend
JOE KELLY - August 14, 2025
The leader of a US congressional delegation has encouraged greater defence spending by Canberra, urged Donald Trump to visit Australia and argued that an in-person meeting between the leaders of both nations would be of “real value”.
Speaking in Adelaide on the sidelines of the Australian American Leadership Dialogue, Democrat senator Chris Coons – a member of the Senate Foreign Relations and Appropriations committees – said there was strong bipartisan support in Congress for the landmark AUKUS agreement.
Critiquing the administration’s tariff policies, he noted there were “tensions in the relationship at the moment” and suggested it would be “valuable for President Trump to come and visit Australia”.
However, he provided no assurance about the outcome of the AUKUS review being led by Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby. A leading supporter of the AUKUS agreement in the US congress, Joe Courtney, also warned that some of Mr Colby’s past comments about the security partnership had “definitely raised some warning flags”.
While Mr Courtney was optimistic about the ability of the US to produce enough Virginia-class submarines to honour its agreement to provide Australia with three boats from the early 2030s, Senator Coons noted some challenges.
He said the US was “severely constrained in our shipyard capacity and our workforce. We are not hitting our targets in terms of naval construction”.
Amid calls from the US Department of Defence for Anthony Albanese to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, Senator Coons said Australia needed credit for what it was already doing but acknowledged the need for greater efforts to be made.
“All of us need to increase our investment in defence given the threat environment we face,” he said.
“Frankly, Australia is making the investment in other critical capabilities – development and diplomacy – in areas where the United States just cut back sharply.”
“But, of course, I would encourage increased investment in defence,” he said.
Republican congressman Michael Turner, a former chair of the House Intelligence Committee, also said Australia needed credit for its actions on defence spending. But he stressed that “we have to take this in (the) context of what our adversaries are doing”.
Mr Turner said the application of pressure from Mr Trump had helped to facilitate a “wildly successful” NATO summit at The Hague which saw Europe agree to lift its defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP.
“I suspect that all of the allied relationships and certainly even the relationships and the issues that Donald Trump are picking will result in the same (outcome),” he said.
Members of the US delegation – which included two US senators and five members of the US House of Representatives – are scheduled to meet with Anthony Albanese in Sydney after this week touring the Osborne shipyard in Adelaide and stopovers in the Marshall Islands and Papua New Guinea.
Opposition Leader Sussan Ley warned the alliance relationship was in a state of “drift” and told The Australian the Albanese government should extend an invitation for Mr Trump to visit Australia.
She said the country had “such a good story to tell when it comes to the opportunities in our alliance. I’m not sure why the Prime Minister hasn’t invited the President to see it for himself.”
“We all know a strong Australia-United States relationship is critical for our national security and the prosperity of both our nations,” she said.
“Getting the President to see the opportunities on offer for advancing our shared interests is something I’d urge the Prime Minister to pursue.”
“The last presidential visit was in 2014. Since that time the world has changed significantly,” she said.
“To deepen shared understanding of each nations’ interests a presidential visit to Australia would be an important opportunity to ensure Australia and America continue to stand shoulder to shoulder in a volatile world.”
Senator Coons said the US-Australian relationship was “close and longstanding”.
While the relationship would not turn on whether Mr Albanese and Mr Trump had an in-person meeting, he said that “when you are sitting in the same room, watching and talking with someone you have a better conversation. You have a better dialogue with each other in person. So, yes, of course I would see a real value in President Trump making a priority of sitting down with Prime Minister Albanese”.
Mr Turner also said he thought an in-person meeting between both leaders would be a positive development.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/us-politicians-back-aukus-and-bigger-defence-spend/news-story/ec52d0ab3900e94e23e6c6684f7af0bd
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109540
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470421 (160619ZAUG25) Notable: Beijing accuses Australia of fabricating ‘Chinese espionage threat’ – China’s Ministry of State Security has accused Australia of fabricating espionage threats while itself running covert operations, in a rare rebuke after the arrest of a Chinese woman in Canberra charged with foreign interference. The ministry said it had cracked “multiple espionage cases” instigated by Australian intelligence, accusing Canberra of “self-dramatization” and “persecution fantasies”. It denounced “Chinaphobia” among Australian politicians, while citing trade ties and calling for stability and cooperation. The remarks followed ASIO chief Mike Burgess warning that China, Russia and Iran are leading sources of espionage against Australia.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109325
>>109378
>>109469
>>109483
Beijing accuses Australia of fabricating ‘Chinese espionage threat’
MOHAMMAD ALFARES and SARAH ISON - 15 August 2025
Beijing has accused Australia of fabricating a “Chinese espionage threat” while secretly running covert operations against the Asian nation, in a rare rebuke less than two weeks after a Chinese woman was charged with foreign interference in Canberra.
In a statement published on its official WeChat account, China’s Ministry of State Security accused Australian agencies of hyping the “serious threat” of foreign spying, casting themselves as innocent “victims” in what it called unfounded claims about Chinese espionage.
It said China had in recent years uncovered multiple Australian-instigated spy cases, acted “in accordance with the law” and moved to protect its sovereignty, security and development interests.
“Australian intelligence agencies advocated the ‘serious threat’ posed by foreign espionage activities to Australia, and even packaged themselves as innocent ‘victims’ in groundless accusations of ‘Chinese espionage threat’,” the Chinese ministry’s statement said.
“In recent years, China’s state security organs have successively cracked a number of espionage cases against China instigated by Australian intelligence agencies in accordance with the law, effectively safeguarding China’s sovereignty, security and development interests.”
The statement accused “some forces” in Australia of not wanting to see a healthy relationship with China and making “false accusations”.
The statement comes after – but did not directly reference – the arrest this month of a Chinese woman in Canberra, who has since been charged with reckless foreign interference, accused of allegedly spying on Buddhist association Guan Yin Citta for China’s Public Security Bureau.
According to a translation of the text, the statement said the language revealed Australia had “anxiety” about its own security despite being an island continent with many natural geographic advantages.
“Australia’s smear campaign against China will only lose its morality in the international community … and will do nothing to safeguard Australia’s security interests,” the translated statement said.
“Since 2009, China has been Australia’s largest trading partner … It is in Australia’s national interest to promote the sustained and sound development of China-Australia relations.”
The statement acknowledged that, thanks to “joint efforts”, China-Australia relations had gradually emerged from a previous low point, bringing “tangible benefits to the two peoples”.
“However, for some time now, the ‘Chinaphobia’ and ‘anti-China’ paranoia of some politicians in Australia has not improved, and they frequently take negative actions on China-related issues,” it said.
“The erroneous words and deeds run counter to the correct direction pointed out by the leaders of the two countries.”
The statement said that “as a responsible major country, China has always adhered to the concept of common, comprehensive, cooperative and sustainable security and promoted the realisation of common international security”.
“At the new beginning of the second decade of the China-Australia comprehensive strategic partnership, the two sides should continue to enhance strategic mutual trust, deepen and expand mutually beneficial co-operation, broadly cultivate people-to-people friendship, jointly address risks and challenges, and provide more stability and certainty to the international community through practical security co-operation in the same direction,” it said.
The remarks appeared to seize on a recent speech by ASIO director-general Mike Burgess, in which he warned that “nation states are spying at unprecedented levels, with unprecedented sophistication.”
Mr Burgess singled out China, Russia, and Iran as three of the main sources of espionage activity, though he acknowledged that many countries were attempting to steal Australia’s secrets.
The ministry also accused Canberra of “self-dramatisation” over national security, saying its intelligence agencies were guilty of “malicious speculation” and “groundless persecution fantasies”. It said Australia was attempting to portray itself as a victim, adding it was “irrational and unprofessional”.
“This latest performance by Australia’s intelligence agencies may be an act of fetching chestnuts from the fire on behalf of others, or perhaps another forced ‘assigned essay’, but in any case it appears irrational and unprofessional,” the translated statement says.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/beijing-accuses-australia-of-fabricating-chinese-espionage-threat/news-story/e9904fcb0443500686109b047bfdd3ac
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109541
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470424 (160621ZAUG25) Notable: China’s MSS issues commentary article warning Australian intelligence agencies not to exaggerate their actions — "The head of Australia's security intelligence agency recently delivered a speech, making unfounded claims that ‘espionage’ activities from multiple countries, including China, pose a threat to Australia… this attempt to fabricate and hype a ‘Chinese espionage threat’ reflects the unwillingness of certain forces in Australia to see a healthy and stable development of China-Australia relations… Australia is accustomed to engaging in ‘small tricks,’ frequently making baseless complaints and harboring unwarranted suspicions… Australian intelligence agencies have never been the victim… there is no factual basis or evidence to support their claims… Rumors stop with the wise, and facts speak louder than words." — The Global Times
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109540
China’s MSS issues commentary article warning Australian intelligence agencies not to exaggerate their actions
Global Times - Aug 15, 2025
China’s Ministry of State Security (MSS) issued a commentary article on Friday, warning Australian intelligence agencies not to exaggerate their actions.
The head of Australia's security intelligence agency recently delivered a speech, making unfounded claims that “espionage” activities from multiple countries, including China, pose a threat to Australia. According to the article posted on the MSS’s official WeChat account on Friday, this attempt to fabricate and hype a "Chinese espionage threat" reflects the unwillingness of certain forces in Australia to see a healthy and stable development of China-Australia relations, engaging in groundless speculation and sensationalism.
Such malicious conjecture and unfounded victim mentality not only recycle the familiar narrative of viewing China through a "gray filter," but also expose Australia's "excessive anxiety" over its own security, said the article. Australia is really overthinking it, the article said.
Australia is the only country in the world that occupies an entire continent and is one of the few sovereign nations without land neighbors, enjoying a unique geographical advantage that could allow it to focus on its own development with a detached stance. However, as one of the Five Eyes Alliance countries, Australia’s intelligence agencies often take the initiative to get involved in great-power conflicts and assist certain countries in global intelligence-gathering activities, which is off-putting and unwelcome, said the article.
In terms of relations with China, Australia is accustomed to engaging in "small tricks," frequently making baseless complaints, acting with a guilty conscience, and harbor unwarranted suspicions toward other nations. The article stated that Australia’s attempts to slander and smear China will only lead to a loss of moral standing in the international community, and will neither damage China's image as a responsible major country nor serve Australia's security interests.
Since 2009, China has been Australia's largest trading partner, top source of imports, and largest export market for 16 consecutive years, fostering the steady, healthy development of China-Australia relations, which aligns with Australia's national interests. Currently, with joint efforts, China-Australia relations have recently emerged from a low point and are on a path of recovery, bringing benefits to the peoples of both countries, the article noted.
However, for some time now, the "China-phobia" and "anti-China" paranoia of certain Australian politicians have persisted, as they frequently adopt negative actions and false rhetoric regarding China, running counter to the direction set by the leaders of both countries. In the context of further advancing and improving China-Australia relations, they continue to cling to erroneous views that demonize and stigmatize China, fueling negative narratives and sensationalizing the fictitious "Chinese espionage threat." This kind of baseless "self-dramatization" can only invite ridicule from the world, the article said.
Ironclad facts show that in the realm of international covert struggles, Australian intelligence agencies have never been the victim. In recent years, Chinese national security authorities have lawfully uncovered multiple espionage cases orchestrated by Australian intelligence agencies against China, effectively safeguarding China’s sovereignty, security, and development interests, the article said.
The Australian security intelligence agency’s hype of the "serious threat" posed by foreign espionage activities, and their unfounded accusations of a "Chinese espionage threat," serve only to portray themselves as innocent "victims." Apart from some speculative assumptions and sensationalized conjectures, there is no factual basis or evidence to support their claims. This performance may be an attempt to take advantage of others' misfortunes or a forced exercise in rhetoric, but in any case, it appears lacking in rationality and professionalism, according to the article.
Rumors stop with the wise, and facts speak louder than words, said the MSS in the article. As a responsible major country, China has consistently upheld to a security vision that is common, comprehensive, cooperative, and sustainable, working to advance of international common security, according to the MSS.
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202508/1340931.shtml
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109542
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470435 (160633ZAUG25) Notable: Convicted sex offender and former Melbourne headmistress accused of sexual assault in prison — Malka Leifer, jailed for abusing students at the Addas Israel School, has allegedly assaulted a younger Aboriginal inmate in Melbourne’s maximum-security Dame Phyllis Frost Centre. The alleged incident, said to be captured on CCTV, has seen her moved to solitary confinement for 23 hours a day. Leifer was previously reported to have kissed fellow inmate and conwoman Samantha Azzopardi. Her victims, including Dassi Erlich, Nicole Meyer and Elly Sapper, said the new allegations show “she has a pattern, it doesn’t stop just because she is in prison.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109518
Convicted sex offender and former Melbourne headmistress accused of sexual assault in prison
Notorious former headmistress and serial rapist Malka Leifer is accused of a horrific act “on camera” inside Melbourne’s max security prison.
Rohan Smith - August 11, 2025
1/2
The former headmistress of a Melbourne school who raped her students has allegedly sexually assaulted a much younger woman inside Melbourne’s maximum security women’s prison.
Malka Leifer, 58, previously ruled over the ultra-orthodox Addas Israel School in the Melbourne suburb of Elsternwick before she was jailed for 15 years for repeated sexual abuse against students in her care.
The convicted predator sexually abused sisters Nicole Meyer, Elly Sapper and Dassi Erlich on campus, in a school office, in her home and on school camps. The dual Israeli-Australian citizen fled to Israel and remained there from 2008 until 2021 before she was extradited to Melbourne to face justice.
News.com.au earlier this year exclusively revealed that Leifer had kissed the troubled conwoman Samantha Azzopardi while locked up together inside the protection unit at the Dame Phyllis Frost Centre.
Azzopardi is best known for dressing up and posing as a vulnerable “schoolgirl” to get money from her victims.
News.com.au can now reveal that Leifer has been sent to solitary confinement at the facility in Melbourne’s north over an alleged incident involving a younger inmate — one that sources say happened in full view of “CCTV cameras”.
The incident allegedly occurred in late July inside the Murray Unit where inmates are segregated for their own protection.
A source with knowledge of the incident told news.com.au the alleged victim was “a young woman who was only recently moved to (protection) from the compound”.
“There was camera footage of it in the hallway of the Murray Unit,” the source said.
The alleged victim is believed to be a “young Koori girl” — an Aboriginal inmate in her 20s.
Leifer, who is a mother of eight children and is “disliked” in prison because she is “arrogant and entitled”, is now confined to a tiny cell for 23 hours a day where she cannot mix with other inmates.
Her only taste of freedom each day will include a 20-minute visit to the airing yard or a trip to the loungeroom where the TV does not work.
The added perks she has been accustomed to in prison, including a mircrowave and cooking equipment in her room, did not travel with her to an area of the prison referred to colloquially as “the slot”.
The Department of Justice and Victoria Police were approached for comment.
A Department of Justice spokesperson said they cannot comment on individual prisoners but “all allegations of sexual assault or violence in Victorian prisons are referred to Victoria Police for investigation”.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109543
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470518 (160710ZAUG25) Notable: Video: More Hamas officials welcome Albanese’s recognition move, as PM warns against propaganda — Two senior Hamas figures have backed Australia’s decision to recognise Palestine, deepening criticism from the opposition that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has emboldened terrorists. Hamas media director Ismail Al-Thawabta said recognition “reflects a growing global awareness” and urged Australia to apply “diplomatic pressure to end the Israeli occupation.” Senior Hamas official Basem Naim added that recognition needed “teeth” or the conflict would remain in a “violent vicious circle.” Albanese warned Hamas spreads propaganda and said the Arab League had united in July to demand the group be disarmed and excluded from Gaza’s governance.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109520
>>109521
>>109528
More Hamas officials welcome Albanese’s recognition move, as PM warns against propaganda
Matthew Knott - August 14, 2025
1/2
Two senior Hamas officials have confirmed the organisation welcomes Australia’s decision to recognise a Palestinian state, as Opposition Leader Sussan Ley doubled down in her criticism of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese for being praised by a listed terrorist group.
But Albanese hit back, citing a post in a Hamas Telegram channel disavowing an earlier statement from the group celebrating Australia’s move to recognise a Palestinian state, and told media outlets on Thursday not to promote propaganda from the militant organisation.
Hamas media director Ismail Al-Thawabta used similar language to that of the office of jailed senior Hamas official Hassan Yousef, which provided a statement praising the recognition decision to this masthead on Tuesday.
“We welcome Australia’s decision to recognise the State of Palestine, and consider it a positive step towards the legitimate rights of the Palestinian people,” Al-Thawabta told the ABC.
A statement on a Telegram channel in Hamas’ name on Thursday had disavowed comments attributed to Yousef in this masthead on Wednesday, saying that he had been “held in poor detention conditions, cut off from the outside world, and has no means of communication with any local or international press outlets”.
The original comments were provided by Yousef’s office in Beitunia, a town near Ramallah in the occupied West Bank, which issues statements on his behalf.
Contacted on Thursday, a spokesperson for the office confirmed it had released the statement and that Youssef was still in jail, but said he was expected to be released soon.
With many of its top leaders killed and imprisoned in recent years, and with surviving officials scattered throughout multiple countries, Hamas’ communications can be unco-ordinated and at times contradictory. The group has more and less radical elements, and engages in information warfare to help achieve its military aims.
Al-Thawabta, who is based in Gaza, said in his comments originally provided to the ABC that Australia’s move to recognise a Palestinian state “reflects a growing global awareness of the necessity to end the injustice suffered by our people for decades”.
“We call on the Australian government to translate this recognition into concrete actions — by exerting diplomatic pressure to end the Israeli occupation.”
Al-Thawabta added that “while recognition has come late”, the move was “better late than never”.
Albanese on Monday confirmed that Australia would recognise a state of Palestine at the United Nations next month, following similar moves from France, the United Kingdom and Canada in an international push to revive momentum for a two-state solution.
Albanese told Channel Seven’s Sunrise earlier this week: “Hamas will be totally opposed to this decision. Hamas don’t support two states, they support one state.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109544
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470656 (160741ZAUG25) Notable: Warning from Washington: Speak out about Chinese threat or risk AUKUS subs — US figures have warned Australia must be more explicit about China’s military threat or risk the AUKUS submarine pact. John Bolton said Labor was “less vocal” than past governments, while naval expert Bryan Clark argued Australia was “reticent to explicitly call out” using the subs against China. Alexander Gray added that Australia’s shifting rhetoric caused “discomfort” in Washington. Penny Wong’s office rejected the criticism, saying Australia had been “clear and consistent” on China, and stressed AUKUS strengthened regional peace.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109316
>>109512
>>109347
Warning from Washington: Speak out about Chinese threat or risk AUKUS subs
Michael Koziol - August 14, 2025
1/2
Washington: Australia must speak more clearly about the threats posed by China, including how it would respond to a regional conflict, or risk the AUKUS submarine agreement, Indo-Pacific experts in the United States are warning.
John Bolton, who served as Donald Trump’s national security adviser in his first term, and held senior roles in other Republican administrations, said policymakers in Washington had noted the Albanese government was “less vocal about what the problem is” compared with its predecessors.
“It is a little hard to get used to,” Bolton said in an interview. “In the Cold War days, Labour governments in Great Britain were just as anti-communist as the Conservatives. When you see a leftist government that’s not willing to talk as openly about what the real threat is, it does make some people nervous.
“I would be less than fully candid if I said it didn’t make me a little nervous. Why the hell are we worried about talking about what the threat is? The struggle is on, and we ought to be candid about it.”
Naval operations expert Bryan Clark, a senior fellow at the conservative Hudson Institute with close links to the administration, said the AUKUS review was about putting Australia on notice that the US expected Australia to use the submarines it bought.
“The Australians have been a little reticent to explicitly call out that they might use them against China,” he told this masthead. “If you’re not willing to say it in public, then you’re not going to put the Chinese on notice. It has been privately conveyed in the past, but the US would like Australia to make it more public.”
Clark noted – as have other prominent defence experts in Washington – that AUKUS represented a significant portion of the Australian defence budget, especially at the current level of defence spending.
“That’s the concern in the US – that you’re spending 10 to 20 per cent of your procurement budget on this one system, yet you’re not talking about how you might use it,” he said.
Referring to the Pentagon, he said: “There’s definitely some questions on their part about why isn’t Australia being more straightforward about why they are buying these submarines.”
The reluctance to be more explicit made people in the administration believe that “short of a direct attack on Australia, these submarines are probably not going to be in the mix”, Clark said.
Alexander Gray, who was National Security Council chief of staff during Trump’s first term and is now at the Atlantic Council, said the American perception was that Labor had eased its rhetoric on China compared to the Morrison or Turnbull governments.
“You see what looks like a consensus among DFAT [Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade] and Department of Defence folks in Australia – bureaucrats, experts – on the China threat, but the language that comes from politicians is much more dependent on who’s in power,” Gray said.
“I think there’s a little bit of discomfort in our system with a China narrative that can so easily change based on who’s in power. That type of strategic clarity, even if it’s not spoken directly, is going to be an evolving American expectation as we go forward with AUKUS.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109545
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470712 (160753ZAUG25) Notable: No free ride in defence of free world, Pentagon tells Indo-Pacific — The Pentagon has warned Australia and Japan must lift defence spending to NATO’s 5 per cent of GDP benchmark or risk undermining AUKUS and collective deterrence against China. US officials said Canberra was not spending enough “even for Pillar 1” of AUKUS and urged allies to “step up” ahead of a critical 2027 window when Beijing could seize Taiwan. Defence Minister Richard Marles insisted AUKUS remained secure, citing US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth’s backing, despite policy chief Elbridge Colby’s scepticism.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109316
>>109405
>>109512
No free ride in defence of free world, Pentagon tells Indo-Pacific
US Defence chiefs demand Australia match European NATO spending levels of 5pc of GDP as China threat looms ahead of critical 2027 deadline.
JOE KELLY - August 13, 2025
1/2
The US Defence Department is aiming to integrate Australia and other Asian allies into a stronger collective defence framework focused on deterring Beijing and safeguarding Taiwan, warning that partners in the Indo-Pacific must not “sit back while the Europeans are stepping up”.
As Canberra and Washington prepare to mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II on Friday, the Pentagon has made clear its plans to strengthen collective defence as an urgent priority in the lead-up to 2027, when it is thought China will be capable of seizing Taiwan.
It can also be revealed that Anthony Albanese’s Curtin Oration last month raised questions among senior figures in the Trump administration.
In the address, the Prime Minister praised Labor’s wartime leader John Curtin for standing up to UK prime minister Winston Churchill and US president Franklin Roosevelt during World War II – a jarring message in Washington, given its reassessment of AUKUS and the push for Australia to lift defence spending.
Defence officials in Washington said they did not believe Australia was spending enough “even for Pillar 1” of the AUKUS deal, under which the US has agreed to provide at least three nuclear-powered Virginia-class submarines to Canberra from the early 2030s.
“Our allies have to do their part,” a US Defence official told The Australian. “We’re coming up to the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. The lesson to take in commemorating the end of the war in the Pacific is the need for real efforts and readiness for collective defence.
“All countries have political difficulties. All countries have fiscal difficulties. All countries have constitutional restrictions. Yet we have to be able to defend ourselves in ways that are realistic, equitable and sustainable.”
The key priorities of the US Defence Department were given as defending the homeland, deterring China, revitalising the defence industrial base and “getting the allies to do more in order to pick up slack”.
The Australian was told that the ongoing AUKUS review was “designed to be fact-based, rigorous, and empirical”.
It will include Pillar 1, which relates to provision of the Virginia-class – and later the AUKUS-class – nuclear-powered submarines to Australia, as well as Pillar 2, which relates to the sharing of advanced defence technologies.
“I think the main thrust of the review is to give people a real brass-tacks, clear-eyed understanding of where things stand,” a US Defence official said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109546
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470744 (160803ZAUG25) Notable: Brisbane the best stage for Australia’s first Quad summit, says Anthony Albanese — Anthony Albanese has backed Queensland Premier David Crisafulli’s bid for Brisbane to host the 2026 Quad Leaders’ Summit, calling it a “great” chance to showcase the city ahead of the 2032 Olympics. Albanese said he would “make sure” the meeting of Australia, the US, Japan and India takes place in Queensland, amid doubts over this year’s planned summit in New Delhi. Crisafulli said bipartisan support was “heartening” as he prepares to lobby Narendra Modi and Shigeru Ishiba later this month.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109532
Brisbane the best stage for Australia’s first Quad summit, says Anthony Albanese
MACKENZIE SCOTT - August 13, 2025
Anthony Albanese has endorsed Queensland’s pitch for Brisbane to host the powerful Quad Leaders’ Summit next year, saying it would be a “great” opportunity to put the city on the international stage ahead of the 2032 Olympic Games.
The Prime Minister on Wednesday threw his support behind Queensland Premier David Crisafulli’s bid to secure Australia’s first meeting of the reformed Quad, which the state leader has also been selling in separate communications to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba in recent months.
The move comes as the first-term Premier works to repair relations between the key business partners, which were tested by the former Labor government.
Mr Albanese said he would work closely with Mr Crisafulli to “make sure” the meeting takes place in Queensland.
“In the lead up to Brisbane 2032, it is an opportunity to showcase this great global city to the world,” Mr Albanese said in Brisbane.
“Hosting of a Quad that brings together Australia, the United States, Japan and India, for major economies, will, of course, be a major international event.
“It attracts thousands of people, not just the four leaders, but it also attracts great international attention.”
The request comes as doubts remain over the next planned Indo-Pacific security meeting in New Delhi this year, due to disagreements between Mr Modi and US President Donald Trump over tariffs and geopolitical matters.
No date has been set, although the meeting dialogue may be held as early as September.
Queensland’s bid to host the summit is in part to repair the state’s business relationships with some of the region’s largest economic players after policies of the previous government created tensions with big business.
Indian conglomerate Adani’s proposed coalmine was accused by the country’s business leaders of being politicised in 2017.
Later, the Palaszczuk government’s decision to hike coal royalties without warning in 2022 was labelled as insulting by then-Japanese ambassador Shingo Yamagami, who urged the government to reconsider.
Mr Crisafulli said Mr Albanese’s bipartisan support was “heartening” ahead of this planned overseas delegation at the end of August. He first raised the idea of hosting the Quad publicly in July.
“We are in lock-step and I intend to take that pitch directly to business and political leaders in India and Japan later this month,” he said.
“I’m serious about securing the extraordinary opportunities our major trading partners can provide for communities right across our state as we push our way on to the world stage.
“We’re on the doorstep of something very special in this state, and I believe if we can get Queensland to be the Q in the Quad, it will better protect our lifestyle through a stronger economy.”
The two leaders, both of Italian heritage, have previously boasted about their strong relationship and “cannoli diplomacy”.
A report released last month revealed the Olympic and Paralympic Games are expected to drive a $71bn boost in Queensland’s gross domestic product in the two decades following the month-long sporting event if the government invests in driving economic reform.
Southeast Queensland alone could generate $40m in extra gross regional project.
Construction is yet to begin on major venues of the Games, including the centrepiece 63,000-seat stadium at Brisbane’s Victoria Park.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/brisbane-the-best-stage-for-australias-first-quad-summit-says-anthony-albanese/news-story/aad42582d02b625d3dfd4c1b57b3ac51
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109547
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470811 (160823ZAUG25) Notable: Australia and Vanuatu agree to $500m deal, but details remain scarce — Australia and Vanuatu have “initialled” the landmark Nakamal Agreement on Mount Yasur, with Canberra pledging about $500m over a decade for climate resilience, infrastructure, security and labour mobility. Deputy PM Richard Marles said the pact reflects a “shared destiny,” while Vanuatu PM Jotham Napat called it a “win-win.” Visa-free travel, demanded by Napat, remains unresolved, with Australia offering only to discuss easing requirements. Analysts say the deal strengthens Australia’s position against China’s growing influence in Vanuatu.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Australia and Vanuatu agree to $500m deal, but details remain scarce
Stephen Dziedzic and Lillyrose Welwel - 13 August 2025
1/2
Senior ministers from Australia and Vanuatu have trooped to the top of an active volcano on the island of Tanna for a ceremony to celebrate a major new pact between the two countries.
Foreign Minister Penny Wong, Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles and Pacific Minister Pat Conroy joined their counterparts from Vanuatu on the top of Mount Yasur to "initial" the landmark Nakamal Agreement ahead of formal signature by prime ministers next month.
Australia is set to funnel some $500 million into Vanuatu over a decade under the pact, which will supplant a bilateral security agreement that was effectively scrapped by the Pacific nation after it was signed in 2022.
While most of the details in the agreement are not yet public, Australia has labelled it "transformational", and Mr Marles says it reflects the two nations have a "shared destiny".
"What this agreement really does is, for the first time, acknowledge what has always been the truth, and that is that as two nations, we are family and that our future is very much bound together," Mr Marles said.
The Prime Minister of Vanuatu Jotham Napat declared the deal a "win-win" for both countries.
"The agreement that has entered today will transpire into a lot of great benefits between the two countries, whether it be the security agreement, economic transformation, with some specific focus on the mobile labour mobility and financial support," Mr Napat told journalists in Tanna.
Under the agreement, Australia is expected to funnel funding into a host of areas, including climate resilience, key infrastructure, security support, labour mobility and budget support.
There were some last-minute negotiations to secure an in-principle agreement ahead of the ministers' arrival, with officials from Vanuatu telling the ABC that both sides had to make some late concessions in order to secure the pact.
Mr Marles would not be drawn on exactly what financial commitments Australia had made, but said the Nakamal Agreement "acknowledges our shared economic connection".
He added it "makes clear that it is core business for Australia to be engaged in the human development of Vanuatu".
It is also not clear if the arrangement will make it easier for Ni-Vanuatu to travel to Australia.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109548
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470848 (160837ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Jacinta Allan blasts concerns over gender-clinic pipeline in schools — Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan has dismissed as “disgraceful nonsense” claims of a “school-to-gender-clinic pipeline,” backing the state’s Respectful Relationships curriculum, which now teaches children as young as five that body parts may not match gender and allows biologically male students who identify as female to play on girls’ teams. Critics, citing the Cass review in the UK, warn of weak evidence for puberty blockers and hormones, while psychiatrists argue the model risks misdiagnosis. Allan said schools must support transgender students, who face far higher suicide risks.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73621 (pb)
>>109282
>>109499
Jacinta Allan blasts concerns over gender-clinic pipeline in schools
RACHEL BAXENDALE - August 13, 2025
1/2
Jacinta Allan has dismissed as “disgraceful nonsense” the view of the mother of a gender dysphoric child that there is a “school to gender clinic pipeline” in Victoria, and backed the state’s “Respectful Relationships” curriculum.
The Australian revealed on Thursday Victoria’s curriculum has been updated to teach children as young as five that their body parts may not match their gender, and that biologically male students who identify as female are entitled to play sport on girls’ teams.
Concern over the “Respectful Relationships” curriculum, which was quietly amended in August last year, comes as parents and psychiatrists warn of a “school-to-clinic pipeline” for children struggling with adolescence who are persuaded they were born in the wrong body, and pushed towards irreversible and often harmful medical treatment.
Responding to the report on Thursday, the Victorian Premier said Respectful Relationships had been expanded “in response to the ongoing perpetration of violence against women” and “the ongoing rise of the number of kids who are bullied”.
“I have seen first hand how important the respectful relationships program is because it’s in my kids’ school, and so yes, I back the respectful relationships program and the curriculum, that is all about protecting kids, strengthening resilience of kids, and supporting kids to be who they are across our schools, to help other kids understand why respecting difference is so important,” Ms Allan said.
“This ongoing campaign against the respectful relationships by The Australian speaks about, does not recognise the transformative difference this program is making every single day in schools.”
Asked to respond to the view of a spokeswoman for Parents of Adolescents with Gender Distress that the policy at Victorian schools of affirming children’s chosen genders is resulting in a “school to clinic pipeline” towards irreversible medical treatment, Ms Allan said the view was “just nonsense”.
“It’s disgraceful, nonsense. Like, seriously, this sort of ongoing attack on a program that is making a difference in kids’ lives, just should be stopped,” she said.
“It should be stopped. It’s disgraceful reporting. It’s hurtful. When you consider the incidents, that transgender kids are 15 times more likely to kill themselves, we should be supporting them.
“We should be supporting them across our schools, across our society, across our community. The Australian needs to stop this ongoing campaign, because it’s hurtful and harmful.”
The gender-affirming care model has been abandoned in a number of overseas jurisdictions, including the UK, where an independent review by pediatrician Hilary Cass last year concluded that the evidence base for medical interventions such as puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones was “remarkably weak”.
Asked, in light of the Cass review, why Victoria is persisting with the gender affirming care model, Ms Allan did not engage with the finding of the review.
“Perhaps I was not clear enough in my previous answer. I’ll repeat again, transgender kids are 15 times more likely to kill themselves,” the Premier said.
“So whether it’s across our schooling system or across our health system, supporting those kids and supporting those families should be a priority because it’s the right thing to do.
“What’s not right, what’s not right is this ongoing campaign to tear down programs that are about strengthening kids’ resilience. It’s about preventing bullying. It’s about protecting kids against future harm.”
Initiated in 2016 as a response to Victoria’s family violence royal commission, Respectful Relationships is a teaching resource designed by the state Education Department with the aim of “preventing family violence by promoting gender equality and teaching children about respectful relationships”.
The revised curriculum for “foundation level” – children in the first year of primary school – includes a case study of a transgender girl called “Stacey”.
“She dresses like the other girls, plays with them and everything seems fine,” the sample lesson plan states. “But one day, Lara says Stacey should be in the boys’ team at sports, not the girls’ team.”
They are advised to tell their students that “Stacey” could respond by saying: “Yes I can play with the girls’ team because I am a girl!”, or “Go and ask the teacher if you don’t believe me. Our teacher says I belong in the girls team.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109549
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470875 (160848ZAUG25) Notable: Parents of gender dysphoric kids hit back at Jacinta Allan — Parents representing more than 50 Victorian families have written to Premier Jacinta Allan after she dismissed warnings of a “school to gender clinic pipeline” as “disgraceful nonsense.” The group, Parents of Adolescents with Gender Distress, challenged Allan’s claim that transgender children are “15 times more likely” to commit suicide, accusing her of using “alarmist and irresponsible” figures without reliable data. They argued the Respectful Relationships curriculum is pushing children toward harmful medicalisation and requested a meeting to share lived experiences, after being refused access to Education Minister Ben Carroll.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73621 (pb)
>>109282
>>109499
>>109548
Parents of gender dysphoric kids hit back at Jacinta Allan
'RACHEL BAXENDALE - August 14, 2025
A group representing more than 50 Victorian parents of children with gender dysphoria has hit back at Jacinta Allan after she dismissed the views of one as “disgraceful nonsense”, writing to the Premier to ask that she meet them to hear their concerns.
Parents of Adolescents with Gender Distress has also taken issue with Ms Allan’s assertion that transgender children are 15 times more likely to commit suicide than their peers, accusing her of citing inaccurate data and making “alarmist and irresponsible” claims.
The Australian revealed on Thursday Victoria’s curriculum had been updated to teach children as young as five that their body parts may not match their gender, and biologically male students who identify as female are entitled to play sport on girls’ teams.
Concern over the Respectful Relationships curriculum prompted a spokeswoman from PAGD to warn of a “school to gender clinic pipeline”, arguing children struggling with adolescence are being persuaded they were born in the wrong body and pushed towards irreversible and often harmful medical treatment.
Asked to respond to the views of the spokeswoman, whom The Australian has agreed not to name to protect her child’s privacy, Ms Allan said the notion of a “school to clinic pipeline” was “nonsense”.
“It’s disgraceful nonsense. Like, seriously, this sort of ongoing attack on a program that is making a difference in kids’ lives just should be stopped,” she said.
“It should be stopped. It’s disgraceful reporting. It’s hurtful. When you consider the incidence, that transgender kids are 15 times more likely to kill themselves, we should be supporting them,” the Premier said.
In a letter sent to Ms Allan on Thursday afternoon, PAGD sought a meeting with the Premier in light of her “recent dismissive comments concerning the operation of the Respectful Relationships program and its impact on our gender distressed children”.
“We would welcome the opportunity to discuss our concerns and lived experience with you,” PAGD wrote, adding they have been seeking meetings with Education Minister Ben Carroll and his departmental secretary for more than a year, “and they have refused to engage with us”.
“You made the alarming suggestion of a 15 times higher rate of suicide amongst transgender children. We believe this figure comes from survey data and concerned thoughts of suicide rather than completed suicide,” the parents wrote.
The data Ms Allan referenced appears to come from the website of advocacy group LGBTIQ+ Health Australia, which did not cite its source. The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare website states “there are … no reliable national data on rates of suicide and self-harm among LGBTIQ+ communities in Australia”.
Data from the world’s largest gender clinic, the UK’s Tavistock Clinic, shows that rates of suicide amongst youth referred to the clinic were slightly higher than the general population, and the same amongst those receiving treatment and those who were not.
Pediatrician Hilary Cass’s comprehensive independent review of gender identity services for children in the UK last year found that “the evidence does not adequately support the claim that gender affirming treatment reduces suicide risk”.
PAGD said Ms Allan’s remarks were “especially concerning considering experts caution against alarmist and irresponsible claims of suicide, particularly, as is the case here, when it’s not backed up by data”.
“Data shows suicide rates for transgender youth, while elevated, remain extremely low, and as many also suffer from co-occurring conditions (ASD (autism spectrum disorder), eating disorders, anxiety) which have similar levels of risk, a direct correlation can’t be made,” the parents wrote.
“Neither affirmation nor medicalisation impacts this suicide risk or suicidal ideation and there is no evidence that programs introducing unevidenced concepts of ‘gender identity’ are beneficial to the mental health of children or adolescents.
“We believe these programs which invite children to question their sex, and therefore their comfort in their own bodies, based on stereotypes, create unnecessary anxiety and confusion, particularly for gender-nonconforming or neurodiverse children.
“We hope that in the spirit of inclusivity you could meet with us to hear our personal stories.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/parents-of-gender-dysphoric-kids-hit-back-at-jacinta-allan/news-story/ac8c7932c4cf77c80953dc767b02f346
https://x.com/pagd_vic
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109550
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470911 (160903ZAUG25) Notable: COMMENTARY: Why amplifying suicide risk cynically inflames transgender row — "Victoria’s Premier, Jacinta Allan, is right about the risk of harm and wrong about the cause… Media scrutiny of social transition in schools is perfectly legitimate… If Allan wishes to prevent harm, she should stop the suicide scare campaign… Like politicians, journalists are supposed to follow mental health advice not to harp on the suicide risk of a particular group… The “transition or suicide” claim is a feature, not a bug, of the “gender-affirming” treatment model… The clearest study so far hails from Finland… suicide risk was driven not by gender distress but by the accompanying psychiatric problems." — Bernard Lane, writer of Gender Clinic News, The Australian
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73621 (pb)
>>109282
>>109548
>>109549
COMMENTARY: Why amplifying suicide risk cynically inflames transgender row
BERNARD LANE - August 15, 2025
Victoria’s Premier, Jacinta Allan, is right about the risk of harm and wrong about the cause (“Jacinta Allan blasts concerns over gender-clinic pipeline in schools”, 14/8).
Media scrutiny of social transition in schools is perfectly legitimate. Social transition – where adults reinforce a child’s alienation from his or her immutable birth sex – is akin to a clinical intervention with potentially lifelong effects. Parents should know about this. Canadian psychologist Ken Zucker, an international authority on gender dysphoria, argues that early social transition makes it more likely the child will go down the path of gender medicalisation, starting with puberty blockers.
If Allan wishes to prevent harm, she should stop the suicide scare campaign. Unable or unwilling to discuss social transition, she protested twice that “transgender kids are 15 times more likely to kill themselves”. Like politicians, journalists are supposed to follow mental health advice not to harp on the suicide risk of a particular group, nor to catastrophise or oversimplify the possible causes of suicide. Social contagion of suicide is a distinct possibility.
Allan is not alone in ignoring this danger. The “transition or suicide” claim is a feature, not a bug, of the “gender-affirming” treatment model championed by Victoria’s Labor government. Parents hesitant about signing off on blockers, hormones or a mastectomy for their child have been told to choose between a “dead daughter or a trans son”.
Why do suicide prevention experts remain silent when the “trans suicide narrative” is irresponsibly used to promote experimental medical treatments and to silence dissent?
Alarming statistics of the kind invoked by Allan typically come from low-quality, anonymous online surveys with no follow-up to verify the answers.
The resulting headlines reinforce the stereotype of vulnerability, which is likely to amplify responses to the next survey. Thoughts of suicide, distressing but not so unusual, are glibly conflated with actual suicide attempts. Activists seem untroubled by the possibility that suicide may become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Thankfully, it appears suicide among patients of pediatric gender clinics is rare and, in some cases, it follows treatment offered as “life-saving”. A study of the UK Tavistock clinic found four patients over 10 years known or suspected to have died by suicide out of a total of 15,000.
Zucker is among the clinicians who believe that although gender-dysphoria patients do have an elevated suicide risk compared to the general population, it is comparable to the risk of the wider group of young people with mental health problems. Clinicians are used to managing the suicide risk of depression; nobody expects a politician to recklessly publicise exaggerated risks in this context.
But Allan seems to think that deploying the term “transgender kids” marks the end of inquiry, not the start. The surge in young people identifying as the opposite sex or “non-binary” is complicated by disproportionate rates of mental health issues, autism and ADHD, as well as awkward same-sex attraction and, in some cases, past sexual abuse. What is it exactly that causes the suicide risk?
The clearest study so far hails from Finland, where researchers concluded suicide risk was driven not by gender distress but by the accompanying psychiatric problems. And the risk was not reduced by the hormonal or surgical treatments of gender medicine, a finding repeated by England’s historic Cass Review.
In 2020, Finland led the European shift away from the medicalised gender-affirming model. This more cautious therapeutic approach insists on an open-minded exploration of all the difficulties of a gender-distressed child, with priority treatment of any mental health disorders. To truly help these young people, it’s necessary to look beyond the “trans kids” slogan.
Bernard Lane, a former journalist with The Australian, writes Gender Clinic News.
'''If you or someone you know is at risk of suicide, call Lifeline (13 11 14), the Suicide Call Back Service (1300 659 467) or Beyond Blue (1300 224 636).
https://www.lifeline.org.au/
https://www.suicidecallbackservice.org.au/
https://www.beyondblue.org.au/
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/why-amplifying-suicide-risk-cynically-inflames-transgender-row/news-story/56e60a2e59cd15d14da16df0f23060e2
https://www.genderclinicnews.com/
https://qresear.ch/?q=Bernard+Lane
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109551
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470925 (160913ZAUG25) Notable: Finnish doctor Riittakerttu Kaltiala argues case for science in teen gender dysphoria care — Finnish psychiatrist Riittakerttu Kaltiala, who leads a national gender identity service in Finland, has warned that early medical interventions such as puberty blockers have shown “very weak” evidence of benefit and often failed to improve outcomes. She said most patients were teenage girls with “a long history of severe psychiatric issues” rather than lifelong dysphoria, and many did not thrive on hormone treatment. Finland’s cautious guidelines now stress psychosocial support and psychiatric care before any intervention. Kaltiala will present her findings in Adelaide at the Gender Healthcare Summit in October.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73621(pb)
>>109282
>>109548
>>109549
Finnish doctor Riittakerttu Kaltiala argues case for science in teen gender dysphoria care
DAVID PENBERTHY - 15 August 2025
1/3
Finnish psychiatrist Riittakerttu Kaltiala holds a unique and important position in the treatment of gender dysphoria. She has had a front-row seat for the introduction and subsequent rollback of gender-affirming care in her native Finland across the past 15 years.
She has done so not from the position of activist or ideologue but as a medical professional concerned with patient care, who believes she has a medical duty to call out practices that are failing to improve the lot of the unwell.
This is the conclusion she drew about the gender-affirming care treatments that were introduced for adolescents in Finland after 2010 but that have been wound back, so medical intervention and the use of puberty blockers now occur only in rarer cases where alternative treatments for perceived gender dysphoria prove ineffective.
Kaltiala is professor of adolescent psychiatry at Finland’s Tampere University and chief psychiatrist in the department of adolescent psychiatry at Tampere University Hospital. She also has been the leader of one of the two nationally centralised gender identity services for minors in Finland since 2011, when the services were first opened.
She will be a keynote speaker at the Coalition for Advancing Scientific Care Gender Healthcare Summit in Adelaide in October.
Ahead of her visit she spoke to The Australian about how Finland made its own transition away from a world where transitioning was being touted as the default option for troubled adolescents.
“In Finland, until 2010, medical gender reassignment and gender assessments and interventions were only available for legal adults,” Kaltiala says.
“Discussion started in society about whether this was a problem, whether it was aged-based discrimination that minors could not access these assessments.
“It was decided there must be a gender identity service for adolescents as well. It was decided that in adolescent psychiatry we had to provide this service for minors. So I was given this task and of course I set about to organise our team and we familiarised ourselves with the literature and we contacted other services that had been providing gender identity services for gender dysphoria.”
Kaltiala says that in the early 2010s what’s known as the Dutch model of care – early intervention with puberty blockers – was just emerging as the preferred treatment for younger people found to have gender dysphoria. She and her colleagues spoke with gender treatment clinics in Amsterdam, London and Stockholm, all of which were working in accordance with the Dutch protocols, and prepared to work along the same lines.
“The literature assumed that young people with lifelong gender dysphoria or cross-gender identification would find the onset of puberty stressful as they are developing undesired sex characteristics,” she says.
“The thinking was that this would risk the development of mental health issues as well.
“But when the patients started coming in they were nothing like they had been described in the literature. Given the small size of the population here in Finland we were only expecting a small number of patients. We were expecting they would predominantly have male sex. We also expected they would have only mild mental health issues.
“But actually, to our surprise, the patients were mainly biologically female, they presented well after puberty at an average of 16 years old, they had the onset of feelings of gender dysphoria well after the onset of puberty.
“Many of them, around two-thirds of them, had a long history of psychiatric need and psychiatric treatment. A long history of severe psychiatric issues, which predated any sense of gender dysphoria.
“So what was this about? We were very confused. Nevertheless, and especially because this was a new field, we made a very thorough assessment of all the patients and tried to make sure their feelings of identifying with the opposite sex would indicate a permanent and stable achieved identity rather than just being a phase of adolescent development.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109552
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470963 (160944ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Pro-trans rights protesters, police clash in the Melbourne CBD countering ‘Women Will Speak’ rally — Four arrests were made after about 80 pro-trans rights activists clashed with police during a counter-protest in Melbourne’s CBD. Police said three officers were injured but not hospitalised, with pepper spray deployed and one man charged after allegedly striking an officer with an umbrella. Protesters blocked cameras with umbrellas and harassed media. At Parliament, around 40 “Women Will Speak” attendees criticised anti-vilification laws and gender identity policies, with speakers warning women’s sex-based rights were being eroded. Police conducted 145 searches and ordered 50 protestors to remove face coverings.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73621 (pb)
>>109282
>>109548
>>109549
Pro-trans rights protesters, police clash in the Melbourne CBD countering ‘Women Will Speak’ rally
JOANNA PANAGOPOULOS - 16 August 2025
Victoria police have arrested four people as a group of pro-trans rights activists and police officers clashed in Melbourne’s CBD.
Three police officers were injured but did not require hospitalisation, police said.
About 80 pro-trans rights activists marched through the CBD on Saturday in counter-protest of a planned women’s rights rally at Parliament House over the Allan government’s new anti-vilification laws and women’s based sex rights.
The ‘Women Will Speak’ rally was organised by Women’s Voices Australia, and followed a similar protest in April.
The pro-trans rights protestors arrived about 11am, many dressed in black and with their faces covered.
Footage, taken by the Herald Sun, showed a group of the activists with face coverings clashing with police on Spring St towards Carlton Gardens. A number of were taken to the ground by police.
Four people were arrested.
“OC spray was deployed, and a 21-year-old Flemington man was arrested after he allegedly struck a police officer with an umbrella at the intersection of Russell and Lonsdale Streets just before 11.30am,” police said in a statement. The man was charged with assault.
A 19-year-old Wallington woman and a 27-year-old man from Coburg were arrested after allegedly being in possession of flares, and a 33-year-old Oakleigh South man was arrested for failing to move on. All are expected to be charged on summons.
A number used umbrellas to block the view of TV cameras and harassed media, the Herald Sun reported.
Police said three police officers were injured, but none required hospitalisation.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109553
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23470973 (160952ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Four arrested as pro-trans protesters clash with police — Four people were arrested after clashes between pro-trans rights protesters and police in Melbourne’s CBD. About 80 activists confronted a women’s rights rally at Parliament House before being pushed by police towards Carlton Gardens, where they chanted “trans liberation, not assimilation” and “all cops are Nazis.” A 21-year-old man was charged with assaulting police after allegedly striking an officer with an umbrella, while pepper spray was deployed and flares set off. Others were arrested for possessing flares and failing to move on. The women’s rally, attended by about 50 people, ended peacefully under heavy police presence.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73621 (pb)
>>109282
>>109548
>>109549
Four arrested as pro-trans protesters clash with police
Ashleigh McMillan - August 16, 2025
1/2
Four people have been arrested after scuffles broke out between pro-trans rights protesters and police officers on Saturday morning in Melbourne’s CBD.
About 80 pro-trans demonstrators arrived at Parliament House at 11am to counter a women’s rights rally taking place on the steps.
The counter-protest was pushed away from Parliament House as the Women Will Speak rally began, and moved towards Carlton Gardens.
Walking back through the CBD, pro-trans protesters yelled slogans including “trans liberation, not assimilation” and “all cops are Nazis”.
A 21-year-old Flemington man was arrested after he allegedly struck a police officer with an umbrella at the corner of Russell and Lonsdale streets about 11.30am. He was charged with assaulting police and was bailed.
Protesters and a police officer were hit with oleoresin capsicum spray as flares were set off.
The pro-trans group then walked back to Parliament House, where they were met with a large line of police officers. An officer, talking on a loudspeaker, told them not to approach the line.
At the corner of Albert and Gisborne streets, police approached a woman they believed had thrown a flare earlier and asked others to remove their masks. As police tried to arrest the woman, other protesters grabbed her and tried to pull her pack into the larger protest group. People were forced to the ground, unmasked and arrested.
A 19-year-old Wallington woman and a 27-year-old Coburg man were arrested for allegedly possessing flares and are expected to be charged on summons. A 33-year-old man from Oakleigh South was arrested for failing to move on and is also expected to be charged on summons.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109554
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23476554 (180907ZAUG25) Notable: ‘Sanction China’ plea from Hong Kong activist granted asylum, Ted Hui — Hong Kong pro-democracy activist Ted Hui, now granted asylum in Australia, has urged the Albanese government to impose Magnitsky-style sanctions on Hong Kong officials responsible for human rights abuses, including the 10-year jailing of Australian Gordon Ng. While praising his family’s new security, Hui said Canberra has shown “much greater attention” to Cheng Lei and Yang Hengjun, and asked why Ng has not received the same focus. He noted Hong Kong police have placed bounties on him and lawyer Kevin Yam, and said US-style sanctions would limit officials’ global reach.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109321
>>109337
>>109397
>>109428
‘Sanction China’ plea from Hong Kong activist granted asylum, Ted Hui
STEPHEN RICE - August 17, 2025
Hong Kong pro-democracy activist Ted Hui Chi-fung has pleaded with the Albanese government to impose sanctions on Hong Kong officials responsible for human rights abuses, including the 10-year jail sentence imposed on Australian Gordon Ng.
While expressing gratitude at being granted political asylum last week to remain in Australia, Mr Hui urged stronger action to free Mr Ng and other Hong Kong activists.
“There’s a lot of room for the Australian government to speak up a lot more and more strongly, and also for actions like putting sanctions over Hong Kong officials who infringe human rights in Hong Kong,” the now-Adelaide-based lawyer said.
“I’ve been making that request consistently over the years – I say that to (Foreign Minister) Penny Wong whenever I see her,” Mr Hui told The Australian. “I understand it’s complicated, but I think it’s about time to do it, because they spend a very long time in jail just for defending democratic rights.”
Mr Hui noted the much greater attention paid by the government to higher-profile cases like that of news anchor Cheng Lei, released by China in 2023, and writer Yang Hengjun, still imprisoned on spying charges.
“Gordon is also an Australian citizen – why doesn’t he deserve more attention to stronger positions by the Australian government, like how it has been done for Cheng Lei and Yang Hengjun?”
The former Hong Kong lawmaker fled Hong Kong while on bail in December 2020 after he was hit with criminal charges over his role in pro-democracy protests. He was granted a special travel exemption to enter Australia with his wife and children in March 2021 during the pandemic.
Mr Hui said the grant of asylum had brought the family a great sense of security. “We are very much relieved because we have been living in Australia for 4½ years and my wife and my kids are more settled. There were many questions in the past, but now those questions are answered by this protection.”
In July 2023, Hong Kong police placed a $HK1m bounty on Mr Hui and Melbourne-based Australian lawyer Kevin Yam, in an unprecedented application of the Beijing-authored National Security Law.
Chief Superintendent Steven Li said Hong Kong police “won’t stop chasing them” under a controversial law that bans acts of secession, subversion, terrorism and collusion with foreign forces, and was imposed under instructions from Beijing after months of protests in 2019.
Mr Hui said he would still be restricted in where he could travel, not only to those countries that had extradition treaties with China but even those that were simply friendly to Beijing.
“They might have diplomatic relations – I wouldn’t go to those countries unless they are free and open countries and democracies, so there’s half of the world I wouldn’t travel to,” he said.
“But think about those Hong Kong officials who put bounties and arrest warrants over my head – they’re sanctioned by the US, so there’s half the world where they can’t travel either, so that’s fair enough,” he says.
He said he would like to see the Australian government using its Magnitsky legislation to join the US in imposing sanctions on those same Hong Kong and Chinese officials.
“I haven’t seen any sanctions being put up by the Australian government for Hong Kong or Beijing officials who infringe on human rights in Hong Kong.
“It’s a pity and I can’t understand, but I’m still urging the government to do it.”
Earlier this year, Mr Hui was the target of a local intimidation campaign involving an anonymous letter purporting to be from Hong Kong authorities and offering a $HK1m reward for information leading to his arrest or the whereabouts of his family.
A fake pamphlet was also sent to Adelaide mosques claiming he wanted to “wage war” against “Islamic terrorism”.
“In terms of personal safety, I think I’m safe,” he said. “I have trust in the AFP, for example, who are really trying very hard to track down those people who sent the letters. They have been in constant communications with me, and they will call me from time to time to check on my safety.
“And with asylum status, I think it will be even better because those who are in Australia trying to do work for the Chinese government intimidating me, now they understand the Australian government’s stronger positions in giving me protections, and they would know there will be consequences.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/sanction-china-plea-from-hong-kong-activist-granted-asylum-ted-hui/news-story/f73926988843428ac6bc6ae97dc5d135
https://qresear.ch/?q=Ted+Hui
https://qresear.ch/?q=Gordon+Ng
https://qresear.ch/?q=Kevin+Yam
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109555
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23476569 (180927ZAUG25) Notable: Far-right Israeli politician's visa cancelled ahead of speaking tour — The federal government has cancelled the visa of Simcha Rothman, a far-right Israeli MP from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s coalition, blocking his planned speaking events in Australia and banning him from entry for three years. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said, “If you are coming to Australia to spread a message of hate and division, we don’t want you here.” Rothman, who has advocated expelling Palestinians from Gaza, denounced the decision as “blatant anti-Semitism.” The cancellation comes a week after Australia said it would recognise a Palestinian state at the UN next month.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73631 (pb)
>>109251
>>109520
>>109521
Far-right Israeli politician's visa cancelled ahead of speaking tour
Jake Evans - 18 August 2025
The federal government has cancelled the visa of Israeli politician Simcha Rothman, a member of Israel's far right Mafdal-Religious Zionism party, just days before he was due to arrive in Australia for a speaking event.
Mr Rothman, whose party is part of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's governing coalition, has previously advocated for the expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza, and denied claims of starvation in the territory.
In May Mr Rothman told the UK's Channel 4 that Britain should let Palestinians "run away" from Gaza, and if it did not, "you are aiding and abetting a terrorist organisation using them as human shields".
He added those refugees should not be accepted into Israel, however, because "they are our enemies".
"And according to international law, treaties about refugees in a time of war, you don't let them conquer your country with refugees," he said.
The Israeli politician was due to speak at events in Australia in a matter of days, including a Sydney event next Thursday hosted by the Australian Jewish Association.
But his visa has been cancelled, and Mr Simcha has been banned from travel to Australia for three years — a condition that is sometimes applied to a cancellation depending on the grounds it was cancelled on.
Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said Australia would not accept people travelling to cause division.
"Our government takes a hard line on people who seek to come to our country and spread division," Mr Burke said.
"If you are coming to Australia to spread a message of hate and division, we don't want you here.
"Under our government, Australia will be a country where everyone can be safe, and feel safe."
Rothman claims visa denial is 'anti-Semitic'
In a post on social media, Mr Rothman responded to the visa cancellation.
"In the decision to deny the visa, the Australian Home Affairs Minister claims that my presence and my words will have a serious impact on peace and the rule of law in Australia, meaning that the Islamist mob calling for the destruction of Israel on the streets of Sydney and Melbourne will not be happy about my presence," he wrote.
"I was invited by the community in Australia due to anti-Semitic attacks on synagogues and a strong sense of alienation and hostility within the community.
"The Australian government's decision to deny me the opportunity to come and speak to my people, due to expressing simple and clear positions, is clear and blatant anti-Semitism that gives a boost to terrorism."
Mr Rothman's visa cancellation is the first major action against a member of Israel's Knesset since the federal government's announcement last week that it would recognise a Palestinian state at next month's United Nations meeting.
Israeli minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, one of two government members sanctioned by Australia, accused the federal government on social media of aiding Hamas.
"The Australian government's active support for Hamas and terrorists, and the entry ban against MK Simcha Rothman, are a historical stain and a shame for the Australian government," Mr Ben-Gvir said in a post in Hebrew, translated to English.
"The cheers of joy by Israeli left-wing activists, Hamas collaborators, and Israel slanderers around the world, are a disgrace that will never be erased from their minds."
In June, Australia joined several other nations to impose sanctions on Mr Ben-Gvir and another minister, Bezalel Smotrich, accusing the men of inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank.
Mr Smotrich is the leader of the Mafdal-Religious Zionism party, of which Mr Rothman is a member.
Liberal senator Dave Sharma, who was previously an ambassador to Israel, said he was not aware of Mr Rothman during his time in Israel but that elected representatives should as a principle be granted entry to Australia.
"I would say that elected representatives from democratic nations, liberal democracies with friendly relations with Australia, the presumption should always be they are granted a visa, they are entitled to visit Australia, even if we don't always agree with their views," Senator Sharma told Sky News.
"I would like to know the basis on which Tony Burke has cancelled this visa because it seems as though it was issued. And what are the comments in particular that he finds so troubling that he think would incite social unrest here in Australia?"
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-08-18/simcha-rothman-visa-cancelled/105668088
https://x.com/rothmar/status/1957332583785669039
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109556
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23476575 (180931ZAUG25) Notable: Royal Randwick lined up for Pope visit on a bumper weekend — Sydney’s Royal Randwick racecourse is being considered to host a papal Mass in 2028 if Pope Leo XIV accepts Anthony Albanese’s invitation to attend the Catholic Church’s International Eucharistic Congress. Early planning has flagged September 30, coinciding with the AFL grand final in Melbourne and potentially disrupting the Epsom Handicap and NRL grand final weekend. The Archdiocese of Sydney said dates and venues were still open, with attendance expected to vary greatly depending on whether it marks the first papal visit to Australia in 20 years. Royal Randwick last hosted Pope Benedict XVI in 2008.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Royal Randwick lined up for Pope visit on a bumper weekend
Chris Barrett - August 15, 2025
Royal Randwick racecourse is in line to stage a papal Mass two decades after a crowd of 400,000 filled the venue for Pope Benedict XVI’s appearance at World Youth Day.
Sydney will host the Catholic Church’s International Eucharistic Congress in 2028 and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has invited the new head of the Vatican, Pope Leo XIV, to attend.
The American pontiff is yet to take up the offer, but the church has begun devising plans in the event he does, and Royal Randwick has been discussed as a favoured site for a large-scale public gathering.
It’s understood Saturday, September 30, of the October long weekend that year, has been raised as an option for a papal Mass in Sydney.
Such timing would force racing’s $1.5 million Epsom Handicap to be relocated from Royal Randwick and potentially cause disruption around the NRL grand final, which is typically played on the first Sunday of October. It would also be the same day as the AFL grand final in Melbourne.
The church congress, which Sydney is holding in 2028 for the first time in a century, is being organised by the Catholic Archdiocese of Sydney, which said dates and venues were still to be determined.
“There have been several dates touted for the [congress], but we are keeping options open because we are excited about the potential of having Pope Leo here and will obviously work around his availability, if he accepts the invite,” said Benjamin Galea, chief operating officer for the International Eucharistic Congress.
“Estimates of pilgrim numbers and sourcing of venues will differ greatly depending on whether we get our first papal visit in 20 years, and so these early stages are planning for several different possibilities.”
Galea said while the archdiocese had expressed its desire to have the Pope visit Australia, he expected any official acceptance would be made directly in response to Albanese’s invitation.
The quadrennial congress is not as big as World Youth Day, a week-long coming together of young Catholics from around the world.
But a crowd of 100,000 assembled in Budapest for the 2020 event, which was held in late 2021 due to the pandemic, for a closing Mass led by Pope Francis.
Royal Randwick’s 80 hectares and central location make it one of the few places suitable for such an occasion.
In 2008, there was resistance from Randwick-based racehorse trainers to World Youth Day, where more than 200,000 people slept overnight before a Mass fronted by Pope Benedict XVI.
It went ahead after the racing industry was promised $40 million in compensation from the state and federal governments, including $10.8 million for relocation of horses and staff while Randwick was shut down.
Railings had to be taken down and horses moved to temporary stables, but according to early discussions, the crowds for the closing Mass at the 2028 congress would be contained to the in-field and the grandstands rather than on the track itself.
That would prevent the racecourse being out of action for weeks on end, limiting the impact on other major races such as the $20 million The Everest, which is held in mid-October.
Albanese invited Pope Leo XIV to Australia at the Vatican after attending his inauguration Mass along with other world leaders at St Peter’s Basilica in May.
It was the first time an Australian prime minister and a pontiff had met in 16 years and the Pope blessed the rosary beads of Albanese’s late mother, Maryanne, who was Catholic.
The Chicago-born former cardinal is no stranger to Australia, having made several trips in his past capacity as prior general of the Order of St Augustine.
Then known as Robert Prevost, he delivered a Mass at Sydney’s Collaroy Beach after World Youth Day in 2008 and visited St Augustine’s College at Brookvale in 2008 and 2009.
According to the 2021 census, more than 5 million Australians – 20 per cent of the population – identified as being Catholic.
https://www.theage.com.au/national/nsw/royal-randwick-lined-up-for-pope-visit-on-a-bumper-weekend-for-sydney-20250814-p5mn01.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109557
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23476579 (180938ZAUG25) Notable: Citizenship reward for PNG warriors to fight for Australia in ADF — Thousands of Papua New Guineans will be able to gain Australian citizenship by joining the Australian Defence Force under a new treaty to be signed by Anthony Albanese and PNG Prime Minister James Marape on September 15. PNG Defence Minister Billy Joseph said the deal, timed with PNG’s 50th independence anniversary, would cement the nations as defence partners and allow up to 10,000 recruits. The agreement, addressing Australia’s workforce shortfall, will see PNG citizens serve in support roles while retaining dual nationality. Fiji is expected to join the scheme later.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73607 (pb)
Citizenship reward for PNG warriors to fight for Australia in ADF
BEN PACKHAM - August 15, 2025
1/2
Thousands of Papua New Guineans will get Australian citizenship by serving with the Australian Defence Force after the PNG government dropped its resistance to the legal requirement that it feared would deprive the country of some of its most capable people.
Anthony Albanese and PNG counterpart James Marape will sign off on the plan next month to open the ADF to PNG recruits as part of a landmark defence treaty.
The agreement will cement PNG as one of only three Australian allies, after the US and New Zealand, shutting out China from any security involvement with Australia’s closest neighbour.
PNG Defence Minister Billy Joseph said it would include mechanisms committing each country to come to the other’s aid if threatened with military force.
“The idea is that PNG and Australia are like two houses, and the treaty will create a big fence so that those two houses are inside one fence,” Dr Joseph told The Australian.
“We want to be seen as a partner who can be trusted in good times and in bad times.”
PNG citizens will become the first in the Pacific other than New Zealanders to join the ADF under the government’s plan to address a military workforce crisis.
Dr Joseph said his country could supply 10,000 personnel, and “if they want more, we are willing to give them”.
“You know that 58 per of the population of PNG is below the age of 25, so you are looking at a very big pool, and Australia can have as many as they want,” he said.
Would-be recruits would have to meet “stringent requirements”, Dr Joseph said, and would be signed up in Port Moresby and provincial centres including Lae and Manus Island.
Admission to the ADF is likely to become a coveted prize for Papua New Guineans, with the salaries on offer far exceeding those available in their home country, where unemployment is rife and the minimum wage is just $1.30 an hour.
The defence treaty will be inked by Mr Albanese and Mr Marape in PNG on September 15 – the day before PNG’s 50th anniversary of independence from Australia.
It will open the way for much closer military co-operation between the countries, and support the expansion and modernisation of the PNG Defence Force.
Dr Joseph said it would offer no immunities for Australian personnel if they broke the law while on PNG soil, and PNGDF personnel would be subject to Australian law when in Australia.
Australian law requires that anyone serving in the ADF is a citizen or applies to take out Australian citizenship within 90 days of joining up.
PNG initially expressed concern over the requirement, because it wanted to ensure its people would return home after their service.
But Australia argued its sovereignty required that those who served under the Australian flag were Australian citizens. Papua New Guineans who take up the offer will retain their PNG citizenship as dual nationals.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109558
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23476583 (180949ZAUG25) Notable: Video: MRF-D joins U.S. Ambassador, Solomon Islands Government to honor Allied sacrifice for 83rd Battle of Guadalcanal Anniversary — U.S. Marines from Marine Rotational Force–Darwin stood with officials in Honiara on August 6 to mark the 83rd anniversary of the Battle of Guadalcanal. A sunrise service at Skyline Ridge honored more than 7,000 Allied troops and Solomon Islanders killed, with wreath-layings and tributes recalling the brutal six-month campaign that turned the tide of the Pacific War. Colonel Jason Armas said victory “was not won by Marines alone but forged in partnership with the people of these islands.” Tributes were paid to Solomon Scouts and Coastwatchers whose bravery was vital to the Allied victory.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109495
>>109310
MRF-D joins U.S. Ambassador, Solomon Islands Government to honor Allied sacrifice for 83rd Battle of Guadalcanal Anniversary
Capt. John Fischer - 08.08.2025
HONIARA, Solomon Islands — On August 6, 2025, U.S. Marines with the Marine Rotational Force – Darwin (MRF-D) 25.3 Marine Air-Ground Task Force (MAGTF) stood alongside U.S. and Solomon Islands officials atop Skyline Ridge, participating in the 83rd anniversary commemoration of the Battle of Guadalcanal. Hosted by U.S. Ambassador to Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, and Vanuatu Ann Marie Yastishock and with the Solomon Islands government, the ceremony served as a solemn reminder of the shared history and sacrifice that binds the United States and Solomon Islands in strength, security, and prosperity.
Representing the U.S. Marine Corps and 1st Marine Regiment’s “The Old Breed” in this historic location, MRF-D’s presence honored the memory of the Marines from the 1st, 5th, and 7th Marine Regiments who landed on Guadalcanal in 1942 — Marines whose courage helped define the identity of the modern Corps. Their presence reflected a deep respect for the sacrifices of both American and Solomon Islander lives lost during the six-month campaign that turned the tide of the Pacific War.
“As Marines returning to this region today, we do so with humility and gratitude,” said Col. Jason Armas, commanding officer of the MRF-D 25.3 MAGTF. “We are here to acknowledge that victory in Guadalcanal was not won by Marines alone but forged in partnership with the people of these islands. May their courage be remembered, and their spirit of unity and resilience live on in our bond of friendship, today and always.”
The sunrise ceremony, held at the Guadalcanal American Memorial, included wreath-layings and tributes to the more than 7,000 Allied service members and Solomon Islanders who died in the Guadalcanal Campaign. Superintendent Ryan Blum of the American Battle Monuments Commission noted that Skyline Ridge, once known as Hill 73, witnessed some of the fiercest fighting of the war and now serves as hallowed ground for remembrance. During the memorial’s construction, the U.S. Defense Prisoner-of-War/Missing in Action Accounting Agency uncovered more U.S. service member remains, returned final closure and peace of mind to the families of lost loved ones.
Later that morning, MRF-D Marines honored the Solomon Scouts and Coastwatchers — local and Allied personnel whose bravery and intelligence-gathering were instrumental in defeating enemy imperial forces. These individuals operated deep in enemy territory, often unarmed and always at risk, guiding Allied forces through dense jungles, rescuing downed airmen, and relaying critical information that shaped the outcome of the campaign.
“These were not supporting roles,” said Col. Armas. “The Coastwatchers and Solomon Scouts were integral to the success of the Guadalcanal campaign and to turning the tide of war in the Pacific.”
Among those remembered was Sergeant Major Sir Jacob Vouza, a local hero tortured by his enemy captors but who refused to betray Allied forces. His story, along with those of Coastwatchers like Frederick “Snow” Rhoades and local scouts like Biuku Gasa and Eroni Kumana, was shared to highlight the deep and often overlooked impact of Solomon Islander sacrifice.
Today, MRF-D continues to serve as a forward-deployed force in the Indo-Pacific, committed to enhancing regional security and honoring the legacy of those who came before. That legacy includes not only U.S. Marines in uniform but the brave communities who fought beside them in times of great peril.
“As we commemorate today those lost in this bloody battle and give thanks for the freedoms we enjoy as a result of their sacrifices, let us also remember that the work continues to ensure safety of all of our countries, and the Pacific,” said Ambassador Yastishock. “From UXO [unexploded ordnance] clearance to educational exchanges, the United States will continue to work with Solomon Islands to ensure our people are safer, stronger, and more prosperous.”
As wreaths were laid and names echoed across revered grounds, the Marines of MRF-D stood with U.S. and Solomon Islands government officials as quiet sentinels of memory — part of a small but enduring presence that connects the past to the present and reaffirms the shared values of peace, sacrifice, and unity.
https://www.dvidshub.net/news/545258/mrf-d-joins-us-ambassador-solomon-islands-government-honor-allied-sacrifice-83rd-battle-guadalcanal-anniversary
https://x.com/MRFDarwin/status/1955113862879232349
https://qresear.ch/?q=Guadalcanal
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109559
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23476596 (181002ZAUG25) Notable: VP Day: Remembering the war and what we sacrificed — "Eighty years ago, prime minister Ben Chifley began his address to the nation with perfect simplicity: ‘Fellow citizens, the war is over’… Chifley turned his words to all who had fought the darkness but not lived to see the light… ‘Let us remember those whose lives were given that we may enjoy this glorious moment’… We think of all we owe to every Australian who served in our name. Every Australian who fell, and every Australian who came home but could never leave the battle. Every family that felt the pride and weight of a loved one who put on the uniform. Every family that knew the grief that had no ending, only a beginning. Amid the shadows of war, the power of their courage and the strength of their character is a light that is a beacon to us still. They showed us what it is to remain true to ourselves, no matter what. They showed us what it means to stand shoulder to shoulder with friends and allies. And together, they turned the tide. As we stand here today, think of everyone who gathered 80 years ago. Think of the noise of their elation. And, hanging in the air just beyond the sound of their happiness, the silence of those who never came home. A silence that touched every corner of our continent, from the biggest city to the smallest country town. As we do, we return to another sentence whose simplicity is matched only by its power: Lest we forget." — Anthony Albanese, The Australian
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109224
>>109495
>>109310
>>109558
VP Day: Remembering the war and what we sacrificed
ANTHONY ALBANESE - August 15, 2025
Eighty years ago, prime minister Ben Chifley began his address to the nation with a sentence of perfect simplicity – and infinite power: “Fellow citizens, the war is over.”
The signing of the surrender was some weeks off, but the darkness that had engulfed the world – and made its last stand in the Pacific – was at last lifted.
Here in Sydney – as they did in towns and cities across Australia – crowds poured into the streets. They sang and danced amid a joyous blizzard of paper. Chifley, who had seen his friend and predecessor John Curtin worn down by the gravity of war leadership, turned his words to all who had fought the darkness – but not lived to see the light.
“Let us remember those whose lives were given that we may enjoy this glorious moment and may look forward to a peace which they have won for us.
“Let us remember those whose thoughts, with proud sorrow, turn towards gallant, loved ones who will not come back. … Nothing can fully repay the debt we owe them nor can history record in adequate terms their deeds …”
Chifley spoke, too, of the home front, the men and women who had “performed miracles of production … so that the battle of supply could be won”.
Between us and that extraordinary day, eight decades now stretch. At this distance, the story of World War II has become set in our memories.
The Allied victory over tyranny has, in retrospect, taken on a feel of inevitability.
Part of the debt we owe to all who served our nation is to remind ourselves how close history came to taking a different path. And to remember and honour every Australian – and every friend and every ally – who gave everything to ensure it did not. Across Europe and North Africa. Across Asia and the Pacific, and even across our own shores. We think of all the stories of courage. Of resilience and exhaustion, of fear and elation, and an endless longing for the home that so many never saw again. These are not stories rendered in bronze or marble, but written in flesh and blood. Stories of ordinary people facing the extraordinary. Facing loss, securing victory. Stories of mateship tempered in the fire of combat.
We think of all we owe to every Australian who served in our name. Every Australian who fell, and every Australian who came home but could never leave the battle. Every family that felt the pride and weight of a loved one who put on the uniform. Every family that knew the grief that had no ending, only a beginning.
As we gather in the very place so many Australians celebrated that day, we reflect on what victory meant – and what it cost.
Every life and dream and future swallowed in that vortex of madness and cruelty, from every battlefield and every burning city, from the prisoner of war camps to the unprecedented horror of the concentration camps. These were nightmares made real – not by monsters but by human beings in a grotesque perversion of humanity.
Yet, as we feel that weight, our hearts are lifted by every Australian who stood against it.
Amid the shadows of war, the power of their courage and the strength of their character is a light that is a beacon to us still. They showed us what it is to remain true to ourselves, no matter what. They showed us what it means to stand shoulder to shoulder with friends and allies. And together, they turned the tide. As we stand here today, think of everyone who gathered 80 years ago. Think of the noise of their elation. And, hanging in the air just beyond the sound of their happiness, the silence of those who never came home.
A silence that touched every corner of our continent, from the biggest city to the smallest country town. As we do, we return to another sentence whose simplicity is matched only by its power: Lest we forget.
This is the text of a speech Anthony Albanese delivered on Friday, August 15 2025, in Martin Place, Sydney.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/remembering-the-war-and-what-we-sacrificed/news-story/93c04fb76fbb1d840f6e5a2f89a41bbb
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109560
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23482561 (190923ZAUG25) Notable: Israel bans Australian officials as diplomatic row intensifies — Israel has revoked visas for Australian representatives to the Palestinian Authority and warned of tighter restrictions on official travel after Canberra blocked Israeli MP Simcha Rothman from visiting. Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar said the Australian ambassador was notified and future visa applications will be “carefully examined,” citing Australia’s recognition of a Palestinian state and refusal to admit Israeli figures including former minister Ayelet Shaked and Rothman. Tony Burke defended cancelling Rothman’s visa, saying Australia would not accept visitors spreading “hate and division.” The move escalates tensions after Australia sanctioned Religious Zionist leader Bezalel Smotrich in June.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109520
>>109521
>>109555
Israel bans Australian officials as diplomatic row intensifies
RHIANNON DOWN - 18 August 2025
Israel has revoked the visas of Australian representatives to the Palestinian Authority and warned of tighter entry restrictions for officials, in a sharp escalation of diplomatic tensions after Canberra blocked a controversial Israeli politician from visiting.
Gideon Sa’ar, Israel’s foreign minister, confirmed on Monday he had ordered the cancellations, saying the Australian ambassador to Israel had been notified and the Israeli Embassy in Canberra instructed to “carefully examine” any future visa requests from Australian officials.
The move follows the Albanese government’s decision to revoke the visa of Simcha Rothman, a member of Israel’s right-wing Religious Zionist Party and chair of the Knesset’s Constitution, Law and Justice Committee.
Mr Rothman was scheduled to begin a solidarity tour with Australia’s Jewish community this week before Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke intervened at the 11th hour.
“I decided to revoke the visas of Australian representatives to the Palestinian Authority,” Mr Sa’ar said in a statement.
“The Australian Ambassador to Israel was just notified on the matter. I also instructed the Israeli Embassy in Canberra to carefully examine any official Australian visa application for entry to Israel.
“This follows Australia’s decisions to recognize a ‘Palestinian state’ and against the backdrop of Australia’s unjustified refusal to grant visas to a number of Israeli figures, including former Minister Ayelet Shaked and the Chairman of the Knesset’s Constitution, Law and Justice Committee, MK Simcha Rothman.
“While antisemitism is raging in Australia, including manifestations of violence against Jews and Jewish institutions, the Australian government is choosing to fuel it by false accusations, as if the visit of Israeli figures will disrupt public order and harm Australia’s Muslim population.
“It is shameful and unacceptable!”
Earlier on Monday, Mr Rothman was unable to travel after his visa was revoked the day he was due to fly to Australia to meet with victims and visit institutions targeted in anti-Semitic incidents in Australia.
Mr Rothman has drawn criticism for describing children in Gaza as “enemies”, pushing for the takeover of the West Bank and forcefully grabbing a megaphone out of a protester’s hand in New York, prompting a criminal harassment complaint that was later dropped.
Mr Burke confirmed on Monday he had blocked Mr Rothman from entering Australia, declaring anyone who came to the country to spread “hate and division” would not be welcome.
“Our government takes a hard line on people who seek to come to our country and spread division,” Mr Burke said.
“If you are coming to Australia to spread a message of hate and division, we don’t want you here. Under our government, Australia will be a country where everyone can be safe, and feel safe.”
Mr Rothman’s party forms part of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s ruling coalition. The Religious Zionist Party’s leader, Bezalel Smotrich, was sanctioned by Australia in June for inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank. He is also a chair of the Knesset’s Constitution, Law and Justice Committee.
Australian Jewish Association chief executive Robert Gregory, whose organisation had arranged the visit, said the decision to cancel the visa was the result of Labor’s obsession with “targeting the Jewish community and Israel”.
“All the paperwork was filled out correctly and on time and the visa was approved,” he said. “The timing of the cancellation at the last minute was spiteful and intended to cause maximum harm to the Australian Jewish community.”
Mr Gregory said the purpose of Mr Rothman’s tour was to show solidarity with Australia’s Jewish community”.
The decision comes after Mr Burke approved Palestinian woman Mona Zahed’s application for an entertainment visa, after she had publicly praised Hamas’s October 7 attack. The visa – which is usually reserved for rock stars and sportsmen and women stars – was later cancelled on the grounds she was not eligible to receive it.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/tony-burke-blocks-visa-for-rightwing-israeli-politician/news-story/84447e7f70b88a0ebec3eefa622a51c9
https://x.com/gidonsaar/status/1957400330875896095
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109561
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23482656 (190943ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Israeli MP Simcha Rothman was blocked from Australia in part due to ‘inflammatory’ Hamas calls — Internal Home Affairs documents reveal Israeli MP Simcha Rothman was denied entry to Australia over fears his past statements, including calling Gazan children “enemies” and urging Hamas’s elimination through total conquest of Gaza, would inflame tensions and risk “the good order of the Australian community.” Officials warned his presence could embolden anti-Islamic sentiment. Penny Wong accused Israel of “isolating itself” after it revoked Australian visas in retaliation. Jewish leaders including Mark Leibler and the Executive Council of Australian Jewry urged both governments to end tit-for-tat measures to protect $2bn trade and security ties.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109520
>>109521
>>109555
Israeli MP Simcha Rothman was blocked from Australia in part due to ‘inflammatory’ Hamas calls
RICHARD FERGUSON and RHIANNON DOWN - 19 August 2025
1/2
An Israeli MP was blocked from Australia due to his “inflammatory” calls for the elimination of terror group Hamas via the total conquest of Gaza and fears he would upset the Muslim community, as Jewish leaders call on both Labor and the Netanyahu government to cool their growing diplomatic stoush.
But the document also says his calls to eliminate Hamas – which has killed scores of Palestinians who have revolted against their iron rule of Gaza and was behind the biggest mass murder of Jewish people since the Holocaust – would be considered “inflammatory and concerning” to some in the Australian community.
Foreign Minister Penny Wong has accused Israel of isolating itself after her representatives to the West Bank were due to be thrown out of the Jewish State in retaliation for Labor’s recognition of Palestine and Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke’s move to cancel the visa of Simcha Rothman.
Mr Rothman – a member of Israel’s right-wing Religious Zionist Party and chair of the Knesset’s Constitution, Law and Justice Committee – was scheduled to begin a solidarity tour with Australia’s Jewish community this week before his visa was cancelled at the 11th hour.
Home Affairs documents obtained by The Australian now reveal that Mr Rothman was denied his visa for fear his past comments – including calling Gazan children “enemies” and calling for Palestinians to be relocated to other countries – would spark major counter-protests.
“The visa holder’s social media and public statements as described above mirror the policies of his Religious Zionist Party including the elimination of Hamas and the expansion and sovereignty of the Israeli State, and denial of any wrongdoing by Israel against Palestinians and Gaza during the current conflict.
“These statements have been received by members of the Australian community as inflammatory and concerning.”
The Hamas comments from the Home Affairs department contrast with Anthony Albanese’s repeated comments that the Gazan terror group should disarm, leave Palestine, and play no role in a two-state solution.
The government has previously come under pressure for giving visas to anti-Israel speakers, including Brit Sammi Hamdi who encouraged people to “celebrate” October 7 and preacher Mohammed Ghuloom who had praised slain Hezbollah terror chief Hassan Nasrallah.
And this month, Mr Burke had to reverse the decision to let in a Palestinian author who said she had prayed to see a day like October 7, after his department was due to let her in on an entertainment visa.
Israel’s top diplomat Gideon Sa’ar has said he will instruct the Jewish State’s embassy in Canberra to “carefully examine” all other official visa applications after Mr Rothman’s blocking, and accused Labor of making false allegations against Israeli politicians.
A high-ranking Foreign Affairs department official rang Israel’s ambassador Amir Maimon to convey the government’s resentment over the decision to cancel the visas of Australian representatives to the Palestinian Authority.
Department of Foreign Affairs deputy secretary Harinder Sidhu made the phone call on Monday night shortly after Israel expelled the diplomats in retaliation to the government’s decision to cancel the visa of a far right Israeli politician.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109562
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23482715 (190958ZAUG25) Notable: Netanyahu blasts Albanese as ‘weak’ as diplomatic relations plummet — Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has branded Anthony Albanese a “weak politician who betrayed Israel and abandoned Australia’s Jews” as tensions over visa cancellations plunged ties to historic lows. The row began when far-right Israeli MP Simcha Rothman was denied entry, prompting Israel to revoke visas of Australian diplomats in Ramallah. Penny Wong condemned the move as isolating Israel, while DFAT officials protested to Israel’s ambassador. Home Affairs documents cited Rothman’s past remarks, including describing Gazan children as “enemies,” as likely to inflame division. Jewish leaders warned trade and security ties worth $2bn are at risk.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109520
>>109521
>>109555
Netanyahu blasts Albanese as ‘weak’ as diplomatic relations plummet
Matthew Knott - August 19, 2025
1/2
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has launched a scathing personal attack on Anthony Albanese, branding his Australian counterpart weak as tit-for-tat visa cancellations plunged bilateral relations to their lowest levels since the creation of the state of Israel.
Alarmed Jewish community leaders called for the two nations to stop tensions spiralling out of control after Simcha Rothman, a far-right member of the Israeli government, was denied an Australian visa and Israel retaliated by revoking the visas of Australian diplomats working in the occupied West Bank.
Netanyahu, who spoke on the phone to Albanese a fortnight ago, said in a post on his official X account on Tuesday night: “History will remember Albanese for what he is: A weak politician who betrayed Israel and abandoned Australia’s Jews.”
Albanese last week accused Netanyahu of being in “denial” about the scale of humanitarian suffering in Gaza. His office was approached for comment over Netanyahu’s latest post.
Netanyahu attacked the Albanese government on social media last December after a synagogue was firebombed in Melbourne, accusing it of encouraging antisemitism by adopting an “extreme anti-Israeli position”, including in votes at the United Nations.
In a move that drew a speedy rebuke from Foreign Minister Penny Wong, Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar sent a warning about any Australian representatives who sought to come to his country, saying he had instructed the Israeli embassy in Canberra to “carefully examine” any official visa applications.
Wong slammed the decision, expected to affect three employees of the Australian representative office in Ramallah, as another step in “isolating Israel” from other countries and undermining attempts to find peace in the Middle East.
Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade deputy secretary Harinder Sidhu called Israel’s ambassador to Australia Amir Maimon on Monday night to express the government’s displeasure at the decision.
A nine-page Home Affairs Department record of the Rothman decision, obtained by this masthead, says that Rothman could have used his planned speaking tour to Australia to “continue making inflammatory statements to promote his controversial views and ideologies, which may lead to fostering division in the community”.
“Specifically, I consider his presence in Australia would or might be a risk to the good order of the Australian community or a segment of the Australian community, namely the Islamic population,” a delegate for Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke wrote in the document, dated August 18, which outlines the reasons for his visa approval to be overturned.
The document references media reporting of Rothman’s comments in which he described Gazan children as “our enemies”, argued a Palestinian state would be the first step towards the destruction of Israel and that Israel bears the responsibility for eliminating Hamas, the militant group that has governed the Gaza Strip since 2007.
“The visa holder’s social media and public statements ... mirror the policies of his Religious Zionist Party, including the elimination of Hamas and the expansion and sovereignty of the Israeli state, and denial of any wrongdoing by Israel against Palestinians and Gaza during the current conflict,” the document states.
“These statements have been received by members of the Australian community as inflammatory and concerning.”
The document also notes that Rothman’s arrival was protested by members of the local Jewish community who opposed his support for a controversial overhaul of the Israeli judiciary in January 2024, during a visit to the US.
“Some protesters allege he is indirectly responsible for the Hamas October 7, 2023 attacks as he ignored the advice of top Israeli military leaders that the controversial judicial legislation was leading to political instability that threatened military preparedness,” the document says in a passage that has raised eyebrows in some quarters of the Jewish community.
Sa’ar named Rothman’s visa refusal, which he called “shameful and unacceptable”, and the government’s planned recognition of a Palestinian state as reasons for his decision to revoke the visas of Australian representatives to the Palestinian Authority.
He made the statement in Israel, shortly after 9pm on Monday, AEST.
Wong responded within four hours of Israel’s move by issuing a statement at about 12.45am on Tuesday, AEST, saying it was an unjustified reaction after Australia chose to recognise Palestine.
“At a time when dialogue and diplomacy are needed more than ever, the Netanyahu government is isolating Israel and undermining international efforts towards peace and a two-state solution,” she said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109563
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23484714 (200926ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Jewish leaders hit out at Netanyahu as Albanese takes the high road in spat — Australia’s top Jewish community leaders have criticised Benjamin Netanyahu for calling Anthony Albanese “weak,” warning his remarks were “clumsy,” “provocative,” and fuelled antisemitism. Executive Council of Australian Jewry president Daniel Aghion wrote to Netanyahu urging “measured and seemly language befitting national leaders,” while praising Albanese for acting diplomatically. Zionist Federation president Jeremy Leibler also condemned Netanyahu’s tone, saying personal attacks were “unhelpful.” Albanese declined to escalate, saying he treats foreign leaders with respect. Meanwhile, Penny Wong and Tony Burke accused Israel of isolating itself after cancelling visas for Australian diplomats in retaliation over Simcha Rothman’s visa denial.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109521
>>109555
>>109562
Jewish leaders hit out at Netanyahu as Albanese takes the high road in spat
Matthew Knott and Nick Bonyhady - August 20, 2025
1/2
Australia’s top Jewish community leaders have criticised Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for personally attacking Anthony Albanese on social media, as Albanese declined to engage in a public slanging match with his counterpart.
In an unprecedented letter to an Israeli leader, the nation’s peak Jewish body wrote to Netanyahu to decry his “clumsy” and “inflammatory” intervention into Australian politics, accusing him of playing into the hands of antisemites.
Netanyahu called Albanese “weak” in a scathing social media post on Tuesday night that accused the prime minister of abandoning Israel and Australia’s Jewish community.
Albanese responded by telling reporters on Wednesday: “I treat leaders of other countries with respect, I engage with them in a diplomatic way.”
Albanese said he had made a point to call Netanyahu a fortnight ago to brief him on plans for Australia to recognise Palestinian statehood and listen to his point of view.
Asked why he thought Netanyahu might be targeting him, Albanese said: “I don’t take these things personally”.
The latest flare-up in tensions was triggered when Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke’s department cancelled a visa this week for far-right Israeli politician Simcha Rothman, basing the decision on his views and previous comments that included calling Gazan children “enemies” of Israel.
The personal tone of Netanyahu’s social media post has angered Jewish community leaders, who urged the two nations to de-escalate tensions before they spun out of control.
In a letter sent to Netanyahu on Thursday, Executive Council of Australian Jewry president Daniel Aghion said the Israeli prime minister’s comments about Albanese “were inflammatory and provocative, and demonstrated a woeful lack of understanding of social and political conditions in Australia”.
“These comments have played straight into the hands of opponents of Israel and antisemites, to the detriment of the Australian Jewish community,” he wrote.
“Had we been consulted, we would have warned against such a clumsy intervention into Australia’s domestic politics.
“The charge of antisemitism, whether made directly or indirectly, is a serious one and never to be made lightly.”
In a separate letter to Albanese, Aghion said the prime minister had been “excessive and gratuitously insulting” to Netanyahu last week by saying he was in denial about the suffering of Palestinian civillians in Gaza.
“It was unseemly for an Australian prime minister to depart from diplomatic norms concerning the leader of a country with which Australia has had friendly relations for many decades,” he said.
“You could simply have said that you vehemently disagreed with the Israeli prime minister, without descending into a personal attack.”
Arguing that both leaders were at fault for the deteriorating relationship, Aghion urged the two prime ministers to use “measured and seemly language befitting national leaders” to get bilateral links back on track.
Zionist Federation of Australia president Jeremy Leibler described Netanyahu’s comments as “entirely unhelpful and unproductive”.
“I don’t think the use of personal or inflammatory language is appropriate or helpful,” he told this masthead.
Leibler praised Albanese for acting as a “statesman” by declining to fire back at Netanyahu, saying that it was wrong to describe the government’s decision to deny Rothman a visa as antisemitic even though he disagrees with the move.
“The relationship is clearly under strain,” Leibler said. “Both nations should return to what brings them together and respectful discussion.”
Israel’s centrist opposition leader Yair Lapid accused Netanyahu of handing Albanese a political “gift” by attacking him. “The thing that most strengthens a leader in the democratic world today is a confrontation with Netanyahu, the most politically toxic leader in the Western world,” he said in a post on X.
Earlier on Wednesday, Burke hit back at Netanyahu for attacking Albanese.
“Strength is not measured by how many people you can blow up or how many children you can leave hungry,” Burke, who is one of the prime minister’s closest political allies, told ABC radio.
Instead, he said, Albanese had shown strength by calling Netanyahu before Australia moved to recognise Palestine.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109564
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23484725 (200932ZAUG25) Notable: AUKUS tensions: Hastie warns of ‘huge backlash’ if US backs out — Opposition home affairs spokesman Andrew Hastie has warned that if the US abandons its AUKUS commitment to supply Virginia-class submarines, it would trigger “a huge backlash” in Australia. He said local support in Rockingham, WA — where HMAS Stirling will host rotating US and UK submarines from 2027 — could collapse if “Pillar I” fails while communities absorb thousands of US personnel under what he calls “Pillar zero.” Hastie argued Australians would see it as “giving the US prime strategic geography in exchange for nothing,” urging Washington to uphold its deal.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109316
>>109405
>>109512
AUKUS tensions: Hastie warns of ‘huge backlash’ if US backs out
JOE KELLY - 20 August 2025
Coalition home affairs spokesman Andrew Hastie has sounded a warning to Washington over AUKUS, arguing that a decision by the Pentagon to pull back from the submarine deal would ignite a damaging grassroots backlash.
Mr Hastie told The Australian “there will be consequences” if the Pentagon’s review of the AUKUS agreement resulted in the deal being shelved. He said this would be especially true in the local community of Rockingham, south of Perth.
“Australians are good partners and friends. But we don’t like being treated as mugs,” he said. “Particularly when we are effectively giving the US prime strategic geography so they can disperse their forces from the Indo-Pac (Indo-Pacific Command).”
Rockingham is home to HMAS Stirling, which, from 2027, will host the rotation of US and UK nuclear submarines under the AUKUS framework. The base is currently being upgraded to support the rotation.
Speaking on the sidelines of the Australian American Leadership Dialogue in Adelaide last week, Mr Hastie explained the rotation would require major housing and infrastructure upgrades, something he has referred to as “Pillar zero”.
He suggested the local community could end up accommodating an extra 3000-9000 Americans – a development that would place extra pressures on vital services.
If the US refused to uphold its side of the AUKUS deal and provide Australia with Virginia-class submarines, Mr Hastie warned that it would harden community attitudes towards “Pillar zero” and the accommodation of US personnel in Western Australia.
“If the USA, after this review, were to cancel Pillar I, it makes Pillar zero to the US Navy base almost impossible in my view because the backlash against America would be huge,” Mr Hastie told The Australian.
Under the AUKUS framework, the provision of three nuclear-powered Virginia-class submarines to Australia from the early 2030s is referred to as “Pillar I”. The sharing of advanced technologies makes up “Pillar II” of the deal.
“We talk a lot about Pillar I, which is the optimal pathway for a submarine. And we talk about Pillar II and all the emerging technologies. But no one’s talking about Pillar zero,” Mr Hastie said. “And I call Pillar zero the US Navy base that’s being built in Rockingham at HMAS Stirling.
“That’s the big secret at the heart of AUKUS – that in two years’ time, the US will have a squadron of Virginia-class submarines operating off the West Australian coastline.”
“And it’s really important that that has a social licence at the local level. At the moment, there’s not enough homes for Australians. Roads are congested. Our essential services are overrun,” he said. “So when you add up to 3000-9000 people, as the Americans have said, that’s going to potentially cause social licence issues.”
Mr Hastie said that if the Pentagon were to cancel Pillar I, there would be “a lot of pushback from the Australian people, not just locally in WA but across the country, because we would be basically giving the US prime strategic geography in exchange for nothing”.
“President Trump has written The Art of the Deal. He would himself agree that that is a very bad deal,” Mr Hastie said.
The opposition’s home affairs spokesman said he had raised this issue with a range of US congressmen including the Republican chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Roger Wicker, and the Democratic co-chair of the Congressional Friends of Australia Caucus, Joe Courtney.
“They’re very sympathetic to my perspective,” he said. “As a believer in the alliance, I want it to continue. I think AUKUS is a great opportunity for Australia and for the United States.”
Mr Hastie said a big reason why Pillar zero was at risk was “because (WA Premier) Roger Cook and the WA Labor state government has gone so slow on it. What we really need in WA is a (South Australian Premier) Peter Malinauskas who believes in AUKUS”.
“Decisions need to be made on roads, critical infrastructure, more houses need to be built in and around the area,” he said. “We’re worried about the social licence for integrating up to 9000 Americans.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/aukus-tensions-hastie-warns-of-huge-backlash-if-us-backs-out/news-story/103fab9bb76508f287f74728ab923f5a
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109565
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23484746 (200948ZAUG25) Notable: Late former Central Coast mayor Laurie Maher linked to child sex abuse civil claims — Former Gosford mayor Laurie Maher, once celebrated for founding NSW homelessness charity Coast Shelter and awarded an OAM, has been posthumously linked to more than 100 civil child sex abuse claims from his time as superintendent of the Mount Penang Training School for Boys in the 1970s and 1980s. Maher, who died in May aged 86, had been acquitted of several charges but was awaiting retrial on others. Survivors allege sexual and physical abuse, including assaults in dormitories and offices. Lawyers say the process of pursuing claims is “really painful” for complainants, whose entire lives are placed under scrutiny. At least 59 cases have been settled by the NSW government, with victims stressing their fight is for acknowledgement, not “dirty money.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Late former Central Coast mayor Laurie Maher linked to child sex abuse civil claims
Mary-Louise Vince - 20 August 2025
1/2
The death of an accused paedophile, who had once been a respected community leader, has left behind scores of alleged victims who are suing over historical sexual abuse they say they suffered at a notorious boys' home he once ran on the New South Wales Central Coast.
Laurie Maher, 86, was most widely known as a tireless crusader against homelessness and domestic violence, founding what is today one of the largest homelessness charities in NSW — Coast Shelter.
Mr Maher served numerous terms on the former Gosford City Council, was mayor for four years and in 2010 awarded the Medal of the Order of Australia (OAM) for his service to the community.
He was never convicted of abuse, but died in May, awaiting a retrial on charges of buggery and indecent assault involving two boys.
The charges related to his time as the long-time superintendent of the Mount Penang Training School for Boys near Gosford, where many former detainees claim he sexually abused them during the 1970s and 1980s.
Mt Penang was among several state-run reform centres for "troubled" teenage boys who were convicted of varying offences.
Royal commission leads to charges
The ABC is aware of at least 100 civil child sex abuse claims dating back to when Mr Maher ran the Mount Penang Training School for Boys.
Allegations about the former superintendent's offending began to surface at the time of the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sex Abuse between 2013 and 2017.
The royal commission did not directly examine Mt Penang. However the ABC understands 18 private submissions were received about Laurie Maher, which triggered a police investigation in 2016.
Mr Maher was arrested in 2020 and charged with 13 offences against six boys.
By the time the case reached a District Court trial in 2022, he stood accused of eight child sex abuse charges involving four boys spanning a 10-year period.
He was acquitted of six charges, but the jury was hung on the remaining two and a retrial was set down for September 2025.
Mr Maher unsuccessfully sought to halt the retrial in 2024 when he engaged high-profile barrister Margaret Cunneen to seek a permanent stay on proceedings due to his "old age and poor health".
Tony’s story
Tony, who did not want to use his real name, said it took decades to confront his past experiences at Mount Penang, where he found himself in the late 1980s, after he was caught stealing a car stereo system.
He said he was trying to feed and clothe his two younger siblings, who had been living with him in the roof cavity of a small building in Sydney for several years to escape violence at home.
At 16, Tony was sent to Mount Penang and placed under the care of Mr Maher, who he said sexually abused him on two separate occasions.
Tony alleged he was forced to perform oral sex on the superintendent — the first time he described being "trapped in a shed" with him, while the next time, he recalled being summoned to his office.
"Laurie Maher was a monster to me," he said.
"My life was ruined from the age of 16 because of him."
Tony described living in fear after being told by Mr Maher "to keep his mouth shut", barely sleeping in the large dormitory he shared with about 40 other boys.
"You'd hear screaming at night," he recalled.
After what he described as a life of homelessness, addiction, insomnia and crippling flashbacks, Tony started to receive the medical and psychological support he needed — and the strength to "speak out" — after accessing community housing during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Tony successfully sued the state in 2024 over the abuse he suffered while in detention in the late 1980s.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109566
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23484779 (201007ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Former SAS soldier Oliver Schulz committed to stand trial for war crimes charge of murder — Former SAS trooper Oliver Schulz, 43, will be the first Australian soldier to face trial for a war crimes charge after being committed to the NSW Supreme Court. He is accused of murdering Afghan villager Dad Mohammad in Uruzgan Province in 2012, an incident captured on helmet-cam and first exposed by ABC’s Four Corners. Footage showed Schulz asking, “You want me to drop this c*nt?” before firing three shots. Mohammad, a father of two, was initially deemed lawfully killed by ADF investigators. Schulz, charged in 2023, faces arraignment in October and could receive life in prison.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73512 (pb)
>>73531 (pb)
>>73552 (pb)
Former SAS soldier Oliver Schulz committed to stand trial for war crimes charge of murder
Sean Rubinsztein-Dunlop - 20 August 2025
1/2
A former special forces trooper will be the first Australian soldier to stand trial for a war crimes charge, more than 13 years after he shot dead a villager in an Afghan field.
Former SAS trooper Oliver Schulz, 43, was charged in 2023 with the war crime of murder after helmet-cam footage aired on the ABC's Four Corners showed him in 2012 shooting Afghan man Dad Mohammad.
Local court Magistrate Greg Grogin today committed Mr Schulz to stand trial in the NSW Supreme Court, after previously condemning delays from Commonwealth prosecutors.
Mr Schulz faced a committal hearing in April and May, in which the local court heard from Australian Defence Force (ADF) witnesses and repeatedly watched footage of the killing.
Mr Schulz could face life in jail if found guilty.
The killing was first publicly revealed in March 2020 by ABC Investigations and Four Corners, sparking a three-year criminal investigation.
The court heard that the footage, from the helmet camera of a dog handler on Mr Schulz's patrol, showed an SAS dog attacking Dad Mohammad in a wheat field during an ADF mission in Uruzgan Province, in southern Afghanistan.
The dog is then called off and Mr Schulz is seen training his weapon on Dad Mohammad, who is lying on the ground.
The soldier is heard asking three times: "You want me to drop this c*nt*?" He then fires three shots at the man.
Mr Mohammad was in his 20s and a father of two girls - a newborn and toddler - at the time of his death.
He had a condition that stunted growth in one leg.
ABC Investigations and Four Corners identified the dead man and tracked down his father and brother during their investigation.
Afghan villagers first complained to the ADF about the killing months after the 2012 raid.
However, ADF investigators cleared Mr Schulz, concluding that Dad Mohammad was lawfully killed because he posed a direct threat to the Australians.
Investigators were told the Afghan man was holding a radio and "tactically manoeuvring".
Mr Schulz will face the Supreme Court in October for arraignment.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109567
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23484784 (201010ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Former SAS soldier Oliver Schulz committed to stand trial for war crimes charge of murder — Former SAS trooper Oliver Schulz, 43, will be the first Australian soldier to face trial for a war crimes charge after being committed to the NSW Supreme Court. He is accused of murdering Afghan villager Dad Mohammad in Uruzgan Province in 2012, an incident captured on helmet-cam and first exposed by ABC’s Four Corners. Footage showed Schulz asking, “You want me to drop this c*nt?” before firing three shots. Mohammad, a father of two, was initially deemed lawfully killed by ADF investigators. Schulz, charged in 2023, faces arraignment in October and could receive life in prison.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109566
2/2
Under the Commonwealth Criminal Code, a killing constitutes the war crime of murder if the victim is not a combatant or is out of action due to injury or damage.
Prosecutors must also prove that the perpetrator knew, or was reckless to, this fact.
The killing does not constitute a war crime if it occurred as a result of an attack on a military objective, during which the perpetrator did not expect excessive civilian casualties.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-08-20/former-sas-trooper-to-stand-trial-for-war-crime-charge-of-murder/105675766
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-11-18/igadf-inquiry-into-special-forces-in-afghanistan-is-over/12816626
https://qresear.ch/?q=Australian+SAS
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109568
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23484790 (201016ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Killing Field: Explosive new allegations of Australian special forces war crimes - A Four Corners investigation has uncovered new allegations that unarmed civilians were unlawfully killed by Australian special forces in Afghanistan. In an investigation months in the making, drawing upon sources in Australia and Afghanistan, our program will expose a culture of impunity and cover-up among members of Australia's special forces who served in Australia's longest war. - Four Corners / ABC News In-depth, 16 Mar 2020
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109566
Killing Field: Explosive new allegations of Australian special forces war crimes | Four Corners
ABC News In-depth
16 Mar 2020
A Four Corners investigation has uncovered new allegations that unarmed civilians were unlawfully killed by Australian special forces in Afghanistan.
In an investigation months in the making, drawing upon sources in Australia and Afghanistan, our program will expose a culture of impunity and cover-up among members of Australia's special forces who served in Australia's longest war.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-GPplTKCYpQ
—
Witnesses say Australian SAS soldiers killed unarmed Afghan civilians in potential war crimes
Mark Willacy, Rory Callinan and Alexandra Blucher - 16 Mar 2020
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-03-16/new-allegations-unarmed-civilians-killed-by-sas-in-afghanistan/12028448
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109569
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23489318 (211014ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Mines to Missiles: Kevin Rudd highlights Australia’s role in US critical minerals strategy — Australian ambassador to the US Kevin Rudd says Australia can help achieve Donald Trump’s goal of a resilient America by diversifying critical mineral and rare earth supply chains, calling Australia a “great power, if not a superpower” in the sector. He noted Trump hosted BHP and Rio Tinto chiefs to discuss a copper project in Arizona and cited 20–25 other US-based Australian mining projects. Speaking in Washington, Rudd compared critical minerals to munitions, highlighting their role in submarines and F-35s. He urged a coalition of allies to counter Chinese dominance and outlined Canberra’s $1.2bn strategic reserve and $3.4bn Critical Minerals Facility.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73551 (pb)
>>73667 (pb)
>>109240
Mines to Missiles: Kevin Rudd highlights Australia’s role in US critical minerals strategy
JOE KELLY - 21 August 2025
1/2
Kevin Rudd says Australia can help diversify critical mineral and rare earth supply chains to help achieve Donald Trump’s goal of building a more resilient America while reducing Washington’s reliance on Beijing.
The nation’s top diplomat in America said this represented a major area of co-operation for Canberra and Washington, arguing that Australia was – in terms of critical minerals and rare earths – a “great power, if not a superpower.”
“That’s how nature has endowed us,” he said.
Dr Rudd argued it was possible to make “real, measurable, tangible progress” in countering Chinese dominance in critical minerals, but did not offer a timeline for when it was possible to catch-up with Beijing.
Noting that Australia was home to the largest mining companies in the world, Dr Rudd said the US President had hosted the chief executives of both BHP and Rio Tinto in the Oval Office on Tuesday local time to discuss a copper project in Arizona.
“The President recognises the size of these companies, their ability to act,” he said. “There are some 20 to 25 other projects in which the Australian mining industry is actively invested here in the US of A in the critical mineral space.”
“So put together what we’re investing here in the US with what was already invested in Australia, add to it a new layer of processing (and) we are then on the road to making a material difference in terms of securing supply chains of the future.”
Speaking at an event at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, the Australian ambassador to the US said that critical minerals should be viewed more like defence goods such as munitions or weapons systems.
“When you produce a Virginia class submarine, something we’re now working with the United States on … it contains within it something like 4.5 tonnes of critical minerals, rare earths, highly processed,” he said.
“You go to an F-35, you’re looking at a high proportion of the actual aircraft itself being derivative of advanced and processed rare earths.”
Dr Rudd said there were now governments in power both in Washington and Canberra that were “determined to turn the corner on this.”
“As a US ally, we are ready and able to help. And we have the capacity to do so,” he said.
He argued that it was important to see critical minerals and rare earths as the “flip side to what we’re doing with chips, what we’re doing with data centres and what we’re doing with artificial intelligence.”
“These are seamless elements of the future economic competitiveness of the United States in its global strategic competition with the People’s Republic of China,” he said. “If you don’t have it, well, kiss goodbye to your long term ability to produce chips, to produce data centres and to win the AI race across the world.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109570
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23489330 (211025ZAUG25) Notable: Pro-Palestinian protest over Brisbane's Story Bridge won't be allowed, Queensland court rules — A Brisbane court has blocked a planned pro-Palestinian protest march across the Story Bridge after police argued it posed “a real and significant risk of safety.” Organisers expected 7,000 people, citing Sydney’s Harbour Bridge rally that drew nearly 100,000. Magistrate Janelle Brassington acknowledged the cause was “serious” but ruled the route unsafe due to bridge repairs and safety concerns. Police warned they would make arrests if protesters defy the order and noted risks of crowd crush. An alternative Victoria Bridge route was offered but rejected. Organisers said they respected but disagreed with the ruling and were considering an appeal.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109458
>>109475
Pro-Palestinian protest over Brisbane's Story Bridge won't be allowed, Queensland court rules
Talissa Siganto - 21 August 2025
1/2
A pro-Palestinian march across Brisbane's Story Bridge has been banned from going ahead after police successfully argued it would be unsafe.
The protest, which was due to take place on Sunday, is part of nationwide action against the ongoing war in Gaza.
Organisers have indicated approximately 7,000 people are expected to attend the rally.
It follows a recent demonstration in NSW, which attracted almost 100,000 protesters who shut down the Sydney Harbour Bridge.
The Queensland Police Service (QPS) raised safety concerns, and, when mediation with organisers— which focused on trying to redirect the march — was unsuccessful, the matter ended up in court.
On Thursday, Queensland's chief magistrate Janelle Brassington said she was satisfied police had established "a real and significant risk of safety" due to the features of the bridge and surrounds.
Asked outside Brisbane Magistrates Court if protesters would march across the Story Bridge despite the ruling, organiser Remah Naj said they were considering the next steps.
"We are considering our options in terms of appeal and in terms of what the group will decide in the next few days," she said.
"While we do respect the magistrate ... we disagree."
Police Minister Dan Purdie called on event organisers to "respect the decision of the court".
"If protesters defy the decision of the court, it will not only put people at risk, it will also take hundreds of police away from responding to crime," he said in a statement.
Police could arrest protesters
Speaking on Thursday evening, QPS Acting Assistant Commissioner Rhys Wildman confirmed police would take "tactical and operational" actions, including arrests to prevent a protest from going ahead on Sunday.
He urged anyone considering taking part to reconsider, saying police generally supported protests going ahead, as long as they were safe.
"We have to make it quite clear that anyone participating in a protest which has not [been] authorised ... faces the prospect of enforcement action being taken against them, whether that's on the day or post-event," Acting Assistant Commissioner Wildman said.
He said police interpreted the court's decision to mean there was "no alternative route" and protesters were not authorised to "block any roadways or obstruct public spaces" on Sunday.
"We will take the appropriate enforcement action in a reasoned manner to prevent offences from occurring and [maintain] community safety," he told reporters.
Police resources would be available to respond on Sunday, should something go ahead, Acting Assistant Commissioner Wildman said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109571
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23494426 (221341ZAUG25) Notable: China demands Pacific nations roll back ‘erroneous’ Taiwan participation — China has urged Pacific Island nations to amend a 1992 communique granting Taiwan participation rights in the Pacific Islands Forum, calling it “erroneous” and contrary to the One China principle. In a statement from its embassy in Tonga, Beijing cited the precedent of last year’s removal of Taiwan references under Chinese pressure. The Solomon Islands, host of next month’s summit, has already excluded both Taiwan and China, later expanding the ban to all 21 dialogue partners — including the US, UK, EU, Japan and South Korea — provoking regional backlash. Tuvalu’s Prime Minister has threatened to boycott, while New Zealand and others insist partners must attend. Analysts warn Beijing may have “overstepped the mark.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109487
China demands Pacific nations roll back ‘erroneous’ Taiwan participation
AMANDA HODGE - August 20, 2025
China has demanded Pacific Island nations amend what it says is an “erroneous” 33-year-old communique recognising Taiwan’s right to participate in the region’s most important annual forum, raising the geopolitical stakes in what is shaping up to be a contentious leaders’ summit next month.
An extraordinary statement released on Tuesday by the Chinese embassy in Tonga forcefully rejects claims of Beijing interference in the Pacific Islands Forum as “misinformation”, even as it pushes for the bloc to amend a 1992 communique declaring Taiwan a Pacific Island Forum development partner with participation rights.
“The Taiwan-related content in the 1992 Forum Communique violated the One China principle in the first place,” the statement posted on the Chinese embassy’s social media account on Tuesday reads.
“Now more than 30 years later, China has established diplomatic relations with 11 of the 14 PICs (Pacific Island countries), and all these countries firmly adhere to the One China principle and clearly support China’s reunification,” it adds, referring to Beijing’s assertion that Taiwan is an “inalienable part of China. It is now time to correct the erroneous Taiwan-related content in the 1992 Forum Communique.”
The embassy statement cites as a precedent for its demands a highly controversial decision by Forum leaders last year to delete a reference to Taiwan - under pressure from China’s Special Envoy to the Pacific - from the final summit communique.
China’s relentless push to dismantle all support for Taiwan in the region and have it excluded from the Pacific Island Forum summit prompted the Solomon Islands, this year’s host and a nation that has grown increasingly close to Beijing, to announce last month that both countries would be excluded from the September meeting in Honiara.
Solomons Prime Minister Jeremiah Manele has since controversially expanded that decision to exclude all 21 Pacific Island Forum dialogue partners - including the UK, US, EU, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Indonesia and Malaysia - sparking mass frustration and accusations that China is seeking to interfere with Pacific regionalism and splinter the bloc.
The move was clearly intended to pacify those countries that still recognise Taiwan - Marshall Islands, Palau and Tuvalu - while also meeting China’s demands, but has pleased almost no one.
Australia and New Zealand - both full PIF member states who cannot be barred from next month’s summit - Fiji, PNG, Tuvalu and the Republic of Marshall Islands have all raised concerns over the decision.
“We want all dialogue partners to be there. We think that’s important,” NZ Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said this week.
Tuvalu Prime Minister Feleti Teo has threatened to boycott the summit over the exclusions, and in a recent interview speculated that China was behind the decision to block partners from the forum.
“There is no denying that China is trying to extend its footprint in the Pacific and so is the US,” Mr Teo told The Guardian.
Whether China sees the mass exclusion as a win is difficult to tell though its latest statement insists it gains nothing from being excluded.
While China’s Pacific presence and interest has grown exponentially in recent years, Anna Powles, associate professor of security studies at New Zealand’s Massey University, says Beijing’s latest demand is unlikely to be well received, even by nations firmly within Beijing’s camp.
“It’s going to be interesting to see how PIF members react to this latest statement by China that they should amend a collectively agreed declaration, and by extension the regional architecture,” Dr Powles told The Australian.
“I think China has overstepped the mark by calling for a change to an earlier Pacific Island forum declaration that would have been agreed to by leaders at the time. People in the region may find that quite unacceptable.”
China’s demand comes as Pacific Island nations have been discussing ways to better manage the intense and growing interest in the region by dividing partners into two tiers.
Many had hoped that process - aimed at preserving Pacific unity - would be finalised in Honiara, though Beijing’s latest diktat may have complicated that process.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/china-demands-pacific-nations-roll-back-erroneous-taiwan-participation/news-story/5a9d67d0e3de2984ca4bb456e11693bd
https://www.facebook.com/chinaembassytonga/posts/statement-by-the-chinese-embassy-in-tonga-on-recent-misinformation-concerning-th/1086464560286171/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109572
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23494458 (221350ZAUG25) Notable: Xi Jinping’s man in Canberra warns: Taiwan’s return to China must not be denied — Chinese ambassador Xiao Qian has urged Anthony Albanese to adopt a “correct historical perspective,” declaring that “Taiwan’s return to China must not be denied.” Writing in The Australian, he linked Beijing’s sovereignty claims to World War II outcomes and UN Resolution 2758, which he said affirmed the PRC as China’s sole representative. Taiwan’s Foreign Minister Lin Chia-lung rejected this, stressing the PRC has “never ruled Taiwan for a single day” and likening Beijing’s claims to “the emperor’s new clothes.” Australia’s parliament last year condemned China’s use of the UN resolution to justify its claims, with bipartisan support for Taiwan’s participation in UN bodies.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73422 (pb)
>>73569 (pb)
>>109230
>>109277
Xi Jinping’s man in Canberra warns: Taiwan’s return to China must not be denied
GEOFF CHAMBERS and BEN PACKHAM - August 21, 2025
1/2
Xi Jinping’s top diplomat in Australia has called on Anthony Albanese to uphold a “correct historical perspective” that Taiwan belongs to China, as he seeks to exploit the memory of World War II to push the Communist Party’s strategic aims.
Amid rising US concerns about a potential conflict with Beijing over Taiwan by 2027, Chinese ambassador Xiao Qian has invoked China and Australia fighting “side by side” against the Japanese in the 1940s to declare “Taiwan’s return to China must not be denied”.
Writing in the wake of the 80th anniversary of the end of one of Australia and China’s bloodiest modern conflicts, Mr Xiao claims one of the key outcomes of the war is that communist China – which took control of Beijing and the mainland four years after Japan’s surrender – has sovereignty over Taiwan.
“The recovery of Taiwan is a victorious outcome of Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War, and an important part of the post-war international order,” he writes in The Australian.
The ambassador’s use of World War II follows a speech last month by the Prime Minister during which he focused on Australia’s wartime prime minister John Curtin standing up to Winston Churchill and Franklin Roosevelt.
The Curtin Oration address sparked concerns in Washington, where US officials are reviewing the $368bn AUKUS nuclear-powered submarine pact and calling on Australia to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP “as soon as possible” to help thwart Chinese military aggression in the Indo-Pacific region.
After Mr Albanese last week said he would formally recognise a Palestinian state when he attends the UN General Assembly in New York in September, Mr Xiao cites a disputed UN resolution that he claims “affirmed there is but one China, the government of the People’s Republic of China”.
“Some seek to challenge the authority of UNGA Resolution 2758, calling Taiwan’s status ‘undetermined’, falsely claiming that the PRC has never governed Taiwan, and fudging and hollowing out the one-China principle,” Mr Xiao wrote in The Australian.
“To uphold the one-China principle, and to oppose ‘Taiwan independence’ and external interference, is an inevitable requirement for safeguarding China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, the foundation and prerequisite for ensuring peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait, and a just cause defending the outcomes of the victory in the Second World War and the post-war international order.”
Taiwan Foreign Minister Lin Chia-lung hit back at the ambassador’s interpretation of the UN resolution, pointing to the fact “the People’s Republic of China from 1949 has never ruled Taiwan for a single day”.
“The resolution is around 158 words, but none of these words have anything to do with Taiwan. Taiwan is not mentioned,” Dr Lin told The Australian in Taipei.
“I think it was the Australian parliament which first passed the resolution that rejected China’s claims on UNGA Resolution 2758 saying that it determined Taiwan’s status.
“And especially, starting from last year, the State Department of the US has continued and repeatedly expressed that we should refute these distortions by China.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109573
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23494499 (221400ZAUG25) Notable: COMMENTARY: Australia and China share history of triumph in war on fascism — "During one of humanity’s darkest hours, China and Australia stood firmly as allies in the fight against fascism… The shared memory of China and Australia standing together in mutual support and united resistance deserves to be cherished and remembered by our two peoples. Eighty years ago, Taiwan was returned to China, with the recognition of major victorious nations and Japan. The recovery of Taiwan is a victorious outcome of the Chinese people’s resistance against Japanese aggression and an important part of the post-war international order. Resolution 2758… settled once and for all the political, legal and procedural issues regarding the representation of the whole of China, including Taiwan, at the UN. China and Australia forged friendship in times of hardship. Today… China is ready to work with Australia and all peace-loving nations to uphold a correct historical perspective, to defend international fairness and justice, and a bright future for China-Australia relations." – Xiao Qian, China’s ambassador to Australia – The Australian.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109559
>>109572
COMMENTARY: Australia and China share history of triumph in war on fascism
XIAO QIAN - August 21, 2025
1/2
Recently, a series of commemorative events has been held across Australia to mark the 80th anniversary of the end of WWII. Together with peoples around the world, China will also hold a gathering to mark the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese people’s war of resistance against Japanese aggression and the world anti-fascist war.
During one of humanity’s darkest hours, China and Australia stood firmly as allies in the fight against fascism, making important contributions to the defence of world peace and justice. Yet, for too long, the enormous sacrifices made by the Chinese people, the historic contribution of China to the victory in the world anti-fascist war, and the shared struggle of China and Australia have often been neglected or overlooked. The smoke of war may have long dispersed, but the glory of that struggle must never fade into oblivion.
To uphold a correct historical perspective of WWII is not only to restore historical truth, but also to safeguard the fruits of victory, to cherish peace, and to open up a brighter future. In this spirit, I wish to share three points. First, the strategic importance of the Chinese battlefield must not be underestimated. Influenced by the Western-centric historical view, some tend to focus primarily on the European theatre of World War II while downplaying the decisive role of the China theatre. As noted in the China-Australia jointly made documentary, The War That Changed the World, the Chinese people’s war of resistance against Japanese aggression marked the outbreak of the world anti-fascist war and opened the first large-scale anti-fascist battlefield in the East.
Starting the earliest and lasting the longest in the war, China’s resistance led to more than 35 million casualties in the fight for the nation’s survival. As the main battlefield in Asia, China made an immense historic contribution to the global victory over fascism. The Communist Party of China held high the banner of the national united front against Japanese aggression, safeguarded the unity of resistance, and stood as the pillar of the entire nation’s resistance.
China’s resistance greatly weakened Japan’s capacity to expand into the Asia-Pacific, disrupted its attempts at strategic coordination with Nazi Germany, and bought precious time for other anti-fascist nations. This played an important role in ensuring coordination among the Allies’ fronts and the smooth implementation of the overall strategy. Research by institutions such as the Australian National University has shown China’s resistance paved the way for victories of anti-fascist allies in the Pacific theatre. Without China’s prolonged struggle, Japan might have shifted its forces to Southeast Asia and even towards Australia at a much earlier time.
Second, the shared history of China and Australia fighting side by side must not be forgotten. The peoples of China and Australia, standing firm for justice and fighting side by side amid the flames of war, made immense sacrifices to secure the great victory of the world anti-fascist war.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109574
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23494538 (221412ZAUG25) Notable: ‘Forever tarnished’: Benjamin Netanyahu steps up criticism of Anthony Albanese - Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has escalated attacks on Anthony Albanese, declaring the Australian leader’s record is “forever tarnished” by recognising a Palestinian state. He said Hamas’s welcome of the move showed “you know something is wrong,” and accused Albanese of “weakness” in confronting “terrorist monsters.” Netanyahu announced a Pacific Islands tour by his deputy foreign minister to deepen ties with loyal supporters such as PNG, Fiji and Palau. He warned of a “tsunami” of anti-Semitic attacks in Australia and cited Churchill’s “slumber of democracies.” Albanese declined to retaliate publicly, while Health Minister Mark Butler dismissed the criticism as “frankly ridiculous.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109521
>>109562
>>109563
‘Forever tarnished’: Benjamin Netanyahu steps up criticism of Anthony Albanese
RHIANNON DOWN and BEN PACKHAM - August 21, 2025
1/2
Israel will move to strengthen ties with its loyal Pacific Island supporters with a tour of states in Australia’s immediate region, as Jewish State leader Benjamin Netanyahu declares Anthony Albanese will be “forever tarnished” by his recognition of a Palestinian state.
In an interview with Sky News host Sharri Markson, the Israeli Prime Minister doubled down on his criticism of Mr Albanese’s support for a two-state solution, declaring that when Hamas welcomed a decision “you know something is wrong”.
“I’m sure he [Mr Albanese] has a reputable record as a public servant, but I think his record is forever tarnished by the weakness he has shown in the face of these Hamas terrorist monsters,” Mr Netanyahu said.
“When the worst terrorist organisation on earth – these savages who murdered women, raped them, beheaded men, burnt babies alive in front of their parents and took hundreds of hostages – when these people congratulate the Prime Minister of Australia, you know something is wrong.”
His comments came as his Foreign Minister, Gideon Sa’ar, ordered his deputy, Sharren Haskel, to prepare for an official tour of Pacific Island states. Pacific Island states including Papua New Guinea, Fiji, Nauru, Palau, Tuvalu and Tonga, are among Israel’s staunchest supporters, backing the Jewish state in key UN votes.
“Deputy Foreign Minister Haskel will lead the delegation to engage in discussions aimed at deepening and advancing Israel–Pacific relations in a wide range of bilateral, multilateral, and strategic fields,” Israel’s Foreign Ministry said in a statement on X.
“The Pacific Island states constitute an important focus of support for Israel across various international frameworks.
“This support is expressed bilaterally – most notably through the establishment of official embassies in Jerusalem, Israel’s capital, as exemplified by Papua New Guinea in 2023 and as additional states intend to pursue in the near future — as well as multilaterally, including through significant backing of Israel within the United Nations.”
It said the tour reflected “Israel’s profound appreciation for the Pacific Island states and underscores Israel’s commitment to strengthening co-operation with them”.
The tour announcement came as Australia’s relationship with Israel fell to a new low this week, after Mr Netanyahu accused Mr Albanese of abandoning Australian Jews in a scathing letter retaliating to Labor’s decision to recognise Palestine and deny visas to Israeli political figures.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109575
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23502068 (240817ZAUG25) Notable: Australia ‘harbouring criminal’, says Hong Kong in new row over asylum for activist - Hong Kong’s Chief Secretary Chan Kwok-ki has accused Australia of “harbouring a criminal” after Adelaide-based activist Ted Hui was granted asylum, summoning consul-general Gareth Williams to protest “interfering in China’s internal affairs.” Hui, a former Hong Kong legislator facing national security charges, dismissed the threats, saying officials “know they cannot change the situation now that the visa has been granted.” The dispute follows Britain’s granting of asylum to student leader Tony Chung. DFAT said Australia was concerned by Hong Kong’s broad application of the security law, stressing support for freedoms of expression and assembly. Hui has urged sanctions on officials responsible for human rights abuses.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109554
Australia ‘harbouring criminal’, says Hong Kong in new row over asylum for activist
STEPHEN RICE - August 22, 2025
1/2
A fresh diplomatic row with China is brewing after the Hong Kong government called in Australia’s consul-general, Gareth Williams, to protest against Australia’s grant of political asylum to pro-democracy activist Ted Hui, accusing the Albanese government of “interfering in China’s internal affairs”.
Hong Kong’s Chief Secretary, Chan Kwok-ki, summoned Mr Williams to express his government’s anger at the asylum granted last week to Mr Hui, accusing Australia of “harbouring a criminal” and vowing to keep pursuing “the fugitive”.
The former Hong Kong lawmaker fled Hong Kong while on bail in December 2020 after he was hit with criminal charges under national security laws over his role in pro-democracy protests.
Mr Hui told The Australian he was not concerned about the Hong Kong government’s threat to keep hunting him.
“They are doing it in a very high-profile (way), and they are jumping up and down, but they know they cannot change the situation now that the visa has been granted,” he said.
Mr Hui said it was unusual his case was now being handled by the Hong Kong government rather than the foreign office in China.
“Perhaps it’s something that’s too big for them, so they have to break protocol and do it in a higher profile to make their position clear to Australia and the international community,” he said.
Mr Hui memorably threw rotten plants on the floor of Hong Kong’s Legislative Council chamber in 2020 to protest at the National Security Law, saying it symbolised the decay of Hong Kong’s political system.
He was given a special travel exemption to enter Australia with his wife and children in March 2021 during the pandemic and now lives in Adelaide, practising as a lawyer.
The British consul-general in Hong Kong, Brian Davidson, was also called in for a dressing-down on Tuesday after the UK granted refugee status to student leader Tony Chung, who was convicted under the national security law of calling for Hong Kong’s secession.
The chief secretary demanded the Australian and British governments “immediately stop interfering in Hong Kong affairs, which are purely China’s internal affairs”.
In a statement released after meeting the two diplomats, Mr Chan expressed “strong opposition to the granting of asylum to two Hong Kong fugitives endangering national security who have absconded overseas”.
The Australian understands Mr Williams made it clear to Mr Chan that Australia was troubled by Hong Kong’s continued pursuit of Mr Hui.
A Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade spokesperson said the Australian government had consistently expressed concerns about the broad, extraterritorial application of Hong Kong’s National Security Law to arrest or pressure pro-democracy figures.
“Freedom of expression and assembly are essential to democracy, and we support people who exercise these rights. We have raised our concerns directly with China and with Hong Kong authorities,” the spokesperson said.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109576
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23502072 (240829ZAUG25) Notable: ‘Sheltering criminals’: China ramps up attack over asylum for Hong Kong activist - Beijing has escalated its condemnation of Australia’s decision to grant asylum to Hong Kong activist Ted Hui, with the Chinese embassy quoting Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning calling Hui “an anti-China agitator… lawfully wanted by Hong Kong police” and denouncing “any country sheltering criminals in any form.” The backlash follows Hong Kong’s Chief Secretary summoning Australia’s consul-general last week. China Daily carried fierce commentary, with barrister Grenville Cross branding Hui “a vile criminal fugitive” and accusing Canberra of “demeaning itself.” Hui, who fled Hong Kong in 2020, now lives in Adelaide. Meanwhile, Melbourne-based lawyer Kevin Yam was struck off the roll of Hong Kong solicitors in Hong Kong and fined $160,000 after calling for sanctions.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109554
>>109575
‘Sheltering criminals’: China ramps up attack over asylum for Hong Kong activist
STEPHEN RICE - 24 August 2025
China has ramped up its attack on the Albanese government for giving political asylum to Hong Kong pro-democracy activist Ted Hui, condemning Australia for “sheltering criminals” after last week accusing Canberra of interfering in China’s internal affairs.
Late on Friday, the Chinese embassy in Australia posted on its official Facebook account a statement by Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning that Mr Hui “is an anti-China agitator who disrupts Hong Kong’s order and is lawfully wanted by Hong Kong police” and condemning “any country sheltering criminals in any form”.
The move comes after Hong Kong’s Chief Secretary, Chan Kwok-ki, called in Australia’s consul-general, Gareth Williams, last week to express his government’s anger at the asylum granted to Mr Hui, and vowed to keep pursuing “the fugitive”.
The former Hong Kong politician fled Hong Kong while on bail in December 2020 after he was hit with criminal charges under the National Security Law over his role in pro-democracy protests; he now lives in Adelaide, working as a lawyer.
Australia’s grant of asylum last week to Mr Hui – and an almost simultaneous grant by Britain of refugee status to student leader Tony Chung – has come at a sensitive moment for Hong Kong as the landmark sedition trial of democracy activist and newspaper publisher Jimmy Lai comes to a close, with a guilty verdict all but certain.
In an interview with The Australian last week, Mr Hui pleaded with the Albanese government to impose sanctions on Hong Kong officials responsible for human rights abuses.
Commentators in the China Daily, a newspaper owned and controlled by the Central Propaganda Department of the Chinese Communist Party, have launched vitriolic attacks on Mr Hui in recent days.
Barrister and former Hong Kong director of public prosecutions Grenville Cross described Mr Hui as a “vile criminal fugitive” and said Canberra had “demeaned itself” by giving him sanctuary.
Mr Cross is a regular cheerleader in the China Daily for Hong Kong’s National Security Law, and for the $HK1m cash bounty ($197,000) offered for the arrest and conviction of Mr Hui and other pro-democracy activists.
“That Canberra should have embraced a figure like Hui is offensive to right-thinking people everywhere. A common criminal who lied to the courts, he is a worthless individual,” Mr Cross said. “To grant Hui asylum was a calculated insult to China and an affront to the rule of law.”
Mr Cross claimed the Albanese government had “shamefully turned a blind eye to his anti-China activities”, which included “close liaison with subversive elements” in Britain UK and the US.
“No civilised society should have any truck with serial offenders like Hui, and Canberra has demeaned itself by letting him stay,” he said.
Noting Mr Hui’s fear that someone might try to kidnap him and send him back to Hong Kong or China illegally, he said: “He will never know for sure who he can trust or where he can go. Nobody need feel any pity. He will forever be looking over his shoulder.”
Meanwhile, Hong Kong legal authorities launched new punitive measures against Melbourne-based pro-democracy lawyer Kevin Yam who, like Mr Hui, has a $HK1m reward on his head.
At the weekend, Mr Yam revealed he had been struck off the roll of Hong Kong solicitors, and hit with a $160,000 bill for the cost of the disciplinary hearing.
The proceedings were sparked by his call for sanctions against Hong Kong lawyers who participated in the persecution of democracy activists under the China-imposed National Security Law.
In a statement at the weekend Mr Yam said he could not stand by “while those who supposedly lead and represent the Hong Kong legal profession have at best quietly acquiesced to, and at worst been enthusiastically complicit in, the post-National Security Law crackdown.”
Mr Yam has been the target of anonymous leaflets dropped around Melbourne calling for him to be kidnapped and taken back to Hong Kong.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/sheltering-criminals-china-ramps-up-attack-over-asylum-for-hong-kong-activist/news-story/44d4f5b722122c40c3ad0aad5ef67c8f
https://www.facebook.com/ChinainAus/posts/1075842294756502
https://www.chinadailyasia.com/hk/article/618096
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109577
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23502080 (240837ZAUG25) Notable: Queensland government announces new child sex offender registry with personal details of offenders – Queensland will introduce “Daniel’s Law,” creating a public child sex offender register named after Daniel Morcombe, the teenager abducted and murdered in 2003. The legislation, to be passed before year’s end, establishes a website listing reportable offenders who abscond or fail obligations, displaying names, ages, and photos. Queenslanders will also be able to apply for images of high-risk offenders in their area, and parents may ask police whether adults with unsupervised access to their children are on the register. Premier David Crisafulli said victims’ rights come before offenders’ rights, while Bruce and Denise Morcombe welcomed the reform as their son’s legacy. They believe it will deter breaches and provide families with a vital safety tool.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Queensland government announces new child sex offender registry with personal details of offenders
Jack McKay - 24 August 2025
Queenslanders will be able to apply for images of child sex offenders who live in their area under new laws that will be introduced to state parliament this week.
The legislation, dubbed Daniel's Law, was named in honour of Sunshine Coast teenager Daniel Morcombe, who was abducted and murdered in 2003.
The reforms would create a new public child sex offender register, which is something the LNP pledged to set up at the state election last October.
Under the changes, the government would establish a website that listed reportable offenders who failed to comply with their obligations or were hiding from police.
Personal details to be shared on database
Premier David Crisafulli said the offender's name, age, and photo would be featured on the webpage.
"If you commit hideous crimes and you try to hide, Queenslanders deserve to know who you are and where you are to keep our kids safe," he said.
Mr Crisafulli said the planned law changes would also allow Queenslanders to apply for images of high-risk reportable offenders in their local area.
People making such searches would not be granted access to other personal information, such as the offender's age or their name.
"Parents have a right to protect their kids, and they have a right to be vigilant to the risks in their community," Mr Crisafulli said.
"We believe the rights of victims and the rights of parents come before the rights of offenders and the rights of paedophiles."
'Daniel's Law' by the end of the year
Another element of the reforms would enable parents and carers to apply to police to determine if an adult having unsupervised contact with their child was a reportable offender.
Mr Crisafulli outlined the details of the proposed reforms at the LNP convention in Brisbane on Sunday, with legislation set to be introduced to parliament this week and pass before the end of the year.
He said more details would be released in the coming days, including new offences and safeguards to prevent people from misusing the information on the register.
"In this important moment, I want to acknowledge the advocacy of [Daniel's parents] Bruce and Denise Morcombe," the premier said.
"They are incredible Queenslanders, who from unfathomable pain have fought for change."
Morcombes welcome change
Mr Morcombe welcomed the reforms and said it would make a difference in keeping kids safe.
"It's good news in recognising Daniel's tragedy and makes something positive come out to protect Queenslanders," he said.
"At the end of the day, we have always put one foot in front of the other to make sure that what happened to Daniel never happens to other kids.
"This is Daniel's legacy at work. Daniel's Law will make a difference and we're really quite honoured that this legislation is named after Daniel."
Mr Morcombe believed the register would act as a deterrent to potential offenders, as well as to convicted offenders who breach their court orders.
"They will think twice before they wish to abscond or not follow the court orders as required," he said.
"I think the deterrent factor is underplayed, but I think its potential benefit will be really sound and a strong force to keep Queenslanders safe."
Mr Morcombe also acknowledged the proposed law changes were not a silver bullet.
"It's possible [someone has] done stuff and never been caught," he said.
"We all understand that, but at least it's a level of security that mum, dad, grandparents, and carers have that ability to check."
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-08-24/new-child-sex-offender-registry-daniels-law/105690778
https://qresear.ch/?q=Daniel+Morcombe
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109578
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23508392 (252257ZAUG25) Notable: ‘Shameful’: Far-right Israeli MP speaks out on visa cancellation - Israeli MP Simcha Rothman has denied describing Gazan children as enemies, claiming his remarks were misconstrued, and labelled Australia’s cancellation of his visa “shameful.” Speaking at an online event organised by the conservative Australian Jewish Association, Rothman said views cited by Home Affairs — support for eliminating Hamas and opposing a Palestinian state — were “mainstream” in Israel. He urged Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to conquer Gaza City, reject hostage deals, and extend sovereignty over the West Bank, which he called “the homeland of the Jewish people.” Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke defended the cancellation, warning Rothman could spread division in Australia. The decision has intensified diplomatic tensions with Israel.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109521
>>109555
>>109561
>>109562
‘Shameful’: Far-right Israeli MP speaks out on visa cancellation
Matthew Knott - August 24, 2025
1/2
The far-right Israeli politician who was blocked from travelling to Australia, triggering a fiery spat between the two nations, has claimed his visa was cancelled for expressing mainstream Israeli views as he denied referring to Gazan children as enemies of his nation.
The Albanese government’s decision to cancel Israeli parliamentarian Simcha Rothman’s visa for a planned speaking tour last week prompted a ferocious response, with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu branding Australian counterpart Anthony Albanese “weak” and his government cancelling the visas of Australian diplomats working in the occupied West Bank.
Speaking at an online event organised by the conservative Australian Jewish Association on Sunday night, Rothman said he believed the cancellation of his visa was a “shameful” attempt to silence Israelis who have different political views to the Australian government.
Rothman said quotes cited by the Department of Home Affairs to justify the refusal of his visa – including support for the elimination of Hamas and opposition to a two-state solution – were commonplace in Israel.
“The threat is that they are outlawing basically the views of the State of Israel and of most of the Jewish people,” he said, citing a vote last year in the Israeli parliament in which a vast majority of politicians voted against the creation of a Palestinian state.
Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke has said the key reason for the decision to block Rothman from travelling to Australia was that he had described Gazan children as enemies of Israel in a May interview with Britain’s Channel 4.
“It was a quote by the journalist. I never said that children in Gaza are our enemies,” Rothman told the online event. “I did not say it. I said, ‘The Gazans are our enemies’.”
In the interview Rothman replied that “they are our enemies” when asked about children in Gaza, although some defenders have argued that his comments have been misconstrued.
A nine-page Home Affairs Department record of the Rothman decision said that Rothman could have used his planned speaking tour to Australia to “continue making inflammatory statements to promote his controversial views and ideologies, which may lead to fostering division in the community”.
Burke defended the decision by saying: “Our government takes a hard line on people who seek to come to our country and spread division. Under our government, Australia will be a country where everyone can be safe, and feel safe.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109579
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23508523 (252329ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Man charged over series of graffiti attacks on Melbourne synagogue - A 37-year-old South Yarra man has been charged with more than 20 offences over six graffiti attacks on the Melbourne Hebrew Congregation between March and August. Graffiti included “Iran Is Da Bomb” and “Free Palestine,” painted on the synagogue’s facade. Police allege he arrived alone on an e-scooter each time, and seized items linked to the vandalism at his home. He faces charges including six counts of criminal damage, offensive graffiti, unlicensed driving, and failing to stop for police. Rabbi Shlomo Nathanson welcomed the charges, saying justice will be served and expressing hope it deters future acts of “hateful, discriminatory lawlessness.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109251
>>109252
>>109286
Man charged over series of graffiti attacks on Melbourne synagogue
LILY MCCAFFREY - 25 August 2025
A man has been charged with more than 20 offences in relation to a series of graffiti attacks on a Melbourne synagogue.
Police arrested and charged a 37-year-old man on Monday in relation to six separate instances of criminal damage that occurred at the Melbourne Hebrew Congregation on Toorak Road in South Yarra, in Melbourne’s inner south.
The incidents occurred on March 11, June 21, June 22, July 22, July 30 and August 19 this year.
Photos from one incident at the synagogue in June show a mushroom cloud containing the words “Iran Is Da Bomb” in red paint on the synagogue’s facade, close to a second tag with the words “Free Palestine”.
Detectives executed a search warrant on Monday morning at the South Yarra man’s home where they seized items allegedly related to the offending, Victoria Police said in a statement.
Police arrested the man and charged him with six counts of criminal damage, six counts of marking offensive graffiti, five counts of using an unregistered motor vehicle, five counts of unlicensed driving and one count of failing to stop on police direction.
The man was bailed to appear at the Melbourne Magistrates Court on November 21.
Police had released CCTV footage this month of a man they believed was involved in the vandalism. Each time, he arrived alone at the synagogue on a black e-scooter and spray-painted offensive phrases on the walls, police alleged.
During the July incidents, the man wore a mask similar to one used in the horror film series Scream, which completely covered his face, police said.
Melbourne Hebrew Congregation rabbi Shlomo Nathanson told The Australian he was very grateful to the team at Victoria Police who had worked on the case.
“Whilst there was a limited resource to put on the case, they certainly have brought about justice with the outcome here,” Rabbi Nathanson said on Monday after police laid the charges.
“In this very heightened tension in the political arena that we’re feeling across the community, we’re happy that the law of the land and justice can be carried out, and that the laws that are in place to prevent hateful, discriminatory lawlessness like we’ve seen at the Melbourne Hebrew Synagogue and at other places of worship and Jewish sites across the state, that justice will be served there, and hopefully it will be a deterrent for those that have chosen violence over dialogue.
“Our hope is certainly that we can correct the path and get back to a space of mutual respect, a fair go for all, like the Australian values, rather than the hatred and the lawlessness that we’ve experienced since October 7.”
This comes after the Victorian Joint Counter Terrorism Team last week arrested a second man in relation to an arson attack that severely damaged the Adass Israel Synagogue in Ripponlea in December.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/man-charged-over-series-of-graffiti-attacks-on-melbourne-synagogue/news-story/a863b73d35e304ae70243dedb64ad4a2
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/congregation-exhausted-after-proiranian-vandals-again-target-synagogue/news-story/198f1a42f7cfd14469f12b1eced2b91b
https://combatantisemitism.org/cam-news/iran-is-da-bomb-historic-melbourne-synagogue-vandalized-with-antisemitic-hate-graffiti/
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109580
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23508657 (260002ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Queensland Premier David Crisafulli condemns protester for flying Hamas’ flag during Brisbane Palestine rally - Police are investigating after a Hamas flag was flown at a 10,000-strong pro-Palestinian rally in Brisbane. Premier David Crisafulli called the act “horrendous” and said the protester must face “the full force of law.” Federal opposition spokesman Andrew Hastie and Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said terrorist symbols have no place in Australia. Hava Mendelle of the Minority Impact Coalition said the act showed “support for radicalism.” Queensland Jewish Board president Jason Steinberg said the community was “sickened” by Hamas and jihadist flags. Organiser Remah Naji refused to condemn the flag, stressing the rally’s broader message.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109475
>>109476
>>109478
Queensland Premier David Crisafulli condemns protester for flying Hamas’ flag during Brisbane Palestine rally
BIMINI PLESSER - 25 August 2025
1/2
Queensland Premier David Crisafulli has condemned the “horrendous” actions a protester who carried a Hamas flag at Brisbane’s pro-Palestine rally on Sunday.
Police are investigating after the terrorist organisation’s flag was flown above a crowd of 10,000 Queenslanders as they marched through the city’s CBD.
Acting assistant commissioner Rhys Wildman said displaying the terror symbol in public was a commonwealth offence, which could result in a jail sentence.
“It is being investigated and we are taking that matter very, very seriously,” Mr Wildman said.
A Queensland police spokeswoman confirmed on Monday that the matter was being investigated, but no charges had been laid.
Mr Crisafulli slammed the rogue protester’s actions.
“It’s just horrendous, and that individual should bear the full force of law,” Mr Crisafulli said in Toowoomba.
“That individual can’t get away with that, because … that is provocative, it’s inciteful, it’s anti-Semitic, and it’s the kind of behaviour that we don’t see in this state, in this nation.”
Federal opposition home affairs spokesman Andrew Hastie expressed a similar sentiment, saying Australians were “tired of seeing ancient hatreds spill out on to our streets”.
“It’s unacceptable that in Australia we have the flags of terrorist organisations being paraded across our capital cities,” Mr Hastie said.
“Those responsible should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.”
Federal Home Affairs minister Tony Burke said terrorist symbols have no place in Australia.
“That flag is a hate symbol, and there are laws against hate symbols because they were put in place by the Albanese Labor government,” he said.
“Wherever hate symbols are shown, I hope those thresholds are met, because we passed those laws for the simple reason that we want them enforced, people have a right to feel safe and be safe in Australia.
“Hate symbols are about attacking our social cohesion and they have no place here.”
Hava Mendelle from the Minority Impact Coalition, a Queensland-based collaboration of refugees and minorities, said flying the Hamas flag was “very un-Australian”.
“It’s actually really concerning for everyone, not just for the Jewish minorities, but all Australians in general … that there’s such support for radicalism in the form of terrorism,” Ms Mendelle said.
“The man that was carrying the flag was masked, he was wearing a keffiyeh, so they obviously knew they were doing something illegal.”
Ms Mendelle said she was disappointed at the inaction of other protesters at the rally.
“If it was indeed one bad egg or a plant, where was the outrage of the crowd of protesters standing around that flag?” she said.
“If they are a peaceful march, they want peace for Palestinians – which, by the way, I can align with, I also want freedom for Palestinian people – where was the outrage at showing terror flags of a terror group that is using the Palestinian people and actually making their lives more dangerous and increasing their suffering?”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109581
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23508828 (260042ZAUG25) Notable: Mysterious Chinese billion-dollar proposed deal in Nauru sparks concern in Canberra - Australia is pressing Nauru for details of a claimed AU$1bn investment agreement signed with the little-known “China Rural Revitalisation and Development Corporation.” The deal, announced by Nauru’s foreign minister Lionel Aingimea, promises investment in sectors from renewable energy to fisheries, but analysts doubt its plausibility, noting no record of the company exists. Under a new treaty signed with Nauru last year, Canberra holds effective veto power over national security decisions, prompting Pacific Minister Pat Conroy to warn that Article 5 may be triggered. Experts suggest the proposal could be “theatre” ahead of Nauru’s September election.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109248
>>109487
>>109571
>>109547
Mysterious Chinese billion-dollar proposed deal in Nauru sparks concern in Canberra
Stephen Dziedzic, Iris Zhao and Hugo Hodge - 19 August 2025
1/2
Australia has pressed Nauru for more detail about a claimed billion-dollar investment agreement that it has signed with a mysterious Chinese company, as federal government officials scramble to ensure the Pacific nation is not breaching a landmark treaty it signed with Australia just nine months ago.
Last week, Nauru's government announced that its foreign minister, Lionel Aingimea, had signed a "phase 1 investment project proposal … valued at approximately AU$1 billion" with a Chinese company called the "China Rural Revitalisation and Development Corporation (CRRDC)".
But the ABC has not been able to track down any information about the company, and Pacific analysts say that scale of investment doesn't seem plausible for Nauru, which has a population of just 12,000.
Late last year, Australia signed a sweeping new treaty with Nauru, promising to provide ongoing budget and security support in return for effective veto power of decisions on national security.
The pacific minister, Pat Conroy, said that Australian officials were checking that Nauru wasn't contemplating any investments which might breach the agreement.
"(DFAT) is engaging with the government of Nauru about whether (the announcement) activates part of our treaty with Nauru, particularly Article 5 of the treaty," Mr Conroy said.
"That is a really important treaty for us that helps position us as the security partner of choice of Nauru."
The ABC understands Foreign Minister Penny Wong also raised the issue with Mr Aingimea when they were both in Fiji last week to attend the Pacific Islands Forum Foreign Ministers meeting.
Article 5 of the treaty says Australia needs to "mutually agree" with any security arrangements Nauru makes, including on maritime security, defence, policing, border protection, cyber security, and some critical infrastructure.
In its statement, Nauru said that the Phase 1 proposal would focus on "developing key sectors in Nauru", including "renewable energy, the phosphate industry, marine fisheries and sea infrastructure, water resource and environmental system, modern agriculture systems, eco-tourism, green transport system, health and cultural exchange platforms".
It also said a "scoping team" from the company would come to Nauru in October to develop a "road up" for the investments.
But Nauru's government hasn't provided any information beyond that statement.
The ABC contacted Nauru on Tuesday to seek a response to Mr Conroy's comments, but it didn't immediately reply.
The assistant minister for the Pacific, Nita Green, travelled to Nauru this week to open a Commonwealth Bank branch — delivering on an Australian government commitment under the treaty to ensure the Pacific nation wasn't left without a bank in the wake of Bendigo's withdrawal.
But it is not clear if she raised the proposed investment in her meeting with Mr Aingimea and Nauru's president, David Adeang.
One Australian government source, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said there were "zero detail" available on the proposed deal, and they doubted it would ever transpire.
Graeme Smith from the Australian National University also told the ABC that the proposal was "highly unlikely" to bring in a billion dollars to Nauru because its economy simply wasn't large enough to sustain such an investment.
"I think Nauru is having their chain yanked, and I think it would be the height of foolishness for Australia to overreact and assume that this thing is actually going to happen," he said.
"I would put it up there with Manly winning the premiership this year."
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109582
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23509012 (260137ZAUG25) Notable: Epstein, Prince Andrew accuser Virginia Giuffre wrote a memoir. It’s coming out months after her death - A posthumous memoir by Jeffrey Epstein accuser Virginia Roberts Giuffre, Nobody’s Girl: A Memoir of Surviving Abuse and Fighting for Justice, will be released October 21 by Knopf. Giuffre, who died in April aged 41, had completed the 400-page manuscript with co-author Amy Wallace. In an April 1 email, she wrote it was her “heartfelt wish” the book be published “regardless” of her circumstances, stressing the need to expose “systemic failures” in trafficking. Knopf says the memoir contains “intimate, disturbing and heartbreaking” new details about Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and Prince Andrew, about whom she speaks publicly for the first time since their 2022 settlement.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109289
>>109443
>>109473
>>109474
Epstein, Prince Andrew accuser Virginia Giuffre wrote a memoir. It’s coming out months after her death
Hillel Italie - August 25, 2025
1/2
New York: A posthumous and “unsparing” memoir by one of Jeffrey Epstein’s most prominent accusers, Virginia Roberts Giuffre, will be published on October 21, publishing house Alfred A. Knopf announced on Sunday (Monday AEST).
Giuffre, who died by suicide in April aged 41, had been working on Nobody’s Girl: A Memoir of Surviving Abuse and Fighting for Justice with American author-journalist Amy Wallace. She had completed the manuscript for the 400-page book, according to the publisher.
The publisher’s statement includes an email from Giuffre to Wallace a few weeks before her death, saying that it was her “heartfelt wish” the memoir be released “regardless” of her circumstances.
“The content of this book is crucial, as it aims to shed light on the systemic failures that allow the trafficking of vulnerable individuals across borders,” the email reads.
“It is imperative that the truth is understood and that the issues surrounding this topic are addressed, both for the sake of justice and awareness.”
Giuffre had been hospitalised following a serious accident on March 24, Knopf said, and sent the email on April 1. She died on April 25 in Western Australia.
“In the event of my passing, I would like to ensure that NOBODY’S GIRL is still released. I believe it has the potential to impact many lives and foster necessary discussions about these grave injustices,” she wrote to Wallace.
In 2023, the New York Post had reported that Giuffre had reached a deal “believed to be worth millions” with an undisclosed publisher. Knopf spokesperson Todd Doughty said she initially agreed to a seven-figure contract with Penguin Press, but moved with acquiring editor Emily Cunningham after Knopf hired Cunningham as executive editor last year.
Giuffre had often stated that, in the early 2000s, when she was a teenager, she was caught up in Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring and exploited by Britain’s Prince Andrew and other influential men. Epstein was found dead in a New York City jail cell in 2019 in what investigators described as a suicide. His former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, was convicted in late 2021 on sex-trafficking and other charges.
Andrew had denied Giuffre’s allegations. In 2022, Giuffre and Andrew reached an out-of-court settlement after she had sued him for sexual assault. A representative for Andrew did not immediately return a request for comment.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109583
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23509019 (260139ZAUG25) Notable: Q Post #4923 - https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1319071346282778624 - Dearest Virginia - We stand with you. Now and always. Find peace through prayer. Never give up the good fight. God bless you. Q - https://qanon.pub/#4923 - https://qanon.pub/#4568
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109582
2/2
Nobody’s Girl is distinct from Giuffre’s unpublished memoir, The Billionaire’s Playboy Club, referenced in previous court filings and initially unsealed in 2019. Through Doughty, Wallace says she began working with Giuffre on a new memoir in 2021.
Giuffre’s name has continued to appear in headlines, even after her death. In July, United States President Donald Trump said that Epstein had “stolen” Giuffre from Mar-a-Lago, his private club in Florida where she once worked. She had alleged being approached by Maxwell and hired as a masseuse for Epstein. Maxwell has denied Giuffre’s allegations.
Doughty declined to provide details about the Epstein associates featured in Nobody’s Girl, but confirmed that Giuffre made “no allegations of abuse against Trump,” who continues to face questions about Epstein, the disgraced financier and his former friend.
Knopf’s statement says the book contains “intimate, disturbing and heartbreaking new details about her time with Epstein, Maxwell and their many well-known friends, including Prince Andrew, about whom she speaks publicly for the first time since their out-of-court settlement in 2022.” In a statement, Knopf publisher and editor-in-chief Jordan Pavlin called Nobody’s Girl a “raw and shocking” journey and “the story of a fierce spirit struggling to break free”.
Giuffre’s time with Epstein is well documented, although her accounts have been challenged. She had acknowledged getting details wrong, errors she attributed to trying to recall events from years ago. In 2022, she dropped allegations against Alan Dershowitz, saying in a statement at the time that she may “have made a mistake in identifying” the famed attorney as an abuser.
“Nobody’s Girl was both vigorously fact-checked and legally vetted,” a Knopf statement reads.
Wallace, Giuffre’s co-author on her memoir, is an award-winning magazine and newspaper reporter whose work has appeared in The New York Times and the Los Angeles Times, among other publications. She has also collaborated on two previous books, Pixar co-founder Ed Catmull’s Creativity, Inc. and former General Electric CEO Jeff Immelt’s Hot Seat.
If you or anyone you know needs support, you can contact the National Sexual Assault, Domestic and Family Violence Counselling Service at 1800RESPECT (1800 737 732), Lifeline (13 11 14), the Suicide Call Back Service (1300 659 467), Beyond Blue (1300 22 4636) and Kids Helpline (1800 55 1800).
https://www.1800respect.org.au/
https://www.lifeline.org.au/
https://www.suicidecallbackservice.org.au/
https://www.beyondblue.org.au/
https://www.kidshelpline.com.au/
https://www.theage.com.au/culture/books/epstein-prince-andrew-accuser-virginia-giuffre-wrote-a-memoir-it-s-coming-out-months-after-her-death-20250825-p5mpit.html
https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/712958/nobodys-girl-by-virginia-roberts-giuffre/
—
Q Post #4923
Oct 21 2020 20:55:05 (EST)
https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1319071346282778624
Dearest Virginia -
We stand with you.
Now and always.
Find peace through prayer.
Never give up the good fight.
God bless you.
Q
https://qanon.pub/#4923
https://qanon.pub/#4568
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109584
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23509774 (260838ZAUG25) Notable: ‘Extraordinary and dangerous acts’:Iran blamed for two antisemitic attacks on Australian soil– (Video) Australia has expelled Iran’s ambassador and shuttered its embassy in Tehran after ASIO confirmed Tehran directed arson attacks on Sydney’s Lewis’ Continental Kitchen and Melbourne’s Adass Israel Synagogue. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, flanked by ASIO chief Mike Burgess, Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke, condemned the “extraordinary and dangerous acts of aggression orchestrated by a foreign nation on Australian soil.” The government will now list Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist organisation. Israel and Jewish groups praised the move, warning Iran’s “malign reach extends into western democracies, including here in Australia.”
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>73674 (pb)
>>>/qresearch/23224374 (pb)
>>109251
‘Extraordinary and dangerous acts’: Iran blamed for two antisemitic attacks on Australian soil
In response, Iran’s ambassador to Australia has been expelled and the Australian embassy in Tehran shut down.
Matthew Knott and Paul Sakkal - August 26, 2025
1/2
Iran’s ambassador to Australia has been expelled and the Australian embassy in Tehran shuttered after the stunning revelation that Iran directed at least two high-profile attacks on the Australian Jewish community.
The most dangerous example of foreign interference in modern Australian history also prompted the Albanese government to designate Iran’s powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist organisation, a move applauded by local Jewish groups.
The nation’s top spy agency believes that Iran was responsible for plotting arson attacks against Lewis’ Continental Kitchen in Sydney and the Adass Israel Synagogue in Melbourne last October and December, respectively.
The incidents, particularly the Melbourne synagogue attack, fuelled accusations that the government had been soft on antisemitism and helped damage diplomatic relations between Australia and Israel.
“It is likely Iran directed further attacks as well. These were extraordinary and dangerous acts of aggression orchestrated by a foreign nation on Australian soil,” Albanese said at a press conference in Parliament House alongside ASIO boss Mike Burgess, Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke on Tuesday afternoon.
“They were attempts to undermine social cohesion and sow discord in our community. It is totally unacceptable. The Australian government is taking strong and decisive action in response.”
The synagogue and kitchen both suffered significant damage in the attacks, but there were no injuries.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu last year linked the Australian government’s “extreme anti-Israel position” and voting record at the United Nations to the firebombing of the synagogue in a social media post attacking the government.
This is the first time Australia has expelled an ambassador since World War II, reflecting the seriousness of the foreign interference plot.
Burgess said that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps had used “a complex web of proxies” to hide its involvement in antisemitic attacks on Australian soil. He said he did not believe Iran was responsible for all antisemitic attacks in Australia, but they may be responsible for more than the two announced on Tuesday.
“We have investigated dozens of incidents,” Burgess said. “ASIO now assesses the Iranian government directed at least two and likely more attacks on Jewish interests in Australia.
“Our painstaking investigation uncovered and unpicked the links between the alleged crimes and the commanders in Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps, the IRGC.
“Iran and its proxies literally and figuratively lit the matches and fanned the flames. I want to assure all Australians that ASIO and our law enforcement partners take these matters extremely seriously.”
Burgess described Iran’s involvement in the incidents as a “layer cake of cutouts” between the IRGC and the alleged perpetrators. When asked if there was organised crime involvement in the attacks, Burgess said there was an “organised crime element offshore”.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109585
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23509797 (260901ZAUG25) Notable: Iran ambassador expelled from Australia, Anthony Albanese accuses nation of directing antisemitic attacks – For the first time since WWII, Australia has expelled a foreign ambassador after ASIO concluded Iran directed arson attacks on Melbourne’s Adass Israel Synagogue and Sydney’s Lewis’ Continental Kitchen. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, flanked by AFP chief Reece Kershaw, ASIO director Mike Burgess and Foreign Minister Penny Wong, said Iran’s “extraordinary and dangerous acts of aggression” sought to terrify Jewish Australians and divide society. Iranian ambassador Ahmad Sadeghi and three officials were given seven days to leave. Burgess said Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps used “a complex web of proxies,” including organised crime, to hide its role. Australia also suspended operations at its Tehran embassy.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109584
Iran ambassador expelled from Australia, Anthony Albanese accuses nation of directing antisemitic attacks
For the first time since WWII, a foreign ambassador has been expelled from Australia. The PM gave the diplomat 30 minutes warning before holding a bombshell conference.
Samantha Maiden - August 26, 2025
1/2
Australia’s spy agency ASIO has found that Iran was responsible for a string of anti-semitic attacks in Australia in a bombshell finding that has prompted the expulsion of Iran’s ambassador.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese made the shock announcement today flanked by AFP chief Reece Kershaw, ASIO boss Mike Burgess and Foreign Minister Penny Wong.
The anti-semitic campaign linked to Iran includes the attack on the Adass Israel Synagogue in Melbourne that occurred on December 6, 2024, when two masked men set fire to the building.
The spy agency believes there are also links with the attacks on the Lewis’ Continental Kitchen in Bondi, Sydney, which was damaged in firebombings in October last year.
Iranian ambassador to Australia Ahmad Sadeghi was told just 30 minutes before the press conference that he - and three other officials - were being expelled from the country.
The group - declared “persona non grata” - have seven days to leave. It also marks the first time since World War II that Australia has expelled a foreign ambassador.
ASIO stressed the Iranian embassy and its diplomats were not involved in the attacks.
“ASIO has now gathered enough credible intelligence to reach a deeply disturbing conclusion that the Iranian government directed at least two of these attacks,’’ the Prime Minister said.
“Iran has sought to disguise its involvement, but ASIO assesses, it was behind the attacks on the Lewis Continental kitchen in Sydney on October 20 last year, and the Adas Israel Synagogue in Melbourne on December 6 last year.
“ASIO assesses it is likely Iran directed further attacks as well.
“It is totally unacceptable, and the Australian Government is taking strong and decisive action in response. A short time ago, we informed the Iranian Ambassador to Australia that he would be expelled. We have suspended operations at our embassy in Tehran.”
The government also advised all Australians to leave Iran if they can do so safely.
“These were extraordinary and dangerous acts of aggression orchestrated by a foreign nation on Australian soil,” Mr Albanese said.
”They have sought to harm and terrorise Jewish Australians and sow hatred and division in our community.”
Foreign Minister Penny Wong said that the conduct was completely unacceptable.
“They have tried to divide the Australian community, and they have done so with acts of aggression that not only sought to terrify Australians, but put Australia’s - Australian lives in danger,’’ Senator Wong said.
“There is no doubt that these extraordinary and dangerous acts of aggression orchestrated by a foreign nation on Australian soil have crossed a line.
“And that’s why we have declared Iran’s ambassador to Australia persona non grata, as well as three other Iranian officials and they’ll have seven days to leave the country.
“This is the first time in the postwar period that Australia has expelled an ambassador. Iran’s actions are completely unacceptable.”
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109586
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23509808 (260912ZAUG25) Notable: Shock tactics: Why Albanese had to send the Iranians packing – "By booting out Sadeghi and three other Iranian officials, the federal government has skipped all the interim steps available to it and gone straight to the diplomatic equivalent of the nuclear option. This suggests two things. First, that ASIO boss Mike Burgess is absolutely certain of the intelligence to hand… Second, it underscores the fact that the government’s rhetoric about wanting to stamp out antisemitism and ensure social cohesion… is genuine. Today’s move was not weak… symbolically, the expulsion of Sadeghi is a big deal because of the message it sends to Iran, and other nations such as China and Russia… that they will be called out and publicly humiliated if caught." – James Massola, The Age
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109584
>>109585
Shock tactics: Why Albanese had to send the Iranians packing
James Massola - August 26, 2025
The expulsion of Iran’s ambassador to Australia, Ahmad Sadeghi, marks a shocking new low in diplomatic relations with the Islamic Republic of Iran.
It also highlights just how serious the crisis of antisemitism has become in Australia, after Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and spy chief Mike Burgess revealed that Iran was involved in directing two antisemitic attacks in Australia, at the Adass Synagogue in Melbourne and the Lewis’ Continental Kitchen in Sydney.
Diplomatic expulsions of any sort are extraordinarily rare.
In the cautious world of diplomacy, there are usually multiple steps that are taken before expulsion including carefully worded protests, diplomatic démarches (essentially an ambassador getting a dressing down from a foreign minister) and even dispatching an ambassador to their home country for a spell to signal discontent.
A 2022 Parliamentary Library research paper highlights just how rare expulsions are. Since 1983, a handful of Russian, Iraqi and Syrian lower-ranking diplomats have been expelled on the grounds they were suspecting of spying, while one South African and one Israeli were also sent packing.
But as Albanese made clear, “this is the first time in the postwar period that Australia has expelled an ambassador”.
By booting out Sadeghi and three other Iranian officials, the federal government has skipped all the interim steps available to it and gone straight to the diplomatic equivalent of the nuclear option.
This suggests two things.
First, that ASIO boss Mike Burgess is absolutely certain of the intelligence to hand which showed Iran used third parties both in and outside Australia, with some links to criminal organisations, to direct and put into effect two of the most serious antisemitic attacks in Australia in years. Burgess also said that investigations are ongoing and that Iran may have had a role in other attacks.
Second, it underscores the fact that the government’s rhetoric about wanting to stamp out antisemitism and ensure social cohesion – despite the criticism it has faced from sections of the Jewish community, the federal opposition, and the Israeli government – is genuine.
Government concerns about foreign interference in Australia’s domestic politics and civil society have been growing for close to a decade, and former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull introduced tougher laws that sought to tackle head on foreign powers interfering in Australian society.
Burgess warned in his 2022 “threat assessment” speech that “espionage and foreign interference has supplanted terrorism as our principal security concern”, while in his 2023 speech he said a “hive of spies” from an unnamed foreign country (later revealed to be Russia) had been disrupted and deported.
But there is a big difference between deporting a low-ranking Russian apparatchik and expelling a nation’s chief diplomat.
This is also Albanese’s clearest signal of how serious his government is about tackling antisemitism at its source.
Australia’s Jewish community has been sounding the alarm about the rise of antisemitism in this country ever since the October 7, 2023 attacks.
It was only a week ago that Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu labelled Albanese “weak” and castigated him for abandoning Australia’s Jewish community, after Albanese announced Australia was joining like-minded allies and moving towards recognising a Palestinian state.
Today’s move was not weak.
Australia and Iran are neither allies nor major trading partners.
There is a small Iranian-born diaspora in Australia of about 85,000 people, though it’s likely that many of those Iranian-Australians are fierce opponents of the vicious theocracy that has ruled Iran since the 1979 revolution that deposed the Shah.
The practical effect on the Australian economy and the diplomatic relationship may not matter much.
But symbolically, the expulsion of Sadeghi is a big deal because of the message it sends to Iran, and other nations such as China and Russia engaged in foreign interference operations on Australian soil, that they will be called out and publicly humiliated if caught.
Australia might be on the other side of the world to the Middle East, but these Iranian influence operations are a reminder that we are on the frontlines when it comes to foreign interference.
And Iran isn’t even our number one competitor.
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/shock-tactics-why-albanese-had-to-send-the-iranians-packing-20250826-p5mpz1.html
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109587
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23509816 (260931ZAUG25) Notable: Labor is taking decisive action on Iran’s attacks, but the warnings were there for Anthony Albanese — "The evil actions of Ali Khamenei’s Islamic Republic of Iran in orchestrating the firebombings of the Adass Israel Synagogue and Lewis’ Continental Kitchen is the tip of the iceberg… Anthony Albanese has taken decisive action… The Iranian-backed attacks on Australian soil, which drove waves of copycat plots and anti-Semitic incidents, is a dramatic escalation that widens the net outside of espionage, foreign interference and cyber attacks… Yet their past comments and actions are not easily forgotten by Jewish-Australians… Iran, which funds and supplies Islamic terror groups including Hezbollah and Hamas… has always been an enemy of Australia… The interconnectedness between enemy states, organised crime gangs and street thugs poses a clear and present danger for Australia’s security." — Geoff Chambers, The Australian
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109584
>>109585
Labor is taking decisive action on Iran’s attacks, but the warnings were there for Anthony Albanese
GEOFF CHAMBERS - 26 August 2025
The evil actions of Ali Khamenei’s Islamic Republic of Iran in orchestrating the firebombings of the Adass Israel Synagogue and Lewis’ Continental Kitchen is the tip of the iceberg.
After ASIO director-general Mike Burgess on Monday informed the government that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps was directly involved in the synagogue arson in Melbourne and attack on a Jewish-run kosher restaurant in Bondi, Anthony Albanese has taken decisive action.
The Prime Minister and Burgess revealed the shocking revelations on Tuesday shortly after the government expelled Iranian ambassador Ahmad Sadeghi and three of Tehran’s top operatives in Canberra – the first expulsion of an ambassador since World War II.
In the wake of Hamas’s murderous attacks against innocent Israelis on October 7, 2023, Sadeghi publicly incited anti-Israel hate but received only light reprimands from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade over his anti-Semitic vomit.
The Iranian-backed attacks on Australian soil, which drove waves of copycat plots and anti-Semitic incidents, is a dramatic escalation that widens the net outside of espionage, foreign interference and cyber attacks.
The explosion in anti-Semitic incidents targeting Jewish-Australians and the government’s immediate response to the synagogue terror attack heaped pressure on Albanese, who often struggled to manage the crisis as Labor ministers elevated the scourge of Islamophobia.
The Albanese government has been told not all anti-Semitic attacks in Australia are linked to the IRGC. While investigations are ongoing in some cases, Iranian-backed attacks should not diminish dozens of other anti-Semitic incidents across the country.
Extreme elements in the pro-Palestinian movement are fuelling a new wave of anti-Semitism, which concerns some senior government figures.
Albanese, Tony Burke and Penny Wong – who have been locked in a war of words with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over the government’s decision to formally recognise Palestine as a state – on Tuesday were careful to keep the focus on anti-Semitism and supporting the Jewish-Australian community.
Yet their past comments and actions are not easily forgotten by Jewish-Australians.
When Israel in June launched targeted attacks against Iran focused on nuclear and military facilities, the Albanese government urged caution and called for de-escalation.
Iran, which funds and supplies Islamic terror groups including Hezbollah and Hamas, which call for the destruction of Israel, has always been an enemy of Australia.
Amid tensions between the Australian and Israeli governments, Executive Council of Australian Jewry president Daniel Aghion is right in saying “Israel’s enemies are Australia’s enemies” and that the “Iranian regime has demonstrated that anti-Semitism is a threat not only to the Jews, it is a threat to civilisation”.
Burgess and outgoing Australian Federal Police Commissioner Reece Kershaw have repeatedly warned of the rising threat posed by extremism, espionage and foreign interference.
The interconnectedness between enemy states, organised crime gangs and street thugs poses a clear and present danger for Australia’s security.
ASIO and AFP investigators have been connecting the dots, threading together a complex network of encrypted communications, cryptocurrency and financial transactions crisscrossing the globe. This involved cracking anonymising technology, including dedicated encrypted communication devices used to co-ordinate the Iranian-backed attacks.
Investigators focused on young criminals based in Australia who were actively recruited, radicalised online and encouraged to commit anti-Semitic attacks.
The forensic investigation, supported by Five Eyes security partners including the US and other intelligence agencies, was built around the need to gather hard evidence.
In his Hawke Lecture delivered on July 31, Burgess listed China, Russia and Iran as countries targeting Australian secrets but warned people that there were many other nation states seeking to undermine our security.
As China, Russia, Iran, North Korea and other countries forge closer security and intelligence ties in an increasingly fragmented world, the schism between Western democracies and autocracies is deepening at a frightening pace.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/how-asio-cracked-the-code-and-found-out-iran-was-plotting-attacks-on-australias-jewish-community/news-story/cf776ef2a199d2886de157dfd16c7f6d
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109588
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23509829 (260948ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Porepunkah shooting: Weapons stolen from fatally wounded officers, alleged offender a ‘sovereign citizen’ — Two Victoria Police officers have been shot dead and a third seriously wounded in Porepunkah, north-east Victoria, with alleged gunman Dezi Freeman, 56, identified as a self-proclaimed “sovereign citizen” who has previously denounced police as “scumbags” and “criminal filth.” Freeman, his wife Mali, and at least one family member remain on the run after police attended his property to execute a warrant over historical sex abuse allegations. Weapons were taken from the slain officers, prompting a large-scale search and lockdown of the town. Tributes have flowed from Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, Premier Jacinta Allan, and police leaders.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Porepunkah shooting: Weapons stolen from fatally wounded officers, alleged offender a ‘sovereign citizen’
Cameron Houston and Carla Jaeger - August 26, 2025
1/2
The alleged gunman who fatally shot two police officers in Porepunkah on Tuesday has been identified as Dezi Freeman, a 56-year-old conspiracy theorist who has repeatedly espoused hatred for police and authorities.
Freeman, a self-proclaimed “sovereign citizen”, remains on the run from police with his wife, Mali, and at least one other family member.
Freeman allegedly shot two officers dead and seriously wounded another after a shooting at a rural property in the small town of Porepunkah, about 300 kilometres north-east of Melbourne and seven kilometres from Bright.
Freeman made headlines in 2021 when he attempted to privately prosecute then-premier Daniel Andrews on treason and fraud charges.
Freeman was arrested outside the Myrtleford Court before the December 2021 hearing, where he described the officers as “scumbags” and “criminal filth” who were “obsessed with power”. On another occasion, in 2020, he called an officer who pulled him over for speeding a “terrorist” and “corrupt scum”.
In a statement issued late on Tuesday afternoon, Victoria Police said 10 police had attended the property on Rayner Track, which runs south off Mount Buffalo Road, shortly after 10.30am on Tuesday when the shooting occurred. A call for urgent help at the property was made at 10.55am. No other officers were physically injured, but they remain at the property along with members of the special operations group and critical incident response team.
Three police sources, not authorised to speak on behalf of the force, told this masthead that police had attended the property to execute a warrant over historical sex abuse allegations when Freeman allegedly shot the two officers dead in an ambush and wounded the other.
Police sources confirmed earlier on Tuesday that Freeman was living on a bus on the property and was now on the run with family members, including children and his wife, Mali.
However, at a press conference, Victoria Police chief commissioner Mike Bush could not confirm whether Freeman fled into the bush alone, nor did he confirm his identity as reported by this masthead.
“He was seen going into the bush alone. We don’t know exactly where his wife is at the moment or the children, and we have no information to suggest whether he is with or without them,” Bush said.
“We are still looking to locate his partner and two children, but he was not seen to head into the bush with them.”
Two weapons were stolen from the fatally wounded officers, this masthead has been told.
“The exact circumstances surrounding the incident are still being determined, and it remains an active and ongoing situation,” the Victoria Police statement said. “A significant search is actively under way to locate the man.”
Sovereign citizens are considered to be part of a radicalised fringe group which follows conspiracy theories and believes the government is illegitimate. Members of this fringe group are known for their deep distrust of, and contempt for, law enforcement.
To reflect his beliefs, Freeman had changed his name.
Bush confirmed the deaths and said the wounded officer was undergoing surgery.
“This is a terribly tragic event for the Victoria Police, the police family,” Bush said. “It’s also very important that we wrap ourselves around the friends, family and colleagues of these officers who so bravely gave their lives to support their communities.”
Police urged people in and around Porepunkah to remain indoors until further notice and asked people not to travel into the area.
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109589
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23514551 (270923ZAUG25) Notable: Second man faces court for Adass Israel firebombing, a day after Iran exposed as behind the attacks — A 20-year-old Meadow Heights man, Ali Younes, has faced Melbourne Magistrates Court charged with arson, conduct endangering life and theft of a motor vehicle over the firebombing of the $20m Adass Israel Synagogue in Ripponlea last December. Police allege Younes was one of three masked men who broke in and set the building alight while about 20 people were inside. He is also accused of stealing a blue Volkswagen Golf used in the attack and linked to other crimes. Co-accused Giovanni Laulu, 21, was charged last month. Neither man has entered a plea.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109447
>>109584
>>109585
Second man faces court for Adass Israel firebombing, a day after Iran exposed as behind the attacks
GEORGIE KIBEL - 27 August 2025
A second man has faced court over the alleged firebombing of the Adass Israel Synagogue, valued at about $20m, a day after it was revealed Iran was behind the attack.
Ali Younes, 20, appeared via video link from Metropolitan Remand Centre on Wednesday for a brief filing hearing.
The Meadow Heights man was charged by the Victorian Joint Counter Terrorism Team with arson, conduct endangering life and theft of a motor vehicle for his alleged involvement in the destruction of the Ripponlea place of worship in the early hours of December 6 last year.
Police will allege Mr Younes is one of three individuals who broke into the synagogue on Glen Eira Ave, and deliberately set it on fire.
Charge sheets released by the Magistrates Court allege that Mr Younes “did engage in conduct namely setting fire to the Adass Israel Synagogue … while persons were inside, that placed those persons in danger of death”.
About 20 people were reported to be inside the place of worship when it was set alight.
CCTV footage released this year showed masked men smashing their way into the property – estimated to be valued at about $20m – with one carrying a red jerry can. Flames then engulfed the building.
The charge sheets revealed Mr Younes was accused of stealing the blue Volkswagen Golf in which the three offenders arrived at the scene .
Police believe the vehicle was used as a “communal crime car” and has been connected to a string of unrelated incidents – including a firebombing at South Yarra’s Lux Nightclub.
Mr Younes wore a green prison-issued bomber style jacket, and was mostly expressionless throughout the hearing.
He did not apply for bail and his lawyer did not declare any custody management issues.
Last month, Mr Younes’s co-accused – 21-year-old Werribee man Giovanni Laulu – was charged with arson, recklessly endangering life and vehicle theft.
The offence of arson carries a maximum penalty of 15 years’ imprisonment, while theft of motor vehicle and conduct endangering life both carry a maximum penalty of 10 years’ imprisonment.
Neither man has yet been required to enter a plea. They will return to Melbourne Magistrates Court on December 4.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/second-man-faces-court-for-adass-israel-firebombing-a-day-after-iran-exposed-as-behind-the-attacks/news-story/dddfb8ac2e2ca5683f5f16ddd84a78fd
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109590
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23514558 (270930ZAUG25) Notable: Australia 'primarily' responsible for investigation that uncovered Iran links to antisemitic attacks — Prime Minister Anthony Albanese confirmed ASIO was “primarily” responsible for uncovering Iran’s role in the firebombings of Melbourne’s Adass Israel Synagogue and Sydney’s Lewis’ Continental Kitchen. He said the investigation traced perpetrators “right through to the funding” and identified individuals both offshore and onshore. Iran’s foreign ministry condemned the expulsions of its ambassador Ahmad Sadeghi and three officials as an “assault on diplomacy,” linking them to domestic criticism of Israel. ASIO said Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps used “cut-outs” to direct the attacks. Operations at Australia’s Tehran embassy have been suspended, and the IRGC will be listed as a terrorist organisation.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109584
>>109585
Australia 'primarily' responsible for investigation that uncovered Iran links to antisemitic attacks
Maani Truu, Claudia Long, and Olivia Caisley - 26 August 2025
Iran has criticised Australia's move to cut diplomatic ties with the regime after an investigation found the country directed antisemitic attacks in Sydney and Melbourne, labelling it an "assault on diplomacy".
ASIO chief Mike Burgess on Tuesday accused Iran of ordering the attacks on Adass Israel Synagogue and Lewis Continental Kitchen in October and December, prompting the expulsion of Iran's ambassador to Australia from the country.
Responding publicly to the revelations for the first time, Iran's foreign ministry spokesperson, Esmaeil Baghaei, said the move appeared to be influenced by "domestic developments" in Australia, citing recent protests against the war in Gaza.
"It appears that this action against Iran, effectively an assault on diplomacy and the relationship between the two nations, is being used to offset the modest criticism Australia has recently directed at the Zionist regime," he said.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese confirmed late on Tuesday that Australia was primarily responsible for the investigation that uncovered Iran's alleged links to the attack.
In an interview with the ABC, he dismissed a question about whether those findings were a result of a joint investigation with other countries.
"No, it was primarily ASIO's investigation, and ASIO came to this determination," he said.
"They have been able to trace the whole line-up, if you like, from the perpetrators who physically committed the crimes, the actions, right through to the funding of those criminal acts."
The ABC understands that partner intelligence was used in one case, but it did not confirm Iran's involvement, and that the majority of intelligence was Australian-based.
Mr Burgess said the investigation found Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps directed the attack through a series of "cut-outs" or third parties and that some perpetrators were paid.
Evidence uncovered during the investigation leading to certain individuals is "clear", the prime minister told ABC's 7.30, confirming that their identities are known.
"We certainly have the identity of people that were involved offshore, as well as onshore, the elements that were used to carry out these attacks," he said.
Mr Albanese did not say whether the individuals within the Revolutionary Guard identified by the investigation would be sanctioned, but added that the government would "take whatever action is appropriate".
The Iranian ambassador to Australia, Ahmad Sadeghi, and three other officials have already been expelled and given seven days to leave Australia.
ASIO confirmed no diplomats or embassy staff were involved in the attacks.
Meanwhile, operations at Australia's embassy in Tehran have been suspended, with all diplomats already out of the country.
Pending legislation, the government will also designate the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist organisation, a move that has been welcomed by the opposition.
Mr Burgess flagged that ASIO believed Iran may have also been behind other antisemitic attacks.
The spy agency and the Australian Federal Police will continue their investigations into Iran’s interference in Australia, the prime minister said, including the regime’s activities targeting Australian citizens.
"What we will continue to do is to work with the agencies. ASIO are very aware of the activities that have occurred, including two Australians of Iranian descent who've been harassed here."
"This is a very complex situation that they have worked through and they have kept the government and our appropriate committees informed at regular intervals about the work that's been taking place."
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-08-26/prime-minister-iran-links-antisemitic-attacks/105700422
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109591
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23514579 (270947ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Israeli government claims credit for pushing Albanese to expel Iranian diplomats — Israel has claimed Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s “forthright intervention” shamed Australia into expelling Iranian ambassador Ahmad Sadeghi after ASIO linked Tehran to antisemitic attacks in Sydney and Melbourne. Israeli spokesman David Mencer said Australia was now “taking the threats seriously,” while Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke dismissed the claim as “complete nonsense,” insisting the decision was based solely on ASIO’s findings. Iran’s foreign minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi echoed Netanyahu’s insult, branding Anthony Albanese a “weak politician,” while Tehran rejected responsibility and threatened reciprocal action, accusing Canberra of appeasing Israel and ignoring “genocide” in Gaza.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109584
>>109585
Israeli government claims credit for pushing Albanese to expel Iranian diplomats
Matthew Doran - 27 August 2025
1/2
The Israeli government is claiming credit for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and intelligence agencies publicising Iranian involvement in antisemitic attacks on Australian soil, as well as kicking Tehran's envoy out of Canberra.
On Tuesday, Mr Albanese and ASIO director-general Mike Burgess accused Iran of directing at least two attacks in Sydney and Melbourne.
In protest, the government announced it would expel Iran's ambassador to Australia, Ahmad Sadeghi, and three other diplomats.
Australia's diplomatic mission in Tehran has been suspended, and officials have already left the country.
The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) will also be labelled a terrorist organisation under Australian law.
Mr Albanese was personally called out again for the move, with Iran echoing Benjamin Netanyahu's criticisms from last week.
Officials in Israel had refused to comment for hours after the announcement, pointing only to a statement from the Israeli embassy in Canberra welcoming the move.
But in a press briefing overnight, Israeli government spokesperson David Mencer effectively accused Australia of being shamed into acting.
"Prime Minister [Benjamin] Netanyahu has made a very forthright intervention when it comes to Australia, a country in which we have a long history of friendly relations," Mr Mencer said in response to a question from the ABC.
"He made those comments because he did not believe that the actions of the Australian government had gone anywhere near far enough to address the issues of antisemitism. He made very forthright comments about the prime minister himself.
"We certainly see it from Israel that Australia taking the threats against Israel and the Jewish people, Jewish Australians living in Australia — for the Australian government to take those threats seriously is a positive outcome."
Australia's Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said it was "complete nonsense" for Israel to claim credit.
"There was not a minute between us receiving this assessment [from ASIO] and us starting to work through what we would do as a response," Mr Burke told ABC Radio National.
"We've taken this action because Iran has attacked Australians. No other country is involved in terms of that conclusion."
Last week, a diplomatic furore erupted as Mr Netanyahu labelled Mr Albanese a "weak" leader who had "betrayed Israel and abandoned Australia's Jews".
The day before, Israel announced it would tear up the visas of Australian diplomats working in the West Bank in protest against the Albanese government's moves to recognise a Palestinian state and block controversial Israel figures wanting to travel to Israel.
"Jewish Australians felt threatened," Mr Mencer said.
"The relationship between this country and Australia was damaged, and so it's welcome that after the Prime Minister Netanyahu's timely intervention that these actions have been taken by Australia's government."
Mr Mencer added that it was up to Australia to decide how to respond to the threat of foreign interference from Iran.
"The government of Iran are a wholly negative influence on world affairs — they desire, they openly say, they wish to wipe this country [Israel] off the face of the earth," he said.
"They have around the world, in London, and now it seems in Australia as well, are actively seeking to attack Jewish communities and other Israeli interests or targets in Israel."
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109592
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23514611 (271010ZAUG25) Notable: Loud bangs heard, as police reveal identities of cops allegedly killed by fugitive Dezi Freeman — Victoria Police has named Detective Leading Senior Constable Neal Thompson, 59, and Senior Constable Vadim De Waart, 35, as the officers killed in Tuesday’s Porepunkah ambush. Chief Commissioner Mike Bush said the loss “has struck at the heart of Victoria Police,” describing both men as heroes. Thompson was a 38-year veteran nearing retirement; De Waart, a linguist and traveller, joined in 2018. As colleagues and leaders offered tributes, the hunt for alleged gunman Dezi Freeman intensified with roadblocks, a no-fly zone, and Special Operations Group units searching bushland where Freeman, armed and skilled in survival, remains at large.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109588
Loud bangs heard, as police reveal identities of cops allegedly killed by fugitive Dezi Freeman
As bad weather closes in, those pursuing alleged double cop killer Dezi Freeman know it could take days before police are able to flush out a man with nothing to lose. Now they have named his alleged victims.
JOHN FERGUSON - 27 August 2025
1/2
The identities of the two slain police victims of the Porepunkah ambush have been revealed by the force on Wednesday.
Killed were Detective Leading Senior Constable Neal Thompson, 59, a 38-year veteran of Victoria Police, and Senior Constable Vadim De Waart, 35, who joined the force in 2018.
Both men have been hailed as heroes by their colleagues after being allegedly gunned down by Dezi Freeman in a firefight on Tuesday morning that also seriously injured a third officer.
Chief Commissioner Mike Bush said: “This devastating loss of Neal and Vadim has struck at the heart of Victoria Police, the broader policing family and the community of Porepunkah.
“In the coming days, weeks and months, we will all grieve this loss and deeply miss our colleagues and friends who have paid the ultimate sacrifice in the line of duty.
“It is not lost on me that our members take a risk every time they go to work to protect the Victorian community. While we all live with the knowledge that the worst could happen on a shift, we don’t expect it to.
“In these difficult times it is so important that our people stand together and support each other, and I have full confidence that we will all do this with dignity and respect.”
Police said Mr Thompson joined in September 1987 and spent seven years in general duties at Collingwood police station.
Mr Thompson then worked as a detective at the Major Fraud Squad and the State Crime Squad, before moving to Wangaratta CIU in July 2007.
“Neal was an adventurer and enjoyed all things outdoors. He loved getting out in nature, and his friends and colleagues regularly joined him on these trips,’’ police said.
“Neal had spent the past six years alongside his partner, Lisa, the love of his life. Since the pair met, Neal had found new purpose and was planning in earnest for his imminent retirement.
“Together with Lisa, Neal had built a new home and had a long list of tasks planned after he knocked off work for the last time.’’
Mr De Waart started his career at the Victoria Police Academy in December 2018.
“Following his training, Vadim joined St Kilda police station where he worked for three years, before joining PORT as a senior constable in April 2023. At the time of his passing, Vadim was on temporary assignment in Wangaratta,’’ police said.
“An eternal optimist and avid traveller, Vadim was fluent in French, Spanish, Flemish and English. He had also completed scuba dives all around the world and motorcycling trips more locally with his friends and colleagues.
“He was a keen gin collector and always picked up a local bottle on his overseas adventures for his large collection at home. While travelling was his passion, Vadim was extremely proud to have purchased his first home in Melbourne in recent years.
“Vadim is survived by his beloved parents Carolina and Alain, who live in his native Belgium, and his younger brother Sacha, who lives in Switzerland. Closer to home in Melbourne, he leaves behind his aunty Jacqueline, uncle Shane, uncle Peter, aunty Maria and his cousins Christopher, Jeremy, Laura and Tessa.’’
(continued)
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109593
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23514628 (271019ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Marles gets last-minute meeting with Hegseth — Richard Marles has secured a late meeting in Washington with US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Vice President JD Vance, though a scheduled press conference was cancelled. The Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister also met White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller and was expected to see Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Marles shared photos with Hegseth and Vance, saying the alliance was “longstanding” and that he reaffirmed Australia’s commitment. The visit comes as the Pentagon reviews AUKUS, with Hegseth urging Canberra to lift defence spending to 3.5% of GDP — a request not yet met by the Albanese government.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109316
>>109512
>>109545
Marles gets last-minute meeting with Hegseth
Richard Marles also met with JD Vance on his trip to Washington but we don’t know what they talked about as a planned press conference was cancelled.
JOE KELLY - August 27, 2025
Richard Marles has managed to secure a last-minute meeting with US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, along with US Vice President JD Vance on his trip to Washington – although a planned press conference has been cancelled.
The Australian Deputy Prime Minister is also expected to meet with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio later on Tuesday local time after holding further discussions with defence industry companies during the day including Boeing.
The Australian first revealed that Mr Marles, who also serves as Australia’s Defence Minister, had not locked in a meeting with Mr Hegseth on Monday night local time – despite publicly saying on the weekend that this was the reason for his trip to Washington.
The Australian understands that Mr Marles also met with White House Deputy Chief of Staff, Stephen Miller, on Tuesday morning local time.
It is not yet clear how long or comprehensive the meeting with Mr Vance and Mr Hegseth was, or what issues the trio discussed.
However, taking to social media, Mr Marles posted photos of himself standing alongside both Mr Vance and Mr Hegseth.
He said: “The Alliance between Australia and the United States is longstanding, built on our shared history of deep collaboration.”
“I was pleased to have the opportunity to reaffirm Australia’s commitment to building on this partnership with US @VP JD Vance and Secretary of Defense @PeteHegseth in Washington D.C. today,” he added.
A press conference planned with Mr Marles before his departure back to Australia at 7pm local time has been cancelled.
The trip from Mr Marles comes amid a Pentagon review into the landmark AUKUS partnership under which Washington is scheduled to provide Canberra with at least three Virginia class submarines from the early 2030s.
Mr Hegseth has previously asked Mr Marles for Australia to increase its defence budget to 3.5 per cent of GDP – a request that has not been accepted by the Albanese government.
Anthony Albanese has yet to meet with Donald Trump and there is speculation about whether he will have a chance when he travels to America next month to address the UN General Assembly.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/marles-gets-last-minute-meeting-with-hegseth/news-story/71422050312af703f993609c10742c7d
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bv_vcNmBzlQ
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109594
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23514638 (271026ZAUG25) Notable: Allies bowing to defence demands, Hegseth boasts after Marles meeting — US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth declared Indo-Pacific allies were “stepping up” on military spending just hours after his talks with Richard Marles in Washington on the AUKUS submarine pact. Marles also pitched Australia as a “reliable” supplier of critical minerals while seeking relief from Donald Trump’s tariffs, and met with Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Trump aide Stephen Miller. Hegseth wants Australia to lift defence spending from 2% to 3.5% of GDP, but Labor has so far resisted, leaving the Pentagon review of AUKUS under Elbridge Colby unresolved.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109316
>>109545
>>109593
Allies bowing to defence demands, Hegseth boasts after Marles meeting
Jessica Gardner and Andrew Tillett - Aug 27, 2025
Washington/Canberra | US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has boasted that allies in the Indo-Pacific have heeded Donald Trump’s demands to lift military spending, just hours after talks with Richard Marles on the AUKUS nuclear-powered submarine deal.
The defence minister also pushed Australia’s case as a reliable and plentiful supplier of critical minerals for new technologies – an offer Labor has put repeatedly as it seeks relief for exporters from Donald Trump’s tariffs – in face-to-face talks with high-ranking US officials.
Marles made a sudden dash to Washington this week, skipping parliament, amid growing concerns over differences between Canberra and Washington on trade and defence spending and the outcome of a Pentagon review into the AUKUS submarine pact.
While the purpose of the trip was to meet Hegseth, it took several days for Marles to lock in a time with the colourful defence secretary.
Marles shared photographs of his encounter with Hegseth and Vice President J.D. Vance on Tuesday (Wednesday AEST) in Washington, highlighting that a diplomatic blunder was avoided but providing little detail about the engagement.
Marles said in a post on social media platform X that he was able “to reaffirm” Australia’s commitment to its longstanding alliance with the US to Vance and Hegseth.
As well as the meeting with Vance, Marles met Trump’s deputy chief of staff, Stephen Miller, who is regarded as one of the president’s most loyal and influential aides, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Rubio is also filling in as Trump’s national security adviser, giving him Trump’s ear.
Marles’ meeting with such high-ranking figures could pave the way for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to have his first face-to-face meeting with Trump sooner rather than later. The date of that long-awaited meeting remains up in the air.
Hegseth has pushed for Australia to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of gross domestic product, up from 2 per cent, which put some strain on the relationship, amid a broader push that American allies boost their military budgets.
After the Albanese government rebuffed the request, it was revealed that Hegseth’s Pentagon policy chief, Elbridge Colby, was conducting a review of the AUKUS nuclear-submarine pact.
Following his meeting with Marles, much of Hegseth’s day on Tuesday was taken up by a live-streamed cabinet meeting in the White House, which went for more than three hours.
Hegseth sat to the left of Trump, who encouraged each of his cabinet secretaries to speak about their successes in the first eight months of his second term, especially any initiatives that were “bringing jobs back to America”.
“Whether it’s Europe ... our allies [will be] paying 5 per cent now. Our allies in the Indo-Pacific [are] stepping up to do the same,” Hegseth said.
“That’s a recognition that American leadership is here.”
Labor is already increasing defence spending, albeit not at the rate the US is demanding, but Marles has left the door open to a further rise next year when Defence updates its integrated investment program – the 10-year blueprint for new weapons.
During Marles’ meetings, the ministers and the Americans discussed deepening the military alliance between Australia and the US, including through AUKUS and US deployment of forces to Australian military bases.
Marles reiterated the importance of defence co-operation to the Indo-Pacific amid a time of strategic competition in our region with China.
Marles also highlighted Australia’s potential as one of the largest resources deposits to meet increasing global and domestic demand for critical minerals and rare earths needed for energy, technology and defence. He also emphasised the importance of two-way investment.
“Australia’s defence relationship with the United States continues to grow and deepen,” Marles said.
https://www.afr.com/policy/foreign-affairs/allies-bowing-to-defence-demands-hegseth-boasts-after-marles-meeting-20250827-p5mq3v
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109595
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23514649 (271031ZAUG25) Notable: Marles’ mystery visit to US raises more questions than answers amid mix-ups — "Richard Marles was on a mission for Australia this week in Washington DC, but his purpose and whether he succeeded are mysteries. His meetings with the Trump administration have raised more questions than answers… The Defence Minister’s main public reason for rushing to Washington was to meet Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth… As revealed by The Australian, Marles touched down in Washington to find that no meeting with Hegseth had been locked in. In the end, Marles did see the Defence Secretary - although it appears they spoke only briefly. A readout from the Australian side revealed that Marles discussed critical minerals and rare earths, investment opportunities, US-Australia defence ties including AUKUS, US force-posture initiatives and growing ties between both nations’ defence industrial bases as well as the need for deeper defence industry engagement. Yet, his overall agenda with the administration remains opaque - including whether he may have laid the groundwork for a face-to-face meeting between the President and the Prime Minister. On these issues, it may better serve the government’s political interests to embrace ambiguity rather than clarity." — Joe Kelly, The Australian
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109316
>>109545
>>109593
Marles’ mystery visit to US raises more questions than answers amid mix-ups
JOE KELLY - 27 August 2025
Richard Marles was on a mission for Australia this week in Washington DC, but his purpose and whether he succeeded are mysteries.
His meetings with the Trump administration have raised more questions than answers and the evidence suggests the visit did not go according to script.
The Deputy Prime Minister left the US on Tuesday, local time, after cancelling a news conference and without answering a single question from the media.
His key engagements appeared to have been secured at the last minute – lending the entire trip an improvised atmospheric. Yet, on the surface, it must be seen as a success.
Marles obtained in-person meetings with Vice-President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio at the White House – two of the most powerful people in the Trump administration.
He also met White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller.
This should be seen as a clear symbol of the strong relationship between Canberra and Washington and the high-level access afforded to Australian ministers – a good news story for the Albanese government.
Except this isn’t why Marles said he was travelling to America.
The Defence Minister’s main public reason for rushing to Washington was to meet Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth.
This was crucial given Australia is under immense pressure from the US after rebuffing a request – by Hegseth – to increase defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP.
A major review being conducted by the Pentagon into the landmark AUKUS agreement also threatens plans for Washington to sell Australia Virginia-class submarines from the early 2030s.
The situation has been made more uncertain given Anthony Albanese’s failure to meet Donald Trump and the growing rift with Washington on key policy matters – including recognition of a Palestinian state.
Marles may have been on a simple mission to assure the US that it could still rely on Australia as an ally and partner. But there was a major problem.
As revealed by The Australian, Marles touched down in Washington to find that no meeting with Hegseth had been locked in. This sparked a diplomatic scramble on Monday, local time, and a short time later news emerged of meetings the next day with Vance, Rubio and Miller. The source of the mix-up with Hegseth and whether it was reflective of a deeper problem in the alliance relationship is unclear but unlikely.
Australian officials believe it was the result of a scheduling clash on the US side.
In the end, Marles did see the Defence Secretary – although it appears they spoke only briefly.
While Marles issued a statement saying that he met Vance and Rubio to “reaffirm our commitment to the alliance and advance our strong partnership”, his engagement with Hegseth was given a more cosmetic description.
“It was fantastic to see Secretary Hegseth again, following our most recent meeting at the Shangri-La Dialogue in May,” Marles said.
He posted photos on social media of himself standing alongside both Vance and Hegseth, declaring the alliance was “built on our shared history of deep collaboration”.
A readout from the Australian side revealed that Marles discussed critical minerals and rare earths, investment opportunities, US-Australia defence ties including AUKUS, US force-posture initiatives and growing ties between both nations’ defence industrial bases as well as the need for deeper defence industry engagement. Yet, his overall agenda with the administration remains opaque – including whether he may have laid the groundwork for a face-to-face meeting between the President and the Prime Minister.
There is also no illumination on whether assurances were provided by the US on the future of AUKUS or if a further request was made for the Albanese government to increase the defence budget.
On these issues, it may better serve the government’s political interests to embrace ambiguity rather than clarity.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/marles-mystery-visit-to-us-raises-more-questions-than-answers-amid-mixups/news-story/5299a98ab687d6db56ce879e78f75eef
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109596
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23514674 (271041ZAUG25) Notable: Beijing to Canberra: ‘Say no to AUKUS’ — Beijing has used the rift between the Albanese government and the Trump administration over defence spending to renew pressure on Australia to abandon AUKUS. In a China Daily editorial, Beijing said Canberra should “exercise strategic autonomy” and “say no to AUKUS,” calling the pact a Cold War project serving only to heighten tensions. The piece cited Paul Keating’s view that Washington might “save Australia from itself.” The warning came as Defence Minister Richard Marles met US counterparts in Washington, and ahead of a major PLA parade showcasing new hypersonic and strategic missile systems.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109299
>>109316
>>109392
>>109430
Beijing to Canberra: ‘Say no to AUKUS’
WILL GLASGOW - 27 August 2025
Beijing has seized on the rift between the Albanese government and the Trump administration over defence spending to argue that Australia should follow Paul Keating’s counsel and “say no to AUKUS”.
Xi Jinping’s government delivered the message in the lead editorial on Wednesday in the state-owned China Daily, Beijing’s most authoritative English language masthead.
“As the Pentagon is now reviewing the AUKUS security pact between the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia, Canberra needs to decide whether it is still ready to push ahead with this US-led project that goes against its own national interests in many aspects,” the China Daily editorialised.
“The purported aim is to counter what the US and its allies perceive to be a ‘China threat’ in the Asia-Pacific through enhanced trilateral security and defence collaboration,” continued the state-owned masthead, which is overseen by Beijing’s Propaganda Ministry.
“China has firmly opposed the plan since it was announced, saying it is driven by a Cold War mentality and serves only to increase tensions in the region,” the China Daily wrote.
“Now, with the current US administration’s review of AUKUS being conducted to make sure it meets the ‘America First’ agenda, the possibility has emerged that the project might be put on hold or even dropped.”
Beijing has opposed the AUKUS pact ever since it was announced in September 2021. The defence sharing agreement was conceived by then Prime Minister Scott Morrison and became a centrepiece of the Biden administration’s attempt to work with allies to create collective deterrence against future military aggression by China.
The AUKUS pact is currently under review by Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby, leading some of its longstanding critics to argue that it may be shelved.
Amid the review, Defence Minister Richard Marles this week visited Washington for meetings with US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, US Vice President JD Vance and White House Deputy Chief of Staff, Stephen Miller.
Mr Marles cancelled a planned press conference in Washington amid ongoing speculation about when Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will meet with US President Donald Trump. Eight months after the American president’s inauguration, the two leaders have still not met in person.
The Wednesday editorial continues Beijing’s four year effort to talk Canberra out of the AUKUS pact, which the China Daily characterised as a “lopsided arrangement where the US calls the shots with the unilateral right to cancel any aspect of the deal”.
“This has prompted former Australian prime minister Paul Keating to express the hope the ongoing review ‘might very well be the moment Washington saves Australia from itself’.”
Beijing’s excitement about fissures in the US-Australian defence partnership comes as the People’s Liberation Army prepares for a huge display of its increasingly potent military power.
Next week, President Xi will be joined by Russia’s President Vladimir Putin and other world leaders for a military parade in central Beijing to mark the 80th anniversary of what it calls the victory in the “Chinese people’s war of resistance against Japanese aggression and the world anti-fascist war”.
A PLA major general last week said the parade will include the debut of hypersonic, antimissile defence and strategic missiles “to exhibit our strong strategic deterrence capabilities”.
China has undertaken a huge military build up over the past three decades as its economy has grown into the world’s second biggest.
That build up, along with the PLA’s increasingly assertive behaviour in the region, has concerned capitals around the region, including Canberra.
Beijing dismisses those concerns, including in its barbs against the China-focused AUKUS agreement.
“Under the plan, Australia will spend huge amounts of money on a navy transformation based on the false belief that China, its largest trading partner and export market for the past 16 years, ‘threatens’ the country’s security,” the China Daily wrote in its Wednesday editorial.
“The assumption, which has no historical or contemporary proof to support it, will only jeopardise the mutually beneficial partnership between the two countries.
“Canberra should come to terms with reality and exercise strategic autonomy in handling China-related issues … It should say no to AUKUS.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/beijing-to-canberra-say-no-to-aukus/news-story/ba039e2b63252689fb150f4fd5638642
https://www.chinadailyasia.com/hk/article/618702
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109597
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23518712 (280925ZAUG25) Notable: Video: Iranian ambassador conducts dramatic press conference before leaving Australia — Expelled Iranian ambassador Ahmad Sadeghi held a tense press conference in Sydney before departing Australia, denying Tehran’s role in antisemitic arson attacks despite ASIO’s findings. Flanked by men berating journalists as “stenographers” and a “disgrace,” Sadeghi dismissed the allegations as a “conspiracy” and a “misunderstanding” in relations. He insisted Iran was peaceful and claimed that Iran has a large Jewish community to counter criticism that Iran has long sponsored antisemitic attacks via proxy forces abroad. His departure comes after ASIO concluded Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps directed at least two attacks, prompting Canberra to expel Sadeghi, shut its Tehran embassy, and warn Australians against travel.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>109584
>>109585
>>109593
>>109595
Iranian ambassador conducts dramatic press conference before leaving Australia
Nick Bonyhady - August 28, 2025
Men accompanying Iranian ambassador Ahmad Sadeghi have been filmed berating journalists attempting to interview the envoy as he departed Sydney on Thursday evening after being ordered out of the country.
Australian intelligence services revealed on Tuesday that they had concluded that the Iranian regime’s state militia had funded and directed at least two antisemitic attacks on Australian soil, prompting the Albanese government to expel Sadeghi.
The outgoing ambassador denied Iran had any involvement in the arson attacks that gutted Lewis’ Continental Kitchen in Bondi and the Adass Israel Synagogue in Melbourne in late 2024 and said the theocratic state was peaceful. Sadeghi said, without evidence, that the agencies’ conclusions could have come from a “conspiracy against our friendly relations with Australia.”
Before Sadeghi spoke to reporters, men accompanying him raised their voices at journalists attempting to interview the envoy and accused them of uncritically accepting the work of Australia’s intelligence services.
“You’re a pack of stenographers. That’s all you are, and it’s a disgrace. Is that really what you study? Is that really the pinnacle of your career,” one of the men said. “What a disgrace. What a disgrace.”
Sadeghi went to check in shortly after being interviewed. There are no direct flights from Australia to Iran, but there are connections via Gulf states and Turkey. The ambassador leaving the nation comes just over 48 hours after the revelations of foreign interference by Iran were made public.
The ambassador was on Tuesday called in to the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade headquarters in Canberra, and told he had just days to leave the country.
The meeting took place just before Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Australia’s intelligence services told the nation that Iran was being accused of being involved in antisemitic attacks on Australian soil. They made clear that Sadeghi and his embassy staff were not involved in the incidents.
He was then photographed at Iran’s Canberra embassy on Wednesday, and staff during the same day were seen at both the embassy and the ambassador’s residence with moving boxes.
He said his expulsion has come about as a result of a “misunderstanding” in the relationship between Australia and Iran. The outgoing ambassador claimed that Iran has a large Jewish community to counter criticism that Iran has long sponsored antisemitic attacks via proxy forces abroad.
“I’m telling you they’re ordinary, just they have the synagogues,” Sadeghi said. “I can just send, you know, the videos of how they practice.”
In recent years, ASIO Director-General Mike Burgess has warned that Iran, alongside China and Russia, was among the most pernicious practitioners of foreign interference in Australia.
Iran, and the nation’s powerful armed forces group the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, have been accused of acts of terror and other crimes in Western democracies, including, among others, the US, Spain and France. The revolutionary guard will be listed as a terror group after Tuesday’s revelations.
Burgess said on Tuesday that security agencies had investigated dozens of incidents of antisemitism in Australia. “ASIO now assesses the Iranian government directed at least two and likely more attacks on Jewish interests in Australia,” he said.
Australia has also shuttered its embassy in the Iranian capital, Tehran. Eight Australians, six embassy staff and two dependents, were moved to a third country for their own safety on Monday.
It’s estimated that between 3000 and 4000 Australians, or dual citizens, live in Iran. The Australian government has advised Australians not to travel to Iran and warned they could be subject to arbitrary detention.
As he left, Sadeghi admitted his final days in the country had been challenging but kept a brave face. Australians, he said, were “very nice people”.
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/iranian-ambassador-conducts-dramatic-press-conference-before-leaving-australia-20250828-p5mqqj.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2NNxvZb4SaA
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.
80e470 No.109598
Originally posted at >>>/qresearch/23524952 (292027ZAUG25) Notable: Tony Burke’s ‘nothing could be less Australian’ slur on immigration march protesters exposes Canberra elite's preference for every flag except their own - "The March for Australia rallies are barely 24 hours away, and it appears Tony Burke has acquired a sudden craving for patriotism. According to the Home Affairs Minister, “nothing could be less Australian” than the planned demonstrations. Unfortunately, the flag to which the majority of the ruling class swears allegiance seems pretty different from the one most regular folks rally around. Throughout the year, high-status flags, like the Pride flag, hang on every high street and building, symbolising a hostile foreign ideology colonising the country. It signals the elite’s preference for every flag but Australia’s. The March for Australia is taking place because the ruling class continues to refuse to listen to the electorate on immigration, and dismiss mainstream ideas like patriotism as far-right. Believing that nations should maintain and enforce their borders is neither radical nor extreme. The belief that multiculturalism is failing is not an extreme viewpoint. To believe that the flag represents national pride and belonging, which unites all patriotic Australians is not ‘un-Australian.’ Let them march." - Noel Yaxley, SkyNews.com.au Contributor and Immigration Commentator
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
General Research #28657
Tony Burke’s ‘nothing could be less Australian’ slur on immigration march protesters exposes Canberra elite's preference for every flag except their own
by Noel Yaxley August 30, 2025
The protesters rallying for migration control on Sunday aren't knuckle-dragging racists, but normal people who think open borders is a bad thing – that's something that will shake the progressive activists to their core, writes Noel Yaxley.
The March for Australia rallies are barely 24 hours away, and it appears Tony Burke has acquired a sudden craving for patriotism.
According to the Home Affairs Minister, “nothing could be less Australian” than the planned demonstrations.
Unfortunately, the flag to which the majority of the ruling class swears allegiance seems pretty different from the one most regular folks rally around.
Throughout the year, high-status flags, like the Pride flag, hang on every high street and building, symbolising a hostile foreign ideology colonising the country.
It signals the elite’s preference for every flag but Australia’s.
Those Burke disingenuously characterises as un-Australian are decent people who believe Australia is a tolerant, liberal society.
They are not ashamed of their country’s past and accept nuanced interpretations of history, unlike those who wallow in perpetual racial grievance.
Even though they have been criticised for being out of touch with modern Australia, they are not the ones who react to the national flag like a vampire to sunlight.
Your ordinary Australian is not the knuckle-dragging racist that the media and academic class portray.
This weekend’s march will draw attention to how mass migration and poor governance are accelerating Australia’s transformation.
According to ABS data, more than 1,000 migrants enter Australia each day under the Albanese government.
From June 2022 to December 2024, more than a million people arrived.
As a result, a third of the population is foreign born, the largest proportion since 1893.
https://www.skynews.com.au/insights-and-analysis/tony-burkes-nothing-could-be-less-australian-slur-on-immigration-march-protesters-exposes-canberra-elites-preference-for-every-flag-except-their-own/news-story/f33c17a896e6d29b504f9e4ce0f5fac8
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.